Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vibration Mechanics
Linear Discrete Systems
by
KLUWER
SPRINGERACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
SCIENCE+BUSINESS MEDIA, B.V.
DORDRECHT I BOSTON I LONDON
ISBN 978-94-010-5554-3 ISBN 978-94-011-3514-6 (eBook)
DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-3514-6
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Brief history
1.2 Disruptive or useful vibrations 3
BIBLIOGRAPHY 299
INDEX 302
FOREWORD
Objectives
pescription
AcknQWledgepents
They particularly thank Martin Schmidt who reviewed the text and
corrected the proofs.
CHAPTER INTRODUCTION
Musicians and philosophers seek the laws of the production of sound and
apply them to the construction of musical instruments. For example,
Pythagoras (582-507 BC) showed experimentally that if two strings are under
identical tension, then thei!' tones will differ by one octave when the
length of one is double that of the other.
Their studies have shown that a string can vibrate laterally in different
ways, called modes of vibration. The first mode corresponds to the lowest
frequency.
Sauveur gave the name fundaaental to the lowest frequency and harmonics to
the higher frequencies.
The linear superposition of the harmonics was proposed for the first time
by Bernouilli. Finally in 1822, Fourier presented his celebrated paper un
the theory of harmonic series.
During the course of recent decades, the rapid development of computers and
of experimental methods has resulted in .important progress in vibratory
mechanics. It is now possible to undertake the study of complex systems,
subject to any deterministic or random stimulations.
As w" have said, the first vibratory phenomena studied concerned the
creation and transmission of sound. People later became interested in the
- 3 -
For a very long time, one has studied the vibrations of machines and struc-
tures almost uniquely with the objective of attenuating them and, i f
possible, eliminating them. This preoccupation is still essential but is no
longer the only one. More and more nowadays one constructs machines and
equipment which use vibratory mechanics to fulfil their desired function.
Here are several examples where the vibrations are a disruptive element and
must be counteracted :
One can say, on the subject of disruptive vibrations, that all primary
motion is a source of vibrations. It is remarkable to note that a slight
constructIve modification can bring about a noticeable reduction or the
complete elimination of these vibrations. That does not mean that it is
always easy to correct a machine or an existing structure, but rather that
shows the neceSSIty of being concerned about vibrations in every
construction proJect. The problem can be summed up as follows : discover
the sources of vibrations, study the transmission of the vibrations to the
rest of the construction, seek the possibilities for resonance then imagine
the means to attenuate the phenomenon.
Let us recall that a mechanical system possesses only one degree of freedom
when its configuration can be, at each moment, characterized by a single
variable. More generally, a system has n degrees of freedom if the
minimum number of variables necessary to define its configuration is equal
to n .
a rigid mass m,
a massless spring which supplies an elastic force proportional and
opposed to the displacement x(t) ; the coefficient of proportionality k
is called the stiffness - or rigidity - of the spring;
a da.per which supplies a resistive force, proportional and opposed to
the velocity x(t) , the coefficient of proportionality c is called the
linear viscous da.pinq factor or, more simply, the resistance of the
system.
I.rn
~
tiill
k .
1--x(1)
.. [(I)
mx k x c x + f (t)
which gIves mx + c x + k x f (t) (2.1)
mx + c X+ k x f(t)
x + 2 ~
x+k x 1 f(t)
2m m m
w2
0
=km =) wo ={! natural angular frequency
conservative system
of a (2.2)
A. ~
damping coefficient (2.3)
2m
x + 2 A x + w2 X = 1 fIt) (2.5)
o m
1 fIt)
k
1 fIt) (2.6)
k
L x + 2A x + x (2.7)
UJ2 1/J 2
o 0
x + wo 2 X =0 (3.1)
x cos(wot-op) (3.3)
X -
{ (3.4)
tgljl = !!
A
- 10 -
fO L ( J . 5)
(, rr ljJ (J
TO L (3.6)
10
wo X cos(wot-~+rr!2) (3.7)
x w~ X C05(wot-~+rr) (] . 8)
These results mean that the velOCIty and acceleration are 90' and
180' respectively out of phase with the di.placement (figures 3.2
and 3.1).
- 11 -
Fig. 3.2 Rotating vectors representing the displacement, the velocity and
acceleration
x.i. x
T.
v = dx
dt
12
r]2x dv dv dx dv v
dt 2 dt dx dt dx
1 m v2 + 1 k x2 ~ T + V H COllst.
2
When the velocity is zero, the displacement has its maximum value
X and all the energy is In t.he form of potential energy.
Conversely, when the displacement. IS zero, t.he velocity reaches
it. maximum v = woX and all the energy ]5 kin~tic. Thus one has
H 1 k X2
2
dH o (3.10)
dt
- 13 -
3.3.1 Introduction
mg To
2 To k1 Xl 0
2 To k2 x20
Xo 2 (XlO + X20)
- 14 -
Fig. 3.4 Oscillator consisting of wire of fixed length and two massless
pull~ys
TO
Xu
(3.11 )
In summary
ke Xo - mg o (3.12)
Let us now write Newton's law for the total displacement of the mass
and consequently
m~' mg - ke x'
m (0 + ~) = mg - ke(xo + x)
or again
The right-hand side being zero according to (3.12), one has finally
o (3.16)
kinetic energy
potential energy
V
="21 k
1
x,2
1
+ 1Z k 2 x,2
2
- m g x'
- 16 -
x'
k2 x' x'=~x'
1 2 2(kl+k 2)
v 1
2
v =1 ke x'2 - mg x'
2
The natural frequency for small movements of the system is thus, using
(3. 5) and (2.2)
fo .L wo
2rr
- 17 -
Numerical example
m 9.81 m/s 2
This gives
ke = (3.11)
1.54 Hz
Comments
The weight mg of the mass does not play a role in the natural
frequency of the system, which one can assert a priori for a
problem of this type. It is therefore possible to proceed more
rapidly by considering only the dynamic displacements, that is
to say :
2 T=
k, " } T
2 T k2 x2 => x T • 4 (~+~)
kl k2 ke
x = 2 (Xl+X2)
The <,ystt,ro wIll have three degrees vf freedom, instead of unly nne, if
the mass of the pulleys 1S t~ken into account. The fundamental frequency
of such a system, that IS to say the lowest natural frequency, w.ill be
less than 1.54 Hz.
a =aL b = PL
m D
m'
X(I)
m X+ k x o fo = L fi'
l' ~
=)
2.
- 19 -
o P ~
3 LEI
fo L 1 ~ 3 E Ii
2n (l ~ L mL
Numerical example
n 04
=~ 1018 cm 4 1.018.10- 5 m4
64 64
(3.2.1.1.018 10"-5-2)'/2
fo =L 97 Hz
2n 0.4·0.6·1 3· 1
Comments
The fact that one has neglected the mass of the shaft m'
results in one over estimating the natural frequency of the
system. One can obtain a lower bound by replacing m by
- 20
m' ~
4 L Q 88,2 kg => m + m' 388 kg => fo 85 Hz
A"
,
I
I
I
,,).:'t.-----.1.
'--
Fig. 3.6 Pendulum system rolling un an horizontal plane
In the inertial reference frame Oxy, the centre C' is marked out by
its radius-vector OC'
oC' { RR0}
_
- 21 -
. t
OA' = Re - L Sine}
-R + L cose
=>
->
VA' [
(R - L cose;
- L sine • e
eJ
Knowing the vector expression for the velocity, one can calculate the
kinetic energy of the system
1
+-m
2
T = 2 82 (J + M R2 + m (R 2 + L2 - 2 R L cose)) (3.19)
2
V m g L (1 - cose) (3.20)
From relation (3.10), one obtains the differential equation of the system
by differentiating the total energy:
dH d
crt = dt (f + V)
division by
(J + M RZ + m (R - L)2) 8 + m g L B o (3.21 )
fO
1 ~/ m g L (J.22)
2~ VJ + M R2 + m (R - L)2
dt as aB as
m = A L 110
it +.lL.::...lliI. 0 (3.23)
L 110
v
c B
A
tA
~ P
_x(l)
~~---------------,
dp l..12 dQ
dp (3.24)
R To
dp (J. 25)
The elementary mass which enters in the container has the value
dm A QO dx
dg ~dX (3.26)
V
dp :t......!Ll.iJ......lL..Q. dx
V
- 25 -
p - Po
1 R To A po x (3.27)
V
x + 1 R To A x = 0 (3.28)
L V
w2
o
1 R To A
LV
fo = .L
2n
JY R To A'
L V
(3.29)
One knows that the speed of propagation of sound waves in a gas has the
value
fo = ~nJ L\'
w2 a2 A (3.31)
o LV
Numerical example
R 287 m2/s2 OK To 273 + 20 = 293 OK
(3.33)
with
_ W2i (3.34)
o
~ super-critjcal damping
~ critical damping
~ sub-critical damping
When the damping factor is larger than unity, one must write, from the
relation (3.35) above
~ > 1 =) Wl (3.36)
(3.38)
(3.39)
I Xo A+ B
{:
= _1_ (Xo (i- + IV 1l + Vo)
21111
(3.40)
= .::.L ( Xo (i- - 1111) + Vo)
2U11
x. i
v.
One easily confirms that K(t) presents an inflexion point, and therefore
x(t) an extreme value, for
M(A-WI) + Va
< 1
Xo (HW1) + Vo
2
- Xo (Hw 1) < Vo < - Xo !&.!l. (= - Xo k)
2A c
The initial displacememt Xo being fixed, fiyure 1.9 gives the shape of
x(t) for different values of the initial velocity.
X(/)
(I)
(1) Vo 0
(2 ) Vo 0
2
(3 ) - X0 .illll. ( Vo ( 0
2A
2
(4 ) -Xo(HwJl< Va < -Xu !&.!l.
2)"
(5)
. inflexion point
r2 - wo (3.43)
e- wot
One can see, by substitution into the differential equation, that there
exists a second specific solution of the form
Xz = u(t) e- wot
In effect,
x = E X1 + F X2 (E + F D) + F C t)e- wot
- 30 -
Xo (3.46)
wo Xo + Vo
These functions have the same shape as those of figure 3.8. The inflexion
point has the abscissa
wo Xo + 2 Vo (3.49)
wo(wo Xo + Vol
This point does not exist if ti < 0 , that is to say when the initial
velocity, for Xo > 0, is situated in the interval
(3.51)
(3.52)
(3.53)
(3.54)
When the oscillator is released with any initial conditions x(O) Xo,
x(O) ; Vo, one finds the values for the constants
Xo
(3.55)
A Xo + Vo
W1
(3.57)
with
X
{ (3.58)
AXa + Vo
tgll>
Wl Xo
Fig. 3.10 Free state of a damped oscillator. Locu~ of the rotating vector
(3.59)
The damping reduces the angular frequency and increases the period
of the oscillations. In effect, using again relation (3.52).
(3.60)
whence
1\ (independent of n)
Since
2rr
n <lIO and T1
~
and vice versa
1\
(3.63)
(3.64)
Let us search again for a more convenient expression for the velocity
x(t) than relation (3.54). By differentiating (3.57) we get
x (3.65)
x + w2
1
- 35 -
in which
tga = "-
W1
with
tga (3.67)
a ~ tg a (n « 1) (3.68)
Relation (3.66) means then that the velocity x is practically 90· out
of phase to the displacement x as is the case for a conservative
oscillator (see figure 3.2, page 11).
H = -1 k X2 e- 2H cos 2 (Wit - .) + -
1
m Wo2 X2 e -2H Sln
" 2
(Wit - • + a)
2 2
By de fin it ion k and the preceding expression can
be written
or again
H -_ ~ k X2 e- 2At (1 + sl"n N
~ sl"n 2(w I t ~ + -all
-"¥
2 2
~
whence finally
• z => tg ~
TlWoXo + VQ(1 +
TlVo + wo Xo (1 +]"""17)
~) (3.70)
In this way, the total energy oscillates at the angular frequency 2wI
about a decreasing mean value
(3.71 )
The first intersection between H(t) and H(t) occurs at time t' such that
t' =L 0.72)
WI
p(t)
. .=
c x • x c ~2 0.75)
- 38 -
(3.76)
When the damping factor is small (~« 1) , one can interchange the
energies Hand H without appreciable error. The energy lost then
takes the simple form
(3.78)
1 m v2 + 1 kx2 H (3.79)
2 2
(3.80)
U)2 k
o
- 39 -
RZ = 2.H (3.81)
k
When the damping is zero, this length is a constant Ro. The equation
(3.80) then becomes
~ + XZ RZ (3.82)
w2 o
o
With non-zero damping, the radius R = R(t) diminishes with time and
the circle is transformed into a spiral which tends towards the
origin.
,
...
