Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crafting an essay on the works of Michael Crichton presents a unique set of challenges, as his
literary contributions are diverse and multifaceted. Michael Crichton, known for his prowess in
blending science, technology, and suspense in his novels, offers a rich tapestry for analysis. The
difficulty lies in capturing the essence of his writing style, delving into the scientific intricacies he
often explores, and deciphering the underlying themes that run through his works.
Firstly, one must navigate through the myriad genres Crichton effortlessly traverses – from science
fiction to medical thrillers, each demanding a nuanced understanding. Unraveling the scientific
concepts he integrates into his narratives requires a grasp of complex ideas, adding an extra layer of
challenge. Additionally, considering the societal and ethical implications embedded in his stories
necessitates a keen analytical eye.
Furthermore, the task involves synthesizing information from a vast array of sources, including his
novels, interviews, and critical analyses. Michael Crichton's unique perspective on the intersection of
science and humanity requires a deep dive into the context of his writing, making it imperative to
contextualize each piece within the broader scope of his literary canon.
In the process of composing an essay on Michael Crichton, one must tread the fine line between
academic analysis and appreciation for his storytelling prowess. Balancing critical examination with
an exploration of the visceral impact of his narratives adds another layer of complexity to the task.
Figure 2: Areal X ray shadowgraphs of flood progress in scaled five spot patterns
showing areal sweep efficiencies of two model floods for two mobility ratios
(Willhite,1986)
Fig. 3 shows how WOR varies over time for one of the numerical wells created in a
numerical simulation model for the Wytch Farm Field, UK.
Figure 3: Illustration of a typical WOR vs. dimensionless time dependence showing the
four distinct time regimesFigure 4: A plot of log[(1+W)2/(Wt)] vs. log W showing that
in the case of large M, the cross plot conditions described by Eq. 8 apply over a wide
range of WOR (b=2.0) (Yortsos et al., 1999)
Using diagnostic plots of log[(1+W)2/(Wt)] vs. logW Yortsos et al. (1999) showed
numerically that for large water oil viscosity ratio and small Corey exponent to oil, the
flood front water saturation is relatively low. As a result the behavior immediately
following breakthrough described by Eq. 8 is valid over a wide range of WOR, in
which case the ratio [(1+W)2/(Wt)] remains approximately constant for an extensive
range of WOR. Conversely, for small viscosity ratios, the late time behavior becomes
dominant at much lower values of WOR. His studies were supported by numerical