Professional Documents
Culture Documents
| Legal Compass®
WHAT IS LEGAL COMPASS©?
DATA OF THIS SURVEY AND OTHER ALM SURVEYS, REPORTS AND RANKINGS,
IS AVAILABLE IN LEGAL COMPASS©.
Legal Compass is a comprehensive, intuitive web-based platform that connects law firms and legal departments to decades of unique
firm data and proprietary ALM analysis.
Dynamically explore and compare data on firms, companies, lawyers, and trends. More than just an access point, it’s a road map for
navigating the challenges you face on a daily basis:
n B
enchmark firms against peers n nalyze lateral, office location,
A n everage the insights in our
L
n R
etrieve unique intelligence on law news, and event trends within proprietary surveys and reports,
firm performance, legal departments, the legal profession into the industry, including the Am
and lawyers. n se Legal Compass to facilitate,
U Law 200, the NLJ Billing Report,
support, or refute existing strategy the Global 100 and the Diversity
n C
ompare key metric rankings,
scorecard and more.
including the Am Law 200,
Global 100, NLJ 500, and more.
Legal Compass gives professionals the clarity necessary to drive strategy and make the decisions that matter.
Look Inside Legal Compass: at.alm.com/legalcompass
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
114 39% 80% Online survey with sponsors identified. Invitations sent to US
and UK marketing and business development contacts on the
Marketing/ of participants of participants
Am Law 200, Global 100, NLJ 500 and shared on closed social
business from with 10 or
media groups.
development Am Law 200 more years of
professional firms legal marketing
participants experience
FIELDED
n n
Managers
5.
total of
Yes, they are separate 7% 114 people 3% Yes, Business
functions asked Development reports
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
8 3 to Marketing
total of total of
111 people 110 people
asked asked
33% 2% 34% 0%
No formal plan Don’t know No formal plan Don’t know
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
37 2 37 0
37% 9%
Yes, it is 2 years Yes, it is older
old or less than 2 years
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
41 10
total of
110 people
asked
52% 2%
No formal plan Don’t know
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
57 2
total of total of
64 people 72 people
asked asked
90% 10% 0%
Yes No Don’t know
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
46 5 0
total of
51 people
asked
total of total of
2% 110 people 0% 2% 110 people 0%
asked asked
Somewhat Very Somewhat Very
ineffective ineffective ineffective ineffective
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
2 0 2 0
total of total of
5% 110 people 1% 10% 110 people 3%
asked asked
Somewhat Very Somewhat Very
ineffective ineffective ineffective ineffective
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
6 1 11 3
total of total of
4% 106 people 3% 6% 107 people 5%
asked asked
Somewhat Very Somewhat Very
ineffective ineffective ineffective ineffective
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
4 3 6 5
2% 5% 5% 26%
Chief Pricing Chief Practice Pricing Others
Officer Officer Manager (Specify)
2% asked FREQUENCY:
operate independent of
each other on pitches
12
FREQUENCY:
and proposals
2 Others (specify):
OTHER (SPECIFY)?
0% 100%
Facilitator of Barrier of
change change
FREQUENCY: total of FREQUENCY:
5 people
0 asked 5
Others (specify):
66
AVERAGE
total of
It is often an obstacle 40% 100 people 16% Don’t know
for both asked
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
40 16
4% 28% 8% 16%
Lockstep Formula Don’t know Others (Specify)
(by class/tiers) (base, including
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
bonus, based on
FREQUENCY:
hours, origina-
total of 8 16
4 102 people
tion credits)
asked Others (specify):
FREQUENCY:
29 Combination of formula Subject and formula Formula (Base,
44%
and subjective A mixture. No origina- Performance, team
Combination of formula tion credit, but billings work, bonus)
and subjective assess- are taken into account 75% formula, 25%
ment based on non- (for some). subjective
total of
Reward amounts are 21% 100 people 4% Other (specify)
determined by an asked
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
executive/compensa- 21 4
tion committee
Member of the management Dual reporting to Chairman/CEO Dotted line to Marketing Partner on Member of Management Group, Executive Committee President
committee, one of two candidates and COO management committee; direct line #3 in firm hierarchy Management Committee NA
to take over the CEO spot Chairman of the firm to COO/CFO; and direct to MP Management Committee Chairman / Founder Chief Operating Partner
Board Managing Partner and COO Chief Client Officer 5 Member Executive Committee
20% 6%
Yes, but not a Yes, but a voting
voting member member
FREQUENCY: total of FREQUENCY:
20 100 people 6
asked
74%
No
FREQUENCY:
74
26
AVERAGE
68% 0% 72% 0%
Stayed the same Not applicable Stayed the same Not applicable
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
50 0 51 0
34% 3% 44% 5%
Increased Decreased Increased Decreased
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
21 2 41 5
total of total of
62 people 94 people
asked asked
63% 0% 51% 0%
Stayed the same Not applicable Stayed the same Not applicable
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
39 0 48 0
8% 3% 40% 8%
Increased Decreased Increased Decreased
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
6 2 29 6
total of total of
73 people 73 people
asked asked
89% 0% 52% 0%
Stayed the same Not applicable Stayed the same Not applicable
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
65 0 38 0
total of total of
8 people 10 people
asked asked
total of total of
21 people 9 people
asked asked
total of total of
27 people 30 people
asked asked
total of total of
12 people 28 people
asked asked
total of total of
70 people 0 people
asked asked
total of total of
40 people 28 people
asked asked
OTHER (SPECIFY)?
40% 60% 0%
1st 2nd 3rd
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
2 3 0
Others (specify):
total of
5 people Ensure that partners Events Two separate departments
asked adhere to sales portion BD Initiatives NA
of business plans
Others (specify):
Others (specify):
total of
95 people
No, hours are not 86% asked
formally tracked
FREQUENCY:
82
total of
Factored into the ROI 8% 13 people 38% Not measured against
of various client asked any firm initiative
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
development initiatives, 1 5
such as client events
$5,262,548
AVERAGE
1.66% 2.5%
AM LAW 100 AM LAW 200 $2,354,946
AVERAGE
49% 15%
Increased Decreased
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
46 total of 14
93 people
asked
35%
Stay the same
FREQUENCY:
33
INCREASED DECREASED
+7% -18%
AVERAGE AVERAGE
Other (specify) 5%
FREQUENCY:
4
Others (specify):
PARTNERS?
total of
73 people
Using both internal 55% asked 10% Not Applicable/No
FTE’s and outside training
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
consultants 40 7
ASSOCIATES?
total of
74 people
Using both internal 40% asked 7% Not Applicable/No
FTE’s and outside training
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
consultants 29 5
total of
72 people
Using both internal 41% asked 10% Not Applicable/No
FTE’s and outside training
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
consultants 30 7
Others (specify):
3% 5% 53% 27%
Less than 3-6 years 11-20 years 21+ years
3 years
FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY: FREQUENCY:
FREQUENCY: 4 total of 39 20
2 74 people
asked
12%
7-10 years
FREQUENCY:
9
| Legal Compass®