Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adv Eng Mater - 2023 - Duan
Adv Eng Mater - 2023 - Duan
www.aem-journal.com
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201861 2201861 (1 of 8) © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH
15272648, 2023, 14, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202201861 by GEBZE TEKNIK UNIVERSITESI, Wiley Online Library on [15/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.aem-journal.com
metasurface inspired by moth-eye structure[27] to successfully that the magnetism of the alloy mainly depends on its composi-
achieve a significant enhancement of the absorbing perfor- tion,[2,11,29] and the atomic composition determines the magnetic
mance. In addition, the frequency-selective surface consists of moment and other properties of the alloy. Second, processes
the prepared periodic hexagonal aluminum structural unit that such as annealing will not only change the magnetism of the
has excellent low-IR emission properties, while enabling material, but also impact on the dielectric constant of the mate-
selective transmission and absorption enhancement of radar rial,[30,31] which might bring more uncertainty to the absorption
waves. This work provides a new feasible solution for radar/ performance. Therefore, introducing artificial structure into the
IR-compatible stealth and demonstrates the outstanding surface of absorbing coating is more controllable to regulate the
application prospects of frequency-selective surfaces in this absorbing performance.
field. Figure 1b shows the RL of HEA absorbing coatings with etch-
ing 1 and 3 mm hexagonal structures on their surface. The slight
difference in thickness and filling ratio of 4# and 5# coatings
2. Results and Discussion because of the different preparation batches leads to a slight dif-
2.1. Radar Stealth Performance ference in the frequency of absorption peaks. The results show
that after structure etching, the absorption peak of the coating
As a magnetic absorbent, HEA exhibits excellent microwave- increases and moves to higher frequency, and the effective
absorbing properties in the coatings. As shown in Figure 1a, absorption bandwidth is also improved. Among them, the RL
the filling ratios of 1#, 2#, and 3# coatings are 1.5:1, 1:1, and of 4# increases from 13 to 42 dB after etching 1 mm struc-
0.5:1, respectively. The absorption performance of the coatings ture. Proper coating structure design can significantly improve
increases and then decreases with the increase of frequency. the electromagnetic wave absorption capacity. According to the
The matching frequency and absorption peak of the coating equivalent LC circuit[32]
are very sensitive to many factors according to the theoretical for- pffiffiffiffiffiffi
mula of quarter wavelength.[28] f 0 ¼ 1=2π LC (2)
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
f m ¼ nc=4d jεr jjμr jðn ¼ 1, 3, 5, 7 : : : Þ (1) where f0 is the resonant frequency, L is the equivalent induc-
tance, and C is the equivalent capacitance. The existence of this
where fm is the matching frequency, d is the matching thickness, hexagonal periodic structure unit increases the equivalent capac-
εr and μr are the relative permittivity and permeability of the coat- itance and reduces the equivalent inductance. Since the main
ing, and c is the speed of light in vacuum. Increasing the filling components of the absorbing coating are resin and HEA powder,
ratio of absorbent in the coating will increase εr and μr at the it is difficult for electrons to move in the resin. Therefore, the
same time in terms of the effective medium theory,[27] so as capacitance formed between adjacent hexagonal structures under
to move the matching frequency to low frequency. It also explains alternating electromagnetic field is weaker, and the change of
the improvement of reflection loss (RL) when the filling ratio equivalent inductance L promotes the movement of matching
increases from 0.5:1 to 1:1. However, when the content of absor- frequency to high frequency.
bent continues to increase, the dielectric constant will further Etching the surface is to divide the originally complete coating
increase, which will make it far away from the frequency range into many independent absorption units. These millimeter units
of optimal impedance matching of the coating, resulting in the have periodic dielectric constant and permeability, which can
decline of microwave absorption performance. achieve better impedance matching with free space. In addition,
For magnetic materials such as HEAs, it is difficult to realize the hexagonal periodic units are also excellent antireflection
desired microwave-absorbing properties of the coating only rely- structures, which can scatter and strongly couple with the
ing on its intrinsic characteristic. First, quantum theory explains incident microwave.[27] Therefore, this low-reflection structure
Figure 1. Reflection loss of HEA absorbing coatings with different a) filling ratios and b) etched structures.
