III-II SEM IV

Contracts - II
Summary Notes

Hemant Patil
2-3-2024
Contents
Long discussion topics ......................................................................................... 3
Contract of Indemnity ....................................................................................... 3
Contract of Guarantee ...................................................................................... 3
Comparison between Contract of Guarantee and Contract of Indemnity..................... 4
Legal and Moral Duties of a Surety ...................................................................... 5
Circumstances Under Which a Surety Is Discharged from Liability ............................ 6
Discuss - Liability of a Surety is coextensive with that of a Principal debtor ................ 7
Definition and Types of Bailments ....................................................................... 8
Bailor and Bailee .............................................................................................. 8
Liabilities and duties of Bailee ............................................................................ 9
Legal Principles and Exceptions ........................................................................ 10
Understanding Agency Relationships ................................................................. 11
Termination of Agency Relationships.................................................................. 13
Essentials and Nature of Partnership ................................................................. 14
Admission, Expulsion, and Retirement of Partners ............................................... 16
Rights, Duties, and Liabilities of Partners ........................................................... 19
Dissolution of Partnership Firm ......................................................................... 20
Remedies for Breach of Contract ....................................................................... 22
Legal Principles in Sales of Goods ..................................................................... 22
Transfer of Property in Sale of Goods ................................................................. 26
Contract of Sale and Essential Features ............................................................. 28
Short conversation topics ................................................................................... 30
Rights And Duties of Indemnifier ...................................................................... 30
Revocation Of Guarantee ................................................................................. 31
Revocation Of Continuing Guarantee ................................................................. 32
Rights of Surety ............................................................................................. 32
Discharge Of Surety ....................................................................................... 33
Pledge And Bailment....................................................................................... 33
Distinguish Between General Lien and Particular Lien (Rights of Pledge) .................. 34
Pledge - A Special Kind of Bailment ................................................................... 34
Position Of Finder of Goods .............................................................................. 35
Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se ........................................................................ 35
Classification Of Agents ................................................................................... 35
Delcredere Agent ........................................................................................... 36
Extent Of Agent's Authority ............................................................................. 36
Agency Coupled with Interest........................................................................... 36
Agent's Authority in An Emergency ................................................................... 37
Sub Agent .................................................................................................... 37

Page 1 of 48
 Undisclosed Principal ...................................................................................... 38
“Delegatus Non Potest Delegatus” - With Reference to an Agency .......................... 38
Distinction Between Partnership and Company .................................................... 38
Duties Of Partner ........................................................................................... 39
Relation Of Partners Inter-Se and with third-Parties ............................................. 39
The Rights & duties of Partner .......................................................................... 40
Minor as a Partner in a firm ............................................................................. 40
Rights and duties of an Outgoing Partner of a firm ............................................... 41
Expulsion of a Partner ..................................................................................... 41
Dissolution of a Firm ....................................................................................... 42
Mode of settlement of accounts between Partners of a Firm .................................. 42
Effects of Non-registration of a Partnership......................................................... 43
Sale by Auction ............................................................................................. 44
Sale of specific Goods ..................................................................................... 45
Unpaid seller rights ........................................................................................ 45
Distinguish between Condition and Warranty ...................................................... 46
Distinguish between Sale and Hire-Purchase Agreement ....................................... 46
Goods sent on Approval for Sale or Return Basis ................................................. 47
Ascertainment of Price .................................................................................... 47
Risk Prima-facie passes with the Property .......................................................... 48
Disclaimer: ...................................................................................................... 48

Page 2 of 48
Long discussion topics
Contract of Indemnity
Definition, Scope, and Rights & Duties of Indemnity Holder
In Indian Contract Law, a contract of indemnity is defined under Sections 124 to 147 of the Indian Contract Act,
1872. It is an agreement between two parties, the indemnifier and the indemnity holder, whereby the indemnifier
promises to compensate the indemnity holder for any loss or damage suffered by the latter due to the former's
actions or the actions of a third party. The scope of indemnity covers losses arising from any cause, whether it
be the actions of the indemnifier or a third party, as long as they fall within the terms of the contract.
Rights of Indemnity Holder:
1. Right to Claim Compensation: The indemnity holder has the right to claim compensation from the
indemnifier for any loss suffered within the scope of the indemnity agreement. This right arises when
the indemnity holder suffers a loss due to the actions specified in the contract.
2. Right to Exercise Discretion: The indemnity holder has the discretion to take reasonable steps to
mitigate the loss or damage suffered. However, they must act prudently and in good faith to minimize
the extent of the loss.
3. Right to Sue Third Parties: If the loss or damage is caused by the actions of a third party, the
indemnity holder has the right to sue such third party for recovery of the losses. The indemnity holder
can then claim reimbursement from the indemnifier according to the terms of the contract.
Duties of Indemnity Holder:
1. Duty to Notify: The indemnity holder has a duty to notify the indemnifier as soon as they become
aware of any potential loss or damage covered under the indemnity agreement. Prompt notification
enables the indemnifier to take necessary steps to mitigate the loss.
2. Duty to Cooperate: The indemnity holder must cooperate with the indemnifier in the investigation and
assessment of the loss or damage. This includes providing relevant information and evidence to support
the indemnity claim.
3. Duty to Mitigate Loss: The indemnity holder has a duty to take reasonable steps to mitigate the loss
or damage suffered. This may include taking preventive measures to minimize further losses or seeking
alternative means of compensation.
Exceptions:
 Exclusion of Liability: The indemnifier may limit their liability under the contract by specifying certain
exclusions or limitations in the indemnity agreement. For example, the contract may exclude liability for
losses caused by events beyond the indemnifier's control.
 Illegal Acts: The indemnity agreement does not extend to losses arising from illegal or unlawful acts
committed by the indemnity holder. In such cases, the indemnifier is not obligated to compensate for
any resulting losses.
Example: Suppose A agrees to indemnify B against any losses arising from the use of a defective product sold
by A to B. If the product proves to be defective and causes injury to C, who subsequently sues B for damages,
B can claim compensation from A under the indemnity agreement. B's right to claim compensation is contingent
upon notifying A promptly and cooperating in the legal proceedings against C. If B fails to fulfill these duties, A
may be discharged from their obligation to indemnify B for the losses incurred.
Hadley v. Baxendale (1854): While this case originated in England, its principles have been widely influential
in Indian jurisprudence. The case established the principle of foreseeability of damages in contract law. It held
that damages that arise naturally from a breach of contract, or those that can be reasonably supposed to have
been in the contemplation of both parties at the time of contract formation, are recoverable. However, damages
that arise as a consequence of special circumstances, known only to the party breaching the contract, may not
be recoverable unless they were expressly communicated and agreed upon by both parties. While this case does
not specifically deal with indemnity, its principles regarding the assessment of damages are relevant to the
determination of compensation in indemnity agreements.
Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. M/s Girdharilal Parshottamdas and Co. (1966): In this Indian case,
the Bombay High Court discussed the scope of indemnity and the duties of the indemnity holder. The court held
that an indemnity holder must take reasonable steps to mitigate the loss or damage suffered and that failure to
do so may affect their right to claim compensation from the indemnifier. This case emphasizes the duty of the
indemnity holder to act prudently and in good faith to minimize the extent of the loss, which is a key aspect of
the rights and duties of the indemnity holder.
Contract of Guarantee
Definition, Essentials and Discharge of Surety
In Indian Contract Law, a contract of guarantee is governed by Sections 126 to 147 of the Indian Contract Act,
1872. It is a tripartite agreement involving three parties: the principal debtor, the creditor, and the surety. In a
contract of guarantee, the surety undertakes to perform the obligations of the principal debtor if they default.
The following are the essential elements of a contract of guarantee:
1. Principal Debtor: This is the party who owes a primary obligation to the creditor. The principal debtor
is usually the borrower or the person who receives the benefit of the contract.
2. Creditor: The creditor is the party to whom the principal debtor owes a debt or obligation. They are
the recipient of the guarantee and have the right to enforce it against the surety in case of default by
the principal debtor.

Page 3 of 48
 3. Surety: The surety is the party who provides the guarantee for the performance of the principal debtor's
obligations. The surety's liability is secondary to that of the principal debtor, meaning they are only
liable if the principal debtor fails to fulfill their obligations.
Discharge of Surety:
The liability of a surety under a contract of guarantee may be discharged under certain circumstances. The
following are the common methods of discharge:
1. Performance of Obligation: The surety's liability is discharged when the principal debtor performs
their obligations under the contract, thereby fulfilling the purpose of the guarantee. Once the debt is
paid or the obligation is fulfilled by the principal debtor, the surety is no longer liable to the creditor.
2. Revocation of Guarantee: The surety may revoke the guarantee at any time before the contract is
entered into or the debt is incurred, provided that the revocation does not prejudice the rights of the
creditor. Once the guarantee is revoked, the surety is discharged from any liability arising from the
contract of guarantee.
3. Death or Insolvency: The death or insolvency of the surety automatically discharges their liability
under the contract of guarantee. However, the estate of the deceased surety may still be liable for
obligations incurred before their death.
4. Release by Creditor: If the creditor releases the principal debtor from their obligations without the
consent of the surety, the surety is discharged from liability to the extent of the value of the security
held by the creditor at the time of release. This is provided under Section 134 of the Indian Contract
Act.
5. Variation of Terms: Any material variation in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor
and the creditor without the consent of the surety discharges the surety's liability to the extent of the
variation. This is also covered under Section 134 of the Indian Contract Act.
Exceptions:
 Continuing Guarantee: In the case of a continuing guarantee, the surety's liability may continue
despite changes in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and the creditor, provided
that such changes are within the scope of the original guarantee.
Example: Suppose A takes a loan from B, with C acting as the surety. If A fails to repay the loan, B can demand
payment from C, the surety. If C pays the amount to B, C's liability as a surety is discharged. However, if B
releases A from the debt without informing C, C's liability would be discharged to the extent of the value of the
security held by B at the time of release, as per Section 134 of the Indian Contract Act.
Case: Bank of Bihar Ltd. v. Damodar Prasad and Others (1969)
Facts: In this case, the Bank of Bihar had advanced a loan to a partnership firm, of which Damodar Prasad was
a partner. To secure the loan, Damodar Prasad executed a deed of guarantee in favor of the bank, undertaking
to guarantee the repayment of the loan by the partnership firm. Subsequently, there was a material alteration
in the terms of the loan agreement between the bank and the partnership firm, without the consent of Damodar
Prasad, the surety.
Issues: The main issue before the court was whether the material alteration in the terms of the loan agreement
discharged the liability of Damodar Prasad as a surety under the contract of guarantee.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court held that the material alteration in the terms of the loan agreement
without the consent of the surety discharged the surety's liability to the extent of the alteration. The court
emphasized that any material variation in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and the creditor,
without the consent of the surety, would discharge the surety's liability to the extent of the variation. The court
based its decision on the provisions of Sections 126 to 147 of the Indian Contract Act, which govern the contract
of guarantee and discharge of surety.
Comparison between Contract of Guarantee and Contract of Indemnity
Contract of Guarantee: (Nature, Parties Involved, and Scope of Liability)
Definition:
A contract of guarantee is a tripartite agreement involving three parties: the principal debtor, the creditor, and
the surety. In this agreement, the surety undertakes secondary liability to perform the obligations of the principal
debtor if they default.
Essentials:
1. Principal Debtor: The party who owes a primary obligation to the creditor.
2. Creditor: The party to whom the principal debtor owes a debt or obligation.
3. Surety: The party who provides the guarantee for the performance of the principal debtor's obligations.
Exceptions:
 Continuing Guarantee: In the case of a continuing guarantee, the surety's liability may continue
despite changes in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and the creditor, provided
that such changes are within the scope of the original guarantee.
 Exclusion of Liability: The surety's liability may be limited by exclusions or limitations specified in the
guarantee agreement.
Example: A, the principal debtor, borrows money from B, the creditor. C, acting as the surety, guarantees the
repayment of the loan. If A fails to repay the loan, B can demand payment from C, the surety, to fulfill A's
obligations. However, if the terms of the loan agreement are altered without C's consent, C may be discharged
from liability to the extent of the variation.

Contract of Indemnity:

Page 4 of 48
Definition:
A contract of indemnity is a bipartite agreement involving two parties: the indemnifier and the indemnity holder.
In this agreement, the indemnifier promises to compensate the indemnity holder for any loss or damage suffered,
irrespective of the default of a third party.
Essentials:
1. Indemnifier: The party who promises to compensate the indemnity holder for any loss or damage
suffered.
2. Indemnity Holder: The party who is entitled to claim compensation for any loss or damage incurred.
Exceptions:
 Exclusion of Liability: The indemnifier may limit their liability under the contract of indemnity by
specifying certain exclusions or limitations in the agreement.
Example: A, the indemnifier, promises to indemnify B, the indemnity holder, against any losses arising from the
use of a defective product sold by A to B. If the product proves to be defective and causes damage to B, A is
liable to compensate B for the losses incurred, irrespective of any default by a third party.
Comparison Table between Contract of Guarantee and Contract of Indemnity
Aspect Contract of Guarantee Contract of Indemnity
Tripartite agreement involving principal Bipartite agreement involving indemnifier and
Nature
debtor, creditor, and surety. indemnity holder.
Parties
Principal debtor, creditor, and surety. Indemnifier and indemnity holder.
Involved
Scope of Secondary liability; surety's obligation arises Primary liability; indemnifier agrees to
Liability upon default of principal debtor. compensate irrespective of third-party default.
Caselaw: State of Madras v. Jayalakshmi Rice Mill Contractors Co. (AIR 1959 SC 933)
Facts: In this case, the State of Madras (now Tamil Nadu) entered into contracts with rice millers for the supply
of rice. The contracts required the millers to furnish security deposits as a guarantee for the due performance of
their obligations. Jayalakshmi Rice Mill Contractors Co. was one of the contractors who supplied rice under these
contracts. The State of Madras terminated the contracts and forfeited the security deposits of Jayalakshmi Rice
Mill Contractors Co. due to alleged breach of contract.
Issues: The main issue before the court was whether the State of Madras was entitled to forfeit the security
deposits of Jayalakshmi Rice Mill Contractors Co. under the contract of guarantee and indemnity.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court held that the contracts between the State of Madras and the rice millers
were contracts of guarantee and indemnity. The security deposits furnished by the rice millers served as
guarantees for the due performance of their obligations under the contracts. The court emphasized that the
liability of the millers under the contracts was secondary, and the deposits could only be forfeited in case of
default by the millers. The court further held that the State of Madras was not entitled to forfeit the security
deposits of Jayalakshmi Rice Mill Contractors Co. arbitrarily or without valid reasons. The forfeiture of the deposits
could only be justified if there was a breach of contract by the millers, leading to their default under the contracts.
Since there was no evidence of any breach of contract by Jayalakshmi Rice Mill Contractors Co., the forfeiture of
their security deposits was held to be unjustified.

