You are on page 1of 30

Climate

 change  impacts  on  


hydropower  genera4on  in  Brazil  

André  Lucena,  Bruno  Borba,  Roberto  Schaeffer,  


Alexandre  Szklo,  Pedro  Rochedo,  Rafael  
Kelman,  Pedro  Ávila,  Bernardo  Bezerra  
IntroducAon  –  Brazilian  Energy  
System  
• The  Brazilian  energy  system  is  highly  dependent  on  
renewable  energy,  especially  hydropower  
• Renewables  accounted  for  around  40%  of  primary  energy  
supply  in  2014  
– Hydropower  was  80%  of  all  electricity  producAon  in  the  country  in  
average  over  the  last  ten  years  
– 15%  of  fuel  consumpAon  in  the  transportaAon  sector  was  ethanol  in  
2014  
– Wind  energy  is  sAll  low,  but  has  increased  sharply  over  the  last  few  
years  (currently  4.8%  of  total  installed  capacity)  

How  is  that  impacted  by  future  climate  change?  


Hydrological  Seasonality  in  Brazil    
(Historical  data  1931  –  2009)  

Source:  Silva  (2012)  


NaAonal  Interconnected  
System  (SIN)  

h[p://www.ons.org.br/  
Previous  Studies  on  Climate  
Change  Impacts-­‐AdaptaAon  
What’s  new?  
• Project  hired  by  Secretaria  de  Assuntos  Estratégicos  da  
Presidência  da  República  –  Colabora4on  COPPE-­‐PSR  
– New  scenarios  –  RCPs  8.5  and  4.5  
• MiAgaAon  vs.  AdaptaAon  
– New  GCMs  (HadGEM  and  MIROC)  
– StochasAc  dispatch  modeling  
• Research  quesAons:  
– What  are  the  impacts  of  climate  change  on  the  Brazilian  
Interconnected  System?  
– What  would  be  the  best  alternaAves  to  compensate  
hydropower  loss?  
• What  is  the  best  way  to  adapt:  operaAon  vs.  expansion?  
– To  what  extent  miAgaAon  policies  may  affect  these  best  
alternaAves?  
Methodology  and  Results  
Climate  Change  Data  
• RCPs  
– 4.5  
– 8.5  
• GCMs  
– HadGEM  
– MIROC  
• Dowscaling  
– ETA:    INPE  (Chou  et  al.,  2014)  
• Hydrological  Model  
– SMAP  (water  balance  model):  University  of  Ceará  
(MarAns  et  at.,  2014)  
Projected  Riverflow  
Brazilian  River  Basins  
Projected  Riverflow  
Brazilian  River  Basins  –  Paraná    
Projected  Riverflow  
Natural  inflow  to  Itaipu  hydropower  plant  –  RCP  8.5  
 
       HadGEM                MIROC  
Projected  Riverflow  
Brazilian  River  Basins  –  TocanAns  Araguaia  
Projected  Riverflow  
Natural  inflow  to  Tucuruí  hydropower  plant  –  RCP  8.5  
 
       HadGEM                MIROC  
 
Projected  Riverflow  
Brazilian  River  Basins  –  São  Francisco  
Projected  Riverflow  
Natural  inflow  to  Sobradinho  hydropower  plant  –  RCP  8.5  
 
       HadGEM                MIROC  
 
Energy  Modeling  Approach  
GCM  –  Dowscaling  –  Hydrology  Model  

Scenario  Premisses  (RCP  4.5  and  8.5)  


195  riverflow  series  

OperaAon  Model   Opera4on/   Expansion  Model  


SDDP   Expansion   MESSAGE-­‐Brazil  
(PSR)   (COPPE)  

OperaAon   AdaptaAon  
Opera4on/
Impacts/   Expansion  
through  
adaptaAon   expansion  

•Hydro  generaAon  scenarios   •Capacity  expansion  


•Marginal  cost  of  operaAon   •Investment  costs  
•Deficit  probability   •Second  order  effects  
Energy  Modeling  Approach  
GCM  –  Dowscaling  –  Hydrology  Model  

Scenario  Premisses  (RCP  4.5  and  8.5)  


195  riverflow  series  

OperaAon  Model   Opera4on/   Expansion  Model  


SDDP   Expansion   MESSAGE-­‐Brazil  
(PSR)   (COPPE)  

OperaAon   AdaptaAon  
Opera4on/
Impacts/   Expansion  
through  
adaptaAon   expansion  

•Hydro  generaAon  scenarios   •Capacity  expansion  


•Marginal  cost  of  operaAon   •Investment  costs  
•Deficit  probability   •Second  order  effects  
Baseline  Scenarios  
Baseline  scenarios:  RCP  comparison  –  Electricity  
160.0  
Premisses:  
140.0    
120.0   RCP  8.5  
•BAU  expansion  –  no  
100.0  
explicit  miAgaAon  
GW  year  

80.0  
assumed  
60.0  

40.0  
RCP  4.5  
•Energy  efficiency  
20.0  
•Lower  fossil  expansion  
0.0   •100$/tCO2  Carbon  tax  
Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base   Base  
4.5   8.5   4.5   8.5   4.5   8.5   4.5   8.5   4.5   8.5   4.5   8.5   4.5   8.5   aoer  2030  (ETP,  2015)  
2010   2015   2020   2025   2030   2035   2040  

Hydro   Coal   Gas   Oil   Nuclear   Biomass   Wind   Solar  


Energy  Modeling  Approach  
GCM  –  Dowscaling  –  Hydrology  Model  

Scenario  Premisses  (RCP  4.5  and  8.5)  


