Professional Documents
Culture Documents
nb
y
C
Ya
al
om nd
m i ss i il a
o n fo r Ju ba
SAUDI HIGHWAY CODE (SHC)
SHC 303 – Highway Facilities and Utilities Design - Rest Areas,
Truck Inspection Stations, Parking & Garage Facilities
SAUDI HIGHWAY CODE (SHC)
SHC 303 – Highway Facilities and Utilities Design - Rest Areas,
Truck Inspection Stations, Parking & Garage Facilities
2.5.11. Utilities.................................................................................................................................................... 33
SHC 303 I
3.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 35
3.1.1. Exception Procedure .............................................................................................................................. 35
II SHC 303
3.8.3. Benefits from Reduced Truck Delay ....................................................................................................... 58
IV SHC 303
List of Figures
Figure 2-1 Site Configuration of a Typical Type A Rest Area (FGSV, 2011) ....................................... 6
Figure 2-2 Site Spacing for Type A and Type B Rest Areas (FGSV, 2011) ........................................... 8
Figure 2-3 Standard and Minimum Distances between Type A Rest Areas and Freeway
Interchanges (FGSV, 2011) ................................................................................................................................. 12
Figure 2-4 Minimum Distances between Type B Rest Areas and Intersections along Highways
(FGSV, 2011) ............................................................................................................................................................ 12
Figure 2-5 Example of Intermediate Lane Configuration (FGSV, 2011) ............................................ 18
Figure 2-6 Construction Detail with Traversable Curbs at HGV Parking Spaces (FGSV, 2011) 20
Figure 2-7 Distances between Successive RA Internal Aisles Entries and Exits (FGSV, 2011) .. 21
Figure 2-8 Pedestrian Walkways Adjacent to Passenger Parking Spaces (FGSV, 2011) ............. 22
Figure 2-9 Pedestrian Crossings (FGSV, 2011) ........................................................................................... 23
Figure 2-10 Example of Fuel Station Dimensions with Side-Arrangement (FGSV, 2011) .......... 26
Figure 2-11 Tree-Planted Separating Island between Adjacent Passenger Parking Spaces
(FGSV, 2011) ............................................................................................................................................................ 29
Figure 2-12 Tree-Planted Separating Island between Vehicle Passages/Aisles and Passenger
Parking Spaces (FGSV, 2011) ............................................................................................................................ 30
Figure 2-13 Planting of Trees in Intermediate Islands at HGVs Parking Spaces (FGSV, 2011) 31
Figure 3-1 Typical TIS Layout (Queensland DoT, 2021) .......................................................................... 38
Figure 3-2 Minor Portable Scale Site (WSDOT, 2021) ............................................................................. 39
Figure 3-3 Major Portable Scale Site (WSDOT, 2021) ............................................................................. 40
Figure 3-4 Operating Diagram of a Typical WIM System at Highways (Zhang, et al., 2008) .. 43
Figure 3-5 Truck Inspection Station Site: TLTW Highways (WSDOT, 2021) .................................... 51
Figure 3-6 Layout A: Main Line Sorting with Additional On-Ramp Sorting (FHWA, 1995) ...... 53
Figure 3-7 Layout B: Main Line Sorting Only (FHWA, 1995) ................................................................. 54
Figure 3-8 Layout C: Additional Layout (FHWA, 1995) ........................................................................... 55
Figure 3-9 Virtual Weigh Station on By-Pass Roadways (Regan, et al., 2006) ............................... 56
Figure 4-1 Parking Design Vehicle (PDV) for KSA (Qatar MOTC, 2021-adjusted) ........................ 63
Figure 4-2 Turning Characteristics of a Typical Tractor–Semitrailer (AASHTO, 2018) ................ 65
Figure 4-3 Minimum Dimensions of Parallel Parking Space in Residential and Commercial
Areas (MoMRA, 2019).......................................................................................................................................... 67
Figure 4-4 Minimum Dimensions of Parallel Parking Space in Industrial Areas (MoMRA, 2019)
...................................................................................................................................................................................... 67
Figure 4-5 Dimensions of Angled or Perpendicular Parking Space (MoMRA, 2019) .................. 68
SHC 303 V
Figure 4-6 Bicycle Parking Space Requirements (FGSV, 2012). ........................................................... 69
Figure 4-7 Minimum Street Width for Adding Parking Lanes (MoMRA, 2019) ............................. 71
Figure 4-8 Minimum Distance of Parking Spaces from A) Signalized Intersections B) Non-
Signalized Intersections (MoMRA, 2019) ..................................................................................................... 72
Figure 4-9 Parallel Parking Stalls at A) Signalized Intersections B) Non-Signalized Intersections
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 73
Figure 4-10 Parallel Parking at the Area of Secondary Roads (MoMRA, 2019)............................. 74
Figure 4-11 Minimum Distance of Angled Parking Stalls from Pedestrian Crossing/Stopping
Line at Intersections (MoMRA, 2019) ............................................................................................................ 75
Figure 4-12 Minimum Dimensions for 30 ° Angled Parking Stalls for One-Way Roadway
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 76
Figure 4-13 Minimum Dimensions for 30 ° Angled Parking Stalls for Two-Way Roadway
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 76
Figure 4-14 Minimum Dimensions for 45 ° Angled Parking Stalls for One-Way Roadway
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 77
Figure 4-15 Minimum Dimensions for 45 ° Angled Parking Stalls for Two-Way Roadway
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 77
Figure 4-16 Minimum Dimensions for 60 ° Angled Parking Stalls for One-Way Roadway
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 78
Figure 4-17 Minimum Dimensions for 60 ° Angled Parking Stalls for Two-Way Roadway
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 78
Figure 4-18 Minimum Dimensions for 90 ° Angled Parking Stalls for One-Way Roadway
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 79
Figure 4-19 Minimum Dimensions for 90 ° Angled Parking Stalls for Two-Way Roadway
(MoMRA, 2019) ...................................................................................................................................................... 79
Figure 4-20 Separating Platforms in Setback Area (MoMRA, 2019) .................................................. 81
Figure 4-21 Parking Stalls in Setback Area without Separating Platforms and with Maneuvering
Lane (MoMRA, 2019) ........................................................................................................................................... 81
Figure 4-22 Example of Motorcycle Parking Areas (Qatar MOTC, 2021)......................................... 82
Figure 4-23 Typical Bicycle Parking Layout on the Sidewalk (Qatar MOTC, 2021) ...................... 83
Figure 4-24 Minimum Space and Aisle Dimensions of Surface Parking per Parking Angle for
One-Way Traffic (Qatar MOTC, 2021) ........................................................................................................... 86
Figure 4-25 Surface Parking Facility Internal Circulation (FGSV, 2012-adjusted) ......................... 87
Figure 4-26 HGVs/Buses Minimum Off-Street Parking Dimensions and Aisle Widths (Qatar
MOTC, 2021) ........................................................................................................................................................... 89
Figure 4-27 Angled (45 o) Parking Layout for WB-20 Design Vehicle in Rest Areas (Qatar MOTC,
2021) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 90
VI SHC 303
Figure 4-28 Parallel Parking Layout for WB-20 Design Vehicle in Rest Areas (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
...................................................................................................................................................................................... 90
Figure 4-29 Parking Layout for City Transit Bus Design Vehicle in Rest Areas (Qatar MOTC,
2021) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 91
Figure 4-30 Vertical Bicycle Parking Rack (FGSV, 2012) ......................................................................... 92
Figure 4-31 Ramp Systems (FGSV, 2012) ..................................................................................................... 95
Figure 4-32 Semi-Ramp with Dual-Way Directional Traffic as Left-Hand Traffic (FGSV, 2012-
adjusted) ................................................................................................................................................................... 96
Figure 4-33 Tangent Ramp Design with Grade >15 % (MoMRA, 2019) .......................................... 97
Figure 4-34 Typical Dimensions of One-Way and Dual-Way Tangent Ramps (Qatar MOTC,
2021) .......................................................................................................................................................................... 98
Figure 4-35 Typical Dimensions of One-Way and Dual-Way Curved/Helical Ramps (Qatar
MOTC, 2021) ........................................................................................................................................................... 98
Figure 4-36 Lateral Displacement Automated Parking Systems (FGSV, 2012) ............................ 100
Figure 4-37 Vertical Displacement Automated Parking Systems (FGSV, 2012) .......................... 100
Figure 4-38 Inadequate Entry Throat Length (Qatar MOTC, 2021).................................................. 103
Figure 4-39 Driveway Throat Length (Qatar MOTC, 2021).................................................................. 103
Figure 4-40 Minimum Dimensions of Entrances and Exits of Surface Parking Facilities (MoMRA,
2019) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 104
Figure 4-41 Visibility Requirement of Vehicle Exiting the Parking Facility (MoMRA, 2019) ... 105
Figure 4-42 Parking Entrances and Exits Location in relation to Surrounding Roads (MoMRA,
2019) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 106
Figure 4-43 Reserve Space Required for the Rate of Arrival of Cars in Rush Hour (MoMRA,
2019) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 107
Figure 4-44 Off-Street Accessible Parking Layout (Qatar MOTC, 2021) ....................................... 109
Figure 4-45 On-Street 45 o Accessible Parking Layout (Qatar MOTC, 2021) ............................... 109
Figure 4-46 On-Street Perpendicular Accessible Parking Layout (Qatar MOTC, 2021)............ 110
Figure 4-47 On-Street Parallel Accessible Vehicle Parking Stall Layout (Qatar MOTC, 2021)111
Figure 4-48 Example of Open Loading Yard with Side Entry/Exit (FGSV, 2012).......................... 112
Figure 4-49 Ramp Wheel Slip (MoMRA, 2019) ........................................................................................ 114
Figure 4-50 Minimum Wheel Stop Dimensions (MoMRA, 2019) ..................................................... 116
Figure 4-51 Wheel Stop Installations (MoMRA, 2019) .......................................................................... 116
Figure A-1 Schematic Layout of Type A RA Design with Fuel Station and Integrated Commercial
Use (FGSV, 2011) ................................................................................................................................................. 123
Figure A-2 Schematic Layout of Type A RA Design with Fuel Station and Separate Commercial
Use Area (FGSV, 2011)....................................................................................................................................... 124
SHC 303 IX
1. Introduction
1.1. Summary of Chapters
Volume SHC 303 - Highway Facilities and Utilities Design – Rest Areas, Truck Inspection
Stations, Parking and Garage Facilities is divided into 4 chapters. A brief outline of these
chapters is given below:
Chapter 1. Introduction - This chapter provides an overview of the chapters, the scope of the
volume, and a full list of the standards referenced within the volume.
Chapter 2. Rest Areas - This chapter provides guiding principles and general requirements
for the design and operation of Rest Areas facilities aimed at a safe, secure and operationally
efficient Rest Area network across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) highway system. It covers
design principles that refer to the location, site layout and operation of the Rest Area along a
freeway, divided expressway as well as a rural highway.
Chapter 3. Truck Inspection Stations - This chapter provides guiding principles and general
requirements for the design and operation of Truck Inspection Stations facilities. It outlines
the general guidelines for the main components of the facility, its layout, necessary equipment
and operational procedures in order to contribute to the strict enforcement of legal load limits
as means to reduce weight violations, heavy truck crashes, as well as highway maintenance
and rehabilitation expenditures.
Chapter 4. Parking and Garage Facilities - This chapter provides the guidelines and general
requirements for the design of Parking and Garage Facilities. It provides guidance for the
design of on-street parking, off-street parking, and parking building facilities for passenger
cars, motorcycles, bicycles, HGVs and buses, in order to ensure the uniformity of parking
design in the Kingdom.
1.2. Scope
This volume is to be utilized as a manual for aspects related to the design and
operation/management of both parking and enforcement roadside facilities, namely rest
areas, truck inspection stations and parking and garage facilities.
The present guidelines provide guidance to be used in the project scoping, design, and
construction of a new or the reconstruction/rehabilitation or extension of an existing facility.
SHC 303 1
2. Rest Areas
2.1. Introduction
A wide range of roadside facilities provide opportunities for motorists to safely stop, rest and
manage their travel needs. These include rest areas, safety parking areas with no buildings,
scenic overlooks, etc.