The figure (3.13) shows the point M(t) (given by the coordinates
x, v two), the radius vector d, its normal a, and the tangent to
the spiral b. The angle 1 between a and b varies periodically
but always keeps the same sign since R(t) is always decreasing,
except for v = O. In effect, when the velocity is zero, the power
dissipated is also zero and the energy H is constant. Also, for
all t.he points M(t) situated on the axis Ox, the tangents to the
spiral are vertical. (On the contrary, the tangents to H(t) are
horizontal at the corresponding points, see figure 3.12.)
dv + 2 ~ woV + w2 X = 0 (3.83)
dt 0
'L gy .L dv
y =) (3.84)
wo dt wo dt.
gy
- (2 ~ woY + wo x) (3.85)
dt
gy gy dt gyl (3.86)
dx dt dx dt v
gy - (2 ~ + X) (3.87)
dx Y
- 41 -
The radius vector d passing through the origin, the ratio x/y is
a constant which we call A. Consequently
gy
dx
- (2 n+ A) B (3.88)
xU)
350 . 9.81
k6 mg =) k 12,260 N/m
0.28
n=~1-yJl=(1 27 52
-'-)
1/2
0.463
w2 35.04
o
The damping constant is deduced from the relation (2.4)
__c_
=) c = 2 n m wo 2·0.463·350·5.919 1,920 kg/s
2 m wo
In summary :
k 12,260 N/m
c 1,920 kg/s
0.835 Hz
0.463 1 when the suspended mass is equal to 350 kg
- 43 -
length L 1.5 m
modulus of elasticity E 2.2 10 9 N/m2
cross-section A 5 cm2 = 0.5 10-3 m2
mass m = 100 kg
A Er
1ft 1ft
A 1 In 1.00 0.24079
5 0.30
0.03830 3.83 %
By using the approximate relation (3.64), one obtains the very close
value n = 0.03832 . The resistance of the equivalent oscillator can
then be calculated by means of (2.4)
A T € = C X (3.89)
€ = d€ lL 11 1 x (3.90)
dt dt L L
It gives therefore
Comments
T=f>.
11
1
E_ LJA '
A
(3.92)
m x = - k x - (sgn x) II mg (3.93)
mx + k x - (sgn x) ~ mg (3.94)
- (sgn x) l!....ll!9.
k
(3.95)
(3.9?)
With the initial conditions x(O} = Xo and x(O} o , the
constants have the values, from (3.96) and (3.9?)
n=[u+1] (3.100)
The movement of the mass stops at the end of the first half-period
where
(3.103)
or again
u ~ 1 ( Xc. - 1) (3.104)
2 X£
no (3.105)
Numerical example
fI ~ = 0.32 x 2 x 9.81
k 7,200
- 0.464 mm and
mm x
12
-12
CHAPTER 4
Let us recall that the forced state 1S the behav10ur of the osc1l-
lator when acted upon by an external force. The study of the forced
state, 1n the general sense, 1S the subJect of chapter 6. We w1ll
first cons1der a very 1mportant spec1al case, that of the harmonic
steady state, caused by a pure harmon1c external force, after the
disappearance of the trans1tory terms. It w1ll then be possible to
tackle, by means of the Fourier series, the periodic steady state
due to any form of periodic force (chapter 5).
mx + C X+ k x F cos wt (4.1)
{
-
A(k - w2 ml + B w c
A w c + B(k w2 m)
F
{:
F ____~k~-~w~2~m~____
(k - w2 m)2 + w2 c 2
(4.3)
F ________~w~c~______
(k - w2 m)2 + w2 c2
- 50 -
By combining the two harmonic functions (see fig. 3.1), the solution
becomes
x r: (4.5)
1(k - ",2 m) 2 + ",2 c2
Elk Xs
X
(4.10)
and consequently
(4.11 )
~max (4.12)
~o = _1_ (4.13)
2 ~
Q=_l_
2 c/c'
w £ 2 ~ J!L
w C k wo
tg '" k - w2 m _ w2 !!l
k
- 53 -
I'
4,0
~ ~ °
3,5
3,0
2,5
2,0
1,5
1,0
0,5
P ~!"..
w,
3n/41-----1-----+-Hyc.-b--..:::::~_fc:::::;;;:..._fT=::::::==
~ = I
1</2 I-----+--~"""~----.:...t--'---'-t---+--___j
l.....!L.L (4.14)
tg '"
1 - ~2
infinity.
mx + c X + k x F cos wt
This relation expresses that the sum of the forces acting on the
mass is zero. In the steady state x = X cos (wt - "') and these
forces have the value
f(t) F cos wt
k x k X cos(wt - ~)
~x
/ I
/ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The unknowns of the problem are the amplitude X and the phase ~
F
(k X - w2 m X)2 + (w C X)2 F2 => X
l/(k - w2 m)2 + w2 c 2
wC
tg ~
k - w2 m
mx + c X + k x F cos wt
x = X cos(wt - ~)
Re
f Re(1)
(4.16)
x = Re(l\)
(4.17)
w .1>
..
.1> - w2 .1>
«k - w2 m) + w c).1> 1 (4.18)
The quantity
(k - w2 m) + wc (4.19 )
wc
tg 'l'
k - w2 m
- 58 -
Ix i
1 (4.21 )
X 11
1
F e jwt F ej(wt - q»
X (4.22)
(k - w 2 m) + j w c ..y(k - w 2 m)2 + w2 c 2
x F
tg q>
wc
k w2 m
[k] !!l
metre m N
So the product
H k 1 (4.23 )
k (4.24)
li(w)
(k-w 2 m) + j w c (1 - (~)2) + 2 j~ w
UJo wo
- 59 -
(4.25)
(1 - ~2) + 2 i n ~
_ ~2
(k X) 1 f (k X) I e iwt
k - k
(4.27)
(4.28)
One can eliminate X and tp uSlng the relations (4.5) and (4.6)
F
X
V(k - w2 m) 2 + wZ c Z
11 W c FZ (4.29)
(k - w2 m)2 + w2 c 2
w2 C F2 (4.30)
p
2((k - w2 m)2 + wZ cZl
woZ k
m
- 61 -
~ = -c- -
2 m 1110
so for ~ 1• c = 2 m 1110 and
_F_2_
Po (4,31 )
4 m 1110
2 m 1110 1112 c
E =
Po (k - 1112 m)2 + 1112 c 2
I: = e.
p,
4,0
3.5
3,0
2,5
2,0
1.5
1,0
0,5
p
o 2.5 3,0
4 n 92
< = (4.32)
(1 - ~2)2 t 4 02 p2
1 (4.33)
<max o
In this way the power resonance, like the phase resonance, occurs
at the angular frequency wo, whatever the damping factor.
One knows, from the results of paragraph 4.1, that the steady state
displacement is given by the expression
x = X cos(wt - ~) with
X
~(1 - ~ 2) 2 t 4 02 P2
- w X sin(wt - ~) - V sin(wt - ~)
V wX
wo Xs -::=======::::;-
~ (1 - P2) 2 + 4 02 p2
(4.34)
- 63 -
then let us seek the angular frequency for which the oscillator is
at velocity resonance, that is to say for which V is maximum
x - w2 X cos(wt - ~) - A cos(wt - ~)
(4.35)
_
A w2 X w~ Xs ~:::::::8:2::::::::~
,(1 - ~2)2 + 4 ~2 p2
3A
o =) o
ap
wo
W3
"'0
"'3 angular frequency at the acceleration
resonance
The curve of the figure 4.5 shows the complex frequency response H
as a function of the relative angular frequency ~,for a constant
value of the damping factor . One such curve is a Nyquist
graph. According to the relations (4.25) and (4.26), H is given by
the expression
H
(1 - ~2) + 2j~~
with
tgtj)
1 - ft2
(1 - ~2)2 + 41l2~2
{: (1 -
-2 D ft
~2)2 + 41l2~2
(4.39)
Since the imaginary part is always negative, only the lower half of
figure 4.5 is accessible, with the exception, however, of the
half-circle of diameter OS, as we shall see below. The notable
angular frequencies, listed at the end of the previous paragraph,
correspond to the points !io, HI, Hz and !!3, in the order shown in
the figure as a result of the inequalities (4.37).
1m
!!.'
-1.5j
ao = ;~ (= - ~ D) (4.40)
2 (1 - 0 2 )
(4.41)
-1 11 - 20 2'
20(1 - 0 2 )
When the damping factor tends to zero, a2 tends towards 1/2. Thus,
the locus of the points H2 , shown in figure 4.7, has a vertical
asymptote. Finally, one can prove that the imaginary part b1 of H1
is very close to a maximum.
(4.42)
[ - R1' ' "
2(1 - P2)
1m
@lli
M
(:)t
R
/(1)
R
wi
M
m
At what speed must the unbalanced weights rotate so that F' = 3200N,
assuming that the test piece is rigid in comparison with the spring?
x = X cos(wt - ~)
F
X (4.44)
(4.45)
k2 + w2 c 2
F' 2 R M w2
(k - w2 m)2 + w2 c 2
- 70 -
k _ _c__
wo
2 =J!L
m - 2 m wo wo
F' (2 R M wp ~2
1 + 4 0 2 82
(2 R M wij) (l(~) (4.46)
(1 - ~2)2 + 4 ~2 ~2
(l( ~)
1+0.168 2
(1 - ~2)2 + 0.16 ~2
(4.46) .. (l (~) =
F' = 3! 200 = 1.829
2 R M w~ 1,750
1 + 0.16 8 2
1.8292
(1 - ~2)2 + 0.16 ~2
a(jJ)
~
(I).
F'
F~ ,
o P, I p, p, 4 P
Fig. 4. 9 Relative force a as a function of the rela ti ve angular
frequency ~
wo .,
= ~i
~
~. - 60 ~ 60
1 2 • 2 •
Let us note again that the force B of traction of the nuts and
bol ts. regulated by elastic washers, must be sufficient to ensure
permanent contact between the mounting plate and the test tube.
In the case F0 = 1.5 F I , the load on the test tube has the
shape shown in figure 4.9. Such a load is called alternating
coapressioD.
Comments
11=~
w" + Wi
x,
o w' w" w
!iq.~ Amplitude measured as a function of the angular frequency
~max
=~
Xs
2 n 11 - n 2 I
The relative angular frequencies P' !!L.. and P' =.YL.. are thus
wo wo
fixed by the condition
- 73 -
.L
{2 2n~
which gives
(1 - 2 n2 ) ± 2 n 11 - n2 ' (4.47)
~2 2 n
and as a result
~'2 - 2 n
=) n 1 (~"2 - ~' 2) 1 W + ~' ) (~" - ~' )
~" 2 + 2 n 4 4
n 1 <a" - n (4.48)
l~ ~ (4.49)
2 wo w + WI
a:: ~ (4.50)
w"
.L:......g
(4.51)
1 + (l
- 74 -
Exact solution
Let us write the relation (4.47) for the angular frequencies w'
and w·
n4 - n2 + (1 - g2)2 0
8(1 + g4)
Numerical example
w· =) g = ill 0.9048
126
4.969 %
COmments
0.75
£(1) , + 5 % 0.14
2.9 %
Fig. 4.11
Shaft of machine supporting
an unbalanced disk
mZ R (4.55)
w2
k 11 - aZI
Ii
(4.56)
m, g r
x, - - - -
48 E I
0, 4 I
L
(4.57)
0, L2
x, (4.58)
12 E r
00 L2
Xo (4.59)
12 Er
The sum of the stress due to the static weight and of that due to
the unbalanced weight varies as the direction of the latter stress
changes with the rotation. This sum has a maximum when the unbal-
anced weight acts downwards with the static weight. This leads to
the condition:
(4.60)
By introducing the results (4. 56), (4. 58) and (4. 59) into relation
(4.60), we get
'-'2=---_
_...JS + _0_,_L_2_ 00 L2
11-~21 12Er 12 E r
that is to say
(4.61 )
11 - ~21 12 E r
then successivelY
(10-1.85)10 7 0.8 2
2.760
12 x 2.1·10" x 3.10- 2 x 2.5'10- 4
( 2.76
wo
fo 39.8 Hz
2 w
no 60 . fo 2,390 rpm
48
By grouping the cosines and the sines for the same angular
frequency, f(t) becomes
mx + c X+ k x f(t)
1/2 Fo
x(t) - - - - + [ Xn cos(nwt - "'n - 'l'n) (5.5)
k
n
This result shows that x(t) is a periodic function, with the same
period as f(t) , and so Justifies the expression periodic steady
state.
(5.6)
~ (k - n 2 w2 m)2 + n 2 w2 c 2
82 -
By analogy with (4.8) and (4. 10), the static displacement and the
corresponding dynamic amplification factor have the values
Fn
(5.7)
k
~n (5.8)
(1 - n 2 ~2)2 + 4 n2 n2 ~2
n wc -.l..Jl....!l...L
tg "'n (5.9)
k - n 2 w2 m 1 - n2 ~2
F, F,
F,
F.
~
Wo
x,
x,
x,
x.
(2)
OJ!
W
~
x, w,
L ____-'--_____
~n
n2 y (1- -
n2
~2)2 +~
n2
l~
tg 'l'n
n L _ ~2
n2
_1_
~n
n2 ~2
tg 'l'n ~ - L.n
n ~
e jnwl _ e- jnwt
cos nwt sin nwt
2 j
{
Co =1 Fo
C'
-n = £;.-n = 12 (An + j Bn)
f(t) (5.12 )
- 85 -
1
T
iT
0
f(t) (cos nwt - j sin nwt) dt
One can free oneself from the negative terms of the summation (5.12)
by considering f(t) as the real part of a complex force I( t)
defined as follows
00 = Co
(5.17)
2 ~n 1 (T fIt) e- jnwt dt
T )0
"'n·
O jnwt Dn e j(nwt - "'n)
=> -n e
t.g "'n
(5.19)
One defines the static displaceaent Xsn and the coaplex static
displaceaent Xsn caused by the nth harmonic of the force. The
phase shift of this harmonic being ~n' one has
(5.20)
The phase shift of the displacement, the complex admittance and the
complex frequency response for the nth harmonic can be deduced
from the relations (4.14), (4.20) and (4.25) by replacing w by nw
and ~ by n~ (~ = !iL).
wo
tg 'Pn = 2 n n a (5.21 )
1 - nZ ~2
e-j'Pn
In = (5.22)
(k - nZ wZ m) + j n w c
l(k - nZ wZ m) 2 + n 2 w2 c 2
!in = (5.23)
(1 - n2 ~Z) + 2 ~ n ~
Let us finally show the agreement between the relations (5.5) and
(5.6) on the one hand and (5. 19) on the other. The productn .!l. :t
can be written
Dn e-j('Pn + ~n)
In . .!l.n = I
(k - nZ wZ m)Z + nZ wZ c Z
J
Since Dn = Fn , one finds the amplitude of the nth
harmonic of the displacement.
