George McMillan

Mass Migration and

the “Seven P Plan” of the Left

Special Report — G3Insights.com January 23, 2024
Mass Migration and

the “Seven P Plan” of the Left

George McMillan

Preface — the overarching fact pattern 3

Introduction 4

Game Theory Modeling 5

RABPC Modeling 5

Fabian Socialists 6

Rational Choice Modeling and the “7 P Plan” 8

The First “P” — the Professors 8

Second “P” — the Priests 9

The Third “P” — the Press 9

Failed Marxist Experiments 9

The Fourth “P” — the Prosecutors 11

The Fifth “P” — the Politicians 11

The Sixth “P” — the Police 11

The Seventh “P” — the Parents 12

The “Transformation of America” 13

G3Insights 2
Preface — the overarching fact pattern associated with Fourth World failed states.
The overarching fact pattern of technology and This series of correlations between the three
population growth through history was presented macro behavioral frameworks of Aristotle’s Six
by 1992 economics Nobel laureate Robert F. Forms of Government, the per capita gross
Fogel. The two primary trends of technology and national product ratio depicting economic
population growth over time are part of the growth rates of change and population growth
fundamental atmospheric conditions that all rates of change as they relate to the gradations of
countries are operating in. Furthermore these First, Second, Third, and Fourth World Countries,
two primary trends beget the two post-1950s whose gradations are based on a tight-versus-
secondary trends of First World manufacturing catastrophically-loose wage-labor continuum.
jobs migrating to the Developing World and the This is increasingly important as the US
mass migration of people from the developing surpasses $34 trillion in national debt with no
World to the Developed World. Two things are way to pay the unfunded social security pension
significant here: First, that population growth is fund liabilities for its seniors. The US is likely to
drastically outpacing economic growth as the experience runaway inflation as the country
global wages labor equilibrium rate plummets as nears the $40 trillion debt level and as more
income disparity is climbing. Secondly, the countries exit the petrodollar exchanges due to
migration levels are likely to be a tsunami in the sanctions on Russia, Iran and China. (For
North America and Europe this decade as people more on this topic, see the “Energy and
continue to migrate from developing countries to Geopolitical Realignment” series of articles by
developed countries.
George McMillan that were published late 2023
through early 2024—now available on
The two variables of technology and G3Insights.com.)
population growth over time allows for the
correlation of Aristotle’s Six Forms of
Government, as they relate to the per capita GNP
ratio, signifying economic growth and population
growth rates of change, with the Four Category
Geopolitical Form outcome measure based on the
reality that: (1) First and Second World developed
countries are characterized by higher economic
growth and low population growth, and tighter
wage-labor rate proportions with stable
monetary systems; in direct contrast with (2)
Third and Fourth World failed states which are
characterized by lower economic growth and
higher population growth proportions associated
with catastrophically loose wage labor rate levels,
catastrophically high levels of income disparity,
and higher levels of crime and instability. Of
course, monetary instability is also strongly

G3Insights 3
Figure: Growth of world population and the history of technology

Robert Fogel’s correlation between the two variables of technology and population growth is directionally

true.

Source: The authors with the assistance of James Hudak. Modified from Figure 1 of Robert W. Fogel, “Catching Up With the

Economy,” American Economic Review 89/1 (1999): 2.

Introduction

This paper begins with an explanation of the “Seven Ps” which are (1) the Professors, referring

origins of rational choice models as the basis of to all of the educators at all levels; (2) the Priests,

strategic planning. Next, it explains the strategic referring to all the religious institutions and

plans of the Left to incrementally transform theological schools; (3) the Prosecutors, referring

America into a Fabian Socialist welfare state, as, all of the government attorneys, judges and

ultimately, the Left wants to replace the justices; (4) the Press, referring to all mass media

Puritanical Christian institutions with an institutions and personalities; (5) the Politicians,

atheistic curriculum based on the ideas of or those individuals running for office whether

