The text primarily employs deductive reasoning and explanatory reasoning.

Deductive Reasoning:
It uses deductive reasoning by outlining a specific approach or method (structured or closed-ended
questions) and then explaining the outcome or purpose derived from employing this method. The
text starts with a general principle (not seeking new ideas or thoughts) and applies it to a specific
method (using structured questions) to achieve a particular outcome (collecting specific,
predefined information).

Explanatory Reasoning:
It also employs explanatory reasoning by providing an explanation or rationale behind the choice of
structured or closed-ended questions. It clarifies how these questions, with predefined answer
options, help in gathering specific, predetermined information without encouraging open-ended
contributions or new insights from respondents. This explanation serves to justify the chosen
approach based on its purpose and intended outcome.

Absolutely, supporting evidence is essential in bolstering any argument. When examining evidence,
it's crucial to consider various factors:
● Facts and Data: Objective, verifiable information serves as a strong foundation.
Quantitative data, statistics, or proven historical facts provide robust support for an
argument.
● Examples and Illustrations: Concrete examples or case studies can elucidate a
point, making it more relatable and understandable. Real-life instances add depth and
credibility to the argument.
● Expert Opinions or Testimony: Credible opinions or statements from experts in the
field strengthen an argument by providing authority and expertise.
● Logical Reasoning: Sound reasoning, logical deductions, and coherent explanations
based on established principles contribute to the solidity of an argument.
● Analogies or Comparisons: Drawing parallels or making comparisons can clarify
complex ideas by relating them to more familiar concepts.
Supporting evidence provides substance, credibility, and depth to an argument, making it more
persuasive and convincing to the audience.

Critical reading entails more than just comprehending the text; it involves analyzing and evaluating
the author's argument, assessing its strengths and weaknesses, and making informed judgments
about its effectiveness. When your reading is critical, it means you're actively questioning,
interpreting, and assessing the logic, evidence, and structure presented in the text. This approach
allows you to form reasoned judgments about the validity, coherence, and persuasiveness of the
author's argument.

Absolutely, not everything written is automatically credible or believable. Critical reading

involves examining texts with a discerning eye, questioning the validity of the information
presented, and assessing the reliability of its sources. It's essential to consider the author's
expertise, the evidence provided, potential biases, and whether the information aligns with
established facts or reputable sources. This critical approach helps distinguish between
credible, well-supported information and content that may lack reliability or accuracy.

Critical reading involves questioning information that doesn't seem logical or coherent. Even
when something appears to make sense, it's essential to maintain a critical mindset and
continue questioning to deepen understanding or identify potential biases, limitations, or
overlooked aspects. Questioning allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of the text,
ensuring a nuanced understanding and a more informed interpretation of the information
presented.

Indeed, re-reading is a valuable strategy in critical reading. It helps prevent overlooking

important details, enhances comprehension, and allows for a deeper analysis of the text.
Revisiting the material provides an opportunity to catch nuances, clarify complex points, and
solidify understanding, ensuring that nothing crucial is missed and enabling a more thorough
critical assessment.

Assessing the type of material before determining its significance is crucial in critical reading.
Different types of content hold varying levels of credibility and relevance. For instance, peer-
reviewed academic articles typically carry more weight than opinion pieces or unverified
online sources. Understanding the nature of the material—its author, purpose, publication
type, and potential biases—helps in determining its reliability and the extent to which it
should contribute to one's understanding or argument.