You are on page 1of 1

Search Wikipedia Search Create account Log in

Sense of smell 71 languages

Contents hide Article Talk Read Edit View history Tools

(Top) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

History of study (Redirected from Olfaction)

Function
The sense of smell, or olfaction, is the special sense through which smells (or odors) are perceived.[1]
Taste
Smell
The sense of smell has many functions, including detecting desirable foods, hazards, and pheromones,
Hearing and plays a role in taste.

Inbreeding avoidance In humans, it occurs when an odor binds to a receptor within the nasal cavity, transmitting a signal through
Guiding movement the olfactory system.[2] Glomeruli aggregate signals from these receptors and transmit them to the olfactory
bulb, where the sensory input will start to interact with parts of the brain responsible for smell identification,
Genetics
memory, and emotion.[3]
Variability amongst vertebrates
There are many different things which can interfere with a normal sense of smell, including damage to the
Human smell abilities
nose or smell receptors, anosmia, upper respiratory infections, traumatic brain injury, and
Physiological basis in neurodegenerative disease.[4][5]
vertebrates

Main olfactory system


History of study [ edit ]
Receptor neuron
Early scientific study of the sense of smell includes the extensive doctoral dissertation of Eleanor Gamble, Painting of a woman smelling a carnation.
Olfactory bulb projections
published in 1898, which compared olfactory to other stimulus modalities, and implied that smell had a Olfaction uses chemoreceptors that create
Coding and perception lower intensity discrimination.[6] signals processed in the brain that form the
sense of smell.
Accessory olfactory system
As the Epicurean and atomistic Roman philosopher Lucretius (1st century BCE) speculated, different odors Details
In insects are attributed to different shapes and sizes of "atoms" (odor molecules in the modern understanding) that System Olfactory system
In plants stimulate the olfactory organ.[7] Function sense chemicals in the environment
that are used to form the sense of
Machine-based smelling A modern demonstration of that theory was the cloning of olfactory receptor proteins by Linda B. Buck and smell
Classification Richard Axel (who were awarded the Nobel Prize in 2004), and subsequent pairing of odor molecules to Identifiers
specific receptor proteins.[8] Each odor receptor molecule recognizes only a particular molecular feature or MeSH D012903
Disorders
class of odor molecules. Mammals have about a thousand genes that code for odor reception.[9] Of the Anatomical terminology
genes that code for odor receptors, only a portion are functional. Humans have far fewer active odor [edit on Wikidata]
receptor genes than other primates and other mammals.[10] In mammals, each olfactory receptor neuron
expresses only one functional odor receptor.[11] Odor receptor nerve cells function like a key–lock system: if the
airborne molecules of a certain chemical can fit into the lock, the nerve cell will respond.

There are, at present, a number of competing theories regarding the mechanism of odor coding and perception.
According to the shape theory, each receptor detects a feature of the odor molecule. The weak-shape theory,
known as the odotope theory, suggests that different receptors detect only small pieces of molecules, and these
minimal inputs are combined to form a larger olfactory perception (similar to the way visual perception is built up
of smaller, information-poor sensations, combined and refined to create a detailed overall perception).[12]

According to a new study, researchers have found that a functional relationship exists between molecular volume
of odorants and the olfactory neural response.[13] An alternative theory, the vibration theory proposed by Luca
Turin,[14][15] posits that odor receptors detect the frequencies of vibrations of odor molecules in the infrared range
by quantum tunnelling. However, the behavioral predictions of this theory have been called into question.[16]
The Lady and the Unicorn, a
There is no theory yet that explains olfactory perception completely.
Flemish tapestry depicting the sense of
smell, 1484–1500. Musée national du
Function [ edit ] Moyen Âge, Paris.

Taste [ edit ]

Flavor perception is an aggregation of auditory, taste, haptic, and smell sensory information.[17] Retronasal smell plays the biggest role in the sensation
of flavor. During the process of mastication, the tongue manipulates food to release odorants. These odorants enter the nasal cavity during exhalation.[18]
The smell of food has the sensation of being in the mouth because of co-activation of the motor cortex and olfactory epithelium during mastication.[17]

Smell, taste, and trigeminal receptors (also called chemesthesis) together contribute to flavor. The human tongue can distinguish only among five distinct
qualities of taste, while the nose can distinguish among hundreds of substances, even in minute quantities. It is during exhalation that the smell's
contribution to flavor occurs, in contrast to that of proper smell, which occurs during the inhalation phase of breathing.[18] The olfactory system is the only
human sense that bypasses the thalamus and connects directly to the forebrain.[19]

Hearing [ edit ]

Smell and sound information has been shown to converge in the olfactory tubercles of rodents.[20] This neural convergence is proposed to give rise to a
perception termed smound.[21] Whereas a flavor results from interactions between smell and taste, a smound may result from interactions between smell
and sound.

Inbreeding avoidance [ edit ]

The MHC genes (known as HLA in humans) are a group of genes present in many animals and important for the immune system; in general, offspring
from parents with differing MHC genes have a stronger immune system. Fish, mice, and female humans are able to smell some aspect of the MHC
genes of potential sex partners and prefer partners with MHC genes different from their own.[22][23]

Humans can detect blood relatives from olfaction.[24] Mothers can identify by body odor their biological children but not their stepchildren. Pre-adolescent
children can olfactorily detect their full siblings but not half-siblings or step siblings, and this might explain incest avoidance and the Westermarck
effect.[25] Functional imaging shows that this olfactory kinship detection process involves the frontal-temporal junction, the insula, and the dorsomedial
prefrontal cortex, but not the primary or secondary olfactory cortices, or the related piriform cortex or orbitofrontal cortex.[26]

Since inbreeding is detrimental, it tends to be avoided. In the house mouse, the major urinary protein (MUP) gene cluster provides a highly polymorphic
scent signal of genetic identity that appears to underlie kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance. Thus, there are fewer matings between mice sharing
MUP haplotypes than would be expected if there were random mating.[27]

