Direct evidence directly proves a fact in question, either through oral testimony under section 5 of the Evidence Act regarding facts in issue or relevant facts, or through direct oral evidence as required by section 60. Circumstantial evidence refers to facts from which the judge can infer the existence of a fact in issue, including facts not directly related but connected to the facts in issue that together form a chain of circumstances leading to an inference of the principal fact, and all circumstantial evidence must be given directly as oral evidence under section 60.
Direct evidence directly proves a fact in question, either through oral testimony under section 5 of the Evidence Act regarding facts in issue or relevant facts, or through direct oral evidence as required by section 60. Circumstantial evidence refers to facts from which the judge can infer the existence of a fact in issue, including facts not directly related but connected to the facts in issue that together form a chain of circumstances leading to an inference of the principal fact, and all circumstantial evidence must be given directly as oral evidence under section 60.
Direct evidence directly proves a fact in question, either through oral testimony under section 5 of the Evidence Act regarding facts in issue or relevant facts, or through direct oral evidence as required by section 60. Circumstantial evidence refers to facts from which the judge can infer the existence of a fact in issue, including facts not directly related but connected to the facts in issue that together form a chain of circumstances leading to an inference of the principal fact, and all circumstantial evidence must be given directly as oral evidence under section 60.
1 Direct evidence is one which establishes the very fact in
issue. Direct evidence is in two different contexts, in the contexts of s.5 and s.60 Evidence Act
s.5 Evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant
facts
s.60 Oral evidence must be direct
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE 1 Circumstantial evidence refers to any fact from the existence of which the judge may infer the existence of a fact in issue
2 i)These facts are not direct to the facts in issue, but it is
evidence of various circumstances which are connected to the facts in issue ii)When taken together, they form a chain of circumstances inviting the court to draw inference or presumption of the principal fact
3 All circumstantial evidence must be given directly in the context
of s.60 where the witness must testify what he perceives the evidence