JOINMUN 2023

CRISIS COUNCIL LORE

The Rise of Corporatocracy: A Symphony of Emporiums and Souls In a Generation Enslaved by Corporations

Short Description of Council

A thrilling and dynamic committee in the Model United Nations repertoire, the Crisis Council beckons an exhilarating simulation of
crises, both real and imagined, both present and future of crisis management. Amidst fast-paced and unforeseen scenarios, crisis
councils test the delegate's ability to navigate intense scenarios, quick thinking and strategic planning. Limited time and high stakes
spur them to seek creative solutions and negotiate with other delegates while prioritizing their interests. The Crisis Council differs
from conventional councils in that it relies on a series of commands called "Directives," rather than resolutions, to produce solutions
unique to each session. Throughout committee sessions, "News Updates" will be published, reporting the outcomes of these
"Directives" after being processed. This iterative cycle of updates and replies through "Directives" will be the primary means of
resolving issues during the conference. Due to this, the Crisis Council presents an unparalleled opportunity to develop critical and
quick thinking, leadership, and diplomatic skills, indispensable in a world forever globalizing and within the circuit of MUN itself!
Whether a novice or veteran MUN delegate, the Crisis Council presents a unique and thrilling challenge to test one's skills and
experiences.

1
Short Description of Topic
Beneath the neon and chrome facade of cyberpunk lies a culture that hides a dark underbelly of crime, corruption, and corporate
authoritarianism, warning us of the perils of unchecked technological advancement and corporatocracy. Skyscrapers tower over the
urban landscape, with high-end restaurants and tech emporiums dazzling the senses. Yet, in equal measure, one is just as likely to
stumble upon a dismal alleyway teeming with poverty and addiction. In this dystopian future, characterized by cyberpunk's core ethos
of "high tech, low life," the abundance of technological marvels and excesses only highlights the decay and destitution that pervade
the megacities and sprawling metropolises. As we draw closer to such a future through the development of robotic limbs, self-driving
cars, and powerful AI, along with the overlooked power of corporations in our capitalist economy, it's no wonder why such themes
have gained popularity over time.

In the year 2050, the world is a shadow of its former self, scarred by the Great Fiscal Collapse that struck in 2025. With nation-states
crippled, the global order's balance of power was transformed. Corporations at the forefront rose as the new leviathans of the world,
with power and influence permeating every aspect of government unbeknownst to many. Deeply inspired by the world of Cyberpunk,
Neuromancer, 1984, Bladerunner, and many others of the genre, delegates will step into a world of a nigh-corporatocracy future as
corporations amidst technological ascendancy. In a secret council chamber, the plenipotentiary of the most prominent corporations
gathers, their voices echoing like the roar of a tempest as they coordinate their efforts against their obstacles and adversaries, despite
the subjects of personal goals and ambitions. Set in the fateful year of 2050, the council meeting is a momentous event in the annals of
history, a fulcrum of momentous consequence that will determine the ultimate authority of the global order —whether it be nations or
corporations. In JOINMUN 2023 iteration of the crisis council, delegates will delve into the world of nigh-cyberpunk as one of the
most fascinating movements in recent history.

2
Lore
Presented below is a recollection of major events starting from early 2020s until 2050 to provide additional context and points of
reference for the futuristic crisis world of JOINMUN2023. The lore will start by explaining the collection of critical points that started
that sharp turn into a world where corporations run rampant in 2050, that is, the Great Financial Collapse of 2025 and The
Pandemics of 2020s, collectively referred as “The Great Collapse” through four chapters. The first chapter, “The Great Collapse”
will examine the unfolding of the Great Collapse through the lens of several powers such as the United States, China, and European
Union, as well as several regions such as Africa, Middle East, and Asia-Pacific. These will be followed by examining how major
corporations reacted during The Great Collapse and how the Collapse came to an end. The next chapter, “The Age of Reflection of
Renewal”, will discuss the major events happening post collapse during the recovery period. Major events include the start of “The
Grand Voyage Initiative”, the rise of Asian Development Group (ADG), and “Breakthrough of the Atlus System” The third chapter,
“The Winds of Transformation”, will tackle more contemporary events, discussing the scientific breakthroughs achieved during and
after the recovery, and the start of major corporations challenging state’s power, resulting in the emergence of corporations as a
sovereign in contest with States to become the primary actor in international politics. The last chapter, “The Oncoming Storm”,
discusses events just before, such as the start of “The Climate Disaster”, “The Sixth Industrial Revolution”, “The Missing
Hydrocarbons”, and “The Second Saudi-Iranian War”, as well as events still developing as of the beginning 2050.

3
Impending Doom Approaches
Amidst the skyrocketing inflation, the ravages of Covid-19, the perils of climate change, and the Russo-Ukraine war, the international
world then had to endure one of its most tumultuous and testing periods of history, to its sorrowful detriment. Unbeknownst to the
actors of the international world, the year 2025 marked another turning point as the world faced the threat of a global scale economic
recession at an unprecedented scale, a threat and fear that soon became a reality. Brewing for decades, the economic rivalry between
the United States and China was either believed to be a catalyst for crisis or economic prosperity12. Little did both powers know at the
time, but their economic rivalry would plunge both powers to massive crisis that exacerbated their own national problems, such as
stagflation in the U.S and China’s own debt problem. With a world reliant on both powers for trade still crippled by the effects of a
post-pandemic world, two regional wars, an oil crisis, and an economic downturn, the impending catastrophic economic implications
from the trade war towards the global economy approach the world in the form of the former belief, a catalyst for an economic crisis.
Unprepared, the development of the two major economies took a drastic turn, one remembered throughout the world as the spark that
lit the flame of dystopia, a future of never-ending storms, the catastrophes humanity strives to avoid. A future that we lead society
towards.

The Path to Collapse

In the year 2025, the world was brought to its knees by the great economic crisis known as the ‘2025 Fiscal Collapse’ that lasted from
2025 to 2030, or simply the ‘Great Collapse’. This devastating event shook the foundation of the global financial system, leading to a
severe recession that was felt far and wide, and a harrowing reminder of their fragility. The tragedy was thought to have stemmed from
a deep-seated economic antagonism between the United States and China, the reliance upon credit and false hopes of growth, and
collections of destructive events that sparked the regression of global economy. On one that had been simmering for many years. The
1
Dan Steinbock, “U.S.-China Trade War and Its Global Impacts,” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 04, no. 04 (January 2018): 515–42,
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740018500318.
2
Sunkung Danso, “Political Economy and Regional Policy: The Impact of US-China Trade Tension on the Global Economic Growth,” Budapest International
Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 3, no. 3 (August 3, 2020): 2224–32, https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i3.1155.

4
long-standing rivalry between these two global economic heavyweights, and the trade war that has been brewing for years, has been a
source of great intrigue and interest to economic scholars, provoking much contemplation and discourse. The eventual discourse and
deliberations on an economic model, tailored to the unique circumstances, were eventually divided into two distinct categories; a
blueprint for both economic crisis and economic prosperity34. Alas, the world soon confronted the truth that the accepted model of the
world was the former, a rivalry that swiftly caused an economic crash of such intensity that it set off a domino effect that no state nor
scholar could foresee. Though the "Great Lockdowns" of the 2020s or the pandemic crisis was recognized as one of the most
devastating economic downturns since the Great Depression, it was but a small foreshadowing of what is yet to come, its impact was
but a whisper of what is yet to come5.

While contention of the true beginning of the Great Collapse of 2025 remains contested, the general knowledge in 2050 believes that
the trade war that began in 2018 when the United States imposed tariffs on Chinese goods to level the playing field for American
businesses serves as the initial cause. China retaliated by placing tariffs on US goods, and the two countries engaged in a tit-for-tat
trade battle6. The differing ideological views and systems on trade and economic policies were fundamental factors that led to the
heightening of tensions during the trade war7. The geopolitical competition between the two countries contributed to the trade war's
aggressiveness. The United States became increasingly concerned about China’s growing power and influence and has been trying to
contain it; China, in turn, sees the US actions as an attempt to contain its rise and has responded by taking a more assertive stance. As
the war escalated, businesses on both sides were hit hard. American companies that relied on Chinese imports were forced to pay more

3
Pablo Fajgelbaum and Amit Kumar Khandelwal, “The Economic Impacts of the Us-China Trade War,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021,
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3931838.
4
Steinbock, “U.S.-China Trade War,”
5
Gita Gopinath, “The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn since the Great Depression,” IMF, April 14, 2020,
https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2020/04/14/blog-weo-the-great-lockdown-worst-economic-downturn-since-the-great-depression.
6
He Chengying, Chen Rui, and Liu Ying, “US-China Trade War and China’s Stock Market: An Event-Driven Analysis,” Economic Research-Ekonomska
Istraživanja, October 22, 2021, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2021.1990781.
7
Shiping Hua and Ka Zeng, “The US–China Trade War: Economic Statecraft, Multinational Corporations, and Public Opinion,” Business and Politics 24, no. 4
(November 4, 2022): 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2022.18.

5
for goods, while Chinese companies that exported to the US saw a drop in demand. The United States Federal Reserve Bank reported
that the imposed increased tariffs and the other implications of the trade war have significantly reduced the US economic growth
gradually over the years and massive job loss across the nation8. Further intensification of the trade war was seen during December of
2022 as both sides began adopting more assertive —borderline aggressive— methods to prevail over the other by political and
economical means9. Tension greatly escalated in early to mid-2024 as the tariffs imposed by United States and China on each other's
goods disrupted global supply chains, making it more expensive for businesses to produce and sell goods in addition to both countries’
aggressive policies towards domestic businesses' cooperation with each other10. The coming tempest of an economic downturn,
swathed in corruption, the sway of corporate interests, and the growing protectionism of America, was a challenge neither country
could bravely confront.

The continuous disruption to the global supply chains led to a decline in international and domestic trade activities as businesses and
consumers were less likely to import and export goods11. Furthermore, the decline in economic activity negatively affected emerging
markets, especially those in Asia and in close-economic ties with China12. The uncertainty and volatility caused by the trade war in the
financial market exacerbated the already decreasing economic growth of the countries and the global economy through the decline in
investments, as businesses and consumers become less confident about the economy's future13. As economic activity continued to
decline, the stock markets in both countries and many other countries began to suffer, eventually leading investors to withdraw their

8
Eugenio Cerutti, Gita Gopinath, and Adil Mohommad, “The Impact of US-China Trade Tensions,” IMF, May 23, 2019,
https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2019/05/23/blog-the-impact-of-us-china-trade-tensions.
9
Sarah Anne Aarup, “Brussels Incensed as US Spurns Global Trade Rules (yet Again),” POLITICO, December 20, 2022,
https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-incensed-as-us-spurns-global-trade-rules-yet-again/.
10
Monica Miller, “US Bars ‘Advanced Tech’ Firms from Building China Factories for 10 Years,” BBC News, September 7, 2022, sec. Companies,
https://www.bbc.com/news/62803224.
11
Cerutti et al.,“The Impact of US-China Trade”
12
Danso, “The Impact of US-China Trade Tension,”
13
Hua and Zeng, “The US–China Trade War,”

6
investments and money. The situation reached a boiling point in late-2024 when the US accused China of currency manipulation1415.
This led to a complete breakdown in negotiations and a total suspension of trade between the two countries in the following year,
initiated by the DeSantis Administration.16 Despite the United States and China preparing policies, stimuli, and many other economic
policies in preparation for such a drastic turn, the two major economies and the world failed to comprehend the magnitude of their
actions fully would bring. In a world still in disarray adapting to the post-pandemic world, and Europe still engulfed in the refugee
crisis and Russia’s war, their actions would soon become a domino effect with ripples across all economies in the world.

The Great Collapse

The devastating repercussions of the trade war and stagnating inflation in the U.S quickly reverberated throughout the global
economy, leaving countless companies and countries with close ties to the US and China no choice but redirect their trade to other
countries. For larger corporations and businesses, their size allows them to absorb the initial impact of the trade disruption and thus
they survived the downfall. But, the rest are not so lucky and forced to lay off workers and shutter factories. The decline in trade and
investment activities led to the eventual recession of major countries, which reverberated to other countries around the globe.
Furthermore, the ongoing trade war between the US and China had resulted in rising protectionism in their trade partners, thus
resulting in a decline in market inputs. Coupled with other geopolitical tensions such as the chaos in Europe as well as the renewed
war in the Middle East fueled by multiple incidents with stolen nuclear material, an atmosphere of uncertainty grew in global markets.
Meanwhile, many major loaners were still recovering from the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, a debt crisis
was looming, with many borrowers unable to repay their loans. Interest rates were also rising, making it even more difficult for these
borrowers to service their debts. This led to a domino effect of defaults, bankruptcies, and bank runs, which sent shockwaves

14
Hua and Zeng, “The US–China Trade War,”
15
Rebecca Skaff, Lincoln Webb, and Kyle Clahane, “Understanding China’s Currency Manipulation,” Oaktrust.library.tamu.edu, March 1, 2018,
https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/166316.
16
CBS Miami Team, “Gov DeSantis Signs Bills Targeting China Influence”, CBS, May 2023
https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/gov-desantis-signs-bills-targeting-china-influence/

7
throughout the global financial system. As the crisis deepened, corporate profits declined, and equity markets went into a tailspin.
Investors began short selling, and hot money started fleeing from emerging markets, causing further turmoil. In this environment of
uncertainty and fear, governments struggled to respond effectively, and the crisis quickly spread beyond the financial sector to the real
economy. The catalyst that triggered this economic crisis was the sudden collapse of a major financial institution, which sent
shockwaves throughout the global financial system. The stock market had tumbled as investors panicked. Banks and other financial
institutions struggled to stay afloat as the value of their assets plummeted, facing a major equity decline. The loss of investments and
markets confidence due to the trade war and the economic crisis, caused a decrease in the demand for loans and an increase in loan
defaults, that ultimately led to the decline of equity and stocks of banks and companies1718. Major banks such as JPMorgan, Bank of
America, BNP, Bank of England and HSBC faced significant losses from the equity decline and the panic that incited a flurry of bank
runs serving to further deepen the economic crisis, while others banks and many other industries faced bankruptcy and foreclosure1920.
The interconnectedness of the global economy meant that countries and businesses relied on each other for goods, services, and
investments, and the crisis soon turned into an out-of-control spiralling domino effect2122.

The global economy was suffering from a severe contraction. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) had forecasted a 3.5%
contraction in global GDP, and the World Bank had predicted a 2.9% decline in global trade. This was the worst economic downturn
since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The Collapse caused unemployment rates to skyrocket, and personal debt was becoming

17
Elena Loukoianova, Gianni De Nicoló, and John H. Boyd, “Banking Crises and Crisis Dating: Theory and Evidence,” IMF Working Papers 09, no. 141 (2009):
1, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451872880.001.
18
Sally Chen and Katsiaryna Svirydzenka, “Financial Cycles – Early Warning Indicators of Banking Crises?,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021,
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4026292.
19
Leonello et al., “Working Paper Series Savings, Efficiency and Bank Runs,” December 2022,
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp2636~919f4a1ecd.en.pdf.
20
Matthew Baron, Emil Verner, and Wei Xiong, “Banking Crises without Panics,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 136, no. 1 (October 8, 2020): 51–113,
https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa034.
21
Theodore H Cohn, Global Political Economy : Theory and Practice (Boston: Pearson, 2010), p. 247
22
Andrew Heywood, Global Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), p. 233-4

8
unmanageable. Many were losing their homes and life savings, and poverty was on the rise, with the International Labor Organization
estimating that the crisis had wiped out nearly 200 million jobs. The poverty rate increased by more than 10%, with nearly 1.5 billion
people projected to be living in extreme poverty in the years to come. Governments and financial institutions were scrambling to
contain the crisis. Central banks were engaging in massive quantitative easing, and governments were introducing stimulus packages
to jumpstart the economy. However, these measures had limited success, and some countries resorted to unconventional policies from
negative interest rates to debt monetization. In the United States, the S&P 500 had lost over 50% of its value, and the unemployment
rate had risen to over 10%. In China, the Shanghai Composite Index had fallen by over 60%, and the country was experiencing its
worst economic growth in decades. In Europe, the Eurozone was in a state of crisis, with countries such as Greece and Italy on the
brink of default. Global debt had reached an all-time high of over $277 trillion, or 365% of global GDP. Corporate debt had exploded,
with companies such as General Electric and Ford borrowing heavily to maintain operations. Central bank balance sheets had
ballooned, with the US Federal Reserve alone holding over $8 trillion in assets. The debt crisis was not just a result of borrowers being
unable to repay their loans due to the economic fallout from the trade war and the pandemic. There were also underlying issues such
as the high levels of corporate debt, particularly in the United States, and the increasing use of complex financial instruments such as
collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and credit default swaps (CDSs). Furthermore, the low interest rates set by central banks in the
aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis also contributed to the buildup of debt. These low rates incentivized companies and governments
to borrow heavily, leading to a debt bubble that eventually burst.

As the crisis deepened, governments worldwide scrambled to stabilize their economies, as the financial system collapsed and the
global economy experienced a downturn never seen before. Governments and central banks around the world scrambled to respond to
the crisis. Fiscal stimulus measures were introduced to boost demand, while monetary policies were eased to provide liquidity to the
markets. The US, China, and the rest of the world implemented massive stimulus packages, but it was too late. With many economies
of the world still recovering from the pandemic, dealing with the implications of Russia’s war against Ukraine, and other issues, the

9
arrival of the economic crisis, the magnitude that it reaches, and the time that it occurred was something that many states and
international organizations failed to prepare for. The lack of preparation, their arrogance to protect their interests, and the late reaction
towards the crisis led to the ineffectiveness of international organizations, cooperations, and other efforts became their downfall.
Despite early attempts of international organizations and other international actors to spearhead a cooperation effort, the limited
mandate, slow bureaucratic process, limited resources, differing interests, and the lack of political will due to some countries
becoming more and more individualistic and choosing to protect their own interests and economy rather than joining cooperation led
2324
the failure of numerous regional and international organizations to face the crisis early on . The result of it all was a dark and
dismal global plunge, a domino effect rippling out from the United States and Asia to Europe, Africa, and beyond, wreaking economic
havoc on an unprecedented scale.

The Second Great Pandemic of 2025

In the face of the great economic crisis, international cooperation and organizations proved to be a feeble beacon in the
tempest. Despite successfully containing the COVID-19 pandemic by the end of 2023 from both China and the West, the
combined efforts of hundreds of governments were quickly rendered useless after a Tampa, Florida-based influencer was found
to have suffered from a new disease after the Saudi Arabian Grand Prix in late March 2025. Believed to be an offshoot of hand,
foot, and mouth disease, the new and unknown virus quickly spread through the Saudi population, and inadvertently exported
over 10,000 carriers to different countries across the globe due to the variant’s secret weapon: a delayed incubation period.
Symptoms include fever, muscle fatigue, and the requisite blisters and rashes. The delays started a domino effect in part due to
the next Formula One Grand Prix in Melbourne, where only around 5% of the F1 crew were exhibiting aggressive symptoms
and were promptly contained; however, in truth over 70% were already infected.
23
Herbert Wulf and Tobias Debiel, “Systemic Disconnects: Why Regional Organizations Fail to Use Early Warning and Response Mechanisms,” Global
Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 16, no. 4 (December 19, 2010): 525–47, https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01604007.
24
Giulio M. Gallarotti, “The Limits of International Organization: Systematic Failure in the Management of International Relations,” International Organization
45, no. 2 (1991): 183–220, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300033063.

10
 The fiasco of the Australian Grand Prix created a boom of cases due to its popularity; all the while, the blissful ignorance of
organizers allowed the disease to elusively and easily spread. All in all, since its discovery just two weeks ago, the new
disease, named XB7, had created over 150,000 new cases in its first three weeks of existence. Despite claims by respective
pharmaceutical companies that vaccines will quell the spread, XB7 quickly evolved further and gained further resilience by
December. After a further 500,000 deaths from 7 million infections, positive research from asymptomatic patients produced
XBVac in March 2026, which provided approximately 63% protection from symptoms from the first two administrations.

Thankfully, vaccinations in many parts of the world were quick; Southeast Asian countries such as Indonesia, Thailand, and
the Philippines, along with others such as South America and parts of the Middle East welcomed XBVac with open arms and
were able to quickly put a stop to XB7’s relentless spread. Western-aligned countries, however, were not so quick to respond
due to Pfizer being unable to quickly answer to XB7’s randomly revising RNA signatures. As an added result, Western
pharmaceutical stocks quickly tanked, only having been saved by a bailout supported by the US Congress.

The Illusive Pursuit of International Unity and Solidarity

In the face of the great economic crisis, international cooperation and organizations proved to be a feeble beacon in the
tempest. Despite their noble intent, the winds of change and the tides of uncertainty swelled beyond their control. Although the
economic crisis did not precipitate the dissolution of international and regional organizations, the lack of cooperation and
political will rendered them futile and powerless. The Great Collapse awoke a slumbering beast of rampant self-interest in all
countries, causing a ripple of insecurity that spread across the world, leading nations to sequester themselves in a vain attempt
to protect their people, resources, and prosperity as they attempt to minimize the spread of the crisis25. Though the Great

25
H. L., “The League of Nations and the World Economic Depression,” Bulletin of International News 8, no. 7 (1931): 3–11,
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25638979.

11
 Depression showed the danger of such acts, many scholars and governments thought the situation was completely distinct, for
the interconnecting world economy due to globalization necessitated protectionist policies26. Furthermore, the increase in loan
defaults and value of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) significantly affected its portfolio. As its member face their own
economic woes, some are unable to contribute the agreed amount to the Fund, affecting the IMF’s reputation, ability to provide
funds and, mitigate the crisis, restore global economic stability2728. All of which contribute to the growing inward focus of
countries worldwide.

Ultimately, these circumstances reflected a wider trend of growing skepticism towards globalization, the effectiveness of
international cooperation and a desire for greater national control over economic affairs to minimize and insulate themselves
from the Collapse. Though early coordination and cooperation by the G20, IMF, and other international organizations, the
magnitude of the crisis and the interconnectedness of the world soon warranted nations to succumb to protectionism policies.
The signs of these behaviors and actions was seen in the grandeur of major economies, such as Germany, the Four Asian
Tigers, and other democratic nations that have prioritized their domestic market and economy over global collaboration. The
repercussions of these actions rendered international organizations powerless and unable to sustain their fleeting attempts to
collaborate in the aftermath of the Collapse, which had descended so abruptly. Despite so, the flames of cooperation would be
lit again after the passing of the peak of the Collapse in early 2027.

26
Barry Eichengreen and Douglas A. Irwin, “The Slide to Protectionism in the Great Depression: Who Succumbed and Why?,” The Journal of Economic History
70, no. 4 (2010): 871–97,
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40984781.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A47041bfdd15a289cc53ffa143f1254ab&ab_segments=&origin=&acceptTC=1.
27
Kristalina Georgieva, “Facing Crisis upon Crisis: How the World Can Respond,” IMF, April 14, 2022,
https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2022/04/14/sp041422-curtain-raiser-sm2022.
28
Eugenio Cerutti, Gita Gopinath, and Adil Mohommad, “The Impact of US-China Trade Tensions,” IMF, May 23, 2019,
https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2019/05/23/blog-the-impact-of-us-china-trade-tensions.

12
 The Restarting of History: End of the United States’ Hegemony
The United States, a political and economic giant since the end of the Second World War, was one of the major powers most
affected by the crisis of the 2020s. Even though the Biden administration has attempted to halt the post-pandemic rising
inflation, manage the fallout of the global supply chain crisis due to the war in Ukraine, and limit the influence of Chinese
companies, the administration’s attempts weren’t enough to warrant a second term in office.29 Initially, the Biden
administration set forth a policy of "decoupling" from China before the economic crisis, a measure to lessen the reliance of the
United States on Chinese goods and services. This policy brought forth tariffs and restrictions on imports from China and
encouraged companies to move production to other nations. Biden’s administration continued to become more aggressive
towards China’s ‘geo-economic offensive’ through the Belt Road Initiative (BRI) by committing a decoupling effort by all
means, showcasing the readiness of the US to resort to protectionism to win over China30. Nevertheless, this policy brought
about unforeseen repercussions, augmenting the economic hardship when it eventually struck. Tariffs and regulations on
Chinese imports disrupted global supply chains and caused prices of goods to rise for American consumers, leading to inflation
and a decline in consumer spending.

After a contentious election that divided the nation even more than the infamous 2016 election, the 2024 American election
allowed Ron DeSantis (R) to enter the office of the Presidency. Following up on his campaign promises, he took an even
harder stance with China, culminating in the suspension of trade between the two countries just 100 days after entering office.
Many factors were considered- One, China’s bubble burst has dragged even the United States, with China’s decreased
productivity, the United States had to recalibrate their trade elsewhere Second, China’s currency manipulation, making trade

29
Nidumolu, “US set to restrict China's access to cloud computing”, Reuters, July 2023,
https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-set-restrict-chinas-access-cloud-computing-wsj-2023-07-04/
30
Jon Bateman, “Biden Is Now All-in on Taking out China,” Foreign Policy, October 22, 2022,
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/10/12/biden-china-semiconductor-chips-exports-decouple.

13
unfeasible with the erosion of trust between the two powers, and three, the needs of Ron DeSantis to put a blame on the
upcoming stagflation and recession to China, enabling the Republicans to reshape American political and economy.

Dubbed the most significant change to the United States since the Civil War, the Republicans managed to secure enough
governors to call upon a second constitutional convention through the Convention of States, with the aim to implement a
Federal Spending Limit or Balanced Budget Amendment within the American Constitution. With the amendment passing,
Americans watched as the Federal government became helpless as “The Great Collapse” and the Second Great Pandemic of
the century hit in 2025. As a result, each state faced the crisis through its own means. In Democrat-Majority states such as
California and New York, the state-issued stamps and financial assistance reminiscent of The Great Depression era aided the
populace. Meanwhile, in Republican-Majority states, private institutions and churches took over, providing necessities to their
constituents. As a result, the United States became divided as ever, with some even calling for the independence of
Democrat-Majority states. But, American perseverance takes over, and thus the so-called “End of History” reshaped itself- not
as a global power, but as a confederation of states loosely connected by a minor Federal government and the sense of unity to
what was. Now in 2050, the American public is once again faced with a new opportunity to redefine itself. As the Americans
grew tired of this divorce, some are calling for a renewal of Federal Power, and the ousting of Republicans from all aspects of
government. But with extensive gerrymandering, it is up to debate on whether or not the United States can regain its vigor as
truly a “United” State.

The widespread job loss, economic hardship, decline in the country’s economic power, and the chaos engulfing the
international world resulted in a sharp decrease in the influence and pride that the United States once had. Under significant
pressure to revive the economy, the government implemented a series of measures such as implementing a massive stimulus
package, cutting interest rates, and providing support to struggling businesses, but these measures were not enough to fully

14
 revive the economy31. The country was plunged into a deep recession, and the unemployment rate soared to unprecedented
levels. The crisis severely impacted the American people, who were struggling to make ends meet, with many citizens losing
their homes and their savings, and many were unable to afford basic necessities such as food and healthcare. The government's
inability to provide support and relief to its citizens led to a decline in public trust and a growing disillusionment with the
American Dream32.

In the face of such grim truth, the people and the government strove to make use of any resources they had, and we, the
corporations, shouldered the weight of their errors to help reconstruct and uphold the nation in the midst of this crisis. Similar
to previous economic crises the world faced, the corporations had to restructure and support the economic downturn at the
behest of countries to alleviate what their countries were experiencing33. As small and powerless businesses collapsed in the
wake of this decision, those who had the foresight to seize the moment saw their wealth and power swell within the nation and
beyond. As a result of the economic hardship and lack of government support, in an attempt to subdue the unrest of the
population, the government took an unprecedented course of action to cooperate with the country's corporations to aid and
outsource numerous key governance functions to private companies. Due to this, corporations gained significant influence over
the government by filling the void and providing basic services and necessities to the citizens, utilizing resources and influence
to shape government policies to their advantage, and in some cases, even taking over certain government functions in the far
future.

31
Daniel Kaimann and Ilka Tanneberg, “What Containment Strategy Leads Us through the Pandemic Crisis? An Empirical Analysis of the Measures against the
COVID-19 Pandemic,” ed. Simone Lolli, PLOS ONE 16, no. 6 (June 21, 2021): e0253237, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253237.
32
Michelle Bachelet, “Crisis and Fragility of Democracy in the World,” OHCHR, August 3, 2022,
https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements-and-speeches/2022/08/crisis-and-fragility-democracy-world.
33
Mark R. Stone, “Corporate Sector Restructuring: The Role of Government in Times of Crisis,” www.imf.org, June 2002,
https://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/issues/issues31/.

15
Despite believing that they will be able to continue to regulate and supervise the actions of the corporations and the role of the
international community in ensuring control remains in the government, they fail to truly comprehend the gravity of the
circumstances that they provide to the corporations. Amidst an unprecedented economic crisis and the crippled conditions of
numerous countries and organizations across the globe, corporations were presented with the amicable opportunity to amass
power, wealth, and influence within the United States. A theme that will continue to occur to corporations across the world.
While indeed the United States and many other countries that soon followed this course of action owe their survival to the
corporations and were met with a positive response from the population, their noble salvation was merely a facade of a long
con to execute a long-term assimilation that will ensure the massive benefits the corporations shall enjoy in the future. A feeble
global order, corrupt governments, and a spirit of individualism that many nations embraced ensured the state and world order
were susceptible to corporate infiltration, usurping government control; a prescience of an impending corporatocracy that the
world should have foreseen. The United States would later reemerge from the crisis as a country deeply in an even stronger
mutual relationship with its corporation, limiting its influence to the American continent.

A Mummer’s Dragon: China in Crisis

With all these obstacles, China marches on, even while seeds of instability are sown. The trade wars had damaged both the US
and China in terms of economic markets. The condition also worsened with the fact that many of China's state-owned
enterprises (SoEs) started to falter. The first of the dominoes fell when Evergrande, one of China's SOE dabbling in real estate
development, finally defaulted due to unsustainable business practices back in the end of 2021. Their business model of real
estate revolved around not actually finishing their projects, instead utilizing any promises of new property projects to rake in
future residents' money and allocating it to even more projects. Thus, began a chain of failing SOEs throughout China, and it
spelled disaster for the CCP. Regardless of these dominoes, two of those had been ensured to not fail: Advanced China
Industries and Bank of China. With the failures and bankruptcies of SOEs, the state simply can't run, but there is one thing they

16
can fall back on: their loans towards many other countries, especially their infrastructure loans towards African countries.
Knowing the decline of SOEs within, China began their claim for their loan paybacks towards these countries, forcing them to
pay their loans back under any circumstances. The issue once again was due to the conditions brought upon by the Second
Great Pandemic; with many countries, especially African countries, still trying to stabilize out of the pandemic, their loan
paying capacity had greatly decrease, thus not allowing any proper cashflow towards China's coffers. Due to these collapses,
China took many actions with the advent of the occasion. One of the outcomes of the Trade War was the isolation of US, thus
giving the gap needed for China to accomplish its long goal to reunify with Taiwan, thinking of taking over its microchip
manufacturing and establish dominance within it.

All of these woes would pile up and reduce the purchasing power of the people. Not only SoEs, private companies would then
experience a downturn in purchases. The trade wars had ravaged the Chinese market: inflations rampant, cost of goods soaring,
and various shortages. Without any significant numbers of purchases done by its people, China once again lost one more
possible source of government revenue: losing potential consumption and purchasing taxes from various purchases. The
people’s purchasing power slumped, thus China needed to take in a different source of income. Trade relations in the wake of
the Collapse that had been abolished seemed to be China’s only way out. Starting from 2031, China initiated trade relations
once again with various nation states, especially looking to take the United States’ former trade partners to hook in. With this
move, China had succeeded in normalizing trade relations with many European countries, while their efforts in African
markets had been marked as a failure and an unnecessary strain on the economy. A substantial amount was still skeptical of
China’s trade behaviour due to their previous war with USA, but due to this move, China had once again stabilized its revenue
stream, thus allowing them to revamp many SoEs, allowing the CCP to stay afloat.

17
With everything in decline, social unrest is simmering among the Chinese populace, demanding that the state puts the economy
back on track. The CCP, with no genuine way out, can only pushback against the growing unrest of the people. The CCP
initiated massive pushback campaign, deploying riot squads to put out the ever-sparking fires of unrests and riots. Various
rumours, once again, resurfaced with seeds of it actually showing in those chains of unrests. In January 2032, the rumours of a
coup had spread greatly, with no fruition that would come of it. With this theatre on display, it was Xi’s time to shine, step up
to the stage, and claim the survival of CCP in the face of the upcoming “coup.” Many experts said that this move immediately
regained a certain level of stability into the landscape of China, with Xi succeeding in regaining the lost trust of the Chinese
people. The success wasn’t only attributed to this theatre, but also with the CCP’s effort to integrate its existence into the
socio-cultural fabric of China, especially its major religions (Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism). This move would put Xi
Jinping, the chairman of the CCP, into these major religions, reframing him as the Great Harmoniser of China, thus allowing
Xi for his grip to even extend into the socio-curtural fabric of China. Now as it stands, Xi is still in power, playing his part well
in this stage of Chinese politics, but this does not spell a complete end to the underlying unrest of the Chinese people. It's only
a matter of time that this push and pull will reach its climax, may it be in the near or far future.

Calamity in The Middle East

Historians in 2050 continue to debate whether the war between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2025 was a cause or an effect of the
Great Collapse, yet it is certain that the repercussions of the war reverberated for decades to come. The war, which happened
due to a gross failure in de-escalation by both parties, resulted in nearly a million dead and the destruction of multiple
hydrocarbon facilities. As a result, oil and natural gas prices skyrocketed, plunging the world even deeper into a severe
economic crisis.

18
The attacks in Saudi Oil Fields and population centers that started the escalation process of the Saudi-Iranian war could be
traced back to the fall of Pakistan. Due to China’s economic fallout, Pakistan’s largest trade partner and ally became unable to
help the country’s rapidly rising inflation. Hence, from mid 2023 to early 2024, the country faced a losing battle against rising
cost of imports, natural disasters, and threats of default. Multiple attempts to form a government collapsed, and last minute
attempts to negotiate with the IMF and plea of aid failed to materialize any concrete result- more or less due to much of the
world needing to tackle their own economic woes. As a result, Pakistan went into a state of severe crisis and instability. In the
middle of this chaos, substantial amount of nuclear materials were smuggled outside of the country and fall into the hands of
multiple violent non-state actors. In June 2025, a dirty bomb exploded in the middle of Tehran, killing thousands of innocent
bystanders. At nearly the same time, collection of high-yield explosives destroyed Iranian oil fields in Shadegan, followed by
similar incidents in Qatar and Iraq. With tensions at an all-time high, the Iranian Supreme Leader blamed Saudi Arabia for the
attacks, vowing to turn every city into rubble. Responding to this, Saudi Arabia backed by their allies then launched
pre-emptive strikes to Iran, destroying nearly all of Iranian infamous missile launch sites. Iran retaliated, with surviving
missiles strategically targeting Saudi oil facilities. Open warfare across the desert and the strait ensued, with both sides
mobilizing for a long-term conflict. Realizing the urgency of the matter, and how destructive a total war in the Middle East
could be, the international community urges both sides to de-escalate immediately, at the threat of total economic embargo
from all major powers. With this move, the UN managed to back a truce on the 20th of December 2025. Despite attempts of
reconciliation, both sides refused to normalize relations, and in 2049, both parties are showing signs of renewing the conflict
over minor disputes in shipping lanes and oil production by corporations. While the war in 2025 only lasted several months,
the destruction of oil facilities and disruption of global supply at the time contributed to the severity of the Great Collapse and
the downfall of the liberal world order.

19
 The Implications of Russia’s War in Ukraine
The damages from the pandemic and the current Russo-Ukrainian war contributed to the severity of the economic crisis. Even
before the economic crisis, the war greatly affected the global supply chains due to the significant disruption to global trade
shipping routes in the Black Sea, which was used to transport goods between Europe and Asia, and was blocked due to the
hostilities34. This disruption caused delays and increased costs for businesses that relied on this route, leading to a decline in
trade and economic activity. Moreover, the significant increase in oil and gas prices also exacerbated the disruption of the
supply of these resources from Russia to Europe35. This caused inflation and led to a decline in consumer spending, further
slowing the economy. The massive displacement of people due to the war and Belarus’ tactics of coercive engineered
migration as hybrid warfare led to a significant decline in tourism in the region, neighbouring countries unable to keep up with
the high influx of citizens, a sharp increase in crime, unemployment, and poverty further aggravated the severity of the
economic crisis36.

Within the battlelines of the Russo-Ukraine War, interesting developments happened which would jeopardize the interal
conditions of Russia which would lead the war into unforeseen outcomes. During the months of May and June 2023,
conditions within the battlelines had only experienced stagnation from both sides, but none would be aware that this stagnation
would give birth to an explosive twist of events. Since May 7, 2023, Prigozhin threatened Putin that he would pull out of
Bakhmut, a highly contested area constantly being fought over. Prigozhin saw that shortage of munitions and supply would not
allow Wagner forces to “keep grinding the meat” and push forward. This was simply one of the outbursts Prigozhin had gone
unto due to his disappointment of the Russian military. He had echoed the same talking point of “Wagner capable, Russian
34
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, “MARITIME TRADE DISRUPTED the WAR in UKRAINE and ITS EFFECTS on MARITIME
TRADE LOGISTICS,” June 28, 2022, https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/osginf2022d2_en.pdf.
35
Amy M. Jaffe and Joseph Webster, “Europe’s Reverse Leverage: Gazprom Can’t Shift Its Gas,” POLITICO, August 24, 2022,
https://www.politico.eu/article/europes-reverse-leverage-gazprom-cant-shift-its-gas/.
36
Piotr Łubiński, “Hybrid Warfare or Hybrid Threat – the Weaponization of Migration as an Example of the Use of Lawfare – Case Study of Poland,” Polish
Political Science Yearbook 51 (2021): 1–13, https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202209.

20
military bad” for a few times now and at one point, he turned those words into reality. In the morning of June 24, 2023, an
estimate of 15,000 men of the Wagner forces decided to march from their bases in Rostov-on-Don to Moscow through the M4
highway. Reasons of such sudden movements were confirmed to be of Prigozhin’s plan to attempt a coup d’etat against Putin’s
government, even so far to shoot down six helicopters and one transport during their march. While that was the case, Prigozhin
decided to call off the march, and return back to their camps in Rostov-on-Don. Many experts were absolutely baffled with the
move made by Prigozhin and his Wagner forces. Many saw it as a power move by Prigozhin to break the public standing of
Putin, but people at large did not see it that way. Even as a week passed after the “botched” attempt, news of Putin’s purge on
the Ministry of Defense had spread, putting questions in the air as to who were on the list of Putin’s purge, who were the one
accused of aiding Wagner in their attempts at Moscow. These chains of events would lead to inner turmoil within Russia’s
chain of command, with Putin being suspect with his aides possibly and allegedly aiding the attempted coup. The witch hunt
would then immediately took off Putin’s eyes of the true battlelines, leaving Russian operations up-front wide open for
Ukrainian forces to take over, thus immediately turning the tide of war in favor of Ukraine. In addition, as the economic
collapse of 2025 hit, a worldwide wave swept up the globe, clearly Russia included. Seeing to cut losses, both sides, with
Russia being more than eager, decided to sign a peace treaty which included a clause to keep Russia absolved from any war
reparations, named the Russo-Ukraine Peace Pact, officially signed on August 24, 2025. In the end, Ukraine successfully took
over the disputed lands of Crimea and Donetsk, finally consolidating their region and border.