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201861 2201861 (2 of 8) © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH
15272648, 2023, 14, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202201861 by GEBZE TEKNIK UNIVERSITESI, Wiley Online Library on [15/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.aem-journal.com
can promote the microwave-absorbing coating to capture more and those opposite distributions of two field intensity also appear
electromagnetic waves for consumption, thus enhancing its in the slab absorber. It can be found from Figure 3c that for the
RL ability. current vector, the existence of the hexagonal structure limits its
To deeply understand the influence mechanism of hexagonal horizontal orientation, so that the current cannot cross the
periodic structure on the microwave absorption performance, groove and only pass through the center of the structure to form
HFSS software was used for simulation. Figure 2a–d shows a ring current, which can enhance its loss capacity. The volume
the simulated HFSS model and calculated RL. It can be seen that loss density diagram, as shown in Figure 3d, shows that the peri-
with the reduction of structure size, the absorption peak gradu- odic structure can effectively improve the loss capacity of the
ally moves to higher frequency; meanwhile, the maximum RL coating, and that phenomenon is more obvious when the struc-
and effective absorption bandwidth are increased. Although ture size is smaller.
there is a certain deviation between the experimental and simu-
lation results, the same change trend between them proves the 2.2. Infrared Stealth Performance
reliability of the results.
Figure 3 shows the electric field, magnetic field, current The IR emissivity of the metasurface is related to the area pro-
vector, and volume loss density of the HEA coating calculated portion of different kinds of materials. Under the certain temper-
from the HFSS simulation. For the slab coating without etching ature, the ratio of the radiant energy density of the object to that
structure, the electric field and magnetic field of electromagnetic
of the blackbody can be defined as the emissivity of the object
wave uniformly distribute on the coating surface, and the current
surface. Assuming that the surface energy field is uniformly
vector direction is basically the same. Therefore, the bulk loss
distributed, if the emissivity of the two materials in the compos-
density presents the uniform distribution in the whole coating.
ite is ε1 and ε2, and the ratio of their area is R1 and R2, respec-
It is worth noting that, with the decrease of structure size, the
tively, the average emissivity of the composite can be calculated
strength of electric field and magnetic field has been improved,
as follows.[25,33,34]
as shown in Figure 3a,b. In addition, in the periodic structure
unit, the electric field intensity in the central area is stronger,
while the magnetic field intensity in the edge area is stronger, εtotal ¼ ε1 R1 þ ε2 R2 (3)
Figure 2. a) Slab, b) 1 mm and c) 3 mm models, and d) reflection loss of HEA coatings with different structures simulated by HFSS software.
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201861 2201861 (3 of 8) © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH
15272648, 2023, 14, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202201861 by GEBZE TEKNIK UNIVERSITESI, Wiley Online Library on [15/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.aem-journal.com
Figure 3. a) Electric field, b) magnetic field, c) current vector, and d) volume loss density of HEA coatings with different structures simulated by
HFSS software.
In this work, the measured IR emissivity of aluminum foil and structure, the calculated IR emissivity of IR stealth layer can
PC film is 0.05 (ε1) and 0.99 (ε2), respectively. When the width of be obtained by Equation (3). It can be deduced from the
laser etching is 0.1 times of the side length of hexagonal periodic hexagonal area formula that the ratio of the aluminum foil area
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201861 2201861 (4 of 8) © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH
15272648, 2023, 14, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202201861 by GEBZE TEKNIK UNIVERSITESI, Wiley Online Library on [15/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.aem-journal.com
Figure 5. a) 0.6 mm, b) 0.9 mm, c) 1.2 mm, d) 1.5 mm, and e) 1.8 mm hexagonal structure of infrared stealth layer after 100 times magnification.
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201861 2201861 (5 of 8) © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH
15272648, 2023, 14, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202201861 by GEBZE TEKNIK UNIVERSITESI, Wiley Online Library on [15/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.aem-journal.com
Figure 6. Reflection loss of HEA absorbing coating with filling ratio of a) 1.5:1, b) 1:1, and c) 0.5:1 loaded with infrared stealth layer with different
structure size.
structure has a certain fit relationship with the coating perfor- periodic hexagonal aluminum unit of the IR layer is equivalent
mance of the bottom layer; the higher the peak frequency of to a series device of inductance and capacitance. In the circuit,
the coating and the larger the scale of the periodic structure the wave with low-frequency passes and the wave with high
are, the more improvement of the microwave absorption frequency is resisted through the inductor, while the capacitor
performance. has the opposite effects on the waves with different frequency.
