Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Letter of Approval
This Quality Manual for Air Atlanta Icelandic, revision 6, dated 20th of May 2010 complies with EU‐OPS, JAR‐
FCL, EASA Part‐145, Part‐M, Part‐66, and ICAA rules, regulations and requirements.
The Icelandic Civil Aviation Administration (ICAA) has reviewed Air Atlanta Icelandic Quality Manual,
revision 6, dated 20th of May 2010.
Upon completion of this review, the ICAA accepts the manual in accordance with EU‐OPS and
approves it in accordance with EASA PART‐145 and EASA Part‐M.
A copy of this signed statement must be incorporated into and become a part of the manual.
______________________ ________________________
Revision highlights
3.4.4 Analysis, findings and actions [revised, text moved/added from 5.2.2]
Introduction
0.1 ........................................................... 1 .................................................................... 5
0.2 ........................................................... 2 .................................................................... 5
0.3 ........................................................... 3‐4 ................................................................. 5
Policies
4.1 ........................................................... 2 .................................................................... 5
4.2 ........................................................... 3 ‐4................................................................ 6
Procedures
5.1 ............................................................ 1 ................................................................... 5
5.2 ............................................................ 2‐7 ............................................................... 6
Rev. No. Date Issued Inserted by Rev. No. Date Issued Inserted by
Orginal 01 May 2005 AAI 20
1 15 June 2006 AAI 21
2 07 Nov 2006 AAI 22
3 11 Feb 2008 AAI 23
4 01 Dec 2008 AAI 24
5 29 Jan 2010 AAI 25
6 20 May 2010 AAI 26
7 27
8 28
9 29
10 30
11 31
12 32
13 33
14 34
15 35
16 36
17 37
18 38
19 39
Page
LoA Letter of Approval .................................................................................... N/A
‐‐‐‐ Revision highlights.................................................................................... N/A
LEP List of Effective Pages................................................................................ N/A
ROR Record of Revisions................................................................................... N/A
ToC Table of Contents ..................................................................................... N/A
Section 0 – Introduction
0.1 The Air Atlanta Icelandic Organisation...................................................... 1
0.2 Compliance Checklist ............................................................................... 2
0.3 Terms and Definitions............................................................................... 3‐4
0 Introduction
Rev. 5 Introcuction
QUALITY MANUAL
0 Introduction
The organisation consists of shared services, production and operations supported by quality
and safety. Operations consist of technical operations and flight operations, which includes
training and ground operations.
Bases are established at other locations as necessary under suitable management structure and
with support from headquarters.
Qualified and experienced personnel are employed throughout the company to ensure
adequate resources in order to enable the organisation to fulfil its obligations under the EU‐OPS,
JAR‐FCL, EASA Part‐M, Part‐145, Part‐66 and ICAA rules, requirements and regulations, as
applicable.
The organisation provides scheduled, charter, international passenger and cargo operation to
the air transport industry with speciality in wet‐leased scheduled operation.
The organisation places emphasis on training and conducts training at headquarters and other
facilities.
Terms used in this manual have a direct application with reference to the series of international
standards on quality management and quality assurance.
Accountable Manager
The person acceptable to the ICAA who has corporate authority for ensuring that all operations
and maintenance activities can be financed and carried out to the standard required by the ICAA
and any additional requirements defined by the operator. He is the organisation’s CEO.
Audit
A systematic and independent examination to determine whether quality activities and related
results comply with planned arrangements and whether these arrangements are implemented
effectively and are suitable to achieve objectives.
Auditor
The person who has the qualification to perform quality audits.
CEO
Chief Executive Officer who is also the Accountable Manager of the organisation.
EASA
European Aviation Safety Agency.
IATA
International Air Transport Association.
ICAA
Icelandic Civil Aviation Administration.
ICAO
International Civil Aviation Organization.
IOSA
IATA Operational Safety Audit.
ITRM
IATA Technical Reference Manual.
JAA
Joint Aviation Authorities.
JAR
Joint Aviation Requirements.
Quality
The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to
satisfy stated or implied needs.
Quality Assurance
All those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that
product or service will satisfy given requirements for quality.
Quality Inspection
An inspection is the act of observing a particular event or action to ensure that correct
procedures and requirements are followed during the accomplishment of that event.
Quality Manual
The document stating the Quality Policy, Quality System and quality practices of an organisation.
Quality Plan
A document setting out the specific practices, resources and sequence of activities relevant to a
particular product, service, contract or a project.
Quality Policy
The overall quality intentions and direction of the organisation with reference to quality as
formally expressed by the CEO.
Quality System
The organisational structure, responsibilities, procedures and resources for implementing
quality management.
Responsible Manager
The person responsible for an area of a documented standard, the standard set by the
organisation or requirements of the ICAA.
SAFA
Safety Assessment of Foreign Aircraft.
Senior Management
The highest level of management within the organisation that has the authority and the
responsibility for setting policies, demonstrating commitment, meeting requirements, approving
resources, setting objectives, implementing processes and achieving desired results.
Standard
The documented procedures and requirements the Operational Standards are set against.
The Organisation
Air Atlanta Icelandic.
1.1 Introduction
1.1.1 Operational Continuity
1.1.2 Organisation Chart
1.1 Introduction
Management and control of the organisation is in the hands of the senior management. Senior
management is the highest level of management within the organisation that has the authority
and the responsibility for setting policies, demonstrating commitment, meeting requirements,
approving resources, setting objectives, implementing processes and achieving desired results.
Deputising is in effect when the management personnel is absent due to vacation, sickness or
any time management person can not be reached within reasonable time, depending on the
urgency of the matter.
The absent management person should make all correspondence through the deputy, while
being deputised.
The quality department is controlled by Director Quality Assurance, empowered by the CEO. The
main functions of the quality department are to support the organisations operations by the
means of auditing and monitoring, with special emphases on safety and security.
The CEO has corporate authority for ensuring that all operations and maintenance activities can
be financed and carried out to the standard required by the ICAA, and any additional
requirements defined by the organisation.
Responsibilities
The CEO shall:
a) establish goals and policies, in co‐operation with senior staff, for the main activities in the
organisation
b) establish and promote the Quality and Safety policies, in cooperation with, VP Maintenance,
VP Operations and the Director Quality Assurance
c) assign necessary resources to the organisation’s different departments and sub‐
departments, in cooperation with the respective directors and managers
d) ensure that all Maintenance and Flight Operations can be financed and carried out to the
standards established and approved for the entire organisation
e) Provide his staff with necessary facilities, workspace, equipment and supporting services
f) call and chair the management evaluation of the quality system
g) participate in the meeting of the Technical Board when applicable
1.3.2 Solicitor
The organisation’s Solicitor reports to the CEO.
His main activities are to advice on various areas of law and represent the organisation where
there is a business related dispute.
The Solicitor specializes in particular areas of law, such as property, tax, employment,
competition and aviation. Typical work activities for the Solicitor vary, depending on the type of
case and field of law in each case.
Responsibilities
The Solicitor shall:
a) have responsibility for various matters requiring legal advice and the undertaking of legal
services in connection with delivering results desired by the organisation
b) undertake research, as and when requested, and provide briefings on legal issues
c) in appropriate cases, represent the organisation at meetings, hearings and tribunals,
including providing advocacy and case management
d) acquire sufficient practical experience, knowledge and skills as a lawyer so as to give
reassurance that all relevant legal issues will be dealt with competently in the interests of
the organisation
e) undertake such other duties as the CEO may require in the interests of delivering effective
legal services to the organisation
The primary role of The VP Human Resources is to manage the day to day operations of the
Human Resources department. The VP Human Resources manages the administration of the
human resources policies, procedures and programs. The VP Human Resources carries out
responsibilities in the following functional areas: departmental development, Human Resource
Information Systems, employee relations, training and development, benefits, compensation,
organizational development, and control all communication and contracts with the
organisation’s related unions. VP Human Resources also completes all contracts with
recruitment agencies.
Responsibilities
The VP Human Resources:
a) is responsible for all or part of these areas:
i) recruitment and staffing logistics
ii) organisational and space planning
iii) performance management and improvement systems
iv) organisation development
v) employment and compliance to regulatory concerns and reporting
vi) employee orientation, development, and training
vii) policy development and documentation
viii) employee relations
ix) the organisation wide committee facilitation
x) the organisations employee communication
xi) compensation and benefits administration
xii) employee safety, welfare, wellness and health
xiii) employee services and counselling
b) the VP Human Resources originates and leads Human Resources practices and objectives
that will provide an employee oriented, high performance culture that emphasises
empowerment, quality, productivity and standards, goal attainment, and the recruitment as
well as ongoing development of a superior workforce
c) ensures safety of the workforce
d) ensures development of a superior workforce
e) ensures development of the Human Resources department
f) ensures development of an employee oriented organisation culture that emphasises quality,
continuous improvement, and high performance
g) ensures personal ongoing development
1.3.4 VP Finance
The VP Finance reports to the CEO.
He directs all financial activities of the organisation. The individual works hand in hand with the
CEO on major financial issues and the organisation wide strategies. VP Finance manages banking
relationships with both foreign and local banks. The VP Finance is an active member of the
corporate management team and is responsible for the development and implementation of
short and long term strategic planning with the Senior Management. To support all of these
responsibilities the person in this position must have excellent communication skills and a
proactive approach.