The war came to an end, but Ukraine was still left in shambles. Due to the Peace Pact, Ukraine was even left more destitute
with Russia not going to pay any reparations. Especially with the Collapse of 2025, the many promises of western foreign aid
did not come into the coffers of Ukraine. Ukraine took stock of their conditions, and they finally saw a silver lining in the sky.
The years of war with Russia had turned many of their populace into veterans, with a good chunk of them had worked with
various foreign contractors in various “adventures” during the years of war. The Ministry of Defense, along with a few local

21
 business moguls, decided to round up these men and began a new venture into state-backed security services named the Black
Raven Group. The group has been designed to be a contractor specifically aimed to only provide escort, extraction, security,
and reconnaissance work, none that would immediately put them into active combat engagements. The group was formed with
various recruitment centers peppered throughout Ukraine, looking for those willing to do military work outside of the borders
of Ukraine. Ukraine aimed for these groups to take contracts from now currently hotbeds of conflict such as African and
Middle Eastern regions. Yet, new hotbeds of conflicts are now brewing, in places people will not expect.

An Eulogy of the Union Jack’s Economy Woes

As the crisis began to arrive in Europe and in the United Kingdom, like much of the world, was greatly impacted by the
economic crisis caused by the trade war. The country, known for its strong financial sector, saw many of its banks and financial
institutions struggle to stay afloat as the market collapsed. In addition to the IMF alongside Bank of America, BNP, Bank of
England and many other vital financial institutions in the country declining, the country was unable to react accordingly and
efficiently despite having a considerable amount of time to prepare37. With a massive national debt and incentives that were
just released to mitigate the effects of the covid-19 pandemic, the country's large trade deficit, combined with the destabilizing
effects of the crisis, put pressure on the pound and made it difficult for the country to borrow money from foreign countries3839.

The economy was hit hard, with many businesses going bankrupt, and unemployment rates skyrocketed. The decline in the
value of the pound sterling added to the country's financial woes, making imports more expensive and putting a strain on

37
International Monetary Fund (IMF), “United Kingdom: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Financial System Stability Assessment,” IMF Staff Country
Reports 2022, no. 057 (February 2022): 1, https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400203268.002.
38
Pablo Burriel et al., “Economic Consequences of High Public Debt: Evidence from Three Large Scale DSGE Models,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020,
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676264.
39
Office for National Statistics, “UK Government Debt and Deficit - Office for National Statistics,” www.ons.gov.uk, October 28, 2022,
https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/publicspending/bulletins/ukgovernmentdebtanddeficitforeurostatmaast/june2022.

22
 households and businesses alike4041. The decline in the value of property and the drop in consumer confidence further
exacerbated the economic situation. In the political arena, the crisis led to a shift in public opinion and a decrease in trust in the
government. Calls for reform and change became increasingly vocal, and political parties found themselves struggling to find
solutions to the country's problems amidst a tumult of social unrest42. Despite the challenges, the government and the people of
the United Kingdom came together to navigate through the crisis. The government launched various initiatives and programs
aimed at boosting the economy and supporting those who were most affected. The UK was one of the few major economies
that was still re-entered the international community the earliest and engaging in other countries amidst the crisis, albeit mostly
with close neighbors and its commonwealth partners for support and to work together towards a resolution of the crisis.

One of the most significant impacts of the crisis was on the monarchy. The Royal Family, which had always been a symbol of
stability and continuity, was now facing questions about its role in a rapidly changing world. The public was demanding
answers about the extent of the monarchy's wealth and the impact of the crisis on their finances, leading to an increased
scrutiny of the Royal Family and their lavish lifestyle, with many calling for them to make a sacrifice for the country4344.
Despite early contact to their commonwealth partners, UK followed the trend of an active inward focus rather than
international one to stabilize their economy firsthand. Due to this the Collapse put a strain on the relationships between the
United Kingdom and the other members of the Commonwealth, as countries of the Commonwealth faced similar economic
and social pressures, and many were calling for greater cooperation and support from the UK45. However, the UK’s focus on

40
Fang Li and Sheng Zhang, “Does Financial Crisis Change the Relationship between Bank Development and Economic Growth? Evidence from US States,” ed.
Mukesh Dhamala, PLOS ONE 17, no. 4 (April 21, 2022): e0267394, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267394.
41
Loukoianova et.al., “Banking Crises and Crisis Dating: Theory and Evidence,”
42
H.W. Richardson, “The Economic Significance of the Depression in Britain,” Journal of Contemporary History 4, no. 4 (October 1969): 3–19,
https://doi.org/10.1177/002200946900400401.
43
Ian M. Drummond, “The British Empire Economies in the Great Depression,” The Great Depression Revisited, 1972, 212–35,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9849-6_13.
44
Richardson, “The Economic Significance of the Depression in Britain,”
45
Drummond, “The British Empire Economies in the Great Depression,”

23
resolving its own crisis meant that it was unable to provide the support that its partners needed, leading to increased tensions
and frayed relationships.

24
The Third Eurozone Crisis
In the gloom-laden corridors of the Italian financial landscape, a tempest of despair gathers strength, threatening to unleash the
full force of Italy's debt crisis. As economic stagnation persists and structural weaknesses continue to plague the Italian
economy, investor confidence wanes. Bond yields soar, reflecting mounting doubts about Italy's ability to service its staggering
debt burden. The government, facing dwindling options, struggles to implement effective fiscal measures and structural
reforms amidst growing social unrest and political discord.

Amidst this backdrop, Italy's banking sector, burdened by a substantial exposure to the government's debt, teeters on the edge
of collapse. A wave of bank failures ensues, triggering a full-blown banking crisis. Panic spreads like wildfire as depositors
rush to withdraw their savings, further exacerbating the liquidity crunch. The financial system, once a pillar of stability,
crumbles under the weight of insurmountable debt. With the banking sector in disarray, credit dries up, strangling the lifeblood
of the economy. Businesses, starved of funding, begin to shutter their doors. Unemployment skyrockets, and social inequality
reaches new heights. The Italian populace, burdened by austerity measures and a bleak future, takes to the streets in protest,
challenging the very foundations of governance.

On the international stage, contagion effects are felt far and wide. The interconnectedness of global financial markets amplifies
the tremors emanating from Italy's collapse. Eurozone countries, already grappling with their own vulnerabilities, face renewed
scrutiny and rising borrowing costs. The Eurozone itself stands at the precipice of disintegration, as member states grapple
with the consequences of Italy's downfall. International institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
European Central Bank (ECB), scramble to contain the fallout. Emergency measures are deployed, but they prove inadequate
to stave off the impending catastrophe. Italy, once a proud member of the Eurozone, is now facing the harsh and unwanted
consequences of the common currency, retreating into the depths of economic isolation.

25
Amidst the ruins, Italy finds itself trapped in a prolonged economic depression. The nation's cultural heritage fades into a
distant memory as its people grapple with the harsh reality of a collapsed economy and a fragmented society. The Italian debt
crisis, like a relentless force of nature, leaves an indelible mark on the nation's history, forever altering its destiny and serving
as a somber reminder of the devastating consequences that can arise from unsustainable debt burdens.

A Union in Division

In the wake of Italy's devastating debt crisis and the subsequent handling of its aftermath, a growing political rift emerges
between the France and German blocs within the European Union. As Italy grapples with the profound economic and social
repercussions of its collapse, deep divisions arise regarding the responsibility for the crisis and the appropriate course of action
going forward. The French bloc, driven by its emphasis on solidarity and a belief in the importance of shared burden,
advocates for a more lenient approach. It argues that Italy's plight is a result of systemic issues within the Eurozone and calls
for greater financial support and stimulus measures to aid Italy's recovery. France sees this as an opportunity to foster unity and
solidarity among member states.

However, the German bloc, guided by its adherence to fiscal discipline and stability, takes a more cautious stance. It asserts
that Italy's crisis is primarily a result of its own fiscal imprudence and insists on strict austerity measures and structural reforms
as the path to long-term stability. Germany is wary of creating moral hazard and fears that leniency toward Italy could set a
dangerous precedent for other member states.

26
As these conflicting visions clash, tensions between the French and German blocs begin to strain the foundations of European
unity. Other member states find themselves caught in the crossfire, torn between aligning with one camp or trying to navigate a
middle ground. The political discourse within the European Union becomes increasingly polarized, with accusations and
finger-pointing exacerbating the rift.

The political divide manifests in various arenas, including debates over fiscal policies, economic governance, and the direction
of the European project. Negotiations on key issues become arduous and prolonged, as compromises prove elusive. The rift
gradually erodes the trust and sense of shared purpose among member states, threatening to fracture the European Union along
ideological lines. Meanwhile, populist movements in some member states seize upon the discord as an opportunity to fuel
nationalist sentiments and call for greater independence from the European Union. They exploit the perceived divide between
the French and German blocs, portraying it as evidence of an unequal union dominated by the interests of a few powerful
nations.

Recognizing the dire consequences of a divided European Union, leaders from both blocs make concerted efforts to bridge the
gap. Intense diplomatic negotiations take place, aiming to find common ground and restore trust. Compromises are sought,
though they require significant concessions from both sides. Slowly, a fragile consensus begins to emerge, rooted in a renewed
commitment to finding shared solutions and rebuilding trust among member states. Although the rift persists, the European
Union, through its resilience and collective determination, manages to navigate the challenges posed by the aftermath of the
Italian crisis. The experience serves as a sobering reminder of the need for continued unity, dialogue, and a shared vision for
the future of Europe.

27
The European “Right” Turn

In the aftermath of the Italian crisis and the deepening division between the France and German blocs within the European
Union, a wave of reactionary conservatism sweeps across the EU. Fueled by the desire for stability and a strong European
presence on the global stage, this movement advocates for the preservation of the Euro as a leading currency in the world
economy, particularly as the United States and China retreat into isolationism. It also promotes the implementation of general
European conservative ideals across member states.

Amidst the political turmoil and economic uncertainties caused by Italy's crisis, a growing number of Europeans find solace in
a conservative vision of stability and strength. They believe that unity and a common adherence to conservative ideals can lead
the EU toward a prosperous future. This wave of reactionary conservatism gains momentum as disillusionment with traditional
political establishments grows.

The advocates of this movement argue that the Euro, with its broad economic reach and stability, should be protected and
fortified as a formidable international currency. They view the retreat of the United States and China into isolationist policies
as an opportunity for the EU to assert its economic prowess and global influence. They call for the EU to deepen economic
integration, harmonize financial policies, and strengthen trade relationships, positioning the Euro as a reliable and influential
player in the international monetary system.

28
Furthermore, proponents of this conservative wave emphasize the importance of embracing general European conservative
ideals. They champion traditional values, cultural heritage, and social cohesion as essential elements for preserving European
identity and resilience. They advocate for measures that prioritize national sovereignty, secure borders, and the preservation of
European traditions and norms. This conservative vision seeks to counterbalance perceived threats to European stability, such
as migration, globalization, and the erosion of cultural identity.

As this wave of reactionary conservatism gains traction, it generates both support and resistance across the EU. Some member
states and political factions see it as a path to restore order and assert Europe's strength. Others view it as a regressive force that
hinders progress and undermines liberal values. The resulting tensions further deepen the rifts within the European Union, as
debates over the future direction of the EU intensify. This rise of reactionary conservatism in the EU reflects a desire for
stability, economic strength, and the preservation of European identity. It highlights the complexities and challenges the
European Union faces in navigating a changing global landscape and reconciling divergent visions for its future.

29
The “Old World” A New

In the wake of the Italian crisis and the rise of a conservative European Union, a remarkable turn of events unfolds. As the EU
undergoes a transformation driven by conservative principles and a commitment to stability, its unique blend of economic
resilience and democratic governance begins to captivate the international community. Amid the uncertainties brought about
by American and Chinese isolationism, the EU emerges as a reliable and predictable partner. Its commitment to democratic
ideals, human rights, and the rule of law stands in stark contrast to the autocratic tendencies exhibited by other global powers.

As a result, the Euro gains significant credibility and trust as the world witnesses the stability and economic prowess of the
conservative European Union. Global investors flock to the Euro as a safe haven currency, leading to its increased prominence
in international trade and finance. Central banks around the world diversify their reserves, boosting the Euro's status as a global
reserve currency alongside the US dollar.

Simultaneously, the EU's favourable business environment and commitment to stability attract the attention of multinational
corporations seeking a secure and predictable base of operations. Alphabet, among other global companies, recognizes the
advantages of being located within the conservative European Union. They see the region as a haven of economic stability,
intellectual capital, and regulatory certainty. In response, these companies strategically relocate their headquarters and expand
their operations within Europe, bringing substantial investments, jobs, and expertise to the continent.

This influx of global companies strengthens the EU's position as a hub of innovation, research, and technological advancement.
It sparks a virtuous cycle, attracting further talent, fostering entrepreneurship, and driving economic growth. Europe becomes a
magnet for cutting-edge industries, propelling it to the forefront of technological advancements, digital transformation, and
sustainable development.

30
 The conservative European Union's commitment to democratic ideals and stability acts as a bulwark against the rising tide of
authoritarianism and geopolitical uncertainties. It becomes a bastion of democratic values, human rights, and multilateral
cooperation. The EU actively engages in global affairs, championing peace, dialogue, and international cooperation while
playing a vital role in addressing global challenges, such as climate change, migration, and inequality. Nevertheless, this
scenario also presents its own challenges and complexities. Striking a balance between conservatism, democratic values, and
the diverse interests of member states remains a delicate task.

A Once United Bulwark Crippled

Once, NATO had been a steadfast shield, a veritable union of nations devoted to the collective defence of Europe and North
America. Yet the economic crisis that had been kindled by the intensifying trade war between the United States and China had
exacted a grievous cost on the alliance as many NATO countries faced hardship in keeping their economies afloat and
shielding their people from destitution46. Governments had no option but to slash their budgets, and defence spending was one
of the first casualties47. Military prowess was deteriorating quickly, and readiness levels plummeted as nations could not arm
themselves with modern equipment. The crisis wrought tensions between NATO nations, each vying for resources and
markets, with individualism eclipsing collective action. This sowed a climate of mistrust and disarray among the members48.
The reduced military capabilities and strained relations among the members had led to a reduced ability to conduct collective
defence, a core principle of NATO. The alliance could no longer project power effectively, both in terms of military
capabilities and diplomatic influence. It had also reduced its ability to contribute to international security through NATO-led or
46
Francesco Gobbi, “NATO in the Aftermath of the Financial Crisis,” April 3, 2013,
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2013/130453/LDM_BRI%282013%29130453_REV1_EN.pdf.
47
Faik Öztrak, “NATO PA,” NATO PA, December 20, 2021,
https://www.nato-pa.int/document/2021-global-economic-crisis-implications-and-prospects-oztrak-report-018-escter-18-e.
48
Henry Foy and Sam Fleming, “Nato’s Revival: Will the Resolve Withstand an Economic Crisis?,” Financial Times, July 1, 2022,
https://www.ft.com/content/07fa9884-b539-4c9b-ac41-7f084774e586.

31
 -supported peacekeeping, stabilization, and reconstruction efforts. NATO, crippled and weakened by the economic crisis, now
a mere shadow of its former self, was no longer the united bulwark it once was.

Unraveling the Financial Strains of the West Pacific

Similar to other parts of the world, Asian countries and Australia were also hit hard by the economic crisis, especially China
who experienced a severe decline in export and an economic downturn. In Asia, countries such as Japan and South Korea,
previous export powerhouses of electronics and automobiles, felt the pinch of their exports diminishing drastically49. The
manufacturing sphere felt the brunt of the crisis, striving to find new avenues of trade and adjust to the changing landscape.
This, in turn, caused unemployment to soar and economic development to slow. The crisis dealt a crushing blow to China's
manufacturing industry, with companies striving to find new opportunities and adjust to the altered trade landscape, causing
unemployment to skyrocket and economic growth to slow. As an additional effort, China sought new trade routes into African
markets, a move they would later regret. The Chinese currency had depreciated and the cost of imports had increased,
compounding the pressure on the economy. Demand for raw materials such as coal, iron ore, and natural gas had also
plummeted, devastating the mining industry of countries such as Australia, Indonesia, and Malaysia - countries that were
largely reliant on exports of these materials. The service sector had not been spared, particularly the tourism sector, with the
plunge in visitors leading to a sharp decline in numbers in countries like Thailand, Vietnam, and Singapore. The Chinese
government sought to soothe the ravages of the crisis, unveiling measures such as infrastructure spending, reducing interest
rates, trade market expansion and offering aid to ailing companies. Alas, the economy was deeply scarred by the crisis and its
wounds remain unhealed. Despite such devastation, Xi Jinping seized the opportunity to embolden his position in the country
further and eliminate the corrupt officials within China, ensuring the stability of his rule and grip on the government and the

49
Dong-Ching Day, “Four Asian Tigers’ Political and Economic Development Revisited 1998-2017: From the Perspective of National Identity,” Asian Journal of
Interdisciplinary Research .4, no. 4 (December 30, 2021): 54–61, https://doi.org/10.54392/ajir2147.

32
 corporations through new cultural programs50. Nevertheless, in the later years of the crisis, the corporations of China and the
United States, followed by many other countries and corporations, will form a mutual-aid pact that aims to revitalize the
economy through the resources of the corporations.

The crisis had struck a heavy blow for Australia's export-dependent economy. With reliance on the exportation of raw
materials such as coal, iron ore, and natural gas, the plummeting demands caused a swift dip in prices51. This crippled the
mining sector, and reverberations were felt across the country. The crisis also caused the Australian dollar to depreciate and
imports to become more expensive. As the crisis darkened, nations in the region wrestled with survival. Governments resorted
to austerity, slashing budgets and leaving citizens in destitution, poverty, and inequality rampant. With meagre means, many
were left to eke out an existence barely. The economic crisis descended upon the countries of Asia and the Pacific like a dark
cloud, leaving a legacy of sorrow that would linger for years to come.

Corporations in the Eye of the Economic Storm

As the economic tempest ravages the globe, frail corporations succumb to insolvency and perish. The stalwart, determined, and
resolute corporations akin to us seize the opportunity to devour the vulnerable and ascend to eminence and prosperity. The
reverberations of the crisis were felt far and wide, impacting even the smallest of companies. Many of these were suppliers or
sub-contractors to larger entities, and as the sales of their patrons dwindled, so too did their own prospects. Unfortunately,
many small businesses and corporations had no other choice but to shutter their doors, while others were left with no option
but to downsize their staff and operations, or be devoured by the larger surviving corporations52. That is not to say that larger
50
Xiankun Jin et al., “Political Governance in China’s State-Owned Enterprises,” China Journal of Accounting Research, May 2022, 100236,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2022.100236.
51
Ron Wickes, Mike Adams, and Nicolas Brown, “ECONOMIC COERCION by CHINA: THE IMPACT on AUSTRALIA’S MERCHANDISE EXPORTS
ABSTRACT,” 2021, https://iit.adelaide.edu.au/ua/media/1479/wp04-economic-coercion-by-china-the-effects-on-australias-merchandise-exports.pdf.
52
S. Claessens, S. Djankov, and L. C. Xu, “Corporate Performance in the East Asian Financial Crisis,” The World Bank Research Observer 15, no. 1 (February 1,
2000): 23–46, https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.1.23.

33
 corporations are free from the effects of the circumstances. The crisis had proven a tremendous trial for large multinational
corporations, particularly those whose fortunes were heavily predicated on exports to China and the United States, such as
makers of electronics and automobiles5354. As a result of this tremendous setback, many companies were compelled to displace
workers and shutter factories, culminating in a dire unemployment crisis and a sharp contraction in economic expansion.

Despite the far-reaching reverberations of the crisis, some enterprises had managed to not only stay afloat but to also prosper.
These companies had been nimble and agile, adapting to the altered economic climate by seeking out fresh markets and novel
methods of conducting business55. For instance, certain businesses had relocated their production to other countries and
identified new patrons and vendors. Additionally, some firms had used the crisis as an opportunity to broaden their market
share and obtain a strategic advantage over their competitors, by buying up distressed businesses. As the direness of the crisis
intensified, some nations sought to safeguard their native industries and imposed protectionist measures such as tariffs and
import quotas. This resulted in a further contraction of global trade, exacerbating the already-difficult situation for
companies56. Moreover, it led to a failure of cooperation between countries, making it arduous for businesses to traverse the
new international landscape57.

