The document announces a conference on the geological, exploration, and economic implications of the transition between porphyry and epithermal deposits that will take place from May 19-22. It notes that porphyry copper deposits, high sulfidation epithermal deposits, and intermediate or low sulfidation epithermal deposits within the same district are typically separated by barren rock. It states that exploration in these settings can be challenging due to shallow hydrothermal systems, structural complexity, and differences in erosion levels and host rocks. In particular, lithocaps associated with some major deposits can be difficult to explore but rewarding.
The document announces a conference on the geological, exploration, and economic implications of the transition between porphyry and epithermal deposits that will take place from May 19-22. It notes that porphyry copper deposits, high sulfidation epithermal deposits, and intermediate or low sulfidation epithermal deposits within the same district are typically separated by barren rock. It states that exploration in these settings can be challenging due to shallow hydrothermal systems, structural complexity, and differences in erosion levels and host rocks. In particular, lithocaps associated with some major deposits can be difficult to explore but rewarding.
The document announces a conference on the geological, exploration, and economic implications of the transition between porphyry and epithermal deposits that will take place from May 19-22. It notes that porphyry copper deposits, high sulfidation epithermal deposits, and intermediate or low sulfidation epithermal deposits within the same district are typically separated by barren rock. It states that exploration in these settings can be challenging due to shallow hydrothermal systems, structural complexity, and differences in erosion levels and host rocks. In particular, lithocaps associated with some major deposits can be difficult to explore but rewarding.
David R Cooke1, J. Bruce Gemmell1, Zhaoshan Chang1, Noel C. White1, Pete Hollings2 and Cari L. Deyell1 CODES, University of Tasmania, AUSTRALIA Lakehead University, CANADA
Discrete mineralised zones within porphyry-epithermal districts, including porphyry
copper deposits (PCDs), high sulfidation (HS) and intermediate or low sulfidation epithermal deposits (IS/LS), are typically separated by gaps of barren veins and/or background hydrothermal alteration assemblages. If indeed the deposits are produced from an evolving magmatic-hydrothermal system, then there are only discrete points along that evolutionary path where ore formation can occur.
Because we lack a comprehensive understanding of the links between different deposit
styles, exploration in these settings can be ad hoc. Seldom can minor mineralization or background alteration be used to locate big deposits. Exploration is often complicated by shallow-level alteration systems (e.g., lithocaps), structural complexities and differences in erosional levels and host rocks. Exploration within lithocaps can be particularly challenging, due to diverse possible origins (hypogene, steam-heated, supergene, or combinations thereof), and the difficulties associated with assessing the depth to mineralized zones. However, the rewards can be plentiful, with some of the world’s major PCDs (e.g., Far Southeast, Philippines) and HS gold deposits (e.g., Yanacocha, Peru; Lepanto, Philippines) associated with lithocaps.
Below the lithocap, centers of magmatic-hydrothermal activity outboard from porphyry
deposits can include broad propylitic alteration halos and distal IS/LS epithermal deposits. This ‘green rock’ environment is the domain that separates a porphyry deposit from its distal and/or near-surface hydrothermal manifestations. Lateral transitions between PCD and LS / IS epithermal deposits occur here (e.g., Baguio, Philippines), but more likely relates to the superposition of two discrete types of mineralization than to significant lateral fluid flow.