Guiding movement [ edit ]

Some animals use scent trails to guide movement, for example social insects may lay down a trail to a food source, or a tracking dog may follow the
scent of its target. A number of scent-tracking strategies have been studied in different species, including gradient search or chemotaxis, anemotaxis,
klinotaxis, and tropotaxis. Their success is influenced by the turbulence of the air plume that is being followed.[28][29]

Genetics [ edit ]

Main article: Evolution of olfaction

Different people smell different odors, and most of these differences are caused by genetic differences.[30] Although odorant receptor genes make up one
of the largest gene families in the human genome, only a handful of genes have been linked conclusively to particular smells. For instance, the odorant
receptor OR5A1 and its genetic variants (alleles) are responsible for our ability (or failure) to smell β-ionone, a key aroma in foods and beverages.[31]
Similarly, the odorant receptor OR2J3 is associated with the ability to detect the "grassy" odor, cis-3-hexen-1-ol.[32] The preference (or dislike) of cilantro
(coriander) has been linked to the olfactory receptor OR6A2.[33]

Variability amongst vertebrates [ edit ]

The importance and sensitivity of smell varies among different organisms; most mammals have a good sense of smell, whereas most birds do not,
except the tubenoses (e.g., petrels and albatrosses), certain species of new world vultures, and the kiwis. Also, birds have hundreds of olfactory
receptors. [34] Although, recent analysis of the chemical composition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from king penguin feathers suggest that
VOCs may provide olfactory cues, used by the penguins to locate their colony and recognize individuals.[35] Among mammals, it is well developed in the
carnivores and ungulates, which must always be aware of each other, and in those that smell for their food, such as moles. Having a strong sense of
smell is referred to as macrosmatic in contrast to having a weak sense of smell which is referred to as microsmotic.

Figures suggesting greater or lesser sensitivity in various species reflect experimental findings from the reactions of animals exposed to aromas in known
extreme dilutions. These are, therefore, based on perceptions by these animals, rather than mere nasal function. That is, the brain's smell-recognizing
centers must react to the stimulus detected for the animal to be said to show a response to the smell in question. It is estimated that dogs, in general,
have an olfactory sense approximately ten thousand to a hundred thousand times more acute than a human's.[36] This does not mean they are
overwhelmed by smells our noses can detect; rather, it means they can discern a molecular presence when it is in much greater dilution in the carrier, air.

Scenthounds as a group can smell one- to ten-million times more acutely than a human, and bloodhounds, which have the keenest sense of smell of any
dogs,[37] have noses ten- to one-hundred-million times more sensitive than a human's. They were bred for the specific purpose of tracking humans, and
can detect a scent trail a few days old. The second-most-sensitive nose is possessed by the Basset Hound, which was bred to track and hunt rabbits and
other small animals.

Grizzly bears have a sense of smell seven times stronger than that of the bloodhound, essential for locating food underground. Using their elongated
claws, bears dig deep trenches in search of burrowing animals and nests as well as roots, bulbs, and insects. Bears can detect the scent of food from up
to eighteen miles away; because of their immense size, they often scavenge new kills, driving away the predators (including packs of wolves and human
hunters) in the process.

The sense of smell is less developed in the catarrhine primates, and nonexistent in cetaceans, which compensate with a well-developed sense of
taste.[37] In some strepsirrhines, such as the red-bellied lemur, scent glands occur atop the head. In many species, smell is highly tuned to pheromones;
a male silkworm moth, for example, can sense a single molecule of bombykol.

Fish, too, have a well-developed sense of smell, even though they inhabit an aquatic environment.[citation needed] Salmon utilize their sense of smell to
identify and return to their home stream waters. Catfish use their sense of smell to identify other individual catfish and to maintain a social hierarchy.
Many fishes use the sense of smell to identify mating partners or to alert to the presence of food.

Human smell abilities [ edit ]

Although conventional wisdom and lay literature, based on impressionistic findings in the 1920s, have long presented human smell as capable of
distinguishing between roughly 10,000 unique odors, recent research has suggested that the average individual is capable of distinguishing over one
trillion unique odors.[38] Researchers in the most recent study, which tested the psychophysical responses to combinations of over 128 unique odor
molecules with combinations composed of up to 30 different component molecules, noted that this estimate is "conservative" and that some subjects of
their research might be capable of deciphering between a thousand trillion odorants, adding that their worst performer could probably still distinguish
between 80 million scents.[39] Authors of the study concluded, "This is far more than previous estimates of distinguishable olfactory stimuli. It
demonstrates that the human olfactory system, with its hundreds of different olfactory receptors, far out performs the other senses in the number of
physically different stimuli it can discriminate."[40] However, it was also noted by the authors that the ability to distinguish between smells is not analogous
to being able to consistently identify them, and that subjects were not typically capable of identifying individual odor stimulants from within the odors the
researchers had prepared from multiple odor molecules. In November 2014 the study was strongly criticized by Caltech scientist Markus Meister, who
wrote that the study's "extravagant claims are based on errors of mathematical logic."[41][42] The logic of his paper has in turn been criticized by the
authors of the original paper.[43]

Physiological basis in vertebrates [ edit ]

Main olfactory system [ edit ]

Main article: Olfactory system

In humans and other vertebrates, smells are sensed by olfactory sensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium. The olfactory epithelium is made up of at
least six morphologically and biochemically different cell types.[19] The proportion of olfactory epithelium compared to respiratory epithelium (not
innervated, or supplied with nerves) gives an indication of the animal's olfactory sensitivity. Humans have about 10 cm2 (1.6 sq in) of olfactory epithelium,
whereas some dogs have 170 cm2 (26 sq in). A dog's olfactory epithelium is also considerably more densely innervated, with a hundred times more
receptors per square centimeter.[44] The sensory olfactory system integrates with other senses to form the perception of flavor.[17] Often, land organisms
will have separate olfaction systems for smell and taste (orthonasal smell and retronasal smell), but water-dwelling organisms usually have only one
system.[45]

Molecules of odorants passing through the superior nasal concha of the nasal passages dissolve in the mucus that lines the superior portion of the cavity
and are detected by olfactory receptors on the dendrites of the olfactory sensory neurons. This may occur by diffusion or by the binding of the odorant to
odorant-binding proteins. The mucus overlying the epithelium contains mucopolysaccharides, salts, enzymes, and antibodies (these are highly important,
as the olfactory neurons provide a direct passage for infection to pass to the brain). This mucus acts as a solvent for odor molecules, flows constantly,
and is replaced approximately every ten minutes.

