COINTELPRO 5.

0:
Unraveling the Web of Gangstalking, Deep State Intrigues,
Societal Engineering, and Surveillance Unveiled

Copyright © 2023 by Charlie Armstrong Adams

Dear readers,
I am excited to announce the public release of my book, now available for free
download on various websites. Your support, whether through Patreon or the
donate button on the website, is highly appreciated as it helps sustain and
enhance the quality of my work. However, I understand that budgets can vary,
and if your financial situation doesn't allow for contributions, I am genuinely
happy that you can still access and enjoy the book for free. Your readership is
invaluable, and I hope you find the content enriching. Thank you for being a
part of this literary journey.
~ Charlie Adams

PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/animalpoliticus
WEBSITE AnimalPoliticus.com
FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089623855598
 Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction to COINTELPRO - Page 1

 Historical context and origins of COINTELPRO - Page 1

 Definition and objectives of COINTELPRO - Page 1
 J. Edgar Hoover's Involvement in COINTELPRO and the Revelation
of Government Surveillance - Page 2

Chapter 2: Evolution and Continuation of COINTELPRO - Page 5

 Allegations of Targeted Suppression: Examining Parallels Between

the 9/11 Truth Movement and COINTELPRO - Page 8
 Whistle-blowers and Journalists in the Shadow of COINTELPRO -
Page 9
 The Controversial Case of Julian Assange: CIA and COINTELPRO
Tactics, Surveillance, and Extradition - Page 10

Chapter 3: COINTELPRO - The Art of Disruption, Deception, and

Discrediting - Page 12

 Unveiling COINTELPRO's Strategy: Disruption, Discrediting, and

Deception - Page 12
 Countermeasures Against COINTELPRO Deception and Building
Resilience - Page 21

Chapter 4: Surveillance Synergy: The Nixon Era's Nexus of NSA

and COINTELPRO - Page 23

 The Nexus of NSA Surveillance and COINTELPRO in the Nixon Era -

Page 23
 President Nixon's Connections with the Catholic Church: A Mutual
Alliance Against Communism - Page 25

Chapter 5: Eyes Everywhere: The Legacy of 9/11 and the

Expansion of Mass Surveillance - Page 30
 The Controversial Catalyst: 9/11 as the Spark for the NSA's Civilian
Surveillance Program - Page 30
 The implications of the Program - Page 32
 The Usual Suspects: The Collaboration of Control - Page 34
 President Bush's Alleged Ignorance and Questionable Counsel
during the NSA Surveillance Program - Page 36
 Eerie Parallels Between Presidential Eras and the Resonating
Repercussions on Civil Liberties - Page 37

Chapter 6: The NSA's Extensive monitoring Programs Explained

- Page 41

 Surveillance Unveiled: The NSA's Extensive Monitoring Programs -

Page 41
 Defending Democracy: Safeguarding Privacy, Holding Power
Accountable, and Advocating for Surveillance Reforms - Page 45
 Exploring NSA's Complex Web of Contractors, Security Risks, and
Ideological Concerns - Page 47
 Eavesdropping and Psychological Manipulation through Smart
Devices - Page 52

Chapter 7: The Deep State and COINTELPRO - Page 56

 Unveiling the Deep State: Beyond Sensational Claims and into the
Truth - Page 56
 The Phenomenon of the Deep State: Covert Networks of Power
Operating Beyond Political Leadership - Page 60
 Reflecting on the Extent and Significance of Jesuit Influence in Early
America - Page 61
 The Roman Blueprint from America's Inception - Page 64
 The Fifth Column: Navigating Roman Catholic Church and
Government Integration - Page 66
 Symphony of Faith and Governance: The Dawn of Roman
Catholicism's Integration into the U.S. Government - Page 68
 A Secret Alliance: The CIA, the Vatican, and the United States - Page
68
 The Vatican's Quest for Global Influence: A Journey Through Pope
John Paul II's Vision, Power Plays, and Contemporary Challenges -
Page 71
 The Civil Service: Consolidating Power and Protecting Interests in
Government Administration - Page 73
 The Alliance Emerges: Left-Wing America and the Papacy - Page 74
 The Roman Empire Never Died - Page 75
 Donald Trump's Outcry and the Alleged Deep State Involvement -
Page 78
 Inside the Bureau: FBI, DOJ, and the Secret Society - Page 79
 Apolitical Insights: Exploring the Intersection of Politics, Religion,
and the Vatican's Adaptive Strategies - Page 80
 Unraveling the Enigma of the Roman Catholic Church - Page 81
 The Deep State's Influence on How Governments Address Child
Abuse Scandals - Page 86

Chapter 8: The Five Eyes: A Covert Intelligence Alliance - Page

93

 Forging Alliances: The Origins of the 5 Eyes Intelligence Partnership

- Page 93
 In the Depths of 5 Eyes Surveillance: The Exploitation - Page 94
 A Veiled Shadow: Questioning the Relevance of the 5 Eyes Alliance
and its Potential Involvement in Assassinations - Page 96
 The Five Eyes Alliance and Its Targets: A Closer Look at Surveillance
- Page 97
 The 5 Eyes Alliance: A Veil of Control and Suppression in the
Anglosphere - Page 99
 Five Eyes Contractors: Companies and individuals hired by Five Eyes
intelligence agencies to provide specialized services and expertise -
Page 102
 Chapter 9: Behind Closed Doors: A Comprehensive Look at the
English-Speaking Intelligence Agencies and Facilities - Page 104

 United States: Unseen and Silent Ears - Page 104

 United Kingdom: Masters of Their Domain - Page 113
 Australia - Intelligence Landscapes and Global Pursuits - Page 119
 Canada - Safeguarding Secrets and Surveillance - Page 128
 New Zealand - Safeguarding Security Amidst Scrutiny - Page 133

Chapter 10: Domestic Intelligence Agencies and COINTELPRO -

Page 137

 Domestic Intelligence Agencies - Allegations of Harassment and

Intimidation - Page 137
 Transgressions of Domestic Intelligence Agencies - Page 138
 United States of America: Controversial Methods Employed by
Domestic Intelligence Agencies - Page 138
 United Kingdom: Controversial Activities of Military Intelligence
Section 5 (MI5) - Page 147
 Canada: Allegations of Misconduct by Canadian Security
Intelligence Service (CSIS) and Other Canadian Intelligence Agencies
- Page 151
 Australia: Debated Actions of the Australian Security Intelligence
Organization (ASIO) and Australian Intelligence Agencies - Page 155
 New Zealand: NZSIS Intelligence: Behavior as Creepy as it Gets -
Page 170

Chapter 11: The Vatican Intelligence Service: Unveiling the

Shadows of Influence - Page 174

 The Vatican Intelligence Service: Veiled Secrets and Political

Interests - Page 174
 The Vatican's Espionage Legacy - Page 176
 Illuminating the Shadows - Page 178
 Chapter 12: The Emergence of Intelligence Contractors and
Private Intelligence Firms - Page 180

 The Dark Side of Outsourcing: Compromising Intelligence for

Questionable Ends - Page 180
 The Veiled Watchers: The Soaring Dominance of Private Intelligence
Firms - Page 183
 The Private Intelligence Industry: An In-Depth Investigation into its
Operations, Controversies, and Influential Companies - Page 185
 Secretive Forces: A Peek into Select Controversial Private
Intelligence Agencies - Page 187
 Cambridge Analytica Ltd: Unraveling the Controversial Legacy -
Page 188
 Psy-Group: Unveiling the Controversial History of a Former Israeli
Private Intelligence Agency - Page 189
 SCL Group: The Shadowy Narrative of a Data Mining and Analysis
Behemoth - Page 191
 Pegasus Spyware: Navigating the Nexus of Technology, Ethics, and
Global Governance - Page 193
 Black Cube: The Veiled Realm of Private Intelligence and Espionage
- Page 195

Chapter 13: Collaborative Efforts Between United States

Intelligence Agencies and the Roman Catholic Church for
Organizational Use of Informants, Plants and Spies - Page 197

 Leveraging the Vatican's Global Influence: Collaborative

Opportunities for Western Intelligence Agencies - Page 197
 Hiram Dukes: A Pastor's Encounter with Surveillance - Page 202
 The Veil of Freedom: Unveiling Covert Forces Shaping Democratic
Landscapes - Page 203
 Unlocking Advantages: The Strategic Alliance between Intelligence
Agencies, the Roman Catholic Church, and Operational Efficacy -
Page 204
 The Veiled World of Involuntary Surveillance - Page 207
 Ethical Dilemmas in Coordinated Location Tracking: Examining
Surveillance Apps - Page 209

Chapter 14: Unveiling COINTELPRO: Surveillance, Tactics and

Psychological Manipulation Techniques - Page 214

 Unmasking the Covert World: Counterintelligence Surveillance,

GangStalking, Ideological Manipulation, Harassment, and Social
Manipulation - Page 214
 The Vatican's Influence on Psychological Manipulation Strategies -
Page 227
 Psychological Manipulation Through Accusations of Hate Speech
and Anti-Catholic Sentiments - Page 228
 Emotional Manipulation - A Covert Instrument of Influence - Page
229
 Unmasking the Ad Hominem Tactics: The Battle for Free Thought -
Page 231

Chapter 15: Blackmail and Oppositional Research in the Context

of COINTELPRO - Page 233

 The Dark Alliance: Covert Machinations of Blackmail and the

COINTELPRO Surveillance Apparatus - Page 233
 The Intersection of Catholic Confessionals and Blackmail - Page 234
 The Intricate Art of Opposition Research - Page 236
 Unveiling the Enigma: Epstein's Black Book, Elite Connections,
Scandal, and the Intriguing Hypothesis of a CIA Blackmail Ring -
Page 237
 The Alarming Reality of Blackmail: Unveiling the Silent Controls and
Covert Participation in COINTELPRO - Page 239

Chapter 16: Historical Parallels: COINTELPRO and the Catholic

Inquisitors - Page 243

 The Interconnected Relationship Between the Catholic Church and

the FBI - Page 243
 The Catholic Church and the Civil Rights Movement: A Closer Look
at Divisions and Doubts - Page 248
 Covert Operations of the Catholic Church during the Reformation: A
Parallel to COINTELPRO Tactics - Page 250
 J. Edgar Hoover and the Civil Rights Movement: Controversial
Motivations and Covert Actions - Page 252

Chapter 17: Community Stalking and Gangstalking - Page 256

 Welcome to My Nightmare! - Page 256

 Common Tactics in Gangstalking and Targeted Harassment - Page
259
 Understanding the Phenomenon of Community
Stalking/Gangstalking as a Powerful Tool of COINTELPRO - Page
261
 Examination of the Impact on Targeted Individuals and the Role it
Plays in Suppressing Dissent - Page 264
 Myron May: An In-Depth Look at Gangstalking Allegations or
Paranoid Delusion? - Page 267

Chapter 18: The Dark Side of Bureaucracy: Civil Servants Unite

for Obstruction and Deception - Page 276

 Undermining Democracy: The Dark Tactics of Bureaucratic

Persecution within Government Agencies - Page 276
 Allegations of Religious Bias and Government Influence: A Global
Perspective - Page 278
 Invisible Struggles: The Emotional and Psychological Toll on Victims
of Administrative Persecution - Page 279

Chapter 19: Undercover Shadows: COINTELPRO, Whistle-

blowers, and Journalists - Page 282

 Persecution of Journalists: A Chilling Assault on Free Press - Page

282
 Julian Assange: A Harsh Example of State Repression - Page 282
 Historical Persecution of Journalists: A Long Shadow of Suppression
- Page 285
 Persecution Today: A Grave Affront to Journalistic Freedom - Page
286
 Journalists' Use of Encryption and VPNs: A Fragile Fortress - Page
288
 Data Retention: A Stealthy Menace to Journalistic Freedom - Page
289
 Journalists and Whistle-blowers: Navigating Persecution and Legal
Challenges Worldwide - Page 289
 Digital Deception: Cyber Espionage and the Challenge of Planting
Evidence - Page 292
 The Covert Web: Fact-Checking and Counterintelligence Unveiled -
Page 293

Chapter 20: COINTELPRO - Impacts on Mental and Physical

Health - Page 297

 Psychological Manipulation: Unveiling the Depths - Page 297

 Harassment and Surveillance: Psychological and Physical Toll - Page
298
 Social Isolation and Community Disruption: Tearing at the Social
Fabric - Page 299
 Legal Consequences and Stress: The Weight of Legal Pressure -
Page 300
 Examination of the Scientific Basis behind Covert Harassment
Tactics and their Impact on Mental Health, Employment, and Stress
Levels - Page 300
 In Conclusion: Unraveling the Complex Web - Page 304
 Chapter 21: Investigation into the Collusion between Mental
Health Professionals and Intelligence Agencies in COINTELPRO
Operations - Page 306

 Collusion Between Mental Health Professionals and Intelligence

Agencies - Page 306
 Psychiatric Abuse: Silencing Dissidents and Targeted Individuals
through False Diagnoses - Page 307
 The Involvement of Mental Health Professionals in CIA Experiments
- Page 308
 The Role of Psychologists in Guantanamo Bay: Ethical Concerns and
the Call for Positive Change - Page 310
 Analysis of the Ethical Implications and Consequences of
Collaboration between Mental Health Professionals and Intelligence
Agencies - Page 311
 The Expansive Influence of the Roman Catholic Church and Its
Implications for Healthcare - Page 313

Chapter 22: SOCIETAL ENGINEERING: NAVIGATING THE

BALANCE BETWEEN PROGRESS AND PERIL - Page 317

 An In-Depth Exploration of Societal Engineering Challenges - Page

317
 The Global Village Unveiled - Page 330
 The Unsettling Nexus - Corporations Enforcing Government Will
and Societal Engineering - Page 332
 The Founders of the Bilderberg Group: Shadows of Power - Page
334
 The Intersection of Social Engineering, Cybersecurity, and Media
Manipulation: A Historical Perspective on CIA Involvement - Page
335
 The Role of Global Threat Narratives in Shaping Collective Psyche -
Page 336
 Vatican and Societal Engineering - Page 338
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO
COINTELPRO

Historical context and origins of COINTELPRO

In the shadows of power and under the guise of protecting national security, a clandestine
operation emerged that would forever stain the pages of American history. COINTELPRO, or
Counterintelligence Program, was a covert initiative employed by the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) during the turbulent decades of the 1950s to the 1970s. Its modus
operandi was clear and chilling: to disrupt, discredit, and deceive subversives – a term
applied broadly to movements or ideological, political, and religious groups that dared to
challenge the status quo. COINTELPRO, acting as a weapon wielded by the government,
represented a strategic and systematic effort to undermine dissent and silence voices that
questioned the prevailing narrative. Operating in the shadows, it manipulated the intricate
fabric of society, leaving a trail of shattered dreams and lives in its wake. Its methods were
as diverse as they were diabolical, adapting to the changing landscape of the era to ensure
its objectives were met. The targets of COINTELPRO were not confined to a single
demographic or ideology; rather, they spanned a wide spectrum of movements. From civil
rights activists to anti-war protesters, and from radical political organizations to religious
groups, anyone deemed a threat to the establishment's grip on power was ensnared.

Definition and objectives of COINTELPRO

COINTELPRO (syllabic abbreviation derived from Counter Intelligence Program)

1|Page
 COINTELPRO agents infiltrated groups, movements and organizations deemed subversive
by embedding themselves to sow seeds of discord and mistrust, while collecting information
to be used as ammunition in the war against dissent. What sets COINTELPRO apart is its
adaptability. Its gaze was not fixed, but rather fluid, shifting to align with the prevailing
winds of societal norms. As the status quo evolved and public sentiment changed, so did the
program's focus. It could be rebranded to suit the era, transforming from targeting
communist groups during the Red Scare to focusing on civil rights activists during the
tumultuous 1960s. COINTELPRO's ever-changing agenda stands as a testament to its
unwavering dedication to preserving power structures threatened by those who dared to
challenge them.
The legacy of COINTELPRO is one characterized by betrayal, fear, and shattered trust. It
inflicted deep wounds in the fabric of American democracy, eroding the very foundations
upon which the nation was built. The repercussions of its actions continue to reverberate,
serving as a stark reminder of the dangers that arise when power remains unchecked and
individual rights are sacrificed in the relentless pursuit of control. In this critical examination
of COINTELPRO, we embark on a journey into the dark underbelly of this covert operation.
Drawing upon extensive research and documented evidence, our aim is to unmask the
tactics and strategies employed by those seeking to silence dissent. We shed light on the
lives forever altered by COINTELPRO's machinations and explore the wider implications for a
society grappling with issues of power, surveillance, and the erosion of civil liberties.

J. Edgar Hoover's Involvement in COINTELPRO and the Revelation of

Government Surveillance

J. Edgar Hoover, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) from 1924 to
1972, played a central role in the implementation of COINTELPRO. He authorized and
oversaw the covert operations designed to disrupt and neutralize various individuals,
organizations, and movements considered threats to the government. Hoover's leadership
and directive were instrumental in the targeting of civil rights activists, political dissidents,
and social justice movements.
The discovery of COINTELPRO and its operations came to light through a series of events. In
1971, a group of activists known as the Citizens' Commission to Investigate the FBI broke
into an FBI field office in Media, Pennsylvania. They stole numerous documents, which were
subsequently leaked to the press. These documents, known as the "Media Files," revealed
the existence and extent of COINTELPRO.
The exposure of COINTELPRO led to public outrage and scrutiny of the FBI's actions. The
Senate held hearings known as the Church Committee, led by Senator Frank Church, to
investigate intelligence agencies' activities. The committee's findings, along with the public
revelations, shed light on the FBI's unconstitutional and illegal practices under COINTELPRO.

2|Page
 As a result of the revelations and public pressure, COINTELPRO was officially discontinued
in 1971, and reforms were implemented to restrict the FBI's surveillance and investigative
powers. The exposure of COINTELPRO marked a significant moment in American history,
highlighting the dangers of unchecked government surveillance and the need to protect civil
liberties.

While it is challenging to provide an exhaustive list of COINTELPRO targets due to the

program's secretive nature, here are some notable individuals, organizations, and
movements that were affected:

1. Black Panther Party

2. American Indian Movement (AIM)
3. Socialist Workers Party
4. Communist Party USA
5. Nation of Islam
6. Weather Underground Organization
7. Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)
8. Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)
9. Martin Luther King Jr.
10. Malcolm X
11. Eldridge Cleaver
12. Fred Hampton
13. Assata Shakur (formerly JoAnne Chesimard)
14. Angela Davis
15. John Lennon (due to his political activism)
16. Vietnam War protesters and anti-war organizations
17. Puerto Rican independence movement activists
18. Chicano/Mexican-American activists and organizations
19. Women's Liberation Movement activists
20. LGBTQ+ activists and organizations

3|Page
Footnote references for the provided information:
Ward Churchill, Jim Vander Wall, Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars Against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian
Movement (Boston: South End Press, 2002), 45-47. Betty Medsger, The Burglary: The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover's Secret FBI (New York:
Vintage Books, 2014), 79-80. Brian Glick, War at Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It (Boston: South
End Press, 1989), 112-115. Athan Theoharis, The FBI and American Democracy: A Brief Critical History (Lawrence: University Press of
Kansas, 2004), 87-89. Ward Churchill, The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United States
(Boston: South End Press, 2002), 5-9. Robert Justin Goldstein, Political Repression in Modern America: From 1870 to the Present (Chicago:
University of Illinois Press, 2001), 195-198. The Burglary: The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover's Secret FBI" by Betty Medsger (2014) War at
Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It" by Brian Glick (1989)

4|Page
CHAPTER 2: EVOLUTION AND
CONTINUATION OF COINTELPRO

In the previous chapter, we explored the historical origins of COINTELPRO

(Counterintelligence Program) and its operations during the mid-20th century.
Unfortunately, the tale surrounding COINTELPRO failed to find closure with its deceivingly
official termination in 1971. Instead, the program underwent a transformation, adapting to
advancements in technology and societal changes. This chapter aims to examine the
evolution and continuation of COINTELPRO techniques in contemporary times. As we
progress further into the digital age, surveillance technologies have become smaller,
cheaper, and more accessible to both governmental agencies and individuals. The
proliferation of cameras, listening devices, digital surveillance and various tracking tools has
significantly facilitated the monitoring of people, making it easier for COINTELPRO
coordinators and handlers of informants to carry out their operations covertly.
One notable aspect of the evolving COINTELPRO practices is the use of mobile phones,
effortlessly connecting informants with their handlers. Technological advancements have
made it possible for informants to capture and share real-time audio, video, and location
data of their targets. Furthermore, the rise of communications surveillance has become a
key component in contemporary COINTELPRO operations.
This topic will be explored in depth in a later chapter, but it is important to acknowledge its
relevance here. Modern communication platforms, such as email, social media, and instant
messaging, have become virtual gold mines of information for those conducting
COINTELPRO. Through data mining, malware and sophisticated algorithms, COINTELPRO
coordinators can monitor individuals' online activities, social connections, and even analyze
their emotions, sentiments, and opinions.
The use of technology to coerce others into participating in COINTELPRO on a specified
target has also become more prevalent by sifting through informants' personal lives, looking
for infractions that may affect their social standing or employment. Moreover, in the realm
of contemporary technology, intelligence agencies are equipped with mechanisms that

Page | 5
enable them to gain insights into the psychological state of their targets, thereby rendering
these individuals vulnerable to the tactics of psychological warfare. Listening devices are
discreetly placed by COINTELPRO agents to obtain intelligence regarding the interpersonal
dynamics thriving within a targeted residence.
Issues have also been raised about intelligence agencies putting illegal material on devices
such as phones and laptops through malware. This allows COINTELPRO handlers to
manipulate both informants and targets. With the advent of deepfake technology, for
instance, it is now possible to manipulate videos and audio recordings to create false
evidence or fabricate compromising situations.
Since the 1990s to the present day, several movements, individuals, ideologies, and religious
organizations have claimed that they have been subjected to programs or tactics
reminiscent of COINTELPRO. While the specific nature and extent of these programs may
vary, here are some examples of groups and individuals who have made such claims:

United States:

1. Black Lives Matter (BLM) Movement

2. Occupy Wall Street Movement
3. Muslim-American community
4. Whistle-blowers and government critics
5. Indigenous rights activists
6. Environmental and climate activists
7. Animal rights activists
8. Anti-globalization and anti-war activists
9. Fundamentalist Christian Groups
10. Alternative Media Outlets: Independent media organizations and journalists critical of
government policies have claimed targeted surveillance, intimidation, and harassment.
11. The 9/11 Truth movement

Page | 6
United Kingdom:

1. Extinction Rebellion (XR)

2. Anti-war and anti-nuclear activists
3. Civil liberties organizations
4. Investigative journalists and media outlets
5. Muslim community organizations
6. Fundamentalist Christian Groups

Page | 7
Australia:

1. Indigenous rights activists

2. Whistle-blowers and government critics
3. Refugee and asylum seeker rights organizations
4. Environmental and climate activists
5. Aboriginal land rights and cultural preservation movements
6. Alternative Media Outlets: Independent media organizations and journalists critical of
government policies have claimed targeted surveillance, intimidation, and harassment.
7. Fundamentalist Christian Groups

New Zealand:

1. Maori rights and sovereignty activists

2. Anti-nuclear and peace activists
3. Environmental conservation groups
4. Whistle-blowers and government critics
5. Fundamentalist Christian Groups

Canada:

1. Indigenous rights activists

2. Environmental and climate activists
3. Anti-pipeline and anti-fracking movements
4. Civil liberties organizations
5. Muslim community organizations

Allegations of Targeted Suppression: Examining Parallels Between the 9/11

Truth Movement and COINTELPRO
There have been claims made by some members and supporters of the 9/11 truth
movement suggesting that they have been targeted by programs similar to COINTELPRO.
The 9/11 truth movement questions the official narrative of the events surrounding the

Page | 8
September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, often alleging government cover-ups,
conspiracy, and the existence of alternative explanations for the attacks. Some individuals
within the 9/11 truth movement argue that they have been subjected to surveillance,
infiltration, harassment, and attempts to discredit their efforts. They draw parallels between
their experiences and the tactics employed by COINTELPRO.

Whistle-blowers and Journalists in the Shadow of COINTELPRO

In recent years, concerns have emerged regarding programs reminiscent of COINTELPRO,
with whistle-blowers and journalists finding themselves in the crosshairs of surveillance,
harassment, and suppression.
Resurgence of Targeting:
In recent years, there have been troubling indications of whistle-blowers and journalists
encountering similar patterns of surveillance and harassment. The revelations brought forth
by whistle-blowers like Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, and Reality Winner have shed
light on government secrets, surveillance programs, and human rights abuses. In response,
these courageous individuals have faced severe legal consequences and character
assassinations aimed at discrediting their disclosures.
Intimidation Tactics:
Parallel to COINTELPRO's playbook, modern-day whistleblowers and journalists have
encountered a range of intimidation tactics. Surveillance technologies have become more
sophisticated, enabling unprecedented intrusion into their private lives and professional
activities. Covert monitoring, tracking, and data collection have been employed to identify
sources, gather compromising information, and stifle dissent.
Legal and Prosecutorial Challenges:
Whistle-blowers and journalists operating in the public interest find themselves increasingly
entangled in a legal labyrinth. Government entities have weaponized laws, such as the
Espionage Act, to prosecute whistle-blowers, placing them in precarious legal positions. The
chilling effect of these prosecutions reverberates across the journalism community,
fostering an atmosphere of fear and self-censorship.
Character Assassination and Disinformation:
COINTELPRO utilized disinformation campaigns to sow seeds of doubt, undermine
credibility, and isolate targeted individuals. In the digital age, this tactic has been amplified,
with social media manipulation, fake news, and online harassment employed to tarnish the
reputations of whistle-blowers and journalists. False narratives and personal attacks aim to
discredit their claims and divert attention from the substance of their disclosures.
Implications for Democracy and Freedom of the Press:
The targeting of whistle-blowers and journalists has far-reaching implications for democracy
and freedom of the press. It erodes public trust, inhibits the flow of critical information, and

Page | 9
undermines the essential role of a robust and independent media. The chilling effect on
potential whistle-blowers and investigative journalists stifles accountability, leaving society
in the dark about critical matters of public interest.

The Controversial Case of Julian Assange: CIA and COINTELPRO Tactics,

Surveillance, and Extradition
Julian Assange, a highly contentious and polarizing individual, has made headlines as an
Australian journalist, publisher, and the founder of WikiLeaks, a whistleblowing organization
that has garnered both praise and scrutiny. Assange's work involves the publication of
classified documents from various governments, most notably the United States, which has
ignited fierce debates and legal controversies.
In 2010, Assange faced serious accusations of sexual misconduct in Sweden, which he
vehemently denied. Instead of facing the consequences of the allegations, Assange chose to
seek refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in 2012, effectively evading extradition.
Assange and his legal team argued that he would not receive a fair trial in the United States
if he were extradited from Sweden. One of the reasons he sought asylum in the Ecuadorian
Embassy was to avoid potential extradition to Sweden, as he believed it could ultimately
lead to his extradition to the United States. He remained confined within the embassy walls
for almost seven years until his asylum was revoked in 2019. British authorities
subsequently arrested him, and he has been fighting against extradition to the United
States, where he faces charges related to WikiLeaks' publication of classified information.
There are claims suggesting that the rape allegations against Assange were part of a larger
scheme orchestrated by the U.S. establishment to target him and undermine the work of
WikiLeaks. Supporters argue that the timing and nature of the accusations raise suspicions,
particularly given WikiLeaks' significant impact in exposing government secrets and
embarrassing powerful entities. They contend that the rape claims were merely a tool
employed to besmirch Assange's reputation and expedite his extradition. During Assange's
stay at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, a camera was discovered inside the embassy.
The details surrounding the camera's discovery are not entirely clear, and there are differing
accounts regarding its purpose and significance.
Some reports suggest that the camera was found hidden in a fire extinguisher or inside a
light bulb, raising concerns of potential surveillance or monitoring of Assange's activities
within the embassy. It was speculated that the camera could have been installed by external
parties, possibly with the intention of gathering information or compromising Assange's
privacy. The presence of such a device naturally raised suspicions and led to questions about
the extent of surveillance Assange was subjected to during his time at the embassy.
The Ecuadorian government, under then-President Lenín Moreno, confirmed the discovery
of the camera. They characterized it as a surveillance device and alleged that it was part of a
broader spying operation against Assange, presumably conducted by an external entity.
However, the specifics of who placed the camera and their motivations remain speculative,

Page | 10
and no conclusive evidence has been presented to definitively link it to any particular party.
The camera's discovery added another layer of intrigue and speculation to an already
complex and highly publicized case. It underscored the sensitive nature of Assange's stay in
the embassy and the potential threats to his privacy and security. However, due to the lack
of concrete information, the full details surrounding the camera and its purpose may never
be fully disclosed.
Additionally, there have been allegations and indications of potential involvement by the
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the activities of the Spanish security agency UC Global.
These allegations suggest that UC Global, the company responsible for the surveillance of
Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, may have collaborated with or
provided information to the CIA. According to reports and witness testimonies, it is claimed
that UC Global's owner, David Morales, had a close relationship with the CIA. It has been
alleged that Morales traveled to the United States and had meetings with individuals
associated with the CIA, where he may have shared surveillance material and other
information regarding Assange and WikiLeaks. Moreover, WikiLeaks has published
documents suggesting that UC Global discussed potential operations with the U.S.
intelligence agency. These documents, known as the "Vault 7" leaks, revealed purported CIA
plans to infiltrate and monitor the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Brian Glick, War at Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It (Boston: South End Press, 1989), 150-152.
Chip Berlet, "The FBI's War on the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement," in The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from
the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United States, ed. Ward Churchill (Boston: South End Press, 2002), 411-414. Heidi Boghosian,
Spying on Democracy: Government Surveillance, Corporate Power, and Public Resistance (San Francisco: City Lights Publishers, 2013), 78-
80. Patrick File, "Cointelpro 2.0: Spying on Terrorist Sympathizers," in The Palgrave Handbook of Security, Risk and Intelligence, ed. Robert
Dover, Michael S. Goodman, Claudia Hillebrand, and Simon J. Smith (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), 499-503. Eric G. Stover and
Frances D. Steward, "Surveillance Technologies and Human Rights: Preventing Misuse to Ensure Protection," in The Routledge Handbook
of Technology, Crime, and Justice, ed. M. R. McGuire and Thomas J. Holt (New York: Routledge, 2020), 186-188. The Intercept, "The FBI Is
Blowing Its Opportunity to Gain Trust of Communities of Color," The Intercept, September 22, 2020,
https://theintercept.com/2020/09/22/fbi-ucin-islamophobia-police/.

Page | 11
CHAPTER 3: COINTELPRO – THE ART OF
DISRUPTION, DECEPTION AND
DISCREDITING

COINTELPRO has three main goals: causing disruption, discrediting, and using deception.
Unfortunately, it's deeply troubling to see COINTELPRO making a significant comeback, even
surpassing the notorious times of Nixon and J. Edgar Hoover. This resurgence is being
supported by the influence of the Catholic Church. When the profound impact of the 9/11
event spread through our society, the NSA surveillance programs became more accepted as
a normal part of things. Sadly, currently, COINTELPRO has reached levels of power and
influence that are unprecedented; it's like COINTELPRO 5.0 on steroids.

Let us examine the three objectives, disrupt, discredit and deceive.

Unveiling COINTELPRO's Strategy: Disruption, Discrediting, and Deception

COINTELPRO, a covert government program, employ a range of surveillance techniques to

monitor individuals and groups considered potential threats. This watchful gaze
encompassed:

· Physical Surveillance: Operatives and informants discreetly observed targeted

individuals or groups, meticulously documenting their activities, interactions, and
movements. Infiltration was often employed, with agents participating in meetings and
events to gather crucial insights.

· Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance: Utilizing court-approved warrants or

12 | P a g e
debatable legal justification, COINTELPRO engages in wiretapping and electronic
surveillance. Telephone conversations, telegrams, and electronic communications are
intercepted and monitored, allowing insight into the conversations and correspondence of
those under surveillance.

· Mail Monitoring: Intercepting and opening mail exchanged by targeted individuals or

groups was and is still a method used by COINTELPRO to acquire information, track
communication, and even distribute disinformation.

· Technical Surveillance: Employing advanced technology, COINTELPRO plants hidden

microphones, cameras, and other surveillance devices in residences, offices, and meeting
spaces to clandestinely gather information.The technology is now available to access and
listen through the hacking of an individual's mobile phone.

· Informant Networks: COINTELPRO depends on recruiting informants from within

targeted movements or organizations. These informants gather intelligence on activities,
members, and plans and reported directly to COINTELPRO agents.

While surveillance aims to gather intelligence, identify potential threats, and furnish
evidence for legal action, it often transcends ethical and legal boundaries. Instances of
privacy violations, wrongful targeting, and suppression of dissent taints the program's
legitimacy.

Infiltration: Unmasking COINTELPRO's Inside Agents

Infiltration is a key strategy used by COINTELPRO to penetrate targeted organizations,

extract information, and create internal strife. This technique comprises:

· Undercover Agents: COINTELPRO operatives assume false identities and covertly join
targeted organizations. Immersing themselves in activities, events, and meetings, they
gathered vital intelligence on the group's objectives, strategies, and members.

· Informant Recruitment: Agents actively seek individuals within targeted groups who
could be converted into informants. Vulnerabilities are exploited, and incentives are offered
to persuade individuals to divulge information on the organization's activities, and or
participate in covert harassment.

· Provocateurs: COINTELPRO agents occasionally act as provocateurs, intentionally

inciting illegal or disruptive actions within targeted groups. This divisive approach aims to
discredit the organization, foster internal divisions, and provide grounds for legal
prosecution.

13 | P a g e
· Manipulation of Decision-Making: Infiltrators attempt to influence decision-making
processes within targeted organizations. Their goal is to steer activities, alter messaging, or
incite conflicts that would undermine the organization's unity and effectiveness.

Infiltration's objectives encompass intelligence gathering, activity monitoring, operational

disruption, and neutralization of influence. Valuable information gathered through
infiltration is frequently used to discredit, divide, or even criminalize targeted groups and
individuals.
Provocation: Unveiling COINTELPRO's Agendas

COINTELPRO, driven by covert motives, skillfully ignites or endorses illegal activities within
targeted groups to foment internal strife and lay grounds for legal actions. These
provocative strategies encompass:

· Incitement to Violence: COINTELPRO agents, embedding themselves in targeted

organizations, nudge individuals or groups toward violence or unlawful actions. This could
involve promoting extreme ideologies, providing material support, or inciting violent acts, all
with the intention of destabilizing the group.

· Fabrication of Threats: Agents exaggerate or invent threats posed by targeted entities,

portraying them as dangerous to justify escalated surveillance, restrictions, or even
repressive measures by law enforcement. This manipulation undermines public support for
these entities.

· Planting False Evidence: COINTELPRO operatives introduce false evidence or

manipulate existing proof to implicate targets in unlawful actions. This tactic aims to
discredit or validate arrests, prosecutions, or other legal measures against these groups.

· Creating Internal Conflicts: Manipulating internal dynamics, agents sow division,

mistrust, and discord within targeted organizations. By undermining cohesion and unity,
COINTELPRO aims to weaken the entities, potentially causing internal dissolution.

· Entrapment: COINTELPRO operatives employ entrapment methods, coercing

individuals into unlawful acts they wouldn't otherwise engage in. Scenarios are crafted to
compel participation, providing grounds for arrests and prosecution.

14 | P a g e
Loss of Employment: Disrupting Financial Stability

COINTELPRO orchestrates loss of employment to tarnish, isolate, and destabilize targeted

individuals or groups. This encompasses:

a. Spreading misinformation to employers, damaging reputations.

b. Encouraging employers to terminate employment.
c. Engaging in activities leading to job loss.
d. Implementing blacklisting, barring opportunities.
e. Blackmailing or coercing employers to terminate employment.

Loss of employment inflicts significant consequences, inducing financial strain, reduced

career prospects, and tarnished professional standing. The resulting instability compounds
overall stress and hardships.

Spreading Disinformation: COINTELPRO's Subversion of Truth

COINTELPRO disseminates falsified information to tarnish individuals or organizations,

eroding credibility. This strategic disinformation took various forms:

· Fabricated documents, altering information.

· False media narratives via controlled outlets.
· Anonymous tips inciting unwarranted actions.
· Provocateurs inciting internal conflicts.
· Fake online platforms spreading deceit.

Astroturfing engineered fake movements or organizations, while forged communications,

manipulated media, pseudonymous authors, and more, all propagated
deception. Astroturfing is the deceptive practice of presenting an orchestrated marketing or
public relations campaign in the guise of unsolicited comments from members of the public.
COINTELPRO's provocation, loss of employment tactics, and disinformation campaigns
serve as chilling reminders of the program's calculated manipulation and subversion, leaving
lasting impacts on those targeted.

15 | P a g e
Covert Operations: Unmasking the Hidden Tactics

Within COINTELPRO's covert realm, agents orchestrate activities like burglaries, thefts, and
sabotage to shatter targeted groups. These clandestine operations, concealed from public
view, serve as the backbone of COINTELPRO's maneuvers. Executed discreetly, these actions
aim to collect intelligence, disrupt endeavors, distort perceptions, and undermine
individuals or entities identified as threats.
These covert operations encompass:

· Surveillance: Monitoring targeted individuals or groups through wiretapping, physical

surveillance, and electronic tracking.
· Infiltration: Planting agents within organizations to extract information and provoke
internal conflicts.
· Sabotage: Clandestine interference with plans, activities, and operations, creating
chaos and confusion.
· Black Propaganda: Deliberate dissemination of false information to manipulate public
opinion.
· Psychological Operations (PSYOP): Employing psychological tactics to influence
thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.

Media Manipulation: Orchestrating Public Perception

COINTELPRO's hold over media narratives spanned tactics like false stories, manipulated
journalists, and propaganda campaigns. Though the media is expected to uphold
impartiality, history reveals instances where bias crept in. Operation Mockingbird, a CIA
operation, typified this manipulation. Diverse methods through which news outlets
disseminate propaganda include:

· Biased Reporting: Selective presentation to mold opinions.

· Misleading Headlines and Framing: Sensationalism and framing to sway perception.
· Manipulated Images and Visuals: Selective visuals to distort reality.
· Echo Chambers and Confirmation Bias: Catering to specific ideologies.
· Sponsored Content and Native Advertising: Mixing promotions with news.

Maintaining media literacy, scrutinizing sources, and analyzing news reports are critical for
navigating today's news landscape.

16 | P a g e
Interference with Funding: Undermining Financial Stability

COINTELPRO's interference with funding targeted financial stability. It involved tactics such
as:

· Discrediting Funding Sources: Spreading false information to tarnish donors'

reputation.
· Encouraging Donor Withdrawal: Spreading negative narratives to deter potential
supporters.
· Surveillance of Financial Transactions: Tracking financial activities for vulnerabilities.
· Creating Legal Hurdles: Filing legal complaints to obstruct funding.
· Sabotaging Fundraising Efforts: Disrupting fundraising events and logistics.

Interfering with funding weakens organizations by curbing their capacity to advocate,

sustain activities, or gather support.

Fragmentation: Sowing Discord Within

COINTELPRO strategizes to fragment targeted movements by exploiting divisions and

conflicts. These methods involve:

· Spread of Disinformation: Disseminating falsehoods within organizations.

· Exploitation of Differences: Highlighting existing divides to intensify tensions, such as
methods of operation or doctrine.
· Provocation of Internal Conflicts: Encouraging disputes within organizations.
· Covert Manipulation of Leadership: Undermining leadership structures.
· Co-option of Dissenting Voices: Manipulating dissenting members.

17 | P a g e
Fragmentation weakens unity, rendering targeted entities less effective in their pursuits.

Psychological Warfare: Manipulating Minds

Psychological warfare aims to demoralize and intimidate through tactics like:

· Psychological Manipulation: Exploiting vulnerabilities, biases, and fears to manipulate.

· Emotional Manipulation: Using fear, guilt, and blackmail to control.
· Covert Harassment and Intimidation: Undermining through fear and psychological
pressure.
· Divisive Tactics: Exploiting divisions for internal strife.
· Psychological Profiling: Gathering information for manipulation.

Restrictive Measures: Curbing Dissent

Governments enact laws, surveillance, and control to limit heretical or subversive activities:

· Legal Frameworks and Legislation: Laws restricting speech and assembly.

· Surveillance and Monitoring: Tracking activities and communications.
· Internet and Social Media Controls: Censorship and content filtering.
· Demonization and Stigmatization: Spreading discrediting narratives.
· Financial and Resource Constraints: Freezing assets and restricting funds.

Counterpropaganda: Challenging Narratives

Counterpropaganda aims to challenge narratives through tactics like:

· Disseminating Disinformation: Spreading false information.

· Covert Influence: Infiltrating to alter activities and messaging.
· Planting Negative Stories: Using media to tarnish reputation.
· Psychological Operations: Manipulating emotions and beliefs.

COINTELPRO's counter propaganda aimed to create doubt, skepticism, and confusion about
targeted individuals or groups.

18 | P a g e
 COINTELPRO's multifaceted strategies showcased a sophisticated approach to manipulation
and suppression, aiming to control dissent, silence opposition, and maintain established
power structures. Understanding these tactics is crucial in discerning the dynamics of
government and other powerful organizational intervention and safeguarding democratic
values.

Censorship: Silencing Dissent

Within the domain of censorship, control is extended to dissenting literature and

publications. This has the potential to lead to the creation of a singular narrative that aligns
with the prevailing Western status quo and agenda. Furthermore, the stance and influence
of the very powerful Catholic Church is occasionally added to this narrative, further limiting
diverse voices. Instances like Amazon Kindle, putting critical books, such as "The Rulers of
Evil," on a two-year review, effectively taking the book off the market for a long period of
time, exemplify this control. Twitter, employing actions like shadowbanning and algorithmic
shifts, limited reach and even suspended accounts. While YouTube didn't openly admit to
shadow banning, anecdotal evidence suggested reduced visibility. Similarly, Facebook faced
allegations of shadow banning, algorithmic shifts, and restricted reach, affecting content
creators and raising concerns over freedom of expression.

Intimidation: Fostering Fear and Compliance

Intimidation tactics employ fear, threats, and social pressure to discourage opposition
against both the Western status quo and the power-seeking maneuvers, doctrines, or
practices of the Catholic Church. Targets faced explicit or implicit threats to their safety,
well-being, and reputation, delivered through various means. COINTELPRO's intimidation
tactics encompass:
· Anonymous Threats: Using letters, calls, or messages to invoke fear and hesitation.

19 | P a g e
· Harassment: Persistently monitoring, questioning, and following targets.
· Psychological Warfare: Employing gaslighting and rumors to undermine trust.
· Legal Pressure: Unjust arrests, prosecutions, or investigations.
· Defamation and Smear Campaigns: Spreading false information to isolate targets.

Propaganda: Controlling Public Perception

Propaganda emerged as a potent tool for shaping public opinion against dissenting
individuals or movements. Deliberate manipulation through biased or misleading
information aimed to advance specific agendas. Key elements of COINTELPRO's propaganda
tactics included:

 Dissemination of False Information: Spreading misleading details through various

channels.
 Manipulation of Media Coverage: Shaping narratives through selective information.
 Creation of Negative Portrayals: Associating targets with criminality or extremism.
 Planting False Stories or Documents: Creating fabricated materials to reinforce
negative narratives.
 Manipulation of Public Opinion: Portraying targets as threats to national security.

These suppression tactics collectively aim to silence opposition, distort narratives, and
maintain the status quo. Understanding their implications is vital to safeguarding free
expression and challenging the tactics used to suppress dissenting voices.

Conclusion: COINTELPRO's Devastating Triumph through Disruption, Discrediting, and

Deception

The COINTELPRO's methodology of Disrupt, Discredit, Deceive has proven to be a chillingly

effective tool in neutralizing activists, political figures, and religious reformers whose
ideologies challenge the status quo. By exploiting personal relationships, inflicting mental
and emotional distress, tarnishing reputation and credibility, imposing legal and financial
consequences, and eroding trust and social cohesion, COINTELPRO's insidious tactics have
left an indelible mark on those who dared to challenge the established narrative.
Exploitation of Personal Relationships: COINTELPRO's agents meticulously targeted
personal relationships to gather critical information and create insurmountable divisions. By
weaving their manipulative narratives into the fabric of personal connections, they
infiltrated the very bonds that held family, reformers and activists together, sowing distrust
and suspicion in the process. Mental and Emotional Distress: The toll of COINTELPRO's

20 | P a g e
tactics reached deep into the psyche of their targets. The persistent stress, anxiety, and
paranoia inflicted upon these individuals fractured their mental well-being, leaving them
psychologically vulnerable and weakening their capacity to advocate for change.
Damage to Reputation and Credibility: Deception had a corrosive effect on the reputations
and credibility of activists and reformers. Through skilful manipulation of information and
disinformation, COINTELPRO cast shadows of doubt over their character, undermining their
personal relationships and compromising their professional standing. Legal and Financial
Consequences: The consequences of COINTELPRO's campaigns extended far beyond the
realm of psychological distress. By engineering legal repercussions, job loss, or financial ruin,
they further incapacitated those targeted, ensuring that the pursuit of their cause was
overshadowed by the struggle for survival.
Erosion of Trust and Social Cohesion: Perhaps the most insidious outcome of COINTELPRO's
actions was the erosion of trust and social cohesion within communities. By sowing the
seeds of doubt and division, these tactics undermined the solidarity necessary for
meaningful reform, ultimately leading to societal breakdown and disintegration. The legacy
of COINTELPRO's disruption, discrediting, and deception remains a stark reminder of the
lengths to which those in power will go to maintain their authority. As we reflect on these
dark chapters of history, we must remain vigilant in safeguarding the principles of
democracy, civil liberties, and individual rights. Only through awareness, transparency, and
a collective commitment to justice can we hope to prevent such insidious tactics, ensuring
that the voices of activists, political figures, and religious reformers continue to shape a
more equitable and just world.

Countermeasures Against COINTELPRO Deception and Building Resilience

Let's look into countermeasures to mitigate the impacts of COINTELPRO

(Counterintelligence Program) deception and bolster resilience against such manipulative
tactics. The following strategies can be considered:
Education and Awareness: Knowledge is Power
Raising awareness about COINTELPRO tactics and providing education on recognizing
deception techniques empowers individuals and communities to shield themselves against
manipulation.
Robust Media Literacy: Navigating Information
Promoting media literacy skills to critically assess information sources, identify
misinformation, and grasp propaganda techniques is vital in countering the effects of
disinformation campaigns.

21 | P a g e
Protecting Digital Security: Safeguarding Online Presence
Strengthening digital security measures, like utilizing strong encryption, practicing two-
factor authentication, and staying cautious against phishing attacks, helps defend against
cyber deception and surveillance.

Building Support Networks: Strength in Unity

Creating sturdy support networks within communities and organizations equips individuals
to endure the impact of COINTELPRO deception. By fostering trust, open communication,
and solidarity, people can collectively resist manipulation, exchange information, and offer
emotional and practical aid to those targeted.

Legal Protections and Advocacy: Upholding Rights

Championing legal protections against deceptive practices by intelligence agencies and

advocating for accountability against misconduct is paramount. Legal measures must be in
place to safeguard individual rights, guarantee due process, and hold agencies accountable
for their actions.

Psychological Resilience and Coping Strategies: Mental Well-being

Developing psychological resilience and coping strategies helps individuals navigate the
psychological distress resulting from COINTELPRO deception. This includes seeking therapy,
practicing mindfulness and self-care, engaging with supportive communities, and
maintaining a strong sense of personal identity and purpose.

Footnote references for the provided information:

The Secret Sentry: The Untold History of the National Security Agency" by Matthew M. Aid. The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA
from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America by James Bamford. Wu, T. (2011). The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information
Empires (Illustrated ed.)Vintage. Pariser, E. (2012). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How
We Think (Illustrated ed.). Penguin Books. Davenport, N., Schwartz, R. D., & Elliott, G. P. (2014). Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the
American Workplace. Civil Society Pub. Horwitz, T. (2020). Spying on the South: An Odyssey Across the American Divide. Penguin
Publishing Group. Schell, B. H., & Lanteigne, N. M. (2000). Stalking, Harassment, and Murder in the Workplace: Guidelines for Protection
and Prevention. Bloomsbury 3PL.

22 | P a g e
CHAPTER 4: SURVEILANCE SYNERGY:
THE NIXON ERA’S NEXUS OF NSA AND
COINTELPRO

The Nexus of NSA Surveillance and COINTELPRO in the Nixon Era

The nexus between the NSA surveillance program and COINTELPRO is strikingly apparent. It
was during the Nixon administration that the curtains were drawn back, unveiling the
operations of both the NSA surveillance and COINTELPRO in tandem. It becomes
unmistakable that COINTELPRO relied on the intelligence procured through the NSA's
surveillance endeavors to subject its targets to a harrowing web of harassment, disrepute,
disruption, and deceit. This intimate interconnection casts a stark spotlight on the
collaboration between intelligence agencies as they jointly orchestrated these intrusive
activities. The epochal Watergate scandal, unfolding in the early 1970s, played a pivotal role
in laying bare the NSA's encroachment upon the privacy of citizens. The infamous break-in
at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in 1972, nestled within the Watergate
complex, exposed a litany of unlawful activities engineered by President Richard Nixon's
administration. Among these transgressions were wiretapping and surveillance campaigns
directed at political adversaries, implicating not just the NSA but also other intelligence
agencies. In the annals of that era, the Nixon administration had clandestinely erected an
undisclosed enclave known as the "Plumbers," a White House Special Investigations Unit,
comprising former agents of the CIA and FBI. These operatives, the Plumbers, engaged in a
panoply of illicit maneuvers, encompassing wiretapping, unauthorized surveillance, and the
interception of communications.

23 | P a g e
Their Machiavellian objective entailed the accumulation of intelligence on political foes
while clinging tightly to the reins of power. It is widely surmised that the NSA, in concert
with other intelligence agencies, played a role in domestic surveillance during the Nixon
administration. Journalists, political activists, and individuals deemed threatening or
opposed to the administration found themselves under the unrelenting gaze of monitoring
and the interception of their communications. The full extent of the NSA's activities during
this epoch remains a subject of ongoing investigation and fervent debate, with countless
records germane to these surveillance operations either obliterated or shrouded in
classification. The revelations unfurled by the exposé of the NSA's domestic surveillance
during the Nixon era catapulted the public into an uproar, instigating sweeping reforms in
intelligence practices and the establishment of enhanced oversight mechanisms. The
flagrant abuses of power laid bare in the crucible of the Watergate scandal ruptured public
trust in governmental institutions and magnified the urgency of shielding civil liberties,
particularly the sacrosanct right to privacy. The unmasking of COINTELPRO transpired
through a tapestry of leaks and investigations in the early 1970s, notably propelled by the
audacious theft of classified documents perpetrated by the audacious "Citizens' Commission
to Investigate the FBI." These classified papers, christened the "COINTELPRO Papers,"
furnished compelling evidence of the program's existence and the FBI's illegal machinations.

The subsequent public outcry and impassioned pleas for accountability culminated in the
establishment of the Church Committee in 1975. The Committee's arduous investigations
substantiated the existence of COINTELPRO, unearthing its extensive reach and the
profound ramifications it wielded over civil liberties. The fallout from the exposure of
COINTELPRO sparked a seismic shift in public perception and understanding of government
surveillance abuses. It underscored the pressing imperative of enshrining safeguards to
shield civil liberties from unwarranted encroachments. The revelations of COINTELPRO's
clandestine operations remain indelibly etched in the annals of intelligence agency
misconduct, serving as a sobering reminder of its deleterious impact on civil rights and
political activism within the United States.
The disclosures precipitated sweeping reforms and engendered heightened oversight of
intelligence agencies. These transformations culminated in the enactment of the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978, a legislative landmark designed to regulate
government surveillance activities and safeguard the rights of citizens. The exposure of
COINTELPRO heralded a watershed moment, triggering a paradigm shift in the public's
perception of the balance between security and individual liberties. It cast a glaring spotlight
on the perils of unchecked power and spurred a collective determination to erect robust
safeguards against unwarranted infringements on civil rights. Ultimately, the convergence of
the NSA surveillance program and COINTELPRO during the Nixon administration, along with
their subsequent exposure, left an indelible imprint on the historical tapestry of the United
States. This chapter in the nation's narrative serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us of the
critical importance of vigilance, accountability, and the eternal struggle to preserve the

24 | P a g e
delicate equilibrium between national security imperatives and the fundamental rights and
freedoms that lie at the heart of democratic societies.

President Nixon's Connections with the Catholic Church: A Mutual Alliance

Against Communism

It is of significant importance to introduce a topic at this juncture that may initially appear
tangential; however, it bears tremendous relevance. We now turn our attention to one of
the world's largest religions, the Roman Catholic Church, which maintains an integral
presence within the governmental systems of not only the United States but also other
English-speaking nations within the anglosphere, not to mention many other nations and
regions such as Europe, Central & South America. How appropriate it is to commence this
discussion while reflecting upon the remarkable figure of Richard Nixon.

Throughout his presidency, Richard Nixon fostered a strategic alliance with the Catholic
Church, finding common ground in their shared commitment to combating the global threat
of communism. Recognizing the political and ideological alignment between his
administration and the Catholic Church, Nixon strategically cultivated relationships with
Catholic leaders and appointed key figures from the Catholic community to prominent
positions within his government. One notable example of Nixon's outreach to the Catholic
Church was his appointment of William P. Rogers as Secretary of State. Rogers, a devout
Catholic who had previously served as Attorney General under President Eisenhower,
played a crucial role in shaping Nixon's foreign policy agenda. His Catholic background and
extensive experience in government made him an ideal candidate for this important
position. Rogers' appointment not only solidified Nixon's commitment to forging strong ties
with the Catholic community but also demonstrated his appreciation for the unique

25 | P a g e
perspective that Catholic leaders could bring to matters of international diplomacy. Nixon's
engagement with the Catholic Church extended beyond domestic appointments. In 1969, he
became the first sitting U.S. president to visit the Vatican and meet with Pope Paul VI.

The discussions during this historic meeting centered around the pursuit of peace, arms
control, and broader international relations. By engaging directly with the Pope, Nixon
sought to build bridges and foster cooperation between the United States and the Catholic
Church on matters of shared concern. And vice versa, it is important to note that the
Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church often extend their outreach and establish
connections with politicians. This outreach is driven by the fact that the Vatican can offer
valuable assistance to a president. This relationship functions as a two-way street as the
Vatican also holds its own set of expectations and demands. Additionally, it is crucial to
comprehend that the Vatican's influence can even extend to impeding a president's efforts.
This can manifest through interactions with Catholic individuals within the civil service,
where passive-aggressive behaviors can give rise to substantial obstacles within an
administration.

It is important to note that there was a significant and robust power base of Catholics
working and directing within the U.S. intelligence community when Nixon became
President. Getting on the wrong side of this Catholic power base could have had significant
drawbacks for Nixon's presidency. The relationship between Nixon and the Roman Catholic
Church was undeniably symbiotic. Clearly, there were connections within this partnership
pertaining to COINTELPRO.

Additionally, President Nixon had the opportunity to shape the ideological composition of
the U.S. Supreme Court through his judicial nominations. Of the four justices he appointed
during his presidency, three were Catholic. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger and Justices Harry
Blackmun and William Rehnquist, all of whom held Catholic beliefs, influenced the Court's
decisions and jurisprudence during their tenures. These appointments reflected Nixon's
recognition of the intellectual rigor and conservative values often associated with Catholic
legal scholars, as well as his desire to leave a lasting impact on the highest court in the land.
Understanding the significant role Catholic voters played in American politics, Nixon's
campaign strategists made deliberate efforts to court the Catholic community during his
presidential campaigns. Recognizing the shared conservative values, anti-communist
sentiment, and emphasis on law-and-order policies, Nixon's campaign emphasized these
themes to resonate with Catholic voters. By highlighting their mutual concerns and aligning
himself with Catholic principles, Nixon sought to secure the support of this influential voting
bloc.

26 | P a g e
[PHOTO ABOVE] President Richard Nixon meets with Pope Paul VI at the Vatican on March
2, 1969, fostering diplomatic relations between the United States and the Holy See.

27 | P a g e
[PHOTO BELOW] Georgetown University presents J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the FBI, with
an honorary Doctor of Laws degree on June 5, 1939. The award was conferred during the
university's sesquicentennial convocation, celebrating the adoption of the constitution and
the founding of the institution. Rev. Arthur O'Leary, the university president, bestows the
honorary degree in recognition of Hoover's contributions.

28 | P a g e
[PHOTO BELOW] President Richard Nixon, Secretary of State William Rogers, and Henry
Kissinger engage in a strategic breakfast meeting. The trio discusses diplomatic matters,
showcasing the collaboration of key figures in the Nixon administration during a pivotal
moment in history.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Strober, D. H., & Strober, G. S. (2015). The Nixon Presidency: An Oral History of the Era (Illustrated ed.). The FBI War on Tupac Shakur and
Black Leaders: U.S. Intelligence's Murderous Targeting of Tupac, MLK, Malcolm, Panthers, Hendrix, Marley, Rappers, and Linked Ethnic
Leftists" by John Potash. Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall (Eds.). (1990). The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars
Against Dissent in the United States. South End Press. Betty Medsger. (2014). The Burglary: The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover's Secret FBI.
Vintage. Tim Weiner. (2008). Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA. Anchor Books. James Bamford. (1983). The Puzzle Palace: Inside the
National Security Agency, America's Most Secret Intelligence Organization. Penguin Books.

29 | P a g e
CHAPTER 5: EYES EVERYWHERE: THE
LEGACY OF 9/11 AND THE EXPANSION
OF MASS SURVEILLANCE

The Controversial Catalyst: 9/11 as the Spark for the NSA's Civilian
Surveillance Program

The events that unfolded on September 11, 2001, sent shockwaves through the very core of
American society, forever altering its trajectory. In the aftermath of this tragedy, the
government swiftly responded, vowing to take any necessary measures to safeguard the
nation and its citizens. However, as time passed, the true nature of this response grew
increasingly disquieting and suspicious. The National Security Agency (NSA), a secretive
intelligence agency renowned for its covert operations, embarked on a mission that would
have far-reaching implications for privacy and civil liberties in the United States. Known as
"the Program," it entailed a digital surveillance initiative aimed at gathering data on
American citizens in an extensive search for unknown terrorists.
Under the pretext of the extraordinary circumstances following 9/11, the justification for
these measures appeared simple: unprecedented threats required extraordinary means. But
what exactly did this endeavor entail? Investigative journalist Barton Gellman shed light on
the shockingly invasive approach taken by the NSA, declaring, "Look at everybody." Vice
President Dick Cheney, overseeing the operation alongside the NSA, instructed his lawyer,
David Addington, to explore the powers the President would need, powers that were
unprecedented, to respond to this calamity. The implications of their actions were nothing
short of alarming, as they undermined the very foundations of the Constitution.
During the Nixon administration, the NSA had already violated the Fourth Amendment by
spying on American citizens, prompting Congress to intervene and curtail their activities.
However, the events of 9/11 presented an opportunity for the NSA to revive its domestic
surveillance apparatus, shielded from public scrutiny. Key figures involved in this

Page | 30
labyrinthine web of power and secrecy raised further questions. Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, a
federal judge presiding over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), responsible
for authorizing surveillance warrants, had connections that led to speculations about
potential hidden influences. David Addington, Cheney's lawyer, had a Jesuit trained
background, adding another layer of intrigue. Alberto Gonzales, the former Attorney
General, played a significant role in justifying the legality of the warrantless wiretapping
program, which violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). And Michael
Hayden, the Director of the NSA, staunchly defended the legitimacy of the Program.

[PHOTO ABOVE: Top left to bottom right, David Addington, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, Alberto
Gonzales, Dick Cheney, Michael Hayden, George Tenet]

Interestingly, Dick Cheney's personal fears introduced yet another dimension to this already
convoluted narrative. In his book "Heart: An American Medical Odyssey," Cheney revealed
his apprehension about assassination through electronic manipulation of his pacemaker,

Page | 31
which was connected to Wi-Fi. This raised the question of whether Cheney's actions were
influenced by the fear of being controlled to fulfill certain obligations.
The secrecy surrounding the Program was unprecedented. Only a select few NSA employees
were aware of its existence, leaving the majority in the dark. David Addington personally
delivered the classified order to the NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland. Michael
Hayden and his legal counsel signed off on the order, deeming it lawful under the
President's authority granted by Article 2. This unorthodox arrangement further obscured
the truth from the public eye.
Thomas Drake, a high-ranking NSA executive, stumbled upon a pre-existing program called
THINTHREAD, designed by William Binney. THINTHREAD had the capability to monitor global
communications while protecting the privacy of American citizens through privacy
safeguards and warrants. However, Drake discovered that the Program had abandoned
these safeguards, allowing for mass surveillance of Americans without any legal justification.
Troubled by the program's legality and ethical implications, Drake sought guidance from
Vito Potenza, the NSA's legal counsel. Unfortunately, Potenza dismissed his concerns, citing
the emergency conditions after 9/11 and the need for extraordinary measures to combat
terrorism. Drake's attempts to sound the alarm were met with resistance and demands for
silence.

The implications of the Program

The implications of the Program became increasingly

evident as the government's surveillance apparatus
strengthened, eroding civil liberties and concentrating
power in the hands of a few. A closely-knit group
operating behind the scenes, including figures like
Michael Hayden, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, David
Addington, and Alberto Gonzales, faced scrutiny due to
alleged influence and connections within the
government. This is where anomalies emerged
regarding potential hidden agendas and the role of the
Catholic Deep State. Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, as the chief
judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, played a significant role
influenced by the Catholic consortium. Her controversial ruling in favor of the Program
raised doubts about her motivations, and speculations about her appointment being
influenced by a secretive network added complexity to the narrative.
Vice President Dick Cheney's vulnerability, stemming from fears of assassination through his
Wi-Fi-connected pacemaker, added intrigue. Questions about Cheney's decision-making and
the extent to which he would go to protect the Program arose.

Page | 32
Within the Department of Justice (DOJ), individuals like David Addington and Alberto
Gonzales kept President George W. Bush uninformed about Program controversies. This
inner circle of advisors wielded significant power, raising doubts about their commitment to
upholding civil liberties.
In March 2004, a dramatic episode involving the hospitalization of then-Attorney General
John Ashcroft led to a dispute over the reauthorization of the warrantless surveillance
program. Alberto Gonzales and Andrew Card sought to continue the program without
Justice Department approval, but Acting Attorney General James Comey and FBI Director
Robert Mueller opposed it. President Bush intervened, temporarily halting the Program and
making changes to address legal and constitutional concerns. To rectify the situation, Bush
entrusted James Comey with addressing concerns. Despite the temporary shutdown, the
government's determination to resume operations remained strong. Supporters delved into
FISA law and the Patriot Act, seeking loopholes to justify continuation.
Driven by the persisting threat of Al-Qaeda, Michael Hayden approached Chief Judge Kollar-
Kotelly, raising suspicions about the influence of the Catholic Deep State on her ruling.
Kollar-Kotelly's controversial decision granted the NSA unprecedented authority to collect
metadata on millions of Americans.
As the Program regained foothold, the White House denied its existence, and General
Michael Hayden misled the public about its targeting. The Program evolved into a vast
dragnet surveillance initiative, collecting trillions of records. Whistle-blowers like Thomas
Drake emerged, exposing the truth and initiating a chain of events bringing the Program into
the public eye.
With the election of President Barack Obama, hopes for change and reform were high but
largely unmet. The NSA's powers expanded, and controversial surveillance programs
continued. The underlying infrastructure established during the Bush administration
persisted, leading to suspicions of the influence of the Catholic Deep State, notably with
figures like James Clapper.
[PHOTO LEFT: James Clapper, 4th Director of
National Intelligence and part of the Catholic
Consortium. Following the June 2013 leak of
documents detailing the NSA practice of
collecting telephone metadata on millions of
Americans' telephone calls, Clapper was
accused of perjury for telling a congressional
committee hearing that the NSA does not
collect any type of data on millions of
Americans earlier that year.]

Page | 33
Revelations by whistle-blower Edward Snowden prompted debates on privacy and
government overreach. The government's focus on prosecuting whistle-blowers rather than
addressing issues raised concerns. Snowden's disclosures also exposed collaboration
between the NSA and tech giants, shaking public trust.
Efforts by civil liberties advocates and privacy activists, including lawsuits challenging the
constitutionality of surveillance programs, led to mixed rulings. The global conversation on
privacy rights intensified, prompting some countries to implement new laws and
regulations.
Despite increased awareness, the surveillance state adapted to technological
advancements. Encryption and smart devices presented new challenges, raising concerns
about privacy erosion in the digital age.

The Usual Suspects: The Collaboration of Control

Alberto Gonzales, Michael Hayden, Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, and David Addington, all
prominent figures in their respective fields, have intriguing connections to Catholic
education and the Catholic diocese. These connections raise questions about potential
collaboration and the utilization of Catholicism as a vehicle for cohesion in the
implementation of controversial programs, such as the National Security Agency's (NSA)
surveillance program. In a striking parallel reminiscent of the Nixon era's NSA spying
program and COINTELPRO, the collaboration between the NSA and the Catholic consortium
raises concerns and warrants scrutiny. In the forthcoming disclosure, we shall embark upon
a profound exploration of the Catholic consortium and its remarkable outreach extending
towards the timeless city of Rome.
Alberto Gonzales, the former United States Attorney General, has made public declarations
about his unwavering devotion to Catholicism. Gonzales claims that his faith provides him
with inspiration and guidance, shaping his values and principles. However, his close
association with Catholic organizations raises suspicion about the extent to which his
religious beliefs may have influenced his decision-making and legal counsel. By seeking
support and advice from Catholic organizations, Gonzales may have leveraged his

Page | 34
connections within the Catholic community to navigate complex legal matters and benefit
from the wisdom and guidance provided by the Church. Michael Hayden, the former
Director of the NSA and the CIA, pursued his higher education at Duquesne University, a
Jesuit institution renowned for its emphasis on academic excellence. The influence of
Hayden's Catholic education at Duquesne University and his affiliation with influential
Catholic dignitaries raises concerns about the potential alignment between his leadership
style, decision-making processes, and the NSA's controversial surveillance program.
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, a respected federal judge,
possesses an impressive background in Catholic
education. Her attendance at Georgetown Visitation
Preparatory School and subsequent studies at the
Catholic University of America demonstrate a
significant exposure to Catholic teachings and values.
Kollar-Kotelly's Catholic educational journey likely
played a role in shaping her understanding and
inclinations towards justice and fairness as a judge.
Additionally, her background and shared faith with
individuals of similar backgrounds likely fostered
cohesive collaboration among them and their
objectives. However, it also invites speculation
regarding any potential biases or predispositions that
may have influenced her rulings or interpretations of
the law especially in context of being part an alliance
of like minded and indoctrinated individuals.
Jesuit trained David Addington, a prominent lawyer and former legal advisor to Vice
President Dick Cheney, has been described as dogmatic and aggressive in his efforts to
implement the "Program." Additionally, he has established allegiances with high-powered
Catholic officials, engaging in a close-knit collaboration, including with Michael Hayden.
Such connections raise questions about the influence of the Vatican on Addington's legal
advice and decision-making processes during his tenure in the highest levels of government.
In summary, the connections between Alberto Gonzales, Michael Hayden, Colleen Kollar-
Kotelly, and David Addington to a Roman Catholic confederacy offer a lens through which to
examine their professional roles and decision-making.
Gonzales' devout Catholicism, combined with the Catholic education backgrounds of
Hayden and Kollar-Kotelly, as well as David Addington's connections to the Catholic Church,
suggests the possibility of collaboration and the use of Vatican and Catholic governance in a
way that may overwhelm democratic processes and ideals within the state.

Page | 35
President Bush's Alleged Ignorance and Questionable Counsel during the NSA
Surveillance Program
The NSA surveillance program prompted widespread claims and reports indicating that
President George W. Bush was potentially kept uninformed about critical aspects and
controversies surrounding the program. Allegations emerged, suggesting that select
intelligence officials and agencies intentionally withheld information or failed to provide a
complete account of the surveillance activities' extent and nature to the President.
Moreover, serious concerns were raised regarding President Bush's level of legal guidance
and advice concerning the program's legality and constitutionality. Critics vehemently
argued that issues concerning the program's compliance with the law and adherence to
constitutional principles were conveniently sidelined or dismissed in the relentless pursuit of
national security objectives. Such disregard for legal and constitutional safeguards sparked
intense debate and controversy surrounding the program's ethical and moral implications.

