Professional Documents
Culture Documents
innovative ideas and approaches that have not been tried successfully by private, public, or
nonprofit sector entities. Social entrepreneurship combines the passion of a social mission with
an image of business-like discipline, innovation, and determination. Social entrepreneurship is
the creator of new models that provide products and services that directly meet the basic
human needs that are still unsatisfied in current economic or social institutions. Another point of
view is that social entrepreneurship is about construction, evaluation, and the pursuit of
opportunities for social change. Social entrepreneurship is a group of innovative and effective
activities. Its strategic focus is to solve social market failures, systematically using new resources
and organizational forms to create new opportunities, increase social values, maximize social
impact, and achieve change. Social entrepreneurship is also expressed as innovative, social value
creation activities occurring within non-profit, commercial and/or public/government sectors or
across sectors.
social entrepreneurship is mission-oriented and the social mission lies in the central, their
objective is improving society rather than wealth creation. It combines business and social
causes together with aim of resolving the existing issues in society in an innovative way, thus
improve the living conditions or life quality of human beings. Social entrepreneurship is hybrid
combining of profit pursue and non-profit pursue, it should balance social goals and market
success in some way. What is more, the value of social entrepreneurship is determined by the
social impact and social value it has created.
Social entrepreneurship is the whole procedure of an individual or organization using new and
innovative ways to resolve social problems. There are similarities and differences between social
entrepreneurs and commercial entrepreneurs. Similarities are both of them have the ability to
find opportunity and make a significant impact on society. Differences are commercial
entrepreneurs try to meet people’s needs, while, social entrepreneurs seek to reduce the needs.
The difference can be described as ‘giving a man a fish’ versus ‘teaching a man to fish’. Social
entrepreneurship differentiates from the non-profit organization. Because social entrepreneurs
seek social change and finance sustainability at the same time, it is hybrid management between
profit pursuit and non-profit pursuit. Social entrepreneurship contains social programs and
social enterprises, and various models including giving back to society, giving work opportunity
to disadvantaged people, innovating new idea/ways to resolve existing social issues.
Similarities
1. Entrepreneurial process – Both commercial and social entrepreneurs focus on vision
and opportunity, as well as the ability to persuade and empower others to help them
turn their ideas into reality. They are willing to put effort and take the risk to make the
idea come true. Identifying opportunities and transforming big vision into manageable,
achievable operations is a quality that every entrepreneur should possess. First of all,
entrepreneurs need to find out the social needs and market demand. Sometimes people
feel inconvenient or dissatisfied with something, but they just can’t tell what exactly the
problem is and how to solve it. Entrepreneurs need to identify public pain points and
provide effective solutions.
2. Seek outcomes – Second, both the commercial and social entrepreneurs seek
outcomes that can be measured and quantified. According to them, entrepreneurs seek
returns on investment which is a percentage return on the monetary investment in a
venture; while, the achievement of social entrepreneurs could be measured by metering
the social return on investment, which is calculated in financial perspective that
expresses the value of the enterprise to society.
3. Both belong to entrepreneurship field – Third, social entrepreneurship is sub-species
of entrepreneurship. As mentioned above, social entrepreneurship is doing business
with social goals. They also pursuit profit to make sure social enterprises could have
sustainable development in the future.
Differences
1. Market-driven and mission-driven – The biggest difference between social
entrepreneurs and commercial entrepreneurs is ‘the nature of the immediate return
each trend to seek’. It is said commercial entrepreneurs are market-driven, by contrast,
social entrepreneurs are driven primarily by an organizational mission. Social
entrepreneurs pay more attention to social roles and commercial roles being accessory.
As mentioned above, the mission-related impact is the central standard of social
entrepreneurs rather than economic value. Furthermore, social entrepreneurs will
reinvestment the majority of profit in social mission rather than distribute them
to stakeholders. By contrast, even commercial entrepreneurs integrate the social
responsibilities, they don’t give it the top priority. Commercial entrepreneurs are bound
by market discipline, and it is market discipline determines if firms creating value. If they
do not generate value, they are often driven out of the business. Here, market-driven
could be understood as profit-driven. Commercial entrepreneurs have to profit-driven
because the sufficient economic value could help firms grow.
2. Outcomes measurement – The outcome of commercial entrepreneurship could be
simply measured by monetary and tangible terms. For commercial
entrepreneurs, wealth creation is a way of measuring value creation. Thus, the
performance of commercial entrepreneurship could be measured by the market share,
the market value of the firm, net profit, customer satisfaction, quality, and firm’s assets
etc. On the other hand, for social entrepreneurship, the mission-related impact becomes
the central criterion, not wealth creation. Hence, the performance of the social
entrepreneurship could be gauged by social impact and social change. Such intangible
and soft outcome creates a big challenge for measuring the outcome of social
entrepreneurship, because of the non-quantitative, multifactorial, temporal dimensions,
and different perception of social change.
3. The approaches – There will be widespread differences between the two approaches in
terms of the way in which human and financial resources are mobilized and managed. In
order for a company to be competitive in the market and grow steadily, commercial
entrepreneurs typically employ competitive and promising employees and pay them
accordingly. Remuneration is recognition of their work, and employees are attracted to
the company because of competitive rewards. In addition, the company’s interests will
be distributed to all stakeholders and invested in new projects. However, human
resource of social entrepreneurship could contain full-time staffs, part-time staffs, and
volunteers. Majority of social entrepreneurs could not compensate employees with
competitive wage compared to commercial entrepreneurs because of their venture and
they are usually small, resource-constrained. Also the employees of social
entrepreneurship value more on non-monetary compensation obtained from work.
What is more, social entrepreneurs will reinvest in the social mission when they have a
surplus than distributing to all stakeholders. So there is a big difference between social
and commercial entrepreneurs when it comes to managing finance and human
resource.