Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TIE36-Fluorescence of Optical Glass
TIE36-Fluorescence of Optical Glass
1. Origin of fluorescence in glass emission. This energy is absorbed as phonons (solid state
vibrations), as heat or occurring as long living phosphores-
Excitation of an optical material at a given wavelength will
cence emission as mentioned earlier.
primarily result in partially absorption and transmittance of
the light. Most part of the absorbed light is transformed
Fluorescence in optical glass is for instance generated by
into vibrational energy, generating heat, but a part of it can
point defects like color centers, which are known to be origi-
be re-emitted as light of different wavelength (luminescence
nated by rare earth elements, and certain impurities [2][3]
processes). Fluorescence is a luminescence process in which
[4]. The observed UV excited fluorescence correlates strongly
part of the absorbed light is re-emitted after ns to µs at
with the content of UV absorbing ions in the material like
longer wavelength (lower energy) and is known as Stokes
rare earth elements (REE), Iron, Zinc or Vanadium [5] and also
shift. Many substances, organic as well as inorganic, can
Pb2+. Most of these elements absorb and emit nearly inde-
exhibit fluorescence. Fluorescence can be distinguished
pendent (especially the REE) from the glass matrix.
from phosphorescence by the lifetime or decay of the
excited states, which is e.g., typically in the ms to s range
Optical transitions from the ns2-levels (n = 1,2,3,..), related to
for phosphorescence [1].
structural units of the glass matrix, like e.g. SbO3, AsO3 or
ZnO, behave in a different way. Here the glass matrix and the
The efficiency of energy transfer of the absorption light, known
processing (oxidation and reduction) have a strong influence
as quantum efficiency, strongly depends on the excitation
on the absorption and emission characteristics.
wavelength or wavelength spectrum. It has a maximum close
to the absorption bands and high photon energy respectively.
➜
The fluorescence is in contrast to the non-radiative absorption
where the incident light is transferred to a higher energy level
and the down conversion to lower energy levels without light
1
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
2. Methods of Characterization
The measurement procedure shown in figure 1 works as The Fluorolog-3 system is part of SCHOTT’s chemical and
follows: On the excitation side a 450 Watt high pressure Xenon physical testing laboratories that are accredited within
lamp delivers a broad band radiation spectrum from 200 to D-PL-14645-01-00 according DIN ISO IEC/ 17025:2019.
1500 nm with a maximum intensity between 250 and 650 nm. The typical emission spectral range is 300 nm to 850 nm.
This is the wavelength range that is mainly used for excitation.
The radiation is spectrally selected and guided to the sample
450 Watt high Double
box by a Czerny Turner double monochromator which allows
pressure monochromator sample
a high noise reduction in order to enable a signal to noise Xenon lamp for excitation
ratio better than 4000. The spectral linewidth of the excitation
is 5 – 7 nm FWHM (full width half maximum) having an inten-
sity of approximately 1 µW/cm2 On request LED or Laser lights 28°
with higher intensities are possible as excitation source with
linewidths of 20 – 30 and 2 – 10 nm FWHM respectively. The
modular setup of this equipment allows an easy change of
Double
the excitation source. monochromator
for emission
The fluorescence light emits in all directions, but is either
Fluorescence spectrum
measured in scattering arrangement in reflection at an angle
of 28° to the incident light (14° to the normal of the plane
Fig. 1: Setup of the fluorescence spectrometer Jobin Yvon Fluorolog 3.
of the sample) to avoid the incident (excitation) light in the The arrangement allows flexibility in geometry and excitation source.
fluorescence measurement signal. The spectral fluorescence Due to the double monochromator concept no filters are required.
intensity is evaluated using a second Czerny Turner double
monochromator and a photo multiplier as UV/VIS detector.
Alternatively, pulsed excitation and a corresponding detec-
tion are also possible. Besides the intensity of the excitation
source, the optimization of the detection efficiency depends
on the proper choice of geometry and cut-off filter settings,
which are required to have no intrinsic fluorescence at the
applied wavelength. ➜ ➜ Back to index
2
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
1.0
using BAM standards 35000000 0.92
using Starna standards
30000000 0.90
0.8
CaF2 + 485 ppm TmF3
25000000 0.88
Fluorescence [a.u.]
emission at 250 nm
0.6
20000000 excitation for 450 nm 0.86
emission at 350 nm
10000000 0.82
0.2
5000000 0.80
0.0 0 0.78
300 400 500 600 700 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
Fig. 2: Efficiency for 1200 lines/nm grating and the PM detector. The maximum Fig. 3: A
bsorption, excitation and emission spectra of TmF3 doped CaF2.
efficiency is observed for appr. 420 nm.