Figure 7 shows the interaction mechanism of IR stealth layer When the unit size of hexagonal structure gradually increases,
on IR wave and radar wave. From a macropoint of view, the for a single periodic unit, on the one hand, it will increase the
capacitance and enhance its response to the high frequency,
which makes the redshift of the absorption peak at higher fre-
quency more obvious; on the other hand, it will also increase
the inductive reactance and reduce the transmission of electro-
magnetic waves through the IR layer. When they achieve balance,
the best absorption can be achieved.
From the microscopic point of view, there are a large number
of free electrons moving in aluminum foil. When excited by the
electric field in the external electromagnetic wave, these free elec-
trons will oscillate. This mechanism is similar to the electric
dipole polarization. The electromagnetic wave generated by free
electron oscillation will interfere with the transmitted electro-
magnetic wave in the incident direction, so as to reduce the effect
of the underlying microwave absorbing coating. In a single
Figure 7. Schematic diagram of action mechanism of infrared stealth layer periodic unit, the effects of low-frequency and high-frequency
(hexagonal periodic structure Al film) on infrared and radar waves. electromagnetic fields on free electrons are different. When
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201861 2201861 (6 of 8) © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH
15272648, 2023, 14, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202201861 by GEBZE TEKNIK UNIVERSITESI, Wiley Online Library on [15/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.aem-journal.com
Figure 8. Reflection loss of HEA coatings etched a) 3 mm and b) 1 mm hexagonal structures after coating with infrared stealth layer.
the low-frequency electromagnetic wave is incident, the oscilla- is increased to 2.8 GHz, and the absorption peak is increased
tion intensity of the free electron is weak. When it moves to the from 13 to 42 dB. The IR emissivity of the samples with hex-
edge of the periodic unit, the electron may remain stationary for a agonal structure of IR stealth layer of 0.9–1.8 mm is lower than
long time under the excitation of the low-frequency electric field; 0.2, which is a promising low IR emission material. In addition,
when the free electron is excited by the high-frequency electric the low IR-emitting layer has an obvious enhancement effect on
field, this oscillation will be very strong, which will hinder the radar wave absorption performance of the double-layer struc-
the transmission of high-frequency electromagnetic wave. ture. The metasurface of this periodic unit tends to affect the
Therefore, this periodic structure unit will have a greater impact absorption performance of high frequency, but has a weak influ-
on the absorption capacity of high-frequency waves. In addition, ence on the absorption of low frequency. There is a certain fit
when the unit size of the periodic structure becomes larger, the relationship between the size of the periodic structure and the
free electrons are less likely to move to the edge, which will have a coating performance of the bottom layer. The higher the fre-
greater impact on the transmitted electromagnetic wave, so as to quency of the peak of the coating and the larger the scale of
reduce the RL of the double-layer structure. the periodic structure, the more obvious the improvement
Figure 8 shows the change of RL of HEA coatings (filling ratio of the microwave absorption performance. Among them, when
of 1:1) with laser etching structures and compositing IR stealth the filling ratio of 0.5:1 coating composite IR stealth layer absorp-
layer. With the increase of unit size of the IR layer, the absorption tion performance was significantly improved from 7 to 38 dB.
peak frequency of the double-layer structure gradually moves to
low frequency. It is worth noting that the absorption peak after
etching 1 mm structure is higher, but the absorption peak
decreases slightly after the composite IR layer, while the absorp-
4. Experimental Section
tion peak of the 3 mm structure coating after the composite IR Absorbent and Coating Preparation: To ensure the uniformity of
layer increases to a certain extent, but it is not as obvious as that elements, the spherical FeCoNiMn0.5Si0.5Al0.5 HEA powder used in sub-
after the composite of the original coating. Therefore, this IR sequent experiments was first prepared by melt atomization method and
layer tends to have a more obvious regulation or enhancement then flattened by Union Process 1S experimental stirring mill for 6 h to
effect on the microwave absorption performance of the unstruc- obtain flake HEA powder. The speed of the ball milling was 320 rpm.
