Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
We examine a chain of periodic arrays of 4 quantum spins with magnitudes of 1/2, 1, 3/2 and 1. There are four kinds
of nearest-neighbour exchange parameters among them. We choose two independent parameters for concreteness:
one represents the ratio of typical exchange parameters, and the other represents a distortion. We determine the
phase diagram of the ground state in the parameter space. The phase boundaries appear as gapless lines which
separate gapful disordered phases. They are determined by the gapless equation which was previously derived by
mapping a general periodic spin chain to the nonlinear σ model.
2
5 2.0
4
1 1.5
v/aJ
1
θ/π
1.0
2
0.5
1
γ =0
γ =0
0 0.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4
J'/J
J'/J
Fig. 3. The spin wave velocity v as a function of J ′ /J for
Fig. 2. The topological angle θ as a function of J ′ /J for γ
γ = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0.
= 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0. The system is gapless on
the lines of θ/π = 1 and 3 (dashed line).
1 1 1
= + ′, 2
J (0) J 3J
1 1 1 1 γ
= + + ,
J (1) 4 J 3J ′ J′ 1 γ =0
1 1 1 5 γ
= + + . (9)
J (2) 8 J 3J ′ J′
0
Comparing Eq. (4) with Eq. (7), we have the
0.0 0.2 0.4
topological angle J'/J
3
3. Phase diagram 1.0
B+
It is well known that an NLSM has gapless exci-
tations if the topological angle θ is an odd-integer 0.5
A+
multiple of π. In the general periodic spin model,
this condition is turned into the gapless equation
0.0
γ
2J (0) 2l − 1
(1)
= (13)
J 2
A−
-0.5
with arbitrary integer l. In the present case of
Eq. (10), it becomes of a simple form B−
-1.0
J′ 1
0.0 0.1 0.2
γ = 2l + . (l = −1, 0, 1) (14) J'/J
J 3
Fig. 5. The phase diagram in the (J ′ /J, γ) parameter
The equation for each l determines a phase bound- space (−1 < γ < 1). The phase boundaries are gapless
ary between gapful disordered phases. The re- lines determined by Eq. (14).
stricted values of integer l is due to the condition
4. Summary
−1 < γ < 1. In the symmetric case of γ = 0, the
system is gapless irrespective of the ratio J ′ /J,
because it satisfies Eq. (14) with l = 0. We have examined the 1/2-1-3/2-1 spin chain
The phase diagram of the ground state is ob- with a distortion of the exchange parameters by
tained by identifying the gapless lines (14) as the using the nonlinear σ model method. We obtained
phase boundaries. We show the phase diagram in the phase diagram of the ground state in the pa-
Fig. 5. There exist four phases A+ , A− , B+ and rameter space. There exist four gapful phases. In
B− in the (J ′ /J, γ) parameter space. The phase the case of no distortion, the system is always gap-
structure is symmetric for γ → −γ according to less and is on a phase boundary. When the distor-
the symmetry of the Hamiltonian (1) with Eqs. (2) tion is strong, there are two phases to be explained
and (3). by a VBS picture. It is a future work to explain
In phase B+ , γ is close to 1 and J2 is selectively the other phases by the singlet-cluster-solid (SCS)
large. The ground state of B+ may be explained by picture developed in Ref. [6].
a VBS picture [10]. That is, if we decompose each
spin into spins with magnitude 1/2, the ground References
state is approximately a direct product of dimers.
Two dimers in a unit cell are formed between 1/2- [1] F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Lett. 93 A (1983) 464; Phys.
spins at the both sides of a coupling with exchange Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 1153.
parameter J2 . Phase A+ is of an intermediate char- [2] I. Affleck, Nucl. Phys. B 257 (1985) 397; 265 (1986)
409; I. Affleck, F.D.M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. B 36 (1987)
acter and spreads over almost all area in the pa- 5291.
rameter space. The ground state of A+ does not [3] T. Fukui, N. Kawakami, Phys. Rev. B56 (1997) 8799.
seem to be explained by the conventional VBS pic-
[4] K. Takano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 5124.
ture.
[5] K. Takano, to be published in Physica B (cond-
mat/9909440).
[6] K. Takano, to be published in Phys. Rev. B (cond-
mat/9911098).
4
[7] W. Chen, K. Hida, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67 (1998) 2910.
[8] T. Hikihara, T. Tonegawa, M. Kaburagi, T. Nishino, S.
Miyashita, H.-J. Mikeska, preprint.
[9] T. Tonegawa, T. Hikihara, M. Kaburagi, T. Nishino, S.
Miyashita, H.-J. Mikeska, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67 (1998)
1000.
[10] I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, H. Tasaki, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 799.