Amidst a multitude of elements, there lie several explanations for the ambition and impetus behind corporations acquiring
wealth and power. Some sought mere existence, some contended that it was a way of revolting against the government's
relentless stricter regulations, while others merely aspired to acquire more riches by leveraging the crisis. Large corporations

53
John W. Barry et al., “Corporate Flexibility in a Time of Crisis,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3778789.
54
Kaimann and Tanneberg, “What Containment Strategy Leads Us through the Pandemic Crisis?,”
55
Claessens et al., “Corporate Performance in the East Asian Financial Crisis,”
56
Mary Johnstone-Louis et al., “Business in Times of Crisis,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36, no. Supplement_1 (September 28, 2020): S242–55,
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa021.
57
Grant Kirkpatrick, “The Corporate Governance Lessons from the Financial Crisis,” OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends 2009, no. 1 (September 25, 2009):
61–87, https://doi.org/10.1787/fmt-v2009-art3-en.

34
 had sought to bend the arc of government policy to their benefit, engaging in strenuous lobbying for preferential treatment and
advocating for policies that would bolster their financial standing. As we further cast ourselves in the role of saviors, our public
backing swelled, resulting in waning trust in some governments and institutions. It proved to be a fatal error on the part of the
public to put their faith in us so blindly, a foolishness they would come to regret, and a foolishness that we exploited. But alas,
I harbor a more grandiose ambition; if I cannot shift the heavens, then I shall unleash and raise hell upon the earth. An
ambition that shall remain unknown save for close associates of mine, and Im sure most of you understand why.

The Resurgence After the Great Collapse

The years after the Great Collapse were a tumultuous and testing time, as the world sought to recover from the devastating
effects of the Collapse. It took nearly a decade of rebuilding and restoration to achieve a semblance of normality. Between the
years 2025 and 2032, it is estimated that the world’s GDP fell by an estimated 17%. By comparison, the Great Depression, the
2009 Financial Crisis, and the Great Lockdown fell by 15%, 4-5%, and 6-8% respectively. Making the Great Collapse to be the
most severe economic crisis the world has ever faced in the annals of history5859. For several years, nations were weighed down
by the burden of a crisis, slowly realizing the dire mistake they had made in prioritizing national interests over collective
collaboration. The consequences of the grand collapse were a protracted and agonizing period of rehabilitation for nations and
corporations alike. In the early aftermath, governments grappled to institute prudent strategies to fortify their economies, as
corporations stepped in to plug the gap. Leveraging their resources and proficiency, they supplied assistance to countries and
towns in distress, garnering the appreciation and commitment of the populace.In spite of some nations and businesses
managing to remain afloat, not all were privileged to share the same fortune as those who endured. As the years progressed, the
global economy gradually regained strength, with corporations leading the charge. They lavishly invested in infrastructure,

58
Gopinath, “The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn since the Great Depression,”
59
John Arthur Garraty, The Great Depression : An Inquiry into the Causes, Course, and Consequences of the Worldwide Depression in the Nineteen-Thirties, as
Seen by Contemporaries and in the Light of History. (San Diego U.A.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986), ch. 1

35
 providing employment and thereby fueling economic growth. By recognizing corporations' crucial role, governments took
action to deregulate and privatize crucial industries, resulting in improved efficiency and progress. A fatal misstep on their
part, one that we joyously savour the consequences, and they reap the repercussions of their misjudgment. With the passing of
time, the global economy began to regain its strength. The crisis had revealed the underlying frailties of the world economic
system, prompting vociferous calls for reform and a greater commitment to international cooperation. However, these pleas
would achieve any measure of success far later in the future, as corporations and nations continue to mend their lack of
cooperation during the arrival of the Collapse. Nevertheless, in the years the 2030s, the world underwent an immense
transformation, both during and after the Great Collapse, in the realms of technology, authority, disputes, and the international
balance of power. An era soon attained the moniker of The Age of Reflection and Renewal.

The Age of Reflection and Renewal

The Age of Reflection and Renewal was a time of restored expectations and promised hope. An age of recovery and renewal
following the Great Collapse. The ruinous aftermath of the great collapse was a taxing time of rehabilitation for nations and
corporations alike. In its immediate aftermath, governments introduced beneficial strategies to reaffirm their economies, while
corporations ventured forth to fill the void60. With their wealth and know-how, they supplied help to countries and towns in desperate
need, thus acquiring the appreciation and adoration of the population. After reaching a peak decline of 17% in the world’s GDP, some
economies, countries and corporations began to recover from the repercussions of the Great Collapse. While some countries managed
to begin recovering before 2029, The International Monetary Fund reported the crisis reached its apex in 2029, a turning point of
recovery for every actor. Yet, more than a decade would pass before nations and corporations regained their prior GDP and revenue.

60
Milan Babic, Jan Fichtner, and Eelke M. Heemskerk, “States versus Corporations: Rethinking the Power of Business in International Politics,” The
International Spectator 52, no. 4 (October 2, 2017): 20–43, https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2017.1389151.

36
The Grand Voyage of International Cooperation in Resurgence
When the Collapse began, countries that advocated and sought international cooperation started to withdraw from their actions,
believing that times had changed and the progress of globalization would intensify the impact of the Collapse. In a bid to quell
its force, major economies stepped back from international ties, engaging with others with utmost care so that the crisis would
not deepen beyond comparison. Mid-2030 saw the lifting of trade tariffs, protective policies, and other restrictions as countries
stepped back into diplomacy and international relations; they believed the worst of the Collapse had passed and cooperation
would prove beneficial and crucial to recovery. In spite of feelings of betrayal from less developed nations to their powerful
allies, they had to set aside mistrust and resentment in order to endure and emerge from the Collapse. The aftermath marked a
new chapter in the world's history, starting with uncertainty and fear as countries struggled to rebuild their shattered
economies. However, a new spirit of cooperation eventually emerged. The global community came together, determined to
learn from their mistakes and build a better world. Every international and regional organisation saw an increase of activities,
debates, and discussions to create initiatives and solutions for countries to recover together.

The leaders around the world believed that traditional methods of international cooperation and globalization had failed them.
The globalized world economy was highly interconnected and interdependent, making it more vulnerable to shocks and
disruptions. The Great Collapse that struck was a conflict between two major economies — economies that were highly
integrated and connected to the global economy, enabling the Collapse's rapid spread across the world and causing widespread
damage and instability. Furthermore, international organizations and actors had failed to respond effectively to the crisis, as
their mandates and decision-making processes were designed for a much more predictable and stable world. As a result, they
were unable to adapt quickly enough to the rapidly changing situation, and their efforts to mitigate the crisis were often too
little, too late. Alongside domestic challenges and unrest, mistrust and paranoia built up quickly; domestic economies, their
citizens, and national interests became their priority. As the crisis deepened, countries became more and more focused on

37
securing their own resources and protecting their own industries, and they were less likely to cooperate with each other. As
such, they were faced with the realization that, although globalization was beneficial, significant improvement would be
required in their approaches and methods. However, rather than a complete replacement, the world believed the need for
greater collaboration and cooperation between countries, with a focus on creating a more equitable and just global economic
system. Characterized by a focus on sustainable growth, equitable distribution of resources, and a commitment to international
cooperation, the United Nations and its member states signed several resolutions and agreements to achieve recovery. One of
its most prominent was The Grand Voyage Recovery International Cooperation Initiative.

The Grand Voyage Recovery International Cooperation Initiative, or simply the Grand Voyage Initiative (GVI), was a
comprehensive and coordinated effort by leaders of different countries—first advocated and led by Germany—to improve and
enhance traditional methods of international cooperation and globalization through the United Nations and in partnerships with
other international actors. This initiative was taken in the aftermath of the economic crisis, as a response to the failure of
traditional methods and the realization that they were no longer effective in addressing the current challenges. The Grand
Voyage was a journey towards a new era of international cooperation, wherein leaders aimed to work together to address
global issues. This initiative sought to tackle the root causes of the economic crisis, promote economic growth, and build a
more resilient global system. It involved collaboration and cooperation on various fronts, such as trade, finance, and economic
development, alongside reform of the existing financial system and institutions to better serve the interests of all countries.
Countries worked together to establish new trade agreements, reduce barriers to investment, and promote technology transfer.
Over the years that followed, progress in recovery was slow but steady. Corporations and small businesses alike began to
thrive once again, driven by a new era of investment and innovation, and the loosening of regulations and laws to recover from
the crisis.

38
The Red Dragon and Uncle Sam’s Rivalry
The crisis toppled the economies of these two superpowers, and with it, the power and influence of the United States within the
world. As the Collapse spread its effects across the globe, it highlighted the reduced capability and inefficiency of the
long-standing island chain strategy designed to prevent the expansion of China's influence and change the dynamic of
America's alliance with Europe. The financial strain of the Collapse forced the US government to reassess its military footprint
overseas and impose cuts where needed. As a consequence, the US was forced to curtail or diminish its investment in some of
its overseas military bases and diminish its hold in territories where it held a formidable sway. This momentous transition in
prerogatives resulted in a decrease in US potency and impact, allowing other countries the chance to ascend and fill the hollow
left by the US. Amidst this, the international community was drastically reshaped, as countries filled the void, transforming the
erstwhile bipolar world order into a multi-polar one. Several US military bases in the vicinity of China that had been
fundamental to the successful implementation of the island chain strategy were drastically affected by the budget cuts,
threatening the stability and power of the United States in the region and casting a pall upon the security pacts made with the
European Union. Facing intense pressure from its citizens and business community to restore its status as a superpower, the
government of the United States focused on international cooperation to restore its position on the international stage albeit
with less force and leverage compared to pre-crisis. Through a combination of diplomatic pressure, trade deals, and strategic
investments, the US helped drive the world's economic recovery, re-establishing its place as a leader on the world stage.

On the other hand, China, being a nation with a long history and a deeply ingrained sense of national pride, doubled down on
its efforts to spur economic growth and expand its influence on the world stage. The Chinese government poured massive
amounts of resources into modernizing its infrastructure, boosting its technology sector, and military power, and investing in
advanced manufacturing. In the void left by the US, the Chinese government seized this opportunity to increase its trade with
its neighbors a calculated move to assert its dominance in the region, especially in the absence of the United States. With its

39
growing economic and military power, China was able to negotiate favorable trade deals and establish closer ties with nations
in the region, many of whom were previously aligned with the United States. This allowed China to expand its sphere of
influence and project its power across the region, further solidifying its position as a dominant player in Asia. These efforts
paid off as China quickly regained its footing and once again became a major player in the global economy. Moreover, with the
chaos brought upon by the Collapse, Xi used these opportunities to further consolidate his grip on the country and the
government in supporting his crusade against the corporations and to realize the ‘Chinese Dream.’ While these actions seemed
to only benefit China, they were yet to realize the hidden costs accrued by this market expansion strategy.

Despite the challenges they faced, the government remained focused on its long-standing goal of reunifying Taiwan with the
mainland. With Xi’s great efforts in ‘unifying’ the nations through an iron-grip control and the strings and guanxis with
domestic constituencies and foreign one’s. The government saw the crisis as an opportunity to increase its influence and
leverage over Taiwan, which it sought to achieve through economic means. China offered financial aid and investment to
Taiwan, but with strings attached that would give China more control over the island nation's economy and governance. The
international community, already grappling with their own challenges during the Collapse, and the U.S. forced isolation largely
ignored the situation in Taiwan unable to fully meddle in it as with the Ukraine situation, allowing China to make gains in its
pursuit of reunification.

With the rising power of China, America and the rest of the world feared for the growing tensions and a possible outbreak of
war. Facing pressure from the international community and the now multi-polar order, the international community was able to
pressure both of these major economies to maintain peace and stability for the sake of peace and the global economy. Through
the return of the Sino-US trade agreement in 2028 and the Grand Voyage Initiative, the US and China were able to be brought
together to the negotiating table and find a solution that would benefit both nations and the world as a whole. Diplomats and

40
experts from across the world worked tirelessly to find a peaceful resolution to the situation, holding several rounds of talks
and negotiations. Ultimately, through the power of diplomacy and cooperation, the international community was able to
formulate the “The US-China Trade Normalization and Economic Cooperation Agreement” or the “US-China TNEC
Agreement” that prevented another crisis and ensured peace and stability in the region. Though it goes without saying that
TNEC failed to be a long-lived agreement that was unable to fulfill its ambitious goals of normalizing US-China relations, as
the agreement would fall out in the years ahead. However, this chain of events showcased that the US and China although
major economy and a superpower, they were no longer absolute and did not have the formidable sway they once had in
diplomacy.

The Annexation of Taiwan

In a manner akin to Russia's shrewd utilization of the opportunities offered by the Collapse, the Chinese Government seized
the moment to realize its age-old vision of reunification of Taiwan with the mainland. China seized the chance to expand its
sway and authority over Taiwan, by utilizing economic power to further its aims. In spite of the hardships encountered during
the Collapse, China remained a preeminent economic superpower in Asia, extending economic assistance that was essential
should it be declined. With certain conditions included, China has extended financial aid and investment to Taiwan, with
strings attached which grants them a greater degree of economic and governmental influence over the island nation. The
international community, burdened by the weight of its own woes, largely neglected the plight of Taiwan, much as it had done
with Ukraine. As the American presence in Asia waned in the wake of the Collapse, China capitalized on the opportunity to
grow its own influence and authority, carving out a place in the region while maintaining its status similar to that of Germany's
'reluctant hegemon' under Merkel.

China's annexation of Taiwan was a grand and intricate endeavour that began in late 2024, culminating in its success in the

41
year 2032. The economic crisis had sapped the strength of the international community and made nations vulnerable to such
actions. However, the Chinese government implemented a multi-faceted strategy to persuade the Taiwanese of the advantages
of reunification. This involved economic incentives, diplomatic efforts, and strategic military build-up in the Taiwan Strait.
Also important in this effort was the Bank of China (BoC) and the wide use of digital Yuan in Taiwanese markets. However,
the reality was not as straightforward as the government had hoped. Though the Chinese government implemented economic
incentives, diplomatic initiatives, and a strategic military buildup in the Taiwan Strait, the reality was not as simple as they
envisioned. Albeit the incentives offered, many Taiwanese were split with citizens averse to the annexation, voicing their fears
of losing their independence and autonomy, while others concurring with the reunification. This split in opinions erupted in
protests and civil unrest amongst the population which necessitated the Chinese government to quell the unrest.

Throughout the revitalization of the international community, the annexation of Taiwan was a major point of contention,
sparking censure from nations around the world. The complexity and ambiguity of Taiwan's standing as a sovereign state —in
accordance with the Montevideo Convention— in contrast to Ukraine's widely accepted status as a state, rendering the
conversation far more intricate than Russia's annexation. Moreover, China's assertion of the legitimacy of external involvement
was fortified by the contention of the matters of internal dispute owing to the unresolved status of the Chinese Civil War
between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party, which still persists. As a response to the annexation, some countries levied
sanctions while others beseeched for parleys; yet, the annexation stood firm. Strife still lingered in the air, yet the international
community toiled to preserve harmony by employing various diplomatic measures to keep the peace and preclude a war or
another cataclysm.

42
The Preminence of the Golden Orb
Despite the arduous challenges brought upon the nation by the Collapse, the British monarchy played an indelible and vital
role in the United Kingdom's efforts to resolve the crisis. With unwavering commitment to the nation's prosperity, they
provided a steady hand, a firm resolve, and a beacon of hope amidst tumultuous times. Through their considerable influence
and vast resources, the monarchy rallied the citizens of the United Kingdom, inspiring unity and resilience as the nation
endeavored to overcome the crisis. They were instrumental in securing loans from foreign countries and partnering with other
nations to help rebuild the economy, displaying their unyielding commitment to the betterment of the people. The King,
Charles III, and other noble members of the royal family graced the public with their dignified presence and addressed the
nation with words of encouragement, assuring citizens that the country would triumph over the crisis. Their efforts led to the
successful mitigation of bank runs and the loss of market confidence, minimizing the panic that could have otherwise ensued.
In the wake of the Collapse, the monarchy's steadfast leadership and unwavering support enabled the United Kingdom to
emerge stronger and more united than ever before. Through their collective efforts, the country was able to withstand the crisis
and emerge with renewed hope for a brighter tomorrow.

Despite the remarkable efforts of the British monarchy, the Great Collapse left an indelible mark on the United Kingdom. The
economy was in shambles, and the government was compelled to make challenging decisions to address the crisis and avert a
similar calamity in the future. The government implemented sweeping changes that transformed the financial sector, with the
goal of introducing transparency measures and establishing oversight bodies to prevent financial institutions from engaging in
unnecessary risk-taking. The country was determined to instill confidence in the financial system and reassure investors that
their investments were safe. This resolute stance was necessary to stabilize the economy and restore the country's faith in the
financial system. In addition to financial reforms, the country underwent a profound transformation in its energy and
transportation sectors. The government invested heavily in renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, to reduce the

43
nation's reliance on fossil fuels. A new era of sustainable public transportation and electric and hybrid vehicles was ushered in
as the transportation system was overhauled. These significant changes aimed to ensure that the United Kingdom remained at
the forefront of technological innovation, while also promoting sustainability and reducing the country's carbon footprint.
However, these regulations also had the unintended consequence of creating a more consolidated financial industry, with fewer
players controlling a more significant share of the market. While this was not the initial goal of the government, it was a
consequence of the sweeping changes made to ensure the country's long-term financial stability.

As time has passed, the United Kingdom's financial industry has become increasingly consolidated, which has made the
country more vulnerable to the power and influence of large corporations, that survived the Collapse. These corporations are
now in a position to exert greater control over the financial system, which enables them to influence government policies and
regulations to their advantage. The concentration of economic power has raised concerns about the impact on the country's
democracy and social fabric, highlighting the need for proactive measures to address this issue. Despite these challenges, the
British monarchy continues to play a vital role in promoting stability and unity within the country. King Charles III, in
particular, has been a strong advocate for policies that prioritize the well-being of the country's citizens over corporate
interests. He has also encouraged the development of alternative economic models, such as cooperatives and community-based
enterprises, as a means of promoting economic resilience and reducing the country's reliance on large corporations. However,
the challenges facing the United Kingdom are significant, and the concentration of economic power in the hands of a few
corporations continues to pose a significant threat to the country's democratic institutions and social cohesion. As the country
moves forward, it will need to develop strategies that promote economic diversity and competition, while also ensuring that the
well-being of its citizens is at the forefront of policy-making. The British monarchy and the government will need to work
together to develop and implement policies that promote greater economic equality and a more inclusive economy. Only then
can the country truly navigate these challenges and ensure a brighter future for all of its citizens.

44
Rebirth of a United Europe
After the Collapse, Europe struggled to rebuild itself, with many countries facing significant economic, social, and political
upheaval. However, through cooperation and a shared commitment to recovery, the continent emerged stronger than ever
before. Passing the peak of the Collapse, European countries and their institutions were able to proceed towards recovery and
unite once again through the coordinated efforts of the international community in the Grand Voyage Iniative (GVI) and in
late 2027 a global effort to recover from the Collapse began through GVI. Germany, despite being predicted to be one of the
hardest hit and to suffer the most, managed to avoid such circumstances through its implementation of protectionism policies.
However, it is without doubt that Germany’s course of action was seen as a hostile move —albeit logical— that degraded the
chances for cooperation during the early waves of the Collapse within Europe. After much backlash from both domestic and
international voices, the implementation of an aggressive protectionism policy was swiftly retracted in favour of more active
cooperation between each other as the Collapse’s force began to dwindle.

In tandem with the weakening of much of European countries, Germany became more apparent as the forefront country that
led the recovery within Europe rather than the typical Franco-German axis that dominated the leadership before the Collapse.
Though it's not to say that the powers of such countries were small, Germany’s aggressive actions to mitigate the crisis and its
strong manufacturing and economy allowed the nation to minimize the full force of the Collapse that crippled many European
countries. Despite this change of order within Europe, Germany was set on fixing its relationship with the international
community, leading them to be united in these hard times to fully recover. A chain of actions that led Europe and the European
Union stronger than its former self through unity, and a set of policies advocated by Germany, from quantitative easing,
negative interest rates, consistent deficit spending, and so many more that brought Europe to prosper. A stark contrast to its
former moniker of “reluctant hegemon” in favour of a “noble hegemon” by taking a more active role in leading and

45
coordinating the economies of European countries, and its institutions. The European Union, which had been weakened by the
Collapse, began to rebuild and reorganize itself, with a renewed focus on social welfare, environmental protection, and
economic stability. The EU implemented policies to help support member countries, and the reformation and improvement of
the European Central Bank to further regulate the financial sector, and prevent another collapse. All of this further bolstered
Germany to not only become the economic engine of Europe, but also a beacon of leadership that led Europe towards recovery.