J (k - n 2 w2 m) 2 + n Z wZ c Z
- 88 -
f' (t) F' cos w't and f" (t) F" cos w"t
WI + wn
x = (X' + X') cos(--- t - L...±.....!L ) cos(.iIL.....:..... t - !L........=..£ )
2 2 2 2
w·
- (X' - X") sin (.!!L....±.....Y t - L...±.....!L
2 2 )
Wi
sin(--- t -
-
2
~)
2
(5.26)
- 89 -
When the amplitudes X' and X" are equal, the displacement takes
the simple form
(a) (b)
, / \
,
\
~\I'~
\ I
I\A
\
Ir I
T = 2 1I:/W = O,D s
T = 2 n/w = 0,13 s
/(1)
- F
1
0
TI4 TI2 TI4
F
-
T = 2 nlw
(
± F-L if n odd
n 11
An = F ~ sin D-E =) (5.29)
n 11 2
An =0 if n even
Case (a)
Xn 4
- ((1 - 1.5625 n2)2 + 1.563·10-2 n2l-l/2
6 n n
Case (b)
Xn ___4_ I
((1 - 3.56· 10-2 n2)2 + 3.56·10-4 n2)-1 2
/j n n
One can in this way establish the table shown in figure 5.5
-.
n 1 3 5 7 9 11 13
(al (b)
10-' I-+--t--tt--t-....
10 -1 I-+--t--tt--t-....
w w
w, w
11 11 9 11
Fig. 5.5 Summary table and presentation of the spectra f(t) and
x(t) for example 5.3.2
Comments
In case (b), on the other hand, the 5th harmonic is close to the
J
resonant amplitude UJ2 = UJO J1 - 2 n2 i = 5.3 UJ 1 - 2 x 0.05 2 i =
5.29 UJ Its amplitude is thus bigger than that of the
fundamental. Taking account of the 3rd and 7th harmonics as well,
x(t) presents a shape significantly different from a pure sine
wave.
- 94 -
f(t) F(e- 2t / T - 1)
1(1)
1
T
f T/2
-T/2
f(t) e-
J·n t
w dt
(5.35)
lIIi
.(;n F
_1_
2 n r: (e n - 1) e- jnwt d(wt)
- (1+jn1T) wt
F _1_
2 n r: (e
n _ e -jnUlt) d(wt)
- 95 -
fIt) (5.37)
00 = Co F(sh - 1)
that is to say
Un = On e-j~n (5.39 )
with
2 F
sh 1 !;QS 111l tg n1l
On ~n
11 + n2 112
By using again the defini hons (5.20) and (5.24), the response of
the system is of the form (5.5)
Do
x =- I (sh 1 - 1) Xo(sh 1 - 1) (5.41 )
k k
and
Dn
Xn Xsn ~n =k ~n
sh 1 cos nrr
Xn 2 Xo (5.49)
,
J 1 + n 2 rr2 J (1 - n2 ~2)2 + 4 n2 n 2 ~2
0.26 0.2 n = 20
Comments
1 +1 sin U du 0,0895
2 rr u
J(I)
x(l)
For the value a = 0.26 (1/4 < 0.26 < 1/3) chosen in this
example, the 3rd and 4th harmonics predominate in the response
x(t) , which is clearly visible in figure 5.7 (c).
m x+ c X+ k x f(t)
(a)
Linearity
I
I g(t) = 0 for t < a I G(s) e- as F(s)
Displacement
in the time
g(t) = f(t-a) for t ) a domain
(fig. 6.1 b)
rr
f(u) du .! F(s) + .! f(u) du Transformation
It: s s to
---r- I; ",'
f(u) du
-at Displacement
e f(t) in the trans-
form domain
L - _ _ _ ..
(b)
(c)
1 S2-w2
t cos wt
s (s2+w2)2
2 wS
(s2+w 2 )2
s + a
(s+a)2+",2
I (1+at) eat
r t r t
(e 1 -e 2 )
(s-rl) (s-rz)
I cos wt I S2:W 2
I
L _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _--'-_ _ _ _ _ _ _---', L - - - -
m x + c it + k x f(t)
it gives
Z (5) m 52 + c s t k (6.2)
Y(s) (6.3)
m 52 + C S + k
- 102 -
Z(s) m(s2 + £ s + X)
m m
w2 X _c_ !L
o m 2 m wo
Thus
1 _ _---'-_ __
Y(s) (6.5)
m s2 + 2 A S + w~
The transform of X(s) of the solution sought x(t) has the form,
may be (6.1) and (6.5)
Xo(s + 2 A) + Vo
X(s) Y (s) F (s) + -=-'------'---....:. (6.6)
S2 + 2 A s + w5
If the inverse functions of the two terms on the right-hand sidp alC
1 ___-'-_ __ 1 ___ ~ _ __
Y(s)
m s2 + 2 II s + wij m (s - rl)(s - r2)
with
- II + 1J)1
- II - IJ) 1
(6.8)
Critical damping
=> II wo
The admittance becomes
Y(s) = 1 1
m 52 + 2 wo 5 + wij m (s + wO)2
x(t) 1
= -
m 0
it u e -w 0u f(t - u) du + (Xo + (wo Xo + Vol t) e -w 0 t (6.11 )
1 _ _ _-L-_ __ _ 1_ W1
y(s) = 1 - - - - ' - - - -
m s2 + 2 A s + w~ m (s + A)2 + wij - A2 m W1 (s + A)2 + '"~
-At
y(t) _e_ sin w1t (6.12 )
m W1
This result, just like the relations (3.57) and (3.58), determines
the forced state
with
( A Xo + VO l2 A Xo + Vo
x Xb + tg~
W1 Xo
These states are called the impulse response and the indicial
response respectively. We will assume that the initial conditions
are zero. If that is not the case, it is sufficient to put in the
correctly chosen function xb(t) (free state).
F £ [F tl 1 N s 1 Newton x second
d(ll
'll
o ,
One shows that the Laplace transform of the Dirac impulse is equal
to 1. Consequently, if one designates the response of the oscillator
by d(t),
- 106 -
Having noted this, one can directly use the preceding results.
(6.15)
Critical damping n
Sub-critical damping n( 1
-/It
d(t) = _e_ sin w1t (6.17)
m W1
- 107 -
Figure 6.2 shows d(t) for three values of the damping factor. It
is easy to prove that the three curves have a common tangent at the
origin
f(t) o for t o
f(t) for t o
- 108 -
t"(I)
t
Fig. 6.3 Unit step force and indicial response
Super-critical damping n ) 1 =)
E(s) = 1 ____-'-1_ __
m s(s - rll (s - q) (6.21 )
with
r 1 =-A+W1
{
r2 = -A - W1
[ o = cr (r1
o=a+~+~
+ r2) + ~ r2 + ~ r1
1 = cr r1 12
- 109 -
0.=_1_=.1- .!!!
k
- 1
- 1
2 '"1 (il + '"1)
_e-ilt '"It
__ (_e_ _
e(t) = 1
k 2 m '"1 iI - '"1
since
(6.22)
1 JL = m (6.23)
k N/m
Critical damping ~ =)
'"0
E(s)
1_-,-_ (6.24)
m s(s+,"0)2
- 110 -
E(s) = .1 (l!; + B
+
)s )
m s (s + wo)2 (5 + wO)2
o =a + )'
o 2 Cl wo + ~ =)
a w~
E(s) =1 (6.26)
m s( (s + A)2 + wp
~ + ) :i ~ 5 + A
E(s) =.1 (l!; + (l!; + )' +
m 5 (5 + A)2 + w~ m 5 (5 + A)l + w21
~ - )' A Wl
+---
w1 (s + A)2 + w~
0 2 a II + ~ =) ~ - 2 a A = -2 m A
k
a(A2 + w2 ) )'
m
k
- 111 -
v~ = 1 k E2 .L (6.29)
2 s 2k
This energy, which is equal to 0.5 joule when the stiffness is 1N/m,
thus represents half of the work of the external force. The other
half has therefore been dissipated by the resistance c.
Fo F6
(-)2 V~ (6.30)
1 2k
- 112 -
D(s) Y(s)
E(s) Y(5) 1
s
D(s) (6.33)
and consequently
d(t) (6.34)
6.4.1 Introduction
X,,(t) 1 f (t)
k
- 113 -
with
k _ _ _'--_ _
H(s) "'6 ----'----
m s2 t 2 As t "'ij 52 t 2 A s t "'ij
H(s) (6.35)
wo
h(t) (6.36)
2~
Critical damping ~
h( t) w~ t e- wot (6.37)
h(t) (6.38 )
The curves h(t) have exactly the same shape as the curves d(t)
of figure 6.2.
g(t) (6.39 )
- 115 -
Critical damping ~
g(t) (6.41 )
Let us use again the periodic function of figure 5.1 which was
expressed by the complex form of the Fourier series (5.12)
(nt1) w - n w w = 2u/T
JT/2
T ~n = foT f(t) e- jwnt dt f(t) e- jwnt dt (6.43)
-T/2
E(w) = lim(T
T-+oo
~n) = J~
-00
f(t) e- jwt dt (6.45)
l'>w n+O
The relation (6.44) expresses the fact that any function f(t) can
be described by an integral representing the contributions of the
harmonic components having a continuous frequency spectrum from
to +00 .
- 117 -
The integrals
few) (6.46)
and
By ana logy with the decomposition using the Fourier series, the
relations (6.46) and (6.47) give the frequency composition of the
non-periodic function f(t).
1 = L: If(t)1 dt (6.48)
f(w) does not exist and the function can generally be handled by the
Laplace transform (with the condition that this transform is itself
convergent) .
}i(t) [ 1- [ (6.49)
k
lUw) (6.50)
(6.51 )
1 ___"-_ _
xes) Y(s) F(s) Y(s)
m s2 + 2 A s + wg
F _ _5_ _
F(s) L(F cos wt)
s2 + lu2
and consequently
X(s) = f 5 (6.53)
m (52 + w2) (52 + 2 A s + w~)
X(t) (6.54)
with
x ~
f .,2 k n =L ~
!L
0
k m wo wo
- n 2) Ln...JL
l(
w21 wg(1 ~ tg Ijl =
I _
1 ~2
1 - ~2)2 + 4 n2 ~2
- 120 -
f =5 Hz fo = 17 Hz ~ 0,05 ~ .E =X
k
w =2 wf = 31,4 s-1 wo =2 w fo
a = .2.... = 0 294
17 '
.t·'(I)
T = 0.058 s
Let us recall that the same problem can be solved without using the
Laplace transform. In fact. the solution of the equation of the
oscillator
m x + c K+ k x = F cos wt
is the sum of the general solution x"(t) of the equation without
the right-hand side and of a specific solution x'(t) of the complete
equation
x(t) x' (t) + x"(t) (6.56)
with X F
tg III
wC (6.57)
k - w2 m
The relation (3.57) gives x"(t) (one writes Xl and 1111 in order
to avoid any confusion with the quantities above)
x'(t) (6.58)
-T o T
f (t) FO for -T t ( T
f(t) o for t -T and t >T
mx + c x + k x f(t)
(1 - (.!iL )2
wo
+ 2 j ~ .!iL)
wo -
X(w) k1 I(w) (6.60)
or agaln
1 (6.61 )
K(w) F(w)
1 - (.!iL J2 + 2 j .!iL k -
~
wo wo
We are going to determine the real and imaginary parts, then the
modulus and the phase of X(w) . It gives successively
(6.65)
Re[X(w) 1
Im[X(w) 1 (6.66)
!X(w) ! (6.67)
- 124 -
with - 2~ l!L
wo
tg ~(w) (6.69)
and
.L ."
4u [l+J ~j
, f~
_~
e
jw(ttT) jw(t-T)
-e
II t jw + j W1 dw]
(6.71 )
f~
_~
e jwu
J W
dw {
-rr
u
if u
ifu
0
L
jwu if u
L~ e
dw
0 0
At jw-jw1 rr e-iluejw1u if u 0 (6.72)
L~
L
jwu 0 if u 0
e
dw
At jwtj,u1 u e-Aue-jw1u if u 0
- 125 -
Ul t t T
Uz t - T
t <- T
-T < t < T
x(t) In.
k
1
(211 [n t n] - 12 (1 - j IL) e- A(ttT)e jwl (ttT)
Wl
T <t
x(t)
x(t) =
In.
k (e
-A(t-T) A
[coswl(t-T) + ~ sinwl(t-T)]
(6.75)
- 126 -
F(Ol)
Re(!(Ol))
1m (!(ol»
\OI(ol)
ol
x(t)
2T
lim
I]-t{) " 0 lim
1]+0
WI wo
t <T
x(t) 0 (6.76)
- T <t <t
x(t) = In [1 - cos wo(ttT)] (6.77)
k
T <t
x(t) =In [coswo(t-T) - coswo(ttT)] =lJl. 2sinwoT sinwot (6.78)
k k
Figure 6.12 shows this response in the case TITo 1.43 and
To = 211/wo
lim
I]-t{)
f"
_
ejwu 1"
" t jw _ j Wl dw ~ _"
e jwu
lim (" t jw _ jWl) dw
~O
(6.79)
- 128 -
x(t)
Comments
In contrast to the result for example 5.3.2. one notes here that
the spectra associated with the exciting force and the response
x(t) are continuous.