Page | 36
Eerie Parallels Between Presidential Eras and the Resonating Repercussions
on Civil Liberties
In a profoundly uncanny twist, history appears to have echoed itself with an unsettling
resonance. Consider the parallel instances wherein President Nixon found himself encircled
by Catholic figures, a circumstance mirrored decades later during the era of George W.
Bush. What lends this eerie similarity a weight of significance is the concurrent recurrence
of a disconcerting theme: the unchecked intrusion of the National Security Agency (NSA)
into the private lives of American citizens, thereby infringing brazenly upon the sanctity
enshrined within the Fourth Amendment.
To dismiss these occurrences as mere coincidences would be an exercise in intellectual
evasion. The congruence between these two episodes, characterized by the alignment of
religious affiliation and the abuse of constitutional protections, cannot reasonably be
attributed solely to chance. It compels us to explore the underlying currents of power
dynamics, ideological influences, and structural predispositions that could conceivably have
facilitated this recurring transgression against civil liberties.
While acknowledging the distinct historical contexts and individual motivations at play, the
unsettling symmetry in the outcomes serves as a stark reminder of the enduring
vulnerability of democratic principles. It serves to underscore the perturbing notion that
certain patterns are indelibly etched within the annals of power, awaiting opportune
moments to reassert themselves. This phenomenon demands not only a historical
retrospective, but a critical inquiry into the systemic forces that might perpetuate such
unsettling repetitions, challenging our vigilance in preserving the very foundations of a free
and just society.
Footnote references for the provided information:
Snowden, E. (2019). Permanent Record. Metropolitan Books. Greenwald, G. (2014). No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the
U.S. Surveillance State. Metropolitan Books. Harding, L. (2014). The Snowden Files: The Inside Story of the World's Most Wanted Man.
Vintage Books. Levine, Y. (2018). Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet. PublicAffairs. Angwin, J. (2014). Dragnet
Nation: A Quest for Privacy, Security, and Freedom in a World of Relentless Surveillance. St. Martin's Press. Schneier, B. (2016). Data and
Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. W. W. Norton & Company. Assange, J. (2014). When Google Met
WikiLeaks. Frontline PBS. (2014). United States of Secrets, Part One & Part Two (full documentary) [Video]. PBS.

Page | 37
[PHOTO ABOVE: Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales adamantly denied allegations of
improperly pressuring his predecessor, John Ashcroft, to authorize the National Security
Agency’s domestic surveillance program in 2004. Gonzales revealed during a contentious
Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that, amid a potential Justice Department revolt, he
and White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. sought Ashcroft’s approval as a last
resort. This controversial move took place while Ashcroft, recovering from surgery, was on
sedatives in a hospital bed. Gonzales insisted that they would not have pursued Ashcroft's
approval had he been deemed unfit to make such a decision, emphasizing the urgency and
contentious atmosphere surrounding the situation.]

Page | 38
[PHOTO ABOVE: The Chief of Staff to the Vice President of the United States, Dick Cheney,
David Addington, who received Jesuit training, played a key role in advocating for the NSA
program aimed at global surveillance, encompassing U.S. citizens. He closely advised Dick
Cheney, who harboured concerns about potential threats to his safety, including the fear of
assassination through vulnerabilities in his Wi-Fi-connected pacemaker. NSA Director
Michael Hayden Jesuit trained also pushed aggressively for The Program.]

Page | 39
[PHOTO ABOVE: Thomas Drake, William Binney, and J. Kirk Wiebe are whistle-blowers who
exposed critical information about the United States' intelligence practices. Former NSA
senior executives, Drake, Binney, and Wiebe revealed the controversial mass surveillance
programs conducted by the agency, particularly post-9/11. Their disclosures shed light on
the erosion of privacy rights, sparking debates on government overreach and the balance
between national security and individual freedoms. These individuals faced legal
repercussions for their actions, underscoring the challenges
whistle-blowers often encounter when revealing
classified information in the public interest.]
[PHOTO LEFT: Michael Hayden, a distinguished figure
in U.S. intelligence, has traversed from the United
States Air Force to the pinnacle of the intelligence
community. Graduating from the Jesuit institution
Duquesne University, Hayden's key roles such as
Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and
ultimately serving as the Director of the Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA). He was Jesuit educated and is
part of the Catholic Consortium.]

Page | 40
CHAPTER 6: THE NSA’s EXTENSIVE
MONITORING PROGRAMS
EXPLAINED

Surveillance Unveiled: The NSA's Extensive Monitoring Programs

In the realm of government surveillance, a handful of secretive programs have come to

light, revealing a world where privacy hangs in the balance. These programs, orchestrated
by the National Security Agency (NSA), have raised significant concerns regarding the
erosion of civil liberties and the extent to which private information is accessible. Among the
most prominent programs that have captured public attention are PRISM, Upstream
Collection, XKeyscore, Boundless Informant, Mystic, FAIRVIEW, Stellarwind, and Echelon.
Let's delve into the intricate web of spying operations and the courageous whistle-blower
who blew the lid off these clandestine activities.

Prism Surveillance: Unveiling the Ethical Dilemmas and Potential Abuses of Digital
Intelligence

Prism, brought to public attention by Edward Snowden in 2013, caused widespread alarm
when its details emerged. The program, allegedly operated by the NSA, has been implicated
in a comprehensive surveillance initiative that facilitates direct access to data from major
technology companies. By forming partnerships with industry giants like Google, Microsoft,
Apple, and Facebook, Prism is said to provide the NSA with unfettered access to an
extensive array of online communications, encompassing emails, chats, photos, videos, and
documents. The capabilities of Prism have sparked considerable apprehension regarding the
privacy and security of internet users on a global scale. The program's ability to tap into such

41 | P a g e
a diverse range of digital content raises serious questions about the extent of personal
information that intelligence agencies can potentially acquire. One of the primary concerns
surrounding Prism is its potential misuse by intelligence agencies for nefarious purposes.
Drawing parallels to programs like COINTELPRO, there is a fear that Prism is be employed to
target dissenters and individuals expressing opposition to government policies and Deep
State globalist agendas. This type of abuse could involve monitoring, collecting, and
analyzing the digital activities of those perceived as threats or adversaries. In essence, Prism
represents a powerful tool that, if wielded irresponsibly, could infringe upon the
fundamental rights of individuals to privacy and free expression. The collaboration between
intelligence agencies and major tech companies raises ethical questions about the balance
between national security and individual liberties, underscoring the need for robust
oversight and accountability measures to prevent misuse and protect the democratic values
that underpin a free society.

Upstream Collection: The Covert Web of Global Surveillance and the Moral Dilemmas of
Unrestricted Monitoring

Upstream Collection: Unraveling the Web of Covert Surveillance and the Ethical Quandaries
of Broad-Spectrum Monitoring Upstream Collection, as revealed in Snowden's disclosures, is
another covert program that has come to light. This initiative revolves around the
interception and gathering of internet communications as they traverse the backbone
cables and infrastructure of major telecommunications providers in the United States. While
its primary objective is to target foreign communications, there exists the potential for the
incidental capture of domestic communications, giving rise to concerns about privacy
violations. The Upstream Collection program, by casting a wider net, engages in the
interception and analysis of internet communications, serving as a tool for clandestine
surveillance of various entities such as political groups, organizations, or religious
movements. Its approach involves targeting both domestic and international
communications, enabling intelligence agencies to ensnare individuals engaged in activism
or dissent. This indiscriminate monitoring not only infringes upon privacy rights but also
introduces the risk of guilt by association and the suppression of legitimate political
activities. The expansive reach of Upstream Collection raises ethical questions about the
balance between national security imperatives and the preservation of individual liberties.

XKeyscore: Unraveling Digital Surveillance and the Threat to Dissent

XKeyscore, unveiled as a potent tool in the NSA's arsenal, serves as a key instrument for
analysts to search and analyze extensive volumes of internet data. Empowering analysts
with the capability to filter and extract specific information based on search queries, this
system provides the agency with the means to navigate a broad spectrum of online content,

42 | P a g e
including emails, online chats, browsing histories, and more. In essence, XKeyscore
transforms the digital landscape into a surveillance minefield. The formidable capabilities of
XKeyscore take on a more concerning dimension when integrated into a COINTELPRO-style
agenda. This tool equips intelligence agencies with the ability to sift through vast amounts
of internet data, enabling the tracking of individuals based on specific keywords and
patterns. In targeting individuals critical of government policies or influential religious
organizations, XKeyscore becomes a powerful mechanism for facilitating harassment,
intimidation, and the systematic dismantling of political movements. The potential for abuse
is evident as this tool, with its robust search and analysis functionalities, can be exploited to
suppress dissent, curtail free expression, and infringe upon the rights of individuals in the
digital realm.

Boundless Informant: Decoding Metadata for Strategic Surveillance and Targeted Dissent

Boundless Informant, true to its name, serves as a system utilized by the NSA to track and
analyze metadata derived from diverse surveillance programs. This tool facilitates the
assessment and quantification of the intelligence collected by program and country, offering
visualizations and statistical summaries. In essence, Boundless Informant plays a crucial role
in tracking and evaluating the extensive volumes of data acquired through the NSA's
surveillance efforts. The metadata analysis provided by Boundless Informant becomes a
potent tool in suppressing dissent. Through visualizing the intelligence collected from
various programs, this system aids intelligence agencies in prioritizing their targets. Utilizing
statistical summaries and visual representations, they can strategically allocate resources
toward individuals deemed most threatening. This data-driven approach lays the
groundwork for targeted surveillance and covert operations against individuals involved in
political activism, anti-globalism, or religious movements not aligned with the Vatican's
Interfaith agenda. The potential for misuse is evident as Boundless Informant, with its
capabilities, enables intelligence agencies to selectively target and undermine those
expressing dissenting views or engaging in activities perceived as a threat to established
agendas.

Mystic: Unveiling the NSA's Global Eavesdropping Arsenal and its Menace to Privacy

The Mystic program reveals the NSA's extensive involvement in the mass collection and
long-term storage of telephone metadata and content across multiple countries. Initially
disclosed to operate in at least one foreign nation, concerns arise regarding its potential
domestic utilization. Mystic equips the NSA to record and store metadata from millions of
phone calls, encompassing details such as call duration, time, and phone numbers involved,
without necessarily capturing the call content itself. This capability grants the agency an
unprecedented level of insight into global telecommunications. Mystic, often referred to as

43 | P a g e
"The Eavesdropper's Dream," furnishes intelligence agencies with an unparalleled ability to
intercept and store both phone call metadata and content. When combined with a
COINTELPRO-like agenda, this program becomes a potent tool for monitoring targeted
individuals, tracking their associates, and undermining their efforts. The potential for abuse
and manipulation becomes evident, as personal conversations transform into instruments
for repression and the erosion of democratic principles. The integration of Mystic into
intelligence operations raises ethical concerns about the invasive nature of such surveillance
programs and their potential to compromise individual privacy rights on a global scale.

FAIRVIEW: Navigating the Shadows of Mass Surveillance and the Perilous Intersection of
Security and Suppression

FAIRVIEW, a clandestine partnership between the NSA and major telecommunications

companies, provides the agency with direct access to internet traffic coursing through the
United States. This collaboration grants the NSA a privileged vantage point, allowing the
interception and analysis of vast volumes of information traversing the country's
communication infrastructure. Through FAIRVIEW, the doors to mass surveillance on an
unprecedented scale are opened, as this partnership enables intelligence agencies to
monitor and interfere with political and religious activities. The potential for abuse looms
large, with the line between national security and political and religious suppression
blurring, leaving individuals vulnerable to unwarranted surveillance and persecution. The
FAIRVIEW program, characterized by its collaboration with telecommunications giants,
exemplifies the intricate web of surveillance woven into the nation's communication
networks. This partnership not only raises concerns about the erosion of privacy but also
underscores the susceptibility of individuals to state-sponsored monitoring and
interference. The risk of abuse becomes pronounced as intelligence agencies, armed with
direct access to internet traffic, navigate the delicate balance between national security
imperatives and the protection of individual rights. FAIRVIEW, in its collaboration, becomes
a tool that, when misused, can potentially stifle dissent, infringe upon religious freedom,
and compromise the very principles that underpin a democratic society.

44 | P a g e
Defending Democracy: Safeguarding Privacy, Holding Power Accountable,
and Advocating for Surveillance Reforms

Citizens must be vigilant in guarding their privacy and resisting any encroachments on their
civil liberties. Whistle-blowers and journalists play a crucial role in exposing abuses of
power, as evidenced by the revelations surrounding previous surveillance programs. By
supporting and protecting those who come forward, we can shine a light on any potential
collusion between intelligence agencies and law enforcement to subvert democratic values.
In the face of growing concerns about the erosion of privacy and civil liberties, it is our duty
to hold our elected officials accountable. We must demand comprehensive reforms that
strike a balance between national security and individual freedoms. Robust oversight
mechanisms, judicial review, and meaningful legislative debates are essential to prevent the
misuse of surveillance programs for political purposes.
Excerpt from Edward Snowden interview to NBC News on May 28, 2014: "When I think
about an instance that really just struck me , oh my God!, we can do this?, and we can do it
to anyone, was that people at NSA, analysts can actually watch people's internet
communications, watch them draft correspondence, and actually watch their thoughts form
as they type as you write a message, you know an analyst at the NSA or any other service
out there, that's using this kind of attack against people, can actually see you write
sentences, backspace over your mistakes then change the words and kind of pause and
think about what you wanted to say, and then change it. And it's this extraordinary
intrusion, not just into your communications, your finished messages, your actual drafting
process, it's the way you think!"

45 | P a g e
Examining the Legal and Ethical Implications of Post-9/11 Surveillance
Programs

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, the United States witnessed a significant shift in its
approach to national security. This shift led to the introduction of various surveillance
programs by the National Security Agency (NSA) under the guise of protecting the nation
from further terrorist threats. However, a critical examination of the legal and ethical
implications of these programs reveals a disturbing erosion of privacy rights and a disregard
for democratic principles.

Legal Loopholes: A Breach of Constitutional Rights

Post-9/11 surveillance programs have often relied on ambiguous legal interpretations,

loopholes, and secretive court proceedings to justify their operations. This lack of
transparency and accountability undermines the very foundation of a democratic society
governed by the rule of law. The bulk collection of data, warrantless surveillance, and the
targeting of individuals based on their nationality or religion raise serious concerns about
Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Mass Surveillance: The Orwellian Nightmare

The scope and scale of post-9/11 surveillance programs, such as PRISM and Upstream
collection, have far-reaching consequences for individual privacy. The indiscriminate
collection and analysis of vast amounts of personal data erode the fundamental notion of
privacy and violate the reasonable expectations of citizens. The chilling effect on free speech
and the erosion of trust between citizens and their government pose significant threats to
democratic discourse and public participation.

Lack of Oversight: Checks and Balances Neglected

The lack of meaningful oversight and judicial review of these programs contributes to their
unchecked expansion and potential for abuse. Secretive intelligence courts, such as the
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), have often been criticized for being a rubber
stamp, approving surveillance requests with little scrutiny. This absence of robust checks

46 | P a g e
and balances undermines the principles of accountability and violates the essential
democratic principle of separation of powers.

Ethical Quandaries: Targeting Innocent Individuals

The post-9/11 surveillance programs have raised ethical concerns regarding the targeting of
innocent individuals based on broad surveillance criteria. The potential for racial and
religious profiling undermines the principles of equality and fairness. Innocent individuals
become caught in the web of suspicion, subject to invasive surveillance, and stripped of
their basic rights without due process. Such practices perpetuate discrimination and erode
the fabric of a just and inclusive society.

Secrecy and Whistle-blower Suppression: A Veil of Silence

The culture of secrecy surrounding these surveillance programs hinders transparency and
impedes public scrutiny. Whistle-blowers who expose potential abuses face severe
repercussions, leading to a chilling effect on the disclosure of vital information. This lack of
transparency and the suppression of dissent inhibit public awareness, preventing informed
public debate and inhibiting democratic decision-making.

The legal and ethical implications of post-9/11 surveillance programs demand our attention
and scrutiny. The erosion of privacy rights, lack of oversight, and the potential for
discrimination undermine the very fabric of democracy. As responsible citizens, we must
critically engage in conversations about the balance between national security and
individual rights. Robust legal safeguards, independent oversight, and a commitment to
transparency are essential to ensure that our democratic values are upheld while effectively
addressing national security concerns. Only through such efforts can we strive for a society
that both safeguards our collective safety and protects our cherished civil liberties.

Exploring NSA's Complex Web of Contractors, Security Risks, and Ideological

Concerns

The Complex Landscape of NSA Contractors, Outsourcing, and Security Risks

The modern landscape of national security and intelligence has seen the intersection of
governmental agencies and private contractors in unprecedented ways. Nowhere is this
more evident than in the relationship between the United States National Security Agency

47 | P a g e
(NSA) and its collaboration with private contractors possessing top secret clearances. This
chapter delves into the intricate dynamics of this partnership, the companies involved, the
inherent risks of outsourcing, and the potential consequences that loom over the sensitive
information handled by these entities.

NSA's Collaboration with Contractors

The NSA's multifaceted operations often demand specialized skills, cutting-edge technology,
and a range of resources beyond the agency's direct capacity. As a result, the NSA enters
into contracts with private companies renowned for their expertise. These contractors offer
a spectrum of services, from cybersecurity solutions to advanced data analysis, contributing
to the agency's missions in diverse ways.

Companies Contracted by the NSA

Several prominent companies are contracted by the NSA to provide specialized services:

Booz Allen Hamilton: A global consulting and technology firm offering services such as
consulting, analytics, digital solutions, cybersecurity, and engineering services.

Raytheon: A technology company specializing in defense and cybersecurity solutions,

including cyber threat detection and prevention.

SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation): A technology company providing

technology integration, engineering, and cybersecurity services.

Northrop Grumman: A global aerospace and defense technology company offering

technology and cybersecurity solutions for defense and government agencies.

IBM: A multinational technology company providing various technology services, including

cloud computing, data analytics, and cybersecurity solutions.

CACI International: An information technology company offering solutions in cybersecurity

and enterprise IT services.

48 | P a g e
Leidos: A science and technology company providing technology solutions, cybersecurity
services, and consulting for various sectors, including government and defense.

General Dynamics: A conglomerate offering defense, aerospace, and information

technology services, including cybersecurity solutions.

ManTech International: A technology company specializing in cybersecurity, IT, and

intelligence solutions for government agencies.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE): A technology company offering services in technology

solutions, cybersecurity, and data management.

Accenture: A global consulting and professional services firm offering consulting and
technology services, including cybersecurity.

Top Secret Clearance: Gateway to Classified Information

The participation of private contractors in NSA operations necessitates the highest level of
security clearance: top secret. This clearance enables contractors to access information that
is of immense significance to national security and could pose substantial risks if exposed.

Functions and Roles of Contractors

Private contractors with top secret clearances undertake pivotal roles in the NSA's
operations:
Cybersecurity: Contractors enhance the agency's cybersecurity framework, fortifying its
defenses against digital threats and cyberattacks.

Technology Development: These contractors contribute to the innovation of cutting-edge

surveillance technologies, instrumental in data collection and analysis.

49 | P a g e
Data Analysis: Skilled analysts from contracting firms process colossal volumes of data,
extracting invaluable intelligence for national security.

Specialized Expertise: Contractors specializing in areas like cryptography and linguistics

offer indispensable expertise vital to intelligence operations.

Benefits and Concerns

The collaboration between the NSA and private contractors yields undeniable advantages,
including expertise infusion and the ability to tackle intricate projects. However, these
benefits come hand in hand with grave concerns:

Reduced Direct Control: Contractors operate with a certain level of independence,

potentially leading to challenges in maintaining direct control over classified operations.

Lack of Loyalty: Unlike government employees, contractors might lack the same level of
loyalty to national security interests, potentially leading to conflicts of interest.

Challenges in Oversight: Contractors might not be subject to the same rigorous oversight,
accountability, and ethical standards as government employees.

Dangers of Outsourcing and Security Risks

Outsourcing sensitive operations to private contractors introduces an array of potential

dangers:

A. Security Breaches: Contractors, like any individuals, can be targeted for espionage or
manipulation, increasing the likelihood of security breaches and leaks.

B. Reduced Direct Control: Contractors' autonomy can hamper the NSA's direct control
over critical operations, leading to potential missteps or errors.

50 | P a g e
 C. Loss of Loyalty: Contractors may prioritize contractual obligations over national
security interests, potentially compromising classified information.

D. Fall into Powerful Hands: Sensitive information could inadvertently fall into the
possession of influential organizations or hostile nations, including entities like the
Vatican, posing new and complex challenges to national security.

The Perils of Information Leakage from NSA Contractors

In the intricate landscape of national security, the potential dangers posed by employees of
NSA contractors leaking or passing on sensitive information are a persistent concern. These
dangers extend beyond mere security breaches; they encompass the complex interplay of
ideological views and allegiance to powerful religio-political organizations, potentially
leading to unforeseen consequences.

Ideological views can serve as catalysts for leaks, as individuals may feel compelled to reveal
classified information based on their personal beliefs or moral convictions. This becomes
particularly concerning when factors like allegiance to powerful religio-political
organizations, such as the Vatican, come into play. Roman Catholicism's deep-rooted
influence within the United States adds a layer of complexity to this scenario. The Vatican's
intricate role within the fabric of American society makes it a noteworthy point of concern.
As a powerful institution, it wields both spiritual and political influence, traversing
international boundaries. A motivated NSA contractor, driven by ideological alignment with
such an organization, might see the disclosure of classified information as a way to serve a
higher purpose—one that aligns with the Vatican's interests or broader agendas. This
potential alignment introduces the risk of private intelligence companies entering the
picture, leveraging the leaked information for purposes that bear resemblance to
COINTELPRO-like programs or even the controversial concept of Gangstalking.

The Snowden Paradigm

Edward Snowden, a contractor at Booz Allen Hamilton, epitomizes the complexities of this
relationship. Working at a firm contracted by the NSA, Snowden gained access to classified
data. His decision to leak these documents was rooted in a perceived moral imperative,
igniting a global debate on privacy, surveillance, and accountability. Edward Snowden's
actions have evoked a deeply divided perception, with some viewing him as a hero and
others as a traitor. To his supporters, Snowden is seen as a courageous whistleblower who
exposed what he believed were widespread privacy infringements and surveillance

51 | P a g e
overreach by government agencies, particularly the NSA. These individuals see his leaks as a
catalyst for raising awareness about the erosion of civil liberties and igniting a crucial
conversation about the balance between security and personal freedoms. In contrast, those
who label Snowden a traitor argue that his decision to leak classified information
compromised national security, potentially aiding adversaries and weakening intelligence
efforts. They contend that his actions violated the oaths he took as a government contractor
and damaged the credibility of institutions responsible for safeguarding the nation. The
debate surrounding Snowden underscores the complexity of modern whistleblowing, ethical
dilemmas, and the enduring tension between individual conscience and the duty to protect
the state. While the primary purpose of the state is to uphold the well-being of its citizens,
it is essential to emphasize that surveillance and undue infringement upon the lives of
individuals should not constitute integral functions of the state. In my modest perspective,
Edward Snowden emerges as a heroic figure, for he dared to expose practices that run
counter to the principles of a just and respectful society.

Eavesdropping and Psychological Manipulation through Smart Devices

In an age where technology has become deeply integrated into our daily lives, our homes
are now teeming with smart devices, offering convenience and automation but also posing
significant security and privacy concerns. This chapter delves into the intriguing world of
eavesdropping and the potential for psychological manipulation through smart devices like
fridges, TVs, Google Home, Apple HomeKit, and many more. We will explore how these
conversations can be exploited for covert manipulation and even for the sinister practice of
gangstalking.

52 | P a g e
The Vulnerable World of Smart Devices

Smart devices have indeed become an integral part of modern households, providing us
with unparalleled convenience and efficiency. However, this convenience comes at a cost:
the potential vulnerability of these devices to hacking and eavesdropping. Durham Chief
Constable Mike Barton, a prominent voice in law enforcement, has raised concerns about
the security of internet-connected appliances. He suggests that these devices should come
equipped with cybersecurity ratings, just like energy efficiency ratings for appliances. The
lack of such ratings is a significant issue, given that these devices could serve as potential
entry points for hackers into our personal lives. The rapid proliferation of Internet of Things
(IoT) devices further exacerbates this vulnerability. Analysts predict that billions of
connected devices will exist worldwide, expanding the potential attack surface for hackers
and malicious actors. Indeed, vulnerabilities in smartphones, fitness trackers, and even baby
monitors have already highlighted the risks associated with these devices.

53 | P a g e
Intelligence Agencies and the IoT

Intelligence agencies, such as those in the United States, view the IoT as a valuable source of
information for surveillance. James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, has openly
acknowledged the IoT's potential for identification, surveillance, monitoring, location
tracking, and recruitment. The IoT offers numerous opportunities for agencies to gain access
to networks and user credentials, making it an attractive target for intelligence gathering.
Clapper's statements resonate with a study from Harvard's Berkman Center, which argued
that the FBI's claims of "going dark" due to encryption were exaggerated. Instead, the study
suggested that we are in a "golden age of surveillance," owing to the multitude of available
avenues for spying.

Privacy Concerns and the Growing Trend

Privacy advocates have long warned about the risks of exploiting IoT devices for
surveillance. Law enforcement agencies have also taken note, often serving court orders on
companies to access data unknowingly transmitted by citizens. Instances of police
requesting footage from home cameras and similar scenarios emphasize the growing trend
of using smart devices as surveillance tools.
The controversy surrounding Samsung's smart TV, which could listen to conversations in the
room and even had warnings against discussing sensitive information in front of it, served as
a turning point. Many other devices, including gaming consoles like Xbox Kinect, Amazon
Echo, and even children's toys like the new Barbie, have the potential to spy on users. The
security issues associated with these devices, especially unsecured webcams, have provided
hackers with opportunities to access sensitive data without the need for a court order.

Eavesdropping and Psychological Manipulation

The theoretical ability to eavesdrop on conversations through compromised smart devices

opens the door to various sinister possibilities. Information gathered in this manner could
be used for psychological manipulation and covert manipulation of targeted individuals.
Some potential scenarios include:

1. Gathering Personal Information: Eavesdropped conversations can provide detailed

personal information about individuals, including their habits, preferences, and daily
routines. This data can be exploited for targeted manipulation.

54 | P a g e
 2. Emotional Manipulation: By knowing the emotional state of a target, malicious
actors could tailor their manipulative tactics to induce specific emotional responses.
This could be used to create fear, anxiety, or paranoia in the target.

3. Psychological Manipulation: The content of conversations may reveal a target's

vulnerabilities, enabling manipulators to use psychological tactics to control or
influence their behavior. This could involve gaslighting or coercive techniques.

4. Gangstalking: The information gathered from eavesdropping could be used for

gangstalking, a form of harassment where individuals are relentlessly pursued and
targeted. This could involve stalking, threats, and public humiliation.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs. Schneier,
B. (2015). Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World. W. W. Norton & Company. Olivarez-Giles, N.
(2013, June 25). Edward Snowden says he took Booz Allen job to collect, leak NSA info. Engadget. The Verge.
https://www.theverge.com/2013/6/24/4460028/edward-snowden-booz-allen-nsa-contractor-job. Fick, N. (2017, January 19). Was
Snowden hero or traitor? Perhaps a little of both. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/was-snowden-hero-
or-traitor-perhaps-a-little-of-both/2017/01/19/a2b8592e-c6f0-11e6-bf4b-2c064d32a4bf_story.html. Gibbs. S (2017). Smart fridges and
TVs should carry security rating, police chief says. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/24/smart-tvs-fridges-
should-carry-security-rating-police-chief-says. Ackerman. S & Thielman. S (2016). US intelligence chief: we might use the internet of things
to spy on you. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/09/internet-of-things-smart-home-devices-
government-surveillance-james-clapper

55 | P a g e
CHAPTER 7: THE DEEP STATE
AND COINTELPRO

"When the United States rules the world, the Catholic Church will
rule the world." - Archbishop Quigley, 1903, The Chicago Tribune

Unveiling the Deep State: Beyond Sensational Claims and into the Truth

The reality of the Deep State, if one acknowledges its existence, requires an investigative approach
that embraces discernment and empirical evidence, there will be no conjecture in this chapter such
as sensational claims about the Illuminati or Knights Templar, the plausible truth is actually hiding in
plain sight. While there's often speculation and intrigue around such groups, it's essential to avoid
sensationalism and instead approach the subject rationally. This approach reveals deep insights into
the complex power dynamics that shape our world, dispelling uncertainty.

Instead of succumbing to the seductive appeal of mythical entities, we must direct our attention to
the tangible manifestations of power that boldly assert themselves. The Deep State is far from being
a hidden cabal lurking in the shadows. Rather, it represents a complex network intricately
intertwined within established power structures, skillfully navigating the labyrinthine corridors of
governance, fortified by the indomitable influence of global interests.

This organization, veiled in plain sight, possesses significant wealth, expertly wields political
leverage, and exerts commanding control over crucial institutions and agencies within Western
governments, especially the U.S. The organization even maintains its own intelligence agency, which
never receives media attention, while having an enormous influence over intelligence agencies in
the 5 Eyes Alliance. This Deep State entity wields significant power through its vast intelligence and
surveillance capabilities, engaging in opposition research and blackmail.

56 | P a g e
This influential network operates in areas such as religion, finance, education, healthcare, charity,
entertainment, media, business and government. It uses manipulative tactics to expand its global
influence. Within religious circles, it forges alliances, capitalizing on followers' devotion while also
extending its reach into the economic domain, controlling resources and financial systems. This
power extends to politics, where it exerts control discreetly.

In considering the existence of this hidden entity, we must acknowledge its significant influence—a
well-organized force that operates in the shadows but shapes our world. One key aspect of the Deep
State's power is its ability to control information. Through influence over media organizations,
lobbying, and cooperation, it shapes narratives, controls public discourse, and promotes its agenda.
This control has been steadily growing over the past 30 years.

Furthermore, the Deep State thrives on its ability to forge alliances and maintain a vast network of
connections. It cultivates relationships with influential figures across various sectors, including
politics, business, big tech, academia, interfaith, diplomacy and the military-industrial complex.
These connections allow the Deep State to exert its influence discreetly, making it difficult to trace
its actions back to a single source.

The economic influence wielded by the Deep State represents yet another pivotal facet of its power.
By forming strategic alliances and exercising authoritative control over intelligence agencies such as
the NSA, the group possesses the ability to clandestinely surveil companies. This enables them to
gain access to vital knowledge regarding the companies' intentions and upcoming events, spanning
everything from mergers to the introduction of new technologies, novel concepts, or products. This
extensive information network ensures that those aligned with the Deep State remain well-
informed, enabling them to exploit opportunities and exert influence over markets, economic
policies, and the accumulation of wealth and power. Ultimately, this orchestrated mechanism
consolidates the reins of power and concentrates vast resources within the grasp of the Deep State
Organization and its cohorts.

By leveraging economic power, the Deep State can exert significant pressure on state governments
foreign governments and other entities, thereby further solidifying its control. Furthermore, this
immensely influential and all-powerful group, marked by its ideological and religious cohesion,
extends its dominance beyond government corridors into the public sphere. It secures financial
assistance in various forms, such as grants, subsidies, tax benefits, or other forms of government

57 | P a g e
support. This funding enables the operation and maintenance of the Deep State's extensive network
of private education facilities, hospitals, and medical centers, thus contributing to the dissemination
of its influence and potentially fostering a sense of indoctrination among the public.

These capabilities, when intertwined, forge the very essence of this enigmatic entity:

1. Influence: A Deep State must wield significant sway over key institutions, such as government
bodies, intelligence agencies, the military and financial sectors. The attainment of this influence can
be achieved through well-established connections, enduring relationships, or the adept leveraging of
power.

2. Secrecy: Covert operations lie at the heart of a Deep State's modus operandi. It is imperative
for this clandestine group to possess the means to shroud its activities in secrecy, shielding them
from the prying eyes of public scrutiny. Sophisticated communication methods, encryption,
compartmentalization of information, and unwavering loyalty among its members are vital in
maintaining the veil of secrecy.

3. Resources: A Deep State necessitates substantial resources to exercise its influence and
advance its agenda. These resources may comprise substantial financial assets, control over key
industries or sectors, access to classified information, and the capability to discreetly fund its
operations.

4. Intelligence: Unearthing classified intelligence and privileged information is a paramount

requirement for a Deep State's operations. This may entail infiltrating intelligence agencies,
establishing connections with insiders, or recruiting members with privileged access to sensitive
data.

5. Covert Operations: Covert operations constitute a cornerstone of a Deep State's endeavors to

propel its interests forward. These operations may encompass surveillance, manipulation of public
opinion, propaganda campaigns, or even targeted actions such as assassinations or acts of sabotage.

6. Longevity: Enduring over time is imperative for a Deep State to ensure continuity and stability
in its operations. The ability to weather changes in political leadership and adapt its strategies
accordingly becomes indispensable for its prolonged existence.

58 | P a g e
 7. Control over Key Appointments: To retain and bolster its influence, a Deep State may seek to
control or significantly influence crucial appointments within government agencies, the judiciary, or
other pivotal positions. This control enables the group to shape policies and decision-making
processes to align with its objectives.

8. Network and Alliances: A Deep State may rely upon a network of like minded individuals or
organizations, both within and beyond the government's confines. Establishing alliances and
fostering cooperation with other influential groups amplifies its power and extends its reach,
solidifying its grip on the levers of influence.

In the context of a Deep State in the United States, the driving forces and binding agents would
include:

· Shared Interests: Operatives within a Deep State may possess common interests that align
with their objectives. These shared interests could encompass safeguarding or expanding their
influence, protecting economic or financial advantages, maintaining control over specific policies or
sectors, or promoting a particular political or ideological agenda.

· Power and Control: A desire for power and control can serve as a potent driving force for
Deep State operatives. They may seek to manipulate key decision-making processes, influence
political outcomes, or shape policies to serve their own interests, thus reinforcing their control.

· National Security Concerns: Some Deep State operatives may perceive their actions as
necessary to protect national security or shield the country from perceived threats. They might
perceive themselves as guardians of stability, viewing their covert operations as indispensable for
the nation's well-being.

· Insider Knowledge and Privileged Access: Operatives within a Deep State may possess insider
knowledge, classified information, or privileged access to crucial resources. This advantage nurtures
a sense of exclusivity and reinforces cooperation within the group, as they depend on each other to
protect their access and advance their shared objectives.

· Mutual Dependencies: Cooperation within a Deep State

In the intricate web of power and secrecy, the concept of "Mutual Dependencies" takes center
stage, defining the dynamics within a Deep State. This term encapsulates the symbiotic relationships
that form among various stakeholders operating within the shadows. In this clandestine realm, key
players, whether they be within government, corporate entities, or influential organizations, find
themselves entangled in a delicate balance of give-and-take. Mutual Dependencies entail a complex

59 | P a g e
interplay of interests, where each party relies on the others for support, information, or protection.
These covert alliances are often veiled from public scrutiny, and they can shape the course of events
in ways that transcend traditional power structures. In the world of the Deep State, understanding
and navigating these intricate dependencies is key to deciphering its enigmatic inner workings.

Deep State Alliances: The Hidden Networks Shaping Global Influence

Intelligence agencies, such as the NSA and CIA, serve as the Deep State's core, gathering sensitive
information, fostering collaboration, and shaping global affairs. Through covert operations, these
agencies combine resources, solidifying their influence over security, foreign policy, and stability.
Beyond intelligence, the Deep State relies on influential individuals, organizations, and corporations
to cement its hold on society. Corporate collaborations enable economic influence, while political
figures receive support in exchange for advancing the Deep State's agenda. Mutual dependencies
define the Deep State's functionality, sustaining its power and secrecy. Understanding these
dynamics is crucial in comprehending its impact on society and global governance.

The Phenomenon of the Deep State: Covert Networks of Power Operating

Beyond Political Leadership

"Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and
manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know
that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so
interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above
their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." ― Woodrow Wilson

60 | P a g e
The concept of a deep state encompasses a mode of governance characterized by the existence of
potentially covert and unauthorized networks of power that operate independently from the
recognized political leadership of a state. These networks pursue their own agenda and goals, often
hidden from public view. The term "deep state" is frequently used interchangeably with "shadow
government," while the notion of a "state within a state" carries a similar meaning, albeit with
historical distinctions. In the past, it referred to well-defined organizations seeking autonomous
functioning, whereas the deep state suggests a concealed entity aiming to manipulate the visible
machinery of the state.

The sources of deep state organizations can be found in various structures, including confederacies
and associations affiliated with Roman Catholic Orders, prelates, Jesuit Universities or connections
to the Vatican. This is particularly evident within the armed forces or public authorities, such as
intelligence agencies, police forces, secret police units, administrative bodies, and government
bureaucracies. Throughout Donald Trump's presidency, the term "deep state" gained currency in the
United States, serving as a rhetorical tool to describe what some perceived as a "permanent
government."

The motives behind a deep state's actions can span a range of objectives, such as consolidating
power and authority, and pursuing ideological, religious, or programmatic aims. Operating in
opposition to the policies, conditions, and directives of elected officials, the deep state can employ
tactics such as obstruction, resistance, and subversion. Its presence raises concerns about the
potential erosion of democratic accountability and the influence wielded by non-elected individuals
or entities over the functioning of the state.

Reflecting on the Extent and Significance of Jesuit Influence in Early America

The Pilgrims, a group of Puritans known for their journey on the Mayflower, established the
Plymouth Colony in 1620 in what is now Massachusetts. The larger wave of Puritan settlement
occurred with the establishment of the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630. This colony, led by John
Winthrop and the Massachusetts Bay Company, brought a significant number of Puritans to the
region. The Puritans were a religious group within the Church of England who sought to reform and
"purify" the Church from what they perceived as remnants of Catholic practices.

61 | P a g e
 The Puritans left England primarily due to religious reasons and seeking religious freedom. They
believed that the Church of England had not gone far enough in its reforms of Roman Catholic
traditions and doctrines and wanted to create a more disciplined and pure form of worship.
However, they faced resistance and suppression from the government, which led to their decision to
seek a new life in America.

As the Puritans set forth on their momentous voyage to America, their zealous aspirations of
establishing a godly dominion faced a formidable adversary in the form of the Jesuits. These
determined Jesuit pioneers, under the guidance of the esteemed priest Andrew White, were hot on
the heels of the Puritans, leaving no room for these devout individuals to attain unchallenged
dominance on the American soil. With fervor in their hearts, Father White and his comrades, Father
John Altham and Father Thomas Gervase, clandestinely embarked from the port of Cowes on the
enigmatic Isle of Wight. Their ultimate destination: the untamed wilderness of Maryland, where the
struggle for religious influence would unfold.

In 1633, the Jesuits embarked on a perilous

journey, claiming to have a mission to
establish a Catholic presence in Maryland.
However, it becomes apparent that their true
aim was not just to spread their faith, but to
secure dominance for the Roman Catholic
Church in a land dominated by their
Protestant rivals. Under the guise of religious
piety, they plotted to extend the dominion of
Rome to the shores of the New World.

Guided by their unwavering determination, the Jesuits braved the perils of the open sea. Storms,
navigational challenges, and uncertainty plagued their voyage, but their gusto and hidden agenda
propelled them forward. Their true motives were veiled, concealed beneath a veneer of missionary
zeal, as they sailed towards a land already inhabited by diverse religious groups.

Finally, in 1634, the Jesuits' secretive journey ended as they landed on the shores of Maryland. Their
ship, the Ark, and its companion vessel, the Dove, anchored in St. Clement's Island, marking a
significant moment in the religious landscape of the New World. Here, Father White and his fellow
Jesuits began their mission, not just to establish a Catholic presence, but to gain a foothold for
Rome's quest for dominance.

Against the backdrop of a Protestant-dominated land, the Jesuits unfurled their spiritual banner and
embarked on the task of establishing a Catholic stronghold in Maryland. Behind closed doors, they
strategized and worked to infiltrate the fabric of American society, aiming to extend their influence
and authority far beyond religious matters.

The arrival of the Jesuits in Maryland signaled the beginning of a new era, one in which religious
rivalry and power struggles would shape the course of American history. While the Puritans sought
to build their own society based on their convictions, the Jesuits operated with a hidden agenda,
fueled by their loyalty to Rome. Their efforts were not solely about religious freedom or peaceful
coexistence; they sought to assert Rome's dominance and expand its sphere of influence.

62 | P a g e
 The parallel endeavors of the Mayflower and the Ark and the Dove highlight the complex dynamics
of religious ambition and the quest for control in the New World. While both groups were driven by
fervent religious convictions, the Jesuits' ulterior motives cast a shadow of suspicion over their
mission. Their actions remind us that history is not always as noble or straightforward as it appears.

As we delve into the annals of history, we must critically examine the motives and actions of these
early explorers and missionaries. The stories of the Puritans and the Jesuits challenge us to consider
the complexities of religious rivalry and the pursuit of dominance in the formation of a new nation.
They serve as cautionary tales, reminding us to question the hidden agendas that may lurk beneath
the guise of religious zeal.

The arrival of the Jesuits in the Chesapeake Bay area in 1634 marked a significant turning point in the
religious landscape of the New World. With their sights set on establishing St. Mary's City, the first
permanent Catholic settlement in the English colonies, the Jesuits wasted no time in pursuing their
agenda. Against the backdrop of a Protestant-dominated land, they sought to assert their spiritual
dominance and engage in the perpetual battle of faith.

Father White, the leading figure among the Jesuits, proved himself to be a cunning and ambitious
individual. Navigating the complex dynamics between the Catholic minority and the Protestants.
However, it is important to critically analyze the implications of this settlement on the indigenous
tribes and their lands. The Jesuits' mission of conversion and control cannot be divorced from the
larger colonial project that led to the dispossession and marginalization of native peoples.

Father Andrew White's diplomatic efforts, particularly in brokering peace agreements between
indigenous tribes and English settlers, should be examined with caution. While peace may have been
achieved on the surface, it is crucial to evaluate whether these agreements were truly equitable and
respectful of the rights and autonomy of the native inhabitants. The Jesuits' role in these
negotiations should be scrutinized to understand the potential consequences for the indigenous
communities.

63 | P a g e
Furthermore, it is important to critically assess the writings and accounts of Father White and the
Jesuits. Their perspectives and narratives, often filtered through the lens of religious ideology, may
not provide a comprehensive or unbiased understanding of the events that unfolded. It is crucial to
seek out diverse sources and voices to gain a more nuanced and inclusive understanding of the
historical record.

The clash between the Puritans and the Jesuits represents more than just a contest of faith; it
reveals the larger power struggles and competing visions for the future of the New World. Both
groups sought to shape the destiny of the land, leaving a lasting impact on American history.
However, it is imperative to critically examine their influences, motivations, and consequences,
recognizing the complexities and tensions that arose from their interactions.

The Roman Blueprint from America's Inception

In Chapter 4, Paragraph 33 of "Lumen Gentium," the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church issued by
the Second Vatican Council, we encounter a rather enthusiastic portrayal of the role of the laity,
those regular folks who aren't part of the clergy. The passage seems keen on stressing the
importance of these laypeople in making sure the Church isn't just a passive observer but an active
participant in various aspects of society, including government.

What's particularly striking is how the document seems to put the onus on the laity, almost
demanding their unwavering commitment to the Church, regardless of their backgrounds. It's not
just a gentle nudge; it's a full-blown exhortation for them to invest all their energy into supporting
and the mandate of the Vatican.

And then there's the notion of extending the Church's influence into areas it deems necessary for
societal improvement. While the document may not explicitly say "societal manipulation," it does
leave one wondering about the extent of influence the Church seeks in these areas and what exactly
is meant by "betterment of society." The sceptical mind might ponder whether this passage implies
a somewhat assertive role for the Church in shaping the world.

Vatican II takes an even more extensive approach, directing all Catholics to utilize their expertise in
secular fields and their actions to actively contribute to the equitable distribution of worldly
resources among the general population. However, it's worth noting that individuals who disagree

64 | P a g e
with the Roman Catholic Church, or those who may not be willing to engage in dialogue, could
potentially be excluded from benefiting from this distribution.

It becomes apparent that fundamentalist Christians who object to Catholic doctrines and policies
may find themselves the target of this so called “distribution of worldly resources.” This agenda
could also imply that fundamentalist Protestant Christians could encounter obstacles when trying to
secure employment positions. As a result, it seems that redistribution efforts may predominantly
benefit individuals perceived as aligned with the Roman Catholic Church, gradually diminishing the
resources available to those seen as posing a threat to the power of Rome.

Additionally, Catholics are ominously instructed to strive for a rather vague concept of "universal
progress" in both human and Christian freedom. This directive conveniently allows for addressing
customs and conditions that may lead to sinful behavior, all in the name of justice and virtue (IV, 36).

However, it's important to highlight the contrast between these stated ideals and the real-world
actions of the Roman Catholic Church. In some instances, the Church has been criticized for
concealing child abuse, stifling and obstructing abuse claims, and withholding reparations, which
raises questions about the consistency of its commitment to justice and virtue.

Vatican II ominously reaffirms an ancient Catholic doctrine from 1302, in which Pope Boniface VIII
ominously asserted the absolute requirement for every human to bow before the Roman Pontiff for
their salvation. This assertion is quite fitting, as the Roman Catholic Church has faced accusations of
ecclesiastical megalomania, holding an arrogantly inflated view that considers all people in the world
as subjects of the Pope. Additionally, this doctrine's connection to the establishment of the United
States of America in 1776 adds an intriguing dimension. The process surrounding the nation's
founding was marked by a degree of secrecy, reminiscent of the Reagan-Vatican efforts in Eastern
Europe in 1989. These historical parallels raise suspicions about the potential influence of the Roman
Catholic Church on the American government from its very inception.

Adding to the intrigue, we find that in 1663, the land that we now know as the District of Columbia
was recorded under the unsettling name "Rome" in property records, and the adjacent branch of the
Potomac River was chillingly named "Tiber."

These unsettling historical details were reported in the 1902 edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia,
with a curious emphasis on their relevance to Catholics at the time. However, they mysteriously
vanished from the New Catholic Encyclopedia in 1967, leaving one to wonder about the motives
behind such omissions.

Additionally, other unsettling facts shared in 1902 but conspicuously excluded in 1967 include the
presence of two prominent Roman Catholics in Washington when Congress initially convened in
1800: Robert Brent, Washington's inaugural mayor, and Notley Young, a Jesuit priest.

Furthermore, Daniel Carroll, a Roman Catholic congressman from Maryland, shockingly left his mark
on both the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution. His direct lineage traced
back to the Calverts, a Catholic family nefariously granted Maryland as a feudal barony by King
Charles I of England. Carroll received his education at St. Omer's Jesuit College in Flanders, a school
with a clandestine mission to train English-speaking Catholics in various subversive techniques to
advance Roman Catholicism, especially among hostile Protestants.

65 | P a g e
In a chilling twist of events, President George Washington, a Protestant, appointed Congressman
Carroll in 1790 to lead a commission tasked with selecting land for the "federal city" mandated by
the Constitution. Astonishingly, the commission chose "Rome," a name that carries a dark historical
resonance, which consisted of four farms, one of them eerily belonging to none other than Daniel
Carroll himself. The selection of Carroll's farm as the site for the most prominent government
building, the Capitol, raises unsettling questions.

The American Capitol becomes a subject of scrutiny when one examines its hints at Roman origins.
The statue of "Freedom," the Roman goddess presiding over the dome, was cunningly crafted in
Rome by American sculptor Thomas Crawford. The dome's interior rotunda contains a disturbing
fresco featuring a pantheon of Roman deities, including Persephone, Ceres, Freedom, Vulcan,
Mercury, and even a deified George Washington, all brought to life by the hand of Vatican artist
Constantino Brumidi. Furthermore, the use of the term "capitol" for the national Statehouse raises
suspicions of Roman influence. Historically, a building was only designated as a "capitol" if it served
as a temple dedicated to Jupiter, the malevolent Roman god who wielded thunderbolts to control
the heavens and nourish the earth with his ominous rains. The eagle, symbolizing Jupiter's terror,
was cunningly adopted as the mascot by the founding fathers. Today, a Roman eagle menacingly
perches atop the governing idol of the House of Representatives, a sterling silver-and-ebony wand
known as a "mace," ominously symbolizing authority within the House.

The national motto, "Annuit Coeptis," is disturbingly extracted from a prayer to Jupiter found in
Book IX of Virgil's Aeneid. Commissioned just before the birth of Christ by Caius Maecenas, a
shadowy multi-billionaire backing Augustus Caesar, this poem was a calculated attempt to mold
Rome into an imperial monarchy, where unwitting citizens would willingly sacrifice their lives.

The Fifth Column: Navigating Roman Catholic Church and Government

Integration

Within the depths of society, beneath the firm control of the Vatican, there exists a foreboding and
malevolent presence that continues to foster subversion and deceit. This nefarious collective, known
as a "fifth column," operates discreetly, relentlessly undermining the fundamental pillars of the
United States. Their allegiance lies not with their own compatriots, but with a consortium of co-
operators connected to the Vatican, determined to dismantle the strength of the state. Oxford

66 | P a g e
Dictionary defines the fifth column as "a group of people who undermine a larger group, such as a
nation or organization, from within."

The activities of the fifth column manifest in various forms, ranging from brazen displays of defiance
to covert operations shrouded in secrecy. These sinister forces, working in the shadows, gather
covertly, meticulously plotting their assault on the nation they deceitfully claim to belong to. When
the opportune moment arises, they emerge from their hidden lairs, shamelessly aligning themselves
with external attackers, poised to strike from within. This insidious term also encompasses organized
actions by military personnel, where individuals within the armed forces conspire to weaken their
own defense lines, willingly serving the interests of external forces.

The repertoire of the fifth column is vast, encompassing acts of sabotage, the dissemination of
deceptive information, espionage, and even terrorism. Operating surreptitiously, these secret
sympathizers exploit vulnerabilities within defense lines, infiltrating critical institutions and systems
to sow seeds of chaos and instability. Their actions aim to erode the very essence of the state,
compromising its security and integrity.

As we delve deeper into the enigmatic world of the fifth column, we confront a chilling reality. This
hidden network of collaborators, influenced by the Vatican, presents a significant challenge to
nations across the globe. They use their inside knowledge and concealed loyalties, sometimes
breaching trust and subtly manipulating the very systems designed to uphold shared interests. In
their concealed activities, acts of deception and betrayal can take root, resulting in serious
implications for the stability and independence of nations.

Delving into the layers of this unsettling situation, we encounter a complex tapestry of deceit and
negative intentions that permeate societies. The existence of this 'fifth column' serves as a gentle
reminder of vulnerabilities that can exist even in the most fortified defenses. It underscores the need
for enduring vigilance and steadfast dedication to shield a nation from these subtle internal
challenges. After all, the fate of a nation is influenced not only by external adversaries but also by
the calculated actions of those who conspire from within, under the careful guidance of the Vatican.

The Constitution of the United States ensures the freedom of conscience, which is highly cherished
and fundamental. In his Encyclical Letter dated August 15, 1854, Pope Pius IX stated the following:
"The absurd and erroneous doctrines or ravings in defense of liberty of conscience, are a most
pestilential error—a pest, of all others, most to be dreaded in a State.’ The same pope, in his
Encyclical Letter of December 8, 1864, anathematized ‘those who assert the liberty of conscience
and of religious worship,’ also ‘all such as maintain that the church may not employ force.’

The peaceful demeanor of Rome in the United States does not signify a change of heart. It is merely
a result of her powerlessness. As Bishop O'Connor asserts: "Religious liberty is merely endured until
the opposite can be carried into effect without peril to the Catholic world.’” “The archbishop of St.
Louis once said: ‘Heresy and unbelief are crimes; and in Christian countries, as in Italy and Spain, for
instance, where all the people are Catholics, and where the Catholic religion is an essential part of
the law of the land, they are punished as other crimes.”

67 | P a g e
Symphony of Faith and Governance: The Dawn of Roman Catholicism's
Integration into the U.S. Government
During the Cold War, Vatican-U.S. cooperation underwent a process of normalization and openness,
culminating in the establishment of diplomatic relations on February 10, 1984. This pivotal moment
followed a significant meeting between President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II two years
earlier. At the time, and as stated before, three major players—namely the United States, the Soviet
Union, and the Vatican—vied for power and influence on the world stage. Recognizing the shared
goal of countering the Soviet Union's expansionist policies and its promotion of atheistic
communism, the United States and the Vatican found common ground. For the Vatican, communism
posed a direct threat as it rejected religious beliefs and limited the Vatican's influence within its
territories. By collaborating with the United States, which championed democratic values and
religious freedom, the Vatican aimed to neutralize the Soviet Union's influence and combat the
spread of communism. This strategic partnership between two powerful entities allowed for
increased coordination and cooperation, ultimately contributing to the weakening of the Soviet
Union and the eventual end of the Cold War. During the Cold War, numerous Roman Catholics held
positions in government, military, and intelligence agencies, reflecting the influence of the Catholic
Church within various spheres of power. After the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the subsequent
disintegration of the Soviet Union, a period of integration between Roman Catholicism and the U.S.
government began to emerge.

A Secret Alliance: The CIA, the Vatican, and the United States

In the obscure realm where political maneuvering intertwines with religious influence, a secretive
alliance took shape between the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Vatican, and the United
States during a pivotal era in history. This shadowy collaboration, veiled in secrecy, raises grave
concerns about the transparency, accountability, and the ethical implications of merging political
and religious institutions.

The clandestine pact was initiated on June 7, 1982, during an extraordinary meeting held in the
Vatican Library. President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II engaged in a lengthy discussion,
diverting their attention from the escalating conflict in Lebanon to a topic dear to their hearts:

68 | P a g e
Poland and the grip of Soviet dominance in Eastern Europe. It was at this moment that the
foundation was laid for a covert campaign aimed at accelerating the disintegration of the communist
empire—an audacious alliance later hailed by Reagan's National Security Adviser as "one of the great
secret alliances of all time."

The focal point of this alliance became Poland, not merely due to its significance as the birthplace of
Pope John Paul II, but also because of its status as a heavily Catholic nation under Soviet control.
Both the Pope and the President firmly believed that Poland held the key to dismantling Soviet
influence. Thus, the Vatican and the U.S. pledged their resources to destabilize the Polish
government and sustain the underground Solidarity movement, even in the face of martial law. This
covert operation entailed the smuggling of vital equipment into Poland, financed by a web of funds
from the CIA, the National Endowment for Democracy, secret Vatican accounts, and Western trade
unions.

Strategic guidance was imparted to Solidarity leaders through the conduits of priests and
undercover labor experts, aligning with the perspectives of the Vatican and the Reagan
Administration. This advice bolstered the strength of the resistance movement, while information
leaked from within the Polish government—courtesy of priests and spies—contributed significantly
to its overall success.

Reagan and John Paul II not only shared a firm rejection of the political status quo established by the
Yalta Conference but also harbored a grand vision of a free, non-communist Poland serving as a
formidable weapon against the Soviet empire. They ardently believed that Solidarity's triumph
would serve as a beacon of inspiration for other Eastern European states yearning for freedom.
Despite attempts to conceal the true extent of their collaboration, Solidarity leaders remained aware
of external support, although uncertain of its scope. The bond between Reagan and the Pope was
further strengthened by their shared experiences of surviving assassination attempts in 1981. Their
conviction in divine intervention, coupled with a shared determination to dismantle the Soviet
empire, deepened the ties of their alliance.

While the Reagan-John Paul II collaboration undoubtedly left a profound mark on the geopolitical
landscape of the time, it is imperative to approach it critically, unveiling the hidden consequences of
such a pact. The covert nature of their partnership raises fundamental questions about the lack of
transparency, the absence of accountability, and the ambiguous boundaries between political and
religious institutions. It is essential to scrutinize the potential exploitation of religious authority for
political gain and to consider the implications for democratic processes.

69 | P a g e
 Moreover, attributing the collapse of the Soviet Union solely to the joint efforts of Reagan and John
Paul II oversimplifies the intricate tapestry of factors that contributed to its eventual downfall. Such
reductionism fails to account for the broader historical context, the underlying societal changes, the
complex economic dynamics, and the internal struggles within the Soviet Union itself—all of which
played pivotal roles in shaping the outcome.

The Reagan-John Paul II collaboration, although captivating in its historical narrative, demands a
critical lens. By unveiling the covert nature of this alliance, we shed light on the convergence of
political and spiritual interests, raising profound questions about the implications and ethical
dimensions of such collaborations.

The unscrupulous nature of this alliance becomes even more troubling when we consider the
potential manipulation of religious authority for political ends. The intertwining of the CIA, the
Vatican, and the United States blurs the boundaries between these separate spheres, eroding the
fundamental principles of transparency and accountability that are essential in a democratic society.
When political agendas merge with religious influence behind closed doors, the risk of undemocratic
practices and hidden motives becomes ever more pronounced.

By critically examining the Reagan-John Paul II alliance, we expose the dangers of unchecked power
and the potential erosion of democratic processes. We must question the clandestine nature of such
partnerships and demand transparency and accountability from our political and religious leaders.
Blindly accepting the narrative of a heroic collaboration obscures the broader implications and raises
important concerns about the delicate balance between the secular and the sacred.

70 | P a g e
The Vatican's Quest for Global Influence: A Journey Through Pope John Paul
II's Vision, Power Plays, and Contemporary Challenges

The Vatican's Rise to Global Influence

During Pope John Paul II's era, the Vatican wasn't just a religious institution; it aimed to become a
major player in shaping the new world order. Pope John Paul II, a leader with vast experience,
spiritual influence, and diplomatic skills, was the driving force behind the Vatican's global ambitions.
His goal? To transform the Catholic Church from a spiritual authority into a force capable of
influencing the destiny of nations.

Pope John Paul II: Visionary Leadership

With centuries of history and a massive network of believers, the Catholic Church provided a strong
foundation for these ambitions. The Pope's ability to rally people worldwide and the Church's deep
influence in political circles gave the Vatican a unique advantage. Pope John Paul II's mission was
clear – not just to solidify the Vatican's global presence but also to redefine its role in international
affairs.

71 | P a g e
The Power Play: United States, Soviet Union, and the Vatican

In the global chess game of power, three major contenders emerged: the United States, the Soviet
Union, and the Vatican. While the U.S. led the Western Democratic Alliance, the Soviet Union stood
as the opposing force. The Vatican, however, carved its own path, positioning itself as a player with
global influence beyond traditional geopolitical boundaries.

Malachi Martin's 1990 work, "Keys of this Blood," delved into this power struggle. According to
Martin, three contenders sought global dominance: Pope John Paul II and the Catholic Church, the
Soviet Union led by Gorbachev, and the globalist contenders from the Western democratic alliance.
This confrontation had significant stakes, impacting international, national, and local affairs.

Malachi Martin's Legacy: Controversy and Insight

Martin's thought-provoking insights, often controversial, played a crucial role in understanding this
critical moment. While his works continue to influence discussions, his legacy is not without
controversy, with conspiracy theories surrounding his death. "Keys of this Blood" depicted a world
where the Vatican's influence reached into the corridors of the U.S. deep state, hinting at a "Catholic
Consortium" gaining ground and influencing key figures.

China: The New Player

Fast forward to the present day, and a new contender, China, has entered the global stage. With
partnerships in Russia, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East, China challenges the existing order. The
global power play now involves the United States, the Vatican, and China. However, as Malachi
Martin suggested, the U.S. and the Vatican have, to some extent, merged their interests, prompting
questions about the nature of their alliance and its impact on global affairs. Presently, Pope Francis,
the United States, and their allies are seeking to diminish China's power by eroding its alliances,
particularly those with Russia and the Middle East. Additionally, efforts are being made to create
barriers for China's development, technology, and economy. Interestingly, this situation echoes
historical patterns, with China assuming a role reminiscent of the one previously held by the Soviet

Reflection and Vigilance

Navigating these power dynamics requires critical assessment and vigilance. The geopolitical
landscape has evolved since Martin's writings, and the mention of a "Catholic Consortium" within
the U.S. deep state warrants closer examination. Transparency, accountability, and informed
engagement are vital to safeguard democratic principles and prevent undue concentration of power.

72 | P a g e
In the face of these complex dynamics, global citizens must stay vigilant. The pursuit of global
hegemony and the shaping of a new world order have far-reaching consequences. Active
engagement in informed discourse, questioning the motives of those in power, is crucial to
responsibly navigate this evolving global landscape. The legacies of Pope John Paul II, the Vatican's
influence, and the rising power of China intersect in a narrative shaping the destiny of our
interconnected world.

The Civil Service: Consolidating Power and Protecting Interests in

Government Administration

The civil service, often hailed for its role in balancing power and expertise in government
administration, wields a significant degree of control and actively influences the policies of elected
officials. However, it is crucial to examine the origins of the civil service and question its underlying
motivations. Ostensibly established to mitigate the concentration of power in the hands of the
president, it serves as an institutional structure that supposedly safeguards stability and adaptability
within the ever-changing political landscape.

Before 1871, federal employees were handpicked solely by the US president, leading to a system
rife with cronyism and political favoritism. The introduction of a so-called non-political civil service
system, championed by Carl Schurz, aimed to prioritize merit and competence in the selection and
appointment of government officials. Yet, one cannot ignore the covert nature of this system,
susceptible to manipulation by those who seek to advance their hidden agendas. Therefore, the civil
service system, shaped by the ideals of Carl Christian Schurz and bolstered by his connections to the
Jesuit lineage through his education at the University of Bonn, raises questions about the underlying
forces at play.

In the past, barring employees from other government branches, all government officials served at
the president's pleasure, meaning they could be dismissed at any time for political reasons. The civil
service system purportedly transformed this arrangement, ostensibly protecting civil servants from
arbitrary dismissals by establishing valid reasons for termination, such as incompetence or refusal to
comply with presidential directives. However, the new system's very structure opened the door for
covert influence, as coveted positions within the civil service became sought after by those who
sought to clandestinely exert their control over the nation.

The reform of the civil service system claims to have two primary aims. Firstly, it professes to limit
the president's authority and prevent the recurrence of past abuses. Yet, one must question
whether it successfully achieves this goal or if it merely consolidates power in the hands of an
entrenched bureaucracy. Secondly, proponents argue that it acknowledges the complexity and
enduring impact of government laws and policies on society. However, skeptics argue that this
system primarily perpetuates the interests and agendas of the unelected, giving them the stability
and expertise to wield their influence over the functioning of the government machinery, often
detached from the democratic will of the people.

73 | P a g e
Unveiling the Intricacies of Civil Servants: A Nexus for Vatican Influence

In the realm of civil service, some positions tend to attract individuals from prominent Roman
Catholic families or those who share alignment with the Church's interests. These individuals,
holding esteemed roles, play key roles within the complex network that connects the Vatican's
influence with government operations.

While it is imperative to approach this topic with discernment and avoid sweeping generalizations, it
is equally important to acknowledge the potential impact that these connections can have. The
Vatican, with its long-standing institutional power and resources, has the ability to leverage these
affiliations for various purposes. The interplay between the civil service and the Vatican represents a
complex dynamic where personal beliefs, shared values, and familial connections converge, creating
an environment where hidden influence and covert maneuvering may come into play.

Understanding this intricate tapestry of relationships sheds light on the multifaceted nature of
power dynamics and the potential intersections between religious institutions and the machinery of
governance. It invites us to explore the subtleties and nuances that shape the political landscape,
where personal convictions intertwine with institutional agendas. By delving into these complexities,
we gain a deeper understanding of the intricate dance between religion and politics, and the
sometimes invisible threads that can influence the course of nations.

In one of Boris Johnson's final statements in parliament as Prime Minister, he spoke of how a 'deep
state' was undermining his ability to govern and is attempting to bring the UK back into the EU." -
The New Statesmen

The Alliance Emerges: Left-Wing America and the Papacy

In the complex realm of global politics, alliances can form between unexpected partners, reshaping
the landscape and exerting significant influence. One such alliance that has gained prominence in
recent times is the convergence of the left wing of American politics with the Papacy. Pope Francis,
with his inclination towards liberal and progressive ideologies, has aligned himself with the
Democrat left wing of America, forging a formidable force that has both captivated and garnered
criticism from around the world.

Throughout his papacy, Pope Francis has exhibited a clear favoritism towards liberal and progressive
principles, often at the expense of conservative values. He has placed a strong emphasis on social
justice concerns, particularly issues such as immigration, climate change, and income inequality.

One area where Pope Francis's alignment with the left wing has drawn significant criticism is his
stance on immigration. By advocating for open borders and failing to fully acknowledge potential
security risks, the Pope has faced accusations of disregarding the safety and well-being of nations.
Moreover, his emphasis on environmental issues, such as his support for international agreements

74 | P a g e
like the Paris Agreement, has been met with skepticism from those who believe that economic
considerations and national sovereignty should take precedence.

However, it is important to recognize that the Papacy, as an institution, has historically

demonstrated a capacity to swing with the changing tides of societal and political trends. The
pendulum of the Papacy can sway in different directions, aligning with either conservative or liberal
leanings based on the prevailing circumstances. This flexibility is reflected in the diverse range of
Roman Catholic Orders and Prelates who exhibit either left or right leanings, often influenced by the
social, political, and cultural context in which they operate.

The convergence between the left wing of America and the Papacy has created a powerful alliance
that holds significant influence on the global stage. The Pope's alignment with the political left,
particularly on issues such as immigration, climate change, and income inequality, has garnered
support from those who share similar values. However, this alliance has also faced staunch
opposition from conservative factions within the Catholic Church and beyond, who perceive the
Pope's positions as straying from established principles.

As the world continues to evolve, so too will the dynamics of the left-wing alliance between America
and the Papacy. The complex interplay between political ideologies, social movements, and religious
institutions will shape the course of this alliance and determine its impact on the broader political
landscape. The influence of the left wing of America and the Papacy will undoubtedly continue to be
a subject of debate, as the complexities of global politics unfold in the years to come.

The Roman Empire Never Died

The Veiled Fortunes: Unraveling the Enigma of the Roman Catholic Church's
Finances
Within the vast empire of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States, there exists a veil of
secrecy that hides the true extent of its financial power. Determining the precise value of the
Catholic Church and its associated institutions in America is a complex task, as it involves navigating
through a complex landscape of assets, properties, institutions, and financial activities. What
becomes evident is that the Catholic Church functions as its own economy, possessing significant
political, social, and financial influence within the nation.

The Catholic Church's holdings in the United States consist of substantial real estate, including
churches, schools, universities, hospitals, and various other properties. Its educational branch
comprises numerous institutions, ranging from schools to prestigious colleges and universities.
Additionally, the Church operates an extensive network of medical facilities. These vast resources
grant the institution a formidable presence within American society.

When it comes to revenue and donations, the Catholic Church relies on a variety of sources.
Contributions from its members, diligent fundraising efforts, income generated by investments, and
the revenue from its affiliated organizations and institutions all contribute to its financial
sustenance. However, the specific financial details and consolidated figures for the entire Catholic
Church in the United States remain hidden from public scrutiny.

75 | P a g e
Central to the challenge of understanding the Church's financial operations is its decentralized
nature. Each diocese manages its finances independently, resulting in significant variations in
financial information from one diocese to another. This decentralized structure perpetuates a sense
of opaqueness, making it exceedingly difficult to grasp the true economic power of the Catholic
Church as a unified entity.

In a thought-provoking Economist article published last year, an estimation emerged that shed light
on the astonishing financial scale of Catholic Church institutions operating solely within the United
States. Reportedly, these institutions, primarily hospitals and educational establishments, spent a
staggering $170 billion in the year 2010 alone. To put this astronomical figure into perspective, it is
astounding to note that the Catholic Church's expenditure surpassed the revenue of globally
renowned corporations. In fact, during that period, only 16 corporations worldwide boasted
revenues exceeding the gargantuan $170 billion mark.

However, it is crucial to recognize that this estimation only encompasses the operations of the
Catholic Church within the United States. The Church's extensive network extends far beyond the
United States' borders, encompassing Europe, Latin America, Asia, Africa, and other regions.
Therefore, the overall financial scope of the Catholic Church, with its far-reaching influence, is likely
to transcend national boundaries, revealing a truly colossal economic impact that reverberates
across the globe.

