MANIPAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICATION

(MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, MANIPAL)

YEAR-lll
MEDIA RESEARCH

RASHIKA SINGH
210701005

RESEARCH PAPER

PUBLIC PERCEPTION AND MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE 2008

LEHMAN
BROTHERS AND AMERICAN MARKET CRASH.
ABSTRACT

This study looks at how public perception and media coverage shaped the narrative of the 2008
financial crisis and its aftermath. It investigates how the public was portrayed during the crisis and
how these representations influenced public opinion, policy responses, and the subsequent trajectory
of financial markets. The study emphasises how the media was critical in conveying the crisis's
complexities, humanising its impact, and scrutinising government responses. It delves into the
far-reaching effects of the 2008 market crash, such as economic turmoil, regulatory reforms, and shifts
in public trust and financial behaviour. Furthermore, it draws parallels to Japan's experience during
the crisis, highlighting structural changes in the trade and industrial sectors that made Japan especially
vulnerable. The paper proposes policy measures to improve resilience to external shocks, with a focus
on both export promotion and domestic demand. Overall, the findings shed light on the long-term
impact of media coverage on global financial crises and their aftermath.

INTRODUCTION-

The 2008 Lehman Brothers and American market crash was a pivotal moment in the history of global
finance. The catastrophic events of this crisis sent shockwaves through the world's economies and had
a profound impact on the lives of millions. This paper investigates the critical role of public
perception and media coverage in shaping the narrative of the 2008 financial crisis, providing a
nuanced understanding of how the crisis was portrayed to the public and how these representations
influenced public opinion, policy responses, and the subsequent trajectory of financial markets. The
2008 global financial crisis was a complex and multifaceted event marked by the rapid and
widespread failure of major financial institutions, a severe credit crunch, falling housing prices, and a
sharp increase in unemployment. As the crisis unfolded, the media played an important role in
disseminating information and shaping public perception. The media's portrayal of the crisis not only
influenced public opinion, but also had significant implications for policy decisions made by
governments and central banks.Several key elements characterised media coverage of the Lehman
Brothers and American market crash. First and foremost, the crisis was portrayed as a systemic failure
of the financial industry, with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers serving as a metaphor for this larger
failure. The failure of Lehman Brothers was widely covered in the media, both print and electronic, as
a historic event that marked the tipping point of the financial crisis. The media frequently dramatised
the bankruptcy, with images of distraught employees leaving the Lehman Brothers offices with boxes
of personal belongings. This portrayal contributed to the crisis's perception as a sudden and
catastrophic event.
Furthermore, the media was critical in communicating the complexities of the crisis to the general
public. The media attempted to convey the causes and consequences of the financial meltdown
through various forms of reporting, including news articles, television broadcasts, and expert
interviews. The housing market bubble, the subprime mortgage crisis, and the interconnectedness of
global financial institutions were all highlighted by the media. The media sought to simplify complex
financial concepts in order to make them accessible to a wide audience.The media's portrayal of key
figures and institutions heavily influenced public perception of the crisis. Government officials and
central bankers, for example, were frequently portrayed as heroes or villains, depending on the media
outlet and the tone of their coverage. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and then-Treasury
Secretary Henry Paulson were prominently featured in media reports, and their actions and decisions
were scrutinised. The portrayal of these figures in the media influenced public trust in the
government's ability to effectively address the crisis.The media also covered the crisis's human
impact, featuring stories of people who had lost their homes, jobs, or retirement savings. These
human-interest stories humanised the crisis, making it more relatable to the general public. These
narratives' emotional resonance fueled public concern and prompted government action. In addition to
influencing public perception, media coverage influenced government responses to the crisis. The
intensity of the media coverage created a sense of urgency, putting pressure on governments and
central banks to act quickly and decisively. Public pressure, which was frequently amplified by the
media, resulted in the implementation of a variety of measures, including bailouts of major financial
institutions and the passage of the Troubled Asset Relief Programme (TARP) in the United States. The
media's scrutiny of government responses also contributed to decision-makers' accountability.
The global recession that followed the 2008 market crash was severe and prolonged. The crisis caused
widespread economic turmoil, including mass layoffs, foreclosures, and a severe credit crunch.
Significant bailouts and stimulus packages were implemented by governments and central banks
around the world to stabilise financial institutions and jumpstart their economies. The crisis exposed
flaws in the financial system, prompting regulatory reforms to prevent a repeat of the crisis. It also
harmed public trust in financial institutions and contributed to a general sense of mistrust. The effects
of the 2008 crash were felt for years, resulting in a slow economic recovery and increased government
debt. The lessons of the crisis reshaped financial and regulatory policies, emphasising the importance
of risk management, transparency, and oversight to mitigate the impact of future financial crises
The 2008 market crash had a significant impact on people's purchasing power. Many people saw their
wealth erode dramatically as stock markets and home values fell. People who had made investments
in stocks or real estate frequently suffered significant losses. Furthermore, the credit freeze and
banking crisis limited access to loans and credit, making it difficult for individuals to finance large
purchases such as homes or cars. High unemployment rates strained household budgets even more.
Reduced consumer spending, caution in investments, and a focus on saving became prevalent in this
environment, resulting in a significant decline in individual purchasing power and a shift towards
more conservative financial behaviours.

RATIONALE OF THE STUDY-

The 2008 Lehman Brothers and American market crash was a watershed moment in global finance,
leaving an indelible mark on economies, policies, and public sentiment around the world. Its seismic
ramifications not only reshaped the financial landscape, but also reverberated across multiple facets of
society.
This financial catastrophe highlighted the vulnerability of financial systems. It exposed the intricate
and often precarious underpinnings of global finance. The failure of Lehman Brothers and the
subsequent market turmoil demonstrated that even the most powerful financial institutions were not
immune to risk, and that systemic vulnerabilities required immediate attention.During this crisis, the
interaction between media coverage and public perception was also significant. The media, in all of its
forms, was crucial in disseminating information about the crisis. The public received its understanding
of the unfolding events through the media. The media's narrative influenced how the public perceived
the crisis and, as a result, how they responded to it. This dynamic relationship between media and
public perception is critical to understanding the full scope of the crisis.The need for a comprehensive
understanding of the 2008 financial crisis is critical. We gain valuable insights into what happened
and why by investigating the causes, responses, and aftermath of the crisis. This understanding serves
as a beacon for preventing future crises, enacting stronger regulatory measures, and providing
financial institutions and governments with the tools they need to navigate turbulent economic
waters.The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the American stock market was a crucible that tested the
global financial system's resilience. It had far-reaching consequences, affecting economies, policies,
and public opinion. The crisis highlighted the vulnerabilities in our financial systems, the critical role
of the media in shaping public perception, and the importance of comprehensive understanding to
avoid future financial upheavals. The lessons of 2008, as a watershed moment in global finance,
continue to reverberate through time, informing our approach to financial stability, policy, and media
ethics.

