KING IV Principles

Certainly! Let's break down the King IV Code's 17 principles in a way that will help you apply your
knowledge to real-life scenarios and identify where a company may not be complying with King IV:

**1. Ethical Leadership (Principle 1):** Imagine you're in a company, and you notice that the top
executives are involved in unethical practices, like fraud or bribery. This is a non-compliance issue
with Principle 1 because the leaders are not acting ethically.

**2. Board Composition (Principle 2):** If you look at a company's board, and you see that it's
dominated by executives who are also running the day-to-day operations, without any independent
voices, it's not complying with Principle 2.

**3. Board Responsibilities (Principle 3):** In a scenario where the board is not actively overseeing
the company's compliance with laws and ethical standards, you would spot non-compliance with
Principle 3.

**4. Role of the Chairman (Principle 4):** If the chairman of the board is also the CEO, it could be a
non-compliance issue with Principle 4 because it's best practice to have separation to avoid conflicts
of interest.

**5. Non-Executive Directors (Principle 5):** Suppose all board members are employees of the
company, and there are no independent directors. In that case, it's not in compliance with Principle
5 because independent voices are missing.

**6. Audit Committee (Principle 6):** If the audit committee is not reviewing the company's
financial reports or doesn't have qualified members, it's a non-compliance issue with Principle 6.

**7. Risk Governance (Principle 7):** In a scenario where a company ignores potential risks or
doesn't have a risk management plan, it's not complying with Principle 7.

**8. Technology and Information (Principle 8):** If a company is not using technology to provide
clear information and make decisions, it's not in compliance with Principle 8.

**9. Compliance with Laws (Principle 9):** If you find that a company consistently breaks laws
without consequences or corrective actions, it's a non-compliance issue with Principle 9.
**10. Reporting (Principle 10):** In a scenario where a company's financial reports are unclear,
incomplete, or not made available to shareholders and stakeholders, it's not complying with
Principle 10.

**11. Auditing (Principle 11):** If the company's financial statements are not independently audited
or the auditors are not objective, it's a non-compliance issue with Principle 11.

**12. External Auditors (Principle 12):** When external auditors have a close relationship with the
company, like being hired by the company for non-audit services, it's a non-compliance issue with
Principle 12.

**13. Integrated Reporting (Principle 13):** If a company only focuses on its financial performance
and ignores its impact on society and the environment, it's not complying with Principle 13.

**14. Public Reporting on Application (Principle 14):** In a situation where a company doesn't
explain why it's not following certain principles or doesn't have a plan to improve, it's a non-
compliance issue with Principle 14.

**15. Responsible Corporate Citizenship (Principle 15):** When a company doesn't engage
positively with its community or ignores ethical responsibilities, it's not in compliance with Principle
15.

**16. Social and Ethics Committee (Principle 16):** If a company doesn't have a committee to
oversee its ethical behavior and societal impact, it's a non-compliance issue with Principle 16.

**17. Governance Reporting (Principle 17):** When a company doesn't disclose how it's following
the King IV principles and improving its governance practices, it's a non-compliance issue with
Principle 17.

By applying these principles to real-life scenarios, you can identify areas where a company may not
be in compliance with the King IV Code and needs to improve its corporate governance practices.

Certainly! Each of the committees mentioned in the King IV Code has specific requirements and
responsibilities to ensure effective corporate governance. Here's an overview of the requirements
for each of these committees:

**1. Audit Committee:**

- **Composition:** The audit committee should consist of a majority of independent non-executive
directors, at least one of whom should have financial expertise.

- **Responsibilities:** The primary responsibility of the audit committee is to oversee the financial
reporting process, ensure the integrity of financial statements, and assess the effectiveness of
internal controls. This includes reviewing financial statements, overseeing external and internal
audits, and addressing any financial misconduct or irregularities.

**2. Executive Committee:**

- **Composition:** The executive committee typically consists of senior executives, including the
CEO and other top management members.

