Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development of RTV Silicone Coatings in China - Overview and Bibliography - 2008
Development of RTV Silicone Coatings in China - Overview and Bibliography - 2008
Year Milestone
B. Hydrophobicity Class
The surface hydrophobicity was found to be decreased and
covered a wide range as the number of energized years increased.
For strings of insulators, the hydrophobicity classes (HCs) of those
Figure 7. Hydrophobicity transfer of various mixture samples. in the middle were better than those at either end of the insulator
NSDD, 1 mg/cm2; ESDD, 0.1 mg/cm2. string. The HCs on the lower and upper surfaces did not vary in
any systematic manner.
It was obvious that the hydrophobicity of the sample surface
to testing [17]. It has been found that hydrophobicity is lost tem- decreased and covered a wide range with the increase of the
porarily when the RTV silicone rubber is immersed in alkaline number of energized years, as shown in Figure 10.
solutions for a certain period of time. The loss of hydrophobicity
depends on the extent of the alkaline solution, so it can be con- C. Deposited Contaminations
sidered that RTV rubber loses hydrophobicity temporarily due to Because the insulators were energized on different lines and
a chemical reaction and due to the formation of a layer of silic- affected by different pollution sources, as listed in Table 1, the
alcoholic-salt on its surface when immersed in alkaline solution for results of these tests varied substantially. The NSDD and ESDD
a certain period of time. Because silicone rubber has the capacity
for hydrophobicity transfer, that is, it can cause the property of
hydrophobicity to migrate to the contaminated surface, which is
usually explained by the migration of LMW silicone components
from the bulk of the silicone rubber to the contaminated surface,
the RTV coating can recover its hydrophobicity.
Experimental results of corona discharge indicate that RTV
silicone loses hydrophobicity after corona discharge on its surface.
Based on chemical analyses, it can be considered that oxidation
may occur on the surface of the RTV coating. The RTV coating
will lose hydrophobicity temporarily due to this oxidation layer.
However, the hydrophobicity of the RTV coating can recover
gradually as described above.
A. Appearance
Figure 8 shows a post insulator after 12 years of operation.
Figure 9 shows the RTV coated samples after being energized
for different numbers of years in the polluted environment of a
cement factory.
Careful visual checks showed that although the porcelain was
exposed on the edges of the sheds on most samples, the aged coat- Figure 8. Appearance of a post insulator after 12 years of
ing had not become putty-like, cracked, brittle, or easily separated aging.
Figure 9. Appearance of upper and lower surfaces of 12-year aged insulator near a cement factory.
on the sheds near the high voltage end were higher than those RTV SIR coated insulators could not occur at the operating system
near the grounded end. Because of this, the quantity of deposited voltage, as shown in Table 3. The results of the flashover voltage
contamination was affected by the strength of the electric field, test are shown in Table 4. The laboratory tests showed that, under
i.e., the higher the electric stress near the surface was, the more clean fog conditions, aged RTV sample insulators still possessed
easily contamination was deposited. excellent electrical performance. In other words, flashover ac-
Although the degradation of hydrophobicity was obvious, the cidents were still unlikely in aging RTV coating insulators, even
aged RTV silicone coating still could recover its hydrophobicity though their HC was less than with a new RTV coating.
and retain its ability to transfer hydrophobicity.
E. Characteristics of Aged Coatings
D. Anti-Pollution Flashover Ability In both the flashover tests and the voltage withstand tests, the
Guan et al. [20] tested the anti-pollution flashover of aged wetting effects on the hydrophobicity change on sample surfaces
RTV coated insulators. The results showed that the antipollution differed from those on new RTV-coated insulators in artificial
flashover prevention of the samples still was very good. Four pollution tests. In addition, the wetting process on the upper
types of RTV SIR coated suspension insulators that had been in surfaces was totally different from that on the lower surfaces. A
service for 6, 9, and 12 years were evaluated. Table 2 shows the typical scanning electron microscope (SEM) photograph of an
operation conditions. These particular insulators were removed aged coating (Figure 11) illustrates the degradation of the aged
from their service sites without any maintenance. The results of coating. The aged coating did not have cracks or holes, but was
voltage withstand tests clearly suggest that flashover of these aged not as smooth as the original RTV coating. The aged coating also
showed the effects of other factors, such as pollution adhering on
the surfaces and traces of dust left on the surfaces.