7.1 Generalities
the mass corresponds to the capacity and the spring to the self-
inductance; this is the force-current analogy.
The force-current analogy, also called the mobility analogy, for the
free state elementary oscillator gives rise to the correspondence
shown in the electrical circuit diagram of figure 7.1.
i, i,
(3)
(I)
- L
(2)
R
(3)
(2)
t-x
Fig. 7.1 Force-current analogy Free state
The sum of the three currents is zero, as is the sum of the forces
acting on the mass :
o (7.1)
ill
L (7. 2)
dt
By eliminating i, and i3
1. di2
R dt
d 2i2 _L di2
L C -- + i2 + 0
dt2 R dt
o (7. 3)
- 131 -
mx + c X+ k x 0
Force-currents
Energies
~
2
- ~
2
the kinetic energy corresponds to the electrostatic
energy
k xZ ~
- the potential energy corresponds to the electro-
2 2 L
magnetic energy
Z
c vZ - u the power dissipated in the damper corresponds to
R
the power dissipated in the electrical resistance
R i~
In the forced state, the equivalent circuit diagrams for the force-
current analogy can be found readily by qualitative reasoning. We
are going to consider two examples.
(3)
R
- (3)
m
/
(I)
(2) t-,
(3)
R
k m (3)
I\u"-~_-" x
(2)
f= Fcoswl
A
C\i=!coswt A
'-/
..--... :IL n
k"
:: C,
c, IL"
m, ~-
=r=C, L,
)~
k, =;:C, L , IR,
I
The condition that the sums of currents are zero at the nodes
(equivalent to the sums of the forces), as well as the possibili-
ties for resonances can both be seen more clearly in the electri-
cal circuit diagram.
On the other hand, if one asks how many degrees of freedom the
system has, one immediately sees that the answer is 3 for the
mechanical circuit diagram (position of 3 masses, for example),
whereas that demands a little more reflection for the electrical
circuit diagram (voltage at the level A, B, C, for example).
c
f~;HC i~R
"
~
.c.
..· •..
k
w · . · · . ·
f9.·
N •. k f =q
,. . .'.·•.· L i.
j. m C
m I ;1--/
(a) (b) (c)
ktl ...........
m,
k, :t,..----I-k_"...,
L,
m,
m,
mll o
{
..
m22 X2 + C22 X2 + kZ2 X2 + m21 Xl o
(8.1)
[
mll
m21
m12j
m22
{~1l
X2 :::] {::} < {:1 (8.21
X vector of displacements,
....
X vector of velocities,
x vector of accelerations,
or again
o
(8.4)
[M] = [ml
o
0]
m2
[C]
__ [C 1 +
- cJ
cJ - CJ]
c2 + cJ
[K]
When the resistances of figure 8.1 are zero, equations (8.4) take
the simple form
Xl + (kl + k3)Xl kJ X2 0
{ ml (8.6)
m2 X2 - k3 Xl + (k2 + kJ )X2 0
Xl Al ept X2 A2 e pt
- 140 -
(m, p2 + k, + k3)A, - k3 A2 o
{ (8.7)
- kJ A, + (m2 p2 + kz + k3)Az o
The solutions of this homogeneous system are not all zero (the zero
solutions correspond to static equilibrium) only if its determinant
is zero
I m, p2
o (8.8)
mz p2 + kz
k, + k3 kz + k3 k, kz + kz k3 + k3 k,
p4 + p2 (-m-,-- + -m-2--) + m, mz o (8.9)
p4 + B pZ + C o => pZ 1 (- B ± - 4 C')
2
A2 ml p2 + kl + kJ kJ
~2 (8.10)
Al kJ m2 p2 + k2 + kJ
kl + kJ - ml 1012 kJ
{
~2l
kJ k2 + kJ - m2 IU~
(8.11 )
kl + kJ - ml 1022 kJ
~22
kJ k2 + kJ - m2 IU~
Let All , A12 and A21 , A22 be the values of Al and A2 when
~2 has the values ~21 and ~22 respectively
~22
(8.12 )
- 142 -
Xl
{
X2 (8.13)
..
x
(8.14 )
with
(8.15)
.. (8.16 )
~T [M] ~2
1
0 ~T [K] ~2 0
{
m1 + m2 ~ 21 ~22 0 (8.17 )
The role of the natural modes appears clearly when the system
has a geometric symmetry (figure 8.2). Tn this case
k + k3 13 (8.19 )
p2
m m
k + 2 k3 (8.20)
.. 2
1 =k UJ~ m
m
The ratios ~21 and ~22 of relation (8.11) then take the valu~s
+1 and - 1 In fact
(8.21 )
~21 + 1 - 1
- 144 -
Xl =
{ (6.23)
X2 =- X2 COS(W2 t - 'Il2)
(I)
m m m
(1) -
--t~
-
Xl _.r= --t-
X2
.-
.
(2) -
For the reference system and for the double pendulum, the elastic
coupling does not participate in the first mode because of the
symmetry, whereas it does in the second mode. This statement
cannot be applied directly to the last example of the bending of a
beam. However, one should note that the flIst mode shape has a
single curved portion whereas the second has two, separated by an
inflexion point.
k, + kJ kJ
- wZ
ml ml
0
kJ kz + kJ
wZ
mz mz
The first term is a function of wZ and one can write it, after
expansion
f(wZ) o (8.24)
QZ
Z
angular frequency of mz when m, is blocked
(I)
(2)
o (8.26)
(8. 27)
few')
Fig. 8.6 Relative values
of the natural angular
frequencies and of the
angular frequencies at
zero coupling
w'
It gives thus
Q~ - Q~ 1 (8.28)
w2 (---)2
2
+ Q12 (Q~ + QP ±R
",2 ",2
(8.29)
1 2
On the other hand, if the coupling tends towards zero, one has
By neglecting the masses of the shaft and of the cable, and assuming
that the drum is rigid and that the cable always stays taut,
calculate the natural frequencies and the angular frequencies for
zero coupling in case of locking of the bearing Pl
{
diameter d 50 mm 5.10- 2 m
Shaft length L 3 m
shear modulus G 0.8 ·10" N/m2
Drum { moment
radius
of inertia
R
J
200 mm = 0,2 m
5 kg·m 2
{
cross-section A 1 cm 2 10- ~ m2
so that
B + (k t + R2 kc)B - R kc x o (8.30)
x + o
- 151 -
kc kt + R2 kc R2 _
_ k2c
( - - w2) ( - W2 ) o (8.31)
m J J m
Q2 = kc (8.32)
1
m
Numerical example
,
Q2 4.000 (rad/s)2 Q22= 13.900 (rad/S)2 Q4'2 (6.890)2(rad/s)4
One can also plot the circle of angular frequencies in figure 8.9.
1000 s-,
OJ'
Comments
In the particular case chosen, the shaft is long (3 m), whereas the
cable is relatively short (15 m). Thus, the frequencies f, and fa
are close enough to each other. On the other hand, if the shaft was
short
- 153 -
(for example 0,5 m) and i f the cable was long (for example 100 m),
the frequency fl would be much lower than f2 . Then the system
would no longer present any significant difference from an
elementary oscillator consisting simply of the cable and the load.
A system with two degrees of freedom can present, in the free state,
a phenomenon of beats analogous to that of an elementary oscillator
being acted upon by two harmonic forces, as examined in paragraph
5.3.1 .
X2 COS(W2t-<P2)
(8.34)
{
W = 1 (WI + W2) tp = 1 (tpl + tp2)
sin(ut-I(J)
the amplitudes (~2l Xl + ~22 X2) and (~2l Xl - ~22 X2) . This
phenomenon of beats, which one can put in the form
X,
/ ' /
~
/ /
/
I I
I~/n "Ai
~¥\ y,~\
\
/
/
\
\
/
\
, /
T = 2 nlw
!" = 2n/a
x,
/ / "
\ \
\ \
/ / I
/ / I
/
\
I / \
/ / \
\
\ I
/
T = 2 nlw
r = 2 x/a
Fig. 8.10 8eats in the free state of a system with two degrees of
freedom
wl 60 rad/s 0.6 ~2l 1.6 <Ill 0.5
W2 50 rad/s 0.4 ~22 - 1.4 <Il2 0.2
-155 -
Comments
/= Fcoswt
Q'
i,
m,
i; ,;'
k,
/'0.. C, L,
k,
m, C,
F cos wt
(9.1)
o
Xl = Xl cos(wt-q>ll
{
X2 = X2 coS(wt-q>2)
One obtains
Likewise, the external force is the real part of the complex force
I =F ejwt . Equations (9.1) become thus
{
- w2 ml Al + kl Al + kJ (Al - Az) + j w C(Al - A2) F
or
{-
Al (- w2 ml + kl + kJ + w c) - A2 (kJ + w c) F (9.3)
Al (kJ + j w c) + A2(- w2 m2 + kJ + j w c) 0
- 158 -
(kJ-wZmz) + j w c
F --------------~~~~~~---------------- (9.4)
((kl-w 2ml) (kJ-w Zm2) - w2 m2 kJ) + j w C(kl-W2ml 'w2m2)
~
c2 + d2
(9.5)
m2
ratio between the mass of the damper and the main
ml mass,
IJJl ={f ml
natural angular frequency of the isolated main
oscillator,
IJJ2 ={1f m2
natural angular frequency of the isolated
undamped secondary oscillator,
IJJ2
il ratio between these natural angular frequencies,
IJJl
Xl
~ dynamic amplification factor of the motion of the
X1s main mass.
~2
4 02 ~2 + (~2 - ( 2 )2 (9.6)
4 ~2 ~2(~2 (1 + E) - 1) ) 2 + (8 il 2 ~2 - (~2 - 1) (~ 2 il2) ) 2
· ~ o 0.1 ; 0.3
- 160 -
One obtains in this way the curves shown in figure 9.2, all of which
pass through the two points P and Q , independent of the damping
factor. The existence of these points will be demonstrated below.
p
~=O ,,= 00
(9.7)
- 161 -
i\
i, I'
1111
i; i;'
k,
-" C, L,
k,
m, C,
I
I P
fJ' fJ"
Fig. 9.3 Frahm damper and amplification factor in the case nO,
a = 1 and E = 0.05
Fcos wI
m,
k,
0.976
(9.8)
IS 2 (1 + 0.05) - 11
It is infinite for ~ 1/~ = 0.976 .
Let us now show, from relation (9.6), that there effectively exists
two values of ~ for which is independant of n . One can write
A n2 + B
e n2 + D
(a 2 (1 + e) - 1)2
which gives
e cr 2 a2 - (a 2 - 1) (a 2 - cr 2 )
o o W : 0
This result shows that all the curves tend towards the point ~
a4 (2 + EI - a2 (2 + 2 cr 2 (1 + E1) + 2 cr 2 0
- 164 -
or again
~4 _ 2 ~2 1 + a Z (1 + €) + ~ 0 (9.9)
2 + € 2 + €
(9.10)
[1 ~2 (1 + E) [
~(q) - ~(f~)
- 1
- ~ \ ( 1 + E) - ~~(1 + E)
- ~ \ ( 1 + E) + ~~ (1 + E)
(9.11 )
_2_
~\ + f~
1 + E
_2_ 2 1 + a 2 (1 + E)
+ E 2 + €
(1 + El2
- 165 -
In the extraction of the root, only the positive sign must be consi-
dered, since the ratio a = lli2/llil is essentially posjtive. Thus
_1_
1 + E (9.13 )
Let us recall that for this value of a the points P and Q are at
the same height. Thus one sees that the optimal solution is obtained
when the natural angular frequency of the damper is sliyhtly less
than that of the main system (ie E is small).
Let us first calculdte the roots of (9.9) when the condition (9.13)
is satisfied.
2
~4 _ 2 p,2 _1_ + o
1 + E (2 + El (1 + .)2
~2 _1_ (1 J~)
1 + E l' 2 + E
1 - (1 ± --{ E i) ~~
2 + E 12 + •
(9.14)
- 166 -
__
1_ i
0: = 0,8
1 + 1/4 5
~1 0.730 ~2 = 1.033
+ 0.25
0.25
Let us compare this result with the case of a damper for which
IJJ 2 = IJJ 1 , SO (l =1 .
~4 - 2 ~2 + _2_
2 + E
°
whence
_2_
2 + E
-~
1
12+ E
(9,15)
- 167 -
p.
v
=0 = 00 =0
I t!
