Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 951251021

    Uploaded by

    kyrellosiskander0
    4 views37 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views37 pages

    951251021

    Uploaded by

    kyrellosiskander0

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 37
    Workshop on Eurocodes: Training the trainers Moscow - 09 December - 10 December, 2010 Section 6: Verification by the partial factor method Annex B: Management of structural reliability for construction works Jean-Armand Calgaro cen Chairman of CEN/TC250 — EUROCODES ‘tool tor uding story and rolabity onhancomant Section 6 - Verification by the partial factor method 6.1 General 6.4 Ultimate limit states 6.2 Limitations and 6.4.1 sot ations ; ceneral iia simplifications 6.4.2 Stet equilibrium 6.3 Design values 6.4.3. Combination of actions 6.3.1 Design values of 6.4.4 Partial factors for actions and actions combinations of actions 6.3.2. Design values of the 6.4.5 Partial factors for materials effects of actions = 5 + Serviceability limit states S88 Design Wales Ot 6.5.1 Verifications of serviceability material properties 6.5.2 Performance criteria oar Design aluesier 6.5.3 Combination of actions geometrical vas 6.5.4 Partial factors for actions €:5:9 Design resistance 6.5.5 Partial factors for materials EUROCODES Introduction to EN 19 ‘tool for ulding safety and rolabity onhancomant COMBINATIONS OF ACTIONS : PRINCIPLE Turkstra’s Rule (1972) In the set of variable actions to be applied to a construction works, one of these variable actions is selected and considered as the leading action and the other actions are accompanying actions; they are taken into account in calculations with their combination value. ¥%,2%.2} Intermediate tangent Curve of iso probability for 20,60, %12kt > ht oe The set including permanent actions, the leading variable action and the variable accompanying actions form a combination of actions. Introduction to EN 1! ACTIONS (Fe) > Fes el Fas = reser I Action Design value of Effect of Characteristic the action value o — Ea? ElwraPis i Aa) action Ey = YsaE(Fai 5 Aa) action effect Design value of action Design value of effect (simplified expression) EUROCODES Introduction to EN 1 A 1 Key: a, Design value of geometrical data % Partial factor for actions, which takes account of the possibility of unfavourable deviations of the action values from the representative values Ysq_ Partial factor associated with the uncertainty of the action and/or action effect model y is 1,00 or Wo yj, OF We EUROCODES Introduction to EN 19 ‘tool for ulding safety and rolabity onhancomant RESISTANCES Xai = (0 ¥mdXci Material ‘i ic Characteristic Design value of Structural property value of the the material resistance material Property property Ra = R((n/yudX xi ad) Ra = (Wad (Xai 5 Aa) Design value of the structural Design value of the resistance Structural resistance (simplified expression) ODES Introduction to EN 1 1 safety and Design value of geometrical data Partial factor for a material property Partial factor associated with the uncertainty of the resistance model Conversion factor taking account of : - volume and scale effects, - effects of temperature and moisture, - and any other appropriate factor. Introduction to EN 1 DES ‘an 6.4 Ultimate limit states EQU Loss of static equilibrium of the structure or any part of it considered as a rigid body, in which : - minor variations in the value or the spatial distribution of actions from a single source are significant ; - the strengths of construction materials or ground are generally not governing STR Internal failure of the structure or structural elements, including footings, piles, basement walls, etc., in which the strength of construction materials or excessive deformation of the structure governs GEO Failure or excessive deformation of the ground in which the strengths of soil or rock are significant in providing resistance FAT Fatigue failure of the structure or structural elements Introduction to EN STR || Ultimate Limit-States EQU -— STR - GEO ‘STR involving geotechnical actions GEO) 6.4.2 Verifications of static equilibrium and resistance Ultimate limit states of static equilibrium (EQU) : Eager < Excw Ultimate limit states of resistance (STR/GEO) : Eys Ry 6.5 Serviceability limit states Eys 1000 m a.s.l. — Remainder of CEN Member States, for sites 0,50 0,20 0 located at altitude H < 1000 ma.s.l ‘Wind loads on buildings (See EN 1991-1-4) 06 02 0 Temperature (non-fire) in buildings (see EN| 0,6 05 0 1991-1-5) NOTE The y values may be set by the National annex. * For countries not mentioned below, see relevant local conditions. EUROCODES ‘tool for ulding safety and rolabity onhancomant Introduction to EN 1! Aation Symbol ela TS. 075] 07s | 0 (LMI+pedesteian or [UDI 040 [040 | 0 eyele-track loads) [pedesiianvowlewaskleads™ | D.40_| 040 | 0. erib (Single axle) 0 | o7s | o "Traffic loads 12 (Horizontal forces) oO 0 0 (see EN 1991-2, 13 (Pedestrian loads) 0 | oa0 | o ‘Table 4.4) 24 (LM Crowd loading) 0 a a 5 (LMS — Special vehicles) o io o Wind forces Fn i oe | 02 0 Persistent design sitations ae ‘i = Execution. i "Thermal actions 7 de” [oe | 05 [Snow loads ‘Oia (during exeoulton) Os : - [Construction loads 2. 10 z 10 1) The recommended values of yo. yi and ys for grla snd grtb are given for toad traffic corresponding 10 adjusting foctors ay, dy. ey and fig equal 10 1 Those relating to UDL correspond 10 common traffic scenarios, in which a rare accumulation of lorries can occur. Other values may be envisaged for other classes of| routes, oF of expected traffic, related to the choice of the corresponding a factors. For example, a value of ys other than zer0 may be envisaged for the UDL system of LMI only, for bridges supporting severe continuous waffic, ce also EN 1998, 2) The combination value of the pedestrian and cycle-track Joad, mentioned in Table 4:48 of EN 1991-2, is a “reduced” value, y andy; factors are applicable to this value 3) The recommended yp value for thermal actions may in most eases be reduced co 0 for ultimate limit states EQU, STR and GEO, Sce also the design Eurovodes.. EN 1990: Table Al.1- Recommended values of y factors for road bridges Introduction to EN1 Ultimate limit states of STR/GEO - Fundamental combination for persistent and transient design situations Expression (6.10) in EN 1990 Ye iGe jt VP" Vo Qe at" D Yoo Qe jel i Expressions (6.10a) and (6.10b) in EN 1990 Dre iGej"t" VP" +" Do MoiQei pl iL YE 6jGaj" 4" 0pPMH" Vos Qea"+" DosV oi Qe pel iol 0,85 < E< 1,00 EUROCODES rolabity onhancomant Variation of the reliability index for one variable action for EN 1990 = Sete * G,+Q, +W, Probability pt Aighas for 6.10) & 0 Of 02 03 O4 08 06 o7 0&8 o9 1 Load ratio CHICO AMQUGK+OKEW) Eeeecsaan Introduction to EN 0 0.2 04 06 08 1 Introduction to EN 199 ULS EQU TABLES ULS STR without geotechnical actions ULS STR with geotechnical actions ULS GEO 7 APPROACH 1 mam> §=APPROACH 2 “a APPROACH EUROCODES ‘tool tor uding story and rolabity onhancomant Approach 1: Applying in separate calculations design values from Table A1.2(C) and Table A1.2(B) to the geotechnical actions as well as the other actions on/from the structure. In common cases, the sizing of foundations is governed by Table A1.2(C) and the structural resistance is governed by Table A1.2(B) ; NOTE In some cases, application of these tables is more complex, see EN 1997. Approach 2 : Applying design values from Table A1.2(B) to the geotechnical actions as well as the other actions on/from the structure ; Approach 3 : Applying design values from Table A1.2(C) to the geotechnical actions and, simultaneously, applying partial factors from Table A1.2(B) to the other actions on/from the structure, NOTE The use of approaches 1, 2 or 3 is chosen in the National annex. EUROCODE J FUR mir Introduction to rolabiy. Accidental design situations : expression 6.11b DG, "+" P+" A, "(Why or Vo, O.1"+" V2 Qui jal pl Seismic design situations : expression 6.12b > G, ; "Pe Avg a > Wri Qu jel i>l EUROCODES . p Seorroumgsaeves — Introduction to EN 1 EN 1990: Design values of actions for use in accidental and seismic combinations of actions for both buildings and bridges Design Permanent actions Leading Accompanying situation accidental variable actions (**) or seismic action Unfavourable [Favourable ‘Accidental © Gila Gijud (E Main (i any) Seismic Gasp (Eq, 6.12a/b) () In the case of accidental design situations, the main variable action may be taken with its frequent or, as in seismic combinations of actions, its quasi-permanent values. The choice will be in the National annex, depending on the accidental action under consideration, See also EN 1991-1-2. (®*) Variable actions are those considered in Table AL. EUROCODES ‘tool tor uding story and Introduction to EN Serviceability limit states It shall be verified that : E,

    You might also like