Moral policing, a practice involving the enforcement of societal moral codes by authorities or

individuals, has been a subject of heated debate. While proponents argue that it safeguards
cherished values, critics question its legitimacy and the potential infringement on personal
liberties.

Advocates of moral policing often argue that imposing restrictions on actions deemed
immoral or socially unacceptable helps in upholding cultural norms. Moreover, they contend
that by imposing restrictions on certain behaviors or forms of expression, society maintains a
moral compass that guides future generations toward virtuous paths.

However, in my opinion, the enforcement of laws governing societal behavior is a matter of

state policy rather than moral policing. Moreover, unofficial moral policing can infringe upon
personal freedoms and rights to the extent of penalizing an individual to the point of death if
he or she engages in acts that are construed as violation of societal norms. Mahsa Amini’s
death in police custody after being arrested for failure to comply with Iran's compulsory
dress code for women is a case in point.

Perhaps the path forward lies in balancing the need to uphold cherished values with
respecting individual freedoms. Human rights bodies can play a crucial role by raising
awareness about instances of extreme moral policing. Also, campaigns promoting inclusivity
and understanding different perspectives can help mitigate the negative impacts of moral
policing and encourage a more open-minded society. Ultimately, fostering dialogue and
understanding among communities with differing ideologies.is the key to addressing the
pitfalls of moral policing.