IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1164 EDA 2016 Kathleen Granahan Kane Appeliant PROOF OF SERVICE - DRAFT Uneceby cetty that this 2nd day of May, 2016, | nave served the attached document(s) to the persons on the date(s) and in the manners) stated below, which service satisfes the requirements of Pa. RAP. 121. Service Served Amil Michael Minora Service Method Email Email amil:minora@gmail.com Service Date 51212016 Address: Phone: 570-961-1616 Representing Appoliant Kathleen Granahan Kane ‘Served AAmil Michael Minora Service Metnod Service Ema ‘aml mingra@gmail.com ‘Service Date Address: 700 Vine Street Scranton, PA 18510 Phone: 570-96-1-1616 Representing Appoliant Kathleen Granahan Kane Serves Assistant Counsel Seth C. Farber ‘Service Method Email Email sfarber@winston.com Service Date 5722016 Address: Prone: 212.294.6700 Representing ‘Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane PAGFie 1001 Page Tels EASTERN DISTRICT MAY XS Pore | Print Date: 5/2/2016 11:33 amServed Service Method! Emait Service Date: Address: Phone Representing Served Service Method: Emait Service Dat Address Phone. Representing Served: Service Method Ema Service Date Address: Phone: Representing Served: Service Method: Email Service Date Address: Phone: Representing Served Service Methos Email Service Date Address: Phone: Representing IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA PROOF OF SERVICE - DRAFT ‘coninves) Gerald L, Shargel Ema sfarber@winston com 5722018 212.204.2637 ‘Appellant Kathleen Granahan Kane Kevin R. Stoole Email kstoele@montcopa org 5/2/2016 610-278-3098 ‘Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Robert Martin Falin Email sfalin@montcopa org 57212018 610.278-3102 Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Robert Martin Falin eService FHalin@montcopa.org Montgomery County Courthouse P.O. Box 311 Norristown, PA 19404-0311 610.278.3104 Appellee Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ross Mitchell Kramer Email sfarber@vinston com 512/2016 AppeliantKathleen Granahan Kane PAGF te 1001 Page 2013) Pra baw 6aR016 7 93amIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA | PROOF OF SERVICE - DRAFT (ontinesy 1 | Courtesy Copy : i Served Stan J. Caterbone | Service Method Email ! Email stancaterbone@gmallcom Service Date: 51212018 Address: Phone: 717-860-2163, 1 Pro Se Person Serving ‘Aiorney Registration No: Law Firm: Address Pact 1001 Pagesold Pint Date 6272016 135 aeWeihze'u g1ozreis "pee 008 :994 Buin WWVEL-LE SLOZ/Z5 fomnzye1ea peordn ‘59, :pounbay oni ausova pd }2ug 9eung snowy :oweN jwewn20q Jeua Seung sromuy :oueN Bulg jeaunod sams dal remeyg wesBoug ready ye 4 '3uey wo :uonde ‘Saray 7omieig 95D (9207) 9102 waa Fol somes pucoeu PR] @ swedoruea ou wsiaets3 ] foeyouy sodky Bun wsuneg ow usiseis3 DX] s98e9 199198 [X] RAT TORTTT TG Ga ON 3980 eueAKsuVeG IO UneD JoUedNS ;wondDSeG, O1Ze800003uASM soquinN Bune aWIGANg ION “Smeg WorSsIEGNEStanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se i Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance, Registered in the State of Pennsylvania ‘Advanced Media Group | 1250 Fremont Street | Lancaster, PA 17603 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. T EASTERN DISTRICT i | IN RE: Case NO. 1164 EDA ors) Montgomery Court Case No.) Docket No. 8423-15: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : ve : | KATHLEEN KANE t | AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF KATHLEEN KANE'S (ATTORNEY GENERAL) MOTION TO QUASH BASED ON SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF THE SAID COURT: si Wo nee sic Sane cane pg hese Aen Media Group, as Movant, to file an Amicus in the above captioned case. ! I The Movant has an interest in this case as also being a victim of “SELECTIVE AND VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION” by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office dating back to the myriad of prosecutions by the Commenwealth of Pennsylvania in 1987, 2005, and 2006 while a resident of the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. 1 Most of which have been dismissed without any convictions, most without any trials, which according to law are false arrests and false imprisonments. The MOVANT was a Federal Whistleblower in the United States v. International Signal and Control, Pic., case of 1991. This amicus provides a voice for the Movant as well as providing another perspective and opinion that should benefit the courts; the parties; and the public-at-large. The matters presented in this amicus have a direct relevancy in the disposition ofthis case as it does in the Attomiey General (Kathleen Kane) fight to restore integrity and equity to the Judicial System of Pennsyivbnia, which ates al of te residents of the COMMONWEALTH. The Attoey General has been) aucted af saying she Is in a battle with the ‘old boys! network’ of Pennsylvania and the MOVANT has writer: extensively about this same select group over the years beginning in 1998, In an interview with Brian Taff of WPVI on February 16, 2016 the Attorney General is quoted as saying "Everybody Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 1 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016makes mistakes. I knew there was a good old boy network, everyone does. I had no idea how deep and how powerful that network actually ran. The fact that I took it on and wasn't silent about it and that I am determined to tear that down, I think that’s what my legacy will show.” | | In a 1998 narrative the MOVANT wrote the following “This story was perpetuated through a gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by bath the law enforcement community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as community leaders. A process that continues to obstruct Stan Caterbone’s rights for justice. It's mannerisms reach into the inner soul of political and judicial corruption. All in the name of greed, and all in the honor of continuing the status quo of the|"Good Ole Boy's" club of Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it's disclosure from escaping beyond the confines of “Pandora's Box". It's a tenure of power that evolved from the days of this country's earliest settlers, but an evolution that has somewhere strayed away from the intent of our constitution; with total disregard for the law, in total atrocity, like the Lambert case, would have made our founding forefathers revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In fact, their spirits and energies probably are!” liberties. TI i disrespect for the Constitution, and void of many of our tn 2009 Opecnews.com printed the narrative in full and the MOVANT wishes tis sa court to considers content in I's fnal deliberations in suppor of dismissing all prosecutions against the Atorney General of Pennsyvana, In addition atached are supporting documents to advanced the credibility and integrity of the MOVANT. These documents are attached as exwerTs In addition the MOVANT wrote to the ATTORNEY GENERAL on November 12, 2015 and stated the following “Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I had just attended a job fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car, He introduced himself as being from the NSA and T questioned him about why they would not leave me alone. His response was “It is not US (NSA) it's the Good ole Boys". I also have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We parted ways in an amicable fashion.” Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 2 of 48 Thursday, April 28,2016| The ATTORNEY GENERAL returned a letter the following day that stated /*Dear Mr. Caterbone, Thank You for your correspondence to the Office of Attorney General, we will keep your information in our files”. These are attached as EXHIBITS. Date: April 28, 2016 5 fe, Pro Se : Freedom From ¢gvert Harassment and Sufvellance | Advanced Meck/ Group 1250 Fremont Street ! Lancaster, PA 17603 www amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com ‘scaterbone@live,com ! | (717) 669-2163 . H ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 3 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016Iv: UL?* ! Authored in May of 1998 ! | ‘Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or | strikes out against Injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope. And crossing each| other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples|build @ er TT by Robert F Kennedy In 1987 This Plaintiff (Stan J. Caterbone) Had Unjustly Lost His Freedoms, His Rights, And His Pursuit Of Life, Liberty And Justice. ‘The following report (most identities purposely omitted from this version) is en amazingly tue and factual account of an extraordinarily bizarre tragedy that has turned one man's life into ar} eleven (11)* year free fall into "Dante's Hel! | (On the surface, this is a story of a vietim (Stan J. Caterbone) struggling to seek thé truth, but in realty, the evidence wil conclude that tis Is @ victim, IReraly,neld hostage by vitue of hi truth, Later, the preponderance of evidence that Stan Caterbone has amassed and his obsession for meticulously documenting is ordeal might seem eccenrie, yet his demonstrated ability to react to events before they unfold appears mystical. And this was his manner in which he tacfly defences and protected his fe. Its these actions that have pant the landscape with a dire vengeance for his ruin. His actions will ultimately serve to protec, preserve, and foster the truth of his story incriminating the cupabilty of his many perpetrators, while atthe same time being twisted and tainted in relentless manner to atack his credit. This Is a story of a human being endearing for his rights, living in fear of his Ife, and the remedial actions required for the truth to set hm free. A victim (Stan J. Caterbone) foreves beteving In his accomplishments and his visions, yet forced to adhere to a life of thei diversons. Fateflly, ten years after being taken as a “poltical hostage’, with the ald of humerous arrests and false imprisonment's conveniently faling short convictions,| Federal Judge, Judge Stuart Dalzall, of the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania, opened a Pandora's Box" Into the true colors of the inner workings and poltics of ultra conservative, Lancaster County, Pennsyivania, a supposedly "God's" country. His findings reeled a dramatic and emotional response from the Lancaster County community that Was akin tothe assassination of Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 4 of 48, ‘Thursday, April 28,JFK. A community where “obstructions of justice” strikes a startling and stark contrast to the image it so desperately embraces. A community proud of it's "tough on crime’ judges, a community of "plain folks” and Amish, and a community settled in a beautiful landscape abundant in an agricultural bounty. This Is not a community of compromising integrity. Or so has been perceived. | Judge Dalzall's extremely controversial findings were responsible for Pennsylvania's own crafting ofthe "Laurie Bil", the retaliation by the Commonwealth of Pennsyivania Intended th curb the Federal Courts interference within the respective state's own jurisdictions and proceedings. Or was it a political maneuver to close the lid on “Pandora's Box"? The Pennsylvania Attorney General and the Lancaster County District Attorney have both thrown all their might and all thelr muscle at turning the tides of Judge Dalzal’s findings. This story and Stan Caterbone's rights have been violated and abused by some of the very same principal: that were responsible for Judge Dalzall's unsettling revelations. Lancaster County prosecutors were found to have engaged in one of the grossest acts of prosecutorial misconduct "found i the English speaking language”, which allegedly occurred in this now famous Liga Michelle Lambert case, a murder trial which began in the summer of 1992. Subsequently, it is now in the midst of a treacherous appeal process convened by Judge Dalzall. And if so, by fate, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the home of the “Freedom Fighters”. : | Weis hs public ascosur, that casts @ new ight and sudden hope for freedom into Stay Catervone’sunbelevable and herd str, that beeun Just four years prior to te murder of Laurie Show, Ik is the decisive smnanties of how both viens were subjected to a ver) calculated and poltcally mtwvated attempts to “ram and "brleate cumstances to oda the results tat usted the means for MIGk sele-serving interests. This very same conduct committed by public servants, elected and enlisted to enforce the law, to which Judge Dalzel found 20 appaling. Conduct, which violated the very same rights thelr respective bles ard commissioned to protec. Conduct, whleh strikes the meaning of *We The People! trom oul ration’ very onn Constuton. | rortunatly, Stan Caterbone’s story is laced with tread of flth, a fath in God. Ard because of his faith, Stan Caterbone will forever regard Lisa Michelle Lambert® and Laurie Show as his. ite "Angels of ustice, » Godsend, An answer to his many prayers, that forthe ft time in ten years provided a small glimmer of hope, and a few moments of solitude that have) materially justiled his ow tragic experience. The realation thatthe truth Is that much more believable because of the trials and tribulations of Lisa Michelle Lambert. Unfortunately, this revelation came atthe unfortunate and untimely death of Laurie. However, It jst may be God's itendons ofa Higher Purpose. ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 5 of 48. Thursday, April 28, 2016This story was perpetuated through a gross miscarriage of justice: a tenure of malicious wrongdoing by both the law enforcement community of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as community leaders. A process that continues tp obstruct Stan Caterbone's rights for justice. It's mannerisms reach into the infer soul df political and judicial corruption. Allin the name of greed, and all in the honor of continuing th= status quo of the "Good Ole Boy's" club of Lancaster County. A process obsessed with keeping it’s disclosure from escaping beyond the confines of "Pandora's Box". I's a tenure of power that evolved from the days of this country’s earliest settlers, but an evolution that has Somewhere strayed away from the intent of our constitution; | with total disregard for the law, in total disrespect for the Constitution, and void of niany of out Civil liberties. This atrocity, like the Lambert case, would have made our founding forefathers: revel in disgust and bellow in despair. In fact, their spirits and energies probably are} | ATISSUE 1 | ‘The central Issue in this story Is a cover up, a cover up of mass proportions, and of perplexing design, with national consequences. The fact of the matter is that this cover up has had ramifications throughout this world; specifically the Middle East The cover up|would be emphatically unbelievable without the wealth of evidence, especially the recorded conversations: with Pennsylvania officials. A cover up that permeates from what will later emerge as the ath largest financial fraud (Billion Dollars) in the history of the United States coupled with the covert sales of arms to Iraq, And five years after this cover up began, these same| munitions were used against our own troops in the Persian Gulf War. And of course, there are admitted ties to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA}... And this cover up and story, which began in June of 1987, in Lancaster County, preceded criminal indictments by the United States Attorney General, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI); the Intemal Revenue Service (IRS), the Department of Justice and Commerce, and more. & vast array of criminal activities conspired from the ultra conservative Lancaster County, where God is supposedly supreme, and it's hard line approach to crime is said to be preeminent. In, June of 1987, Lancaster County was immersed In a dynamic twist of fate, with a host|of players which may never be fully identified. H | ‘The Irony of this story is how Lancaster County manages the disclosure of the very same criminal activities that this story proves that it condoned, prior to the intervention |of federal authorities. It most dramatically will prove the nature of it's integrity, or lack thereof International Signal & Control, (ISC) Is the controversial player in this web of conspiracy. In 1987, ISC was the third largest employer in Lancaster County, a non-discrete defense contractor. In all due respect to our beloved country, this report is in no way challenging the, ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 6 of 48, Thursday, April 28, 2016poles or the aces ofthe Department of Defense, or te vast agencies ofthe “ntligenes Community", especially the CIA or the NSA (National Security Advisory). with regards to ISC’: ; foreign dealings. Tring to protect the world of malous and evl empires i a precess which never ends, and whose players are constonly changing. And our respective intllgencs aconies are conta chalenged wh ta tn of trying to maka a lferanca, n hzardaneh with protecing our national security. Unfortunately, given the nature of ther dicretk acted ard given the CIs Ntory a avoldng congressional approval cartin situation, bur curen [ans are void of efecvely dealing wth the peripheral catastrophes of such acivies thet Inerenty wanspre. The CIA females immune, while everyone outside sifers the ‘The fact that the CIA, or anyone of the other Intelligence community, may have beeh involved! does not grant a blanket of immunity over activities which were not material to Prot recting out atonal secunty If company proves a servi to anyone in he ntelignce comunity, ou constitution, our as, and I's respective commercial regulatory authors, must stil have the fll sense of thelr jurisdiction. The inteligence community may not have the right of intervention into the commercial enterprise, or organization, circumventing the rights of employees, sharetolders,cedtors, and cstomers. No Unted States lw or statue suegest that there is any involuntary mandate that cequires any of the preceding to compromise his of her interests in the respective enterprise for the sake of national security, or the respective inteligence agency. There must be considerations paid to all volved for those tights and interests that compromise such a relationship. Otherwise, the CIA could effectively gun control of any domestic corporation it so desires, without ever owning one share of its olitstanding stock, simply by enlisting its product or services for the sake of national security. The CIA, requires a formal vehicle to enlist the aid of our domeste commercial enterprises) ISC i a] proven and unfortunate example of that. j Stan Caterbone was a shareholder of record of International Signal & Control (IS¢) for the previous four years prior to when this tragic ordeal began. Stan Caterbone was to pulchase thel stock from now Republican Pennsylvania Senator Gib Armstrong, who was in the brokerage! business at the time and selling ISC stock. The stock was sold over the London {Securities Exchange, supposedly for reasons to suppress information. Stan Caterbone was interested in} the stock because of his appetite for technology, and was more curious about the business of 1SC, than anything. In fact, Stan Caterbone had never made any inference to any of the illicit dealings with Iraq. However, the perpetrators of this story, attempt to hide behind a vale of “national security," in an effort to find legal immunity from all wrongdoing. In accordance, the record will prove that this 1s merely a smoke screen used to intimidate and obstruct Stan Caterbone’s access for due process of the law. Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 7 of 48 Thursday, Api 28,218The trials and tribulations of Stan Caterbone are unprecedented in terms of emotional and psychological duress, fortunately his indestructible faith in God, and his enduring bellef th himself and the truth, endures his life. There was one attempt on the his life, days within the public discosure of the CIA's involvement with the local Lancaster County defense contracter (ISC), which Ted Kopel reported on ABC News Nightline, on May 23, 1991, 4 yeas after the initial cover up began. This story will depict a series of systematic and strategic offensive attacks upon Stan Caterbone and his businesses that will result failed business enterprises, anid a Hollywood motion picture, deserted. An impeccable professional reputation and a flawless credit rating purposely sabotaged, Financial opportunities, that in 1987, were almost impossible to extrapolate, Vast financial opportunities and aspirations forever a part of history. This horrendous Crime was perpetrated for the interest of a cover up, further protecting |the corrupt } enterprises of Lancaster County's International Signal & Control (ISC). A quest for justice that polarized every relationship Stan Caterbone maintained, in Lancaster County and beyond, including friends and family. This story demonstrates a methodology of his perpetrators for keeping Stan Caterbone "quarantined" from justice and public disclosure, through la malicious means of "credibility" proponents, and horrendously deceptive tactics. Financial motives prominently displayed in the hands of all of the perpetrators, which absolves the Uurden for|a traditional conspiracy. | ‘The emotional response to the truth of this story is compelling, to say the least. Subsequent), the startling keen sense of perception that Stan Caterbone had demonstrated is) even mote intriguing. It is this extraordinary quality that is responsible for saving his life, while yet at the same time providing his perpetrators with an alibi and a vehicle for discrediting his startlilg allegations and his story. This story embellishes a dichotomy of perception that hat! Hollywood County Community conveniently and maliciously labeling him as “insane” and ‘jemetionally disturbed.” | TH DSCAPI The perplexing question of Stan Caterbone’s intelligence, or lack thereof, is best apalyzed as|a question of perception. However it terms of the legal consequences of the activities contained herein, they are of Ite if any relevancy. The fact of the matter is thatthe "mental Henciencies™ have very little relevancy to this story, other than serving as a means to discredit Stan Caterbone, a vehicle to facilitate the cover up, and a blanket of Immunity for all of the perpetrators. | | | The heart of Stan Caterbone's legal dogma is best described as follows: If a person, is perceived to have a “mental deficiency"; yet whose actions and decisions are always proven to be instinctually and amazingly prudent, always abiding within the law, and in the best interest ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 8 of 48, ‘Thursday, April 28, 2016of his affairs, what rights and protection do the laws afford him from persons abusing that perception, in order to yield political and financial rewards, as a direct consequence of his demise? Furthermore, how does the law protect his rights, if any and all malicious acts against Stan Caterbone, are constantly and immediately disregarded because he is perceived to not to ve "credible"? As this story unfolds, these questions will become even more trdubling ang appalling. Although Stan Caterbone could never describe the pain of his trauma, he would often say that the closest situation that may compare is that of a woman being continuously raped, night after night, helplessly praying for relief, struggling to free herset from her captor, all with no avail. He would call It as being "brain f- Stan Caterbone, coming from the lower middle class of Lancaster City, was only 28 years old when this tragedy began. Coming from a broken home, he was the third of six boys, While at very young age, he would help his mother run a dry cleaning business, in an amazing similarity like Lisa Michelle Lambert, he had also nursed his mother during bouts of depression. While in high school, he was nursing his mother's depression, while at same time tending to his older brothers bouts of schizophrenia. Stan Caterbone had learned to listen to the obscenities of mental iliness since he was a child, He learned to fil the shoes of his absent fathe” in helping hhis mother raise his three younger brothers.. Stan Caterbone was often called the “little old man’ because of his extraordinary maturity a5 a child. Stan Caterbone was determines to break the "barrier" of the "Good Ole Boy's" club or the power elite, and had always felt a sense of compassion for those less fortunate, and those neglected by those of material means, the oppressed and impoverished. He had an undivided aspiration to someday make a difference to those that could not help themselves, especially his older brother. Through his ingenious, resourceful, and honest business approach, he was relentlessly growing his business and their respective missions, in constant reminder of his oppression. His in depth undetstanding pf computer technology and his vision were his most powerful allies. Always pushing the envelope for advanced technologies and seeking solutions for the most efficient means of his operations. He knew that every break was going to be few and far between, he dedication himself to his work, and married his business affairs, always embracing his projects with a passion. | tn 1986, ater serng on the Baud of Drecors for the Canal Pennsyvana Chapter br recuse and prominent franca anes fen Washngton, Dc, oe a headin Speake 2 dinner meeting. Ms. Alexandra Armstrong, one of the most nationally recognided financal planners, often headlined in Money Magazine, attracted 100 industry professionals to the ‘Treadway Resort Inn. The attendance was unprecedented for the local IAFP chapter. The IAFP is the authoring organization for certification as a financial planner. It was through the direct Superior Court +164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 0of 48 Thursday, April 26,2016Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 10 of 48 Thursday i | e e , | conversations with Ms. Armstrong regarding his ideas and her experience, that inspired Sta’ Caterbone to pursue his ambitions of growing his own financial firm, which he began in the ij following months. | Disgruntied with the conflets of Interest and the lack of incentive for various professionals tp work together in managing one's wealth, a process which lacked efficiency, this entrepreneur founded the firm Financial Management Group, Ltd., or FMG as it was often called. The firm was to incorporate a "one-stop-shopping” strategy and incorporate financial services, legal, accounting, tax preparation, real estate, insurance, mortgage banking, and estate services alt in one firm, all residing in one location, all taking advantage of the synergistic approach toward managing wealth. And to provide the professionals long term security and equity perticipation, all participants were encouraged to purchase stock in the company. This was p new and innovative approach that attracted a lot of attention from investors and clients, but zlso came lot of nervous titches from cornpetitrs, especially in conservative Lancaster County Stan Caterbone began recruiting professionals from all of the other firms, with great success He had