~ ~ ~
">\\
/ I
/ l/ \\
4
;
\j i
1'-_ _ '.J.Q I
~
I
' .....
i\
I
/ I
I ..........
i\ /
I ---.J
I
V'
I
I Ip= w,
~
o
0,6 0,7: 0,8 0,9 1,0: 1,1 1,2 1,3 \.4
I I
p, = 0,730 P, = 1,032
(9.16)
L: J
~
1- € + (1+ €)
~2 ; N 4 n2 S 2 + (S 2 - 0.2) 2
o 4 ~2 a2 (a2 (1 + £) - 1)2 + (E 0.2 a2 - (~2 - 1) (~2 - 0.2))2
(~) 0
ap2 p2
1
(9.17)
Differentiating gives
(9.18 )
(9.19)
+ 2« 0. 2 p2 - (P2 - 1) (P2 - 0.2)) (E 0.2 - (P2 - 0.2) - (P2 - 1))
~2 - 0.04267 0 ;) 0.207
- 169 -
f= Fcoso>,
i,
m,
i; i;'
l~
"'- c, 1.,
k,
C,
~4 _ 2 ~2 _1_ 0
2 + 8
2 _2_ (9.20)
~2 2 + 8
- 170 -
1 + 2. (9.21 )
11 - _2_ (1 + e) 1
2 + £
r
10 ~ = 00-./ ~ = 0
I
9+---------------T---~
p
/!, = jIO:889 /! =!"..
oL--....,....., ~----~------r-~--r-----.-----.-----.-~w,
o 0.1 0,1 0,8 0.9 1,0 1,1 1.2 1,3
~ (9.22)
4 E
- 171 -
9.87 10
x 0.25
This value is a bit less favourable than that found for the
Lanchester damper with viscous friction (10 in place of 9).
- 172 -
....
[Ml x + [Cl x + [Kl x
.. f(t) (10.1 )
..
In this equation, as in section 8.1, ~ , x and x are the vectors,
..
of displ~cements, velocities and accelerations respectively. As for
the vector f (t) , it represents the external forces acting on the
system.
The matrices [M], [Cl and [K], which one assumes to be symmetrical,
are called the mass matrix, damping matrix and stiffness matrix
respecti vely .
T =1
2
xT [M) x (10.2)
m11
, ... , ~2 Im21 m121
m22
>0 mll > 0
v 1 xT [K) x (10.3)
2
..
generalized displacements. I t is said to be semi -defini te because
it can be zero for a value of x different from zero.
- 174 -
W 1 xT [C] x (10.4)
n n
Q ~T [5] ~ [ [ Sij Xi Xj Sji (10.5)
i j
n n
Q [ sik Xi x k + [ Skj x k x·) + skk xR + Q' (10.6)
i ~k j~k
In this expression, the term Q' does not depend on the index k.
Differentiation gives as follows
n n n n
QQ... [ sik x. + [ Skj x.
[ sik x.1 + [ Skj x.) + 2 skk x k 1 )
(lXk i~k j .k i
- 175 -
n
iliL 2 I: Slj Xj iliL
OXl OXl
=>
.
2 [S1 x
n
iliL 2 E Snj Xj QQ....
oXn oXn
_0_
OXl
{L.} (10.7)
oXi
--L
xn
{iliL} 2 [S1 x
.. (10.8)
oXi
k 1, ... , n (10.9)
- 176 -
There are n of them, but the number can be reduced to one equation
by using the matrix operator defined above. It gives in this way
.f(t) (10.11 )
.
T ~ 1 xT [M] x
2
V = 1 ~T
..
[K] x
2
W 1 xT [C] x
2
c,
T =lm
21
x2, + 12 m2 x~
That is to say, in matrix form
,
v = 1 (k, x2 + k 3{x, - x 2)2 + k2 xp
2
k3
- k3 ]
k2 + k3
r'}
X2
= -1 x~ T [K] x
2
~
w= 1 (c , x~ + c J (x, - x2,2 + c 2 xp
2
W =1 ( (c , + cJl x~ - 2 c J x, x 2 + (c 2 + cJl xp
2
Cl + CJ
[ [Cl X
- CJ
One confirms that the matrices [Ml, [Cl and [Kl are symmetrical and
that they clearly have the values found from Newton's equations
(8.4). On the other hand, one notes that the structure of [Cl is
the same as that of [Kl This similarity is not general but
never-the-Iess frequent. Conversely, the structure of [Ml is
intrinsically different.
( 10.12)
- 179 -
( 10.13)
1 n
V = - 1: Qi Xi ( 10.14)
2 i
1 n n
V = -2 1: 1: kij Xi Xj (10.15)
i
- 180 -
Q [KJ x
.. (10.16)
V 1 QT x .. 1 ~T Q (10.17 )
2 2
V =l~T[KJ x
.
2
.
x [a] Q ( 10.18)
V 1 QT [a] Q (10.19)
2
It 1.5 easy to show, as we are going to below, that the kinetic ener-
gy of a system of point mazses is a positive definite symmetric qua-
dratic form of the generalized velocities. Let us therefore examine
a system of r point masses ma (figure 10.3), linked between
themselves and to the planes of an inertial reference system by
elastic forces and by viscous damping forces. One makes the hypothe-
sis that the system is acted upon by £ holonomic constraints,
which are bilateral and independant of time. It therefore has
n = 3 r - Q degrees of freedom.
- 181 -
Z'
O~______~____~____~Z~'
Z;
Z'
(10.20)
r
T = 1 I: m v 2
2 cr cr
cr
r 3
T = 1 I: I: m (Zk)2 (10.21)
2 Cl k a a
n az k
dZ k [ ---.S!. dx. => (10.22)
a i oXi 1
(10.23)
1 r J n
T = - [ [ ma ([ hk. Xl.)2
2 a k i al
By using two indices in place of one alone, the square of the last
sum can be put in the form
n n n
[ hk. Ki l2 [ [ hkal hk x· x·
al a) 1 )
i i j
It gives thus
n n r 3
T = 12 [ [ x. x [ [ ma hk. hk.
1 j al a)
(10.24 )
i j a k
r J
[ [ ma (10.25 )
a k
- 183 -
1 n n
T = 2 [ [ mij Xi Xj (10.26)
i j
Written in the matrix form, this result clearly gives again relation
(10.2)
T = 1 xT [M) x
- 184 -
11.1 Introduction
[M] x + [K] x
.
o (11.1)
.o (11.2)
[A] (11.3)
x e [A] x
. o (11.4)
In the first way to tackle the problem, one initially searches for
solutions xi(t) of the system (11.4) which are the same function
of time, apart from a factor
Xi g(t)
x X cos(UJt-tp) ( 11.5)
w2 (11.6)
[[A]- 6['IJ] X
.0 (11.7)
- 186 -
I[AJ-~['I-JI o (11.8)
o (11.9)
(ann - 6)
o (11.10)
( 11 . 11 )
(11.13 )
(11.14)
=)
(11.15 )
~ip
- 188
.
x
n
r: "Yp xp
.. n
r: "Yp
..
~p xp cos(wpt-~p)
p P
x
. n ..
r: ~p Xp cos(wpt-~p) ( 11.16)
P
~np
~nn
mode n
[M] x + [K] x
.. .0
and pre-multiply by [K]-l [cr]
The product [cr] [M] is the inverse of the previously defined core.
Let us write
It gives therefore
.... .. ..o
[E] x + x (11. :<0)
.
x X cos(wt-4» X cos(-f51t-4»
o (11. 21)
( 11 .22)
T = 1 (11.23 )
- 190 -
(11. 24)
(11.25 )
which one deduces immediately from the preceding equations.
(11.27)
- 192 -
Let us again use the differential equation in the matrix form (11.1)
[M] x + [K] x 0
o p 1 t 2, ... , n
- 193 -
qp + ~
p qp 0 p 1, 2, ... / n ( 11 .29)
kO
....Q
with ~
p ( 11.30)
mO
p
.x [B] q ( 11 .31 )
x ~ [B] q ( 11 . 32)
.
o ( 11 . 36)
(11.37 )
The matrix sought [B] is thus that which allows one to diagonalize
the core [A] = [Mj-1[Kj of the system
(11. 38)
The matrix of the left-hand side and that of the right-hand side are
equal if their columns are identical, in other words
[A] Bp (11.41)
.
o (11.42)
One has found again the characteristic equation (11.8) allowing one
to calculate the eigenvalues of [A] , which we have previously
assumed to be all distinct. Once these eigenvalues are obtained,
equation (11.42) enables one to calculate the columns of the matrix
[B] apart from a scale factor. It is thus a matter of solving
successively n homogeneous systems of n algebraic equations with
n unknowns.
..o ( 11 .43)
- 196 -
Let us recall that ~ = [B] q and that matrices ~M~ and tK~ are
defined by (11.35). By dividing (11.43) by tM~ , one obtains
.o ( 11.44)
o
. (11. 46)
One knows, from (10.3) and (10.2) that the potential and kinetic
energies have the values
v= 1 xT[KJ ~
2
T
..
1 xT[M] x
2
v = 1 qT[B]T[K] [EI] q
2
T = 1 ~T[B]T[M] [B] q
2
- 197 -
n
V = 1 qT~K.!j q ~
1 [ kO q2 (11. 47)
2 2 p p
p
n
T = 1 qTr-~ q 1 [ mpO q2p (11.48)
2
p
We are going to show that the eigenvalues of the system are all
positive or zero. The terms mg of the matrix ~~ are all
exclusively positive since the kinetic ~nergy is a positive definite
quadratic form.
mO ) 0 (11.49 )
P
kO ~ 0 (11. 50)
P
It follows that
kO
5p .....I! ~ 0 (11.51 )
mpO
5p w2 ( 11 .52)
P
- 198 -
p 1, 2, ... I n ( 11 .53)
~ [8] q
one obtains
.x ( 11 . 54)
.
x
n ..
[ Bp Qp cos(wpt-~p) ( 11 . 55)
P
.x n ..
[ Pp xp cos(wpt-~p)
P
.
The eigenvectors of the core [AJ are proportional to the columns
Bp of the matrix [BJ , so they are also proportional to the vectors
~p appearing in the previous relationship. These are the .odal
vectors, called the natural mode shapes of the system. They are the
static deformations or displacements associated with each natural
angular frequency.
- 199 -
n
[ 'rp ~p t 0 (11.56)
p
in which the 'r pare arbitrary constants, not all of which al'e
zero. This is easily demonstrated (but we will not do that here)
from another property of vectors known as the orthogonality of modal
vectors or orthogonality of modes. The relations expressing this
last property, which is fundamental in modal analysis, can be estab-
lished from expressions (11.35). Let us start with the first
- 200 -
f :lJ[ ; l .
~nl
m~
0 :gj
(11. 57)
mO (11. 58)
r
~T[Ml
r
~ s ~ 6rs rn ro (11.60)
When the mass matrix is diagonal with the terms all equal,
1M] = moll] , the orthogonality takes the form of a direct scalar
product
o r 1- S (11.62 )
The fact that the modal vectors making up the modal matrix IB] are
defined using an arbitrary scale factor justifies any choice of
normalization for the natural modes shapes. Here are some examples.
. The modal masses are all set equal to one, which is to say
n 2
[ ~ip (11.64)
i
..x n ..
E ~p xp cos(wpt-~p)
P
n ..
E ~p Xp(cos ~p cos wpt + sin 'Pp sin Ulpt)
p
(11. 65)
x(O) Va (11.66)
n .. (11.67)
Xo E ap Xp cos 'Pp
P
..Va n ..
E ap "'p Xp sin 'Pp (11.68)
p
;i[M] Xo
n ..
E ai[M]
.~p Xp cos 'Pp
p
n .. ..
;i[M] Vo E ai[M] Sp wp Xp sin 'Pp
p
- 203 -
X .L ~~[Ml
. (11.69 )
r cos <Pr mO
Xo
r
(11.71 )
Let us examine the particular case where the vector of the initial
displacements is proportional to one of the eigenvectors ~r and
where the vector of initial velocities is null
Xo Xo h (11. 72)
Vo
..o (11.73 )
.+
X
(11. 74)
This result shows that the system vibrates only in the r th mode .
In this way, one can isolate a vibratory mode, in d conservative
system with n degrees of freedom in the free state, by choosing
the initial conditions (11.72) and (11.73).
- 204 -
Vo Vo ~r ( 11 .75)
the motion of the system also occurs only in the rth mode. In
effect, one easily finds in this case
By replacing the core matrix [A] by its value [Mr 1[K], the
eigenvalue problem (11.42), examined previously, can be put in the
form
(11.77 )
[K] ~p (6 p
p 1, 2, ... , n
one obtains
./3~[K] ./3
p
6p wp2 p 1, 2, . '0, n (11.78)
;~[M] /3 p
~T[K] u
w2 R(u) (11. 79)
~T[M] ~
One calls the scalar quantity R(u) defined in this way the
..
Rayleigh quotient, which depends on the matrices [K] and [M] as
well as u
of
For a given 5ystem the Rayleigh quotient depends only on U
of
Let us express any vector U as a linear combination of the
modal vectors (11.56)
( 11.80)
p
of
or again, in matrix ftllm, [B] being the modal matrix and 'Y
the vector made up from the coefficients 'Yp
ii ; [B] :y (11.81)
On the other hand, let us assume that the modal vectors are
normalized in such a way that
[B]T[M] [B] ; tIl
One can then introduce the relation (11.81) into the definition
(11.79) for the Rayleigh quotient and then use the above two
relations
In this last result, the matrix products are the sums of n scalar
quantities
R(u) (11.83 )
+
When the vector u is not very different from the eigenvector
+ +
~r ' the '1p for P t r , are very small compared to
n
[
r +
6 6 p .2
p
R(u) PH (11.85 )
n
1 + [ ,2
P
PH
n n
R(u) (0 r + [
PH
0p 'p (1 - [
ptr
,~)
(11.86)
n
R(u) 6 + [ (op - or) ,2p
r
PH
- 207 -
n
R(u) b1 + 1: (5 p - I) 1) E~ ( 11 .87)
p=2
(i 2, ... , n)
As a result
R(u) ~ OJ (11.88)
1 3 .