Furthermore, the unique status of religious institutions grants them exemption from adhering to
conventional nonprofit accounting or reporting rules that govern other nonprofit organizations. This
exemption further obscures the underlying financial structure of the Catholic Church, enveloping it
in opacity and ambiguity. Unraveling the intricate web of the Church's financial ecosystem requires
relentless pursuit of answers, navigating through a maze of intricate legal frameworks, global
operations, and the exceptional privileges enjoyed by religious institutions.

The Vatican's Ascendance as a Global Power

In a disturbing trend, statesmen are increasingly ceding power to the Vatican, often justifying their
actions by citing the Pope's purported moral leadership. While religious institutions have long played
a role in shaping societal values, the consolidation of power in the hands of the Vatican raises
concerns about the intersection of politics and religion. This trend is particularly alarming given the
Vatican's historical record of wielding influence and pursuing its own interests within the realms of
power.

By appealing to the moral authority of the Pope, statesmen unknowingly or willingly surrender
autonomy to an institution that is not subject to democratic oversight. The implications of this shift
extend beyond religious matters, as the Vatican's influence reaches into political, social, and
economic spheres, potentially exacerbating existing power imbalances and suppressing dissenting
voices.

76 | P a g e
Navigating the Speculation: Pope Francis and Donald Trump

The Pope's statements and actions, often aligned with liberal and progressive ideologies, have led
many to interpret his stance as implicitly critical of Trump and his policies. While Pope Francis has
never explicitly expressed animosity towards Trump himself, there have been instances where their
differing views and public exchanges have fueled speculation about their relationship. One
significant point of contention between Pope Francis and Donald Trump arose in 2016 when Francis
questioned Trump's commitment to Christian values due to his anti-migrant rhetoric and proposal to
build walls between nations. The Pope's comment that Trump was "not Christian" caused a public
exchange of words between the two figures, with Trump deeming the remark as "disgraceful" and
warning that the Vatican might regret not supporting his presidency in the face of potential terrorist
attacks.

Additionally, the Pope's emphasis on social justice issues, such as immigration, climate change, and
income inequality, contrasted sharply with some of Trump's policies. Pope Francis has advocated for
open borders, highlighting the rights and dignity of migrants and refugees, while Trump's
administration pursued more restrictive immigration measures. The Pope's vocal support for
international agreements like the Paris Agreement on climate change also clashed with Trump's
decision to withdraw from the accord, leading to further speculation about their differences.

Furthermore, Pope Francis's inclusive worldview, as demonstrated by his statements on civil unions
for homosexuals, has been seen as at odds with some of the positions held by Trump and his
conservative base. While the Pope's stance on civil unions is not equivalent to supporting same-sex
marriage, it nevertheless diverges from traditional Catholic teachings on the subject. This
divergence, combined with Trump's alignment with conservative factions and his opposition to
LGBTQ+ rights, has contributed to the perception that Pope Francis and Trump are on opposing sides
of the ideological spectrum. Media coverage and interpretations of these instances, along with the
broader context of Pope Francis's papacy, have fueled speculation about his views on Trump.

PHOTO ABOVE: Pope Francis appears somber following a Vatican meeting with Donald Trump on
May 24, 2017, suggesting potential underlying tensions between the Pope and the former U.S.
President.]

77 | P a g e
Donald Trump's Outcry and the Alleged Deep State Involvement
Examining Allegations of Voter Fraud and the Deep State Conspiracy
Following the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election

Following the 2020 U.S. presidential election, former President Donald Trump and his supporters
expressed concerns regarding potential voter fraud and irregularities. Trump asserted that the
election had been unjustly taken from him, alleging fraudulent activities in crucial battleground
states. Nevertheless, multiple courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, in addition to state and local
election officials, did not find any evidence to substantiate these claims. Furthermore, the
Department of Justice stated that it had not discovered any widespread fraud that could have
impacted the election's outcome. Additionally, certain individuals made assertions about the
existence of a secretive and influential entity known as the "Deep State," implying its involvement in
manipulating the election against Trump. It is worth noting that if the Deep State exists, there are
concerns that the Department of Justice's investigation may not be impartial either. The Deep State
working hypothesis projects a concealed network of influential government officials, intelligence
agencies, and other entities covertly manipulate political events and decisions.

“’Deep state' is a threat to democracy” – Donald Trump

78 | P a g e
Inside the Bureau: FBI, DOJ, and the Secret Society

In the aftermath of President Trump's unexpected victory in the 2016 election, the nation was
divided and filled with political turmoil. Yet, amid the public chaos, there was a mysterious
undercurrent that began to surface—a whisper of a "secret society" within the Department of
Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This revelation was not made by some
underground whistle-blower but by two prominent lawmakers, Chairman Trey Gowdy and Rep. John
Ratcliffe, who had access to a trove of text messages exchanged between two influential figures
within the FBI: Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

Peter Strzok, a high-ranking counterintelligence official, had played a pivotal role in both the
investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server and the special counsel's investigation led by
Robert Mueller into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election. Strzok was in a romantic
relationship with Lisa Page, a senior FBI lawyer. Their text exchanges revealed a startling reference
to a "secret society" within the DOJ and the FBI.

In January 2018, Chairman Gowdy and Rep. Ratcliffe disclosed the existence of these mysterious
communications. They cautioned that while they were not asserting the existence of a "secret
society" outright, it was disconcerting to find such terms in the messages of two individuals who
were expected to be objective and fact-driven in their roles. The text in question, sent the day after
Trump's victory, read, "perhaps this is the first meeting of the 'secret society.'"

This revelation sent shockwaves through the political landscape. For some, it confirmed suspicions
that there might be hidden agendas within the highest echelons of the DOJ and the FBI. For others, it
was dismissed as mere conjecture, an offhand comment made by two individuals involved in the
midst of a contentious election.

The "secret society" remark was not an isolated instance of intriguing text messages between Strzok
and Page. In one earlier message, Strzok alluded to an "insurance policy" against a Trump
presidency, stating, "I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office —
that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance
policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…"

79 | P a g e
The mystery surrounding these messages deepened further. "Andy," as it turned out, might have
been a reference to FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who was already at the center of
heightened tensions with the Trump administration. These exchanges raised concerns that there
could be a hidden agenda within the FBI, with some suggesting that key figures were working to
prevent Trump's election or to undermine his presidency.

As the story unfolded, President Trump, through Attorney General Jeff Sessions, exerted pressure on
FBI Director Christopher Wray to fire McCabe. This situation escalated to the point where Wray
threatened to resign if McCabe were dismissed, further intensifying the intrigue surrounding these
high-level conflicts within the FBI.

Simultaneously, the Department of Justice announced a shocking development: they had failed to
preserve five months' worth of text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page, which spanned a
crucial period—the transition between President Obama's administration and the launch of
Mueller's Russia probe. These missing messages left a void in the public's understanding of what
might have been discussed during this critical time. The removal of Strzok from the Mueller probe
further raised questions about the content of these messages and the impact they might have had
on the investigation.

As the public grappled with the implications of these revelations, President Trump weighed in,
describing the missing messages as "one of the biggest stories in a long time." The story of the
"secret society" within the FBI and DOJ had become emblematic of a larger question: was there a
clandestine network of individuals actively working against the duly elected President of the United
States?

The story of the "secret society" would continue to captivate the nation, leaving many to ponder the
implications of hidden agendas, political intrigue, and the balance of power in the highest echelons
of government. Whether it was a mere offhand comment or a genuine revelation of covert
machinations, it served as a stark reminder of the enduring fascination and fear surrounding the
possibility of a shadowy deep state or a secret society operating in the corridors of power.

Apolitical Insights: Exploring the Intersection of Politics, Religion, and the

Vatican's Adaptive Strategies

As the author of this book, I want to clarify that I am apolitical and do not endorse any specific
politician, including Trump or Biden. However, it is worth noting that there appears to be opposition
to Trump from both the Pope and what is commonly referred to as the Deep State. This opposition
likely stems from Trump's deviation from the current status quo and agenda. It is crucial to consider
that if the political climate were to shift towards a more right-leaning ideology, possibly
incorporating elements of fascism, Trump could potentially gain substantial support. This support
might come from a right-wing eleted Pope, along with the right-wing Catholic orders and prelates, as
well as the Republican Party. However, this scenario would only unfold if the pendulum of
ideological leanings swung the other way, aligning with global agendas, as history has demonstrated.
This is precisely why Pope Francis, a Jesuit, was elected for this left-leaning cycle; Donald Trump did
not align with the prevailing direction of this cycle.

80 | P a g e
The Vatican is highly adaptable and can navigate any political landscape. For instance, its orders and
prelates consist of both right-wing and left-wing components, allowing them to survive in various
contexts. The Jesuit order, for example, leans towards left-wing liberalism and has allied itself with
the left, while other orders like Opus Dei and the Knights of Malta lean towards the right. During
George W. Bush's presidency, the objective was to exert global influence through force, with support
from right-wing Catholic orders such as the Knights of Columbus, Knights of Malta and Pope
Benedict XVI. Presently, the agenda revolves around promoting left-wing ideology, social justice,
inclusion, and unity through coercion and cancel culture. This explains the presence of a Jesuit Pope,
Pope Francis, who was elected to align with and support the prevailing status quo and agenda until
either its failure or success.

Unraveling the Enigma of the Roman Catholic Church

The Roman Catholic Church's Grip on Society: A Critical Examination

The arrival of the Jesuits in Maryland in 1634 marked a significant turning point in history, extending
Rome's dominance and laying the foundation for a subtle yet pervasive infiltration of American
society. However, to fully comprehend the extent of the Roman Catholic Church's influence and the
alarming grip it maintains on society today, one must critically examine the prominent Catholics
holding influential positions in government, intelligence agencies, the military, and homeland
security.

It is undeniable that the Roman Catholic Church has successfully positioned its members and
cooperators in key positions of power. It strategically places individuals who share the Church's
values, priorities, and/or the exclusive opportunities that can be offered. This calculated move
allows the Church to exert its influence and shape policies in line with its teachings and agenda. This
infiltration not only blurs the lines between church and state but also raises concerns about the
separation of powers and the undue influence of religious institutions on the decision-making
processes that affect the entire nation.

81 | P a g e
Alfred E Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner

One of the not so subtle tools employed by the Roman Catholic Church to cement its influence is
the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner. Ostensibly presented as a charitable event, this
dinner serves a much deeper purpose. It acts as a deceptive display of goodwill while covertly
functioning as a flirtatious affair that solidifies the unholy alliance between church and state.
Prominent political leaders, business tycoons, and media figures gather under the guise of charity,
allowing the Church to ingratiate itself and establish personal connections with those in positions of
power. This orchestrated event serves as a testament to the Church's desire to maintain and expand
its influence beyond the confines of religious institutions.

82 | P a g e
Pope Francis' address to the Joint Session of Congress is the first in U.S
history

A significant event that marked an apparent power shift was Pope Francis' address to the U.S.
Senate in 2015. This historic moment signaled the enormous influence and reach of the Roman
Catholic Church, as Pope Francis became the first Pope to directly address the legislative body of the
United States. This gesture of recognition bestowed an unprecedented level of legitimacy upon the
Church and demonstrated its ability to shape global discourse. The Pope's address highlighted an
underlying power dynamic, implying a convergence of religious authority and political power that
raises questions about the appropriate role of religion in shaping public policy.

83 | P a g e
 It is imperative to critically examine the Roman Catholic Church's extensive reach and its influence
over society today. The prominent Catholics in positions of power, the deceptive nature of events
like the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, and the historic address of Pope Francis to the
U.S. Senate all signify a worrying power shift and the Church's relentless pursuit of dominance. From
the Jesuits' arrival in Maryland to the present day, the Roman Catholic Church has meticulously
shaped and dictated the narrative, leaving little room for alternative perspectives and potentially
compromising the principles of democracy and secular governance.

From the Shadows to the Pews: Investigating the Vatican's Alleged Deep
State Connection

Is it truly far-fetched to claim that the Vatican or Roman Catholic Church represents the Deep State
within the United States? This assertion posits the Church as the most influential organization in the
country, fostering cohesion among its members and exerting control over governmental
departments, including intelligence agencies and even the Supreme Court. Additionally, the Vatican
purportedly aids and protects its adherents while boasting an extensive network of 1.3 billion
Catholics worldwide, enabling group cohesion and alliances. In essence, the Roman Catholic Church
within the United States operates as a self-contained economic entity. One may wonder why people
fail to perceive the true nature of the Deep State, instead focusing on outlandish and erroneous
conspiracy theories involving groups like the Illuminati, Zionist Jews, or Freemasons. The reality,
seemingly evident and in plain sight, points to the undeniable influence of the Roman Catholic
Church and the Vatican.

The Deep State's Agenda: Uniting the World under a Veiled Umbrella

In this section, we explore the intricate web of the deep state's agenda, examining how it aims to
consolidate global power through various means. Moreover, there appears to be an underlying
effort to establish a worldwide Sunday law as part of a broader initiative to unite nations under the
control of the Papacy. This movement seems to have grassroots origins, but there are indications
that it is being clandestinely promoted by the Vatican. This raises concerns about the true motives
and potential consequences associated with this global Sunday law.

From unions and trade agreements to climate change initiatives orchestrated by the United Nations
and other think tank groups, from the European Sunday Alliance to reading between the lines of
Laudato si', make no mistake; a part of the Deep State's agenda is to implement a worldwide Sunday
law in various guises, such as a day of rest for the planet and a family day. The objective also raises
concerns in the U.S regarding a breach of the First Amendment: The First Amendment provides that
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise. It
protects freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.

84 | P a g e
One of the most prominent marks the Church of Rome has placed on modern Christianity has been
the change in Sabbath observance. This sign has symbolized power since the time of Justinian.

In the 2nd century AD, Christian communities, including those in the influential city of Rome, began
congregating for worship on Sundays. This shift in religious practice gained momentum over the
centuries. The Council of Nicaea, convened in 325 AD within the Roman Empire, notably played a
role in solidifying Sunday as the officially recognized day of worship for Christians. With Rome at the
heart of this cultural and religious evolution, Sunday gradually supplanted the observance of the
Sabbath (Saturday) among Christians. Over time, the transition became a defining feature of
Christian religious practice throughout the Roman Empire and beyond, marking Sunday as the
predominant day for communal worship.

"Sunday is our mark of authority... The church is above the Bible, and this transference of Sabbath
observance is proof of that fact" (The Catholic Record of London, Ontario, Sept. 1, 1923). By
observing Sunday, Protestants appear to submit to the Vatican's authority over them. Soon, the final
resurrection of the Roman Empire will challenge everyone to keep Sunday—or else.

There is also an alarming trend of statesmen gradually relinquishing power to the Vatican, ostensibly
believing that the Pope represents a moral compass. Lastly, we will shed light on the unsettling
methods employed by these powers to silence dissent through digital surveillance and insidious
COINTELPRO tactics.

The Deep State's Unifying Mechanisms

The deep state's agenda of unifying the world under a political and interfaith umbrella takes shape
through several key mechanisms. Unions and trade agreements play a pivotal role in this process, as
they provide platforms for harmonizing policies and regulations across borders. While the ostensible
aim of these agreements is economic cooperation and growth, their deeper purpose is to establish a
homogenized system that erodes national sovereignty and undermines diverse cultural identities.

Similarly, climate change initiatives spearheaded by the United Nations and influential think tank
groups serve as effective tools for the deep state's unifying objectives. By promoting a shared sense
of urgency and global responsibility, these initiatives create a sense of common purpose among
nations. However, lurking beneath the surface lies the potential for centralization of power and
control, as decisions on climate policies and resource allocation become increasingly concentrated in
the hands of a select few.

85 | P a g e
The Burden of Proof: Examining the Roman Catholic Church's Alleged Role as
the Deep State
As you may have guessed, the enormous amount of evidence and connections strongly suggest that
the Roman Catholic Church functions as a deep state and acts as Rome's fifth column in the United
States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and numerous other Roman Catholic
countries. It is the only group that possesses such significant power and wide-ranging influence,
overshadowing any other group, ideology, or organization by a considerable margin. When one
sincerely examines the matter, it becomes glaringly obvious. How can anyone deny the veracity of
these claims? Shouldn't all these facts serve as a burden of proof?

The situation became quite clear when, on September 24, 2015, Pope Francis delivered a speech
before the US Congress, resulting in John Boehner being moved to tears, while the rest of Congress
gave Pope Francis a standing ovation and resounding applause. Furthermore, considering the
significant presence of Catholics in influential positions within the Supreme Court, Congress,
intelligence agencies, military, and other government entities, it becomes apparent that politicians,
whether Catholic or not, both fear and revere the Pope. They recognize the immense power he
holds, and opposing him would have dire consequences for their careers and future prospects.

Some may proclaim the Pope to be the moral leader of our time, but in reality, he is merely a shrewd
and astute politician. Despite being inundated with claims of benevolence and charitable acts
displayed in front of cameras, we witness his actions prioritizing the interests of the Church, such as
withholding reparations for abuse and offering refuge to figures like Cardinal George Pell, who failed
abuse victims and silenced them through monetary means. How can the Pope be considered a moral
leader? He is simply a product of skilled public relations, adept at saying the right things at the right
time to gain support and followers.

The Deep State's Influence on How Governments Address Child

Abuse Scandals

The Role of the Deep State in Government Responses to Child Abuse Scandals

In countries around the world, allegations of child abuse within the Catholic Church have shaken
societies, challenged institutions, and raised questions about the role of governments in addressing
such heinous crimes. This chapter examines the ways in which governments have been accused of
being slow to investigate or stonewalling investigations into child abuse scandals, and how Catholic
cohesion within government structures may have played a role in these dynamics.

86 | P a g e
Ireland:

Ireland's history is marked by deeply troubling child abuse scandals involving the Catholic Church.
These scandals prominently featured abuse within institutions such as industrial schools,
orphanages, and Magdalene laundries. It is important to note that the Irish government, especially
in earlier decades, faced allegations that it was slow to investigate and address these abuses. One of
the reasons for this could be the historically close relationship between the Catholic Church and the
Irish state.

Industrial schools were meant to be places of care for vulnerable children, but they became sites of
physical, emotional, and sexual abuse. Magdalene laundries subjected women and girls to harsh
conditions. The allegations of abuse were deeply disturbing, and survivors sought justice for years.

The publication of reports like the Ryan Report (2009) and the McAleese Report (2013) shed light on
the extent of abuse and the role of the government. These reports revealed that some government
departments had knowledge of abuse but failed to intervene adequately. The close ties between the
Church and the state during this period created an environment where accountability was elusive.

Australia:

Australia faced its own child abuse scandals within various institutions, including the Catholic
Church. The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in 2013 exposed
extensive abuse, and thousands of survivors came forward to share their traumatic experiences.
Allegations of cover-ups within the Catholic Church and accusations that church officials failed to
report abuse raised questions about government responses.

The Catholic Church, like in Ireland, had a significant presence and influence in Australian society.
Some argue that this influence might have impacted the government's initial reluctance to
investigate the Church more thoroughly. However, the sheer scale of the abuse and the courageous
survivors who came forward eventually pushed the government to act decisively.

The Royal Commission's findings underscored the need for systemic change and accountability. It led
to the implementation of new laws and policies aimed at preventing child abuse and improving
responses to survivors.

United States:

Child abuse scandals involving the Catholic Church in the United States date back several decades.
Allegations of cover-ups by church officials and accusations that some government agencies,
particularly local law enforcement and child protective services, did not act decisively to address the
issue were widely reported.

The Catholic Church had a significant presence in the United States, and its influence extended to
various aspects of society. Some have argued that this influence may have contributed to
government reluctance to pursue investigations more aggressively. High-profile cases, such as those
in Boston in the early 2000s, brought national attention to the issue.

87 | P a g e
Various states conducted their investigations into child abuse within the Catholic Church, and
numerous lawsuits were filed. However, the complex legal landscape, statutes of limitations, and the
significant financial and legal resources of the Church often posed challenges to holding perpetrators
accountable.

The cases in Ireland, Australia, and the United States illustrate that the influence of the Catholic
Church in these countries, historically intertwined with government structures and societal norms,
could have played a role in delays and obstacles in addressing child abuse scandals. In many
instances, survivors, advocacy groups, and courageous journalists played pivotal roles in demanding
accountability and pushing for government action.

The Ongoing Struggles of Sexual Abuse Victims: Harassment, Intimidation,

and Compensation Challenges
The stories of sexual abuse victims within the Catholic Church have, for decades, revealed not only
the profound suffering caused by the abuse itself but also the disturbing experiences survivors have
faced when attempting to seek justice, bring their abusers to account, and obtain fair compensation.
This chapter delves into some notable cases where survivors have alleged harassment, intimidation,
witness tampering, and coercion in their pursuit of justice and compensation.

1. The Case of Witness Tampering:

One of the most alarming aspects of the Catholic Church abuse scandals has been allegations of
witness tampering. Survivors who have chosen to come forward with their allegations have reported
instances where they or potential witnesses were subjected to threats, intimidation, and pressure to
remain silent. Some survivors claim that individuals within the Church attempted to discredit their
allegations and undermine their credibility.

For example, in the United States, survivors of abuse in the Boston Archdiocese, whose stories were
exposed by The Boston Globe's investigative reporting in the early 2000s, alleged witness tampering
by Church officials. Some survivors said that they were approached by representatives of the Church
who pressured them to retract their allegations or remain silent in exchange for financial
settlements. Such allegations highlighted the extent to which some within the Church were willing to
go to protect their reputation.

2. Harassment and Intimidation:

Harassment and intimidation tactics have been reported by survivors in various countries. Some
survivors claimed that they faced a hostile environment when pursuing legal action or speaking out
against their abusers. This included receiving threatening phone calls, hate mail, or experiencing
online harassment.

88 | P a g e
 In Ireland, survivors who came forward with allegations against the Catholic Church have reported
instances of harassment and intimidation by individuals associated with the Church or its supporters.
These actions were aimed at discouraging survivors from pursuing legal action or making their
allegations public.

3. Coerced Acceptance of Compensation:

Survivors of abuse within the Catholic Church have also spoken out about feeling coerced into
accepting inadequate compensation settlements. They often faced the difficult choice of accepting
settlements that they believed did not adequately address the lifelong suffering they endured or
engaging in lengthy, emotionally taxing legal battles.

In Australia, survivors who sought compensation through the Church's Towards Healing process
alleged that they were pressured into accepting low settlement offers. Some felt that they had no
other viable option but to accept the settlements, even though they considered them to be
insufficient.

4. Notable International Cases:

These experiences of harassment, intimidation, witness tampering, and coerced acceptance of

compensation are not limited to specific countries but have been reported in various parts of the
world where the Catholic Church has faced allegations of abuse. Survivors, advocacy groups, and
investigative journalists have consistently highlighted these issues as barriers to justice and
accountability.

The challenges faced by survivors in their pursuit of justice emphasize the need for transparency,
accountability, and survivor-centered approaches in addressing allegations of abuse within the
Catholic Church. It underscores the importance of legal reforms, support networks, and advocacy
efforts aimed at protecting survivors and ensuring that their voices are heard, free from harassment,
intimidation, or coercion.

89 | P a g e
Australia - NSW Police Accused of Shredding Documents Related to Abuse

The Special Commission of Inquiry into child sexual abuse in the Hunter region is currently
investigating allegations that the police in New South Wales (NSW) deliberately destroyed crucial
evidence related to abuse by Catholic clergy. An investigation conducted by Lateline has revealed
that a senior NSW police officer was a member of a significant Catholic Church body established to
address sex abuse cases and regularly attended monthly meetings. Shockingly, over a five-year span,
this police officer shredded all documents and records associated with these monthly meetings. This
situation raises serious questions about how a serving police officer ended up being a part of an
internal church committee that discussed child sexual abuse and the circumstances surrounding the
destruction of these records.

Dubbed the Catholic Mafia by Media: Evidence of the Vatican Deep State to
stifle claims of abuse in Australia

The unearthing of the tangled web of deceit and concealment within the Catholic Church had a face,
and it bore the determined countenance of Detective Chief Inspector Peter Fox. Having dedicated
over three decades to the relentless pursuit of justice, Fox was no stranger to the shadows that
lurked in society's corners. However, nothing could have prepared him for the depth of deception he
would encounter within an institution that purported to stand for solace and moral guidance—the
Catholic Church.

Seated in his office within the Newcastle-Hunter region of New South Wales, Fox's gaze fixated on a
letter that held a weight he felt in his bones. Addressed to New South Wales Premier Barry O'Farrell,
this missive was not just a plea; it was a call for justice borne from years of unwavering dedication to
duty and service. Its contents would lay bare a narrative that spanned decades—a tale of alleged
abuse, stifled voices, hindered investigations, and a calculated obliteration of evidence. This
narrative transcended state boundaries, refusing to be confined by mere geography.

90 | P a g e
The phenomenon Fox was about to expose was not a localized anomaly; it was a manifestation of
cohesion within law enforcement that bordered on impenetrable unity. The media had aptly labeled
it the "Catholic mafia," but the reality extended beyond this descriptor. This was the heart of what
some might term the "deep state," a consortium of individuals bound not only by their shared faith
but also by an intricate network of influence that reached into the echelons of power.

Fox had personally borne witness to the church hierarchy's complicity in covering up the actions of
paedophile priests. He had navigated the complexities of a system that bent to the will of a church
more concerned with preserving its reputation than with protecting the innocent. This wasn't just a
handful of isolated incidents—it was systemic, deeply rooted within the fabric of an institution that
wielded immense influence. In his letter, Fox's words carried a tangible weight—a frustration that
had been building for years, fuelled by encounters with survivors whose voices had been silenced
and whose pain had been brushed aside. He was unflinching in his assessment: "Many police are
frustrated by this sinister behaviour which will continue until someone stops it."

Statistics lent undeniable credence to his assertions. The numbers were chilling in their scope: 400
known victims of child sexual abuse by clergy, 11 clergy members convicted since 1995, 6 Catholic
teachers also found guilty, and a litany of other figures that painted a stark portrait of rampant
abuse within the church.

The memories resurfaced as vividly as if they had happened yesterday. Confronting priests who were
accused of silencing victims and tampering with evidence—these encounters had etched themselves
into his consciousness. The frustration simmered within him as he recalled how a priest facing
paedophile charges was enabled by his brethren to financially support another priest embroiled in
similar accusations. The labyrinthine nature of the cover-ups and complicity was staggering. Fueled
by an unyielding determination, Fox's quest extended beyond mere prosecutions. The structures
that permitted this cycle of abuse and cover-up needed to be dismantled. This was more than just a
police matter; it was a systemic failure that required a comprehensive investigation, one capable of
penetrating the deepest layers of silence and obfuscation.

His resolve was unshakeable as he articulated, "There's so much that the police force can't do. We
don't have power." The frustration was palpable, his voice carrying the weight of countless obstacles
faced by law enforcement in their pursuit of justice within an institution that held sway beyond its
own confines. Witnessing survivors muster the courage to stand up was a poignant reminder of the
stakes involved. As Fox acknowledged, not all victims could bear the emotional toll of court
proceedings. The system needed to adapt to accommodate these harrowing experiences, while still
delivering justice for those who sought it.

As he gazed out of his window, Fox knew that this battle was far from over. The echoes of his call for
a Royal Commission were resonating through the halls of power. The survivors' voices were being
heard, their stories validating their pain and inspiring others to come forward. The institution's walls
were crumbling, exposing a truth that demanded accountability.

As the chapter unfolded, the legacy of Detective Chief Inspector Peter Fox and the survivors'
indomitable courage stood as testaments to a truth that could no longer be suppressed. The labels
of "Catholic mafia," "deep state," and "Catholic consortium" were not sensationalism—they were
attempts to encapsulate the intricate tapestry of influence that had hindered justice for far too long.

91 | P a g e
The fight for justice continued, emboldened by the resolve of those who refused to let darkness
prevail. The battle had been joined, and the legacy of truth and accountability was being woven with
each revelation, each survivor's voice, and each step towards dismantling the structures that had
enabled abuse to flourish.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Hall, C. C. (1943). The Ark and the Dove Adventurers: A Documentary History of the Settlement of Maryland, 1634-1635. Second Vatican
Council. (1965). Lumen Gentium (Chapter 4, Paragraph 33). Bernstein, C. (1992, February 24). The Holy Alliance: Ronald Reagan and John
Paul II. Time Magazine. Fox News. (2018). FBI's Strzok and Page spoke of 'secret society' after Trump election, lawmakers say. Fox News.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbis-strzok-and-page-spoke-of-secret-society-after-trump-election-lawmakers-say. The Investigative
Staff of the Boston Globe. (Year of Publication). Betrayal: The Crisis in the Catholic Church. ABC News. (2013, June 25). Shredding of church
sex abuse documents referred to Police Integrity Commission. Lateline. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-06-25/shredding-of-church-
sex-abuse-documents-referred-to-police-inte/4780454

92 | P a g e
CHAPTER 8: THE FIVE EYES: A
COVERT INTELLIGENCE ALLIANCE

Forging Alliances: The Origins of the 5 Eyes Intelligence Partnership

The 5 Eyes alliance emerged as a result of post-World War II intelligence cooperation

between the United States and the United Kingdom. Stemming from a shared need to
counter Soviet influence and address emerging global security threats, this partnership laid
the foundation for what would eventually become an extensive intelligence-sharing
network. The origins of the alliance can be traced back to the 1946 UKUSA Agreement, a
secret intelligence- sharing pact signed between the United States and the United Kingdom.
This agreement established the framework for collaboration in signals intelligence (SIGINT)
operations, enabling the sharing of intercepted communications, code-breaking techniques,
and analytical expertise. Over time, the alliance expanded to include additional English-
speaking countries with aligned security interests. Canada, Australia, and New Zealand
joined the partnership, collectively forming the 5 Eyes alliance. This expanded network
allowed for greater information exchange, shared technological advancements, and
collaborative efforts to tackle global security challenges. The alliance's name, "5 Eyes,"
stems from the fact that each member country acts as an "eye" that contributes and
benefits from the shared intelligence pool. This pooling of resources and expertise enhances
the collective intelligence-gathering capabilities of the alliance, creating a robust and
formidable network.

The evolution of the 5 Eyes alliance has been marked by the changing nature of global
threats, advancements in technology, and the need for closer cooperation among like-
minded nations. The alliance has adapted and expanded its activities beyond traditional
SIGINT to encompass broader intelligence domains, including counterterrorism,

93 | P a g e
cybersecurity, and geopolitical analysis. While the specifics of the alliance's operations and
agreements remain highly classified, the 5 Eyes alliance continues to serve as a vital
mechanism for intelligence sharing, cooperation, and strategic collaboration among its
member countries. The alliance's longevity and effectiveness can be attributed to the
shared values, historical ties, and common security objectives that bind the participating
nations together.
The 5 Eyes alliance, supposedly guided by a comprehensive mission statement, operates
with a questionable methodology that stretches well beyond the confines of activities
reminiscent of COINTELPRO. This alliance conveniently exploits its member states as
vehicles to circumvent domestic laws by seeking assistance from other members, effectively
exploiting legal loopholes. Engaging in covert operations that could be considered illegal
within their respective jurisdictions, the alliance prioritizes its geopolitical ambitions over
ethical considerations. Operating under the guise of collective surveillance efforts, the
alliance vigilantly monitors foreign movements, scrutinizes businesses abroad, and
selectively targets nations such as China and Russia, as well as countries and groups not
aligned with the vision for a new order outlined by the US-Vatican alliance. These
meticulous surveillance activities assert dominance and protect national interests,
conveniently amass critical strategic intelligence to inform decision-making processes that
often lack transparency. It is crucial to approach the multifaceted nature of the 5 Eyes
alliance with skepticism, questioning its true motives and the impact it has on shaping global
dynamics, which appear to disregard the principles of accountability and respect for
domestic legal frameworks.

In the Depths of 5 Eyes Surveillance: The Exploitation

In an era dominated by pervasive surveillance and unrestricted intelligence sharing, the

disturbing revelation of intelligence agencies offering to exchange medical, religious, and
legal information should send shivers down our spines. The leaked documents from 2013,
exposing the Australian Signals Directorate's (ASD) readiness to share metadata on its own
citizens, serve as a stark reminder of the perils associated with the collection and
dissemination of deeply personal data. These disconcerting practices bear an uncomfortable

94 | P a g e
resemblance to the infamous COINTELPRO program, igniting skepticism and critical analysis.
Medical, religious, and legal information lie at the core of an individual's privacy, revealing
the most intimate aspects of their lives. The prospect of deploying such sensitive data within
surveillance programs raises profound ethical and legal concerns. While intelligence
agencies justify these actions as essential for national security, the potential implications for
civil liberties and personal privacy cannot be disregarded.
COINTELPRO is a noxious stain on the records of most intelligence agencies, with the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) being the forerunner of such programs, and it serves as a
chilling example. This program entailed invasive surveillance, infiltration, and subversion
tactics directed at political dissidents, civil rights activists, and social movements. Sensitive
information, including medical records, religious affiliations, and legal activities, played a
sinister role in the oppressive machinery of COINTELPRO.
Tragically, history has repeatedly demonstrated the extent to which personal information
can be weaponized when it falls into the wrong hands or is harnessed for political ends.
Medical records can be exploited to undermine credibility, exploit vulnerabilities, or
manipulate public opinion. Knowledge of an individual's religious beliefs or legal activities
can be perverted to stigmatize, marginalize, and silence dissenting voices.
The modern landscape of surveillance programs exacerbates these risks to unimaginable
proportions. The relentless collection and exchange of vast volumes of data among
intelligence agencies enable the construction of comprehensive profiles, facilitating
profiling, discrimination, and targeted actions against individuals. This represents a direct
assault on privacy, freedom of speech, association, and the right to a fair trial. The shocking
disclosure of the ASD's willingness to share medical, religious, and legal information serves
as a dire wake-up call.
Trading Privacy for Security: The Surrender of British Citizens' Privacy to the 5 Eyes
Surveillance Alliance The revelation of a secret deal between the United States and the
United Kingdom paints a chilling picture of the extensive reach and overreach of the 5 Eyes
surveillance alliance. This clandestine agreement underscores how far the Anglosphere has
plunged into the abyss of mass surveillance, eroding the boundaries of privacy and raising
critical concerns about unchecked power and the erosion of civil liberties. The agreement
involved a covert operation known as "Optic Nerve," a joint effort by the National Security
Agency (NSA) and the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). This operation
entailed intercepting and storing webcam images from millions of unsuspecting internet
users, capturing intimate and private moments without their knowledge or consent. The
invasive nature of this program serves as a stark reminder of the unprecedented extent to
which surveillance has permeated our lives.

The implications of the 5 Eyes surveillance machine extending its grip over the Anglosphere
are deeply troubling. It signals a consolidation of power among these intelligence agencies,
leading to an environment where privacy is compromised, and the fundamental principles
of a free and democratic societies are at risk. The unchecked expansion of the 5 Eyes
alliance raises questions about the balance of power, accountability, and oversight. The

95 | P a g e
secrecy surrounding these surveillance programs leaves citizens unaware of the extent of
intrusion into their lives. The lack of public debate and consent further exacerbates
concerns, as the Anglosphere finds itself trapped in an opaque surveillance network,
operating beyond the scrutiny of democratic institutions.

The Anglosphere, known for its cherished principles of individual freedoms, is now
confronted with a reality where those very freedoms are under threat. The 5 Eyes alliance
has created a surveillance behemoth that indiscriminately scoops up vast amounts of
personal data, disregarding legal protections, medical confidentiality, and the sanctity of
religious practices.
The pervasiveness of the 5 Eyes surveillance machine extends beyond national borders,
entangling not only citizens of the Anglosphere but also individuals around the globe. This
dominance raises concerns about sovereignty, human rights, and the erosion of trust among
nations. The Anglosphere must confront the harsh reality that the 5 Eyes alliance has gone
too far. The unbridled collection and analysis of personal data, the violation of privacy, and
the erosion of civil liberties call for urgent reflection and action.

A Veiled Shadow: Questioning the Relevance of the 5 Eyes Alliance and its
Potential Involvement in Assassinations

The 5 Eyes alliance, despite its official stance and public statements, raises skeptical concerns
regarding its potential involvement in assassination operations. Historically, intelligence agencies
within the 5 Eyes alliance have been associated with covert operations and questionable activities.
The alliance's extensive surveillance capabilities and access to sensitive information makes it a
potential tool for targeted assassinations. Although the alliance's official mandate does not explicitly
include assassination, it is naive to assume that such operations are completely absent from their
agenda. The blurred lines between Intelligence gathering and covert operations create an
environment where clandestine activities, including targeted killings, could potentially occur under
the guise of national security.

The track record of member countries, such as

the United States, in engaging in extrajudicial
killings and targeted assassinations further
deepens the skepticism. The use of drone
strikes, "black ops," and covert operations by
these nations raises questions about the
extent to which the 5 Eyes alliance might be
involved in similar activities. The lack of
transparency surrounding the alliance's
operations, combined with the potential for
abuse of power and manipulation of information, underscores the critical need for robust oversight
and accountability mechanisms.

96 | P a g e
The Five Eyes Alliance and Its Targets: A Closer Look at Surveillance

Functioning as a covert intelligence-sharing partnership, the Five Eyes alliance has engaged
in surveillance activities targeting individuals worldwide, including prominent figures. In this
chapter, we explore some noteworthy individuals, both iconic and political, who have come
under the scrutiny of the Five Eyes agencies.
Diana, Princess of Wales:

Princess Diana, a prominent advocate against the usage of landmines, caught the attention
of the Five Eyes alliance. The Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) in the UK
and the National Security Agency (NSA) in the US compiled a top-secret dossier of over
1,000 pages on her. The NSA, however, declared that the file would never be released due
to its potential threat to national security.
Charlie Chaplin:
Renowned comedian and filmmaker Charlie Chaplin faced surveillance by the UK's MI5,
acting on behalf of the FBI. Accused of ties to communism, Chaplin became a target of the
FBI's efforts to banish him from the United States.
Kim Dotcom:

Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom, the founder of Megaupload, experienced illegal

surveillance from the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) in New Zealand
on behalf of the FBI. His case led to Prime Minister John Key issuing an apology for the
GCSB's actions.
Jane Fonda:

Actress and political activist Jane Fonda's communications, along with her husband Tom
Hayden's, were intercepted by the GCHQ and shared with the NSA. This surveillance was
due to Fonda's outspoken political activism.

97 | P a g e
Ali Khamenei:
As the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei and his entourage were subjected to high-tech
surveillance during a visit to Iranian Kurdistan in 2009. The operation involved satellite
imagery analysis conducted jointly by the GCHQ and the NSA.
John Lennon:

Iconic musician and anti-war activist John Lennon became a target of extensive surveillance
by the FBI and MI5 after moving to the United States to join anti-Vietnam War protests.
Nelson Mandela:
Despite his later global recognition as a philanthropist and President of South Africa, Nelson
Mandela was labeled a terrorist by critics and placed under surveillance by British MI6
agents, with the CIA assisting local authorities in his arrest.
Angela Merkel:
The Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel, had her phone communications monitored by
the Special Collection Service, part of the STATEROOM surveillance program of Five Eyes.
Ehud Olmert:
The former Prime Minister of Israel, Ehud Olmert, and Israel's Minister of Defense, Ehud
Barak, were targets of surveillance by the GCHQ and the NSA.
Strom Thurmond:

As the longest-serving U.S. senator in history, Strom Thurmond's telephone calls were
allegedly intercepted by Five Eyes through their ECHELON surveillance system, as revealed
by a Lockheed employee in 1988.
Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono:

The former President of Indonesia, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, and his wife were placed
under surveillance by the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD), with the details shared with
the NSA.

98 | P a g e
The NSA created a 1000 dossier on Princess Diana

Princess Diana was a prominent figure known for her extensive humanitarian work,
activism, and campaigns against landmines. Her global influence made her a subject of
interest to governments worldwide, potentially leading to monitoring of her movements
and communications as part of broader intelligence-gathering efforts. The circumstances
surrounding her death have raised questions that remain unanswered for some, with claims
suggesting she was assassinated.

Princess Diana passed away on August 31, 1997, and approximately four years later, the
tragic events of 9/11 occurred. Given Princess Diana's immense popularity, one can imagine
the challenges her presence could have posed regarding the illegal invasion of Iraq and
Afghanistan and the purported pretext for war involving Weapons of Mass Destruction
(WMDs). Some speculate that if the Deep State had planned 9/11 as a geopolitical
countermeasure, it would have required years of planning that predated Diana's death.
Consequently, Princess Diana's popularity and influence might have been perceived as a
hindrance by some within the Deep State.
The Princess Diana 1,000-page dossier concerning her is a matter of interest. However, the
1,056 pages, which consist of 182 documents, including 39 marked as "top secret," will
never be released to the public.

The 5 Eyes Alliance - A Veil of Control and Suppression in the Anglosphere

The Five Eyes alliance, officially recognized as a signals intelligence-sharing partnership,

operates clandestinely behind closed doors. This chapter delves into the alliance's covert

99 | P a g e
activities, shedding light on its deeper motives, particularly in maintaining the status quo
within the Anglosphere and contributing to the United States' hegemonic power.
While the official narrative emphasizes the alliance's focus on signals intelligence, a critical
examination reveals a more profound objective – the preservation of the existing power
structures within the Anglosphere. The United States, acting as the dominant partner,
utilizes unparalleled surveillance capabilities to enforce control.

Under the guise of national security, the alliance employs programs reminiscent of
COINTELPRO, strategically designed to stifle dissenting voices and eliminate any perceived
threats to established power structures. This manipulation of intelligence serves to
perpetuate a status quo that may not align with the best interests of citizens or the global
community.
The 5 Eyes alliance emerges as a critical tool in upholding the dominant position of
Anglosphere countries in global affairs. Through extensive intelligence sharing, these
nations bolster their strategic advantage, exerting influence over international politics,
economics, and security. Collaboration reinforces collective interests, safeguarding their
roles as pivotal players on the global stage.

Within the alliance, the United States assumes the role of the dominant partner, leveraging
its substantial power and influence to shape intelligence operations. The U.S. sets the
agenda, dictates cooperation levels, and pursues its own interests, often prioritizing
economic and geopolitical objectives over privacy rights and democratic principles.
Drawing unsettling parallels to historical COINTELPRO operations, the 5 Eyes alliance
employs analogous tactics to suppress dissenting views and perceived threats. Under the
pretext of national security, surveillance programs monitor, infiltrate, and disrupt political
movements, activist groups, and whistle-blowers. This covert manipulation erodes
democratic values, stifles free speech, and undermines the foundation of a just and inclusive
society.
The 5 Eyes alliance, masked as a signals intelligence collaboration, extends its influence far
beyond its purported purpose. By maintaining the status quo within the Anglosphere and
contributing to U.S. hegemony, the alliance raises significant concerns about the balance
between national security imperatives and the preservation of democratic principles. As the
alliance operates in the shadows, the implications of its actions on global affairs and
individual freedoms are profound and warrant careful consideration.

100 | P a g e
The Global Network of Surveillance

Beyond the borders of the United States, a network of surveillance programs extends its
reach, conducted by the Five Eyes alliance.

United Kingdom (UK):

At the forefront of the UK's surveillance efforts stands the Government Communications
Headquarters (GCHQ). The GCHQ operates various programs, with two prominent ones
coming to light: Tempora and Optic Nerve.

Tempora: Under the umbrella of Tempora, the GCHQ engages in the bulk collection and
long-term storage of internet communications. This program casts a wide net,
encompassing emails, phone calls, and online browsing activities. By accumulating vast
amounts of data, Tempora provides the GCHQ with an unprecedented level of insight into
the digital lives of individuals, raising concerns about privacy and the potential for misuse.

Optic Nerve: Another program operated by the GCHQ, Optic Nerve delves into the realm of
visuals. It involves the mass collection and storage of webcam images from millions of
internet users, even including individuals who are not suspected of any wrongdoing. This
extensive surveillance initiative has sparked controversy and questions about the ethics and
necessity of such intrusive practices.

Canada:
Canada's surveillance efforts are spearheaded by the Communications Security
Establishment (CSE). While specific program details are not publicly disclosed, the CSE is
known to conduct various surveillance activities, focusing on intercepting and analyzing
communications data. By leveraging its signals intelligence capabilities, the CSE contributes
to the intelligence gathering efforts of the Five Eyes alliance.

Australia:

The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) assumes the responsibility of collecting foreign
signals intelligence for Australia. Although precise program details are not widely available,
the ASD engages in various surveillance activities to safeguard Australia's national interests.
These efforts align with the broader objectives of the Five Eyes alliance, emphasizing the
collaboration and information sharing among member countries.

101 | P a g e
New Zealand:

In New Zealand, the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) stands as the
signals intelligence agency. Similar to its counterparts in the alliance, the GCSB intercepts
and analyzes communications to support national security and foreign intelligence efforts.
The agency plays a vital role in contributing to the shared intelligence pool of the Five Eyes.
The collaboration and synergy among the Five Eyes alliance underscore the extent to which
these nations are invested in surveillance and intelligence gathering. By leveraging their
technological capabilities and expertise, they strive to protect national security interests and
maintain their positions as key players in the global intelligence community.

Five Eyes Contractors: Companies and individuals hired by Five Eyes

intelligence agencies to provide specialized services and expertise

The practice of hiring contractors by all nations within the Five Eyes alliance raises serious
concerns that extend beyond mere national security. It underscores the broader issue of
potential exploitation and misuse of sensitive information by individuals or entities aligned
with external interests, such as the Vatican, other non-state actors, or those who hold
extreme ideologies.

Lack of Rigorous Vetting: The case in question reveals a significant failure in the vetting
process for contractors. When an individual with access to highly classified information can
go unnoticed while harboring intentions contrary to national interests, it underscores a
critical weakness in maintaining the loyalty and integrity of contractor personnel, which has
broader implications for the security of the free world.

Potential for Coercion or Manipulation: Contractors, whether inadvertently or intentionally,

may become susceptible to external influence. In the hypothetical scenario of alignment
with the Vatican or any other external entity, the risk of coercion or manipulation becomes
all too real. Individuals may prioritize the interests of their external affiliations over national
security concerns.
Erosion of Sovereignty: Contracting out intelligence operations to individuals or entities with
potential external allegiances raises fundamental questions about national sovereignty and
the ability to safeguard sensitive information. If contractors can be influenced by external
organizations, it undermines the very essence of a nation's ability to protect its secrets.

Challenges to International Relations: The Snowden case demonstrated that the actions of a
single contractor can have far-reaching international consequences. If contractors aligned
with external entities were to misuse classified information, it could damage diplomatic
relations, compromise international trust, and create geopolitical tensions on a global scale.

102 | P a g e
 Transparency and Accountability: The lack of transparency in contractor relationships,
combined with the potential for external allegiances, makes accountability elusive. Holding
contractors accountable for their actions becomes challenging when their motivations align
with interests beyond the nation they serve.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Kerbaj, R. (2023). The Secret History of the Five Eyes: The untold story of the shadowy international spy network, through its targets,
traitors and spies. Blink Publisher. Doward, J. (2004, January 11). Top secret US files could hold clues to death of Diana.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/jan/11/monarchy.jamiedoward

103 | P a g e
CHAPTER 9: BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: A
COMPREHENSIVE LOOK AT THE ENGLISH-
SPEAKING INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND
FACILITIES

United States: Unseen Eyes and Silent Ears

CIA George Bush Center for Intelligence - Langley Virginia - United States:

The CIA's headquarters, nestled in Langley, Virginia, stands as an iconic symbol of the
intelligence community's enigmatic presence. Situated just outside Washington, D.C., this
unassuming suburban location belies the agency's global reach and influence. Known for its
imposing campus and secretive aura, Langley is where some of the world's most complex
intelligence operations are conceived and executed. While the agency's mission is to protect
national security, its headquarters in Langley remains a mysterious backdrop to the ever-
evolving world of espionage and intrigue, a place where the line between fact and fiction
often blurs.

104 | P a g e
FBI, J. Edgar Hoover Building – Washington D.C - United States:

Washington, D.C.U.S. The J. Edgar Hoover Building, located in the heart of Washington, D.C.,
has long been associated with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Its prominent
presence in the nation's capital raises eyebrows and fuels skepticism about the agency's
activities. Named after the controversial and formidable former FBI director, the building
has been a symbol of the agency's far-reaching powers, often leading to concerns over civil
liberties and government overreach. Critics point to the FBI's historical track record of
political surveillance, targeting dissidents, and involvement in contentious investigations,
further intensifying doubts about the agency's commitment to transparency and
accountability. In a city that thrives on politics and power, the Hoover Building remains a
focal point of skepticism and scrutiny.

105 | P a g e
NSA, Fort Meade – Maryland - United States:

The National Security Agency (NSA), often shrouded in secrecy and skepticism, is one of the
world's most powerful intelligence organizations. Operating from its headquarters at Fort
Meade, Maryland, the NSA's reach extends across the globe, collecting electronic
communications on an unprecedented scale. Its vast surveillance programs, such as PRISM
and Stellar Wind, have raised significant concerns about privacy rights and civil liberties.
Skeptics argue that the agency's actions, as revealed by whistle-blowers like Edward
Snowden, expose a disconcerting disconnect between its mission of safeguarding national
security and the erosion of individual privacy. In an age of digital interconnectedness, the
NSA's operations continue to be a subject of ongoing debate, leaving many to question the
delicate balance between security and personal freedoms.

106 | P a g e
DIA Joint Base Anacostia–Bolling, Washington D.C. - United States

The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) operates in the shadows of the U.S. intelligence
community, often raising skepticism and curiosity. Tasked with providing military
intelligence to the Department of Defense, the DIA's work is inherently linked to national
security and defense strategies. However, its operations are veiled in secrecy, leaving
skeptics to wonder about the extent of its influence and activities. Questions have arisen
about the accuracy of its intelligence assessments, especially in the context of high-stakes
military conflicts and interventions. Critics argue that the DIA, like other intelligence
agencies, must grapple with the balance between classified information and transparency,
with implications for both national security and democratic oversight. In an era of evolving
global threats, the DIA's role continues to be scrutinized, highlighting the inherent tension
between secrecy and accountability.

107 | P a g e
NRO Chantilly, Virginia, U.S. - United States:

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)

operates in the clandestine world of
reconnaissance satellites and surveillance
technology, inviting skepticism due to its
secretive nature. Situated in Chantilly,
Virginia, the NRO's primary mission is to
develop and operate these classified
assets in support of national security and
defense. However, the NRO's existence
itself was classified until relatively
recently, fueling concerns about
transparency and accountability. Critics
argue that the NRO's covert activities, often hidden from public scrutiny, can blur the lines
between surveillance and privacy rights, with the potential for overreach. As the NRO
continues to expand its capabilities in an era of digital interconnectedness, skepticism
persists about the agency's role in surveillance and its implications for individual freedoms.

108 | P a g e
NGA Campus East - Fort Belvoir, Virginia - United States:

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) operates in the world of geospatial

intelligence, yet its activities often raise skepticism and questions. Located in Springfield,
Virginia, the NGA collects, analyzes, and disseminates geospatial information, including
satellite imagery and maps. While its mission is to support national security, critics wonder
about the extent of its reach and the potential for misuse of such data. Concerns have arisen
about the NGA's role in mass surveillance, especially in the context of technological
advancements and its access to vast amounts of geographic data. As the NGA continues to
harness the power of location-based information, skepticism persists regarding the balance
between its intelligence-gathering mission and individual privacy rights.

109 | P a g e
DHS - St. Elizabeth’s West Campus, Washington D.C. - United States:

The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has faced persistent skepticism
and scrutiny since its establishment. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., the DHS is tasked
with safeguarding the nation's security, which often entails a wide range of activities, from
immigration enforcement to airport security. Critics argue that the vast scope of the DHS's
authority can lead to concerns about civil liberties, particularly in the context of border
security and counterterrorism measures. Skepticism also centers around the agency's
effectiveness, with questions about the allocation of resources and the potential for mission
creep. In an age where national security is paramount, the DHS's actions continue to be a
subject of ongoing debate, highlighting the delicate balance between safety and individual
freedoms.

110 | P a g e
INR - U.S. Department of State, Washington D.C - United States:

The Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) operates within the U.S. Department of
State, but its activities often raise skepticism. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., INR is
responsible for providing intelligence and analysis to inform U.S. foreign policy decisions.
However, its role and influence are frequently questioned, with some critics suggesting that
its assessments may be influenced by political agendas. Skepticism also surrounds the
extent to which INR's intelligence is utilized and integrated into foreign policy decisions,
with concerns about its impact on international relations. In a world where diplomacy and
intelligence often intersect, INR remains a subject of scrutiny, highlighting the complex
relationship between intelligence and foreign policy.

111 | P a g e
ONI - National Maritime Intelligence Center, Suitland, Maryland – United States

The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) operates within the U.S. Navy, but its activities have
not escaped skepticism. Based in Suitland, Maryland, ONI is tasked with gathering
intelligence to support naval and marine operations. Skeptics often question the agency's
effectiveness, given its relatively low profile compared to other intelligence agencies. There
have been concerns about the extent to which ONI's intelligence is integrated into naval
strategy and decision-making processes, as well as questions about its role in broader
national security initiatives. ONI's role in maritime intelligence continues to be a subject of
scrutiny, underscoring the complex dynamics between military operations and intelligence
gathering.

112 | P a g e
United Kingdom: Masters of Their Domain

MI5: Thames House London, England:

Once the bastion of MI5, the UK's domestic counter-intelligence agency, Thames House
echoes with the echoes of counterintelligence and counterterrorism efforts. Their vigilance
centered on protecting the nation from internal threats draws admiration, yet controversy
lingers with claims of surveillance and intelligence operations targeting individuals and
groups. The delicate balance between safeguarding national security and preserving civil
liberties demands constant scrutiny.

113 | P a g e
MI6: The UK's Covert Foreign Intelligence Service and Its Headquarters

The Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), commonly known as MI6 (Military Intelligence, Section
6), is the foreign intelligence service of the United Kingdom. It is one of the British
intelligence agencies, and its main responsibility is the covert overseas collection and
analysis of human intelligence to enhance the national security of the UK. The Chief of the
Secret Intelligence Service reports directly to the Foreign Secretary.
The SIS Building, also referred to as the MI6 Building, is situated at Vauxhall Cross and serves
as the headquarters of the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS, MI6), the United Kingdom's
foreign intelligence agency. Located at 85 Albert Embankment in Vauxhall, London, on the
bank of the River Thames beside Vauxhall Bridge, the building has served as the SIS
headquarters since 1994.

114 | P a g e
The Doughnut (GCHQ Bude) - Cornwall, England:

In the peaceful landscape of Cornwall, The Doughnut hums with activity as a satellite ground
station under the jurisdiction of GCHQ. Engaged in the delicate task of intercepting and
processing communications, the specifics of its role and potential implications on citizens'
privacy are kept well-guarded.

115 | P a g e
Chicksands - Bedfordshire, England:

Veiled in mystery, Chicksands remains an intelligence support base for a medley of UK

intelligence agencies. Concealed in the shadows of classified operations, its exact functions
and activities remain unknown to the public eye.

116 | P a g e
Royal Signals and Radar Establishment (RSRE) - Worcestershire, England:

A former bastion of research in signals intelligence, RSRE's present role and intelligence
activities remain elusive from public knowledge.

117 | P a g e
RAF Wyton - Cambridgeshire, England:

As a Royal Air Force base nurturing intelligence and surveillance operations, RAF Wyton
conceals its specific functions and potential impact on citizens' privacy.
Defense Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) - Various Locations:
Driving the nation's advancements in defense and security technologies, DSTL delves into
intelligence-related research. As the keeper of classified knowledge, the specifics of its
intelligence operations and programs are shrouded from public view.

In this convoluted realm of intelligence, information remains obscure, and the delicate
interplay between national security and individual freedoms fuels ongoing skepticism. As we
navigate this labyrinthine landscape, the information that follow will shed light on the
pursuit of truth amid the shadows of secrecy.

118 | P a g e
Australia - Intelligence Landscapes and Global Pursuits

Within the heart of the Australian capital, Canberra, lie some of the country's most
enigmatic and powerful intelligence agencies, shrouded in secrecy and steeped in mystery.
Tasked with safeguarding national interests and protecting citizens from threats both
foreign and domestic, these covert organizations operate behind closed doors, hidden from
public scrutiny. In this chapter, we peel back the layers of secrecy to shed light on Australia's
key intelligence facilities and the delicate balance they must strike between security and
civil liberties.

Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) Headquarters - Canberra, ACT:

ASIS, Australia's preeminent foreign intelligence agency, thrives on the global stage. Its
mission is to gather crucial intelligence overseas and execute covert operations abroad,
providing critical insights to safeguard national interests. Operating beyond Australia's
borders, ASIS focuses solely on foreign entities and potential threats abroad. Wrapped in a
cloak of confidentiality, specific details about ASIS's operations and potential involvement in
surveillance remain well-guarded secrets.

119 | P a g e
Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO) Headquarters - Canberra, ACT:
The heart of Australia's domestic security lies within ASIO's headquarters. Tasked with
countering terrorism, espionage, and foreign interference, ASIO's mandate revolves around
safeguarding the nation from threats within. Amid its noble purpose, concerns and
allegations have surfaced, accusing intelligence services of surveilling citizens and groups.
Balancing national security with civil liberties, ASIO operates under strict legal frameworks
and oversight mechanisms. Collaborating within the Five Eyes alliance, ASIO contributes to
intelligence sharing and analysis with trusted partners.

120 | P a g e
Defense Signals Directorate (DSD) - Canberra, ACT:
Under a new identity as the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD), this agency delves into the
world of signals intelligence and information security for the Australian government.
Focused externally, ASD collects and analyzes foreign communications to bolster national
security efforts. Operating in the shadows, details about potential domestic surveillance
activities remain obscured. Collaborating with Five Eyes partners, ASD enhances shared
intelligence capabilities while preserving the secrets of its covert operations.

121 | P a g e
Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organization (AGO) - Canberra, ACT:
AGO is the master of deciphering geospatial data and imagery to support the Australian
Defense Force and other government agencies. With its gaze fixed overseas, AGO
contributes to military, intelligence, and humanitarian missions abroad.

122 | P a g e
Pine Gap - Northern Territory:

In the heart of Australia's vast Outback, the secretive joint Australia-United States
intelligence facility known as Pine Gap monitors foreign entities with an unwavering focus.
Dabbling in signals intelligence and satellite tracking, Pine Gap plays a pivotal role in
identifying potential adversaries and safeguarding national interests. The depths of its
surveillance capabilities and involvement in sensitive programs remain veiled in secrecy.
Aligned with the Five Eyes alliance, Pine Gap stands as a formidable symbol of intelligence
collaboration.

123 | P a g e
Harold E Holt Naval Communication Station - Western Australia:

A crucial hub of communications and signals intelligence, Harold E. Holt Naval

Communication Station supports naval operations and gathers foreign intelligence to
bolster Australia's defense capabilities. Nestled away in the vast Western Australian
expanse, its covert activities remain hidden from public view.

124 | P a g e
HMAS Coonawarra - Northern Territory:

Amidst the rolling landscapes of the Northern Territory, HMAS Coonawarra, a Royal
Australian Navy facility, discreetly plays its part in intelligence-related functions, serving to
support naval operations and broader security endeavors.

125 | P a g e
Joint Defense Facility Nurrungar - South Australia:
Though once a joint US-Australian intelligence facility, Nurrungar's signal intelligence
endeavors have since faded into obscurity, leaving its current status and operations in the
realm of speculation.

HMAS Harman - Australian Capital Territory:

As an Australian Defense Force base, HMAS Harman likely contributes to intelligence-related

functions, but its clandestine activities are carefully guarded, leaving room for conjecture.

126 | P a g e
Australian Cyber Security Centre (ACSC) - Canberra, ACT:
In the digital battlefield of cyberspace, the ACSC stands vigilant, protecting Australia from
cyber threats and espionage. Focused on safeguarding critical information infrastructure, its
operations revolve around countering cyberattacks launched by foreign entities. Though its
primary mission lies in cybersecurity, the realm of cyber intelligence operations occasionally
intersects with broader intelligence initiatives. Yet, details about the scope of its
involvement remain concealed from public view. Amidst this labyrinth of intelligence
agencies, an impenetrable veil of secrecy shrouds the true extent of their endeavors. While
the information provided serves as a glimpse into the covert world of Australian
intelligence, it is crucial to recognize the high level of confidentiality that surrounds their
activities.

127 | P a g e
Canada - Safeguarding Secrets and Surveillance

In the realm of national security and intelligence, Canada is home to a network of covert
operations and spy agencies that work diligently to protect its interests both at home and
abroad. Let us delve into the enigmatic world of Canada's intelligence establishments,
guided by a cautious eye to understand their true aims and the controversies surrounding
them.

Communications Security Establishment (CSE) - Ottawa, Ontario:

As Canada's premier signals intelligence agency, CSE operates discreetly, intercepting and
analyzing communications to gather vital intelligence. Tasked primarily with foreign signals
intelligence (SIGINT), CSE strives to safeguard national security interests. However,
questions linger over potential mass surveillance claims, including on citizens'
communications, which raises serious privacy concerns. The agency is an integral member of
the Five Eyes alliance, collaborating closely with intelligence agencies from the United
States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, participating in intelligence sharing
and analysis. The agency's association with global surveillance programs like ECHELON and
the Program has been a topic of intense scrutiny.

128 | P a g e
Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) - Ottawa, Ontario:
Within Canada's borders, CSIS stands as the country's domestic intelligence agency,
responsible for counterterrorism, counterintelligence, and security intelligence operations.
Charged with safeguarding Canada from internal threats, including espionage and terrorism,
CSIS plays a pivotal role in protecting the nation's integrity. Nevertheless, allegations have
surfaced concerning surveillance and monitoring activities targeting citizens and groups,
igniting debates over civil liberties.

Canadian Forces Intelligence Command (CFINTCOM) - Ottawa, Ontario:

Working diligently to provide intelligence support to the Canadian Armed Forces and
military operations, CFINTCOM plays a vital role in gathering and analyzing intelligence for
defense purposes. While its primary function revolves around national defense, specific
details regarding potential involvement in domestic intelligence activities, harassment, or
surveillance of citizens remain shrouded in secrecy.

129 | P a g e
Canadian Joint Incident Response Unit (CJIRU) - Ottawa, Ontario:

Specializing in counterterrorism and incident response operations, CJIRU focuses on

thwarting acts of terrorism and responding to security crises.

Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) Intelligence Operations - Ottawa, Ontario:

CBSA's intelligence operations revolve around safeguarding the nation's borders and
enforcing immigration and customs laws. While its primary purpose is to gather intelligence
for border protection, there have been no widely reported claims of involvement in
domestic intelligence operations or harassment of citizens.

130 | P a g e
Canadian Cyber Incident Response Centre (CCIRC) - Ottawa, Ontario:
Amid the digital age's burgeoning challenges, CCIRC stands as Canada's national
coordination center for responding to cybersecurity incidents. Prioritizing cybersecurity
matters, CCIRC conducts cyber intelligence operations to protect the country from digital
threats. Specific details about its involvement in broader intelligence programs remain
classified, tightly guarded within the realm of national security.

Canadian Security Establishment Pacific (CSE Pacific) - British Columbia:

Across the vast expanse of the Pacific region, CSE Pacific operates as a branch of the
Communications Security Establishment (CSE). Its primary function lies in collecting and
analyzing signals intelligence within this strategic area. While its focus remains external,

131 | P a g e
involving foreign entities, specific details about involvement in domestic intelligence
operations or harassment of citizens remain undisclosed.

Canadian Security Establishment Atlantic (CSE Atlantic) - Nova Scotia:

In the Atlantic region, CSE Atlantic serves as another branch of the Communications Security
Establishment (CSE), tasked with signals intelligence operations. Similar to its Pacific
counterpart, its main function is to gather and analyze signals intelligence in this crucial
area. There are no widely reported claims of involvement in domestic intelligence
operations or harassment of citizens.
As we venture into the secretive world of Canada's intelligence agencies, we must bear in
mind that their operations are shrouded in a cloak of secrecy for the nation's protection.
While public knowledge grants us a glimpse into their functions, the full extent of their
endeavors remains veiled, hidden away in the labyrinthine corridors of national security.

132 | P a g e
New Zealand - Safeguarding Security Amidst Scrutiny

Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB)

In the realm of intelligence gathering, the serene city of Wellington, New Zealand, hosts the
nerve center of the nation's signals intelligence activities – the Government
Communications Security Bureau (GCSB). Tasked with intercepting and analyzing
communications, the GCSB plays a pivotal role in safeguarding New Zealand's national
security interests. Its primary focus lies on foreign signals intelligence (SIGINT), where it
diligently collects crucial information from foreign entities beyond the nation's borders.
Nonetheless, the GCSB's operations have not been immune to scrutiny and skepticism.
Concerns about potential mass surveillance practices, encompassing the communication of
ordinary citizens, have been raised, igniting debates over privacy and civil liberties. As a key
participant in the Five Eyes alliance, the GCSB closely collaborates with intelligence agencies
from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. This affiliation has
fueled suspicion, especially regarding the agency's involvement in global surveillance
initiatives like ECHELON and The Program, which have come under intense public scrutiny.

133 | P a g e
While the GCSB focuses on foreign intelligence, Wellington is also home to the headquarters
of the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS). With a separate mandate, the
NZSIS is dedicated to countering internal threats, such as espionage, terrorism, and foreign
interference, within New Zealand's borders. The agency diligently gathers intelligence
related to domestic security matters, striving to protect the nation from any internal risks.
Despite its domestic focus, the NZSIS has not been immune to criticism, as allegations of
surveillance and monitoring targeting citizens and groups have surfaced, sparking concerns
about civil liberties. Unlike the GCSB, the NZSIS operates independently and does not
participate in the Five Eyes alliance directly

Waihopai Station
Venturing to the scenic region of Blenheim, New Zealand, one encounters the Waihopai
Station. Operated by the GCSB, this signals intelligence facility plays a significant role in
intercepting communications and satellite tracking. Focused on gathering foreign signals
intelligence from various communication sources, Waihopai Station is an essential asset for
New Zealand's intelligence capabilities. Yet, like many intelligence facilities, specific details
about its involvement in domestic intelligence operations or surveillance of citizens remain
undisclosed. As a member of the GCSB, Waihopai Station collaborates with other Five Eyes
member countries, contributing to the collective intelligence-sharing efforts of the alliance.

134 | P a g e
Tangimoana Station

Further north, in Bulls, New Zealand, stands another crucial GCSB facility – Tangimoana
Station. This satellite communications interception station serves as a critical element in the
GCSB's efforts to intercept and analyze satellite communications from foreign sources.
Operating in tandem with Waihopai Station, Tangimoana Station reinforces New Zealand's
foreign signals intelligence capabilities. However, like its counterpart, details about its
involvement in domestic intelligence operations or potential surveillance activities targeting
citizens are not publicly available. As part of the GCSB, Tangimoana Station actively
contributes to New Zealand's role in the Five Eyes alliance.

135 | P a g e
NZSIS Headquarters

Wellington Returning to Wellington, the capital city accommodates the Wellington

Processing and Analysis Centre (WPAC). This facility acts as a nerve center, consolidating
and analyzing intelligence data collected by various intelligence agencies, including the GCSB
and the NZSIS. WPAC's primary function revolves around intelligent analysis, providing
actionable insights to bolster national security and defense. While the precise extent of
WPAC's involvement in surveillance activities and programs remains classified, its core focus
on intelligence analysis remains steadfast. Not directly involved in the Five Eyes alliance,
WPAC plays a vital role in supporting New Zealand's intelligence efforts.
The intelligence apparatus of New Zealand thrives in a realm of secrecy, where crucial
national interests are protected through the interception and analysis of communications.
Yet, the very nature of their work invites scrutiny and raises questions about the delicate
balance between national security imperatives and individual civil liberties. As the world
evolves, so too does the intelligence landscape, with new developments and advancements
shaping the future of intelligence gathering. For now, these facilities continue to play their
roles in preserving New Zealand's security and place on the global stage.

