Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Macroeconomics 13th Edition Parkin Solutions Manual Full Chapter PDF
Macroeconomics 13th Edition Parkin Solutions Manual Full Chapter PDF
Solutions Manual
Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://testbankdeal.com/dow
nload/macroeconomics-13th-edition-parkin-solutions-manual/
C h a p t e r
11 EXPENDITURE
MULTIPLIERS**
*
* This is Chapter 28 in Economics.
© 2018 Pearson Education, Inc.
150 CHAPTER 11
real GDP.
4. If real GDP and aggregate expenditure are greater than equilibrium expenditure, what
happens to firms’ inventories? How do firms change their production? And what happens
to real GDP?
If real GDP and aggregate expenditure are greater than their equilibrium levels, an unplanned
increase in inventories occurs. The unplanned increase in inventories leads firms to decrease
production to restore inventories to their planned levels. The decrease in production decreases
real GDP.
Page 282 (page 690 in Economics)
1. What is the multiplier? What does it determine? Why does it matter?
The multiplier is the amount by which a change in autonomous expenditure is multiplied to
determine the change in equilibrium expenditure and real GDP. A change in autonomous
expenditure changes real GDP by an amount determined by the multiplier. The multiplier
matters because it tells us how much a change in autonomous expenditure changes equilibrium
expenditure and real GDP.
2. How do the marginal propensity to consume, the marginal propensity to import, and the
income tax rate influence the multiplier?
The marginal propensity to consume, the marginal propensity to import, and the income tax rate
all influence the magnitude of the multiplier. The multiplier is smaller when the marginal
propensity to consume is smaller, when the marginal propensity to import is larger, and when
the income tax rate is larger.
3. How do fluctuations in autonomous expenditure influence real GDP?
Fluctuations in autonomous expenditure bring business cycle turning points. When autonomous
expenditure changes, the economy moves from one phase of the business cycle to the next. For
example, if autonomous expenditure decreases, equilibrium expenditure and real GDP decrease
and, as a result, the economy enters the recession phase of the business cycle.
employment equilibrium. In the long run, an increase in aggregate expenditure raises the price
level but has no effect on real GDP.
multiplier is 2 and the change in investment is $100 billion, so the aggregate demand curve shifts
rightward by $200 billion.
b. In the short run, does real GDP increase by more than, less than, or the same amount as
the immediate change in the quantity of real GDP demanded?
In the short run, real GDP increases by less than $200 billion. Real GDP is determined at the
intersection of the AD curve and the SAS curve. In the short run, the price level will rise and real
GDP will increase but by an amount less than the shift of the AD curve.
11. In the short run, does the price level remain at 100? Explain why or why not.
In the short run, the price level rises. Real GDP is determined at the intersection of the AD curve
and the SAS curve. In the short run, the increase in aggregate demand means that the price level
will rise as the economy moves along its upward-sloping SAS curve.
12. a. In the long run, does real GDP increase by more than, less than, or the same amount as the
immediate increase in the quantity of real GDP demanded?
In the long run, real GDP equals potential GDP, so real GDP does not increase. Real GDP is
determined at the intersection of the AD curve and the SAS curve. After the initial increase in
investment, money wages increase, the SAS curve shifts leftward, and in the long run, real GDP
moves back to potential GDP.
b. Explain how the price level changes in the long run.
Real GDP is determined at the intersection of the AD curve and the SAS curve. In the long run,
money wages increase so the SAS curve shifts leftward, raising the price level by more than it
rose in the short run.
13. Are the values of the multipliers in the short run and the long run larger or smaller than 2?
The multiplier in the short run is less than the multiplier of 2 because the short-run increase in
real GDP is less than $200 billion. The long-run multiplier is even smaller. It equals zero.
14. Use the data in the Worked Problem on p. 293 (page 702 in Economics). Calculate the
change in equilibrium expenditure when investment decreases by $150 billion.
The multiplier equals 4. Consequently the change in equilibrium expenditure equals (4) ×
(−$150 billion), or a decrease of $600 billion.
16. Calculate consumption at each level of disposable income. Calculate the marginal
propensity to consume.