● Historical Importance- The 2008 financial crisis was the turning point in the twenty-first
century. The scale of the collapse was unprecedented since the Great Depression, making it a
topic of enormous historical significance. It had far-reaching consequences, affecting not only
 economic domains but also sociopolitical and cultural aspects of society. To comprehend the
gravity of this crisis, we must investigate how the public perceived it and how the media
framed the story.
● The Media as a Public Opinion Shaper- The media, which includes both traditional and digital
outlets, is a powerful force in shaping public opinion. It is a primary source of information
and plays an important role in the dissemination of news. During the 2008 financial crisis,
media coverage influenced how the public perceived events, influencing their reactions,
behaviours, and choices. Investigating the relationship between media and public perception
helps to provide a more nuanced understanding of the crisis's dynamics.
● Market Movements and Investment Decisions- Market movements and investment decisions
are inextricably linked to public perception, particularly during economic crises such as the
2008 Lehman Brothers and American market crash. The public's interpretation of events and
subsequent reaction can set off a feedback loop that has a significant impact on financial
markets. This interaction is critical to understanding the dynamics of financial crises.During
times of economic turmoil, media narratives play a critical role in shaping public sentiment.
The manner in which the media covers and communicates information about the crisis can
have a significant impact on how the public perceives the situation. Media outlets may
emphasise certain aspects, emphasise potential risks, or provide optimistic perspectives, all of
which influence public sentiment. Negative or alarming coverage, for example, can instil fear
and lead to panic selling, lowering stock prices and increasing market volatility.In contrast, if
media coverage is reassuring and provides a sense of stability, it can help to reduce market
volatility. The public's trust in the information they receive from media outlets has the
potential to either boost or depress market confidence. As a result, comprehending the
connection between media narratives and public sentiment is critical. Public sentiment has a
direct impact on investment decisions. When individuals or institutional investors perceive
increased risks and uncertainties, they may choose to exit riskier assets such as stocks in
favour of safer havens such as government bonds or precious metals. This shift in investment
preferences has the potential to cause a sell-off in financial markets, causing prices to fall. In
contrast, during times of optimism and confidence, investors are more likely to enter or
remain in the market, potentially increasing their returns.The critical link between media
coverage, public sentiment, and investment decisions highlights the need for a thorough
examination of the 2008 financial crisis.
● Financial Regulations and Policy Implications- The policy response to the 2008 financial
crisis was significant, resulting in a slew of regulatory changes and economic stimulus
measures. A study of public perception and media coverage can reveal how the way the crisis
was portrayed in the media and perceived by the public influenced these policies. Such
insights help to shape future crisis management and policy.
● Crisis Communication Lessons- The examination of how the 2008 financial crisis was
communicated to the public teaches valuable lessons in crisis communication. Understanding
the strategies and approaches that were successful or unsuccessful in communicating complex
financial issues to the public is critical for improving communication during future crises.
This understanding can help governments, financial institutions, and media outlets create
more effective crisis communication strategies.
● Economic and social ramifications- The 2008 financial crisis had far-reaching economic and
social ramifications, including job losses, housing market collapses, and long-term economic
consequences. Researchers can shed light on the broader societal implications of financial
crises by studying public perception. This includes the effect on people's financial well-being,
trust in financial institutions, and larger social trends.
 ● Responsibility and Ethics in the Media-The study can also assess the media's role and
responsibility in accurately, ethically, and responsibly reporting financial crises. This includes
investigating media practices, ethical concerns, and potential biases in coverage.
Understanding the role of the media in shaping public perception can lead to discussions
about improving crisis reporting standards.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE-

● Coverage of the 2008-2009 Economic Crisis in the Media and Relationship of the
Coverage to Actual Situation- Vilija Tauraite.
Key findings-
Economic Reality Appearance: The media's coverage of the economic crisis appears to have
accurately reflected the actual economic situation. This suggests that the media's coverage
corresponded to the actual events and conditions.

Negative Reports Prevail: Negative reports, which conveyed a pessimistic outlook, were more
prevalent in media coverage than positive reports. This fits with the typical pattern of media reporting
during economic downturns, when challenges and uncertainties dominate the headlines.

Variable Reporting Tone with Economic Juncture: The study discovered an increase in the number of
highly pessimistic and highly optimistic reports during the economic crisis' darkest days. This shift in
reporting tone is consistent with the evolving economic situation, in which extreme pessimism
frequently prevails at the height of a crisis.

Differences in Reporting: The study discovered differences in reporting between the BNS news
agency and the DELFI news website. In comparison to DELFI, BNS's coverage tended to be more
upbeat. These variations could be attributed to linguistic differences, target audiences, or editorial
policies of the respective media outlets.

Asymmetrical Consumer Response: Interestingly, consumers' reaction to the crisis was not
symmetrical. Consumers reacted to deteriorating reporting tones more quickly and consistently,
indicating that negative news has a more immediate impact on public sentiment.

Stronger Correlation with Consumer Sentiment: The study discovered a stronger correlation between
media coverage and consumer sentiment indicators, highlighting the media's influential role in
shaping public perceptions and reactions during economic crises.

● The Dominoes Fall: A Timeline of the Squeeze and Crash- Robert J. Marks.
The world watched in awe and anxiety in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis as a cascading
series of events unfolded, resulting in a profound reshaping of the global economic landscape. This
financial earthquake had its epicentre in the United States, and its repercussions echoed across
continents, prompting governments to take unprecedented measures to avert a total economic
collapseThe Financial Times compared the crisis to a "cardiac arrest," describing it as a swift and
merciless blow to the Western banking system. It followed a series of significant events, including the
government's rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as the subsequent bailout of American
International Group (AIG). However, the failure of Lehman Brothers, unaided by a bailout, was the
tipping point. The failure of Lehman Brothers sent shockwaves through global financial markets,
eroding trust and faith in the stability of the financial institutions that supported the modern
economy.The sudden freezing of the interbank credit market was one of the most visible symptoms of
the crisis. Financial institutions, which have traditionally relied on short-term loans and lending to one
another, have found themselves unable or unwilling to extend credit, fearful of the undisclosed risks
lurking in their counterparties' balance sheets. The rise in counterparty risk became painfully obvious,
and the TED spread, a measure of the difference between the interest rates on interbank loans and
short-term US government debt, reached record highs, peaking at more than 200 basis points. This
was a clear indication that the very foundation of the global financial system was in jeopardy.In
response to the impending disaster, governments in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe,
and Australia recognised the global economy's precipice. Fearing a total collapse of the banking
system, they launched an unprecedented series of interventions. These measures were enacted to assist
failing banks, prevent their failure, and ensure interbank lending. Central banks pumped liquidity into
the system, and governments provided guarantees and financial assistance to institutions on the verge
of failure. This represented a radical departure from free-market principles, as governments became
the ultimate backstop for financial institutions deemed "too big to fail."Despite not being apocalyptic
in the sense of total economic collapse, the financial crisis caused significant and widespread damage.
Millions of people were heartbroken as the value of their stock market investments plummeted. The
financial crisis did not end there; it had far-reaching consequences that extended into the real
economy. Many people lost their jobs as businesses were forced to downsize, cut costs, or shut down
entirely due to crippling debt and limited credit.The bursting of the US housing bubble was at the
heart of the crisis. The housing market had been on an unsustainable upward trend, fueled by a wave
of subprime mortgage lending and speculative excess. When the bubble eventually burst, it set off a
vicious cycle of foreclosures, declining home values, and a toxic web of securitized mortgage-backed
assets that poisoned financial institutions' balance sheets.