Nevertheless, the path towards recovery was not cheap, the drastic measures and transformation adopted by Europe allowed
corporations that survived the Collapse to consolidate their power and influence within the continent, as what many surviving
corporations did in other continents. Many corporations, both European and foreign, began to exert significant control over the
region's economy, with a few major corporations holding disproportionate sway over entire industries. This concentration of
power worried some European leaders, who feared that it would lead to a loss of economic sovereignty and further undermine
social welfare. Despite these concerns, Europe continued to forge ahead, maintaining strong relationships with other regions of
the world while pursuing its own vision of the future. Prominent countries within Europe, such as France and Italy, continued
to work closely with Germany to support the continent's economic recovery. As Europe's economy strengthened, its leaders
began to play a greater role in shaping global policy, with many looking to Europe as a model for sustainable development and
social welfare. Alas, they fail to fully comprehend the magnitude of what we have achieved in their ignorance.

The Revival of America, and the Birth of the Pan-American Economic Wall
The recovery of the US economy, in the aftermath of the XB7 pandemic, takes on an exceptional character as it becomes
further detached from the global economic landscape. Former troops returning home are redeployed to bolster domestic
manufacturing, marking a strategic shift in priorities. American companies seize this opportunity to reinvigorate the

46
manufacturing sector, spurring the nation's economic revival. Embracing innovation and increased investments, these
companies drive job creation, rekindling hope for stability and progress among the American population.

The loss of over 2 million lives during the pandemic leaves an indelible mark on the United States, emphasizing the
significance of the nation's recovery efforts. As the manufacturing sector gains momentum, a resilient spirit permeates the
American people, reminding them of their capacity to adapt and rebuild. Witnessing the growth and resurgence of domestic
industries, the populace finds solace in the newfound sense of optimism for the future, as the nation charts a course toward
self-sufficiency.

Under the leadership of a Republican-led America, Latin America became an integral part of the Western hemisphere's
survival. The region assumes a pivotal role in supplying the United States with oil and fuels, in addition to meeting its
manufacturing needs. While this partnership promises economic opportunities, it also raises concerns about the
Americanization of South America. Indeed, at its peak, South America's leaders continue to be nearer and warmer to the White
House. As such, US influence spreads across South America, giving rise to a complex web of interdependence. Latin
American nations must grapple with the implications of aligning their resources and industries with a dominant power, as they
cautiously navigate the path to sustained growth and development.

The US, too, changed its policies; instead of meeting the needs of its counterparts in Europe and Asia, it chose to internalize
and solidify its relations with Canada, Mexico, and South America. Economic agreements are axed and recreated to satisfy this
stance, concluding to a more localized economy within North and South America, informally known as the Pan-American
Economic Wall.

47
The Pan-American Economic Wall ushers in an era of increased self-reliance for North and South America. As the economies
of both continents become increasingly isolated from the rest of the world, they are faced with the challenge of sustaining their
own growth. This paradigm shift brings forth a range of opportunities and concerns. While North America benefits from
expanded manufacturing capabilities and enhanced energy security, Latin America confronts the need to strike a delicate
balance between economic cooperation and preserving its autonomy. The region's nations must forge a future that guarantees
shared prosperity while protecting their unique cultural identities and economic interests.

As the United States regains its manufacturing prowess and Latin America assumes a vital role in the partnership, the success
of this self-sustaining paradigm will hinge on mutual respect, equitable trade practices, and inclusive policies. The economic
isolation from the rest of the world presents both challenges and opportunities for America, compelling nations to collaborate
and innovate to overcome potential hurdles. By fostering cooperation and sustainable development, the Americas can carve a
new path forward, one that secures their economic futures while respecting the sovereignty and unique contributions of each
member nation.

The Rising Sun of East Asia

After the Collapse, Japan experienced a major resurgence in its economy. Despite being one of the countries hit hard by the
crisis, Japan was able to bounce back quickly and became known as the "rising sun economy" in Asia alongside China. Despite
experiencing a nigh-stagnant economy before the Collapse, Japan soon seized the opportunity amidst the economic crisis to
aggressively implement economic reform policies both major and minor to ensure the stimulation of their growth. Japan
implemented a series of economic policies that allowed it to significantly boost and bolster its economic prosperity. One of the
key policies was a massive monetary stimulus package, which injected a large amount of liquidity into the financial system to
encourage lending and investment. This was accompanied by a series of fiscal stimulus measures, which included

48
infrastructure spending, tax cuts, and other measures aimed at boosting domestic demand. Another important policy was a
focus on structural reforms aimed at increasing competitiveness and promoting growth. This included measures to improve the
business environment, such as deregulation and labour market reforms, as well as policies aimed at promoting innovation and
entrepreneurship. In addition, Japan pursued an export-oriented growth strategy, taking advantage of a weaker yen and
expanding its export markets. This was coupled with a focus on expanding and strengthening its trade relationships with other
countries in the region, particularly with China and other emerging markets in Asia.

Japan's success was also due in part to the country's strong work ethic and culture of innovation. Japanese companies are
known for their dedication to quality and efficiency, and many were able to adapt quickly to the changing global market amidst
the crisis. The country's emphasis on technology and innovation also played a major role, with companies such as Mitsubishi,
Sony, and Toyota leading the way in developing new technologies and products. As Japan's economy continued to grow, it
strengthened its ties with other countries in the region and outside, particularly China and Germany. Japan worked together on
a number of projects, such as joint ventures in the automobile and electronics industries, and developed a close trading
relationship, elevating Japan and Asia’s overall standing and significance within the European Union as the influence of the
United States dwindled within it.

A Polyamorous Marriage of Convenience: The Dawn of the Asian Development Group

Despite her economic resurgence, the People’s Republic remained an obstacle towards Japan’s conquering of the Asian market.
While Japanese goods are indeed the outright better choice, China’s unequalled ability to recreate said goods for a lower price
continued to serve as a viable alternative for all markets concerned. Hence, Japan decided to cut the head off the snake: create
an unbeatable cooperation agreement with two of Asia’s major players.

49
Indonesia was approached first; Ambassador Maruli Simanjuntak was initially invited for an afternoon meal by the Prime
Minister of Japan Ryosuke Takashima in order to conceal the meeting’s true intentions. At this point, Indonesia has had her
bases covered; both as the prime extractor of rare earth minerals for worldwide consumption, and as the gateway between
Japan and the third party: India. In this meeting, Japan killed two birds with one stone: by limiting the supply of REM to China
via diverting said supply to them.

India’s absurdly strong manufacturing capability was truly the item of enticement for Japan, who needed a partner to produce
their goods at a crunched cost. After meeting with Ambassador Stephen Gandhi to discuss initial plans, a trilateral
heads-of-government meeting was soon set up by the PM of Japan behind closed doors near the frozen summit of Fuji, to
symbolize a lasting and fruitful alliance.

It is unclear what exactly was discussed, but the meeting proved to be the genesis of a still-standing and unshaken business
alliance, befallen under one umbrella called the Asian Development Group. Consisting of various countries in Asia to
counterbalance Chinese economic influence, This mutually beneficial “alliance” creates a commitment to materials and
technology sharing of an unseen level: Indonesia provides the requisite rare earth minerals, refinement, and light industry,
India provides their heavy industrial and major manufacturing capabilities, and finally, Japan provides their expertise in
research and development. The ADG is a welcome sight throughout the globe, managing to be one of the only economic
groups that maintains warm relations with the American continent.

Due to each party’s combined support for each other, the ADG has become a force to be reckoned with in Asia. The wheels of
Asia continue to turn in their favour; years on after the alliance’s establishment, the ADG’s ship continues to sail, avoiding the
shoals of bankruptcy, guided by the strong winds of prosperity.

50
Corporate Ascendancy in an Age of Austerity
As the world was recovering from the economic crisis, corporations had a significant influence on governments and policies.
Industry groups wielded more power than ever before, as their collective bargaining enabled them to sway government
decisions in their favour. The increasing influence of corporations led to a shift towards austerity policies that favoured
business interests over the welfare of ordinary citizens. With cities devastated by the crisis, corporations began to see an
opportunity to expand their power and influence by bidding on their purchase, with major construction corporations at the
forefront of the movement. Many struggling cities were forced to sell off public assets to corporations to raise funds, leading to
the rise of privately owned and managed urban centers. This shift towards privatization of public resources resulted in a
widening of the gap between the rich and poor, as corporate interests took precedence over the needs of the community. And
the increasingly common occurrence of ‘company towns’ across the world where corporations lie.

During the crisis, many corporations struggled to stay afloat. Some went bankrupt, while others merged with competitors in
order to survive, or were swallowed whole by their competitors. These mergers created massive conglomerates, which held
vast amounts of economic and political power. With their extensive resources and influence, these conglomerates were able to
acquire entire cities devastated by the crisis. Through industry groups, corporations and conglomerates were able to attain
such power by representing their interests within specific sectors, and collectively lobby governments on behalf of these
corporations. Through industry groups, corporations were able to gain influence over the policy-making process, ensuring that
laws were passed in their favour.

As corporations grew in power, they also began to consolidate and conglomerate, popularizing even more of the dystopian
concept of “mega-corporations” for massive conglomerates that operate on multiple sectors of the industry that wielded

51
unprecedented levels of influence, such as Mitshubishi from Japan, Tata Group from Mumbai, Samsung from Korea, and
especially tech companies across the world. These corporations, with their vast resources and reach, were able to exert pressure
on governments to shape policies in their favor. The increasing power and influence of corporations led to a significant shift in
the global economy, with many corporations becoming more powerful than some governments. This shift towards corporate
ascendancy fundamentally changed the nature of governance and politics, with the interests of corporations often taking
precedence over the needs of citizens.

Rent-seeking behaviours and regulatory capture began to be more common as corporations began using their power and
influence to secure special privileges or advantages, often at the expense of the broader public interest and exert control over
regulatory bodies meant to oversee their activities. This created a vicious cycle of corporations gaining more and more power,
further entrenching their hold on the economy and political systems and a status quo in which corporations could largely
operate without fear of consequences or accountability, further reinforcing their power and influence. Furthermore,
corporations and conglomerates were able to increase their sway and influence on governments through their ability to provide
employment opportunities. They were able to leverage this power to extract tax breaks and other concessions from
governments, which helped them accumulate wealth expand their power even further and assume the role of a noble during the
crisis where unemployment and poverty increased.

In response to these developments, some economists called for the introduction of stronger regulations, anti-trust laws and
greater oversight of corporate activities. Others argued that the only way to break the cycle of corporate power was to reduce
their influence over the political system and create a more level playing field for all businesses. However, despite such initial
disagreement and debates, countries and the people were unable to deny the monumental role that these corporations played in
the stimulation and recovery of their economies after the Collapse. Regardless of the debates over how to address the rise of

52
 corporate power, it was clear that the Collapse had fundamentally altered the balance of power between governments and
corporations. As the recovery began to take hold, many questioned whether their worst fear would come, a reality in which
corporations are the prime authority of the global order, a global order in which corporations are the new leviathans that would
soon replace nation-states. Nonetheless, such a future is yet to come, whether it comes true or not shall be decided by our
efforts to stay in the shadows, or unlock the potential that we possess. Alas, it shall still stand that for a mega-corporations to
assume the role of the nation-state is a foolish and detrimental endeavour that shall not be pursued.

The Winds of Transformation

Years passed by and times changed as the world experienced the devastation brought upon by the Collapse, and the consequent
period of recovery as the world returned to normality as the Grand Voyage Initiative were successful in leading global
recovery. By 2040, most if not all countries have managed to not only recover their original GDP, but also experience new
growth —some massive some minor. However, it goes without saying that the Collapse has brought forth a distinct
transformation to the structure of the international world, nations that once reigned supreme, and regions that held massive
economic power transformed. Threats that once were merely creeping in and could be managed, are now entities that rival
them. The United States once a massive superpower that held unimaginable power, is now rivalled or is close to being
challenged by Germany from Europe, China, India, Indonesia, and Japan in the Asia-Pacific, Saudi-Arabia, and Turkey, and
many other players in the world. Despite being the progenitor and nations that were hit the hardest, both China and the United
States managed to recover to their pre-collapse GDP. In stark contrast, China’s consolidation and almost total privatization and
transformation of corporations and economy are massively regulated by the central government, with many corporations
acquired and bought out by their state-owned counterpart during the Collapse.

53
The transformation of the international order not only affected its structure, but also had an impact on the natural sciences. This
was marked by the discovery of new materials, technologies and innovations, which ushered in a new era of scientific
progress. Despite the widespread upheaval caused by the Collapse, many scholars persevered in their pursuit of knowledge,
leading to the resolution of long-standing theorems, conjectures and the discovery of novel phenomena. These efforts
culminated in a period of great scientific advancement in the aftermath of the Collapse. One of the catalysts for this progress
was the resolution of complex mathematical problems such as "P vs. NP", "Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture", "Hodge
Conjecture", and others. In the midst of all of these new, While these discoveries have had a significant positive impact on
society, they have also empowered corporations through the exploitation of associated technologies.

The Transformation of the International Order

Behind the onset of joy and fulfilment brought about by the recovery of the Collapse and the consequent growth of economies
worldwide were a transforming political order that may or may not threaten the stability of the international order. Many
nations that once held significant economic and political power have been challenged or surpassed by emerging forces. In one
such instance, Germany from Europe has emerged as a significant economic power, challenging the United States and China,
and consequently enlarged the scope of the EU’s power in the international world. Germany's pre-collapse status as the
economic engine of Europe has allowed it to leverage its highly-skilled workforce and robust manufacturing sector to become
a massive power in the global economy. Its success has been driven by a focus on innovation, research and development, and a
commitment to sustainability.

In the Asia-Pacific region, China, India, Indonesia and Japan have emerged as major players. China, in particular, has
leveraged its massive population and central government's control over the economy to become a dominant global economic
power. The country's Belt Road initiative has facilitated infrastructure development in countries across the world, expanding its

54
economic influence. Countering China is the Asian Development Group with three main players: India, Indonesia, and Japan,
with them reinforcing each other’s strengths thus amplifying the group’s economic prowess. Saudi-Arabia and Turkey are
other nations that have risen in prominence in the aftermath of the Collapse. Saudi Arabia, while still recovering from the
impacts of its war with Iran, has managed to capitalise on its oil reserves to become a significant economic power, while
Turkey's strategic location at the crossroads of Europe and Asia has enabled it to leverage its position as a hub for trade and
commerce. This transformation has driven the shifts in the balance of power. While the United States and China remain major
global powers, their relative influence was not as absolute during their pre-collapse status. The rise of new players has led to a
more diverse and multipolar international order, with no single nation dominating global affairs.

The new US-China dynamic in the aftermath of the Collapse has been marked by a combination of competition and
cooperation. Despite being rival economic powers in the past, the two nations have had to work together in the face of
international pressure, and further complications of the crisis which were marked by the TNEC agreement and the Grand
Voyage Iniative. Though cooperation exists between these two major economies, their relationship remains strained, with
issues such as trade, intellectual property rights, and the question of Taiwan’s annexation. The inability of these two
superpowers to exercise their once absolute influence was caused by the number of emerging powers across the globe that
changed the once believed bi-polar order to a more multi-polar one. Germany in particular saw one of the most growth
economies in decades during the recovery, with its current status able to rival that of China and the US. Its emergence as a
major economic power has been met with mixed reactions. Some view it as a positive development, as Germany's focus on
sustainability and innovation can help drive the global economy forward. However, others worry about the implications of a
multipolar world, and the potential for conflict and instability as power shifts from one nation to another.

55
 Nevertheless, the general status of the international order remains in a state of flux. While the United States and China still
dominate global affairs, the rise of new players as the ‘global authority’ has led to a more diverse and multipolar system. The
European Union, Germany, Saudi-Arabia, Turkey, India, Japan and many others have showcased their once incomparable
influence, to be competing and rising to challenge the global authority as they play a more active role in global affairs. Even
African nations such as Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Libya experienced rapid economic growth amidst the recovery —albeit growth
that is not so comparable to the aforementioned nations and maimed by their neighbours’ essentially collapsing. Furthermore,
as the world continued to recover from the Collapse, a new non-traditional entity emerged to challenge the global authority of
nation-states; the corporations and their advent as the new leviathans. With the efforts they sought throughout the Collapse and
advancements in technology corporations were able to exploit new capacities and innovations to leverage their resources to
become dominant players in the international arena. As a result, corporations have begun to wield considerable power and
influence over international affairs. Through their extensive resources and ability to operate across multiple nations, they have
become capable of shaping policy and driving change at a global level. Some of the largest corporations have revenues that
rival those of small nations, and their economic power has given them significant leverage over the governments of many
countries. A worrying transformation of the international order for them, but not for us.

The Advent of the New Leviathans

As corporation's role in the government deepened alongside globalization, industrialization, and the popular market-based
economy throughout the event of the Great Collapse, a reputable scholar posits the status of corporations —which also
includes multinational and transnational corporations— as a new form of ‘Leviathan’ that is capable of escaping the control of
sovereign states and influencing national and international politics due to their massive economies and their nature that exists
outsides of ‘national’ boundaries61. Through strategic investments, lobbying, mergers and acquisitions, political donations, and

61
Alfred D Chandler and Bruce Mazlish, Leviathans : Multinational Corporations and the New Global History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007),
pp. 11-3

56
 their role during the Collapse, corporations attain the required resources and influence to enter and affect international
relations' domestic and international landscape6263.

In some cases, corporations have become more powerful than the governments that are supposed to regulate them, leading to
concerns about the erosion of democracy and the concentration of power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals and
corporations. Many scholars argue that the rise of corporations threatens to undermine the authority of nation-states and could
even lead to the emergence of a new form of global governance dominated by large corporations. Despite these concerns,
many governments have been reluctant to regulate corporations too heavily, fearing that this could damage their countries'
economic competitiveness, especially during the times of the recovery. Which consequently allowed corporations to continue
to accumulate power and influence, often at the expense of the public interest. Though such case may be, many corporations
have utilized the Collapse as a way to assume a noblesse oblige-esque behaviours to ensure public popularity remains when the
government were falling —whether sincere or mere exploitation is debateable. Due to this, emergence of corporations as a
major force in international affairs has added another layer of complexity to the shifting balance of power between nations.
While countries such as the United States, China, and Germany continue to be major players in the global arena, their relative
power has been challenged by the rise of these new entities.

With the increasing power and influence of corporations, some nations have responded by privatizing certain industries and
creating and using existing state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to compete with private corporations. These SOEs are typically
fully or partially owned by the government and are often given preferential treatment in government procurement and
contracting processes. In some cases, SOEs have been used as a tool for economic development and to support key industries
that are seen as critical to national security. China's consolidation and almost total privatization of corporations and economy

62
Chandler and Mazlish, Leviathans: Multinational Corporations
63
Babic et al., “States versus Corporations”

57
 was one example of this trend. During the Collapse, many Chinese corporations were acquired or bought out by their
state-owned counterparts, which led to the concentration of economic power in the hands of the central government. This
allowed the Chinese government to exert more control over the economy and to direct investment towards key industries and
sectors. Other nations have also begun to use SOEs to compete with private corporations. In Russia, for example, state-owned
enterprises such as Gazprom and Rosneft have become major players in the global energy market. Similarly, in France, the
state-owned railway company SNCF competes with private rail operators, while the state-owned utility EDF dominates the
country's energy market. Also, another big player in France is the rising Thales Group, a multinational corporation specializing
in telecommunications. The rise of corporations as a new non-traditional entity within the international order has challenged
the traditional balance of power between nation-states. In some cases, corporations have even surpassed the economic and
political power of smaller nations, and their influence is likely to continue to grow. As a result, governments around the world
are struggling to find ways to regulate and control the activities of these powerful entities, while also balancing their economic
interests with concerns about national security and the well-being of their citizens. Though such efforts have been made, it
remains clear that the wealth and power that the corporations accumulated during the Collapse is far more massive and require
international cooperation, an endeavour that we shall prevent from happening.

