Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Syntax is the study of the relationships bet linguistic forms, how they
are arranged in sequence, and which sequences are well – formed.
This type of study generally takes place without considering any world
of reference or any user or the forms.
Semantics is the study of the relationships bet linguistic forms and
entities in the world: how words literally connect to things.
Pragmatics is the study of the relationships bet linguistic forms and
the users of those forms. Only pragmatics allows humans into the
analysis. One can talk abt people´s inteneded meanings, their
assumptions, their purposes or goals, and the kinds of actions (for
example: requests) that they are performing when they speak. The
big disadvantage is that these very human concepts are extremely
difficult to analyse in a consistent and objective way.
Regularity.
Luckily, people tend to behave in fairly regular ways when it comes to
using language. Some of that regularity derives from the fact that
people are members of social groups and follow general patterns of
behaviour expected within the group, we normally find it easy to be
polite and say appropriate things. In a new, unfamiliar social setting,
we are often unsure abt what to say and worry that we might say the
wrong thing.
Another source of regularity in language use is the fact that most
people within a linguistic community have similar knowledge. For
example:
If I say: “I found an old bycycle lying on the ground. The chain was
rusted and the tires were flat”. I can normally assume that you will
make thae inference that if X is a bicycle, then X has a chain and tires
and many other regular parts.
Both speaker and hearer are usually helped in this process by the
circumstances surrounding the utterance. These circumstances,
including other utterances, are called the speech events. In many
ways, it is the nature of the speech event taht determines the
interpretation of an utterance as performing a particular speech act.
Speech acts.
One way to think abt the speech acts being performed via utterances
is to assume that underlying every utterance there is a clause
containing a performative verb which makes the illocutionary force
explicit.
The advantage of this type of analysis is that it makes clear just what
elements are involved in the production and interpretation of
utterances.
Declarations are those kinds of speech acts that change the world
via their utterance.
E.g: Priest: I now pronounce you husband and wife.
Referee: you´re out!
In using a declaration, the speaker changes the world via words.
Representatives are those kinds of speech acts that state what the
speaker believes to be the case or not. Statements of facts,
assertions, conclusions, and descriptions.
E.g: The earth is flat.
It was a warm sunny day.
In using a representative, the speaker makes words fit the world (of
belief).
Expressives are those kinds of speech acts that state what the
speaker feels.
E.g: I´m really sorry!
Congratulations!
In using an expressive, the speaker makes words fit the world (of
feeling).
Directives are those kinds of speech acts that speakers use to get
someone else to do something.
E.g: Gimme a cup of coffee. Make it black.
Could you lend me a pen, please?
In using a directive, the speaker attempts to make the world fit the
words (via the hearer).
Speech events.
There´s a definite difference bet asking someone to do X and asking
someone if the preconditions for doing X are in place. Asking abt
preconditions technically doesn´t count as making a request, but does
allow the hearer to react `as if´the request has been made. Because a
request is an imposition by the speaker on the hearer, it is better in
most social circumstances, for the speaker to avoid a direct
imposition via a direct requesst. When the speaker asks abt
preconditions, no direct request is made.
Politeness
Face wants
The availability of the bald on record form, as well as off record forms,
means that the use of a face-saving on record form represent a
significant choice. The choice of a type of expression that is less
direct, potentially less clear, generally longer, and with a more
complex structure means that the speaker is making a greater effort
in terms of concern for face (i.e. politeness), than is needed simply to
get the basic message across efficiently.
Strategies
The tendency to use positive politeness forms, emphasising closeness
bet speaker and hearer can be seen as solidarity strategy.
Pre-sequences
E.g:
E.g:
E.g:
E.g: