Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brandon Reitz
NDT TECHNOLOGY MANAGER
Agenda
1
Phased Array &
2
Advanced
3
Case Studies
Conventional UT Techniques
2.0”
Phased Array
7.5 MHz – 32 Element
40-75° Sectoral
Full coverage of the weld
Conventional
5 MHz – 0.500”
60°
Requires rastering
Conventional UT
Phased Array UT
Tri-
Lateral
Phased
Array
Full Matrix Capture (FMC): each element in Plane Wave Imaging (PWI): all or groups
the phased array probe is pulsed individually elements are excited simultaneously (like
while all elements receive the signals, creating conventional phased array) while the returning
a matrix of elementary A-scans signals are “listened to” by all elements
Total Focusing Method: Reconstructs the Phase Coherence Imaging (PCI): uses the
elementary A-scans generated from FMC or phase distribution of normalized A-scans to
PWI pixel by pixel, differentiating areas of high identify high levels of coherence, advantageous
amplitude (defect) from areas of low amplitude for identifying small defects in noisy materials
Source: https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/white-papers/phase-
coherence-imaging-for-flaw-detection/
Source: https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/insight/tfm-resources/
Copyright © 2023. Gecko Robotics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Contains confidential information. Do not distribute.
Processing PCI Data
In standard TFM both Amplitude
Delay-and-Sum (TFM)
Phase and Amplitude are
calculated into the
resulting images
Amplitude is removed
leaving only the Phase
Phase
information to process (PCI)
into a TFM image
Manual UT Phased Array
Data Imaging
Comparison
ID-connected cracking in a single
V carbon steel weld
TFM PCI
Copyright © 2023. Gecko Robotics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Contains confidential information. Do not distribute.
Advantages of TFM/PCI
• Increased POD • Improved sizing, sensitivity, and
characterization of defects
• High resolution imaging without the need to
configure the focusing or aperture • Basic image is easier to understand
TFM PCI
Challenge
Out of service vessel, used for technician qualification
• 2002: HIC & H blisters first identified (manual SWUT)
• Annual inspection schedule following FFS
• Slow growth and stepwise cracking found over time
• 2020: Vessel removed from service
Solution
Deployment of TriLat robotically
FMC with TFM and PCI Imaging
Result
No step-wise cracking.
Extensive laminations, but no HIC indications
Copyright © 2023. Gecko Robotics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Contains confidential information. Do not distribute.
Defect 1
Defect: 1
Depth: 4.5mm from OD
Dimension: 13mm x 63mm
Characterization: Lamination
Tri-Lateral PAUT
0°L/30°L/45°S
C-Scans Defect 2
Defect: 2
Depth: 6.98mm from OD
Dimension: 11mm x 66mm
Characterization: Hydrogen Blister
Defect: 3
Depth: 4.29mm from OD Defect 3
Dimension: 10mm x 61mm
Characterization: Lamination
Defect: 1
Depth: 4.5mm from OD
Dimension: 13mm x 63mm
Characterization: Lamination
FMC Data
TFM 0° (L-L)
PCI 0° (L-L)
Defect: 2
Depth: 6.98mm from OD
Dimension: 11mm x 66mm
Characterization: Hydrogen Blister
Defect: 3
Depth: 4.29mm from OD
Dimension: 10mm x 61mm
Characterization: Lamination
Challenge
Non-intrusive inspection pre-TAR to monitor H blistering
Inspection history:
• 2012: Tri-Plex AUT, identified H blistering
• 2018: Tri-Plex AUT, no growth in blistering
• 2021: Tri-Plex AUT, no growth in blistering
Solution
2022: TriLat and PAUT weld inspection deployed robotically
TriLat with TFM and PCI Imaging
Result
Significant HIC and weld-adjacent SOHIC found
2023: Removed from service and replaced
TriLat 0° PA
TriLat 0° TFM
TriLat 0° PCI
Tri-Lateral
TriLat 0° PA
TriLat 0° TFM
TriLat 0° PCI
Tri-Lateral