Legal and Moral Duties of a Surety

Responsibilities, Moral Obligations
Responsibilities:
1. Primary Obligation: The primary responsibility of a surety is to fulfill the obligations of the principal
debtor in case of default. This includes the payment of debts, performance of contracts, or any other
agreed-upon obligations.
2. Honouring the Guarantee: The surety must honour the terms of the guarantee agreement entered
into with the creditor. This entails fulfilling the surety's obligations as specified in the contract, including
making payments or providing performance as required.
3. Cooperation with Creditor: The surety has a duty to cooperate with the creditor in the enforcement
of the guarantee. This may include providing necessary information, documents, or access to assets to
facilitate the creditor's recovery efforts.
Moral Obligations:
1. Good Faith: The surety is morally obligated to act in good faith towards both the creditor and the
principal debtor. This entails honesty, fairness, and transparency in all dealings related to the guarantee.
2. Ensuring Principal's Performance: Morally, the surety assumes the responsibility of ensuring that
the principal debtor fulfils their obligations. This may involve monitoring the principal's actions and
intervening if necessary to prevent default.
3. Protecting Creditor's Rights: The surety has a moral duty to protect the rights and interests of the
creditor to the best of their ability. This includes timely communication, cooperation, and honest
representation of the surety's financial capability to fulfill the guarantee.
Exceptions:
 Breach of Contract: If the principal debtor breaches the underlying contract, the surety's duty to fulfill
the guarantee is triggered. However, if the surety can demonstrate that the creditor's conduct impaired
their rights or increased their risk without consent, the surety may be discharged from liability.
Brief Comparison Table

Page 5 of 48
Aspect Legal Duties of a Surety Moral Obligations of a Surety

Primary obligation to fulfill principal debtor's Act in good faith towards creditor and principal
Responsibilities
obligations. debtor.

Honor terms of guarantee agreement. Ensure principal debtor's performance.

Cooperate with creditor in enforcement of

Protect creditor's rights and interests.
guarantee.

Caselaw: United Bank of India v. Naresh Kumar and Others (AIR 1996 SC 3120)
Facts: In this case, Naresh Kumar, the proprietor of a partnership firm, availed a loan from United Bank of India
(UBI). The loan was secured by a personal guarantee given by Naresh Kumar himself and his father, Darshan
Lal. The partnership firm subsequently defaulted on the loan, leading UBI to initiate recovery proceedings against
Naresh Kumar and Darshan Lal as sureties.
Issues: The main issue before the Supreme Court was whether Darshan Lal, as a surety, could be held liable for
the debts of the partnership firm, and what were his legal and moral duties as a surety.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court held that Darshan Lal, as a surety, had both legal and moral duties towards
the bank and the principal debtor (Naresh Kumar). The court outlined the following legal duties and moral
obligations of a surety:
1. Legal Duties:
o The surety has a primary obligation to fulfill the obligations of the principal debtor in case of
default.
o The surety must honour the terms of the guarantee agreement entered into with the creditor,
including making payments or providing performance as required.
o Cooperation with the creditor in the enforcement of the guarantee is also a duty of the surety.
2. Moral Obligations:
o The surety is morally obligated to act in good faith towards both the creditor and the principal
debtor. This includes honesty, fairness, and transparency in all dealings related to the
guarantee.
o Morally, the surety assumes the responsibility of ensuring that the principal debtor fulfils their
obligations. This may involve monitoring the principal's actions and intervening if necessary to
prevent default.
o Protecting the rights and interests of the creditor to the best of their ability is another moral
duty of the surety.

Circumstances Under Which a Surety Is Discharged from Liability

Variation of Terms, Death or Insolvency, Release of Principal Debtor and Creditor's Conduct
1. Variation of Terms:
o If there is any material variation in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and
the creditor without the consent of the surety, the surety may be discharged from liability to
the extent of the variation.
o Exception: In the case of a continuing guarantee, the surety's liability may continue despite
changes in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and the creditor, provided
that such changes are within the scope of the original guarantee.
o Example: A guarantees repayment of a loan to B. Without A's consent, B extends the
repayment period or increases the interest rate. A may be discharged from liability to the
extent of the variation in terms.
2. Death or Insolvency:
o The death or insolvency of the surety automatically discharges their liability under the contract
of guarantee.
o Exception: The estate of the deceased surety may still be liable for obligations incurred before
their death.
o Example: A, the surety, passes away. A's estate is no longer liable for any guarantees provided
after A's death, but remains liable for obligations incurred before A's death.
3. Release of Principal Debtor:
o If the creditor releases the principal debtor from their obligations without the consent of the
surety, the surety may be discharged from liability to the extent of the value of the security
held by the creditor at the time of release.
o Exception: If the surety consents to the release of the principal debtor, they remain liable under
the guarantee.
o Example: A guarantees B's loan from C. Without A's consent, C releases B from the loan. A
may be discharged from liability up to the value of the security held by C at the time of release.
4. Creditor's Conduct:

Page 6 of 48
 o If the conduct of the creditor impairs the rights of the surety or increases the risk to the surety
without their consent, the surety may be discharged from liability.
o Exception: If the surety expressly or impliedly consents to the creditor's conduct, they may
remain liable under the guarantee.
o Example: A guarantees B's loan from C. C fails to notify A of B's default, leading to increased
losses. A may be discharged from liability if C's conduct impaired A's rights or increased A's
risk without consent.
Exceptions:
1. Variation of Terms:
o Continuing Guarantee: In the case of a continuing guarantee, where the surety agrees to be
liable for transactions that may occur over a period of time, the surety's liability may continue
despite changes in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and the creditor.
However, such changes must fall within the scope of the original guarantee.
2. Death or Insolvency:
o Liability for Past Obligations: While the death or insolvency of the surety discharges their
liability for future obligations under the contract of guarantee, their estate may still be liable
for obligations incurred before their death or insolvency. This means that any guarantees
provided by the surety prior to their death or insolvency remain enforceable against their
estate.
3. Release of Principal Debtor:
o Surety's Consent: If the surety consents to the release of the principal debtor, they may
remain liable under the guarantee despite the release. This consent can be express or implied,
and if the surety expressly or impliedly agrees to the release, they cannot claim discharge from
liability on this ground.
4. Creditor's Conduct:
o Surety's Express Consent: If the surety expressly consents to the creditor's conduct that
may impair their rights or increase their risk, they may not be discharged from liability. The
surety's explicit agreement to such conduct negates their ability to claim discharge based on
the creditor's actions.
Caselaw: Bank of Bihar Ltd. v. Damodar Prasad and Others (1969)
Facts: In this case, Bank of Bihar (the appellant) had advanced loans to several individuals and firms, including
Damodar Prasad (the respondent), who executed deeds of guarantee in favor of the bank. Subsequently, there
were material alterations in the terms of the loan agreements between the bank and the borrowers, without the
consent of the sureties.
Issues: The main issue before the court was whether the material alterations in the terms of the loan agreements
discharged the liability of the sureties.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court held that material alterations in the terms of the loan agreements without
the consent of the sureties discharged their liability to the extent of the variation. The court emphasized that any
material variation in the terms of the contract between the principal debtor and the creditor, without the consent
of the surety, would discharge the surety's liability to the extent of the variation. The court further held that in
the case of a continuing guarantee, where the surety agrees to be liable for transactions that may occur over a
period of time, the surety's liability may continue despite changes in the terms of the contract between the
principal debtor and the creditor, provided that such changes are within the scope of the original guarantee.
Outcome: As a result of this decision, the liability of the sureties in the case was discharged to the extent of the
material alterations in the terms of the loan agreements without their consent. The case clarified the principles
governing the discharge of sureties from liability due to material variations in the terms of the underlying
contracts, providing guidance for future cases involving similar issues.

Discuss - Liability of a Surety is coextensive with that of a Principal debtor

The principle that the liability of a surety is coextensive with that of a principal debtor, unless otherwise provided
by the contract, is a fundamental concept in the law of suretyship. Let's break down this principle and explore
its various aspects:
1. Coextensive Liability:
 This principle means that the surety is equally liable for the debt or obligation as the principal debtor.
In other words, the surety's obligation mirrors that of the principal debtor in terms of both scope and
extent.
2. Unless Otherwise Provided by the Contract:
 While the default rule is that the surety's liability is coextensive with that of the principal debtor, the
parties have the freedom to vary this arrangement by agreement. The terms of the contract of guarantee
may specify exceptions or limitations to the surety's liability.
3. Implications of Coextensive Liability:
 If the principal debtor fails to fulfill their obligations under the contract, the creditor has the right to
demand performance from the surety.
 The surety may be called upon to fulfill the same obligations, undertake the same actions, or make the
same payments as the principal debtor.

Page 7 of 48
4. Exceptions and Limitations:
 The contract of guarantee may contain provisions that modify the coextensive liability of the surety. For
example:
o The contract may limit the surety's liability to a specific amount or a certain portion of the debt.
o It may specify particular circumstances under which the surety's liability is triggered, excluding
liability in other situations.
o The contract may provide for the surety's liability to be contingent upon the occurrence of
certain events or conditions.
5. Importance of Contractual Clarity:
 It is crucial for the parties to clearly define the extent and limitations of the surety's liability in the
contract of guarantee.
 Ambiguities or uncertainties in the contract terms may lead to disputes regarding the surety's obligations
and potential liability.
Example:A, the principal debtor, borrows ₹100,000 from B, the creditor, with C acting as the surety under a
contract of guarantee. The guarantee agreement states that C's liability is coextensive with that of A. If A defaults
on the loan, B can demand repayment from C up to the full amount of ₹100,000, as C's liability mirrors that of
A. However, if the guarantee agreement had specified that C's liability was limited to ₹50,000, then C would only
be liable for repayment up to that amount, notwithstanding A's full debt of ₹100,000.

Definition and Types of Bailments

Definition of Bailment: Bailment refers to a legal relationship in which one person (the bailor) delivers goods
to another person (the bailee) for a specific purpose, under an agreement, express or implied, that the goods
will be returned or disposed of in accordance with the terms of the agreement once the purpose is fulfilled.
Types of Bailments:
1. Bailment for the Benefit of Bailor (Gratuitous Bailment):
o In this type of bailment, the bailor delivers goods to the bailee without any consideration or
benefit to the bailee.
o The bailee holds the goods for the sole benefit of the bailor and owes a duty of utmost care
towards the goods.
o Example: A lends his lawnmower to B for a week without any payment. B has the duty to take
care of the lawnmower and return it to A in the same condition.
2. Bailment for the Benefit of Bailee (Gratuitous Bailment):
o Here, the bailor delivers goods to the bailee for the bailee's benefit without any consideration
from the bailee.
o The bailee is responsible for taking reasonable care of the goods but is not required to use the
same degree of care as in bailment for the benefit of the bailor.
o Example: A lends her car to B for B's personal use. B is responsible for taking reasonable care
of the car but is not held to the same standard of care as if the car were being used for A's
benefit.
3. Bailment for Mutual Benefit (Contractual Bailment):
o In this type of bailment, both the bailor and the bailee derive some benefit or consideration
from the bailment.
o The bailee owes a duty of reasonable care towards the goods, and the extent of care required
depends on the nature of the bailment and the terms of the agreement.
o Example: A hires a truck from B to transport goods for A's business. Both A and B benefit from
the transaction, and B is responsible for taking reasonable care of the truck and goods during
transportation.
4. Gratuitous Bailment (Without Consideration):
o Bailment where no consideration (payment or benefit) passes from one party to another.
o Example: A lends his laptop to B for a day without any payment or benefit to B.
5. Non-Gratuitous Bailment (With Consideration):
o Bailment where consideration (payment or benefit) is provided by one party to another.
o Example: A rents a power tool from B for a week, paying B a rental fee for the use of the tool.
Bailor and Bailee
Rights, responsibilities, obligations, and entitlements
1. Rights of the Bailor:
o Right to Terminate Bailment: The bailor has the right to terminate the bailment at any time
before the purpose of the bailment is fulfilled.
o Right to Demand Return: The bailor has the right to demand the return of the goods from
the bailee once the purpose of the bailment is fulfilled.
o Right to Compensation for Breach: If the bailee breaches their duties and obligations, the
bailor has the right to seek compensation or damages for any loss or damage to the goods.
2. Responsibilities and Obligations of the Bailor:
o Duty to Disclose Defects: The bailor must disclose any known defects or dangers associated
with the goods to the bailee.

Page 8 of 48
 o Duty to Pay for Bailee's Expenses: In some cases, the bailor may be responsible for
reimbursing the bailee for reasonable expenses incurred in fulfilling the purpose of the
bailment.
3. Entitlements of the Bailor:
o Entitled to Return of Goods: Upon completion of the bailment, the bailor is entitled to the
return of the goods in the same condition as when they were delivered, subject to reasonable
wear and tear.
Bailee:
1. Rights of the Bailee:
o Right to Use Goods: The bailee has the right to use the goods in accordance with the terms
of the bailment agreement and for the purpose specified by the bailor.
o Right to Sue Third Parties: If the goods are damaged or stolen while in the bailee's
possession due to the actions of a third party, the bailee has the right to sue the third party for
damages.
2. Responsibilities and Obligations of the Bailee:
o Duty of Care: The bailee owes a duty of care towards the goods entrusted to them and must
take reasonable precautions to prevent loss, damage, or misuse of the goods.
o Duty to Return Goods: Upon completion of the bailment, the bailee is obligated to return the
goods to the bailor in the same condition as when they were received, subject to reasonable
wear and tear.
o Duty to Account: The bailee must keep accurate records of the goods received, used, or
disposed of during the bailment period and provide an account to the bailor upon request.
3. Entitlements of the Bailee:
o Entitled to Receive Compensation: The bailee may be entitled to receive compensation or
reimbursement for expenses incurred in fulfilling the purpose of the bailment, subject to the
terms of the agreement.
Exceptions: In certain situations, the rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the bailor and bailee may be
modified by the terms of the bailment agreement or by specific circumstances. For example, if the bailment
agreement explicitly states that the bailee is not responsible for certain types of damage to the goods, the bailee
may not be liable for such damage, even if it occurred during the bailment period.
Example: A lends his bicycle to B for a week. A has the right to demand the return of the bicycle at any time
and is entitled to receive it back in the same condition. B, as the bailee, has the right to use the bicycle for
transportation purposes but must take reasonable care of it to prevent damage. If B fails to lock the bicycle
properly and it gets stolen, B may be liable to compensate A for the loss.
Caselaw: State of Uttar Pradesh v. Dr. Vijay Anand Maharaj (AIR 1963 SC 946)
Facts: In this case, the State of Uttar Pradesh (the appellant) entered into an agreement with Dr. Vijay Anand
Maharaj (the respondent) for the temporary use of certain immovable properties owned by the respondent. The
agreement specified that the properties would be used for a specific purpose, and upon the completion of the
purpose, they would be returned to the respondent in the same condition as when they were received.
Issues: The main issue before the Supreme Court was to determine the rights, responsibilities, obligations, and
entitlements of the parties involved in the bailment agreement, particularly concerning the use and return of the
immovable properties.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court held that in a bailment agreement, the bailor (in this case, Dr. Vijay Anand
Maharaj) retains ownership of the property but temporarily transfers possession to the bailee (the State of Uttar
Pradesh) for a specific purpose. The bailee is obligated to use the property in accordance with the terms of the
agreement and to return it to the bailor in the same condition as when it was received, subject to reasonable
wear and tear. The court further emphasized that the bailee owes a duty of care towards the property entrusted
to them and must take reasonable precautions to prevent loss or damage. If the bailee breaches this duty and
causes damage to the property, they may be held liable to compensate the bailor for the loss suffered.
Outcome: As a result of this decision, the State of Uttar Pradesh was held liable for damage caused to the
immovable properties during the period of bailment. The court reaffirmed the rights of the bailor to expect the
return of the property in the same condition as when it was delivered and the corresponding duties and
obligations of the bailee to ensure the proper care and use of the property during the bailment period.