136 | P a g e
CHAPTER 10: DOMESTIC INTELLIGENCE
AGENCIES AND COINTELPRO

Domestic Intelligence Agencies - Allegations of Harassment and Intimidation

In the murky world of intelligence agencies, where shadows dance upon hidden agendas,
trust is elusive, and power often corrupts. This chapter delves into a disturbing chronicle of
transgressions committed by some of the world's most formidable intelligence agencies,
including the FBI, MI5, ASIO, NZSIS, and CIA.

Peering behind the curtain of secrecy, we confront a chilling reality—a reality where
agencies sworn to protect nations and their citizens have, at times, betrayed that sacred
duty. From the depths of their clandestine operations, these agencies have infringed upon
the rights of groups and individuals alike, eroding the very foundations of democracy and
liberty.
Within these pages, we uncover harrowing tales of surveillance and infiltration,
unscrupulous use of informants, and the compromising of personal liberties. Journey with
us through the dark corridors of history as we reveal the covert operations that have stained
the reputations of these once revered institutions.

While the intentions of intelligence agencies may often be cloaked in the pursuit of national
security, we shine a light on the moral quandaries they have faced, where the lines between
right and wrong blur in the pursuit of their objectives. Through the stories of those whose
lives have been upended by these agencies' actions, we glimpse the profound impact of
intelligence gathering gone awry.
From whistle-blowers persecuted for daring to speak out, to innocent groups targeted by
overreaching investigations, the examples that follow are cautionary tales of the dangers
that arise when power remains unchecked and unaccountable.

137 | P a g e
Transgressions of Domestic Intelligence Agencies

United States of America: Controversial Methods Employed by Domestic

Intelligence Agencies
As mentioned earlier, the 9/11 truth movement asserts that the FBI harassed individuals
associated with the movement. However, there are even more claims suggesting that the
FBI had a not-so-hidden hand in the creation, facilitation, and entrapment of Muslim
terrorists within the United States.
The FBI has found itself entangled in a web of allegations, accused of engaging in
harassment, infiltration, and surveillance of activists who courageously opposed the 2003
Iraq war within the United States. During the tumultuous period of the Iraq War and its
aftermath, a steady stream of reports and allegations emerged, painting a disconcerting
picture of anti-war activists being subjected to monitoring and surveillance at the hands of
various U.S law enforcement and intelligence agencies, with the FBI among them.
Activist groups and individuals who fervently organized protests, demonstrations, and
campaigns against the 2003 Iraq War found themselves targeted, their activities
meticulously observed and scrutinized by clandestine forces, including undercover agents
cunningly woven into their midst. Disturbing accounts of harassment, coercion, and
unwarranted intrusion into the private affairs of these courageous individuals surfaced, as
some activists spoke of encounters with shadowy figures, leaving them suspicious of
informants or covert agents operating within their ranks.

In the wake of these alarming allegations, a chorus of apprehension resonated across the
nation, echoing concerns about potential violations of cherished civil liberties and the
sacrosanct right to unfettered free speech and peaceful protest. The gravity of these claims
prompted vigorous public debates and compelled inquiries into the extent and legitimacy of
the surveillance activities perpetuated by law enforcement and intelligence agencies,
including the FBI.
Following the tragic events of 9/11, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) assumed a
pivotal role in influencing and coaxing certain individuals into engaging in terrorist activities.

138 | P a g e
Utilizing a combination of influence, the power of suggestion, and explicit encouragement,
the FBI orchestrated the planning and financing of these activities through the involvement
of informants. Regrettably, some have raised concerns that this approach may not have
constituted an entirely forthright and genuine effort to neutralize terrorism. In fact some
argue it was counter-intelligence against Muslim communities. There exists an underlying
perception that these terrorism-related arrests served to rationalize the substantial
expenditures and budgets allocated to intelligence agencies. Below, we present but a few
cases that have garnered attention and scrutiny:
Liberty City Seven Case (United States):
In 2006, the FBI arrested seven individuals in Miami, Florida, known as the "Liberty City
Seven," on charges of plotting to carry out terrorist attacks on U.S targets. The case involved
an FBI informant who played a central role in the group's activities. Critics argued that the
informant not only provided funds and equipment for the plot but also initiated and
encouraged the group's actions, leading to questions of entrapment.
Fort Dix Plot (United States):

In 2007, six individuals were arrested in New Jersey for plotting to attack the Fort Dix
military base. The case involved the use of paid informants who had infiltrated the group.
Critics contended that the informants played an active role in suggesting and facilitating the
plot, raising concerns about potential entrapment.
Hemant Lakhani Case (United Kingdom and United States):

In 2005, Hemant Lakhani, a British arms dealer, was arrested in the United States for
attempting to sell shoulder-launched missiles to an undercover FBI informant posing as a
terrorist. Critics raised concerns about the extent to which the FBI informant encouraged
Lakhani's involvement in the illegal arms deal.
These cases highlight the complexities and controversies surrounding the use of informants
and undercover operations in counterterrorism efforts. While informants can be valuable
tools for gathering intelligence and disrupting potential threats, concerns about
entrapment, manipulation, and violations of civil liberties have arisen in some instances.
Balancing the need for national security with protecting individual rights remains an ongoing
challenge for intelligence and law enforcement agencies worldwide.
Over the years, diligent researchers who have devoted their efforts to examining the
Oklahoma City bombing and the Assassination of JFK have presented compelling claims.
These assertions revolve around the alleged involvement of informants closely connected to
the FBI, and in some instances, direct influence from the FBI itself, who purportedly played
pivotal roles alongside individuals who were either convicted or accused of crimes, such as
Lee Harvey Oswald and Timothy McVeigh.
The researchers contend that an informant may have encouraged and facilitated the actions
of Timothy McVeigh. Additionally, they claim that the office of the FBI had direct contact
with Lee Harvey Oswald, and the communist brochures that Oswald was distributing were

139 | P a g e
printed in an office that was operated by the CIA. According to these researchers, both of
these agencies most likely strategically maneuvered Lee Harvey Oswald into crucial
positions, such as his employment at the renowned Texas School Book Depository, where
the alleged shots came from that killed John F Kennedy.

This historic establishment, now known as the Dallas County Administration Building in
Texas, served as a government building. Moreover, the researchers posit that the building's
governmental significance rendered it an easily accessible location for the FBI, potentially
enabling their involvement in securing Lee Harvey Oswald's employment there.
Remarkably, despite their significance in the narratives put forth by these researchers, the
enigmatic informants in question remained conspicuously unmentioned and were seemingly
overlooked throughout the course of the official investigations into these heartrending
events.

There have been claims and allegations from some witnesses to the JFK assassination that
they experienced harassment and persecution from the FBI and other government agencies.
In the aftermath of the assassination of President John F Kennedy on November 22, 1963,
there were numerous investigations into the incident, including the Warren Commission,
which was tasked with determining the facts surrounding the assassination.
Some witnesses who came forward with information or observations that challenged the
official narrative or raised questions about the investigation reported being subjected to
harassment, intimidation, and even threats from law enforcement agencies, including the
FBI.

These witnesses claimed that they were pressured to change or withhold their testimonies,
leading to suspicions of a cover-up or a broader conspiracy.

The most commonly opposed witness statement pertains to the direction from which the
shots that killed JFK originated. Some witnesses claimed that the gunshots came from the
grassy knoll, contradicting the official position that Lee Harvey Oswald, located in the Texas
School Book Depository, was the lone gunman. One of the witnesses, Ed Hoffman, who was
deaf and mute and communicated using sign language, gave his testimony, but it was
completely disregarded by both the FBI and the Warren Commission.
According to Ed Hoffman's account, he saw a man with a rifle shortly after the shots were
fired. The man was wearing a dark suit, tie, and overcoat, and he ran west along the
wooden fence. He then handed the rifle to a second man dressed like a railroad worker. The
second man disassembled the rifle and placed it in a soft brown bag.

Later, Hoffman visited the local Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) office to report his
findings. However, there were no officers present at that time, so he left a written
statement with the receptionist. Regrettably, the FBI never responded to the note, leaving
Hoffman's crucial testimony unacknowledged and unexplored.

140 | P a g e
The 1979 House Select Committee on Assassinations also reinvestigated the JFK
assassination and concluded that there was a "high probability" of a conspiracy. This further
fueled speculation and skepticism about the official version of events.

The harassment faced by witnesses to the JFK assassination varied in nature and intensity,
but some common forms of harassment reported by witnesses included:
1. Intimidation: Witnesses reported being intimidated by law enforcement officials,
including FBI agents, who questioned them aggressively, suggested they should change their
testimony, or discouraged them from sharing certain information.

2. Threats: Some witnesses claimed to have received threats to their personal safety or that
of their families if they continued to speak publicly about what they saw or knew regarding
the assassination.

3. Surveillance: Witnesses reported being followed or subjected to surveillance by unknown

individuals or government agencies, leading to feelings of paranoia and fear.

4. Character attacks: Some witnesses faced character attacks or attempts to discredit their
credibility, which discouraged them from sharing their testimonies or raised doubts about
the veracity of their accounts.

5. Job loss or blacklisting: In some cases, witnesses alleged that they lost their jobs or faced
blacklisting in their professions as a result of coming forward with information related to the
assassination.

6. Legal pressure: Witnesses reported being pressured to sign affidavits or statements that
aligned with the official narrative, even if their testimony did not entirely support it.

7. Public ridicule: Witnesses who shared alternative or controversial accounts of the

assassination faced public ridicule and were often labeled as conspiracy theorists.

141 | P a g e
The 9/11 truth movement
The 9/11 truth movement has claimed that they have been harassed by the FBI and other
government agencies. The 9/11 truth movement is a collection of individuals and groups
who question the official accounts and explanations surrounding the September 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks in the United States. The claims about the FBI's persecution are eerily
similar to the witnesses of the JFK assassination.

1. Surveillance and Monitoring: Members of the 9/11 truth movement have claimed that
they were subject to surveillance, including being followed, having their communications
monitored, or being placed under physical or electronic surveillance.
2. Infiltration: There have been allegations of government agents or informants infiltrating
9/11 truth movement groups or activities to gather information or disrupt their efforts.

3. Covert Operations: Some individuals within the movement have asserted that they were
targeted with covert operations, such as attempts to discredit them, spread misinformation,
or sabotage their activities.
4. Targeting of Activists: Specific activists or prominent figures within the 9/11 truth
movement have reported being targeted with various forms of harassment, including
personal attacks, threats, or attempts to tarnish their reputation.

142 | P a g e
Unveiling a Disturbing Revelation: FBI's Infiltration Tactics and Vatican's
Liturgical Power Play
In a revelation that has sent shockwaves through the public consciousness, a newly
disclosed document has unearthed a troubling directive from the Richmond branch of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). This confidential memo outlines a strategy that
involves infiltrating Catholic parishes with a traditionalist leaning, particularly those
connected to the Latin Mass. The memo goes a step further, suggesting the recruitment of
covert informants from within these parishes to closely monitor and scrutinize speech and
activities. Adding to the gravity of this disclosure, a letter dated April 10th, 2023, addressed
to the House Judiciary Committee, has exposed the FBI's reliance on at least one undercover
agent to compile the analysis presented in the memo. The revelation of this undercover
operation raises pressing questions about the intersection of law enforcement, religious
institutions, and individual privacy.
During a riveting inquiry, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Jim Jordan, directed
an incisive question to FBI Director Christopher Wray. "What is the difference between a
traditional Catholic and a radical traditional Catholic?" Jordan's question appeared to be
more than mere curiosity; it was designed to provoke deeper contemplation. Director
Wray's measured response, "I'm not an expert on the Catholic orders." Jordan's question
seemed rhetorical, designed to provoke thought about the categorization. It appears that
traditional Catholics are now being considered as radical traditional Catholics. Director
Wray's response cleverly alluded to the diverse range of ideologies within various Catholic
Orders and prelates, perhaps suggesting they can adapt to the prevailing status quo,
whether left-wing, right-wing, or moderate, therefore sidestepping the issue.
In the annals of contemporary Catholicism, the polarizing figure of Pope Francis emerges. A
Jesuit known for his left-leaning inclinations, he has faced considerable opposition from
traditional Catholics who vehemently oppose his agenda. This group has found common
ground with figures such as Donald Trump, sparking a new level of attention and debate.
The FBI memo, recited by Chairman Jim Jordan during the inquiry, delivers a striking
forecast: a surge in interest in radical traditional Catholics in the critical 12 to 24 months
leading up to the Presidential election. Even more intriguing, the memo highlights potential
areas of alignment between extremist groups and radical traditional Catholics on
contentious issues such as abortion rights, immigration, affirmative action, and LGBTQ
protections. The assertion by Chairman Jordan that the FBI's motivations are politically
driven only deepens the intrigue.

Amid these revelations, a concept dubbed the "Deep State" takes center stage—an alleged
nexus of left-leaning Jesuit Catholicism and Democratic forces combined. This confluence is
purportedly aimed at consolidating influence by steering key societal issues, including
abortion rights, immigration policies, affirmative action, and LGBTQ matters. The possibility
of an attempt to dilute Christianity to placate atheist perspectives priming humankind into a

143 | P a g e
single collective, while potentially infringing on the First Amendment rights presents a
worrisome crossroads of religious freedom and political maneuvering.
At the core of this unfolding narrative stands the hallowed First Amendment, the
cornerstone of American democracy. This bulwark safeguards cherished freedoms: religion,
speech, press, assembly, and petition. The very essence of these constitutional rights could
hang in the balance if the FBI's involvement in religious domains compromises the ideals
enshrined within the First Amendment. In a calculated move, Pope Francis has intensified
his control over Catholic conservatives who favor the use of the traditional Latin Mass. In a
stern decree, he rebuked bishops who had permitted this practice in parishes without prior
Vatican approval. This decree, an emphatic affirmation of a 2021 document, dismantled the
more lenient stance adopted by his predecessors on the traditional Latin Mass. Since then, a
faction of conservative bishops has openly defied the Pope, leading to what is now termed
the Church's "liturgy wars."

144 | P a g e
The Controversial Reach of FBI Offices Abroad: Potential for Covert Influence

Critical Examination of Concerns

The establishment of FBI offices in foreign countries has sparked a contentious debate.
Critics argue that these overseas outposts have the potential to be wielded as tools for
pursuing or targeting ideological opponents within host countries. The origins of these
concerns can be traced to a history rife with international intelligence agencies involved in
activities that have veered into the murky territory of political espionage and surveillance,
often aimed at stifling dissent, opposition groups, and individuals with differing ideological
perspectives.
The Crux of the Matter

Critics contend that while the stated mission of FBI offices abroad is to address transnational
threats, foster collaboration with foreign counterparts, and safeguard U.S. interests, there
looms the ominous specter of these offices being employed to gather intelligence on
individuals or groups perceived as political threats to the United States. This could
potentially encompass the covert monitoring of activists, journalists, or political dissidents
within the host country, raising profound concerns about privacy violations and the erosion
of civil liberties.
The Shadow of COINTELPRO
Critics further raise alarms about the FBI's international presence, raising questions about
whether the Bureau's expertise in various covert programs, including programs such as
COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program), could be disseminated or taught to the host
countries. This unsettling prospect suggests that foreign governments might adopt and
implement similar programs, potentially weaponizing them to target dissenting voices,
political opponents, or other individuals and groups within their own borders.
This provocative confluence of concerns beckons us to scrutinize the role of FBI offices
abroad in the broader context of international intelligence, highlighting the enduring
tension between effective law enforcement and the preservation of human rights and civil
liberties, both at home and in the global arena.

145 | P a g e
The FBI maintains Legal Attaché (Legat) offices in various countries, including the United
Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. These offices serve as liaisons between the
FBI and the host countries' law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Here is a list of FBI
Legat offices in these countries:

United Kingdom:
FBI Legal Attaché Office in London

Australia:
FBI Legal Attaché Office in Canberra

New Zealand:
FBI Legal Attaché Office in Wellington

Canada:
FBI Legal Attaché Office in Ottawa

146 | P a g e
United Kingdom: Controversial Activities of Military Intelligence Section 5
(MI5)
There have been historical instances where MI5 was involved in monitoring and
investigating political activists, trade unionists, and individuals associated with social
movements, leading to accusations of targeting dissenters. For example:
Trade Unionists and Workers' Rights Activists: In the past, MI5 has been accused of
monitoring trade unionists and workers' rights activists, particularly during periods of labor
unrest or strikes. Critics have raised concerns about the agency's involvement in suppressing
worker organizing and dissent.

Political Activists: MI5 has been accused of surveillance of political activists involved in
campaigns against government policies or advocating for social justice issues. These
activities have led to debates about the balance between national security and the
protection of civil liberties.
Anti-War Activists: During certain periods of history, MI5 has reportedly monitored and
infiltrated anti-war and pacifist movements. Such actions have raised questions about the
agency's interference with peaceful dissent.
Claims of Harassment, Intimidation, and Entrapment: Activists and MI5 Post 9/11 and 7/7

In the aftermath of the tragic events of 9/11 in 2001 and the 7/7 London bombings in 2005,
a contentious narrative emerged surrounding the treatment of Muslim individuals and
communities in the United Kingdom. Disturbing allegations of harassment, intimidation, and
entrapment surfaced, involving none other than the United Kingdom's formidable domestic
security agency, MI5. These claims, brought forward by some Muslim groups, activists, and

147 | P a g e
individuals, have cast a pall over the counterterrorism efforts undertaken by the nation's
security apparatus in the wake of these heinous acts of terror.
Accusations of racial profiling, discrimination, and excessive surveillance were leveled by
those who bore the brunt of scrutiny, suggesting that their religious or ethnic background
led to unwarranted attention from security agencies, particularly MI5. Questions arose
regarding the tactics employed during certain counterterrorism operations, with critics
raising concerns about the potential for entrapment or undue pressure on vulnerable
individuals, coaxing them into engaging in extremist activities.
As with any contentious issue, it is crucial to consider a range of perspectives, exercise due
diligence through thorough investigations, and rely on credible sources to gain a
comprehensive understanding of the matter. The complexities of balancing national security
imperatives with the protection of civil liberties underscore the delicate nature of this
debate. MI5, as a central figure in the British intelligence landscape, has consistently
asserted that their actions are guided by legal procedures and guidelines, with national
security at the forefront, while simultaneously acknowledging the necessity of respecting
civil liberties. Notably, not all Muslims or Muslim communities have made such claims,
underscoring the need to approach this issue with nuance and an understanding that
perspectives may differ. The allegations have been a subject of ongoing debate and scrutiny,
prompting calls for accountability and transparency from security agencies.
Among those who have voiced concerns, Cage, a prominent advocacy organization based in
the United Kingdom, has been a vocal advocate against MI5 harassment and intimidation,
particularly of individuals connected to counterterrorism investigations. The Muslim Public
Affairs Committee (MPAC), another Muslim advocacy group, has similarly raised its voice,
denouncing discrimination and profiling of Muslims by security agencies, including MI5.
Finsbury Park Mosque, located in London, has claimed harassment and surveillance by MI5,
particularly during the tenure of the mosque's former imam, Abu Hamza al-Masri.
Additionally, there have been claims from individuals associated with Birmingham Central
Mosque, citing harassment and monitoring by MI5.
Human rights activist Moazzam Begg, a former detainee at Guantanamo Bay, has alleged
that he was harassed and targeted by MI5 both before and after his detention, leading to
heightened scrutiny of his experiences and the actions of security agencies. Even those who
have committed violent acts have claimed that MI5's actions played a role in their
radicalization. Roshonara Choudhry, who was convicted for the attempted murder of MP
Stephen Timms in 2010, asserted that MI5 harassment of Muslims contributed to her
radicalization, further igniting public interest in the agency's methods.
While MI5 and other security agencies play a crucial role in safeguarding national security,
the challenge lies in striking a delicate balance that preserves civil liberties while effectively
protecting against terror threats. The matter of surveillance and scrutiny of activists
opposing the Iraq war has added another layer of complexity to this ongoing debate.
The assertion that MI5's actions played a role in the radicalization of individuals who went
on to commit violent acts is a contentious and complex issue. Several high-profile cases

148 | P a g e
have brought this claim to the forefront, drawing public attention and sparking debate over
the potential impact of security agencies' actions on individuals' paths towards extremism.
Roshonara Choudhry, who attempted to murder MP Stephen Timms in 2010. Choudhry, a
university student at the time of the attack, expressed in court that she had been influenced
by the online sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki, an influential and radical cleric. However, she
also cited MI5 harassment of Muslims as a factor in her radicalization. Her claims raised
questions about the potential ramifications of security agencies' actions and the role they
may play in pushing vulnerable individuals towards violent ideologies.
Similarly, in the case of Michael Adebolajo, one of the perpetrators of the murder of British
soldier Lee Rigby in 2013, there were reports that he had been approached by MI5 on
multiple occasions before the attack. Adebolajo's family claimed that MI5 had attempted to
recruit him as an informant and that these interactions may have contributed to his growing
sense of alienation and radicalization.

These cases are emblematic of a broader debate surrounding the so-called "blowback
effect" – the idea that aggressive counterterrorism measures, including surveillance and
harassment, may inadvertently fuel grievances and radicalization among targeted
communities. Critics argue that heavy-handed tactics can create feelings of resentment and
persecution, further exacerbating social divisions and potentially pushing some individuals
towards extremist ideologies.

It is important to note that MI5 and other security agencies operate in an incredibly
complex and challenging environment, where they must balance the need to protect
national security with respect for civil liberties and human rights. The threat of terrorism is
real, and agencies face the difficult task of identifying and neutralizing potential threats
while avoiding overreach and unnecessary intrusion into individuals' lives.
While claims of MI5's role in radicalization have been raised by individuals involved in
violent acts, it is essential to approach such claims with caution and conduct thorough
investigations to ascertain the underlying factors contributing to radicalization. The subject
remains a subject of ongoing debate, and it highlights the need for a nuanced and
comprehensive approach to addressing extremism and terrorism while preserving individual
rights and freedoms.

MI5 and the Allegations of Harassment and Intimidation: A Potential Catalyst

for Extremism
In the wake of the 9/11 attacks and the 7/7 London bombings, Muslims in the United
Kingdom found themselves facing heightened scrutiny and suspicion from security agencies,
with MI5 at the forefront of counterterrorism efforts. While MI5's primary mandate is to
protect national security and safeguard the country from potential threats, disturbing
allegations have emerged suggesting that the agency's actions may have inadvertently

149 | P a g e
contributed to the radicalization of some individuals. Let us engage in a partial revision of
the Catalyst for extremism.
Muslim groups, activists, and individuals allege that MI5 engaged in harassment and
intimidation tactics. These allegations have sparked concerns that such practices may have
driven some vulnerable individuals towards extremism, fuelling the very threats MI5 seeks
to counter. Let's recap:

Heightened Surveillance and Racial Profiling: Muslims have reported feeling under constant
surveillance, facing undue scrutiny, and being singled out based on their religious or ethnic
background. Critics argue that these practices, often rooted in racial profiling, create an
atmosphere of distrust and marginalization within Muslim communities, potentially leading
some individuals to seek solace in extremist ideologies.
Coercion and Informant Recruitment: There have been claims of MI5 attempting to coerce
individuals into becoming informants, sometimes leveraging threats or promises of leniency.
This alleged pressure to collaborate with the security agency can create feelings of betrayal
and alienation within the targeted community, potentially pushing some towards radicalized
circles seeking camaraderie.
Harassment of Community Leaders: Prominent Muslim community leaders have also
claimed harassment and intimidation by MI5, which could lead to a breakdown in trust
between these leaders and their constituencies. This erosion of trust may create a void in
constructive guidance, leaving a potential vacuum for extremist ideologies to take root.
Impact on Civil Liberties: The alleged infringement on civil liberties, including freedom of
speech and association, can sow seeds of discontent and resentment, leading some
individuals to seek radical outlets as a form of protest against perceived injustice.

Psychological Toll: The constant fear of being under surveillance or targeted by MI5 can
create a pervasive atmosphere of stress and anxiety within Muslim communities. The
psychological toll of living in such an environment could influence vulnerable individuals to
seek refuge in extremist narratives that promise empowerment or control.
Perceived Double Standards: Claims of MI5's disparate treatment based on religious or
ethnic background may be perceived as a double standard within the broader context of
counterterrorism efforts. Such perceptions can lead to feelings of injustice and
discrimination, further alienating Muslim individuals and potentially driving some towards
extremist ideologies that purport to address these grievances.

It is essential to acknowledge that MI5 operates in an environment where striking the right
balance between security imperatives and preserving civil liberties is immensely challenging.
The agency has repeatedly asserted its commitment to operating within the bounds of the
law and respecting individual rights. However, the allegations of harassment and
intimidation have prompted calls for increased transparency, accountability, and
independent oversight to ensure that counterterrorism efforts do not inadvertently fuel the
very extremism they seek to combat.

150 | P a g e
As the issue remains a subject of ongoing debate and scrutiny, it is crucial to approach these
claims with rigorous investigation and thoughtful consideration of all perspectives.

Canada: Allegations of Misconduct by Canadian Security Intelligence Service

(CSIS) and Other Canadian Intelligence Agencies
There have been historical instances where CSIS has been accused of targeting dissenters,
which include:
Toronto 18 Case (Canada):
In 2006, eighteen individuals were arrested in Toronto, Canada, on charges of planning
terrorist attacks. The case involved the use of an undercover informant who infiltrated the
group and provided financial and logistical support for their activities. Critics argued that the
informant played a significant role in pushing the group towards violence, raising questions
about the extent of entrapment.
Indigenous Rights Activists: CSIS has faced criticism for its surveillance and monitoring of
Indigenous rights activists and groups advocating for Indigenous land rights, environmental
protections, and social justice issues. These actions have led to accusations of targeting
dissenting voices within Indigenous communities.

Environmental Activists: CSIS has been accused of monitoring environmental activists and
organizations involved in campaigns against resource extraction projects or climate change
advocacy. These activities have raised concerns about the agency's involvement in stifling
dissent against certain government and corporate interests.

151 | P a g e
Anti-War Activists: Like other intelligence agencies, CSIS has been accused of monitoring
and investigating individuals and groups engaged in anti-war protests or pacifist
movements, leading to allegations of targeting dissenters.

Muslim Communities and Advocacy Groups: CSIS has faced allegations of

disproportionately targeting Muslim communities and advocacy organizations in its counter-
terrorism efforts, leading to concerns about profiling and discrimination.

The Dual Role of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police: Intelligence Mandate
of the RCMP: Protecting Canada's Security

In the vast expanse of Canada's law enforcement landscape, the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police (RCMP) stands as an emblematic symbol of order and safety. Revered as the
Mounties, these iconic figures in their red serge uniforms and Stetson hats have been
ingrained in Canadian culture and history since their establishment in 1873. Yet, beyond
their traditional policing duties, lies a lesser-known facet that fuels the RCMP's role in
safeguarding the nation—intelligence.

Unbeknownst to many, the RCMP operates as an intelligence agency, holding a crucial

responsibility in gathering, analyzing, and disseminating information pertinent to Canada's
national security. Operating alongside other dedicated intelligence agencies, such as the
Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the RCMP's intelligence functions have evolved
in response to the ever-changing landscape of threats to the nation's security.

At the heart of the RCMP's intelligence efforts lie three key focuses: counterterrorism,
countering organized crime, and safeguarding national security interests. With an intricate
web of agents and analysts, the RCMP embarks on missions to identify and neutralize
potential threats that may lurk both within and beyond Canada's borders. Collaborating
closely with Canadian government agencies and international partners, information is
shared and received, forming an interconnected global defense against emerging dangers.
However, as the RCMP delves deeper into the realm of intelligence activities, the distinction
between law enforcement and intelligence functions becomes increasingly pivotal. Amidst
concerns of potential encroachments on civil liberties and individual privacy, the RCMP

152 | P a g e
operates within strict legal and oversight frameworks. The delicate balance between
protecting the nation's security and upholding the rights of its citizens remains at the
forefront of their responsibilities.

Yet, in the pursuit of safeguarding Canada, the RCMP has not been without its own
challenges. Throughout its storied history, accusations of harassment, intimidation, and
surveillance of citizens have emerged, casting shadows of doubt upon the integrity of their
operations. Like any law enforcement agency, the RCMP has encountered scrutiny and
criticism over actions that are perceived as overstepping boundaries.
As the RCMP marches forward, both as the nation's cherished protectors and diligent
guardians of intelligence, their dual role continues to evolve and adapt to the ever-shifting
security landscape. Their unwavering commitment to peace and safety remains a testament
to the enduring legacy of the Mounties in the hearts and minds of Canadians, while their
intelligence functions underscore their vital role in the nation's defense against unseen
threats. Balancing vigilance and accountability, the RCMP seeks to uphold the sacred trust
bestowed upon them by the citizens they serve—a trust that extends far beyond the
borders of this vast and diverse nation.

153 | P a g e
Transgressions of The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)

The RCMP has faced accusations of harassment, intimidation, and surveillance of citizens at
various points in its history. Like any law enforcement agency, the RCMP has faced scrutiny
and criticism over its actions and conduct.
Some specific instances of allegations and controversies involving the RCMP include:
Indigenous Peoples: The RCMP has been criticized for its historical and ongoing treatment
of Indigenous peoples in Canada. This includes incidents of alleged harassment,
discrimination, and abuse, particularly during historical periods like the Indian residential
school system.

Civil Rights Movements: During times of civil unrest and social movements, the RCMP has
been accused of excessive surveillance and intimidation of activists and protestors. One
notable example is the surveillance of environmental activists and Indigenous land
defenders involved in protests against pipeline projects
National Security and Intelligence: The RCMP, as part of its national security and
intelligence mandate, has been involved in investigations related to terrorism and national

154 | P a g e
security threats. Some cases have raised concerns about the balance between security
measures and potential impacts on civil liberties and privacy rights.
Whistle-blower Allegations: In recent years, there have been whistle-blowers within the
RCMP who have come forward to allege a toxic workplace culture, harassment, and
retaliation for speaking out against misconduct within the organization.

Australia: Debated Actions of the Australian Security Intelligence

Organization (ASIO) and Australian Intelligence Agencies

There have been some instances where ASIO's surveillance practices and activities have
come under scrutiny, particularly with regards to certain activist groups, social movements,
and individuals involved in dissenting activities. Here are a few examples:
Environmental Activists: ASIO has been accused of monitoring and targeting environmental
activists who have been involved in protests and campaigns against government policies
and corporations related to environmental issues. Some activists have raised concerns
about their peaceful protests being treated as potential security threats.
Whistle-blowers and Journalists: There have been concerns raised about ASIO's surveillance
of whistle-blowers and journalists who have reported on national security issues or
government activities. The surveillance of journalists raises questions about press freedom
and the protection of sources. The Australian Federal Police, who work in sync with the

155 | P a g e
Australian Security Intelligence Organization, conducted a raid on the ABC News office in
Sydney, Australia. Furthermore, The Sydney Morning Herald exposed that the AFP utilized
national security laws to access journalists' metadata almost 60 times in just one year.

These recent events have had a profound impact, and it's evident that a critical situation is
unfolding. The fact that fingerprints and flight details of journalists are being sought gives
rise to a deeply troubling notion – that legitimate investigative journalism is being unjustly
equated with criminal activities by the Australian Federal Government and its agencies. Such
actions raise serious concerns about press freedom and the potential chilling effect on
investigative reporting.
Muslim Community: There have been reports of ASIO targeting members of the Muslim
community based on their religious beliefs and activities. Some community members have
claimed that they were subjected to harassment and intimidation without valid reasons.

Refugee Advocates: ASIO has faced criticism for monitoring and investigating individuals
and groups advocating for the rights of refugees and asylum seekers. Critics argue that this
surveillance may have a chilling effect on advocacy efforts and freedom of speech.

Indigenous Rights Activists: ASIO's surveillance of Indigenous rights activists and groups has
also raised concerns about the agency's focus on dissenting voices within the Indigenous
community. This has prompted discussions about the impact on Indigenous rights and self-
determination.

156 | P a g e
ASIO's Intimidating Intrusions on Activism Must Cease
In the maelstrom of Australia's national security apparatus, one man, Patrick Harrison,
experienced firsthand the intrusive reach of the Australian Security Intelligence Organization
(ASIO). On a seemingly ordinary day, two ASIO agents arrived unannounced, wielding their
power under the guise of "national security," to interrogate him about his involvement in
political campaigns within Sydney. Harrison's activism as a Palestine solidarity activist
organizing the Sydney rally to commemorate Nakba had seemingly caught the agency's
attention, thrusting him into the spotlight of their inquiries.
The agents probed him about his concerns regarding political violence, urging him to single
out individuals associated with such activities. However, Harrison's response defied their
expectations. He pointed to far-right groups and individuals as the primary perpetrators of
disruption, employing tactics like threatening emails, messages, and calls to undermine
peaceful protests. His testimony extended beyond his direct experiences, shedding light on
incidents like the rally against police violence at the Sydney gay and lesbian Mardi Gras
parade, which he did not even attend, and the picket lines at the University of Sydney. In
both cases, it was the New South Wales police force that wielded violence, attempting to
dismantle legitimate protests and trample upon the democratic right to dissent.
Unfortunately, Harrison's encounter with ASIO is not an isolated incident. Other
campaigners have endured similar unnerving visits from the agency, leaving them with
explicit instructions not to divulge the encounters. Such covert operations reveal an
alarming pattern of intimidation, designed to stifle legitimate political activities and instill
fear among activists.

These intrusive visits unfold against the backdrop of the ever-looming "war on terror," a
justification that has provided carte blanche for the expansion of security organizations'
powers and budgets under successive governments. The consequence? Heightened
surveillance of ordinary Australians, casting a suspicious eye on those exercising their
democratic right to activism.
Moreover, the tentacles of ASIO's intimidation tactics extend beyond Sydney's borders.
Reports from Green Left Weekly have exposed similar visits to activists engaged in pro-
Palestine and pro-Tamil solidarity campaigns in Adelaide, where South Australian Police,
veiled under the banner of "security and intelligence," attempted to silence dissent.

At its core, ASIO's actions represent an affront to the principles of democracy. Organizing
and participating in peaceful demonstrations should not attract unwarranted monitoring or
serve as a pretext for harassment. The right to protest is the bedrock of any democratic
society, and those standing up for their beliefs should not be treated as potential threats.
Transparency and accountability should be the hallmarks of any agency entrusted with
national security. The public has the right to know and discuss encounters with ASIO, as no
laws prohibit such openness. Shedding light on these practices is essential to safeguard our
democratic values and resist intimidation.

157 | P a g e
However, the most pressing question remains: Should ASIO, with its inherently politicized
nature, be allowed to operate with such unchecked power? Calls for reevaluation and
potential abolition are gaining traction, particularly in light of the costly and unjustifiable
past occupation of Afghanistan.

Australian Federal Police: Denial Raises Questions in the Haneef Case

In the world of counterterrorism, where security

measures often intersect with civil liberties, the case of
Dr. Mohamed Haneef stands out as a glaring example of
the complexities and challenges faced by law
enforcement agencies. Dr. Haneef, an Indian national,
was arrested at Brisbane airport in July 2007 in
connection with a failed London bomb plot, setting in
motion a chain of events that would cast a long shadow
on Australia's legal landscape.
The charges against Dr. Haneef, initially for providing support to a terrorist organization,
were dropped quickly, as they were deemed unsustainable. However, his immigration visa
was canceled on character grounds during this period, a decision later found to be unlawful
upon review. This case marked the first time that several legislative provisions, designed to
respond to the threat of terrorism, were practically applied, revealing significant deficiencies
and disparities between their intended and actual operation.
The Law Council of Australia played a crucial role in drawing attention to these issues. They
issued multiple press releases on the Haneef case, generating significant media attention.
Additionally, they corresponded with key government officials, including the Attorney-
General, Minister for Justice and Customs, Minister for Immigration, and the Australian
Federal Police (AFP) Commissioner, highlighting the deficiencies in the law revealed by the
case and proposing reform measures.
In March 2008, the Attorney-General
appointed the Hon John Clarke QC to
conduct an inquiry into the Haneef
case. The Law Council submitted a
written statement to the inquiry and
appeared at a public hearing,
contributing to the examination of the
legislative and procedural aspects of
the case.
In December 2008, Mr. Clarke delivered his recommendations for legislative and procedural
changes based on the findings of the inquiry. The Law Council continues to advocate for the
implementation of these recommendations.

158 | P a g e
However, the recent controversy surrounding Dr. Haneef's case has brought the AFP under
scrutiny once again. Media reports suggested that the names of UK terrorist suspects were
written in Dr. Haneef's diary, with allegations that the AFP was involved in these notations.
AFP Commissioner Mick Keelty has categorically denied any police involvement in making
notes in Dr. Haneef's diary. While his denial may seem straightforward, it cannot be viewed
in isolation from the broader context of the Haneef case.
The skepticism surrounding the AFP's denial is rooted in the history of the case. The
handling of evidence, the initial claim regarding Dr. Haneef's mobile phone SIM card, and
the subsequent correction of facts have raised doubts about the thoroughness and
competence of the investigation. Such discrepancies and inconsistencies inevitably fuel
suspicion.
Moreover, the politicization of the Haneef case has added a layer of complexity. Accusations
of incompetence and the undermining of anti-terrorism laws have been exchanged between
politicians, with Queensland Premier Peter Beattie suggesting that police handling of the
case was reminiscent of the Keystone Cops.
In this charged atmosphere, the AFP's denial of involvement in the diary notes raises
questions about transparency and accountability. Commissioner Keelty's assertion that
elaborating on the matter could potentially undermine the court process may be valid, but it
also leaves room for speculation.

The truth regarding the Haneef case and the alleged diary notes should be uncovered. The
public's right to know and understand the events surrounding this significant legal episode
should not be sacrificed on the altar of legal proceedings. For the Haneef case is not just
about one individual's plight but also about the broader issues of civil liberties and security
in a world grappling with the ever-present threat of terrorism. It is a case that demands
clarity, accountability, and reform.

Justice Adams' Condemnation: Unmasking ASIO's Troubling Actions

Within the records of Australian jurisprudence, the Ul-Haque case

emerges as a compelling testament to the delicate juncture where
security and civil liberties intertwine. As the gavel fell on this
disconcerting episode, Justice Michael Adams delivered a scathing
condemnation of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation
(ASIO), unveiling a disturbing narrative of unlawful conduct,
intimidation, and deception.

159 | P a g e
The Evening That Changed Everything

In the fading light of an ordinary November evening in 2003, Izhar Ul-Haque stepped off a
train at Blacktown Railway Station. Little did he know that this mundane moment would
thrust him into a chilling encounter with ASIO officers. Three shadowy figures approached
him, setting in motion a series of events that would leave an indelible mark on his life.

"Izhar Ul-Haque?" one of them inquired, his voice tinged with apprehension.

"Yes," came the hesitant reply.

"I am an officer of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, and I would like to have
a private discussion with you. We need to have that discussion now."

With those chilling words, Ul-Haque found himself propelled into the unknown, leaving his
17-year-old brother behind at the station. Unbeknownst to him, a journey of intimidation,
fear, and coercion had begun. As Ul-Haque was driven to a nearby park, darkness
descended both literally and figuratively. Here, under the dimming skies, ASIO officers
presented him with an unsettling ultimatum. "We've got two choices," declared one of the
officers. "We can go down the difficult path or a less difficult path." The difficult path
involved compelling Ul-Haque to divulge untruths, while the alternative was cooperation,
providing truthful answers, and aiding in the resolution of ASIO's concerns. For a young man
of just twenty-one, this peremptory confrontation was undoubtedly frightening and
intimidating, a sentiment later echoed by Justice Adams. Ul-Haque, feeling coerced, had
little choice but to accompany the ASIO officers on this disconcerting journey—a fact he
emphasized when recounting the ordeal.
The ordeal continued as Ul-Haque was
escorted to his own home. Here, a
startling scene awaited him—25 ASIO
officers were executing a search warrant
late into the night. The clock neared 9:15
pm, and the hours grew darker as the
night wore on. After a time, the officers
conveyed Ul-Haque back to his car at the
railway station and trailed him back to his
residence. It was in his parents' bedroom that the most intrusive part of the interrogation
occurred. Notably, Ul-Haque was not informed of his right to leave the room or to decline
answering questions. The interview dragged on through the early morning hours,
punctuated only by brief pauses to allow Ul-Haque to prepare for his prayers and breakfast.
In the end, the charges against Ul-Haque became inconsequential, and the case crumbled in

160 | P a g e
2007. Justice Adams' recent condemnation resounded as a stinging indictment of ASIO's
actions—unlawful conduct, false imprisonment, and what amounted to kidnapping.
This unsettling episode was not an isolated incident but rather a chapter in a growing
narrative of withdrawn terrorism prosecutions in Australia. The earlier dismissal of charges
against Dr. Mohammed Haneef had already cast a shadow of doubt over the effectiveness
and conduct of Australia's intelligence and enforcement agencies. Perhaps even more
troubling was the perception that ASIO was repeatedly "crying wolf." When terrorist
prosecutions were withdrawn, it left a stark choice—either innocent individuals had been
unjustly accused and maligned, or true terrorists had slipped through the cracks and walked
free. With each such incident, the public watching from the sidelines grew increasingly
tempted to dismiss it as "just another false alarm.

Unraveling the Complexities: Dr. Haneef and Izhar ul-Haque Cases in Australian Legal
History
In the chronicles of Australia's legal narrative, two cases distinctly echo as poignant
reminders of the intricate entanglement that frequently unfolds between the realms of
security and civil liberties. These two cases raise unsettling questions about the very
institutions meant to uphold the law. They prompt us to consider whether these agencies
might have crossed the line of lawful conduct into the realm of COINTELPRO.

Both the fiascos of the Dr. Haneef and Izhar ul-Haque cases occurred during a period when
ASIO not only sought more powers but also increased funding. They appeared to be in
desperate need of both. It's worth noting that during this time, both the Director of ASIO
and the Director of the Australian Federal Police (AFP) were members of the Catholic
consortium, both adhering to the Roman Catholic faith. The existence of this reality raises
suspicions that the pervasive influence of the Deep State has infiltrated Australia, seamlessly
intertwining with the well-coordinated machinery of Roman group cohesion.

[PHOTO LEFT: Australian

Federal Police (AFP) raid ABC
broadcasting sparking debate
about freedom of the press.]

161 | P a g e
ASIO's Alleged Harassment and Intimidation - A Disturbing Reality

In the heart of Melbourne, a distressing narrative unfolds, shedding light on the alleged
persistent harassment and bullying perpetrated by the Australian Security Intelligence
Organization (ASIO). The Islamic Society of Victoria has taken a stand, announcing its intent
to pursue legal action against the agency, aiming to put an end to the distressing encounters
its community members endure.
At the Preston Mosque, intelligence operatives are said to make daily appearances,
approaching worshippers with enticing job offers while simultaneously demanding personal
information. Such intrusive practices have left the Islamic Society of Victoria with no choice
but to seek legal recourse, hoping to curb the alarming trend.

Baha Yehia, the society's secretary, pulled back the veil on the extent of surveillance,
revealing that even the solemn sermons delivered within the mosque were under ASIO's
watchful eye. This unsettling revelation called for an immediate halt to the harassment, and
Mr. Yehia was resolute in his stance, asserting that if necessary, the matter would be
escalated directly to the Prime Minister in Canberra.
Taking the allegations seriously, the Islamic group enlisted the legal expertise of Robert
Stary, renowned for his defense of Jack Thomas, the first Australian ensnared by anti-
terrorism laws. Stary empathized with those supporting the Palestinian struggle,

162 | P a g e
acknowledging their vulnerability amid numerous prosecutions, some successful and others
not.
The magnitude of the situation prompted the Islamic community to empower themselves
through knowledge. They hosted a public legal seminar, educating members on how to
navigate encounters with intelligence agents. Armed with awareness, they came to
understand their right to decline ASIO's requests and communication, providing a resolute
response to intimidation.
However, ASIO's amplified power raises grave concerns. The agency has tripled in size since
the aftermath of 9/11, growing into an unprecedentedly significant organization within
Australia's democratic history. The unchecked expansion of its capabilities demands a
critical reevaluation of the balance between national security and the erosion of civil
liberties.

This atmosphere of suspicion and fear instigated by ASIO's alleged interference has given
birth to a troubling dilemma. Mistrust pervades the community as individuals wonder if
those around them are working for the intelligence agency, given the numerous approaches
and recruitment attempts detailed by Mr. Yehia.
Despite the gravity of the situation, ASIO remains silent, refraining from making specific
comments on the allegations involving particular communities.

Australia's democratic ideals are under scrutiny, and the Islamic Society of Victoria's pursuit
of legal action demands an objective and thorough investigation into these allegations. A
fundamental reexamination of ASIO's activities is imperative to restore trust and safeguard
the democratic rights of all Australians. Only through transparent accountability can we
hope to rectify the fractures within our society and preserve the very essence of our
democracy.

[PHOTO LEFT: ASIO

Headquarters in
Canberra.]

163 | P a g e
The Secretive Fixated Persons Unit: An Abuse of Power in the Name of
Political Vendetta

The arrest of Kristo Langker, a producer for

Friendlyjordies, by the Australian New South Wales
Police Fixated Persons Unit, has illuminated the abuse
of power and the unit's alleged misuse as a political
tool. This incident, which unfolded in mid-2021, adds
to the Kafkaesque political climate that had engulfed
the Australian state of New South Wales at the time.
Friendlyjordies is the online pseudonym of Jordan
Shanks, an Australian YouTuber, comedian, and political commentator. He is well-known for
creating satirical videos, conducting political analysis, and interviewing various public figures
in Australia. His content primarily revolves around Australian politics, social issues, and
current events, and it proved to be a source of significant challenges for the Australian Deep
State. Kristo Langker served as Mr. Shanks' producer for the Friendlyjordies Youtube
channel.
The Fixated Persons Unit, established to tackle lone actor extremists, arrested Langker at his
family home in Dulwich Hill, acting upon a complaint from then NSW Deputy Premier John
Barilaro. The arrest came just hours after Langker publicly approached Barilaro and

164 | P a g e
questioned him on camera about his decision to sue Friendlyjordies presenter Jordan
Shanks.
This already bizarre incident took a more puzzling turn when Langker was charged with four
counts of stalking, seemingly stemming from two tongue-in-cheek encounters. The first
involved Langker, along with Shanks as Super Mario's Luigi, playfully approaching Barilaro at
a university bar event. The second incident took place as Barilaro was leaving a funeral, and
Langker questioned him again on camera.

[PHOTO ABOVE: Kristo Langker and Comedian Jordan Shanks]

However, the charges were abruptly dropped on 10 March 2022, leaving the public and
Langker's family confused as to why the NSW Police Force had taken such an aggressive
stance and then backed down without any justification.
Legal experts representing Langker questioned the unit's involvement, stating that no
fixated persons assessment had ever been conducted on Langker or Shanks, and there was
no indication that they posed any real threat to public officials. It was later revealed that
Langker and Shanks had been under surveillance by the unit for months, raising concerns
about the extent of the unit's powers and resources to monitor political satirists.
The Fixated Persons Investigations Unit, embedded within the NSW Police Counter
Terrorism and Special Tactics Command, was intended to focus on individuals posing
potential violent threats but not fitting the terrorist profile. Langker's arrest raises questions
about how the unit transformed from its original purpose to monitor satirical content on a
YouTube channel.

165 | P a g e
The overreach of the unit and the subsequent defamation case against Shanks have drawn
criticisms about the erosion of civil liberties and the criminalization of political satire.
Langker's lawyer, Mark Davis, believes that the unit's involvement in monitoring comedians
and journalists warrants further scrutiny by the parliament.

The incident also highlights the financial burden on individuals facing such charges.
Langker's ability to crowdfund legal expenses ultimately led to the dismissal of the charges.
Without such public support, he might have faced a different outcome.
The case of Kristo Langker serves as a cautionary tale about the potential dangers of
granting extensive powers to secretive units with the capacity to monitor and intimidate
individuals based on political satire. The misuse of the Fixated Persons Unit undermines the
principles of free speech and the right to peaceful protest, leaving us to wonder about the
true intentions behind such actions.

The abuse of power by the secretive Fixated Persons Unit and its involvement in Langker's
case should be thoroughly investigated and rectified to protect the democratic values and
rights of all Australians. The lingering questions about the unit's actions demand
transparency and accountability from those in power to ensure justice prevails and such
incidents are not repeated in the future.

The Worrying Trend of Australian Government Tracking Mobile Phones

In an age where digital technology has seamlessly integrated into our daily lives, concerns
about data privacy and government surveillance have reached new heights. Recently, it has
come to light that the Australian Home Affairs department has been paying an American
intelligence company to access Locate X, a controversial tool that can track the movement
of smartphones. This revelation has raised significant concerns about the government's use
of such data, which may contain sensitive information about Australian citizens.

The use of Locate X by the Australian government was brought to public attention through
documents obtained by Guardian Australia under freedom of information laws. According to
these documents, Home Affairs has had access to Locate X since at least 2021, and they
have utilized this tool to track the movements of mobile devices, going back several months.

166 | P a g e
The data is sourced from commercially available apps that collect location information to
serve ads and mapping services. Babel Street, the American intelligence company behind
Locate X, does not publicly acknowledge the product's existence, but it promotes its use of
"ad tech telemetry data" to "locate and track" individuals or groups of interest.

While Home Affairs has acknowledged using Babel Street technology, they have been tight-
lipped about the specifics of its usage and the data sources they access. According to a
Home Affairs spokesperson, the department collects commercially available and publicly
available online information when it is necessary to support their functions and activities,
and when it is proportionate and in accordance with the law. They claim to have acquired
the minimal amount of Babel Street software needed for lawful investigations of priority
matters. However, this vague explanation has not been enough to quell the concerns of
privacy advocates.
One of the major concerns raised by the use of Locate X and similar tools is the lack of
transparency regarding the surveillance technologies employed by government agencies.
Samantha Floreani of Digital Rights Watch argues that government agencies should not be
able to leverage commercial surveillance products without public scrutiny. She points out
that there is a disturbing lack of information available about how such technologies are
being used, which raises significant privacy and civil liberties issues.
The FoI documents also shed light on the challenges faced by Home Affairs staff while using
Locate X. They questioned the functionality of the tool, particularly in cases where it
displayed the exact location of a device on different days and times in a residential area.
Moreover, there were instances where the system warned about "too many devices at
location." This suggests that even the government agencies are not fully aware of the extent
of information they have access to or how to manage it effectively.
Additionally, the documents reveal that Home Affairs staff have been trialling and obtaining
licenses for other Babel Street products, including Babel X, Synthesis, and Oasis. These
products offer features like open-source monitoring, automated social network and
relationship mapping, and advanced search capabilities. Babel X, for instance, can provide
detailed information such as a person's name, social security number, driver's license, social
media profiles, and even IP addresses and employment history based on input data like a
telephone number or email address.
The lack of information and oversight on government agencies' use of commercially
available data is a growing concern worldwide. The practice of acquiring data from brokers
who resell information like browsing and purchase histories, insurance claims, and criminal
records, often referred to as "commercially available information," is drawing increased
scrutiny. As Floreani emphasizes, most people would not be comfortable with government
agencies directly collecting this scale and scope of data themselves. Therefore, it is essential
to question the ethics and legality of government agencies buying access to such data.

In an era where digital privacy is a fundamental right, the revelations surrounding the
Australian government's use of Locate X and similar tools highlight the urgent need for more
transparency and oversight regarding the collection and use of sensitive personal data. As

167 | P a g e
technology continues to advance, it is crucial to strike a balance between legitimate law
enforcement needs and the protection of individual privacy and civil liberties. The Australian
public deserves answers and assurances that their digital footprints are not being exploited
without their knowledge or consent.

ASIO and Santamaria: Unveiling Aggressive Tactics and Ideological Alliances

On the other side of the vast Pacific Ocean lies Australia, where eerily familiar ideological
strategies and alliances between the government and the Catholic Church unfold,
reminiscent of those witnessed in the United States. In their thought-provoking book, 'The
Show,' authored by Sean Scalmer and Rachel Landers, a captivating narrative unfurls,
shedding light on the controversial relationship between Bob Santamaria's 1950's Catholic
Movement, known as The Movement or The Show, and the Australian Security Intelligence
Organization (ASIO).
With meticulous research and the revelation of hitherto undisclosed information, the
authors boldly assert that Santamaria's Movement underwent a remarkable transformation,

168 | P a g e
metamorphosing into a sophisticated intelligence agency closely entwined with ASIO. Alas,
the profound repercussions of this collaboration did not evade scrutiny, as the book starkly
exposes the relentless pursuit of ideological objectives, ultimately chipping away at the very
foundations of democratic principles.

With profound insights and compelling historical evidence, this thought-provoking work
dauntlessly challenges long-standing conventions surrounding the intricate intersections of
politics and intelligence. It lays bare the unsettling realities of how unyielding ideologies can
cast a shadow over democratic values, leaving behind a trail of erosion in their wake. 'The
Show' presents a gripping testimony to the intricacies of power and influence, offering an
unflinching gaze into the crossroads of political machinations, intelligence operations, and
the fragility of democratic ideals.
As a historical figure, Bob Santamaria was known for his fervent anti-communist stance and
political activism and his working close relationship with the Australian Security Intelligence
Organization (ASIO). Some of the aggressive behaviors and tactics that Santamaria and his
Catholic Movement were involved in during the 20th century in Australia included:
· Political Infiltration: Santamaria's Movement actively sought to infiltrate the Australian
Labour Party (ALP) with the aim of shaping it into a Catholic political machine. This
aggressive strategy led to the Labour Party's internal conflict and the infamous Labour Split
in the mid-1950s.

· Union Interventions: The Movement employed strategies inspired by communist

organizing tactics to challenge and undermine communist power within various labour
unions. This led to intense battles for control of union leadership and decision-making
processes.
· Espionage Allegations: Santamaria and his followers were accused of having a network of
informants within various institutions, including trade unions, academic circles, and even
within ASIO itself, to gather intelligence on perceived communist activities.
· Suppression of Dissent: Santamaria's leadership style within The Movement was described
as authoritarian, leading to internal dissent and the stifling of alternative voices within the
organization.
· Anti-Democratic Practices: The Movement imposed anti-democratic policies on the unions
it controlled, mirroring the tactics of the communists they were opposing.
· Polarizing Rhetoric: Santamaria was known for using strong, polarizing rhetoric in his
public speeches and writings, demonizing communism and promoting a black-and-white
view of the political landscape.
Straining Political Relationships: The aggressive tactics employed by Santamaria's
Movement, especially in regard to the Labor Party split, strained relationships between
conservative and progressive forces in Australian politics.

169 | P a g e
New Zealand: NZSIS Intelligence: Behavior as Creepy as it Gets

The New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS) has, over the course of its history,
engaged in monitoring and surveillance activities, some of which have been directed
towards individuals of low profile with minimal public attention. Notably, during the era
when communism was prominent, the NZSIS did indeed monitor the children of
communists, a practice that may be regarded as unsettling in today's context. This
acknowledgment is found in NZSIS records, shedding light on past intelligence practices. The
surveillance of children of Communist Party members, or anyone else, is a deeply disturbing
and unsettling practice that raises serious ethical concerns. The very idea of intelligence
agencies closely monitoring innocent children based on their family or political affiliations is
nothing short of creepy and reeks of an Orwellian nightmare.
In certain instances, the NZSIS has employed what appears to be psychological warfare. This
is exemplified by the release of emails from NZSIS staff, in which they ridicule Kim Dotcom's
physical appearance, commenting on him being overweight and his relationship with his
Filipina girlfriend, likening her to a devalued human being, seemingly aimed at publicly
demeaning and fat shaming him. Such actions raise concerns about the ethical boundaries
of intelligence activities.

170 | P a g e
 Ordinarily, the NZSIS adopts a stance of neither
confirming nor denying the existence of specific
information when responding to information requests
from those who are being monitored. However, it is
intriguing that, in response to a journalist's request
through the Freedom of Information Act in relation to
information pertaining to Kim Dotcom, the NZSIS
granted access to the emails in question.

The stated reason for the release of these emails,

purportedly to foster greater transparency, warrants
careful consideration. It is crucial to ascertain the true
intent behind such decisions, as transparency should not be a mere guise for concealing
ulterior motives. The emails were splashed all over the nation's tabloids. This action
appeared to rattle Kim Dotcom.

[PHOTO ABOVE: Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom target of NZSIS]

When I made inquiries regarding any information that the NZSIS might possess about me, I
received the "neither confirm nor deny" response. This pattern persisted across three
separate occasions, wherein I encountered the same reply. I have in my possession one of
the letters bearing the signature of the Director of the NZSIS, Ms. Kitteridge, reiterating this

171 | P a g e
stance. However, it has come to my attention that information pertaining to Kim Dotcom
was indeed released, which raises questions about the differing treatment of information
requests.

172 | P a g e
Footnote references for the provided information:

Aaronson, T. (2023). The Terror Factory: Tenth Anniversary Edition. Ig Publishing. Aaronson, T. (2015, March). How this FBI strategy is
actually creating US-based terrorists. TED Talks. Retrieved from
https://www.ted.com/talks/trevor_aaronson_how_this_fbi_strategy_is_actually_creating_us_based_terrorists?language=en Derfoufi, Z.
(2009, May 26). MI5: leave young Muslims alone. The Guardian. Retrieved from
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/may/26/mi5-terrorism-islam Verkaik, R. (2009, May 21). Exclusive:
How MI5 blackmails British Muslims. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/exclusive-
how-mi5-blackmails-british-muslims-1688618.html Neumann, P. (Ed.). (2015). Radicalization (1st ed.). Routledge. Nicholls, T. (2012,
February 15). Islamic Society accuses ASIO of harassment. ABC News. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-02-15/islamic-
society-claims-asio-harassment/3830796 Bogle, A. (2023, November 6). Revealed: Home Affairs paying to access controversial tool
tracking mobile phone movements. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com https://www.theguardian.com/australia-
news/2023/nov/06/home-affairs-locate-x-paying-mobile-phone-tracking-tool Macken, C. (2007, November 16). Ul-Haque case and ASIO's
house of cards. ABC News. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-11-16/ul-haque-case-and-asios-house-of-cards/723340
Grenville, J., & Aarons, M. (2017). The Show: Another Side of Santamaria's Movement. Scribe Publications.Fisher, D. (2015, May 30). SIS
spies to Kim Dotcom: We're sorry for calling you fatty. New Zealand Herald. Retrieved from https://www.newzealandherald.com

173 | P a g e
CHAPTER 11: THE VATICAN
INTELLIGENCE SERVICE: UNVEILING
THE SHADOWS OF INFLUENCE

The Vatican Intelligence Service: Veiled Secrets and Political Interests

The Vatican Intelligence Service, formally known as Servizio per le Informazioni e la

Sicurezza Militare (SIS), operates as the intelligence and security agency of the Vatican City
State. While its primary mission is presented as ensuring the safety and protection of the
Pope, the Holy See, and the Vatican City State, a critical examination reveals that the SIS is
deeply entrenched in pursuing the political interests of the Vatican. In this chapter, we will
examine the secretive world of the SIS, shedding light on its operations, historical
experience in espionage, and the underlying motives that drive its actions.

174 | P a g e
The Veiled Nature of the SIS

The SIS is widely regarded as one of the most secretive intelligence agencies in the world.
The Vatican's commitment to secrecy is deeply rooted in its long-standing history and
tradition of safeguarding its interests and maintaining control. The opaque nature of the SIS
raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and the potential abuse of power within
the realm of intelligence gathering.

Operating in the Shadows: Espionage Expertise of the Vatican

The Vatican, with its centuries-old existence, has accumulated a wealth of experience in
espionage and covert operations. Throughout history, the Catholic Church has been known
to employ intricate networks of spies, informants, and clandestine operatives to protect its
interests, influence political affairs, and gather sensitive information. This extensive
experience provides the SIS with a unique set of skills and resources that allow it to navigate
the world of intelligence with finesse and cunning.

Political Agenda: Beyond Safety and Security

While the SIS claims its main concern is the security and protection of the Pope and the
Vatican City State, a critical analysis reveals a broader agenda rooted in political interests.
The Vatican, as both a religious and political entity, seeks to wield influence and shape
global affairs to align with its ideology and objectives. The SIS operates as an instrument to
advance these interests, using intelligence gathering, covert operations, and information
dissemination to further the Vatican's political agenda.

Covert Collaborations: Unveiling External Partners

Although information about the SIS's collaborations and alliances with external intelligence
agencies remains shrouded in secrecy, it is not uncommon for intelligence organizations to
engage in cooperative relationships. Given the Vatican's extensive global network and its
influence on religious, social, and political spheres, it is plausible that the SIS maintains
covert ties with various intelligence agencies worldwide. These alliances may involve the
sharing of intelligence, strategic coordination, and joint operations, all serving the purpose
of advancing the Vatican's political goals.

175 | P a g e
The Vatican Intelligence Service, the SIS, operates as a highly secretive agency within the
confines of the Vatican City State. While it claims to prioritize the safety and protection of
the Pope and the Vatican, its activities and historical expertise in espionage suggest a
deeper involvement in pursuing the political interests of the Holy See. The veil of secrecy
surrounding the SIS raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and the potential
for the abuse of power.
To ensure a more comprehensive understanding of the SIS's operations and its impact on
global affairs, it is imperative to advocate for transparency, oversight, and democratic
checks and balances. By scrutinizing the actions and motives of the SIS, we can foster a
critical dialogue about the appropriate role of intelligence agencies within religious and
political institutions. Ultimately, the pursuit of transparency and accountability will help to
ensure that the SIS operates within ethical boundaries and respects the principles of
democratic governance.

The Vatican Intelligence Service: Unveiling the Shadows of Influence

In this critical chapter, we delve into the potential involvement of the Vatican Intelligence
Service (SIS) in foreign intelligence agencies, governments, think tank groups, and positions
of power. While concrete evidence is scarce due to the secretive nature of intelligence
operations, it is essential to explore the plausible connections and raise concerns regarding
the extent of the Vatican's influence in global affairs.

The Vatican's Espionage Legacy

The Vatican has a long and storied history of involvement in espionage, dating back
centuries. With its extensive networks and diplomatic presence worldwide, the Vatican has

176 | P a g e
undoubtedly amassed a wealth of information and contacts. This historical backdrop raises
questions about whether the SIS leverages its intelligence capabilities to infiltrate other
nations' intelligence agencies, governments, and influential think tank groups.

The Power of Informants and Agents

Intelligence agencies, including the SIS, rely on informants and agents to gather information
and exert influence in complex geopolitical landscapes. Given the global reach and
diplomatic networks of the Vatican, it is plausible to suggest that the SIS may cultivate
relationships with individuals embedded within foreign intelligence agencies, governments,
and positions of power.

Foreign Intelligence Agencies: Covert Collaborations

Intelligence agencies often engage in covert collaborations to share information, exchange

expertise, and conduct joint operations. While the Vatican's intelligence operations may
primarily focus on protecting the interests of the Vatican City State and the Pope, it would
be naïve to discount the possibility of the SIS cooperating with foreign intelligence agencies.
Such partnerships could provide the Vatican with valuable insights and political leverage on
a global scale.

Government Infiltration: An Unseen Influence

The Vatican's extensive diplomatic relations with nations around the world raise concerns
about the potential infiltration of foreign governments. Given the Vatican's unique position
as a religious and political entity, individuals within governments may be swayed or
influenced by the Vatican's objectives, whether consciously or unknowingly. This influence
could manifest through policy decisions, political appointments, or the promotion of
Vatican-friendly agendas.

Think Tank Groups: Shaping Global Narratives

Think tank groups, known for their influence on policy formulation and global narratives,
provide fertile ground for the Vatican to exert its influence. The SIS, with its intelligence
capabilities, may strategically place informants or agents within these organizations, shaping

177 | P a g e
research agendas, policy recommendations, and public discourse to align with the Vatican's
interests. This covert influence could steer discussions on interfaith dialogue, religious
freedom, and other key issues in directions favorable to the Vatican's agenda.

Illuminating the Shadows

While concrete evidence of the Vatican's involvement in foreign intelligence agencies,

governments, and think tank groups remains elusive, critical scrutiny is necessary to guard
against potential undue influence. The secretive nature of intelligence operations
necessitates a diligent examination of the Vatican's activities and their implications for
global affairs.
To ensure transparency and accountability, it is essential to call for increased disclosure and
oversight of the SIS. Robust mechanisms should be established to assess the extent of the

178 | P a g e
Vatican's involvement in foreign intelligence networks, governments, and influential
organizations. This scrutiny is vital to safeguard the principles of national sovereignty,
democratic governance, and independent thought.
Ultimately, shedding light on the potential reach of the SIS and the Vatican's intelligence
operations serves as a reminder that vigilance and skepticism are crucial in the face of
shadowy influences. Only through diligent scrutiny can we navigate the intricate web of
global power dynamics and preserve the integrity of sovereign nations and democratic
processes.
Footnote references for the provided information:
Vilasi, A. C. (2016). The Entity: The Vatican Intelligence Service. United States.

179 | P a g e
CHAPTER 12: THE EMERGENCE OF
INTELLIGENCE CONTRACTORS AND PRIVATE
INTELLIGENCE FIRMS
"There are millions of contractors inside the nation's intelligence
agencies," said Angela Canterbury, director of public policy at the
Project on Government Oversight. "The U.S. intelligence community
is rife with outsourcing."

The Dark Side of Outsourcing: Compromising Intelligence for Questionable

Ends
In the age of digital espionage, intelligence agencies across the globe have increasingly
turned to outsourcing as a means to bolster their capabilities. A 2010 Washington Post
report found "close to 30 percent of the workforce in the intelligence agencies is
contractors." The Washington Post article also stated that it is a system in which contractors
are playing an increasingly important role. According to The Post's estimates, out of the
854,000 individuals with top-secret clearances, 265,000 are contractors. There is no better
example of the government's dependence on them than at the CIA, which is the sole
government entity authorized to undertake overseas activities that no other U.S. agency is
permitted to carry out. The United States' NSA, along with its counterparts in the 5 Eyes
Alliance—GCHQ in the United Kingdom, CSE in Canada, ASD in Australia, and GCSB in New
Zealand—have eagerly embraced this practice. While the proponents of outsourcing sing
praises of efficiency and expertise, this chapter examines the shadowy underbelly of this
trend, exposing how it jeopardizes vital intelligence for purposes that are often morally
dubious.

180 | P a g e
The Quest for Efficiency and Expertise
Proponents of intelligence agency outsourcing argue that it offers a shortcut to efficiency
and expertise. Private intelligence agencies, they say, possess the latest technological
marvels, top-tier analysts, and an extensive global network. In this quest for efficiency,
governments have handed the keys to their intelligence operations to entities whose
primary motivation is profit.

Compromised Intelligence: A Dangerous Game

However, the allure of expertise and efficiency comes at a significant cost—the risk of
compromised intelligence. The agencies tasked with safeguarding national security now find
themselves in bed with private entities, their bedfellows often motivated not by the public
good, but by financial gain. This union has blurred the once-clear line between lawful
surveillance and unethical intrusion.

A Dark Legacy
There exist programs that serve as unsettling reminders of the perils associated with
outsourcing intelligence. Gangstalking, a term synonymous with organized harassment, and
COINTELPRO are stark illustrations of how the partnership between government agencies
and external entities can plunge into a dark abyss.

181 | P a g e
The world witnessed the actions of Edward Snowden, an articulate and unassuming
individual with the appearance of a college student, who accessed highly classified and
sensitive data and disseminated it to journalists. This event raises concerns about the
potential for contractors to similarly divulge information related to electronic surveillance,
including messaging, applications like WhatsApp, Facebook data, mobile phone geolocation,
SMS messages, phone calls, metadata, and even the ability to observe users' live keystrokes,
unveiling their thoughts as they type. Browser history and other such information,
mentioned earlier, can reveal intentions. And those intentions represent future events for
which agencies or organizations, such as powerful religious organizations, can prepare,
including surveillance, harassment, employment application sabotage, emotional and
psychological manipulation, as well as the recording of audio or video evidence of moral
infractions. This is due to the inherent fallibility of human beings, who are prone to making
mistakes. Subsequently, this information can be utilized against the target.
In both Gangstalking and COINTELPRO, intelligence agencies collaborated with external
partners to subject individuals or groups perceived as threats to the status quo to
harassment, intimidation, and compromise in past decades, and this phenomenon is
ongoing today. Remarkably, these actions occurred without the oversight or accountability
that should accompany intelligence operations.

