Compare and contrast the community development model and social planning models in

community work.

Community work encompasses a broad and diverse range of approaches aimed at fostering
positive change and development within communities. Two prominent models utilized in
community work are the community development model and the social planning model.
While both models share the common goal of improving community well-being, they differ
significantly in terms of their approaches, principles, and outcomes.

The community development and social planning models equally share a common goal of
effecting positive change within a community. Although their approaches may diverge in
certain aspects, both models are oriented toward achieving tangible improvements in various
domains, including access to resources, healthcare, education, housing, and social equity.
Their underlying vision is centered on enhancing the overall well-being and quality of life for
community members. Community development strives to create transformative change by
empowering individuals and communities to address social issues and promote social justice
(Green, 2018; Ledwith, 2011). It emphasizes the mobilization of community assets, active
citizen participation, and grassroots action to bring about sustainable improvements
(Kretzmann & McKnight, 1993). Community development scholars argue that by working
collectively, community members can drive positive change and address systemic challenges
(Taylor, 2017). Correspondingly, social planning seeks to improve community well-being by
addressing social issues through informed decision-making and evidence-based strategies
(Healey, 2013). It utilizes research, data analysis, and needs assessments to identify areas for
intervention and develop comprehensive plans (Galster, 2007). Social planning scholars
emphasize the importance of equitable resource allocation, social inclusion, and participatory
processes in achieving positive outcomes (Friend & Jessop, 2015). On that note both models
are underpinned by a commitment to enhancing the quality of life within communities
(Ledwith & Springett, 2010). They recognize the interconnectedness of social, economic, and
environmental factors and aim to create holistic and sustainable improvements. Hence,
through targeting areas such as resource access, healthcare, education, housing, and social
equity, both community development and social planning models contribute to the
advancement of community well-being.

Both the community development and social planning models underscore the significance of
collaboration and stakeholder engagement in the community work process. They recognize
the value of involving diverse stakeholders, including community members, government
agencies, non-profits, and experts, to contribute to decision-making, planning, and
implementation efforts. In the community development model, collaboration and stakeholder
engagement are fundamental principles that drive the process of community empowerment.
Community development scholars emphasize the importance of engaging community
members as active participants in decision-making and implementation (Cornwall, 2008).
This approach is rooted in the belief that involving community members in shaping their own
destinies leads to more sustainable and effective outcomes (Arnstein, 1969). By engaging
multiple stakeholders, community development efforts can tap into a wide range of
perspectives, expertise, and resources, fostering collective ownership and shared
responsibility (Minkler, 2012). Similarly, the social planning model recognizes the
significance of collaboration and stakeholder engagement in addressing community needs.
Professionals and experts play a key role in coordinating and facilitating collaboration among
various stakeholders (Taylor, 2017). Social planning emphasizes the importance of
conducting needs assessments and involving relevant stakeholders in the decision-making
process (Popple & Leighninger, 2015). By engaging government agencies, non-profits, and
community members, social planning endeavours to ensure that policies and services are
informed by diverse perspectives and meet the needs of the community.

Regarding outcomes, both the community development and social planning models aim to
enhance the well-being of communities, but their focus and timeframes for achieving
outcomes may differ. Community development emphasizes long-term social change and
community capacity-building (Ledwith & Springett, 2010). By fostering community
cohesion, promoting social inclusion, and addressing systemic inequalities, community
development aims to create sustainable and transformative change (Pretty, 1995). On the
other hand, social planning focuses on the implementation of specific programs and policies,
aiming for measurable short-term outcomes (Innes & Booher, 2010). It seeks to address
immediate needs and achieve specific targets within defined timeframes (Healey, 2013).
Social planning scholars argue that by targeting specific issues and employing evidence-
based approaches, interventions can yield tangible results in a relatively short period.