T - m L (L xi)2
2
i
3
V mg L L (1 - cos xi)
one differentiates and then adopts the small angle hypothesis (sin x x and
r
cos x ~ 1). We get in this way:
m L2 + Xl (m 9 L + k d2) - X2 k d 2 0
X2 m L2 - Xl k d2 + X2 (m gL+2kd 2 ) - XJ k d2 0
XJ m L2 - X2 k d2 + xJ(m g L + k d 2 ) 0
(11.90)
[M] x + [K]
. o..
x
~ ( 11 .91 )
mg L
one sees that the mass matrix and the stiffness matrix have the values
1:",1
~
,-:".1
[A] + 2 ~ (11.93)
~ 210 ~
y ~
g
+ ~ ~ y o
t 2 ~ - y o
o + ~ ~ y
(1 ~ y)( 1 + ~ ~ y) (1 + 3 ~ ~ y) ~ 0
r r r
'I
L If
Y2 + ~ =) 02 'l ( 1 +
],
~) =) 1JJ2 1JJ1
-.f1+7
Y3 1 + 3 ~ ~3 'l (1 + 3 ~) IJJ) 1JJ1 -{ 1 t .1 ~'
L
One will naturally obtain the same results, apart from a normaliza-
tion factor, by replacing y by Yl ,Yz and Y3 in the terms of
the characteristic equation. These terms are the coefficientH of the
equations to solve. lis for the var iables of these equations, they
are proportional to the amplitud~s of the oscillations. We will
designate them by r, s, t to simplify the notation.
Y Yl
{-
o r
o
~
t ~> ~1 { ; } (11911
r
+ p t o
Y i'2 ~
1 + p
{
- p s 0
{:
0
p r + p s - P t 0 =>
- r
=> ~ 2 { : } (11.98)
- p s 0
r
Y Y3 ~ 1 + 3
{- iI
2 p r - p 5 0
- 2 r
p r - p s - p t 0 ~>{: r
=) ~J ( 11 .99)
- p - 2 p t 0
- 212 -
Let us verify the orthogonality of the natural mode shapes, by using the
relation (11.62) since [M] = m L2[1]
;r1 ~2 (1 1 1)
F1 1 + 0 - 1 0
;r
2 ~3 (1 0 -
"{J 1 + 0 - 1 0
..
~T
3 ~1 (1 - 2 1)
{:} 1 - 2 + 1 0
Apart from the initial conditions, the free state is now entirely
determined
Fig. 11.2 Natural mode shapes and angular frequencies of the system of
fig. 11.1
- 213 -
L 1 m dO,S m m = 1 kg
~ =~ k = 0.0255 k
mg L
f2 = fl~
Hz f
1,5
0,51{'-----:!.!---_ _
O~----.-----r---_.----._--
o 50 100 150 200 N/m
The three natural frequencies become equal when the coupling tends
to zero, as is to be expected. The system then degenerates into
three independent simple pendulums.
- 214 -
(I)
(2)
[0:] [M] x + x
. o
- 215 -
T(~+~)
ai bi
=~
aii TL
r
b'
=~ aii if i (aj > ail
bi
One notes that the influence coefficients, and therefore the natural
frequencies of small transverse movements of t.he system, are not a
function of the cross-section nor of the modulus of elasticity of
the cord. Apart from the I engths and the masses, only the initial
tension is important.
- 216 -
[M] m LI~
T m m m T
3/4 1/2
1/4]
[,,] =.-t...... [ 1/2 1 1/2 ( 11.102)
4 T
1/4 1/2 3/4
3/4 1/2
1/4]
t i [ 1/2 1 1/2 - t o
4 T
1/4 1/2 3/4
One readily finds the three solutions and the corresponding natural
angular frequencies
1.53 CL""'
-V;;;-t
2.S3-
1f;-r:r ( 11.105)
1113 3.70 ~ T i
mL
cos(WJt-tjlJ)
(11.106)
One notes that the central mass does not move in the second mode.
This circumstance plays an important role in the steady state of the
system [3J.
We will limit ourselves here to the simplest case, that of the late-
ral and coplanar vibrations of point masses on a straight beam
(figure 11.6)
(1)
(2)
tal [M) it + x
.o
E.l
m m m m
x, x, x,
2,41 2,41
I 1
I 1 1
~'
~
1 'I
""V 1
[M] m ~IJ
l
A formula obtained from the theory of strength of materials allows
one to calculate the matrix [a]
0.95 0.81
[a]
L3
122.88 E I
049
0.95
0.81
0.31
2.25
2.07
2.07
2.25
0.9S
0"1
0.81
0.95
0.49
(11.107)
0.81
Z ::; 1
122.88 E =1 122.88 E I =.1.... 122.88 E (11.108)
m L3 m L3 w2 m L3
w2 = 122.88 .L.L
mLl
=) w = ~ 12~.88'. 1
L
.~
mL
(11.109)
r
5.04900 W1
= 4.9333 fE I'
L mL
z2 0.32000 W2 3.97 W1 (11.111)
Z3 0.07098 WJ 8.43 W1
Z, o 04000
""
11. 2 W1
221 -
{If'}
XJ
X4
2.41
1
X, cos(I",t-lPl)
{} cos(wzt-lPz) +
{:,,} {}
(11.112)
( 11 . 113)
in which ~ I is the mass per nnit length and n the order of the
modes, The series of natural angular frequencies is thus
w;= 12
LZ
1 E1 '
~,
w'4 16 w; (11. 114)
L
~,
Lm m=
~,
=) ( 11 . 115)
L 4
By comparing (11.115) and (11.114), one sees that in thi.,; way one
would make the follc1winy very small relative error for the
fundamental angular frequency
1st mode EI
w', - 0,03 %
- 222
In the same way, the relative error for the angular frequencies of
the other modes would be
The relative error increases rapidly with the order of the modes, it
is about - 10 \ for the fourth. This is easy to understand, because
t.he dynamic displacements of t.he discrete system deviate increas-
ingly from those of the cant lnuous beam as the number of inertial
forces (one per point mass) becomes smaller on each undulation. This
number is four for the first natural mode ,;hape and one for the
fOlJ1th.
Rayleigh guotient
~2 1 .L.1.1 (11.116 )
{1 2.41 2.41 1} =) 2.41
~ 11
"T
u { 1 1 } =) 2.00 (11.117 )
E'
2.00 - 2.41 - 17 %
2.41
- 223 -
R(u) Ii
D
One det.crmtnes in the first. place the value of the Ilumerator using
(11.117)
N { 1 10
IT! L3
D . 50.24
122.88 E
wa.= 4.94611Ll'
L mL
w~ - w1 24.46 - 24.33
0.53 %
w2 24.31
1
In accordance with the theory, the above results show that the
approximate natural angular frequency is larger than the exact
eigenvalue, and that i f €' is of the first order, 8" is of the
second order, 8" = 0.031
- 224 -
t.he first natural mode shape is a sine wave which gives, with the
normalization Ul =1
tiT = { 1 2.414 2.414 1 } (11.118)
4 4
ui = crij / L cr1j
j
hence tiT = {1 2.375 2.375 1 } (11 . 119)
In these two cases, one confirms that the relative error on the
natural angular frequency becomes completely negligible
(E" ( 0 .01 %).
stop k.
pulley J,
\
~,c
belt kc L
motor J.
C
~. '--'--'
pulley J!
This choice implies that the motor shaft as well as the pulleys are
considered undeformable. The origin of the generalized coordinates
corresponds to the rest position of the system.
fly ,( h:o defining the active length L of the screw, the linear
displacement per radian . (l = t/2n of the nut, and the radius Rp
of the pulleys, we can calculate the potential and kinetic energies
of the system in order to use Lagrange's equations.
- 226 -
Kinetic energy
Table
1 .
2 mt x2
SC1CW, translation of
For the screw, one assumes that the longitudinal and angular
velocities vary linearly from one extremity to the other. Thi.s
gives, u being the auxiliary variable of integration indicated
in the figure,
Tvt 1 m [L [l!
_::::I.
2 L 0 L
(x - a ~v) J 2 du
1 mv (J{ - a ~v)2
Tvt
2 3
· Screw, rotation of
1 Jv
Tvr (~2 + ~~ + "'p ~r)
2 3 P
T 1 J ~2
P 2 p P
Neglecting the kinetic energy in the belt, the total kinetic energy
is then
T Tt + Tvt + Tvr + Tp + Tm
- 227 -
T = 1 [m
2 t
x2 + mv
3
(x - a ~v)2 + Jv
3
(~2
P
+ ~~ + 'l'p ~v)
(11. 120)
+ J p ,~2p + (J m + J p ) ~~l
Potential energy
v = 1 k (x - a 'l'V)2
vc 2
k ( 11.121J
v Vvc + Vvt + Vc
( 11.122)
- 228 -
Ll{~}.
mt + mv/3 - C1 mv/3
~
- 11 k
112 k + kvt - k vt
(11.123 )
[ k - kvt
o
Numerical values
. Bal1screw
mv = 4 kg t 5.10- 3 m
Jv = 4.34.10- 4 kgm 2 d 2.9.10- 2 m
L = 0.7 m E 2.1.10 11 N/m2
G 0.8,10 11 N/m2
1.713 10 2 - 1.061.10- 3 o
2.LJ
=[ - 1.0~1.10 J .455.10- 4 7.231· 10- 5
[M] ( 11 . 124)
.233.10- 5 1.595.10- 3
o o o
1.540.108 - 1.225.10 5 o
= [_
1.225·105 8.038.10 3 - 7.940.10 3
[K] (11.125)
o - 7.940.10 3 9.789.10 3
o o - 1.849·103
r
One then calculates the eigenvalues, angular frequencies and natural
frequencies
"'1 0 fl 0
=08 772.10 5
02 , S -2 "'z 9.339·102 S-l fz 148 Hz (11.126)
,~) 1.6%.10 6 S -2 ill) 1. 302 .10 3 s-1 fJ 207 Hz
04 6.683.10 7 S -2 "'4 8.175.10 3 5- 1 f4 1301 Hz
These results show that there exists a mode with zero frequency, in
other words a zero mode (or rigid body mode) which we are going to
return to later.
- 230 -
is then written
7.379· 10-2
[ 114410' 1.614·10-2
1680 10']
1.437·10' 2.7".4 - 1.825·10' -8.052·10' (11.127)
[B] ~
1.437·10' 1.601 - 1.787· 10' 1.063·10'
1.437·10' - 4.649 1.108· 10' 1.042·10-'
Let llS 'J<'>\.t, ,<1 so that the modal vector corresponding to the zero
mode introduces the ratios
1
"
This confirms the fact that this mode represents a simple sliding of
the system, without putting into play any energy of deformation.
.
o ( 1 1 . 128)
We should have then been able to say that this vector was the
eigenvector Po of a mode with zero angular frequency. By using
the orthogondllty relationship for the natural mode" it gives
.o ( 1 1 . 129)
~T (11.130)
r
(11.131)
'Pv (11.132 )
One can in this way reduce the order of the system of equations by
means of the transformation
x o
<i>v - (1 +~) (11.133 )
\ Jv
<i>p
<i>m o
X [8] q
(12.2)
and which allows one to decouple the differential system (12.1).
{
[M' ] [B]T[M] [B]
[C' ] [B]T[C] [B] (12.5)
[K' ] [B]T[K] [B]
If that is the case, then the initial system (12.1) can be replaced
by a system of n equations analogous to that of a dissipative
elementary oscillator, that is to say
q + [M']-1(C']
..
q+ [M']-1[K'] q=
..
0 (12.8)
(12.9)
Taking account of the relations (12.5), the equality above takes the
form
(12.10)
(12.11 )
235 -
One can also show [1] that conditiun (12.11) is siJti;ificd if t.he
damping matrix meets to the following condition, which is sufficient
but not necessary :
n-1 (12.12)
L "i [[M'r'[K ]]i
i~O
In thi~ relation, n is the order of the matrices [M], [C], [K] and
the "i are any l"ell cocffir-ient.s. As an example, let us consider
the case where only "0 c'lnd '" are different from zero.
mO q
p p
+ CO
p
qp + k po qp 0 p 1, 2, ... , n
CO kO
qp +....PO qp +....PO qp 0 p 1,2, ... ,n
mp mp
(12.16 )
- 237 -
kO
L
w2 =~
Op mO
p
(12.17)
CO
Ap =~
mO
p
(12.18)
p 1, 2, ... , n ( 12.19)
=~ (12.20)
~p wOp
p 1, 2, ... , n (12.21 )
~ [B] q
x
~
n ~ ( 12.?~)
[ Bp Qp e~ Apt cos(wpt - .p)
~
x
P
x
-V-
~
P
pth natural mode
~(O) Xo (12.25 )
Vo (12.26)
.. n ..
Xo [~p Xp cos ~p (12.27)
p
n ..