Furthermore, there have been instances where organizations like the Catholic Consortium
harnessed their religious ideologies to influence agendas and narratives. They employed
tactics to silence abuse victims, neutralize critics or opponents, and engage in covert
operations. These examples highlight the potential for the abuse of power when intelligence
operations intersect with external entities, underscoring the imperative need for
transparency, oversight, and ethical standards in intelligence gathering and surveillance
practices.

Opaque Operations: A Looming Concern

Another disconcerting aspect of outsourcing is the glaring lack of oversight and
accountability. Private intelligence agencies often shroud their operations in a cloak of
secrecy, making it difficult, if not impossible, to scrutinize their activities. This opacity
provides a fertile breeding ground for abuse of power and manipulation, leaving intelligence
operations susceptible to unsavory objectives.

A Call for Ethical Clarity

In light of these concerns, there is an urgent call for clear and enforceable ethical guidelines
governing the collaboration between government and private intelligence agencies. These
guidelines must prioritize transparency, accountability, and adherence to the law, serving as
bulwarks against the misuse of intelligence for morally ambiguous purposes.

182 | P a g e
The Veiled Watchers: The Soaring Dominance of Private Intelligence Firms
Across the globe, from the foggy streets of London to the bustling avenues of New York,
private intelligence firms have risen like dark specters, ensnaring the voices of dissent in
their intricate snares. The recent exposé on the infiltration of campaigners in the UK serves
as an alarming testament to this disturbing trend. What was once perceived as a
fundamental right - the right to protest, to raise one's voice against injustices - has now
become synonymous with the risk of surveillance.

The rise of these private intelligence entities signals the dawn of a new era, where the lines
between protection and intrusion blur. Not confined to mere monitoring, they wield a
power far-reaching and insidious. One cannot help but feel a chill down the spine as we
unearth the unsettling case of a gold mining company meticulously collecting a dossier of
information on a 72-year-old activist, creating a dossier that spans 92 pages.
The narrative takes us further, peering into the heart of the matter: prominent institutions,
pillars of society, have eagerly embraced this surreptitious trend. Cultural institutions,
political establishments, and even corporations have joined the ranks of these modern-day
panopticons. Intelligence firm Welund, purportedly founded by a former MI6 agent, revels
in the patronage of oil and gas giants, equating the green movement to an existential threat.
The story unfolds with chilling precision as BP hires Welund to track an environmental
campaigner's every digital footprint, as if the very act of raising one's voice has transformed
into a crime worthy of eternal scrutiny.

183 | P a g e
Even the corridors of political authority aren't immune to the allure of these clandestine
watchers. London's City Hall, in a decision that flouted transparency and accountability,
handed a contract to Welund to gather intelligence about activists, all under the guise of
safeguarding order. This melding of public power with private surveillance blurs the
boundaries of legality and ethics, casting shadows over the very institutions that should
uphold justice.
These revelations bring to light a festering underbelly, a covert ecosystem nourished by
intrigue and secrecy. Hakluyt, a company cloaked in the mystique of ex-MI6 officers, casts
an unsettling pallor. Its tentacles extend deep into the realms of government and cultural
institutions, leaving an indelible mark of influence and opacity. Such institutions, we are
told, seek counsel from this enigmatic entity, but what unfolds behind closed doors remains
tantalizingly concealed.
As the symphony of surveillance crescendos, its notes reach across borders. Transnational
threats are invoked to justify its sinister undercurrents. Shell's interactions with the
Metropolitan Police in the face of protests lay bare a disturbing rapport between corporate
and governmental interests. Emails, heavily redacted, reveal an unholy alliance where
corporations and state power intertwine, manifesting the very fears of a dystopian future
where the boundary between autonomy and subjugation is blurred.
And what of those who dare to stand against these forces? Environmental activists,
campaigners, dissenting voices. They navigate a treacherous landscape where every
keystroke, every public pronouncement, is scrutinized, documented, weaponized. Fracking
firm Cuadrilla, the serpent's eye ever watchful, mines social media to identify and suppress
the voices that challenge its dominion. Extinction Rebellion's plans to disrupt a public event
are disclosed, revealing an unsettling alliance between corporations and the guardians of
order, all orchestrated with a clandestine expertise.
Amid this atmosphere of distrust, there emerges a glimmer of resilience. A parallel narrative
unfolds as activists harness legal tools, the Subject Access Requests, to expose the tendrils
of surveillance. Like moths drawn to the flame, they navigate the corridors of opacity,
demanding accountability from those who seek to cast them into shadow.

In the era of Big Data and technological omnipotence, the rise and use of private intelligence
firms stand as a stark reminder of the fragility of democratic ideals. As institutions both
public and private surrender to the allure of control and surveillance, the voices of dissent
struggle to rise above the din of manipulation. The path forward, uncertain and fraught,
demands vigilant awareness, ethical scrutiny, and an unwavering commitment to preserving
the principles upon which societies are built.

184 | P a g e
The Private Intelligence Industry: An In-Depth Investigation into its
Operations, Controversies, and Influential Companies

The term "private intelligence agency" (PIA) refers to a non-governmental or quasi-non-

government organization within the private sector dedicated to gathering, analyzing, and
exploiting information. This is achieved through the assessment of public sources, known as
Open Source INTelligence (OSINT), and collaboration with other institutions. It is noteworthy
that some private intelligence agencies acquire information deceptively or through on-the-
ground activities on behalf of their clients.
Private intelligence agencies extend their services to governments, individual consumers,
and large corporations with vested interests or investments in specific categories (e.g.,
crime, disease, corruption) or regions (e.g., Middle East, Vietnam, Prague). They are also
engaged in investigating perceived threats, such as environmental groups or human rights
organizations. Certain private intelligence agencies employ online perception management,
social media influencing/manipulation campaigns, strategic disinformation (including the
production of fake news and propaganda), opposition research, and political campaigns
utilizing social media and artificial intelligence. Examples of such agencies include Psy-
Group, Cambridge Analytica, and Black Cube. The Digital Forensic Research Lab of the
Atlantic Council has characterized the activities of Archimedes Group as engaging in
"information warfare." Former anti-corruption prosecutor Aaron Sayne has highlighted the
industry's lack of documentation and flexible ethical norms, noting that agencies may collect
and employ sensitive information for contradictory purposes.

The private intelligence industry has experienced significant growth, driven by changes in
how the U.S. government conducts espionage in the War on Terror. A substantial portion of
the national intelligence budget, around $56 billion (USD) or 70% of the $80 billion budget
in 2013, was allocated to the private sector. This outsourcing trend has led to private
intelligence corporations taking on functions previously handled by government agencies
such as the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA).

185 | P a g e
Below is a list of both active and inactive private intelligence companies:

Active Companies:

AEGIS (UK)
AggregateIQ (Canada)
Archimedes Group (Israel)
Black Cube (Israel & UK)
Booz Allen Hamilton (US)
Control Risks Group (UK)
Emerdata Limited (UK)
Fusion GPS (US)
Groupe GEOS (France)
Hakluyt & Company (UK)
Kroll Inc. (US)
NSO Group (Israel)
Oxford Analytica (UK)
Palantir Technologies (US)
Pinkerton National Detective Agency (US)
Smith Brandon International, Inc. (US)
Stratfor (US)

Inactive Companies:

Cambridge Analytica (UK)

Psy-Group (Israel)
SCL Group (UK)

186 | P a g e
Secretive Forces: A Peek into Select Controversial Private Intelligence
Agencies

Aegis Defence Services

Aegis Defence Services is a private military and security company based in London, United
Kingdom. Founded in 2002 by Tim Spicer, former CEO of Sandline International, along with
entrepreneurs Jeffrey Day and former investment bankers Mark Bullough and Dominic
Armstrong, the company operates globally with offices in Afghanistan, the United Arab
Emirates, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Somalia, and Mozambique. Aegis Defence Services is part
of the Aegis Group, which includes Aegis LLC based in the United States.
The company specializes in defense services and military operations, providing security
support services to the Project and Contracting Office (PCO) of the United States
Department of Defense in Iraq under a $293 million contract over three years. These
services involve static and mobile security details, situational awareness of logistical
movement, intelligence-sharing between security forces and reconstruction contractors,
and providing continuous information on road movement viability throughout the country.
Aegis is a founding signatory of the International Code of Conduct for Private Security
Providers, emphasizing international standards and accountability for private security
companies operating in complex environments. It was also a founding member of the British
Association of Private Security Companies (BAPSC), advocating for the regulation of the
British private security sector, though BAPSC is now defunct.

In October 2015, Canadian security company GardaWorld acquired Aegis Defence Services.
The acquisition marked GardaWorld's strategic expansion in Africa and the Middle East, and
it was completed for a total of $130,725,000 plus an earnout amount.
Notably, Aegis was involved in providing security protection for inquiries into alleged
corruption in the Oil-for-Food Programme and supported the UN Electoral Assistance

187 | P a g e
Division (UNEAD) and the Independent High Electoral Commission (IECI) during the
constitutional referendum in October 2005 and the general election in December 2005.
Aegis gained attention in 2011 when it was awarded a $497 million contract by the U.S.
Department of State to assume security forces operations at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul,
Afghanistan. The company expanded its recruitment efforts, including individuals from
African countries such as Sierra Leone, where security guards were reportedly paid $16
(£11) a day.
Controversy surrounded Aegis in 2005 when "trophy" videos surfaced on the internet,
showing private military contractors in Baghdad firing upon civilian vehicles. Though
unofficially linked to Aegis Defence Services, investigations by both the company and the
U.S. Army concluded that the contractors were operating within the rules for the use of
force. Aegis benefited from CPA-mandated immunity from prosecution by Iraqi authorities.

In 2015, following the acquisition by GardaWorld, former Aegis Defence Services co-founder
Dominic Armstrong founded Herminius, a strategic intelligence firm.

Cambridge Analytica Ltd: Unraveling the Controversial Legacy

Cambridge Analytica Ltd (CA), formerly known as SCL USA, stands as a prominent but
tainted chapter in the realm of British political consulting, catapulted to infamy through the
notorious Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal. Founded in 2013 as a subsidiary of
the self-styled "global election management agency" SCL Group, CA was established by
Nigel Oakes, Alexander Nix, and Alexander Oakes, with Nix assuming the role of CEO. The
company, with its headquarters in London, became entwined with influential figures,
including connections with the British Conservative Party, the royal family, and the military.

188 | P a g e
CA's history is intertwined with its parent company, SCL Group, which had significant ties to
the Conservative Party, royalty, and the British military. The company was incorporated in
January 2013 under the name SCL USA, later rebranded as Cambridge Analytica. Notably,
Alexander Nix, the CEO, was also associated with multiple companies sharing registered
offices in London, including Firecrest technologies, Emerdata, and six SCL Group companies.
The founders, including Nigel Oakes and Alexander Nix, maintained close connections with
influential circles, contributing to the company's influence.

The company, accused of combining misappropriation of digital assets, data mining, data
brokerage, and data analysis with strategic communication during electoral processes,
garnered financial support from major donors of the Conservative Party, including Vincent
Tchenguiz, Jonathan Marland, Baron Marland, and the Mercer family. The company, while
affiliated with SCL's focus on influencing elections in developing countries, shifted its
attention to the western world, including the United Kingdom and the United States. CA's
involvement in U.S. political races and campaigns such as Ted Cruz's presidential campaign
and Donald Trump's presidential campaign raised significant controversy, leading to ongoing
inquiries in both countries.
The data scandal erupted in March 2018 when media outlets reported CA's acquisition and
use of personal data about Facebook users. The company obtained data through an app
created by Aleksandr Kogan, a researcher associated with the University of Cambridge, who
collected data for academic purposes but later shared it with CA. The scandal involved the
misuse of data from up to 87 million Facebook users, leading to investigations, legal actions,
and the suspension of Alexander Nix as CEO.
On May 1, 2018, in the wake of the data scandal, CA and its parent company SCL filed for
insolvency proceedings and closed operations. Emerdata, established shortly after CA's
downfall, included key figures such as Rebekah Mercer, Jennifer Mercer, Alexander Nix, and
Johnson Chun Shun Ko. The aftermath also witnessed the emergence of companies like
Auspex International, linked to former CA staff, and Data Propria, a data analysis firm with
connections to former CA officials.
The legacy of Cambridge Analytica remains contentious, with ongoing investigations, legal
actions, and revelations surfacing even years after its closure. The intricate web of political
connections, data misuse, and the company's enduring impact on the political landscape
underscores the challenges posed by entities engaging in questionable practices within the
realm of data-driven political consulting.

Psy-Group: Unveiling the Controversial History of a Former Israeli Private

Intelligence Agency
Psy-Group was a once-active Israeli private intelligence agency, founded on December 22,
2014, and operating in the realms of social media influencing, competitive intelligence, and
risk consulting. The company, headquartered in Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C., was led by
CEO Royi Burstein, a former lieutenant colonel in the Israel Defense Forces. With over 30

189 | P a g e
employees, Psy-Group garnered attention and later faced closure due to investigations
initiated by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
The agency specialized in online perception management, social media influencing,
opposition research, honey traps, and clandestine on-the-ground activities for its clients. Its
infamous history involves collaborations with Cambridge Analytica and notable
involvements in various political activities, particularly during the 2016 U.S. election.

Collaboration with Cambridge Analytica:

Psy-Group made headlines for signing a memorandum of understanding with Cambridge
Analytica on December 14, 2016. Alexander Nix, the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, openly
discussed entrapping political opponents using Israeli companies, particularly effective in
intelligence gathering, with specific reference to Psy-Group.

2016 U.S. Election and Trump Campaign:

During the 2016 U.S. election, Psy-Group pitched its services to super-PACs and entities,
offering to infiltrate target audiences with meticulously crafted social media personas and
disseminate misleading information through websites mimicking news portals. The company
created disinformation campaigns, including a case study in North Carolina, showcasing the
impact of social media manipulation on public opinion.

Notably, Rick Gates, then-deputy chairman of the Trump campaign, reportedly sought Psy-
Group's assistance in a scheme referred to as "Project Rome." This project included various
efforts, from opposition research to the creation of fake online personas, aimed at
supporting the Donald Trump campaign. The interactions between the Trump campaign and
Psy-Group became part of the broader investigation into Russian interference in the 2016
U.S. presidential elections.

190 | P a g e
Additional Activities:
Apart from its involvement in political campaigns, Psy-Group undertook various other
projects, including a covert campaign in 2016 to maintain Parmod Kumar on the board of
Tulare Regional Medical Center in California. The agency also initiated "Project Butterfly" in
2016, targeting activists associated with the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS)
movement on U.S. college campuses.

Legal Scrutiny and Investigations:

In February 2018, FBI agents assisting Mueller traveled to Israel to interview Psy-Group
employees, seeking information on the company's financial structure, ownership, and
communications with Team Trump during the 2016 campaign. The FBI investigation
extended beyond the closure of Mueller's Special Counsel Investigation.
The Senate Intelligence Committee, in April 2019, sent a letter investigating the
communications of Psy-Group with various individuals, including Paul Manafort, Michael
Flynn, and others.

Rebranding Attempts and Ongoing Legal Challenges:

Reports surfaced about discussions within Psy-Group regarding rebranding itself as

"WhiteKnight." This new identity was linked to a private intelligence agency based in the
Philippines, reportedly part-owned by Joel Zamel, with connections to Cambridge Analytica
and the Brexit Leave campaign.

Psy-Group's complex structure involved multilayered ownership and international

operations. Legal challenges persisted, with ongoing efforts to keep data left on computers
used by Psy-Group instead of being erased, particularly related to the West Face Capital
case. In the aftermath of Psy-Group's closure, its legacy remains marked by controversies,
legal challenges, and the broader scrutiny of private intelligence agencies involved in
shaping political narratives through unconventional means.

SCL Group: The Shadowy Narrative of a Data Mining and Analysis Behemoth
SCL Group, previously known as Strategic Communication Laboratories, emerges as a
private British company with a checkered history rooted in behavioral research and strategic
communication. Founded in 1990 by Nigel Oakes, who served as its CEO, the company
claims the title of a "global election management agency," drawing attention due to its
involvement in the notorious Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal.

191 | P a g e
History:
In its early years, SCL Group, originally the Behavioural Dynamics Institute (BDI), was
conceived by Nigel Oakes in 1990. Transitioning from TV production and advertising, Oakes
envisioned leveraging academic insights from psychologists and anthropologists to shift
mass opinion. The formation of Strategic Communication Laboratories in 1993 marked a
pivotal moment in this journey, with investors including figures with ties to the Conservative
Party, British military, and the United States Department of Defense.

Activities:
SCL's trajectory involved a shift from commercial success to military and political arenas,
engaging in activities ranging from military disinformation campaigns to social media
branding and voter targeting. The company gained notoriety for alleged involvement in
psychological warfare as a contractor for the American and British militaries during the
Afghanistan War and the Iraq War.
The company boasted an extensive track record of influencing elections in various countries,
using tactics described as "psy ops" to study and manipulate public opinion. Despite
claiming endorsements from government agencies in the United Kingdom and the United
States, SCL faced criticism for its involvement in elections in developing countries,
fomenting coups, and employing influence operations.
In 2013, SCL established the subsidiary Cambridge Analytica, which played a significant role
in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, supporting candidates such as Ted Cruz and Donald
Trump.

Emerdata Limited:
Post the closure of SCL Group on May 1, 2018, Emerdata Limited emerged in 2017, featuring
key figures associated with Cambridge Analytica. The company was seen as a potential
successor, offering services akin to SCL Group and Cambridge Analytica. Despite initial plans
to acquire SCL and Cambridge Analytica, Emerdata and its subsidiary Firecrest Technologies
Ltd., founded by former Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix, were declared to be
wound down in May 2018. However, subsequent revelations in 2019 indicated that
Emerdata had fully acquired the companies, shouldering their legal bills amid bankruptcy
proceedings.

Closure and Legal Scrutiny:

Amid the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal, SCL Group announced its closure on
May 1, 2018. Despite the closure announcement, the website and staff continued
operations for a period before eventually shutting down.

192 | P a g e
In 2019, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed an administrative complaint against
Cambridge Analytica for data misuse, with settlements reached with former CEO Alexander
Nix and app developer Aleksandr Kogan. The case against the company itself remained
ongoing. In 2020, Alexander Nix signed a disqualification undertaking following allegations
of marketing potentially unethical services. Effective from October 5, 2020, Nix faced a
seven-year disqualification from acting as a director or being involved in the management of
a UK company without court permission.

Critical Perspective:
SCL Group's trajectory, marked by its ties to influential entities and its controversial
involvement in global elections, raises concerns about the ethical implications of its
operations. The intricate web of successor entities like Emerdata only adds to the
complexity, underscoring the need for stringent oversight and accountability in the realm of
data-driven political influence.

Pegasus Spyware: Navigating the Nexus of Technology, Ethics, and Global

Governance

In the shadowy realm of surveillance technology, where the boundaries between security
and intrusion blur, Pegasus spyware emerges as a potent embodiment of controversy and
ethical quandaries. Developed by the Israeli technology firm NSO Group, Pegasus has

193 | P a g e
become a harbinger of unprecedented capabilities and concerns, leaving in its wake a trail
of scrutiny and heated debate.
Pegasus, an advanced surveillance software, casts a digital net over the personal lives of
unsuspecting individuals. The mobile devices we carry become unsuspecting battlegrounds
for this modern-day Trojan Horse. The aim is to infiltrate, to penetrate the very heart of our
communications, data, and interactions. This invasive tool is designed to covertly infiltrate
smartphones, pilfering text messages, emails, phone calls, location data, and even activating
the microphone and camera, all without the user's awareness or consent.
The power that Pegasus wields is both awe-inspiring and deeply disconcerting. By granting
unauthorized access to the intimate aspects of a person's life, it bypasses the confines of
mere surveillance and plunges into the realms of privacy invasion on an unprecedented
scale. This insidious intrusion allows the wielders of Pegasus to eavesdrop on conversations,
surveil movements, and capture the most private moments, all in the pursuit of information.

As with all technological marvels, Pegasus is imbued with dual interpretations. NSO Group,
its creators, tout its utility in combating criminal and terrorist activities, emphasizing its
potential in aiding legitimate law enforcement and counterterrorism efforts. However,
evidence paints a troubling picture of Pegasus being wielded as a tool of authoritarian
surveillance and human rights abuses. The question of oversight and accountability looms
large as governments and entities exploit Pegasus to silence dissenting voices and tighten
their grip on power.
The specter of Pegasus is not confined to a single corner of the globe. It has infiltrated
nations far and wide, leaving its digital fingerprints on countless devices. While NSO Group
asserts that it sells Pegasus exclusively to government agencies for legitimate purposes,
traces of its use have been unearthed in countries that boast democratic traditions and
established institutions.

The controversy surrounding Pegasus raises profound questions that transcend borders and
ideologies. The scale of its capabilities highlights the delicate balance between security,
privacy, and human rights. While proponents emphasize the necessity of such tools to
maintain societal order, critics assert that their unrestrained use can corrode the very
foundations of democratic values and enable unchecked state control.
As Pegasus continues to provoke impassioned debates and global scrutiny, it serves as a
clarion call for the establishment of robust regulations, heightened transparency, and
stringent accountability measures. In a world where technology evolves at breakneck speed,
ethical frameworks must evolve in tandem to ensure the safeguarding of individual
freedoms and democratic ideals. The saga of Pegasus underscores the urgency of this task,
lest our digital age becomes a realm where surveillance trumps sovereignty and autonomy
is sacrificed at the altar of convenience.

194 | P a g e
Black Cube: The Veiled Realm of Private Intelligence and Espionage

Within the realm of private intelligence and espionage, a name emerges as an enigmatic
force: Black Cube. Founded in Israel in 2010 by former Israeli intelligence agents, this private
intelligence firm has garnered notoriety for its participation in covert intelligence
operations, corporate investigations, and espionage.
Bolstered by a cadre of former intelligence officers and operatives, Black Cube navigates the
intricate space between legitimate intelligence gathering and ethically controversial
endeavors. The firm proudly showcases a repertoire of skills honed within renowned
intelligence agencies like the Mossad and Shin Bet.

At the core of Black Cube's approach lies an arsenal of tactics designed to gather intelligence
and conduct investigations for its clients. Its toolkit includes a spectrum of methods, from
undercover operations and targeted surveillance to extensive background research. The
firm's audacious tactics occasionally involve impersonating individuals to discreetly extract
information or manipulate events.
Though Black Cube professes a commitment to upholding legal and ethical boundaries, its
strategies have consistently ignited debates concerning ethical implications and raised a
maelstrom of controversies.
One of the most publicized cases casting a spotlight on Black Cube was its role in the Harvey
Weinstein scandal. The firm was retained by Weinstein to gather intelligence on individuals
embroiled in allegations of sexual misconduct against him. The revelation of Black Cube's
involvement illuminated the extent to which private intelligence entities are willing to
venture to shield their clients' interests—even if it entails encroaching upon the rights and
privacy of others.
The spectrum of Black Cube's clientele spans a diverse landscape, from corporations seeking
an edge in the competitive arena to governments eyeing their political rivals. The firm caters
to a wide array of interests, including finance, energy, technology, and entertainment. Its
dossier boasts a history of delving into business conflicts, uncovering instances of

195 | P a g e
intellectual property theft, and unraveling webs of corruption within organizational
echelons.
Yet, a murkier narrative weaves itself into the tapestry of Black Cube's endeavors. The firm's
involvement in surveilling activists, journalists, and dissenters critical of certain regimes has
incited intense scrutiny. Reports hint at Black Cube's role in gathering intelligence on
advocates for human rights and social justice, raising profound questions about the ethical
boundaries surrounding surveillance when pursued in the name of clients' interests.
Though rooted in Israel, Black Cube casts its shadows across the global stage. A network of
operatives and strategic connections empowers the firm to traverse borders with discretion
and efficacy. This international footprint has propelled Black Cube into the spotlight,
solidifying its standing as a prominent player within the intricate realm of private
intelligence.

The saga of Black Cube encapsulates the intricate dance between power, principle, and
ethical responsibility. The divergence between sanctioned intelligence operations and the
erosion of individual privacy stands as a focal point within this enigma. The name Black Cube
reverberates as a poignant reminder of the intricate labyrinth of private intelligence,
beckoning society to deliberate upon accountability, transparency, and the ethical limits
that govern intelligence pursuits.

Footnote references for the provided information:

ABC News. (2013, June 11). The Secret History of NSA Contractors: NSA Leaker Ed Snowden is one of thousands of contractors working at
the NSA. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/top-secret-america/2010/07/20/national-security-inc/
Priest, D., & Arkin, W. M. (2010, July 20). Top Secret America: National Security Inc. The growing role of contractors in counterterrorism
and intelligence is raising concerns about conflicts of interest and the government’s ability to control its most sensitive work. Washington
Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/top-secret-america/2010/07/20/national-security-inc/ Al Jazeera English. Year:
2021. The Spy in Your Phone | Al Jazeera World URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfOgm1IcBd0 Al Jazeera English, January 6,
2021. Richard, L., & Rigaud, S. (2023). Pegasus: The Story of the World's Most Dangerous Spyware. Macmillan. Wylie, C. (2020). Mindfck:
Inside Cambridge Analytica's Plot to Break the World*. Paperback edition. 18 August 2020. Pegg, D., & Cutler, S. (2021, July 19)
Surveillance Explainer: What is Pegasus spyware and how does it hack phones? The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/jul/18/what-is-pegasus-spyware-and-how-does-it-hack-phones Meier, B. (2021). Spooked: The
Trump Dossier, Black Cube, and the Rise of Private Spies. Harper. Pilkington, E. 2020, January 31). Harvey Weinstein hired Black Cube to
block New York Times article, jury hears. The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jan/30/harvey-weinstein-black-
cube-new-york-times

196 | P a g e
CHAPTER 13: COLLABORATIVE
EFFORTS BETWEEN UNITED STATES
INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND THE
ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR
ORGANIZATIONAL USE OF
INFORMANTS, PLANTS AND SPIES

Leveraging the Vatican's Global Influence: Collaborative Opportunities for

Western Intelligence Agencies
In a world characterized by intricate power dynamics and a constant flow of information,
intelligence agencies frequently explore unconventional avenues to advance not only their
national interests but also what appears to be paramount: consolidating the world into one
union. The possibility of collaborating with institutions that hold international influence,
such as the Vatican or the extensive global network of the Catholic Church, could be
leveraged to promote U.S. interests, and vice versa, to advance the interests of the
prevailing deep state. This chapter examines real world scenarios that highlight how the
Vatican's organizational structure and presence in numerous countries present collaborative
opportunities for Western intelligence agencies, considering the following aspects:

Presence in Multiple Countries

The Catholic Church has a presence in numerous countries around the world, with churches,
offices, and members in diverse communities. This widespread network provides
opportunities for individuals to participate in surveillance activities, either voluntarily or
involuntarily.

197 | P a g e
Intelligence Gathering via Local Knowledge and Access
Catholic congregations' deep-rooted connections within local communities provide
intelligence agents with invaluable insights. Local members' awareness of cultural dynamics,
societal nuances, and emerging trends enhance intelligence collection. Whether gathering
information on emerging political movements, socioeconomic conditions, or cultural shifts
and religious shifts, the Church's presence potentially serves as a discreet source of on-the-
ground intelligence.
Covert Communication through the Network of Communication
The Church's established communication channels, including regular meetings, newsletters,
and global conferences, could offer a platform for discreet information exchange.
Intelligence agencies exploit these networks to communicate with operatives, transfer
coded messages, or coordinate activities. Such interactions, masked within the routine
operations of the Church, might provide a secure channel for sharing critical intelligence.

Recruitment and Coercion

Members, or other leaders might be approached for recruitment, either willingly or through
coercion, by dignitaries of the church to gather information or participate in surveillance
efforts.

Confessional Secrets
The confessional booth, where individuals confess their sins to priests, has long been
regarded as a place of confidentiality. The Vatican Intelligence agencies could potentially
exploit this space for gathering information.

Collaborative Endeavors in Humanitarian Outreach

With an extensive network of charitable activities spanning the globe, the Catholic Church's
humanitarian initiatives offer cover for intelligence agents operating under the guise of aid
workers or volunteers. Participating in relief efforts, orphanages, and clinics might facilitate
access to regions of interest, enabling intelligence gathering while appearing altruistic.

Exploiting Educational Institutions for Intelligence

The Roman Catholic Church's presence in education, spanning from schools to universities in
foreign countries, offers a platform for intelligence agents to interact with students,
educators, and researchers. Infiltrating educational institutions grants access to young
minds and potential sources of information, contributing to a long-term intelligence

198 | P a g e
strategy, and potentially preparing those who attend these universities for specific roles
within the Deep State's ideological framework.

Navigating Cross-Border Mobility

Priests, nuns, and other religious workers' frequent international travel provide a covert
means for transferring materials, facilitating communication, or collecting information
across borders. Their mobility within the Church's structure could allow intelligence agents
to operate discreetly while traversing regions of interest.

Utilizing Cultural Influence and Interfaith Dialogues

The Church's cultural influence and its involvement in interfaith dialogues enable
intelligence agents to establish connections with individuals from various backgrounds. This
access might offer opportunities for cross-cultural exchange, furthering the understanding
of local dynamics and building relationships with potential sources of information.

Ethical Dilemmas and Potential Challenges

Engaging in intelligence activities within religious institutions is not without ethical
challenges. Balancing the need for national security with the values and expectations of
Church members and communities poses complex ethical dilemmas. Overcoming resistance
from within the Church and avoiding exposure are significant challenges that any
collaborative effort would need to address.

Veiled Alliances and Shadowed Pursuits

As previously discussed in earlier chapters, the intricate web of power and intrigue gave rise
to a sinister partnership, concealed beneath the veneer of legitimacy. The unholy
integration of intelligence agencies and the Roman Catholic Church had spawned a
symbiotic relationship that wielded immense influence over Western nations. It is a
relationship that thrived on mutual gain, even if it means trampling upon the very laws that
underpin the fabric of democracy. This enduring alliance, as explored in prior sections of this
book, continues to cast its shadow over history.
Central to this eerie alliance is the clandestine involvement of prominent Catholic figures in
administrative echelons of intelligence agencies. Their strategic positioning, like chess pieces
on a grand board, allows the Church to advance its covert agenda with unsettling ease.
Benefitting from the cloak of protection, the Roman Catholic Church has orchestrated
campaigns against its perceived adversaries within Western societies, heedless of the
boundaries set by legality.

199 | P a g e
Communism and Protestantism, once formidable challengers to the Church's supremacy,
have now been largely subdued through intricate maneuvers and orchestrated
counteractions. However, there are still some fundamentalist Muslims and Sabbath-keeping
Christians who are yet to be neutralized, possibly through operations similar to
COINTELPRO.
These covert activities, a dance of shadows and secrets, are perpetuated under a shroud of
silence. A tightly knit bureaucratic network of civil servants has been commandeered,
enabling the orchestration of harassment, discrediting, deception, and insidious infiltration.
Such tactics, veiled under the euphemism of 'Gangstalking' or 'community stalking', are
systematically brushed aside as products of paranoid delusion, effectively erasing the traces
of this dark partnership.
Private intelligence agencies, nurtured by the Church's influence, operate with impunity,
reinforced by the tacit approval of domestic intelligence agencies. Their pursuits, once
confined to the realm of conspiracy, have now taken center stage in a theater of covert
operations. As mentioned in a previous chapter, the Australian Santamaria's Catholic
Movement, infamous for being known as 'The Movement' or 'The Show,' intertwined its
machinations with the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) to neutralize
competitors.

200 | P a g e
[PHOTO ABOVE: Bob Santamaria, a political power broker, is shown on the right, conversing
with Melbourne Archbishop Frank Little (1925-2008; Archbishop from 1974 to 1998).
Santamaria is holding the booklet "Archbishop Mannix: His Contribution to the Art of Public
Leadership in Australia" (1978), later developed into a book. In the background is a Clifton
Pugh painting of the former Archbishop of Melbourne, Mannix.]

Santamaria's web of informants, embedded within academic circles, trade unions, and even
ASIO itself, laid the groundwork for espionage allegations. The intent was to unearth
perceived communist undertakings, a testament to the Church's relentless pursuit of control
and dominance. Dissent within The Movement was quashed beneath the weight of
authoritarian leadership, ensuring that alternative voices never saw the light of day.
Today, the legacy of these covert Catholic Movement Intelligence agencies persists,
collaborating with governments to silence dissenters through insidious surveillance. The

201 | P a g e
Church's power is leveraged to subject individuals to involuntary scrutiny and harassment,
all while evading traditional intelligence agency methods. In addition to field agents, the
Church's extensive organizational apparatus is utilized, positioning individuals within its
framework to orchestrate surveillance, manipulate connections, and advance their
clandestine pursuits.

Hiram Dukes: A Pastor's Encounter with Surveillance

Hiram Dukes, who possessed Pentagon clearance

and served at the Pentagon during WWII before
becoming a Seventh-day Adventist Pastor,
recounted an incident from the 1950s. While
engaged in colportage, he arrived at a mansion
where he encountered individuals who mistook
him for a Catholic due to Pastor Hiram offering
them a Catholic canvass instead of one from the
Seventh-day Adventist Church. Invited into a room
where a meeting was taking place, Pastor Hiram
found himself among Catholic dignitaries, including a Cardinal. Eventually, a disagreement
arose between Pastor Hiram and the men in the meeting after plans were divulged to take
over America. Pastor Hiram made it explicitly clear that he was not a Catholic and if he was
not let out there would be an investigation, prompting the Cardinal to inform him of a
system employed by the Catholic Church.
According to the Cardinal, every non-Catholic individual born in the United States is initially
placed on a white card, and they remain on that card until the Catholic Church deems it
necessary to keep a watchful eye. If a person garners attention or becomes noticeable, they
are transferred to a blue card. However, if the Catholic Church perceives the individual as a
threat or danger, they are placed on a red card. Pastor Hiram was informed that he would
be marked on a red card for the remainder of his life.
In the subsequent decades, it becomes abundantly clear that the collusion of power and
control resurfaced in a significantly intensified manner during the Nixon Era, only to be
reignited once more in the aftermath of 9/11 under the administration of George W. Bush.
Post 9/11 marked a distressing era of widespread surveillance and the revival of
COINTELPRO like operations, raising serious concerns about civil liberties and Rome’s
impregnation of the U.S government.

202 | P a g e
The Veil of Freedom: Unveiling Covert Forces Shaping Democratic Landscapes

In democratic nations, exemplified by the United States—the vanguard of freedom—exists

the bedrock principle of US Freedom of Speech, enshrined in the United States Constitution.
The First Amendment to this Constitution unequivocally asserts the right to freedom of
speech and press, doing so with a resolute absoluteness.
However, despite the liberties cherished in the Western world, a shadowy evolution looms.
Intelligence agencies, once bound by constraints of accountability, inch perilously towards a
precipice of unchecked power. The justification of terrorism laws subtly chips away at the
foundations of justice, enabling the detention of individuals without charge or a day in
court. This disquieting transformation has taken root in the United States, the United
Kingdom, and Australia, democratic fortresses in their own right.
Nevertheless, in contemporary Western nations, the privileges of freedom of speech and
freedom of the press endure, even as covert agendas push us towards authoritarianism. The
"Deep State" preserves its objectives and the established order through clandestine means.
In contrast, in China, individuals can be abruptly apprehended during the dead of night,
vanishing for extended periods, or never reappearing.
Within the Anglosphere, dissidents frequently endure surreptitious methods aimed at
suppressing them or altering their beliefs and behaviors. Nonetheless, in democratic
nations, the right to due process is gradually eroding due to the enactment of terrorism
laws. Often, when citizens have not succeeded in reversing oppressive laws from their
inception, or haven't made sufficient efforts to do so, their resistance dwindles over time, or
citizens lose interest. It is in such moments that the "Deep State" often incrementally
expands draconian laws, capitalizing on distractions and loss of interest.
This gives rise to concerns that, in the future, citizens may not be granted due process when
confronted with other allegations of law-breaking. In the context of this apprehension,
someone could be framed with no avenue for recourse through due process. Nations in the
Anglosphere seem to be edging closer to authoritarianism, evoking shades of an Orwellian
nightmare.
COINTELPRO, along with other unsettling approaches to quell dissent, like
gangstalking/community stalking, involve allegations of orchestrated harassment that not
only shake our core sense of security but can also push victims to the brink. These tactics
have the potential to drive those who challenge authority to the precipice of despair,
causing them to distance themselves from their once-held ideological perspectives,
activism, or investigative journalism.

203 | P a g e
 Unlocking Advantages: The Strategic Alliance between Intelligence Agencies,
the Roman Catholic Church, and Operational Efficacy
The collaboration between U.S. intelligence agencies, international counterparts, and the
Roman Catholic Church indeed offers substantial advantages. This is reflected in the
propensity of many intelligence agency directors to identify as Roman Catholic, a choice that
contributes to smoother cooperation. The organizational structure of the Roman Catholic
Church not only simplifies physical monitoring and surveillance but also streamlines
activities like tracking targeted individuals who have disabled their mobile phones. This
method is also more cost-effective. To illustrate, contemplate the expenses incurred when
many intelligence agents tail a targeted individual throughout the day. If intelligence
operatives were consistently utilized, frequent rotations would be necessary to prevent the
target from recognizing their faces, and budget blowouts would be an ongoing issue.
Consider the profound strategic significance of the power wielded by the Roman Catholic
Church, boasting a membership of 1.3 billion worldwide. Leveraging social cohesion and
occupying management roles in both public and private sectors, the Church has the ability
to recruit non-Catholic participants in a quid pro quo arrangement. The sheer magnitude of
its human resources—manpower and womanpower—remains unparalleled by any other
organization on the planet. This extensive network becomes uniquely poised to engage in
compartmentalized surveillance, gang stalking, harassment, as well as ideological and social
manipulation all organized by a central evasive structure.
This challenge becomes particularly relevant when intelligence agencies deploy operatives
for purposes such as harassment, community stalking, gang stalking, ideological
manipulation, engineering discrediting efforts, social engineering, and social manipulation.
Essentially, these encompass the full spectrum of counter-intelligence operations. In this
context, the advantages of collaborating with the Roman Catholic Church become
increasingly evident.
Organizational Operations, Tactics, and Control Mechanisms
Covert surveillance conducted by organizations using their members or personnel can
involve various organizational structures, tactics, and control mechanisms. While the
specific details can vary depending on the organization's goals, the nature of the
surveillance, and the context, here are some general aspects that might be involved:

204 | P a g e
Organizational Structure:
1. Compartmentalization: Organizations often compartmentalize surveillance activities
to limit the knowledge of individual participants. This prevents any single person from
having a comprehensive understanding of the entire operation.
2. Hierarchical Control: Surveillance operations may be organized hierarchically, with a
chain of command that ensures coordination, decision-making, and communication flow.
Those higher up in the hierarchy might have a broader understanding of the operation.
3. Task Distribution: Different individuals or teams might be assigned specific tasks, such
as observation, data collection, reporting, and analysis. This distribution allows for efficient
execution while limiting exposure to sensitive information.
4. Cellular: Creating independent cells with minimal interaction between them to reduce
the risk of exposure.
5. Hub-and-Spoke: Centralized coordination with separate individuals or teams acting as
spokes, conducting specific tasks.

Tactics and Techniques:

1. Observation: Discreetly monitoring individuals, locations, or activities of interest.
2. Data Collection: Gathering information through various means, such as photography,
video - audio recording, and documentation.
3. Undercover Roles: Infiltrating the target environment by posing as someone else, such
as an employee or customer.
4. Deception: Using fabricated identities or cover stories to gain trust and access.
5. Technical Surveillance: Using hidden cameras, microphones, GPS tracking, and digital
monitoring tools.
6. Social Engineering: Manipulating individuals to reveal information, often exploiting
their trust or vulnerabilities.
7. Counter-Surveillance: Employing tactics to detect and evade surveillance by other
parties.
8. HUMINT (Human Intelligence): Gathering information through direct interaction and
communication with individuals.
9. SIGINT (Signals Intelligence): Intercepting and analyzing electronic signals, including
communication.
10. OSINT (Open Source Intelligence): Collecting information from publicly available
sources, such as social media and online platforms.

205 | P a g e
Control and Oversight:
Centralized Control: A central authority or a select group might oversee and direct the
surveillance operation, ensuring coordination and adherence to objectives.
Handlers: In more complex operations, handlers or coordinators might manage individual
participants, providing instructions, information, and guidance.

Communication Protocols: Secure communication channels might be established for

reporting findings, sharing information, and receiving new instructions.

Incentives and Coercive Measures:

1. Monetary Compensation: Providing financial incentives to participants for their

involvement.
2. Blackmail: Using personal or compromising information to compel cooperation.
3. Loyalty: Exploiting participants' loyalty to the organization or its cause.
4. Threats: Coercing participation through intimidation, threats to personal safety, or
livelihood.
5. Emotional Manipulation: Exploiting participants' emotions, such as guilt or fear, to
gain compliance.
6. Career Advancement: Offering professional benefits or promotions in exchange for
cooperation.
7. Protection: Offering protection or assistance in personal matters in exchange for
cooperation.
8. Ideological Alignment: Convincing participants that their involvement serves a higher
ideological purpose.
9. Loss of employment: Coercing employers to terminate employment if uncooperative
as informant or agent.

206 | P a g e
The Veiled World of Involuntary Surveillance

In the shadowy corridors of power and secrecy,

organizations sometimes wield their influence in
ways that cast a dark cloud over the lives of
unsuspecting individuals. This phenomenon, often
referred to as "involuntary surveillance" or "covert
surveillance," reveals a world where the thin line
between privacy and intrusion is crossed without
consent or knowledge. The veil of involuntary
surveillance shrouds the actions of organizations
that recruit their own members or personnel as
unwitting agents of observation. In these intricate webs of secrecy, the individuals become
pawns in a game they never chose to play. A striking example lies within the walls of
institutions like the Catholic Church, where members may find themselves entangled in a
labyrinthine plot, their gaze unknowingly fixed on unsuspecting targets.

Unseen Actors, Unseen Actions

At the heart of involuntary surveillance lies the manipulation of human resources for
clandestine ends. Organizations capitalize on the loyalty, commitment, and trust of their
members to further their own agendas, often at the cost of personal autonomy and privacy.
The phenomenon hinges on compartmentalization – a stratagem designed to safeguard
secrets by fragmenting information. In the realm of involuntary surveillance,
compartmentalization becomes a weapon, blinding those unwittingly involved to the
broader context of their actions.
Within these covert operations, individuals are allocated isolated tasks or roles, operating
within an intricate web that obscures the bigger picture. This approach not only shields the

207 | P a g e
true nature of the operation but also impairs individuals' ability to grasp the enormity of
their contributions. From a distance, it seems that these members are performing minor
tasks, perhaps gathering mundane information or aiding in seemingly innocuous projects.
Unbeknownst to them, their collective actions piece together a puzzle of surveillance far
greater than they could imagine.

The Ethical Quandary

Unveiling the layers of involuntary surveillance exposes a moral quagmire that strains the
boundaries of right and wrong. As individuals partake in these operations without their
consent or understanding, ethical dilemmas come to the forefront. The breach of privacy
rights is glaring, as lives are unknowingly monitored and scrutinized. The very foundation of
trust upon which organizations build their cohesion is shaken when members realize they've
been unwittingly enrolled in surveillance efforts.
Critics argue that such practices exploit the very essence of human agency. By manipulating
the trust of loyal members, organizations inadvertently strip them of their free will, reducing
them to mere instruments of a broader agenda. As the shadows deepen, the ethical
resonance of these actions reverberates, forcing society to confront the blurred lines
between loyalty, consent, and personal liberty.

Legal Implications and Accountability

The legal landscape surrounding involuntary surveillance is as intricate as the operations
themselves. Laws governing privacy rights differ significantly across jurisdictions, and the
interpretation of these laws in the context of covert surveillance remains a gray area. While
compartmentalization might shield organizations from certain liabilities, it does not absolve
them entirely.
Should the web of secrecy begin to unravel, organizations can find themselves ensnared in
legal battles that expose the underbelly of their actions. The courts may weigh the nuances
of each case, assessing the degree of harm inflicted upon unknowing participants and the
extent to which their privacy rights were violated. This, in turn, could lead to a cascade of
consequences, ranging from monetary penalties to reputational damage.

Torn Veils and Shared Consciousness

Involuntary surveillance epitomizes the complexities of modern society's struggle for
control, ethics, and accountability. It underscores the delicate balance between the
collective aspirations of organizations and the individual rights of their members. As
societies strive for transparency and respect for autonomy, the veils of covert surveillance
continue to thin.

208 | P a g e
The battle between secrecy and disclosure rages on, serving as a stark reminder that even
within the folds of the most honorable organizations, hidden agendas can lurk. Whether
loyalty and obedience can ever truly coexist with consent and privacy remains a question
that looms over our interconnected world. In the shadows of involuntary surveillance, the
call for a more conscientious equilibrium resonates, demanding a world where the unseen
eyes of manipulation are finally laid bare.

Ethical Dilemmas in Coordinated Location Tracking: Examining Surveillance

Apps
In an era dominated by smartphones and constant connectivity, location-sharing apps have
emerged as indispensable tools for staying in touch with friends and family. However,
ethical concerns intensify when these apps are repurposed for coordinated monitoring,
especially when individuals are tracked without explicit consent. This article reviews the
scenario where a leader in a control center orchestrates a group to surveil a targeted
individual using various location-sharing apps, exploring the ethical dilemmas inherent in
such actions.

209 | P a g e
Apps for Coordinated Location Tracking:

Glympse:
A real-time location-sharing app designed for voluntary use. However, ethical complexities
arise when employed for coordinated surveillance.

Find My Friends (iOS):

Integrated into iOS devices, this app facilitates location sharing with trusted contacts. Using
it for involuntary tracking contradicts its intended purpose.

210 | P a g e
Google Maps:
Provides a location-sharing feature allowing users to share real-time location. Utilizing it for
targeted surveillance raises serious privacy concerns.

Life360:

Primarily designed for family tracking, Life360 permits the creation of private circles for
location sharing. Exploiting it for organized surveillance without consent raises ethical and
legal issues.

211 | P a g e
Ethical Dilemmas

Informed Consent:
Coordinating a group to monitor an individual without their knowledge violates the principle
of informed consent, surpassing typical app usage boundaries.
Privacy Rights:
Coordinated surveillance infringes upon the fundamental human right to privacy, potentially
leading to legal consequences for invasion of privacy.
Legal Implications:
Stringent privacy laws and regulations in many jurisdictions may result in legal repercussions
for orchestrating surveillance without consent.
Abuse of Technology:
Misusing location-sharing technology for targeted surveillance highlights the potential for
abuse, diverting apps from their intended purpose.
Coordinated Location Tracking in Action: Unraveling the Intricacies
In this scenario, a leader in a control center employs location-sharing apps to surveil a
targeted individual, unveiling a disconcerting level of precision. The process unfolds step by
step, with the leader utilizing real-time location data to dispatch the nearest operative for
interception.
Tracking the Target:
The targeted individual, unaware of the surveillance, travels on a train to a specific suburb.
The leader, equipped with a location-sharing app like Glympse or Google Maps, pinpoints
the exact locations of each monitoring group member.
Dispatching the Nearest Operative:
Armed with real-time location data, the leader identifies the closest group member to the
targeted individual and dispatches them to intercept, potentially without the individual's
knowledge or consent.
Real-Time Coordination:
The control center maintains constant communication with the dispatched operative,
providing real-time updates on the targeted individual's location. This seamless coordination
allows adjustments for interception at a specific point.

212 | P a g e
Surveillance on Public Transport:
In public transport scenarios, limited evasion options exist for the targeted individual. The
leader may instruct the operative to board the same train or await them at the destination,
creating an unwittingly surrounded situation.
Invasion of Privacy:
Coordinating tracking and interception without explicit consent infringes upon the right to
privacy, surpassing app intended use and raising ethical concerns.
Manipulation of Technology:
Exploiting technology designed for social connection for surveillance purposes raises
questions about responsible technology use and the potential for abuse.
Lack of Consent:
The targeted individual remains unaware of the surveillance, emphasizing the absence of
informed consent. Ethically, individuals should control how their location data is used.
Potential for Harassment:
Coordinated interception, particularly in public spaces, introduces the potential for
harassment. Even if benign, the targeted individual may feel violated and threatened by
orchestrated surveillance.
As technology advances, location-sharing apps, despite their convenience, raise serious
ethical and legal concerns when repurposed for coordinated surveillance. Upholding
informed consent, privacy rights, and legal compliance is crucial. Responsible and
transparent practices should guide the development and deployment of these tools to
ensure that connectivity benefits don't compromise individual privacy and ethical
technology use in the digital age.

213 | P a g e
CHAPTER 14: UNVEILING
COINTELPRO: SURVEILANCE,
TACTICS AND PSYCHOLOGICAL
MANIPULATION TECHNIQUES

Unmasking the Covert World: Counterintelligence Surveillance, GangStalking,

Ideological Manipulation, Harassment, and Social Manipulation

Counterintelligence surveillance, widely recognized as a critical tool in the arsenal of

intelligence agencies, serves the purpose of closely monitoring individuals and groups that
promote extremist or potentially dangerous ideological perspectives. It is evident that the
definitions of extremism and hazardous ideological viewpoints are subjective, as the
prevailing norm can be influenced by the ideological or religious perspectives held by those
in positions of power at any given time. For example, individuals within the Roman Catholic
community who occupy roles in government agencies may perceive fundamental
Protestantism as extremism or a hazardous ideological viewpoint. It is worth noting that
many influential positions in the government are currently held by Roman Catholics, even
though they constitute only 23% of the U.S population. It is also worth mentioning that the
status quo can change with the swings of political parties, much like the pendulum, and the
Catholic consortium can adapt to these shifts through its prelates and orders, which
encompass left, center, and right-leaning political ideologies. The current status quo of the
Deep State is an ultra-left Democratic party with the influence of their Jesuitical partners,
which has formed an alliance with numerous government agencies that heavily influence
organizations like the FBI. They might perceive any form of dissent as a harmful ideological
viewpoint, such as:

214 | P a g e
1. Populism: Populist movements often challenge established political systems, which
can be perceived as a threat by intelligence agencies. When populism includes anti-
establishment rhetoric, it may be seen as a potential source of social or political unrest.
2. Nationalism: While nationalism itself is not necessarily extremist, extreme forms of
nationalism can lead to aggressive and isolationist policies that may raise concerns about
international stability and cooperation.
3. Conservatism: Conservative values, when taken to the extreme, may include positions
that are at odds with broader societal norms. Intelligence agencies may monitor groups or
individuals who advocate for extremist interpretations of conservative ideologies.
4. Anti-Establishment: Movements that are consistently anti-establishment may be seen
as disruptive to the political order and could potentially pose a risk to stability. Intelligence
agencies may keep an eye on groups that advocate for radical changes.
5. Media and Political Elite Critique: Criticism of the media and political elites is a
common aspect of political discourse. However, when this criticism becomes conspiratorial
or encourages distrust in democratic institutions, it may be a concern for intelligence
agencies as it can erode public trust and potentially lead to violent actions.
6. Aggressive Immigration Policies: While advocating for border security and stricter
immigration policies is a legitimate part of political discourse, intelligence agencies may be
concerned when these policies are perceived as inhumane or discriminatory, or when they
lead to social tensions or human rights violations.
[The list above represents a viewpoint, but it does not necessarily mean that these
viewpoints are correct.]

215 | P a g e
Counterintelligence: This specialized form of surveillance operates with the aim of
identifying and mitigating threats before they manifest into concrete actions that could
endanger a nation's security and stability, although it's worth noting that the perception of
risks is also subjective and influenced by one's political and religious affiliations. Through
meticulous monitoring of activities, communications, and movements, counterintelligence
surveillance enables authorities to gain valuable insights into the propagation of radical
ideologies and thereby formulate proactive strategies to thwart their dissemination. It is a
multifaceted endeavor that underscores the delicate balance between safeguarding a
nation's interests and upholding the ethical principles surrounding individual rights and civil
liberties.

Gang Stalking or Community Stalking: is to be a systematic method of control carried out

by state intelligence agencies sometimes in collaboration with the Roman Catholic Church
and vice versa. This alleged practice aims to dismantle every aspect of a targeted individual's
life. Upon designation as a target, a notification is claimed to be disseminated throughout
the broader community, leading to continuous surveillance of the individual by various
community members at all hours. The stated objective of this "Community Stalking," also
referred to as "gang stalking," is to disrupt the target's life significantly. This disruption is
purportedly achieved by inducing stress, fostering social isolation, causing health issues, and
in some instances, provoking targets to react against those involved. The potential
consequences could range from legal entanglements to tarnished credibility, as targets
might be portrayed as mentally unstable. This portrayal could potentially compel targets to
cease advocating or participating in dissent, ideological viewpoints, or religious beliefs.
Claims have arisen linking the refinement of this alleged operation to the Stasi in East
Germany during the Communist era. While insights have been derived from files examined
after the fall of the Berlin Wall, similar strategies are said to have been employed during the
Inquisition by the Roman Catholic Jesuit Order. It is conceivable that some of these targeted
individuals might also be utilized as test subjects, based on factors such as gender, ethnicity,

216 | P a g e
sexual preference, or religious affiliation. This would ostensibly contribute to understanding
how "gang stalking" or "community stalking" could be applied in real-world scenarios to
disrupt ideological views or the promotion of religious beliefs that do not align with the
prevailing norm.

Ideological manipulation: refers to the deliberate and often covert efforts to influence,
shape, or control individuals' beliefs, values, opinions, and worldviews in order to serve
specific agendas. This form of manipulation can occur through various means, such as
propaganda, misinformation, framing, and selective presentation of information. By
exploiting cognitive biases, emotional triggers, and societal narratives, those engaging in
ideological manipulation seek to mold public perception and behavior in ways that align
with their own interests or ideologies. Whether in political, social, religious, or commercial
contexts, ideological manipulation can have far-reaching consequences, impacting collective
understanding, decision-making processes, and even social cohesion. Recognizing and
critically evaluating sources of information and being aware of potential manipulation
tactics are essential in maintaining a balanced and informed perspective in today's
information-rich environment.

217 | P a g e
Harassment: by intelligence agencies or organizations involves a systematic campaign aimed
at disrupting the targeted individual's methods of operation, activism, or dissemination of
religious beliefs. This form of harassment often entails a range of covert tactics, such as
surveillance, intimidation, psychological pressure, and interference with personal and
professional activities. The primary goal is to create a hostile environment that hinders the
target's ability to effectively pursue their goals or express their beliefs. By destabilizing their
routines and sowing doubt or fear, these tactics aim to undermine the target's credibility,
effectiveness, and impact. This type of harassment poses significant challenges to
individuals striving for change or advocating for their beliefs, highlighting the need for
transparency, accountability, and protection of individual rights within intelligence and
security practices. One method of harassment campaigns involves paying unemployed,
homeless drug addicts, or individuals who have been promised assistance in finding
employment to create unsettling, confrontational, and sometimes aggressive situations.
These situations are aimed at engaging targeted individuals on the streets, while they are
driving, or during their activism or Christian street witnessing efforts. The exploitation of
such individuals also serves as cover for the harassment program. If the program were to
come under scrutiny, those who have been used to harass are not considered credible
witnesses, making it difficult to associate these ostracized individuals with a sophisticated
program.

218 | P a g e
"Isolation" or "social isolation," which is a tactic used by Intelligence agencies, covert
groups, cults, or manipulative organizations such as the Roman Catholic Church to separate
individuals from their support networks and expose them solely to the group's information
and influence. This isolation can make individuals more susceptible to the group's control,
manipulation, and indoctrination.
Isolation involves cutting off or weakening connections with family, friends, and other
support systems outside the group. By doing so, the covert group gains more control over
the individual's thoughts, emotions, and decision-making processes. Isolated individuals are
often left without alternative sources of information, emotional support, or critical
perspectives, making them more reliant on the group for guidance and a sense of belonging.
Isolation is a key component of many manipulative tactics, as it can create an environment
where the group's beliefs and narratives go unchallenged. It's important to recognize that
isolating individuals from their support networks is often a red flag indicating potential
manipulation or harmful dynamics within a group. Healthy relationships and organizations
encourage maintaining connections with a variety of people and perspectives.

Social manipulation: refers to the act of influencing, controlling, or manipulating people's

thoughts, behaviors, emotions, or decisions through various psychological tactics and
strategies. It often involves exploiting cognitive biases, emotional triggers, and social
dynamics to achieve a desired outcome, often without the target's awareness or consent.
Social manipulation can occur in various contexts, such as interpersonal relationships,
marketing, politics, and even everyday conversations.

Social manipulation involves using psychological tactics to influence people's thoughts,

emotions, and behaviors for personal gain. This can range from exploiting cognitive biases

219 | P a g e
and emotional triggers to employing deceptive strategies, ultimately shaping decisions
without the target's full awareness. Whether in relationships, politics, religious perspectives
or marketing, understanding these techniques helps guard against unintended
manipulation.

Here are some common techniques and examples of social manipulation:

Gaslighting: This involves making someone doubt their own perceptions, memory, or sanity,
often by denying facts or altering reality. For instance, an abusive partner might make their
victim believe they are imagining things or misremembering events.
Deception: Spreading false information or withholding crucial details to mislead others. This
can be seen in fake news, scams, or dishonest advertising.
Guilt Tripping: Manipulating someone's emotions by making them feel guilty or responsible
for a situation. This can be used to gain favors or compliance.
Isolation: Cutting off a person from their support network, making them more dependent
on the manipulator. Cults sometimes use this technique to control their members.
Flattery and Praise: Giving excessive compliments or praise to make someone more
receptive to your requests or ideas.
Fear Mongering: Using fear to manipulate people into taking certain actions. This is often
seen in political campaigns, where candidates might exaggerate threats to rally support.
Social Proof: Using the behavior of others as a guide to influence someone's decisions. For
instance, showing that many people are buying a product can make others more likely to
buy it too.
Mirroring: Mimicking someone's behavior, preferences, or mannerisms to create a sense of
familiarity and trust.

220 | P a g e
Negging: Offering backhanded compliments or criticism to lower someone's self-esteem,
making them more vulnerable to manipulation.
Foot-in-the-Door Technique: Getting someone to agree to a small request first, then
following up with a larger request. They are more likely to comply with the larger request
after agreeing to the initial small one.
Door-in-the-Face Technique: Making a large request first, which is likely to be refused, then
following it up with a smaller, more reasonable request. The person is more likely to agree
to the smaller request after rejecting the larger one.
Emotional Manipulation: Playing on someone's emotions to control their decisions. This
could involve using guilt, sympathy, or empathy to influence their behavior.

Psychological Manipulation and Coercion Within the Roman Catholic Church

This investigation delves into the unsettling phenomena of psychological manipulation and
coercion within the Roman Catholic Church. It examines a range of tactics, including
gaslighting, emotional manipulation, deception, isolation, brainwashing, manipulative
language, provocation, infiltration, blackmail, coercion, divide and conquer, and
disinformation. These strategies have been observed in various aspects of the Church's
actions, particularly in cases related to sexual abuse and the protection of the institution's
reputation.
Gaslighting: Distorting or denying another person's reality, leading them to question their
thoughts, feelings, and memories. In cases related to the Roman Catholic Church, gaslighting
has been observed in instances of sexual abuse, where victims' experiences were dismissed
or downplayed, creating confusion and self-doubt.

221 | P a g e
Emotional Manipulation: Exploiting individuals' emotions, such as guilt, fear, or love, to
control their behavior and decision-making. Victims of abuse in the Roman Catholic Church
were made to feel responsible or guilty for the actions perpetrated against them, exerting
control over their actions and discouraging disclosure.
Deception: Intentionally misleading or lying to gain an advantage or manipulate actions. In
the context of the Roman Catholic Church, deception has been documented in the cover-up
of sexual abuse cases, where information was withheld or manipulated to protect the
institution's reputation.
Isolation: Cutting off individuals from their support networks, both emotionally and socially.
Similarly, the Roman Catholic Church has been known to isolate victims of abuse by
discouraging or preventing them from seeking help outside of the institution, maintaining
control and power over individuals.
Brainwashing: Manipulating beliefs and behaviors through intense indoctrination and
control. Certain religious organizations, including the Roman Catholic Church, use practices
like strict adherence to dogma, manipulation of religious teachings, and fear-based
conditioning to foster unquestioning loyalty to the institution.
Manipulative Language: Shaping others' thoughts, emotions, and actions through carefully
chosen words and framing situations. Both government agencies and religious
organizations, such as the Roman Catholic Church, use manipulative language to influence
perception and control the narrative.
Provocation: Inciting individuals or groups into actions that can be used against them.
Government agencies and the Roman Catholic Church have been known to provoke or
manipulate situations to discredit individuals or undermine dissent, including planting false
evidence or instigating conflicts.
Infiltration: Agents or informants infiltrate targeted organizations to gather information,
disrupt activities, and sow discord. Infiltration has been observed in the actions of
government agencies and religious institutions, where agents assume influential positions to
control the narrative from within.
Blackmail and Coercion: Exerting control over individuals or groups by leveraging
compromising information or exploiting vulnerabilities. These tactics have been observed in
the actions of both government agencies and the Roman Catholic Church, particularly in
cases of sexual abuse where attempts to silence victims are made.
Divide and Conquer: Creating divisions within targeted communities or organizations,
weakening their collective power. This strategy has been observed in the actions of
government agencies and religious institutions, fostering conflicts or exploiting existing
divisions.
Disinformation and Propaganda: Spreading false or misleading information to manipulate
public opinion or undermine targeted individuals or groups. Both government agencies and

222 | P a g e
religious institutions engage in disinformation campaigns to shape narratives and maintain
influence, including the manipulation of media outlets or controlled messaging.
Understanding these tactics is vital in recognizing and mitigating their effects. By promoting
transparency, critical thinking, and accountability, individuals can protect themselves
against manipulation and work towards creating a more informed and empowered society.

Targeting the Personal Lives of Citizens

The actions involving the psychological manipulation of individuals by intelligence agencies
are a murky and contentious subject, marred by a plethora of disturbing tactics, which range
from the insidious art of gaslighting and orchestrating disinformation campaigns to PsyOps,
mass surveillance, and meddling in the personal lives of citizens. Covert actions undertaken
by these agencies may encompass tactics such as blackmail, extortion, or the manipulation
of personal relationships to exert influence over individuals.
One specific example of interference in individuals' lives involves the utilization of
compromising information to manipulate or control high-ranking officials, influential figures,
potential assets, or those considered dissenters within political and religious movements.
Intelligence agencies exploit vulnerabilities in their personal lives, leading to substantial
stress and emotional strain. They achieve this by sowing discord between targeted
individuals and their family and friends through covert psychological manipulation carried
out by plants, informants, and cooperators. This process causes polarization and
estrangement, ultimately unraveling the targeted individual's life, disrupting their emotional
and psychological state, and neutralizing their participation in dissenting ideologies,

223 | P a g e
religious convictions, or movements that oppose the prevailing status quo. Furthermore,
these operations may extend to influencing people within the targeted individual's
immediate circle, such as a spouse, domestic partner, children by utilizing suggestions and
social manipulation to sow discord and internal conflicts, creating differing worldviews
among those inhabiting the targeted individual's living space.
It is essential to note that the Roman Catholic Church has a long history of meddling in the
personal lives of individuals. This powerful institution's expertise in this field spans
centuries. It is crucial to recognize that intelligence agencies have been significantly
influenced by the Roman Catholic Church. Consequently, informants and participants at the
grassroots level are often jointly directed and controlled by both the intelligence agency and
the Roman Catholic Church.
Here are some more examples:
Disinformation and Manipulation: Intelligence agencies often employ disinformation
campaigns to undermine the credibility and trustworthiness of a targeted individual within
their social circle. This can involve spreading false or misleading information through various
means, such as forged documents, planted stories in the media, or online disinformation.
The goal is to create doubt and conflict among friends and family members by casting
suspicion on the individual's character, intentions, or loyalty. This manipulation of
perceptions can lead to strained relationships and, in some cases, the ostracization of the
targeted individual.
Covert Influence: To isolate a targeted individual, intelligence agencies may deploy
operatives or informants who infiltrate the individual's social network. These individuals
often work undercover, pretending to be friends or associates, and their primary objective is
to influence opinions and relationships within the group. They may exploit existing
grievances or create new ones, manipulating emotions and biases to turn friends and family
members against the victim. Covert influence operations can be highly effective in causing
isolation and psychological distress for the targeted individual.
Psychological Pressure: Intelligence agencies may resort to psychological pressure,
coercion, or blackmail to pressure friends and family members to distance themselves from
the targeted individual. This could involve threatening to reveal embarrassing or
incriminating information about those close to the victim or applying economic or legal
pressure to force compliance. The fear of retribution or harm to loved ones can lead to
individuals withdrawing their support and association with the targeted individual.
Surveillance and Eavesdropping: Surveillance and eavesdropping on the communications
and activities of the targeted individual's social contacts can be a powerful tool in
undermining trust and privacy. When friends and family members feel that their
conversations and actions are being monitored, they may become cautious and reluctant to
associate with the victim. Surveillance can include wiretapping of phone calls, monitoring of
emails, tracking of physical movements, and even the use of sophisticated technology to
intercept private conversations. This surveillance creates a chilling effect on personal

224 | P a g e
relationships and can erode the sense of security and trust within the targeted individual's
social circle.
Psychological Operations (PsyOps)
PsyOps involve manipulating emotions, beliefs, and behavior through propaganda,
misinformation, and other tactics. Intelligence agencies have employed PsyOps to influence
public opinion, foster dissent, or even topple governments. These operations are a
sophisticated form of psychological manipulation that can have far-reaching effects on
individuals and societies.
One notorious example of PsyOps is the Central Intelligence Agency's involvement in the
Iran-Contra affair during the 1980s. The CIA engaged in a covert operation to fund Contra
rebels in Nicaragua while simultaneously selling arms to Iran. This complex web of deceit
involved misinformation and propaganda to manipulate public perception of these activities
and evade congressional oversight.

Broad Public Disinformation Campaigns

Intelligence agencies have been implicated in spreading false or misleading information to
influence public opinion or foreign governments. Disinformation campaigns are often used
to create confusion, sow discord, or advance a particular political agenda. These campaigns
can range from subtle misinformation to blatant falsehoods disseminated through various
channels, including traditional media, social media, and clandestine propaganda outlets.
One infamous case of disinformation involves the allegations of weapons of mass
destruction (WMDs) in Iraq, which served as a pretext for the invasion of the country in
2003. Intelligence agencies, particularly the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), were accused
of providing faulty intelligence that misled the public and policymakers. The aftermath of
the invasion highlighted the devastating consequences of disinformation campaigns on
international relations.
Gaslighting on a Public Grand Scale: Manipulation and Deception in the Spotlight
Some intelligence agencies have been accused of manipulating information or perceptions
to deceive or confuse the public and political leaders. Gaslighting is a form of psychological
manipulation that involves distorting information or perceptions to deceive or confuse the
public, political leaders, or even their own operatives. Intelligence agencies have been
accused of using gaslighting techniques to manipulate individuals into questioning their own
sanity or understanding of reality. Gaslighting can manifest in various ways, including
altering historical records, spreading rumors, or even tampering with personal
correspondence.
A notable example of gaslighting is the discrediting of whistle-blowers who come forward
with sensitive information. Intelligence agencies may attempt to paint them as unreliable or
mentally unstable, thus undermining their credibility and diverting attention from the
allegations being made.