A Rest Area (RA) is defined as a roadside area specially designed to host permanent facilities
for road users’ needs such as restrooms, fuel stations, restaurants and other amenities related
to user safety and comfort. Their primary benefits include reduced driver fatigue, improved
safety, security and environmental responsibility and provision of refuge from adverse driving
conditions.
Rest areas constitute integral parts of the highway system and must be included in a
comprehensive highway network planning and investment process.
The objective of the present section is to lay down the basic principles and design criteria and
standards for a safe, secure and operationally efficient Rest Area network across the freeway,
divided expressway and rural highway system of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
It is desirable that minimum standards be satisfied in order to obtain permission to develop
such facilities.
The standards herein do not substitute other design or construction standards that must be
followed by the developer. For example, the following guidelines of Saudi Highway Code (SHC)
still need to be adhered to:
• Highway Geometric Design - SHC 301 (Highway Geometric Design).
• Hydraulic Design Aspects - SHC 302 (Highway Facilities and Utilities Design –
Hydrology and Hydraulic Design).
• Parking Design Aspects of Chapter 4.
• Highway Lighting Design Aspects - SHC 306 (Highway Facilities and Utilities Design –
Public Utilities, Highway and Street Lighting, Control and Monitoring Devices).
• Pavement Design Aspects - SHC 308 (Pavement Design).
• Environmental Aspects - SHC 701 (Environmental Aspects of Highways).
In addition, the complete study of a Rest Area facility requires the elaboration of other types
of designs and studies such as signing, pavement design, hydraulics, planting, architecture and
landscaping, etc. together with the application of corresponding guidelines, regulations, and
specifications.
2 SHC 303
2.2. Design Objectives
A Rest Area (RA) project should be considered when:
• An existing RA facility reaches 30 years of age.
• An existing RA’s operation is impacted by congestion caused by significant increases
in traffic volume, including that of Heavy goods vehicles (HGV).
• Security issues warrant the upgrade/reconstruction of an existing RA.
• Inadequate RA spacing has been identified by related study.
• A new highway is under planning/construction.
The design of a Rest Area should meet the following explicit objectives:
• Optimal location in relation to:
o Relative distance between previous and next RA.
o Integration within the context of site area/terrain limitations and activities
developed.
• Meeting parking demand of highway users as well as need for sanitary and other
services.
• Provision of high-quality services in terms of accommodation, recreation, safety and
security for highway users.
• Safe movement of highway users after long and high-speed travel journeys.
• Easy and uninterrupted traffic flow of pedestrians and vehicles.
• Unimpeded movement of people with disabilities.
• Cargo security.
• Minimum environmental impact.
• Acceptable construction, operation and maintenance costs.
SHC 303 3
• Type B: Rest Areas located on freeways and divided expressways (between Type A
ones) or rural highways, providing an appropriate number of parking spaces with
facilities intended for short to medium term rest period for all users. These are
considerably smaller in size, without commercial uses, providing at minimum, a parking
area and a restrooms building.
• Type C: Rest Areas located typically on undivided rural highways providing an
adequate number of parking spaces and minimal facilities, at which motorists can stop
away from the highway in order to rest. In exceptional cases, Type C Rest Areas may
be located on divided highways too.
Rest Areas by default accommodate both passenger cars and heavy vehicles. Each Rest Area
is different, and therefore the level of facilities to be provided should be ascertained as
appropriate for each individual site. Nonetheless, Table 2-1 summarizes the mandatory
minimum and optional facilities for each RA type.
Traffic
Separation from
roadway: at grade or
grade separated YES OPTIONAL NO
traffic connection to
the highway
Internal circulation
roadways with or
YES OPTIONAL NO
without parking
spaces
Raised or painted
islands within RA YES OPTIONAL NO
parking area
Commercial Facilities
4 SHC 303
Type A Type B Type C
Restaurants and
YES NO NO
shops
Constructed shelters
(for protection from YES OPTIONAL OPTIONAL
sun, sand, wind)
Utilities (water,
sewerage, electricity,
YES OPTIONAL NO
telecommunications,
etc.)
Other: information
point, highway police
patrol, roadside OPTIONAL NO NO
assistance, roadway
maintenance, etc.
Electric vehicle
YES OPTIONAL NO
charging
Engineering Design judgment may expand and supplement the contents of Table 2-1.
The following sections provide guidelines for all three types of RA facilities. Typical RA layouts
are provided in Appendix A.
SHC 303 5
2.5. Rest Areas Design Features
Rest Areas of Type A located on freeways and/or divided expressways are more integrated
compared to those of Type B. Their size may vary between 2,000 - 10,000 m2, depending on
the freeway traffic and projected RA development. For a 40,000 - 60,000 m2 site, not more than
20,000 - 40,000 m2 may normally be developed.
Figure 2-1 depicts the different features of a typical Rest Area of Type A classification.
Figure 2-1 Site Configuration of a Typical Type A Rest Area (FGSV, 2011)
The dimensioning of Type B and Type C RAs based on their respective traffic volumes depends
on the available information for each segment of the highway.
6 SHC 303
2.5.2.1. Evaluation of existing rest areas
The following general criteria should be used to assess existing RAs:
• RA Level of use: Assessment of (a) demand for RA area services at a given location
and (b) the extent to which existing facilities accommodate demand.
• Route characteristics: Analysis of key characteristics of the route on which the RA is
located including AADT levels, expected growth in AADT, percentage of commercial
vehicles, urban/suburban or rural region, etc.
• Spacing/distance to the next RA: Identification of distance/driving time to the next
RA.
• Alternative stopping opportunities: Number and frequency of neighboring stopping
opportunities (i.e., gas stations, truck stops, restaurants, malls/retail outlets, etc.) that
may render the need for an additional RA redundant.
• Urban/rural location: RA of 20 - 30 years old located in previously underdeveloped
areas that have experienced considerable growth may offer now alternative stopping
opportunities.
• Design life: The operation of RAs having surpassed their design life should be subject
to evaluation by the concerned entity (e.g., Roads General Authority-RGA).
2.5.2.2. Spacing
The distances between consecutive RAs (spacing) should be standardized based on the relative
freeway/highway user needs and that of road safety.
A standard distance between RAs of Type A ranges between 50 - 60 km. In cases of
predominantly regional traffic flows coupled with low long-distance traffic volumes or
seasonal peaks, the above distance may be increased up to 80 km. In any case, the spacing
should not allow for more than one hour of driving time between two consecutive facilities.
Between large Type A RAs, smaller Type B Rest Areas may be created with a typical density of
15 - 20 km or every 25 km (approx.), in the case of short-distance regional traffic and seasonal
long-distance traffic, as depicted in Figure 2-2.
SHC 303 7
Figure 2-2 Site Spacing for Type A and Type B Rest Areas (FGSV, 2011)
The above standard distances should not be exceeded to a high degree in cases whereby RA
sites are developed adjacent to interchange entry-exit ramps.
Operational and road safety requirements may necessitate the installation of Rest Areas of
Type B and Type C also along rural highways in regular distances between them. These are
mainly necessary when their existing or planned length along a non-built-up context exceeds
40 km. Notably, Rest Areas of all types may also serve as sand storm refuges.
At the time of final project implementation, the RGA should indicate and finalize the number,
type, and approximate location of Rest Areas.
8 SHC 303
be determined by the related parking demand analysis. As a typical rule, this should be taken
as a percentage of forecasted one-way annual average daily traffic, for a period of 15 years
after the opening of the Rest Area. The related percentages are presented in Table 2-2 for each
vehicle category.
Regardless of the demand assessment for parking provision, the minimum number of parking
spaces for each vehicle category is listed in Table 2-3.
Vehicle Type Percent of Mainline One Way Annual Average Daily Traffic
HGVs 0.80
Buses 0.02
Passenger Cars 40
HGVs 10
Buses 3
With regard to Type B Rest Areas, these should in general not provide for more than 30 parking
spaces for passenger cars and 50 parking spaces for HGVs due to special needs for utilities.
Type C Rest Areas should in general not provide for more than 25 parking spaces for passenger
cars or 10 parking spaces for HGVs due to special needs for utilities.
SHC 303 9
In addition, locations should account for the needs of both short- and long-stay traffic.
On such divided highways, Rest Areas should be duplicated to allow motorists travelling in
either direction access to a rest opportunity. As a general rule, Rest Areas should be located in
opposite positions across the freeways and divided expressways, or staggered for operational
and economic purposes.
A large RA on one side of the freeway and/or divided expressway serving both traffic directions
and accessed via an interchange (overpass or underpass) may be created in the absence of a
location for two opposite Rest Areas due to topographical and environmental constraints, or
unfavorable economic conditions (in terms of duplicating required facilities).
In the case of prohibitive or unfeasible creation of entry-exit ramps to the opposite freeway
stream, Rest Areas may be alternately arranged on the opposite sides of the freeway, where
feasible.
The location of other available public or private facilities offering potential stopping
opportunities should also be considered.
2.5.3.1.2. Type B
For rural highways, a suitable site for the RA location should normally be sought along sections
of up to 5 km length between interchanges. The main criterion should be the optimal location
sought based on the estimated parking demand. The effort should be to install non-
commercial Rest Areas also on opposite sides of the highway to the extent possible.
Duplication of sites should be necessary in cases of difficulty in crossing into a Rest Area or
whereby vehicle movements across a highway would interfere with through traffic raising
safety concerns. In such cases, safety treatments such as protected left turn lanes on the
roadway itself can be avoided. If local conditions do not allow opposite Rest Areas, then the
RA installed in the direction of travel should be placed ahead of the RA in the opposing traffic
to avoid dangerous left-turn maneuvers (see also Figure 2-5 in next section).
2.5.3.1.3. Type C
For rural undivided highways, a suitable site for the RA location should normally be sought
along sections of up to 5 km length between intersections. The main criterion should be the
optimal location sought based on the estimated parking demand.
The facilities shall be duplicated along the highway in order to avoid undesirable vehicle
crossing.
10 SHC 303
• Timely recognition and assessment of the RA benefits from the highway.
• Location away from industrial uses, producing noise, odors and dust.
• Location away from high voltage power lines.
• Location away from wind turbines.
• Potential for future expansion (availability of land).
• Projected annual average daily traffic 15 years after year of RA opening.
• Projected percent of heavy goods vehicles.
• Possibility of pedestrian access to RA commercial facilities (Type A) by non-
freeway/divided expressway users, with appropriate configuration of a separate car
park that makes use of the local road network for access, while at the same time
blocking entry/exit of vehicles to the remaining RA site and the freeway/divided
expressway.
SHC 303 11
NOTE: Color of signs corresponds to divided expressways.
Figure 2-3 Standard and Minimum Distances between Type A Rest Areas and Freeway Interchanges (FGSV, 2011)
Regarding rural highways, the minimum distance between a Rest Area and an intersection
should be such that the necessary way-finding signing for the upcoming facility can be
installed without compromising the corresponding rules. Figure 2-4 demonstrates the typical
case of minimum distance between a Rest Area and an intersection.
Figure 2-4 Minimum Distances between Type B Rest Areas and Intersections along Highways (FGSV, 2011)
12 SHC 303
2.5.3.4. Unauthorized truck parking
Unauthorized truck parking along freeway and divided expressway routes indicates the
potential need for additional parking supply for a particular area (other reasons could include
desire for privacy, more convenient parking locations, etc.).
Unauthorized truck parking locations and magnitude along KSA routes that could potentially
benefit from new RA facilities may be identified by interviewing highway patrol police officers
with responsibility for patrolling the freeway network and by reviewing satellite imagery of the
related route segments.
SHC 303 13
• Scenic, environmental and cultural features of the location and surrounding area
should be preserved and balanced against mobility, safety, energy conservation and
economic design requirements.
• Sound protection measures should be installed along the roadside separating island
to meet the need of HGV drivers to rest.
2.5.4.2. Type A
The General Design of a large Rest Area is difficult to standardize and should typically be
adapted to local conditions and constraints such as type of planned or existing commercial
uses, architectural design and construction alternatives for buildings, terrain constraints, etc.
Parking areas
Adequate parking should be provided within the Rest Area facilities. Parking spaces for
motorcycles, passenger cars, HGVs of all types, vehicles with trailers, recreational vehicles and
buses should be provided at each Rest Area. Parking spaces for very large and heavy goods
vehicles may also be provided on a case-by-case basis in large RAs.
