This document discusses a 1985 legal case from Bangladesh regarding the ownership of land. The plaintiff claimed ownership of the land based on documents showing his ancestors purchased it, while the defendant said the land belonged to him based on adverse possession for over 12 years. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the defendant, finding that the documents provided by the plaintiff were not sufficient to prove his ownership, and that the defendant had adversely possessed the land for longer than the legal limit.
This document discusses a 1985 legal case from Bangladesh regarding the ownership of land. The plaintiff claimed ownership of the land based on documents showing his ancestors purchased it, while the defendant said the land belonged to him based on adverse possession for over 12 years. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the defendant, finding that the documents provided by the plaintiff were not sufficient to prove his ownership, and that the defendant had adversely possessed the land for longer than the legal limit.
This document discusses a 1985 legal case from Bangladesh regarding the ownership of land. The plaintiff claimed ownership of the land based on documents showing his ancestors purchased it, while the defendant said the land belonged to him based on adverse possession for over 12 years. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the defendant, finding that the documents provided by the plaintiff were not sufficient to prove his ownership, and that the defendant had adversely possessed the land for longer than the legal limit.