In insects, smells are sensed by olfactory sensory neurons in the chemosensory sensilla, which are present in insect antenna, palps, and tarsa, but also
on other parts of the insect body. Odorants penetrate into the cuticle pores of chemosensory sensilla and get in contact with insect odorant-binding
proteins (OBPs) or Chemosensory proteins (CSPs), before activating the sensory neurons.

Receptor neuron [ edit ]

The binding of the ligand (odor molecule or odorant) to the receptor leads to an action potential in the receptor neuron, via a second messenger pathway,
depending on the organism. In mammals, the odorants stimulate adenylate cyclase to synthesize cAMP via a G protein called Golf. cAMP, which is the
second messenger here, opens a cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel (CNG), producing an influx of cations (largely Ca2+ with some Na+) into the cell,
slightly depolarising it. The Ca2+ in turn opens a Ca2+-activated chloride channel, leading to efflux of Cl−, further depolarizing the cell and triggering an
action potential. Ca2+ is then extruded through a sodium-calcium exchanger. A calcium-calmodulin complex also acts to inhibit the binding of cAMP to the
cAMP-dependent channel, thus contributing to olfactory adaptation.

The main olfactory system of some mammals also contains small subpopulations of olfactory sensory neurons that detect and transduce odors
somewhat differently. Olfactory sensory neurons that use trace amine-associated receptors (TAARs) to detect odors use the same second messenger
signaling cascade as do the canonical olfactory sensory neurons.[46] Other subpopulations, such as those that express the receptor guanylyl cyclase GC-
D (Gucy2d)[47] or the soluble guanylyl cyclase Gucy1b2,[48] use a cGMP cascade to transduce their odorant ligands.[49][50][51] These distinct
subpopulations (olfactory subsystems) appear specialized for the detection of small groups of chemical stimuli.

This mechanism of transduction is somewhat unusual, in that cAMP works by directly binding to the ion channel rather than through activation of protein
kinase A. It is similar to the transduction mechanism for photoreceptors, in which the second messenger cGMP works by directly binding to ion channels,
suggesting that maybe one of these receptors was evolutionarily adapted into the other. There are also considerable similarities in the immediate
processing of stimuli by lateral inhibition.

Averaged activity of the receptor neurons can be measured in several ways. In vertebrates, responses to an odor can be measured by an electro-
olfactogram or through calcium imaging of receptor neuron terminals in the olfactory bulb. In insects, one can perform electroantennography or calcium
imaging within the olfactory bulb.

Olfactory bulb projections [ edit ]

Olfactory sensory neurons project axons to the brain within the olfactory nerve, (cranial nerve I).
These nerve fibers, lacking myelin sheaths, pass to the olfactory bulb of the brain through
perforations in the cribriform plate, which in turn projects olfactory information to the olfactory cortex
and other areas.[52] The axons from the olfactory receptors converge in the outer layer of the
olfactory bulb within small (≈50 micrometers in diameter) structures called glomeruli. Mitral cells,
located in the inner layer of the olfactory bulb, form synapses with the axons of the sensory neurons
within glomeruli and send the information about the odor to other parts of the olfactory system,
where multiple signals may be processed to form a synthesized olfactory perception. A large degree
of convergence occurs, with 25,000 axons synapsing on 25 or so mitral cells, and with each of
these mitral cells projecting to multiple glomeruli. Mitral cells also project to periglomerular cells and
granular cells that inhibit the mitral cells surrounding it (lateral inhibition). Granular cells also
mediate inhibition and excitation of mitral cells through pathways from centrifugal fibers and the
anterior olfactory nuclei. Neuromodulators like acetylcholine, serotonin and norepinephrine all send
axons to the olfactory bulb and have been implicated in gain modulation,[53] pattern separation,[54]
and memory functions,[55] respectively.

The mitral cells leave the olfactory bulb in the lateral olfactory tract, which synapses on five major
regions of the cerebrum: the anterior olfactory nucleus, the olfactory tubercle, the amygdala, the
piriform cortex, and the entorhinal cortex. The anterior olfactory nucleus projects, via the anterior
commissure, to the contralateral olfactory bulb, inhibiting it. The piriform cortex has two major
divisions with anatomically distinct organizations and functions. The anterior piriform cortex (APC)
Schematic of the early olfactory system including
appears to be better at determining the chemical structure of the odorant molecules, and the the olfactory epithelium and bulb. Each ORN
posterior piriform cortex (PPC) has a strong role in categorizing odors and assessing similarities expresses one OR that responds to different
between odors (e.g. minty, woody, and citrus are odors that can, despite being highly variant odorants. Odorant molecules bind to ORs on cilia.
ORs activate ORNs that transduce the input signal
chemicals, be distinguished via the PPC in a concentration-independent manner).[56] The piriform
into action potentials. In general, glomeruli receive
cortex projects to the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus, which then projects to the orbitofrontal input from ORs of one specific type and connect to
cortex. The orbitofrontal cortex mediates conscious perception of the odor.[citation needed] The three- the principal neurons of the OB, mitral and tufted cells
layered piriform cortex projects to a number of thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei, the hippocampus (MT cells).

and amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex, but its function is largely unknown. The entorhinal cortex
projects to the amygdala and is involved in emotional and autonomic responses to odor. It also projects to the hippocampus and is involved in motivation
and memory. Odor information is stored in long-term memory and has strong connections to emotional memory. This is possibly due to the olfactory
system's close anatomical ties to the limbic system and hippocampus, areas of the brain that have long been known to be involved in emotion and place
memory, respectively.