Parking spaces for passenger cars should be arranged in such a way that restaurants/food
outlets are easily accessible via pedestrian walkways. There is no such need for passenger cars
with trailers and recreational vehicles.
Bus parking spaces should be located near the restaurants/food outlets to avoid their
passengers’ conflict with RA internal traffic. This also applies to a mixed use of parking facilities
by bus and vehicles with trailers.
For very large heavy goods vehicles, parking spaces should preferably be arranged along the
longitudinal direction of the main RA vehicle passage via an adjacent parking lane.
In cases of geomorphological constraints (i.e., steep grades), parking areas should be
developed as grade separated facilities.
14 SHC 303
Recreational areas
Recreational areas should be located in close proximity to the restaurant areas and parking
spaces of passenger cars and buses on the opposite side of the traffic and within the Rest
Area’s outer limit. Where this is not feasible, a location within the area designated for traffic
should be selected.
On certain Rest Areas, a grassed picnic area may be designated to the rear of the site away
from the main vehicle passage. Where possible, an area of at least 150 m2 should be provided.
SHC 303 15
2.5.4.2.3. Separation of vehicles
In order to reduce safety risks, vehicles should be separated in accordance with their type. In
this respect, motorists shall be separated from heavy goods vehicles where possible,
particularly in Rest Areas handling high volumes. Special attention should be paid to areas
with potential VRUs-HGVs conflict.
Heavy vehicles carrying livestock and refrigerated vehicles can cause disturbance to other
drivers, and where possible should be accommodated in separate parking areas to minimize
noise impact.
Commercial vehicles carrying hazardous goods should preferably not be accommodated at
the same RA as other heavy vehicles.
2.5.4.3. Type B
Standard configurations should be preferred for Type B Rest Areas. The general design should
provide for the use of layouts adapted to local conditions, as deemed appropriate. It may
follow the same basic principles as for Type A RAs in terms of parking spaces, recreational
areas, traffic flows and, where necessary, other distinct infrastructure.
The restroom building should be centrally located so that it is accessible from the parking area
in the easiest and shortest way. Seating should be at a reasonable distance.
Depending on the choice of location of the restroom building (edge or interior of the RA), its
building type and related access should be determined at the general design stage.
Appendix A provides relevant layouts of Type B Rest Areas for different cases and local
conditions in accordance with the above requirements.
2.5.4.4. Type C
Standard configurations should also be preferred for Type C Rest Areas. The general design
should provide for the use of layouts adapted to local conditions, as deemed appropriate.
Appendix A provides a relevant layout of Type C Rest Area.
16 SHC 303
2.5.5.2. Vehicle passages and aisles design
2.5.5.2.1. Geometric design
The geometric design of a Rest Area should also ensure the unimpeded movement of highway
operation and maintenance staff’s vehicles as well as of those for waste collection.
For safety reasons, a tangential design of vehicle passages/aisles alignments should be
preferred for cases where parking spaces are included.
In vehicle passages and aisles with visibility restrictions along curved sections with angled
parking spaces, there may be a need for an intermediate safety lane between the parking
spaces and vehicle passages/aisles to mitigate the risks for vehicles exiting the spaces (Figure
2-5).
The maximum value of the longitudinal grades should not exceed 5.0 % and, in frequently
used vehicle passages/aisles, the value of 4.0 %. The standard value of superelevation is 2.0 %.
In every case, their combined grade should not exceed 5.5 %.
The length of sag and crest curves of vehicle passages’/aisles’ vertical design should be at least
10.0 m in order to avoid visual distortions.
In vehicle passages or aisles with curbs on both sides, their longitudinal and superelevation
grades should be coordinated in a way as to avoid areas of poor drainage on the roadside. In
such cases, the roadside (paved edge line) grade should be not less than 0.5 %. Otherwise, it
will be necessary to install specific hydraulic features for surface drainage.
The connection of Rest Areas to the highway should be realized with appropriate entry and
exit ramps. Table 2-4 outlines the relevant acceleration and deceleration lengths per Rest Areas
type.
Ramp Acceleration/Deceleration
250 m 150 m 110 m
Length
NOTE: For Type B located on freeways and divided expressways, the length of 250 m applies. Details on tapered
acceleration and deceleration lanes are provided in Section 11.5 of SHC 301 (Highway Geometric Design).
SHC 303 17
On vehicle passages or aisles where only one side is intended for parking, a uniform width
should be chosen for construction or future extension purposes. In areas with curved vehicle
passages and aisles, the need for widening the respective curvature should be examined.
In the case of mixed use of parking spaces by both passenger and HGVs, necessary
adjustments should be made.
In order to ensure the visibility of the Rest Areas for high-speed traffic entering from the
freeway or divided expressway, no obstructing objects should be placed on the lateral area of
the entry ramp.
Taking into account the steering paths of buses and tractor semi-trailers when entering an
angled single side parking space, a safety margin of 1.0 m width should all be provided on the
opposite side of the vehicle passage or aisle. This area should not be occupied by any type of
obstacle including signing. In case of parking spaces on both sides of the vehicle passage or
aisle, an intermediate lane of 1.0 m minimum width may be provided. This lane should be
identified by users as a surface on which no parking takes place. Figure 2-5 shows an
intermediate safety lane in the case of two-sided parking spaces for passenger cars and buses,
respectively. However, the necessity for designing this 1.0 m intermediate lane is subject to
the aisle width; for this reason, a swept path analysis shall be required.
For very large and heavy vehicles, the need to widen the lateral safety clearance on curved
areas of the vehicle passage or aisle should be considered. In any case, exact dimensions
should be the result of a design vehicle swept path analysis.
Vehicle passages or aisles without side parking spaces, pedestrian walkways or paved surfaces
should be drained via the relevant grade and superelevation to the adjacent green areas. Curbs
with gutters should be provided only where required in cases of side pedestrian walkways or
surface drainage necessity.
In order to avoid the damage of curbs by crossing vehicles, traversable curbs should be used
with either (a) concrete on their rear side and an intermediate strip of appropriate material for
pedestrian sidewalks (Figure 2-6) or (b) reinforced concrete, if adjacent surfaces are not paved.
Entry and exit ramps configurations and that of the underpasses/overpasses, in the case of a
RA positioned on one side of the freeway, should be based on the principles of vehicle
dynamics as transitional road sections from the freeway to the RA. RA vehicle passages and
18 SHC 303
aisles should be designed on the basis of the geometric elements of vehicle motion (vehicle
steering paths and maneuvers).
Entry and exit connections to/from the RA should be designed on plan view and longitudinal
profile drawings based on interchange ramps designed for a design speed of 50 km/h. In the
cases of Rest Areas not arranged parallel to the freeway, the required steeper curvature of
entry and exit ramps should be designed with a 40 km/h design speed.
Depending on the geometric configuration, longitudinal grade, sight distance and criteria for
informational signing, RA entry/exit ramps should be of sufficient length and not less than 70
m. Achieving an adequate length for entry/exit ramps normally requires the use of a reverse
curve.
Entry and exit connections to/from one-side RA through overpasses/underpasses should be
designed in plan view and longitudinal profile drawings, as interchange ramps.
Entry and exit connections should be designed in a way that does not result in queuing on the
main highway. Any plans should be subject to a Traffic Impact Study.
In order to facilitate the HGVs, an additional criterion concerns the tangential design of the
vehicle passage or aisle alignment to the highest degree possible. In addition, for a RA used
also by heavy goods vehicles, entries and exits should be designed to a standard suitable for
the largest combination vehicle utilizing the route.
Regarding the inner paved edge line area of vehicle passages/aisles, the control horizontal
radii values are:
• Rmin= 17.50 m for vehicle passages/aisles to be used by HGVs or vehicles with trailers
and in cases of restricted space of up to Rmin= 15.0 m.
• Rmin= 7.50 m for vehicle passages/aisles to be used exclusively by passenger cars and
in cases of restricted space of up to Rmin= 6.0 m, if there are no traversable curbs.
In any case, the above dimensions are indicative and should be subject to a design vehicle
swept path analysis.
SHC 303 19
Figure 2-6 Construction Detail with Traversable Curbs at HGV Parking Spaces (FGSV, 2011)
2.5.5.2.3. Intersections
Intersections are created within Rest Areas by connecting the vehicle passages/aisles to each
other.
To ensure road safety, all intersections should be designed in a way that:
• They are identifiable, comprehensible, visible to their full extent and accessible.
• Vehicle paths’ crossings are avoided.
• One-way traffic is enhanced by appropriate configuration of the Rest Area facilities.
• Wrong turn maneuvers are addressed to the extent possible.
20 SHC 303
The configuration of vehicle passages’ or aisles’ exit areas should be either diverged or skewed
(Figure 2-7). Vehicle passages or aisles exits with segregated passenger and HGV traffic or
traffic directed towards parking areas of the freeway or divided expressway require the design
of diverging branches to facilitate driver orientation. Skewed exits of vehicle passages or aisles
offer the advantage of prohibiting unwanted turns e.g., from passenger cars to the bus parking
area.
The exit angle should normally be designed at 45 degrees.
Vehicle passages or aisles entries within the RA traffic area should be designed by deviating
from the principles of intersection design with a connecting angle normally equal to
approximately 65 degrees (Figure 2-7Figure 2-7 ). The connecting angles should not be
designed at less than approximately 55 degrees. At entry areas of vehicle passages/aisles, the
length of the visibility triangles should be at least 15 m.
The distance between successive entries and exits into RA aisles within the traffic area of a RA
should be of sufficient length to facilitate driver orientation. This distance should not be less
than 20 m, even in cases of restricted space (Figure 2-7).
Roundabouts offer advantages in distributing one-way traffic. However, they require longer
and more tangential entry connections, which cannot be used for parking spaces and limit the
traversability of particularly large and heavy goods vehicles.
For roundabouts, in order for the informational signing to be comprehensive at the exit areas
and also to enable the accommodation of HGVs, their external diameter should be designed
at not less than 50 m long.
Figure 2-7 Distances between Successive RA Internal Aisles Entries and Exits (FGSV, 2011)
SHC 303 21
2.5.5.2.4. Pedestrian access
Parking areas, commercial uses, prayer facilities, restrooms and leisure areas should be
interconnected by pedestrian walkways without creating obstacles for pedestrians and people
with disabilities. Pedestrian walkways should be located in a manner to reduce the potential
for vehicle-pedestrian conflicts.
Pedestrian movements through the Rest Area should be facilitated for all ages and abilities.
Barrier free walkways should be provided for access to buildings, prayer facilities, restrooms,
leisure areas, etc. They should be designed for long-term durability and ease of maintenance.
Pedestrian walkways should be designed in accordance with Section 4.8.2 of SHC 301 (Highway
Geometric Design). Examples of pedestrian walkways formation in both Type A, Type B and
Type C Rest Areas are given in Appendix A.
In general, a typical pedestrian walkway width within a Rest Area should be 1.80 m. In areas
with bus parking, as well as in those with high pedestrian traffic, pedestrian walkways should
be designed with a greater width. Next to the parking areas for heavy goods vehicles, an area
of normally 0.75 m length should be included to allow for drivers/passengers to get safely
in/out of vehicles.
Pedestrian walkways next to angled passenger parking spaces should be at least 2.50 m wide;
the additional 0.70 m includes the pedestrian buffer (Figure 2-8Figure 2-8 ).
Figure 2-8 Pedestrian Walkways Adjacent to Passenger Parking Spaces (FGSV, 2011)
22 SHC 303
Pedestrian crossings in vehicle passages/aisles should be laid out along their shortest routes.
Crossings should be positioned at sufficient distances from vehicle passage/aisle entries and
exits in order to ensure road safety. The crossings should always be perpendicular to the
vehicle passage/aisle pavement. The pedestrian crossing facility should be provided with
dropped curbs (Figure 2-9).
The longitudinal gradient of pedestrian walkways should not exceed the value of 6.0 % and
the superelevation the value of 2.0 %. Stairs should be avoided along walkways; ramps may be
preferred instead. Their grade should also not exceed 6.0 %. After a length of no more than
6.0 m along a ramp, horizontal platforms of 1.5 m length should be provided.
If stairs cannot be avoided, they should be designed in such a way as to be easily identifiable,
illuminated and adapted to the pedestrian path with a distinct appearance from the
neighboring pedestrian walkways. The use of guardrails should be determined on a case-by-
case basis.