Liabilities and duties of Bailee

Specific duties and liabilities of the bailee
1. Duty of Care: The bailee owes a duty of care towards the goods entrusted to them. This duty
requires the bailee to exercise reasonable care and diligence in handling, using, and preserving the
goods during the period of bailment. Example: A lends his laptop to B for a week. B, as the bailee, must
take reasonable precautions to prevent damage to the laptop, such as keeping it in a secure location,
avoiding exposure to extreme temperatures, and handling it with care to avoid accidental damage.
2. Duty to Use Goods for Intended Purpose: The bailee must use the goods for the specific purpose
outlined in the bailment agreement and must not use them for any unauthorized or unintended
purposes. Example: A lends her car to B for transportation purposes. B, as the bailee, must use the car
only for transportation and not for any other purposes such as off-road driving or racing.
3. Duty to Return Goods: Upon the completion of the bailment period or fulfillment of the purpose of
the bailment, the bailee is obligated to return the goods to the bailor in the same condition as when

Page 9 of 48
 they were received, subject to reasonable wear and tear. Example: A rents a power tool from B for a
construction project. Once the project is completed, B, as the bailee, must return the power tool to A in
the same condition, apart from normal wear and tear incurred during legitimate use.
4. Duty to Account: The bailee must keep accurate records of the goods received, used, or disposed
of during the bailment period and must provide an account of such transactions to the bailor upon
request. Example: A hires a storage facility from B to store household items temporarily. B, as the
bailee, must maintain records of the items stored, any movements or changes in their condition, and
provide A with an account of these transactions upon request.
5. Duty to Avoid Unauthorized Acts: The bailee must refrain from engaging in any unauthorized acts
or activities that may jeopardize the safety, integrity, or ownership of the goods entrusted to them.
Example: A lends her jewellery to B for safekeeping. B, as the bailee, must refrain from selling, pledging,
or otherwise disposing of the jewellery without A's consent, as such actions would constitute
unauthorized acts.
Liabilities of the Bailee:
 If the bailee breaches any of the duties outlined above and causes loss or damage to the goods, they
may be held liable to compensate the bailor for the loss suffered.
 The extent of the bailee's liability depends on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any
provisions or limitations specified in the bailment agreement.
These duties and liabilities of the bailee ensure that the goods entrusted to them are handled, used, and returned
responsibly and that the bailor's interests and property rights are adequately protected during the period of
bailment.
Caselaw: Union of India v. Kishorilal Gupta & Bros. (AIR 1959 SC 1362)
Facts: In this case, the Union of India (the appellant) entered into a contract with Kishorilal Gupta & Bros. (the
respondent) for the transportation of goods by rail. During transit, the goods were damaged due to the negligence
of the railway administration.
Issues: The main issue before the Supreme Court was to determine the extent of the railway administration's
liability as a bailee for the loss or damage to the goods during transit.
Ratio Decidendi: The Supreme Court held that the railway administration, acting as a bailee, owed a duty of
utmost care towards the goods entrusted to it for transportation. The court emphasized that the bailee must take
all reasonable precautions to prevent loss or damage to the goods during transit and that any failure to exercise
such care would render the bailee liable for the loss suffered by the bailor. In this case, the railway administration
failed to exercise the requisite degree of care, leading to the damage of the goods. As a result, the court held
the railway administration liable for the loss suffered by the bailor and ordered it to compensate the bailor for
the value of the damaged goods.
Outcome: The decision in this case reaffirmed the principle that the bailee, in this instance, the railway
administration, is liable for any loss or damage to the goods entrusted to it during the period of bailment. It
highlighted the bailee's duty to exercise utmost care and diligence in handling and transporting the goods and
the corresponding liability for any breach of this duty resulting in loss or damage to the goods. This case serves
as a significant precedent in Indian jurisprudence concerning the duties and liabilities of bailees, particularly in
the context of commercial transportation of goods, and underscores the importance of holding bailees
accountable for any negligence or failure to exercise due care in fulfilling their obligations as custodians of the
goods entrusted to them.

Legal Principles and Exceptions

1. Distinction between Bailment and Pledge:
 Bailment: Bailment is a legal relationship where one party (the bailor) delivers goods to another party
(the bailee) for a specific purpose under an agreement, express or implied, that the goods will be
returned or disposed of in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The bailee does not acquire
ownership of the goods but merely possesses them for the specified purpose.
 Pledge: Pledge, on the other hand, involves the delivery of goods by a debtor (the pledgor) to a creditor
(the pledgee) as security for a debt or obligation. Unlike in bailment, where the goods are delivered for
a specific purpose, in pledge, the creditor holds possession of the goods as security until the debt is
repaid. The pledgee has a special property interest in the goods until the debt is discharged.
 Example: A lends his car to B, who sells it to C without A's consent. If C purchases the car in good faith
from B, who was entrusted with possession of the car by A, C acquires good title to the car, despite B's
lack of ownership rights. This scenario illustrates an exception to the legal maxim "Nemo Dat Quod Non
Habet," where a person who receives goods from a party entrusted with possession by the rightful
owner may acquire good title to the goods, even if the transferor lacks ownership rights.
2. Rights and Obligations of Finder of Goods:
 Rights: The finder of lost goods generally has a possessory right over the goods until the rightful owner
claims them. If the owner does not claim the goods within a reasonable time, the finder may acquire
legal ownership through adverse possession. However, the finder must make reasonable efforts to locate
the owner and return the goods.

Page 10 of 48
  Obligations: The finder of lost goods has an obligation to take reasonable steps to locate and return
the goods to the rightful owner. If the owner is not known, the finder must report the find to the
appropriate authorities or make efforts to publicize the discovery. Failure to fulfill these obligations may
result in legal consequences.
 Example: A finds a lost wallet containing cash and identification cards on the street. A has a possessory
right over the wallet and its contents until the rightful owner claims them. A must make reasonable
efforts to locate the owner and return the wallet. If the owner does not claim the wallet within a
reasonable time, A may acquire legal ownership through adverse possession. This example illustrates
the rights and obligations of a finder of goods in accordance with the legal principle governing lost
property.
3. Legal Maxim "Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet" (No One Can Pass a Better Title Than What He Himself
Has):
 This legal maxim signifies the principle that a person cannot transfer a better title to goods than what
they themselves possess. In other words, a person cannot convey more rights to someone else than
they themselves have.
 Exceptions to this rule include transactions involving a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of
any defects in the transferor's title, transactions with a person who has voidable title but subsequently
transfers good title to a bona fide purchaser, and transactions involving entrustment of goods to a
merchant who deals in goods of that kind.
 Example: A purchases a stolen watch from B without knowing that it was stolen. A obtains a good title
to the watch as a bona fide purchaser for value, despite B's lack of ownership rights. This example
demonstrates an exception to the legal maxim "Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet," where a bona fide
purchaser for value without notice of any defects in the transferor's title may acquire good title to the
goods, even if the transferor lacks ownership rights.

Understanding Agency Relationships

Definition of agency and its essential elements, Various modes of creating agency and Types of agencies and
functions of different types of agents.
Definition of Agency: Agency is a legal relationship in which one person, known as the principal, grants
authority to another person, known as the agent, to act on their behalf in various matters. This relationship
allows the agent to make decisions, enter into contracts, and perform other actions on behalf of the principal
with third parties. The agency relationship is established through an agreement, either express or implied,
between the principal and the agent.
Essential Elements of Agency:
1. Consent:
o Consent refers to the voluntary agreement of the principal to grant authority to the agent to
act on their behalf. This agreement can be explicit or implicit, depending on the circumstances.
o Both parties must enter into the agency relationship willingly, without any coercion or duress.
2. Fiduciary Relationship:
o The agency relationship is characterized by a fiduciary duty owed by the agent to the principal.
A fiduciary duty requires the agent to act in the best interests of the principal at all times and
to avoid any conflicts of interest.
o The agent must prioritize the principal's interests above their own and must not engage in any
actions that could harm or disadvantage the principal.
3. Control:
o The principal retains the right to control or direct the actions of the agent within the scope of
the agency relationship. This control allows the principal to dictate the parameters within which
the agent can act on their behalf.
o The principal may provide specific instructions or guidelines to the agent regarding the tasks
they are authorized to perform and the manner in which they should be carried out.
4. Agency Capacity:
o Both the principal and the agent must have the legal capacity to enter into the agency
relationship. This means that they must be competent to understand the nature and
consequences of their actions.
o If either party lacks the capacity to enter into a contract, the agency relationship may be
deemed invalid or unenforceable.
Example: A practical example of agency is when a homeowner, A, hires a real estate agent, B, to sell their
property. In this scenario, A is the principal, and B is the agent. A grants B the authority to act on their behalf in
marketing the property, negotiating with potential buyers, and entering into contracts for the sale of the property.
B, as the agent, owes a fiduciary duty to A, meaning they must act in A's best interests and follow A's instructions
within the scope of the agency relationship.

Let's now elaborate on the various modes of creating agency:

1. Express Agency: Express agency is created through an explicit agreement between the principal and
the agent, either orally or in writing. The terms of the agency relationship are clearly defined, including the
scope of the agent's authority, the duties and responsibilities of both parties, and any limitations on the
agent's actions.

Page 11 of 48
  Example: A signs a written contract appointing B as their exclusive sales agent for a specified
period. The contract outlines B's authority to market and sell A's products, the commission
structure, and the duration of the agency relationship.
2. Implied Agency: Implied agency arises from the conduct of the parties or the circumstances of the
situation, indicating that an agency relationship exists even though there is no explicit agreement. The
actions or behavior of the parties imply that one is acting as an agent for the other.
 Example: A consistently allows B to negotiate contracts with suppliers on their behalf and pay
invoices using A's company funds. Even though there is no formal agreement, B's actions imply
that they have the authority to act as A's purchasing agent.
3. Apparent Agency: Apparent agency is created when the principal holds out the agent as having authority
to act on their behalf, leading third parties to reasonably believe that the agent has such authority. The
principal's actions or representations create the appearance of an agency relationship.
 Example: A allows B to use A's company logo, business cards, and office space, leading customers
to believe that B is an employee or representative of A's company. Third parties reasonably believe
that B has the authority to enter into contracts on behalf of A's company.
4. Agency by Estoppel: Agency by estoppel is created when the principal's actions or representations lead
third parties to believe that an agency relationship exists, and the principal is then estopped from denying
the existence of the agency relationship. The principal's conduct gives rise to the appearance of agency, and
they are subsequently bound by it.
 Example: A allows B to represent themselves as A's authorized agent to potential clients and
provides B with business cards and marketing materials identifying them as such. Third parties rely
on these representations and enter into contracts with B on A's behalf. A cannot later deny the
agency relationship when disputes arise.
5. Agency by Ratification: Agency by ratification is created when the principal retroactively approves or
ratifies the actions of an unauthorized agent, thereby creating an agency relationship after the fact. The
principal accepts or adopts the agent's actions as if they had been authorized from the beginning.
 Example: A, an artist, discovers that B has sold several of their paintings without prior
authorization. Instead of rejecting the sales, A decides to accept the proceeds and acknowledges
B's actions as their agent. A ratifies the sales, thereby creating an agency relationship with B
retroactively.
These various modes of creating agency provide flexibility in establishing legal relationships between principals
and agents, allowing for different circumstances and arrangements to be accommodated based on the needs and
preferences of the parties involved.
Let's further elaborate on the types of agencies and the functions of different types of agents:
1. General Agency: General agency occurs when the agent is authorized to perform a broad range of
tasks on behalf of the principal within a specified area or scope of authority. The agent has the authority
to act on behalf of the principal in various matters without specific limitations. Example: A hires B as
their general manager to oversee all aspects of their business operations, including sales, marketing,
human resources, and finance. B has the authority to make decisions and take actions on behalf of A in
the day-to-day management of the business.
2. Special Agency: Special agency occurs when the agent is authorized to perform specific tasks or
transactions on behalf of the principal, typically for a limited duration or purpose. The agent's authority
is restricted to particular actions or objectives defined by the principal. Example: A appoints B as their
real estate agent to sell a specific property owned by A. B's authority is limited to marketing and
negotiating the sale of that particular property, and their agency terminates once the transaction is
completed.
3. Universal Agency: Universal agency occurs when the agent is granted broad authority to act on
behalf of the principal in all matters, similar to a power of attorney. The agent has comprehensive
authority to represent the principal and make decisions on their behalf across various areas of interest.
Example: A grants B a power of attorney authorizing them to manage all of A's financial affairs, legal
matters, and personal affairs. B has the authority to enter into contracts, make investments, sign
documents, and take any other actions necessary to represent A's interests.
4. Sub-Agency: Sub-agency arises when an agent delegate some or all of their authority to another
agent to act on their behalf, with the original agent still retaining liability to the principal. The sub-agent
acts under the authority of the primary agent and carries out tasks on their behalf. Example: A, a real
estate agent, delegates the task of showing properties to potential buyers to B, who works as a sales
assistant under A's supervision. B acts as a sub-agent of A and assists in facilitating property viewings,
but A remains responsible for B's actions.
Functions of Agents: Agents may perform various functions depending on their role and the scope of their
authority. These functions may include:
 Negotiating Contracts: Agents negotiate agreements, contracts, or transactions on behalf of the
principal with third parties.
 Entering into Agreements: Agents enter into legally binding agreements or contracts with third
parties on behalf of the principal.

Page 12 of 48
  Representing the Principal: Agents represent the principal's interests in legal matters, negotiations,
or dealings with third parties.
 Managing Financial Affairs: Agents manage the principal's financial assets, investments, payments,
and financial transactions.
 Making Decisions: Agents make decisions on behalf of the principal within the scope of their authority,
exercising judgment and discretion to advance the principal's interests.
These functions of agents are carried out in accordance with the authority granted to them by the principal and
within the parameters defined by the agency relationship.

Termination of Agency Relationships

Concept of Termination of Agency Relationship: Termination of an agency relationship refers to the
cessation or ending of the legal relationship between the principal and the agent. Once the agency relationship
is terminated, the agent no longer has the authority to act on behalf of the principal, and the principal is no
longer bound by the actions of the agent. Termination can occur for various reasons, including fulfilment of the
agency's purpose, expiration of the agency agreement, mutual agreement between the parties, or by operation
of law.

Various Modes of Terminating Agency Relationships:

1. Fulfilment of Purpose: The agency relationship terminates upon the completion of the purpose for
which it was established. Once the objective or task specified in the agency agreement is accomplished,
the agency relationship automatically comes to an end. Example: A hires B as their real estate agent to
sell a property. Once the property is sold and the transaction is completed, the agency relationship
terminates.
2. Expiration of Time: If the agency agreement specifies a duration or time limit, the agency relationship
terminates upon the expiration of that period. Example: A hires B as their marketing agent for a one-
year term. At the end of the one-year period, the agency relationship automatically terminates.
3. Mutual Agreement: The principal and the agent may mutually agree to terminate the agency
relationship at any time, provided there are no contractual obligations that prevent such termination.
Example: A and B agree to terminate their agency agreement due to a change in business
circumstances. They sign a mutual termination agreement, and the agency relationship ends.
4. Revocation by Principal: The principal has the unilateral right to revoke or terminate the agency
relationship at any time, even if there is an existing agency agreement, unless the agreement specifies
otherwise. Example: A hires B as their attorney-in-fact through a power of attorney document. A later
revokes the power of attorney, terminating B's authority to act on A's behalf.
5. Renunciation by Agent: The agent may renounce or terminate the agency relationship by giving notice
to the principal, provided they do not breach any contractual obligations or duties owed to the principal.
Example: B, acting as A's real estate agent, decides to resign from their position due to personal
reasons. B informs A of their decision to terminate the agency relationship.
6. Death or Incapacity: The agency relationship terminates automatically upon the death or legal
incapacity of either the principal or the agent, as the agent's authority to act on behalf of the principal
ceases. Example: A, the principal, passes away. The agency relationship between A and B, the agent,
terminates automatically upon A's death.
7. Completion of Transaction: If the agency relationship is established for a specific transaction or task,
the relationship terminates upon the completion of that transaction or task. Example: A hires B as their
agent to purchase a specific property. Once the property is acquired, the agency relationship terminates.
These modes of terminating agency relationships provide the principal and the agent with flexibility in ending
the relationship based on various circumstances, ensuring that both parties can move on from the agency
arrangement when appropriate.
Let's delve into the examination of the methods through which agency relationships come to an end:
1. Fulfilment of Purpose: The agency relationship terminates upon the completion of the purpose for
which it was established. Once the objective or task specified in the agency agreement is accomplished,
the agency relationship automatically comes to an end. Example: A hires B as their real estate agent to
sell a property. Once the property is sold and the transaction is completed, the agency relationship
terminates.
2. Expiration of Time: If the agency agreement specifies a duration or time limit, the agency
relationship terminates upon the expiration of that period. Example: A hires B as their marketing agent
for a one-year term. At the end of the one-year period, the agency relationship automatically terminates.
3. Mutual Agreement: The principal and the agent may mutually agree to terminate the agency
relationship at any time, provided there are no contractual obligations that prevent such termination.
Example: A and B agree to terminate their agency agreement due to a change in business
circumstances. They sign a mutual termination agreement, and the agency relationship ends.
4. Revocation by Principal: The principal has the unilateral right to revoke or terminate the agency
relationship at any time, even if there is an existing agency agreement, unless the agreement specifies
otherwise. Example: A hires B as their attorney-in-fact through a power of attorney document. A later
revokes the power of attorney, terminating B's authority to act on A's behalf.