Responsibilities
The VP Finance:
a) is responsible for all budgeting and financial reporting to include project and indirect
planning. The VP Finance is also responsible for the accounting department, Treasury as
well as Financial Planning & Control
b) is also responsible for coordination of insurance issues and communication with the
insurance brokers. Annually the VP Finance will supply supporting schedules for insurance
renewal. The VP Finance coordinates legal issues with the organisations Solicitor
c) is ultimately responsible for cost proposal development and profit or business analysis. In
most cases only the very large or complex cost proposals require the VP to create those files
d) ensures that all indirect expenses and any unallowable expenses are budgeted and
monitored in coordination with department directors on spending on a monthly basis
e) is ultimately responsible for all audits, although the day to day communications are handled
by the Accounting department. Top level corporate strategies and their communications to
auditors is the responsibility of the VP Finance
He leads and coordinates the organisation’s sales and marketing functions and develops and
implements the sales and marketing strategy. He monitors and analyses sales and marketing
activity against set targets and is responsible for creating and delivering sales strategies for the
organisation, product range and designated markets.
The VP Sales and Marketing plays a fundamental role in developing future growth, and provides
vision, direction and leadership.
Responsibilities
The VP Sales and Marketing:
a) develops strategy, tactics, sales plans and revenue targets
b) delivers sales by developing relationships with business partners
c) identifies and reports on business opportunities in target markets
d) acts as an ambassador and role model for the organisation
e) increases market share in existing markets and maximises new business development
opportunities
f) achieves targets for revenue, profitability and sales growth
g) provides direction for the sales and marketing department
Responsibilities
The VP Fleet Planning:
a) establishes excellent rapport with key senior management and numerous functional areas,
including Sales & Marketing (Aircraft Contracts & Leasing), Finance (Financial Planning &
Control, Accounting, etc.), Flight Operations, (Planning & Scheduling, Flight Performance,
Ops Cost Control, etc.), Maintenance (Planning, Engineering, Power plants & Contracts,
Maintenance Cost Control, etc.), Legal (external counsel), and Corporate Communications
b) develops short and long‐term fleet plans by aircraft types and by activity (Cargo/Pax),
through on‐going interaction and coordination with all parties
c) determines aircraft allocation tradeoffs for overall best interest of the organisation, rather
than solely for particular functional areas. Effectively explains these tradeoffs to all
participants
d) leads cross‐functional teams to resolve conflicting fleet issues
e) establishes and maintains ongoing processes, which allow measurement against plan and
budget
f) balances short term versus long term fleet requirements
g) determines need for special aircraft mission capabilities or improvements, such as over‐
water and ETOPS or other aircraft improvements, and develop justifications for such
modifications with all affected groups
h) presents business cases to management and upon approval, oversee implementation efforts
i) closely coordinates new aircraft deliveries, retirements, and lease expiration/renewal
activities with all key groups
j) develops and maintains thorough understanding of aircraft mission capabilities,
performance, operating costs and product offerings
k) interacts regularly with aircraft manufacturers’ and aircraft leasing and brokers firm sales
and marketing representatives
l) establishes himself as key contact in the organisation for all fleet‐related information;
m) maintains up to date fleet information on databases or equivalent
n) maintains centralised storage for, and control access to, all contracts relating to aircraft and
engine acquisitions and leases
o) tailors fleet plans and fleet information to different customers
p) maintains competitive fleet plans and information on other airlines and industry fleet
activity
q) performs other fleet related responsibilities, as needed
The primary role of the Director Quality Assurance is to verify, by monitoring activity in the fields
of flight operations, maintenance, safety and security, that the standards required by EU‐OPS,
JAR‐FCL, EASA Part‐M, Part‐145, Part‐66 and ICAA rules, requirements and regulations, as
applicable., and any additional requirements defined by the organisation, are being carried out
under the supervision of the relevant postholder.
Responsibilities
The Director Quality Assurance:
a) has direct access to the CEO and unlimited access to all relevant parts of the organisation
and, as necessary, all parts of any sub‐contractor’s organisation
b) informs the CEO when corrective action that is required as a result of a non‐conformance is
not implemented within an acceptable timescale
c) is responsible for establishing and maintaining the quality system
d) monitors activities in flight operations, maintenance, safety and security, for compliance
with the standards requested by the ICAA
e) ensures that a quality audit schedule is established and carried out to ensure that all areas
of the operation are reviewed at regular intervals. He brings observed non‐conformance to
the attention of the person concerned with a timescale for remedial action to be completed
f) monitors the effectiveness of changes resulting from proposals for corrective action
identified by the Flight Safety Programme
g) supervises and coordinates activities of Audit Manager and Quality Assurance Surveyor
h) issues Part‐145 Authorizations for Certifying Staff and ensures their qualification records are
managed
i) coordinates with the ICAA with regard to audits and non‐conformances
j) is a special confidential consultant to the ICAA (Icelandic law no.60 10 June 1998 article 83).
Qualifications
The Director Quality Assurance shall:
a) have completed international standards training on quality assurance systems
b) hold good knowledge of the EASA requirements and ICAA rules and regulations
c) hold good knowledge of the English language
d) hold good knowledge in operating computer software programs and handling computer
data and information
Training
The Director Quality Assurance shall complete:
a) approved quality assurance system course
b) approved quality assurance auditor’s course
c) CAME procedure related to job function according to CAME Part 3.4.8.1(b)
d) he shall also attend a continuation training programme according to CAME Part 3.4.8.1(g)
Deputy
The deputy for Director Quality Assurance is Quality Assurance Surveyor.
Responsibilities
The Director Flight Safety:
a) heads the Flight Safety Management Programme
b) monitors the overall flight safety performance in operations and maintenance
c) promotes safety and risk awareness within the organisation
d) ensures that safety related deficiencies are corrected and learned from
e) disseminates safety related information to personnel and other organisations
f) enforces completion and collection of Form Q‐050, Air Safety Report, when incidents or
findings require such reports
g) manages the Internal Occurrence Reporting system and:
i) evaluates and classifies Air Safety Reports
ii) heads investigation of serious occurrences
iii) requests corrective action of safety deficiencies from relevant departments
iv) analyses collected ASRs for any adverse trends in operations and maintenance
v) advises the relevant managers of the occurrence and requests comments and/or
actions as appropriate
vi) acts upon anonymous safety related reports from staff
h) administers the Flight Data Monitoring Program and:
i) ensures system security and flight crew anonymity
ii) liaises with the Guardian Pilot for crew contacts
iii) administers the flight data monitoring software, access and updates
iv) liaises with maintenance department on data upload issues
i) chairs the Flight Safety Committee and:
i) calls the Flight Safety Committee meeting
ii) prepares any material and issues for review
iii) ensures that minutes of the meeting are recorded
iv) follows up on any actions or recommendations decided by the meeting
j) chairs the ASR groups and:
i) calls the ASR meetings
ii) prepares any material and issues for review
iii) ensures that minutes of the meeting are recorded
k) advises the CEO of any unresolved flight safety issues and trends that may lead to an
unacceptable level of safety
l) heads and coordinates serious incidents and accident investigations with the competent Air
Accident Investigation Board
m) represents the organisation in matters of Flight Safety towards national and international
organisations
n) establishes and maintains industry contacts on matters relating to flight safety with the view
of staying abreast of developments in the field of safety management
Qualifications
The Director Flight Safety shall:
a) through assessment of competence prove sufficient knowledge to interpret maintenance
requirements into maintenance tasks
b) hold general knowledge of flight safety issues
c) hold good knowledge of the EU OPS, EC requirements and ICAA rules and regulations
d) hold good knowledge of the English language
e) hold good knowledge and experience in operating computer software programs and handling
computer data and information
Training
The Director Flight Safety shall complete:
a) CAME procedures related to job function CAME PART 3.4.8.1 (b)
b) continuation training program CAME PART 3.4.8.1 (g)
Responsibilities
The Head of Security:
a) formulates an overall security policy for senior management acceptance
b) preserves the development and promulgation of security standards and practices to
provide line management with direction and control
c) ensures the effective implementation of security procedures as required by national security
programmes and by audits and inspections as deemed necessary
d) reviews and implements national security standards in close cooperation with governing
bodies;
e) liaises effectively with governments, authorities and law enforcement agencies
f) evaluates and assesses any security threats to the organisation and recommends remedial
action as necessary
g) initiates special security measures during periods/instances of increased threat
h) provides specialised advice to senior and line management in all security functions,
protection, intelligence, information and investigation
i) reviews and records the organisation’s security incidents and occurrences and initiates an
investigative procedure as outlined in OM‐A (vol .I) ch.11
j) ensures compliance and stays abreast of any current national APIS programmes
k) oversees and maintains a training programme for the Mandated Security Awareness training
Qualifications
The Head of Security shall:
a) hold general knowledge of flight security issues
b) hold good knowledge of EASA requirements, EU‐OPS and ICAA rules and regulations
c) hold good knowledge of the English language
d) hold good knowledge and experience in operating computer software programs and
handling computer data and information
Training
The Head of Security shall complete:
a) annual training in security as available, or at least
b) review all requirements and regulations regarding aviation security on annual basis
Deputy
Deputy for Head of Security is Director Ground Operations
Responsibilities
The Head of Emergency Response Planning:
a) ensures that the organisation maintains a comprehensive Emergency Response Plan that
fulfils our moral responsibilities to our employees, our customers, and our stakeholders as
well as the communities we reside
b) ensures that the organisation has the ability and resources to recover from any major
disaster, emergency, or business interruption to prevent or minimize threats to customers,
employees, and the public
c) ensures that the organisation continues and maintains normal operations in the events of a
major emergency or a disaster
d) ensures that the organisation remains in compliance with the regulatory requirements set
forth by national authority and safeguard that industrial standards are met
e) ensures that the orgainsation Emergency Response Plan are exercised on a regular basis, to
identify weaknesses using thorough debriefing in order for necessary modifications for the
safe conclusion of an actual emergency situation
f) ensures that the organisation Emergency Response team members are trained periodically
to ensure operational readiness of the Crisis Management Center (CMC)
g) ensures liaison with relevant authorities and other external entities such as customer airline,
service providers, police, coast guards, hospitals, etc, as applicable
h) ensures that the organisation promotes Emergency Response culture and awareness
throughout the organization structure
Qualifications
The Head of Emergency Response Planning shall:
a) hold general knowledge of Emergency Response Plan issues
b) hold good knowledge of the EASA requirements, EU‐OPS and ICAA rules and regulations
c) hold good knowledge of the English language
d) hold good knowledge and experience in operating computer software programs and
handling computer data and information
Training
The Head of Emergency Response Planning shall complete:
a) Annual training in Emergency Response Planning as available; or at least
b) Review all requirements and regulations regarding Emergency Response Planning on annual
basis.