For people with disabilities, access to commercial uses, restrooms, prayer facilities and leisure
areas is designed without stairs in accordance with the relevant access guidelines for disabled
people.
SHC 303 23
2.5.5.4. People with disabilities
Type A and Type B Rest Areas should be fully accessible by people with disabilities, and
conform to all related legislation in force in KSA.
Special parking spaces for disabled persons should be provided at a rate of 5 %. The spaces
should bear indicative marking and be located in close proximity to the commercial uses and
restroom buildings.
In wheelchair-accessible parking spaces, adjacent curbs and pedestrian walkways should be
lowered for a sufficient length.
At least one accessible route of travel should be provided from the parking area to each on-
site facility or ancillary service in accordance with the relevant access guidelines for disabled
people. Rest Area vehicle passages/aisles should not be crossed by people in wheelchairs.
It may be necessary to provide parking spaces for disabled people and temporary parking
spaces at fuel stations, if they provide a restroom for the disabled.
2.5.5.6. Pavement
Traffic circulation and parking areas should be paved with asphalt layers. Concrete (rigid)
pavement should be used for the HGVs parking area, based on pavement design requirements.
Pavement design shall be in accordance with the principles laid out in SHC 308 (Pavement
Design).
24 SHC 303
clear for all RA visitors. This particular arrangement for fuel stations constitutes a standard
solution for Rest Areas.
At centrally-arranged fuel stations, entry/exit for passenger and heavy goods vehicles should
be realized separately through two distinct vehicle passages. Such stations are less attractive
to visitors and require additional guidance to users in terms of accessing the fuel pumps. This
type of fuel stations are generally appropriate in cases of renewing or extending existing RAs
with limited space available, as they require less longitudinal development, if exiting vehicles
from the fuel facility are directed to parking spaces directly behind the station. In this
configuration, provision should be made to avoid traffic conflicts points, which are not clearly
understood and visible.
SHC 303 25
Figure 2-10 Example of Fuel Station Dimensions with Side-Arrangement (FGSV, 2011)
2.5.6.3. Restrooms
Restrooms should be made available to the public at all times. Restrooms should be sanitary
and provide drinking water.
The restrooms and drinking water should be available at no charge or obligation.
Type A and Type B Rest Areas should provide at least:
26 SHC 303
• One restroom (WC cabin) for women per 9 passenger car parking spaces.
• One restroom (WC cabin) for men per 14 passenger car parking spaces.
• One restroom (WC cabin) at least for disabled men and at least one for women.
In Type A Rest Areas, an adequate number of showers and changing rooms should be
provided.
All hygiene standards must meet the relevant KSA regulations and laws.
SHC 303 27
2.5.7. Free Surfaces
2.5.7.1. General
Free surfaces within a Rest Area should be non-paved surfaces within the traffic circulation
area. They should aim at:
• Integration of the RA into the natural environment.
• Recreation in the outdoors.
• Aesthetics.
• Supporting the distribution and separation of traffic.
Free surfaces should have areas with planting and vegetation, piping and lighting, all
appropriately combined.
2.5.7.2. Landscaping
Rest Areas should be aesthetically pleasant to encourage their use. The design of the RA
should complement the surrounding area, implementing local design features and materials
that blend in with the local environment, reducing, thus any visual impact.
The landscaping needs require also careful consideration as to type and location of vegetation,
number of picnic tables, waste bins, etc.
For design guidelines and details on landscaping, refer to Section 2.4 of SHC 307 (Highway
Facilities and Utilities Design – Landscape Planting, Outdoor Advertising).
Measures against noise and visual intrusion should be appropriately included into the overall
design of the Rest Area.
Protective fences should be combined with plantation in order to improve their aesthetic
image.
In the case of a RA site bordering a residential area, a buffer zone of 50 m in between the two
areas should be ensured.
28 SHC 303
Shelter and protection against sand storms may also be considered.
2.5.7.4. Islands
Any type of islands may be planted with trees or any other type of plantation. Figure 2-11, Figure 2-12 and
NOTE: The width of 0.75 m is for allowing drivers/passengers to get safely in and out of vehicle.
Figure 2-11 Tree-Planted Separating Island between Adjacent Passenger Parking Spaces (FGSV, 2011)
SHC 303 29
Figure 2-12 Tree-Planted Separating Island between Vehicle Passages/Aisles and Passenger Parking Spaces
(FGSV, 2011)
30 SHC 303
NOTE: The width of 0.75 m is for allowing drivers/passengers to get safely in and out of vehicle.
Figure 2-13 Planting of Trees in Intermediate Islands at HGVs Parking Spaces (FGSV, 2011)
2.5.8. Lighting
Adequate lighting levels are important to enhance safety for pedestrians and motorists and
deter undesirable activities. Lighting of traffic area and vehicle passages/aisles should be
compulsory for Type A Rest Areas and Type B Rest Areas with a number of HGV parking spaces
above 30. Lighting in small RAs below 30 parking spaces for heavy vehicles should be installed
in the immediate area of the restroom building.
Lighting installations should be designed to provide a high standard of illumination using high
efficiency light sources with low maintenance costs, while minimizing night time light pollution,
glare and the amount of fugitive light escaping from the sites. Care should be taken to prevent
inconvenience to properties adjacent to the Rest Area.
SHC 303 31
Lighting in Type A and Type B Rest Areas should begin at the site entry (exit lane gore area)
and end at the exit (entry lane gore area). Traffic surfaces such as vehicle passages, parking
areas and pedestrian walkways should be illuminated. Only walkways within the leisure area
can normally not be lit.
The relevant lighting design should ensure that pedestrian detection is possible at all crossings.
Guidance on the level of lighting required should be obtained from Chapter 5 of SHC 306
(Highway Facilities and Utilities Design – Public Utilities, Highway and Street Lighting, Control
and Monitoring Devices).
32 SHC 303
Public access to a Type A Rest Area should only be allowed from the exit and entry ramp from
the freeway (and from dedicated secondary local road network, if applicable). Access for
emergency or maintenance vehicles may be allowed from a local road with the agreement of
the relevant authority. In such cases, security should be provided to prevent unauthorized
entry.
2.5.11. Utilities
Availability of water, power systems and sewer disposal system options are critical in each
potential RA site, the proximity of which should be evaluated at the onset prior to site
acquisition.
It is desirable to locate Rest Areas near public systems that can be tapped for the proposed
site.
Sleeves and conduits should be provided for future utilities in accordance with the site master
plan considering a 20-year projected growth.
SHC 303 33
2.6.3. Operating Model
A benefit-cost analysis (BCA) should determine the economic feasibility of a Type A Rest Area
facility at the preliminary design stage.
The main RA ownership and operating models are:
• Built and Operated by public funding.
• Built by public funding and Operated by a Private Entity.
• Built and Operated by Private Entity.
In case of budgetary constraints, Public Private Partnerships (PPP) can offer significant strategic
value to the Kingdom by way of expanding the level of Rest Area services while achieving
considerable capital and operating cost savings, and in certain cases, even generating income.
If the government’s priority is to minimize capital and maintenance costs, and expedite project
implementation, but not necessarily maintain control of the RA use over a long period of time:
• A long-term lease agreement with a private partner may be preferred, who either owns
the land, or would purchase or lease it, and would be responsible for the design and
construction of the RA facility.
If the government’s priority is to control the RA site over the long-term, but not necessarily to
minimize costs or expedite project implementation, then it may:
• Acquire the site, and subsequently implement a procurement process for a long term
lease agreement with a private partner who would design, develop, operate and
maintain the rest area in accordance with KSA standards.
Any PPP model used shall be aligned with the provisions of the relevant Law governing PPPs
in KSA.
34 SHC 303
3. Truck Inspection Stations
3.1. Introduction
Overweight trucks can be the cause of pavement premature deterioration, mistimed
maintenance and high pavement life cycle cost. They also contribute to greenhouse emissions
and pose a considerable threat to traffic safety. Dramatic increases in maintenance costs have
been observed in areas without effective weight enforcement programs. Vehicle weight is also
an aggravating factor in the traffic crash rate.
Truck inspection and weighing stations are primarily used to check a truck’s weight to ensure
it is not overweight and is compliant with national laws and safety guidelines. These facilities
are necessary to protect the national highway network from overweight vehicles and facilitate
vehicle safety inspection. Their primary goal is to deter commercial vehicle traffic from
operating under conditions that reduce the safety of all types of vehicles, as well as pavement
life cycle and infrastructure fatigue life. The concerned entity (e.g., Roads General Authority)
may also be able to utilize valuable data collected from their operation for highway pavement
design purposes.
A Truck Inspection Station (TIS) is defined as a checkpoint at locations throughout the highway
network used for vehicle and/or operator assessments and can range from a simple widened
shoulder (truck lay-by), to a complex facility that includes, but is not limited to, static weigh
scale sites, Weigh-In-Motion (WIM) scales, buildings, and off-line inspection and storage areas.
The scope of the present guidelines is to outline the general requirements and standards for
the design and operation of a Truck Inspection Station and/or the retrofitting/upgrading of an
existing facility in the national freeway and rural highway network that will contribute to the
strict enforcement of legal load limits as means to reduce weight violations, heavy truck
crashes, as well as highway maintenance and rehabilitation expenditures.
The guidelines provide general standards applicable to all Truck Inspections Stations for the
main components of the facility, its layout, necessary equipment and operational procedures.
SHC 303 35
3.2.1. Functions
The main function of the majority of Truck Inspection Stations is weighing. However, additional
ones may be performed on site as part of an umbrella roadside enforcement program,
including the measurement of vehicle dimensions, safety inspection in terms of checking
whether the vehicle is being operated in accordance with corresponding legislation (i.e.,
dangerous goods, load security and fatigue) and verification of operating authority of the
vehicle.
Other enforcement activities that could potentially be undertaken within the same premises
(e.g., traffic offences) should be conducted by the police, or other authorized officials.
Typical functions should include:
• Weighing of the individual axles, axle groups and the vehicle itself. The measurement
of the spacings between individual axles and axle groups may also be obtained.
• Credentials verification: checking vehicle registration, driver eligibility and authority,
operating authority, insurance coverage, and special cargo requirements such as
hazardous materials transport permits, agricultural permits, and where applicable,
customs clearance or duty.
• Size enforcement encompasses checks to ascertain conformity of vehicle’s dimensions,
namely height, width, and length.
• Safety Assurance aims at the verification of the vehicle’s mechanical condition, driver
qualifications, licensing, and duty hours of service.
36 SHC 303
The spatial relationship of the sites should be selected to minimize the probability of weighing
the same commercial vehicle more than once during a single origin-destination (O-D) trip. The
O-D movements may provide the input for determining the optimal checkpoints. In this
respect, it is recommended that truck patterns are reviewed on an annual basis.
Finally, where TIS sites are located at both sides of the highway to cater for each traffic stream,
they need not be placed directly opposite each other; although the latter may be preferable
to minimize personnel requirements for both facilities. The first one encountered should be
for that direction of travel, to avoid drivers being alerted.
SHC 303 37
NOTE: TI & vehicle conflict areas refer to truck inspection station operators-vehicle conflict areas
The actual size of a particular TIS should depend on its individual requirements in handling
assigned demand and accommodating planned operations, as well as the site’s unique
characteristics.
38 SHC 303
Portable scale operations may be conducted on a regular basis with a focus on those areas of
the national highway network that have fewer hours of operation of the permanent TIS
facilities.
SHC 303 39
Figure 3-3 Major Portable Scale Site (WSDOT, 2021)
The portable scale should be set up in locations where its operation does not impede the
operation of the highway or other related highway features (i.e., intersections).
40 SHC 303
3.4.2. Screening / Interviewing Area
Vehicles may be stopped in a pre-inspection area, where enforcement personnel may briefly
assess vehicle and driver compliance, by conducting a preliminary check of the truck and
interview of the driver. During this preliminary screening step, personnel should not enforce
any non-compliances.
Screening should point out to noticeably overloaded vehicles, which should be directed to the
scales for subsequent formal weighing and/or to the parking area for a detailed mechanical
and driver inspection.
The screening/interviewing area should be located upstream of the weigh scales.
SHC 303 41
• The concrete pad surfaces on both the approach and departure sides of the
weighbridge should be designed with 0.3 % superelevation to allow for drainage and
0.0 % longitudinal gradient.