Since any one receptor is responsive to various odorants, and there is a great deal of convergence at the level of the olfactory bulb, it may seem strange
that human beings are able to distinguish so many different odors. It seems that a highly complex form of processing must be occurring; however, as it
can be shown that, while many neurons in the olfactory bulb (and even the pyriform cortex and amygdala) are responsive to many different odors, half
the neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex are responsive to only one odor, and the rest to only a few. It has been shown through microelectrode studies that
each individual odor gives a particular spatial map of excitation in the olfactory bulb. It is possible that the brain is able to distinguish specific odors
through spatial encoding, but temporal coding must also be taken into account. Over time, the spatial maps change, even for one particular odor, and the
brain must be able to process these details as well.

Inputs from the two nostrils have separate inputs to the brain, with the result that, when each nostril takes up a different odorant, a person may
experience perceptual rivalry in the olfactory sense akin to that of binocular rivalry.[57]

In insects, smells are sensed by sensilla located on the antenna and maxillary palp and first processed by the antennal lobe (analogous to the olfactory
bulb), and next by the mushroom bodies and lateral horn.

Coding and perception [ edit ]

The process by which olfactory information is coded in the brain to allow for proper perception is still being researched, and is not completely understood.
When an odorant is detected by receptors, they in a sense break the odorant down, and then the brain puts the odorant back together for identification
and perception.[58] The odorant binds to receptors that recognize only a specific functional group, or feature, of the odorant, which is why the chemical
nature of the odorant is important.[59]

After binding the odorant, the receptor is activated and will send a signal to the glomeruli [59] in the olfactory bulb. Each glomerulus receives signals from
multiple receptors that detect similar odorant features. Because several receptor types are activated due to the different chemical features of the odorant,
several glomeruli are activated as well. The signals from the glomeruli are transformed to a pattern of oscillations of neural activities[60][61] of the mitral
cells, the output neurons from the olfactory bulb. Olfactory bulb sends this pattern to the olfactory cortex. Olfactory cortex is thought to have associative
memories,[62] so that it resonates to this bulbar pattern when the odor object is recognized.[63] The cortex sends centrifugal feedback to the bulb.[64] This
feedback could suppress bulbar responses to the recognized odor objects, causing olfactory adaptation to background odors, so that the newly arrived
foreground odor objects could be singled out for better recognition.[63][65] During odor search, feedback could also be used to enhance odor
detection.[66][63] The distributed code allows the brain to detect specific odors in mixtures of many background odors.[67]

It is a general idea that the layout of brain structures corresponds to physical features of stimuli (called topographic coding), and similar analogies have
been made in smell with concepts such as a layout corresponding to chemical features (called chemotopy) or perceptual features.[68] While chemotopy
remains a highly controversial concept,[69] evidence exists for perceptual information implemented in the spatial dimensions of olfactory networks.[68]

Accessory olfactory system [ edit ]

Many animals, including most mammals and reptiles, but not humans,[70] have two distinct and segregated olfactory systems: a main olfactory system,
which detects volatile stimuli, and an accessory olfactory system, which detects fluid-phase stimuli. Behavioral evidence suggests that these fluid-phase
stimuli often function as pheromones, although pheromones can also be detected by the main olfactory system. In the accessory olfactory system, stimuli
are detected by the vomeronasal organ, located in the vomer, between the nose and the mouth. Snakes use it to smell prey, sticking their tongue out and
touching it to the organ. Some mammals make a facial expression called flehmen to direct stimuli to this organ.

The sensory receptors of the accessory olfactory system are located in the vomeronasal organ. As in the main olfactory system, the axons of these
sensory neurons project from the vomeronasal organ to the accessory olfactory bulb, which in the mouse is located on the dorsal-posterior portion of the
main olfactory bulb. Unlike in the main olfactory system, the axons that leave the accessory olfactory bulb do not project to the brain's cortex but rather to
targets in the amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and from there to the hypothalamus, where they may influence aggression and mating
behavior.

In insects [ edit ]

Main article: Insect olfaction

Insect olfaction refers to the function of chemical receptors that enable insects to detect and identify volatile compounds for foraging, predator avoidance,
finding mating partners (via pheromones) and locating oviposition habitats.[71] Thus, it is the most important sensation for insects.[71] Most important
insect behaviors must be timed perfectly which is dependent on what they smell and when they smell it.[72] For example, smell is essential for hunting in
many species of wasps, including Polybia sericea.

The two organs insects primarily use for detecting odors are the antennae and specialized mouth parts called the maxillary palps.[73] However, a recent
study has demonstrated the olfactory role of ovipositor in fig wasps.[74] Inside of these olfactory organs there are neurons called olfactory receptor
neurons which, as the name implies, house receptors for scent molecules in their cell membranes. The majority of olfactory receptor neurons typically
reside in the antenna. These neurons can be very abundant, for example Drosophila flies have 2,600 olfactory sensory neurons.[73]

Insects are capable of smelling and differentiating between thousands of volatile compounds both sensitively and selectively.[71][75] Sensitivity is how
attuned the insect is to very small amounts of an odorant or small changes in the concentration of an odorant. Selectivity refers to the insects' ability to
tell one odorant apart from another. These compounds are commonly broken into three classes: short chain carboxylic acids, aldehydes and low
molecular weight nitrogenous compounds.[75] Some insects, such as the moth Deilephila elpenor, use smell as a means to find food sources.

In plants [ edit ]

See also: Plant perception (physiology) § Senses in plants

The tendrils of plants are especially sensitive to airborne volatile organic compounds. Parasites such as dodder make use of this in locating their
preferred hosts and locking on to them.[76] The emission of volatile compounds is detected when foliage is browsed by animals. Threatened plants are
then able to take defensive chemical measures, such as moving tannin compounds to their foliage.