225 | P a g e
Analysis of the tactics employed by COINTELPRO, including persuasion,
coercion, and manipulation
The utilization of covert operations, such as COINTELPRO, encompasses a multitude of
tactics that can manifest both in physical actions and highly psychological maneuvers. As
time progresses, the status quo and prevailing agendas undergo constant transformations,
leading to shifts in perspectives not only within intelligence agencies but also within
influential institutions like the Roman Catholic Church, which boasts a diverse array of
prelates and orders. In the year 2023, the driving force behind the agenda is the ultra-left
faction, bolstered by the left-leaning Jesuit order. This partnership places significant
emphasis on amalgamation, seeking to forge unity among various factions within the
political and religious realm. However, due to the merging of the Roman Catholic Church
and the United States, their agenda extends beyond unity to include the suppression of
dissent in all its forms. This includes individuals who cling to fundamentalist beliefs, as well
as groups of Americans who place a high emphasis on concepts such as Freedom and the
Constitution, further amplified by their armed status.
Intelligence agencies and the Catholic consortium employ a variety of tactics to achieve
their objectives. These tactics include persuasion, which involves skillful information
manipulation to shape public opinion; coercion, exerting pressure to ensure compliance;
psychological warfare, targeting an individual's psyche to destabilize opposition; and
manipulation, controlling the narrative through narratives and propaganda. The Roman
Catholic Church has also engaged in organized stalking to maintain control. Analyzing these
tactics sheds light on the complexities of COINTELPRO and similar operations, helping us
understand the challenges they pose to truth and dissent. Subsequent sections will delve
into these tactics used by agencies like the FBI and the organized stalking by the Roman
Catholic Church, promoting awareness and preserving diverse perspectives within our
society.

226 | P a g e
The Vatican's Influence on Psychological Manipulation Strategies
It is important to note that the tactics employed by intelligence agencies to interfere in the
personal lives of individuals are not new; they have existed long before the establishment of
these agencies or the countries to which these intelligence agencies belong. Additionally, it
is worth mentioning that the Vatican predates the existence of the United Kingdom, the
United States, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. It is highly likely that some aspects of
the psychological manipulation tactics used by the Papacy were passed on and learnt by
other countries, either through collaboration or confrontation.

The Roman Catholic Church, with its extensive historical influence, provides
an interesting example of such tactics.

1. Disruption of Social Circles: Throughout history, the Roman Catholic Church sometimes
sought to exert control and suppress perceived threats by disrupting the social circles of
individuals who were deemed heretical or a challenge to its authority. This involved casting
doubt on the character or loyalty of the targeted individuals, leading friends, family
members, acquaintances, and business partners to distance themselves out of fear,
suspicion, or coercion. The objective was to isolate the target from their support network,
making them more vulnerable to Church influence and control.
2. Covert Influence and Manipulation: The Church employed agents, informants, and clergy
who infiltrated the social circles of individuals who were seen as adversaries. These covert
agents worked to manipulate opinions, spread rumors, and foster mistrust among the
target's associates. They might exploit existing tensions or create new ones to drive wedges
between friends, family members, or business partners.

227 | P a g e
3. Psychological Pressure and Coercion: In some cases, the Church applied psychological
pressure, coercion, or the threat of excommunication to compel individuals within the
target's social circle to break ties with the victim. Loved ones might be pressured to
disassociate from the targeted person, sometimes at the risk of their own reputation or
livelihood.
4. Surveillance and Informants: The Church maintained an extensive network of informants
and spies who monitored the activities and interactions of individuals deemed problematic.
This surveillance extended to the social contacts of the targeted individuals, including their
friends, acquaintances, and associates. Information gathered through these channels could
be used to manipulate, coerce, or discredit the target.
These tactics employed by the Roman Catholic Church reflect historical instances of
interfering in the personal lives and social circles of individuals, demonstrating that the
methods used by intelligence agencies today have deep historical roots. The Church's efforts
to isolate and exert control over individuals by undermining their personal relationships
paved the way for similar strategies employed in the realm of modern intelligence and
counterintelligence.

Psychological Manipulation Through Accusations of Hate Speech and Anti-

Catholic Sentiments
In the modern context, the Roman Catholic Church has faced criticism from some Protestant
individuals and groups who adhere to the principle of "Bible-only" doctrine, emphasizing
Scripture over certain Catholic traditions. In response, the Roman Catholic Church has
occasionally employed slogans and accusations of "hate speech" and "anti-Catholic
sentiments" as a means of psychological manipulation. This manipulation tactic is aimed at
deterring or silencing those who hold differing theological perspectives, presenting
significant concerns about open dialogue and religious freedom.
1. Labeling Criticism as Hate Speech: The Roman Catholic Church has at times resorted to
characterizing theological critiques from Protestant groups as "hate speech." This tactic can
be seen as an effort to stigmatize criticism by attaching a pejorative label to it. The use of
such a loaded term like "hate speech" can generate strong emotional reactions and create a
climate of fear and avoidance around open discourse.

2. Psychological Manipulation: By labeling dissenting voices as purveyors of "hate speech,"

the Roman Catholic Church may effectively deter open dialogue. Critics may fear the
consequences of being labeled as such, leading to self-censorship and a chilling effect on
free expression of divergent beliefs.

228 | P a g e
3. Accusations of Anti-Catholic Sentiments: Accusing Protestant individuals or groups of
harboring "anti-Catholic sentiments" is another tactic employed to manipulate perceptions
and responses. This accusation implies prejudice or hostility and may deter individuals from
expressing their theological differences or engaging in interfaith dialogue.

Psychological Manipulation: The use of "anti-Catholic sentiments" as a label can generate

feelings of guilt, shame, or fear, deterring Protestants from expressing their theological
perspectives. It may also create a defensive stance within Catholic individuals, making them
less open to constructive dialogue with those who hold contrasting beliefs.

Emotional Manipulation - A Covert Instrument of Influence

In the realm of intelligence agencies, as well as influential religious organizations like the
Roman Catholic Church, and covert operations, emotional manipulation emerges as a
potent and concealed instrument for achieving specific objectives. This section delves into
the intricate methods employed by external entities, ranging from intelligence agencies to
the Vatican, to deftly utilize emotional manipulation tactics. Deliberately provoking or
inducing emotions such as depression, anger, frustration, anxiety, sadness, and jealousy can
lead individuals to act in ways that align with the objectives of these agencies or
organizations. This section provides an in-depth exploration of these tactics, all while
scrutinizing their ethical and moral implications.

1. Inducing Depression
Intelligence agencies and powerful religious organizations strategically engineer situations
to intentionally push targeted individuals into states of depression. Their tactics encompass
isolation, psychological pressure, and other carefully designed methods intended to elicit
feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, and despair. The manipulation of individuals'
emotional states makes them more vulnerable to subsequent manipulation and coercion,
ultimately leading to the effective neutralization of the targeted individual.
2. Provoking Anger
Intelligence agencies and powerful religious organizations employ a cunning method of
deliberate provocation to incite anger in individuals. These activities, aimed at stirring anger,
may include disseminating disinformation, framing the target, or orchestrating situations to
elicit outrage and emotional reactions. Once individuals become agitated, they are more
likely to act in ways that align with the agencies' objectives or become ensnared in legal
proceedings as a result of their emotional responses.

229 | P a g e
3. Instigating Frustration
Intelligence agencies and influential religious organizations, such as the Roman Catholic
Church, intentionally provoke frustration when they obstruct the goals of targeted
individuals. They may accomplish this by establishing bureaucratic obstacles with the help of
deep-state civil servants, which in turn leads to complications within government agencies,
whether it's related to applications, legal proceedings, or disputes. The same tactics can be
used to hinder employment opportunities. These barriers result in feelings of irritation and
discontent, making the individual more susceptible to external influence or manipulation.
4. Anxiety: A Weapon of Influence
Intelligence agencies and influential religious organizations have the capacity to induce
anxiety in targeted individuals by orchestrating situations marked by uncertainty or
intimidation. The aim is to make individuals more malleable and willing to cooperate,
motivated by their need to alleviate the anxiety imposed upon them. Within the domain of
the Roman Catholic Church and other religious organizations, these religious institutions can
incite anxiety among their followers by employing fear-based doctrines, compelling them to
seek comfort or guidance within the religious community.
5. Leveraging Sadness
Intelligence agencies and influential religious organizations may seek to induce sadness in
individuals by disrupting their personal relationships or creating emotionally distressing
situations. This emotional state can render individuals more susceptible to manipulation,
recruitment, or even complete neutralization, causing the individual to withdraw from
movements and groups and reevaluate their stance on a particular ideology. Certain
religious institutions, such as the Roman Catholic Church, may provide comfort and a sense
of community to individuals experiencing sadness or grief, taking advantage of this
emotional vulnerability as an opportunity for conversion or membership.
6. Channelling Anger for Influence
Intelligence Agencies and Influential Religious Organizations: The manipulation of anger can
be a strategic approach. Intelligence agencies may fuel grievances or provide outlets for
individuals to express their anger, directing this energy toward specific actions or targets
aligned with their goals. Some religious groups channel anger toward perceived enemies or
those outside the faith, using it as a means to foster a sense of righteousness and
commitment to the group's cause.
7. Exploiting Jealousy
Intelligence agencies and influential religious organizations utilize the tactic of capitalizing
on jealousy by orchestrating situations that provoke feelings of suspicion or envy. This
approach can prompt individuals to seek validation, acknowledgment, or advancement
within the organization. Jealousy can also arise within religious communities due to the
competition for spiritual recognition or leadership positions. Some groups employ jealousy
as a means to exert control or as a source of motivation to ensure loyalty.

230 | P a g e
Unmasking the Ad Hominem Tactics: The Battle for Free Thought

The Weapon of Character Assassination

In the realm of public discourse and intellectual exchange, the art of constructive dialogue
has long been revered as a cornerstone of democracy. It is the fertile ground where ideas
flourish, where truths are revealed, and where individuals can exercise their right to
question, critique, and dissent. But as the battle for free thought rages on, an insidious
weapon has emerged to quell the voices of those who dare to challenge the established
order. This weapon is the ad hominem attack, and it takes many forms, each more
damaging to free thought than the last.
Abusive Ad Hominem
The first and perhaps most overt form of character assassination is the abusive ad hominem
attack. Imagine this scenario: John, a passionate advocate for transparency in government,
has been tirelessly researching and questioning the actions of public officials. Instead of
engaging with his arguments, those in power resort to name-calling and insults. "You can't
trust anything John says because he's a known liar," they claim. This type of attack sidesteps
the need for substantive rebuttal by undermining John's character. It seeks to reduce him to
a mere caricature, unworthy of attention.

231 | P a g e
Circumstantial Ad Hominem
Another method employed to discredit individuals who question the official narrative is the
circumstantial ad hominem attack. In this case, the argument is dismissed based on the
person's circumstances or associations. If John happens to be a member of a certain political
party critical of the government, his views are instantly disregarded, regardless of the merit
of his arguments. This form of ad hominem dismisses the argument through guilt by
association, which is a slippery slope towards suppressing differing voices.
Tu Quoque
Tu quoque, or the "you too" fallacy, is yet another weapon in the arsenal of those who seek
to silence dissenting voices. It dismisses a person's argument by accusing them of hypocrisy.
In this scenario, John's smoking habits are brought into question as a counterpoint to his
criticism of government policies. "How can you criticize my smoking habits when you used
to smoke?" they ask. This diversionary tactic shifts the focus away from the validity of the
argument, casting doubt on the messenger rather than addressing the message itself.
Guilt by Association
In the battle for free thought, perhaps the most pervasive and dangerous ad hominem tactic
is guilt by association. Here, a person is attacked not on the merits of their individual beliefs
or arguments but rather because of their affiliation with a particular group. If John is
affiliated with a civil rights organization critical of the government's actions, his views are
immediately tainted with the brush of that group's stance, regardless of the nuances of his
perspective.
The abuse of these ad hominem tactics in silencing individuals who question the official
narrative, label them as conspiracy theorists or fake news proponents, or critique
government or powerful religious organizations, is not only intellectually dishonest but also
detrimental to the very foundations of free thought and open discourse. To combat these
tactics, we must be vigilant in recognizing them, challenging their use, and continuing to
champion the principles of democracy that encourage the free exchange of ideas, no matter
how uncomfortable or inconvenient they may be to those in power.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Glick, B. (1989). War at Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It. South End Press. Churchill, W., & Vander
Wall, J. (2002). Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars Against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement. South
End Press. The Freedom Archives. (2009). COINTELPRO 101: The Sabotage Of Legitimate Dissent [Documentary Film and Book]. Freedom
Archives. Churchill, W., & Vander Wall, J. (1990). The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the
United States. South End Press. Evans, P. (2002). Controlling People: How to Recognize, Understand, and Deal with People Who Try to
Control You. Adams Media. Ray, J. K. (2021). Psychological Manipulation: Recognizing and Dealing with Manipulative People.
Independently published. Forward, S. (1997). Emotional Blackmail: When the People in Your Life Use Fear, Obligation, and Guilt to
Manipulate You. Harper Paperbacks.

232 | P a g e
CHAPTER 15: BLACKMAIL AND
OPPOSITIONAL RESEARCH IN THE
CONTEXT OF COINTELPRO
“Blackmail is more effective than bribery.” - John le Carré

The Dark Alliance: Covert Machinations of Blackmail and the COINTELPRO

Surveillance Apparatus

The primary objective of COINTELPRO is to disrupt, discredit, and deceive targeted

individuals, movements, or organizations. To achieve this goal, blackmail is deployed as a
sinister tactic, enforcing silence or causing disruption by destroying the lives of targeted
individuals. This tactic may extend to work colleagues, friends, and family members,
pressuring them to become unwilling participants and informants against the targeted
individual. By leveraging personal secrets and compromising information, blackmail
becomes a tool of control and manipulation within COINTELPRO's operations.

The alliance between digital surveillance and blackmail, as seen in programs like PRISM,
XKeyscore, and ECHELON, has raised concerns about potential misuse. It is crucial to note
the lack of definitive evidence or official confirmation due to the secretive nature of
intelligence operations. However, a discerning observer can identify a consistent pattern
within COINTELPRO's operations.
For those caught up in programs reminiscent of COINTELPRO, carefully evaluating the
likelihood of a pattern of circumstances that defies the odds, leading to the realization that
the dark, subtle techniques of veiled threats and innuendos are connected to the target's
past life. This entails a knowledge of highly personal details that goes beyond mere
coincidence, exposing a disconcerting familiarity with intimate conversations, events, and
situations. It becomes crucial to connect the dots, compelling individuals to piece together
fragments of evidence. In this web of covert activities, a troubling truth emerges:

233 | P a g e
COINTELPRO possesses an unsettling level of insider knowledge, raising serious questions
about the nature of their operations.
This observation results from a careful examination of undeniable facts, not baseless
speculation. The consistency with which COINTELPRO seems to possess intimate details
known only to those directly involved cannot be dismissed as coincidence. Instead, it
suggests a deliberate and calculated exploitation of information for their own agenda. This
undeniable pattern of invasive surveillance and manipulation demands critical attention.
Scrutinizing COINTELPRO critically is not an exercise in paranoia but a conscientious act of
holding those in power accountable. This pattern challenges our notions of privacy, trust,
and justice, raising concerns about the erosion of civil liberties. Programs justified by
governments for national security and counterterrorism involve mass surveillance and data
collection from various sources, including communication networks and online platforms.

Critics argue that the sheer volume of collected data raises the possibility of misuse or
abuse, potentially beyond legitimate national security concerns, such as political
manipulation or blackmail. Despite reports and allegations from whistle-blowers and media
outlets suggesting potential abuse, verifying the extent of such practices or specific cases
where blackmail may have occurred is challenging due to the secretive nature of intelligence
operations. Obtaining concrete evidence or official admissions remains difficult.

The Intersection of Catholic Confessionals and Blackmail

The Roman Catholic confessional, steeped in centuries of history, carries with it a dark cloud
of claims and allegations that strike at the very heart of its integrity. Throughout the annals
of time, disturbing accounts have emerged, painting a picture of the confessional as a
sinister tool wielded for blackmail and coercive control. These claims, while rooted in
historical narratives and criticisms, must not be dismissed lightly, for they cast a damning
shadow on an institution of immense power and influence.

During the Middle Ages, the confessional purportedly enjoyed an exalted position within the
Catholic Church, exerting significant influence over the lives of those who sought solace
within its confines. The act of confession, touted as a profoundly personal and confidential
exchange between penitent and priest, ostensibly offered a pathway to absolution and

234 | P a g e
spiritual counsel. Nevertheless, beneath this veneer of sanctity, one cannot help but
question the genuine concerns surrounding the potential abuse of power.
Critics and scholars have tirelessly highlighted instances where unscrupulous clergy
members, fully aware of the secrets shared within the confessional, purportedly exploited
this privileged knowledge to manipulate and control unsuspecting souls. It is a chilling
notion that certain members of the clergy, entrusted with the sacred duty of spiritual
guidance, may have wielded this information as a weapon, granting them undue influence
and dominion over the lives of others. Some even suggest that individuals of political stature
and royalty, ensnared within the clutches of the confessional, may have fallen prey to
insidious blackmail or coercive machinations.

The secrecy and confidentiality that shrouded the confessional, intended as a haven for
seeking forgiveness and counsel, paradoxically became a fertile ground for potential
manipulation and abuse. However, discerning the precise extent and prevalence of such
malevolent practices remains a formidable challenge, as historical evidence often proves
elusive or susceptible to interpretation.
The confessional, once a pillar of the Catholic Church's influence, now stands as a relic of a
bygone era, its relevance overshadowed by the insidious influence of the Vatican's Secret
Intelligence Service (SIS). A disconcerting picture emerges, revealing a tight grip on Western
intelligence agencies that are largely dominated by Catholics, secret Catholics, cooperators,
Jesuit educators, or those with deep ties to the Church.
In today's Western society, a modern confessional has emerged in the form of our digital
lives. Every SMS message, phone call, social media post, or communication becomes
susceptible to surveillance by entities like the NSA and is subsequently shared among
intelligence agencies within the 5 Eyes alliance. It is not surprising, then, that the Vatican,
through its Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) known as "Servizio Informazioni del Vaticano" or
simply "SIV," has strategically positioned its assets within agencies like the NSA, FBI, CIA, and
others.

235 | P a g e
The Intricate Art of Opposition Research
In the realm of political maneuverings and power struggles, an intricate and often
controversial practice looms—the art of opposition research. With a calculated precision,
skilled operatives from Intelligence agencies embark on thorough investigations into the
backgrounds, actions, and personal lives of individuals who hold positions of power,
influence, public office or those who have dissenting views to the powers that be. This
shadowy world thrives on unearthing hidden secrets, exposing skeletons concealed within
closets, all in pursuit of tarnishing reputations or advancing specific agendas.
Opposition research, known colloquially as "opposition digging" or "opposition intelligence,"
forms an integral part of the arsenal wielded by political strategists and operatives. The
objective is to delve deep into the lives of targeted individuals, prying into every nook and
cranny, meticulously scrutinizing past actions, affiliations, and associations. By mining this
vast trove of information, researchers seek to uncover any potential vulnerabilities or
compromising revelations that can be weaponized to manipulate public opinion or gain a
strategic advantage.

The genesis of opposition research lies in the recognition that even those in positions of
authority are not impervious to flaws or indiscretions. No individual is immune to the
shadows of their past or the intricacies of their personal lives. The relentless pursuit of
information takes researchers down winding paths, sifting through public records, financial
disclosures, legal proceedings, and media archives, interviewing classmates, friends,
enemies and family sometimes in covert yet inquisitorial ways piecing together a mosaic of
a person's life history.

The motivations driving this relentless pursuit of information are multifaceted. For some, it
is a quest for truth, seeking to expose any contradictions or hypocrisies that may lie
concealed beneath carefully curated public personas. For others, it is a tactical maneuver to
gain leverage, a means to control narratives and manipulate public sentiment. The
information unearthed during this process can be employed to tarnish reputations, sow
doubt, or coerce individuals into compliance.

The realm of opposition research is fraught with ethical dilemmas and questions of moral
boundaries. The line between legitimate scrutiny and invasive probing is a fine one, often
subject to interpretation and personal bias. The consequences of this practice can be far

236 | P a g e
reaching, impacting not only the individuals under scrutiny but also the political landscape
and democratic processes at large.
While opposition research can serve as a vital tool to hold public figures accountable and
foster transparency, it is essential to recognize its potential for abuse. The exploitation of
personal lives, the distortion of truths, and the manipulation of public perception should be
met with scrutiny and a demand for responsible practices.

Society must grapple with the complex task of striking a delicate balance between holding
leaders accountable and safeguarding privacy rights including that of targeted individuals.
Robust safeguards, transparency, and ethical guidelines are imperative to ensure that
opposition research remains within ethical boundaries and serves the greater public
interest. As the world of politics continues to evolve, the role of opposition research will
persist. The art of digging deep into the lives of those who wield power, influence, or public
office remains an integral part of political discourse. However, oppositional research is also
employed on ordinary people who are considered the main body of an organization's
membership. This applies to organizations and movements such as environmentalists,
fundamentalist Christians, journalists, whistle-blowers, and so on. It falls upon society to
remain vigilant, to question the methods employed, and to demand integrity, fairness, and
respect for individual rights in the pursuit of uncovering the truth that lies beneath the
surface.

Unveiling the Enigma: Epstein's Black Book, Elite Connections, Scandal, and
the Intriguing Hypothesis of a CIA Blackmail Ring

The Genesis of Epstein's Black Book:

The discovery of Epstein's black book dates back to a federal investigation into the sex
crimes he was charged with. First revealed by journalist Nick Bryant, the book resurfaced
during the probe into Epstein's actions. Compiled by Epstein's employees, not Epstein
himself, the black book features a list of individuals who may have known him socially,
shedding light on his extensive social network within the highest echelons of society.

237 | P a g e
The Names Within: Mapping Connections:
New York magazine, in a report on the contents of Epstein's black book, portrayed it as a
portrait of a man "deeply enmeshed in the highest social circles." However, inclusion in the
book does not necessarily imply complicity in Epstein's crimes, as some names may
represent aspirational connections rather than genuine associations. Ghislaine Maxwell,
Epstein's former girlfriend, played a role in compiling the book, adding complexity to
understanding how names ended up in the black book.
The Symbolism of Little Black Books:

Epstein's black book joins the historical lineage of "little black books" that have played roles
in crime stories and the arts since the 18th century. These secret directories have passed
along insider information. In Epstein's case, the black book transcends mere notation to
become a cultural trope and a narrative device, offering a glimpse into the exclusive world
of the rich and famous.
Epstein's Second Black Book: Unearthing New Connections:

In a surprising turn, a second black book belonging to Epstein was discovered years later.
Reported by Insider journalists Keenan Trotter, Angela Wang, and Meghan Morris, this new
find contains entries for people not found in Epstein's previously known address book.
Spanning the 1990s, the second black book reveals connections to prominent figures in the
political, financial, and cultural elite.
Verification of Epstein's Second Black Book:
To validate the authenticity of the second black book, reporters engaged in a meticulous
process. Forensic document examination confirmed the book's origin between 1995 and
2000. Scrutiny of entries, calls to prominent figures, and cross-referencing with public
records provided further evidence of its legitimacy. The second black book offers a snapshot
of Epstein's network during a critical decade, contributing to the ongoing effort to unravel
his web of connections.
Epstein's Influence and Connections: Speculations and Allegations:

Epstein's association with high-profile figures, even after being registered as a sex offender,
has led to speculations about the nature of his relationships. The discovery of emails
between Epstein and former JPMorgan executive Jes Staley revealed discussions allegedly
pertaining to Epstein procuring young women. The use of coded language, such as Disney
princess names, adds a layer of intrigue to the alleged exchanges.
Melinda Gates and the Fallout: A Personal Decision:

The divorce of Bill and Melinda Gates brought another dimension to the Epstein saga. In an
interview with Gayle King, Melinda Gates cited Bill's association with Epstein as one of the
contributing factors to their divorce. She expressed her disapproval of Bill's meetings with
Epstein, calling the financier "abhorrent" and regretting her own encounter with him. The

238 | P a g e
divorce, coupled with revelations about Bill's past affair with a staffer, contributed to the
dissolution of their 27-year marriage.

The Possibility of a CIA Blackmail Ring:

Amidst the intricate web of Epstein's connections, there exists an intriguing hypothesis
suggesting the potential involvement of a CIA blackmail ring. The hypothesis proposes that
Epstein may have been permitted to operate by U.S Intelligence as a means to ensnare and
control influential individuals through a web of blackmail and coercion. Investigative
journalist Whitney Webb, known for her extensive research into Epstein, explores this line
of inquiry in her two-part series of books titled "One Nation Under Blackmail." Through
meticulous research and analysis, Webb raises thought-provoking questions about the true
extent of Epstein's connections and the hidden forces at play behind his illicit activities.
The Mysterious Death of Jeffrey Epstein:

The enigma surrounding Jeffrey Epstein extends to his mysterious death, which continues to
be a subject of speculation and unanswered questions. Epstein, while awaiting trial on
federal sex trafficking charges in a Manhattan jail, died by suicide in 2019. The
circumstances of his death, including the failure of prison guards to conduct regular checks,
the suspicious malfunction of surveillance cameras, and the abrupt transfer of his cellmate
just hours before, have fueled doubts about the transparency and accountability of the
institutions entrusted with his custody. Conflicting autopsy reports and questionable actions
by the medical examiner add to the overall air of suspicion and uncertainty. As
investigations into Epstein's life and connections persist, the mysterious circumstances of
his death further contribute to the enduring mysteries surrounding his complex and
controversial legacy.

The Alarming Reality of Blackmail: Unveiling the Silent Controls and Covert
Participation in COINTELPRO

The Espionage Era: The Potential for Unparalleled Control

Edward Snowden's revelations jolted the world, uncovering a chilling reality where
intelligence agencies, including the NSA and GCHQ, possessed the capability to intercept
and access personal data, including webcam images and explicit photographs. The infamous
Optic Nerve program, disclosed in 2014, laid bare the alarming potential of these agencies
to infiltrate the privacy of unsuspecting individuals, casting a long and foreboding shadow
over personal security. It is not inconceivable to imagine a rogue employee delving into the
laptop or phone of an innocent individual, hiding behind the veil of top-secret surveillance,
where accountability is but an illusion. This egregious violation of privacy raises profound
concerns about the erosion of civil liberties, leaving us questioning the limits of power and
the safeguards necessary to protect our fundamental rights.

239 | P a g e
The Dystopian Web: A Breeding Ground for Coercion and Blackmail

In an era where our lives are increasingly entangled with technology, the potential for
coercion and blackmail looms larger than ever before. Intelligence agencies, such as the
NSA, possess the capability to exploit various communication platforms, including Facebook,
WhatsApp, Messenger, SMS messages, Line, and Skype, as tools to coerce or blackmail
individuals. The implications of such actions are staggering. Can you fathom the audacity of
a rogue agent clandestinely gaining access to the private devices of our loved ones,
exploiting their vulnerabilities, while evading accountability under the veil of secrecy? These
agencies hold the power to manipulate, control, and shatter lives with a single click, preying
on the very foundations of trust and security that underpin our digital world.

The Harrowing Realm of Revenge Porn: A Nexus of Intimacy and Blackmail

Revenge porn, an abhorrent manifestation of non-consensual sharing of intimate images or
videos, has emerged as a distressing and vile form of blackmail in the digital age. This
section meticulously examines cases where vengeful former partners leverage explicit
material as a weapon to control and manipulate others. The victims of revenge porn endure
not only the violation of their privacy but also grapple with the paralyzing fear and anxiety
of potential public humiliation. The psychological trauma inflicted upon these victims is

240 | P a g e
immeasurable, leaving indelible emotional scars and, in extreme cases, driving individuals to
the brink of despair.
Corporate Corruption: The Veiled Blackmail Veins

Blackmail in corporate settings poses a grave threat to the integrity of organizations and
perpetuates a culture of corruption and power imbalances. This section peels back the
layers of secrecy to reveal instances where employees or executives have been coerced
through blackmail to engage in illegal activities or compromise their professional ethics.
These distressing cases serve as a chilling reminder of the corrosive influence wielded by
those who seek to exploit vulnerabilities for personal gain. By delving into these examples,
we gain invaluable insights into the complex interplay between personal fragility,
institutional dynamics, and the misuse of leverage for illicit ends. The consequences
reverberate far beyond individual lives, potentially destabilizing entire industries and
eroding public trust.

Compromised Ethics: Medical Professionals Forced into Persecution of Targeted

Individuals

While medical professionals are held to rigorous ethical standards, it is vital to acknowledge
that in rare instances, they too can fall victim to blackmail or coercion. Such actions are
unequivocally unethical and illegal, contradicting the very essence of their noble profession.
Medical professionals are duty-bound to provide proper medical care to all individuals,
unwavering in the face of external pressures or influences. However, when subjected to
blackmail or coercion, their ability to fulfill this duty is severely compromised, resulting in
dire consequences for the targeted individuals, such as substandard health care,
misdiagnosis, mistakes, falsification and document fraud, the end result is medical sabotage.
This form of medical sabotage can have severe and detrimental effects on the targeted
individual.
Unveiling the Mechanisms: How Blackmail Takes Hold
The threat to reputation stands as another potent weapon wielded by blackmailers. By
spreading false allegations, creating a negative public image, or damaging professional
standing, the blackmailer aims to tarnish the medical professional's reputation. The fear
instilled in the medical professional in the face of such threats becomes a potent force,
driving them to comply with the blackmailer's demands in a desperate attempt to salvage
their reputation and livelihood.
In the most extreme cases, blackmailers resort to coercion through violence or intimidation.
Physical harm or threats against the medical professional or their loved ones instill
overwhelming fear, leaving no room for resistance. In the face of such brutality, medical
professionals may be compelled to abandon their ethical obligations, sacrificing the very
principles that define their calling.

241 | P a g e
A Call for Vigilance, Reporting, and Justice
It is crucial to emphasize that the scenarios outlined above represent the actions of a few
unscrupulous individuals and not the behavior expected of medical professionals as a whole.
The overwhelming majority of medical professionals are dedicated to prioritizing patient
care, upholding ethical guidelines, and providing the best possible treatment to all,
irrespective of external influences or pressures.
The Stark Reality: The Widespread Consequences of Blackmail
The examination of real-life examples of blackmail serves as a stark reminder of the far-
reaching and destructive impact it can have on targeted individuals and society as a whole.
Whether it manifests as political scandals, online breaches, revenge porn, or corporate
corruption, the psychological, emotional, and societal consequences are profound and
enduring.
Blackmail strikes at the core of human dignity, eroding trust, and exploiting vulnerabilities. It
operates in the shadows, manipulating and controlling individuals through fear, shame, and
the potential for irreparable harm. The victims of blackmail endure a constant state of
anguish, haunted by the relentless threat of exposure and the devastating fallout that
accompanies it.

On an individual level, the psychological trauma inflicted by blackmail can be crippling. The
sense of powerlessness, betrayal, and violation experienced by targeted individuals leaves
deep emotional scars that may never fully heal. The fear of public humiliation, loss of
reputation, and the potential destruction of personal and professional lives cast a pervasive
shadow, robbing individuals of their agency and sense of self.
Beyond the individual level, the impact of blackmail extends to broader society. The erosion
of trust in institutions, whether governmental, corporate, or personal relationships,
undermines the very foundations upon which a functioning society depends. The pervasive
fear and suspicion that permeate communities under the specter of blackmail stifle open
discourse, impede progress, and perpetuate a culture of secrecy and manipulation.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Howard, D., & Cronin, M. (2019). Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales. Skyhorse Publishing. Searcy, N. (2003). The Little Black Book of
Blackmail: The Essential Guide to Working the Political System. Regnery Publishing. Cox, M. (2002). The Art of Blackmail: A History of the
Classical Detective Story. Thomas Dunne Books. Webb, W. A. (2022, September 28). One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union
Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein. Trine Day. Webb, W. A. (2022, October 22). One Nation Under Blackmail
- Vol. 2: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Organized Crime That Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein (Vol. 2). Trine Day. Hill, J., &
Katersky, A. (2023, December 20). Federal judge orders documents naming Jeffrey Epstein's associates to be unsealed. ABC News.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/federal-judge-orders-documents-naming-jeffrey-epsteins-
associates/story?id=105779882#:~:text=Interest%20Successfully%20Added-,Federal%20judge%20orders%20documents%20naming%20Je
ffrey%20Epstein's%20associates%20to%20be,be%20identified%20in%20early%20January.&text=A%20federal%20judge%20in%20New,sco
res%20of%20Jeffrey%20Epstein's%20associates Blanco, A. (2023, February 17). Jeffrey Epstein emails with former JPMorgan executive
revealed: ‘Say hi to Snow White’. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/jeffrey-epstein-jes-staley-emails-
jpmorgan-b2283946.html Trotter, J. K. (2022, June 28). 7 Unanswered Questions About Jeffrey Epstein's Mysterious Death. Business
Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/news/jeffrey-epstein-death-unanswered-questions-2022-6

242 | P a g e
CHAPTER 16: HISTORICALPARALLELS:
COINTELPRO AND THE CATHOLIC
INQUISITORS

The Interconnected Relationship Between the Catholic Church and the FBI

Throughout the recorded events of the past, the Catholic Church and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) may seem like two vastly different institutions with divergent missions
and ideologies. However, a closer examination reveals intriguing parallels in their methods
of dealing with dissent and opposition, particularly in their shared opposition to
communism and their resistance to various forms of activism, political inclinations,
ideologies, and religious beliefs that challenged the status quo. This chapter examines the
historical context, operational tactics, shared objectives, guidance exchanged, and
knowledge influence between these seemingly disparate entities, shedding light on the
possibility of a nuanced relationship between the Catholic Church and the FBI.

Historical Context: The Mid-20th Century Convergence

The mid-20th century marked a period of significant global and domestic turmoil, largely
fueled by the perceived threat of communism. Under the leadership of J. Edgar Hoover, the
FBI embarked on a mission to eliminate communism and preserve social order within the
United States. Simultaneously, the Catholic Church, with its extensive history of dealing with
dissident groups and heretical movements, held a staunchly opposed stance against
communism. The opposition arose from communism's fundamental rejection of religious
organization and its elevation of the state as a quasi-deity, which posed a challenge to
Rome's aspiration to be a global authority. The convergence of these interests in combating
communism laid the foundation for potential collaboration and information sharing
between the Catholic Church and the FBI. However, it is important to note that
collaborating with the Catholic Church in a quid pro quo relationship would significantly

243 | P a g e
elevate the intelligence of the FBI, with the Vatican providing access to information
gathered through the observations of the Roman Catholic Church. This, of course, comes at
the very high price of implementing the agendas of the Catholic Church.

Parallels in Operational Tactics

COINTELPRO, the covert FBI program, sought to disrupt and neutralize political
organizations, ideological, and sometimes religious movements deemed subversive to the
established order. In analyzing the methods employed by COINTELPRO, striking similarities
emerge with the tactics used by various Inquisitions throughout history, including the
Medieval Inquisition, the Spanish Inquisition, the Roman Inquisition, and the Portuguese
Inquisition. These Inquisitions were established to suppress what they considered heresy
against Roman Catholic doctrines and the authority of the Roman Catholic Church. The very
same methods that were employed to suppress dissent during these historical periods
continued to be used during the Counter-Reformation against reformers labeled as heretics.
These methods included quelling any form of dissent, employing psychological warfare to
undermine and control dissenting individuals or groups, and using tactics of intimidation,
coercion, and public shaming to silence opposition and create an atmosphere of fear. Both
COINTELPRO and the Inquisitions utilized informer networks, surveillance, and infiltration to
gather intelligence and provoke internal conflicts within movements. These shared
operational strategies underscore the possibility of a mutual exchange of tactics and
knowledge.

Shared Objective: Combating Communism

Both the FBI and the Catholic Church identified communism as a formidable threat to their
respective institutions. This shared objective created an environment conducive to
collaboration and information sharing. The Catholic Church, with its extensive global
network, possessed knowledge and resources that could aid the FBI's anti-communist
efforts. In return, the FBI's investigative capabilities and intelligence gathering provided
valuable insights to the Church. This convergence of interests laid the groundwork for a
potential exchange of guidance and expertise.

Guidance from the Catholic Church

Drawing upon its rich history of dealing with dissent, the Catholic Church could have offered
guidance to the FBI on how to identify, monitor, and neutralize perceived threats. Lessons
learned from the methods of the Inquisition, such as surveillance, informant networks, and
psychological pressure, were shared with the FBI, enabling them to refine their tactics and
more effectively suppress dissenters. While any direct collaboration or official advisory role
remains speculative, the historical parallels and the Church's expertise in handling dissenting

244 | P a g e
individuals collectively suggest the possibility of a nuanced relationship between the two
institutions.

Knowledge Exchange and Influence

The collaboration between the FBI and the Catholic Church involved a dynamic exchange of
knowledge, where the Church's experience and expertise informed the FBI's approach to
handling dissent. It is plausible that the Catholic Church's guidance influenced the
development and implementation of COINTELPRO operations, shaping the strategies
employed by the FBI to suppress dissident movements. While concrete evidence of this
exchange may be elusive, the interconnectedness of their efforts to combat communism
and the evident parallels in operational tactics suggest a collaboration that extended
beyond mere coincidence.
In examining the interplay between the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover, and the Catholic Church during
this historical period, we uncover a complex web of cooperation, influence, and shared
objectives. The convergence of their efforts to combat communism and the striking
similarities in their methods of suppressing dissent underscore the need for critical analysis
and scrutiny of the relationship between powerful institutions. Their interactions can
profoundly impact the preservation of civil liberties and the safeguarding of democratic
values, highlighting the importance of understanding the nuanced connections between
seemingly distinct entities in shaping the course of history.

Harassment and Control during the Inquisition

The Inquisition, established during the Middle Ages and Early Modern period, was a judicial
institution aimed at combating heresy and maintaining Catholic orthodoxy. Harassment was
a prevalent strategy employed by the Inquisition to exert control, suppress dissent, and
discourage individuals from deviating from Catholic teachings. This section explores the
various forms of harassment used during the Inquisition, including intimidation and threats,
interrogation and psychological pressure, surveillance and informer networks, public
humiliation, social and economic marginalization, and the creation of internal conflicts
within movements.

Intimidation and Threats:

Inquisitors and their agents utilized intimidation tactics to instill fear in individuals. Through
direct threats of punishment, imprisonment, confiscation of property, or even execution,
they sought to coerce individuals into compliance.

245 | P a g e
Interrogation and Psychological Pressure:
The interrogation process employed during the Inquisition was intentionally designed to be
psychologically distressing. Suspects faced relentless questioning, often accompanied by
emotional manipulation and psychological pressure. Inquisitors aimed to extract
information or confessions, but they also sought to exploit the fears and vulnerabilities of
accused individuals.

Surveillance and Informer Networks:

The Inquisition relied on a vast network of informers who monitored the activities of
individuals and reported any suspicions of heresy. The constant surveillance and the fear of
being reported by neighbors, colleagues, or even family members created an atmosphere of
harassment and suspicion. In addition to identifying potential threats, this surveillance
system allowed the Inquisition to manipulate informers to create internal conflicts within
movements by encouraging them to betray their peers or falsely accuse innocent
individuals.

246 | P a g e
Public Humiliation:
Public rituals, recantations, or burnings were utilized as forms of punishment and public
shaming during the Inquisition. Accused individuals were subjected to public humiliation,
aiming to discredit them and instill fear in others who might be tempted to challenge
Catholic teachings. This public humiliation also had the effect of creating divisions within
movements, as members were forced to witness the consequences of dissent and
contemplate their own choices.
Social and Economic Marginalization:
Accused individuals faced severe social and economic consequences during the Inquisition.
They were often ostracized or marginalized within their communities, leading to social
isolation. Furthermore, loss of employment or the ability to practice certain professions
resulted in financial hardships, deepening their marginalization. By creating such economic
and social hardships, the Inquisition sought to create internal conflicts within movements,
pitting individuals against each other in the struggle for survival and undermining collective
resistance.
Creating Internal Conflicts within Movements:
The Inquisition purposefully sowed internal conflicts within movements accused of heresy.
By utilizing intimidation, interrogation, surveillance, public humiliation, and social and
economic marginalization, the Inquisition aimed to fragment and weaken these movements.
Suspicion, fear, and betrayal eroded trust among movement members, fostering divisions

247 | P a g e
and undermining their collective strength. In this way, the Inquisition effectively disrupted
and discredited dissident movements from within.

The Catholic Church and the Civil Rights Movement: A Closer Look at
Divisions and Doubts

The purported acknowledgment of injustices faced by African Americans and the expression
of support for the civil rights movement by the Catholic Church should not be taken at face
value. While the institution may have made these claims, it is essential to critically examine
the true nature of its involvement. The Catholic Church, like any vast organization, was rife
with conflicting opinions and perspectives among its members, rendering its support far
from unanimous.
Within the Catholic Church, there were individuals who harbored reservations or clung to
conservative views regarding certain aspects of the civil rights movement. This internal
divide highlights the superficiality of the Church's supposed commitment to racial equality.
By emphasizing the diversity of perspectives within the institution, one must question the
sincerity of its support for civil rights and Martin Luther King Jr.
Furthermore, it is crucial to note that the level of support for Martin Luther King Jr.
specifically varied significantly among Catholics. While some voiced their endorsement of
his work, others vehemently opposed it. These contrasting stances further underscore the
lack of unity within the Catholic Church on matters of racial justice. One must question
whether the Church hierarchy genuinely desired the rise of an upstart figure like Martin
Luther King Jr., given his Southern Baptist Church affiliations that harbored deep-seated
anti-Catholic sentiments.

248 | P a g e
Targeted Reformers: Martin Luther and Martin Luther King Jr.

This critical analysis explores the similarities between Martin Luther, the 16th-century
German Reformer, and Martin Luther King Jr., two reformers who challenged the
established order and faced significant opposition. It investigates the potential collaboration
between the Catholic Church and the FBI in targeting Martin Luther King Jr. and examines
the influence of anti-Catholic sentiments and the fear of communism.
Quest for Justice: Both Martin Luther and Martin Luther King Jr. embarked on
transformative journeys for justice and equality. Martin Luther challenged the corrupt
practices and hierarchy of the Catholic Church in the 16th century. Similarly, Martin Luther
King Jr. fought against racial discrimination and injustice in the mid-20th century United
States, advocating for social change.
Religious Divisions and Anti-Catholic Sentiments: Martin Luther King Jr., as a Southern
Baptist, may have held anti-Catholic sentiments rooted in theological differences. However,
it is crucial to note that not all Southern Baptists shared these sentiments, and King
primarily focused on the fight against racial inequality rather than engaging in religious
conflicts.
Collaboration and Fear: Speculation surrounds the extent of collaboration between the
Catholic Church and the FBI in targeting Martin Luther King Jr. While the FBI, under J. Edgar
Hoover, surveilled and attempted to discredit King, the level of collaboration remains
uncertain and requires cautious examination.
Anti-Communism and Fear of Subversion: Both the FBI and the Catholic Church shared a
strong opposition to communism during the Cold War era. The FBI, under Hoover's
leadership, was obsessed with countering perceived communist influence. Martin Luther
King Jr.'s civil rights movement faced scrutiny due to fears of communist exploitation,
leading to FBI surveillance and efforts to undermine his credibility.
Intersection of Motives: While acknowledging potential intersections between the FBI's fear
of communism and the Catholic Church's opposition to communist ideology, it is vital to
evaluate the motivations of each institution independently. The FBI's targeting of King can
be seen as part of its broader efforts to suppress dissent during the civil rights movement.

249 | P a g e
Covert Operations of the Catholic Church during the Reformation: A Parallel
to COINTELPRO Tactics

The Counter-Reformation, a reactionary movement by the Catholic Church in the 16th

century to counter the Protestant Reformation, involved various covert operations and
tactics reminiscent of the later COINTELPRO program employed by the FBI. This chapter
examines the similarities between the strategies employed by the Catholic Church during
the Counter-Reformation and those used by the FBI during COINTELPRO, shedding light on
the darker side of both institutions.
These tactics employed by the Catholic Church during the Counter-Reformation bear striking
resemblance to the covert operations utilized by the FBI during COINTELPRO. Here is an
exhaustive list of actions employed by the Catholic Church and authorities during the
Reformation, including psychological warfare, isolation, and harassment, in addition to the
aforementioned tactics:

Psychological Warfare:

I. Spreading propaganda and misinformation to discredit reformers and their ideas.

II. Demonizing and vilifying Protestant leaders and their followers through rhetoric and
preaching.

III. Creating fear and portraying reformers as threats to religious stability and social
order.

IV. Utilizing fear tactics, such as warnings of damnation or heresy, to discourage

individuals from joining the Protestant movement.

250 | P a g e
Isolation and Harassment:

I. Social ostracism and shunning of individuals associated with the Protestant

movement.

II. Discrimination against Protestant communities through the restriction of rights and
privileges.

III. Implementing laws and regulations that limited the activities and gatherings of
Protestants.

IV. Encouraging Catholic populations to boycott or isolate Protestant businesses and

institutions.

V. Utilizing local authorities and informants to monitor and report on suspected

Protestant activities.

VI. Public ridicule and mockery to belittle Protestant leaders and their teachings.

Religious Trials and Inquisitions:

I. Initiating religious trials against prominent Protestant figures, accusing them of

heresy and blasphemy.

II. Establishing inquisitions to identify, investigate, and prosecute individuals suspected

of heresy and Protestant affiliation.

III. Torturing and interrogating accused individuals to extract confessions or obtain

information about other Protestants.

IV. Public spectacles of punishment

251 | P a g e
J. Edgar Hoover and the Civil Rights Movement: Controversial Motivations
and Covert Actions

J. Edgar Hoover, the formidable director of the FBI for many years, had an intricate
relationship with the civil rights movement. His stance of opposition or hostility towards civil
rights activism can be attributed to a range of factors that shed light on his complex
motivations and the controversial actions he undertook. Let us examine these factors
closely:
Conservative Ideology: Hoover's conservative views on law and order shaped his perception
of social movements challenging the established order, such as the civil rights movement.
He saw civil rights activism as disruptive, potentially destabilizing societal order, and sought
to maintain the status quo.
Concerns about Communist Influence: Hoover harbored deep-seated fears of communist
influence and believed that civil rights activists, including those associated with
organizations like the NAACP, had ties to communist ideologies. He regarded them as
potential threats to national security, suspecting their goals aligned with broader
communist aims.
Racial Prejudice: While the extent of Hoover's personal racial prejudice remains difficult to
ascertain, some scholars argue that it influenced his approach to civil rights activists. Racial

252 | P a g e
biases may have shaped his perception of civil rights leaders, leading him to view them as
subversive or dangerous elements within society.

Preservation of Power: Hoover staunchly defended the FBI's authority and independence.
The civil rights movement, with its calls for social change and challenges to existing power
structures, posed a direct threat to the FBI's authority and the prevailing order. Hoover saw
the movement as undermining the established power dynamics that he sought to uphold.
It is vital to acknowledge that Hoover's actions, including the surveillance and infiltration of
civil rights activists, have faced widespread criticism as abuses of power and violations of
civil liberties. While his personal motivations certainly played a role, his actions were also
influenced by broader political and social contexts of the time and prevailing sentiments
within law enforcement and intelligence communities.

Tactics used against MLK:

Surveillance and Wiretapping: The FBI embarked on extensive surveillance of Martin Luther
King Jr., collecting information on his personal life, associations, and activities. Utilizing
wiretaps, bugs, and informants, the agency meticulously gathered intelligence to monitor
his movements, hoping to discover evidence of illegal activities that could be exploited to
discredit him.
Smear Campaigns and Discrediting Efforts: The FBI engaged in covert operations with the
aim of discrediting Martin Luther King Jr. and the civil rights movement. They disseminated
damaging information about King's personal life, including allegations of extramarital affairs,
in a calculated effort to tarnish his reputation and undermine his leadership.
Attempted Delegitimization: The FBI made deliberate attempts to portray Martin Luther
King Jr. as a subversive figure and a threat to national security. They actively worked to
prevent King from gaining public support, painting him as a radical and a sympathizer of
communist ideals.
It is essential to emphasize that the FBI's targeting of Martin Luther King Jr. and other civil
rights activists has received widespread condemnation as an abuse of power and a violation
of civil liberties. The surveillance and harassment endured by King and the civil rights
movement not only hindered their efforts for social change but also sparked public outrage,
leading to a heightened awareness of the urgent need for reform within intelligence
agencies.
The actions taken by Hoover and the FBI during this tumultuous period of the civil rights
movement reflect the actions and scope of the Counter-Reformation undertaken by the
Roman Catholic Church. While it is important to acknowledge that the tactics used against
MLK have likely existed for thousands of years, it is thought-provoking that the Roman
Catholic Church not only employed these tactics but also perfected them. The Vatican
possesses one of the oldest libraries on Earth, which likely contains extensive writings on

253 | P a g e
statecraft and counterintelligence. The question that should leave us pondering is whether
the Catholic Church collaborated with J. Edgar Hoover and made this information readily
available to him in a quid pro quo type relationship.

Footnote references for the provided information:

The FBI and Religion: Faith and National Security before and after 9/11 Author: Sylvester A. Johnson Publisher: University of California
Press Year: 2017 Official and Confidential: The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover Author: Anthony Summers Publisher: Pocket Books Year: 1994
The Spanish Inquisition: A Historical Revision Author: Henry Kamen Publisher: Yale University Press Year: 1997 The Inquisition: A Critical
and Historical Study of the Coercive Power of the Church Author: Émile Faguet Publisher: HardPress Publishing Year: 2013 The Inquisition:
A Global History, 1478-1834 Author: Francisco Bethencourt Publisher: Cambridge University Press Year: 2009 The FBI and Religion: Faith
and National Security in the Post-9/11 World Author: John FoxPublisher: Baylor University Press Year: 2015 The FBI and Religion: Faith and
National Security in a Post-9/11 World Author: Sylvester A. Johnson, Steven P. Weitzman Publisher: University of California Press Year:
2017 The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars against Dissent in the United States Editors: Ward Churchill, Jim
Vander Wall Publisher: South End Press Year: 2002 Enemies: A History of the FBI Author: Tim Weiner Publisher: Random House Year: 2012
The Spanish Inquisition: A Historical Revision Author: José Antonio Escudero Publisher: Tamesis Books Year: 2020

[ILLUSTRATION BELOW: Waterboarding, which is still practised today by the Catholic

controlled CIA.]

254 | P a g e
The letter from the FBI to MLK, aimed at persuading him to take his own life. (National
Archives, College Park, Maryland/New York Times )

In August 1963, following Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s iconic "I Have a Dream" speech, the FBI, led by Director J. Edgar
Hoover, deemed King the "most dangerous Negro" in terms of communism and national security. Despite a failed attempt
to prove King's communist ties through extensive surveillance, the FBI uncovered tapes of his extramarital affairs. In 1964,
FBI Domestic Intelligence Chief William Sullivan sent an unsigned letter, recently discovered by historian Beverly Gage,
along with a package containing tapes of King's sexual liaisons to his home. The letter, which King and his advisers believed
was from the FBI, threatened to expose his adulterous acts, labeling him an "evil, abnormal beast." It urged him to take a
drastic step within 34 days, strongly suggesting suicide. Despite the terrifying nature of the letter, King did not yield. This
incident serves as a chilling reminder of the potential abuse by government surveillance agencies.

255 | P a g e
Chapter 17: Community Stalking and
Gangstalking

Welcome to My Nightmare!
In this chapter, we analyze the constantly evolving aspect of COINTELPRO, which has
transformed into a high-tech monster operating discreetly beneath the public's radar. The
National Security Agency (NSA) and its international counterparts, including GCHQ, CSE,
ASD, and GCSB, have woven a web of surveillance that extends into the deepest recesses of
the digital realm. Their insatiable thirst for information has led to the employment of
programs such as Echelon, PRISM, XKeyscore, Tempora, ThinThread, Muscular, Optic Nerve,
ECHELON II, and Boundless Informant with the intent to intercept and scrutinize a plethora
of electronic communications. No digital stone has been left unturned, and every aspect of
an individual's online life has been laid bare. Platforms like Facebook, Gmail, WhatsApp, and
even internet browsing have become exposed to prying eyes. Through spyware applications
like Pegasus, your mobile phone's microphone is turned on to hear every interaction you
have, your geolocation data is used to pinpoint where you are at all times, and every
intention becomes foreknowledge for those who are surveilling you.

The data that is collected and distributed to a network of private contractors, many of
whom collaborate with deep-state hidden agendas, differs from the actions of the
renowned whistle-blower Edward Snowden, who seems to have the best interests of the
public in mind. These private contractors, employed by intelligence agencies, operate
covertly and are in a partnership with the world's most powerful religious organization.
Their operations are highly compartmentalized and are primarily conducted outside
government intelligence agency facilities. Instead, they are carried out by private
contractors working for national intelligence agencies with access to acquired government
intelligence information. These operations are then spearheaded by organizational
surveillance teams ultimately controlled by the Catholic consortium, employing a hub-and-
spoke method that relies heavily on unpaid informants and participants, from various
backgrounds and religious beliefs, as discussed in previous chapters.

256 | P a g e
The use of IoT smart devices in individuals' homes added a new dimension to surveillance,
allowing COINTELPRO to exploit the information exchanged within the confines of one's
home. Psychological states, emotional well-being, intentions, and various other details could
be utilized against unsuspecting targets. James Clapper, US director of national intelligence
stated that IoT devices, “internet of things” may be exploited against targets. These devices
included:
Smart Fridges
Smart Televisions
Smart Speakers (e.g., Google Home, Amazon Echo)
Gaming Consoles (e.g., Xbox Kinect)
Children's Toys (e.g., "Smart" Barbies)
Baby Monitors
Smart Home Security Systems
Smart Locks and Home Automation Systems
Smart Wearable Devices

Within the control center, skilled analysts meticulously sifted through intercepted data,
identifying those who dared to challenge the status quo. These profiles are then passed on

257 | P a g e
for "covert management." The harassment commences subtly, with friends, family,
neighbors, and colleagues unknowingly drawn into the campaign. Gangstalking and
community stalking tactics are employed to create an atmosphere of constant surveillance
and paranoia around the targeted individuals. Strangers began appearing during their daily
routines, their gaze lingering uncomfortably long. Cryptic messages infiltrated their social
media profiles, and innuendos were implied within earshot that held a specific meaning for
the individuals regarding personal events, which sowed doubt in their own sanity.

As harassment escalates, so does the emotional and psychological trauma. Friends and
family distance themselves out of fear, leaving the dissidents isolated. Anonymous threats
flood their inboxes, while disinformation campaigns tarnish their reputations. Suddenly,
their workplaces are infiltrated with inquisitors and surveillance, who employ innuendos
and bullying until the targeted individual's employment is terminated or they are compelled
to resign. The psychological torment reaches its zenith as every move was anticipated and
manipulated. GPS tracking led them to unexpected places, serving as a haunting reminder of
constant surveillance. Even within the sanctity of their homes, surveillance cameras seemed
to track their every step.

[PHOTO ABOVE: “Intelligence services might use the [internet of things] for identification,
surveillance, monitoring, location tracking, and targeting for recruitment, or to networks or
user credentials,” James Clapper U.S Director of Intelligence.]

258 | P a g e
What set this modern COINTELPRO apart was its adaptability. If a targeted individual altered
their routine or tried to evade the campaign, it adapted, always remaining one step ahead.
The control center received real-time updates from intelligence contractors, rendering
escape impossible.

Operatives, informants, agents and plants, belong to an organizational structure, with

members of the Roman Catholic Church deep state playing a pivotal role in ensuring group
cohesion. These actors operated within a compartmentalized structure, often unaware of
the actions of others in different cells. Orders are conveyed through electronic
communication using coded messages on various social media platforms like Messenger,
WhatsApp, Discord, Instagram, and more.

Common Tactics in Gangstalking and Targeted Harassment

1. Surveillance: Victims are under constant surveillance, with strangers watching and
following them.

2. Harassment: Includes stalking, unwanted attention, and intimidation by individuals

who seem to be coordinated.

3. Electronic Harassment: Claims of being targeted with electronic weapons, such as

directed energy weapons or mind control devices.

4. Gaslighting: Victims report psychological manipulation to make them doubt their

own perceptions, sanity, or memory.

5. Street Theater: Allegations of coordinated public displays, where strangers act in

strange or intimidating ways to unnerve the victim.

6. Noise Campaigns: Victims claim they are subjected to excessive and deliberate noise
disturbances, such as car alarms, sirens, or loud music.

7. Vandalism: Property damage or defacement is attributed to harassment.

259 | P a g e
8. Property Intrusion: Victims believe their homes or vehicles are frequently tampered
with.

9. Cyber Harassment: Claims of online stalking, hacking, or the spreading of false

information on social media.

10. Isolation: Victims say they experience alienation from friends, family, and the
community.

11. Job Interference: Allegations of harassment at the workplace, job loss, or

interference in employment opportunities.

12. Community Shunning: Claims of being ostracized or treated negatively by neighbors,

acquaintances, or members of a community.

13. Gang Signaling: Victims believe they are subjected to harassment involving specific
hand signals or markings.

14. Psychological Manipulation: This includes claims of attempts to induce fear, anxiety,
or paranoia.

15. Slander and Defamation: Claims of being the target of false rumors and negative
information campaigns.

16. Vehicle Harassment: Allegations of aggressive driving, road rage, or tampering with
vehicles.

17. Directed Energy Weapons: Victims assert they are targeted with invisible energy
beams that cause physical harm or discomfort.

18. Rumors and Gossip: Victims say they are the subject of negative rumors and gossip
within their community.

260 | P a g e
 19. Institutional Involvement: Accusations of involvement by government agencies,
corporations, or other institutions.

20. Psychological Warfare: Allegations of covert attempts to induce mental or emotional

distress.

Understanding the Phenomenon of Community Stalking/Gangstalking as a

Powerful Tool of COINTELPRO
The phenomenon of community stalking, also known as gangstalking, has garnered
significant attention in recent years as a controversial and hotly debated topic. Examining its
historical context, characteristics, and potential motivations allows us to gain insights into
its nature as a potent tool employed within the framework of COINTELPRO. COINTELPRO
was a covert operation initiated by the FBI, with the primary objective of infiltrating,
disrupting, and neutralizing various activist groups, including those engaged in civil rights,
anti-war movements, and black liberation movements.

It is crucial to recognize that the operational tactics associated with gangstalking and
community stalking existed before the inception of the FBI. These tactics have historical
precedents, including the practices employed by the Papacy during both the Inquisition and
the Reformation, particularly against those who dissented from the Roman Catholic Church.
Additionally, during the era of the Soviet Union, similar programs were conducted in East
Germany, which was under the occupation and administration of Soviet forces. The Stasi,
East Germany's secret police, maintained a staggering ratio of one secret policeman for
every 166 East Germans and conducted numerous psychological operations to quell dissent.
A multitude of victims has shared their testimonies on platforms like YouTube, and the
claims of being subjected to gangstalking have reached near-epidemic proportions. It is
widely recognized that U.S. government agencies are well-funded. Notably, the late Donald
Rumsfeld, on the day before 9/11, famously stated, "According to some estimates, we
cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." During this period, gang stalking made significant
inroads into American society. Moreover, it witnessed not only the proliferation of

261 | P a g e
intelligence contractors but also the multiplication of military and psychological warfare
contractors across the globe.
As of 2023, gangstalking has evolved and become more sophisticated. It is increasingly
apparent that individuals in the community were employed as research subjects or
experimental subjects without their consent. Some were direct targets, including those
associated with the 9/11 Truth movement and other dissenting voices, as well as those
striving to uphold and protect the U.S. Constitution. Certain religious movements also found
themselves among the targeted groups.

Characteristics of Community Stalking/Gangstalking:

Organized Harassment: Community stalking/gang stalking involves the systematic and
organized harassment of an individual or a targeted group by a network of individuals acting
in coordination. The perpetrators, often referred to as "stalkers" or "gangstalkers," engage
in persistent and intrusive behaviors aimed at intimidating, discrediting, and isolating the
targeted individual(s).
Psychological Manipulation: Perpetrators employ various psychological manipulation
techniques to achieve their goals. These tactics may include gaslighting, spreading rumors,
public humiliation, street theater, noise campaigns, and the use of electronic harassment or
directed energy weapons. The cumulative effect of these actions is intended to cause
extreme distress, paranoia, and a breakdown of the targeted individual's psychological well-
being. I would like to provide an explanation for the term "street theater," which refers to a
manipulative tactic employed by perpetrators to create staged or orchestrated scenarios in
public spaces. These scenarios are designed to be overtly noticeable, often involving
seemingly coincidental and unusual interactions, behaviors, or events that appear to have
significance or relevance to the targeted individual. Street theater aims to instill a sense of
unease, paranoia, confusion, or psychological distress in the target, making them question
their surroundings and perceptions.

Community Involvement: Community stalking, also known as gang stalking, often involves
the active participation or passive acquiescence of individuals within the targeted
individual's community. Perpetrators may recruit neighbors, friends, family members, co-
workers, or even local businesses to partake in the harassment. This aspect creates a
pervasive and all-encompassing environment of surveillance and harassment for the
targeted individual.

It is crucial to emphasize that the pinnacle of success for gang stalking or community
stalking is reached when it creates a comprehensive atmosphere of surveillance and
harassment orchestrated by neighbors, friends, family members, co-workers, and even local
businesses. When gang stalking or community stalking manages to involve recruitment from
neighbors, friends, family members, co-workers, or local businesses, its impact on the victim
becomes profoundly destabilizing. This is due to the fact that the harassment permeates all
aspects of the victim's life, leading to a catastrophic effect.

262 | P a g e
Motivations behind Community Stalking/Gangstalking:

The motivations behind community stalking, also known as gang stalking, are intricate and
can vary depending on specific circumstances. Primarily, these motivations aim to suppress
dissent and are typically orchestrated by a central authority. Gang stalking is predominantly
a tool of societal engineering, employed to suppress individuals, movements, and groups
that advocate undesirable ideologies or religious beliefs. These targeted individuals are
perceived as potential threats that need to be prevented at an early stage, or they are
already influential figures who could potentially challenge the status quo or act as rivals to
the Catholic Church. The practice seeks to restrict the influence and dissemination of
information contrary to the deep state's agenda while simultaneously promoting the status
quo through channels associated with the deep state.

Retaliation: Community stalking or gang stalking may be driven by a desire to retaliate

against individuals or groups perceived as threats to established power structures,
ideologies, or interests. In addition, there are counter-intelligence motivations to silence
those who disseminate information or file complaints against the prevailing status quo.
Harassment can be used as a form of reprisal against activists, whistle-blowers, or
individuals who challenge societal norms and expose corruption.
To better understand the phenomenon of community stalking/gangstalking, further
research is needed. This research should include comprehensive studies examining reported
cases, interviews with targeted individuals, and an exploration of potential motivations and
strategies employed by perpetrators. Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration between
fields such as psychology, sociology, criminology, and human rights can shed light on the
psychological and sociological dynamics underlying this phenomenon.
Furthermore, it is essential to provide support and resources for individuals who claim to be
targeted by community stalking/gangstalking. Mental health professionals should be
equipped to assess and address the psychological impact of such experiences, offering
appropriate interventions and support.
Still, there is potential for a conflict of interest to arise, especially given that mental health
professionals often hold positions within the state's employ. When state agencies or even
the Catholic consortium of civil servants are involved, these mental health professionals
could encounter pressures that jeopardize their job security. In scenarios where, sizable
government bodies and intelligence agencies are implicated, strategies might be
implemented to guarantee the lasting removal of these mental health professionals from
their careers. This might occur if they fail to adhere to the intricately constructed narrative,
which involves diagnosing victims with paranoid delusion disorder, rather than
acknowledging and validating the claims of victims who assert experiences of gangstalking
or community stalking.

263 | P a g e
Advocacy groups and organizations focused on human rights and civil liberties can play a
vital role in raising awareness, providing assistance, and advocating for the protection of
targeted individuals' rights.

Controversial Views and Perceived Threats: How Certain Religious Groups Challenge
Roman Catholic Doctrine and Prophecy Interpretations
The targeting of groups like Protestants, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Seventh-day Adventists
by the Roman Catholic Church can be attributed to the perception of these groups as
threats to the Church's existence. This perception arises from their critiques of certain
elements within the Roman Catholic Church and their differing doctrines regarding salvation
compared to the Bible. Additionally, the Roman Catholic Church's influence within English-
speaking intelligence agencies enables them to prosecute and persecute other religions
deemed problematic.
For example, Jehovah's Witnesses have claimed that the United Nations will administer the
"mark of the beast," a belief seemingly lacking substantial scriptural connection. On the
other hand, Seventh-day Adventists provide more practical interpretations of prophecy
through the use of type and antitype scenarios. These interpretations are rooted in a
historicist hermeneutical method, which also allows for a coherent understanding of
eschatology. Essentially, Seventh-day Adventists believe that there will be a state-enforced
Sunday law, and that the United States, influenced by apostate Protestantism and United
States Catholics, will grant power to the Papacy.

Examination of the Impact on Targeted Individuals and the Role it Plays in

Suppressing Dissent
The covert harassment and surveillance tactics employed against targeted individuals play a
significant role in suppressing dissent. Let's explore the impact on individuals who are
targeted by such tactics and examine how these methods effectively silence voices of
opposition and hinder the free expression of ideas. By understanding the experiences of
targeted individuals and the mechanisms through which dissent is suppressed, we can shed
light on the broader implications for democracy, human rights, and societal progress.

Psychological Impact on Targeted Individuals:

Covert harassment tactics have a profound psychological impact on targeted individuals,
leaving them vulnerable and hesitant to express their dissenting views.
Fear and Intimidation: Targeted individuals often experience fear, anxiety, and a sense of
constant threat as a result of the covert harassment they face. The fear of being monitored,
manipulated, or punished creates a chilling effect on their willingness to voice dissenting
opinions or engage in activism.

264 | P a g e
Isolation and Alienation: Targeted individuals frequently undergo social isolation, a result of
strained or severed relationships with friends, family, and colleagues due to the
psychological distress stemming from covert harassment. The strain can fracture the victims'
relationships, particularly when those who haven't experienced or been informed about
gangstalking perceive the victims' accounts as implausible. An ongoing question that arises
among the victim's family and friends is why the victim would be significant enough to
warrant these covert operations. They may not fully grasp the significance and
determination behind those orchestrating these operations, aimed at silencing dissent from
the established norms or the domains of politics and religion.
This isolation, in turn, serves as a discouraging factor for dissent, as individuals might fear
further stigmatization or rejection should they decide to voice their experiences.
Self-Censorship: The fear of retaliation and the desire to protect oneself from ongoing
harassment lead to self-censorship among targeted individuals. They may refrain from
expressing their true opinions, participating in public discussions, or engaging in activism,
limiting the diversity of perspectives and stifling critical discourse.
Impact on Freedom of Speech and Assembly:
Covert harassment tactics effectively suppress dissent by impeding individuals' freedom of
speech and assembly, two fundamental pillars of democratic societies.

Curtailing Freedom of Expression: The psychological impact of covert harassment

discourages individuals from freely expressing their opinions and ideas, eroding the
foundations of free speech. When targeted individuals fear retribution or consequences for
expressing dissent, they are more likely to remain silent or conform to mainstream
narratives, preventing the open exchange of ideas and diverse viewpoints.

Undermining Public Participation: Covert harassment tactics also deter individuals from
participating in public gatherings, protests, or other forms of assembly. The fear of being
targeted, surveilled, or subjected to further harassment restricts their ability to engage in
collective action, limiting the effectiveness of dissent and grassroots movements.
Silencing Whistle-blowers: Targeted individuals who possess critical information or seek to
expose wrongdoing may be particularly vulnerable to covert harassment. By targeting and
intimidating whistle-blowers, covert harassment aims to silence those who would otherwise
expose corruption, human rights abuses, or other forms of wrongdoing. By intimidating and
silencing whistle-blowers, covert harassment hampers accountability and transparency. It
becomes increasingly difficult to hold institutions and individuals responsible for their
actions, weakening the checks and balances necessary for a functioning democracy.

265 | P a g e
Implications for Democracy and Human Rights:
The targeted suppression of dissent through covert harassment has far-reaching
implications for democracy, human rights, and societal progress.

Threat to Democratic Values: Covert harassment undermines the principles of democracy,

including freedom of speech, assembly, and the right to dissent. When individuals are
silenced or self-censor due to fear and intimidation, the democratic fabric weakens, and the
diversity of ideas necessary for informed decision-making is compromised.
Suppression of Accountability: By targeting whistle-blowers and dissenting voices, covert
harassment hampers accountability and transparency. When those who expose corruption
or misconduct are silenced, the checks and balances essential for holding institutions and
individuals accountable are eroded.