Page 13 of 48
 5. Renunciation by Agent: The agent may renounce or terminate the agency relationship by giving
notice to the principal, provided they do not breach any contractual obligations or duties owed to the
principal. Example: B, acting as A's real estate agent, decides to resign from their position due to
personal reasons. B informs A of their decision to terminate the agency relationship.
6. Death or Incapacity: The agency relationship terminates automatically upon the death or legal
incapacity of either the principal or the agent, as the agent's authority to act on behalf of the principal
ceases. Example: A, the principal, passes away. The agency relationship between A and B, the agent,
terminates automatically upon A's death.
7. Completion of Transaction: If the agency relationship is established for a specific transaction or
task, the relationship terminates upon the completion of that transaction or task. Example: A hires B as
their agent to purchase a specific property. Once the property is acquired, the agency relationship
terminates.
These methods through which agency relationships come to an end provide the principal and the agent with
various options for terminating the relationship based on different circumstances and considerations.
Understanding these methods helps ensure that agency relationships are properly managed and concluded when
appropriate.

Essentials and Nature of Partnership

Define Partnership and its essentials
Definition of Partnership: Partnership refers to a business relationship between two or more persons who
agree to carry on a business together with the aim of making a profit. It is one of the most common forms of
business organization where individuals combine their resources, skills, and efforts to operate a business entity.
Essentials of Partnership:

1. Agreement: The existence of a partnership requires an agreement between two or more persons to
carry on a business together. This agreement may be oral or written, explicit or implied, but it must
demonstrate a mutual intention to create a partnership. Example: A and B agree to start a catering
business together, contributing capital, labor, and expertise to the venture. Their agreement to share
profits and losses indicates the formation of a partnership.
2. Sharing of Profits: Partnerships involve the sharing of profits generated from the business operations
among the partners. While the sharing of profits is a crucial element, it is not necessary that profits are
divided equally among partners. Example: A and B agree to split profits from their clothing store based
on their respective capital contributions, with A receiving 60% of profits and B receiving 40%.
3. Joint Ownership and Mutual Agency: Partnerships entail joint ownership and mutual agency,
meaning each partner has the authority to act on behalf of the partnership and bind it legally in the
ordinary course of business. This mutual agency extends to all partners, allowing each partner to enter
into contracts, make decisions, and conduct business operations on behalf of the partnership. Example:
A, as a partner in a law firm, has the authority to sign client contracts, negotiate deals, and make
business decisions on behalf of the firm, with these actions legally binding on the partnership.
4. Contribution of Capital and Resources: Each partner must contribute capital, assets, or skills to the
partnership to facilitate its operations and achieve its objectives. Contributions may include financial
investments, property, equipment, expertise, or labor. Example: A contributes $50,000 in capital to
start a partnership with B, who contributes valuable industry experience and contacts. Both
contributions are essential for the success of the partnership.
5. Business with a View to Profit: Partnerships must conduct business activities with the primary
objective of making a profit. While partnerships may engage in charitable or nonprofit activities, the
primary purpose remains the generation of profit for the partners. Example: A and B form a partnership
to manufacture and sell organic skincare products. Their primary goal is to generate revenue and profit
from product sales in the market.
Exceptions: There are exceptions to the formation of a partnership, such as:
 Joint ownership without the intention to carry on a business for profit does not constitute a partnership.
 Certain professional relationships, like lawyers or accountants operating in partnership, may have
specific regulatory requirements that differ from general business partnerships.

Let's discuss the rights, duties, and liabilities of partners in a partnership:

1. Rights of Partners:
 Right to Participate in Management: Each partner has the right to participate in the management
and decision-making processes of the partnership unless otherwise agreed upon in the partnership
agreement.
 Right to Share Profits: Partners have the right to share in the profits of the partnership according to
the terms of the partnership agreement or in proportion to their respective contributions.
 Right to Inspect Books and Records: Partners have the right to inspect and access the books,
records, and accounts of the partnership to ensure transparency and accountability.
 Right to Compensation: Partners may be entitled to compensation for services rendered to the
partnership, subject to the terms of the partnership agreement.
 Right to Information: Partners have the right to receive timely and accurate information about the
affairs and financial status of the partnership.

Page 14 of 48
  Right to Dissolve the Partnership: In certain circumstances, partners have the right to dissolve the
partnership, either by mutual agreement or through legal proceedings.
2. Duties of Partners:
 Duty of Loyalty: Partners owe a duty of loyalty to the partnership and must act in its best interests.
This duty requires partners to avoid conflicts of interest, self-dealing, and actions detrimental to the
partnership.
 Duty of Care: Partners must exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in the management and
operation of the partnership's affairs.
 Duty of Good Faith: Partners are obligated to act in good faith and deal fairly with each other and with
the partnership's creditors, employees, and other stakeholders.
 Duty to Account: Partners must keep accurate records of partnership transactions, finances, and
assets and provide an account of these to other partners upon request.
 Duty to Inform: Partners have a duty to inform other partners of any material information relevant to
the partnership's affairs and business decisions.
3. Liabilities of Partners:
 Unlimited Liability: In a general partnership, partners have unlimited personal liability for the debts,
obligations, and liabilities of the partnership. This means that creditors can seek recourse against the
personal assets of individual partners to satisfy partnership debts.
 Joint and Several Liability: Partners may be jointly and severally liable for partnership obligations,
meaning creditors can pursue any one or all partners for the full amount of the debt.
 Liability for Wrongful Acts: Partners may be held personally liable for their own wrongful acts or
misconduct committed in the course of partnership business.
 Liability for Contracts: Partners are generally bound by the contracts entered into by the partnership
within the scope of its ordinary business activities.
 Liability for Tortious Acts: Partners may be liable for tortious acts or negligence committed by other
partners or employees of the partnership in the course of business.
Let's look into the element of agency in a partnership firm:
1. Definition of Agency in Partnership: In the context of a partnership firm, agency refers to the legal
relationship that exists between partners and the partnership entity, where each partner acts as an agent
for the partnership within the scope of their authority. This agency relationship is based on the principle of
mutual agency, wherein each partner has the authority to act on behalf of the partnership and bind it legally
in the ordinary course of business.
2. Mutual Agency: Mutual agency means that each partner in a partnership firm acts as both a principal
and an agent. This implies that:
a) Partners as Principals: Each partner is considered a principal with the authority to bind the
partnership to contracts and transactions entered into on behalf of the partnership.
b) Partners as Agents: Simultaneously, each partner also acts as an agent of the partnership, with the
authority to act on its behalf and represent its interests to third parties.
3. Authority of Partners:
a) Express Authority: Partners may have express authority granted to them through the partnership
agreement or by mutual consent of all partners. This express authority specifies the scope of actions
each partner can undertake on behalf of the partnership.
b) Implied Authority: Partners also have implied authority to perform acts necessary or customary in
the ordinary course of partnership business, even if not explicitly stated in the partnership agreement.
This implied authority arises from the nature of the partnership's business and the partners' roles within
it.
c) Apparent Authority: Additionally, partners may have apparent authority, which is authority that a
third party reasonably believes a partner possesses based on the partner's conduct, position within the
partnership, or representations made by the partnership.
4. Acts Binding on the Partnership:
a) Any act or contract entered into by a partner within the scope of their authority binds the partnership,
making the partnership legally liable for the consequences of those actions.
b) Third parties dealing with a partner in good faith and without knowledge of any limitations on the
partner's authority can enforce contracts and transactions against the partnership.
5. Limitations on Authority: Partners' authority may be limited by the partnership agreement, state law,
or specific instructions from other partners. Acts performed by a partner outside the scope of their authority
may not bind the partnership.
6. Liability for Partner's Acts: Partners are jointly and severally liable for the acts and obligations of their
fellow partners undertaken within the scope of the partnership's business. This means that each partner
may be held personally liable for the actions of other partners.
7. Duty of Care:
 Partners owe a duty of care to the partnership and to each other when exercising their authority as
agents. This duty requires partners to act prudently, in good faith, and in the best interests of the
partnership.
Let's clarify the status and liabilities of a minor in a partnership firm:
1. Status of a Minor in a Partnership Firm:

Page 15 of 48
 a) A minor is an individual who has not attained the age of majority, which is typically 18 years old in most
jurisdictions. In the context of a partnership firm, a minor may be admitted to the benefits of the
partnership but cannot be a full-fledged partner.
b) However, Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, allows a minor to be admitted to the benefits
of a partnership. This means that a minor can share in the profits of the partnership and have an interest
in the partnership property, but they cannot take an active role in managing the affairs of the
partnership.
2. Liabilities of a Minor in a Partnership Firm:
a) While a minor may be entitled to share in the profits of the partnership, they are not personally liable
for the debts, obligations, or losses of the partnership beyond the extent of their capital contribution or
share of profits.
b) The liability of a minor in a partnership firm is limited to the extent of their investment in the partnership.
If the partnership incurs debts or liabilities exceeding the minor's share of profits, the creditors cannot
enforce those debts against the minor's personal assets.
c) However, the minor's share of profits and assets in the partnership may be liable for the satisfaction of
partnership debts and obligations. If the partnership is unable to meet its obligations, the minor's share
may be used to settle the debts owed by the partnership.
3. Position of Minor Upon Attaining Majority:
a) Upon reaching the age of majority, a minor has the option to either continue their association with the
partnership and become a full-fledged partner or disassociate themselves from the partnership. If they
choose to continue, they become fully liable for the debts and obligations of the partnership from that
point onward.
b) If a minor chooses to disassociate from the partnership upon attaining majority, they may either demand
the return of their capital contribution along with their share of accumulated profits or choose to remain
a partner in the partnership.
4. Guardian's Consent and Liability:
a) A minor's admission to the benefits of a partnership requires the consent of their guardian or parent.
The guardian acts on behalf of the minor and is responsible for overseeing the minor's interests in the
partnership.
b) While the guardian may consent to the minor's participation in the partnership, they are not personally
liable for the debts or obligations of the partnership unless they have also become a partner in their
own right.
5. Restrictions on a Minor's Activities: Due to their status as minors, individuals admitted to the benefits
of a partnership cannot actively participate in the management or decision-making processes of the
partnership. They are limited to sharing in the profits and enjoying the benefits of the partnership as passive
investors.
Admission, Expulsion, and Retirement of Partners
Let's discuss the admission and expulsion of partners in a partnership:
1. Admission of Partners:
a) By Agreement: New partners may be admitted to a partnership by mutual agreement among the
existing partners. This agreement can be formalized through an amended partnership agreement or by
the execution of a new partnership agreement.
b) By Investment: A person may be admitted as a partner by contributing capital or assets to the
partnership. The amount of the investment and the terms of admission are typically negotiated between
the prospective partner and the existing partners.
c) By Inheritance or Will: In some cases, an individual may become a partner in a partnership firm
through inheritance or by virtue of being named as a partner in a will or testamentary document.
d) By Purchase: An individual may purchase an existing partner's share of the partnership, thereby
acquiring the rights and obligations associated with partnership membership.
e) By Estoppel: In certain situations, a person who holds themselves out as a partner or allows others to
believe they are a partner may be deemed to have been admitted to the partnership by estoppel, even
if no formal agreement exists.
2. Expulsion of Partners:
a) By Agreement: Partners may agree to the terms and conditions under which a partner can be expelled
from the partnership. These terms are typically outlined in the partnership agreement and may include
grounds for expulsion and the process for initiating and conducting expulsion proceedings.
b) By Unanimous Consent: In some partnerships, expulsion may require the unanimous consent of all
partners. This ensures that all partners are in agreement before a partner is expelled from the
partnership.
c) By Legal Action: Partnerships may seek to expel a partner through legal action if the partner has
engaged in misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty, or other actions that warrant expulsion. Legal action
may involve filing a lawsuit or petitioning the court for judicial intervention.
d) By Operation of Law: Certain events or circumstances may lead to the automatic expulsion of a
partner from the partnership by operation of law. For example, if a partner becomes incapacitated,
declared bankrupt, or convicted of a crime, they may be automatically expelled from the partnership.

Page 16 of 48
3. Grounds for Expulsion:
a) Misconduct: Partners may be expelled for engaging in misconduct that violates the partnership
agreement or breaches their fiduciary duties to the partnership and other partners.
b) Breach of Agreement: Expulsion may be warranted if a partner consistently fails to fulfill their
obligations under the partnership agreement or engages in conduct that is detrimental to the
partnership's interests.
c) Financial Mismanagement: Partners may be expelled for mismanaging partnership finances,
embezzling funds, or engaging in fraudulent activities that harm the partnership or its creditors.
4. Process of Expulsion:
a) Notice: The partnership agreement typically outlines the process for initiating expulsion proceedings,
which may include providing the partner with written notice of the proposed expulsion and the grounds
for expulsion.
b) Opportunity to Respond: Partners facing expulsion are usually given an opportunity to respond to the
allegations against them and present their case before a decision is made.
c) Vote: Depending on the partnership agreement, expulsion may require a vote by the remaining
partners. The threshold for expulsion and the voting process may vary depending on the terms of the
partnership agreement.
d) Legal Review: In some cases, expulsion proceedings may be subject to legal review to ensure
compliance with the partnership agreement and applicable laws.