• For cases of individual axle weights requirements, the static scale should be positioned
at least 8 m from the TIS inspection building to permit viewing of the axle locations in
relation to the scale platform.
• Vehicle weights should also be viewed by drivers, unless this causes long queues.
• Safety treatments should be installed in the area around the weighbridge for the
protection of pedestrians.
• Weighbridge accuracy and display resolution should be better than +/-10 kg and 20
kg, respectively, with full scale range weighing capability of 50 tons per deck, or greater.
• The weighing equipment configuration and dimensions should be capable of handling
the peak hourly design volume at an optimal level of service, and therefore should be
based on the classification distribution derived from a traffic study.
Where a particular TIS is not equipped with a weighbridge, weighing should be performed
using certified portable scales.
42 SHC 303
bypass the station. Even in the event of TIS closure, weight data can still be collected
continuously by the WIM unit, if deployed on the mainline.
The WIM system should sort trucks prior to entering a TIS, either on the mainline traveling at
highway speeds and/or on off-ramps at reduced speed in accordance with a preset weight
threshold. The system records axle and gross vehicle weights as they pass over a sensor.
The procedure should typically include the following steps (Figure 3-4):
1. As a truck approaches a WIM system at the highway speed, the device obtains
measurements of the truck’s weight, axle load and configuration, as well as its vehicle
type, if capable.
2. Recorded data is processed via related software, whereby it is set against the preset
limit values for axle loads and Gross Vehicle Weights (GVWs).
3. If a truck is found to be potentially overweight, a directional signal will automatically
indicate to the driver to enter the TIS. Otherwise, the truck is left to continue its journey
without stopping. Vehicles that have a transponder may receive a bypass signal.
Figure 3-4 Operating Diagram of a Typical WIM System at Highways (Zhang, et al., 2008)
The trucks directed to enter the station facility should subsequently pass over a second, this
time low-speed WIM sorter, that measures their weight; based on the result, the vehicle will
either be instructed to stay in the station, or exit through an exit ramp.
If WIMs cannot be installed in all travelled lanes, then appropriate signing should be used to
direct truck drivers to move over to the designated WIM lane.
A WIM system’s accuracy depends on the sensor technology, truck characteristics, and driver
behavior, but requires the appropriate site and installation conditions. In general, WIM sensors
should be able to provide consistent results in asphalt pavement under a wide range of
temperature conditions. In selecting the location of a WIM device (mainline or on ramp), the
following features should apply:
• Location should permit sufficient time for communication with the driver.
• Level grade for the approach/exit areas of the scale (to the extent possible) or grades
that deter vehicles from breaking or accelerating when crossing the scale.
SHC 303 43
• Appropriate cross slope or superelevation to avoid disproportionate loading between
the vehicle’s two sides.
• Smooth surface of highways or ramps (approaches for the system should be installed,
if necessary).
The headway between arriving trucks should be taken into account, in terms of an even and
uninterrupted flow over the sorter scale, avoiding also any vehicle queuing forming ahead of
the WIM scale and back onto the highway-exit ramp.
In the case of directional signals or changeable message signs, the spacing should be such so
as to avoid confusion among trucks following closely behind one another.
It is recommended that related informative signage and signaling be complemented by a
driver education program, for information and guidance on how to drive over WIM system
sensors, as well as the implications of avoiding such an enforcement system.
Maintenance requirements of WIM scales in the highway should be minimized for safety
reasons. Maintenance of required site conditions is necessary to ensure accuracy of the device.
The most mature and proven WIM sensor technologies available are bending plates,
piezoelectric sensors (quartz, polymer, and ceramic), and load cells. In selecting category, the
following characteristics should be qualitatively compared: ease of installation, maintenance,
safety, and cost, along with accuracy in determining the technology or technologies that would
be most appropriate for KSA.
In general:
• Both high-speed mainline and low-speed ramp WIMs are screening tools and do not
replace the need for static scales that are necessary for enforcement.
• When WIM is not included, a conduit for its future installation should be provided.
• WIM requirements are site-specific and driven by developments in technology;
designers should keep abreast of evolving technologies to be applied in TIS design.
44 SHC 303
• On the right-hand side of the weighbridge at facilities with one scale ramp.
• Between the ramps at facilities with dual static scale ramps.
The main side of the scale house should be placed toward approaching traffic, while an
elevated control room should boast adequate window areas that will offer facility personnel
good visibility along both the main line and the approach ramps into the station. A good
viewing point of the static scales is also necessary via larger viewing areas, at the sides of the
scale house parallel to the truck flow over the scales.
Moreover, remote video monitoring should be included to enhance surveillance. The camera
may be mounted for clear viewing of multiple lanes and the far side of vehicles. Visual
supervision of the entire facility is advisable, either with additional window areas providing
unobstructed view of the site’s storage/parking area and exit ramp to the highway or with the
use of surveillance cameras.
A protective jersey barrier between the scale house and highway against errant vehicles should
be provided.
The scale house building must comply with the requirements of the Saudi Building Code of
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and all relevant codes and standards.
SHC 303 45
The approach to the storage area should be clearly indicated and visible to truck drivers. The
area itself should be designed to accommodate a number of different truck configurations. A
critical factor should be the turning characteristics of larger, multi-unit vehicles.
Hot mix asphalt pavement is acceptable for use on the ramp and storage areas. Its depth
should be designed in accordance with the surfacing report. The storage area should also be
made flat to optimize scale efficiency; to facilitate drainage, the slope may be up to 2.0 %.
46 SHC 303
3.4.7.3. Hazardous material parking area
Specially designated areas should be provided in the case of interception of hazardous
materials or illegal goods. If a hazardous material containment area is required, attention
should be paid in choosing its location, since some certain degree of containment and disposal
of leaking materials would be necessary. A sunken parking area along with a slump area to
capture potential hazardous runoff may be needed. The area should be designed at an
appropriate distance from other TIS operations and facilities in order to ensure safety during
any potential loading and unloading activity. The absolute minimum distance is 50 m and is
subject to the type of the hazardous materials (chemicals, gases, toxic, flammables, explosives,
etc.) and shall be defined on a case-by-case basis.
In addition, environmental impact studies may be required to ensure compliance with related
standards, as well as a plan for the arrival and departure of emergency response vehicles.
SHC 303 47
3.4.8.2. Exit requirements
An exit ramp or acceleration lane should be provided for vehicles to safely exit the TIS and re-
enter the traffic stream on the highway. Heavy vehicles require very long acceleration
distances, and acceleration lanes should allow the design vehicle to reach a speed no less than
20 km/h below the mean free speed of the through-traffic.
Additional general requirements include:
• Entry ramps uphill or exit ramps downhill should be avoided.
• Level surface (to the extent possible) should be preferred on the ramps where WIM's
are located.
• Special right-of-way restrictions should be assessed when designing the facility layout.
• The necessary space headway between vehicles (in most cases 30 m) should be
instructed by appropriate signing at the start of lane turnoff ramp.
• Decision sight distance should be provided at the approaches to the intersection or
the diverging gores of ramps that provide access to the inspection station.
• Decision sight distance should be provided at the highway section upstream where the
merging maneuver between the traffic exiting the inspection station and the through
traffic on the highway occurs.
• The length of the acceleration ramps after the inspection station should be adequate
in order for the heavy vehicles to reach a speed value near the highway’s posted speed
limit.
• In cases where the station is accessed through an intersection, both intersection
turning sight distance and decision sight distance for the posted speed limit should be
achieved.
• Merging, diverging and weaving areas should be designed for level of service ‘C’ or
better for the horizon year design volume.
48 SHC 303
• Differences in superelevation and longitudinal grade between the TIS and adjacent
highway to ensure vehicle stability.
• Safety barrier requirements and appropriate clearances to the adjacent highway and
TIS areas (in the absence of safety barrier, the separation zone should be of sufficient
width to create adequate safety buffer).
• In cases of space limitations, the depressed outer separation between the TIS site and
the through lanes may be replaced with concrete traffic barrier.
3.4.10. Amenities
Amenities should be designed for the relevant highway type and commercial vehicles using
the TIS. The following general considerations should apply:
• Amenities should preferably be located adjacent to the weighing area, but away from
through-traffic.
• Points of conflicts between personnel/pedestrian traffic and vehicle traffic should be
considered.
• When a site has only a shaded area and no building accommodation, then
restrooms/prayer facilities should be incorporated into the location as per the design
of a rest area facility in Chapter 2.
• A minimum level of shade should be provided, allowing TIS personnel to interview
drivers in an area that is conducive to completing the necessary documentation.
• Accessibility of utilities should be considered.
• Adequate conduit and utilities should be placed beneath the ramps and parking areas
for potential future upgrades.
• Pedestrian paths/walkways between the scale house and the parking/storage areas
should be considered with related signage in case of safety risk.
3.4.11. Signing
Appropriate signage and signaling are key components of an effective weigh and inspection
station design and operation. Permanent signing for the facility should be provided, as
requested by the KSA highway patrol police.
Signing and pavement marking of all TIS on highways, including exit and entrance ramps
should be in accordance with Sections 6.5.1 and 4.4.5 of SHC 602 (Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices).
On multi-lane divided highways, illuminated electronically controlled “open” and “closed”
message signs should be installed that can be operated from the scale house.
3.4.12. Lighting
Illumination should be provided when requested by the highway patrol police. It is necessary
if the facility is to be operated during the hours of darkness and may be desirable at other
locations to deter unauthorized use.
Guidance on the level of lighting required should be obtained from Chapter 5 of SHC 306
(Public Utilities, Highway and Street Lighting, Control and Monitoring Devices).
SHC 303 49
3.4.13. Automatic Data Acquisition and Processing
Data on measured weights, axle spacings and commercial vehicle dimensions (width and
height) should be obtained automatically through sensors and compared against the desirable
limits corresponding to the related specification of each vehicle.
A loop-monitoring system should be installed at critical locations along the TIS bypass and
weigh/inspection lanes to capture any incorrect vehicle movements and notify personnel
accordingly.
In the event of system failure, manual operation overriding automatic functions should be
permitted.
Data recorded by the automated system, namely numbers of trucks passing through the site
and percentages of non-compliant vehicles, should be stored in a dedicated database to be
made available upon request.
Enforcement personnel should be able to access real-time data from the virtual WIM scales in
order to effectively target trucks that are likely to be overweight and/or have safety violations.
All KSA truck inspection station equipment and instruments need to be able to communicate
with each other and allow for all related data to be downloaded to a central database system.
Enforcement operations should require real-time access to high speed mainline WIM scale
data for the operation of permanent and virtual weigh stations.
Information collected from the permanent TIS as well as virtual weigh stations’ high-speed
mainline WIMs on a continuous basis, should be retrievable by interested KSA agencies and
used for, among other things, selecting location and timing of enforcement activities.
50 SHC 303
facility with direct highway access that consists of a single weigh/inspection lane with minimal
storage area for trucks. Provision for future expansion should be made at the initial design
stage.
Scales on TLTW highways could be used by having a single site to weigh both traffic streams.
These are small facilities but need careful attention to design.
A typical layout to guide the design of truck inspection stations on TLTW highways is shown
in Figure 3-5.
Figure 3-5 Truck Inspection Station Site: TLTW Highways (WSDOT, 2021)
SHC 303 51
3.5.2.2. High traffic volumes
In the cases of higher traffic volumes exceeding the capacity of a single platform-scale lane
(approximately 90 trucks per hour per direction), then additional weigh/inspection lanes and
multiple scales should be arranged in parallel to allow for weighing multiple axle vehicles in
one single stop.
The maximum handling capacity of the sorter scale is a function of the headway between
vehicles, but is nominally set to 200 trucks per hour per directions. When this volume is
exceeded, the TIS layout could include additional WIM sorters.
Based upon the sorting mechanism, the following layouts are identified:
52 SHC 303
Figure 3-6 Layout A: Main Line Sorting with Additional On-Ramp Sorting (FHWA, 1995)
SHC 303 53
Figure 3-7 Layout B: Main Line Sorting Only (FHWA, 1995)
54 SHC 303
Figure 3-8 Layout C: Additional Layout (FHWA, 1995)
SHC 303 55
Figure 3-9 Virtual Weigh Station on By-Pass Roadways (Regan, et al., 2006)
56 SHC 303
3.7.2. Managing Queuing Under Peak Conditions
A major issue associated with TIS operation is temporary peaking in the truck volumes
resulting in delays and vehicle queues. At locations with high volumes, weighing/inspecting
every n-th truck will prevent queues and associated safety issues. Attention should be paid
that a repeated selection sequence is not identified and manipulated by drivers to avoid
inspection. In this case, the random selection of vehicles for inspection may be preferred.