Deputy
A Deputy for Head of Emergency Response Planning is not required.
Responsibilities
The VP Flight Operations:
a) is responsible for the safe, efficient and economic conduct of all organisation operational
activity
b) is responsible for approving the contents of the Operations Manual, Part A, Volumes I and II,
and ultimately, for authorising all flight operations
c) ensures that the organisation’s flight operations are carried out in accordance with
conditions of the AOC
d) is responsible for compliance with EASA and other foreign regulatory requirements and
standards established by the organisations
e) shall assure access to necessary funds and resources to enable his department to operate in
accordance with ICAA requirements and the organisation’s standards
f) is a special confidential consultant to the ICAA (Icelandic law no.60 10 June 1998 article 83).
Qualifications
The VP Flight Operations shall:
a) hold a valid ATPL issued or validated by EASA Member State. In a case where the VP Flight
Operations does not hold such a license, his deputy shall hold an ATPL as required above
b) have at least 5 years of work experience with Airline where at least 2 years should be in
Flight Operation Department and include airline management experience
c) be familiar with the Quality Systems
d) have Practical experience of Aviation Safety Standards and safe Operating Practices
e) have Good Knowledge of:
i) EU‐OPS and associated requirements and procedures
ii) The Company AOC Holder Operation Specifications
iii) The Company Operation Manual and its supplements
iv) The english language
Training
Deputy
Deputy for VP Flight Operations is Director Flight Operations.
1.3.12 VP Maintenance
The VP Maintenance is the postholder for the Maintenance System.
He is appointed by the organisation and must be accepted by the ICAA.
The VP Maintenance reports directly to the CEO.
Responsibility
The VP Maintenance:
a) ensures the airworthiness of the aircraft and the serviceability of both operational and
emergency equipment
b) is responsible for liaison with regulatory authorities, original equipment manufacturers and
other operationally relevant external entities
c) ensures accomplishment of pre‐flight inspections
d) ensures rectification to an approved standard of any defect or damage affecting safe
operation, taking into account the minimum equipment list and configuration deviation list if
available for the aircraft type
e) ensures accomplishment of all maintenance in accordance with the approved operator’s
aircraft maintenance program
f) ensures analysis of the effectiveness of the maintenance program
g) ensures accomplishment of any operational directive, airworthiness directive and any other
continued airworthiness requirement made mandatory by the ICAA
h) ensures that all work and maintenance is carried out to the standards specified in Part‐145
i) is responsible for any corrective action resulting from the quality compliance monitoring of
Part‐145.A.65 (c)
j) ensures accomplishment of modifications in accordance with an approved standard and, for
non‐mandatory modifications, the establishment of an embodiment policy
k) is the head of the Technical Board and chairs the Board’s regular meetings
l) ensures that the Certificate of Airworthiness for each aircraft operated remains valid
m) ensures requirements specified above must be performed in accordance with Continuing
Airworthiness Management Exposition (CAME) procedures
n) responsible for overseeing and reviewing all contracts for the Technical Department
o) is responsible for continuing airworthiness of the organisations aircraft as listed on the AOC
Operations Specification IS‐008 and Part‐M certificate IS.MG‐008
p) ensures that all EASA Part‐M and Part‐145 operations and maintenance activities can be
carried out to the standard required by the ICAA
q) is a special confidential consultant to the ICAA (Icelandic law no.60 10 June 1998 article 83).
Qualifications
The VP Maintenance shall:
a) hold maintenance technician license or through assessment of competence prove sufficient
knowledge to interpret maintenance requirements into maintenance tasks
b) have at least five years of experience with an air carrier, commercial operator, or certified
repair station, one year of which must have been in a supervisory capacity
c) hold good knowledge of EASA rules and regulations, Part‐145 and subpart M
d) hold good knowledge of the English language
e) hold good knowledge and experience in operating computer software programs and
handling computer data and information
Training
The VP Maintenance shall complete:
a) thorough training in all CAME procedures
b) continuation training program CAME PART 3.4.8.1 (G)
c) familiarisation Type training for all Aircraft types operated
Deputy
The Deputy for VP Maintenance is Director Engineering & Planning.
Responsibilities
The Manager Audits:
a) schedules audits according to requirements
b) establishes and publishes audit schedules
c) initiates audits according to the audit schedule
d) assigns auditors to audits
e) monitors preparation of audit checklists
f) conducts audits and inspections
g) ensures that audits are carried out on time
h) ensures timely closure of audits
i) ensures that audit reports are compiled and distributed
j) monitores non‐conformance closure
k) communicates with responsible persons within each department, external auditors and
the ICAA
Qualification
a) Have completed International Standards training on Quality Assurance Systems
b) Good knowledge of EU‐OPS, JAR‐FCL, EASA Part‐145, Part‐M, Part‐66, and ICAA rules,
regulations and requirements.
c) Good knowledge of the English language
d) Good knowledge and experience in operating computer software programs and handling
computer data and information
Training
a) Approved Quality Assurance System Course
b) Approved Quality Assurance Auditors Course
c) Continuation training program CAME PART 3.4.8.1 (G)
d) CAME procedures related to job function CAME PART 3.4.8.1 (B)
Responsibilities
a) The Quality Compliance ‐ Maintenance:
b) signs and issues Part‐145 authorisations to Certifying Staff
c) evaluates suppliers and submits evaluation report on his findings
d) determines acceptability of part certification documents
e) serves as an Auditor when requested by Manager Audits
f) conducts inspections of maintenance activities to ensure that procedures are complied with
and work standards are to an acceptable standard
g) follows up on timely closure of non‐conformances with responsible managers
h) reviews and certifies airworthiness data as required
i) performs any other duties as directed by Director Quality Assurance
Qualifications
The Quality Compliance ‐ Maintenance shall:
a) hold maintenance technician license or through assessment of competence prove sufficient
knowledge to interpret maintenance requirements into maintenance tasks
b) hold good knowledge of the continuing airworthiness management exposition (CAME),
operations manual (OM) and associated manuals relevant to the quality assurance system
c) hold good knowledge of the EASA requirements particularly Part‐145 and Part‐M
d) have completed international standards training on quality assurance systems
e) hold good knowledge of the English language
f) hold good knowledge and experience in operating computer software programmes and
handling computer data and information
Training
The Quality Compliance ‐ Maintenance shall complete:
a) quality assurance system course CAME Part 3.1.6(a)
b) approved quality assurance auditors course CAME Part 3.1.6(d)
c) CAME procedures related to job function CAME Part 3.4.8.1(b)
d) continuation training program CAME Part 3.4.8.1(g)
e) maintenance computer system training related to job function
Responsibility
The Lead Auditor:
a) is ultimately responsible for all phases of the audit
b) prepares and maintains audit checklists
c) has the authority to make final decisions regarding the conduct of the audit
d) assists with the selection of other audit team members
e) prepares the audit
f) represents the audit team with the auditee’s management
g) raises non‐conformance reports resulting from audits
h) submits the audit report
Qualifications
The Lead Auditor shall:
a) in addition to the qualifications of Auditor, the Lead Auditor shall have a minimum 3 years
experience or have attended Lead Auditors course by recognised organisation
Training
The Lead Auditor shall complete:
a) a Lead Auditor’s course
1.4.4 Auditors
Auditors report to Manager Audits.
They are qualified individuals who shall audit the organisations quality system to ensure that all
organisations procedures are conducted in accordance with applicable requirements, standards
and procedures. Auditors shall have sufficient background experience to enable them to identify
non‐conformance with Part‐145, Part‐M, EU‐OPS, JAR‐FCL and ICAA regulations and
requirements.