Let's explore the various methods of partner retirement and their liabilities afterward in a partnership:

1. Voluntary Retirement:
 Agreement: A partner may voluntarily retire from a partnership by mutual agreement with the
remaining partners. This usually involves executing a retirement agreement that outlines the terms and
conditions of the retirement, including the distribution of the retiring partner's share of assets and
liabilities.
 Notice: The retiring partner typically provides advance notice to the other partners of their intention to
retire, allowing the partnership to plan for the transition and make necessary arrangements.
 Settlement: Upon retirement, the retiring partner's share of partnership assets and liabilities is settled
according to the terms of the partnership agreement or the retirement agreement. This may involve the
payment of any outstanding debts or liabilities owed by the partnership and the distribution of assets
to the retiring partner.
2. Buyout or Redemption:
 Buyout Agreement: Partners may enter into a buyout agreement whereby the remaining partners
agree to purchase the retiring partner's interest in the partnership for a predetermined price or formula.
This allows the retiring partner to exit the partnership while providing liquidity for their investment.
 Redemption: In some partnerships, the partnership itself may have the option to redeem the retiring
partner's interest in the partnership by paying them a predetermined amount or purchasing their share
of partnership assets.
 Payment Terms: The buyout or redemption agreement typically specifies the terms of payment,
including the timing, method, and amount of payment to the retiring partner. Payment may be made in
cash, promissory notes, or other forms of consideration.
3. Sale of Interest:
 Third-Party Sale: A retiring partner may sell their interest in the partnership to a third party, such as
an existing partner, an outside investor, or another entity. The sale price and terms are negotiated
between the retiring partner and the buyer, subject to approval by the remaining partners.
 Assignment: Upon sale of their interest, the retiring partner assigns their rights and obligations in the
partnership to the buyer, who assumes their position as a partner and becomes liable for their share of
partnership debts and obligations.
4. Dissolution and Liquidation:
 Voluntary Dissolution: In some cases, a partner's retirement may trigger the voluntary dissolution of
the partnership, whereby the partnership ceases operations and winds up its affairs. Assets are
liquidated, debts are paid off, and any remaining proceeds are distributed among the partners, including
the retiring partner.
 Liability for Partnership Obligations: Even after retirement, a partner may remain liable for
partnership obligations that arose during their tenure as a partner. This includes debts, contracts, and
other liabilities incurred by the partnership before the retirement date.
5. Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) and Limited Partnerships:
 Conversion: In certain jurisdictions, partners may have the option to convert the partnership into a
limited liability partnership (LLP) or a limited partnership, where partners have limited liability for
partnership debts and obligations. This allows retiring partners to limit their liability exposure after
retirement.

Page 17 of 48
  Withdrawal of Capital: Retiring partners in limited liability partnerships or limited partnerships may
be required to withdraw their capital contributions from the partnership upon retirement, thereby
reducing their ongoing liability exposure.

Let's delve into the modes of dissolution of a partnership and their consequences, including the
settlement of accounts:
1. Dissolution by Agreement:
 Voluntary Decision: Partners may decide to dissolve the partnership by mutual agreement, either
because they no longer wish to continue the business together or because they have achieved the
objectives for which the partnership was formed.
 Consequences:
o Upon agreement to dissolve, the partnership ceases to carry on its business activities.
o Assets are liquidated, debts are paid off, and any remaining proceeds are distributed among
the partners according to their respective shares.
o The partnership agreement or a separate dissolution agreement may outline the specific
procedures for winding up the partnership affairs and distributing assets.
2. Dissolution by Notice:
 Term Partnership: If the partnership is formed for a fixed term or for the accomplishment of a specific
project, it automatically dissolves upon the expiry of the term or completion of the project.
 Consequences:
o The partnership is dissolved automatically without the need for any formal action.
o Partners must wind up the partnership affairs and settle accounts as per the terms of the
partnership agreement or applicable law.
o Assets are liquidated, debts are paid off, and any remaining proceeds are distributed among
the partners.
3. Dissolution by Expulsion of Partner:
 Grounds for Expulsion: Partners may be expelled from the partnership in accordance with the terms
of the partnership agreement or by unanimous consent of the remaining partners for reasons such as
misconduct, breach of agreement, or incapacity.
 Consequences:
o The expelled partner's interest in the partnership is terminated, and they cease to be a partner.
o The partnership continues with the remaining partners, who must settle the accounts with the
expelled partner.
o The expelled partner may be entitled to their share of partnership assets and profits, subject
to the terms of the partnership agreement or a separate expulsion agreement.
4. Dissolution by Bankruptcy or Insolvency:
 Bankruptcy of Partner: If a partner becomes bankrupt or insolvent, it may lead to the automatic
dissolution of the partnership under applicable bankruptcy laws or partnership agreements.
 Consequences:
o The partnership may be dissolved automatically upon the bankruptcy or insolvency of a partner.
o The remaining partners must settle the accounts, liquidate assets, and distribute proceeds in
accordance with bankruptcy laws and partnership agreements.
o Creditors of the bankrupt partner may have priority claims against partnership assets to satisfy
outstanding debts.
5. Dissolution by Court Order:
 Legal Action: A partnership may be dissolved by court order in cases of fraud, misconduct, oppression,
or other circumstances warranting judicial intervention.
 Consequences:
o The court may order the dissolution of the partnership and appoint a liquidator to wind up the
partnership affairs and settle accounts.
o Assets are liquidated, debts are paid off, and any remaining proceeds are distributed among
the partners according to their respective shares.
o The court may also adjudicate disputes among partners and creditors and ensure equitable
distribution of assets.
Settlement of Accounts:
 Asset Liquidation: Upon dissolution, the partnership's assets are liquidated, including inventory,
equipment, and investments. Proceeds from the sale of assets are used to pay off partnership debts
and liabilities.
 Debt Settlement: Partnership debts, loans, and obligations are settled using the proceeds from asset
liquidation. Creditors are paid off in accordance with their priority claims and applicable laws.
 Distribution of Surplus: After settling debts and liabilities, any remaining surplus funds are distributed
among the partners in accordance with their profit-sharing ratios or as per the terms of the partnership
agreement.

Page 18 of 48
  Final Accounting: Partners must prepare a final account statement detailing the assets, liabilities, and
distributions made during the dissolution process. This ensures transparency and accountability in the
settlement of accounts.

Rights, Duties, and Liabilities of Partners

Let's detail the rights, duties, and liabilities among partners and towards third parties in a partnership:
1. Rights Among Partners:
 Right to Participate in Management: Each partner typically has the right to participate in the
management and decision-making processes of the partnership unless otherwise agreed upon in the
partnership agreement.
 Right to Share in Profits: Partners are entitled to share in the profits of the partnership according to
their respective profit-sharing ratios, as specified in the partnership agreement or determined by mutual
consent.
 Right to Access Partnership Information: Partners have the right to access partnership books,
records, and financial information to monitor the business's operations and financial performance.
 Right to Dissolve the Partnership: Partners may have the right to dissolve the partnership by mutual
agreement or in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement or applicable law.
2. Duties Among Partners:
 Fiduciary Duty: Partners owe a fiduciary duty to each other and to the partnership, which requires
them to act in good faith, with honesty, loyalty, and integrity, and in the best interests of the partnership.
 Duty of Care: Partners must exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in managing partnership
affairs and making decisions that affect the partnership's interests.
 Duty of Loyalty: Partners must avoid conflicts of interest and refrain from engaging in activities that
may compete with the partnership's business or undermine its interests.
 Duty to Contribute: Partners are obligated to contribute capital, assets, or services to the partnership
as agreed upon in the partnership agreement or required for the partnership's operations.
3. Liabilities Among Partners:
 Joint and Several Liability: Partners are jointly and severally liable for partnership debts, obligations,
and liabilities, meaning that each partner is individually liable for the full amount of partnership debts,
regardless of their profit-sharing ratio.
 Unlimited Liability: Partners have unlimited personal liability for partnership debts, which means that
their personal assets may be used to satisfy partnership obligations in the event of insolvency or default.
 Liability for Wrongful Acts: Partners may be held personally liable for wrongful acts, negligence, or
breaches of duty committed in the course of partnership business, regardless of whether the actions
were authorized by the partnership.
4. Duties and Liabilities Towards Third Parties:
 Authority to Bind the Partnership: Partners have the authority to bind the partnership to contracts,
agreements, and transactions entered into on behalf of the partnership within the scope of their
partnership authority.
 Liability for Partnership Obligations: Partners are personally liable for partnership debts, contracts,
and obligations incurred during the course of partnership business, even if the obligations were entered
into by another partner.
 Third-Party Claims: Third parties may hold partners personally liable for partnership debts and
obligations if the partnership assets are insufficient to satisfy the claims, or if the partnership is insolvent
or dissolved.
Let's delve into the rights and duties of partners among themselves and towards third parties in a partnership:
1. Rights Among Partners:
 Right to Participate in Management: Each partner typically has the right to participate in the
management and decision-making processes of the partnership, including voting on important matters
such as business strategies, major investments, and hiring decisions.
 Right to Share in Profits: Partners have the right to share in the profits of the partnership according
to their respective profit-sharing ratios, as specified in the partnership agreement or agreed upon among
the partners.
 Right to Access Information: Partners have the right to access partnership books, records, and
financial information to monitor the business's operations, financial performance, and compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements.
 Right to Dissolve the Partnership: Partners may have the right to dissolve the partnership by mutual
agreement or in accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement or applicable law. This right
allows partners to terminate the partnership if they no longer wish to continue the business together.
2. Duties Among Partners:
 Fiduciary Duty: Partners owe a fiduciary duty to each other and to the partnership, which requires
them to act in good faith, with honesty, loyalty, and integrity, and in the best interests of the partnership.

Page 19 of 48
 This duty includes disclosing material information, avoiding conflicts of interest, and prioritizing the
partnership's interests over personal interests.
 Duty of Care: Partners must exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in managing partnership
affairs and making decisions that affect the partnership's interests. This duty requires partners to act
prudently and responsibly in their roles as partners.
 Duty of Loyalty: Partners must avoid conflicts of interest and refrain from engaging in activities that
may compete with the partnership's business or undermine its interests. This duty ensures that partners
act exclusively in the best interests of the partnership and refrain from self-dealing or acting in their
own personal interests to the detriment of the partnership.
 Duty to Contribute: Partners are obligated to contribute capital, assets, or services to the partnership
as agreed upon in the partnership agreement or required for the partnership's operations. This duty
ensures that partners fulfill their financial and operational commitments to the partnership and
contribute to its success and sustainability.
3. Rights and Duties Towards Third Parties:
 Authority to Bind the Partnership: Partners have the authority to bind the partnership to contracts,
agreements, and transactions entered into on behalf of the partnership within the scope of their
partnership authority. This authority allows partners to act on behalf of the partnership in conducting
business with third parties.
 Liability for Partnership Obligations: Partners are personally liable for partnership debts, contracts,
and obligations incurred during the course of partnership business, even if the obligations were entered
into by another partner. This liability extends to third parties who may hold partners personally liable
for partnership debts and obligations.
 Third-Party Claims: Third parties may hold partners personally liable for partnership debts and
obligations if the partnership assets are insufficient to satisfy the claims, or if the partnership is insolvent
or dissolved. Partners may also be subject to legal action by third parties for breaches of contract,
negligence, or other wrongful acts committed in the course of partnership business.

Dissolution of Partnership Firm

Dissolution in the context of a partnership refers to the process of ending the partnership's existence as a legal
entity. It involves the cessation of the partnership's business operations, the winding up of its affairs, and the
distribution of its assets and liabilities among the partners. Dissolution may occur voluntarily by mutual
agreement of the partners or involuntarily due to certain events or circumstances specified in the partnership
agreement or by law.
Elaboration of Modes of Dissolution:
1. Dissolution by Agreement:
 Voluntary Decision: Partners may decide to dissolve the partnership by mutual agreement, either
because they no longer wish to continue the business together or because they have achieved the
objectives for which the partnership was formed.
 Consequences: Upon agreement to dissolve, the partnership ceases to carry on its business
activities. Assets are liquidated, debts are paid off, and any remaining proceeds are distributed
among the partners according to their respective shares. The partnership agreement or a separate
dissolution agreement may outline the specific procedures for winding up the partnership affairs
and distributing assets.
2. Dissolution by Notice:
 Term Partnership: If the partnership is formed for a fixed term or for the accomplishment of a
specific project, it automatically dissolves upon the expiry of the term or completion of the project.
 Consequences: The partnership is dissolved automatically without the need for any formal action.
Partners must wind up the partnership affairs and settle accounts as per the terms of the
partnership agreement or applicable law. Assets are liquidated, debts are paid off, and any
remaining proceeds are distributed among the partners.
3. Dissolution by Expulsion of Partner:
 Grounds for Expulsion: Partners may be expelled from the partnership in accordance with the
terms of the partnership agreement or by unanimous consent of the remaining partners for reasons
such as misconduct, breach of agreement, or incapacity.
 Consequences: The expelled partner's interest in the partnership is terminated, and they cease
to be a partner. The partnership continues with the remaining partners, who must settle the
accounts with the expelled partner. The expelled partner may be entitled to their share of
partnership assets and profits, subject to the terms of the partnership agreement or a separate
expulsion agreement.
4. Dissolution by Bankruptcy or Insolvency:
 Bankruptcy of Partner: If a partner becomes bankrupt or insolvent, it may lead to the automatic
dissolution of the partnership under applicable bankruptcy laws or partnership agreements.
 Consequences: The partnership may be dissolved automatically upon the bankruptcy or
insolvency of a partner. The remaining partners must settle the accounts, liquidate assets, and

Page 20 of 48
 distribute proceeds in accordance with bankruptcy laws and partnership agreements. Creditors of
the bankrupt partner may have priority claims against partnership assets to satisfy outstanding
debts.
5. Dissolution by Court Order:
 Legal Action: A partnership may be dissolved by court order in cases of fraud, misconduct,
oppression, or other circumstances warranting judicial intervention.
 Consequences: The court may order the dissolution of the partnership and appoint a liquidator to
wind up the partnership affairs and settle accounts. Assets are liquidated, debts are paid off, and
any remaining proceeds are distributed among the partners according to their respective shares.
The court may also adjudicate disputes among partners and creditors and ensure equitable
distribution of assets.
Upon dissolution, several consequences and rights come into play for both the partners and the creditors of the
partnership. Let's elaborate on these aspects:
Consequences of Dissolution:
1. Cessation of Business Operations: The partnership ceases its business activities, and all ongoing
operations come to an end. This includes the closure of any ongoing contracts, projects, or transactions.
2. Liquidation of Assets: The partnership's assets, including cash, inventory, equipment, and
investments, are liquidated to pay off debts, obligations, and liabilities.
3. Settlement of Debts and Liabilities: Partnership debts, loans, and obligations are settled using the
proceeds from asset liquidation. Creditors are paid off in accordance with their priority claims and
applicable laws.
4. Distribution of Surplus: After settling debts and liabilities, any remaining surplus funds are distributed
among the partners in accordance with their profit-sharing ratios or as per the terms of the partnership
agreement.
5. Winding Up Affairs: Partners must wind up the partnership affairs, which may include finalizing
contracts, collecting outstanding receivables, paying off outstanding bills, and filing necessary
paperwork with regulatory authorities.
6. Termination of Legal Existence: The partnership's legal existence comes to an end upon dissolution,
and it ceases to be a separate legal entity. Any ongoing legal proceedings, contracts, or agreements are
typically terminated or transferred to the partners individually.
Rights of Creditors Post-Dissolution:
1. Priority Claims: Creditors of the partnership have priority claims to partnership assets over the
partners' personal assets. They have the right to seek repayment from partnership assets before
partners are entitled to any distributions.
2. Enforcement of Debts: Creditors have the right to enforce their debts against partnership assets,
including filing lawsuits, obtaining judgments, and seizing assets through legal means.
3. Access to Information: Creditors have the right to access partnership books, records, and financial
information to verify debts, monitor asset liquidation, and ensure compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements.
4. Equitable Treatment: Creditors are entitled to fair and equitable treatment during the dissolution
process, including timely communication, transparency regarding asset liquidation, and an opportunity
to participate in distribution proceedings.
5. Legal Recourse: Creditors have the right to pursue legal remedies against partners individually if
partnership assets are insufficient to satisfy their claims. They may seek to hold partners personally
liable for partnership debts and obligations, subject to applicable laws and legal principles.
In India, firms may choose to register under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, but registration is not mandatory.
However, there are distinct advantages to registering a partnership firm, and there are also legal implications for
unregistered firms. Let's discuss the registration requirements for firms and the legal capacity of unregistered
firms:
1. Registration Requirements for Firms:
 Application: Partners must submit an application to the Registrar of Firms in the prescribed format,
along with the requisite fee and supporting documents.
 Partnership Deed: A partnership deed, outlining the terms and conditions of the partnership, must be
drafted and signed by all partners. The deed typically includes details such as the firm's name, address,
nature of business, capital contributions of partners, profit-sharing ratios, and other relevant provisions.
 Details of Partners: The application must include details of all partners, including their names,
addresses, contributions to the partnership, and any other relevant information.
 Publication in Official Gazette: After receiving the application and partnership deed, the Registrar of
Firms publishes a notice in the Official Gazette and a local newspaper to invite objections, if any, from
the public.
 Registration Certificate: If no objections are raised within the specified period, the Registrar of Firms
issues a Certificate of Registration, confirming the formation of the partnership firm.
2. Legal Capacity of Unregistered Firms:
 No Separate Legal Entity: Unregistered firms do not have a separate legal identity distinct from their
partners. Partners are personally liable for the debts, obligations, and liabilities of the firm.

