1. The document raises several questions and issues regarding the methodology and conclusions of a study on the performance of 3-D geogrid-reinforced sand under direct shear mode.
2. Specific concerns include how the use of geogrid reduces soil improvement costs, validation of input parameters in the finite element model, specifications for large-scale direct shear tests, explanation of soil compaction, and validation of the numerical model for reinforced soil.
3. Clarification is requested on the novelty of the work given other similar studies, and the ABAQUS software reference is missing.
1. The document raises several questions and issues regarding the methodology and conclusions of a study on the performance of 3-D geogrid-reinforced sand under direct shear mode.
2. Specific concerns include how the use of geogrid reduces soil improvement costs, validation of input parameters in the finite element model, specifications for large-scale direct shear tests, explanation of soil compaction, and validation of the numerical model for reinforced soil.
3. Clarification is requested on the novelty of the work given other similar studies, and the ABAQUS software reference is missing.
1. The document raises several questions and issues regarding the methodology and conclusions of a study on the performance of 3-D geogrid-reinforced sand under direct shear mode.
2. Specific concerns include how the use of geogrid reduces soil improvement costs, validation of input parameters in the finite element model, specifications for large-scale direct shear tests, explanation of soil compaction, and validation of the numerical model for reinforced soil.
3. Clarification is requested on the novelty of the work given other similar studies, and the ABAQUS software reference is missing.
Search lines should be numbered to facilitate the review process
2. In the abstract “The geogrid-layer increases the low shear resistance of fine sand, thereby reducing the cost of soil improvement methods” how? One of the uses of soil reinforcement with geogrid is to improve the soil, and this matter is not related to the costs of the improvement process. How did the researcher prove that using geogrid saves the costs of the soil improvement process? 3. How did the authors confirm the input material parameters in the finite element model for fine sand? 4. When conducting large-scale direct shear tests, it is essential to consider the dimensions of the shear box. Standards recommend that the minimum dimensions of the shear box should be: At least 30 cm. 15 × D85 of the soil (where D85 represents the particle size corresponding to 85% passing). At least five times the largest geogrid aperture size used in the investigation, so the authors must clarify the specifications on which they relied in determining the dimensions of the large-scale direct shear test. 5. In Figure 1-A, the researcher explains that the soil is loose. However, when implementing the process of reinforcing the soil with geogrid, the process of compacting the soil must be performed, it is need to explain 6. In (3.1. Model Verification) the author validates the numerical model is for determining the shearing resistance of unreinforced soil. It is necessary to ensure that the program has also the ability to represent reinforced soil with geogrid. We have doubts about all the results as long as no validation work has been done to reinforced soil with geogrid. 7. Fig. 4. It is peter to change Mohr column to lab test in the legend 8. The novelty of the presented work is unclear. There are various studies in the literature on the same topic, some of which are cited by the author(s). The author(s) needs to clarify what additional knowledge/information is generated through this work “Performance of 3-D Geogrid-Reinforced Sand under Direct Shear Mode” 9. The reference of the software ABAQUS is missed in the list of references.