enlisted two partners whom he had worked with at 1DS/American Express, to carry out his mission, which he began after extensive market studies and his early version of the company, Pro Financial Group, Ltd., His two partners had followed Stan Caterbone to an independent broker dealer in Atlanta, named Financial Services Corporation, jwhere Ms Alexandra Armstrong was associated, and encouraged Stan Caterbone to visit, during their discussion after dinner. Within one year, by June of 1987, the firm had invested over $49 million for respective cllents. The company had developed satellite offices throughout Pennsylvania and in several other states, trough his unique design. This frm was causing the other financial services| companies and the local banks in Lancaster County a run for their money. The firm had built a new 20,0( savare fot office building just a few miles north ofthe ct. The frm was attracting cient assndtes, and nervous attention Fm, wel jst about everybody. Considering the Fapabitiel, legal, realestate, insurance, financial services, accounting, FMG was making as mary enemids as it was making friends, And Stan Caterbone always belleved in te premise tha I's always Detter to nave people talking about you, regardless ofthe mate, than to have n| one noice You. And they were taking Stan Caterbone was ony In his late twentles when he ated ths organization, He held several postions; he was Executive Vice President and Secretary df Financial Management Group Ltd, and President of FMG, Advisory, Inc., which was one of te many subsidaries parent company owned. Stan Caterbone acted as the architect and legs administrator of the organization, In additon to bulding his own financial planning clients. He fled al ofthe articles of incorporation in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and submited all of the tedious and rigorous filings necessary for the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, which April 28) 2016were very demanding considering Stan Caterbone, was selling stock of his company to his associates and investors, Stan Caterbone and his associates had also attracted |some very prominent Lancastrians's to Invest in his Venture, coming from various professional cies, al infatuated wth hs extraordinary and intrgung concept of is young wet (Stan Caterbone). Ahad seen its potential for success anc financial reward. | Many of his friends were involved, and in Lancaster, everyone knows everybody, sc it seamsi. ‘And everyone talks, gossip is as common as jogging. This exaggerated trait o} Lancaster County, wil later to come back to haunt Stan Caterbone, in a way that Is most sieening. In way that will parallel the attitudes and sentiments in the Lisa Michelle Lambert story. In 1987, his business affairs were reaching a point of incredible success. In fact, most of his family and friends, have always questioned the merits of their legitimacy. He always conducted his affairs with the presumption that time could not afford the opportunity to complete ris agenda, while at the same time disclosing his business affairs to persons that were fot direct involved.. Accomplishing his mission was first and foremost. But in Lancaster County, that wes Gifficult. Lancastrians's have a notion to fear what they don't know, and will always believg inhibiting progress and stymieing learning. By June of 1987, a majority of his business affairs were conducted out of the grasp of Lancaster County, his unknown activities made others curious, especially in Lancaster County, where the blessing of the power elite was dssential f¢r success. But, deep down inside, he knew he could never be accepted, because|he did not descend from a family of “soda grace’. This fueled his asprations for success even furthe! committed to prove that intelligence was innate and learned, not a direct correlation to material wealth or sodal grace, An elder attorney, Mr. Kenellm Shirk, a very respected and prominent older Lancaster attorney, who was part of the status quo, provided one of his most cherished testimonials to his concept, his reputation, and his mission. Mr. Shirk had petitioned the Pennsylvania Bar Association, after meeting with Stan Caterbone, to obtain their blessing and their knowledge of any, laws whin Would forbid his firm to provide a satelite office in the headquarters of Financial Management Group, Ltd., (FMG) Mr, Shirks firm was to provide a partner, and estate services tp the clients of FMG. The Pennsylvania Bar provided a lengthy recommendation that did not prohibit|a relationship, although cautioned It to proceed with careful review. The fact that the| very young and unknown Stan Caterbone could attract an elder, conservative Lancaster County attorney to associate with his firm was an encouraging sign of respect. Ironically, Mr. Shirk is the father of Roy Shirk Jr, Lisa Michelle Lambert's first attorney who represented her during trial of 1992, the proceeding which was the center of Judge Dalzal's controversial and appaling findings ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 11 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016Stan Caterbone prided himself on his entrepreneurship, and after building the foundation fo} FMG, he set out to take advantage of its resources and it's synergism. | By June of 1987, Stan Caterbone had developed a fairly substantial mortgage banking relationship with 9 Houston, Texas banker. That operation was capable of providing lending tb potential developers and businesses in the range of § 3 million to $100 million. And the lending packages were as compettve if not more competitive than the local lending institutions of Lancaster County, capable with even higher lending limits. In a matter of months bf securing this relationship, Stan Caterbone and his partner were evaluating deals from Pennsylvania, NeW Jersey, New York, Florida, and as far away as California, i ‘There was a uniqueness to his capabilities that was very appealing to potential /borrowers. because of the vast array of services of FMG, potenti developers had the opportunity to obtain both debt and equity financing through his companies. In plain terms, most shopping centers raised capital by raising funds through investors coupled with a mortgage. This gave potential developers one place to “take down the deal” rather than deating with many other professionals at the same time, It was a much more efficent process for al. Star|Caterbone was capable of providing a mortaage, wile at the same time selling shares in a shopping center through it's vast client base of investors at FMG. This also gave Stan Caterbone ja formidable presence into the venture capital markets, by way of his strong ability to raise capital through his vast portfolio of clients of FMG. And this was a rarity that devslopers and investors loved, Investors were attracted