Rousseau and Marx. for or against the sought-after single party; (6)

the Police, referring to all government-

The seven major institutions that need to be
sanctioned gun carriers, namely the single-party
“transformed” are represented in terms of the

G3Insights 4
state-directed military and police, as well as all
private firearms owners; and (7) the Parent,
referring to public educators with capacity to
undermine allegiances to family, clan, or
nationality.
Classical Marxism focused on taking over the
means of production, but Gramsci and Lukács
targeted these seven areas to replace traditional
Christian cultural institutions with Marxist
teachings to further Socialism via the proverbial
long-march through the institutions. Many refer
to this as “cultural Marxism.”
The Origin of the Rational Choice and Rational
Actor Modeling in Game Theory and the Social
Sciences
John von Neumann and Oscar Morgenstern
advanced the use of rational actor modeling in
their magnum opus work Theory of Games and
Economic Behavior in 1944. This text began the
sub-discipline of Game Theory by arguing that
the Rational Actor Model was the basis for
developing a logical plan to achieve goals and
objectives for individuals, groups, or nation-
states.
social sciences in his 2006 article titled “Game
Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral
Sciences,” as well as his 2009 book The Bounds of
Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the
Behavioral Sciences. Gintis highlighted that even
after decades of use in the discipline of
economics, the RABPC format is still not widely
used in the social sciences, and that they are
much “poorer without it”.
Rational Actor Belief Preference Constraint
Models (RABPC)
The reason that the RABPC model is so
necessary for strategic planning is that it is one’s
“beliefs” that define their goals and objectives,
which therefore guides their “preferences”,
while their resources—or lack thereof—define
their “constraints”. By the sum of people’s
beliefs, preferences, and constraints, an actor
will select a logical means of achieving his goals
and objectives, which can be direct or indirect
(overt or covert), or symmetrical or asymmetrical
courses of action. For example, in the legal use-
of-force model of tactical training, one assesses a
threat in terms of his “opportunity, intent, and

capability” which is conceptually similar to a

Nobel Laureate John Harsanyi advanced both RABPC model.

game theory and the use of the rational choice

In this comparison, one assesses the threat and
model in his 1969 article “Rational Choice Models
risk level of an adversary to then select a
of Political Behavior versus Functionalist and
proportional response relative to one’s abilities,
Conformist Theories.” Specifically, Harsanyi
which is typically expressed in the “opportunity,
argued that rational choice models should be
intent, and capability” protocol in a reactive self-
used more widely in the social sciences at large
defense situation. However, for a proactive
rather than being confined to economics and
course of action process, such as the Military
game theory.
Decision-Making Process (MDMP), this format is
Decades later, Herbert Gintis reiterated both best expressed in terms of an RABPC model.

the need for a laterally integrated series of micro

To Von Neumann, Harsanyi and Gintis,
and macro behavioral theories by advocating for
Rational Actor modeling is essential to
the wider use of Rational Actor-Belief,
understand the decisions of two or more
Preference, Constraint (RABPC) modeling in the
adversaries

G3Insights 5
in “strategic interaction” (Gintis, 2009). This Fabian Socialists
form of modeling is employed here to explain the
The Fabian Socialists believed that
strategic plan of the post-Gramsci (Prison
“democratic” processes were the correct path to
Notebooks, 1930s) and post-Marcuse “New Left”
achieve incremental socialism, as opposed to
who believe in the efficacy of Socialism and
Marx who believed the only way towards
continually develop ways to incrementally
complete socialism and non-market Communism
“transform America” in the terms of the original
was through violent class revolution to avoid
Left-leaning French philosophers. For instance,
being stuck in market capitalist socialism in
the goal of Fabian Socialism has always been to
perpetuity. With the failure of non-market
bring about Socialism by incrementally
Communism in the 1990s, the New Left and neo-
expanding executive branch bureaucracies and
Liberals doubled down on their incrementalist
social services over time while steadily increasing
approach to achieving Socialism via democratic
taxes to further “equality” at the expense of all
processes. 