● A big failure: Lehman Brothers’ effects on global markets- Umar Burkhanov

The 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers was one of the most significant and devastating events in
global finance history. This disastrous failure had far-reaching consequences not only for Lehman, but
for the entire financial industry and the global economy. To fully comprehend the magnitude of
Lehman's demise and its impact on global markets, we must examine the events that led up to this
fateful moment, as well as the subsequent chain reaction.The demise of Lehman Brothers began in the
early 2000s, against the backdrop of a tumultuous mortgage market. The "tech bubble" burst and the
implosion of Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM) in the US market had already created an
uncertain environment. In response to these challenges, the Federal Reserve reduced the federal funds
rate from 6.5% to 1% between 2000 and 2003 in an effort to prevent deflation and stimulate economic
growth. This significant interest rate cut had the unintended consequence of fueling a dramatic
increase in demand for homes and mortgages.However, the quality of mortgages issued during this
time period rapidly deteriorated. Traditional lending standards were abandoned, resulting in an
explosion of subprime mortgages. Subprime mortgages were high-risk loans made to borrowers with
poor credit histories, frequently with adjustable interest rates that could cause payment shock when
interest rates inevitably rose. These mortgages were packaged into sophisticated financial products
known as Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), which
were then sold to investors worldwide. The demand for these securities was insatiable, and the
pressure to meet it resulted in further deterioration of lending standards.Lehman Brothers, a storied
investment bank founded in the mid-nineteenth century, was deeply entangled in this web of financial
complexities. It, like other financial institutions such as Bear Stearns, saw its stock price plummet as a
result of the mortgage market turmoil. To avert the impending crisis, the United States government
had already intervened with the bailout of government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac. Lehman Brothers sought financial assistance from competitors, but their efforts were futile.The
events that led up to Lehman Brothers' insolvency were a terrifying series of financial shocks. Bear
Stearns' decline and eventual fire sale sent shockwaves through Wall Street, signalling the financial
system's fragility. Lehman, like other major financial institutions, had to deal with a series of massive
write-offs reflecting the declining value of its mortgage-backed securities holdings. The government's
takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac added to the uncertainty, and Lehman's situation
deteriorated with the spin-off of the majority of its remaining commercial real estate holdings into a
new public company, a move that sparked market scepticism.The decision by the US Treasury to
decline a bailout for Lehman Brothers, on the other hand, was a watershed moment. Lehman Brothers
was forced to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 15, 2008, marking one of the darkest days
in American finance history. The ramifications of this bankruptcy were nothing short of disastrous.
The failure of Lehman Brothers had far-reaching global consequences. It was the catalyst that
triggered the full-fledged financial crisis, which had been brewing for years but had now reached a
boiling point. The world watched in disbelief as panic spread like wildfire through financial markets.
Credit markets froze, and the interbank lending system came to a halt, resulting in an unprecedented
liquidity freeze. The fall of Lehman Brothers was felt not only in the United States, but around the
world, as interconnected financial institutions and markets collapsed under the weight of the
crisis.Credit default swap prices skyrocketed as a result, indicating an increasing risk of default in the
financial sector. Long-term LIBOR rates, a key benchmark for global interest rates, have risen,
indicating a breakdown in bank trust. Commercial paper markets, which are critical for short-term
business funding, have been paralysed, making it difficult for even well-established companies to
meet their financial obligations. The shockwaves of Lehman's bankruptcy reverberated throughout
economies, resulting in an unprecedented recession.

● Market Correlation Structure Changes Around the Great Crash: A Random Matrix
Theory Analysis of the Chinese Stock Market- Ruiqi Han, Wenjie Xie, Xiong Xiong,
Wei Zhang, Wei-Xing Zhou.
The global financial crisis of 2008 had far-reaching consequences that affected financial markets
worldwide, not just in the United States. Ruiqi Han, Wenjie Xie, Xiong Xiong, Wei Zhang, and
Wei-Xing Zhou conducted this research on the Chinese stock market, specifically the Shanghai and
Shenzhen stock exchanges, in the context of the 2008 financial crisis. The researchers used random
matrix theory analysis of high-frequency stock returns from 1228 listed Chinese stocks to gain
insights into structural changes in the market's correlation dynamics during and after the crisis.The
analysis begins with a comparison of market behaviour over two one-year time periods, focusing on
the raw and partial correlation matrices. These matrices are critical tools for understanding the
interdependence of stocks in a market. When compared to 2007 and 2008, the study's findings show a
significant decrease in both the average partial correlation and average correlation for Chinese
equities during these periods. In essence, this indicates a weakening of the Chinese stock market's
overall correlation structure. These shifts in correlation dynamics can be attributed to a variety of
factors, such as changing market conditions, investor sentiment, and government policies enacted in
response to the crisis. Furthermore, the study shows that the correlation matrix's preeminent
eigenvalue, which represents the dominant mode of the market, is significantly higher than that of the
partial correlation matrix during the study periods. This suggests that overall market dynamics were
more influential than individual stock partial correlations. These findings shed light on the changing
structure of the Chinese stock market during and after the 2008 financial crisis. The study also delves
into the correlation matrices' eigenvalues and eigenvectors. While smaller deviating eigenvalues do
not provide much information, the research shows that the primary eigenvalue and its corresponding
eigenvector have a significant effect. These eigenvalues represent the most important modes of the
correlation structure and are critical in comprehending the overall market behaviour. Surprisingly, the
study discovered no evidence that deviating eigenvalues contain sector-specific information. In other
words, these structural changes affected the market as a whole rather than specific industrial sectors.
This suggests that the 2008 financial crisis had a broad impact, affecting stocks in a variety of
industries.The study made an intriguing discovery: stocks from the Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges
could be distinguished based on the eigenvectors of the second and third largest eigenvalues in 2007
and 2008. This suggests that market structural changes had a distinct impact on stocks traded on these
two exchanges, possibly due to differences in market conditions, investor behaviour, or regulatory
factors.The study also finds a link between the component magnitudes of certain large eigenvectors
and stock prices. This is an important finding because it shows that changes in the correlation
structure had a direct impact on stock prices. Understanding these relationships can provide investors
and market analysts with valuable insights. This study employing random matrix theory provides a
valuable perspective on structural changes in the Chinese stock market during the 2008 financial
crisis. The decline in both raw and partial correlations, the dominance of the leading eigenvalue in the
correlation matrix, and the distinct impact on stocks from various exchanges shed light on how the
crisis reshaped market dynamics. These findings have significant implications for investors,
policymakers, and the general public.

● The Lehman Brothers effect and bankruptcy cascades- Paweł Sieczka, Didier Sornette,
Janusz A. Hołyst
The failure of Lehman Brothers in 2008 sent shockwaves through the global financial system,
precipitating a chain of events that culminated in the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
The Lehman Brothers effect and the concept of bankruptcy cascades are explored in this study by
Pawe Sieczka, Didier Sornette, and Janusz A. Hoyst, shedding light on how one institution's default
can significantly impact the creditworthiness of the entire economic network.The study's central
premise is that the default event at Lehman Brothers had a profound and far-reaching impact on the
financial landscape. A model that focuses on the co-evolution dynamics of effective credit ratings
among various financial institutions characterises this influence. In essence, a firm's creditworthiness
is not viewed in isolation, but is linked to the ratings of other firms in the network. The concept of
effective credit ratings captures financial institutions' interconnectedness and susceptibility to adverse
shocks. In this context, Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy was a massive negative shock that reverberated
throughout the entire network. As a result, this study investigates how these co-evolution dynamics
play out in the face of a systemic crisis.One of the study's key findings is the identification of a global
phase transition within the financial system. In physics, this phase transition is analogous to the
transition between paramagnetic and ferromagnetic phases. Individual elements (or firms, in this case)
do not exhibit strong alignment with each other in a paramagnetic phase, whereas there is significant
alignment of elements in a ferromagnetic phase. In terms of financial stability, this transition
represents a shift from relative independence among financial institutions to a state of strong
interdependence.In simpler terms, the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers caused a shift in the behaviour
of financial institutions from one in which they were somewhat insulated from one another to one in
which they became highly synchronised in their creditworthiness. Because of this synchronisation,
when one institution's credit rating was downgraded as a result of the Lehman event, others were more
likely to follow suit.The research also looks into potential solutions to lessen the impact of such a
global shock. While the research suggests that bailing out the initial defaulting firms is not a
permanent solution, it does reduce the overall shock. The proportion of firms that avoid default is used
to calculate this. In other words, while controversial and costly, government interventions and bailouts
can serve as a form of "firefighting" to limit the spread of a systemic crisis. It emphasises the
interconnectedness of financial institutions and how one institution's failure can set off a chain
reaction. The concept of a global phase transition emphasises the systemic nature of financial crises,
emphasising the importance of addressing financial stability holistically. While bailouts are not a
perfect solution, they can help to lessen the severity of such crises. This study adds to our
understanding of the financial system's complexities and the challenges of maintaining stability in an
increasingly interdependent and complex network of institutions.