1.8 kg absolute ethanol and 5 mm stainless steel grinding balls were
tured microwave absorbing coating at the bottom. added. The absorbing coating was prepared by mixing a specific propor-
tion of absorbent, epoxy resin, and diluent, with even mechanical stirring
at 500 rpm for 2 h, sprayed with compressed air onto the sandblasted alu-
3. Conclusion minum sheets (180 180 4 mm), and cured at 70 °C in a drying oven to
be tested. The HEAs used in this experiment all prepared through atomi-
FeCoNiMn0.5Si0.5Al0.5 HEA absorbing coatings were prepared in zation method were purchased from Beijing Ryubon New Materials
this work, and the structured coating surface and IR stealth layer Technology Co. Ltd.
were prepared by femtosecond laser processing, aiming to obtain Periodic Surface Structure Machining: The periodic structural processing
a low IR emission and high electromagnetic wave absorption on the surface of the absorbing coating and IR stealth layer was carried out
double-layer structure. The results of RL and IR emissivity show by Phros 20 femtosecond laser, where the IR stealth layer was prepared by
compounding 180 180 mm aluminum foil (40 μm thickness) and poly-
that this double-layer structure has excellent compatible stealth carbonate (PC) (125 μm thickness). The rated power of femtosecond laser
performance. The coating with filling ratio of 1:1 can achieve was 20 W, the pulse frequency was set to 50 KHz, the scanning speed was
10 dB effective absorption at 8.7–11.2 GHz. After etching the 100 mm s1, and the IR light with wavelength of 1026 nm was used for
1 mm hexagonal structures, the effective absorption bandwidth etching. The scanning galvanometer and machine tool were controlled
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201861 2201861 (7 of 8) © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH
15272648, 2023, 14, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adem.202201861 by GEBZE TEKNIK UNIVERSITESI, Wiley Online Library on [15/09/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
www.advancedsciencenews.com www.aem-journal.com
by software to process 1 and 3 mm structures on the HEA coating and 0.6, [3] H. Kaur, C. Singh, A. Marwaha, S. B. Narang, R. Jotania, S. R. Mishra,
0.9, 1.2, 1.5, and 1.8 mm structures on the IR stealth layer. Y. Bai, K. C. J. Raju, D. Singh, M. Ghimire, P. Dhruv, A. S. B. Sombra, J.
HFSS Simulation: The height of the model was approximately set as Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 14995.
2 mm, in which the height of the upper hexagonal structure was [4] C. Dai, T. Zhao, C. Du, Z. Liu, D. Zhang, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020,
0.8 mm, the height of the HEA structure was 1.2 mm, and the width of 46, 64.
the groove between adjacent hexagonal structures was 1/10 of the side [5] C. Shang, E. Axinte, J. Sun, X. Li, P. Li, J. Du, P. Qiao, Y. Wang, Mater.
length. A cuboid (2 mm thickness) was placed under the coating model,
Des. 2017, 117, 193.
and the substrate material as Al was set to realize the total reflection. An
[6] Q. Zhang, H. Xu, X. H. Tan, X. L. Hou, S. W. Wu, G. S. Tan, L. Y. Yu,
air chamber with appropriate height was constructed to set the floquet
excitation mode and the master–slave boundary. The simulation was car- J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 693, 1061.
ried out at 10 GHz. The electromagnetic parameters of the material used [7] J.-W. Yeh, S.-K. Chen, S.-J. Lin, J.-Y. Gan, T.-S. Chin, T.-T. Shun,
in the model, such as complex dielectric constant, complex permeability, C.-H. Tsau, S.-Y. Chang, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 299.
dielectric loss angle, and tangent of magnetic loss angle, were measured [8] R. Wei, H. Zhang, H. Wang, C. Chen, T. Wang, F. Li, S. Guan,
according to the coaxial sample with equal filling ratio. T. Zhang, T. Hu, Y. Dong, J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 789, 762.
[9] T. Zuo, M. C. Gao, L. Ouyang, X. Yang, Y. Cheng, R. Feng, S. Chen,
P. K. Liaw, J. A. Hawk, Y. Zhang, Acta Mater. 2017, 130, 10.
Supporting Information [10] W. Feng, Y. Qi, S. Wang, Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 106511.
[11] B. Zhang, Y. Duan, H. Zhang, S. Huang, G. Ma, T. Wang, X. Dong,
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from
N. Jia, J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 68, 124.
the author.
[12] T. T. Zuo, R. B. Li, X. J. Ren, Y. Zhang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2014,
371, 60.
[13] B. Zhang, Y. Duan, Y. Cui, G. Ma, T. Wang, X. Dong, Mater. Des. 2018,
Acknowledgements 149, 173.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of [14] H. Zhu, Q. Li, C. Tao, Y. Hong, Z. Xu, W. Shen, S. Kaur, P. Ghosh,
China (52071053, U1704253, 52103334), the China Postdoctoral Science M. Qiu, Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1805.