195  riverflow  series  

OperaAon  Model   Opera4on/   Expansion  Model  


SDDP   Expansion   MESSAGE-­‐Brazil  
(PSR)   (COPPE)  

OperaAon   AdaptaAon  
Opera4on/
Impacts/   Expansion  
through  
adaptaAon   expansion  

•Hydro  generaAon  scenarios   •Capacity  expansion  


•Marginal  cost  of  operaAon   •Investment  costs  
•Deficit  probability   •Second  order  effects  
Results  OperaAon:  
Risk  of  shortage  
HadGEM   MIROC  
RCP  8.5  
RCP  4.5  
Results  –  OperaAon  Costs  

RCP  8.5   RCP  4.5  


1400  

1200  

1000  
Billion  USD  

800  

600  

400  

200  

0  
Base   HadGEM   MIROC   Base   HadGEM   MIROC  
Energy  Modeling  Approach  
GCM  –  Dowscaling  –  Hydrology  Model  

Scenario  Premisses  (RCP  4.5  and  8.5)  


195  riverflow  series  

OperaAon  Model   Opera4on/   Expansion  Model  


SDDP   Expansion   MESSAGE-­‐Brazil  
(PSR)   (COPPE)  

OperaAon   AdaptaAon  
Opera4on/
Impacts/   Expansion  
through  
adaptaAon   expansion  

•Hydro  generaAon  scenarios   •Capacity  expansion  


•Marginal  cost  of  operaAon   •Investment  costs  
•Deficit  probability   •Second  order  effects  
Results  –  AdaptaAon    
RCP  8.5  

160.0

140.0

120.0

100.0
GW  med

80.0

60.0

40.0

20.0

0.0

MIROC
Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC

Base
HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Hidro Carvão Gás Óleo  Combustível Diesel Nuclear Biomassa Eólica Solar
Results  –  AdaptaAon    
RCP  4.5  

140.0

120.0

100.0

80.0
GW  med

60.0

40.0

20.0

0.0

MIROC
Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC

Base

Base

MIROC

Base

MIROC
HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM

HadGEM
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Hidro Carvão Gás Óleo  Combustível Diesel Nuclear Biomassa Eólica Solar
Results  –  AdaptaAon  Costs  
• Accumulated  invesAment  costs  up  to  2040:  
– HadGEM  
• RCP  4.5:  USD  79  billion  
• RCP  8.5:  USD  280  billion  
– MIROC  
• RCP  4.5:  USD  3  billion  
• RCP  8.5:  USD  158  billion  
Discussion  
• Detailed  dispatch  modeling  requires  detailed  
hydrological  modeling  
• OperaAonal  impacts  can  be  severe  and  costly  if  there  is  
no  adaptaAon  through  system  expansion  

• MiAgaAon  policies  do  impact  opAmal  adaptaAon  


strategies  
– AdapAng  to  a  reduced  hydropower  availability  may  further  
increase  Brazil’s  emissions  if  no  other  acAons  are  taken  
– AdaptaAon  can  be  achieved  by  fossil  fuels  or  by  a  
combinaAon  of  energy  efficiency,  renewable  energy,  etc.  
LAMP  Climate  Policy  Scenarios  
Electricity  GeneraAon  
2000
1800
2030
1600
1400
1200
TWh/year

1000
800
600
400
200
0
POLES

POLES

POLES

POLES

POLES
GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil

GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil

GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil

GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil

GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil
TIAM-­‐ECN

TIAM-­‐ECN

TIAM-­‐ECN

TIAM-­‐ECN

TIAM-­‐ECN
EPPA

EPPA

EPPA

EPPA

EPPA
Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix
Core  baseline $10  CO2  price $50  CO2  price 20%  abatement  (FF&I) 50%  abatement  (FF&I)

2000 Hydro Oil Coal Coal  w/CCS Gas Gas  w/CCS Nuclear Biomass Biomass  w/CCS Solar Wind Other

1800
2050
1600
1400
1200
TWh/year

1000
800
600
400
200
0
GCAM

POLES

POLES

POLES

POLES

POLES
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil

GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil

GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil

GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil

GCAM
MESSAGE-­‐Brazil
TIAM-­‐ECN

TIAM-­‐ECN

TIAM-­‐ECN

TIAM-­‐ECN

TIAM-­‐ECN
EPPA

EPPA

EPPA

EPPA

EPPA
Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix

Phoenix
Core  baseline $10  CO2  price $50  CO2  price 20%  abatement  (FF&I) 50%  abatement  (FF&I)
Hydro Oil Coal Coal  w/CCS Gas Gas  w/CCS Nuclear Biomass Biomass  w/CCS Solar Wind Other
Next  Steps  
• Second  stage  of  LAMP  –  impacts/adaptaAon  
– To  what  extent  a  more  detailed  dispatch  analysis  
is  relevant  for  adaptaAon-­‐miAgaAon  assessment?  
– What  are  the  uncertainAes  related  to  the  
miAgaAon-­‐adaptaAon  interacAons?  
• What  is  the  role  of  Brazil  in  a  given  climate  goal?  
• How  will  adaptaAon  take  place  in  such  circumstances?  
• JGCRI  –  impact  analysis  
• Several  IAMs  looking  at  miAgaAon-­‐adaptaAon  
– GCAM,  TIAM-­‐ECN,  IMAGE,  EPPA,  MESSAGE-­‐Brazil  
 
 
Thank  you  
andrelucena@ppe.ufrj.br  

You might also like