other variables.
The Left has always focused on the political
In contrast, Harsanyi in his 1969 article
organization of the masses in direct contrast to
advocated for the wider use of Rational Actor
the Christian conservative Right which focused
Models in the context of Pareto-style models to
on religious and economic organization reflecting
reflect trades-off and opportunity costs so
the difference of eternal and temporal beliefs that
variables become minimized when another
lead to the idea of the separation of church and
variable becomes maximized, which politicians
state. The problem that the Left faced in the
purposely ignore but theorists must accurately
United States and much of Europe is that the
depict.
labor unions never fully accepted “the atheistic
Leftism” of the Rousseau-Marx-Engels thought
lineage, which Professor Danusha Goska
discussed in detail in her 2014 article titled “The
Top Ten Reasons I Am No Longer Leftist.”

In the article, she explains how the white

working class in the US never abandoned its
Christian ideological roots, as opposed to post-
Rousseau Leftism which is based on removing
property rights, marital rites, and religion from
society. To Rousseau, the evolution of property
rights led to the subjugation of men over other
men leading to class inequalities, and the
evolution of marital rites led to the subjugation of
women, forming the basis of gender inequality. 

Since “Thou Shalt Not Steal” and “Thou Shalt

Not Commit Adultery” are in the Ten
Commandments of the Christian Bible (as if
reflects generally on the Abrahamic religions),

