Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Usul Fiqh Paperwork
Usul Fiqh Paperwork
TOPIC: ‘URF
SEMESTER SESSION:
NO CONTENT PAGES
1.
Table Of Content 2
6. Classification of ‘Urf 8
7.
Conditions of Valid ‘Urf 10
8. Types of ‘Urf 12
9. Conclusion 14
10. References 15
2
INTRODUCTION OF ‘URF
One of the important characteristics of Islamic Law is that some of its rulings can
change according to the changes of circumstances. For example, place, time, custom and the
behaviour of people. This is why it is possible for this law to be practised at any time and
place. However, there are some laws, which are fixed and cannot be changed. These are held
situations.
‘Urf has played a significant role in the formation of Islamic Law. There are many
cases that indicate the change of law when the ‘urf of people has changed. For instance,
Imam Malik b. Anas, the founder of Maliki school, has considered the practice of al-Madinah
people (‘amal ahl al-Madinah) as a source of Islamic Law. This indicates the importance of
the ‘urf of al-Madinah people to him. Similarly, Al-Shafi’i has made ijtihad on many issues
that arose when he was in Iraq, but when he moved to Egypt he changed some of his earlier
opinions because of the different circumstances and customs in Egypt. Indeed, the Quran has
also considered some of the urf of the early Arab community as a legal basis in its law. For
example, the doctrine of qisas, which was practised in the early community, has been
approved by the Quran, albeit with some modification in terms of evidence and amicable
settlement.
As for the origin of urf or custom, it is the product of the nature of the people and
their culture. It grows in strength and popularity by means of imitation, which transfers and
implants it in the lives of people. Normally, these customs will be inherited by the next
generation until there come other customs that can overrule the earlier ones.1
1
Mohamad Akram Laldin (2006) Introduction to Shariah and Islamic Jurisprudence
(Malaysia)
3
INTRODUCTION SECONDARY SOURCES IN ISLAMIC LAW
There are two main sources of Islamic law that are commonly referred to by people,
namely the primary sources including the Qur'an and Sunnah and the secondary sources
which are Ijma, Qiyas, Ijtihad and Urf. First of all, the primary source is the Quran which is
one of the primary sources of Islamic law. It includes many commandments, rules for the
behaviour or relations of individuals in the society. The words of the Quran are final and
cannot be changed. The second one, sunnah. Sunnah is also equally important as
Quran where in terms of literal meaning, sunnah means a clear path. Sunnah refers to all that
is narrated from the Prophet, including his actions, sayings and whatever he has tacitly
Next, the secondary sources are ijma means the consensus among Islamic jurists on
matters within the limits of Quran and Sunnah. Muslim jurists provide many verses of the
Quran that legitimize Ijma as a source of legislation. To illustrate, the institution of khilafat is
established on the basis of Ijma among the Islamic jurists. Second, qiyas is also one of the
secondary sources. It means to conclude general principles from the Quran and Sunnah to
generalise the Verses or Hadith. For instance, from wine, the jurists concluded that all thing
principles and provisions of Quran and hadith by faqih or imam. We can find four imams who
formed different schools of thought by interpreting the Quran and Sunnah by study and
research. One school of thought believes that Ijtihad ended with the four pious caliphs while
others believe that it has not ended. Lastly, urf is the common practice among the Muslims as
their common habit. Another term synonym with urf is ‘adah’ means repetition or recurrent
practice of individuals or a group of individuals. and God on one hand and among the
individuals themselves.2
2
Koay Xian Lit (2019/2020) Introduction to Islamic Law (Universiti Utara Malaysia)
4
DEFINITION OF ‘URF
Urf is a noun of ayn, ra, fa, which literally means to know. As a conventional term,
various definitions of urf have been given by the Muslim jurists. Khallaf defines urf as,
“What is established and practised by people from their sayings and doings, or not doing. The
other definition is propounded by Badran who defines urf as “What is established and
common in a group of people (jumhur) from their savings and doings, and is consistently
repeated until it influences them and is therefore accepted by their reason”. He further quoted
that not all that is established and common can be considered as urf, but it is that which is
established and common to the people with wise reason and sound behaviour. Al-Zarqa has
The above definitions indicate that in order for ‘urf to constitute a valid basis for legal
decision it must be the consistent practice of a group of people. Accordingly, the practice of
an individual is not ‘urf but it rather is a personal habit (adah fardhiyyah). Urf must also be
acceptable and reasonable. Hence, the practices that are devoid of benefits or involve
disadvantages are not considered as legal urf. The above definitions also indicate that there
are two main categories of urf. The first one is the doings of the group of people (urf amali)
and the second is the sayings of the group of people (urf lafzi).3
3
Mohammad Akram Laldin (2006) Introduction to Shariah and Islamic Jurisprudence
(Malaysia)
5
THE BASIS OF ‘URF
The majority of the scholars (jumhur) recognised urf as a supportive source of the
Shari’ah and they have quoted several proofs in order to support their view. Among the
proofs are the verse from Quran usually quoted in support of urf is “Keep to forgiveness,
enjoin ‘urf and turn away from the ignorant”. (Al-A’raf: 199) Many mufassirun suggested
that the meaning of urf in this verse is synonymous to ma’ruf which means anything that is
good. Mustafa al-Zarqa, in discussing the proof of uruf, maintains that the word urf in this
verse can be taken as a proof of urf through its literal meaning which is “the good deed which
is acceptable” albeit the meaning of the word urf here is different from its meaning as a
technical term in usul al-fiqh. He further argued that it could be a proof of urf (as a technical
term) in the sense that the customary practice of people, whether in their doings or their
transactions, is normally the practice that is good to them and acceptable by reason.