Page 21 of 48
  Limited Rights: Unregistered firms have limited rights and legal capacity compared to registered firms.
They may face challenges in enforcing contracts, accessing credit facilities, and participating in legal
proceedings.
 Restrictions on Legal Action: Unregistered firms may face restrictions on initiating legal action in
their firm's name. Partners may need to sue or be sued individually, which can complicate legal
proceedings and increase personal liability risks.
 Limited Recognition: Unregistered firms may face challenges in establishing credibility, gaining
recognition, and accessing business opportunities compared to registered firms. Many entities, such as
financial institutions, government agencies, and potential clients, prefer to deal with registered firms
due to the legal protections and transparency they offer.
Advantages of Registration:
 Legal Recognition: Registration provides legal recognition to the partnership firm as a separate legal
entity, distinct from its partners. This offers legal protections and benefits, including the ability to sue
and be sued in the firm's name.
 Limited Liability: Registered firms may enjoy limited liability protection, where partners' personal
assets are shielded from business liabilities to some extent. This helps protect partners from personal
financial risks associated with business operations.
 Credibility and Trust: Registration enhances the credibility and trustworthiness of the partnership firm
in the eyes of stakeholders, including clients, suppliers, lenders, and investors. It demonstrates a
commitment to transparency, compliance, and professionalism.
 Access to Legal Remedies: Registered firms have access to legal remedies and mechanisms for
resolving disputes, enforcing contracts, and protecting their rights. This facilitates smoother business
operations and mitigates legal risks.

Remedies for Breach of Contract

Remedies for breach of contract refer to the legal options available to parties when one party fails to fulfill their
obligations under a contract. Let's break down the concept:
Definition: Remedies for breach of contract are the actions or solutions that the law provides to parties when
someone doesn't do what they promised in a contract. They're like tools to fix the problem caused by the breach.
Concept: Imagine you agree to sell your bicycle to someone, and they promise to pay you a certain amount on
a specific date. If the buyer doesn't pay you as promised, they've breached the contract. In this situation, you
have legal remedies you can pursue to address the breach:
1. Seller's Remedies: As the seller, you might want to get compensated for the loss you suffered because
of the buyer's breach. Your remedies could include:
o Damages: You can ask the buyer to pay you money to make up for the loss you suffered
because they didn't pay as promised.
o Specific Performance: You can ask a court to force the buyer to go through with the purchase
and pay you the agreed-upon amount.
2. Buyer's Remedies: If you're the buyer and the seller breaches the contract (for example, by not
delivering the bicycle), you also have options:
o Damages: You can ask the seller to pay you money to cover any losses or extra expenses you
incurred because they didn't deliver the bicycle.
o Specific Performance: You can ask a court to force the seller to deliver the bicycle as agreed.
3. Unpaid Seller's Rights and Duties: If the buyer doesn't pay, the seller becomes an unpaid seller and
has specific rights:

a) Right to Retain Goods: The seller can keep the goods until the buyer pays or sell them to recover
the money owed.
b) Right to Sue for Price: The seller can take legal action to recover the price of the goods from the
buyer.
c) Stoppage in Transit: If the seller learns that the buyer is insolvent, they can stop the goods while
they're on their way to the buyer and reclaim them.
d) Right of Resale: If the seller hasn't received payment and the buyer hasn't taken delivery, the
seller can sell the goods to someone else and claim damages from the original buyer for any loss.

Legal Principles in Sales of Goods

Legal principles in sales of goods encompass various rules and concepts governing the transfer of ownership,
warranties, and remedies for breaches of contract. Here's a brief articulation of some key legal principles:
1. Transfer of Ownership:
o Goods must be transferred from the seller to the buyer in accordance with the terms of the
contract.
o The transfer of ownership typically occurs when the parties intend to pass title, and the goods
are identified in the contract.
2. Implied Conditions and Warranties:

Page 22 of 48
 o Implied conditions and warranties are automatic guarantees that accompany the sale of goods,
even if not explicitly stated in the contract.
o Conditions are essential terms that must be met for the contract to be fulfilled, while warranties
are secondary promises about the quality or performance of the goods.
3. Title and Risk:
o Title refers to ownership of the goods, while risk refers to the responsibility for any loss or
damage to the goods.
o Unless otherwise agreed, title passes when the parties intend it to pass, and risk follows title.
4. Seller's Duties:
o The seller must deliver the goods as specified in the contract, ensuring they conform to any
agreed-upon quality standards.
o The seller is also responsible for providing clear title to the goods and ensuring they are fit for
the purpose intended.
5. Buyer's Rights and Duties:
o The buyer has the right to inspect the goods upon delivery and reject them if they do not
conform to the contract.
o The buyer must accept and pay for the goods if they conform to the contract terms.
6. Remedies for Breach of Contract:
o If either party breaches the contract, the other party may seek remedies such as damages,
specific performance, or cancellation of the contract.
o The specific remedy available depends on the nature and severity of the breach.
7. Performance of the Contract:
o Both parties are expected to perform their obligations under the contract in good faith and in
accordance with the agreed-upon terms.
o Failure to perform may result in legal consequences, including liability for damages.
Definition and Exceptions to Pledge Rule: Let's delve into the legal principles in sales of goods, beginning
with the definition of pledge and the exceptions to the rule that "no one can make a valid pledge who is not the
owner of the goods":
Definition of Pledge: A pledge, also known as pawn or collateral, is a legal arrangement where a person (the
pawnor or pledgor) gives an item of personal property to another person (the pawnee or pledgee) as security
for a debt or obligation. The pawnor retains ownership of the item but transfers possession to the pawnee until
the debt is repaid. If the debt is not repaid within the agreed-upon time, the pawnee may sell the item to recover
the debt.
Exceptions to the Rule "No One Can Make a Valid Pledge Who Is Not the Owner of the Goods":
1. Pledge by Mercantile Agent: A mercantile agent, who has been entrusted with possession of goods
by the owner or with the owner's consent, can pledge the goods as security for a loan or debt incurred
in the ordinary course of business.
2. Pledge by Seller in Possession After Sale: If a seller sells goods but retains possession of them or
documents of title, they can pledge the goods for the same purpose or purposes as they could sell them
under the sale contract.
3. Pledge by Buyer in Possession After Sale: If a buyer of goods obtains possession or documents of
title to the goods before paying the whole price, they can pledge the goods to the extent of any
remaining unpaid balance.
4. Pledge by Person in Possession Under Voidable Contract: If a person obtains possession of goods
under a voidable contract (a contract that can be affirmed or avoided at the option of one party), they
can pledge the goods to the extent of any money advanced by the pawnee in good faith under the
contract.
5. Pledge by Lien Holder: A person who has a lien over the goods (a legal right to retain possession until
a debt is discharged) can pledge the goods to the extent of the lien.
These exceptions recognize certain situations where a person who is not the owner of the goods may still have
the legal authority to pledge them as security for a debt or obligation. They aim to balance the interests of
creditors with the need to facilitate commercial transactions and provide security for loans or debts. It's essential
to understand these exceptions to ensure that pledges are made and enforced correctly under the law.
Condition vs. Warranty
In the context of sales of goods, understanding the distinction between conditions and warranties is crucial as it
determines the legal consequences of a breach in the contract. Let's elaborate on the concepts of condition and
warranty:
1. Condition:
 A condition is a fundamental term of a contract, the breach of which gives the innocent party the
right to treat the contract as repudiated (voided) and seek remedies.
 Conditions are essential to the main purpose of the contract and directly affect its performance.
 If a condition is not met, the innocent party has the option to reject the goods and terminate the
contract, or they can choose to accept the goods and seek damages for any loss suffered due to
the breach.
Example of Condition: Suppose you agree to purchase a new laptop from a seller. The contract specifies
that the laptop must be brand new and in working condition upon delivery. If the laptop is delivered but is
not brand new or is defective, it would constitute a breach of condition. In this case, you would have the

Page 23 of 48
 right to reject the laptop and terminate the contract, or you could accept the laptop and claim damages for
any loss suffered due to the breach.
2. Warranty:
 A warranty is a secondary or ancillary term of a contract, the breach of which entitles the innocent
party to seek damages but does not give them the right to terminate the contract.
 Warranties are subsidiary to the main purpose of the contract and are not considered essential to
its performance.
 If a warranty is breached, the innocent party can seek damages for any loss suffered due to the
breach but cannot terminate the contract unless the breach is so substantial that it deprives the
innocent party of the whole benefit of the contract.
Example of Warranty: Continuing with the laptop example, suppose the seller provides a warranty stating that
the laptop will be free from defects for one year from the date of purchase. If, after purchasing the laptop, you
discover a minor defect that does not substantially affect its functionality, it would constitute a breach of
warranty. In this case, you would be entitled to claim damages for the cost of repairing the defect, but you would
not have the right to terminate the contract.
Implied Conditions and Warranties
In the context of sales of goods, both the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, and common law provide for implied conditions
and warranties to protect the interests of buyers and sellers. Let's delve into the details of implied conditions and
warranties, along with examples and exceptions:
1. Implied Conditions: Implied conditions are those conditions that are automatically included in every
contract for the sale of goods, even if they are not expressly stated. These conditions ensure that the
goods are of acceptable quality and fit for the purpose intended. The Sale of Goods Act, 1930, specifies
certain implied conditions that apply to all contracts for the sale of goods, unless expressly excluded or
varied by the parties.
Examples of Implied Conditions:
a. Condition as to Title: The seller implicitly guarantees that they have the right to sell the
goods, and the buyer will receive them free from any encumbrances or claims by third parties.
b. Condition as to Description: The goods must correspond with the description provided by
the seller. For example, if a seller advertises a product as "brand new," it must indeed be new and not
used or refurbished.
c. Condition as to Quality or Fitness for Purpose: The goods must be of merchantable
quality and fit for the purpose intended. For instance, if a buyer purchases a refrigerator for storing
perishable food items, it must be capable of maintaining a low temperature and preserving the food
properly.
Exceptions to Implied Conditions:
 If the buyer examines the goods before purchase and any defects are apparent, they cannot
later claim breach of implied condition as to defects.
 If the buyer has specific knowledge or expertise regarding the goods and does not rely on the
seller's skill or judgment, certain implied conditions may not apply.
2. Implied Warranties: Implied warranties are assurances or promises about the quality or
performance of goods that are automatically included in a contract, even if not expressly stated. These
warranties provide additional protection to buyers and are intended to ensure that goods meet certain
minimum standards of quality and performance.
Examples of Implied Warranties:
a. Warranty of Merchantability: The goods must be reasonably fit for the ordinary purposes
for which they are used. For example, if a buyer purchases a bicycle, it must be capable of being ridden
safely on roads and pathways.
b. Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose: If the seller knows or is made aware of a
specific purpose for which the buyer requires the goods and the buyer relies on the seller's skill or
judgment, the goods must be fit for that particular purpose. For instance, if a buyer informs the seller
that they need a laptop for graphic design work, the laptop must be capable of running graphic design
software effectively.
Exceptions to Implied Warranties:
 Implied warranties may be excluded or limited by express terms in the contract.
 If the buyer examines the goods before purchase and any defects are apparent, they cannot
later claim breach of implied warranty as to defects.
Types of Implied Conditions
Implied conditions are integral components of contracts for the sale of goods, ensuring that buyers receive goods
of acceptable quality and fit for the intended purpose. Let's explore the various types of implied conditions along
with simple examples and exceptions:
1. Condition as to Title:
 Implied in every contract for the sale of goods, regardless of whether it is expressly stated.
 It assures the buyer that the seller has the right to sell the goods, and the buyer will receive them
free from any encumbrances or claims by third parties.
 Exception: If the seller is not the owner of the goods, this implied condition does not apply unless
the seller has the authority to sell the goods, such as in cases of mercantile agents.
Example: John sells a laptop to Sarah. Implied in the contract is the condition that John has the legal right
to sell the laptop and that Sarah will receive it free from any claims by third parties.
2. Condition as to Description:

Page 24 of 48
  Implied when the buyer relies on the seller's description of the goods in making the purchase.
 It ensures that the goods correspond with the description provided by the seller.
 Exception: If the buyer examines the goods before purchase and any defects are apparent, they
cannot later claim breach of this implied condition.
Example: A seller advertises a car as "low mileage and excellent condition." The buyer purchases the car
based on this description. Implied in the contract is the condition that the car must indeed have low mileage
and be in excellent condition as described.
3. Condition as to Quality or Fitness for Purpose:
 Implied when the buyer relies on the seller's skill or judgment in selecting goods for a particular
purpose.
 It guarantees that the goods are of merchantable quality and fit for the purpose intended.
 Exception: If the buyer has specific knowledge or expertise regarding the goods and does not rely
on the seller's skill or judgment, this implied condition may not apply.
Example: Sarah purchases a bicycle from a bike shop. She informs the seller that she plans to use the
bicycle for commuting to work. Implied in the contract is the condition that the bicycle must be of sufficient
quality to withstand regular use for commuting purposes.
4. Condition as to Sale by Sample:
 Implied when the goods are sold by reference to a sample shown to the buyer.
 It ensures that the goods correspond with the sample in quality and specification.
 Exception: If the buyer has examined the sample before purchase and any defects are apparent,
they cannot later claim breach of this implied condition.
Example: A seller provides a sample of fabric to a buyer and agrees to sell a larger quantity of fabric based
on this sample. Implied in the contract is the condition that the larger quantity of fabric must match the
quality and specifications of the sample provided.
Distinction Between Representations, Warranties, and Conditions
Understanding the distinction between representations, warranties, and conditions is crucial in contract law,
particularly in the context of sales of goods. Let's delve into each concept in detail:
1. Representations:
 Representations are statements of fact made by one party to another during negotiations or before
the contract is formed.
 They are intended to induce the other party to enter into the contract but are not considered
essential terms of the contract.
 Unlike warranties and conditions, the breach of a representation does not automatically give rise
to a right to terminate the contract, although it may entitle the innocent party to claim damages
for any loss suffered due to the misrepresentation.
Example: A seller tells a buyer that a car has only been driven 10,000 miles. This statement is a
representation about the car's mileage.
2. Warranties:
 Warranties are promises or assurances made by one party to another regarding the quality,
condition, or performance of goods or services.
 They are considered secondary or ancillary terms of the contract, providing additional assurances
to the other party.
 Unlike conditions, the breach of a warranty does not entitle the innocent party to terminate the
contract, although it may give rise to a right to claim damages for any loss suffered due to the
breach.
Example: A seller provides a written warranty stating that a laptop will be free from defects for one year.
This warranty assures the buyer of the laptop's quality and performance.
3. Conditions:
 Conditions are essential terms of the contract, the breach of which gives the innocent party the
right to terminate the contract and claim damages.
 They go to the root of the contract and directly affect its performance.
 Unlike warranties, conditions are considered fundamental to the contract's purpose and are
expressly stated as such.
Example: A buyer agrees to purchase a house subject to a condition that the seller will provide a clear title.
If the seller fails to provide a clear title, the buyer has the right to terminate the contract.
Aspect Representations Warranties Conditions
Statements of fact made Promises or assurances
Essential terms of the
during negotiations or regarding the quality,
Definition contract that directly affect
before the contract is condition, or performance
its performance
formed of goods or services
Breach typically gives rise
Breach typically gives rise
to a right to claim Breach gives rise to a right
Breach to a right to claim
damages, but not to terminate the contract
Consequences damages, but not the right
necessarily the right to and claim damages
to terminate the contract
terminate the contract