Machine-based smelling [ edit ]

Main article: Machine olfaction

Scientists have devised methods for quantifying the intensity of odors, in particular for the purpose of analyzing unpleasant or objectionable odors
released by an industrial source into a community. Since the 1800s industrial countries have encountered incidents where proximity of an industrial
source or landfill produced adverse reactions among nearby residents regarding airborne odor. The basic theory of odor analysis is to measure what
extent of dilution with "pure" air is required before the sample in question is rendered indistinguishable from the "pure" or reference standard. Since each
person perceives odor differently, an "odor panel" composed of several different people is assembled, each sniffing the same sample of diluted specimen
air. A field olfactometer can be utilized to determine the magnitude of an odor.

Many air management districts in the US have numerical standards of acceptability for the intensity of odor that is allowed to cross into a residential
property. For example, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District has applied its standard in regulating numerous industries, landfills, and sewage
treatment plants. Example applications this district has engaged are the San Mateo, California, wastewater treatment plant; the Shoreline Amphitheatre
in Mountain View, California; and the IT Corporation waste ponds, Martinez, California.

Classification [ edit ]

Systems of classifying odors include:

Crocker-Henderson system, which rates smells on a 0-8 scale for each of four "primary" smells: fragrant, acid, burnt, and caprylic.[77]
Henning's prism[78]
Zwaardemaker smell system (invented by Hendrik Zwaardemaker)

Disorders [ edit ]

Specific terms are used to describe disorders associated with smelling:

Anosmia – inability to smell


Hyperosmia – an abnormally acute sense of smell
Hyposmia – decreased ability to smell
Presbyosmia – the natural decline in the sense of smell in old age[79]
Dysosmia – distortion in the sense of smell
Parosmia – distortion in the perception of an odor
Phantosmia – distortion in the absence of an odor, "hallucinated smell"
Heterosmia – inability to distinguish odors[79]
Olfactory reference syndrome – psychological disorder that causes the patient to imagine he or she has strong body odor
Osmophobia – aversion or psychological hypersensitivity to odors

Viruses can also infect the olfactory epithelium leading to a loss of the sense of olfaction. About 50% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 (causing COVID-19)
experience some type of disorder associated with their sense of smell, including anosmia and parosmia. SARS-CoV-1, MERS-CoV and even the flu
(influenza virus) can also disrupt olfaction.[80]

See also [ edit ]

Electronic nose
Evolution of olfaction
Nasal administration olfactory transfer
Olfactic Communication
Olfactory ensheathing cell
Olfactory fatigue
Perfume (novel)
Scent transfer unit

References [ edit ]