➜ ➜ Back to index
3
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
Fluorescence [a.u.]
from optical glass when excited with 250 and 350 nm respec-
tively.
0.6
0.0
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
wavelength [nm]
Fig. 4: E
mission spectrum of NIST certificates fluorophore Quinine Sulphate.
➜ ➜ Back to index
4
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
of the wavelength. The subscript 365 in RIF365 refers to the 2500 SF1 reference
Fluorescence [a.u.]
excitation wavelength at 365 nm. According Eq. (1) the RIF365
of SF1 is 100 %. The RIF365 of N-FK58 XLD was measured to be 2000
1000
Similar to Eq. (1), the relative integral fluorescence for
488 nm excitation (RIF488 – Eq. (2)) or 532 nm excitation 500
(RIF532 – Eq. (3)) is defined by:
0
450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
(2)
∫ 800 sample (λ) dλ
535
wavelength [nm]
RIF488 :=
600
∫ 800
535 SF1 (λ) dλ excitation 532 nm
(3)
∫ 850 sample (λ) dλ
SF1 reference
Fluorescence [a.u.]
580 400
RIF532 :=
∫ 850
580 SF1 (λ) dλ
300
200
The RIF at 405 nm and 642 nm excitation is defined accord-
ingly. Note the different integration ranges (wavelength 100
ranges) of the 3 definitions, Eq. (1), Eq. (2), and Eq. (3).
1000
40000
0
500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850
35000
20000
15000
and SF1 (5.0 mm thickness) which serves as fluorescence standard. Top: meas-
600 10000
urement result for 365 nm excitation. Middle: measurement result for 488 nm
5000
excitation. Bottom: measurement result for 532 nm excitation. Note the differ-
0
ent scale of the y-axis.
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
400
excitation 365 nm For N-FK58 XLD the relative integral fluorescence for an exci-
N-FK58 XLD tation at 488 nm was measured to be RIF488 = 9 % whereas for
0.5 % RIF_365
200 an excitation at 532 nm it was measured to be RIF532 = 23 %
SF1 reference
Again RIF488 of SF1 is equal to 100 % as well as the RIF532 of SF1
0
is equal to 100 %.
350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
wavelength [nm] ➜ ➜ Back to index
5
.
Technical Information .
.
Advanced Optics .
. !"#$%!!!!!&'&&!
. !(#)%! 11/12
fluorescence
!"#$%!!!!!&'&&!
integral fluorescence
from SF57HTUltra to N-KZFS8 according to the sequence of the . 80% !(#)%! 12/12
relative integral
80000 40%
SF57HTUltra 30%
relative
70000 N-KZFS11 20%
N-SF6HT
N-LAF21
10%
60000 N-LASF44 0%
Fluorescence [a.u.]
N-LASF31
LASF35
N-KZFS8
N-LASF9
N-LASF45
N-KZFS11
N-K5
P-SK60
K10
N-KZFS5
N-KZFS4
N-LASF44
N-LASF41
N-KZFS2
N-PK51
N-LASF31A
N-PK52A
N-FK58 XLD
N-FK51A
SF1
SF5
SF2
F2
LLF1
LF5
N-SF5
N-SF1
N-SSK8
N-BAF4
KZFSN5
N-LAK21
N-SK5
N-LAK22
N-LAK10
N-LAF21
N-LAF33
N-LAK9
N-BAK1
N-LAK14
N-SK2
N-PSK3
N-LAK8
N-FK5
N-BAK4
SCHOTT N-BK7®
N-BALF4
SF1 reference
SF6
N-SF6
N-LAK22
N-SF57HT
50000 N-FK5
N-FK51A
40000 N-KZFS8
N-KZFS5
0
relative integral fluorescence
400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540 560 580 600 620 640 660 680 700 80%
wavelength [nm] 70%
60%
Fig. 6: Emission spectra of low fluorescent optical glasses using 365 nm 50%
excitation wavelength and a cut off filter (KV 418)
40%
30%
20%
Data on the relative integral fluorescence (RIF) of optical glass
10% of optical glass
at 365 nm excitation is shown in Figure 7. The data shows TIE-36: Fluorescence
0%
typical values for the glass type.
