Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Save Now Pay Later Scheme Analysis
Save Now Pay Later Scheme Analysis
Arguments for:
Arguments against:
Cannibalization: SNPL might compete with the bank's own credit card
business, potentially reducing revenue from interest charges and fees.
Limited profitability: SNPL generally generates lower fees and commissions
compared to credit cards, potentially impacting the bank's bottom line.
Consumer behavior: Overly promoting SNPL could still encourage impulse
purchases and unhealthy spending habits, even though it involves saving
beforehand.
Regulatory concerns: Depending on the specific features and
implementation of SNPL, there might be concerns about transparency,
unfair terms, and predatory practices towards vulnerable customers.
the best interests of both the bank and its customers in mind.
While the "Save Now, Pay Later" (SNPL) concept is gaining traction in
India, traditional banks haven't yet made significant inroads into offering
direct SNPL solutions. This is partly due to regulatory barriers and existing
competition from dedicated SNPL fintech startups. However, some banks
are indirectly involved in the space through partnerships and collaborations
with these startups.
Here's a snapshot of how Indian banks are currently involved with SNPL:
SBI YONO Savings Plus: SBI offers a savings account with features like
goal setting, recurring deposits, and automatic transfers, which can be
used to accumulate funds for future purchases. While not a true SNPL
product, it shares some characteristics.
Equitas Small Finance Bank: Launched an "Equitas Pay" scheme allowing
customers to purchase smartphones and electronics through monthly
installments deducted from their salary accounts. This model resembles
SNPL, but is limited to specific product categories.
It's important to note that the SNPL landscape in India is evolving rapidly,
and future developments could see traditional banks introduce more
comprehensive SNPL offerings or deepen their partnerships with fintech
players.