● Recession depression: mental health effects of the 2008 stock market crash- Melissa
McInerney, Jennifer M Mellor, Lauren Hersch Nicholas

The 2008 financial crisis left an indelible mark on the global economy, affecting not only individuals'
financial well-being but also their mental health. The authors of this study, Melissa McInerney,
Jennifer M Mellor, and Lauren Hersch Nicholas, investigate the profound mental health effects of
significant wealth losses experienced by older Americans in the United States during and after the
2008 stock market crash. The central question of the study is whether unexpected and substantial
wealth losses have a negative impact on mental health. The researchers used the 2008 Health and
Retirement Study, a valuable dataset that provides insights into the lives and well-being of older
Americans, to answer this question. This dataset enabled them to investigate the mental health
consequences of the stock market volatility.The method used in this study was to examine cross-wave
shifts in wealth and mental health among respondents polled before and after the stock market crash.
The researchers attempted to unravel the intricate relationship between financial losses and mental
health outcomes by comparing the experiences of individuals who had substantial stock holdings prior
to the crisis.The findings of this study paint a compelling picture of the 2008 stock market crash's
impact on the mental health of older Americans. Those who had significant stock holdings prior to the
crisis were found to be the most severely affected by the sudden and significant decrease in their
wealth. As a result, there was a discernible increase in depressive symptoms and an increase in the use
of antidepressant medications. In essence, sudden wealth losses had an immediate and significant
impact on subjective indicators of mental health, resulting in increased depressive symptoms and a
greater need for mental health interventions.The relationship between financial well-being and mental
health is complex. As people saw their wealth dwindle during the crisis, anxiety, stress, and despair
naturally increased. These emotional reactions manifested as depressive symptoms, and the increased
use of antidepressant medications served as a visible indicator of the growing mental health burden.
While the study found a clear link between wealth losses and subjective indicators of mental health,
there was no evidence that such losses resulted in elevated levels of clinically verified measurements
of mental health disorders. In other words, the effect on subjective well-being was more noticeable
than clinical diagnosis of mental health conditions.This study is significant because it emphasises the
importance of understanding the psychological impact of economic downturns. The 2008 financial
crisis, with its massive and widespread wealth losses, had a significant impact on the mental health of
older Americans. The findings emphasise the importance of a well-being approach that includes not
only financial stability but also emotional and mental health support during times of economic
upheaval.Finally, this study sheds light on the emotional and psychological fallout of the recession,
emphasising the importance of understanding the overall impact of financial crises. It serves as a
reminder that economic downturns can have far-reaching effects on mental health in addition to bank
accounts. We should consider the well-being of individuals and communities as we navigate the
complex landscape of global finance, acknowledging the psychological dimensions of economic
insecurity and the need for support systems that go beyond monetary relief.

METHODS-

1. CONTENT ANALYSIS-

Content analysis is a research method used in media studies and communication to systematically
analyse and evaluate the content of media materials, such as newspapers, television broadcasts,
websites, and social media. It helps researchers understand the messages being conveyed and how
they are constructed. Content analysis is particularly important for studying public perception and
media coverage of the 2008 Lehman Brothers and American market crash.
Quantitative analysis of media content allows researchers to assess various aspects of media coverage,
such as the frequency of specific terms, themes, or narratives related to the financial crisis. This data
provides a clear picture of the emphasis and priorities of the media in their reporting. Media framing,
which refers to how news stories are presented to influence public opinion, can be identified through
content analysis.
The emotional tone of media coverage, including the use of words and images that evoke fear, panic,
or reassurance, is crucial for understanding how it influenced public sentiment and behaviour during
the crisis. Content analysis can reveal how the media represented key figures and institutions, such as
government officials, financial experts, and CEOs of major corporations. Comparative analysis allows
researchers to compare the coverage of the 2008 financial crisis in different media outlets, countries,
or time periods, understanding variations in media narratives and their impact on public perception.
Longitudinal analysis tracks changes in media coverage and public perception over time, revealing
how media narratives evolved as the crisis unfolded and influenced public opinion and policy
responses.

1.
The day of September 29, 2008, stands out as a day of tumultuous upheaval and despair. As the
opening bell rang on the New York Stock Exchange, little did anyone anticipate that it would mark the
worst single-day drop in two decades, with $1.2 trillion vanishing from the United States stock market
by the time the closing bell sounded, six and a half frantic hours later.

The dire events of that fateful Monday were a stark reminder of the fragility of the global financial
system. It began with modest sell-offs in Asian stock markets 24 hours earlier, triggered by growing
concerns about the financial crisis's impact on the global economy. These concerns quickly spread to
Wall Street, setting the stage for what would become one of the darkest days since the 1987 crash.

The Standard & Poor's 500-stock index, a broad measure of the U.S. stock market, plummeted almost
9 percent, marking its third-largest decline since World War II. The Dow Jones industrial average was
not far behind, falling nearly 778 points, a staggering 6.98 percent, to 10,365.45.

However, what made this day particularly surreal was that the epicentre of the crisis was not the
trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange but the floor of the House of Representatives in
Washington, D.C. As lawmakers voted on a $700 billion rescue plan for ailing financial institutions,
uncertainty and panic pervaded the markets. The bill's unexpected rejection at 1:30 p.m. sent
shockwaves through Wall Street, and a sense of disbelief and apprehension began to grip the financial
world. As events unfolded, the fear of impending financial catastrophe loomed large. Investors were
gripped by concerns that the decision in Washington could imperil not only the financial industry but
also the broader economy. In response, central banks around the world endeavoured to jump-start the
credit markets by offering hundreds of billions of dollars in loans to banks. Their aim was to
encourage lending, which had almost ground to a halt as banks and investors became increasingly
unwilling to extend credit to one another. Unfortunately, these efforts did little to quell the turmoil in
the stock and credit markets.

The day's events were further complicated by trouble brewing in the European financial sector.
Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg had already agreed to invest $16.2 billion to rescue a
major bank, Fortis. Germany and a group of banks followed suit, pledging $43 billion to save Hypo
Real Estate, a commercial property lender. In the early hours of the morning, the British Treasury
seized the lender Bradford & Bingley, selling most of it to Banco Santander of Spain.

The response from political leaders was sombre and resolute. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown
vowed to do "what is necessary" to address the crisis. As these international events unfolded,
investors around the world watched with growing anxiety as stock markets in Asia began to sell off.
Tokyo's Nikkei 225 sank 1.5 percent, India's stocks fell nearly 4 percent, and in Hong Kong, the Hang
Seng tumbled nearly 4.3 percent, reflecting the uncertainty and unease that had gripped global
financial markets.

The situation in the United States was equally grim. Regulators in Washington were scrambling to
broker the sale of Wachovia Corporation to Citigroup or Wells Fargo, highlighting the fragility of
American banks. Sheila C. Bair, chairwoman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, called
Citigroup executives to inform them that Wachovia's banking business was to be acquired by
Citigroup.By this time, Federal Reserve officials were deeply alarmed. Even though they had
expanded their emergency lending programs, they could see that money markets were seizing up
worldwide. To address this crisis, they decided to provide a true show of force by expanding their
existing loan arrangements by an unprecedented $330 billion. As trading began on the New York
Exchange, stocks immediately fell 1 percent. Concerned about the market's rapidly deteriorating
condition, the Fed announced at 10 a.m. that it would increase its program to lend money through
foreign central banks to $620 billion, up from $290 billion. Additionally, they would double the
money they lent domestically through an auction program to $300 billion.