Among the familiar proofs that are quoted by the scholars as indirect evidence in
support of urf is the following saying of the prominent companion, Abd Allah b. Mas’ud said
“What the muslims deem to be good is good in the sight of Allah ''. Some of the scholars
have suggested this saying to be a direct hadith from the Prophet Himself. However, it is
more likely, as al-Suyuti mentioned in al-Ashbah wa al-Nazair, to be the saying of Abd Allah
b. Mas’ud. The proof that can be deduced from this quotation is that uruf, if not against
Islamic teachings, is normally considered as good practice to the Muslims and acceptable by
people and reason. Therefore, such a practice is accepted by Allah. So, it can be regarded as a
The other hadith frequently quoted is the following hadith reported by Aishah r.a. She
said “Hind, the daughter of Utbah, wife of Abu Sufyan, came to Allah’s messenger and said
“Abu Sufyan is a miserly person. He does not give adequate maintenance for me and my
6
children but I am constrained to take from his wealth some part of it without his knowledge.
Is there any sin for me?”. Thereupon Allah’s messenger said “Take from his property what is
customary (ma’ruf) which may suffice you and your children. Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, the
famous commentator on sunnah, comments on this hadith by saying that al-ma’ruf in this
hadith means the amount that is known to be enough by ‘adah. He further held that this hadith
too indicates that urf should be relied upon in matters where the Shara’ does not give the
exact details.
In addition to the above evidence, earlier and more contemporary scholars of Islamic
Law have agreed that urf is an important source in Islamic Law. They have not objected to
the role of urf in solving the problems that arise in Islamic Law. This is obvious in the past
and present literature of fiqh in which urf has been utilised by the jurists to solve many
problems of fiqh.4
4
Mohammad Akram Laldin (2006) Introduction to Shariah and Islamic Jurisprudence
(Malaysia)
7
CLASSIFICATION OF ‘URF
Islamic jurists have developed a classification of the different types of urf and have
divided them into various types. The classifications are the verbal (Qawli) and practical
(Amali) urf. The verbal urf consists of the general agreement of the people on the usage and
meaning of words for purposes other than their literal meanings. For example, verbal urf is
the usage of certain words among certain groups of people such as the usage of the word
‘doctor’. In a university setting this title normally refers to a person who holds the PhD
degree but to the lay person this word normally refers to a medical practitioner.