Foundation (2020M670748 and 2020M680946), the Fundamental [15] S. Kim, W.-J. Song, S.-H. Kim, Sensors 2016, 16, 1117.
Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT20GF111), and the [16] J. Cai, J. Han, G. Ma, X. Liu, J. Wang, X. Jian, Polym. Chem. 2019, 10,
Open Foundation of China–Belarus Belt and Road Joint Laboratory on 5839.
Electromagnetic Environment Effect (ZBKF2022031001). [17] T. Kim, J.-Y. Bae, N. Lee, H. H. Cho, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29,
1807319.
[18] H. Chu, Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Leng, Carbon 2016, 98, 557.
Conflict of Interest [19] H. Tian, H. Liu, H. Cheng, Chin. Phys. B 2014, 23, 025201.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. [20] Y. Pang, Y. Li, M. Yan, D. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Xu, S. Qu, Opt. Express 2018,
26, 11950.
[21] H. Lv, G. Ji, X. Li, X. Chang, M. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Du, J. Magn.
Author Contributions Magn. Mater. 2015, 374, 225.
[22] Z. Wang, Y. Cheng, Y. Nie, X. Wang, R. Gong, J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116,
Y.D. contributed in conceptualization, validation, resources, project 054905.
administration, and funding acquisition. W.C. contributed in conceptuali- [23] L. Chen, C. Lu, Y. Zhao, Y. Ni, J. Song, Z. Xu, J. Alloys Compd. 2011,
zation, validation, investigation, and writing original draft. H.P. contrib- 509, 8756.
uted in investigation, writing the review and editing, and funding [24] S. Fantucci, V. Serra, Energy Build. 2019, 182, 300.
acquisition. X.S. took care of validation, investigation, and writing the orig-
[25] C. Zhang, X. Wu, C. Huang, J. Peng, C. Ji, J. Yang, Y. Huang, Y. Guo,
inal draft. M.W., J.G., and J.G. conducted investigation.
X. Luo, Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1900063.
[26] Z. Meng, C. Tian, C. Xu, J. Wang, S. Huang, X. Li, B. Yang, Q. Fan,
S. Qu, Infrared Phys. Technol. 2020, 110, 103469.
Data Availability Statement [27] L. Huang, Y. Duan, X. Dai, Y. Zeng, G. Ma, Y. Liu, S. Gao, W. Zhang,
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Small 2019, 15, 1902730.
corresponding author upon reasonable request. [28] H. Lv, X. Liang, G. Ji, H. Zhang, Y. Du, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces
2015, 7, 9776.
[29] A. Generalov, M. M. Otrokov, A. Chikina, K. Kliemt, K. Kummer,
M. Höppner, M. Güttler, S. Seiro, A. Fedorov, S. Schulz,
Keywords S. Danzenbächer, E. V. Chulkov, C. Geibel, C. Laubschat,
high-entropy alloys, metasurfaces, microwave-absorbing coating, radar/ P. Dudin, M. Hoesch, T. Kim, M. Radovic, M. Shi, N. C. Plumb,
infrared wave compatible stealth C. Krellner, D. V. Vyalikh, Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 811.
[30] Y. Duan, X. Wen, B. Zhang, G. Ma, T. Wang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
Received: December 21, 2022 2020, 497, 165947.
Revised: February 14, 2023 [31] Y. Duan, Y. Cui, B. Zhang, G. Ma, T. Wang, J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 773,
Published online: March 21, 2023 194.
[32] J. Zhou, L. Zhang, G. Tuttle, T. Koschny, C. M. Soukoulis, Phys. Rev. B
2006, 73, 041101.
[1] A. Iqbal, F. Shahzad, K. Hantanasirisakul, M. K. Kim, J. Kwon, J. Hong, [33] Z. Gao, C. Xu, X. Tian, J. Wang, C. Tian, B. Yang, S. Qu, Q. Fan, Opt.
H. Kim, D. Kim, Y. Gogotsi, C. M. Koo, Science 2020, 369, 6502. Express 2021, 29, 22108.
[2] Y. Duan, X. Sun, Z. Li, G. Ma, Q. Yu, G. Wei, L. Huang, X. Meng, [34] S. Zhong, W. Jiang, P. Xu, T. Liu, J. Huang, Y. Ma, Appl. Phys. Lett.
H. Pang, X. Liu, J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 900, 163428. 2017, 110, 63502.
Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201861 2201861 (8 of 8) © 2023 Wiley-VCH GmbH