The Director Quality Assurance shall identify the persons within the organisation who have the
responsibility and authority to perform audits and inspections as part of an ongoing quality
assurance programme. A current list of qualified auditors and their area of responsibility is
retained in Q‐Pulse computer system as a part of the Quality Assurance Records.
Responsibilities
Auditors:
a) comply with the applicable audit requirements
b) communicate and clarify audit requirements
c) plan and carry out assigned responsibilities effectively and efficiently
d) documents observations
e) report audit results
f) cooperate with and support the Lead Auditor and the Director Quality Assurance
g) retain and safeguard documents pertaining to the audit, by:
i) submitting such documents as required
ii) ensuring such documents remain confidential
iii) treating privileged information with discretion
Qualifications
Auditors shall:
a) have knowledge of the area of responsibility or receive training of audit technique of the
area
b) hold good knowledge of the continuing airworthiness management exposition (CAME),
operations manual (OM) and associated manuals relevant to the quality assurance system a
c) complete two audits under the supervision of a qualified auditor
Training
Auditors shall complete:
a) thorough introduction to the Quality System
b) a full quality audit training course
c) initial and continuation training in the area of human factors
Manuals can be either in a hard copy format, electronic format, or a combination of both, as
authorised by the ICAA. In such cases, an acceptable level of accessibility, usability and
reliability must be assured.
a) The Quality Manual is the sovereign manual for the organisation. It describes the
management function of the organisation and maintainance of quality with regards to
safety and security. The Quality Manual is published in accordance with EU‐OPS, JAR‐
FCL, EASA part‐145, EASA part‐M, Part‐66, ICAA rules and regulations and IOSA
standards. It is the responsibility of the Director Quality Assurance to maintain the
Quality Manual, on the authority of the CEO.
b) The Operations Manual (OM) contains instructions, procedures and information for
operations personnel employed in flight operations. It is published in accordance with
EU‐OPS, JAR‐FCL and ICAA rules and regulations. It is the responsibility of VP Flight
Operations to ensure the OM is maintained. The OM is divided into parts A, B, C and D.
d) The Emergency Response Plan (ERP) pertains to the whole operation. It contains
information on how to act to emergency situations. It is the responsibility of Head of
Emergency Response to maintain the Emergency Response Plan. Emergency Response
Plan comprises of:
e) The Security Manual contains all instructions, procedures and information related to
security. Parts of the security manual should be treated with confidentiality. It is the
responsibility of Head of Security to maintain the Security Manual.
The Editorial Group is an information sharing platform for those employees responsible for
publishing and distributing manuals within different departments in the organisation. It will serve as
an advisory committee and coordinate between departments every aspect of the editing and
publishing process.
Members of the group are employees in charge of editing, publishing and distributing organisation
manuals issued by their respective departments. The group has a chairperson whose sole
responsibility is to call the meetings and distribute minutes to group members. Meetings will be
held as required based on issues that come up.
The Group’s main responsibilities are to make sure that information in different manuals is not
contradictory, that manuals published by the company have a unified look and feel and that they
use a common terminology.
NOTE: The Group will NOT have responsibility for writing or evaluating the data in individual
manuals, only how it is presented and distributed and that it does not contradict other manuals.
The Group will establish a standard detailing the format and layout of manuals and documents
issued by the organisation. When new manuals or documents are created and issued within the
organisation, the Editorial Group shall be consulted for advice on the standardised look and feel.
1. to find solutions to various problems in publishing and distribution that come up and are
common to all.
2. to design a standard structure, format and layout of manuals and company forms.
3. to establish a controlled list of cross‐references between different manuals.
4. to map out all content that is the same in more than one manual and to establish a method
of controlling that when revised in one manual, others will be updated accordingly.
5. to evaluate the feasibility of streamlining data within the manuals.
The Editorial Group provides a focal point for employees and management to submit comments and
queries. The group’s e‐mail address is EditorialGroup@airatlanta.com.
When a revision is issued in a loose‐leaf format, all holders of the manual are responsible for
ensuring that any amendments or revisions issued by the organisation are correctly inserted and
recorded in their manual. The procedure for incorporating Normal and Temporary Revisions into
a loose leaf publication is outlined below.
Note: Temporary revisions may not apply to all manuals within the organisation
a) Creating manuals
Manuals should not be created without consent from the department head.
Folders are titled to each department on the central hard drive;
b) Maintaining manuals
Manuals are maintained on the central hard drives. When a manual is maintained,
user privilages are required;
c) Updating manuals
Manuals are updated on the organisation’s intranet and the central hard drives;
d) Identifying manuals
It should be easy to identify manuals within the central hard drive. All manuals are
clearly marked to avoid misunderstanding;
e) Accessing manuals
The organisation’s intranet can be used for accessing manuals. All personnel are
supplied with a login for the intranet for this purpose.
Hot drives (HD) are distributed to all maintenance personnel including all maintenance
manuals. As a backup all manuals are accessable on the organisation’s central hard
drives;
f) Retaining manuals
All manuals are retained on the organisation’s central hard drives, which are stored in
a secure facility;
g) Deleting manuals
When manuals need to be deleted they are stored in a folder marked: “delete”. The
folder is then reviewed by the Editorial Board prior to being permanently deleted.
Records are kept in paper form or on electronic format or a combination of both methods as
approved by the ICAA. All records must remain legible throughout the required retention
period.
Records can be stored either in a hard copy format or in electronic format as authorised by the
ICAA. In such cases, an acceptable level of accessibility, usability and reliability must be assured.
a) Creating records
Records can be scanned and imported into computerised systems, centralised hard drives or
created in the system by data entry;
b) Identifying records
Records must be clearly identified to avoid misplacement;
c) Accessing records
Access privilages are required to access record systems;
d) Retaining records
All records are retained on the organisations central hard drives, which are stored in a
secure facility. Retaining periods are defined in OM and CAME;
e) Deleting records
When records need to be deleted from the central hard drives they are stored in a folder
marked: “delete”. The folder is then reviewed by the editorial board prior to being
permanently deleted.
Records can be deleted from computerised databases and central hard drives when the
applicable retention period, as defined in OM and CAME, has lapsed.
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Description of the Quality System
3.9 Monitoring
3.1 Introduction
In order to show compliance with EU‐OPS, JAR‐FCL, EASA Part‐M, Part‐145, Part‐66 and ICAA
rules, requirements and regulations, as applicable and IOSA standards, the Organisation has
established a Quality System in accordance with the instructions and information in this manual.
The Director Quality Assurance leads the Quality Department. He provides leadership in assuring
the compliance with laws, regulations standards and procedures as appropriate to the operation
and implementation of Quality Management into the Organisation.
The Quality System includes all planned and systematic actions necessary to provide confidence
that company procedures are in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, requirements and
standards.
Content and publishing of the Quality Newsletter is the responsibility of the Director Quality
Assurance. The newsletter is published on bi‐annual basis.
3.3.1 General
In order to meet its objectives the organisation will ensure that the technical, administrative and
human factors affecting the quality of its services remain under control by utilising the quality
system. All such control should be oriented to provide the confidence that the Quality System
factors move towards the reduction/elimination, and most importantly prevention of non‐
conformance.
The Quality System is developed and operated for the purpose of implementing the
organisation’s Quality Policy.
The management is committed to operate an effective and suitable Quality System in order to:
The organisation’s Quality Manual is the primary document of the Quality System. Additionally
each department documents and maintains its own procedures.
The Quality System includes a feedback system to the CEO to ensure that corrective actions are
both identified and promptly addressed. The feedback system also specifies who is required to
rectify non compliance in each particular case, and the procedure to be followed if corrective
action is not completed within an appropriate time scale.
3.3.2.1 General
The manhour plan takes into account the anticipated upcoming three months work load, based
on audit schedule and routine tasks, taking into account previous manhours experience.
Auditsareperformedaccordingtoanauditschedule.Checklistsaredevelopedwithinthe
departmentfromthelatestindustryrequirements.Thedepartmentgathersevidencefrom
auditsandanalysesfindingsandactionsaswellasidentifyingrootcauses.Auditreportsand
summaryareusedtoevaluateprogresswithintheorganisationandtoensureclearobjectives
setbytheDirectorQualityAssurance.
3.4.1 Audit
Auditsaretoconfirm,inanobjectivefashion,compliancewithlaws,regulations,requirements
andanyadditionalstandardssetbythecompany.
AQualityAuditisasystematicandindependentprocesstoensurethatthedocumented
proceduresmatchtheactualworkingpractices.
AQualityAuditisusedtoconfirmthatpolicies,structures,facilities,resourcesandprocedures
remainrelevanttocompanyactivitiesandeffectiveinmaintainingstandards.
Independentauditwillincludeapercentageofrandomauditscarriedoutonasamplebasis
whenmaintenanceisbeingcarriedout.Thismeanssomeauditswillbecarriedoutduringthe
night.
ItistheresponsibilityofManagerAuditstoinitiateauditsaccordingtotheAuditSchedule.