because they could invest in equity type| real esta projects with real sense of knowing the developer, or "kicking the bricks" of the project. Ths, was far different than investing in 2 nationally syndicated project, with properties scattered jl over the country, and with developers that they did not know. The synergistic approach to his ‘organization began paying dividends by developing other peripheral markets and businesses. Given the complex nature of Stan Caterbone’s design of FMG, internal struggles within the organization readily became the challenge. Orchestrating the relationships among all of the different professionals, and trying to adhere to the interests of the clients, the professionals and of the firm, FMG, managing the daily activities required immense thought and prudence on the part of the principals. Of, course, Stan Caterbone assumed honesty and intecrity to be) a given. And for most it was. However there were times when the senior partner| engaged in tactical rights of power. | In the later part of 1986, after Stan Caterbone had developed FMG to the point where i future was on stable grounds, his two partners conveniently attempted to circumvent his position and regain control of his stock and the firm. In fact, after Stan Caterbone refused to collaborate on a scheme to “set up" his other partner, the remaining two partners began to attempt to regain Stan Caterbone’s control. Through intimidating techniques, the partners j ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 12 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016began to attack his presence. Stan Caterbone became agitated, especially because he played the lead role and was responsible for the formation of the company, methodically designing and developing its foundation, with great success. And now after the company was beyond it's point of greatest risk, due to n large part Stan Caterbone's efforts, the other two partners wanted to take advantage of his work, and "take the cream of the pie” for their own financial gain. It was a difficult task to carry out because Stan Caterbone was the most respected of all three partners, consistently keeping their respective policies in the best interest of the firm) and of the other associates and stockholders. In fact, most feared that the loss of control of Stat Ceterbone would ultimately lead to adverse consequences. However the two parthers sued neces to ween Hs poston, and when tt dnt wor, hey foased on Weoerng Stan Caterbone, via timation and humilation The coup and hostile environment caused ¢ state of depression for Stan Caterbone, although he kept to his daly duties and respons ies accordingly, he called a client and friend who was @ psychiatrist, whom he t/usted and respected. Tt was easy access to a professional, yet on a very Informal basis. Because Star] Caterbone has a family history of "mental deficiencies, he wanted to seek the prope help. | The psychiatrist had diagnosed Stan Caterbone as having Bi Polar Mood disorder. The psychiatrist had quickly discounted any correlation between the current state of affairs, and hit partner's abuse. The psychiatrist rationale was that “because the startup of the cornpany was 50 sucessful in such a short period of time” , and his demonstrated intelligence and| creativity, Stan Caterbone must have been in a state of mania, and of course now, was subsiding in state of depression, the typical cycle for manic depressants. Stan Caterbone complied with the Psychiatrist. And after refusing to sell out to his partners, vowed to regain his business and rescind any efforts to give up his claim to his accomplishments. The depression soon faded Stan Caterbone never disclosed the fact that he had sought help to anyone other than family members. This coup lead to Stan Caterbone’s aggressive approach to grow the business, and te posture himself in projects that would ultimately remain in his control, out of the influence oF his partners, Particularly of most interest was saving the mortgage banking activities and the digital movie, which he did successfully, but apparently too successfully. ‘THE "DIGITAL MOVIE" Through an act of fate, in February of 1987, Stan Caterbone found himself in a meeting wit Tony Bongiovi at Power Station studios. Through one of his partners, he reluctantly traveled ts New York to consider financing @ motion picture. Stan Caterbone's own lack tolerajce for the risk associated with flm investments was overshadowed by the opportunity to visit # recording studio. Although his associate was @ friend of Tony's, he was not familiar! with his accomplishments, or his work, so he thought. If nothing else, it was a weekend aay from Lancaster, and a chance to visit the Big Apple. Intriguingly, he found more than he had evet ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 13 of 48, Thursday, April 28, 2016imagined on that weekend excursion. Tony Bongiovi, a musical genius, who's credits include one of the most recognized recording studios In the country, Power Station Stutios. Ton Bongiow produced the sound track for *Star Wars, and is responsibie for the format of one of the most successful recording artist of the 80's, Jon “Bon Jow", his cousin. Power Station has recorded the albums for some of the most influential artists of all time, including Diana Ross, Madonna, The Rolling Stones, Steve Winwood, Bruce Springsteen, etc., Tony, ap eccentet: aenius, of Italian decent, had many talents, from music to aerospace enginecring. Stan Caterbone’s associate's sister met Tony while he flew his plane into Lancaster's airport for repairs. They dated for some time and Stan Caterbone's associate and Tony became friends, which led Stan Caterbone to Tony's Power Station Studios. perception, he dramatically recognized the future evolution for the technical merits of delivering digital video and digital audio entertainment to the mass markets. By June of 1987, Stan required, ‘the movie was to be shot “on-location” at the Jersey shore pots, mostly in Wildwood. Tony strategcally envisioned making a movie In the horor genre. There were several specie reasons that supported this strategy. First, he determined that It was the least expensive format to produce, we all estimated a budget of $4 million for the productioh and post production. Secondly, the horror genre would compliment a very intense sound track. The sound track was important to enhance the new digital format, and alo provide te means fo introduce a new band that he had been grooming in his studio for the past several year L "French Lick", his predecessor to “Bon Jovi". There had been bad blood between Tony and his cousin "Bon Jovi", which resulted in egal dsputes pertaining to Tony's fnancal fnterests jn Jon's sucess. It was an unfortunate situation cons dering Tony's father and Jon's father wele except the brothers