As for the practical urf, it consists of commonly recurrent practices of the people in
daily life and in civil transactions. Recurrent practices in normal daily life means the private
practices in life which have nothing to do with other people, such as eating, sleeping,
cultivating and other such matters. The recurrent practices in civil transactions refer to the
practices that are meant to avoid causes for legal disputes. This would normally involve two
contracting practices which are sales, rents, marriages and other similar contracts. For
example, of practical uruf which occurs in normal daily life is the people taking vacations
like the New Year Day. So, taking vacation on this day is considered as an urf for a certain
group of people and can be used by such a group every year. An example for practical urf that
involves transactions is the sale of offering and accepting. Similarly, customary rules
regarding the payment of dower in marriage may require a certain amount to be paid at the
Next, the general (‘Amm) and particular (Khass) urf. Urf, whether verbal or in
practice, is divided into two types which are general (al-‘urf al-‘amm) and particular (al-‘urf
al-khass). The general urf is the common custom which is prevalent everywhere among all
people in a matter regardless of the passage of time. An example of this is the contract of
8
istisna in many matters such as clothing, furniture. This type of contract is a necessity and is
commonly practised everywhere. The example for this type of urf is such as the practices
among the traders in wholesale trading which allow the payment of goods to be deferred to a
certain period of time which is not practiced in retail transactions. The usage of certain terms
among a certain group of people also can be included in this type of urf such as the usage of
Lastly, the valid (Sahih) and invalid (Fasid) urf. Finally, custom is once again divided
into valid (al-‘urf al-sahih) and invalid custom (al-‘urf al-fasid). The valid custom is the urf
that is practised by the people, which does not contravene the Shari’ah and deny the interest
of people and at the same time does not bring corruption. On the other hand, the invalid
custom is the custom that is practised by the people but there is evidence to show that it is
against the principles of Shari’ah or it denies the interest of people or it brings corruption. An
example of this type of urf is the practice of usury in transactions. Although it is common
among many people, it clearly contradicts the clear text of the Quran and sunnah. Therefore,
5
Mohammad Akram Laldin (2006) Introduction to Shariah and Islamic Jurisprudence
(Malaysia)
9
CONDITION OF URUF
Muslim scholars have laid down the condition that must be fulfilled in a customary
practice in order to consider it was valid urf. Urf in order to be authoritative, must fulfil the
following requirements which is first urf must represent a common and recurrent
phenomenon. This means that the urf must be practised by the people commonly and
frequently in their daily life. In addition, the practices, which are commonly mentioned in the
book of fiqh, but practised by the people, cannot be the basis of a legal decision. An example
is that if a sale is concluded in a city where two or three currencies are commonly accepted
and the contract in question does not specify any, the one that is the more dominant and
Second, custom in order to be authoritative, must also be dominant in the sense that it
is observed in all or most of the cases to which it can apply. If it is observed in some cases but
not in others, it is not authoritative. Similarly, if there are two different customary practices
practised by some people and not by some others, and the amount of both are equal, it cannot
Third, the custom must be in existence at the time the transaction is concluded. This
means in order for urf to be considered as a basis of judicial decisions, the practice must be
prevalent at the time the transaction is concluded and not in extinct customary practice. This
be understood in the light of the custom that prevailed at the time they were written or
uttered. As an example, if a person said that he intends to make a bequest (wasiyyah) of part
of his property to an ‘alim (scholar), and the customary meaning of this word at that time
refers to those who are experts in religious matter, part of his inheritance must be given to
those who are experts in religious matters, albeit, the same word might be used, customarily,
10
for people who are expert in any field and not necessarily to the expert in the religious matter.
Similarly in al-‘urf al-fi’li the customary practice considered is the practice that exists at the
time when the transaction was concluded. An example is that the determination of the date of
a transaction is considered according to the practice of the place, whether the Hijri (Islamic
calendar) date is used, or the Christian one. If the Christian calendar is used when the
transaction is concluded, that be referred to, although, after that it can be changed to the Hijri
calendar.
Fourth, the custom must not contravene the clear stipulation of an agreement. A
transaction. This is because a custom is only an equivalent of an implied condition. It will not
agreements prevail over customs. Should there arise a conflict between them, it will normally
be determined in the favour of the former. An example is that the costs of formal registration
in the sale of a real property are customarily payable by the purchaser. But if there is a
stipulation in the contract that specifically requires the vendor to bear these costs, then the
custom would be of no avail and the purchaser would not be required to pay these costs.
Finally, the custom must not be in conflict with the Quran or sunnah (nass). The
opposition of custom to the nass may be absolute or partial. In cases of absolute conflict, the
custom will have no effect because texts override customs. Examples of such conflict are the
practices of usury (riba). Although they are widely practised, they have no legal validity,
because they contradict explicit text. However, if the conflict between the custom and the text
is not absolute, where customs oppose only certain aspects of the text, then the custom is
6
Mohammad Akram Laldin (2006) Introduction to Shariah and Islamic Jurisprudence
(Malaysia)
11
TYPE OF ‘URF
The word urf is usually associated with the word ma’ruf (good) in the texts. In this
sense, it is what the Shari’ah considers to be good, and not what human reason or the
prevalent practices consider to be good. If some of these practices are approved by the
Shari’ah, then they are acceptable to the law. The process of approval, prior to acceptance, is
necessary. There are different ways of classifying urf and each classification is intended to
bring out its nature. Uruf is divided, first into urf qawli (usage) and urf fi’li (practice).