3.4.1.1 AuditInitiation
Priortoinitiatinganaudit,theauditorshallpreparetheaudit,notifytheauditeeandtodelivera
scopeoftheaudittotheauditee.
3.4.1.2 ScheduledAudit
Auditsareusuallyperformedaccordingtotheorganisationsauditschedule.Itisthe
responsibilityofManagerAuditstoensurethatauditsareperformedaccordingtotheaudit
schedule.
3.4.1.3 UnscheduledAudit
Anunscheduledauditshallbeperformedifthroughmonitoringatrendisnoticedorstatistics
showthattasksarenotperformedinharmonywithdocumentedprocedures.
Unscheduledauditsmaybeperformedatanytimewithoutpriornotice.
Unscheduledauditsshallbeenteredontheauditschedule.
3.4.1.5 Auditor
The Auditor shall be free from bias and influences, which could affect objectivity. He shall not
have any day to day involvement in the area of the activity, which is to be audited. The Auditor
or audit team should have relevant operational and/or maintenance experience in the area to
be audited.
All employees of the organisation involved in an audit process must respect and support the
independence and integrity of the Auditor.
The organisation may undertake the monitoring of specific areas or activities by the use of part
time auditors within the organisation or from an external source under the terms of an
agreement acceptable to the ICAA.
3.4.1.6 Scope
The Quality Department verifies compliance with laws, regulations, requirements and the
organisation’s standards and procedures that have been designed to ensure safe operations,
airworthy aeroplanes and the serviceability of operational and safety equipment as applicable.
The Lead Auditor prepares the scope of the audit to be performed and forwards to the auditee
in due time prior to performing the audit.
3.4.1.7 Objectives
The objectives of the audit are to ensure the organisation is:
a) complying with regulatory and internal requirements
b) satisfying stated operational needs
c) identifying hazards, undesirable conditions and areas requiring improvement
Manager Audits decides, depending on the complexity of the audit, wheather to make use of a
dedicated audit team or a single Auditor.
Audit schedule is to define when an audit will be performed in a specified area.
If for some reason, a trend or statistics show that tasks are not performed in harmony with
documented procedures an unscheduled audit may be performed at any time and without
notice.
Follow up audits shall be performed, when Manager Audits deems necessary, to confirm that
corrective action was carried out and that it was effective in eliminating any reported findings.
Such follow‐up action will be entered on the audit schedule, but will not necessarily be
announced in advance to the auditee.
All areas within these requirements shall be covered within variable periods, ranging from 6 to
36 months as acceptable to the ICAA.
The Director Quality Assurance maintains an audit requirements list and the applicable
Postholder shall advise him of any changes to the organisation that affect the scope.
The audit schedule includes the intervals of all requirements to be audited. The schedule is
published every 12 calendar months and reviewed and updated every 2 calendar months. The
audit plan is published on the organisation’s intranet.
The current audit schedule is retained and stored by the Quality Assurance Department as a part
of the Quality Assurance Records.
The audit schedule is intended to be a live document. The Manager Audits may reschedule
audits as he sees fit, with the approval of the Director Quality Assurance. Typical reasons for
rescheduling audits may include Quality Department workload, interference with external
audits, unavailability of key staff, or other unforeseen events.
A department may request a re‐schedule of an audit. The Manager Audits will review such
requests. Care must be taken not to allow a postponement to extend the audit period beyond
the statutory 12 months limit (up to 36 months for suppliers as approved by the ICAA) without
the explicit approval if the ICAA.
Independent audits will sample check one product on each product line every 12 months as a
demonstration of the effectiveness of maintenance procedure compliance. Procedures and
product audits will be combined by selecting a specific product.
The Audit Schedule will include a percentage of random audits carried out on sample bases
when maintenance is being carried out. This means that some audits may be conducted during
the night, as necessary.
During audits all evidence provided by the auditee are gathered and included in the audit file
along with the audit report.
Data inspected will be either copied or referred to reflect the actual data being audited.
If discrepancies are noted in data or procedures during audits evidence is copied as applicable.
All findings raised (internal and external) are recorded in the QA database, classified and
forwarded to the VP responsible for the area being audited for processing.
The responsible VP resolves the findings by delegating the effort to a personnel that will be
responsible for resolving the finding. The VP is responsible for supplying sufficient resources to
the task in order to close the finding within the timeframe listed below.
The responsible personnel initiates recommendation in order to resolve the finding and shall be
named as responsible for actioning all stages of the finding.
The responsible personnel are responsible for timely closure of each stage.
Findings are categoriesed into three levels depending on their severity and impact on flight
safety.
Level 1 Is any significant non compliance considered to be a serious threat to flight safety. Non
compliances of this level shall be corrected prior to further operations.
Level 2 Is any non compliance that could lower the safety standard and poses a potential threat
to flight safety. Proposed corrective action must be submitted to the Quality
Department within 30 days from the date of finding. Corrective action to this level of
non compliances must be completed and submitted within 90 days from the same
reference date.
Level 3 Is any findings that has the potential to be a non compliance, affecting the regularity or
efficiency of the operation, but is not non compliance to established standard or of
regulatory nature. These findings are not considered to have detrimental affect on flight
safety. However, corrective action must be reported within 90 days from the date of
finding.
During root cause analysis the responsible personnel shall study the root cause of the non
compliance, which can be in multiple areas. He shall then relay his results through the QA
database. His proposed corrective action shall be based on the results of the root cause analysis.
The responsible personnel shall consider if the non compliance has occurred before and if there
is a possibility that the same non compliance can be found in other areas within the
organisation.
a) Procedures
i. are procedures not followed because they are not correctly described/defined
ii. is the non compliance caused by absence of procedures
b) Culture
i. is the organisation culture causing the non compliance
c) resources
i. is there a lack of available staff to perform the task
ii. is there a lack of tools, equipment, software etc.
d) training
i. is lack of training an obvious reason for the non compliance
ii. is quality of training adequate
e) personnel competence
i. is the person assigned to the function not qualified to perform the task
f) human factors
i. working environment
ii. communication
iii. Hardware
iv. Software
v. liveware
After root cause has been determined, enter the results in the QA database.
This proposed corrective action plan shall be aimed at eliminating the identified cause of the
non compliance to prevent possible recurrence.
If proposed corrective action is insufficient the stage will be reopened and responsible person
will be notified with reason for the rejection and new due date.
The proposed corrective action is subject to approval from the quality department.
After the acceptance of proposed corrective action, the Quality Assurance forwards the
proposed corrective action to the external audit entity for acceptance. After receiving the
acceptance of the proposed corrective action the stage will be closed in the QA Database.
If corrective action is considered insufficient the corrective action stage will be reopened and
responsible person will be notified with reason for the rejection and new due date.
If corrective action is insufficient the corrective action stage will be reopened and responsible
person will be notified with reason for the rejection and new due date.
After the acceptance of corrective action, the Quality Assurance forwards the corrective action
to the external audit entity for acceptance. After receiving the acceptance of the corrective
action the finding will be closed in the QA Database.
If corrective action is considered insufficient the corrective action stage will be reopened and
responsible person will be notified with reason for the rejection and new due date.
3.4.4.9 Properties
All applicable supporting documents are scanned and attached under the properties tab.
After evaluation of the request, and if satisfied, the quality department may grant an extension
for up to a maximum of 90 days.
In the unlikely event the responsible personnel can still not close the finding, he shall submit a
formal request for any additional extension to the CEO. The CEO will decide on the extended
time granted in cooperation with Director Quality Assurance.
For extension requests on findings raised during external audits, the Quality Department will
consult with the applicable audit entity before granting an extension.
The CEO reviews the information on CA not taken and initiates any management action
necessary to ensure compliance with the Quality System.
The report shall then be filed in the quality department by the Lead Auditor with any evidence
collected during the audit.
b) the auditors
c) the auditee(s)
d) date of the audit
e) Place and area audited
f) scope of the audit
g) what was checked
h) any findings raised
To ensure that corrective actions are both identified and promptly addressed the CEO is notified
when corrective action is not completed within an appropriate timescale.
The CEO receives a report on a monthly basis including all open and overdue findings.
The following records shall be retained and easily retrievable for a period of five years:
a) audit schedules
b) quality inspection and audit reports
c) responses to findings raised internally and externally
d) corrective action reports
e) follow up / verification and closure reports
f) management evaluation reports
g) quality system training documents
h) recommendation reports
It is the responsibility of the Director Quality Assurance to maintain the quality assurance
records.
The ultimate responsibility for the contracted product or services always remains with the
organisation.
Special cases There are several providers of services whom the organisation does not have
the practical ability to audit or otherwise monitor. These include
Jeppesen,Boeing, ATC Services and so forth. There are deemed acceptable
based on industry standards, and not subjected to monitoring by the
organisation.
Selection/acceptance of suppliers that have or may have direct impact on the organisation‘s
area of responsibility is based on their ability to supply product in accordance with industry
accepted standards. In this context, ground handling organisations may be regarded as
approved as a consequence of their certification by a recognised national authority.
When the organisation signs a contract to provide services to other airlines or organisations,
respective Postholder is responsible to ascertain that all supplier oriented activity that has or
may have direct impact on the organisation‘s area of responsibility is evaluated or accepted.