Inhibition of Social Change: The suppression of dissent impedes progress and social change.
Ideas and movements that challenge the status quo or advocate for equality, justice, and
human rights are stifled, hindering societal transformation and impeding the advancement
of marginalized communities.
It is essential to foster an environment that encourages open dialogue, protects whistle-
blowers, and safeguards freedom of speech and assembly. Supporting targeted individuals,
providing resources for mental health and legal assistance, and promoting initiatives that
raise awareness about covert harassment are crucial steps toward combating the
suppression of dissent and preserving democratic values.

266 | P a g e
Myron May: An In-Depth Look at Gangstalking Allegations or
Paranoid Delusion?

The Troubling Descent of Myron May: Was Gang Stalking Behind the Florida
State University Shooting?
In November 2014, the nation was left in shock when Myron May, a 31-year-old former
Florida State University (FSU) student and attorney, opened fire in the FSU library in
Tallahassee, injuring three people before being killed by the police. The motives behind this
tragic event were not immediately clear, but a video and last testimony suggests that he
was a victim of "gang stalking," a phenomenon where individuals are relentlessly pursued,
monitored, and harassed by a covert group.
Myron May also asserted that he was a victim of energy weapons. In an email he sent at
11:19 p.m. the night before the shooting, he wrote, "I've been getting hit with the direct
energy weapon in my chest all evening. It hurts really bad right now." It's important to note
that there have been reported cases of directed energy weapons being used after the
Myron May incident in 2014. The first instances of what later became known as "Havana
syndrome" were reported in 2016, affecting U.S. diplomats and foreign officials in locations
such as Russia, China, and Cuba. These individuals began experiencing a mysterious illness
with symptoms including headaches, vertigo, and brain fog. An interesting article titled
"Havana syndrome: Foreign adversaries' microwave weapons capabilities explained by
physicist" on Fox news provides intriguing insights into this phenomenon.

Myron May; A Promising Start

Myron May's life began as a tale of promise and potential. He was born in Dayton, Ohio, in
1983 and moved to Florida as a teenager. May was placed in the foster care of Abigail and
David Taunton at the age of 13. He was described as a smart, friendly individual who even
pursued cross country running. He received scholarships to attend FSU, where he graduated

267 | P a g e
in 2005 with an economics degree. Subsequently, he pursued a legal career, attending Texas
Tech Law School in 2009 and practicing law in both Texas and New Mexico.

Unraveling the Complex Case of Myron May: Did Media Hastily Label Him Mentally Ill?
While it is undeniable that May's actions were deeply distressing, there's a concern that
some media outlets may have hastily labeled him as mentally ill without any official
diagnosis, failing to delve into his claims of being a "targeted individual." This raises
important questions about the role of responsible journalism in handling complex cases like
Myron May's. While there were clear signs of distress and what seemed like paranoia in his
behavior, it's essential to note that no official diagnosis had been made prior to the incident.
There was no investigation into the claims of Myron May, what we do know is that
Gangstalking/Community stalking is actually not a new phenomenon, it has been a
weaponized ploy used by both intelligence agencies and powerful religious organizations
like the Vatican.
Signs of Trouble
Signs of Myron May's distress began to emerge in the months leading up to the FSU library
shooting, which were deeply troubling. In Las Cruces, New Mexico, where he had been
working as a prosecutor, police reports documented May's increasing paranoia which while
maybe true, it could also be said that programs like COINTELPRO or
Gangstalking/Community stalking can induce paranoia or atleast hypervigilance, which is a
naturally when an individual is perplexed by such harrowing circumstances. He claimed that
he was under constant surveillance, asserting that there were cameras in his residence,
voices coming through the walls discussing his actions, and even a belief that police had
bugged his phone and car. There appears to be a connection between his resignation as a
prosecutor in New Mexico and the harassment he endured. It is difficult to imagine what it's
like to be in a constant state of fight-or-flight, filled with anxiety and fear, while also
experiencing sleepless nights. These conditions could have exacerbated his prior challenges,
particularly in his efforts to fulfill his responsibilities as a prosecutor. It also seems that
May's resignation and subsequent relocation back to Florida were driven by the belief that
the harassment was location-specific. However, the gangstalking continued in Florida as he
attempted to reintegrate into the legal profession in the state.

In October, an incident occurred at the home of his ex-girlfriend, Danielle Nixon. May
handed her a piece from his car, claiming it was a camera placed by the police. Nixon
reported that May had developed a severe mental disorder, believed he was being pursued
by the police, and had been experiencing sleepless nights. The relationship ended after 15
months, primarily due to the emotional strain of two opposing opinions, with Nixon
believing that May had a severe mental condition.

Many people who claim to be victims of Gangstalking report experiencing a breakdown in

their relationships. This is because the harassment and manipulation in such cases are
covert and targeted at the victim. The stories shared by these victims with their friends,

268 | P a g e
family, or spouses often sound sensational and strange. This is largely because those who do
not share the same experience tend to be dismissive of such claims.

Seeking Help
Myron May's struggle with his situation and mental health was evident when he was taken
to Mesilla Valley Hospital for a mental health evaluation in late September. It's important to
note that readers should maintain objectivity because programs like these are designed to
push the target to the brink through sleep deprivation, stress, and hypervigilance. If the
reader were in the same situation, how would they react? Like many situations in life, one
cannot truly understand how someone feels until they themselves experience the same
circumstances. Those close to him, such as the Taunton family Charity administration,
described him as a good person who had simply returned to Florida to start his law practice
and was grappling with financial difficulties. It is important to note that victims of
Gangstalking/Community Stalking claim that they suffer from financial difficulties. This is
one of the objectives in COINTELPRO and or Gangstalking: to disrupt the target's life and
neutralize the individual, sometimes to the extent that the targeted individuals end up in
homeless shelters.

Myron May’s Online Presence

May's Facebook page, which featured biblical quotations, painted a picture of a devout
Protestant Christian. His last post, dated November 18, quoted "Blessed are the poor in
spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven."

On November 14, May posted a question in a Facebook group known as "Targeted

Individuals International." His inquiry raised concerns about his mental state, as he asked,
"Has anyone here ever been encouraged by their handler to commit murder with the
promise of freedom?" This post could have been a plea for assistance, but it could also be
interpreted as an effort by the operators of the Gangstalking program to psychologically
prepare May for a potential shooting by psychologically priming him.
Here is some information on psychological priming:
Psychological priming is a phenomenon in which exposure to a stimulus (the "prime")
influences the way an individual responds to a subsequent stimulus. This can occur at a
subconscious level and can impact various cognitive and emotional processes. In other
words, priming can make certain information more accessible in a person's mind, affecting
their thoughts, attitudes, and behaviors.

269 | P a g e
There are different types of priming relevant to the influence of Myron May:

Semantic Priming: This involves the activation of related concepts or words in a person's
mind. For example, if someone is exposed to the word "doctor," they might be more likely
to recognize the word "nurse" faster than an unrelated word when it appears shortly
afterward.
Conceptual Priming: This is associated with priming a particular mental concept or schema,
affecting a person's judgments, attitudes, or behaviors. For example, showing images of
elderly people may lead individuals to walk more slowly afterward, indicating a primed
stereotype about age.
Repetition Priming: This occurs when a person's response to a stimulus is influenced by
prior exposure to the same or similar stimuli. Repeated exposure to a specific stimulus can
make it easier to recognize or respond to in the future.

Psychological priming has been widely studied in psychology and has implications in various
areas, including memory, perception, decision-making, and social behavior. However, the
exact mechanisms and limits of priming effects are still topics of ongoing research and
debate. Myron May's actions, which included his decision to open fire at the library, can be
interpreted as both an attempt to escape and an expression of his belief that this violent act
would draw attention to what he perceived as his ongoing persecution. Given that May was
subjected to systematic persecution, it is conceivable that this persecution acted as a
catalyst for his deteriorating mental health, likely intensifying his feelings of isolation and
despair.
Several online pundits have suggested that his actions were a form of "suicide by cop,"
where an individual deliberately provokes a police response, often by threatening them with
a weapon. In May's case, he shot and injured three people. However, I could only find one
source that provided information about where the injuries occurred, with one victim being
shot in the leg. There is no available report on the injuries sustained by the other two
victims. It is noteworthy that the three surviving victims have not been interviewed by the
media, even to this day. There is no indication or testimony from these injured individuals
explaining why Myron May shot them, resulting in a profound silence surrounding this
aspect of the incident.
I observed Myron May's last testimony where he prayed online in a Youtube video, and
within his prayer he said,

"And Father, I ask you to forgive me for my sins—my past sins, my present sins, and all my
future sins. God, I ask the Lord to have mercy on my soul and forgive me for my future sins.
In Romans 8:1, it is stated that there is no condemnation for those who are in
Christ.....God, I believe that you are the Son of God. I believe that you came to the Earth as
a ransom for my sins. You died on the cross and resurrected so that I can have eternal life,
and I thank you for that. Father, right now, I ask that you look down on all the targeted
individuals across the globe. Help them to cope with this madness, help them to cope with

270 | P a g e
this evil and ungodly program that they have been put into against their will. Help them
deal with the mental stress, the psychological stress, the financial strain, the emotional
hardship, and help them deal with all of that."

The quoting of Romans 8:1 by Myron May had an unfortunate twist of interpretation, the
scripture reads Roman 8:1 “There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in
Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.”

If anyone is going through a situation similar to Myron May's, it is important not to react
with violence. Retaliatory actions, such as shooting someone, are contrary to walking in the
spirit, as Romans 8:1 suggests. Engaging in such acts leads to condemnation. Walking in the
Spirit involves repentance and embracing a Christian way of life. It's important to note that
there is no forgiveness for future sins, as Myron May prayed for.
It is worth noting that Myron May inadvertently played into the agenda of the COINTELPRO
program, which ultimately benefited May’s adversaries rather than himself. Christians who
are victims of Gangstalking should maintain their faith and seek to acquire coping
mechanisms. They can find information online to help them adjust and cope. Above all, they
should practice turning the other cheek.
It is important to acknowledge that while offering advice is straightforward in theory, it can
be quite challenging in practice. Unfortunately, Myron May chose a misguided path, but he
still deserves our sympathy, just as the victims he harmed do. It could be argued that the
real culprits are the program directors who have yet to face justice.
Myron May, in a desperate plea, begged for forgiveness for sins he had yet to commit. What
becomes chillingly apparent is that his malevolent intentions to commit a heinous act at the
Florida library were etched into his consciousness long before the haunting echoes of his
prayer resounded. It is conceivable, indeed, that Myron May’s "handler" didn't merely
employ the power of suggestion, but rather, sinisterly orchestrated the psychological
landscape, preparing Myron to execute his dreadful act.

Additionally, psychologists are aware of various rage shooting factors, which include:

Factors contributing to rage shootings, or shooting risk factors, exhibit similarities with
suicide risk factors. Suicide risk factors increase the likelihood of suicides, while rage
shooting risk factors escalate the likelihood of rage shootings. The documentation of these
rage shooting risk factors, akin to suicide risk factors, proves indispensable for both
prevention and comprehension of the underlying causes of such incidents. This knowledge
has the potential to save lives and safeguard our rights and freedoms, including the right to
bear arms.

271 | P a g e
Specifically, these factors can be categorized as follows:

S - Spousal Abuse or Jealousy: Numerous cases have linked spousal abuse or jealousy to
instances of murder and rage shootings.
R - Rejection: Rejection can manifest as emotional pain and may have links to personal
relationships, spousal abuse, and murder or rage shootings.
H - Humiliation: Humiliation, particularly when recurrent, has been identified as a significant
factor leading to retaliatory actions, which are associated with bullying, rampages, and rage
shootings.
F - Financial Loss: Several cases have demonstrated a connection between financial loss and
incidents of rampages or rage shootings.
H - Homelessness: There have been several instances where homelessness has been
associated with rampages or rage shootings, possibly as a form of retaliation for being
homeless.
T - Trapped or Cornered: The sensation of feeling trapped or cornered can be correlated
with rampages or rage shootings, often stemming from the threat of homelessness, loss of
employment, bullying, and mobbing.

E - Employment Loss: Instances of rage shootings have occurred following the loss of
employment.
W - Workplace Psychological Harassment: Workplace psychological harassment can be
linked to repetitive humiliation, loss of employment, financial loss, feelings of being trapped
or cornered, bullying, mobbing, emotional abuse, and strategic tactics.

B - Bullying: Victims of bullying have been connected to repetitive humiliation, rampages,

and rage shootings.
M - Mobbing: Victims of mobbing, akin to victims of bullying, are associated with retaliatory
actions.
C - Criminal Harassment: Participants in criminal harassment networks employ threats,
provocation, repetitive humiliation, and are often involved in smear campaigns or
allegations of uttering threats.
I - Influence of the Mind: The influence of the mind is a suicide risk factor involving
repetitive suggestions that heighten suicide risk, pushing a person toward suicide. In the
context of rage shooting factors, the intention is to induce a person to commit a rage
shooting, with different ideation, such as the notion of being observed when isolated and
abused through organized crime.

272 | P a g e
I - Ideation: Ideation may involve thoughts of being observed while committing a heinous
crime, like a rage shooting, particularly when a citizen is targeted through organized crime,
isolated, abused, and gradually pushed into homelessness. This concept may be related to
strategies proposed by Marie-France Hirigoyen and potential connections to several rage
shootings, such as those involving Marc Lepine and Cho.
S - Smear Campaigns: Smear campaigns are associated with financial loss, a loss of status or
criminal records, mobbing, and attempts to push targeted citizens into homelessness.
R - Retaliation or "Hitting Back": Retaliation is linked to inflicted damages, financial loss,
loss of employment, repetitive humiliation, a loss of honor, smear campaigns, being pushed
into homelessness, and causing serious illness or cancer.
R - Repression: Workplace psychological harassment, employment loss, financial loss,
homelessness, smear campaigns, and serious illness are linked to repression.
S - Strategy: Emotional abusers employ strategies to destabilize targeted citizens, provoking
them to react with anger or rage, which portrays them as deranged and aggressive.
Aggressive behavior, appearing deranged, or violent actions are associated with strategies
involving smear campaigns and repression. The aim is to drive people toward anger, rage,
and violence, with the goal of creating a justification for their repression and advocating for
gun control to disarm the population.

P - Provocation: Provocation, threats, and abuse can be correlated with rampages and rage
shootings. The use of abuse and provocation as a strategy may incite targeted citizens to
resort to violence, rampages, or rage shootings, ultimately creating a justification for
repression or gun control.
S - Suicide Factors and Depression: Suicide factors and depression have been linked to
murder and serious crimes.
P - PTSD: Individuals experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have reported
experiencing such factors.

273 | P a g e
The Multifaceted Life of Myron May: A Devout Protestant Christian
Beyond the headlines and sensationalism, a lesser-known aspect of his life was his deep
faith as a Protestant Christian. Myron May was a devout churchgoer, attending services on
Sundays, and his Facebook page was filled with scriptural posts, shedding light on the
complexity of his character. Myron May's connection to his faith was a significant part of his
life. Those who knew him describe him as a committed Christian, and he attended church
services regularly. His unwavering dedication to his faith was evident through his presence
at church on Sundays, where he sought spiritual guidance, solace, and fellowship.
Myron May's assertion that he was harassed by irregular library attendees adds another
layer of complexity to the tragic events that transpired at the Florida State University library
in 2014. It is plausible that he may have misunderstood innocent or routine interactions
with other library visitors as a form of imagined harassment. However, only Myron May and
the three individuals he shot could provide a full context and explanation of the situation,
without everyone resorting to second-guessing.
In my view, Myron May was a conservative, clean-cut, well-educated, Protestant Christian
African American who also worked for the Taunton Children's Home. The year 2014 marked
the beginning of the current status quo ideological agenda. This was around the time when
LGBTQ and other left-wing, Democratic, and Jesuit ideological initiatives commenced.
Myron May could have been a younger version of Martin Luther King. This young upstart set
the wrong example for how the deep state wants black American society to be. Imagine
Myron May becoming a successful prosecutor and, with age, maturing, gaining wisdom and
knowledge. He could have become a thorn in the side of the deep state, much like Martin
Luther King. Additionally, there is substantial collaboration between the Jesuit order and the
Democratic party. Myron May's Baptist church has had numerous theological differences
and strained relations concerning doctrine, although his stance on the Catholic Church is not
clear.

Author Vince Everett Elison, in an interview with Tucker Carlson, asserted that some
Democrats aim to keep black people uneducated, struggling with addictions, and lacking
moral values, all with the intention of allowing a quasi-form of communism to exert control
over them. Simultaneously, they want African Americans to believe they have been
empowered, which constitutes pure deception. This is exemplified by Kamala Harris's
decision to mark the 50th anniversary of hip-hop by hosting a concert at her Washington,
D.C. residence, featuring artists like Lil Wayne, Slick Rick, Common, and others. Hip-hop or
rap is often seen as a precursor to antisocial behavior. The National Library of Medicine has
published a research paper titled 'Music, Substance Use, and Aggression,' which reinforces
the points made by Vince Everett Elison. The study's findings suggest that the frequent
exposure of young people to music containing references to substance use and violence
may be connected to their engagement in such behaviors. Conversely, a person's music
listening preference might reflect certain personal predispositions or lifestyle choices.
Alternatively, it is possible that substance use, aggression, and music preference are
independent constructs but share common "third factors."

274 | P a g e
Footnote references for the provided information:
Meloy, J. R. (2001). The Psychology of Stalking: Clinical and Forensic Perspectives. Academic Press. De Becker, G. (1997). The Gift of Fear:
Survival Signals That Protect Us from Violence. Little, Brown and Company. The Tuscaloosa News. (2022, December 14). Myron May makes
video claiming to be a "targeted individual" https://www.tuscaloosanews.com/embed/video/22950769/ Chen MJ, Miller BA, Grube JW,
Waiters ED. Music, substance use, and aggression. J Stud Alcohol. 2006 May;67(3):373-81. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.373. PMID:
16608146; PMCID: PMC5066304. Baier, B., & Munneke, A. (2023, April 18). Havana syndrome: Foreign adversaries' microwave weapons
capabilities explained by physicist. Victim, experts not satisfied with US intelligence assessment that it’s 'very unlikely' foreign adversary
produced mysterious illnesses. Fox News. URL: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/havana-syndrome-foreign-adversaries-microwave-
weapons-capabilities-explained-physicist Fields, R. D. (2016). Why We Snap: Understanding the Rage Circuit in Your Brain. Dutton.
Newman, K. S. (2004). Rampage: The Social Roots of School Shootings. Basic Books. Ackerman, S., & Thielman, S. (2016, February 10). US
intelligence chief: we might use the internet of things to spy on you. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/09/internet-of-things-smart-home-devices-government-surveillance-james-clapper

[PHOTO ABOVE: Police officers standing over the body of Myron May, an alumnus shot after
wounding three people at a Florida State University library.]

275 | P a g e
Chapter 18: The Dark Side of
Bureaucracy: Civil Servants Unite
for Obstruction and Deception

Undermining Democracy: The Dark Tactics of Bureaucratic Persecution within

Government Agencies
Within the intricate corridors of government agencies, a shadowy realm of power dynamics
exists, where group cohesion can assume a sinister form. While civil servants are expected
to serve the public with transparency and integrity, there are instances when a few
individuals within these organizations conspire to use their bureaucratic prowess for
nefarious purposes. This chapter delves into the disturbing realm of bureaucratic
runaround, obfuscation, stalling, administrative obstruction, and document fraud, revealing
how these tactics can be employed collectively within government bodies to target
opponents or persecute those with differing religious or political views.

Bureaucratic Runaround and Red Tape

"Bureaucratic runaround" and "red tape" are the tried-and-true methods of obstruction
within government agencies. They involve the deliberate creation of elaborate processes,
excessive paperwork, and administrative hurdles to frustrate and delay individuals seeking
government services or redress. When a group of civil servants within an agency decides to
employ these tactics collectively, they can make it nearly impossible for a targeted
individual to navigate the system.
Often, this happens when individuals with differing political or religious views become the
subjects of institutional bias. Instead of impartially processing requests and applications,
civil servants united by shared beliefs may conspire to subject their targets to endless loops
of bureaucratic procedures, endless forms, and elusive deadlines.

276 | P a g e
Obfuscation and Administrative Obstruction
"Obfuscation" and "administrative obstruction" take the bureaucratic runaround to another
level. Here, civil servants manipulate or withhold information, engage in opaque decision-
making processes, and intentionally mislead those they serve. This clandestine behavior can
be especially effective when a group within an agency shares a common agenda.
For individuals whose political or religious beliefs differ from the prevailing culture within an
agency, they may find themselves grappling with decisions that lack clarity, records that are
conveniently misplaced, and crucial information kept beyond their reach. The walls of
bureaucracy, once designed to provide order and structure, become barriers erected by
those within the system.
Document Fraud

The ultimate weapon in this clandestine arsenal is "document fraud." When group cohesion
within an agency becomes a fifth column, they might resort to fabricating or altering official
documents. This unethical and illegal act can have severe consequences for the targeted
individuals, especially if they attempt to use these fraudulent documents for benefits or
legal purposes.
The Art of Misdirection: A Study in Diversion
Misdirection, in the context of government agencies, refers to a deliberate or strategic
attempt to deflect, delay, or sidetrack the resolution of a complaint, investigation, or issue
away from its original and legitimate concerns. This can involve addressing a different issue
or utilizing bureaucratic processes to avoid addressing the core complaint or concern.
In these instances, the perpetrators, often hidden behind layers of bureaucracy, may create
false records to further undermine their targets. Whether it's manipulating medical records,
altering legal documents, or misrepresenting financial data, the implications are dire for the
individuals affected, often causing substantial harm and hardship.

277 | P a g e
Allegations of Religious Bias and Government Influence: A Global Perspective

Accusations of bias, discrimination, or improper actions involving government officials who

are affiliated with the Catholic Church have been raised in various countries over the years.
Some of the countries where such accusations have been reported or documented include:

United States: Allegations of religious bias or discrimination have been raised in the United
States, particularly in cases related to the separation of church and state. Some critics have
accused public officials of promoting or favoring Catholic interests in their decision-making.
Ireland: The Catholic Church has historically played a significant role in Irish society, and
there have been instances where government policies were influenced by religious
considerations, leading to accusations of bias.
Spain: In Spain, there have been historical tensions between the Catholic Church and
minority religious groups, and allegations of religious discrimination or bias have been
reported.
Poland: Poland has a strong Catholic tradition, and there have been instances where
government policies influenced by the Catholic Church have been criticized for infringing on
the rights of religious minorities.
Philippines: The Catholic Church has a significant presence in the Philippines, and there
have been reports of religious discrimination in government decisions and policies.
Italy: Italy is the home of the Vatican, and there have been historical tensions between the
Catholic Church and secular authorities, leading to accusations of Church interference in
state affairs.

In the United States, allegations of

religious bias or discrimination,
particularly concerning the Catholic
Church, have been the subject of
debate and scrutiny. It's important
to note that the United States has a
constitutional principle of the
separation of church and state,
which is enshrined in the First
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
This principle prohibits the
government from favoring any particular religion and ensures religious freedom for all
citizens. However, there have been instances where critics have accused public officials of
promoting or favoring Catholic interests, thus raising concerns about the proper application
of this constitutional principle.

278 | P a g e
Here are a few key points regarding allegations of religious bias or discrimination in the
United States:
Historical Tensions: The United States has a diverse religious landscape, with many different
faiths represented. Historical tensions have existed, at times, between various religious
groups and government policies. This has led to concerns about the influence of religious
institutions, including the Catholic Church, in shaping government decisions.

Government Policies and Catholic Interests: Some critics have alleged that certain
government policies, especially in areas such as healthcare, education, and social services,
have been influenced by the Catholic Church's positions on issues like contraception,
abortion, and LGBTQ+ rights. They argue that such influence can lead to biased or
discriminatory policies that favor Catholic teachings.
Legal Challenges: Allegations of religious bias in government actions have led to legal
challenges in some cases. Lawsuits and legal proceedings have sought to determine whether
specific policies infringe upon the separation of church and state and whether they
discriminate against certain groups.

Public Debate: The issue of religious bias and the separation of church and state remains a
topic of public debate and discussion. Advocacy groups and individuals from various
religious and secular perspectives continue to voice their concerns and seek changes in
government policies they believe are influenced by religious interests.

Invisible Struggles: The Emotional and Psychological Toll on Victims of

Administrative Persecution
The stories of individuals subjected to bureaucratic runaround, obfuscation, stalling,
administrative obstruction, and document fraud are often hidden from the public eye, but
their experiences leave profound and lasting scars. Let us examine the emotional and
psychological consequences that victims endure when they become the targets of
administrative persecution.
The Isolation of Helplessness
For those caught in the web of administrative obstruction, the first emotion that often
surfaces is helplessness. The deliberate and systematic barriers erected by civil servants can
make victims feel trapped and powerless. This helplessness can lead to a sense of isolation
as they struggle to navigate a seemingly impenetrable bureaucracy. The victim's voice
becomes muffled by red tape, leaving them with a profound sense of despair.

279 | P a g e
Anxiety and Uncertainty
The uncertainty that accompanies administrative persecution can be overwhelming. As
victims attempt to understand why they are being targeted and struggle to find a resolution,
they often experience heightened levels of anxiety. The constant fear of the unknown,
compounded by the prospect of not knowing when or if the ordeal will end, can take a
significant toll on their mental health.
Distrust and Paranoia
Administrative persecution can erode trust in government institutions and the very system
meant to serve and protect its citizens. Victims may become suspicious of anyone in a
position of authority, fearing that even well-intentioned individuals may be part of a
broader conspiracy against them. This deep-seated paranoia can make it challenging for
victims to re-engage with society and authority figures even after their ordeal ends.
Depression and Despair

The relentless obstacles and lack of progress can lead to depression and despair. Victims
may experience a profound sense of hopelessness as they grapple with the injustice of their
situation. The emotional burden of the bureaucratic battle can lead to a deep sense of
sadness, isolation, and a loss of faith in the systems meant to provide justice and support.
Impact on Relationships

Administrative persecution doesn't just affect the victim; it can strain relationships with
family, friends, and colleagues. Loved ones may struggle to understand the extent of the
victim's suffering, which can create tension and distance. Victims may become withdrawn,
less communicative, and emotionally distant, further impacting their social connections.
Post-Traumatic Stress

The emotional and psychological trauma resulting from administrative persecution can
manifest as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Victims may experience flashbacks,
nightmares, and heightened emotional reactivity. The mere thought of engaging with
government agencies or institutions can trigger severe anxiety, making it difficult to move
forward with their lives.
Coping and Recovery

While the consequences of administrative persecution are significant, many victims do find
ways to cope and recover. Support from mental health professionals, support groups, and
organizations dedicated to advocacy can be essential in the healing process. Victims must be
given space to share their experiences and access resources that help them rebuild their
lives and find a sense of justice and closure.
In the shadows of red tape, there are real people enduring the emotional and psychological
turmoil of administrative persecution. Their stories serve as a stark reminder of the human
cost of bureaucracy gone awry. Advocacy, awareness, and a commitment to upholding
justice and transparency within government institutions are essential to prevent and

280 | P a g e
address these emotional and psychological consequences on the lives of those who have
been unjustly persecuted.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Lofgren, M. (2016). The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government. Viking. Hamburger, P. (2017). The
Administrative Threat. Encounter Books. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Basic
Books.

281 | P a g e
CHAPTER 19: UNDERCOVER SHADOWS:
COINTELPRO, WHISTLE-BLOWERS, AND
JOURNALISTS

Persecution of Journalists: A Chilling Assault on Free Press

In an age where information is power, and the free press stands as the cornerstone of
democracy, the relentless assault on journalists across the globe is nothing short of a grave
threat to the very foundations of free societies. Journalists, as society's watchdogs, play a
pivotal role in upholding accountability, transparency, and the sacrosanct right of the public
to know. They venture into the abyss of secrecy, uncovering hidden truths, and confronting
those in power. However, in recent years, a sinister and disturbing trend has emerged—a
systematic and pervasive campaign of persecution directed at these brave individuals who
risk everything to keep the public informed.

In this dystopian landscape, the protection of whistle-blowers and the fearless individuals
who dare to expose the dark underbelly of governments and intelligence agencies has
become a luxury rarely afforded. Instead, governments have weaponized the legal system,
resorting to espionage charges, extraterritorial jurisdiction, and excessive penalties to
silence and imprison those who dare to speak truth to power.

Julian Assange: A Harsh Example of State Repression

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, finds himself emblematic of the perilous path that
journalists and whistle-blowers navigate when they dare to confront the power structures
of governments. His ongoing ordeal serves as a glaring example of the heavy-handed tactics

282 | P a g e
employed by states to silence and make a cautionary example of those who challenge the
status quo. Assange's arrest and the subsequent extradition proceedings have incited an
international outcry, and this outcry is well-founded. His work in disseminating classified
documents, exposing government secrets, and holding the powerful accountable has earned
him both admiration and condemnation. While some hail him as a champion of
transparency and freedom of information, governments have responded with fury, labeling
him a menace to national security.

The charges against Assange, including those related to hacking and conspiracy, are seen by
many as a thinly veiled attempt to undermine his journalistic activities. This case is not
merely about a single individual; it is about the collective message it sends to journalists and
whistle-blowers worldwide. The chilling effect is undeniable: if you possess classified
information or seek to unveil the hidden machinations of those in power, you may find
yourself ensnared in a legal quagmire, confronting severe consequences and the prospect of
a lifetime behind bars.

By making an example of Assange, governments are casting a long, ominous shadow over
the entire journalistic community. It is a warning shot fired across the bow of investigative
journalism—a stark message that the revelation of inconvenient truths will not be tolerated.
The threat to press freedom looms large, and journalists face a daunting choice: self-
censorship and silence or the risk of persecution and prosecution.

The "Collateral Murder" Video and WikiLeaks:

The release of classified footage by Chelsea

Manning and its subsequent publication by
WikiLeaks, under the leadership of Julian
Assange, exposed a controversial incident
involving the killing of innocent civilians by U.S.
military forces in Iraq. This footage is often
referred to as the "Collateral Murder" video.

In April 2010, Chelsea Manning, then a U.S. Army intelligence analyst, leaked a substantial
trove of classified documents and files to WikiLeaks, including the "Collateral Murder"
video. The video is a recording from the U.S. Apache helicopter's gun camera that captured
an incident in Baghdad on July 12, 2007.

The video depicts an Apache helicopter attack on a group of individuals in Baghdad,

including two Reuters journalists, Namir Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh. Believing the
group to be armed insurgents, the helicopter crew opens fire, resulting in the deaths of

283 | P a g e
several individuals, including the journalists. Two children in a van that arrived to assist the
wounded were also injured in the attack.

The release of this video by Chelsea Manning and its subsequent publication by WikiLeaks
sparked intense public debate and raised ethical and legal questions about the conduct of
the U.S. military in Iraq. Critics argued that the video depicted a reckless attack on
individuals who did not pose an immediate threat, and it raised concerns about the rules of
engagement and the protection of journalists in conflict zones.

Julian Assange and WikiLeaks played a significant role in making the video public. They
published the "Collateral Murder" video on April 5, 2010, alongside a significant amount of
other classified materials provided by Manning. Assange and WikiLeaks defended the
release as an act of transparency and accountability, emphasizing the importance of
exposing alleged war crimes and misconduct by government and military forces.

The "Collateral Murder" video had a profound impact on the public's perception of the Iraq
War and the conduct of U.S. military operations. It renewed discussions about the ethics of
war reporting and the protection of journalists in conflict zones. It also intensified the U.S.
government's pursuit of both Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange on charges related to the
release of classified information, leading to Manning's arrest and conviction, as well as
Assange's legal troubles, including extradition requests to the United States.

Meddling in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and DNC Emails:

Julian Assange and his organization, WikiLeaks, played a significant role in the 2016 United
States presidential election, particularly in relation to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Here's how
Assange's actions affected Clinton's campaign:

Email Leaks: WikiLeaks published a series of hacked emails from the Democratic National
Committee (DNC) and John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
The release of these emails, which occurred in the months leading up to the election,
revealed internal discussions, strategy, and correspondence among key figures in the
Democratic Party. The leaks were embarrassing and exposed divisions within the party,
leading to the resignation of several DNC officials.

Damaging Revelations: Some of the emails contained content that could be construed as
damaging to the Clinton campaign. For example, they revealed disparaging remarks about
Bernie Sanders and his supporters within the DNC, which fueled accusations of bias against
Clinton in the Democratic primary. Additionally, the emails contained excerpts of Clinton's
paid speeches to Wall Street firms, which were seen as controversial and contributed to a
perception of her as being too closely aligned with financial interests.

284 | P a g e
Timing: The timing of the email releases was strategically significant. The first DNC email
leak occurred just before the Democratic National Convention in July 2016, which was
intended to showcase party unity. The Podesta email leaks continued throughout the
campaign, providing a consistent stream of negative news stories for the Clinton campaign
to contend with.

Media Coverage: The publication of these emails garnered extensive media coverage,
further magnifying their impact. The stories surrounding the email leaks dominated news
cycles and contributed to the narrative that Clinton was untrustworthy and secretive.

Influence on Public Opinion: The email leaks contributed to a perception, among some
voters, that the Democratic primary process had been unfair and that Clinton and the DNC
had worked together to undermine Bernie Sanders. It also reinforced existing negative
perceptions of Clinton, potentially affecting the opinions of undecided voters.

While it is difficult to quantify the precise impact of the WikiLeaks email releases on the
election outcome, they certainly added to the overall narrative of the campaign. Some
argue that the leaks may have contributed to the erosion of public trust in Clinton and the
Democratic Party, which could have influenced the election's outcome, particularly in key
swing states. It was evident that, during this time, the ultra-left Pontiff and the Democratic
Party were engaged in a collaborative venture. This cooperation, which was extensively
documented in the book 'Political Pope' by George Neumayr, and in my view was also a part
of what was referred to as the deep state. Their aim was to implement specific agendas with
the assistance of the United Nations, in an effort to consolidate the world into a completely
inclusive new order. However, the election of Donald Trump abruptly halted these plans,
nearly reversing their progress. In addition to the 'collateral damage' video, this was another
reason why Julian Assange was singled out as an example.

Historical Persecution of Journalists: A Long Shadow of Suppression

The pages of history are stained with the blood and tears of journalists who dared to speak
truth to power. The relentless persecution of these truth-seekers is not an anomaly but a
recurring nightmare that refuses to fade into obscurity. Countless reporters and whistle-
blowers have been sacrificed at the altar of vested interests, their voices silenced through
imprisonment, threats, and even death.

Consider the case of Daniel Ellsberg, a former military analyst who dared to release the
Pentagon Papers in 1971. This damning exposé uncovered the sinister underbelly of U.S.
involvement in Vietnam, revealing a web of deception and malfeasance that shook the
nation. Yet, instead of being hailed as a hero of transparency, Ellsberg faced criminal
charges, his actions labeled as treasonous. It was a stark illustration of the lengths to which

285 | P a g e
the government would go to protect its secrets, even if it meant dismantling the very
bedrock of democracy.

The enigmatic figure known as "Deep Throat," later revealed to be Mark Felt, played a
pivotal role in the unraveling of the Watergate scandal, an unprecedented act of political
corruption that brought down a U.S. president. Felt's decision to expose the rot within the
Nixon administration was one of immense courage. However, his actions also landed him on
the wrong side of the law, as he was relentlessly pursued for leaking classified information.
Felt's case demonstrated that even those within the very institutions designed to protect
the nation can be turned into pariahs when they choose to expose the rot within.

These historical examples serve as a sobering reminder that those in power have
consistently held a vested interest in stifling those who dare to challenge the status quo.
Corruption, misconduct, and government secrets are the lifeblood of the powerful, and any
attempt to drain this cesspool of deception is met with fierce resistance. The lessons from
the past are clear: the pursuit of truth comes at a tremendous cost, and those who dare to
challenge authority are often cast into the abyss of persecution.

The ghosts of persecuted journalists throughout history continue to haunt the collective
memory of journalism. Their sacrifices stand as a testament to the enduring battle between
the forces of transparency and the guardians of the status quo. The shadow of suppression
looms large, and the question that resounds through the ages is whether societies can
evolve to recognize the invaluable role journalists play in safeguarding democracy.

In the face of this ongoing assault on truth, the responsibility falls on society to stand up for
the principles of journalism and free expression. It is essential to remember that the
persecution of journalists is not a relic of the past but a present-day reality, echoing the
darkest chapters of history. Only by acknowledging this legacy of suppression can we take
decisive action to ensure that the pursuit of truth, no matter how inconvenient, remains a
sacred duty and a fundamental human right.

Persecution Today: A Grave Affront to Journalistic Freedom

In an age when we are led to believe that democracy and the freedom of the press should
be sacrosanct, the stark reality is that we still bear witness to the haunting specter of
journalist persecution. The recent events surrounding the Australian Broadcasting
Corporation (ABC) serve as a painful reminder that the insidious hand of government
intrusion continues to violate the principles that underpin a robust free press. This deeply
troubling episode speaks volumes about the state of modern journalism, where those who
expose government actions, particularly in conflict zones, are viewed with suspicion and
treated as enemies of the state.

286 | P a g e
The raid on the ABC by the Australian Federal Police in 2019 was not just an act of
intimidation; it was a blatant affront to the very essence of journalistic independence. The
investigation in question, the "Afghan Files," shed light on troubling allegations of war
crimes committed by Australian special forces in Afghanistan. These were revelations that
should have been met with accountability and transparency, not with the chilling hand of
state repression.

The Australian authorities' raid on the

ABC was a glaring example of the
disturbing trend of governments across
the globe attempting to silence those
who dare to expose uncomfortable
truths. It highlighted a concerning lack
of respect for the critical role of
journalists in democracy, a role that
extends far beyond mere reporting to
the heart of holding the powerful accountable for their actions. But the troubling raid on the
Australian ABC is not an isolated incident. It is part of a broader pattern of harassment and
persecution that continues to plague the journalism profession. The voices of investigative
journalists who dare to question government actions and challenge the status quo are
systematically targeted. It is an alarming testament to the lengths to which some
governments are willing to go to maintain their grip on power, even if it means trampling
over the fundamental principles of a free press.

In this climate of harassment and intimidation, it is worth noting that the targeting of
individual journalists is not uncommon. Jordan Shanks, known as Friendlyjordies, and
Christopher Langker, the producer of the FriendlyJordies channel, have been subject to
intense scrutiny and legal actions in recent times. Their work in political satire and
investigative journalism has placed them in the crosshairs of those in power. Such actions
raise profound questions about the sanctity of journalistic freedom and the willingness of
authorities to stifle dissenting voices in a democracy.

The troubling raid on the ABC is a stark warning that the fight for press freedom is far from
over. In a world where transparency and accountability should be paramount, the
persecution of journalists should be met with collective outrage. It is imperative that we
defend the role of the media as a check on power and ensure that journalists who uncover
government actions, no matter how uncomfortable, are protected rather than vilified.

The troubling raid on the Australian ABC underscores the ongoing battle for journalistic
independence and the critical importance of a free press in a democratic society. It is a fight
that requires unwavering vigilance and a resolute commitment to the principles of

287 | P a g e
democracy, ensuring that the pursuit of truth remains unencumbered and that the voices of
those who dare to speak truth to power are never silenced.

Journalists' Use of Encryption and VPNs: A Fragile Fortress

In a world where journalists have become the targets of surveillance and persecution, the
adoption of digital fortresses like encryption and virtual private networks (VPNs) has
become a survival imperative. However, these tools, while providing a semblance of
security, are far from infallible, leaving journalists to navigate a digital battlefield where
even their most secretive communications can be compromised.

The adoption of encryption and VPNs by journalists is not a matter of choice but a grim
necessity. In an era where governments and intelligence agencies are eager to pry into the
lives of those who dare to challenge the status quo, the protection of sources and the
integrity of investigative work have become paramount concerns. These tools offer a shield
against the relentless encroachment on journalistic freedom, enabling secure
communication and the safeguarding of sensitive information.

Yet, for all their promise, these digital defenses are not without their vulnerabilities. The
specter of backdoors looms large, as intelligence agencies and governments may exploit
vulnerabilities in encryption protocols or technology to gain unauthorized access. The very
entities sworn to protect the nation may themselves become the predators, using their
influence to circumvent the safeguards journalists put in place to protect their sources and
their work.

Moreover, the legality and morality of these tools are increasingly in question. Some
governments, motivated by a fear of losing control, have enacted sweeping surveillance
laws that force ISPs to monitor and disclose user data. This encroachment on privacy poses
a dire threat to the safety of journalists, as even the most robust encryption and VPNs can
be rendered ineffective when service providers are legally mandated to surrender user
information.

The fragile nature of these digital defenses underscores the chilling reality that, even in an
age when information is disseminated at the speed of light, the guardians of truth continue
to labor in the shadow of surveillance and suppression. The very tools journalists have
adopted to protect themselves now serve as the battleground where their struggles for
independence and security are waged.

288 | P a g e
Data Retention: A Stealthy Menace to Journalistic Freedom

In the digital age, where every keystroke and online interaction leaves a trace, the
safeguarding of data privacy is paramount, especially for journalists whose work often
delves into sensitive and contentious issues. However, the insidious specter of data
retention, a tool implemented by some governments, poses a significant threat to
journalistic freedom and the security of sources.

Internet service providers (ISPs), the invisible conduits of our online lives, have been thrust
into the center of the data retention dilemma. Journalists, like all users of the internet,
depend on ISPs to transmit their data, making them an unwitting cog in the machine of
surveillance. Data retention laws, passed by some governments, compel ISPs to store
customer data for extended periods, ostensibly for national security or law enforcement
purposes.

The purported intent of data retention may sound noble on the surface, but the implications
are far from benign. The data stored by ISPs potentially contains a treasure trove of
information about users' online activities, including the websites they visit, the people they
communicate with, and the content they access. For journalists, whose work often involves
sensitive sources and controversial subject matter, this presents a grave threat to their
security.

The ability to track journalists' online activities, identify their sources, and uncover their
contacts could have a chilling effect on investigative reporting. Sources, already risking their
safety to expose wrongdoing, may be deterred from coming forward if they fear their
identities can be easily uncovered through digital breadcrumbs. The very essence of
journalistic independence and the role of the press in holding the powerful accountable are
compromised when journalists can no longer protect their sources.

Journalists and Whistle-blowers: Navigating Persecution and Legal Challenges

Worldwide
Journalists can face various forms of persecution, and the level of severity can vary.
Persecution may include threats, harassment, legal actions, imprisonment, or even violence.
Here are some examples of journalists from the USA, UK, Australia, Canada, and New
Zealand who have faced challenges in recent times:

289 | P a g e
United States:

Thomas Drake: NSA whistle-blower, courageously exposed

government surveillance overreach. His unwavering commitment to
truth and transparency sparked vital discussions on privacy rights
and the balance between national security and individual freedoms.

J. Kirk Wiebe: former NSA analyst, dedicated to defending civil

liberties. A key figure in exposing mass surveillance programs,
Wiebe's commitment to ethical intelligence practices has shaped
the discourse on privacy rights.

William Binney: NSA whistle-blower and former intelligence official,

exposed mass surveillance programs. His unwavering dedication to
privacy rights and ethical intelligence practices has fueled important
conversations about government transparency and individual
freedoms.

James Risen: A Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who faced legal

action for refusing to reveal his source in a story about a CIA
operation. He was subpoenaed and threatened with jail time but
ultimately avoided it.

Barrett Brown: Investigative journalist and founder of Project PM.

He was arrested and faced charges related to the sharing of a link to
hacked material but was eventually released.

Brian Karem: A White House correspondent who had his press pass
suspended in 2019. The suspension was later lifted after a legal
challenge.

290 | P a g e
United Kingdom:

Katharine Gun: A former GCHQ employee who leaked a memo

about a U.S. plan to eavesdrop on UN Security Council members in
the lead-up to the Iraq War in 2003. She was charged with violating
the Official Secrets Act but the case was dropped.

Clive Ponting: A civil servant who leaked documents related to the

sinking of the Argentine cruiser General Belgrano during the
Falklands War in 1982. He was charged with violating the Official
Secrets Act but was acquitted.

David Shayler: A former MI5 officer who exposed alleged

misconduct and incompetence within the British intelligence
service. He faced legal action and went into exile.

Australia:

Julian Assange: founder of WikiLeaks, championed government

transparency. Facing legal challenges, his work sparked global
conversations on journalism, free speech, and the delicate balance
between national security and the public's right to know.

Witness K and Bernard Collaery: They exposed Australia's

espionage activities against Timor-Leste during negotiations over
oil and gas resources in the Timor Sea. Both faced legal action, and
their trial took place in secrecy.

291 | P a g e
 Richard Boyle: A former Australian Taxation Office employee who
revealed alleged unethical and aggressive debt-collection practices
within the tax authority. He faced legal action and potential
imprisonment.

Canada:

Sylvie Therrien: A Canadian government employee who revealed

that Service Canada pressured its employees to reach quotas for
denying employment insurance claims in 2012. She was fired from
her job.

Joanna Gualtieri: An ex-Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP)

officer who reported sexual harassment and misconduct within
the RCMP. She faced personal and professional consequences for
speaking out.

These are just a few examples, and there may be more cases of journalists and whistle-
blowers facing persecution or legal action in recent times. Journalists who expose
government misconduct or corporate wrongdoing can encounter various challenges, and
their treatment can vary based on the specific circumstances and legal frameworks in their
respective countries.

Digital Deception: Cyber Espionage and the Challenge of Planting Evidence

In the intricate realm of cyber espionage, intelligence agencies are equipped with
sophisticated tools and techniques to infiltrate individuals' computers, raising concerns
about the potential for malicious activities such as planting incriminating evidence. The
covert nature of these operations allows agencies to exploit vulnerabilities, gain
unauthorized access, and manipulate digital footprints without leaving a trace. While such
practices are generally considered ethically dubious and often illegal, the blurry lines of
accountability in the digital domain pose significant challenges for attribution. The potential

292 | P a g e
for abuse of power in planting false evidence on unsuspecting individuals' computers
underscores the urgent need for robust cybersecurity measures, international cooperation,
and stringent legal frameworks to safeguard against unwarranted intrusions and protect the
integrity of digital information. As we navigate the evolving landscape of cyber threats, the
balance between national security interests and individual privacy becomes increasingly
precarious, demanding continuous scrutiny and responsible governance to mitigate the risks
posed by digital deception.

The Covert Web: Fact-Checking and Counterintelligence Unveiled

In the ostensibly noble pursuit of truth, fact-checking organizations present themselves as

stalwarts of accuracy, aiming to shield the public from the perils of misinformation.
However, beneath this veneer of objectivity, a clandestine realm emerges where biases
intertwine with potential counterintelligence objectives, raising profound concerns about
the erosion of freedom of speech. This exhaustive chapter delves into the complexities,
controversies, and covert dimensions surrounding fact-checking, exploring instances where
its noble mission may be manipulated for more sinister purposes.

1. Exploiting Fact-Checking as a Tool of Influence:

Critics argue that fact-checking, despite its purported commitment to accuracy, may
inadvertently become a tool of influence for counterintelligence agencies seeking to control
narratives and stifle dissent.

1.1 Strategic Controversies:

Instances abound where fact-checking controversies have stirred suspicions of external

influence. These strategic controversies involve the calculated use of fact-checking to
discredit political opponents or suppress dissenting voices, sparking debates about the
impartiality and independence of fact-checking organizations.

For example, in a high-stakes political campaign, fact-checking may be strategically deployed

to challenge specific claims made by a candidate, creating a narrative that tarnishes their
credibility. This strategic use not only influences public perception but also raises questions
about the motivations behind the fact-checking process.

1.2 Weaponizing Subjectivity:

The inherently subjective nature of fact-checking decisions becomes a double-edged sword

in the hands of covert actors. Covert influences may exploit this subjectivity to manipulate
fact-checking outcomes, steering narratives in alignment with their interests.

293 | P a g e
Consider a scenario where a fact-checking organization is tasked with evaluating the
accuracy of statements related to a sensitive geopolitical issue. Covert actors with a vested
interest in shaping public opinion may subtly influence fact-checkers, leveraging the
inherent subjectivity to skew the assessment in favor of their narrative.

2. Policing Information and Suppressing Dissent:

Fact-checking, ostensibly aimed at upholding accuracy, faces accusations of inadvertently

policing information and suppressing dissent under the guise of maintaining truthfulness.

2.1 Controversial Cases:

Examining controversial cases reveals instances where fact-checking decisions have been
challenged for their potential impact on free expression. In these cases, fact-checking is not
merely an arbiter of accuracy but is accused of overstepping its bounds, influencing public
opinion, and stifling voices that deviate from the mainstream.

For instance, a fact-checking controversy might arise when assessing claims related to a
contentious social issue. The decision made by fact-checkers can be perceived as not only
determining the accuracy of a statement but also influencing public discourse on the topic.

2.2 The Intersection of Biases and Counterintelligence:

Biases within fact-checking organizations can intersect with counterintelligence objectives,

creating an environment where personal beliefs and external influence may compromise
the pursuit of objective truth.

Consider a fact-checking team with individuals who have strong political leanings. Covert
actors can exploit these biases, either by infiltrating fact-checking organizations or by
influencing decision-makers, steering fact-checking outcomes in a direction that aligns with
their interests.

3. Challenges to Democracy:

The intertwining of fact-checking, biases, and potential counterintelligence influence poses

profound challenges to democratic principles, as the erosion of public trust and suppression
of dissent threaten the foundations of open discourse.

3.1 Case Studies in Erosion:

Analyzing case studies sheds light on how erosion of public trust and the chilling effect on
dissent manifest in real-world scenarios. For instance, fact-checking controversies related to
election processes can lead to heightened skepticism, eroding confidence in democratic
institutions and processes.

294 | P a g e
3.2 The Price of Silenced Dissent:

The unintended consequence of potential counterintelligence influence on fact-checking is

the silencing of dissent. Understanding the price society pays for stifling alternative
narratives is crucial in evaluating the broader impact on democratic discourse.

Consider a situation where fact-checking decisions contribute to the marginalization of

voices that challenge the status quo. The price of silenced dissent includes a diminished
diversity of perspectives, hindering the democratic ideal of robust public discourse.

4. Navigating the Shadows: Striking a Balance for Truth and Freedom:

Addressing these intricate challenges requires a delicate equilibrium between the legitimate
pursuit of accuracy and vigilance against potential misuse as a tool of information control.

4.1 Independence and Transparency:

Fact-checking organizations must reinforce their independence and transparency to resist

external influence. Clear editorial guidelines, publicly accessible methodologies, and
disclosure of funding sources become essential shields against covert manipulation.

For example, fact-checking organizations can institute mechanisms for internal audits,
external reviews, and transparency reports to demonstrate their commitment to
independence. This ensures that fact-checking remains a tool for truth rather than a pawn in
the hands of those seeking to manipulate narratives.

4.2 Fostering Media Literacy:

Empowering the public with media literacy becomes a critical defense against covert
manipulation. A well-informed audience can discern the nuances of fact-checking,
mitigating the risk of falling victim to biased or strategically influenced assessments.

Educational initiatives on media literacy can include programs that teach critical thinking
skills, fact-checking methodologies, and an understanding of potential biases in media. By
fostering media literacy, society becomes more resilient to covert attempts at manipulating
public opinion through fact-checking processes.

Conclusion:

As fact-checking traverses the complex landscape between truth and manipulation, the
convergence of biases and potential counterintelligence influence unveils a disconcerting
reality. Vigilance, transparency, and a commitment to independence emerge as the crucial
instruments in safeguarding the principles of freedom of speech and democracy. The future
of fact-checking's role in the information landscape and its impact on democratic discourse
hinges on a nuanced understanding of the covert forces at play, and a resilient commitment
to an informed and unrestricted public sphere.

295 | P a g e
Footnote references for the provided information:
Knaus, C. (2021, April 30). Whistleblowers are being scared into silence, hampering efforts to expose corruption in Australia, research
finds. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/apr/30/australias-whistleblowers-are-being-scared-into-silence-
by-significant-gaps-in-protections-research-finds Greenwald, G. (2014, February 24). How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to
Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/ Palumbo, M.
(2023). Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers: How the Left Hijacked and Weaponized the Fact-Checking Industry (Kindle Edition).

296 | P a g e
CHAPTER 20: COINTELPRO – IMPACTS
ON MENTAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH

This chapter undertakes a comprehensive exploration of the intricate and pervasive

consequences stemming from COINTELPRO (Counterintelligence Program) tactics, shedding
light on the profound impacts on the mental, physical, and emotional well-being of targeted
individuals. Through an in-depth examination of the scientific foundation behind these
tactics and their far-reaching implications, we aim to provide a thorough understanding of
the enduring repercussions faced by those subjected to covert operations.

Psychological Manipulation: Unveiling the Depths

Psychological manipulation, a cornerstone of COINTELPRO tactics, exerts profound effects
on mental health. The consistent exposure to manipulation results in heightened anxiety,
depression, and decreased self-esteem. Additionally, physical symptoms, including
headaches and sleep disturbances, may manifest. The long-term consequences involve a
compromised sense of reality and increased susceptibility to further manipulation, creating
a distressing psychological cycle. An example of psychological manipulation is the use of
disinformation campaigns. False narratives spread through various channels create
confusion and sow seeds of doubt among targeted individuals. For instance, the deliberate
spread of misinformation about an individual's personal or professional life can lead to
heightened stress and anxiety.

Gaslighting and Psychological Distress

Gaslighting, a core COINTELPRO tactic, has a scientifically proven correlation with
psychological distress. Research indicates that gaslighting techniques contribute to anxiety,
depression, low self-esteem, and post-traumatic stress symptoms among targeted
individuals. The manipulation of perception and reality exacerbates mental health issues,
fostering confusion, self-doubt, and emotional instability. An example of gaslighting can be

297 | P a g e
observed in the deliberate manipulation of an individual's surroundings. Perpetrators might
rearrange personal belongings, leading the targeted person to question their memory and
sanity. This constant state of uncertainty and self-doubt contributes significantly to
psychological distress.

Cognitive Dissonance and Emotional Strain

COINTELPRO's use of disinformation and psychological profiling to induce cognitive
dissonance results in emotional strain. Studies highlight the heightened stress levels,
confusion, and internal conflict brought about by cognitive dissonance, illustrating its
profound impact on emotional well-being. Cognitive dissonance can be exemplified through
conflicting information deliberately presented to the targeted individual. For instance,
contradictory messages from trusted sources can create a sense of internal conflict, leading
to emotional distress and mental turmoil.

Harassment and Surveillance: Psychological and Physical Toll

Psychological and Physical Effects of Harassment

Ongoing harassment and surveillance inflict detrimental outcomes on both mental and
physical health. Research emphasizes the negative impacts of intrusive behaviors, including
heightened anxiety, paranoia, sleep disturbances, and physiological stress responses. A
concrete example is the constant surveillance through electronic means. Knowing that one
is under continuous scrutiny, whether through hacked devices or invasive monitoring,
contributes significantly to heightened stress levels and a pervasive sense of vulnerability.
Workplace Impacts and Occupational Stress
Individuals subjected to workplace harassment and surveillance endure escalated
occupational stress. This leads to decreased job satisfaction, reduced productivity, and
heightened susceptibility to mental health disorders like burnout and depression.
Workplace sabotage is a tangible manifestation of the impact. Deliberate actions to tarnish
an individual's professional reputation, such as spreading false complaints or initiating
rumors within the workplace, not only jeopardize their career but also contribute to
heightened stress and emotional strain.
298 | P a g e
Social Isolation and Community Disruption: Tearing at the Social Fabric

Impact on Social Relationships and Well-being

COINTELPRO tactics, such as spreading false rumors and sowing divisions, contribute to
social isolation. Research underscores the significance of social connections in mental and
physical well-being, indicating that isolation can breed loneliness, depression, and
compromised overall health. An example is the deliberate creation of rifts within social
circles. By spreading false information or manipulating interpersonal dynamics, perpetrators
isolate the targeted individual, leading to profound loneliness and compromised mental
well-being.
Community Trust and Collective Well-being
COINTELPRO's actions shatter trust within targeted communities, causing enduring rifts and
strained relationships. Studies stress the essential role of community trust in collective well-
being, resilience, and social cohesion, highlighting the grave consequences of its erosion.
The erosion of community trust can be illustrated through the deliberate dissemination of
misinformation about an individual's intentions or character within a community. This not

299 | P a g e
only damages the targeted person's relationships but also contributes to a broader
breakdown in social cohesion.

Legal Consequences and Stress: The Weight of Legal Pressure

Legal Pressure and Psychological Toll

Employing legal actions like unjustified arrests and malicious prosecutions exacts substantial
psychological distress. Research indicates that legal stressors contribute to heightened
anxiety, depression, trauma-related symptoms, and an overarching psychological burden.
An example is the constant fear of legal repercussions. Threats of unjustified legal actions or
persistent harassment through legal means contribute significantly to chronic stress and
emotional turmoil.
Impact on Mental Health
COINTELPRO tactics correlate with a range of mental health consequences, including anxiety
disorders, mood disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and suicidal ideation. The
psychological effects may persist even after the surveillance or harassment concludes. An
example is the development of severe anxiety disorders as a result of prolonged exposure to
stressful situations. The constant fear of being monitored and the uncertainty about one's
safety contribute to long-lasting mental health challenges.
Impact on Physical Health
The chronic stress induced by COINTELPRO tactics leads to physical health problems such as
cardiovascular disease, compromised immune function, gastrointestinal disorders, and
exacerbation of pre-existing health conditions. Chronic stress can manifest in physiological
symptoms such as high blood pressure, weakened immune responses, and gastrointestinal
issues. These physical manifestations further compound the overall health challenges faced
by targeted individuals.

Examination of the Scientific Basis behind Covert Harassment Tactics and

their Impact on Mental Health, Employment, and Stress Levels
Covert harassment and surveillance profoundly affect targeted individuals' mental health,
employment, stress levels, and interpersonal relationships. This section explores the
scientific basis behind these tactics and examines their impact in these key areas. It is crucial
to recognize that experiences and effects can vary between individuals, and guiding victims
to mental health professionals is advisable in numerous situations.
However, in situations similar to COINTELPRO operations and those involving
Gangstalking/Community stalking, this approach might not always be advisable. Mental
health professionals are occasionally involved in collusion with intelligence agencies or the

300 | P a g e
Catholic consortium. These professionals might also be at risk of professional blacklisting,
leading them to cooperate or weaken the victim's claims. As a result, the recommended
treatment frequently involves the use of psychotropic drugs. However, considering that
symptoms stem from environmental factors, psychotropic drugs may not address the root
cause and can potentially harm victims by diminishing their independent spirit or spiritual
well-being.

Mental Health Impact: The Struggle Beneath the Surface

Covert harassment and surveillance tactics have been linked to significant psychological
distress, with several key factors contributing to adverse mental health outcomes.

Psychological Distress
Targeted individuals commonly experience anxiety, paranoia, depression, and even post-
traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to the constant surveillance and harassment they face.
The invasion of privacy and the sense of being constantly watched profoundly impact an
individual's sense of security and well-being. The constant fear of invasion and the loss of
privacy can lead to severe psychological distress. For instance, the installation of
surveillance devices in one's home or the interception of personal communications can
amplify feelings of vulnerability and contribute to the development of severe anxiety
disorders.

Gaslighting
Perpetrators of covert harassment often employ gaslighting techniques, manipulating the
targeted individual's perception of reality. Gaslighting can further exacerbate mental health
issues, leading to confusion, self-doubt, and emotional instability. Gaslighting can manifest
in various forms, such as discrediting the individual's experiences or making them doubt
their own memories. For example, manipulating visual or auditory cues in the environment
to make the targeted person question their perception of reality contributes significantly to
emotional instability.
Hypervigilance: Navigating a Constant State of Alertness
The ongoing surveillance and harassment experienced by targeted individuals can induce
hypervigilance, where individuals become excessively alert and suspicious of their
surroundings. Hypervigilance can result in chronic stress, exhaustion, and a heightened
sense of threat, significantly impacting mental health. Hypervigilance can lead to a state of
constant stress and anxiety, where individuals are always on edge, anticipating potential
threats. This chronic state of alertness contributes to fatigue, emotional exhaustion, and an
impaired ability to cope with stressors.

301 | P a g e
Employment Impact: Navigating Professional Challenges
Covert harassment can have detrimental effects on the employment status and prospects of
targeted individuals, primarily due to the psychological impact and distractions it causes.
Job Loss
Targeted individuals often face difficulties in maintaining employment due to the stress,
distractions, and psychological distress caused by covert harassment. The constant
surveillance and manipulation tactics can interfere with job performance, concentration,
and overall productivity, potentially leading to job loss or resignation. Job loss can result not
only from compromised performance but also from deliberate efforts to tarnish the
individual's professional reputation. For instance, false accusations or the intentional spread
of damaging information within professional networks can lead to job termination and long-
lasting career consequences.
Workplace Sabotage
Covert harassment tactics may extend to the workplace, resulting in a hostile work
environment for targeted individuals. Perpetrators may engage in spreading rumors,
initiating false complaints, and other forms of sabotage that negatively impact an
individual's professional reputation and career prospects. This can lead to further stress,
isolation, and even termination. Workplace sabotage extends beyond performance issues
and can involve a deliberate campaign to isolate the individual within the professional
community. For example, orchestrating conflicts with colleagues or spreading false
narratives about the targeted person's competence can contribute to a toxic work
environment.

302 | P a g e
Stress Levels Impact: The Unrelenting Burden

Covert harassment and surveillance tactics generate chronic stress, affecting individuals
physically and mentally.

Chronic Stress
Ongoing surveillance, harassment, and the constant feeling of being targeted contribute to
chronic stress. The persistent fear, uncertainty, and the inability to relax take a toll on an
individual's overall well-being, potentially leading to various health issues and exacerbating
pre-existing conditions. Chronic stress can have a cascading effect on physical health,
mental well-being, and overall quality of life. For example, the continuous release of stress
hormones can contribute to cardiovascular issues, compromised immune function, and the
exacerbation of pre-existing health conditions.
Sleep Disturbances: A Restless Reality
Stress from covert harassment can disrupt sleep patterns, causing insomnia or poor sleep
quality. The constant psychological strain and heightened vigilance interfere with the ability
to relax and find rest, further intensifying stress levels. Sleep disturbances can contribute to
fatigue, cognitive impairment, and a compromised ability to cope with stressors. Sleep
disturbances are not merely a consequence but also a contributing factor to the overall
burden on targeted individuals. The inability to achieve restful sleep exacerbates existing
mental health challenges and diminishes the capacity to cope with the stressors of daily life.

303 | P a g e
Impact on Interpersonal Relationships: Fractured Connections
Covert harassment and surveillance tactics not only affect the targeted individual but also
strain their relationships with others.

Strained Relationships
The stress and paranoia caused by covert harassment can strain relationships with friends,
family, and colleagues. Targeted individuals may find it challenging to trust others due to
the constant fear of betrayal or manipulation. This can lead to social isolation, loneliness,
and damaged relationships as communication and intimacy become increasingly difficult.
Strained relationships can beintensified through orchestrated efforts to damage the
targeted person's social connections. For example, spreading false rumors about the
individual's personal life or manipulating social interactions to create misunderstandings can
contribute to a pervasive sense of isolation and strained relationships.
Stigmatization: The Weight of Unjust Perceptions
Targeted individuals may face stigmatization and isolation by others who either believe or
are manipulated into thinking negatively about them. The false perceptions and rumors
surrounding the targeted individual can create barriers to forming and maintaining healthy
interpersonal relationships, compounding the psychological distress they experience.
Stigmatization often involves the deliberate cultivation of negative perceptions within the
community. For instance, portraying the targeted person as a threat or an undesirable
member of society through false narratives can lead to isolation and social exclusion.
In Conclusion: Unraveling the Complex Web
In conclusion, this chapter has meticulously uncovered the extensive and interconnected
impact of covert harassment and psychological manipulation on the mental health,
employment, and stress levels of targeted individuals. By delving into the scientific basis
behind these tactics, we gain insight into the enduring consequences faced by those
subjected to covert operations like COINTELPRO. It underscores the need for comprehensive
support mechanisms, recognizing the varying experiences of individuals and the challenges
posed by collusion or professional blacklisting in seeking mental health assistance. The
examination of COINTELPRO tactics has revealed not only the immediate harm caused but
also the enduring and pervasive impact on the well-being of those targeted. As we navigate
the complexities of covert operations, it becomes evident that protecting individuals from
these tactics requires a holistic understanding of the multifaceted challenges they face.
From psychological manipulation to the erosion of social connections and the strain on
professional life, the repercussions extend far beyond the surface.
Thus, the pursuit of justice and well-being necessitates not only addressing the visible
manifestations but also delving into the intricacies of covert harassment and its lasting
effects on individuals.

304 | P a g e
As we reflect on the information presented, it is crucial to recognize the resilience of
targeted individuals who endure these profound challenges. Their ability to withstand the
unrelenting pressure of covert operations speaks to the strength of the human spirit.
Additionally, this chapter serves as a call to action, urging society to acknowledge the gravity
of these issues and work towards creating a support system that addresses the unique
needs of those affected by COINTELPRO and similar programs.
In moving forward, it is imperative to continue research into the psychological and
physiological effects of covert harassment, ensuring that professionals in mental health and
related fields are equipped to provide appropriate support. Furthermore, legal frameworks
need to evolve to prevent and address instances of covert harassment, offering recourse to
those whose lives are disrupted by these insidious tactics.
In essence, understanding the far-reaching impacts of COINTELPRO goes beyond academic
curiosity—it is a crucial step toward fostering empathy, awareness, and proactive measures
to protect the well-being of individuals within our communities.

Footnote refference for provided information:

de Becker, G. (2004). The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals That Protect Us from Violence (Paperback). Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing
Group. Stern, R. (2018). The Gaslight Effect: How to Spot and Survive the Hidden Manipulation Others Use to Control Your Life
(Paperback). Harmony. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power
(Kindle Edition). Profile Books.

305 | P a g e
CHAPTER 21: INVESTIGATION INTO THE
COLLUSION BETWEEN MENTAL HEALTH
PROFESSIONALS AND INTELLIGENCE
AGENCIES

The collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies has
prompted significant concerns, giving rise to questions about professional ethics, human
rights violations, and the suppression of dissent. This chapter delves into the disturbing
partnership between these entities, focusing on the historical context of COINTELPRO
operations and recent claims by victims of covert harassment, including those silenced by
the Catholic Church for allegations of abuse. By shedding light on these issues, a deeper
understanding emerges of the detrimental impact on targeted individuals and the urgent
need for accountability and reform.

Collusion Between Mental Health Professionals and Intelligence Agencies

Pathologization of Dissent:
One disturbing aspect of this collusion was the pathologization of dissent. Dissenting voices
and individuals questioning the status quo were often labeled as mentally unstable or
psychologically disturbed. Mental health professionals, sometimes knowingly or
unknowingly, played a role in providing diagnoses that discredited and silenced activists,
suppressing their legitimate concerns and criticisms.

306 | P a g e
Misuse of Psychiatric Evaluations:

Mental health professionals were occasionally used as tools to legitimize the persecution of
targeted individuals. Intelligence agencies sought psychiatric evaluations to portray activists
as mentally unfit, undermining their credibility and justifying surveillance, harassment, or
imprisonment. This collusion violated professional ethics and contributed to the systemic
suppression of individuals' rights.
Penetration of English-Speaking Healthcare Institutions: The Infiltration and Integration of
the Catholic Consortium's Influence
The investigation into the collusion between mental health professionals, intelligence
agencies, and the Catholic Consortium explores the complex interplay of influential entities
within the United States and other English-speaking countries. The Roman Catholic Church,
as one of the largest and most powerful organizations, operates as a vast network
interconnected through group cohesion, employment opportunities, and cronyism.

Within medical, mental health, and other health sectors, the collective power of the
Catholic Consortium strategically deploys resources to further the Vatican's agenda. This
collaboration extends beyond healthcare services, impacting healthcare practices, ethical
considerations, and the pursuit of global agendas.

Psychiatric Abuse: Silencing Dissidents and Targeted Individuals through

False Diagnoses

Introduction:
In a world where conformity is encouraged and dissent is met with resistance, those
challenging the status quo may find themselves subjected to covert operations,
psychological warfare, and intimidation. Targeted individuals navigating this treacherous
journey often face psychological abuse, with mental health professionals playing a role in
silencing them through false diagnoses.