Vo [ ~p Xp(wp sin ~p - Ap cos ~p) (12.28)
p
(12.29 )
(12.30)
.. n 1 ; -Apt"T
x [--"p e (~p[Ml Xo cos wpt +
p mp
(12.31 )
- 240 -
B e- bt (12.32)
o
~
[NJ B (12.34 )
o (12.35 )
- 241
We are going to assume in what follows that all the roots are
complex. In effect, the purely imaginary roots are only a particular
case, while the real roots hardly present any int",rest in modal
analysis. Moreover, in order to simplify the writing, the complex
quantities will no longer be underlined, contrary to the convention
adupted for chapters 5 and 6. In effect, at this stage of the
presentation the reader will recognize without difficulty the nature
of the quantities used.
x (12.36)
->
2n 2n
x 1: 1: "Yp Bp .,-5 p t (12.37 )
P
->
x (12.38)
The matriX [B] cannot be used for a change of bas.is of the type
~ [tl] q
-> 7 (12.39 )
p [M] x
1. ~ L(x, h, t) - IT - V)
- 243 -
One knows that the equations for the dynamics of the system are
given by the following derivatives (equations of Lagrange)
k 1, .. " n (12.42)
n ilL
H 1: -.- xk - L (12.43)
k 3xk
n
H 1: Pk xk - L (12.44)
k
H H(x, p, t) (12.45)
- 244 -
(12.46)
6H (12.47)
6H (12.48)
.QlL
xk k ~
1, 2, ... I n (12.49 )
oPk
3L .QlL
k 1, 2, ... , n (12.50)
3xk ilxk
Pk k. 1, 2, ... I n (12.51 )
k 1, 2, ... , n (12.52)
- 245 -
r
Q.!L
oPk
k 1, 2, •.. I n (12.53)
Q.!L
Pk
(lxk
Let us recall that the n first equations (12.53) result from the
transformation of Legendre and from the definition of the
Hamiltonian, whereas the n following are the transcription of the
laws of dynamics which govern motion.
r
; Q.!L
oPk
k 1, 2, ... , n (12.54 )
Q.!L ~
Pk
oXk OXk
In the simplest and most common case where the kinetic energy is
reduced to the positive definite quadratic form of the generalized
velocities xk, the Hamiltonian has the value
H T + V (12.55 )
- 246 -
When the kinetic and potential energjes have the values (10.2) and
(10.3) of chapter 10 respectively, the Lagrangian becomes
"+
On the other hand the generalized momenta (12.42) are given by the
expression
"+
P [M] x (12.57 )
"+ "+
H P X - L P X
(12.58 )
( 12 . 59)
- [K] ;; - [el x
In order to express the equations (12.59) in matrix form, it is
preferable to avoid inversion of the mass matrix. One writes thus
"+
[Ml X = P
{ (12.60)
+ [el x =- [Kl x
~
p
- 247 -
. .
Using P and X on the one hand, and p and on the other, one x
can then make some new vectors having 2n components, so as to put
the preceding equations in the form
then by differentiation
.. }
The system (12.61) takes the form
[
[0)
[M)
{
: :l{l [: : -:::1 ;
.. (12.64)
One can see that by expanding the system (12.64), one obtains the
two systems of n equations
.
[H) : [M) x
{ . (12.65)
[M) x + [C) x - [K] x
- 248 -
(12.66 )
(1267)
[D]
[[0] [M] ]
(12.68 )
[M] [e]
[0]]
[G]
[ [M]
[0] [K]
(12.69)
1
yT {xT xT}
(12.70)
;T {~T ~1'}
- 249 -
Like the matrices of order n ([M] , [e] and [K]) , the matrices of
order 2n ([0] and [G]) are square, real and symmetric.
Moreover, the mass matrix [M] being always positive definite, the
matrix [0] is always invertible, its determinant being equal,
apart from the sign, to the square of that of [M]
-+
y [B] q (12.74)
The change of basis matrix [B] is here square, with constant but
complex coefficients, and of dimension 2n. There are also 2n
decoupled coordinates qi. By differenti.ahon one obtains
y [B] q (12.75)
- 250-
The procedure of section 11.3 allows one to assert that there exists
a matrix [B] such that the products
(12.79)
(12.80)
(12.81 )
[Mrl[C)
[F] = [ (12.82)
- lIJ
- 251 -
The search for the eigenvalues 6p which form the diagonal matrix
[ill is made in the usual way by solution of the characteristic
equation
o I (12.83)
= 0 (12.84)
We have assumed (page 241) that all the roots are complex conjugates
6p =
{
6*
P
= Ap - (12.85)
(12.86)
fDOJ q + rGoJ
.
q o (12.87)
- 252 -
q + ['D°-] 1 [GO] q o -+
(12.88 )
Since
( 12 .89)
it finally gives
(12.90)
p 1, 2, ... , 2 n (12.91 )
Y [B] q
(12.93 )
- 253 -
.
y (12.94)
This results in
(12.96)
0* (12.97)
p
.
y
n.. 0" -o*t
[ [Bp Qp e- pt + B~ Qp +n e p 1 (12.98 )
p
and consequently
y (12.100)
- 254 -
{.
Bp {a ep ejljl.ep} .e 1, 2, • • OJ 2 n
(12.101 )
_1
{
Qp - 2 Yp ejlpp
(12.102)
Q* = 12 Yp e-jyP
p
(12.103)
1, 2, ... , 2 n (12.104)
or
.
y
n
[ (~Ip Yp e
_~ t
p cos(wpt-IjIlp-lpp)}
p
i = .e - n with 1, 2, ... , n
the equation of motion for the dissipative free state with complex
aedes becomes finally
~ n _~ t
x [(!lip xp e p cos(wpt-IjIip-lpp)} (12.105)
p
- 255 -
On the ot.her hand, one calls the pure number defined as follows,
the modal damping factor or relative modal damping
~p
~p (12.106)
vectors
.
a basis fOJ: the phafie space, of di.mension
Bp constitute another basis for this space.
2 n . The complex modal
2n
l: "Yp Bp *0
. ( 12.107)
p
- 256
where t:he 1p are some ,ubi trary complex constants. The orthogo-
nality property of the modal vectors, necessary for the demonstra-
tion of (12.107), is also fulfilled in the case of a dissipative
system. In effect, the diagonalization of [0] and [G] has led to
the relations (12.77) and (12.78)
d~ 1
r
0
(12.108)
= 0 d~rl
By considering this term by term, one deduces from it the equalities
(5[5 heing Kronecker's delta) :
(12.109)
(12.111 )
.
Xo
x(O) Vo
Yo tl (12.112)
Yo
. ( 12.113)
- 258 -
The term,; of the sum are all zero, with the exception of those of
index r, that is to say
and cons<:quently
(12.114)
Q ~.L ~T[Dl Yo
r d" r
r
b* p 1, 2, ... , n (12.115 )
P
..B*
P
and
By setting moreover
- 259 -
(12.118)
n
~ [{~Qp Y~pe-Apt cos(wpt-~Rp-$Op)} (12.119 )
p
One could have established this result more quickly using (12.114),
once the coefficients Qp were determined. In effect, it was then
possible to adopt directly the notation of equation (12.102).
n
x [{~ip xope- Apt cos(wpt-$ip-~OP)} (12.120)
p
(12.121 )
- 260 -
By means of the
r 1~
exponential
1
2
1
Y'
Y'
or
Or
ejlj)Or
e-jlj)Or
(12.123 )
(12.124 )
This gives finally, by grouping the terms and by laming back to the
harmonic functions
y (12.125 )
x
~
(12.126 )
[01 y+ [GI y o
.
with (12.127)
.. -0 t
Y - Ap e p. ( 12.128)
..o
By simplifying this equation using the non-zero quantity e-opt
and by adopting the convention of (12.80)
- 262 -
then by seeking the existence condition for solutions which are not
all zero, one again finds the characteristic equation (12.83)
[U] r [0]
l[U] [M]
LIJ
[ex] [C]
1 (12.112)
[U] Y + Y
.o (12.133)
..
y
(12.136 )
The eigenvectors are given by the 2n homogeneous relations
[[u]-wprrJ]Bp 0
- 264 -
X,
(13.1)
..
In order to calculate the potential energy, let us consider any
displacement 00' of the mass m (figure 13.2).
X,
- 266 -
(13.3)
v (13.4)
s = 1, 2 (13.5)
That being the case, one derives the stiffness matrix from it easily
1 t
w =- [ c. l>.e~ (13.8)
2 J J
The partial derivatives have the same form as before, that is to say
s = 1, 2 (13.9)
The damping matrix therefore has the same form as that of the
stiffness matrix
(13 .12)
· 268 -
-+
Let liS r"c."ll that the vector y is defined by
yT
Finally, the motion of the mass is described by equRtion (12.105)
(13.15)
X 1(0) Xo et o
~Ip =
Xo
Xp - - - - and tg 'Pp (13.19 )
cos 'Pp
Xo(cos I\J p - ~
{
X2(0) ~p
wp sin I\J p )
m xz (0) (13,21 )
(13.22)
These equations, which are of the parametric type, show that the
trajectory of the mass COrIP;;ponding to a nat.ural mode is an
elliptical spiral described in t.he plane 0 Xl x2 of thf' sye;1:cm.
~T x =0
o (13.23)
(11,24)
- 271
o
(13.25 )
r t;
t'po +
tOO +
po
'I' lL
,'(If
wp
lL
wp
'I
'I"
1, 21
(13.26 )
t'P
x,X2 I t ttl
P
(13.27)
X1 (0) Xo and o
X2 (0) ~p Xo and o
(13.28 )
The two initial velocities being zero, it is a matter this time of a
simple relea.se of the mass, from a specific point in the plane
X1 X2 . The equations (13.72) of the conserved natural mode become,
for the conservative system.
( 13 . 29)
and
- 273 -
~2 0 =) 1 + ~1 ~2 o
so that also
~1 . ~2 = - 1 (13.31 )
m ~ 3 kg
kl 700 N/m k2 1100 N/m k3 1300 N/m
"l 19 • (X2 152 • "3 262 0
Cl 15 kg/s C2 21 kg/s C3 13 kg/s
F..l 28 0 l':2 160 0 ~3 300 0
with these values, the mass, stiffness, and damping matrices become
respectively
[M] [ 30 0]
3
[1509 - 61.32]
[C] [
33.49 - 6.161] (13.32)
[K] = _ 61.32 1591 - 6.161 15.51
Tj::'
- 2.054 502.8
- 20 .44 ]
5.171 - 20.44 530.5
(13.33)
[F] o o o0
- 1 o
- 274
r:
The solutions of the ch~racteristic equation ( 12.83) have the values
2350 + 22.62
53
~
= 2.350
5.817 + j 21.93
22.62 ~l' (11.34)
5, = 5.817 ? 1.93 ~z'
(:: + Xz e
-S.817t
cos(21.93t
~1 = 0.1033 0.?S63
_1_
1.0054
cos 'Pl
- 275 -
8' ,~ 74.66 0
8",=-17.19 0
1\2
IP2 = Arc tg .Llli 0.2592 rr/2 - 1.3116
W2 21. 93
_1_
1.0346
cos IP2
x '(0) Xo Xl (0) 0
e'2 - 12.55 0
8; ~ 72.88 0
[M] x + [K]
..x ..o
The mass and stiffness matrices remain defined by the relations
( 13.2) and (13.6) respectively. With the numerical values chosen,
one obtains the following eigenvalues
r
W1 22.18
52 W2 23.27 (13.39 )
53 - j W1 - j 22.18
5, W2 23.27
Since t.he modes are real, the changes of bn~i s matrix [B] , of
order 2 n , is written
[B]
11.78 e- jrr / 2
0.5310
43.82 e jrr / 2
- 1.883
11 .78 e
0.5310
jrr/2
- 1.833
""]
41.82 :-J1I/2
(13.40)
{ X1
X2
X1 cos(22.18 t
0.5310 X1 cos(22.18 t
'I'll +
Ip II
X2 cos(23.27 t
1.883 X2 cos(23.27 t
'1'2)
'1'2)
(13.41 )
X1 (0) Xo o
X2 (0) 0.5310 Xo o
7.78
cos (22.18 t)
(13.42 )
0.5310 cos (22.18 t)
X2 0.5310 Xl
which makes an angle with the axis Xl which has the value
xj{O) Xo Xl (0) o
{
X2 (0) - 1.883 Xo X2 (0) o
cos (2:1.27 t)
(13.4:: )
X2/ XO - 1.883 cos (23.27 t)
-------7;t."---....-'------x,/x,
mode 2
In this chapter, we have s1-udied the \"'havi ,)lIr "f it coplanar system
consisting of a point lOaf,S attached to any number of springs and
viscous resistances (di screte 1 inear elements). Such" system has
two degrees of freedom, referred t.o by x 1 and xl . The 1",·";,,113 of
t.his study can be summarized and commented upon as follows.
14.1 Introduction
systems with real modes, which satisfy the Caughey condition and
conservative systems which are specific cases;
,;ystems with complex modes (general case).
-<
[M] X+ [Cj x + [K] X f(t)
x' [B] q
"t
tM'~ q + rc'~ q , tK'~ q (14.1)
-<
f' (t) (14.2)
-<
one defines the vector f'(t) of modal forces applied to the system.
(14.3)
.L f'(t.) (14.4)
m'
p
- 7.83 -
qp = -1-
m~ wp
It 0
fO(t-u} e -A pu sin wpu du
p
p 1, 2, .. , n (14.5)
One can then relurn tu the initial coordinates by means of the modal
matrix
..
x [B] q
( 14.6)
f~(t} (14.7)
.x 1:n -1 ..Il
p m~ p
(1-
wp
it 0
fO (t-u) e -ApU sin w u du +
p p
(14.8)
- 284 -
0
p 1, :?r ... f n
k'
lJJo p
J?
m'
t'
.
x [n .L"~ (--
p m~
1
p 100 P
It 0
fp'(t-Il) Slll '"opu du +
(14.10)
The change of basis (12.74) dnd (12.75) allows one to decouple the
system above which becomes
W~ q + Wl q (14.12)
The matrix [B] being complex, the modal forces are also. Let us
call P"(t) the vector of modal forces
.P'(t) (14.13 )
(14.14)
q + rt.]