G3Insights 6
Rousseau attributed income and gender
inequalities to religion and proposed that a
“transformation” to atheism without property
rights or marital rites was the cure. Rousseau and
the Leftist movement has always believed that
this “transformation” would lead to a utopian
egalitarian society; that the distinctions between
men and women are learned rather than innate;
and that social norms are reinforced by religion.
The problem from the standpoint
evolutionary theory (e.g. Steven Pinker, 2002) is
that all Leftist thought is based on the false
premises of the domain-general infinitely
malleable hypotheses, as: (1) Leftism ignores the
difference of male and female forms
competition for resources and mates as explained
in Lional Tiger’s landmark work Men in Groups
(1968); (2) Leftism ignores the family unit as an
evolutionarily stable strategy in terms of John
Maynard Smith’s 1978 book The Evolution of Sex,
and his 1982 book Evolution and the Theory of
Games; and (3) Leftist thought ignores Donald
Symons’ differences in male and female forms of
jealousy associated with their strategies to attract
resources and mates for self-survival
survival of the species as expressed in his
landmark work Evolution of Human Sexuality
(1979).
While union workers may not be well read on
the academic origins of Leftism in evolutionary
psychology in the context of differences between
the hardwired domain-specific premise (two
genders) and the infinitely malleable domain-
general premise (infinity genders), or on the use
of Rational Actor modeling in classical and
evolutionary game theory, they
nevertheless satisfied with the advances in
capitalist living standards and the efficacy of
collective bargaining in a capitalist system.
In a first world country, collective bargaining
processes generally produced a satisfactory Nash
equilibrium outcome in a society in which
economic growth was keeping pace with
population growth. The blue-collar union
workers rejected the 1960s radical Leftist
positions of the Vietnam War Era activists that
came to define the Democratic Party in the United
States, as indicated by their voting trends
towards Reagan, Bush Sr., Bush Jr., and now
Trump. As Professor Goska explained in her
of
aforementioned article, the more this trend of
blue-collar workers voting Republican persisted,
the more the Left switched its strategy from
wooing the blue-collar workers to "importing a
proletariat" that would vote for the expansion of
of
the welfare state.
All one has to do is to look at Harvard Professor
Robert Reich’s 1984 book New Deals which
advocated for an industrial policy in the United
States during the mid-1980s and contrast it to his
more recent advocacy for open borders and
denouncement of Trump’s reindustrialization
policies. In other words, Reich’s outlook changed
in accordance with the Left’s strategy to take
and power rather than remaining pro-Union on
principle.
Mass migration became the means of the Left
to incrementally move towards a bureaucratically
controlled Socialist state that has nothing to do
with building a tighter wage-labor scenario to
boost blue collar salaries and a middle class. This
scenario necessitates high economic growth and
stable population growth proportions that would
dictate a closed border policy rather than an open
border policy. Thus, Professor Goska’s premise is
were correct: The Left is importing a proletariat to vote
in socialism so they can rule over the huddled
masses as their ‘beneficent’ masters.
G3Insights 7
Rational Choice Modeling and the “7 P Plan”
Since the objective of the Left is to achieve an
egalitarian Socialist utopia by transforming a
Christian Capitalist country that is based on
devotion to the nuclear family as the micro-level
foundation of the meso- and macro-level
hierarchies of community and nation, the counter
strategy is simply to transform it into an atheistic
society with no property rights or marital rites
with the hope that all peoples can
indoctrinated into a unified global citizenry. Once
one understands the fundamental goals
Leftism, he is prepared to understand how and
why Leftism rebrands itself after each failed
Marxist experiment in hope that “socialism will
work next time.”
nothing like what Marx and Engels predicted, and
Originally, Marxism was based on controlling
the means of production so the bureaucracies
could dole out resources equally. After the
Bolshevik Revolution, Leftist thought began to
shift in terms of how to take over all cultural
institutions and raise secular atheist Marxists
devoid of any religious vestiges, e.g. “the new
Soviet man.” In the history of Leftist political
philosophy and psychology, the contemporary
Left is following the “Beliefs, Preferences, and
Constraints” strategy of seizing the 7 Ps adapted
from the Gramsci-Lucac-Marcuse-Horkheimer-
Alinsky thought lineage. The 7 Ps refer to the
seven major pillars of society that need to be
taken-over to realize a Socialist state (Daniel
Pipes discussed this topic in terms of a “5 P Plan”
in his Middle East Forum circa 2015).
The First “P” — the Professors
The First “P” refers to the “Professors,” or
educators at every level, who are targeted to
initiate a mass indoctrination of society towards
Cultural Marxism; the elimination of organized
religion; and a skepticism of classical Greek
thoughts on governments, which says that all
Government Forms trend towards the perverted
Forms of Oligarchy and Tyranny, as opposed to
be the Proper Forms of idealistic Monarchy,
Aristocracy, and Constitutional Democracy.
of Marxist belief implies that (a) Marxist
Communism or Socialism was the end state of
man, and (b) that it would be indefinitely
sustainable. The reality is that bureaucrats act
Communism is merely a permutation of the
Tyrannical and Despotic forms of government
already explained by Aristotle. In the sense of the
Ancient Greek Government Forms theorists,
Marxism was in no way the "new form" of
government about which Marx and his followers
fantasized. Leo Strauss was correct to assert that
Bolshevik Marxism was merely a new form of
Eastern steppe despotism.
In an aim to remove any skepticism of the
efficacy of Marxism, pos-Bolshevik Leftism has
steadily removed both comparative analysis of
government forms and comparative ideological
systems analysis in the University system. In
other words, the Left “jettisoned” the scientific
project in the social sciences, as explained in
Tooby and Cosmides’ “The Psychological
Foundations of Culture” as featured in Barkow,
Tooby and Cosmides; The Adapted Mind (1992).
The purpose of propaganda is not only to purport
a biased point of view but to also prevent people
from acquiring conflicting information and
making up their own minds.
G3Insights 8
Second “P” — the Priests plummeting of economic production for a
government which “pretends to pay people and
The Second “P” is the “Priests”. This refers to the people pretend to work”. In terms of
the taking over theological schools and replacing Fromm’s Productive-versus-Sadomasochistic
their curriculums with the cultural Marxism of character orientation dichotomy, the society at
Gramsci and Lukács, and subsequently the work large becomes masochistically passive-
of the Frankfurt School and the aggressive en masse. Significantly, Fromm’s
“deconstructionism” of Derrida and Foucault. character orientation dichotomy correlates
The core idea is to replace the self-responsibility directly to The Proper and Perverted Forms of
of Judeo-Christianity with the hollowness of government expressed in Aristotle’s Six Forms of
“do-goodism” patterned after the passiveness of Government.
the beatitudes of Mark Chapter 4 in the Christian
Bible.
Three things are of note here: First, that
socialism always ends up being tyrannical;
The purpose of taking over the priesthood in second, that there is a direct correlation of
this sense is to make the masses passive to the Fromm’s character orientation dichotomy and
imposition of Marxism on society, making it Aristotle’s Six Forms of Government, with the
“un-Christian” to berate socialistic projects. In two frameworks leading to a coordinated micro-
terms of Erich Fromm’s magnum opus The macro behavioral model; and third, when
Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (1972), the correlated to the per capita-gross national
sadists want to turn society into a sea of passive product ratio and the Four Category Geopolitical
masochists who accept individual suffering in the Model, all of Tooby and Cosmides’ objectives to
name of collective ‘welfare’. coordinate the social sciences can be achieved.