Another alternative is increasing temporarily the level of tolerance of the allowable weight limit
(i.e., from 100 to 105 % of the legal limit), whereby some overweight vehicles should be left
out from detailed inspection.
In the case of unforeseen excessive volumes, enforcement personnel should have the option
of allowing empty or lighter trucks to bypass the sorter scale, on their judgment. These vehicles
should be instructed to decelerate past the area for visual inspection by enforcement staff.
As a rule, the estimation of the average queue and delay at weigh facilities follows four distinct
steps:
1. Identification of the following features: truck arrival distribution, peak arrival volume,
enforcement processing time distribution, mean enforcement processing rate, and
number of static scales.
2. Assessment of the percentage of the truck volume sorted to the static scale via a WIM
system.
3. Application of queuing models to estimate queue length and waiting time in the TIS.
4. Estimation of average transit time and delay.
SHC 303 57
RGA and highway patrol police should also agree on the area to be provided for parking and
storage to ensure trucks do not impede the main line through traffic.
Highway patrol police should identify the need for WIM or Commercial Vehicle Information
Systems and Networks (CVISN) capabilities.
Highway patrol police should request the provision of illumination where necessary together
with the respective permanent signage for the facility.
58 SHC 303
annual “vehicle operating cost per stop” saving that results from less travel distance for bypass
vehicles:
• Truck time cost: combined figure that includes the salary of drivers, time value for
inventory (i.e., lost revenues due to late deliveries), and vehicle depreciation cost per
hour.
• Vehicle operating cost: fuel consumption cost, tires, expressed as cost per vehicle-
kilometer travelled.
SHC 303 59
4. Parking and Garage Facilities
4.1. Introduction
Parking planning is an integral part of modern transportation planning and, more specifically,
that of urban development. The way in which parking space is provided affects land-use,
choice of destination and mode of transport, quality of road transport, etc.
As the number of vehicles increases exponentially on a global level, the need to house them
in close proximity to destinations creates a complex design challenge, whereby vehicle,
engineering and traffic issues related to site locations must be integrated to create the
appropriate solution. Designing a parking facility requires, therefore, an integrated approach.
The purpose of this Volume is to provide guidance for the design of parking facilities in order
to ensure the uniformity of parking design in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Volume shall
be used in developing new parking facilities or upgrading existing facilities to the standards
outlined herein. It is directed at urban and transport planners, architects and developers, road
authorities, policy-makers and the interested public to design, operate and maintain efficient
and safe parking facilities in a technically sound way and integrate these in the appropriate
environment. Parking design is also an important element for new developments and shall be
a part of the building permit process.
60 SHC 303
4.3. Parking Design
This section presents the basic parking design elements pertaining to the different vehicle
classifications, parking configurations and types of parking facilities.
SHC 303 61
4.3.1.6. Management and operation
As the horizontal and vertical clearances have a key impact on the design of the entries and
exits of parking areas, it is necessary to clarify at an early stage the management and operating
modes of the planned installation.
4.3.1.9. Drainage
Regarding parking spaces, the complete drainage of water generated on the surface shall be
sought. In the course of the geological investigation, statements on hydraulic conditions and
the suitability for drainage are important, while the planned drainage system shall be defined
at an early stage.
62 SHC 303
at-grade surface facilities, simple structures or multi-level building parking structures (parking
garages).
Figure 4-1 Parking Design Vehicle (PDV) for KSA (Qatar MOTC, 2021-adjusted)
SHC 303 63
The swept path width is of critical importance in determining parking design elements,
especially for tractor-semitrailer combinations (Figure 4-2).
In any case, a swept path analysis shall be carried out per vehicle examined in order to
determine more accurate outcomes for the subject site.
Table 4-1 presents the individual characteristics of the most common types of vehicles. The
most unfavorable vehicle in terms of turning capacity is the intermediate semi-trailer (WB20)
and shall be used as the truck parking design vehicle for the design of parking facilities in Rest
Areas (see Chapter 2) and Truck Inspection Stations (see Chapter 3). The respective design
vehicle for buses shall be the city transit bus (CITY-BUS).
Table 4-1 Dimensions (m) for PDV and Other Commonly Used Vehicles (AASHTO, 2018; Qatar MOTC, 2021)
Radius (m)
Type of vehicle Length (m) Width (m) Height (m) Outer trace
Inner rear
of front
wheel path
overhang
Passenger Car
5.1 2.0 2.0 6.6 4.3
(PDV)
Conventional
School Bus (S- 10.9 2.5 3.2 7.3 12.1
BUS 11)
Articulated Bus
18.3 2.6 3.4 6.5 13.2
(A-BUS)
Single Unit
9.2 2.5 3.4 to 4.1 8.7 13.2
Truck (SU-9)
Single Unit
12.1 2.5 3.4 to 4.1 11.1 16.1
Truck (SU-12)
Intermediate
Semi-trailer 13.9 2.5 4.1 5.9 12.4
(WB12)
64 SHC 303
Radius (m)
Type of vehicle Length (m) Width (m) Height (m) Outer trace
Inner rear
of front
wheel path
overhang
Intermediate
Semi-trailer 22.4 2.6 4.1 0.6 14.1
(WB20)
Double-trailer
Combination 22.0 2.6 4.1 5.8 13.7
(WB20D)
Recreational
Vehicle, Motor 9.1 2.4 3.7 7.9 12.6
Home (MH)
SHC 303 65
4.3.4. Parking Configurations
In principle, three types of parking configurations can be distinguished:
• Parallel.
• Angled.
• Perpendicular.
Parking parallel to the travelled lane is one of the most commonly used types in urban areas
and appropriate for all streets. However, the parallel configuration is too complex to adopt in
surface parking facilities and parking buildings. In general, it allows simple parking operations
that are not particularly disruptive to the normal traffic flow. The disadvantage may be the
potential obstructions during reverse parking in terms of increased parking demand and/or
endangering cyclists and that entry and exit maneuvers must often take place on shared
spaces, with the traffic constituting a potential hazard.
The comparative advantage of angled parking is that this type of parking configuration
provides a larger number of parking stalls compared to parallel parking. It also allows for
easier maneuverability to enter the parking stall. For one-way roadways, angled parking should
be preferred.
It is not recommended to use an angle smaller than 45 °, as it would leave a larger area not
used for parking or any other purpose. On the other hand, angled parking may present specific
issues because of the varying lengths of certain vehicles types and related sight distances;
longer vehicles may interfere with the traveled way. Also, parking in and out without the use
of an additional lane is normally only possible at a small angle.
The perpendicular configuration allows for one-way or dual-way traffic; however, fast parking
is not always guaranteed. 90 ° parking is not advisable along roadways with a median to avoid
confusion of direction. In dead ends, the perpendicular position is preferred, so vehicles which
have entered the dead end for parking can exit without any special turning maneuvers.
Nevertheless, in such cases, an additional lane should normally be used.
66 SHC 303
4.3.5.1. Passenger car
Regarding the parallel type of parking configuration, in residential and commercial areas, the
width of the parking lanes shall be 2.5 m, and in industrial areas, 3.6 m. The length of the
parking space shall be 6.5 m for both cases, as shown in Figure 4-3 and Figure 4-4, respectively.
Figure 4-3 Minimum Dimensions of Parallel Parking Space in Residential and Commercial Areas (MoMRA, 2019)
Figure 4-4 Minimum Dimensions of Parallel Parking Space in Industrial Areas (MoMRA, 2019)
Minimum parking stall dimensions for both angled (of various degrees) and perpendicular (90
°) parking configurations shall be 3.0 m x 6.0 m, as shown in Figure 4-5.
SHC 303 67
Figure 4-5 Dimensions of Angled or Perpendicular Parking Space (MoMRA, 2019)
The above parking dimensions incorporate longitudinal and lateral safety distances for both
parallel and angled parking spaces.
The vertical clearance for all cases shall be set to 2.5 m.
4.3.5.3. Two-wheelers
Parking spaces for motorcycles shall typically be 1.5 m wide and 2.5 m long. These dimensions
include the clearance required for riders’ mounting/demounting, as well as clearance from the
curb.
With regard to bicycles, the simplest form of the frame bicycle holder can be used for almost
all bicycle types. Figure 4-6 shows the typical space requirements for bicycle parking.
68 SHC 303
Figure 4-6 Bicycle Parking Space Requirements (FGSV, 2012).
SHC 303 69
• In the angled or perpendicular parking configuration, an intermediate special lane shall
be provided for maneuvering to reduce the impact of exit/entry maneuvers on the
traffic on the roadway.
• Parking shall be prohibited within 4.0 m of either side of fire hydrants, and allowed at
certain distances from pedestrian crossings and intersections (shown in the following
sections) in order to maintain proper sight distance triangles, depending on speed and
highway geometry.
70 SHC 303
Figure 4-7 Minimum Street Width for Adding Parking Lanes (MoMRA, 2019)
SHC 303 71
Figure 4-8 Minimum Distance of Parking Spaces from A) Signalized Intersections B) Non-Signalized Intersections
(MoMRA, 2019)
72 SHC 303
than 15.0 m and 6.0 m, respectively. The distance of the last parking stall before the
intersection along the secondary road shall not be less than 6.0 m (Figure 4-10).
• The parking space boundaries along parking stalls shall be clearly marked in
accordance with Section 4.2.9 of SHC 602 (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices).
• In the case of acceleration or deceleration lanes, the above distances shall be measured
from the last parking stall to the beginning of the tapered part at the entrance to the
intersection and from the end of the tapered part to the first stall at the exit of the
intersection.
• Long sections of continuous parallel parking stalls shall be interrupted by buildouts,
e.g., for additional landscaping. This is to ensure empty parking will not be used as
additional traffic lane, or to circumnavigate queues at traffic lights.
• It is advisable to allocate 5 % of the number of parking spaces on commercial roads to
electric cars, and the parking spaces be equipped with electric power sources for the
purposes of charging cars.
Figure 4-9 Parallel Parking Stalls at A) Signalized Intersections B) Non-Signalized Intersections (MoMRA, 2019)
SHC 303 73
Figure 4-10 Parallel Parking at the Area of Secondary Roads (MoMRA, 2019)
• For all types of intersections and all types of angled and perpendicular parking stalls,
the distance shall be at least 12.0 m measured from the pedestrian crossing line and
the first parking stall at the beginning of the roadway (according to the direction of
traffic on the roadway) and at least 9.0 m from the stopping line and the last parking
stall at the end of the roadway, as shown in Figure 4-11.
• For parking stalls at an angle of 30 ° to the direction of traffic, the minimum width of
the roadway in one direction shall be 4.0 m, and the vertical dimension of the parking
74 SHC 303
stall on the platform shall be 5.6 m, as shown in Figure 4-12. The minimum width of
the roadway in two directions shall be 8.0 m, as shown in Figure 4-13.
• For parking stalls at an angle of 45 ° to the direction of traffic, the minimum width of
the roadway in one direction shall be 4.2 m, and the vertical dimension of the parking
stall on the platform shall be 6.4 m, as shown in Figure 4-14. The minimum width of
the roadway in two directions shall be 8.4 m, as shown in Figure 4-15. However, in case
of land acquisition constraints, the width of one-directional and two-directional
roadway shall be limited to 4.0 m and 8.0 m, respectively.
• For parking stalls at an angle of 60 ° to the direction of traffic, the minimum width of
the roadway in one direction shall be 5.4 m, and the vertical dimension of the parking
stall on the platform shall be 6.7 m, as shown in Figure 4-16. The minimum width of
the roadway in two directions shall be 10.8 m, as shown in Figure 4-17. However, in case
of land acquisition constraints, the width of one-directional and two-directional
roadway shall be limited to 5.0 m and 10.0 m, respectively.
• For perpendicular parking stalls (at an angle of 90 ° to the direction of traffic), the
minimum width of the roadway in one direction shall be 7.6 m, and the vertical
dimension of the parking stall on the platform shall be 6.0 m, as shown in Figure 4-18.