1. ^ Wolfe, J; Kluender, K; Levi, D (2012). Sensation & perception (3rd ed.). 41. ^ Meister, M (2014). "Can humans really discriminate 1 trillion odors?" .
Sinauer Associates. p. 7. ISBN 978-0-87893-572-7. eLife. 4: e07865. arXiv:1411.0165 . doi:10.7554/eLife.07865 .
2. ^ de March, CA; Ryu, SE; Sicard, G; Moon, C; Golebiowski, J (2015). PMC 4491593 . PMID 26151672 .
"Structure–odour relationships reviewed in the postgenomic era". Flavour 42. ^ Meister, M (2015). "On the dimensionality of odor space" . eLife. 4:
and Fragrance Journal. 30 (5): 342–361. doi:10.1002/ffj.3249 . e07865. doi:10.7554/eLife.07865 . PMC 4491593 . PMID 26151672 .
3. ^ Schacter, D; Gilbert, D; Wegner, D (2011). "Sensation and Perception" . 43. ^ Magnasco, MO (2015). "On the dimensionality of olfactory space".
Psychology. Worth Publishers. pp. 166–171 . ISBN 978-1-4292-3719-2. bioRxiv 10.1101/022103 .
4. ^ Xydakis, MS; Mulligan, LP; Smith, AB; Olsen, CH; Lyon, DM; Belluscio, L 44. ^ Bear, M; Connors, B; Paradiso, M (2007). Neuroscience: Exploring the
(2015). "Olfactory impairment & traumatic brain injury in blast-injured combat Brain . USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp. 265–275 .
troops" . Neurology. 84 (15): 1559–67. 45. ^ Boroditsky, L (1999). "Taste, Smell, and Touch: Lecture Notes" (PDF).
doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001475 . PMC 4408285 . p. 1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 November 2012. Retrieved
PMID 25788559 . 29 May 2012.
5. ^ Xydakis, MS; Belluscio, L (2017). "Detection of neurodegenerative disease 46. ^ Liberles, S (2006). "A second class of chemosensory receptors in the
using olfaction" . The Lancet Neurology. 16 (6): 415–416. olfactory epithelium". Nature. 442 (7103): 645–650.
doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30125-4 . PMID 28504103 . Bibcode:2006Natur.442..645L . doi:10.1038/nature05066 .
S2CID 5121325 . Archived from the original on 1 December 2021. PMID 16878137 . S2CID 2864195 .
Retrieved 10 October 2019. 47. ^ Fulle, HJ (1995). "A receptor guanylyl cyclase expressed specifically in
6. ^ Kimble, GA; Schlesinger, K (1985). Topics in the History of Psychology, olfactory sensory neurons" . Proceedings of the National Academy of
Volume 1. L. Erlbaum Associates. Sciences of the United States of America. 92 (8): 3571–3575.
7. ^ Holtsmark, E (1978). "Lucretius, the biochemistry of smell, and scientific Bibcode:1995PNAS...92.3571F . doi:10.1073/pnas.92.8.3571 .
discovery" . Euphrosyne: Revista de Filologia Clássica. 9: 7–18. PMC 42209 . PMID 7724600 .
Archived from the original on 8 May 2022. Retrieved 14 August 2020 – via 48. ^ Omura, M (2015). "Trpc2-expressing sensory neurons in the mouse main
academia.edu. olfactory epithelium of type B express the soluble guanylate cyclase
8. ^ Ann-Sophie Barwich (2020). "What makes a discovery successful? The Gucy1b2" . Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience. 65: 114–124.
story of Linda Buck and the olfactory receptors" (PDF). Cell. 181 (4): doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2015.02.012 . PMC 4396857 . PMID 25701815 .
749–753. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.040 . PMID 32413294 . 49. ^ Lenders-Zufall, T (2007). "Contribution of the receptor guanylyl cyclase
S2CID 218627484 . Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 November GC-D to chemosensory function in the olfactory epithelium" . Proceedings
2020. Retrieved 17 February 2021. of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104
9. ^ Buck, L; Axel, R (1991). "A novel multigene family may encode odorant (36): 14507–14512. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10414507L .
receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition" . Cell. 65 (1): 175–187. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704965104 . PMC 1964822 . PMID 17724338 .
doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-X . PMID 1840504 . 50. ^ Munger, S (2010). "An olfactory subsystem that detects carbon disulfide
10. ^ Gilad, Y; Man, O; Pääbo, S; Lancet, D (2003). "Human specific loss of and mediates food-related social learning" . Current Biology. 20 (16):
olfactory receptor genes" . PNAS. 100 (6): 3324–3327. 1438–1444. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.021 . PMC 2929674 .
Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.3324G . doi:10.1073/pnas.0535697100 . PMID 20637621 .
PMC 152291 . PMID 12612342 . 51. ^ Bleymehl, K (2016). "A sensor for low environmental oxygen in the mouse
11. ^ Pinel, JPJ (2006). Biopsychology. Pearson Education Inc. p. 178. ISBN 0- main olfactory epithelium" . Neuron. 92 (6): 1196–1203.
205-42651-4. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.001 . PMC 5196021 . PMID 27916458 .
12. ^ Rinaldi, A (2007). "The scent of life. The exquisite complexity of the sense 52. ^ Morris, H; Schaeffer, JP (1953). Morris' Human Anatomy: A Complete
of smell in animals and humans" . EMBO Reports. 8 (7): 629–33. Systematic Treatise (11 ed.). New York: Blakiston. pp. 1218–1219.
doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401029 . PMC 1905909 . PMID 17603536 . 53. ^ Rothermel, M; Carey, RM; Puche, A; Shipley, MT; Wachowiak, M (2014).
13. ^ Saberi, M; Seyed-allaei, H (2016). "Odorant receptors of Drosophila are "Cholinergic inputs from basal forebrain add an excitatory bias to odor
sensitive to the molecular volume of odorants" . Scientific Reports. 6: coding in the olfactory bulb" . Journal of Neuroscience. 34 (13): 4654–
25103. Bibcode:2016NatSR...625103S . doi:10.1038/srep25103 . 4664. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5026-13.2014 . PMC 3965788 .
PMC 4844992 . PMID 27112241 . PMID 24672011 .
14. ^ Turin, L (1996). "A spectroscopic mechanism for primary olfactory 54. ^ Kapoor, V; Provost, A; Agarwal, P; Murthy, VN (2016). "Activation of raphe
reception" . Chemical Senses. 21 (6): 773–791. nuclei triggers rapid and distinct effects on parallel olfactory bulb output
doi:10.1093/chemse/21.6.773 . PMID 8985605 . channels" . Nature Neuroscience. 19 (2): 813–814. doi:10.1038/nn.4219 .
15. ^ Turin, L (2002). "A method for the calculation of odor character from PMC 4948943 . PMID 26752161 .
molecular structure". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 216 (3): 367–385. 55. ^ Shea, SD; Katz, LC; Mooney, R (2008). "Noradrenergic induction of odor-
Bibcode:2002JThBi.216..367T . doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2504 . specific neural habituation and olfactory memories" . Journal of