The Third “P” — the Press Why No Autopsies on Failed Marxist

Experiments?
The Third “P” refers to the “Press”, namely
schools of journalism and communications and Every time Socialism was tried, the
media entities. Again the idea is to dominate the consequences have been catastrophically bad:
information space and eliminate alternative mass famines, concentration camps, and massive
sources of “truth” to shape belief and relegate loss of human life, as discussed in Aleksandr
people into the limited choices to “make Solzhenitsyn’s 1973 book The Gulag Archipelago.
socialism work this time” and obey the Although the aversion to performing autopsies on
bureaucrats for “the greater good”.
the failed Marxist experiments were not
discussed by Tooby and Cosmides in
The problem with obeying the bureaucrats is
“Psychological Foundations of Culture,” they did
that once a state is bureaucratically controlled, it
explain how the “1960s liberals took over the
becomes easy to: (a) “Make everything easier for
department chairs” and immediately
the people behind the counter instead of in front
“abandoned the scientific project” in the social
of the counter” (Bhagwati, “In Defense of
sciences. 

Globalism” 2002); and (b) spot the up-and-

comers and get rid of them before their merits The scientific method entails three major
make a mockery of the of the elites, resulting in a phases: (1) a priori hypotheses and the

G3Insights 9
formulation of a research design, (2) testing and were developing in favor of subjectivity and
careful observation, and (3) ex-post analysis and theoretical interpretations. Bloom’s book in 1988
theoretical reformulation. was consistent with Tooby and Cosmides 1992
article, which explained how the Liberals in the
The ideological experiments of the Twentieth
philosophical and social sciences abandoned the
Century was the biggest live scientific experiment
scientific method altogether—alongside
in history that essentially pitted the
objectivity—and discarded Cartesian methods
Montesquieu-Hume-Smith-Kant thought
used to test and measure competing hypotheses.
lineage against the Rousseau-Marx-Engels
thought lineage. The end result was that the The Socialist Utopian Left resisted performing
Bolshevik bureaucrats used the Communist autopsies on the failed Marxist experiments to
system to punish age-old ethnic and religious avoid subjecting the Rousseau-Marx-Engels
rivals more than promote equality and steadily thought lineage to rigorous examination because
got rid of the up-and-comers by sending them to they do not want people to understand why
the Gulags, all while people had to wait in long bureaucracies routinely produce increasingly
lines to get food rations. In the end, the economy psychopathic power-hungry leaders.

did not produce enough goods to actually pay

This produced a sociopathic group of followers
people and raise living standards, so the system
beneath them consistent with Fromm’s
collapsed in on itself.