National City, a Cleveland-based bank with a $20 billion portfolio of troubled loans, saw its shares
plummet by 50 percent, further unsettling investors. In an environment of panic and despair, many
investors sought safety in U.S. Treasuries, driving yields to nearly zero as they prioritised the return of
their capital over potential profits. The stock market briefly rallied but continued to lose ground in the
afternoon. Minutes before the closing bell, a flurry of sales sent the Dow down another 200 points,
marking a disheartening conclusion to a day that would be etched into the annals of financial history.
Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. addressed the public, looking exhausted as he lamented the
vote's outcome but expressed determination to keep pressing Congress for a broad rescue plan to
alleviate stress in the credit markets.

The events of September 29, 2008, were a stark reminder of the interconnectivity of the global
financial system and the profound impact that decisions made in one part of the world can have on
markets and economies worldwide. It was a day when fear and uncertainty reigned supreme, leaving
investors and financial experts bewildered by the scale and swiftness of the crisis. While the financial
system eventually stabilised, the memories of that tumultuous day continue to serve as a sobering
reminder of the precarious nature of global finance and the critical importance of prudent and
effective regulation in maintaining financial stability.

2.
The day of September 29, 2008, stands out in the annals of financial history as a day of tumultuous
upheaval and despair. As the opening bell rang on the New York Stock Exchange, no one expected it
to be the worst single-day drop in two decades, with $1.2 trillion disappearing from the US stock
market by the time the closing bell rang, six and a half frantic hours later.The tragic events of that
fateful Monday served as a stark reminder of the global financial system's fragility. It started with
minor sell-offs in Asian stock markets 24 hours earlier, triggered by growing concerns about the
global economic impact of the financial crisis. These worries quickly spread to Wall Street, laying the
groundwork for one of the darkest days since the 1987 crash. The Standard & Poor's 500-stock index,
a broad measure of the US stock market, fell nearly 9%, the third-largest drop since World War II. The
Dow Jones industrial average followed suit, dropping nearly 778 points, or 6.98 percent, to 10,365.45.
The fact that the epicentre of the crisis was not the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange, but
the floor of the House of Representatives in Washington, D.C., added to the surreal nature of the day.
Uncertainty and panic gripped the markets as lawmakers voted on a $700 billion bailout plan for
failing financial institutions. The unexpected rejection of the bill at 1:30 p.m. sent shockwaves
throughout Wall Street, and a sense of disbelief and apprehension gripped the financial world. The
threat of impending financial disaster loomed large as events unfolded. Investors were worried that the
decision in Washington would jeopardise not only the financial industry but also the overall economy.
As a result, central banks around the world attempted to kick-start the credit markets by lending
hundreds of billions of dollars to banks. Their goal was to stimulate lending, which had nearly ceased
as banks and investors became increasingly unwilling to extend credit to one another. Unfortunately,
these efforts were ineffective in calming the stock and credit markets.The day's events were
complicated further by problems brewing in Europe's financial sector. Belgium, the Netherlands, and
Luxembourg had already agreed to contribute $16.2 billion to the rescue of Fortis. Germany and a
group of banks followed suit, pledging $43 billion to save commercial property lender Hypo Real
Estate. The British Treasury seized the lender Bradford & Bingley in the early hours of the morning,
selling the majority of it to Banco Santander of Spain.Political leaders responded solemnly and
resolutely. Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister, has pledged to do "whatever is necessary" to
address the crisis. As these international events unfolded, investors around the world watched with
increasing concern as Asian stock markets began to fall. The Nikkei 225 in Tokyo fell 1.5 percent, the
Sensex in India fell nearly 4 percent, and the Hang Seng in Hong Kong fell nearly 4.3 percent,
reflecting the uncertainty and unease that had gripped global financial markets.The situation in the
United States was no better. Washington regulators were scrambling to facilitate the sale of Wachovia
Corporation to Citigroup or Wells Fargo, highlighting the vulnerability of American banks. The
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's chairwoman, Sheila C. Bair called Citigroup executives to
inform them that Wachovia's banking business would be acquired by Citigroup.Federal Reserve
officials were alarmed by this point. Despite the fact that they had expanded their emergency lending
programmes, they could see that money markets were collapsing around the world. To deal with the
crisis, they decided to make a true show of force by increasing their existing loan arrangements by an
unprecedented $330 billion.Stocks fell 1% as soon as trading began on the New York Stock
Exchange. Concerned about the market's rapid decline, the Fed announced at 10 a.m. that it would
expand its programme of lending money through foreign central banks to $620 billion, up from $290
billion. They would also double the amount of money they lend domestically through an auction
programme to $300 billion. National City, a Cleveland-based bank with a $20 billion portfolio of
troubled loans, saw its stock drop by half, further unsettling investors. In a time of panic and despair,
many investors sought safety in US Treasuries, driving yields nearly to zero as they prioritised capital
return over potential profits.The stock market briefly rallied before continuing to fall in the afternoon.
A flurry of sales minutes before the closing bell sent the Dow down another 200 points, capping off a
depressing day that would go down in financial history. Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr.
addressed the public, looking exhausted as he lamented the outcome of the vote but expressed
determination to keep pressing Congress for a broad rescue plan to relieve credit market stress.The
events of September 29, 2008, served as a stark reminder of the global financial system's
interconnectedness and the profound impact that decisions made in one part of the world can have on
markets and economies around the world. It was a day when fear and uncertainty reigned supreme,
confounding investors and financial experts with the magnitude and speed of the crisis. While the
financial system eventually stabilised, the events of that turbulent day remain a sobering reminder of
the precarious nature of global finance and the critical importance of prudent and effective regulation
in maintaining financial stability.

3.

India's ability to navigate the Great Recession of 2008-09 with minimal disruption is admirable.
However, it is critical not to be overly optimistic, given that the post-crisis world remains unstable, as
evidenced by the aftershocks in Southern Europe. India's well-balanced macroeconomic structure,
which increases its resilience, should not be taken for granted. It should instead serve as a reminder to
remain vigilant in the face of external pressures.While India was not immune to the financial crisis
and subsequent recession, it fared far better than many other developed countries. Despite a
significant decline from pre-crisis growth rates, industrial production increased by 0.3% in early 2009,
and real GDP increased by 6.7% in FY09. This relative fortitude in the face of adversity. India
performed well in comparison to other developing economies. In contrast to China, where the external
demand shock posed a significant threat to employment and social stability, India's measured policy
responses did not result in destabilising consequences such as property bubbles or deteriorating bank
loan quality. To address the economic challenges, India, like many others, implemented stimulative
monetary and fiscal policies, though this approach is not without inflationary risks. Now, India, like
other countries, faces the challenge of developing an effective "exit strategy" from the emergency
policies implemented during the crisis, which must be implemented in a still-uncertain post-crisis
global environment. At the same time, these policy manoeuvres must support India's ongoing
development goals, which is no easy task.While India's economy is more balanced than that of many
other developing Asian countries, with a greater emphasis on private consumption and services rather
than exports and investments, it is not immune to external shocks. In 2008, India's export share was
only 24%, well below the 45% average for Developing Asia. However, India's export share has more
than doubled since 1998, demonstrating that the change in India's export share, rather than the
absolute level, drives economic growth. This shift places India more reliant on demand from
Developing Asia and less reliant on developed markets.
Despite these changes, Europe continues to be India's largest export market. As a result, the ongoing
consequences of Europe's sovereign debt crisis may pose a significant challenge to India's economy in
the coming years.In light of these persistent post-crisis challenges, India must refocus its development
strategy. Maintaining the recent increase in domestic saving, which reached 36.4% of GDP in
FY2008, is critical. Reversing the decline in domestic saving, which fell to 32.5% in FY2009 due to
an increase in the government budget deficit caused by the crisis, is critical to supporting India's
investment-led growth.Exiting the crisis-induced policies is difficult for India, as it is for many other
major economies. Although India has recovered strongly since the crisis, with real GDP growth of
8.6% year on year for the quarter ending in March 2010, the Reserve Bank of India has only unwound
a fraction of the easing measures implemented during the crisis. According to the government's most
recent budget, the structural deficit will be reduced only slightly in the current fiscal year. India is not
alone in retaining crisis-like policy settings; this trend can be seen in both developed and major
developing economies such as China.A delayed exit strategy may impede core development strategies
in emerging economies such as India, particularly when it comes to fiscal-policy-induced
impediments to national saving. If the crisis-induced fiscal stimulus is extended, it may have an
impact on India's domestic saving rate and widen its current account deficit, making it difficult to
restart investment-led growth.
Finally, large developing economies such as India must not cling to crisis-induced emergency policies
for too long. It was one thing to survive the crisis; now it's time for a post-crisis reality check.
Balancing the need for continued growth with the risks of delayed exit strategies is a difficult but
critical task.