For a two-way roadway, the width shall be 15.2 m as shown in Figure 4-19. However,
in case of land acquisition constraints, the width of one-directional and two-directional
roadway shall be limited to 6.0 m and 12.0 m, respectively.
• Parking stalls shall be appropriately marked in accordance with Section 4.2.9 of SHC
602 (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices).
• In the event of acceleration or deceleration lanes, the distances are measured from the
beginning of the tapered section to the last parking stall at the entrance to the
intersection and from the end of the tapered section to the first parking place at the
exit of the intersection.
• Oversizing of angled parking stalls should be avoided.
Figure 4-11 Minimum Distance of Angled Parking Stalls from Pedestrian Crossing/Stopping Line at Intersections
(MoMRA, 2019)
SHC 303 75
NOTE: The intermediate maneuvering lane is not shown.
Figure 4-12 Minimum Dimensions for 30 ° Angled Parking Stalls for One-Way Roadway (MoMRA, 2019)
Figure 4-13 Minimum Dimensions for 30 ° Angled Parking Stalls for Two-Way Roadway (MoMRA, 2019)
76 SHC 303
NOTE: The intermediate maneuvering lane is not shown. In cases of limited land availability, roadway width shall
be 4.0 m.
Figure 4-14 Minimum Dimensions for 45 ° Angled Parking Stalls for One-Way Roadway (MoMRA, 2019)
NOTE: The intermediate maneuvering lane is not shown. In cases of limited land availability, roadway width shall
be 8.0 m.
Figure 4-15 Minimum Dimensions for 45 ° Angled Parking Stalls for Two-Way Roadway (MoMRA, 2019)
SHC 303 77
NOTE: The intermediate maneuvering lane is not shown. In cases of limited land availability, roadway width shall
be 5.0 m.
Figure 4-16 Minimum Dimensions for 60 ° Angled Parking Stalls for One-Way Roadway (MoMRA, 2019)
NOTE: The intermediate maneuvering lane is not shown. In cases of limited land availability, roadway width shall
be 10.0 m.
Figure 4-17 Minimum Dimensions for 60 ° Angled Parking Stalls for Two-Way Roadway (MoMRA, 2019)
78 SHC 303
NOTE: The intermediate maneuvering lane is not shown. In cases of limited land availability, roadway width shall
be 6.0 m.
Figure 4-18 Minimum Dimensions for 90 ° Angled Parking Stalls for One-Way Roadway (MoMRA, 2019)
NOTE: The intermediate maneuvering lane is not shown. In cases of limited land availability, roadway width shall
be 12.0 m.
Figure 4-19 Minimum Dimensions for 90 ° Angled Parking Stalls for Two-Way Roadway (MoMRA, 2019)
SHC 303 79
4.3.6.2.3. Parking stalls in building setbacks
Many road corridors in the Kingdom feature privately owned setbacks beyond the limits of the
ROW, used among other for car parking.
Setback distances of buildings may differ from one facility to another on the same roadway,
leading to a difference in the road regulation line, on which these facilities are located. Since
the setback is private property and does not belong to the right-of-way, it is separated from
the ROW by platforms, which connect both sides of the roadway.
The setback space for parking shall be separated by platforms from the traffic lanes when the
setback is 6.0 m wide or more. An entrance and exit shall be provided paying attention to
maintain an appropriate distance between the entrance and exit of the setback space (waiting)
and the nearest intersection.
Parking spaces in the setback space shall be designed in two ways:
1. Separating parking stalls in setback area from traffic lanes with platforms (see Figure
4-20), when:
o Setback continues for less than 100 m and there is a setback space for one or
more facilities.
o Necessary visibility distance is not available to exit the setback space.
o Roadway section includes parallel parking.
o Number of parking stalls in the setback area is equal to the number of parking
stalls without the use of the setback, then the setback is used to improve traffic
on the roadway by limiting the maneuvering of vehicles entering and exiting
the parking stalls.
2. Non-separation of parking stalls in setback area from traffic lanes
Parking stalls in the setback area are designed in this way when the setback continues for more
than 100 m down the road. However, this alternative requires the addition of an intermediate
maneuvering strip (off the traffic space) for entering and exiting the parking stalls and for
limiting the impact on traffic on the road.
Figure 4-21 shows the parking stalls in the setback area without the use of separating platforms.
Since the setback area is located in an intersection area, the first parking stall must be 9.0 m
away from the stopping line, while the beginning of the parking stalls at the intersection exit
must be at least 12.0 m away from a pedestrian crossing line.
Where necessary, RGA should assess front setback configurations in view of car parking
provision requirements according to the different land-use types.
With regard to commercial buildings, RGA shall consider the use of legal setback areas for
parking in case of limited land availability. In this case, the relative setback in the front facades
of buildings shall be 8.0 m for commercial buildings and 5.0 m for commercial residential
buildings.
80 SHC 303
Figure 4-20 Separating Platforms in Setback Area (MoMRA, 2019)
Figure 4-21 Parking Stalls in Setback Area without Separating Platforms and with Maneuvering Lane (MoMRA,
2019)
SHC 303 81
4.3.6.3. Areas for loading
The basic dimensions for loading and unloading in the public road space shall be subject to
the dimensions of the HGVs, with additional space requirements for on-board rear lifting
devices and shunting operations, as well as space requirements for placing goods on the
vehicle at short notice.
For small delivery vehicles, a minimum area requirement of 3.00 m width and 10.00 to 12.00
m length is required for loading. Larger vehicles would require a minimum area of 4.00 m wide
and 12.00 to 14.00 m long. Additional areas of approx. 3.0 to 5.0 m2 shall be provided in the
lateral spaces for the short-term placing of goods delivered. These areas shall be located
outside pedestrian or cycling areas in order to minimize safety hazards.
Bicycle parking facilities are typically classified by the level of security they provide, ranging
from fully enclosed individual bicycle lockers to bicycle racks that enable both the frame and
wheels to be secured with a user-provided lock.
82 SHC 303
In general, safety and security should be prioritized, and hence, bicycle parking shall be
provided at locations with high visibility, illumination and adequate access. The amount of
space used by a fully occupied rack and the space required for cyclists to access the parking
area and use both sides of the rack should be considered, as per the requirements listed in
Table 4-2.
Distance Requirements
Figure 4-23 Typical Bicycle Parking Layout on the Sidewalk (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
SHC 303 83
The “Inverted U” type bike rack is the preferred bicycle parking rack; however, other designs
are acceptable as long as they are respecting the character of the surroundings.
Typical figures for the number of required Bicycle Racks per type of land-use are presented in
Table 4-3.
84 SHC 303
4.3.7.2. Facilities for passenger cars
The following design criteria apply to surface parking:
• The minimum dimensions of an off-street perpendicular or angled parking stall shall
be 6.0 m long and 3.0 m wide.
• The minimum dimensions of an off-street parallel parking stall shall be 6.50 m long
and 2.5 m wide.
• The parking angle shall be chosen to give the highest possible number of parking
spaces in accordance with the configuration and dimensions of the parking area.
Angled parking stalls could be at angles of 30 °, 45 °, 60 ° or 90 °. A uniform angled
parking configuration shall generally be selected.
• Most efficient use of land area in larger parking stalls is obtained by placing all vehicles
perpendicular to the aisles. In general, a perpendicular layout is readily adaptable and
is desirable.
• Trees or other shading equipment (e.g., canopies) shall be installed in parking areas to
provide shade, windbreaks, spatial enclosure, and a visual buffer of parking areas.
• 5 % of surface parking spaces shall be allocated to people with disabilities, provided
that the number of parking spaces is not less than two (see Section 4.3.10).
Table 4-4 Minimum Parking Stall and Aisle Dimensions of Surface Parking per Parking Angle (MoMRA, 2019)
Minimum
Parking Projected aisle
Parking angle
depth parking serving Parking space (m2)
( o)
(m) width (m) one or two
(Length x width)
[A] sides
[B] [C]
[D]
Parallel Parking
Angled Parking
SHC 303 85
Minimum
Parking Projected aisle
Parking angle
depth parking serving Parking space (m2)
( o)
(m) width (m) one or two
(Length x width)
[A] sides
[B] [C]
[D]
90 o
6.0 m 3.0 m 6.0 m 6.0 m x 3.0 m
(one-way aisle)
90 o
6.0 m 3.0 m 8.0 m 6.0 m x 3.0 m
(two-way aisle)
Figure 4-24 Minimum Space and Aisle Dimensions of Surface Parking per Parking Angle for One-Way Traffic
(Qatar MOTC, 2021)
86 SHC 303
NOTE: For entrance/exit areas see Section 4.3.9.
To ensure the safety of vehicles turning within the surface parking facility and entering and
exiting from it, the minimum turning radius of the turning curve shall be provided as shown in
Table 4-5.
Table 4-5 Minimum Turning Curves Radii and Widths in Surface Parking Facilities
The dimensions shown in Table 4-5 are indicative. In any case, the adequacy of internal and
external paths shall be subject to a swept path analysis.
SHC 303 87
4.3.7.3. Facilities for trucks and buses
Truck parking facilities shall be designed to accommodate the vehicle type or types that would
frequently utilize the facility. The layout of an HGV parking facility depends on the dimensions
of the vehicles using the facility. Therefore, one cannot develop guidelines applicable to all
heavy trucks, nor propose a fits-all geometric layout. Design requirements shall be decided on
a case-by-case basis in consultation with the responsible Authority.
Table 4-6 and Figure 4-26 provide basic parking dimensions for typical parking angles for
various types of trucks and buses, as well as the respective aisle widths. The dimensions shown
in Table 4-6 are indicative and a detailed swept path analysis shall be carried out to determine
more precise parking dimensions and aisle widths.
Table 4-6 HGVs/Buses Minimum Off-Street Parking Dimensions and Aisle Widths (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
Minimum Projected
Parking angle Parking Aisle
parking parking
(o) Vehicle type depth (m) width (m)
width width (m)
[A] (m) [B] [C] [E]
[D]
Intermediate
Semi-trailer 4.0 18.5 5.7 14.0
(WB20)
Conventional
45 ° Parking
School Bus (S- 3.5 10.0 5.0 8.0
BUS 11)
Articulated Bus
3.5 15.0 5.0 8.5
(A-BUS)
Intermediate
Perpendicular Semi-trailer 4.0 23.0 4.0 16.0
Parking (90 o) (WB20)
Conventional
School Bus (S- 3.5 11.0 3.5 9.0
BUS 11)
88 SHC 303
Minimum Projected
Parking angle Parking Aisle
parking parking
(o) Vehicle type depth (m) width (m)
width width (m)
[A] (m) [B] [C] [E]
[D]
Articulated Bus
3.5 18.8 3.5 14.0
(A-BUS)
NOTE: The aisle dimensioning refers to one-way traffic and forward entering – reverse exiting maneuvers
NOTE: The aisle dimensioning refers to one-way traffic and forward entering – reverse exiting maneuvers.
Figure 4-26 HGVs/Buses Minimum Off-Street Parking Dimensions and Aisle Widths (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
The following section provides general guidelines in terms of dimensions for Rest Areas which
constitute the most frequent type of parking facility for the HGV (WB-20) and bus (city transit
bus) parking design vehicles.
SHC 303 89
4.3.7.3.1. Trucks and buses parking arrangements in Rest Areas
The layout, circulation and access shall be developed based on a Traffic Impact Study and in
consultation with the responsible Authority. The basic layout rules for Rest Areas, which affect
parking facilities, are discussed in Chapter 2 of this Volume.
Figure 4-27 and Figure 4-28 show the parking layout for the truck design vehicle (WB-20)
regarding angled (45 o) and parallel parking, respectively.
NOTE: The parking configuration refers to forward entering – forward exiting maneuvers.
Figure 4-27 Angled (45 o) Parking Layout for WB-20 Design Vehicle in Rest Areas (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
NOTE: The parking configuration refers to forward entering – forward exiting maneuvers.
Figure 4-28 Parallel Parking Layout for WB-20 Design Vehicle in Rest Areas (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
In general, bus parking, where possible, shall be segregated from truck parking. Otherwise,
truck parking spaces may be used to also accommodate bus parking. In any case, parking
spaces for buses shall be located so as to allow passengers to disembark onto the Rest Areas
buildings, preferably without having to conflict with vehicle paths.
Figure 4-29 shows the parking layout of the bus design vehicle (City Bus) for the saw-tooth
parking configuration.