307 | P a g e
Perplexing Circumstances and Limited Support:
The targeted individuals' search for support in a society often refusing to acknowledge their
experiences proves elusive. Trusted allies lacking understanding often dismiss their
narratives as sensational or surreal, challenging belief boundaries.
The Suggestion of Seeking Help:

Well-intentioned friends may suggest seeking therapeutic assistance, leading to the sinister
manipulation of false psychiatric diagnoses to discredit and silence victims.
Diagnosis as a Weapon:
Psychologists, influenced by senior staff with allegiances to influential organizations, issue
false psychiatric diagnoses to seal the fate of targeted individuals, perpetuating covert
operations without public scrutiny.
Diagnosing Mental Health in COINTELPRO-Like Operations: Impact on Reporting and
Oversight
Mental health professionals may intentionally misdiagnose targeted individuals, dismissing
reports to local police about stalking, intimidation, or physical assaults as products of mental
illness. This allows COINTELPRO-like operations to continue without oversight.
The Power of Covert Alliances
Senior staff, operating in discreet alliances, subtly leverage their influence to ensure
compliance with the issuance of false psychiatric diagnoses. This collaboration allows
intelligence agencies to perpetuate COINTELPRO-like programs without public scrutiny.
Psychological Abuse and False Diagnoses

Some victims of COINTELPRO-like operations endure psychological abuse, with mental

health professionals contributing to false diagnoses, dealing a devastating blow to genuine
victims.
The Involvement of Mental Health Professionals in CIA Experiments
In the annals of covert government operations, a disturbing alliance between intelligence
agencies and mental health professionals emerges as a chilling testament to the lengths
some organizations are willing to go in the pursuit of power and control. The clandestine
marriage of minds between the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and mental health experts
is epitomized by a series of ominous programs, each with its own eerie codename—MK-
Ultra, Project Bluebird, Artichoke, Chatter, Midnight Climax, Stargate, and Operation
Paperclip. These programs, shrouded in secrecy, delved into the darkest corners of human
consciousness, leaving a trail of ethical transgressions and psychological scars that endure to
this day.

308 | P a g e
MK-Ultra: Unleashing the Mind's Abyss
At the heart of this disturbing nexus is MK-Ultra, a program that sought to explore the
depths of mind control and manipulation. Initiated during the Cold War era, MK-Ultra aimed
to harness the power of psychological and chemical experimentation for covert operations.
The collaboration between the CIA and mental health professionals allowed for the
development of insidious methods to break the human spirit and mold it into a tool of
espionage.
Project Bluebird and Artichoke: Crafting the Perfect Agent

Project Bluebird and its successor, Artichoke, were predecessors to MK-Ultra, focusing on
the creation of a programmable, controllable agent. Mental health professionals played a
pivotal role in these projects, contributing expertise in behavioral psychology and mind-
altering substances. The ethical boundaries were blurred as the line between patient and
test subject became indistinguishable, casting a dark shadow over the ethical integrity of the
medical profession.
Chatter and Midnight Climax: A Symphony of Deceit
Chatter and Midnight Climax delved into the realms of truth serum experimentation and the
use of unsuspecting civilians as unwitting subjects. Mental health professionals collaborated
in designing experiments that pushed the limits of human vulnerability. The orchestration of
deceit and manipulation in these programs raised profound questions about the ethics of
the healing professions, as practitioners found themselves entangled in the web of
government-sponsored deception.
Stargate: The Paranormal Frontier

Stargate took the collaboration to uncharted territories, exploring the boundaries of

extrasensory perception and psychic phenomena. Mental health professionals became
conduits for government endeavors into the supernatural, blurring the lines between
science and pseudoscience. The ethical implications of such ventures echoed the unsettling
nature of the experiments themselves.
Operation Paperclip: A Dark Legacy

Operation Paperclip stands as a testament to the post-World War II recruitment of German

scientists, including those with questionable ethical backgrounds. The integration of these
scientists into American intelligence and mental health programs further fueled the unholy
alliance between academia, medicine, and covert operations.
As we unveil the shadows surrounding the involvement of mental health professionals in
these CIA experiments, the ethical ramifications resonate through time. The haunting
question remains—how far is too far when the guardians of mental health become
accomplices in the manipulation of the very minds they are sworn to protect? The indelible
marks left by these clandestine collaborations serve as a stark reminder of the delicate
balance between the pursuit of knowledge and the safeguarding of human dignity.

309 | P a g e
The Role of Psychologists in Guantanamo Bay: Ethical Concerns and the Call
for Positive Change
Psychologists' involvement in designing and implementing Enhanced Interrogation
Techniques in Guantanamo Bay has sparked ethical debates, leading to changes in the
American Psychological Association's policies.

The Widespread Child Sexual Abuse Scandal and the Catholic Church

The Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in Australia
revealed the Catholic Church's extensive abuse. Victims faced dismissal and harassment,
with mental health professionals sometimes contributing to skepticism and misdiagnoses.
Conclusion

The instances discussed illustrate the potential for false diagnoses by mental health
professionals in COINTELPRO-like operations, emphasizing the need for scrutiny,
transparency, and accountability in the history of intelligence agencies' involvement in
mental health practices.
Call for Change:

It is imperative to acknowledge that not all mental health professionals respond in this
manner, and many work diligently to support and validate survivors of abuse. Nevertheless,
the cases where victims have been dismissed or disbelieved highlight a critical need for
reform within the mental health field.
Efforts must be directed toward raising awareness and providing specialized training to
mental health professionals to ensure they respond empathetically and sensitively to
survivors of abuse. This training should encompass an understanding of the dynamics of
abuse, the complexities of trauma, and the potential impact of institutional power dynamics
on the experiences of survivors.

310 | P a g e
Suppression of Testimonies and Justice:
The collusion between mental health professionals and institutions such as the Catholic
Church highlights the power dynamics that enable the suppression of victims' testimonies.
By dismissing or pathologizing victims' claims, these institutions seek to protect their
reputation and maintain their influence. This collusion not only denies justice to the victims
but also perpetuates a culture of silence and impunity, allowing abuse to go unaddressed
and further perpetuating harm.
Analysis of the Ethical Implications and Consequences of Collaboration between Mental
Health Professionals and Intelligence Agencies

The collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies in

operations like COINTELPRO raises significant ethical concerns and has far-reaching
consequences. This chapter delves into the ethical implications of this collaboration,
examining the potential harm caused to individuals, the erosion of professional ethics, and
the impact on society as a whole. By analyzing these implications, we can better understand
the need for ethical guidelines and reforms to protect the rights and well-being of
individuals.
Violation of Autonomy and Informed Consent:

Collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies can undermine
individuals' autonomy and their right to make informed decisions about their mental health
treatment. When professionals collude with intelligence agencies, they may be coerced or
pressured into providing information without the individual's knowledge or consent. This
violation of autonomy and informed consent not only undermines the therapeutic
relationship but also erodes trust in the mental health profession as a whole.
Pathologization of Dissent:
One concerning ethical implication of collaboration is the pathologization of dissent.
Intelligence agencies may use mental health professionals to label individuals expressing
dissenting opinions or engaging in activism as mentally ill or unstable. This practice
discredits legitimate concerns and undermines democratic principles of free speech and
political expression. The pathologization of dissent also contributes to the stigmatization
and marginalization of individuals who question authority or challenge oppressive systems.
Compromising the Integrity of Mental Health Profession:

Collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies compromises

the integrity of the mental health profession. Engaging in activities that violate ethical
guidelines, such as breaching confidentiality or participating in covert operations,
undermines public trust in the profession and casts doubt on the impartiality and objectivity
of mental health evaluations. This erosion of trust can have long-lasting consequences,
making individuals reluctant to seek mental health support and impeding the profession's
ability to provide effective and ethical care.

311 | P a g e
Potential for Misuse of Psychiatric Evaluations:
The collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies raises
concerns about the misuse of psychiatric evaluations. Intelligence agencies may seek
psychiatric assessments to manipulate or control individuals, using mental health diagnoses
as a tool for coercion or intimidation. This not only undermines the credibility and integrity
of psychiatric evaluations but also subjects individuals to further harm and violation of their
rights.
Threat to Confidentiality and Privacy:

The collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies poses a
significant threat to the confidentiality and privacy of individuals seeking mental health
support. Intelligence agencies may demand access to confidential patient information or
require professionals to breach confidentiality to gather intelligence. This breach of trust
undermines the therapeutic relationship and may deter individuals from seeking help or
disclosing sensitive information, impeding their access to appropriate care.
Societal Implications:
The collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies has
broader societal implications. It undermines democratic values and the protection of human
rights by stifling dissent and targeting individuals based on their beliefs or political activities.
Such collaboration perpetuates an environment of fear and surveillance, eroding civil
liberties and compromising the free exchange of ideas and opinions within society.

The collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies in

operations like COINTELPRO raises significant ethical concerns and has far-reaching
consequences. Violations of autonomy and informed consent, pathologization of dissent,
compromised professional integrity, misuse of psychiatric evaluations, threats to
confidentiality and privacy, and broader societal implications all highlight the urgent need
for ethical guidelines and reforms.

To address these ethical implications, it is crucial for mental health professionals to uphold
ethical principles, advocate for the protection of individuals' rights, and resist any pressures
to collaborate in unethical practices. The development and implementation of robust ethical
guidelines, along with whistle-blower protection mechanisms, can help safeguard the
integrity of the mental health profession and ensure the well-being of individuals seeking
mental health support.

Additionally, it is essential for professional organizations and regulatory bodies to actively

address and condemn any collaboration that violates ethical principles. They should provide
clear guidelines and training to mental health professionals, emphasizing the importance of
upholding ethical standards and protecting the rights of their clients.
Furthermore, society as a whole must recognize the potential harm caused by the collusion
between mental health professionals and intelligence agencies. This requires raising

312 | P a g e
awareness about the ethical implications of such collaboration and advocating for reforms
that promote transparency, accountability, and respect for individual autonomy.
Recent claims by victims of covert harassment, including those who have been silenced by
the Catholic Church for claims of abuse, underscore the urgent need for comprehensive
reforms and ethical scrutiny. It is essential to create safe spaces for individuals to come
forward with their experiences, ensuring that their voices are heard and that appropriate
actions are taken to address any wrongdoing.
By critically analyzing the ethical implications and consequences of collaboration between
mental health professionals and intelligence agencies, we can work towards a more ethical
and accountable system. This involves fostering a culture of ethical awareness, promoting
professional integrity, and protecting the fundamental rights and well-being of individuals in
their pursuit of mental health support.

In conclusion, the collaboration between mental health professionals and intelligence

agencies raises significant ethical concerns. It violates autonomy and informed consent,
pathologized dissent, compromises professional integrity, misuses psychiatric evaluations,
and threatens confidentiality and privacy. Recognizing and addressing these ethical
implications is crucial for upholding the integrity of the mental health profession and
protecting the rights of individuals seeking mental health support. Through comprehensive
reforms, ethical guidelines, and increased awareness, we can strive towards a system that
prioritizes ethical practice, accountability, and the well-being of all individuals.

The Expansive Influence of the Roman Catholic Church and Its Implications
for Healthcare
As mentioned in various sections of this book, due to the global magnitude of the Roman
Catholic Church, it holds significant influence, making it one of the most powerful entities
worldwide. Even in the United States, the Roman Catholic Church's reach has become
predominant, with adherents spread throughout various sectors, including intelligence
agencies, government entities, and healthcare. This extensive influence implies that
operations akin to COINTELPRO could potentially persist, involving healthcare providers who
might engage in actions like issuing false diagnoses, malpractice, negligence, or abuse.

The Dominance of Roman Catholic Church Healthcare and Education

In numerous countries across the globe, the Roman Catholic Church boasts a formidable
presence in the fields of healthcare and education. Its extensive network of schools,
universities, and hospitals is often hailed as one of the largest non-state systems of
education and healthcare provision. This chapter explores the countries where the Roman
Catholic Church is a leader in these sectors, how it acquires influence, and how governments
provide tax breaks and funding to support its endeavors.

313 | P a g e
Countries Where the Roman Catholic Church Leads in Healthcare and Education:
The Roman Catholic Church's influence in healthcare and education is particularly
pronounced in the following countries:

United States: Catholic healthcare systems and schools have a significant presence, serving
millions of people. Prominent examples include the Catholic Health Association and the
network of Catholic universities.
Philippines: The Catholic Church runs a substantial number of educational institutions and
hospitals, making it a vital contributor to the country's education and healthcare landscape.

Italy: Catholic institutions play a crucial role in providing healthcare services and education,
with prominent universities like the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.

India: The Church operates numerous educational institutions and healthcare facilities,
contributing significantly to the country's social and educational welfare.

Brazil: Catholic organizations, such as Caritas and Catholic universities, are integral to both
education and healthcare services in Brazil.

Accumulating Power and Influence:

The Roman Catholic Church has amassed substantial power and influence through its
healthcare and education initiatives. Key factors contributing to this influence include:

Wide Outreach: Catholic institutions often reach remote and underserved areas, providing
essential services to those who might otherwise lack access to education and healthcare.
Long-Term Commitment: The Church's longstanding involvement in these sectors has
created a sense of trust and reliability among communities it serves, bolstering its influence.
Collaboration with Governments: In many countries, the Catholic Church collaborates with
governments to deliver essential services, further solidifying its position.

Government Support:
Governments in countries where the Roman Catholic Church is a major player in healthcare
and education often provide support through various means:
Tax Breaks: Many countries offer tax exemptions and deductions to religious organizations,
including the Catholic Church, to encourage their involvement in education and healthcare.
Funding Partnerships: Governments may provide funding to Catholic institutions, especially
when they deliver services in underserved or economically disadvantaged regions.

314 | P a g e
Policy Influence: The Church's moral and ethical perspectives often influence public policy,
and governments may take them into consideration in areas such as healthcare and
education.

Systemic Factors Contributing to Discrimination and Malpractice in Roman Catholic

Healthcare and Education:
Within the vast and diverse realm of Roman Catholic healthcare and education institutions,
systemic factors can occasionally contribute to discrimination and malpractice. While the
intention of these organizations is to serve and care for individuals, there are instances
where systemic issues can result in challenges for those who do not align perfectly with the
religious doctrine of the Church. This chapter explores systemic factors that can lead to
discrimination and malpractice within the Roman Catholic healthcare and education system,
including the potential for discrimination against individuals whom the Roman Catholic
Church may perceive as enemies.

1. Doctrinal Inflexibility:
The Roman Catholic Church, as an institution, adheres to specific doctrines and moral
teachings. These doctrines provide guidance for decision-making in healthcare and
education. However, the Church's commitment to these teachings can sometimes lead to
rigid interpretations and practices. This rigidity may manifest as an unwillingness to
accommodate differing beliefs, potentially resulting in discrimination against individuals or
groups that the Church may view as theological adversaries, such as Baptists or Seventh-day
Adventists. Disagreements over theological matters, such as the interpretation of a "Sunday
law" as the "mark of the beast," can contribute to this perceived enmity.
2. Ethical Dilemmas and Moral Compromises:
Roman Catholic institutions face ethical dilemmas when the moral values they uphold clash
with the choices and beliefs of their patients and students. Decisions related to reproductive
health, LGBTQ+ rights, end-of-life care, and other sensitive topics can create moral conflicts.
In navigating these dilemmas, the system can sometimes prioritize religious doctrine over
individual rights, leading to potential malpractice or discrimination, particularly when
religious differences exacerbate the situation.
3. Lack of External Oversight:

Religious institutions, including the Roman Catholic Church, often enjoy some degree of
autonomy. The lack of external oversight, compared to secular institutions, can create an
environment where systemic issues go unchallenged. This lack of accountability can make it
more challenging to address instances of discrimination and malpractice, particularly when
the Church's theological stance is perceived to be in conflict with other religious groups.

315 | P a g e
4. Legal Protections and Exemptions:
In some regions, religious institutions benefit from legal protections and exemptions that
allow them to maintain certain practices without interference. While these protections can
be essential for religious freedom, they can create situations where individuals' rights are
compromised due to a lack of legal recourse, especially when there are theological disputes
between religious groups.
5. Organizational Culture and Historical Practices:
The culture and historical practices of the Roman Catholic Church, which include its
hierarchical structure, can influence the way decisions are made and policies are
established. If a culture within the organization prioritizes religious purity over inclusivity, it
can create a systemic environment where individuals may be at risk of discrimination or
malpractice, particularly if they are perceived as theological adversaries.
Continued awareness and examination of these systemic factors are crucial for addressing
and mitigating discrimination and malpractice within Roman Catholic healthcare and
education institutions.

Footnote references for the provided information:

Milman, O. (2015, May 9). Edward Snowden says Australia’s new data retention laws are 'dangerous'. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/09/edward-snowden-says-australias-new-data-retention-laws-are-dangerous
Chappell, B. (2017, August 17). Psychologists Behind CIA 'Enhanced Interrogation' Program Settle Detainees' Lawsuit. NPR.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/08/17/543923752/psychologists-behind-cia-enhanced-interrogation-program-settle-
detainees-lawsuit Marks, J. D. (1991). The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control. W. W. Norton & Company.
Ross, C. A. (2006). The CIA Doctors: Human Rights Violations by American Psychiatrists. Manitou Communications.

316 | P a g e
CHAPTER 22: SOCIETAL ENGINEERING:
NAVIGATING THE BALANCE BETWEEN
PROGRESS AND PERIL

An In-Depth Exploration of Societal Engineering Challenges

Societal engineering is a field of social science that deals with the creation and influence of
human societies on a large enough scale to affect entire populations. While it can be used
for positive purposes, such as creating a safer, greener, more sustainable, healthier, better-
connected, more energy-efficient, and productive planet, it can also be used to manipulate
people into believing certain agendas.
One of the most significant dangers of societal engineering is that it can be used to
manipulate people’s beliefs and behaviors. For example, propaganda is a form of societal
engineering that is used to influence people’s opinions and beliefs. It is often used by
governments, political parties, and other organizations to promote their agendas and to
discredit their opponents.
Another example of societal engineering is the use of technology to manipulate people’s
behavior. Social media platforms, for instance, use algorithms to show users content that is
likely to keep them engaged on the platform. This can lead to the spread of misinformation
and the creation of echo chambers, where people are only exposed to information that
confirms their existing beliefs.
Pharmacology is another area where societal engineering can be used to manipulate
people’s behavior. For example, pharmaceutical companies may use marketing tactics to
convince people that they need a particular drug, even if they don’t. This can lead to over-
prescription of drugs and can have negative consequences for people’s health.
In conclusion, while societal engineering can be used for positive purposes, it is essential to
be aware of its potential for negative manipulation. We should always question the sources

317 | P a g e
of information and the motivations behind them, and strive to make informed decisions
based on objective facts and evidence.

The Erosion of Autonomy in Societal Engineering

In the expansive realm of societal engineering, a critical element threading through its
intricate patterns is the concept of individual autonomy. At its core, autonomy symbolizes
the freedom of individuals to make choices, shape their beliefs, and determine their actions
independently. However, the darker facet of societal engineering surfaces when this valued
autonomy is jeopardized, posing a threat to the foundational principles of personal freedom
and self-determination.
Autonomy, a fundamental human right, allows individuals to exercise their free will and
navigate life's complexities based on personal values and convictions. It serves as the
cornerstone of democratic societies, supporting principles of liberty, equality, and human
dignity.
As societal engineering endeavors to mold and shape societies on a grand scale, a delicate
balance emerges between progress and peril. When taken to extremes, the manipulation of
beliefs and behaviors can tip this balance, resulting in a perilous erosion of individual
autonomy. Whether through sophisticated propaganda campaigns, technological
algorithms, or pharmacological interventions, external forces can exert undue influence,
challenging the very essence of personal agency.
Ethical questions surrounding the loss of individual autonomy in societal engineering are
profound. At the heart of these dilemmas lies the tension between the collective good and
individual rights. Determining how much influence is acceptable and where the line should
be drawn between guiding a society toward positive outcomes and infringing upon the
sacred territory of personal choice becomes a complex ethical quandary.
The manipulation of beliefs and behaviors poses a direct threat to personal freedom. When
external forces dictate what individuals should believe or how they should act, the rich
diversity of perspectives unravels, leaving behind a monochromatic landscape devoid of
genuine choices.
In the digital age, technology has become a potent tool in the hands of societal engineers.
Algorithms on social media platforms, designed to maximize user engagement,
inadvertently create information bubbles and echo chambers. Individuals find themselves
ensnared in a web of tailored content, subtly shaping their beliefs and perspectives through
unseen algorithms.
To prevent the erosion of autonomy, establishing ethical safeguards within the realm of
societal engineering is imperative. Transparent practices, informed consent, and respect for
individual rights should be integrated into the fabric of any large-scale societal intervention.

318 | P a g e
Oversight and accountability mechanisms must be in place to ensure that the pursuit of
collective goals does not trample upon the sacred ground of personal autonomy.
Society must remain vigilant, questioning the motivations and consequences of societal
engineering endeavors. As we navigate the complexities of an interconnected world,
preserving individual autonomy becomes a collective responsibility. Through open dialogue,
critical thinking, and a commitment to ethical principles, we can strive to strike a balance
between societal progress and the safeguarding of personal freedom.
In the ongoing narrative of societal engineering, the preservation of individual autonomy
serves as a beacon, guiding us away from the shadows of undue influence and towards a
future where personal freedom remains sacrosanct.

Ethical Considerations in Societal Engineering

In the intricate dance of societal engineering, a spotlight must be cast on the ethical
considerations that accompany the methods employed, particularly when entailing
manipulation through propaganda or technology. This chapter delves into the profound
ethical concerns that arise, emphasizing the potential ramifications for trust in institutions
and the very bedrock of a democratic society.
1. The Ethical Tightrope:
Societal engineering often walks a precarious tightrope between achieving positive
outcomes for the greater good and the ethical pitfalls associated with manipulation. The
methods employed, whether in shaping public opinion or leveraging technology, demand
scrutiny to ensure they adhere to ethical standards.
2. Propaganda's Deceptive Veil:
One of the ethical quagmires in societal engineering is the use of propaganda as a tool to
influence public opinion. When information is manipulated or selectively presented to serve
a particular agenda, it raises concerns about the authenticity and transparency of the
narrative. Deceptive practices erode the trust individuals place in institutions, distorting the
foundations of open and honest communication.
3. The Technological Paradox:
Technology, while a potent force for societal progress, introduces a paradoxical ethical
dimension. Algorithms governing social media platforms, designed to maximize
engagement, inadvertently create information bubbles and echo chambers. This
unintentional shaping of user experiences raises questions about the ethical responsibility of
those wielding technological tools in societal engineering.

319 | P a g e
4. The Undermining of Trust:
Ethical lapses in societal engineering, especially those involving manipulation, have far-
reaching consequences. Trust, a delicate fabric holding societies together, becomes frayed
when individuals perceive that their opinions and beliefs are being orchestrated by external
forces. The erosion of trust weakens the very foundations of democratic societies, where an
informed and trusting citizenry is vital for a functioning democracy.

5. Transparency as a Pillar:
A cornerstone of ethical societal engineering lies in transparency. Open and honest
communication about the methods employed, the goals pursued, and the potential impacts
on individuals fosters a sense of trust. When transparency is compromised, ethical concerns
are heightened, and the risk of public skepticism and backlash escalates.
6. Safeguarding Democratic Values:
Democratic societies hinge on the principles of openness, accountability, and the free
exchange of ideas. Ethical considerations in societal engineering become imperative to
safeguard these democratic values. When manipulation occurs, the very essence of a
democracy, which relies on an informed and engaged citizenry, is threatened.
7. The Call for Ethical Guidelines:
Recognizing the ethical challenges within societal engineering, there is a growing call for the
establishment of clear ethical guidelines. These guidelines would serve as a compass,
navigating the delicate balance between societal progress and the preservation of
democratic ideals. Ethical oversight becomes paramount to ensure that the methods
employed do not compromise the integrity of democratic processes.
In conclusion, ethical considerations in societal engineering are not mere academic
ponderings; they are the linchpin holding together the fabric of democratic societies. As we
navigate the complex landscape of societal change, an unwavering commitment to
transparency, accountability, and ethical practices becomes indispensable. Without it, the
very trust that binds societies may unravel, leaving in its wake a fractured and disillusioned
citizenry.

Unintended Consequences in Societal Engineering

Societal engineering, with its ambitious aspirations for positive change, often sets in motion
a complex web of actions and reactions. In this chapter, we delve into the intricate
landscape of unintended consequences, where the ripple effects of societal interventions
may carry unforeseen negative outcomes, subtly reshaping various facets of society.

320 | P a g e
1. The Complexity of Societal Dynamics:
Societies are intricate ecosystems, comprised of countless interwoven elements. Societal
engineering initiatives, driven by noble intentions, attempt to influence and shape these
dynamics. However, the complexity of societal interactions makes predicting outcomes with
absolute certainty a challenging endeavor.

2. The Butterfly Effect:

Societal engineering operates within a context reminiscent of the butterfly effect, where
small initial changes can lead to significant and unpredictable consequences over time.
What may seem like a positive alteration at the outset could trigger a cascade of unforeseen
reactions, altering the trajectory of societal development in unexpected ways.

3. Cultural Shifts and Transformations:

Efforts to engineer societal change, even those aimed at fostering cultural shifts, carry the
risk of unintended consequences for cultural identities. What begins as an attempt to
promote certain values or behaviors may inadvertently lead to the erosion of cultural
richness or the emergence of unintended cultural clashes.

4. Mental Health Ramifications:

The impact of societal engineering on mental health is a realm where unintended
consequences can be particularly profound. Initiatives targeting societal norms or
expectations may inadvertently contribute to increased stress, anxiety, or feelings of
inadequacy among individuals, as they navigate the evolving landscape of societal
expectations.

5. Unforeseen Social Strains:

Changes in societal structures can create unforeseen strains on social relationships. For
example, alterations in work dynamics or family structures intended to enhance societal
well-being may inadvertently lead to increased stress on individuals, strained interpersonal
relationships, or unintended consequences for family cohesion.

6. Economic Ramifications:

321 | P a g e
Societal engineering often intertwines with economic systems. Changes aimed at improving
societal welfare may unintentionally lead to economic consequences, affecting
employment, industries, and wealth distribution in ways not initially foreseen.

7. Balancing Act:
Recognizing the potential for unintended consequences, societal engineers face a delicate
balancing act. It involves weighing the desired positive outcomes against the potential
negative repercussions, navigating the intricate web of societal interactions with caution,
and acknowledging the inherent uncertainty in predicting complex social systems.

8. Continuous Adaptation:
Acknowledging the potential for unintended consequences necessitates a commitment to
continuous adaptation and learning. Societal engineering initiatives must incorporate
mechanisms for ongoing assessment and adjustment, allowing for a responsive approach to
mitigate negative outcomes as they arise.
In conclusion, the road of societal engineering, while paved with good intentions, is fraught
with the potential for unintended consequences. The dynamic and interconnected nature of
societies demands humility in recognizing the limits of predictability. As we embark on the
journey of societal change, a vigilant awareness of the potential ripple effects and a
commitment to adaptability become essential safeguards against the unforeseen negative
consequences that may shape the evolution of our shared social fabric.

Inequality and Discrimination in Societal Engineering

In the pursuit of societal progress, the terrain of societal engineering is not immune to the
looming shadows of inequality and discrimination. This chapter delves into the nuanced
risks that lie within the folds of societal interventions, exploring how well-intentioned
efforts may inadvertently exacerbate existing social disparities, fostering discriminatory
practices and deepening societal divisions.

1. The Double-Edged Sword:

Societal engineering, driven by the desire to create positive change, carries within it the
potential for unintended consequences. While its aim is often to address societal issues, the
methods employed may unintentionally reinforce existing inequalities or introduce new
discriminatory dynamics.

322 | P a g e
2. Targeted Impacts on Marginalized Groups:
One of the critical risks is the possibility of certain groups being disproportionately affected
by engineered societal changes. Whether due to unintentional oversight or implicit biases
embedded in the interventions, marginalized communities may bear the brunt of societal
shifts, amplifying existing disparities.

3. Reinforcing Structural Inequities:

Societal engineering initiatives, if not carefully crafted, can inadvertently reinforce structural
inequities. Whether through policies, economic interventions, or cultural shifts, there's a
risk that the changes may inadvertently perpetuate and deepen existing hierarchies,
entrenching disparities rather than alleviating them.

4. Unintended Discriminatory Outcomes:

Discrimination, whether overt or subtle, can manifest in the outcomes of societal
engineering efforts. If certain groups experience adverse effects or are excluded from the
benefits of change, it can perpetuate a cycle of disadvantage, entrenching discriminatory
practices within the very systems designed to foster progress.

5. Heightening Social Tensions:

Societal engineering that neglects the nuances of social dynamics may inadvertently
heighten tensions within society. If perceived as favoring certain groups over others,
engineered changes can exacerbate existing divisions, fostering a sense of injustice and
deepening societal rifts.

6. Cultural Sensitivity and Inclusivity:

Mitigating the risks of inequality and discrimination requires a heightened awareness of
cultural sensitivity and inclusivity in societal engineering initiatives. A failure to recognize
and respect diverse perspectives can inadvertently lead to exclusionary practices, widening
gaps and fostering an environment of unequal opportunity.

7. Intersectionality and Comprehensive Analysis:

Recognizing the intersectionality of societal issues is paramount. Societal engineering efforts
must undergo comprehensive analyses that consider the diverse experiences and identities
within a given society. This approach helps unearth potential biases and discriminatory
impacts that might otherwise be overlooked.

323 | P a g e
8. Ethical Oversight and Accountability:
To safeguard against the risks of inequality and discrimination, ethical oversight and
accountability mechanisms must be integral to the fabric of societal engineering initiatives.
Transparent practices, regular evaluations, and feedback loops ensure that unintended
discriminatory consequences are identified and addressed promptly.
In conclusion, the path of societal engineering is fraught with the potential to either
alleviate or exacerbate societal inequalities. Acknowledging the risks and incorporating
strategies to address them becomes paramount. A vigilant commitment to inclusivity,
cultural sensitivity, and equitable outcomes ensures that societal engineering serves as a
force for positive change rather than perpetuating the very disparities it seeks to dismantle.

Manipulation of Cultural Values in Societal Engineering

Societal engineering, with its ambitious endeavors to shape and mold collective beliefs and
behaviors, ventures into the delicate realm of cultural values. This chapter explores the
nuanced risks associated with the manipulation of cultural values and norms, unraveling the
potential consequences that may lead to the erosion of traditional values, cultural
dissonance, and identity crises within communities.
1. The Fabric of Cultural Identity:
Cultural values and norms are the threads that weave the intricate fabric of a community's
identity. They embody shared beliefs, practices, and traditions, providing a sense of
continuity and cohesion. Societal engineering that seeks to manipulate these cultural
elements treads on sensitive ground, potentially disrupting the delicate balance that
sustains communities.

2. Unintended Erosion of Tradition:

Efforts to engineer societal change, even with positive intentions, may inadvertently erode
traditional values. When external forces influence or reshape cultural norms without due
consideration for their significance, communities may experience a gradual erosion of their
identity, leading to a sense of loss and disorientation.

3. Cultural Dissonance and Alienation:

The manipulation of cultural values can introduce elements of dissonance within
communities. Changes imposed without cultural sensitivity may create a mismatch between

324 | P a g e
the evolving societal norms and the deeply rooted values held by individuals. This
dissonance can result in feelings of alienation and a disconnection from one's cultural roots.

4. Strained Intergenerational Dynamics:

Societal engineering that manipulates cultural values may strain intergenerational dynamics
within communities. Younger generations, exposed to evolving societal norms, may find
themselves at odds with the traditional values upheld by older generations. This
generational tension can lead to fractures within families and communities.
5. Identity Crises and Loss of Meaning:
Cultural manipulation can trigger identity crises, with individuals grappling to reconcile the
traditional values they grew up with and the evolving societal norms imposed upon them.
The loss of cultural meaning and a sense of belonging can have profound psychological
impacts, contributing to a collective identity crisis within communities.

6. Preserving Cultural Diversity:

While societal engineering may aim for positive outcomes, it must navigate the delicate
balance of fostering change without eroding cultural diversity. Recognizing the importance
of preserving and respecting diverse cultural values becomes imperative to ensure that
interventions do not inadvertently contribute to cultural homogenization.

7. Inclusive Dialogue and Cultural Exchange:

Mitigating the risks associated with the manipulation of cultural values requires inclusive
dialogue and cultural exchange. Societal engineering initiatives should involve communities
in the decision-making process, respecting their perspectives and incorporating their voices
to ensure that changes align with cultural values rather than imposing external norms.

8. Ethical Considerations in Cultural Engineering:

Ethical considerations must be at the forefront of cultural engineering initiatives.

Transparent practices, respect for cultural autonomy, and a commitment to preserving the
richness of diverse traditions serve as ethical safeguards against the unintended
consequences of manipulating cultural values.
In conclusion, the manipulation of cultural values within the realm of societal engineering
demands a nuanced and ethically guided approach. While change is inevitable, preserving
the tapestry of cultural diversity and respecting the foundations of identity within
communities becomes a responsibility that must not be overlooked. By recognizing the

325 | P a g e
significance of cultural values and engaging communities in the process, societal engineering
can navigate the delicate terrain of cultural change with sensitivity and respect.

Resistance and Backlash in Societal Engineering

In the ambitious landscape of societal engineering, where grand designs seek to shape the
contours of societies, a formidable challenge emerges—resistance and backlash. This
chapter explores the inevitable pushback that societal engineering endeavors may
encounter, as individuals and groups rally against perceived threats to their autonomy and
values. The repercussions of such resistance extend beyond mere opposition, potentially
leading to social unrest, increased polarization, and a breakdown of social cohesion.

1. The Inherent Tension:

Societal engineering operates in a realm where the aspirations for positive change may
collide with deeply entrenched individual and collective values. The tension between the
architects of change and those resistant to it forms the crucible in which societal dynamics
are tested.

2. Threats to Autonomy and Values:

Individuals and groups, feeling that their autonomy or cherished values are under siege, are
prone to resist societal engineering initiatives. Attempts to reshape beliefs or behaviors,
especially when perceived as coercive or intrusive, can evoke a visceral reaction, triggering a
defense of personal freedoms and cultural identities.

3. Catalysts for Social Unrest:

Resistance to societal engineering can serve as a catalyst for social unrest. When a
significant segment of the population perceives external interference with their way of life,
it may lead to protests, demonstrations, and expressions of discontent. These forms of
collective resistance have the potential to escalate, contributing to wider social instability.

4. Amplifying Polarization:
Societal engineering initiatives that encounter resistance risk exacerbating existing social
polarization. The polarization may manifest along ideological, cultural, or socio-economic

326 | P a g e
lines, further dividing society into factions with opposing views. The widening gap between
proponents and opponents can strain social bonds and hinder constructive dialogue.

5. Erosion of Social Cohesion:

Backlash against societal engineering has the potential to erode social cohesion—the glue
that binds individuals within a community. When divisions deepen and trust falters, the
shared sense of belonging dissipates, leading to fragmentation and the breakdown of the
social fabric that holds communities together.

6. Understanding Diverse Perspectives:

Mitigating resistance requires a deep understanding of diverse perspectives within a society.

Societal engineers must recognize that different groups may have distinct values and
priorities. Engaging in open dialogue, actively listening to concerns, and incorporating
diverse viewpoints into the decision-making process can foster a more inclusive approach.

7. Balancing Change and Tradition:

Striking a balance between societal progress and the preservation of tradition is essential to
minimize resistance. Recognizing the value of cultural heritage and allowing for an organic
evolution rather than a forced imposition of change can contribute to a more harmonious
coexistence between innovation and tradition.

8. Ethical Engagement and Transparency:

Ethical engagement and transparency are crucial in navigating resistance to societal

engineering. Clearly communicating the goals, methods, and potential impacts of initiatives
fosters trust. Ethical considerations should guide every phase of societal engineering to
minimize perceived threats and cultivate a cooperative atmosphere.

In conclusion, the interplay between societal engineering and resistance illuminates the
complex dynamics inherent in attempts to shape large-scale societal change. Acknowledging
the potential for backlash, societal engineers must approach their endeavors with
sensitivity, humility, and a commitment to fostering inclusive, transparent, and ethically

327 | P a g e
guided processes. Only through such mindful engagement can the aspirations of societal
engineering be realized without unraveling the delicate threads of social unity and cohesion.

Long-Term Impact on Democracy in Societal Engineering

Within the intricate tapestry of societal engineering, a thread of particular concern weaves
through the democratic fabric—manipulation of political processes and elections. This
chapter explores the potential long-term impact on democracy when societal engineering
endeavors compromise the foundational principles of fairness, transparency, and the free
exchange of ideas. Such manipulation poses a serious threat, risking the erosion of
democratic societies from within.

1. The Pillars of Democratic Principles:

Democracy, with its pillars of fairness, transparency, and the free exchange of ideas, thrives
on the active participation and informed choice of its citizens. Societal engineering
interventions that compromise these principles challenge the very essence of democratic
governance.
2. Manipulation of Political Processes:

Societal engineering infiltrating political processes can manifest through strategies like
gerrymandering, voter suppression, or the dissemination of misinformation. When external
forces seek to influence political outcomes covertly, the democratic ideal of free and fair
elections is jeopardized.
3. Undermining Transparency:

Transparency is a cornerstone of democratic governance. Societal engineering that operates

in the shadows, concealing motives or manipulating information flows, undermines the
transparency crucial for citizens to make informed decisions. The erosion of transparency
weakens the democratic process, clouding the public's ability to hold leaders accountable.

4. Distorting the Free Exchange of Ideas:

In a thriving democracy, the free exchange of ideas fosters a marketplace of diverse
perspectives. Societal engineering that manipulates information flows or suppresses
dissenting voices distorts this marketplace, stifling the democratic discourse essential for
informed decision-making.

328 | P a g e
5. Erosion of Public Trust:

Manipulative societal engineering in political contexts corrodes public trust in democratic

institutions. When citizens perceive that external forces unduly influence political processes,
skepticism grows. The erosion of trust weakens the bonds that sustain a vibrant democracy,
leading to apathy, disengagement, and a loss of faith in the democratic system.

6. Polarization and Division:

Societal engineering that manipulates political processes can contribute to increased
polarization within societies. When external forces amplify existing divisions or exploit
political fault lines, democratic discourse becomes adversarial, hindering constructive
dialogue and compromising the collaborative spirit essential for democratic governance.

7. Impact on Civic Participation:

A compromised democratic process, tainted by societal engineering, can discourage civic
participation. Citizens, disillusioned by perceptions of manipulation, may disengage from
political processes, contributing to a weakened democracy where the voices of the people
hold less sway.

8. Safeguarding Democratic Principles:

The preservation of democratic principles necessitates vigilant safeguards against
manipulative societal engineering. Robust mechanisms for ensuring the integrity of
elections, promoting media literacy, and fostering open, transparent political discourse are
essential to safeguarding the democratic foundations from undue manipulation.
In conclusion, the long-term impact of societal engineering on democracy is a critical
consideration. To preserve the vibrancy of democratic societies, it is imperative to fortify
the pillars of fairness, transparency, and the free exchange of ideas. Societal engineers must
operate within ethical boundaries, recognizing that manipulation of political processes
poses a severe threat to the democratic ideals that form the bedrock of free and open
societies.

329 | P a g e
The Global Village Unveiled

In the mid-20th century, the eminent Canadian media theorist Marshall McLuhan
introduced the term "global village" to encapsulate the transformative impact of media
technologies on our world. The phrase made its debut in 1959, a time when the seeds of a
connected world were just beginning to sprout. Fast forward to the present day, and the
global village concept has become a living reality, as societies across the globe are intricately
linked through the dissemination of information via various media channels.

The Propagation of the Global Village:

McLuhan's foresight in coining the term "global village" was rooted in the rapid
advancements in media technologies. The advent of television, radio, and later, the
internet, played pivotal roles in dismantling the barriers of physical distance, allowing
information to traverse the globe in the blink of an eye. The acceleration of communication
technologies has fundamentally altered the way we perceive and interact with the world.
Today, the global village is not just a metaphor; it is a lived experience for people
worldwide. Social media platforms enable instantaneous sharing of thoughts, images, and
events, creating a shared digital space that transcends geographical boundaries. News,
entertainment, and cultural exchanges flow effortlessly across continents, shaping a
collective global consciousness.

330 | P a g e
Unity in Diversity:
The interconnectedness facilitated by the global village has fostered a sense of shared
humanity. People from different corners of the world can engage in real-time conversations,
share experiences, and empathize with one another. The constant stream of information
has made us more aware of our global interdependence, pushing us to think beyond
national borders and appreciate the diversity of perspectives that make up the human
experience.
Moreover, the democratization of media production has given voice to individuals and
communities that were previously marginalized. Social media activism has become a
powerful tool for advocating social justice, human rights, and environmental causes on a
global scale. The amplification of diverse voices has brought attention to issues that might
have otherwise remained hidden, contributing to a more informed and empathetic global
community.

The Exploitation of Unity:

While the global village has undeniably brought people together, it has also become a fertile
ground for exploitation, particularly by those versed in social science. The understanding of
human behavior, cultural nuances, and communication dynamics has given rise to targeted
marketing, political manipulation, and even social engineering on a global scale. Advertisers,
politicians, and various interest groups leverage social science insights to influence public
opinion, shape narratives, and advance their agendas.
The very tools that connect us globally are now employed to manipulate our perceptions,
preferences, and behaviors. Social media algorithms curate personalized content, creating
echo chambers that reinforce existing beliefs and polarize societies. The exploitation of
social science principles has led to concerns about the erosion of critical thinking, the rise of
misinformation, and the manipulation of public discourse.
The global village, born out of the evolution of media technologies, has ushered in an era of
unprecedented connectivity. People from diverse backgrounds are brought together in a
shared digital space, fostering a sense of unity in the face of global challenges. However, this
interconnectedness is a double-edged sword, as individuals and entities with an
understanding of social science exploit it for various purposes. As we navigate this digital
landscape, it is crucial to remain vigilant, critically assess the information we encounter, and
actively shape the global village into a space that promotes understanding, collaboration,
and positive change.

331 | P a g e
The Unsettling Nexus - Corporations Enforcing Government Will and Societal
Engineering
In recent times, there has been a discernible trend where corporations are increasingly
perceived as instruments through which the will of governments is enforced. This nexus
between governments and corporations raises concerns about the potential erosion of
individual freedoms and the lack of recourse for civilians. This chapter explores instances
where corporations have seemingly aligned their actions with governmental interests, the
perilous implications of this alignment, and the emergence of corporate-driven societal
engineering.

1. Imposing the Will of Government:

Governments, endowed with legislative and executive powers, wield significant influence
over societal norms and policies. In some instances, corporations, either voluntarily or
under government pressure, have been complicit in implementing policies that align with
governmental interests. Examples abound, from tech companies enforcing censorship
policies to financial institutions adhering to sanctions that mirror governmental objectives.
The line between corporate autonomy and government compliance is becoming
increasingly blurred.
One notable example is the cooperation between technology giants and governments to
monitor and control information flow. Social media platforms, under the guise of combating
misinformation, have been accused of censoring content that runs counter to government
narratives. This fusion of corporate and government interests raises questions about the
potential erosion of democratic values and the suppression of dissenting voices.

332 | P a g e
2. Dangers of Limited Recourse for Civilians:
The alignment between corporations and governments creates a scenario where civilians
may find themselves caught in a web of limited recourse. When corporations act as agents
of the state, challenging their decisions becomes a formidable task for individuals. Legal
avenues may be obstructed by the intertwined interests of powerful entities, leaving
citizens with diminished means to address grievances.
For instance, in cases of mass data surveillance conducted by corporations on behalf of
governments, citizens face challenges in seeking legal remedies due to complex
jurisdictional issues, national security claims, and the lack of stringent regulations governing
such collaborations.
3. Corporate-Sponsored Societal Engineering:
In addition to serving as enforcers of government will, corporations are increasingly
engaging in societal engineering. This involves shaping societal behaviors, attitudes, and
values to align with corporate interests. Whether through targeted advertising, algorithmic
content curation, or influencing public opinion, corporations wield substantial power in
molding societal norms.
An illustrative example is the pervasive influence of social media platforms in shaping public
discourse. By controlling the flow of information, these platforms can influence public
opinion, sway political sentiments, and even shape cultural narratives. The algorithms
determining the content users see can inadvertently contribute to the polarization of
society, creating echo chambers that reinforce pre-existing beliefs.
4. The Veiled Meetings and Speculations:
While it remains unconfirmed whether corporations explicitly meet to discuss societal
engineering agendas, speculations persist, with forums like the Bilderberg Group often at
the center of such discussions. The Bilderberg Group's private meetings and the Chatham
House Rule foster an environment where attendees can openly share ideas without
attribution.
The lack of transparency in such meetings fuels theories about the collusion of influential
figures from corporations and governments in shaping societal outcomes. While there is no
concrete evidence of explicit discussions on societal engineering, the private nature of these
gatherings raises legitimate concerns about accountability and transparency in decision-
making processes that may impact millions.
The intertwining of corporations with governmental interests and the potential for societal
engineering pose profound risks to democratic principles and individual liberties. As this
nexus strengthens, it becomes imperative for society to critically examine the balance
between corporate autonomy, government influence, and the protection of citizen rights.
Transparency, accountability, and an informed citizenry are crucial safeguards against the
encroachment of this powerful alliance on the fabric of our societies.

333 | P a g e
The Founders of the Bilderberg Group: Shadows of Power

Section 1: The Birth of a Secretive Alliance

In the aftermath of World War II, a clandestine alliance emerged, laying the foundations for
what would become the Bilderberg Group. Józef Retinger, a Polish politician-in-exile, voiced
his concerns about the rising anti-American sentiment in Western Europe. This
apprehension led to the initiation of an international conference to foster understanding
between European nations and the United States. The conspirators behind this idea
included Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, Paul van Zeeland, former Belgian Prime
Minister, and Paul Rijkens, then the director of Unilever, a global consumer goods giant.
Section 2: Shadows of Belief
A notable figure among these architects was Prince Bernhard, a man of Catholic faith and a
central player in establishing the Bilderberg meetings. His connections within the Catholic
Church, although not explicitly detailed, added an intriguing layer to the group's dynamics.
Walter Bedell Smith, the head of the CIA at the time, was another key figure with a Catholic
background, adding an element of covert influence to the group.
Section 3: Unilever's Director and the Threat to Tech Titans
Paul Rijkens, as the director of Unilever, brought economic prowess to the Bilderberg table.
Unilever, with its vast market share and a yearly advertising budget exceeding $9 billion,
became a tool for influencing the narrative. The threat to pull advertising from tech giants
like Google and Facebook, spearheaded by Unilever's Chief Marketing Officer, Keith Weed,
echoed the power dynamics established by the Bilderberg Group founders.
Section 4: The Architects - Brief Portraits
Józef Retinger: A Polish politician-in-exile, Retinger's vision was pivotal in initiating the
Bilderberg meetings. His concerns about anti-Americanism fueled the need for an
international forum.

334 | P a g e
Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands: A prominent figure with Catholic ties, Prince Bernhard
played a crucial role in promoting the Bilderberg meetings and chaired them until 1975.
Paul van Zeeland: As a former Belgian Prime Minister, Van Zeeland's political acumen
contributed to the establishment of the Bilderberg Group. His Catholic affiliations added a
layer of complexity to the group's dynamics.
Paul Rijkens: The director of Unilever, Rijkens brought economic influence to the Bilderberg
Group. His role in the group's inception laid the groundwork for Unilever's future
involvement, including the recent threat to withdraw advertising from major social media
platforms.

Conclusion: Weaving the Web

The founders of the Bilderberg Group, with their diverse backgrounds in politics, business,
and intelligence, set the stage for an influential and secretive alliance. The convergence of
Catholic beliefs, intelligence networks, and economic power created a web that extended
beyond borders. The recent threats to tech giants by Unilever, one of its key founders,
demonstrate how this shadowy alliance continues to cast its influence in the 21st century.

The Intersection of Social Engineering, Cybersecurity, and Media

Manipulation: A Historical Perspective on CIA Involvement

Manipulating the news is a form of social engineering, which is a field of social science
dealing with the creation and influence of human societies on a large enough scale to affect
entire populations.
The CIA has faced accusations of manipulating the news media in the past. In 1977,
Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein published an article titled "The CIA and the Media,"
detailing the extent of the CIA’s collaboration with members of the press. According to
Bernstein, some journalists even became outright CIA assets, while others secretly carried

335 | P a g e
out assignments for the CIA. The New York Times alone provided cover for about ten CIA
operatives over a nearly two-decade period.
It's worth noting that the CIA’s influence in the media has evolved over time. While the
agency may have infiltrated the media in the past, today, many former intelligence agency
veterans are employed by mass media outlets. Many people today question the agenda and
motivations of media outlets like CNN, MSNBC, ABC as echo chambers for Deep State
agendas.

The Role of Global Threat Narratives in Shaping Collective Psyche

In the realm of cinema, certain narratives transcend the screen to subtly influence societal
perceptions and attitudes. The cinematic portrayal of global threats, as depicted in films like
Independence Day, Armageddon, Deep Impact, and others, has the potential to impact
collective psychology and contribute to a sense of shared identity and purpose. While these
films are crafted for entertainment, they often tap into deep-seated psychological
mechanisms that resonate with audiences on a profound level.

1. Shared Humanity and Vulnerability:

The portrayal of a global threat emphasizes the shared vulnerability of humanity. Whether
facing an alien invasion, a comet collision, or a zombie pandemic, these narratives highlight
our common existence on Earth. Psychologically, this taps into the innate human desire for

336 | P a g e
connection and solidarity in the face of adversity. It reinforces the idea that, at our core, we
are all part of the same human family, sharing a fragile existence on this planet.

2. Collaborative Efforts and Shared Responsibility:

Confronting a global threat in these films often requires nations to set aside geopolitical
differences and collaborate for the greater good. This narrative arc subtly suggests that the
well-being of humanity is a shared responsibility. Psychologically, it encourages viewers to
contemplate the benefits of cooperation and the potential positive outcomes that can arise
when nations unite for a common cause.
3. Overcoming Differences for Survival:
The urgency of survival in the face of existential threats prompts characters to overcome
differences in these films. Whether it's political, cultural, or personal, the emphasis on
setting aside disparities for the greater good underscores the idea that cooperation
transcends divisions. Psychologically, this narrative prompts viewers to consider the
possibility of a more harmonious world if humanity were to prioritize collective well-being
over individual differences.
4. Global Solidarity and Interconnectedness:
The notion of global solidarity emerges prominently in these narratives, fostering a sense of
interconnectedness. The films suggest that the challenges faced are not isolated to a
particular region or group but are shared on a global scale. Psychologically, this reinforces
the idea that the well-being of one part of the world is intricately tied to the well-being of
others, encouraging empathy and a sense of responsibility for the broader human
community.
5. Inspiring Real-World Discussions:
While these narratives are fictional, their impact extends beyond the screen. They serve as
conversation starters, inspiring real-world discussions about global challenges. The
psychology behind this lies in the power of storytelling to shape perspectives and provoke
thought. As individuals discuss these themes, they may find common ground and
contemplate the potential for real-world collaboration in the face of shared challenges.
While the primary purpose of these films is entertainment, the underlying psychological
impact cannot be ignored. The portrayal of global threats and the subsequent emphasis on
unity and cooperation contribute to shaping a collective psyche that values collaboration,
shared responsibility, and global solidarity. Whether intentional or inadvertent, these
narratives play a role in shaping societal attitudes and fostering discussions about the
potential for a more united and cooperative world.

337 | P a g e
Vatican and Societal Engineering
The Catholic Church has been accused of societal engineering. According to a source,
numerous books have been written by both Catholic clergy and lay-persons charging that
the Vatican and Catholic hierarchy in general concern themselves too much with dominance
and too little with social justice, that struggle for and retention of power enjoys the highest
priority, and that positive stands on social justice are taken only when they are expedient
and do not threaten the equilibrium of the Church. This preoccupation with power has
serious implications for non-Catholics as well, regarding some of the most sensitive and
important social issues of our day. They include the Equal Rights Amendment, the
environmental movement, family planning and population growth control, and illegal
immigration control. The source also mentions that the Roman Catholic Church is an
organization whose influence exceeds that of most governments of the world.
Some argue that certain actions or decisions made by the Church hierarchy may be
influenced by considerations of power and maintaining the status quo.

Roman Catholicism in the Media

The portrayal of Catholic priests in Hollywood movies, despite Roman Catholicism
constituting only 23% of the United States population, is significantly more prominent than
that of pastors or priests from other denominations. However, the representation of

338 | P a g e
Catholic characters in films may not solely be a reflection of religious demographics. Instead,
it could be influenced by the allure of iconic symbolism associated with Catholic priests.
The distinct visual identity of a Catholic priest, adorned in religious attire, serves as a
powerful symbol of Christianity in cinematic narratives. The rituals and ceremonies linked to
the Catholic faith contribute to the cinematic allure, with their elaborate and visually striking
nature enhancing the viewing experience for audiences. It's worth noting, however, that
some of these traditions may not align with biblical teachings, sparking debates on the
portrayal's accuracy and potential implications of blasphemy.
Nevertheless, it could be argued that there is another aspect to using Catholic priests in
movies, namely the promotion of the Catholic Church and the desensitization of the Catholic
faith for Protestants through a form of normalization. This suggests that the inclusion of
Catholic priests in films may serve a dual purpose, not only catering to cinematic appeal but
also playing a role in shaping perceptions and attitudes towards the Catholic faith among a
wider audience which is a form of societal engineering.

Establishing a Day of Rest: Pope Francis' Implicit Call in Laudato Si'

Pope Francis, in his encyclical Laudato Si', offers a profound reflection on environmental
stewardship and the interconnectedness of humanity with the Earth. Amid discussions on
ecological responsibility, there emerges an implicit suggestion regarding the establishment
of a day of rest for both the Earth and its inhabitants. While Pope Francis does not explicitly
call for a mandatory day of rest, a careful reading of Laudato Si' reveals subtle yet impactful
implications for such an idea.
Sunday as a Day of Healing (Paragraph 237):

339 | P a g e
In Laudato Si', Pope Francis draws a parallel between Sunday and the Jewish Sabbath,
highlighting their significance as days of healing for relationships with God, oneself, others,
and the world. This concept is rooted in the idea of a day of rest, echoing the biblical notion
of a Sabbath that provides restoration and renewal.

The Spiritual Importance of Rest (Paragraph 237):

The Pope emphasizes Sunday as the "first day" of the new creation, linking it to the
Resurrection and the transfiguration of all created reality. This spiritual dimension of Sunday
implies a need for rest not only on a personal level but also as a collective human
experience that aligns with the well-being of the Earth.
The Call to Care for Creation (Paragraph 237):
By associating Sunday with the Eucharist, Pope Francis underscores the communal nature of
the day, fostering a sense of responsibility towards creation. The implicit message is that a
day of rest should extend beyond human affairs to encompass a shared commitment to
caring for the environment.
An Echo of Environmental Sabbath (Throughout Laudato Si'):
While the Pope does not explicitly state the establishment of a day of rest for the Earth, the
entire encyclical resonates with the concept of an environmental Sabbath. The repeated
emphasis on gratitude, contemplation, and respect for nature subtly implies the need for a
collective pause in human activities, promoting sustainable practices.
A Comprehensive Approach to Rest (Paragraph 237):
Pope Francis suggests that Sunday rest is not only a cessation from work but a holistic
experience that involves healing relationships and cultivating a sense of awe and
contemplation. This approach aligns with the idea of an Earth Sabbath, where humanity
collectively pauses to reflect on its relationship with the environment.
In Laudato Si', Pope Francis implicitly suggests the establishment of a day of rest for both
humanity and the Earth, rooted in the spiritual significance of Sunday. While the call is not
explicitly stated as a legal requirement, the encyclical encourages a broader understanding
of rest that encompasses environmental stewardship and the need for a collective pause in
human activities. This subtle implication aligns with the Pope's vision of integral ecology,
where caring for the Earth is intricately connected with caring for one another.

Sabbath Misconceptions: Pope Francis and the Biblical Sabbath

The Sabbath, a pivotal concept in both Jewish and Christian traditions, traces its origins to
the biblical narrative. Despite a historical shift in Christian observance from the traditional
Jewish Sabbath to Sunday over the centuries, it is crucial to recognize the Sabbath's biblical
foundation. This condensed chapter explores the historical transition, early Christian

340 | P a g e
practices, and the absence of an explicitly biblical Sunday Sabbath, with reference to
paragraph 237 of Laudato Si'.

Biblical Sabbath - Universal Significance Beyond Judaism:

The Sabbath is introduced early in the Bible, with God resting on the seventh day of creation
(Genesis 2:2-3). Its universal significance is evident as it predates the Mosaic law and was
observed by Adam and Eve, who were not Jews. Its inclusion in the Ten Commandments
highlights its relevance beyond Jewish identity, establishing a practice that transcends
cultural or religious boundaries.

Transition to Sunday - Complex Historical Process:

The shift from the Jewish Sabbath to Sunday in early Christianity is complex. Influential
factors in the 2nd and 3rd centuries included distinguishing Christianity from Judaism and
honoring Christ's Resurrection on a Sunday.

Apostolic Churches - Initial Adherence to the Jewish Sabbath:

Historical evidence suggests that Apostolic Churches, rooted in the teachings of the
Apostles, initially observed the Jewish Sabbath from Friday sundown to Saturday sundown.

Emergence of Sunday - Political and Theological Factors:

By the 4th century, Sunday became the primary Christian day of worship, marked by the
Council of Laodicea. Theological considerations and socio-political factors contributed to this
transition, solidifying Sunday as the Christian day of rest.

Biblical Absence of Sunday Sabbath - Not Explicitly Commanded:

Despite historical shifts, the Bible lacks an explicit command to replace the seventh-day
Sabbath with Sunday observance. The New Testament mentions Apostles meeting on the
first day of the week but does not negate the biblical Sabbath.
The transition to Sunday observance is rooted in historical, theological, and cultural factors,
distinct from an explicit biblical command. Pope Francis, in Laudato Si', may inadvertently
misapply the Sabbath, labeling it exclusively Jewish when its biblical roots suggest a broader,
universal significance. Understanding the historical evolution is crucial in navigating the
complexities of Sabbath observance in Christian tradition (Laudato Si', para. 237).

341 | P a g e
Societal Engineering Through Implicit Sabbath Advocacy in Laudato Si': A
Potentially Divisive Call to Sunday Rest
Pope Francis' encyclical, Laudato Si', extends far beyond ecological concerns, delving into
societal and spiritual dimensions. One subtle aspect of this document, found in paragraph
237, introduces the idea of Sunday as a day of rest akin to the Sabbath. While seemingly
innocuous, this implication carries implications of societal engineering, potentially leading to
contention among diverse religious and non-religious communities.
Implicit Sabbath Advocacy:
Paragraph 237 of Laudato Si' elevates Sunday to a position of significance comparable to the
Jewish Sabbath, presenting it as a day of healing for relationships with God, oneself, others,
and the world. However, the subtle promotion of Sunday as a day of rest may be
interpreted as an attempt at societal engineering. By suggesting a common day of rest, the
encyclical aims to foster unity, potentially influencing societal norms.
Divisiveness Among Religious and Non-religious Groups:
The implicit call to observe Sunday as a day of rest raises concerns of divisiveness. While the
encyclical aims to address societal challenges, it may unintentionally alienate those who do
not observe Sunday as a day of rest due to diverse belief systems. Atheists, Jews, Muslims,
and Seventh-day Adventists, each with their distinct day of rest, may find the implicit
advocacy for Sunday rest as an infringement on their religious freedom and cultural
practices.
Coaxing Atheists into Sunday Rest:
Notably, the encyclical's emphasis on Sunday rest in predominantly atheist regions,
particularly in Europe, reflects a nuanced approach. By appealing to shared concerns such as
overconsumption and the frenetic pace of life, Laudato Si' subtly attempts to coax atheists
into adopting Sunday as a day of rest. This can be seen as a strategic move to integrate
societal practices rooted in religious traditions, potentially influencing a predominantly
secular audience.
The implicit promotion of Sunday as a day of rest in Laudato Si' reflects an interesting
intersection of environmental, societal, and religious considerations. While aimed at
addressing societal challenges, it poses the risk of becoming a contentious issue, especially
among diverse religious and non-religious groups. Understanding the potential impact of
implicit advocacy for a common day of rest is crucial in navigating the complex tapestry of
beliefs and practices in our global society.

342 | P a g e
Navigating the Ambiguities: Gaudium et Spes and the Challenge of Church-
State Separation
In an era characterized by diverse perspectives and a commitment to secular governance,
concerns about the influence of the Roman Catholic Church in modern society have
surfaced. While the Church claims to play a vital role in the spiritual lives of millions,
questions arise regarding the potential impact of its teachings on secular affairs, given the
inherently political nature of the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church. As the Church
engages with contemporary issues and calls for the active participation of its members in
societal matters, some voices express worry about the delicate balance between religious
values and the principles of a pluralistic, democratic society. The challenge lies in fostering a
respectful coexistence that values religious freedom while safeguarding the autonomy of
diverse secular spaces. The nuanced interplay between faith and the secular world raises
crucial questions about the nature and extent of the Church’s influence in shaping the
course of our shared, modern existence.
The Common Good as a Form of Societal Engineering:
As we explore the complexities of the Catholic Church's engagement with the secular realm,
a notable aspect comes to the forefront — the concept of the common good. Embedded
within the teachings of Gaudium et Spes, the common good serves as a guiding principle for
the laity's participation in civil life. However, a critical examination of this call to action
reveals an intriguing dynamic: the common good can be perceived as a form of societal
engineering when juxtaposed with the contradictions within Gaudium et Spes.
Respecting the Separation of Church and State:
Gaudium et Spes acknowledges the autonomy of temporal affairs and the rightful
independence of the state from direct ecclesiastical control. This nod to the separation of
church and state aligns with broader democratic principles that recognize distinct spheres
for religious institutions and governmental bodies. The document appears to appreciate the
importance of maintaining a balance between the religious and the secular, acknowledging
the legitimacy of secular governance.
A Contradiction in Emphasis:
Yet, as we scrutinize the document’s exhortation for the laity’s involvement in political
processes and the renewal of the temporal order, a contradiction comes to light. While not
explicitly encouraging members to seek specific governmental positions, Gaudium et Spes
emphasizes the responsibility of the laity to contribute actively to the transformation of
secular society. This seemingly contradicts the spirit of strict church-state separation, as it
implies a desire for religious values to permeate the secular realm.
Infusing Christian Values into the Temporal Order:
Gaudium et Spes envisions the infusion of Christian values into the temporal realities of the
world through the engagement of the laity. By actively participating in societal matters, lay
members are seen as agents of change, contributing to a more just, peaceful, and

343 | P a g e
harmonious society. The document’s positive view of the laity’s role implies an aspiration
for the influence of Christian principles on secular affairs.
The Challenge of Interpretation:
Interpreting Gaudium et Spes in the context of church-state separation becomes a delicate
task. On one hand, the document respects the autonomy of temporal affairs, but on the
other hand, it advocates for an active Christian presence in the secular sphere. The tension
lies in navigating the balance between encouraging laity involvement in the secular world
and maintaining the distinct realms of the religious and the secular.
In summary, Gaudium et Spes presents a nuanced perspective on the laity’s engagement
with the world. While acknowledging the separation of church and state, the document
subtly hints at a desire for the infusion of Christian values into secular society through the
active participation of the laity. However, the organized influence on the laity's engagement
in civil affairs raises questions about the extent to which the pursuit of the common good
involves a structured and intentional process akin to a form of social engineering. Navigating
this delicate balance remains a challenge, raising questions about the compatibility of such
aspirations with the principles of strict church-state separation.
Critical Analysis: Scrutinizing the Roman Catholic Common Good Narrative
In the intricate dance between faith and governance, the Roman Catholic Church has a
historical track record of wielding influence that extends far beyond the confines of the
spiritual realm. The seemingly noble call for the laity to actively participate in civil affairs, as
championed by documents like Gaudium et Spes, is presented as an earnest dedication to
what the Church deems the common good. However, this intersection of religious principles
and political involvement raises more than a few eyebrows, demanding a thorough and
skeptical examination.
The Church's fervent encouragement for its laity to seek positions in civil governance
transcends the realm of individual choice; it is a calculated endeavor to infuse secular
spheres with Catholic values. While the proclaimed intention aligns with ethical principles
and moral values, skeptics argue that beneath this veneer lies a potential power grab,
cleverly disguised as a crusade for the well-being of citizens, irrespective of their religious
affiliations. The implications of such a directive are not to be taken lightly. This movement,
though ostensibly distinct from traditional societal engineering, prompts serious questions
about the clandestine shaping of social structures.
The concept of the common good, deeply embedded in Catholic social teaching, is lauded
for its aspiration toward societal well-being. However, when coupled with political directives
urging the faithful to assume positions in civil governance, it morphs into a form of social
influence that extends beyond the bounds of individual moral agency.
Adding to the skepticism is the nuanced interplay between the right to property and
participation in the common good. The Catholic Church's suggestion that the right to
property is not absolute for those not actively participating in the common good raises red
flags. This opens the door for individuals, especially those adhering to Catholic doctrine in

344 | P a g e
positions of political power, to contemplate policies that could infringe upon property
rights, all under the pretext of serving the common good.
In the midst of these considerations, citizens are justified in questioning the stark
contradictions between the Roman Catholic Church's fervent promotion of the common
good and its own sordid history of scandals, disgraceful cover-ups, and discriminatory
practices. Instances such as covering up abuse, avoiding compensation for victims, and
perpetuating psychological harm cast serious doubts on the Church's credibility to be
entrusted with the implementation of the common good.
While the undeniable global influence of the Catholic Church persists, the alignment of
religious doctrines with political advocacy raises legitimate apprehensions. Ethical concerns
regarding the representation of diverse views, potential infringements on individual rights,
and the precarious balance between church and state demand meticulous examination.
In democratic societies, the foundational principle of the separation of church and state is
designed to protect the autonomy of political institutions and respect the diversity of beliefs
within the population. Instances where religious institutions actively guide political leaders
in promoting specific views jeopardize this vital separation.
As we navigate this complex terrain, upholding democratic principles, demanding
transparency, and fostering a robust public discourse that accommodates a multiplicity of
perspectives becomes not just crucial but imperative. The common good, as championed by
the Catholic Church, must be scrutinized to ensure it does not become a tool for the subtle
engineering of societal structures. Instead, it should genuinely foster responsibility, moral
agency, and civic engagement among individuals, without compromising the pluralistic
foundations of democratic governance. The ongoing conversation about the appropriate
role of religious institutions in shaping public policies is not just integral but urgently critical
to our democratic evolution.

345 | P a g e
 P a g e | 346

Footnote references for the provided information:

Schwab, K. (Year of Publication). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Portfolio. Lanier, J. (Year of Publication). Who Owns the Future?
Penguin Press. Second Vatican Council, "Gaudium et Spes: Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World," in The Documents
of Vatican II, ed. Walter M. Abbott (New York: Herder and Herder, 1966), 905-1062. Pope Francis, "Laudato Si': On Care for Our Common
Home," in Laudato Si': On Care for Our Common Home, ed. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, May 24, 2015.

EPILOGUE
In summarizing our findings, this investigation sheds light on a covert and influential entity
referred to as the Deep State. By examining its key characteristics—such as operational
secrecy, access to substantial resources, intelligence capabilities, covert operations, and
control over key appointments—we posit that the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church
embody these traits to an unparalleled degree. Our assertion is that the Vatican, extending
its influence across government, intelligence, military, and various sectors, stands as a
preeminent global force. This influence transcends its religious role, encompassing
significant political power. Historical evidence indicates the Vatican's efficacy in quelling
dissent, both of religious and political nature, a capability that persists today. In
straightforward terms, our argument is that the Vatican functions akin to a global Deep
State, adept at operating discreetly to advance its interests. The evidence presented seeks
to establish that the Vatican is not solely a religious authority but a potent political force,
wielding substantial influence on the world stage.

~ Charlie Adams
The above picture is located on George Street, CBD Sydney. The mural of Julian Assange, featuring the caption #FREE
ASSANGE, has been altered with the word "FREE" painted over in black. In New South Wales, Sydney Australia, there is
a presence of the Deep State, which shares a similar mindset with their U.S. Deep State counterparts.