F. FTIR Analysis
Figures 12 and 13 show the infrared (IR) spectroscopy results
for aged RTV coatings that were taken from different places such
as near a chemical plant or road [20]. Comparing the spectrum
of unaged RTV made in the laboratory, which is defined as the
reference, to those of specimens cut from the aged insulators,
it can be observed that broad absorption due to O-H appearing
at 3700 cm-1to 3200 cm-1 and broad absorption due to C-H and
Si-CH3 appearing at their specific wavenumbers is weakened
by aging. The data clearly show that the coating cut from the
undersides had become more weakened than that from the tops
of the insulators.
The reason for this result is that there were many nonsoluble
Figure 10. Relationship between HC of the whole surface of deposits adhering to the undersides of the RTV specimens of the
samples and the number of years energized. nonclean samples. Besides the differences in the spectra of the
Sample Insulator C D F G H I J
Flashover or not No No No No No No No
Electrical stress of leakage distance (kV/cm) 0.711 0.525 0.519 0.485 0.571
HC of upper surfaces of samples HC2-4 HC2 HC3-4 HC2 HC3-4 HC4-5 HC4-5
Sample Insulator A B C E F G H I
Flashover voltage (kV) 31.44 23.65 18.9 17.3 22.6 33.25 17.2 14.95
Elect. stress of leakage dist. (kV/cm) 0.806 0.59 0.67 0.426 0.557 0.852 0.424 0.508
Average ESDD (mg/cm²) 0.034 0.31 0.15 0.256 0.286 0.027 0.294 0.443
HC of upper surfaces of samples HC1-2 HC4-6 HC2-4 HC3-4 HC3-4 HC2 HC3-4 HC4-5
HC of undersides of samples HC2 HC5-7 HC3-4 HC4 HC3-4 HC2 HC5-6 HC4-6
Figure 11. SEM figures of new RTV coating and aging RTV coating. The line in the figures represents 10 μm.
undersides and top for the same insulator, different insulators, C. Reapplication
the number of years of operation, and the different surroundings It is not easy to remove the coating from the surface of the
have different influences on the spectra. Naturally, the longer insulator when the RTV silicone coating has failed, especially
an insulator is operated, the weaker the absorption is. Pollution for the one-component coating. However, it is not necessary to
is one of these environmental influences. For example, near the remove the coating when a coating has reached the end of its
chemical plant, there was much acidic or alkaline contamination. life because the disabled RTV coating has no effect on the new
Near the cement factory, many non-soluble deposits adhered to RTV coating. After the coating has failed, the RTV coating can
the RTV coatings of the insulators. These conditions weaken the be recoated after the insulator is cleaned. The procedure is the
absorption band and shorten the life of the RTV coating. same as the first application. In China, RTV silicone coatings
usually are recoated every 5 years, but this may vary according
User Concerns to the pollution conditions.
In China, the greatest concern in using RTV silicone coating is
how to make the coating last as long as possible. Other concerns Standards
are dealing with failure identification, the removal of the coating, In China, the National Antipollution Leading Group is the stan-
and reapplication. dards committee involved in writing standards for RTV silicone
coatings. The task of the group is to develop guidelines for the
A. Life evaluation of RTV silicone coatings in the laboratory. The final
The end-of-life for a coating has been defined by its inability selection of the RTV silicone coatings depends on economics,
to prevent flashover. However, this definition does not refer to the the electrical performance, ease of application, environmental
lifetime of the coating, but to its performance. Coating lifetime is concerns, and service experience,. The group published its first
more accurately defined as the condition in which hydrophobicity
is no longer transferred to deposited layers or in which mainte-
nance becomes no different than that used on uncoated insula-
tors. Various studies have been conducted on silicone materials
in order to learn more about their lifetime [21]. However, to date
no answers have been offered. The first generation coating made
in Tsinghua University has been in service for 15 years or more,
with little or no evidence of showing the end of its life.
B. Failure Identification
In China, the failure of RTV coatings is determined by detect-
ing the hydrophobicity class of the surface. The hydrophobicity
of insulators is determined according to the classification guide
developed by STRI [22]. Here, the wettability is divided into seven
HCs, from 1 to 7, where HC 1 corresponds to a completely hydro- Figure 12. IR spectra of coatings aged for 6 years near a
phobic and HC 7 corresponds to a totally hydrophilic surface. chemical plant.