Customer organisations which provide services such as ground handling through a sub‐
contractor shall be considered accepted/approved by the organisation.
The existence of such agreements between customer organisation and the sub contractor may
thus replace the necessity of a contract between the organisation and the sub contractor.
Provided sub contractors are under audit control by the customer organisation, the customer
organisation shall be audited and a copy of the audit report, or a statement from the customer
airline quality department shall be requested, to confirm that the service provider is under audit
control and they fulfill their audit requirements.
As the responsibility for the service of the sub contractor remains with the operator, the
organisation reserves the right to review any such contract in order to ensure that the sub
contractor has the necessary authorisation/approval required and commands the resources and
competence to undertake the task.
All ground operations and related services provided by suppliers may be subject to review or
audit by quality department.
Contractor
Any entity which is approved by their own authority to perform maintenance work and
regulated by that authority (EASA‐145 Approval)
Sub‐Contractor
Any entity which is not EASA‐145 approved and is providing services for the organisation. This
work is by default the responsibility of the organisation and subject to the organisation‘s quality
system.
a) specifies, in measurable terms, the services the external provider is expected to perform
b) becomes the basis for monitoring of the performance of the external service provider by the
organisation
All external agreements made on behalf of the organisation shall be reviewed by the following,
as applicable:
Each supplier used by the organisation must be assessed and appropriately categorised. This
categorisation is very important as suppliers are certainly not all created equal. Some suppliers
have through the performance of their duties, the ability to greatly affect the safety, regularity
and legality/ regulatory compliance of operations. Others have only a minor impact as their
work is monitored and subjected to receiving inspections. Yet others have little affected on the
operations.
All suppliers selected by the organisation which fall into categories 1 and 2 must be registered in
the QA database and subjected to monitoring by the organisation. Category 3 suppliers do not
need to be listed.
Each department within the organisation is responsible for receiving their products and
establishing a receiving inspection process. The process shall include evaluation on the supplier,
the product or a combination of both.
Any results from such inspections shall be retained with the Quality Department as part of the
quality assurance records.
The CEO is responsible for initiating management evaluation in coordination with Director
Quality Assurance. The CEO shall chair the meeting and appoint one of the participants as
secretary who shall document the meeting.
The Director Quality Assurance shall prepare a documented report summarising Quality System
activity since the previous evaluation.
The document, which acts as a part of the agenda for the meeting, shall be forwarded to the
planned participants at least two working days before the evaluation.
Participants shall be given opportunity to discuss the report prepared by the Director Quality
Assurance and forward any other recommendations and observations as appropriate.
3.8.2 Agenda
The management evaluation consists of analysing audit reports, status of non‐conformance,
corrective action to ensure the overall effectiveness of the organisation’s management in
achieving stated goals and objectives. A management evaluation shall identify and correct
trends which result from quality inspections, audits and any other indications to prevent, where
possible, future non conformities.
TheparticipantsintheManagementEvaluationare:
a) CEO
b) DirectorQualityAssurance
c) VPFlightOperations(PostholderFlightOps)
d) VPMaintenance(PostholderTechnical)
e) DirectorFlightSafety
f) PostholderTraining
g) PostholderGroundOps
h) othermanagementpersonnelinvitedasappropriate
3.8.4 Conclusion
Conclusionsandrecommendationsmadeasaresultofanevaluationshallbesubmittedin
writingtotheapplicablepostholderforaction.
3.9 Monitoring
Monitoring of the organisation enables the Quality Department to monitor compliance with EU‐
OPS, JAR‐FCL, EASA Part‐M, Part‐145, Part‐66 and ICAA rules, requirements and regulations, as
applicable, OM, CAME, requirements from customers and other standards followed by the
organisation, to ensure safe operation and airworthy aircraft.
The aim of monitoring within the Quality System is primarily to investigate and judge its
effectiveness and thereby to ensure that defined policy and company standards are
continuously complied with.
The Director Quality Assurance shall verify that the postholder in response to any finding of non
compliance takes corrective action and monitors the implementation and completion of the
corrective action.
The Quality Assurance Programme includes procedures to ensure that corrective actions are
taken in response to findings. This includes externally raised findings (ICAA and Customer
Airlines). These Quality Assurance procedures monitor such actions to verify their effectiveness
and that they have been completed.
The CEO is ultimately responsible for providing necessary resources thus ensuring, through the
Director Quality Assurance, that the corrective action has re‐established compliance with the
standards required by the ICAA, and any additional requirements defined by the organisation.
All maintenance and operations personnel will receive training, relevant to their function,
covering:
a) the concept of quality assurance
b) quality management
c) an introduction to the quality system
d) CAME and /or OM procedures relevant to the function of personnel
e) introduction to regulatory requirements
Management personnel
All management personnel within the organisation shall receive an introduction to the quality
system.
Quality department personnel
Every individual involved with the Quality Department shall receive training according to the
scope of their work. Those who are involved in quality assurance work mandated by EASA or
ICAA rules and regulations, such as auditors, shall receive training covering:
4 Policies
Rev. 6 Policies
QUALITY MANUAL
4 Policies
Policies are structured and established by the senior management of the company. Policies are
then published in this section of the Quality Manual and are effective from the date of
publication.
The main objective with all activities of Air Atlanta Icelandic is to carry out air transport with aircraft that
are operated, equipped and maintained as described in our established standards and are reflected in our
Company manuals. These standards are not only based on rules and regulations from the European
Union, European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), and the Icelandic Civil Aviation Administration (ICAA),
but they are also based on our own requirements and they are, where possible, adjusted to our customer
needs.
When it comes to safety and quality, Air Atlanta Icelandic places emphasis on the following:
Due to the nature of our business, and widespread operations worldwide, the requirements of safety and
quality are of utmost importance. Therefore, Air Atlanta Icelandic will base all its organizational activities
on modern Quality Assurance principles to meet the requirements of internal control.
Internal control means that the following functions have been implemented as a part of our Company
culture through policies and procedures, where:
In general terms, this means that the management of Air Atlanta Icelandic has the responsibility to plan,
develop, document and to follow up in their area of responsibility, but this is the basis of the Quality
Assurance System and Air Atlanta Icelandic’s continuous improvement scheme.
It is Air Atlanta Icelandic's management responsibility to set the standards for all activities within the
Company and to monitor that these standards are followed. Within their defined areas of responsibility, all
employees have their own responsibility according to the established standards and to report any
deviations to Director Safety / Director Quality, as applicable.
__________________
Hannes Hilmarsson,
Accountable Manager
Air Atlanta Icelandic
4.2.1 General
Air Atlanta Icelandic considers all its employees the company’s most valuable asset.
Air Atlanta’s objective is to have competent, trustworthy, flexible, enthusiastic and well trained
personnel, who are capable of holding responsibility and participate fully in the company’s
progress in a global and demanding environment.
4.2.2 Recruitment
When recruiting new personnel, in‐house database is searched, worked with hiring agencies or
it is advertised. Recruitment of new employees will be based on professional procedures
regarding position and requirements for different positions regardless of gender. Recruitment
will follow formal internal procedures. The contract is confidential between Air Atlanta and new
personnel and is on trial bases for 3‐6 months.
All personnel who perform operationally critical functions shall be physically and mentally fit for
duty. Positions or functions within the organisation considered “operationally critical” are those
that have the potential to affect operational safety or security. This definition includes any
positions or functions that may affect the airworthiness of aircraft.
Any individual suffering from potentially serious mental conditions is able to disclose his
condition under terms of confidentiality with VP Human Resources. The individual will then be
suspended from performing safety related duties while undergoing appropriate treatment.
Stefán Eyjólfsson
Vice President Human Resources & Administration
5 Procedures
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Procedures
5.2.1 [Procedure moved to 3.4.2]
5.2.2 [Procedure moved to 3.4.4]
5.2.3 Quality Assurance Records Procedure
5.2.4 Unscheduled Audit Procedure
5.2.5 [Procedure moved to 3.8]
5.2.6 Sub Contractor Evaluation Procedure
Rev. 5 Procedures
QUALITY MANUAL
5 Procedures
5.1 Introduction
Procedures are structured and established by the management of the company. Procedures are
then published in this section of the Quality Manual and are effective from the date of
publication.
5.2 Procedures
1. Responsibility
It is the responsibility of the Director Quality Assurance to ensure that all records relating to the Quality
System are stored and maintained for a minimum of five (5) years.
2. Assemblage
The following company records are considered a part of the Quality Assurance Records:
a) audit schedules
b) quality inspection reports
c) quality System Training records
d) management evaluation reports
e) audit records
f) responses to findings raised internally and externally
g) corrective action reports
h) follow‐up / Verification and closure reports
i) recommendation reports
Auditors shall forward originals of all audit reports, non compliance reports (NCR), audit checklists and
all other records to the Quality Assurance Department for processing and storage.
The Auditor retains copies of all records forwarded until such a time that the Quality Assurance
Department has confirmed receipt of the originals. The confirmation of receipt can be by facsimile or e‐
mail.
3. Storage
The Quality Assurance Department maintains a file of all Quality Assurance records. The hard‐copy file
shall be stored in a lockable filing cabinet ensuring limited access.
Audit files are divided into internal and external audits in chronological order by the date of the audit.