2. MARXIST ANALYSIS-

A Marxist analysis of public perception and media coverage of the 2008 Lehman Brothers and
American market crash reveals the underlying economic and class dynamics. The crisis exposed
capitalism's contradictions and its negative impact on the working class. The media, acting as
ideological apparatuses, shaped public perception by emphasising individual greed while
downplaying systemic issues. The ruling class's control over media ownership ensured that the
narrative further protected the financial elite's interests. Understanding these dynamics is critical for a
thorough examination of the 2008 financial crisis and its aftermath. It emphasises the importance of
critically evaluating media narratives and challenging dominant ideology in order to address the
inherent flaws of the capitalist system.
I. The Crisis and Its Consequences for the Working Class
The 2008 financial crisis wreaked havoc on the working class, resulting in widespread job losses,
foreclosures, and economic insecurity. According to Marxist analysis, the crisis was caused by the
inherent contradictions of capitalism, in which financial institutions' pursuit of profit led to reckless
risk-taking and eventual collapse. The working class bore the brunt of these consequences, as they lost
jobs and homes while the financial elite responsible for the crisis were bailed out by the government.

II. The Media as a Tool for Propaganda

According to Marxist theory, the media, which is frequently controlled by the capitalist class, serves
as a propaganda tool to maintain the status quo and protect the interests of the ruling elite. The media
played a significant role in shaping public perception during the Lehman Brothers collapse. Selective
reporting, framing, and omission of key details by media outlets influenced public opinion. They
portrayed the crisis, for example, as an unforeseeable event caused by isolated bad actors rather than a
systemic failure of capitalism.

III. Development of the "Greedy Banker" Narrative

The media's coverage aided in the creation of the "greedy banker" narrative, which, while not entirely
false, oversimplified the complex causes of the crisis. This narrative blamed a few individuals for the
downfall, diverting attention away from the broader systemic issues within capitalism. By focusing on
individual greed, the media obscured the financial system's structural problems.

IV. Public Attitudes and the "Too Big to Fail" Ideology

During the crisis, the concept of "too big to fail" became prominent. According to Marxist analysis,
this concept served to protect large financial institutions by reinforcing the idea that some entities
were necessary for the functioning of the capitalist system. This perception influenced public opinion
by instilling fear of further economic collapse, leading to a greater public acceptance of government
bailouts for these institutions.

V. The Importance of Ideology

Marxist theory emphasises the importance of ideology in the maintenance of the capitalist system.
During the Lehman Brothers crisis, the media propagated the notion that capitalism was the only
viable economic system. This ideological reinforcement aided public acceptance of the current
economic structure while stifling broader discussions about potential alternatives.

VI. Class Conflict and Public Reaction

The reaction of the working class to the crisis was complicated. While some protested the bailouts and
corporate greed, others targeted fellow working-class people, particularly those who had taken out
subprime mortgages. This division among the working class demonstrates the ruling class's
effectiveness in shifting blame and maintaining a false sense of consciousness.

VII Financial Elites and Media Ownership

The concentration of media ownership among the capitalist class is highlighted by Marxist analysis.
Many major media outlets, including those in the financial sector, are owned by large corporations.
This ownership dynamic also ensures that narratives surrounding financial crises serve the elite's
interests. The discourse surrounding these crises is shaped by media owners who have a vested
interest in maintaining the capitalist system.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK-

Dynamics of Financial Markets

The overheated housing market was a major contributor to the 2008 financial crisis. Excessive
speculation fueled the housing bubble, which was characterised by rapidly rising home prices.
Speculators invested heavily in real estate, buoyed by the belief that housing prices would continue to
rise indefinitely. Lax lending standards and widespread securitization of subprime mortgages aided
this speculative behaviour.

Complex financial products were crucial in the crisis.

Financial institutions created complex and obfuscated instruments such as Collateralized Debt
Obligations (CDOs) and Credit Default Swaps (CDS). Although these products were poorly
understood, they were heavily marketed and overpriced. Investors, including major financial
institutions, purchased these products without a thorough understanding of the underlying risks.The
crisis exposed financial institutions' vulnerability to liquidity risks. As the value of mortgage-backed
securities and complex financial products declined, institutions found it more difficult to sell these
illiquid assets in order to meet their short-term obligations. This liquidity crisis exposed the financial
system's frailty.

Failures in Regulatory and Supervision

In the years leading up to the crisis, deregulation was a prevalent trend. The Glass-Steagall Act, which
had previously separated commercial and investment banking, was repealed, giving financial
institutions more leeway to take on risk. Because of the lack of effective oversight, banks were able to
engage in risky practices.A significant shortcoming was insufficient regulatory oversight. Regulatory
agencies in charge of supervising financial institutions failed to adequately monitor their risk
exposure. The lack of transparency in financial markets made determining the true extent of risk in the
system difficult. This lack of oversight contributed to an environment in which reckless behaviour
was tolerated.

Moral Hazard
The concept of "too big to fail" was crucial in the crisis. Financial institutions believed that if they
went bankrupt, the government would bail them out. This belief created a moral hazard because
institutions were encouraged to take on greater risks than they would otherwise, confident that the
government would provide a safety net. This moral hazard aggravated the risky behaviour.

Globalisation and Connectivity

The global interconnectedness of financial markets was highlighted by the crisis. A problem that
began in the United States housing market quickly spread to other regions, exacerbating the crisis.
Financial institutions worldwide were exposed to the risks associated with mortgage-backed securities
and complex financial products issued by the United States. Because of global interdependence, a
crisis in one part of the world could cause a domino effect, resulting in a global financial meltdown.

Psychological Aspects
Panic and a loss of confidence were critical factors in the crisis. As the scope of the problem became
clear, a confidence crisis swept through the financial markets. Investors began to question the stability
of financial institutions, resulting in a sharp drop in asset prices. The ensuing panic caused a credit
market freeze, severely limiting access to financing and exacerbating the crisis.

Factors Affecting the Macroeconomy

The bursting of the housing bubble set off a chain reaction of events. Millions of homeowners were
underwater on their mortgages, with their homes worth less than the outstanding mortgage balance.
As a result, the housing market was further destabilised by a wave of foreclosures and falling home
values.The crisis also precipitated a severe economic downturn. Job losses, decreased consumer
spending, and declining corporate profits all contributed to a severe and protracted economic
downturn. The crisis had far-reaching consequences for Main Street, affecting millions of Americans'
livelihoods.