- **Responsibilities:** The executive committee helps in making significant operational and strategic
decisions. It often acts on behalf of the board between board meetings and ensures that the
company's day-to-day operations align with the board's strategic goals.

**3. Nomination Committee:**

- **Composition:** The nomination committee usually includes non-executive directors, including

independent directors.

- **Responsibilities:** The nomination committee is responsible for identifying and nominating

suitable candidates for board positions. It ensures that the board has a diverse mix of skills and
expertise and oversees the succession planning process.

**4. Remuneration Committee:**

- **Composition:** The remuneration committee typically includes non-executive directors,

including independent directors, and may also include the head of human resources.

- **Responsibilities:** The remuneration committee is in charge of determining the remuneration

(compensation) packages for directors and executives. It ensures that remuneration is fair,
competitive, and aligned with company performance.
**5. Social and Ethics Committee (no longer mentioned in King IV, functions often merged with
other committees):**

- **Composition:** Typically includes non-executive directors, including independent directors.

- **Responsibilities:** The social and ethics committee focuses on the company's social and ethical
responsibilities, such as its impact on society and the environment. It oversees ethical behavior,
compliance with social and ethical standards, and sustainability initiatives.

**6. Risk Committee (merged with the audit committee in some cases):**

- **Composition:** May include non-executive directors, including independent directors, with

expertise in risk management.

- **Responsibilities:** The risk committee oversees the company's risk management practices,
including identifying, assessing, and managing risks that could affect the company. It ensures that
risk management strategies are in place.

These committees play crucial roles in ensuring that the company follows good governance
practices, complies with relevant regulations, and operates effectively. The specific requirements
and responsibilities of each committee may vary based on the company's size, industry, and
individual circumstances, but the fundamental goal is to enhance corporate governance and
oversight.

Certainly, here's an overview of the number of members and the eligibility of the chairperson to be
part of these committees as per common corporate governance practices:

**1. Audit Committee:**

- **Number of Members:** Typically, an audit committee should have at least three members, with
the majority being independent non-executive directors.

- **Chairperson Eligibility:** The chairperson of the board is generally not a member of the audit
committee. This separation ensures independence and objectivity in overseeing financial reporting
and auditing processes.

**2. Executive Committee:**

- **Number of Members:** The executive committee usually includes senior executives, including
the CEO. The size can vary based on the company's needs.

- **Chairperson Eligibility:** The chairperson of the board may or may not be a member of the
executive committee. It depends on the company's governance structure and policies.

**3. Nomination Committee:**

- **Number of Members:** The nomination committee often comprises non-executive directors,

including independent directors. Typically, it should have at least three members.

- **Chairperson Eligibility:** The chairperson of the board may or may not be a member of the
nomination committee. It depends on the company's governance policies.

**4. Remuneration Committee:**

- **Number of Members:** The remuneration committee typically includes non-executive directors,

including independent directors. It should have at least three members.

- **Chairperson Eligibility:** The chairperson of the board may or may not be a member of the
remuneration committee, depending on the company's governance practices.

**5. Social and Ethics Committee (if applicable):**

- **Number of Members:** The size of the social and ethics committee may vary, but it usually
includes non-executive directors, including independent directors.

- **Chairperson Eligibility:** The chairperson of the board may or may not be a member of the
social and ethics committee, depending on the company's governance policies.

**6. Risk Committee (if separate from the audit committee):**

- **Number of Members:** Similar to the audit committee, a risk committee should have at least
three members, with the majority being independent non-executive directors.

- **Chairperson Eligibility:** The chairperson of the board is typically not a member of the risk
committee for independence and objectivity.

It's important to note that corporate governance practices may vary from one company to another
based on their specific circumstances and governing documents. However, the principles mentioned
above are common guidelines to promote independence, objectivity, and effective oversight within
these committees. Companies should align their committee structures with their unique needs and
the requirements of relevant governance codes, such as King IV.