The table to the right shows Australia’s consumption
expenditure schedule. Consumption expenditure equals Disposable Consumption
disposable income minus saving. For each increase in income expenditure
disposable income of $100 billion, consumption (billions of dollars per year)
expenditure increases by $75 billion. The marginal 0 0
propensity to consume is 0.75. The marginal propensity 100 75
to consume plus the marginal propensity to save equals 200 150
1. Because the marginal propensity to save equals 0.25, 300 225
the marginal propensity to consume equals 0.75. 400 300
Figure 11.2a shows the effect of an increase in wealth on the consumption function and Figure
11.2b shows the effect on the saving function. Consumption expenditure increases so the
consumption function shifts upward from CF0 to CF1 while saving decreases so the saving
function shifts downward from SF0 to SF1.
18. What factors might explain the actual changes in consumption expenditure and wealth that
occurred in the first quarter of 2017?
According to the article, consumption increased. This change is in line with the effect from the
increased wealth. In addition, at least two other factors could also contribute to an increase in
consumption expenditure. First, disposable income might have increased. This change would
lead to a movement upward along the (new) consumption function so that consumption
expenditure increased. Alternatively people’s expected future incomes might have risen. The
upward revision in expected future income also would lead to an upward shift of the
consumption function.
19. Draw a graph of a consumption function and show at what points consumers were actually
operating in the second and third quarters. Make any necessary assumptions and explain
your answer.
In Figure 11.2a the consumption function shifts upward from CF0 to CF1. It is likely that
disposable income also increased. So the economy moves from disposable income of $16.0
trillion and consuming at point A on consumption function CF0 to disposable income of $17.0
trillion and consuming at point B on consumption function CF1.
A B C D E F G
1 Y C I G X M
2 A 100 110 50 60 60 15
3 B 200 170 50 60 60 30
4 C 300 230 50 60 60 45
5 D 400 290 50 60 60 60
6 E 500 350 50 60 60 75
7 F 600 410 50 60 60 90
Use the spreadsheet above, which lists real GDP (Y ) and the components of aggregate planned
expenditure in billions of dollars, to work Problems 20 and 21.
20. Calculate autonomous expenditure. Calculate the marginal propensity to consume.
Autonomous expenditure equals the value of aggregate planned expenditure when real GDP is
zero. Because the spreadsheet does not list GDP of zero, we must extrapolate to calculate the
value of consumption expenditure and imports when GDP equals zero. From the spreadsheet,
consumption expenditure falls by $60 billion for every $100 billion decrease in GDP. So when
GDP equals zero, autonomous consumption expenditure is $50 billion. Similarly, from the
spreadsheet, imports decrease by $15 billion for every $100 billion decrease in GDP. So when
GDP equals zero, imports equal zero. Autonomous expenditure is $50 billion (consumption
expenditure) plus $50 billion (investment) plus $60 billion (government expenditure) plus $60
billion (exports), which equals $220 billion.
The marginal propensity to consume is 0.6. When income increases from $100 billion to $200
billion, consumption expenditure increases from $110 billion to $170 billion. A $100 billion
increase in GDP increases consumption expenditure by $60 billion. So the marginal propensity to
consume is $60 billion ÷ $100 billion, which is 0.6.
21. a. What is aggregate planned expenditure when real GDP is $200 billion?
Aggregate planned expenditure is $310 billion. Aggregate planned expenditure is the sum of
consumption expenditure ($170 billion) plus planned investment ($50 billion) plus government
expenditure ($60 billion) plus exports ($60 billion) minus imports ($30 billion), which is $310
billion.
b. If real GDP is $200 billion, explain the process that moves the economy toward
equilibrium expenditure.
Inventories are decreasing so that the unplanned inventory change is negative. When real GDP is
$200 billion, aggregate planned expenditure is $310 billion. Because aggregate planned
expenditure exceeds real GDP, firms sell all that they produce and even more so that inventories
are decreasing. Firms then increase their production, to restore their inventories, and real GDP
increases.
c. If real GDP is $500 billion, explain the process that moves the economy toward
equilibrium expenditure.
Firms are accumulating inventories so that the unplanned inventory change is positive. When
real GDP is $500 billion, aggregate planned expenditure is $445 billion. Firms cannot sell all that
they produce so that unplanned inventories increase. Firms respond by decreasing their
production, to lower their inventories, and real GDP decreases.
22. U.S. Wholesale Inventories Post Biggest Gain in Six Months
The Commerce Department reported that wholesale inventories rose 0.7 percent in May
and by 0.6 percent in June. Inventory investment had a neutral effect on second quarter
GDP growth.
Source: U.S. News and World Report, August 9, 2017
Explain why an increase in inventories might bolster economic growth, while a fall in
inventories might be a sign of recession. In your explanation, distinguish between planned
and unplanned changes in business inventories.