Government Reaction
In response to the crisis, the United States government and central banks worldwide implemented
massive bailouts, stimulus packages, and liquidity injections. The goal was to stabilise the financial
system and keep it from collapsing completely. The Troubled Asset Relief Programme (TARP)
injected capital into financial institutions, while central banks cut interest rates and engaged in
quantitative easing to increase liquidity. These measures were intended to restore confidence in the
financial system and avert a total economic meltdown.
 Explaining Japan's Severe Economic Contraction during the Global Financial
Crisis of 2008-2009
(A GLOBAL SOUTH APPROACH)

The global financial crisis of 2008-2009 sent shockwaves through the world's economies, causing
many advanced economies to enter a recession. Among these, Japan stood out as a standout, with
negative economic growth in 2008 and a severe contraction in 2009. Despite initial expectations that
Japan would be immune to the crisis due to its limited exposure to "toxic" assets and the perceived
strength of its banking sector, it turned out to be one of the worst-affected major economies. This
essay aims to solve the mystery of why Japan, with a seemingly strong financial system, was severely
impacted by the global financial crisis, with a particular emphasis on the economic indicators and
structural changes that played a key role in this crisis.

Comparative Economic Contraction: In 2009, Japan's economic contraction was forecasted to be

-6.2%, outperforming the United States (-2.8%), the Eurozone (-4.2%), and the United Kingdom
(-4.1%), all of which were at the epicentre of the financial crisis. Only Singapore and Taipei, China
were in a worse situation than Japan.

Initial Resilience and Delayed Impact: Despite the fact that the crisis erupted in the United States in
2007 and later engulfed much of Europe, Japan's real economy appeared to weather the storm at first.
Positive growth in real GDP and private fixed investment persisted until the second quarter of 2008,
with export growth remaining steady through the third quarter. Only in the fourth quarter of 2008 did
ominous signs of an economic contraction emerge, with exports falling 12.5% year on year. Following
that, the first quarter of 2009 saw a startling 36.8% drop. Similarly, industrial production fell by
15.0%, 34.0%, and 27.6% year on year in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first two quarters of
2009, making Japan's drop one of the most severe among developed countries.

Impact Analysis: When comparing Japan's direct financial impact to that of the United States and
Europe, it is clear that Japan's banking sector was hardly affected directly. The relatively small
estimated value of write-downs and the limited cost of public sector support in Japan contrasted
sharply with the large figures in the United States and Europe.

Explaining Japan's Vulnerability: To understand why Japan was disproportionately affected, we must
conduct a more in-depth examination of the situation.

source- international Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009a)

With the onset of the US subprime loan crisis, Japanese stock prices, which had reached a peak in the
summer of 2007, began a gradual but significant decline. This decline had far-reaching consequences,
including straining commercial banks' balance sheets and capital adequacy ratios, ultimately limiting
their willingness to lend. The subsequent Lehman Brothers collapse in September 2008 exacerbated
the turmoil. This article delves into the crisis's multifaceted impact on Japanese exports and
manufacturing, emphasising the importance of both global and domestic factors.

Manufacturing Production Decline: One of the initial consequences of the crisis was a decrease in
manufacturing production. While overall manufacturing output held steady in September and October
2008, notable exceptions included electronic parts and devices and transportation equipment. The real
shock, however, came in November, when manufacturing output collapsed across major sectors. The
sharp drop in production, particularly in transportation equipment and general machinery, reflected the
crisis's long-term effects.

Impact on Exports: The decline in industrial production closely mirrored the decline in exports, which
were severely impacted by a worldwide contraction of demand and trade in the aftermath of the
Lehman shock. Furthermore, the sharp yen appreciation put additional strain on Japan's
export-oriented firms. Exports in all categories fell, with a particular emphasis on industrial supplies,
capital equipment, and consumer durables, which accounted for more than 90% of Japan's total
exports.

Regional Differences in Export Decline: While the decline in Japanese exports had a uniform impact
on destination markets, the composition of export declines varied across regions. Emerging Asia
accounted for more than 51% of the decline in exports, reflecting its significant share of total Japanese
exports. The drop in exports to emerging Asia was primarily felt by industrial supplies and capital
goods, which are critical inputs in the production of finished consumer goods. This was due to the
"triangular trade" in which Japan and Asian newly industrialised economies supplied parts and
components to emerging Asian economies, which assembled them for the US and European markets.

The mechanism by which Japan's output was so greatly affected by the collapse of
exports in late 2008 and early 2009 has two components: Japan's trade structure and its
industrial structure.

The Composition of Japanese Exports: The composition of Japanese exports was critical in
determining the extent of the global financial crisis' impact. With industrial supplies, capital goods,
and consumer durables accounting for more than 90% of exports, Japan was particularly vulnerable to
a collapse in the US and European markets. Notably, industrial supplies and capital goods exports to
emerging Asia accounted for more than 40% of total exports.

International Comparisons: The financial crisis's impact was not limited to Japan. According to
international comparisons, economies with a higher share of advanced manufacturing in their GDP
experienced sharper output declines. Singapore and Taipei, China, were among the economies
included in this group. In Japan's case, the crisis harmed both consumer durables exports to advanced
markets (which accounted for less than 15% of total exports) and industrial supplies and capital goods
exports to emerging Asia (which accounted for more than 40% of total exports). The global downturn
and softening investment demand were the primary drivers of this decline.
Intra-Regional Trade in Asia: There has been significant growth in intra-regional trade within Asia.
The intra-regional trade share of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the People's
Republic of China (PRC), Japan, and Korea (ASEAN+3) increased from around 30% in 1980-1990 to
more than 38% in 2006. When Hong Kong and Taipei, China are included, the share exceeds 55%.
This increase in intra-regional trade was closely related to intra-regional FDI, which accounted for up
to half of the region's total FDI.

Japan's Role in Intra-Regional Trade: Japan has played a key role in this growing intra-regional trade,
particularly in parts, components, and capital equipment. This phenomenon is especially noticeable in
industries such as electronics, automobiles, and other machinery products, where production networks
and supply chains span national borders. Japan's exports to emerging Asia have grown significantly in
the last two decades, with the share of total exports to emerging Asia rising from 34% in 1990 to 54%
in 2008.

Industrial Shifts and the Real Effective Exchange Rate:During this time, the real effective exchange
rate of the yen fluctuated significantly. It began appreciating in real terms in early 1985 and peaked in
1995, when it was approximately 80% higher than its 1980 level. Following that, the yen declined
until 2007, with the exception of a brief period from 1999 to 2001 when its value briefly rose. These
exchange rate dynamics had far-reaching consequences for Japan's industrial structure.

The Impact of a Strong Yen on Non-Traded Goods: The so-called "lost decade" was marked by an
increase in the non-tradable goods sector's share of Japan's economy. The yen's high real value tends
to raise the relative price of non-tradable goods, encouraging their production. As a result, resources
are diverted away from the production of tradable goods. Furthermore, the decreased price
competitiveness of manufacturing firms producing tradable goods encourages them to shift production
activities abroad via foreign direct investment (FDI).
Non-Tradable Goods Production Shift: the shift in production from untradable to tradable goods from
1980 to 2007. The data show a steady increase in the share of the non-tradable goods sector in
nominal terms, with a more modest increase in real terms. Notably, during the period of a strong yen
(1993-2002), the production of non-tradable goods exceeded the trend, regardless of whether
measured in nominal or real terms. This trend shifted after 2002, when Japan emerged from its
economic slump and relied on exports for growth.

Export-Led Growth and Vulnerabilities: As Japan slowly emerged from its prolonged recession, it
relied more and more on the export sector as a growth engine. This shift was especially noticeable as
the real effective value of the yen fell, making exports more competitive. As a result, Japan's GDP
share of exports increased, and the country's overall openness to global trade increased from the early
2000s to 2008. Japan's export-to-GDP ratio, for example, increased from 11% in 2000 to over 17% in
2008, while trade openness increased from about 20% of GDP to nearly 35%.