The Quality Assurance Department maintains computer records of all audits in a format that allows data
to be analysed and statistical information easily presented to Management and the ICAA.
Access to Quality System Software is limited to the Quality Assurance Department personnel and as
necessary other personnel required to respond to non compliances. Access is restricted by passwords
allocated by the Director Quality Assurance.
5. Software Backup
To secure data in case of hardware failure or unplanned deletion of software and files, a backup is
automatically taken once every 24 hours.
1.0 Purpose:
Responsible manager
YES YES
requests new target
date?
YES YES
NO NO
CAPA is closed by auditor. CAPA is closed by auditor.
Director Quality Assurance
advises Accountable
Manager that actions have
not been effective.
Accountable Manager
decides what further
actions are taken.
1.1 Description:
If for some reasons, a trend or statistics show that tasks are not performed in harmony with
documented procedure an unscheduled audit may be performed at any time without notice.
1.2 Responsibility:
1.3 Procedure:
If repeated non‐conformance of specific standard or area is noted Director Quality Assurance may
schedule and audit of the area or standard without notification.
1.4 Definition:
1. Applicability
Suppliers are in this context organisations or individuals providing services relating to Aircraft
Maintenance and Flight Operations/Ground Operations related services. Due to the variety and nature
of services, different approach to evaluation of services rendered may be applicable.
Supplier services are those services that are provided by organisations that are EASA Part 145 approved
organisations. Evaluation of EASA Part 145 approved Maintenance Organisation is described in CAME
2.1.1 and 2.1.2.
Sub‐contracted services are those services that are provided by organisations that are not EASA Part 145
approved organisations. Evaluation of non‐EASA part 145 approved Maintenance Organisation is
described in CAME 2.1.3.
Full Flight Simulators used by AAI require the approval of the ICAA and are listed in Appendix A of the
Flight Crew Training Manual. Fixed Base Simulators, CBT (Computer Based Training), classroom and
other facilities’ requirement criteria is also set forth in Appendix A of the Flight Crew Training Manual.
Supplier provided services in this context are those services that are normally supplied by locally
positioned organisations, typically Ground Handling Organisations, computer flight plan providers etc.
Selection/acceptance of suppliers that have or may have direct impact on Air Atlanta Icelandic’s area of
responsibility is based on their ability to supply product in accordance with industry accepted standards.
In this context, Ground Handling Organisations may be regarded as approved as a consequence of their
certification by a recognised national authority.
When AAI signs a contract to provide services to other airlines or organisations, respective Post Holder is
responsible to ascertain that all supplier oriented activity that has or may have direct impact on AAI’s
area of responsibility is evaluated or accepted. Evaluation of Ground Handling Organisation may be
through consulting of reputable publications such as IATA Airport Handling Manual or Quality Assurance
Department audit.
Agreements between Air Atlanta Customer Airlines (AACA) and organisations providing AACA with
services such as Ground Handling (the "sub‐contractor"), shall be considered accepted/approved by AAI.
The existence of such agreements between AACA and the sub‐contractor may thus replace the necessity
of a contract between AAI and the sub‐contractor. As the responsibility for the service of the sub‐
contractor remains with the operator, AAI reserves the right to review any such contract in order to
ensure that the sub‐contractor has the necessary authorisation/approval required and commands the
resources and competence to undertake the task.
All Flight/Ground operations and related services provided by suppliers may be subject to review or
audit by Quality Assurance Department. In order to plan its oversight obligation activity:
• Director Quality Assurance is a member of in‐house e‐mail group “Administration” where
corporate activity is discussed and projects announced.
The scope of the evaluation/audit is dependant on the contracted services. All evaluation/audit activity
is conducted according to Quality Manual Chapter 3.4.1 and 3.5.1.
Items for evaluation/audit typically include but are not limited to:
The Director Quality Assurance decides on the extent and level of auditing or monitoring required in
each case, depending on the service/product provided.
ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS:
6 Forms
Rev. 5 Forms
FORM
2. Candidate Information
2.1 Name: 2.2 Empl. no.: 2.3 3 L Code:
3. Licence details
3.1 Licence Type 3.2 Issuing country 3.3 Licence Number 3.4 Issue Date 3.5 Expire Date
INSTRUCTIONS:
The form is completed by the Director Quality Assurance prior to issuing a PART-145 Authorisation to a technician for the
first time with Air Atlanta Icelandic.
6. Required forms and documents: Ensure that all listed records and forms are in the individual's file.
Personnel Assessment
This form is used by each department Director/Deputy when assessing their department staff with Air Atlanta Icelandic. This form shall be
signed by Relevant Director/Deputy when satisfied that all documentation meets the required standards and the candidate has
demonstrated the required knowledge.
2. Candidate Information
2.1 Name: 2.2 Empl. No: 2.3 3L Code:
3. Training details
3.1 Type of training as appl. 3.2 Location 3.3 Period Comments:
CAME/In-house procedures
I hereby certify that the candidate has completed OJT and I hereby certify that the candidate's qualifications records
demonstrated adequate competence and capability in meet the required standards and is released for
performing his/hers duties. unsupervised work.
Name: Name:
Signature Signature
NOTE: This form and any qualification and training records shall be placed in employee file at QA Department.
FORM
Q-002
Revision 1
Assessment of Personnel
15 Aug 2005
Page 2 of 2
INSTRUCTIONS:
The form is completed by Nominated Personnel performing the assessment and Relevant Director as indicated by the
abbreviations in parenthesis.
Please provide information on your work experience for at least the last 24 months (Air Atlanta Icelandic and other employers).
Please scan and e-mail to: hqquality@airatlanta.com or fax to +354-458 4501. Send original by mail.
4
3 Period
Base 4 4
Type of work 5 Aircraft types 6 Name of Supervisor 7
From (DD/MM/YY) To (DD/MM/YY)
Signature
FORM
Maintenance Personnel Training and
Qualifications Record Q-004
Revision 0
Computer generated report 01 Mar 2005
Q-004 is printed out of CRS Record in Access database, controlled by Director Quality Assurance. This sample
is typical and may change without notice as system is developed.
FORM
Form Q-007 is printed from a database. Below is a rendering from a PDF print-out of the form. The form may
change somewhat in layout without notice as the system is developed.
FORM
One Off Authorisation Q-009
PART-145 Release to Service Authorisation Revision 1
12 May 2006
AAI
Purpose
This One-Off authorisation may be used when maintenance/repair/rectification and inspection actions need to be carried out
at a location not supported by Air Atlanta Icelandic or a PART-145 organisation with the necessary cababilities.
The Director Quality Assurance or his deputy will grant approval for the One-Off authorisation in accordance with Procedure
as laid out in CAME 3.4.5.
Authorisation
to
Instructions
After completion of the repair/rectification/inspection, the One-Off Authorisation holder must record the appropriate details in
the “Action Taken” block of the Aircraft Journey and Technical Log.
In addition the holder must identify him/her self by signature and the Single-Event Authorisation Number in the “Certification”
block.
The Single-Event Authorisation holder must also identify his/her company name and 3-/4-Letter Code within the “Action
Taken” block.
1)
2)
3)
4)
FORM
Checklist Q-011
Opening a New Line Station Revision 1
Page 1 of 5
Air Atlanta Icelandic – Hlidasmari 3 – IS-201 Kopavogur – Iceland – Tel: +354 458 4000 – Fax: 354 458 4001
REMARKS
I Aircraft to be operated
III Contacts
IV Personnel
REMARKS
V Office Facilities
REMARKS
VII Tools and Equipment
REMARKS
VIII Maintenance Library
Maintenance Data
Hot Drive (Check revision status)
Illustrated Part Catalogue (Aircraft)
Illustrated Part Catalogue (Engine)
Aircraft Maintenance Manual (Aircraft)
Engine Maintenance Manual (Engine)
Aircraft Wiring Manual
Structural Repair Manual
Standard Practices Manual
Fault Isolation Manual (if applicable)
Trouble Shooting Manual (if applicable)
CAME Continuing Airworthiness Manual
ETOPS Maintenance Manual (if applicable)
BITE Built-In Test Manual (recommended if
applicable)
Schematics Manual (recommended)
Maintenance Forms
Log Book System
M-001 Aircraft Journey and Technical Log
M-002 Defect Continuation/Non-Routine
M-003 Aircraft Cabin Technical Log
M-004 Deferred Maintenance Item
M-005 DMI Inoperative Stickers
M-022 Engine Condition Monitoring
M-043 Aircraft Fuelling Form
P-005 Serviceable Sticker
P-010 Inspection Sticker
P-014 Unsalvageable Tag
P-016 SOS Tag
P-017 Unserviceable Tag
P-018 Quarantine tag
P-020 Calibrated Label
P-021 Do Not Use Until Tested & Calibrated
P-027 Removed Part
Q-050 Air Safety Report
P-020 Calibrated Label
IX Findings
Reference Level Descriptions
I hereby recommend opening of line station as it meets the requirements of CAME L2.1
XI Change of Approval
REMARKS
Signature:
Director Line Maintenance / Manager Line Maintenance
Signature:
Director Line Maintenance / Manager Line Maintenance
FORM
Q-030
Non-Conformance Report Revision 0
1 Mar 2005
Page 1 of 1
NC details
Signature: ___________________________
(Auditor)
CA – Corrective action
PA – Preventive action
Project: Date:
Department/Station Page of
Item
Requirement/Check Point Standard/Procedure Activity Compliance
No.
