Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do.

Some
people think it is necessary, but others are of the opinion that it is unfair.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The debate about the significant disparity in salaries between senior excutives, such as directos of large
organizations and regular employees is always a hot topic. While some argue that these well-paid
salaries are essential because it is suitable for directors’ dedication, others view them as fundamentally
unfair. Personally, I side with the latter view.

Advocates of large executive salaries say that directors should be had have a good salary regime
because of the magnitude of their decisions and immnese immense responsibilities. This could be
explained by the fact that leaders’ command necessitate specialized knowledge and practical
experience so that these positions deserve having financial incentives. Moreover, they would be
reprimanded heavily if directors’ decisions cause damages to the businesses because of their enormous
duties. That is why company leadership’s salary is always higher than ordianry ordinary employees.

On the other hand, protesters ask a question about I believe in the equality between directors and staff,
especially the vast disparities in salaries. They assume that This is because companies’ success may
have the contribution of all employees; nevertheless. In reality, Directors’ salary is excessively high
when comparing with others. Such unfairness can lead to conflicts between employees and leaders, and
an decrease in decreased of motivation and productivity among the workforce, this . This could have a
negative impact to companies in far future. Additionally, staff’s dedication might be overlooked
because some individuals say that employee’s contributions are obvious because those are wage
eaners’ responsibilities when thay signed the labor contract.

Inconclusion In conclusion, the salary discrepancies between senior excutives and ordinary employees
is always an unconclusive debate. From my point of view, I assume that direcotrs should be had a
better salary regime because of the leadership skills and dedication to companies. In addition, leaders
should care about employees because their devotion to the businesses.

Nhắc lại bố cục bài Discussion:

Mở bài:
- Câu 1 (không bắt buộc): Nêu sơ lược về topic.
- Câu 2: Paraphrase lại 2 quan điểm trong đề.
- Câu 3 (có thể lồng vào câu 2): Trả lời thẳng là mình đồng ý với quan điểm nào trong 2 quan điểm đó.
Bắt buộc dùng ngôi thứ nhất “I” hoặc “my” để người đọc biết đây là ý kiến của em.

Thân bài 1:
Viết về quan điểm mà em KHÔNG chọn.

Thân bài 2:
Viết về quan điểm em chọn. Bắt buộc dùng ngôi thứ nhất “I” hoặc “my” ở câu topic sentence.

Kết bài.
- Câu 1: Nhắc lại lần nữa 2 quan điểm.
- Câu 2 (có thể lồng vào câu 1): Nhắc lại lần nữa câu trả lời của em: đồng ý với quan điểm nào. Bắt
buộc dùng ngôi thứ nhất “I” hoặc “my”.