The differences between the two models lies in their key focus areas.The community
development model emphasizes the active participation and empowerment of community
members in decision-making processes and the development of their own communities. It is
rooted in the belief that sustainable change can be achieved by building social capital,
fostering inclusivity, and addressing social and economic inequalities. According to Brechet
et al. (2012), the community development model emerged as a response to the limitations of
traditional top-down approaches, which often failed to consider the unique needs and
aspirations of communities. It emphasizes the importance of community engagement, social
networks, and mobilization, encouraging residents to actively participate in identifying and
addressing community issues. The social planning model, on the other hand, focuses on
systematic and strategic approaches to address community problems. It emphasizes the use of
data, research, and expert knowledge to generate evidence-based plans and policies. Within
this framework, a small group of professionals, such as social workers, urban planners, and
policymakers, take the lead in designing and implementing interventions. Innes (2010) argue
that the social planning model gained prominence in the mid-20th century as a response to
urbanization and the need for efficient, standardized approaches to address complex socio-
economic issues. The model prioritizes expert-led decision-making processes, relying on
scientific evidence and technical expertise to drive change hence the key difference in their
focus.

One of the key distinctions between these models lies in their approach to decision-making
processes. Community development places a strong emphasis on bottom-up approaches,
prioritizing the active involvement of community members in identifying problems, setting
goals, and implementing solutions (Green, 2018; Ledwith, 2011). This approach recognizes
the value of local knowledge and lived experiences in shaping interventions that are
contextually relevant and sustainable (Taylor, 2017). Community development scholars argue
that empowering community members as active participants not only leads to more effective
outcomes but also fosters a sense of ownership and collective agency (Kretzmann &
McKnight, 1993). In contrast, the social planning model adopts a top-down approach where
professionals and experts take the lead in designing interventions based on their specialized
knowledge and expertise (Friend & Jessop, 2015). This approach is rooted in the belief that
professionals possess the necessary skills and technical know-how to develop effective
strategies that address community needs (Healey, 2013). Social planning scholars argue that
this approach allows for efficient resource allocation and the utilization of evidence-based
practices (Galster, 2007).The contrasting decision-making approaches of community
development and social planning reflect different perspectives on the role of community
members and professionals in the change process. Community development emphasizes the
empowerment of community members and their active participation in decision-making,
thereby promoting a sense of ownership and fostering sustainable change. On the other hand,
the social planning model relies on the expertise of professionals to design interventions, with
the aim of achieving efficient and evidence-based outcomes.

Empowerment also distinguishes the community development and social planning model.
Empowerment is a fundamental principle in community development, seeking to bolster the
capabilities of individuals and communities to take charge of their own lives and foster
sustainable change (Green, 2018; Ledwith, 2011). It emphasizes the importance of enhancing
community members’ self-confidence, knowledge, and skills, empowering them to actively
participate in decision-making processes and shape their own destinies (Kretzmann &
McKnight, 1993). Community development scholars argue that empowerment is not only
crucial for achieving positive outcomes but also for promoting social justice and equitable
distribution of power within communities (Ledwith & Springett, 2010).In contrast, the social
planning model, while also focused on addressing community needs, may place less emphasis
on community empowerment as it relies on professionals rather than community members to
initiate change (Friend & Jessop, 2015). Professionals in social planning utilize their
expertise to identify problems, design interventions, and implement strategies to meet
community needs (Healey, 2013). While these approaches may effectively address specific
challenges, they may not fully engage the community in decision-making processes or foster
a sense of ownership and collective agency among community members. It is important to
note that the distinction between community development and social planning models does
not imply a complete absence of empowerment in social planning. Professionals in social
planning can still work collaboratively with community members to ensure their voices are
heard, their needs are considered, and interventions are responsive to their aspirations (Innes
& Booher, 2010). However, community development places a stronger emphasis on
community empowerment as a central pillar of its approach.Overall, community development
prioritizes empowerment as a means to achieve sustainable change, while the social planning
model may rely more on professionals to initiate and implement interventions. Both models
have their merits and may be employed in different contexts based on the specific needs and
dynamics of the community.