living in the same area. It was a subject that Tony never wanted to discu his contributions toward Jon's career. If by another act of fate, Stan Caterbone had the privilege of meeting one of the many superstars while working at Power Station studios. While growing up, at an early age, Stan Caterbone would sneak up Into the bedroom of his oldest brother, and start up his|old General Electric stereo phonograph and listen to his favorite album - Diana Ross and the Supremes. It was a passion and a ritual that provided an early infatuation to music, and to Diana Ross. Stain Caterbone was only 10 or 11 years old. And at this early age, he noticed and listened to the Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 14 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016annoying hiss, that conventional hiss that always seemed to overshadow the music, whethet played on an album, on the radio, 8-track tape, or cassette. | fd In @ mystical twist of fate, whle engrossed In a polect dedicated to delivering must without that his (digital ~ Stan Caterbone opened te door to the recording sute fo pack hi vaas forthe journey back to Lancaster; - and there she se, witha glowing array of beauty, more beautiful than any picture could ever tel, Hs. Dina Ross She was pregnatlond in tk mide of a recording session, for a new albu, Her assistant guickiy demanded, n 4 ser and protecve voice, that we leave, and Stan Coterbone and his assocate replied “this is out makeshift bedroom, we are just gathering our belongings. Stan Caterbone walled tonart Diana Ross who Was seated near his bag, and she asked “and who are you, Stan|Caterbon calmly reed his mame and absorbed as much of her Beaty a is ees out Deol befor walking out the door. The room that was his bedroom the nigh before, and suddenly transfixed into the recaraing sute of Diana Ross, thinking back some twenty years earl, pre of th many gts that God would Beson upon him. A ving memorial and reminder th ns og brother, who dled on Christmas day of 1985, his est flend who taught him two of his greatey pleasures in life, Diana Ross, and listening to music. He prayed that his brother was watching from above, And so, the digital movie project that Stan Caterbone had embraced in 1987 had 7 significance, and he never ever doubted his instincts regarding the technical merits of the project. Stan Caterbone's perception that the entertainment industry would deliver| motion pictures in a truly digital medium will later become a truly remarkable vision. | ful ent During May of 1987, Stan Caterbone had created a joint venture proposal lfor SONY Entertainment, Inc., for the digital movie. After weeks of researching the current state-of- alfairs within SONY, and after his proposal was completed, SONY publicly announced their desire to open the markets for new and emerging technologies on the cover of TIME magazine] Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 15 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016another demonstrated sense of perception, It was this proposal, when delivered to one of the Hollywood producers in Santa Monica, California, after reading a draft of the proposal she said *you are @ genius". The proposal was introduced to Tony Bongiovi at the Wildwood Boardwalk where many of scenes were to be shot, and he approved of the proposal and thought that it had great merits. Tony, who wanted very to do with the business elements of his project, gave Stan Caterbone complete authority to secure the financing of the project, with 2 salary as Executive Producer, and a percentage of the profits on the back end. i ter review of Stan Coterbone's research and proposal’ bis vision and his passion, unfortunately without his efforts, has come to be known as Direct Satelite Systen, oF DSS, entertainment. That technology is fast eroding at the cable industry. Stan Caterbone had his patent research center around the PSDMS system, the Power Station Digital Movie System. Ani that was In 1987, some Seven years before SONY delivered his dreams. Later Stan Caterbone would aso accurately prec that the 90's would become the "Information Age” because ofthe direct contributions and advancements of “tal technologies", which Is directly responsible fr the development ofthe INTERNET" Stan Caterbone’s obsession with his "digital movie" has proven to be one of his most remarkable demonstrations of his keen sense of perception. | ‘The author admitted in an affidavit in 1998 that he did not know the criminal culpability of Lisa Michelle Lambert, and further argues that it was because of the prosecutorial misconduct and the erroneous handling of the crime scene that the truth evaded both the prosecution and the defense as to who actually killed Laurie Show. Pro Se , Harassment and Stirveillancel up Date: April 28, 2016 ‘Advanced Media 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com. scaterbone@live.com (717) 669-2163 ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 16 of 48. Thursday, April 28, 2016EXHIBIT Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 17 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 18 of 48 Stan J. Caterbone ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP 1250 Fremont Stréet Lancaster, PA 17603 scaterbone@live.com 717-669-2163 November 12, 2015 Ms. Kathleen Kane Pennsylvania Attorney General 16" Floor Strawberry Square Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Re: “Old Boys Network’ filed in GENERAL OAG QUESTIONS November 11, 2015 November 11, 2015 7:42am "Kane, the first woman and Democrat elected to the position of Pennsylvania's top prosecutor, has dismissed the case as a backlash over her challenge to what she calls the old-boys' network in Pennsylvania law enforcement." LNP, Attorney General Kane faces trial on more charges, by the Associated Press on November |11, 2015.” Back in 1998 I had a meeting with an NSA (National Security Agency, Ft. Meade, Md) operative in a parking lot of a former car dealer in York, PA. I had just attended aljob fair and he approached me as I was about to get into my car. He introduced himself as being from the NSA and I questioned him about why they would not leave|me alone. His response was “It is not US (NSA) it's the Good Ole Boys". I also have a huge problem with modified, stolen, and planted documents. We parted ways In an amicable fashion. Stan J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group 717-669-2163 www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com i See the enclosed as well as U.S.C.A. 15-3400 LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT APPEAL, | APPELLANT, Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se hl www, scribd.com /doc/284639 x Individual-of-U-S-S, alg) i. | Stan J. Caterbone ‘Thursday, April 28, 2016CCowMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA | KATHLEEN G. KANE [ATTORNEY GENERAL November 13, 2015 \ Stan Caterbone 1250 Fremont Street Lancaster, PA 17603 Dear Mr. Caterbone, ‘Thank you for your correspondence to the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General: We will add your information to our files. Sincerely, i : LDN enti? | Renee Martin f Director of Education and Outreach j RGM/emk ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane CONSTITUENT SERVICES | 16" Floor Strawberry Square | Harrisburg, PA. 17120 | 717-787-3391 | Page 19 of 48 ‘Thursday, April 28, 201616) 28, uursday, Apt Page 20 of 48 le (Superior Court 1164 Amicus re KattEXHIBIT ‘Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 21 of 48 Thursday, April 28, 2016Stan J. Caterbone ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance, ° Registered in Pennsylvbnia 1250 Fremont Steet Lancaster, PA 17503 staroup.