Productive-versus-Sadomasochistic character
In this brief explanation, one can see that orientation framework, where Aristotle’s Six
performing autopsies on failed non-market Forms of Government and Fromm’s character
Communist and market Socialist experiments at a orientation frameworks covary. 

macro level is rather simple (the more

Moreover, the routine failure of centrally
complicated micro analysis of technological
planned systems affirms the metaphysics that
innovation and economic development aspects of
man is not the supreme power. With the erosion
this topic are discussed in other papers). Had the
of scientific methods, the Western University
University system followed the scientific
system no longer has a testable method of
procedures, the university system would have
course-correcting to arrive at accurate theories
compared the key free market theories of human
of human nature.

nature against the Rousseau-Marx-Engels

thought lineage and discarded the latter on both As this paper has indicated, Tooby and
the abstract philosophical level (pertaining to Cosmides’ Integrated Causal Model of
ultimate cause) and the empirical social scientific evolutionary biology and evolutionary
level (pertaining to proximate cause). But did the psychology merge directly with Fromm’s
Left advance the scientific method or did they character orientation dichotomy, Aristotle’s Six
choose to change electoral power strategies? 
Forms of Government, and the per capita-gross
national product ratio depicting economic rates
As Allan Bloom wrote in The Closing of the
of change and population growth rates and the
American Mind (1988), the Left moved into the
Four Geopolitical Form Categories. Ergo, the
soft philosophical and social sciences with “no
methodology needed to reorient the University
objective measures and standards” to reduce
system is actually not difficult to construct if the
what little objective measures and standards
goal of the system was to produce objectively