Urf qawli or usage may be analysed into the following types. First, the meaning of
terms during the period of the Prophet (peace be on him). This is the usage that was prevalent
during the time of the Prophet. The meaning assigned to words at that period is used to
understand the true intention of the Lawgiver. Second, technical terms of the law or urf
shar’i. The jurists usually employ the term urf shar’I to denote the technical sense that a term
may have acquired in Islamic law. This technical meaning is usually different from the literal
meaning in which the term is used. Thus, the word “solat” means any type of prayer or
supplication, but in the technical sense it means the entire form of the prayer that has been
transmitted from the Prophet (peace be on him). The word riba literally means excess and in
general usage it means “interest” in the sense of sud in Urdu, but in the technical sense it has
a much wider and comprehensive meaning assigned to it by the Quran and the Sunnah. For
Third, usage in a local area for the purpose of transactions. It is obvious that people
using languages other than Arabic, undertake their transactions in their own language. Islamic
law will recognise the meaning in such usage, but only if it conforms with the forms
prescribed by the law, that is if such use of words achieves the same purpose as the one
prescribed. If it does not, the law will declare it fasid. In other words, such usage has to be
12
measured against the permitted rules before it can become permissible. It will not be
recognised automatically. It is obvious that none of the above meanings can be called a
source of law in the sense that we understand custom to be a source in Western Law.
Next, urf fi’li (practice) is of three types which is the practices prevalent during the
period of the Prophet (peace be on him). These practices were either approved by the Prophet
(peace be on him), either expressly or tacitly or they were rejected. As such they became part
of the Sunnah. The source of the law here was not custom, but the Sunnah, even though
customs and practices did provide the raw material. Each practice was subjected to the norms
of the Shari’ah by the Prophet himself, and was either accepted or rejected.
Other than that, practices during the later periods. These practises were faced by the
jurists like new instances or cases and each one of them was subjected to scrutiny by the
jurists. The jurists either justified these practices in the light of the principles of Islamic law
or rejected them in the light of the same principles. No practice could automatically be
Lastly, urf as a change in circumstances with the passage of times. This third type has
been emphasised by Ibn Abidin in his writings. The method discussed by him implies that
when circumstances change over time, there is a need to re-examine some of the rulings
issued by the jurists and to alter them according to the circumstances if necessary. Thus, the
later jurists permitted wages for the teachings of the Quran when the earlier jurists had not
allowed this. Imam Abu Hanifah had disallowed the contract of muzara’ah (sharecropping),
but his two disciples later changed the rule on the basis of the change in circumstances and
7
Imran A.K Nyazee (2016) Islamic Legal Maxims (Pakistan)
13
CONCLUSION
'Urf and custom are still taken into account in giving fatwas and considerations in
order to preserve interests or problems, because part of the form of human problems is to
acknowledge something that has been their custom for many years and passed down from
generation to generation. These habits and practices are social behaviours that are difficult to
abandon. Therefore, the recognition is not absolute but is bound by conditions, not
contradicting the Islamic law. In other words, 'urf is one of the most important sources of law,
its strength is proved by the arguments of al-Quran, al-Sunnah and consensus, 'urf cannot be
used absolutely, in fact there are certain conditions that must be present. Making it a source of
law and indeed it cannot be disputed that 'urf has also acted as one of the Shariah laws
established for the benefit of all human beings and rejecting any evil that befalls them.8
8
Faculty of Islamic Studies (2009) Jurisprudence 2 (UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia)
14
REFERENCES
1. Dr. Mohamad Akram Laldin (2008). Introduction to Shari’ah and Islamic Jurisprudence
(2nd edition). CERT Publications Sdn. Bhd. (612565-0) 277, Jalan Bandar II, Metro
2. Imran A.K Nyazee (2016). Islamic Legal Maxims. Center for Excellence in Research,
Head Office: No,103 Street 2, PTV Colony, Shahpur, Islamabad, Pakistan 44000.
3. Koay Xian Lit (2019/2020). Primary sources and Secondary Sources of Islamic Law.
https://www.studocu.com/en-us/document/universiti-utara-malaysia/introduction-to-islam
ic-law/primary-sources-and-secondary-sources-of-islamic-law/6154430
15