Vulnerabilities to the Global Financial Crisis: Japan's export-led growth was vulnerable to global
economic turbulence, which was primarily linked to the US economy's expansion, which was driven
by a housing price bubble and increased personal consumption. This unsustainable economic scenario
eventually led to the housing price bubble bursting in the summer of 2006, triggering the 2008 global
financial crisis. Japan's reliance on export growth made it particularly vulnerable to disruptions in
global demand, particularly from its key trading partners.

Despite the initial resilience of Japan's financial system, the global financial crisis of 2008-2009 had a
profound and unexpected impact on the country. The severe drop in industrial production was caused
by a number of factors, including stock price declines, which eroded commercial banks' capital bases,
reducing their willingness to lend. Furthermore, the long-term consequences of the sharp increase in
oil and commodity prices during the summer of 2008 exacerbated these difficulties. However, the
contractionary effect of global deleveraging on Japan's real economy was the primary cause of the
country's economic downturn.
Over the last decade, Japan's trade and industrial sectors have undergone two significant structural
changes, making it particularly vulnerable to this crisis. For starters, over 90% of Japan's exports were
highly income-elastic, primarily consisting of industrial supplies, capital goods, and consumer
durables. Although emerging Asia was Japan's largest export market, imports from this region
primarily consisted of components for the production of final consumer goods for the advanced
markets of the United States and Western Europe. The contraction in demand from developed
economies due to global deleveraging disrupted these intricate supply chains, affecting not only Japan
but also other similar emerging economies such as Korea, Singapore, and Taipei, China.

Second, since the early 2000s, Japan's trade dependence has grown, with an increasing export-to-GDP
ratio and a declining share of the non-tradable sector. This shift was caused by the yen's real effective
exchange rate returning to historical average levels, allowing Japan to emerge from a decade-long
slump. While increased trade openness is a natural result of economic globalisation and regional
integration, the manner in which this process unfolded left Japan vulnerable to significant external
output shocks.

Looking ahead, it is critical to distinguish between the inevitable result of Japan's participation in
global economic integration and the necessity of managing this process. As Japan continues to
integrate with global and regional economies, the export-to-GDP ratio is likely to rise, with an
increasing share of exports going to emerging Asia as the region's income levels rise. The
geographical and product diversification of these exports becomes critical. Policymakers must create
favourable conditions for increased exports of finished goods to emerging Asia, possibly through the
establishment of a regional free trade agreement.

Domestically, advocating a policy of reduced trade openness in order to reduce vulnerability to

external shocks is illogical. Given the size of Japan's economy, it cannot rely solely on external
demand to sustain growth. Domestic demand should be promoted and impediments to its expansion
should be addressed by policymakers. Reforms to the social protection system, deregulatory measures
to optimise resource allocation between regulated and unregulated sectors, significant agricultural
reforms, and a more liberal immigration policy can all stimulate private investment in an ageing
society with limited fiscal space. These policies will contribute to the development of an environment
conducive to private investment, fueled by robust domestic demand. To be more resilient to external
economic shocks, Japan's future path must combine global integration with prudent domestic policies.
CONCLUSION-

Finally, the global financial crisis of 2008-2009, precipitated by the failure of Lehman Brothers and
the subsequent market crash, had far-reaching and multifaceted effects on economies around the
world. This essay has looked at various aspects of the crisis, from how it is portrayed in the media to
how it affects different countries and regions. A Marxist analysis was also used to highlight the
economic and class dynamics at work during the crisis. Furthermore, the essay delves into the case of
Japan, a country that wIt is impossible to overestimate the importance of public perception and media
coverage in shaping the narrative of the 2008 financial crisis. The media was critical in spreading
information, simplifying complex financial concepts, and humanising the crisis. The portrayal of key
figures and institutions, as well as increased media coverage, influenced public opinion and put
pressure on governments and central banks to act quickly and decisively. The crisis caused a
significant economic downturn, with long-term ramifications that prompted regulatory reforms and
reshaped financial and regulatory policies.According to Marxists, the crisis exposed capitalism's
inherent contradictions, as the working class bore the brunt of the consequences while the financial
elite responsible for the crisis were bailed out. The media, which was frequently controlled by the
capitalist class, played a role in perpetuating the dominant ideology that served the ruling elite's
interests. The "greedy banker" narrative oversimplified the complex causes of the crisis, and the
concept of "too big to fail" reinforced the idea that some entities were required for capitalism to
function.The case of Japan demonstrated the flaws of an export-led growth model, as the country's
reliance on export growth made it vulnerable to disruptions in global demand. Japan was particularly
vulnerable to external output shocks due to the composition of Japanese exports and structural
changes in the economy, such as increased trade openness and a declining share of the non-tradable
sector.As we look ahead, it is critical to recognise the global economic system's complexities and
interdependencies. Globalisation and trade are important economic drivers, but they must be managed
carefully. Policymakers should prioritise creating an environment conducive to private investment and
robust domestic demand, addressing economic growth impediments, and promoting social and
economic reforms to increase resilience to external economic shocks. The media, public perception,
and class dynamics all had a significant impact on the crisis and its aftermath. Japan's experience
teaches us about the complexities of economic globalisation and the importance of prudent policy
measures to ensure resilience in the face of external shocks. Understanding the lessons of the past is
critical as we move forward in order to build a more stable and equitable economic future.
REFERENCES-

Bernanke, Ben, 1983, “Non-Monetary Effects of the Financial Crisis in the Propagation of the
Great Depression,” American Economic Review, Vol. 73 (June), pp. 257–76.

IMF, 2008, Global Financial Stability Report (Washington), October.

Lall, Subir, Roberto Cardarelli, and Selim Elekdag, 2008, “Financial Stress and Economic
Downturns,” in World Economic Outlook (Washington: IMF), October.

Prakash, S. (2020). THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS 2008. ResearchGate.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340502432_THE_GLOBAL_FINANCIAL_CRIS

IS_2008

Deutsche Bank Escapes Subprime Losses - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

2008 crisis a wake-up call for India. (2010, June 2). The Economic Times.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/2008-crisis-a-wake-up-cal

l-for-india/articleshow/6000712.cms

Sieczka, P., Sornette, D., & Hołyst, J. A. (2011). The Lehman Brothers effect and bankruptcy
cascades. European Physical Journal B, 82(3–4), 257–269.
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-10757-2

Burkhanov, U. (2011). The Big Failure: Lehman Brothers’ Effects On Global Markets. European
Journal of Business and Economics, 2. https://doi.org/10.12955/ejbe.v2i0.9

Federal Reserve Board - Home

Zendy - unlimited access to a library of academic literature. (n.d.). Zendy.

https://zendy.io/search?searchQuery%5B0%5D%5Bterm%5D=2008%20market%20crash%2
 0mental%20health&sortFilters=relevance&filters%5B0%5D=__EMPTY_ARRAY__&dateFi

lters%5Bstart%5D=1000-1&dateFilters%5Bend%5D=2050-12&dateFilters%5BappliedFrom

Date%5D=false&dateFilters%5BappliedToDate%5D=false&facetFilters%5B0%5D=__EMP

TY_ARRAY__

McInerney, M., Mellor, J. M., & Nicholas, L. H. (2013). Recession depression: Mental health effects

of the 2008 stock market crash. Journal of Health Economics, 32(6), 1090–1104.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.002

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/08/business/worldbusiness/08bank.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/business/worldbusiness/16iht-yen.4.16201991.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/failure-lehman-brothers-causes-effects-lessons-future-bismark-t
andoh?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&utm_campaign=share_via