Inventories are part of investment. If the increase in inventories reflects an increase in planned
inventories, then planned investment increases which increases aggregate expenditure and real
GDP. If, however, the increase is unplanned, it could reflect a decrease in aggregate expenditure,
which could lead to a decrease in real GDP. Similarly, if a fall in inventories reflects a decrease in
planned inventories, then planned investment decreases, which lowers aggregate expenditure
and real GDP. Alternatively, if the fall in inventories is unplanned, it might indicate an increase in
aggregate expenditure which would then lead to an increase in real GDP.
23. South Korea Plans $10 Billion Stimulus Package to Boost Jobs
The government of South Korea announced a $10 billion (11.2 trillion won) fiscal stimulus
package, which will increase social welfare subsidies for maternity leave and for the
healthcare needs of older people and will also create new public sector jobs.
Source: CNBC, June 4, 2017
If the slope of the AE curve is 0.7, calculate the immediate change in aggregate planned
expenditure and the change in real GDP in the short run if the price level remains
unchanged.
The increase in government expenditure will have a multiplier effect on aggregate expenditure
and real GDP. The multiplier equals 1/(1 − the slope of the AE curve). The slope of the AE curve is
0.7 so the multiplier is 1/(1 − 0.7), which is 3.3. With this multiplier, the $10 billion increase in
government expenditure increases aggregate expenditure by 3.3 × $10 billion, or $33 billion. In
the short run, when the price level is constant, real GDP increases by the same amount, $33
billion.
24. Japan Cabinet Approves $132 Billion in Fiscal Stimulus
Japan’s government will spend $132 billion (13.5 trillion yen) on cash handouts to low-
income earners and on infrastructure projects.
Source: CNBC, August 2, 2016
If Japan spends $66 billion (half the total) on cash handouts and $66 billion on
infrastructure projects, which of these expenditures would have the larger effect on
equilibrium expenditure, other things remaining the same?
The spending on infrastructure projects will have the larger effect on equilibrium expenditure.
The effect on equilibrium expenditure is larger from the infrastructure spending because in the
first round all of the increased infrastructure expenditure increases aggregate expenditure.
Some of the cash handouts, however, will be saved so the first round only part of the cash
handouts is spent so only part goes to increase aggregate expenditure. Because the multiplier
effect applies only to the funds that are spent, the effect on equilibrium expenditure from the
infrastructure spending will be larger than that from the cash handouts.
27. Explain and draw a graph to illustrate the effect of an increase in exports on equilibrium
real GDP in the long run.
In the short run, the economy is in an above
full-employment equilibrium. As time passes,
the money wage rate rises, which decreases
short-run aggregate supply and shifts the
short-run aggregate supply curve leftward.
Eventually the short-run aggregate supply
decreases enough so that the economy
returns to full employment. In Figure 11.5,
this analysis means that the short-run
aggregate supply curve eventually shifts
from SAS0 to SAS1 and the economy returns
to full employment, with real GDP of $17.0
trillion and a price level of 122.
28. Compare the multiplier in the short run and the long run and explain why they are not
identical.
The long-run multiplier is zero, which means that the short-run multiplier is larger than the
long-run multiplier. The long-run multiplier equals zero because in the long run the economy
returns to full employment. For example, in the short run an increase in aggregate demand
increases real GDP, which means that the short-run multiplier is positive. But the economy is at a
greater than full-employment equilibrium. Therefore the money wage rate starts to rise. The rise
in the money wage rate decreases short-run aggregate supply and thereby decreases real GDP.
The short-run aggregate supply continues to decrease until the economy reaches full
employment, at which point it stops decreasing. But the ultimate change in real GDP is zero,
which means the long-run multiplier is zero.
Use the following news clip to work Problems 29 to 31.
Consumer Sentiment in U.S. Rose to Three Month High
Consumer sentiment was up in August helped by merchant discounts, especially from auto
dealerships who received incentives from automakers Honda, General Motors, and Toyota to
lower prices.
But consumers are worried about the future. They are worried about tax changes and
government budget cuts that are on the horizon. Capital spending fell somewhat.
Source: Bloomberg, September 1, 2012
29. For each of the expenditures listed in the news clip, say which is a part of induced
expenditure and which is part of autonomous expenditure?
Induced consumption expenditure changes with changes in disposable income. Autonomous
consumption expenditure does not change when disposable income changes. For many
consumers, purchasing new cars increase when their incomes rise. For these consumers, these
items are induced expenditure. Other Americans plan to buy automobiles regardless of the
change in their income perhaps because their consumer sentiment is “up,” or perhaps because
prices of cars have fallen. For these consumers, these expenditures are autonomous. Capital
spending is part of autonomous expenditure.
