Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.0 Deep Foundations
3.0 Deep Foundations
[TCVG3711]
Pre-cast
Timber Steel Pipe Steel H Concrete Composite
Concrete
TCVG3711 – Mr. S.S. Muluti 15
Methods of Pile Installation
▪ The installation process is every bit as important as the design process
for pile foundations.
▪ Before pile design can commence the type of pile and its method of
installation should be known.
▪ In order to avoid damage to the pile during installation, the method of
installation should actually be considered during the design process.
▪ Installation procedure varies considerably and has an important
influence on the subsequent response of the piles.
▪ There are several methods of installation.
▪ However, there are two main methods of pile installation, namely:
a) Pile Driving (Driven/Displacement Piles)
b) Boring of piles (Bored Piles)
Where:
𝐴𝑏 = Area of Pile Base.
𝑞𝑏 = End-bearing Pressure.
𝐴𝑠 = Area of Pile Shaft.
𝑞𝑠 = Average limiting shear stress
Pile base or tip down pile shaft.
4) Dynamic method
𝑄𝑏 = 𝑞𝑏 ∙ 𝐴𝑏 𝜏 = 𝑐 + 𝜎𝑛 ∙ 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝜙
0 0 B
𝑞𝑏 = 𝑐𝑁𝑐 + 𝑞𝑁𝑞 + 0.5𝛾𝐵𝑁𝛾
∴ 𝑞𝑠 = 𝜎′𝑣 ∙ 𝐾 ∙ 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝛿
∴ 𝑞𝑏 = 𝑞𝑁𝑞
Installation method K
Large displacement 1.0 – 2.0
Pile/soil interface δ
Smooth steel/sand 0.5φ - 0.7φ
Rough steel/sand 0.7φ - 0.9φ
Precast concrete/sand 0.8φ - 1.0φ
Cast-in-place concrete/sand 1.0φ
Timber/sand 0.8φ - 0.9φ
𝑄𝑏 = 𝑞𝑏 ∙ 𝐴𝑏 𝑄𝑠 = 𝑞𝑠 ∙ 𝐴𝑠
0 0 B
𝑞𝑏 = 𝑐𝑁𝑐 + 𝑞𝑁𝑞 + 0.5𝛾𝐵𝑁𝛾 ∴ 𝑞𝑠 = 𝛼𝑐𝑢
Where:
𝑞𝑏 = 𝑐𝑢 𝑁𝑐 ∴ 𝑞𝑏 = 9𝑐𝑢 𝛼 = Reduction or Adhesion friction factor.
1.0
0.8
Source: Skempton (1951)
Reduction Factor,
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0 100 200
6m cu = 25 kPa
sat = 18 kN/m3
4m cu = 120 kPa
REQUIRED:
o Determine the ultimate axial load of the pile.
1. Shaft Resistance
qs,k = αcu
Average Shear Stress:
𝐿 D/L
1
𝑞𝑠 = න 𝑞𝑠 ∙ 𝑑𝑧
𝐿
0
B
1 1.0
1.0
𝑞𝑠 = (𝛼 𝑐 𝑧 + 𝛼2 𝑐𝑢2 𝑧2 )
10 1 𝑢1 1
1 0.8
0.8
𝑞𝑠 = (1 × 25 × 6 + 0.43 × 120 × 4)
10
Reduction Factor,
Reduction Factor,
0.6
0.6
∴ 𝑞𝑠 = 𝟑𝟓. 𝟔 𝒌𝑷𝒂
0.43
0.4
Ultimate Shear Capacity: 0.4
𝑄𝑠 = 𝑞𝑠 ∙ 𝐴𝑠
0.2
0.2
𝑄𝑠 = (35.6)(𝜋 × 1 × 10)
∴ 𝑄𝑠 = 𝟏 𝟏𝟐𝟎 𝒌𝑵 0
0
120
25
0 100 200
0 100 200
Average Undrained Shear Strength, s u (kPa)
Average Undrained Shear Strength, s u (kPa)
TCVG3711 – Mr. S.S. Muluti 33
REDUCTION FACTOR vs UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH
REDUCTION FACTOR vs UNDRAINED SHEAR STRENGTH
Example – Load Capacity of Piles
SOLUTION:
2. Base Resistance
qs,k = αcu
𝑞𝑏 = 𝑐𝑢 𝑁𝑐
𝐿
𝑞𝑏 = (120)(9) = 10 → 𝑁𝑐 = 9 D/L
𝐷
∴ 𝑞𝑏 = 𝟏𝟎𝟖𝟎 𝒌𝑷𝒂
B
Ultimate Base Capacity:
𝑄𝑏 = 𝑞𝑏 ∙ 𝐴𝑏
(𝜋)(1)2 (1080)
𝑄𝑏 =
4
∴ 𝑄𝑏 = 𝟖𝟓𝟎 𝒌𝑵
𝑄𝑢 = 1120 + (850)
∴ 𝑄𝑢 = 𝟏 𝟗𝟕𝟎 𝒌𝑵
TCVG3711 – Mr. S.S. Muluti 34
Example – Load Capacity of Piles
EXAMPLE 2: Cohesionless Soils (c = 0)
▪ A 0.5 m diameter, 12 m long round concrete pile is driven into a sandy soil
stratum as shown.
A
Sand Layer 1
5m = 30º
1 = 17.3 kN/m3
B
12 m Sand Layer 2
7m = 32º
2 = 16.9 kN/m3
C
REQUIRED:
o If the pile is penetrating through multiple sand layers with no groundwater
present, compute:
a) Ultimate bearing capacity
b) Allowable bearing capacity
TCVG3711 – Mr. S.S. Muluti 35
Example – Load Capacity of Piles
SOLUTION:
Note: The value of the bottom sand layer is used to find Nq, since the tip of the pile lies on the bottom sand layer.
𝑄𝑢 = 1067.7 + (1166.2)
∴ 𝑄𝑢 = 𝟐 𝟐𝟑𝟑. 𝟗 𝒌𝑵
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝐹𝑆 = 3.0
Therefore:
(2233.9)
∴ 𝑄𝑎𝑙𝑙 = = 𝟕𝟒𝟒. 𝟔 𝒌𝑵
(3)
3m Sand Layer 1
5m = 30º
B 1 = 17.3 kN/m3
C
15 m Sand Layer 2
10 m = 32º
2 = 16.9 kN/m3
D
REQUIRED:
o If the pile is penetrating through multiple sand layers with the groundwater
located at 3 m below the surface, compute:
a) Ultimate bearing capacity
b) Allowable bearing capacity
TCVG3711 – Mr. S.S. Muluti 40
Example – Load Capacity of Piles
SOLUTION:
Note: The value of the bottom sand layer is used to find Nq, since the tip of the pile lies on the bottom sand layer.
∴ 𝑄𝑢 = 𝟏 𝟖𝟒𝟎. 𝟒 𝒌𝑵
D
Pile Cap
Column load
Skin friction on
perimeter of the
group
End bearing on plan
area (base area) of
the group
L
B
6.0 m
?
0.3 m
L=6m
15 cm
90 cm
90
210 cm ∴ 𝑜𝑓 𝐷 = 𝟑𝑫
30
Conclusion:
L=6m
o In this case, the lesser of the two, i.e., the individual
pile failure governs the design.
o And since 566.1 kN is more than the load of 400 kN,
the arrangement is satisfactory from the load
carrying point of view.