G3Insights 10
testable theories and models.
However, the Left is seeking power, not trying
to create accurate theories and models of human
behavior. Their goal is to import a new proletariat
to turn “red states” into “blue states.” Using the
Baconian scientific method to elucidate the
nomos-physis distinction of discerning
“ideals of man” in contrast to “the laws of
human nature” is not their goal.
The Fourth “P” — the Prosecutors
The “Fourth P” is the “Prosecutors”. This
refers to the push for all law school professors,
government attorneys, judges and
Returning to the ideals of Rousseau in his “Essay
on Inequality” mentioned earlier, he attributed
property rights as the means where
subjugate other men and marital rites as the
means where men subjugate women, creating
class and gender inequalities.
Since “thou shalt not steal” and “thou shalt
not commit adultery” are in the
Commandments. according to Rousseau, it is the
Abrahamic religions that promote inequality and
should therefore be replaced with an atheistic
state with no property rights or marital rites.
From a Rousseauian perspective, the goal of
the law school professors and government
attorneys, judges and justices is to ameliorate all
property rights, martial rites, and demonize all
religions equally over time to achieve the utopia
of Rousseau and Marx. In reality they wish to
ameliorate the Judeo-Christian morality that is
closely associated with First World cultures in
order to turn them into Marxist utopias.
property, the God-given “natural right” of self-
Currently the Soros-affiliated city attorneys in
San Francisco, Philadelphia, and New York are
moving to release offenders without bail, and not
charging protestors, looters, or shoplifters,
making the big cities in the US unlivable for
many. Stores continuously go out of business and
many people are moving out as foreign migrants
are routinely flown and bussed in, contributing to
overcrowding and degrading access to, and
quality of, public services.
the
The Fifth “P” — the Politicians
The “Fifth P” is the “Politicians”. This is most
pertinent to the current mass immigration and
the border issues, about which Leftists
continually gaslight citizens that there is no mass
migration at the US-Mexican border. Danusha
Goska’s explanation is that the Left is importing
justices.
a Proletariat to turn the Red States into Blue
States, and thereby achieve the single-party
socialist state to ensure their power in perpetuity,
men
regardless of the consequences. As Victor Davis
Hanson has explained in several interviews, the
Left has already used mass immigration to turn
California from a Red State into a dark Blue State
in just three decades—so, it is a strategy with a
Ten proven track-record of success. 
It is that success they wish to replicate across
all 50 states to achieve their Socialist utopia. They
merely need to turn Texas and Florida into Blue
States to achieve this “Fifth P”, since they
already have the first Four accomplished.
The Sixth “P” — the Police
The Sixth “P” is the “Police,” or all gun carriers
including law enforcement, military, private
security, citizen watch groups, and private gun
owners. Since the Left does not believe in private
defense—or even that there is a God— it does not
accept separation of church and state, where
there is no valid Church, but only the State.
Instead of religion, the Left begets compliance
G3Insights 11
via importing the masochistic ideology that: (a)
people do not need to defend themselves, because
(b) the government will protect them and provide
for them; and that (c) they should be totally
passive with no instincts for self-preservation, or
that of their family, their clan, or ethnicity.
In other words, since the Left follows the
infinitely malleable premise of human behavior,
it does not understand how the two primary
human evolutionary drives in the pursuit of
resources and mates translate into the pursuit of
“economic gain” (Downs, 1957) and “social
status” (Veblen, 1899); nor that these are
hardwired innate drives that work best in free
market capitalist systems based on “perfect
competition.” In contrast, both Plutocracies and
Socialism are based on the concentration and
centralization of wealth and power, consistent
with Aristotle’s Perverted forms of Tyranny and
Oligarchy, as opposed to an idealistic “utopia.”
While the Seven P Plan may be a rational choice
to attain a Socialist State and a global ‘utopia’ in
terms of post-Rousseau and Marxist Leftism, the
reality is that it will lead to another Socialist
catastrophe no matter how many times the Left
rebrands Marxism. 
religion, and the concept of the family unit, with
The coming problem is that Marx believed that
Communist revolution can only be achieved
through violent uprising; so it is predicated on
dominance instincts for survival, rather than on
forms of cooperative, constructive competition
for resources and mates. In sum, the world is
witnessing Spengler’s “decline of the West.”
The Seventh “P” — the Parents
The Seventh “P” is the Parents. The primary
goal of Rousseau was to get rid of property rights,
marital rites, and religion to foster a society
where “spouses and children are held in
common,” and cared for and raised in state-run
education systems. The objective is to shift the
natural loyalties of children away from their
parents to the state. The goal of Leftism is to
achieve a one world government by getting rid of
the nuclear family en route to ending all clan,
ethnic, and national identity hierarchies, the
accomplishment of which they believe will allow
the masses to “imprint” to the state, as if people
were Konrad Lorenz’s geese which follow the
first moving object they see (Journal für
Ornithologie, 1935). Ideally, citizens would
identify the state itself as the ultimate mother
and father of the people.
It is the obliteration of the nuclear family
based on male and female complementary traits
that is behind the current diversity, equity, and
inclusion trend prevalent in schools. The Left
wants to replace property rights, marital rites,
open marriage and atheism aimed to destroy all
intimate relationships which come between an
individual and his devotion to the state.
This is inapposite to Luther’s idea of the
necessity of faith in God based on a direct
personal relationship, and with any conception of
Jesus or a personal savior that is not the state.
Marxism, and Tyrants in general, always demand
a direct allegiance to state power, and never want
to compete with any higher power that could
challenge their dominion over their subjects.
G3Insights 12
The “Transformation of America”
In closing, the Left has essentially
accomplished four of the Seven Ps, and all they
have to do is to flood a few Red States and turn
them Blue to seize the last 3 Ps by bureaucratic
force. Hence, the push for LGBT inclusion in the
military in conjunction with the astounding
stand-down orders for law enforcement during
the Antifa BLM George Floyd riots. Furthermore,
sophisticated forms of mass operant conditioning
are being put into practice to render people
passive to both mass immigration policies and to
Leftist mobs, which turn the current Republic, a
“Constitutional Democracy” (the Proper Form),
into a mob-rule Democracy (the Perverted Form).
expansion is two-fold: It is an attempt to break
The current situation is drawing the Left ever
closer to a cascade event: All it takes is to turn
enough Red States into Blue States to control the
US presidency; allow for the nomination of
Soros-affiliated attorneys to the Supreme Court;
facilitate the gutting of the military; and continue
driving of the US towards insolvency and higher
taxes to usher in Socialism. That is why the
border patrol has been turned into a regiment of
social workers who assist illegal immigration as
opposed to a proper law enforcement agents who
secure the border. The left wants the last Ps of the
Politicians, the Police, and the Parents to achieve
their current iteration of the French Revolution—
and they believe they are close to achieving it
with this strategy.
is intended to guide readers through the 2024
The Left has been pursuing the Cloward-Piven
Plan as expressed in “The Weight of the Poor”
(The Nation, 1968), which argues that the path to
Socialism was to establish more state and federal
welfare bureaucracies, and to expand the welfare
rolls in order to push the United States toward
bankruptcy and compel a radical increase in taxes
to achieve to Utopian Socialist state.
The Cloward-Piven Plan has occurred
concurrently to the 7 P Plan and the US is now at
$34 trillion in debt with higher levels of inflation
coming in the near future.
The Left thinks they are on the verge of victory
in regards to transforming America, meanwhile
the neoconservatives who now vote Democrat are
actively pursuing an Operation Cyclone-style
regime change-destabilization policy in all of
Eurasia. In one sense, the Neocon goal is to keep
the United States as the sole superpower, but in
another sense, it is to advance the EU and NATO
Eastward to block all of Russia’s ports and
petroleum pipelines. The purpose of the Eastward
apart Russia so the US can maintain geostrategic
dominance, but also to stop the Orthodox revival
that has been occurring since the fall of the Soviet
Union.In other words, the Left is trying to end
Christianity in North America and usher in the
Socialist state, while also conjuring a war
between the Catholic Ukrainians and Orthodox
Russian speaking Ukrainians, all with the end
goal of thwarting the Orthodox revival inside
Russia itself and securing US hegemony in Europe
and Eurasia. 
While these global aspects are covered more
in-depth in the articles series “Energy and
Geopolitical Realignment” also published by
G3Insights, the focus here on the “Seven P Plan”
election cycle in the US. The goal of the ruling
coalition of neoconservatives, neoliberals, and
the Left in the United States is to “transform
America,” as well as Europe and the Russian
Federation, in one fell swoop this year; but it is
also a perfect storm of schizophrenic domestic
and foreign policies that is highly unlikely to
leave the US a global power for much longer.
G3Insights 13