N-LAK22
N-SSK8
N-LASF31A
N-FK51A
F5
N-LASF41
N-LAK8
N-BAK1
N-KZFS11
N-KZFS8
N-KZFS5
N-LAK9
N-SK5
N-PK51
N-BK7
N-K5
N-FK5
SF1 reference
N-BAK4
N-BAF4
N-KZFS4
N-LASF44
N-PK52A
The SF1 reference sample is included in the diagram with a
value of 100 %. The second SF1 data column reflects the pro-
Fig. 8:
Figure Relativeintegral
8: Relative integral fluorescence
fluorescence of optical
of optical glasses
glasses at 405 at
nm405 nm excitation.
excitation. The RIF of the
gress in melt technology over the years. The fluorescence of SF1
Thereference is set
RIF of the SF1toreference
100 %. is set to 100 %.
SF1 glass from recent production runs shows much lower
RIF values than the much older SF1 reference glass.
In general, the N-type glasses show lower RIF values than the TIE-36: Fluorescence of optical glass
➜ ➜ Back to index
6
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
FigureN-FK58
10 shows and the non
the relative N-type
integral glass with
fluorescence the lowest
at excitation at 532 nmvalue is LLF1.
wavelength. The SF1
reference marks the RIF 100 %. This time many glasses show a higher RIF compared to the
One can conclude that excitation at 488 nm is less effective relative integral fluorescence
relative integral (RIF)(RIF)
fluorescence at 532 nmnm
at 532 excitation
excitation
RIF 100 % of the SF1 reference. N-BAK1 shows RIF value way above 600 %. N-FK58 is still
700%
among than at 365with
the glasses nmtheand the
lowest origin of fluorescence is different com-
fluorescence.
fluorescence
integral fluorescence
600%
pared to 365 nm excitation.
500%
relativerelative
integral fluorescence
integral (RIF)(RIF)
fluorescence at 488 nmnm
at 488 excitation
excitation 400%
relative integral
120% 300%
relative integral fluorescence
relative integral fluorescence
100% 200%
relative
80% 100%
0%
60%
N-LASF31A
N-PK52A
N-BAK1
K10
LLF1
N-SK2
N-LAK22
N-PSK3
N-K5
P-SK60
N-SK5
LF5
SCHOTT N-BK7®
N-LAK14
N-LAK8
N-LAK21
N-LAK9
N-LASF44
N-KZFS2
N-LASF31
N-LAF33
N-KZFS11
N-LAK10
N-SSK8
N-KZFS4
LASF35
N-KZFS8
F2
N-LASF41
N-BAK4
N-LAF21
N-BALF4
N-FK5
N-LASF45
KZFSN5
N-LASF9
SF1
SF2
N-PK51
N-KZFS5
SF5
N-BAF4
N-SF1
N-SF5
SF1 reference
N-FK51A
N-FK58 XLD
SF6
N-SF6
40%
20%
0%
FigureFig.
10: Relative integral
10: Relative fluorescence
integral of optical
fluorescence glasses
of optical at 532atnm
glasses excitation.
532 The RIF of
nm excitation.
SF2
N-KZFS5
N-KZFS2
LF5
N-FK5
KZFSN5
LLF1
N-PK51
N-BALF4
N-LASF31
P-SK60
N-KZFS8
SF1
N-K5
LASF35
N-KZFS11
K10
N-LAF33
SF5
SCHOTT N-BK7®
N-LASF9
N-LASF45
N-KZFS4
N-LASF44
N-LAF21
N-LASF41
N-PK52A
N-FK51A
N-FK58 XLD
N-LASF31A
SF6
N-LAK8
N-LAK14
N-SF1
F2
N-SF5
N-BAF4
N-BAK4
N-SSK8
N-BAK1
N-SK5
N-SK2
N-PSK3
N-LAK22
N-LAK21
N-LAK9
N-LAK10
SF1 reference
N-SF6
Figure 9: Relative integral fluorescence of optical glasses at 488 nm excitation. The RIF of the
SF1 Fig. 9: Relative
reference integral
is set to 100 %.fluorescence of optical glasses at 488 nm excitation.
The RIF of the SF1 reference is set to 100 %.
➜ ➜ Back to index
7
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
N-KZFS8
N-SF6HT
2500
SF2 among the glasses with the lowest fluorescence at 642 nm
N-KZFS5
2000 N-FK5 excitation.
N-FK51A
SF57HTUltra
1500
The diagrams Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Fig-
1000 ure 12 are irritating in a way that they only show the relative
500
tendency to produce fluorescence light between the different
glass types at the given excitation wavelength.
