Professional Documents
Culture Documents
late nineteenth century even native middle-class groups turned away from older
work habits to leisure pursuits as Daniel Rodgers showed us some years ago, or
how their sons and daughters respectably helped each other to participate in
formerly proscribed behaviors at school. 3 Like the good progressive, Burnham
would rather see the evil figures who manipulate and exploit behind the scenes.
And he is far more intent to show who gained from our nasty (and often self,
destructive) indulgences and to save us from ourselves, especially those of us
who have weak minds because we are "vulnerable non,middle class people" (p.
276), than to develop the genuinely important historical analysis offered by the
story he tells.
lies in finding new sorts of evidence and new ways of interpreting the evidence
of children's lives.
The authors meet this challenge with mixed success. The more successful
essays draw upon three or more sorts of evidence, looking for continuities and
discontinuities in what the evidence tells us about children's lives. Bernard Mer-
gen's essay, "Made, Bought, and Stolen: Toys and the Culture of Childhood,"
draws upon autobiographies, adult writing on toys, and the surviving artifacts
themselves to show how children used toys to create identity, to try out adult
roles, and to resist adult socialization. Mergen's mastery of the interdisciplinary
scholarship on play makes his the most daring and, I think, the most interesting
essay in the collection. Miriam Formanek- Brunell's essay on the "politics of doll
play" in the nineteenth nicely complements Mergen's essay, as she uses autobi-
ographies, biographies, oral histories, adults writing about dolls (including "doll
really rise above relying upon evidence reflecting only the adult versions of
children's lives. These essays, by and large, still make interesting reading, but
the "Introduction" promises more of a breakthrough in writing the history of
children's lives than some of the authors deliver. William M. Tuttle, Jr.'s essay
on children's popular culture during World War II offers an intelligent survey
of the radio, film, cartoon, advertising, music, popular fiction, and other texts
consumed by American children and adolescents on the homefront, but it is
hard to judge what sense the consumers might have made of the texts.
Ethnographicallv-based audience-response criticism now so common in cul-
tural studies has the luxury of dealing only in the present and only with living
audiences, so it would be interesting to see Tuttle grapple with how the historian
might take on an historical audience, in this case, children. Similarly, David Na-
saw's essay on children and the moving picture industry in the early twentieth
The editors and N. Ray Hiner alert the reader to the possible uses of pho-
tographs as evidence in writing the history of children's lives. Hiner provides
a very brief essay accompanying a number of photographs reproduced in the
center of the volume, and other photographs illustrate the essays throughout.
Hines's essay is speculative and provocative, meant to raise more questions than
he is prepared to answer, and clearly we are only in the early stages of figuring
out how to "read" photographs for clues about children's lives.
Overall, this volume may be more important for what it attempts than for
what it accomplishes. It announces clearly that we need truly to begin writing
the history of American children's lives from their point of view, and that this
history will be very difficult to reconstruct. At their best, the essays show how
new sorts of evidence and new approaches might begin writing this history; at
their least successful, the essaystell us some interesting things about what adults