The document analyzes and compares the e-portfolios of four individuals: Brent Warr, Allie Collins, Shanequa Lanea Williams, and Grace Capps. For Brent Warr's portfolio, the group notes its attention-grabbing design but questionable organization. They observe that graphics are used to showcase Warr's work. For Grace Capps' portfolio, they note its effective organization and how it connects her entire educational experience through sections like "Coursework". Capps is seen to immediately establish her identity while Warr's about page feels like an afterthought. The group considers visual design elements, use of exhibits, and navigation experience for both portfolios.
The document analyzes and compares the e-portfolios of four individuals: Brent Warr, Allie Collins, Shanequa Lanea Williams, and Grace Capps. For Brent Warr's portfolio, the group notes its attention-grabbing design but questionable organization. They observe that graphics are used to showcase Warr's work. For Grace Capps' portfolio, they note its effective organization and how it connects her entire educational experience through sections like "Coursework". Capps is seen to immediately establish her identity while Warr's about page feels like an afterthought. The group considers visual design elements, use of exhibits, and navigation experience for both portfolios.
The document analyzes and compares the e-portfolios of four individuals: Brent Warr, Allie Collins, Shanequa Lanea Williams, and Grace Capps. For Brent Warr's portfolio, the group notes its attention-grabbing design but questionable organization. They observe that graphics are used to showcase Warr's work. For Grace Capps' portfolio, they note its effective organization and how it connects her entire educational experience through sections like "Coursework". Capps is seen to immediately establish her identity while Warr's about page feels like an afterthought. The group considers visual design elements, use of exhibits, and navigation experience for both portfolios.
Analyzing: Allie Collins, Shanequa Lanea Williams, Brent Warr, & Grace Capps Brent Warrr First Glance Observations: • Name and portfolio should switch places • Immediately catches attention of viewer • S-XL organization questionable • Graphics, showcasing... Project Questions: • Who is the author? How did they establish or represent their identity? o Portfolio is bigger than name • What is important to the author ? How can you tell? o Graphics, showcasing • What stands out to you as a reader of their ePortfolio? How did they establish emphasis in the site? o Emphasis through graphics, design stands out, all is unique o Connects through grouping small medium large o Emphasis on color red • In what ways does the author make a positive or negative impression? Why is that? o Positive impression o Don’t know who he is o About page an after thought... could put more about him on the first page Design: • What strikes you about the visual design of each? o Colors o Unique across many mediums ▪ Geode app.... ▪ Collage ▪ Digital Design ▪ Disciplined in different mediums • How did the authors use exhibits (e.g., embedded text, attached PDFs, buttons, links, etc.) rhetorically--in other words, how do they use evidence to make a point? Are some multimodal elements more successful at some things than others? o Links, showing whole project in the corner.. Difficult to find • What is your navigation experience like? o Organization, doesn’t direct Grace Capps First Glance Observations: • About me at first • Projects in different sections • Organization effective, more organized, not as overpowering... know what you • Course work tab.... curriculum map and work from other classes... well rounded, connects entire education and other classes Project Questions: • Who is the author? How did they establish or represent their identity? o Immediately opens up to who she is, personality and as a designer • What is important to the author ? How can you tell? • What stands out to you as a reader of their ePortfolio? How did they establish emphasis in the site? • In what ways does the author make a positive or negative impression? Why is that?
And now for design:
• What strikes you about the visual design of each?
• How did the authors use exhibits (e.g., embedded text, attached PDFs, buttons, links, etc.) rhetorically--in other words, how do they use evidence to make a point? Are some multimodal elements more successful at some things than others? • What is your navigation experience like?