(14.15 )
.L P"(t) p 1, 2, ... , 2 n
d' P
p
qp 1
--
d"
P
it 0
P"(t-u) e -6 Pu du
P
(14.16)
~p+n 5'
P
?86 --
(14.17)
and consequelitly
Let us come back to the in1 tial coordinates by means of the modal
matrix [B]
[B] q
(14.19)
-+
Bp ~. Wep e -J<VQp}
d:' D'
{
d p = Dp \ e-
jap (14.20)
One can now introduce (11.171 and (14.18) into (14.19), taking
account of (14.20). By writing z =t-u, in order to simplify things,
-+
th" Q-th cnmponent of the solution y is given by the expression,
with .e = 1 i 2 f ••• I 2 n I
- 287 -
y,e
(14.21 )
-+
y 1:n {f3,ep -2DO
p P
it
0
(14.22)
-+
x 1:n
P
lP L
{II'
DO
P
it
0
(14.23)
...
x
(14.24 )
Let us assume that the forces are applied to the points where the
measurements are made, in accordance with the usual practice. The
number of degrees of freedom n of the sub-divided system is then
equal to the product of the number of points of measurement m by
the number of generalized coordinates r chosen for each of these
points
n =m. r (14.25)
..
[0] y + [G] y
.PIt)
Let us take the Laplace transform of the two sides by assuming the
initial conditions are all zero.
[2 (~)
.
1 Y(z) P(s) (14.29)
(14.30)
2t1
IT (s - 6Q) o (14.31 )
~
As before, tlve eigenvectors are ubI ain"a by Rol ving the homogeneous
sy,;h'w
o (14."32)
~ (14.33 )
dO
p
- 291 -
[Z (s)]a
[H' (s)] ---- (14.34)
I Z (s) I
[Z (5)]a
[H' (s)] (14.35)
2n
A 1l (s-6Q)
Q
[Z(s=op)]a
(14.37)
2n
A Tl (Op-OQ)
Q;tp
[0] (14.39)
- 292 -
-+
[Z(s=5 p )] Z~ (S=5 p ) o (14.40)
Finally, let us also point out that the matrj ces [Z (s) I and [H' (s) ]
are symmetrical since the matrices [D] and [G] are.
We are now going to express the matrix of transfer functions [H' (5)J
independently of the matrices [0] and [G] which are not known in the
present case. In order to do that, let us expand the vector y(t)
-+
in the modal basis formed from the vectors Bp . Equation (12.107)
allows one to write
(14.41)
Y(s) (14.42)
2n 2n -+
s L rp(s) [D] Bp + L rp(s) [G] Bp P(s)
p P
- 293 -
2n -+ 2n -+
s l: rp(s) Bi[D] Bp + l: rp(s) ~T[G]
r Bp ~T P(s)
r
p p
~i ~(s)
(14.44)
s d; + g;
which becomes, by using the relation (14.33)
~Tr P(s)
(14.45)
Taking account of the last result, relation (14.42) takes the form
Y(s) (14.46)
-+
Y(s) (14.47 )
- 294 -
..xes)
It is possible to express the last n components of yes) , that is
to say the vector , in the form analogous to (14.47). Let us
designate the vector form of the last n components of Bp by bp .
.. .
It gives
n bpT f(s) bp
xes) ,.
L(dO(S-Ii)
p p p ( 14.48)
..
This relation gives the response of the system to any excitation
fIt) in the Laplace domain.
b* b*
+ pk p )
d~*(s - Ii~) (14.49)
The vector
.Xk(s) defined by (14.49) is thus the kth column
vector of the matrix of transfer functions [H(s)] , the latter
consisting of the lower right sub-matrix of [H' (s) 1 and having
dimensions n x n. Let us then designate the ith component of
- 295 -
+
Xk(s) by Hik(s) . This represents the transfer function between
the generalized coordinates for rows i and k
+ (14.50)
~ ( 14.51 )
dO
p
p p'
n R· k R.
[ (_i_ + ---..!.lL..) (14.52)
s - 6 s - 6'
P P p
n [R P ] [R P ']
[H(s) ] [ (--+ --) (14.53)
s - 6 s - 6'p
p P
The comparison of the relations (14.53) and (14.36) shows that the
matrices [RP ] consist of the lower right sub-matrices of the
matrices [R'P]. The terms Rlk are therefore the residues at the pole
6p and are equal~ apart from a factor, to the components bpi of
the eigenvector bp .
The matrix [H' (s)] being symmetrical, the matrix [H(s)] is also. On
the other hand, for a value s = ~P , all the columns of [H(s)]
are proportional to the eigenvector bp . As a result, knowledge of a
single line or of a single column of [H(s)] is sufficient to
+
determine all of the n eigenvectors bp ' taking into account the
results (14.36) and (14.37).
- 296 -
Re(H(w) 1m (H (w)
Re (H (s» 1m (H(s) 3'
(a) (b)
o~ ______ _________
~ o~ ____ ~~ ________
Re (s) ~ i. I Re (s) ~ A
We shall not undertake the study of this procedure here, nor that of
the algorithms which are associated with it, for our objective is
limited to the presentation of the principles of experimental modal
analysis. We shall confine ourselves to point out that the operator
selects the number of modes and their approximate frequencies, for a
specific range of frequencies and on the basis of a visual
examina tion of one or more of the fr equency responses, Then some
appropriate algorithms allow one to find a new approximation for the
modal frequencies as well as a first approximation for t.he modal
dampings. Then curve-fitting techniques allow one to determine the
eigenvalues and vectors, In this way, for each frequency response
Hik(w) of a system having n degrees of freedom, it is necessary
to adjust 4 n + 2 parameters, to know
- 298 -
Once the various modal parameters are determined in this way, the
behaviour of the structure can be describe in a convenient way.
299 -
BIBLIOGRAPHY
I N0 E X
The numbers which follow each entry refer to the corresponding pages in
the book.
When several numbers are given, the main reference(s) is (are) indicated
by bold type.
When it helps one to understand the terms in the Index, the nature of
the system is indicated by means of the following abbreviations :
02 oscillator with two degrees of freedom
OG generalized oscillator with n degrees of freedom
Proper Names
Fourier
- series, 2, 80, 84, 115
- integral, 115
Frahm, damper, 138 156, 162, 166, 167
Gibbs, phenomenon, 96
Baailton
- equations, 242, 245, 246, 261
Relmloltz, resonator, 22
Rayleigh
- quotient, 204, 207, 222
- 304 -
Acceleration (s)
- resonance, 62, 63
AcD.ittance
AIIplitude
- as a function of frequency, 49
- resonance, 51
Analysis
- harmonic, 80
Basis
Beaa
mass concentrated along, 145, 218
natural angular frequenciers of a continuous beam, 221
Beats
- in the free state (02), 153, 154
Circle
Coefficient (s)
- complex Fourier, 85
- damping,
- Fourier, 80, 94
- inertia, 182
Compression, alternating, 71
Condition(s)
Constant(s)
Constraints
- additional, 190
- hulonomic, 180
Coordinate(s)
- cartesian, 181
- modal, 193
Core (or core matrix of a system), 184, 194, 209, 250, 273
Coupling,
inertial, 137
resistive, 137
DaJlper
- Lanchester' s, 169
Damping
- coefficient of,
- proportional, 235
- modal damping factor (relative modal damping, OG), 237, 255, 274
Diagra.
Differentiation
- complex, 57, 86
- cord, 214
- generalized, 172
- imposed, 8, 133
- initial,
J08 -
Electrical analogue
force-voltage, 129
Element(5)
- of a vehicle suspenSIon, 41
Energy
- conservation of, 11
- dissipative oscillator, 35
- electromagnetic, 132
- electrostatic, 132
- lost by oscillator, 37
Envelope
- displacement, 32, 36
Equation(s), relation(s)
- complex differential, 57
- Euler, 84
Excitation
- rectangular, periodic, 90
Factor
- quality, 53
Fatigue of materials,
Force(s)
- random,
- complex, 56, 85
- coupling, 137
- elastic, 7, 55
- 310 -
- generalized, 137
- harmonic, 6, 132
- impulse, 6, 105
- inertia, 7, 54
- periodic, 6, 49, 80
- static, 19, 51
Fo:tllS,
Frequencies, angular
- circle of (02), 148, 152
Function(s)
- complex exponential, 84
- even, 81, 90
- Hamiltonian, 245
- hyperbolic, 32
Generator
- current, 1.32
- tension, 133
- velocity, 133
Graph
- of Nyquist, 64, 65
IJIPeClance(s)
- complex, 57
- matrix, operational (OG), 289
- mechanical, 116
- operational, 101
IlIPlllse
Independence, linear, (of the p.igen- and modal vectors), 143, 199,255
Inertia
- coefficients of, 138, 182
Integral
- of convolution, 102, 283
- of Duhamel, 104
- of Fourier, 115
Isentropic exponent, 24
Isolation of a .ade, 203, 259, 260, 268, 274, 276, 277, 278
llass
- at the end of a wire, 13
- generalized, 182
- matrix, 138, 172, 183, 209, 273
- modal, 200
- on a massless cord, 214
- rigid, 5
313 -
- rigid,
Matrices
- modal, 199
Recbanics
- Lagrangian, 243
- fundamental, 191
- isolation of, 203, 259, 260, 268, 274, 276, 277, 278
- of conservative system (02), 139, 142, 144, 145
Ro.ent of inertia, 20
Orthogonality
Oscillator
~ elementary linear,
~ elementary non~linear,
Penclullm
- of conservative oscillator, 10
- of dissipative oscillator, 33
Phase(s)
- as function of frequency, 49
- opposition, 10, 54
- resonance, 54
Phase shift(s)
Phenomenon of Gibbs, 96
Plane
- phase, 38, 39
Power
- 316 -
- active, 60
- reactive, 60
- relative, 61
Rea1ease (initial),
Resistance
- electric, 129, 131, 161
Resonator of Helaholtz, 22
Response
- complex frequency, 51, 56, 58, 59, 64, 67, 86, 121, 296
- impulse, 105, 106, 112, 113
Rheological aodel, 44
Shaft
Solution(s)
Source of vibrations, 4
Space
- configuration, 199
- Euclidian, 264
Spiral
- of displacement, 32
- of phase plane, 39
State
Step
Stiffness
- modal, 200
- of system, 5, 14, 58, 227
- reciprocal, 179
Structure
- behaviour of J 298
- dynamic characteristics of, 288
- pendulum, 20
- semi-definite, 199
Test(s)
- fatigue, 69, 93
- free state, 75
TheoreJI
- Clapeyron, 179
- Maxwell-Betti, 179
- spectral, 194
Transformation
- Carson-Laplace, 100
Vectors
- 320 .
Velocities
- angular, 9, 68
- resonance, 63
- rotation, 71, 75
SYMBOL LIST
We have used latin and greek letters only and we have resorted to the
least possible number of indices. Consequently, it is inevitable that
certain symbols have several meanings. Thus, for example, T represent.s
the kinet.ic energy of a system, the tension in a wire or the period of an
oscillating quantity. However, confusion is highly unlikely.
General symbols
It. is useful to define the meaning, in this book, of several more general
symbols.
- 322 -
transposed vectur of
..v
II vII
. magnitude of the vector
.
v
N complex number
N* complex conjugate of N
Re N real part of the complex number N
Tm N imaginary part of the complex nllmber N
Note: complex numbers are no longer underlined from section 12.4,
page 189
Latin alphabet
A area of a section
- 323 -
A complex constant
[A] core matrix (OGA, order n)
d~ complex term of the pth row of the diagonal matrix ~ DO~ (d~ ,same
modal stiffness of the pth natural mode (k r , same but rth mode)
L self-inductance
L Lagrange function (or Lagrangian), (= T-V)
p pressure
R gas constant
R radius of a circle (of a cylinder, of a pulley, etc.)
R electric resistance
R(s) radius of convergence of a Laplace transform
R(t) radius of the phase plane spiral
Rayleigh quotient
P residue at the pole op
Rik
[~] matrix of the residues at the pole op (OGC, order n)
[R'P] expanded matrix of the residues at the pole op (OGC, order 2n)
s Laplace variable
[5 I symmetric matrix
t time
u electric tension
- 329 -
V volume
V amplitude of an harmonic velocity
V potential energy of an oscillator (of a system)
Vo initial velocity
V. potential energy transmitted to an oscillator by a unit-step force
(indicial response)
vector of initial velocities (OG, order n)
right-hand side
right-hand side
complex displacement
initial displacement
alnplitudes of the harmonic displacements of an oscillator with 2
static displacement
displacement
X' reference amplitude of the mode Xr(t) caused by the initial
. .
conditions Xo ' Vo (aGe)
displacement
.
XIs) vector of Laplace transforms of the displacements (OG, order nl
- 331 -
Z complex impedance
~a
Z column vector of the adjoint matrix [Z(S=6 p )], (OGe, order 2n)
k
[Z(5)] operational impedance matrix (OGe, order 2n)
Greek alphabet
.
Pp
the pth natural mode), (P r ,
. .
pth natural mode shape (vector of the relative amplitudes of
~s' the same but rth and 5th
modes)
angle, in the phase plane, between the tangent to the spiral and the
6p pth eigenvalue
damping coefficient
modal damping coefficient of the pth natural mode
logarithmic decrement
diagonal modal damping matrix
'P2 of freedom
phase shift of the nth harmonic of a periodic displacement
'Por
. ..
phase shift of the mode ~r(t) stimulated by the initial conditions
vo ' Xo (OGC)
magnetic flux