Community development is characterized by its commitment to inclusive decision-making

processes that involve all stakeholders, ensuring that diverse perspectives are considered in
shaping interventions and policies (Green, 2018; Ledwith, 2011). It recognizes the
importance of community engagement and active participation, aiming to create opportunities
for meaningful dialogue and collaboration among community members, organizations, and
institutions (Taylor, 2017). Inclusive decision-making processes in community developemnt
enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of interventions by incorporating local knowledge,
values, and aspirations (Pretty, 2020). In contrast, the social planning model, while it may
gather input from the community, often involves a narrower range of participants in decision-
making processes (Friend & Jessop, 2015). This limited scope for community participation
can restrict the extent to which community-driven initiatives are incorporated into the
planning and implementation of interventions (Healey, 2013). Social planning scholars
highlight the importance of efficient decision-making processes and professional expertise in
addressing complex social issues (Galster, 2007).

The contrasting approaches to decision-making in community development and social

planning reflect different perspectives on the role of stakeholders in shaping interventions.
Community development emphasizes the value of inclusive decision-making, recognizing
that involving diverse stakeholders can lead to more equitable and sustainable outcomes
(Ledwith & Springett, 2010). By actively engaging community members, marginalized
voices, and organizations, community development seeks to foster a sense of ownership,
collective agency, and social cohesion. On the other hand, the social planning model may rely
more heavily on the expertise of professionals and a limited number of stakeholders in
decision-making processes (Innes & Booher, 2010). This approach aims to streamline
decision-making and ensure efficiency but may limit community involvement and overlook
localized knowledge and perspectives.Nonetheless, community development places a
stronger emphasis on inclusive decision-making processes that involve diverse stakeholders,
promoting community-driven initiatives and fostering collaborative approaches to address
social issues.

Community development models often strive for equitable resource distribution and advocate
for the redistribution of power and wealth to address social and economic inequalities (Green,
2018; Ledwith, 2011). They emphasize the importance of social justice and seek to empower
marginalized communities by challenging systemic barriers and promoting inclusive practices
(Matarasso, 2018). Community development scholars argue that addressing inequities
requires addressing underlying power structures and promoting participatory decision-making
processes that involve community members in shaping interventions (Kretzmann &
McKnight, 1993). In contrast, the social planning model, while recognizing the need for
equitable outcomes, may focus more on efficient resource allocation and optimal utilization
based on expert analysis (Friend & Jessop, 2015). It aims to identify and address community
needs through evidence-based practices and strategic planning (Galster, 2007). Social
planning scholars argue that by employing rational and efficient approaches, resources can be
allocated effectively to maximize the impact of interventions (Healey, 2013).

In conclusion, community development and social planning are two distinct models used in
community work, each with its own strengths and limitations. While community
development focuses on community empowerment, participation, and long-term change,
social planning places more emphasis on expert-led decision-making and efficient resource
allocation. Both models have their merits and can be effective tools in addressing community
needs, depending on the specific context and goals. Understanding the differences between
these models enables community workers to adopt a more nuanced and comprehensive
approach to community development.
REFERENCES

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts?: Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology
Publications.

Friend, R., & Jessop, B. (2015). Planning and social theory in the neoliberal age. Routledge.

Galster, G. C. (2007). The myth of the concentrated poverty/affluence paradox. Housing

Policy Debate, 18(1), 7-37.

Green, G. P. (2018). Community development: Principles, policies, and practices. Routledge.

Healey, P. (2013). Collaborative planning in the neoliberal era. Journal of Planning Education
and Research, 33(3), 280-292.

Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to

collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge.

Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A
path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets. ACTA Publications.

Ledwith, M. (2011). Community development: A critical approach. Policy Press.

Ledwith, M., & Springett, J. (2010). Participatory practice: Community-based action for
transformative change. Policy Press.

Matarasso, F. (2018). A restless art: How participation in the arts can change people and
communities. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

Nelson, G., & Prilleltensky, I. (2010). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and
well-being. Macmillan International Higher Education.

Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and

application. American journal of community psychology, 23(5), 569-579.

Pretty, J. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development,

23(8), 1247-1263.
Taylor, M. (2017). Community development in theory and practice: An international reader.
Policy Press.

Wallerstein, N. B., & Duran, B. (2010). Community-based participatory research

contributions to intervention research: The intersection of science and practice to improve
health equity. American journal of public health, 100(S1), S40-S46.