PMID 12183125 . Neuroscience. 28 (42): 10711–10719. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3853-
16. ^ Keller, A; Vosshall, LB (2004). "A psychophysical test of the vibration 08.2008 . PMC 2588668 . PMID 18923046 .
theory of olfaction". Nature Neuroscience. 7 (4): 337–338. 56. ^ Margot, C (2009). "A noseful of objects". Nature Neuroscience. 12 (7):
doi:10.1038/nn1215 . PMID 15034588 . S2CID 1073550 . See also the 813–814. doi:10.1038/nn0709-813 . PMID 19554043 .
editorial on p. 315. S2CID 28094328 .
17. ^ a b c Shepherd, GM (2013). Neurogastronomy: how the brain creates 57. ^ Zhou, W; Chen, D (2009). "Binaral rivalry between the nostrils and in the
flavor and why it matters. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231159111. cortex" . Current Biology. 19 (18): 1561–1565.
OCLC 882238865 . doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.052 . PMC 2901510 . PMID 19699095 .
18. ^ a b Masaoka, Y; Satoh, H; Akai, L; Homma, I (2010). "Expiration: The 58. ^ Wilson, DA (2001). "Receptive fields in the rat piriform cortex" . Chemical
moment we experience retronasal olfaction in flavor". Neuroscience Letters. Senses. 26 (5): 577–584. doi:10.1093/chemse/26.5.577 .
473 (2): 92–96. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.02.024 . PMID 20171264 . PMID 11418503 .
S2CID 2671577 . 59. ^ a b Leon, M; Johnson, BA (2003). "Olfactory coding in the mammalian
19. ^ a b Doty, RL (2001). "Olfaction". Annual Review of Psychology. 52 (1): olfactory bulb". Brain Research Reviews. 42 (1): 23–32. doi:10.1016/S0165-
423–452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.423 . PMID 11148312 . 0173(03)00142-5 . PMID 12668289 . S2CID 22505357 .
20. ^ Wesson, DW; Wilson, DA (2010). "Smelling sounds: olfactory-auditory 60. ^ Freeman, Walter J (1 May 1978). "Spatial properties of an EEG event in
convergence in the olfactory tubercle" . Journal of Neuroscience. 30 (8): the olfactory bulb and cortex" . Electroencephalography and Clinical
3013–3021. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6003-09.2010 . PMC 2846283 . Neurophysiology. 44 (5): 586–605. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(78)90126-8 .
PMID 20181598 . ISSN 0013-4694 . PMID 77765 .
21. ^ Peeples, L (23 February 2010). "Making scents of sounds: noises may 61. ^ Li, Zhaoping; Hopfield, J. J. (1 September 1989). "Modeling the olfactory
alter how we perceive odors" . Scientific American. Archived from the bulb and its neural oscillatory processings" . Biological Cybernetics. 61 (5):
original on 19 March 2011. Retrieved 30 December 2012. 379–392. doi:10.1007/BF00200803 . ISSN 1432-0770 .
22. ^ Boehm, T; Zufall, F (2006). "MHC peptides and the sensory evaluation of PMID 2551392 . S2CID 7932310 .
genotype". Trends in Neurosciences. 29 (2): 100–107. 62. ^ Haberly, Lewis B.; Bower, James M. (1 January 1989). "Olfactory cortex:
doi:10.1016/j.tins.2005.11.006 . PMID 16337283 . S2CID 15621496 . model circuit for study of associative memory?" . Trends in Neurosciences.
23. ^ Santos, PS; Schinemann, JA; Gabardo, J; da Graça Bicalho, M (2005). 12 (7): 258–264. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(89)90025-8 . ISSN 0166-2236 .
"New evidence that the MHC influences odor perception in humans: a study PMID 2475938 . S2CID 3947494 .
with 58 Southern Brazilian students". Hormones and Behavior. 47 (4): 384– 63. ^ a b c Zhaoping, Li (1 October 2016). "Olfactory object recognition,
388. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.005 . PMID 15777804 . segmentation, adaptation, target seeking, and discrimination by the network
S2CID 8568275 . of the olfactory bulb and cortex: computational model and experimental
24. ^ Porter, RH; Cernoch, JM; Balogh, RD (1985). "Odor signatures and kin data" . Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. Computational modeling.
recognition". Physiology & Behavior. 34 (3): 445–448. doi:10.1016/0031- 11: 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.03.009 . ISSN 2352-1546 .
9384(85)90210-0 . PMID 4011726 . S2CID 42316168 . S2CID 27989941 . Archived from the original on 14 August 2022.
25. ^ Weisfeld, GE; Czilli, T; Phillips, KA; Gall, JA; Lichtman, CM (2003). Retrieved 14 August 2022.
"Possible olfaction-based mechanisms in human kin recognition and 64. ^ "Olfactory Cortex - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics" .
inbreeding avoidance". Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 85 (3): www.sciencedirect.com. Archived from the original on 14 August 2022.
279–295. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00061-4 . PMID 12810039 . Retrieved 14 August 2022.
26. ^ Lundström, JN; Boyle, JA; Zatorre, RJ; Jones-Gotman, M (2009). "The 65. ^ Frank, Marion E.; Fletcher, Dane B.; Hettinger, Thomas P. (1 September
neuronal substrates of human olfactory based kin recognition" . Human 2017). "Recognition of the Component Odors in Mixtures" . Chemical
Brain Mapping. 30 (8): 2571–2580. doi:10.1002/hbm.20686 . Senses. 42 (7): 537–546. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjx031 . ISSN 1464-
PMC 6870682 . PMID 19067327 . 3553 . PMC 5863551 . PMID 28641388 .
27. ^ Sherborne, AL; Thom, MD; Paterson, S; Jury, F; Ollier, WE; Stockley, P; 66. ^ Stevenson, Richard J.; Case, Trevor I. (1 April 2005). "Olfactory imagery: A
Beynon, RJ; Hurst, JL (2007). "The genetic basis of inbreeding avoidance in review" . Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 12 (2): 244–264.
house mice" . Current Biology. 17 (23): 2061–2066. doi:10.3758/BF03196369 . ISSN 1531-5320 . PMID 16082803 .
doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.041 . PMC 2148465 . PMID 17997307 . S2CID 43129982 .
28. ^ Mackenzie, Dana (6 March 2023). "How animals follow their nose" . 67. ^ Rokni, D; Hemmelder, V; Kapoor, V; Murthy, VN (2014). "An olfactory
Knowable Magazine. Annual Reviews. doi:10.1146/knowable-030623-4 . cocktail party: figure-ground segregation of odorants in rodents" (PDF).
Retrieved 13 March 2023. Nature Neuroscience. 17 (9): 1225–1232. doi:10.1038/nn.3775 .
29. ^ Reddy, Gautam; Murthy, Venkatesh N.; Vergassola, Massimo (10 March PMC 4146660 . PMID 25086608 . Archived (PDF) from the original on
2022). "Olfactory Sensing and Navigation in Turbulent Environments" . 4 November 2018. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics. 13 (1): 191–213. 68. ^ a b Auffarth, B (2013). "Understanding smell -- the olfactory stimulus