¢om scaterbone@live.dom 717-669-2163 April 20, 2016 Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder. In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International Signal and Control, or ISG. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in 1992 for &n elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons, most notably cluster bombs. Te was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that ime. 1/have Deeh & victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victm of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. Thad also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned it an all-ut assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts of personal property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of cue provess, thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the ue of direcied Eneray devices and weapons that usvally fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted Wicim, This assault was no comcidence in that began simultaneously with the flng of the federal Acton in'U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE ¥. Lancaster County Prison, et.al, or 05-ev}2288. This assault Began after the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan 3. Caterbone with mental telepathy The main difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with the same person who declares telepathicaly she Isa known celebry. Over the course of 10 years I have been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and Confirm thelr identities witnout success, Most U.S. Ineligence agencles refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the US. Attorney's Oifice refuse to comment and act on the humerous formal complaints that are fled in thelr respective offices. Most complaints are focused fon the routine victimizaton's of a targeted individual including but not limited to stalking, harassment, threats, vandalism, thes, extortion, Durglares, false Imprisonments, fabricated mental neath warrafts or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most offen the cause of obstruction of Justice isthe computer hacking. ' | I have @ very sophisticated and authentlc brary of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind Cont!ol technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the UIS. Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners Schoo! in Florida, including an affidavit motorized and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Alr force and was victim to LSD experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's, In 2015 | filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in|1992 of the murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsyivania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled “Corruption in Lancaster County - My Story”, which Is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com.” 1 ‘am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane ° Page 22 of 48 VThursday, April 28, 2016{In 2009 1 Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT GILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancastes, Pennsylvania) and City, of Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years| The bill jill provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortuljed, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed eneroy weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this day. | In 2006 1 began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Eulton Financial, which is listed as FULT" on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd,, a full service financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial, I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures. Tbelieve that Fulton Financial needs management to become more aggressive in It's strategic planning and the performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value. Expanding the footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is consistent with the expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking institutions acquired by larger regional banks, thus Increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in it’s local marketplace as well as in it's regional footprint. | tn 2008 1, as 2 Pro Se Litgant flied several cul actions as Plants that are In current Itigation In {ne United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third Distlict Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior] Court, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvatiia These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interferejce of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and it’s affliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal Whistieblowers Act regarding the firm of Internd\ and Contro, Plc, (ISC) the $iBillion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling art Africa and Iraq, This litigation dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of SC, and Was solicited by ISC executives for professional services, The Federal False Claims Act is currently part| of RICO Civil Complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288. In 2005 Advanced Media Group/roject Hope fled a Ci Aton In the Court of Comtpon Pleas! o Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We aso proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancas;er Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under construction with a March 2009 Opening date. In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after submission| of ‘an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Execut!ve Officer of the William J. Clinton Foundation. | In 2005 1 began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative, Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Tom’s Project Hope, People|to People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric Center, and numerous others. Superior Court 1164 Amicus re Kathleen Kane Page 23 of 48 VThursday, April 28, 2016