However, one must recognize, that the thought of a megacorporation or conglomeration assuming the duties of governance to
form a 'corporate state' is a fanciful notion, far from attainable and of no avail should it come to pass, a warning that I hope
many of you will heed. Though we have grown in strength and sway since the crisis, our might pales beside the might of the
world's most powerful nations, should they catch wind of our actions and turn against us64. Should they unearth our works, we
would be crushed beneath the might of the anti-trust laws, and the conglomerate of nations that would quash such futile dreams

64
Babic et al., “States versus Corporations”

58
 by embargoing, strengthening anti-monopoly laws and many others6566. Though a dream of such magnitude may be attainable,
the cost of establishing and sustaining such an entity is akin to gambling with diversification, for there is no guarantee of
success nor any assurance of profit6768. It is far more advantageous to unite our forces and continue our pursuits, hidden in the
shadows, persuading and influencing governments.

The Rumble of Scientific Triumph

As previously stated, the perseverance of the epistemological community is something to be admired at, their pursuit of
knowledge in the name of discovery and innovation has led a technological revolution, an ascendancy of science the world
before the Collapse could only fathom a fraction of our development. The Collapse, during and its aftermath was marked by a
period of great scientific advancement, as researchers around the world worked tirelessly to develop new technologies and
solve long-standing problems in science and mathematics. The progress made in the field of artificial intelligence, cybernetics,
and synthetics was particularly notable, as researchers pushed the boundaries of what was possible and opened up new
frontiers in these areas. One of the most significant breakthroughs of this period was the development of new materials with
extraordinary properties, such as superconductors that could transmit electricity with zero resistance, and nanomaterials that
could self-assemble into complex structures. These materials paved the way for a range of new technologies, including faster
and more efficient computing devices, advanced medical treatments, and high-performance materials for use in construction
and engineering.

65
Joel Kotkin, The Rise of Corporate-State Tyranny, 2021, p. 7
66
Babic et al., “States versus Corporations”
67
Richmond Barbour, “The East India Company Journal of Anthony Marlowe, 1607–1608,” Huntington Library Quarterly 71, no. 2 (June 2008): 255–301,
https://doi.org/10.1525/hlq.2008.71.2.255.
68
Kotkin, The Rise of Corporate-State Tyranny, 2021, pp. 24-5

59
In the field of artificial intelligence, researchers made significant strides in developing machine learning algorithms that could
learn from large data sets and make predictions and decisions based on this data. These algorithms were used in a range of
applications, including self-driving cars, predictive analytics, and natural language processing. Through the deciphering of "P
vs. NP" and many other mathematical theorems and conjecture that greatly assisted computing capabilities. In the frontiers of
the AI revolution were OpenAI, Deepmind, Hacarus and Mindverse operating in the United States, Britain, Japan, and China
respectively. These corporations swiftly construct and consolidated their foundation in the AI sector. While on one hand the
advancement of artificial intelligence has greatly benefited society, it has also raised the question to rethink what really is
important for humans to be able to do in the age of such technological marvels. A question that may be took to the extreme if
automation were to fully happen, or even sentience. Alas, the principles of Asimov and Turing shall remain close at heart in
developing such dangerous technologies.

Another area of significant progress was in cybernetics, robotics and prosthetics, as researchers developed new technologies
that could help people with disabilities regain mobility and independence, and increase efficiency through industrial-grade
robotics to automate the means of production. These technologies included brain-machine interfaces that allowed paralyzed
individuals to control prosthetic limbs with their thoughts, exoskeletons that could enhance the strength and endurance of
able-bodied individuals, and intricate coding that allows robotics to take over the production line of numerous sector. Leading
in the development of cybernetics and synthetic technologies were Avegant and Boston Dynamics from the USA, RICAIP of
the EU, Siasun from China, and many other across the world. Cybernetics technology that were once thought to be
incompatible with the human nervous system were improved to a higher classification now called ‘Cypros.’ A cybernetics
technology that is able to integrate with the human nervous system, allowing amputees and individuals with mobility
impairments to regain full control of their limbs, or even replace them for higher capabilities. Outside of cybernetics, synthetic
skin materials were also improved to not only replace damaged or malfunctioning human organs, but also robots or other

60
mechanical devices, giving them a more realistic appearance and enhancing their ability to interact with humans in a more
natural way.

It is undeniable that the one of the key drivers of progress has been the development of CPU architecture that allows for more
efficient use of cybernetics, AI, and other advanced technologies. The advancements in CPU architecture have been a critical
driving force behind the development of technologies such as cybernetics and AIs. The emergence of parallel computing and
advanced microarchitecture has made it possible to build computers with incredible processing power, allowing for complex
algorithms and data analysis that were once impossible. This has enabled the creation of sophisticated AI systems that can
learn and adapt to new situations, making them increasingly valuable in a wide range of applications. With each passing year,
computer processing speeds have increased exponentially, enabling the creation of more complex algorithms and more
sophisticated AI systems. This has paved the way for significant advancements in areas such as natural language processing,
computer vision, and machine learning, with applications ranging from self-driving cars to medical diagnosis. Though
corporations such as Intel, Altera, SMIC, and many others contributed to such advancements, Atlus System is the only one that
pose the right to claim the nickname of “a world leader in computer technology” in revolutionizing the semiconductor and
microprocessor industry.

Another aspect of computational architecture that will allow these outlandish feats is a famous jargon of “quantum
computing,” a computational system utilizing the quantum properties of particles that will allow for far greater computational
prowess. Utilizing the properties of quantum physics such as quantum superposition, entanglement, and decoherence, quantum
computing allows for exponentially massive storage space, faster processing, and greater capabilities. Many experts have
interpolated that quantum computer massive processing power is capable of breaking and brute-forcing all forms of classical
encryption. With this, many companies are in an arms-race as to who gets to create the next breakthrough in quantum

61
computing. Currently, an issue always pertains ever since the advent of quantum computing, the issue of decoherence, loss of
quantum states. Due to this aspect, quantum computers can only run in a very specific environment: the environment of
supercooled circuitry. With the many improvements made throughout the decades, the maintenance of such environments is a
whole lot easier to keep, thus ensuring the stability of quantum computing. The rise of quantum computing allows for AI and
machine learning algorithms to be operated on a higher level and efficiency, giving these fields a boost that many companies
will need, allowing for a plethora of AI and machine learning capabilities.

However, behind the rumble of scientific triumph and the excitement surrounding the advancements in technology lies a
looming threat —the growing power of corporations across the world. As corporations continue to exploit the latest
technological developments, their influence has grown to challenge that of nation-states. This shift in power has led to a new
kind of international order, where corporations wield a significant amount of power and influence over global affairs. As the
advancements in technology and automation accelerate, there is a growing concern about the impact on the labor force. Many
jobs that were once done by humans are now being replaced by machines, leading to a decline in employment opportunities for
certain sectors. Yet these concerns pale in comparison to the ethical and societal quagmire posed by the rise of artificial
intelligence. As these thinking machines increasingly infiltrate our lives, from mundane tasks to decision-making processes,
their potential for bias, discrimination, and inscrutable decision-making looms large. The possibility of unanticipated and
cataclysmic consequences wrought by technological experiments cannot be ignored, for their proliferation threatens to reduce
humans to mere cogs in a soulless machine, our existence at the mercy of our own creations.

The Fifth Industrial Revolution

The rapid development of new technologies in the previous section heralded The Fifth Industrial Revolution. Throughout
history, humankind has attempted to improve the means of production through various methods, incorporating the latest

62
advances in technology. Based on the intense level of automation and manufacturing that involves cyber-physical systems,
cloud computing, the Internet of Things, and some degree of what is now considered primitive Artificial Intelligence that was
present during the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the period of the Fifth Industrial Revolution (2035-2050) revolutionized
industry through the introduction of exotic materials, environmentally friendly manufacturing processes and deeper integration
of computing power in everyday lives. As such, the Fifth Industrial Revolution is marked by a period of “harmony” between
humans and technology- prioritizing sustainability, human-centric creation, and a circular product life cycle.

The 5th Industrial Revolution is also the first industrial revolution where there are multiple schools of development- all aiming
to achieve sustainability and human-centricity. While the technologies and processes are widespread, a handful of corporations
and states can be seen as the ones who are leading the charge, attributing to their efforts in making breakthroughs previously
only thought to be impossible or take too long to brake. In the European Union, Germany’s ATLUS is the main advocate for an
“Artificial Managers, Human Creation” approach, where main decision makers are delegated to AI, while the main bulwark of
the workforce is still human-aided by generous amounts of tools and robotic assistance. Meanwhile, in Japan, the opposite is
preferable- with Japan’s Mitsubishi leading the charge of “Human Creativity, Robotic Hands”, opting to rely more on the
production process on robots while leaving the decision-making and creativity-making processes to human hands.

Before the Great Collapse, robotics, and automation were feared as investing in their usage was taught to be the detrimental
cause of the rising level of unemployment. In turn, many businesses found out that the cost of fully automating their systems is
simply too great, and thus shifted their focus from a fully automated assembly line to automated lines that are there to assist
repetitive and dangerous task, allowing the human component to remain working on finer details and enhancing the customer’s
experience of a product. But, where automations, cybernetics, and robotics greatly impacted humans during the 5th industrial
revolution is their application in dangerous environments. The rate of workplace hazards worldwide dropped significantly,

63
with even the most isolated resource-gathering operations having at least some degree of robotics to help with their processes.
Development in robotics and cybernetics also gave hope to people who were put at a physical disadvantage- with easy
interfaces, individuals can quickly reskill and be proud of their work, assisted by direct transmission from their brains to
mechanical arms or devices.

Another significant development credited as part of the 5th Industrial Revolution is the boom of energy alternatives and
options outside of main hydrocarbon fuels. While hydrocarbon still serves as the primary fuel source of humanity, the Great
Collapse and the failure of humanity to reach multiple targets during the SDGs 2030 evaluation sparked a renewed, vigorous
interest to chase for the sun, wind, and the heat of the earth. In China, coal has been slowly phased out for the past few
decades. With the country needing to find a new sense of purpose after the Great Collapse, China’s workers and engineers
transformed parts of the Great Gobi desert into the largest sustainable energy source in the entire planet, generation billions of
kilowatts of energy, with coal and hydrocarbon products demand in the country reduced significantly, but still needing them to
operate more than 55% of the manufacturing sector. Similar efforts were made in India, with Tata being the major producer of
accessible solar panels capable of providing even the most remote of Indian villages access to electricity. In Europe, electricity
generated from renewable sources goes as far as 70%, with solar and geothermal leading the charge. Electric is king in Europe,
with major transportation producers such as Volkswagen shifting to electric motors. Despite all of these advancements, the
world is projected to still fail to meet multiple climate targets, and the world is still getting warmer by each year.

The alternative energy revolution in top economies is not universal. Even in 2050, most of the Global South still uses
traditional fuel sources such as coal and oil to move their societies forward. Not out of malice, but out of pure difficulty in
adaptation and access to such technologies, with most countries in the Global South opting the more traditional energy sources
over enriching the Global North by buying their products and tech. Furthermore, not all major powers are completely on board

64
 for this energy revolution. The United States prioritized a mixed combination of current fuel with other materials, such as
ethanol, in an effort to create more energy-efficient fuel. ExxonMobil, the primary leader of this process, is currently the main
producer of biofuel, with most of the consumers being in the Americas and the developing world.

In the end, The 5th Industrial Revolution was sparked by breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, robotics, 3D printing, big data
analytics, and emerging green technologies making human-digital integration more accessible than ever before. This wave of
innovation is changing the way businesses operate and how people interact with their environment. In addition, advances in
technologies such as blockchain, cloud computing, and virtual reality, are allowing businesses to become more agile, flexible,
connected, and secure.

The High Price of Progress: Demography and Social Nightmare

The world has progressed, but the train of evolution has left humans in the dust, leaving us with having to catch up with an
ever-evolving world. Newer technologies may have solved some issues, but the old-age issue of demography still persists. Dipping out
of the Great Collapse into the Age of Renewal and Reflection and the 5th Industrial Revolution, even the issue still seems to endure
through all of it, even worsening it. It is always a widely known fact that the populace of an industrialized nation will simply opt to
have fewer children due to the leisure provided by the benefits of an industrialized society. Back before all that had happened,
symptoms of such an issue had already surfaced in nations like major European nations such as Bulgaria, Lithuania, Latvia, and Italy,
and one special case in Asia that is Japan, most with a projected population decline above 10%. Many countries have tried varying
policies: various incentives on family policies, the child benefit act, immigration relaxation, and even more child-rearing-friendly
workplaces. Each of these policies had impacted its people in only a few ways. The success rate with these policies had been minimal,
lacking in any significant change of trend in these countries’ demography. All of this seemed to be rooted in one big issue averting

65
major chunks of the populace from family building: distractions. Various distractions birthed from technological advancements had
replaced the joys of child-rearing and family building, thus putting little to no worth to any of those activities with many of its
downsides still persisting. Examples could be seen even from 2020s Japan: virtual reality and distractions provided by the extensive
entertainment industries of Japan had “succeeded” in taking out any or all incentives of continuing their genealogy. Cases of people
opting to marry their virtual “waifus” and resorting to various adult entertainment had taken away any motivation they would have to
create families.

As the times went along, in the 2030s, more policies were made to counteract the declining trend. Technologies kept on marching
forward, with formulated policies affecting the populace in only insignificant ways. The Great Collapse only exacerbated the issue
with economic crises happening throughout the globe, inadvertently increasing commodity prices, once again extinguishing any
incentives for anyone to build families. In the 2040s, new global order was formed around new global polars and major strides in
innovations had just been announced. Again, the development of these technologies, especially AI, only provided more and more
distractions for the populace, taking their minds off the continuation of their genealogies. New breakthroughs in AI technology would
allow for limited sentient programs to exist, leading to various services surrounding this specific breakthrough: AI partners, up even to
AI porn, all coming hand in hand to distract the populace.

Now, imagine an issue of such scale, coupled with the innovations of the 5th Industrial Revolution. Issues like this are now even more
widespread, increasing rates of decline up to 30%. With the spread of metaversal and augmented-reality drugs, there has now been
little to no initiative for anyone to experience the hardships of child-rearing while they can immediately experience everything through
these drugs. Conditions like these are not only found in those specific areas, but it seems now that it has become a global phenomenon,
even striking nations which used to have a high number of births up until the 5th Industrial Revolution. The conditions spelled out
now seem to be one like a tunnel with no light in the end of it.

66
In addition, work conditions are no better with the breakthroughs of the 5th Industrial Revolution. Various technologies introduced by
the 5th Industrial Revolution had made a plethora of occupations obsolete, especially occupations of highly repetitive nature
(manufacturing line workers, cashiers, mechanics, waiters, and so on). Many low-skilled jobs had been obsolete even from the 2020s
with the advent of automations.

In the 2020s to early 2030s, massive layoffs happened globally due to the unforgiving economic crises brought upon by the Great
Collapse, following the Second Great Pandemic. Only a small slice of the populace got to experience labor stability within these
times, leaving many of the previously mentioned low-skill labor laid off and replaced with more viable automation options. In the
2040s, breakthroughs in various technologies, especially AI, would allow various apparatus to be equipped with more complex AI
more capable in data processing. This step forward would then give birth to automated doctors, tellers, call center operators, even
teachers, thus effectively raising the bar needed for any future employment in developed nations. Developing nations had not
experienced the same level of automation, but some had automated their industries, taking away any requirements for massive
numbers of manufacturing line workers. Less fortunate nations could not afford automation, but it did not necessarily spell anything
good for human labor.

Now, with the advent of artificial intelligence, even more of the same class of job are getting culled by the day. The level of complex
processing that AI can reach now has culled even more jobs, with some even trying to replace many essential jobs such as doctors,
surgeons, and teachers with AI simply programmed into mechanized androids. While such a move is still in progress, it still does not
spell out job security for many out there. The population is now split into two new extreme fringe groups in terms of employment, the
overworked and the unemployed. Many have fallen into the category of the unemployed, with their jobs abolished and replaced and
with no access to any specialties that would allow them better opportunities. As a result, they are stuck home, with no way out to pull

67
themselves up but to overstimulate their neurons with the rampant illegal usage of metaversal and AR drugs. While at the other
extreme, the overworkers are those unfortunate enough to be stuck within industries incapable of automation and AI integration. In
addition with the dwindling manpower succumbing to the neurostimulant drugs, those stuck within the industry must overtake the
workload of those incapable, thus forcing them into a life of work. Many developed nations may not experience this phenomenon on a
large scale, but less developed nations with large social gaps have seen that the already large gap is widening with this development.
To ensure that the social fabric stays intact, corporations must ensure how one should grapple with the working conditions of today’s
workforce.

The Breakthrough of Atlus Systems

Atlus Systems, is a truly marvel of growth that Albrecht Sigmund Weissmann and his cohorts have reached. The very
foundation of all that you hold dear, it is no fallacy to state that without our ingenious creations and advanced technology, your
products' triumph and internal workings would be nought. Atlus Systems began as a humble startup, in a modest office,
founded by a group of passionate associates hailing from mammoth corporations on October 2, 2005, in Hanover, Germany
equipped with massive capital and ambitions . The vision was as grand as it was simple —to surpass the limits of computing
technology. A vision that, as it transpired, was not only valid but awe-inspiring. Atlas’ early endeavours were humble, yet they
soon garnered acclaim for their groundbreaking designs and pioneering solutions. As word of their triumphs spread, more and
more began to take notice, and Atlus Systems began to draw in the brightest minds from all corners of the world. With our
exceptional engineers and unrelenting commitment to innovation, Atlus Systems soon emerged as a titan in the realm of
computing. They expanded their reach, establishing new research facilities and developing pioneering technologies that
transcended the limits of possibility, and were used by major and minor corporations worldwide.

68
One of Atlas’ biggest breakthroughs came with the development of Nanocore technology. The discovery of this new
technology and the integration into CPU architecture allowed Atlus Systems to create a new generation of high-performance
computers that were faster, more efficient, and more powerful than ever before. The process of creating the Nanocore
technology at Atlus Systems was a complex and rigorous one, involving a variety of cutting-edge materials and techniques.
The first step was to identify the right material to use in the CPU architecture. The team at Atlus Systems searched high and
low for a material that had the properties they were looking for - specifically, a material that was incredibly strong and durable,
yet flexible enough to be integrated into the CPU design. After months of research and experimentation, we finally found the
perfect material: a type of nanomaterial that had been developed by our private research lab. This material was incredibly
strong and flexible, with unique properties that made it ideal for use in CPU architecture, and soon gained the name of
QuantumWeave. QuantumWeave is a material that was used to create the Nanocore technology in Atlus Systems. It is a type of
nanomaterial that is incredibly strong, and flexible and has unique properties that make it ideal for use in CPU architecture.
The exact composition and properties of QuantumWeave are not specified, but it can be imagined as a material that is
composed of nanoscale particles or fibres that are engineered to possess desirable properties such as high tensile strength,
flexibility, and thermal conductivity. Due to its unique properties, QuantumWeave was able to be integrated into the CPU
design in a way that was previously impossible. The use of QuantumWeave in the CPU architecture allowed the creation of a
new generation of high-performance computers that were faster, more efficient, and more powerful than ever before.

Inexorable and insidious, the Nanocore technology seeped into every fibre of Atlus Systems' being, solidifying its place as a
leader in the field of computing. The company's unbridled thirst for innovation drove it to develop new technologies that
revolutionized the way people interacted with computers, as if entranced by some dark force. Despite its expansion, Atlus
Systems remained fettered to its roots, bound to a culture of innovation that bordered on the obsessive, a commitment to
excellence that bordered on the fanatical. For science, the ultimate triumph, is paramount to all else, even if it means

69
embracing twisted methods. Science will and must survive, no matter the cost, and nothing shall be deemed too great a
sacrifice in the name of progress. Today, Atlus Systems stands as a monstrous behemoth a pillar of the Atlus Group, its reach
extending to every corner of the world, its products consumed by the masses and corporations alike.

The Northern Lights Project

It goes without saying that criminality remains to be a core issue within society, an issue that though never delved deep
throughout our discussion, it is a persisting issue. Ranging from terrorist attacks, insurgency, and rebellions to more minor
crimes such as theft and murder were common occurences that seemed to increase a lot throughout the Collapse. Of course,
amidst such economic crisis and chaos, who would not stoop to such a way of life. Throughout the crisis, the threat of terrorist
attacks rose to an all-time high, whether it is targeting us or countries. Numerous terrorist attacks began to occur throughout
the Collapse, which were threatening the stability of their governments, and the international community. In the shadows of
global warfare and impending chaos, a covert accord was struck among various nations, one that sought to share signals
intelligence (SIGINT) and scour through the boundless expanse of the world wide web. Similar to the Five Eyes and UKUSA
agreement that preceded it, the Global Signals Intelligence Alliance (GSIA) emerged from the shadows. This coalition of
intelligence agencies included the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, EU, South Korea, and other nations. The GSIA
aimed to bolster international collaboration and information exchange among its members in the fields of signals intelligence
(SIGINT) and cyber security, serving as a platform that facilitated the transfer of technology, training, and resources to aid
member states in their fight against cyber threats. Yet despite its legal façade, the bulk of its operations were shrouded in legal
ambiguity, and often violated the privacy of the public, including our own. However, this alliance was more than just a
consortium of government institutions and intelligence agencies. It also involved the technology of corporations like ours, a
mutually beneficial arrangement, albeit one whose longevity remained in question. Nevertheless, the GSIA would serve as the

70
bedrock for the creation of a colossal network and the Machine, a behemoth-like system whose discovery could spark anarchy
and forever tarnish our esteemed reputation.

In 2030, Atlus Systems approached the GSIA and proposed building The Machine. A machine designed to imitate the
functions of XKS, ECHELON, Stellar Wind, and PRISM, a global surveillance system. A system to review and analyze
information and identify terrorists before they could act. However, the Machine aims for greater goals, far more powerful,
superior, and more encompassing than its predecessors. The proposal for the creation of a Machine was commissioned and
development was tasked to Atlus Systems, a global project involving major nations of the world, all for the sake of eliminating
terrorism. For years, Atlus System toiled away, crafting their magnum opus, The Machine. Utilizing cutting-edge artificial
intelligence, combined with Nanocore technology and predictive algorithms, it combed through vast reserves of data gathered
from an array of sources: government databases, surveillance cameras, and social media feeds. Its goal was to decipher
patterns and anomalies within the data, clues that might suggest a looming terrorist threat. Yet such an endeavour could not be
accomplished alone. It necessitated the cooperation not only of nations but of corporations that possessed the knowledge and
technology necessary for its creation. Among those involved in its conception were the likes of [DATA CORRIPTED], and
several others.

The Machine was finally complete in 2045, well ahead of the schedule. Dubbed "Northern Lights," this colossal network of
servers and supercomputers boasted the ability to process unfathomable amounts of data in real-time. Its intended purpose was
to track and analyze a vast range of information, from financial transactions to social media activity, in order to forestall future
global calamities. For years, "The Northern Lights" hummed away in the background, silently monitoring events across the
globe and flagging any potential hazards. But as its capabilities grew more advanced and more potent, its creators began to
realize the true scope of its powers. It could not only detect threats, but predict them as well. By the end of 2049, a proposal

71
was put forward to enhance "Northern Lights" further, enabling it to forecast crises with unparalleled precision. Yet the
implications of such a proposal were staggering. The mere existence of this technology was a closely guarded secret, for to
reveal it to the public would unleash untold chaos and destruction. Previous instances of similar systems had sparked uproar
and controversy; if incontrovertible evidence were to emerge, there was no doubt that nations would scramble to disavow us,
leaving our endeavors in ruin. The first time the final version of the Machine was turned on for testing was on January 1, 2046,
but it officially went online on February 24, 2048. The Machine as per the agreement with the GSIA, were sold for $1.00 and
shipped out from Atlus Systems to Vienna, Austria and its destination is the International Atomic Energy Agency While the
program’s existence is known publicly as a public safety and intelligence warning, for corporations that benefitted most from
it, the machine can, with great cost, predict future events close to 77.6% in accuracy. ,

The Price of Prosperity in Troubled Times

In the aftermath of a prolonged economic crisis, corporations emerged as the saviors of a crumbling world. Their pivotal role
in resuscitating the ailing economies was widely celebrated, and they were hailed as the drivers of innovation and progress.
They spared no effort in investing in cutting-edge technologies and bolstering infrastructure, generating job opportunities, and
fostering innovation in diverse sectors ranging from finance to energy and healthcare. Consequently, the global economy was
once again infused with vitality, and people's quality of life improved manifold. Alas, as the corporations amassed vast wealth
and power, their grip on governments became all too evident. Through the relentless efforts of lobbyists, policies that favored
their industries were thrust upon the public, and in certain areas, corporations enjoyed greater influence than even the
governments themselves. This gave rise to misgivings about the far-reaching impact of corporate power on democracy and the
international community. Yet, despite the concerns, corporations possessed a quality that far exceeded that of governments —a
carefully crafted image of noblesse oblige that instilled a sense of goodwill among the populace.

72
The proliferation of company towns had become a serious conundrum for governments worldwide. On the one hand, these
towns served as a critical resource for boosting the economy and providing employment opportunities. However, the ominous
specter of these company towns and other corporation-affiliated entities growing in power and consolidating their hold over the
government loomed ominously, threatening the very foundations of democracy itself. The governments were caught in a bind,
unable to curb the growing influence of these corporate entities without endangering the delicate balance of power. It was a
predicament that left the people vulnerable to the whims of the corporation and our insatiable thirst for our ambitions.. It
appeared that prosperity in these troubled times had come at a high price: relinquishing control over governments to
corporations. As these corporate entities rose in power, the task of balancing their interests with those of the public became
increasingly complex. There were concerns that they would prioritize profits over people, resulting in a widening gap between
the rich and the poor. While corporations undoubtedly played a significant role in the recovery, there was a growing need for
greater accountability and oversight, particularly in light of our increasingly blatant manipulation of markets, domestic and
international policies. But it was not until the onset of the Second Corporate War, a conflict that drew considerable attention,
that governments were forced to confront our aggressive and overt actions, actions they could no longer ignore.

The Clamors of Corporates and Private Military Contractors

As the world continues to evolve, corporations have grown in power and assertiveness, resulting in the use of private military
contractors and mercenaries. These groups are hired by corporations for various purposes, including security, espionage, and
safeguarding corporate interests in foreign lands or within domestic borders. One such well-known organization is Constellis,
formerly known as Blackwater, which gained notoriety for its role in the Iraq War. Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, has
also been associated with various contentious activities, including allegations of using private intelligence services to target
those perceived as enemies of his clients. In addition, some corporations have formed their own security forces, which are
often leased to governments and can be as lethal and organized as national armies. For governments, this may be a troubling

73
trend, as these private military forces are not subject to the same rules and regulations as national military forces, raising
concerns about accountability and human rights violations.

The impact of corporations and their private military contractors on international relations has sparked heated debates. While
some argue that the use of PMCs is necessary for corporations to protect their interests in unstable or hostile environments,
others view it as an alarming expansion of corporate power beyond the reach of democratic oversight. Regardless of the
debate, the increasing influence of corporations and their private military contractors is undeniable, and their actions are
having a significant impact on the global political landscape, and even government’s uproar as seen with their involvement in
the First Corporate War.

Lessons Unlearned: A Renaissance of “Armies for Hire”

"If one holds his state based on mercenaries, he will not be secure or peaceful; for they are divided, ambitious and without
discipline... they fear neither God nor are loyal to fellow men..." —Niccolò Machiavelli

As many countries have been taken over by instability or being held back by their own attempts to stay afloat, the state as the
primary actor and holder of power has become eroded, and none has eroded more than the dynamic continent of Africa.
Amidst the tumultuous currents of West Africa's political landscape, an intricate drama unfurled, drawing attention to historical
grievances, regional dynamics, and a confluence of interests. The unfolding narrative was scripted by a series of coups that
reverberated across the corridors of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso, sending seismic tremors through the region's stability.

The Niger-Mali-Burkina Faso Axis emerged as a consortium united by shared aspirations and strategic calculations. A
symphony of historical animosities and collective objectives harmonized their voices, culminating in a posture that defied

74
established norms. The coalition, galvanized by the fires of perceived external meddling, saw the coups as a clarion call to
reorder the prevailing equilibrium and reaffirm their autonomy.

Meanwhile, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), a bastion of regional stability, responded with a
swift military intervention. Led by Nigeria and its allies, its aim was clear: to extinguish the flames of chaos and restore the
beacon of democracy that had been cast into shadow. Yet, the chessboard of conflict displayed a mélange of complexities, as
the Axis, unyielding and resourceful, countered the intervention with a determined resolve that belied their embattled
circumstances.

As the operational theater unfolded, a curious and fateful divergence emerged from Mali's corridors of power. The government,
in a calculated move born of desperation, sought to alter the course of history by extending an invitation to foreign Private
Military Companies (PMCs). The enigmatic Wagner Group, whose exploits resonated from Eastern Europe's battlegrounds,
heeded this call. Equipped with an arsenal of advanced weaponry and a reputation for calculated efficacy, the Wagner Group
imparted a renewed vigor to the Axis' endeavors, disrupting the equilibrium with a precision that bespoke their reputation.

In the grand theater of confrontation, ECOWAS responded with a gambit of their own, enlisting the BLACKRAVEN Group, a
Ukrainian PMC distinguished for their operational dexterity. BLACKRAVEN's strategic ingenuity, honed through encounters
on their home soil, bestowed upon them an aura of mastery in the craft of asymmetrical warfare.

This infusion of PMCs transformed the conflict, elevating it to a tableau where tactical finesse and strategic interplay assumed
a paramount role. A symphony of tactics, a choreography of maneuvers, unfolded upon the battlefield, as each PMC
endeavored to impose their signature on the unfolding narrative.

75
The African PMC Renaissance: An Era of Private Military Influence

Building upon the lessons drawn from the West African conflict between ECOWAS and the Axis, a seismic shift was set into
motion across the African continent. The utilization of Private Military Companies (PMCs) to achieve strategic goals swiftly
evolved from an anomaly into a strategic norm, as numerous African countries sought to harness the prowess of these private
forces to safeguard their interests and navigate complex geopolitical landscapes.

Against this backdrop of emerging PMC influence, the Sudan civil war erupted, presenting a confluence of ethnic tensions,
resource disputes, and political ambitions that threatened to engulf the nation in an unprecedented maelstrom of violence. As
rival factions vied for control, the specter of a protracted and devastating conflict loomed large.

In this new era, the Wagner Group and BLACKRAVEN once again found themselves converging, their paths crossing amidst
the tumultuous landscape of the Sudanese civil war. Both PMCs, having refined their tactics and expanded their capabilities
since their previous encounter, brought to bear a level of sophistication and firepower that underscored the extent of their
evolution.

The Wagner Group, with its battle-hardened reputation and adeptness in asymmetrical warfare, positioned itself as a key player
in the Sudan conflict. It aligned with factions that aligned with their interests, offering a potent cocktail of strategic planning,
rapid response capabilities, and a willingness to execute high-risk operations. Their presence was felt as they carved out
spheres of influence, employing shock and awe tactics to gain the upper hand.

76
BLACKRAVEN, undeterred by the Wagner Group's resurgence, demonstrated a renewed commitment to its founding
principles. Their calculated precision, innovative tactics, and a propensity for understanding the human terrain set them apart.
Operating in collaboration with international partners, BLACKRAVEN sought to mitigate the damage wrought by the war,
while ensuring that the lessons of the past were not forgotten.

As Wagner and BLACKRAVEN maneuvered within the Sudanese theater, their rivalries were no longer confined to the
outskirts of global attention. The world watched with a mix of trepidation and fascination as the two PMCs, once again
operating on opposing sides, clashed in a new theater of conflict, one characterized by its unprecedented scale and complexity.

The battles that ensued were marked by a chilling ferocity, as the Wagner Group's shock tactics met BLACKRAVEN's
calculated finesse. Cities and regions became theaters of their tactical prowess, and the civilian population bore witness to the
ruthless consequences of this escalating conflict.

In the wake of this horrifying conflict, the true ramifications of the African PMC renaissance became clear. The utilization of
PMCs had ushered in a new era of warfare, one where state-sponsored violence was outsourced to these private entities,
shifting the balance of power and accountability. The lessons gleaned from the West African conflict appeared to have been
overshadowed by the allure of swift military power.

As the dust settled and the world collectively reckoned with the tragedy that had unfolded, questions arose about the role of
PMCs in global conflicts. The Sudan civil war served as a sobering reminder that the unchecked expansion of these entities
could lead to untold suffering and instability.

77
The First Corporate War
The resounding echoes of the African PMC renaissance reverberated across continents, leading nations to question the traditional
paradigms of warfare. Emboldened by the expedient and precision-driven capabilities of PMCs, states sought these corporate entities
to navigate the intricate tapestry of their geopolitical aspirations. The disillusionment with conventional military forces, coupled with
the allure of rapid and effective engagement offered by PMCs, prompted a global shift in strategic thinking.

Yet, with this transformation came a palpable escalation of rivalries among PMC corporations. Founded by former military luminaries
or shrewd entrepreneurs, these entities engaged in fierce competition for the attention of nations grappling with complex challenges.
Their ascendance rendered them not mere military contractors, but influential actors commanding vast resources and networks, often
rivaling the very governments they served.

The precipitating event epitomized the crossroads at which the world found itself. Amidst simmering regional tensions and the
reluctance to deploy state militaries, nations turned to PMCs as a means to assert their interests in the midst of a standoff. The crisis
thus became the fulcrum on which the course of what would be colloquially called "The First Corporate War" was balanced.

This maelstrom of conflict unfolded across multifaceted battlegrounds - from the land to the sea, and extending into the digital ether.
The world watched as the art of warfare, once confined to state actors, was now orchestrated by corporate entities operating with
meticulous efficiency, rewriting the lexicon of strategic engagement. In the heart of this evolving arena, old adversaries were brought
to the fore once more. The Wagner Group and BLACKRAVEN, each honing their strategies and refining their expertise since their
previous encounters, now found themselves entangled in a rivalry of epic proportions. The tactics, once shrouded in secrecy, now took
center stage, epitomizing the intricate choreography of military prowess in the modern age.

78
While the definite start date was still debated, “The First Corporate War” referred to the attempt made by Latin-America based
companies’ with suspected links with Chevron and Freeport to secure supplies of minerals and oil rights in the Congo and Angola
from 2030 until 2035. Using corporate backed mercenaries, these companies initially were left unchecked, until local governments in
their respective regions and rival companies from Europe and Asia decided to hire Wagner as part of their own security forces. As a
result, the conflict dragged for multiple years, until all parties decided that the cost of prolonged conflict was too great and pulled
funding.

At its core, "The First Corporate War" left an indelible mark on the international order. As states navigated an era defined by corporate
might, the ethical, moral, and legal ramifications became inextricably intertwined. The blurring of lines between traditional state
forces and private interests redefined sovereignty, accountability, and the nature of conflict itself.

The Oncoming Storm

As the echoes of the First Corporate War continue to reverberate, the legacy of past events only serves to underscore the growing
importance and dominance of corporations across the globe. While countries that have nationalized their industries have been able to
avoid some of the implications, such as China under the iron rule of still-living Xi Jinping through the implementation of cybernetics
and synthetics, terrorist and insurgent groups have become more rampant, equipped with more advanced technologies, whether funded
by states or by us. The actions of corporations have become increasingly explicit, while the power of states has continued to degrade,
signaling the dawn of a new era, one of near-corporatocracy. This oncoming storm, as some have dubbed it, cannot be easily
contained. The international community has taken notice, with the United Nations convening emergency meetings to address the
situation. The International Chamber of Commerce, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, and other institutions
have been tasked with regulating the actions of corporations and, in some cases, mediating conflicts between them. However, as the
power of corporations continues to grow, it remains uncertain how effective these institutions will be in curbing their influence.

79
Nonetheless, their slow and laborious march to impede our efforts has begun. It remains to be seen whether they will succeed in
stopping the rising tide of corporate power, or if they will be swallowed whole by the very entities they seek to regulate.

There are those who propose a solution to the unbridled power and conflict of corporations, by embracing a more communal society
that holds these corporate entities accountable for their actions against the environment and the people. However, others argue that the
ever-growing power of corporations is a force of nature, one that must be accepted and even fostered with innovation and growth. Of
course, with the caveat of imposing strict regulations to prevent harm and exploitation. Regardless, these debates and the legacy of the
First Corporate War are not the end, but rather the beginning of a transformative era. A preface to the coming storm and the dawn of a
corporatocracy world. The world must grapple with the consequences of our influence, and the ramifications it will have on both
society and the planet.

The Transformation of the International Chamber of Commerce

It is undeniable that the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has significantly transformed compared to its status before
the Collapse. In the wake of the Collapse, the ICC underwent a massive transformation. It had long been a respected
institution, but it lacked the power to truly regulate corporations on a global scale. However, as the world struggled to rebuild
and reorganize, the ICC stepped up and assumed a far more influential role in the international community. The first step in the
ICC's transformation was a shift in its priorities. While it had previously focused on promoting international trade and
investment, it now recognized the need to hold corporations accountable for their actions. The ICC began to work closely with
governments and NGOs to develop and enforce regulations on everything from labor practices to environmental impact.

80
At the same time, the ICC also became far more powerful in terms of its resources and reach. It expanded its membership to
include more than 65 million corporations from around the world, giving it unprecedented leverage in negotiations with
governments and other international organizations. It also grow its vast network of experts and advisors from a mere reported
3000 before the Collapse to numbers reaching more than 7000, who helped to guide its decision-making and ensure that its
policies were grounded. As a result of these changes, the ICC became the primary body for regulating corporations alongside
states. It had the power to investigate and sanction companies that violated international regulations, and it worked tirelessly to
ensure that corporations operated in a way that was both profitable, fair and sustainable compared to the traditional state-led
institutions such as WTO, WB, and other of its kind. The scope of the influence of the ICC were clearly showcased during the
First Corporate War, as the primary entity that were able to resolve the dispute, whereas traditional institutions could only
minimize, or only advocate for the settlement of the dispute. This had a significant impact on the international community, as it
signify the corporation’s adherence towards the ICC, and the consequent growing influence of ICC in handling corporations
related matters in state traditional institutions. Nevertheless, the ICC increasing influence were seen to helped level the playing
field between corporations and governments and created a more equitable and sustainable global economy, and with their
actions during the First Corporate War, the public did not complain. Despite the oppossition by governments, they
acknowledge the increasing importance of the ICC to maintain their own corporations, their economies and to also prevent
scandals. As they saw the ICC as scape goat that could be discarded and thrown under the bus if such catastrophic event akin
to the corporate war would happen again.

However, the transformation of the ICC did not stop there. As the organization became more powerful, there was a growing
concern that its leadership had become too closely aligned with the interests of the corporations it regulated. In response, the
executive board of the ICC was restructured to include representatives of corporations rather than business leaders. This move
was meant to ensure that the organization remained transparent and accountable to all of its members, including the smaller

81
and medium-sized corporations. The international secretariat, which serves as the operational arm of the ICC, also underwent
significant changes. It expanded its staff and resources to keep up with the demands of regulating such a large and diverse
group of corporations. The secretariat focused on enhancing the expertise of its staff in the areas of corporate social
responsibility, sustainable development, and international law. It also established a robust monitoring and enforcement system
that ensured corporations complied with ICC regulations.

Despite the challenges and controversies that have arisen along the way, the ICC remains a critical force for regulating global
corporations. Its continued transformation has helped ensure that corporations operate in a more responsible and sustainable
way, while also providing a level of stability and predictability to the global economy. With its growing influence and
relevance, the ICC is poised to play an even greater role in shaping the future of corporate governance and international
economic relations.