Bibcode:2022ARCMP..13..191R . doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- problem" . Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 37 (8): 1667–1679.
031720-032754 . ISSN 1947-5454 . S2CID 243966350 . Archived doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.009 . PMID 23806440 .
from the original on 20 June 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2023. S2CID 207090474 . Archived from the original on 6 March 2023.
30. ^ Howgego, J (1 August 2013). "Sense for scents traced down to genes" . Retrieved 19 February 2019.
Nature News. Archived from the original on 8 October 2017. Retrieved 69. ^ Soucy, ER; Albeanu, DF; Fantana, AL; Murthy, VN; Meister, M (2009).
7 September 2013. "Precision and diversity in an odor map on the olfactory bulb" (PDF).
31. ^ Jaeger, SR; McRae, JF; Bava, CM; Beresford, MK; Hunter, D; Jia, Y; Nature Neuroscience. 12 (2): 210–220. doi:10.1038/nn.2262 .
Chheang, SL; Jin, D; Peng, M; Gamble, JC; Atkinson, KR; Axten, LG; PMID 19151709 . S2CID 30978362 . Archived (PDF) from the original
Paisley, AG; Tooman, L; Pineau, B; Rouse, SA; Newcomb, RD (2013). "A on 18 July 2018. Retrieved 1 December 2018.
mendelian trait for olfactory sensitivity affects odor experience and food 70. ^ Brennan, PA (2001). "The vomeronasal system". Cellular and Molecular
selection" . Current Biology. 23 (16): 1601–1605. Life Sciences. 58 (4): 546–555. doi:10.1007/pl00000880 .
doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.030 . PMID 23910657 . PMID 11361090 . S2CID 19372867 .
32. ^ McRae, JF; Mainland, JD; Jaeger, SR; Adipietro, KA; Matsunami, H; 71. ^ a b c Carraher, C; Dalziel, J; Jordan, MD; Christie, DL; Newcomb, RD;
Newcomb, RD (2012). "Genetic variation in the odorant receptor OR2J3 is Kralicek, AV (2015). "Towards an understanding of the structural basis for
associated with the ability to detect the "grassy" smelling odor, cis-3-hexen- insect olfaction by odorant receptors" . Insect Biochemistry and Molecular
1-ol" . Chemical Senses. 37 (7): 585–593. doi:10.1093/chemse/bjs049 . Biology. 66: 31–41. doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2015.09.010 . PMID 26416146 .
PMC 3408771 . PMID 22714804 . 72. ^ Gadenne, C; Barrozo, RB; Anton, S (2016). "Plasticity in insect olfaction:
33. ^ Callaway, E (12 September 2012). "Soapy taste of coriander linked to to smell or not to smell?". Annual Review of Entomology. 61: 317–333.
genetic variants" . Nature News. Archived from the original on 29 March doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023523 . hdl:11336/19586 .
2021. Retrieved 7 September 2013. PMID 26982441 . S2CID 207568844 .
34. ^ Driver, R; Balakrishnan, C (2021). "Highly contiguous genomes improve 73. ^ a b Li, Q; Liberles, SD (2015). "Aversion and attraction through
the understanding of avian olfactory receptor repertoires" . Integrative and olfaction" . Current Biology. 25 (3): R120–R129.
Comparative Biology. 61 (4): 1281–1290. doi:10.1093/icb/icab150 . doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.044 . PMC 4317791 . PMID 25649823 .
PMID 34180521 . 74. ^ Yadav, P; Borges, RM (2017). "The insect ovipositor as a volatile sensor
35. ^ Gabirot, M; Buatois, B; Müller, TC; Bonadonna, F (2018). "Odour of King within a closed microcosm" . Journal of Experimental Biology. 220 (9):
Penguin feathers analysed using direct thermal desorption discriminates 1554–1557. doi:10.1242/jeb.152777 . PMID 28468812 .
between individuals but not sexes" (PDF). Ibis. 160 (2): 379–389. 75. ^ a b Syed, Z (2015). "Chemical ecology and olfaction in arthropod vectors of
doi:10.1111/ibi.12544 . Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 April diseases". Current Opinion in Insect Science. 10: 83–89.
2019. Retrieved 21 July 2019. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2015.04.011 . PMID 29588018 .
36. ^ Tyson, P (4 October 2012). "Dogs' dazzling sense of smell: what lies 76. ^ Fountain, H (3 October 2006). "This plant has the sense of smell (loves
behind their exceptional gift of sniff?" . PBS. Archived from the original tomatoes, hates wheat)" . The New York Times. Archived from the
on 7 November 2016. Retrieved 2 November 2016. original on 1 July 2017. Retrieved 22 February 2017.
37. ^ a b Padodara, RJ; Ninan, J (2014). "Olfactory sense in different animals" . 77. ^ Berenstein, N (25 August 2014). "Is there a dewey decimal system for the
The Indian Journal of Veterinary Science. 2 (1). Retrieved 14 August 2020. library of smells?" . Nadia Berenstein. Archived from the original on 17
38. ^ Briggs, H (20 March 2014). "Nose can detect one trillion odours" . BBC April 2021. Retrieved 15 August 2020.
News. Archived from the original on 2 March 2018. Retrieved 20 June 78. ^ Henning, H (1915). Der Geruch (in German). Inktank-Publishing.
2018. ISBN 9783750176669.
39. ^ Williams, SCP (20 March 2014). "Human nose can detect a trillion 79. ^ a b Hawkes, CH (2002). Smell and Taste Complaints. Boston: Butterworth-
smells" . Science Now/AAAS News. Archived from the original on 15 Heinemann. pp. 49–50. ISBN 978-0-7506-7287-0.
October 2021. Retrieved 23 March 2014. 80. ^ Mastrangelo, Andrea; Bonato, Matteo; Cinque, Paola (23 March 2021).
40. ^ Bushdid, C; Magnasco, MO; Vosshall, LB; Keller, A (2014). "Humans can "Smell and taste disorders in COVID-19: From pathogenesis to clinical
discriminate more than 1 million olfactory stimuli" . Science. 343 (6177): features and outcomes" . Neuroscience Letters. 748: 135694.
1370–1372. Bibcode:2014Sci...343.1370B . doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135694 . ISSN 1872-7972 . PMC 7883672 .
doi:10.1126/science.1249168 . PMC 4483192 . PMID 24653035 . PMID 33600902 .

External links [ edit ]

Media related to Smell at Wikimedia Commons

Olfaction at cf.ac.uk
Olfactory Systems Laboratory at Boston University
Smells Database
Olfaction and Gustation , Neuroscience Online (electronic neuroscience textbook by UT Houston Medical School)
Digital Olfaction Society

· · Sensation and perception [show]

· · Smell [show]

Authority control databases: National France · BnF data · Germany · Israel · United States · Japan · Czech Republic

Categories: Olfaction Limbic system Otorhinolaryngology

This page was last edited on 12 December 2023, at 23:23 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
organization.

Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Code of Conduct Developers Statistics Cookie statement Mobile view

You might also like