Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PARTNERSHIP
PARTNERSHIP
I. CONTRACT OF PARTNERSHIP
A. DEFINITION
Q: What is partnership?
A: A contract whereby two or more persons bind themselves to contribute money, property, or industry to a
common fund, with the intention of dividing the profits among themselves.
Note: Two or more persons may also form a partnership for the exercise of a profession. (Art. 1767, NCC)
B. ELEMENTS
A:
1. Agreement to contribute money, property or industry to a common fund (mutual contribution to a
common stock); and
2. Intention to divide the profits among the contracting parties (joint interest in the profits). (Evangelista
v. Collector of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. L‐9996, Oct. 15, 1987).
Q: Jose entered into a verbal agreement with Francisco to form a partnership for the purchase of cascoes for a
proposed boat rental business. It was agreed that Francisco would buy the cascoes and each partner is to
furnish such amount of money as he could, and that the profits will be divided proportionately. After Francisco
purchased a casco with the money advanced by Jose, they undertook to draft the articles of partnership and
embody the same in an authentic document. However, they did not come to an agreement. So, Francisco
returned the money advanced by Jose, which the latter received with an express reservation of all his rights as
a partner.
1. Was there a partnership formed between Jose and Francisco?
2. If such partnership existed, was it terminated by the receipt of Jose of the money he advanced?
A:
1. Yes. Both elements in a contract of partnership exist: a) mutual contribution to a common stock, and b)
a joint interest in the profits. If the contract contains these two elements, a partnership relation results,
and the law itself fixes the incidents of this relation if the parties fail to do so. In this case, there was
money furnished by Jose and received by Francisco for the purchase of the cascoes and there was also
an intention to divide the profits proportionately between them. Thus, there is a partnership by virtue of
the verbal agreement between Jose and Francisco.
2. No. There was no clear intent on the part of Jose, in accepting the money, to relinquish his rights as a
partner. (Fernandez v. Dela Rosa, G.R. No. 413, Feb. 2, 1903)
Q: Chim was the owner and manager of a lumber yard. Vicente and Ting participated in the profits and losses.
A contract of sawing lumber was entered into by Chim, acting in his own name, with Frank. At the time the
contract was