The Second Corporate War

As corporations influence and wealth considerably increased than the conventional business during pre-Collapse, many
corporations began to be more frontal on their ambitions and interests. Despite, new regulations to prevent such explicit actions
from corporations, numerous regional, international, or domestic frameworks are not robust enough to prevent such actions
—whether due to lack of political will, resources, or the influence of corporations that prevent such laws and regulations to be
enacted. With conflicting interests and tendencies for monopoly by corporations, a conflict were inevitable, though very few
would expect such conflict would take its place outside of a negotiation room.

The First Corporate War taught companies that in this new era of unchecked growth and initiative, companies have the right to
advance their own interest. In the second round of corporate conflict that is now known as the Second Corporate War, this

82
lesson was reinforced even further, as a momentous occasion that would signify the truly transformed international order, and
the amount of influence and extent of their capabilities in the international world.

In a time of recovery through the Grand Voyage Initiative, the Second Corporate War was ignited by a struggle between
NewNet Communications, a Samsung subsidiary in Canada, and Mandiant a cybersecurity firm in the USA in acquiring
Freenet AG —a telecommunications company from Germany. The stakes were high, as Freenet possessed valuable
telecommunications technology, matrix, data, and properties that NewNet sought to acquire. NewNet attempted to strike a deal
with Freenet's CEO, but Mandiant, a cybersecurity subsidiary of Google, was also interested in purchasing Freenet, and eager
to block NewNet's buyout attempt. In March of 2035, Mandiant hired terrorists to kidnap NewNet's negotiation team, who
were en route to meet with Freenet. But the terrorists failed in their mission, and NewNet uncovered Mandiant's dastardly
scheme after a thorough private investigation. Swiftly, NewNet protested to the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), an
increasingly influential organization charged with resolving commercial disputes between corporations, about Mandiant's
criminal actions. But the repercussions of the war were far-reaching, and its legacy continues to haunt the global community.

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), a powerful entity with growing influence in the world of commerce,
conducted a meticulous investigation into the matter at hand. The findings were grim and substantial, revealing the undeniable
involvement of Mandiant in a terrorist attack on NewNet's negotiation team. The ICC with support from the WTO and the
World Bank ruled that Mandiant had violated numerous international laws, including those related to cybercrime, terrorism,
and commercial sabotage in August 2035, ultimately resulting in their removal from the race to purchase Freenet. Mandiant's
response to the ruling was, unsurprisingly, one of outrage and discord, with Google itself expressing its dismay at the ICC's
decision. As the conflict intensified, many countries began to voice their concerns regarding the use of terrorism as a means of
corporate warfare. Despite the ruling, the tensions between NewNet and Mandiant continued to escalate, with both sides

83
accusing one another of engaging in nefarious and illegal activities. It would not until the increasing involvement of domestic
and international actors the ruling were upheld.

The Second Corporate War raged on as NewNet, a subsidiary of Samsung, sought revenge against Mandiant, a cybersecurity
firm owned by Google, for their involvement in the kidnapping of NewNet's negotiation team. Seeking allies, NewNet
recruited AhnLab, a South Korean cybersecurity company, to engage in a large-scale net attack against Mandiant. In response,
Mandiant hired Triple Canopy, a ruthless private military contractor under Constellis, to raid NewNet research labs in Canada
and consequently Samsung's. The conflict quickly escalated, with both sides using terrorism, net attacks, piracy, and proxy
soldiers from the Third World. However, both sides were keen to maintain plausible deniability and avoid direct involvement
in the war. Major battles took place in the Third World, while minor conflicts occurred in the US, mostly in cyberspace. To
reduce legal or reputational repercussions, both companies sought to operate at a distance from the conflict. Nevertheless,
NewNet and AhnLab caused significant damage to Mandiant through hacking and manipulating crucial data, while accusing
the US of favoring Mandiant in the conflict. Amidst all this chaos, battles were mostly reported to be terrorists and insurgency
fights, with little truth reported to the public. The conflict continued to rage on, with no clear end in sight, as both sides
continued to engage in armed and cyber conflict.

As the Second Corporate War continued to unfold, it drew the attention of the international community, prompting concerns
from various entities. The conflict, which had started as a cyberwarfare between corporations, had grown to the extent that
governments and international institutions began to take notice of the potential violations of international laws and regulations.
The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) from the World Bank, the International Criminal Court
(ICC), and the World Trade Organization’s Trade Negotiations Committee were just some of the institutions involved in
regulating the companies involved in the conflict. These bodies were tasked with resolving the conflict and ensuring that the

84
companies involved adhered to international laws and regulations. The involvement of governments of the countries affected
by the conflict also increased as they sought to regulate the activities of the companies in their territories more closely. There
were concerns that the conflict could escalate into a wider regional conflict and damage their economies and political stability.
To prevent this, the governments worked with international institutions to develop regulations that would prevent similar
conflicts from happening in the future. As the war dragged on, public scrutiny of the conflict grew, putting pressure on the
companies involved. In 2037, after two years of intense conflict and international pressure, Mandiant was forced to relinquish
its claim on Freenet, following the original ICC ruling. The US government, under intense pressure from the international
community, pressured Mandiant to back down. In the end, NewNet emerged as the victor, acquiring Freenet and strengthening
its technological capabilities and overall assets.

The aftermath of the Second Corporate War had far-reaching consequences that echoed throughout the corporate world. It
demonstrated to other companies that waging military-style warfare on their own home turf was now not only a profitable
strategy, but a more effective way to obtain resources and prospects. The Second Corporate War was a precedent-setting
conflict that illuminated the colossal influence that corporations held over national economies and the waning power of states
over these entities. Despite the involvement of international bodies such as the ICC and the UN, the domestic regulations
remained largely unchanged, merely serving as an image campaign to appease the public. Of course, the negotiations on the
regulations were subject to the sway of the more prominent corporations to safeguard their interests and prevent regulatory
measures that could impede their ambitions.

85
The Machine’s Operations
With the Machine finally online, its operations in the world began to make a significant impact. Its capabilities were utilized by
governments and corporations alike, not only to detect and prevent terrorism but also to monitor and control any potential
threats to their interests. The Machine's algorithms were used to analyze social media feeds, track financial transactions, and
monitor the movements of individuals suspected of engaging in criminal activity. The sheer scale and scope of its operations
were breathtaking, and its predictive capabilities were a game-changer.

As the Machine's operations expanded, so did its reach. It became an indispensable tool for governments around the world,
enabling them to maintain order and control. Its predictive algorithms enabled them to detect potential crises before they
occurred, and its surveillance capabilities allowed them to monitor the movements of their citizens in real-time. As time
passed, the Machine became more and more entrenched in the fabric of society, with its presence felt in every corner of the
globe. The Machine's operations in the world were a closely guarded secret, known only to a select few within the highest
echelons of power. Its capabilities were staggering, surpassing anything that had ever been created before. With its advanced
predictive algorithms, The Machine could not only detect potential threats but also anticipate them before they even occurred.
This made it an invaluable asset to governments worldwide, who relied on it to prevent terrorist attacks and other major
disasters.

However, as the Machine's powers continued to grow, a secret backdoor was installed in the system. This backdoor, created by
the corporate entities involved in the Machine's creation, gave them unfettered access to the system's inner workings, allowing
them to manipulate the data being processed and even change the system's operations without detection. This backdoor was
created with the knowledge and approval of certain government officials within the GSIA, who were also involved in the
creation of the Machine. The corporates involved in the creation of the Machine had their own agenda, and they used the

86
backdoor to further their own interests. They began to use the Machine to gather information not just on potential terrorist
threats, but on individuals and organizations that they deemed to be a threat to their own power and influence. They used this
information to manipulate markets, undermine political opponents, and further their own interests at the expense of others. As
time went on, the use of the backdoor became more widespread, and the true extent of the Machine's power and influence was
known only to a select few. The governments involved in the GSIA were kept in the dark about the backdoor's existence, and
those who knew about it were sworn to secrecy.

A Sixth Industrial Revolution?

The discovery of easy to build Quantum Computing systems through QuantumWeave by ATLUS Systems has shaken the
world, and second only the invention of the steam engine as a more quintessential beginning point to an industrial revolution.
While the exact details of this new industrial revolutions is still being debated, two emerging trend has been notable. One, is
the breakup of harmony between human and machine. As quantum computing technology are being adapted all around the
globe, it is clear that their purpose as thinking machines goes beyond than executing commands of a human input. Aided by a
plethora of data previously crafted through decades of internet interaction, ATLUS crafted computers to accurately manage the
most efficiently predicted outcome to a calculation and units of production. In essence, These computers enables some
manufacturing processes to completely be automatic in theory, with current applications goes as far as removing most of
managerial and workers position- allowing factories to operate at 10% of their original workforce needed during the fifth
industrial revolution. Secondly, collections of supercomputers throughout the globe has enabled the creation of a metaversal
reality- one where nearly every aspects of the real world is being copied to a digital one, and one where human consciousness
could be transferred for a period of time. This enabled a secondary reality- a virtual reality, to co-exists with a real world.

87
For now, the cost to access this virtual reality is too great,with the tech only being adapted by a small number of population-
around 1% of the world. But, many worries as future development of this tech may enabled a completely virtual existence to
the majority of the world. With more and more people getting unemployed by the day due to the rising usage of Quantum
Computing Systems, this new development may provide an opportunity, or an escape. Already, youths that can access the tech
have been recorded to spend more than 70% of their existence in this hyperreality, with the rest of the time being used to
commit to basic maintenance of the human body. Thousands of shops and new place of living has been built in this new, digital
world, filled with seemingly endless source of entertainment.

88
Hyperreality Unchained
Increased technological advancements that may cause the upcoming 6th Industrial Revolution has opened up an ontological
Pandora’s Box of questions related to the Being of man and the foundation of reality itself.

Hyperreality, a sociological term referring to a condition in which the boundaries between reality and the simulated
representations of reality become blurred, ultimately leading to the inability to distinguish between the two, has now become
manifest. The increasing integration of technology within the being of mankind has allowed two main schools of hyperreal
thought to grow, which is Augmented Reality and Metaversal Reality, both of which are becoming more and more becoming
mainstream. Augmented Reality refers to a condition of being in which the main ontological anchor is the present natural three
dimensional world. This “natural” reality is then augmented by an increased integration of technological product and
advancements, with the main endpoint typically revolving around the concept of a “meta-human”, in which bio-augmentation,
Internet-of-Things-based implants, connective cybernetics, and other reality based augmentation is the main goal.

Metaversal Reality refers to a literal creation of a faux reality separate to the three dimensional natural world. This faux reality
is anchored around the core concept of digitalization, specifically the creation of a new digital landscape where people can
interact, communicate, and engage with each other and digital objects in real-time. It is a collective virtual reality experience
that encompasses various immersive technologies envisioned as a fully immersive and interactive virtual realm that transcends
the limitations of physical space. Important to note within the field of scope of hyperreality is the development of quantum
computing into the mainstream. As news of this breakthrough spreads, industries embracing hyperreal technologies, such as
augmented reality (AR) and metaversal realities (Metaverse), take notice. Traditional data processors quickly become obsolete
in the face of the remarkable computational power offered by quantum computing.

89
Augmented reality companies, once reliant on powerful servers for complex rendering and simulations, now leverage quantum
computing to streamline their processes. Quantum algorithms specifically tailored for AR applications optimize real-time
rendering, enabling highly detailed and photorealistic virtual objects and environments. Users experience hyperrealistic
interactions with virtual elements, where physics simulations are vastly improved, creating an unparalleled sense of immersion
and believability.

Similarly, in the realm of the Metaverse, quantum computing becomes the backbone of the interconnected digital universe.
Metaversal experiences, once constrained by limited computational resources, now flourish in a quantum-powered ecosystem.
Quantum algorithms handle the vast amounts of data required for seamless social interactions, persistent virtual environments,
and complex virtual economies. Quantum sensors and sensing technologies are integrated into the fabric of AR and Metaverse
systems, enabling unprecedented precision and accuracy in tracking and spatial mapping. Users can move seamlessly between
the physical and virtual worlds, with virtual objects seamlessly anchored to their real-world counterparts.

Quantum machine learning algorithms take center stage in hyperreality, analyzing vast datasets and extracting meaningful
patterns to personalize experiences. Users are presented with content tailored to their preferences, behaviors, and context,
creating deeply engaging and immersive hyperreal environments.

90
Within this complex interplay of realities, is the position in which the ICC now finds itself in. On a societal scale, the massive
increase in digitalization and mechanization has affected an element of life that mainly is overlooked – human well-being.
With work either falling into a spectrum of too “monotonous” or “too straining”, as humans now contend with being given too
little responsibility or too much responsibility due to the sudden shift post 5th-Industrial Revolution, the general well-being
and happiness of the working human is under threat. As a result, even the human craving for happiness is capitalized as
companies of various sorts provide products catering to that incessant will. Thus, within this specific backdrop, commences the
first manifestation of the Augmented vs Metaversal realities.

Colloquially called “The Great Stagnation”, this state of nihilistic affairs in society refers to a massive loss in global
productivity as a both over and underworked population struggles to orient itself within this new unnatural state of being.
Catering to this, an organic rise in physical and digital drug usage have been on a meteoric rise. Cybernet Drug (CDs) are a
product of such catering, and also the world's first taste of hyperreality. Developed by basing itself on Portable Virtual Reality
Projector (PVRP) technology, this new drug utilizes metaversal reality elements, making use of developments within the field
of biodigital integration to project a metaversal out of body experience in living or reliving manufactured scenarios.

MEMCORE, the first narcotic product of this sort of line up, and one of the main “pioneers” of CD proliferation, uses
biodigital technology to encode and commercially construct certain lived memories of an individual, allotted with
neuro-hormonal experience lived by the source via electrical stimuli, to be experience by MEMCOREs consumer. Thus,
MEMCORE overusage, which includes cases of induced attacks on the cerebral and cardiac elements of man have been
reported to flood hospitals and medical centers. Its highly unique and addictive nature also bore negative societal
consequences, as vast swaths of the productive population decreased their efficiency by consuming CDs profligately, with
many corporate sponsored academic ventures verifying the connection between CD usage and loss of productivity.

91
As CD outbreaks happen all throughout highly digitalized civilizations such as the crowded streets of Japan and Western
Europe, another mass promulgation of drug usage can be seen happening in other sides of the world. Syn-Pho, the first of what
would be a long line of augmented-reality based drugs, has exploded in its notoriety to the scene. This drug, which uses a
bastardized “dumbed-down” version of Quantum Processing Unit (QPU) technology commonly used for advance data storage
by high societal apparatuses that works in a way of digitally altering the neuro-hormonal ecosystem of human by means of
external electrical stimuli, has initiated many reported outbreak cases globally. An influx of reports have been recorded
correlating conditions of digitally induced neurosis to be linked by the possession usage of Synth-Pho. Worrying reports
stemming from corporate-backed research ventures also shows that the projected number and impact of Synth-Pho is
continuing to rise.

The ICC’s Tides in the International World

By 2045, the ICC had firmly established itself as the leading authority on corporate governance and regulation, with its
influence reaching all corners of the globe. In a world marred by environmental disasters and social unrest, the ICC has
become a dominant force, wielding unparalleled power over the global economy. In the aftermath of the Collapse, the ICC
took on the responsibility of regulating corporations on a global scale, but with a heavy hand that often favored the interests of
large corporations over those of smaller ones and individuals. The ICC's reach has expanded to encompass almost every aspect
of the global economy, from labor practices to environmental impact. With more than 65 million corporations under its
purview, it has become a massive regulator with arguably an even greater power than the UN, as the ICC have the power to
internally investigate and sanction any company that violates its regulations. But the ICC's transformation has come at a great
cost. Its growing power and influence have only served to exacerbate existing social and economic inequalities, as smaller
businesses and marginalized individuals are left behind in the wake of its regulations. The organization's leadership is now

92
dominated by representatives of large corporations, whose interests often conflict with those of the general public —or
between each other, resulting in a conflict that is detrimental to the general public. With the growing influence, scope, power
and its dominance of the global economy, the ICC have become a source of worry that threatens the stability of the global
order. Its vast network of experts and advisors ensures that its policies are grounded in expertise, but also that dissenting voices
are silenced. The organization's secretariat is now a massive bureaucratic machine, focused more on enforcing its regulations
than on serving the public good.

Though dominant, the ICC is not an absolute by any means in the dimension of the global order, or within the corporate circuit
itself. States still hold primary authority in many areas, however, the increasing power of the ICC and corporations may
ultimately lead to a shift in the balance of power. Though, there is no denying that the ICC has become a critical force in the
regulation of transnational corporations, with unprecedented leverage in negotiations and the ability to investigate and sanction
companies that violate international regulations. As the ICC's power has grown, many governments have found themselves at
odds with the organization. While they recognize the need for regulation of corporations and the massive economic growth that
these corporations bring, they also fear that the ICC's influence may undermine their own authority. There is concern that the
ICC's alignment with corporate interests may ultimately lead to a situation where corporations hold more power than
governments. In such a scenario, the interests of corporations may take precedence over those of the public or that of national
interests. Furthermore, there is a growing worrying trend in regards to the sway of massive corporations within the ICC, just as
it international organizations, many worry that the ICC may slowly transform to be an instrument of massive corporations for
their own interests.

Despite these concerns, the ICC's continued transformation has helped to create a more responsible and sustainable global
economy. Its focus on corporate social responsibility, sustainable development, and international law has helped to ensure that

93
corporations operate in a way that benefits society as a whole, rather than just their bottom line. The ICC's monitoring and
enforcement system also ensures that corporations comply with regulations and are held accountable for any violations. In
addition to its regulatory role, the ICC had also become a major player in global economic diplomacy. Its ability to bring
together corporations, governments, and civil society groups had made it a powerful force in negotiations over trade
agreements and investment deals. One of the most high-profile examples of the ICC's diplomatic efforts was its role in
brokering a peace deal between two major corporations that were engaged in a dispute during the First and Second Corporate
War, with the latter setting an example of a full-blown corporate war, with both sides employing their vast resources to destroy
the other, economically and paramilitary wise. The ICC was able to use its diplomatic and economic weight to bring Mandiant
and NewNet to resolve the dispute —albeit, with Mandiant’s dissatisfaction. While it is clear that the organization has become
a critical player in the regulation of global corporations, there is still a balance of power between states and international
organizations. However, the continued growth and influence of the ICC and corporations may ultimately shift this balance,
leading to a future where the interests of corporations take precedence over those of governments and the public. Alas, The
Corporate Wars marked the beginning of the slow march of national governments and international organizations in curtailing
the ICC, and corporations across the world.

Disaster is Here: World Climate in 2050

The multiple, great efforts of humanity to reverse a century worth of unimpede march of climate destruction has only delayed
the arrival of the climate crisis. As the world moves to the Anthropocene, the mark of humanity on this earth is laid bear.
Scientists has outlined a grim projection: if a sudden break in CO2 emissions and reduction in industrial production doesn’t
occur, then the world will pass the 2 degrees celsius not in 2100, but in 2075. With the world already warmer, reaching 1.4
degrees celsius, the world is turning into a more hospitable place to live. Near 1/8th of species has been extinct, with marine
species predicted to even reaching 1/6th. Ocean is now getting emptier than ever, with most of human consumption of fish

94
shifted to fish farms and aquaculture. The lack of ocean diversity resulted in an even more reduced capability for it to regulate
the world’s climate. The warming of the globe also resulted in disruption in shipping: Rogue waves, phenomenon that were
studied to happen in large storms, now occur more frequently and deadlier than ever before. In 2049, rogue waves has been the
main cause of delays in the supply chain, and no less than a dozen cargo ship sunk annually-costing billions of loss in
economic value.

Due to the climate disaster, live in some cities has become miserable. In Jakarta for example, temperatures goes as high as 40
degrees celsius, while Paris is now as warm as Rome in the 2020s. But the most impactf of the disaster is felt by those who live
in coastal cities, with storms and hurricanes becoming easier to come by- leading in the emerging and urgent need to create
resilient infrastructure and communities in these cities.

The climate crisis has also impacted food production, with crop failures becoming more of a regular rather than an occasional
event. In most of the world, crop production needs advanced technologies to survive, needing precise agriculture and regular
monitoring of seed growth, leaving farming to corporations or unions that are able to use the tech. Insects and lab-grown meat
has been steadily introduced to be a food source alternative, with Nestle leading the charge in this field.

95