30. Which of the events reported in the news clip would change aggregate demand and which
would change the quantity of real GDP demanded? Provide a graphical illustration of the
distinction.
The increase in consumption expenditure
induced by increased income, the
autonomous increase in consumption, and
the increase in capital spending all increase
aggregate demand and shift the aggregate
demand curve rightward. The increase in
consumption expenditure that results from
lower prices reflects a change in
consumption from a lower price level and
creates a change in the quantity of real GDP
demanded. Figure 11.6 illustrates these
differences. The change from point A to point
B reflects a change in aggregate demand. The
movement from point B to point C reflects a
change in the quantity of real GDP
demanded.
31. Explain and draw a graph to illustrate how increasing consumer confidence influences
aggregate expenditure and aggregate demand.
The news clip suggests that in Japan aggregate demand is decreasing so that both the price level
and real GDP are decreasing. Figure 11.8a shows this situation. The information in Problem 29
suggests that consumption expenditure is increasing and, while investment (capital spending) is
decreasing. However it seems that the change in consumption expenditure exceeds the change in
investment so U.S. aggregate demand is increasing. Figure 11.8b shows this situation.
The total change in inventories was $1.8 billion. If the unplanned change was $0.6 billion, then
the planned change was $1.2 billion. Figure 11.9a shows aggregate planned expenditure; Figure
11.9b shows unplanned inventory change. When aggregate planned expenditure is given by AE0,
unplanned inventory change is equal to zero when real GDP is $17.0 trillion, so unplanned
inventory change is given by the top line in Figure 11.9b. The increase in planned investment
increased aggregate planned expenditure. The increase in aggregate planned expenditure shifts
the aggregate expenditure curve upward, as illustrated by the shift from AE0 to AE1 in Figure
11.9a. It shifts the unplanned inventory change line downward to the lower curve, Unplanned
inventory change1, in Figure 11.9b. The increase in aggregate expenditure increases equilibrium
real GDP. In figure 11.9a, real GDP increases from $17.0 trillion to $17.2 trillion. In Figure 11.9b,
at real GDP of $17.2 trillion, along the new unplanned inventory change curve line, unplanned
inventory change is $0.6 trillion.
b. The BEA data show that exports of goods and services were up 3.7 percent and imports of
goods and services were up 1.6 percent. Were these increases in expenditure increases in
autonomous expenditure or increases in induced expenditure, and how do they influence
the magnitude of the multiplier?
Changes in exports are autonomous expenditure and changes in imports are induced
expenditure. Changes in exports have no effect on the magnitude of the multiplier. Changes in
imports do affect the size of the multiplier. The larger the quantity of imports that are induced by
a change in income, the smaller the multiplier.
c. Using the assumptions made in Figure 2 on p. 285 (p. 697 in Economics), what is the value
The shining pewter plates, polished like silver, were part of every
thrifty housewife’s store; a garnish of pewter, which was a set of
different-sized plates, was often her wedding-gift. Their use lingered
till this century, and many pieces now are cherished heirlooms.
Methods of cooking and cooking utensils varied much from those
of the present day. The great brick oven was built beside the
fireplace; sometimes it projected beyond the exterior of the building.
It had a smoke-uptake in the upper part, from which a flue connected
with the fireplace chimney. It was heated by being filled with burning
dry-wood called oven-wood. When the wood was entirely consumed,
the ashes were swept out with an oven-broom called a boender. A
Dutch oven, or Dutch kitchen, was an entirely different affair. This
was made of metal, usually tin, cylindrical in form, and open on one
side, which was placed next the fire. Through this ran a spit by which
meat could be turned when roasting. A bake-kettle, or bake-pan, was
a metal pan which stood up on stumpy legs and was fitted with a
tightly fitting, slightly convex cover on which hot coals were placed.
Within this bake-pan hot biscuit or a single loaf of bread or cake
could be baked to perfection.