Observation / Comments:
FORM
Feedback Reporting on Q-035
Revision 0
Internal Procedures 01 Mar 2005
Page 1 of 1
Provide a brief description of the change requested and the reason required. Attach supporting documentation
including marked up copies of affected pages.
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
The change requested has been reviewed and is /is not acceptable for incorporation into the manuals noted above at
their next revision.
No.
General Information
Sub-Contractor’s name:
Location:
Tel.: Fax:
e-mail: SITA:
Product/Service
Sub-Contractors Performance:
Initial Evaluation: References
Review Method:
Re-Audit: Date/s:
No Comments:
____________________________ ______________________
Director Quality Assurance Signature Date
FORM
Facility: Position:
E-mail:
Division of:
Expiration date:
Regulatory Agency Certificates Certificate Number: (dd/mm/yy)
EASA Approval
FAA Approval
Please submit the following documents with your reply YES NO N/A
YES NO N/A
YES NO N/A
12. Does the company have a procedure to review rejected parts and to
return them to the owner, or to mutilate them to the extent that they
cannot be restored and returned to service?
15. Does repair station roster identify all supervisory and inspection
personnel and all personnel authorized for return-to-service?
16. Are records of all OJT and formal training of mechanics, repairmen,
inspectors and supervisors maintained on file?
18. Does the company issue serviceable tags (FAA 8130, EASA Form
ONE, or other National Approval) [delete as required] or fcontaining
a maintenance release?
YES NO N/A
21. Does the company have a procedure to ensure that current OEM
technical data is used for all pertinent operations?
The data furnished herein is applicable to the execution of contracts and filling of orders from Air Atlanta
Icelandic. Air Atlanta Icelandic will be notified of any re-location or transfer of operations, or of any changes in
the quality organisation or procedures which effect availability of supplies or compliance with Air Atlanta
Icelandic requirements or procedures.
Please submit this data with all required documents attached to:
Remarks:
SYSTEM REFERENCE
2. DATE OF OCCURRENCE 3. TIME UTC 4. A/C TYPE 5. REGISTRATION 6. TECH. LOG. REF. (M-001)
DD MM YY Log. Page No. Item No.
10. FLIGHT NO / CALL SIGN 11. SECTOR 12. SQUAWK 13. FUEL JETTISONED 14. ETOPS
15. ALTITUDE 16. SPEED / KNOTS 17. A/C WEIGHT 18. PASSENGERS / CREW
FL / FT KG.
17. FLIGHT PHASE 18. AIRPORT + STAND
TOWING TAXI-OUT CLIMB HOLDING LANDING
PARKED TAKE-OFF CRUISE APPROACH TAXI-IN 19. GEOG. POSITION / CO-ORDS FIR.
BELOW 1500 FT
PUSHBACK INITIAL CLIMB DESCENT MAINT. CHECK
BELOW 1500 FT
27. EVENT DESCRIPTION (A description of the event, what caused it and actions taken.)
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
DELAY IF ANY
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Mark passage of another aircraft relative to you, in plan on the left and in elevation on the right, assuming YOU are at the centre of each
diagram. Indicate appropriate scale.
View from above (horizontal plane: meters or NM View from astern (vertical plane: feet).
Cleared ALTITUDE / FL* ........................................ TCAS alert was: NECESSARY USEFUL NUISANCE
What made you suspect wake turbulence? FLIGHT CREW hand to: Lead Technician / Station Manager / Duty Officer
Call Flight Safety for further instructions if needed, phone: +354 458 4520
UNAIRWORTHY CONDITIONS
(Reported by Maintenance)
1. Serious cracks, permanent deformation, burning or seri- 3. Failure of a life limited component before completion of
ous corrosion or failure of structure of the aircraft or en- the full life of the component.
gine. 4. Any failure, malfunction or defect that is a result of comply-
2. Failure of any emergency system during scheduled test- ing with an AD or SB.
ing.
OCCURRANCES
(Reported by Flight Crew, Maintenance and/or other personnel, as applicable)
1. When a SYSTEM DEFECT occurs which adversely affects the 19. Whenever a GO-AROUND or a WINDSHEAR GO-AROUND is
handling characteristics of the aircraft or renders it unfit to fly. flown.
2. When DOUBLE Aircraft SYSTEM Failure Occurs. 20. Whenever a GPWS WARNING occurs.
3. Flameout, shutdown or significant MALFUNCTION of any EN- 21. Whenever STALL WARNING occurs.
GINE. 22. When a HEAVY LANDING CHECK is required.
4. When there is warning of FIRE or SMOKE, or when fire, explo- 23. When serious LOSS OF BRAKING occurs.
sion, smoke, toxic, or noxious fumes occur.
24. When the AEROPLANE IS EVACUATED.
5. TECHNICAL document ERROR that could endanger aircraft
safety. 25. When the aircraft lands with FINAL RESERVE FUEL OR LESS
remaining.
6. When an EMERGENCY is declared.
26. When an AIRPROX (Air miss) or ATC INCIDENT or WAKE
7. When SAFETY EQUIPMENT or PROCEDURES are defective TURBULANCE event occurs.
or inadequate.
27. When significant TURBULENCE or WINDSHEAR is encountered
8. When deficiencies occur in any OPERATING PROCEDURES or
or other SEVERE WEATHER.
MANUALS
28. When crew or passengers are SERIOUSLY ILL, INJURED or
9. When there is incorrect LOADING of fuel, cargo or livestock, or become INCAPACITATED.
DANGEROUS GOODS, or a significant LOADSHEET error.
29. When there is difficulty in controlling VIOLENT, ARMED or IN-
10. When OPERATING STANDARDS are degraded due to deficient TOXICATED passengers or when the passengers RESTRAINT
GROUND SUPPORT facilities. KIT is used.
11. When GROUND DAMAGE occurs.
30. When TOILET SMOKE DETECTORS are activated or vandal-
12. When a REJECTED TAKE-OFF is executed after take-off power ized.
is established. 31. When an act of aggression, e.g. passengers or HI-JACK oc-
13. When an EXCURSION occurs, if any part of the aeroplane leaves curs.
the paved surface during taxying, take-off or landing. 32. When SECURITY procedures are breached.
14. When significant HANDLING DIFFICULTIES are experienced.
33. When BIRD STRIKE or other FOREIGN OBJECT DAMAGE oc-
15. When a NAVIGATION ERROR occurs involving a significant de- curs.
viation from the intended track. 34. Any event where SAFETY STANDARDS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY
16. When a HEIGHT CONTROL error of more then 300 feet occurs. REDUCED occurs.
17. When there is an EXCEEDANCE of the LIMITING PARAMETERS 35. When TCAS resolution advisory occurs.
for the AEROPLANE CONFIGURATION or when a significant
36. Any event which may provide USEFUL INFORMATION FOR THE
UNINTENTIONAL SPEED CHANGE occurs.
ENHANCEMENT OF FLIGHT SAFETY.
18. When COMMUNICATIONS fail or are impaired. 37. When the aircraft did not LAND at PLANNED destination.
F I L E I M M E D I AT E LY
Complete 1 to 6
Complete 17 Flight Phase 9 Transit Damage: Part was damaged during transport.
26. Ground Found: Ocurrences and Unairworthy Conditions 9 Incorrect Part Supplied: Incorrect part supplied to maintenance
Conditions found or events occurring while aircraft is being facility / line station.
maintained or is under control of maintenance and endangered 9 Incorrect Part / Fluid Used: Inncorrect parts installed or fluids
or could endanger aircraft airworthiness or safety. used during maintenance.
Complete as follows:
9 Incorrect Assembly / Installation: Part found to be incorrectly
9 Name of reporting technician, three/four letter code, assembled during receiving or installation, or part incorrectly in-
station and shift. stalled. Cross out not applicable.
9 Significant Damage / Deterioration: Hot bleed air leaks result- 9 U/S on Fit: Part tagged as serviceable was unserviceable on
ing in damage. Failure of life limited components. Damage, cracks, installation.
fractures, corrosion, delamination to a primary structure that
exceeds SRM limitations. 9 DMI Raised: DMI number if raised.
9 A/C Docs out of Compliance: Error in technical documents or 9 Component description, Part number, Serial number of
maintenance procedures. components involved.
9 Spillage Causing Hazard to A/C: Contamination of aircraft 9 ATA Code (chapter) of system or component.
structure, system or equipment resulting from baggage or cargo. 9 Tag No.: Identification reference of Serviceable tag or other certi-
9 Significant System Failure: A failure of an aircraft system/ fication document.
component or emergency system/equipment during testing or main-
27. Event Description
tenance.
Brief summary of event/finding. See instructions for “27. Event
9 Parts Missing in Flight: Parts of aircraft seperating from aircraft Description” in Flight Crew section above.
in flight.
9 Result of AD or Alert SB: The event or finding was a result of an 29. Lead Technician’s report
AD or Alert SB complied with. Any addition to a flight crew or technicians report.