90 SHC 303
Figure 4-29 Parking Layout for City Transit Bus Design Vehicle in Rest Areas (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
The above figures are indicative and a detailed swept path analysis shall be carried out to
determine more precise parking dimensions and aisle widths.
Rest areas include also parking for passenger cars, motorcycles, and recreational vehicles, as
well as, parking for the disabled. The same guidelines apply herein as the ones for surface off-
street parking.
SHC 303 91
Figure 4-30 Vertical Bicycle Parking Rack (FGSV, 2012)
92 SHC 303
4.3.7.5.2. Taxi ranks
Taxi ranks in off-street parking are related to the type of land-use and typically serve locations
where there are high passenger volumes and high demand for taxi services.
The following requirements should apply when designing taxi ranks:
• Taxi ranks shall be located where the road geometry provides safe sightlines for
oncoming vehicles and taxi drivers.
• Separate pick-up and drop-off locations should be provided.
• Pick-up area should be located in close proximity to the entrance of the specific land-
use.
• Taxi queuing area should be separated from the parking area or vehicle circulation.
• Taxi ranks should be located in well-lit areas.
• Appropriate signs should be provided to direct passengers to taxi ranks.
SHC 303 93
• The various levels (excluding ramps) must be horizontal.
• The number of levels should preferably be limited to a maximum of six.
• The inner distance between the structure’s pillars shall not be less than 9.0 m, as wide
as to accommodate three parking stalls.
• Each level shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 2.5 m.
• The height of the ground floor shall be preferably 3.75 m to allow entry of elevated
vehicles.
• Counterclockwise rotation shall be preferred to match the entrance and exit traffic
movement in the parking facility.
• 5 % of multi-floor parking spaces shall be allocated to parking spaces for people with
disabilities (see Section 4.3.10).
In general, parking garage structure types are classified into:
• Simple structures.
• Multi-level structures.
94 SHC 303
• Full ramps, which connect levels in a tangent run. The ramps themselves are easy to
drive on. However, the shifting of the ramps may have an unfavorable effect on the
safety and quality of traffic flow.
• Semi-ramps, which connect the parking levels split in two parts and spaced half a
level apart. The shorter ramps result to higher grades.
• Helical ramps, which are external ramps of the parking structures. Given the higher
area requirements, helical ramps are particularly suitable for large park structures.
• Parking ramps, which form an integral part of the parking areas, as at least one side
of the ramp is used also for parking. In cases where accessible parking spaces are
provided, their grade shall not exceed 8 %. Parking ramps are the most economical
solution; however, they are not suitable when shopping carts are used in the parking
facility.
All the above ramp configurations may accommodate one-way or dual-way traffic;
however, in semi-ramps, the widening of the lanes in curves may be required. The latter is
usually difficult to accommodate. In any case, a swept path analysis shall be carried out.
In the case of dual-way ramps, care should be taken to ensure that there is as little as
possible overlap of up-stream and down-stream traffic at their endings. Nevertheless, this
can hardly be avoided in the case of helical ramps, which explains why they are less suitable
SHC 303 95
in large installations with high degree of handling than, for example, helical ramps with
one-way traffic.
In general, dual-way traffic as left-hand traffic shall be excluded for safety reasons. If it
cannot be avoided in individual cases, e. g. the case of semi - ramp systems in left - hand
corners and separate traffic streams, the individual lanes shall be clearly identified and
separated by appropriate structural measures and vertical control devices (see Figure 4-32).
Ramps are designed with safety clearances on both sides, which are raised to 0.08 m. On
dual-way traffic ramps, safety clearance (raised by 0.08 m) is also designed between the
opposing traffic.
The circulation path shall be free from physical and visual obstacles. Vehicle paths shall be
designed respecting pedestrian conflicts.
NOTE: Semi-ramp configurations width with dual-way directional traffic shall be designed as shown above.
Figure 4-32 Semi-Ramp with Dual-Way Directional Traffic as Left-Hand Traffic (FGSV, 2012-adjusted)
96 SHC 303
• The ramp grade shall not be more than 15 %; in exceptional cases, the grade can be
up to 20 % for short distances. In the case that the ramp grade is more than 15 %, a
grade of 15 % shall be used at the top and bottom of the ramp for a distance of 5.0 m
(Figure 4-33).
• Transition curves shall be designed where successive grades along a ramp have a
difference greater than 8 %. In this case, the crest and sag vertical curvature rates (K)
shall be 0.20 m.
• Where transition curves are not an option, a grade transition of 2.0 m in length at grade
of half the difference between the two successive grades shall be provided at the top
and bottom of the ramp.
• If ramps need to be used as parking stalls, the longitudinal grade shall not exceed 8 %.
Figure 4-33 Tangent Ramp Design with Grade >15 % (MoMRA, 2019)
Figure 4-34 and Figure 4-35 show the typical dimensions of one-way and dual-way ramps on
tangent and curved or helical configurations, respectively.
SHC 303 97
Table 4-7 summarizes the basic characteristics of entry and exit ramps in garage parking
facilities.
Figure 4-34 Typical Dimensions of One-Way and Dual-Way Tangent Ramps (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
NOTE: On curved or helical ramps an inner, outer and between paths (only for dual-way traffic) clearance (C) of
0.50 m shall be provided on top. The adequacy of inner, outer and between paths clearance is subject to swept
path analysis. On tangent ramps, the inner and outer clearance (Co) is 0.25 m and the clearance (C) of 0.50 m
applies only between opposing vehicle paths. The width of semi-ramp configurations with dual-way directional
traffic shall be designed as shown in Figure 4-32.
Figure 4-35 Typical Dimensions of One-Way and Dual-Way Curved/Helical Ramps (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
98 SHC 303
Table 4-7 Types and Minimum Dimensions of Entry and Exit Ramps in Garage Parking Facilities (MoMRA, 2019-
revised)
Ramp Type
Helical Helical
Tangent Curved
(counterclockwise) (clockwise)
Characteristics
One- Dual- One- Dual- Dual- One- Dual-
One-way
way way way way way way way
Traffic
Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic
Outer Radius
- - 10.4+C 15.3+C 9.6+C 14.2+C 11.3+C 17.4+C
(Ro) (m)
Inner Radius
- - 5.5 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2
(Ri) (m)
4.5 and ≥
Lane Width 3.7 per 4.0 for
3.7 4.9 4.9 4.5 6.1 6.1
(LW) (m) lane upward
movement
SHC 303 99
Figure 4-36 Lateral Displacement Automated Parking Systems (FGSV, 2012)
Table 4-8 summarizes typical dimensions for the automated parking system, in accordance
with PDV dimensions.
Description Dimensions
A queuing analysis must be carried out to estimate the area required for vehicle queuing
storage required. For queue length estimation, refer to Section A.4 of SHC 601 (Traffic
Engineering).
Elevator cabins shall have a minimum internal width of 3.5 m inside, while elevator gates shall
be at least 2.5 m wide. In terms of height, a vertical clearance of 2.0 m shall be allowed for.
It is critical to provide the appropriate number of entry/exit lanes to meet projected peak traffic
volumes. Parking facilities shall be designed to limit the number of entry and exit driveways,
since multiple access points can introduce numerous conflict points. Larger parking facilities
may require multiple access and egress points. In such cases, the spacing between the
driveways must be coordinated with the responsible Authority.
Figure 4-40 Minimum Dimensions of Entrances and Exits of Surface Parking Facilities (MoMRA, 2019)
With regard to the entrances and exits of the underground parking facilities, their locations
shall be chosen in a way that they do not conflict with the traffic on the roads surrounding the
parking facility, and be adequately distanced away from intersections and highways to ensure
traffic safety (Figure 4-42).
With regard to entrances/exits to multi-level car parks, all requirements for entrance/exit
applicable to both surface and underground parking facilities shall also apply herein.
The entrance is designed based on the type of service offered in the parking facility, namely
self-service or assisted via a facility employee.
In self-service parking, if the flow rate ranges from 300 to 500 cars per hour, there is no
requirement to provide storage space for passenger cars, as these can flow easily and without
the assistance of an employee.
In parking spaces where vehicles are parked by employees, a storage space shall be provided,
whose size depends on the ratio of the average car arrival to the facility to the rate of the
parking employee’s service. The curve in Figure 4-43 can be used to estimate the storage space
required for the rate of cars arriving during peak hours.
In addition, the following shall apply:
• The maximum capacity of the entrance shall not be less than 400 cars per hour.
• At least one entrance shall be provided for every 500 parking spaces.
Figure 4-43 Reserve Space Required for the Rate of Arrival of Cars in Rush Hour (MoMRA, 2019)
Designated Accessible
Total Parking Spaces
Parking
1 - 25 1
26 - 50 2
51 - 75 3
76 - 100 4
101 - 150 5
151 - 200 6
201 - 300 7
301 - 400 8
401 - 500 9
NOTE: Loading accommodating three vehicles; distances X1, Y1 and Y2 subject to design vehicle and swept path
analysis
Figure 4-48 Example of Open Loading Yard with Side Entry/Exit (FGSV, 2012)
Table 4-10 General Design Specifications for Guards (Qatar MOTC, 2021)
Length - 5.0 m
parking wall
4.6. Signing
Parking areas shall be provided with all necessary signage and marking to guide the driver to
the parking stalls, exits, turns, ramps, emergency exits, elevations, restrooms and elevators and
pedestrian crossings, as well as helping them to understand the movement and directions of
traffic. Speed signs shall also be included at the parking.
In general, signing shall be in accordance with Chapter 3 of SHC 602 (Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices).
4.7. Lighting
In general, street lighting is sufficient to park safely in the dark. If necessary, uniform and good
illumination can be ensured by changing poles’ heights, adjust in-between distances and light
output.
Regarding off-street parking, refer to Chapter 5 of SHC 306 (Highway Facilities and Utilities
Design – Public Utilities, Highway and Street Lighting, Control and Monitoring Devices).
Figure A-1 Schematic Layout of Type A RA Design with Fuel Station and Integrated Commercial Use (FGSV, 2011)
Figure A-2 Schematic Layout of Type A RA Design with Fuel Station and Separate Commercial Use Area (FGSV,
2011)
Figure A-3 Schematic Layout of Type A RA Design with Fuel Station via Separating Island and Separate
Commercial Use Area (FGSV, 2011)
Figure A-4 Schematic Layout of Type A RA Design with Fuel Station and Integrated Commercial Use Area at Short
Distance from Neighboring Interchange (FGSV, 2011)
Figure A-5 Schematic Layout of Type A RA Design on One Side of Highway with Connection to Opposite
Direction (overpass) (FGSV, 2011)
Figure A-7 Schematic Layout of Type B RA Design with Lateral Space Limitation (FGSV, 2011)
Figure A-8 Schematic Layout of Type B RA Design with Longitudinal Space Limitation or at Short Distance from
Neighboring Interchange (FGSV, 2011)
Figure A-9 Schematic Layout of Pedestrian Walkways Design in Type A RA (FGSV, 2011)
Figure A-10 Schematic Layout of Pedestrian Walkways Design in Type B RA (FGSV, 2011)
Figure A-11 Schematic Layout of Type B Rest Area along a Rural Highway with Grade Separated Intersections
(FGSV, 2011)
NOTE: The acceleration lane of the Rest Area becomes obsolete if the Rest Area is positioned at an adequate
distance away from the highway pavement, so that the entrance to the highway can be designed as a
grade intersection according to the design principles included in SHC 301 (Highway Geometric Design).
Figure A-12 Schematic Layout of Type B Rest Area along a Rural Highway with At Grade Intersections (FGSV,
2011)
Figure A-14 Schematic Layout regarding Entrance/Exit Signing of Type A Rest Area (MoTLS, 2018)
Figure B-1 Schematic Layout of Standard TIS on Divided Highways (Alberta, 2008)
Figure B-2 Schematic Layout of Portable or Mobile TIS on Undivided Highways (Alberta, 2008)
IA Inspection Area
O-D Origin-Destination
P&R Park-and-Ride
RA Rest Area
ROW Right-Of-Way
SS Static Scale
TLTW Two-Lane-Two-Lane
WIM Weigh-In-Motion
Length
mm Millimeter
cm Centimeter
m Meter
km Kilometer
Area
m2 Square meter
Weight
kg Kilogram
t Ton
Angular
° Degree
Other
Other