Across the chimney was a back-bar, sometimes of green wood,
preferably of iron; on it hung pot-hooks and trammels, which under
the various titles of pot-hangers, pot-claws, pot-clips, pot-brakes, and
crooks, appear in every home-inventory. On those pot-hooks of
various lengths, pots and kettles could be hung at varying heights
above the fire. Often a large plate of iron, called the fire-plate, or fire-
back, was set at the back-base of the kitchen chimney, where raged
so constant and so fierce a fire that brick and mortar crumbled
before it. These fire-backs were often cast in a handsome design,
sometimes a Scriptural subject. These chimneys were vast in size;
Kalm said you could drive a horse and cart through them. Irving says
they were “of patriarchal magnitude, where the whole family enjoyed
a community of privileges and had each a right to a corner.” Often
they were built without jambs. Madam Knights wrote in 1704 of New
York townhouses:—
“The fireplaces have no jambs (as ours have), but the
backs run flush with the walls, and the hearth is of tiles and is
as far out into the room at the ends as before the fire, which is
generally five foot in the lower rooms, and the piece over
where the mantle-tree should be is made as ours with joiners’
work and as I suppose is fastened to iron rods inside.”
The kitchen fireplace was high as well as wide, and disclosed a
vast smoky throat. When the week’s cooking was ended and the
Sabbath was approaching, this great fireplace was dressed up, put
on its best clothes for Sunday, as did all the rest of the family; across
the top was hung a short petticoat, or valance, or little curtain
gathered full on a string. This was called a schouwe-kleedt, a
schoorsteen valletje, or sometimes a dobbelstee-tiens valletje, this
latter in allusion to the stuff of which the valance was usually made,
—a strong close homespun linen checked off with blue or red. This
clean, sweet linen frill was placed, freshly washed and ironed, every
Saturday afternoon on the faithful, work-worn chimney while it took
its Sunday rest. In some houses there hung throughout the week a
schoorsteen valletje; in others it was only Sunday gear. This was a
fashion from early colonial days for both town and country. In the
house of Mayor Rombouts in 1690 were fine chimney-cloths trimmed
with fringe and lace, and worth half a pound each, and humbler
checked chimney-cloths. Cornelius Steenwyck a few years earlier
had in his “great chamber” a still gayer valletje of flowered tabby to
match the tabby window-curtains. Peter Marius had calico valances
for his chimneys.
A description given by a Scotchwoman of fireplaces in Holland at
about this date shows very plainly from whence this form of hearth-
dressing and chimney were derived:—
“The chimney-places are very droll-like; they have no jams
nor lintell, as we have, but a flat grate, and there projects over
it a lum in a form of the cat-and-clay lum, and commonly a
muslin or ruffled pawn around it.”
When tiles were used for facing the fireplace and even for hearths,
as they often were in the kamer, or parlor, they were usually of Delft
manufacture, printed in dull blue with coarsely executed outline
drawings of Scriptural scenes. In the Van Cortlandt manor-house,
the tiles were pure white. I have some of the tiles taken from the old
Schermerhorn house in Brooklyn, built in the middle of the
seventeenth century and demolished in 1895. There were nearly two
hundred in each fireplace in the house. The scenes were from the
Old Testament, and several, if I interpret their significance aright,
from the Apocrypha. The figures are discreetly attired in Dutch
costumes. Irving says of these Scripture-tiles: “Tobit and his dog
figured to great advantage; Haman swung conspicuously on his
gibbet; Jonah appeared most manfully bursting out of the whale, like
Harlequin through a barrel of fire.” To these let me add the very
amusing one of Lazarus leaving his tomb, triumphantly waving the
flag of the Netherlands.
Sometimes the space between the open fireplace and the ceiling
of the kamer was panelled, and it had a narrow ledge of a
mantelpiece upon which usually were placed a pair of silver, brass,
or pewter candlesticks and a snuffers with tray. Occasionally a
blekker, or hanging candlestick, hung over the mantel. In some
handsome houses the sur-base was of tiles and also the staircase;
but such luxuries were unusual.
Domestic comfort and kindly charity sat enthroned in every room
of these Dutch homes. Daniel Denton wrote of them as early as
1670:—
“Though their low-roofed houses may seem to shut their
doors against pride and luxury, yet how do they stand wide
open to let charity in and out, either to assist each other, or
relieve a stranger.”
In these neighborly homes thrift and simple plenty and sober
satisfaction in life had full sway; and these true and honorable
modes of living lingered long, even to our own day. On the outskirts
of a great city, within a few miles of the centre of our greatest city,
still stand some of the farmhouses of Flatbush, whose story has
been told con amore by one to the manner born. These old
homesteads form an object-lesson which we may heed with profit to-
day, of the dignity, the happiness, the beauty that comes from
simplicity in every-day life.
CHAPTER VII
THE DUTCH LARDER