For Retail Clients
G3Insights.com
Retail offerings for individuals, investors,
and small family offices.
Research from George McMillan
Explore the world’s complexities with expert
analysis from Senior Analyst George McMillan.
Gain essential insights that expand your
understanding and decision-making process.
Daily G3 SitRep
Keep up with complex geostrategic, geoeconomic,
and geopolitical developments. Stay informed
without the need to sift through lengthy articles
from unvetted sources.
For Institutional Clients
G3Strat.com
Fortify your company assets against
geostrategic risk.
Bespoke Solutions for Your Company
G3Strat is more than just a service provider; we
are your partners in resilience. Our unwavering
commitment is to empower organizations with
the knowledge, tools, and strategies needed to
navigate the complexities of an ever-changing
world.
Explore Our Services
Friday Night Fireside Chats
Tune in for engaging and entertaining
discussions with industry leaders, military
veterans, and extraordinary individuals from our
global network of professionals.
Industry Expert Interviews
Enjoy in-depth interviews and knowledge sharing
with subject matter experts across the fields of
finance, energy, politics, intelligence, and more.
A Network of Trusted Professionals
Redefine risk management through G3Strat’s
international network of experts. With a wealth of
experience covering the analysis framework
spectrum from macro to micro, our team is at the
forefront of identifying, assessing, and mitigating
risks across diverse industries and environments.
G3Insights 14
Download & Share This Report

Twitter/X: @G3Strat

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/g3strat

g3insights.com/7p-plan

G3Insights

Strategic. Significant.
Substantive.
G3Strat.com Retail: g3insights.com contact@g3strat.com