0
555 575 595 615 635 655 675 695 715 735 755
wavelength [nm] Figure 13 shows the SF1 reference sample spectra for 365 nm,
405 nm, 488 nm, 532 nm and 642 nm excitation. With in-
Fig. 11: Emission spectra of optical glasses using 532 nm excitation wavelength
and without cut off filter. creasing excitation wavelength the maximum and area of the
spectrum decreases. Setting the area below the SF1 reference
In Figure 11 typical emission spectra using 532 nm excitation spectrum at 365 nm to 100% the RIF’s for SF1 reference from
wavelength are shown for several optical glasses. Using the 405 nm to 642 nm can be calculated as shown in the legend
. identical experimental setup the shape of the emission profiles of the diagram. The RFI of SF1 at 642 nm excitation is only
.
. are similar, but the measured intensities in are different and 0.04 % of that at 365 nm excitation.
. overall much lower. The RIF decreases from N-LAK22 to
. !"#$%!!!!!&'&&!
. SF57HTUltra (according to the sequence of the graphs legend)
!(#)%! 16/12
SF 1 reference spectra
35000
SF1 ref. 365 nm excitation,
relative integral
relative fluorescence
integral (RIF) (RIF)
fluorescence at 642at nm
642excitation
nm excitation integral 100 %
30000
1600,0% SF1 ref. 405 nm excitation,
integral 15 %
SF1 ref. 488 nm excitation,
25000
Fluorescence [a.u.]
integral 0.04 %
1000,0% 15000
800,0%
relativeintegral
10000
600,0%
5000
relative
400,0%
0
200,0%
300 400 500 600 700 800
wavelength [nm]
0,0%
Fig. 13: SF1 reference sample spectrum for 365 nm, 405 nm, 488 nm, 532 nm
KZFSN5
N-LAK14
N-LAK10
N-KZFS8
N-K5
N-LAK22
N-KZFS2
N-KZFS5
N-KZFS11
N-SK5
N-BAK1
N-KZFS4
LF5
SF2
SF1
SF1 reference
N-PK52A
N-LASF31A
N-PSK53A
N-FK51A
N-BK7
LLF1
N-FK5
N-SF1
N-SF6
N-LASF45
N-PK51
N-LAF21
F2
N-SSK8
Figure 12 shows the relative integral fluorescence at excitation at 642 nm wavelength. The SF1
reference marks the RIF 100 %. Again many glasses show a higher RIF compared to the RIF
100 % of the SF1 reference. N-SF1 and N-PK52A show a factor of 100 higher fluorescence
compared to SF1. SF1 is among the glasses with the lowest fluorescence at 642 nm excitation.
The diagrams Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 12 are irritating in a way that
they only show the relative tendency to produce fluorescence light between the different glass
types at the given excitation wavelength.
Figure 13 shows the SF1 reference sample spectra for 365 nm, 405 nm, 488 nm, 532 nm and
642 nm excitation. With increasing excitation wavelength the maximum and area of the
spectrum decreases. Setting the area below the SF1 reference spectrum at 365 nm to 100%
the RIF’s for SF1 reference from 405 nm to 642 nm can be calculated as shown in the legend 8
of the diagram. The RFI of SF1 at 642 nm excitation is only 0.04% of that at 365 nm excitation.
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
10%
8%
6%
4%
2%
0%
A
K8
A
8
4
K1
51
2
K5
A
FS
FS
FS
BK
SK
K2
FK
31
52
51
BA
SS
PK
N-
KZ
KZ
KZ
N-
N-
LA
N-
SF
PK
FK
N-
N-
N-
N-
N-
N-
LA
N-
N-
N-
N-
Fig. 14: Weighted relative integral fluorescence based on SF1 to compare the
glasses at different excitation wavelengths.
➜ ➜ Back to index
9
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
(4)
∫ fluor (λ) dλ The C9920 can estimate the self-absorption using with the
FQE = , same device. The self-absorption corrected effective FQE (Ab-
sorption * FQE) is the best value to describe the absolute
∫ in (λ) dλ amount of fluorescence light generated from a given illumina-
tion intensity. In a comparative experiment together with BAM
where fluor is the fluorescent light spectrum (emitted by the
(Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin,
probe) and in is the incident light spectrum (integrated over
Germany) using a sample with perspective to act as a stand-
the whole wavelength spectrum).
ard, we achieved an accuracy of ± 2 % and a re producibility
of better than ± 0.5 % for the un-corrected FQE. The required
FQE is measured using the instrument C9920 from the com-
sample size is 5 – 18 mm in diameter and a thickness between
pany Hamamatsu. The basic set-up is shown in Figure 15.
0.5 mm and 5 mm.
Integrating sphere
Xenon light
source Monochromator
Multi-channel
detector and
Probe (sample) data analyzer
Fig. 15: Basic set-up for measuring the (external) absolute fluorescence
quantum efficiency. By using a calibrated Xenon light source and a monochro-
mator the excitation wavelength can be chosen. An integrating sphere meas-
ures the whole fluorescent light by a multichannel detector. All components
have been calibrated by Hamamatsu.
➜ ➜ Back to index
10
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
Tab. 1: Effective FQE of several optical glasses and OG590 filter glass in
comparison. “n.m.” means “not measurable”
Among the optical glasses SF1 shows the highest FQE of Figure 16 shows the spectral response of the multi-channel
3.5 %. The effective FQE is about 1.5 % with an absorption detector during measurement for excitation at 365 nm of SF1,
measured of 41.7 % with the C9920. The lowest effective N KZFS8, SCHOTT N BK7® and N FK58 XLD. The excitation
FQE at 365 nm excitation was found in N-FK58 and SCHOTT peak at 365 nm is clearly visible. The intensity at the excita-
N-BK7® (in both cases the effective FQE is less than 0.05 %). tion peak in comparison to the spectrum in air reflects the ab-
The effective FQE of SF57 and N-KZFS8 is a factor of 10 higher. sorption of the glass. At longer wavelengths most of the
The values at 488 nm excitation are in general smaller for all measurements are on the same level as the spectrum in air.
optical glasses due to the lower absorption, except for N-FK58 No significant fluorescence can be detected. The only excep-
that exhibits an effective FQE of 0.04 % at 488 nm excitation, tion is SF1, which is significantly above the other signals. A
identical to the effective FQE at excitation at 365 nm. For similar behaviour can be observed in Figure 17 for excitation
many optical glasses the fluorescence signal was too low in at 488 nm. Even the fluorescence of SF1 is not dominant any-
the C9920 at 488 nm excitation. These results are indicated more. The signal is on noise / air level.
with “n.m: not measurable” at 488 nm excitation. To judge
the reliability of the measurements it is important to look at
the measured spectral intensity distribution.
➜ ➜ Back to index
11
Technical Information
Advanced Optics
100000 100000
100000 100000
1000 1000
intensity [a.u.]
intensity [a.u.]
100 100
10 10
1 1
0.1 0.1
300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950
wavelength [nm] wavelength [nm]
Fig. 16: FQE measurement spectrum of different optical glasses at excitation Fig. 17: FQE measurement of optical glasses at excitation of 488 nm.
of 365 nm.
8. Literature
[1] R. Jedamzik F. Elsmann, A. Engel. U. Petzold, J. Pleitz, [6] R
eichel, S., Biertuempfel, R., Engel, A., “Characterization
Introducing the quantum efficiency of fluorescence of and measurement results of fluorescence in absorption
SCHOTT optical glass, SPIE Proceeding 10375, 2017 optical filter glass.” Proc. SPIE, 9626 (2015)
[2] W. Geffcken, The molar absorption of different ions [7] P. deRose, “Bioanalytical and biomedical applications
in glases, Glastechn. Berichte, 35, p. 27 f, 1962 of fluorescence techniques: instrum. characterisation
and validation, traceability and need for Reference
[3] D. Ehrt, P. Ebeling, U. Natura, U. Kohlberg, K. Nau-
Materials”, Fluorescence Workshop@ BAM, Berlin 2003
mann, and S. Ritter, Redox equilibria and ultraviolett
radiation induced defects in glasses, Intern. congr. [8] BAM-F01 to BAM-F05, “Calibration Kit SPECTRAL
on Glass Vol. 1, p. 84, 2001 FLUORESCENCE STANDARDS,” Federal Institute for
Materials Research and Testing (BAM) (2006)
[4] J.S: Stroud, Optical absorption and color caused by
selected cations in high-density, lead silicate glass, [9] BAM-F012, “Glass-based Multi-emitter Fluorescence
J. Am. Cer. Soc. 54, p. 8 ff, 1971 Standard,” Federal Institute for Materials Research
Version May 2022
schott.com