Page 25 of 48
 Not considered essential Not considered essential Essential terms of the
Essentiality
terms of the contract terms of the contract contract
Provide additional
Made to induce the other
assurances regarding the Fundamental to the
Intent party to enter into the
quality or performance of contract's purpose
contract
goods or services

Transfer of Property in Sale of Goods

The transfer of property in the sale of goods refers to the passing of ownership or title from the seller to the
buyer. It is a crucial aspect of any sale transaction as it determines when the buyer becomes the legal owner of
the goods and assumes all associated rights and responsibilities. Let's delve into the concept in more detail:

Definition: The transfer of property in the sale of goods is governed by the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, in India.
Section 19 of the Act defines the rules regarding the transfer of property in a contract for the sale of specific or
ascertained goods.
Key Concepts:
1. Specific or Ascertained Goods: The goods must be identified and agreed upon by both the buyer and
seller. They may be identified at the time of entering into the contract or subsequently.
2. Intention of the Parties: The transfer of property may occur at different stages of the sale transaction,
depending on the intention of the parties and the terms of the contract.
3. Rules for Transfer of Property:
o Unconditional Contract for Sale: If the contract is unconditional and the goods in a
deliverable state, the property in the goods passes to the buyer when the contract is made,
irrespective of the time of payment or delivery.
o Conditional Contract for Sale: If the contract is subject to a condition (e.g., payment of
price), the property in the goods passes to the buyer only when the condition is fulfilled, unless
the parties agree otherwise.
4. Transfer of Documents of Title: In certain cases, the transfer of property may be linked to the
transfer of documents of title, such as a bill of lading or warehouse receipt.
Example: John agrees to sell his car to Sarah for a specified price. They sign a contract stating that payment
will be made upon delivery of the car. In this case, the transfer of property occurs when John hands over the
keys to Sarah, as the contract is unconditional, and the goods are in a deliverable state.
Rules of Transfer of Property
The rules of transfer of property in the sale of goods outline the circumstances under which ownership or title
passes from the seller to the buyer. Let's explore these rules in detail, along with exceptions and examples where
appropriate:
1. Unconditional Contract for Sale:
 In an unconditional contract for sale, where specific or ascertained goods are in a deliverable state,
the property in the goods passes to the buyer when the contract is made, irrespective of the time
of payment or delivery.
 This rule is based on the principle of agreement and ensures that once the contract is formed, the
buyer becomes the legal owner of the goods.
Example: John agrees to sell his laptop to Sarah for a specified price. They sign a contract, and even though
Sarah has not yet paid or received the laptop, the property in the laptop passes to her when the contract is
made.
2. Conditional Contract for Sale:
 In a conditional contract for sale, where the contract is subject to a condition (e.g., payment of
price), the property in the goods passes to the buyer only when the condition is fulfilled, unless the
parties agree otherwise.
 The passing of property is contingent upon the fulfillment of the specified condition, ensuring that
ownership does not transfer until all conditions are met.
Example: John agrees to sell his car to Sarah, subject to her obtaining financing within a specified time
frame. The property in the car will only pass to Sarah when she obtains financing as per the condition in the
contract.
Exceptions and Additional Considerations:
 Sale on Approval or Sale or Return: If goods are delivered on approval or sale or return basis, the
property in the goods passes to the buyer either upon approval or acceptance after the trial period.
 Sale by Description: If goods are sold by description, the property in the goods passes to the buyer
when the contract is made, provided the buyer has relied on the seller's skill or judgment in selecting
the goods.
Exception Example: Sarah agrees to purchase a painting based on a description provided by the seller. The
property in the painting passes to Sarah when the contract is made, as she relied on the seller's description.
Effects and Procedure of Transfer of Property
The effects and procedure of transfer of property in the sale of goods are significant aspects of commercial
transactions, determining when legal ownership passes from the seller to the buyer. Let's delve into these in
detail, including exceptions and simple examples where necessary:
Effects of Transfer of Property:

Page 26 of 48
 1. Passing of Risk: When the property in the goods transfers to the buyer, the associated risks also pass
from the seller to the buyer. This includes the risk of loss or damage to the goods.
2. Right to Sue: The buyer acquires the right to sue the seller for breach of contract related to the goods
upon the transfer of property. Conversely, the seller loses the right to sue for non-payment or other
breaches related to the goods.
3. Right of Resale: Upon transfer of property, the buyer gains the right to resell the goods to a third
party, subject to any restrictions or conditions in the contract.
4. Right of Possession: The buyer gains the right of possession over the goods upon transfer of property,
allowing them to take physical control and use the goods as intended.
Procedure of Transfer of Property:
1. Identification of Goods: The goods must be specific or ascertained at the time of the contract. If the
goods are unascertained or future goods, the property does not pass until they are identified.
2. Intention of the Parties: The intention of the parties, as expressed in the contract, determines when
the property in the goods passes. This may be explicitly stated or implied from the terms of the contract.
3. Compliance with Conditions: If the contract is subject to any conditions (e.g., payment of price), the
property does not pass until the conditions are fulfilled unless the parties agree otherwise.
4. Transfer of Documents of Title: In certain cases, the transfer of property may be linked to the
transfer of documents of title, such as a bill of lading or warehouse receipt. Transfer of these documents
may signify transfer of property.
Exceptions and Considerations:
 Sale on Approval or Return: If goods are delivered on approval or sale or return basis, the property
may not pass until the buyer approves or accepts the goods after a trial period.
 Sale by Description: If goods are sold by description, the property may pass when the contract is
made, provided the buyer has relied on the seller's description.
Example: John agrees to sell his bicycle to Sarah for a specified price. The contract states that payment will be
made upon delivery. When John hands over the bicycle to Sarah, including the keys and ownership documents,
the property in the bicycle transfers to Sarah, along with associated risks and rights.
Unpaid Seller's Rights Against Goods
The rights of an unpaid seller against goods are provided under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, and are essential
for protecting the seller's interests when a buyer fails to pay for the goods. Let's explore these rights in detail,
including exceptions and simple examples where necessary:
1. Right of Lien:
 An unpaid seller has the right of lien over the goods for which the payment has not been received.
Lien allows the seller to retain possession of the goods until the buyer pays the outstanding amount.
 The right of lien is available:
o Express Lien: When the goods are sold without any stipulation as to credit.
o Implied Lien: When the goods are sold on credit, but the term of credit has expired, or
the buyer becomes insolvent.
Example: John sells a laptop to Sarah on credit. After the due date for payment passes, Sarah fails to make
the payment. John, as the unpaid seller, retains possession of the laptop until Sarah pays the outstanding
amount.
Exceptions: The right of lien may not apply if:
 The seller has waived the right of lien explicitly or implicitly.
 The buyer has obtained possession of the goods under a contract for hire or work and materials,
and the goods are not in the seller's possession.
2. Right of Stoppage in Transit:
 If the seller delivers the goods to a carrier for transmission to the buyer and the buyer becomes
insolvent, the unpaid seller has the right to stop the goods in transit and resume possession until
payment is made.
 The right of stoppage in transit is applicable until the buyer or his agent takes delivery of the goods.
Example: John ships a consignment of electronic devices to Sarah via a courier service. Before Sarah
receives the goods, John learns of Sarah's insolvency. John exercises his right of stoppage in transit by
instructing the courier service to return the goods to him.
Exceptions: The right of stoppage in transit may be lost if:
 The buyer takes actual or constructive delivery of the goods.
 The goods are perishable, and the seller does not exercise the right within a reasonable time.
3. Right of Resale:
 If the goods are perishable or the seller has given notice to the buyer of his intention to resell, an
unpaid seller may resell the goods after giving reasonable notice to the buyer.
 The seller may recover the difference between the contract price and the resale price, along with
any expenses incurred in the resale.
Example: John, as an unpaid seller, gives notice to Sarah of his intention to resell a consignment of
perishable goods. After the expiration of the notice period, John resells the goods to another buyer at a
lower price. John can recover the shortfall in price from Sarah.

Page 27 of 48
 Exceptions: The right of resale may not be available if:
 The seller has expressly waived the right of resale.
 The goods have been sold on credit, and the term of credit has not expired.
Modes of Delivery of Goods and Rules
The modes of delivery of goods and associated rules are crucial aspects of commercial transactions, determining
how goods are transferred from the seller to the buyer. Let's explore these modes and rules in detail, including
exceptions and simple examples where necessary:
1. Actual Delivery:
 Actual delivery occurs when the seller physically hands over the goods to the buyer or their
authorized representative. It involves the transfer of possession and control of the goods from the
seller to the buyer.
Rules and Considerations:
 The delivery must be voluntary and unconditional, without any restrictions or encumbrances.
 If the goods are bulky or perishable, delivery should take place at a reasonable time and place.
 The buyer must accept the goods within a reasonable time after the seller offers delivery.
Example: John sells a painting to Sarah. They arrange to meet at John's gallery, where John physically
hands over the painting to Sarah. This constitutes actual delivery of the goods.
2. Constructive Delivery:
 Constructive delivery occurs when the seller does not physically transfer the goods to the buyer but
does something that symbolizes or represents the transfer of ownership.
Rules and Considerations:
 Constructive delivery may involve handing over the key to a warehouse where the goods are stored
or transferring documents of title, such as a bill of lading or warehouse receipt.
 The intention of the parties and the custom of the trade may influence whether constructive delivery
is valid.
Example: John sells a car to Sarah. Instead of physically handing over the car, John hands over the keys
and the vehicle registration documents to Sarah, symbolizing the transfer of ownership. This constitutes
constructive delivery of the car.
3. Symbolic Delivery:
 Symbolic delivery occurs when the seller transfers some symbolic or representative item associated
with the goods to the buyer, signifying the transfer of ownership.
Rules and Considerations:
 Symbolic delivery may involve transferring a document of title, such as a warehouse receipt or
delivery order, which represents the goods stored in a warehouse.
 The document of title must be properly endorsed or assigned to the buyer to effectuate the transfer
of ownership.
Example: John sells a pallet of goods to Sarah, which is stored in a warehouse. Instead of physically
delivering the goods, John hands over a warehouse receipt to Sarah, indicating her ownership of the goods.
This constitutes symbolic delivery.
Exceptions:
 If the goods are specific or ascertained, actual delivery is preferred over symbolic or constructive
delivery to avoid disputes over ownership.

Contract of Sale and Essential Features

Contract of Sale: A contract of sale is a legal agreement where one person (the seller) agrees to transfer
ownership of goods to another person (the buyer) in exchange for money.
Essential Features:
1. Offer and Acceptance: Example: Rohit offers to sell his smartphone to Priya for ₹10,000. Priya agrees
to buy the smartphone for the specified price.
2. Agreement to Transfer Ownership: Example: Rohit agrees to transfer ownership of the smartphone
to Priya, and Priya agrees to accept ownership upon payment.
3. Consideration: Example: Priya agrees to pay ₹10,000 to Rohit in exchange for the smartphone.
4. Capacity of Parties: Example: Both Rohit and Priya are adults capable of entering into a contract.
5. Intention to Create Legal Relations: Example: Rohit and Priya intend for their agreement to buy and
sell the smartphone to be legally enforceable.
Essential Features of Contract of Sale
The essential features of a contract of sale encompass various aspects that must be present to create a legally
enforceable agreement between the seller and the buyer. Let's elaborate on each of these features:
1. Offer and Acceptance:
 The contract begins with an offer made by one party (the seller) to sell specific goods to another
party (the buyer) at a specified price.
 Acceptance occurs when the buyer agrees to the terms of the offer, indicating their willingness to
purchase the goods at the specified price.

Page 28 of 48
  Both offer and acceptance must be clear, definite, and communicated between the parties.
Example: Rahul offers to sell his bicycle to Priya for ₹2,000. Priya agrees to buy the bicycle for the
specified price.
2. Agreement to Transfer Ownership:
 The parties must reach an agreement to transfer ownership or title of the goods from the seller to
the buyer.
 The seller agrees to transfer ownership of the goods, and the buyer agrees to accept and pay for
the goods.
 This agreement is fundamental to the formation of the contract and distinguishes it from other
types of agreements. Example: Rahul agrees to transfer ownership of the bicycle to Priya, and Priya
agrees to accept ownership upon payment.
3. Consideration:
 Consideration refers to the price or value exchanged between the parties as part of the contract.
 The buyer agrees to pay the seller a specified amount of money or other agreed-upon consideration
in exchange for the goods.
 Consideration is essential for validating the contract and creating binding obligations. Example:
Priya agrees to pay ₹2,000 to Rahul in exchange for the bicycle.
4. Capacity of Parties:
 Both parties must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract of sale.
 This means they must be of legal age, of sound mind, and not under any legal disability that would
prevent them from entering into a contract.
 Capacity ensures that the parties are capable of understanding the terms of the contract and
fulfilling their obligations. Example: Both Rahul and Priya are adults of sound mind, legally capable
of entering into the contract.
5. Intention to Create Legal Relations:
 The parties must have a genuine intention to create legal relations through the contract.
 They must understand that their agreement will be legally enforceable, and they intend to be bound
by the terms of the contract.
 This intention distinguishes a legally binding contract from social or domestic agreements that may
not be legally enforceable. Example: Rahul and Priya understand that their agreement to buy and
sell the bicycle creates a legally binding contract, and they intend to be bound by its terms.
Difference Between Contract of Sale and Agreement to Sell
1. Contract of Sale:
 Definition: A contract of sale is a legally binding agreement where the seller transfers or agrees
to transfer the ownership of goods to the buyer for a price.
 Essential Features: It involves the immediate transfer of ownership, and the buyer becomes the
owner of the goods upon entering into the contract.
 Example: Rahul agrees to sell his laptop to Priya for ₹20,000, and Priya pays the amount. Upon
payment, ownership of the laptop is transferred to Priya.
2. Agreement to Sell:
 Definition: An agreement to sell is a promise to sell goods in the future, under certain conditions,
at a specified price.
 Essential Features: It does not result in the immediate transfer of ownership. The seller promises
to transfer ownership at a later date, subject to fulfillment of conditions.
 Example: Rahul agrees to sell his laptop to Priya for ₹20,000, but the transfer of ownership will
happen upon completion of payment within a month.
Differences:
1. Transfer of Ownership:
o Contract of Sale: Ownership of goods is immediately transferred to the buyer.
o Agreement to Sell: Ownership is promised to be transferred in the future, upon fulfilment of
conditions.
2. Legal Effect:
o Contract of Sale: Creates immediate legal obligations for both parties.
o Agreement to Sell: Establishes future rights and obligations, contingent upon fulfilment of
conditions.
3. Risk and Title:
o Contract of Sale: The buyer assumes the risk and title of the goods immediately upon entering
the contract.
o Agreement to Sell: The seller retains the risk and title until the conditions are fulfilled, and
ownership is transferred.
Exceptions:
 In certain circumstances, an agreement to sell may be treated as a sale, such as when:
o The parties intend for immediate transfer of ownership despite labeling it as an agreement to
sell.

Page 29 of 48
 o The agreement satisfies the requirements of a sale under specific laws or customs.
Example of Exception: Rahul agrees to sell his laptop to Priya for ₹20,000 and hands over possession to Priya.
Even though labelled as an agreement to sell, it functions as a contract of sale due to the immediate transfer of
possession and intention of the parties.
Implied Conditions and Warranties in a Contract of Sale
In a contract of sale, certain conditions and warranties are automatically implied by law, even if they are not
explicitly stated in the contract. These implied terms provide protection to both the buyer and the seller and
ensure fairness in commercial transactions.
1. Implied Conditions:
 Implied conditions are essential terms that are deemed to be part of every contract of sale unless
expressly excluded. They relate to the quality, title, and fitness for purpose of the goods being sold.
 Examples:
o Condition as to Title: The seller warrants that they have the right to sell the goods and that
the buyer will enjoy quiet possession of the goods.
o Condition as to Merchantability: The goods sold must be of merchantable quality, meaning
they must be fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used.
o Condition as to Fitness for Purpose: If the buyer expressly or impliedly makes known to
the seller the particular purpose for which the goods are required, and relies on the seller's
skill or judgment, there is an implied condition that the goods will be reasonably fit for that
purpose.
2. Implied Warranties:
 Implied warranties are secondary terms that are also presumed to be part of every contract of sale,
unless expressly excluded. They are promises regarding the quality and performance of the goods.

 Examples:
o Warranty of Quiet Enjoyment: The seller warrants that the buyer will have the right to
peacefully possess and enjoy the goods without any interference from third parties claiming
superior title.
o Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose: If the buyer informs the seller of a specific
purpose for which the goods are required and relies on the seller's expertise, there is an implied
warranty that the goods are fit for that purpose.
o Warranty of Description: If the goods are sold by description, there is an implied warranty
that the goods will correspond with the description.
Exceptions:
 Implied conditions and warranties may be excluded or modified by express terms in the contract,
provided such exclusion or modification is fair and reasonable.
 Custom or trade usage may also override certain implied terms if they are inconsistent with the
customary practices of a particular trade or industry.
Example: Rajesh purchases a new smartphone from a store. It is implied that the smartphone will be of
merchantable quality, fit for its intended purpose, and free from any legal defects in title. If the smartphone turns
out to be faulty or does not meet these implied conditions, Rajesh may have legal recourse against the seller.

Short conversation topics

Rights And Duties of Indemnifier
Rights of the Indemnifier:
1. Right to Be Indemnified:
o The indemnifier has the right to be indemnified against any loss or damage incurred by the
indemnified party due to the indemnified event specified in the contract.
o Example: If Raj indemnifies Rahul against any losses arising from a legal dispute, Raj has the
right to be compensated by Rahul for any expenses incurred in resolving the dispute.
2. Right to Control Legal Proceedings:
o In some cases, the indemnifier may have the right to control legal proceedings or negotiations
related to the indemnified event.
o Example: If Raj indemnifies Rahul against legal claims, Raj may have the right to appoint legal
counsel and make decisions regarding the defense strategy.
3. Right to Subrogation:
o If the indemnifier pays compensation to a third party on behalf of the indemnified party, the
indemnifier may have the right to step into the shoes of the indemnified party and pursue any
rights or remedies against third parties.
o Example: If Raj pays damages to a third party on behalf of Rahul, Raj may have the right to
pursue legal action against any responsible parties to recover the amount paid.
Duties of the Indemnifier:
1. Duty to Indemnify:

Page 30 of 48
 o The primary duty of the indemnifier is to indemnify the indemnified party against any loss or
damage incurred as a result of the specified event.
o Example: If Raj agrees to indemnify Rahul against any losses from a contractual breach, Raj is
obligated to compensate Rahul for any financial harm suffered due to the breach.
2. Duty of Good Faith:
o The indemnifier must act in good faith and deal fairly with the indemnified party when fulfilling
their obligations under the contract of indemnity.
o Example: Raj must provide truthful information and cooperate with Rahul in resolving any
indemnity claims in good faith.
3. Duty to Control Legal Proceedings (if applicable):
o If the indemnifier has the right to control legal proceedings, they also have a corresponding
duty to exercise that right responsibly and in the best interests of both parties.
o Example: If Raj has the right to control legal proceedings, he must act prudently and in
consultation with Rahul's interests when making decisions related to the defense strategy.
There are some exceptions to the rights and duties of an indemnifier in a contract of indemnity. These exceptions
may vary depending on the specific terms of the contract and the applicable laws. Here are a few common
exceptions:
1. Exclusion of Liability: The contract of indemnity may explicitly exclude certain liabilities from the
indemnifier's obligation to provide indemnity. For example, the contract may specify that the indemnifier
is not liable for losses caused by the negligence of the indemnified party.
2. Limitation of Liability: The contract may limit the indemnifier's liability to a certain extent, either by
capping the maximum amount of indemnification or by specifying certain types of losses that are not
covered.
3. Breach of Contract by Indemnified Party: If the indemnified party breaches the contract or fails to
fulfill their obligations, the indemnifier may be relieved of their duty to indemnify. However, this
exception would typically require that the breach directly contributed to the loss or damage incurred.
4. Voluntary Assumption of Risk: If the indemnified party voluntarily assumes a known risk or waives
their right to indemnification for certain events, the indemnifier may not be obligated to provide
indemnity for losses arising from those events.
5. Illegality or Public Policy Considerations: If the subject matter of the indemnity agreement is illegal
or contrary to public policy, courts may refuse to enforce the indemnity provision or limit its scope.
6. Third Party Liability: If the loss or damage is caused by the actions of a third party, the indemnifier
may argue that they are not responsible for indemnifying the indemnified party for those losses.
Revocation Of Guarantee
Concept of Revocation of Guarantee:
Revocation of guarantee refers to the act of withdrawing or canceling a previously provided guarantee by the
guarantor. It involves the termination of the guarantor's obligation to fulfill the terms of the guarantee, usually
before the beneficiary or creditor has relied on or accepted the guarantee.
Essentials of Revocation of Guarantee:
1. Intent to Revoke: The guarantor must have a clear intention to revoke the guarantee. This intention
can be expressed verbally, in writing, or through conduct indicating a desire to withdraw the guarantee.
2. Communication of Revocation: The revocation must be communicated to the beneficiary or creditor
who is entitled to enforce the guarantee. Communication can be in any form that ensures the recipient
is aware of the revocation.
3. Revocation Before Acceptance: Generally, the guarantor can revoke the guarantee at any time before
the beneficiary or creditor accepts or relies on the guarantee. Once the guarantee is accepted, revocation
may not be effective unless agreed upon by all parties.
4. Compliance with Contract Terms: The revocation must comply with any terms or conditions
regarding revocation specified in the guarantee contract. For example, the contract may require
revocation to be in writing or within a certain timeframe.
Exceptions to Revocation of Guarantee:
1. Irrevocable Guarantees: Some guarantees may be designated as irrevocable in the contract terms.
Irrevocable guarantees cannot be revoked by the guarantor unless specific conditions or events occur,
as outlined in the contract.
2. Consideration for Irrevocable Guarantees: If the guarantor receives consideration, such as a fee or
benefit, in exchange for providing an irrevocable guarantee, they may be bound to the guarantee for
the agreed-upon duration, regardless of their desire to revoke it.
3. Estoppel: If the beneficiary or creditor has relied on the guarantee to their detriment or has acted upon
it in good faith, the guarantor may be estopped (prevented) from revoking the guarantee.
4. Statutory Limitations: Some jurisdictions may have statutory provisions that limit or regulate the
revocation of guarantees, especially in consumer contracts or where public policy considerations are
involved.
5. Guarantee as Security: If the guarantee is provided as security for a loan or other obligations,
revocation may be subject to the terms of the security agreement and the rights of the creditor.

Page 31 of 48
Revocation Of Continuing Guarantee
Concept of Revocation of Continuing Guarantee: A continuing guarantee is one where the guarantor's
liability extends to cover future transactions or obligations between the principal debtor and the creditor.
Revocation of a continuing guarantee refers to the termination or withdrawal of the guarantor's obligation to
guarantee future transactions after it has already been provided.
Essentials of Revocation of Continuing Guarantee:
1. Clear Intent to Revoke: The guarantor must have a clear intention to revoke the continuing guarantee.
This intention can be expressed through written communication, verbal notice, or conduct indicating an
intention to withdraw the guarantee.
2. Communication of Revocation: The revocation must be communicated to the creditor or beneficiary
who is entitled to enforce the guarantee. Communication can be in any form that ensures the recipient
is made aware of the revocation.
3. Revocation Prospective in Nature: Revocation of a continuing guarantee is typically prospective in
nature, meaning it applies only to future transactions or obligations that arise after the revocation takes
effect.
4. Compliance with Contract Terms: The revocation must comply with any terms or conditions
regarding revocation specified in the guarantee contract. For example, the contract may require
revocation to be in writing or within a certain timeframe.
Exceptions to Revocation of Continuing Guarantee:
1. Irrevocable Guarantees: Some continuing guarantees may be explicitly designated as irrevocable in
the contract terms. In such cases, the guarantor may not have the right to unilaterally revoke the
guarantee, and revocation may be subject to specific conditions or events outlined in the contract.
2. Estoppel: If the creditor or beneficiary has relied on the continuing guarantee to their detriment or has
acted upon it in good faith, the guarantor may be estopped (prevented) from revoking the guarantee.
3. Statutory Limitations: Certain jurisdictions may have statutory provisions that restrict or regulate the
revocation of continuing guarantees, especially in cases involving consumer contracts or public policy
considerations.
4. Consideration for Irrevocable Guarantees: If the guarantor has received consideration for providing
an irrevocable guarantee, such as a fee or benefit, they may be bound to the guarantee for the agreed-
upon duration, regardless of their desire to revoke it.

Rights of Surety
Concept of Rights of Surety: The rights of a surety refer to the legal entitlements granted to a surety under a
contract of guarantee or suretyship. These rights aim to protect the surety's interests and ensure fairness in the
suretyship arrangement.

Essentials of Rights of Surety:

1. Contractual Basis: The rights of a surety arise from the terms and conditions outlined in the contract
of guarantee or suretyship agreement. It is essential for the surety to review and understand these
terms before agreeing to provide the guarantee.
2. Legal Capacity: The surety must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract of guarantee. This
includes being of sound mind, of legal age, and not under any legal disability that would prevent them
from assuming the obligations of a surety.
3. Consent and Agreement: The surety's rights are based on their voluntary consent to act as a
guarantor and their agreement to the terms of the guarantee contract. The surety should fully
understand their obligations and responsibilities before providing the guarantee.
4. Consideration: In some jurisdictions, the guarantee contract may require consideration from the
creditor to the surety to be legally enforceable. Consideration can take various forms, such as a fee,
benefit, or promise exchanged between the parties.
Exceptions to Rights of Surety:
1. Limitations in Guarantee Contract: The rights of a surety may be subject to any limitations or
exclusions specified in the guarantee contract. These limitations could include caps on liability,
restrictions on the surety's ability to revoke the guarantee, or other conditions agreed upon by the
parties.
2. Third-Party Rights: The rights of a surety may be affected by the rights of third parties, such as other
co-sureties, the principal debtor, or creditors. For example, if the principal debtor defaults on their
obligations, the surety's rights may be impacted by the creditor's actions to recover the debt.
3. Statutory Provisions: Certain jurisdictions may have statutory provisions that govern the rights and
obligations of sureties in guarantee contracts. These provisions may impose additional requirements or
limitations on sureties beyond those outlined in the contract.
4. Equitable Considerations: Courts may consider equitable principles in determining the rights of
sureties, especially in cases where there is evidence of unfairness or unconscionability in the guarantee
contract. Equitable considerations may affect the enforcement of the surety's rights or the extent of
their liability.

Page 32 of 48
Discharge Of Surety
Concept of Discharge of Surety: Discharge of surety refers to the termination or release of the surety's
obligations under a contract of guarantee or suretyship. It relieves the surety from further liability for the debts
or obligations of the principal debtor, effectively ending the suretyship arrangement.
Essentials of Discharge of Surety:
1. Fulfilment of Obligations: The surety is typically discharged from liability once the principal debtor
fulfils their obligations under the underlying contract. This could include repayment of a loan, delivery
of goods, or performance of services as specified in the contract.
2. Expiration of Time: If the guarantee contract specifies a time limit or duration for the surety's
obligations, the surety is discharged automatically once this time period expires, provided there are no
outstanding obligations at that time.
3. Mutual Agreement: The surety may be discharged by mutual agreement between the parties involved,
including the creditor, principal debtor, and surety. This could occur through a formal release or discharge
agreement that relieves the surety of further obligations.
4. Material Alteration of Contract: If the terms of the underlying contract between the creditor and
principal debtor are materially altered without the consent of the surety, the surety may be discharged
from liability. Material alterations could include changes to the amount of debt, terms of payment, or
scope of obligations.
5. Release by Creditor: The surety may be discharged if the creditor releases or relinquishes their rights
against the surety without the surety's consent. This could occur through actions or statements by the
creditor indicating an intention to release the surety from liability.
Exceptions to Discharge of Surety:
1. Continuing Guarantees: In the case of a continuing guarantee where the surety's liability extends to
future transactions or obligations, the surety may not be discharged until all such transactions or
obligations are fulfilled or terminated.
2. Irrevocable Guarantees: If the guarantee contract designates the guarantee as irrevocable, the
surety may not be discharged until the specified conditions or events for termination of the guarantee
occur, as outlined in the contract.
3. Fraudulent Inducement: If the surety was induced to enter into the guarantee contract through fraud
or misrepresentation, the surety may have grounds to seek rescission of the contract and discharge
from liability.
4. Equitable Considerations: Courts may consider equitable principles in determining whether to
discharge a surety, especially if enforcing the guarantee would result in unfairness or injustice to the
surety.
Pledge And Bailment
Concept of Pledge: Pledge refers to a type of security interest where a borrower (the pledgor) provides a
valuable asset, such as property or goods, to a lender (the pledgee) as collateral for a loan or debt. The pledgee
holds the asset until the debt is repaid, at which point the asset is returned to the pledgor. If the pledgor defaults
on the debt, the pledgee may sell the asset to recover the outstanding amount.
Essentials of Pledge:
1. Transfer of Possession: The essential element of a pledge is the transfer of possession of the pledged
asset from the pledgor to the pledgee. The pledgee must have actual or constructive possession of the
asset to enforce their security interest.
2. Security for Debt: The asset pledged serves as security for a debt or obligation owed by the pledgor
to the pledgee. This could be a loan, credit facility, or any other form of financial arrangement where
the asset acts as collateral.
3. Intention to Create Pledge: Both parties must have the intention to create a pledge relationship, with
the pledgor intending to provide the asset as security for the debt, and the pledgee accepting the asset
as collateral.
Exceptions to Pledge:
1. Equitable Mortgage: In some cases, a transaction labeled as a pledge may be deemed an equitable
mortgage if it meets certain criteria, such as an intention to create a mortgage relationship rather than
a pledge. Courts may recharacterize the transaction based on the substance of the arrangement.
2. Failure to Transfer Possession: If the pledgor fails to transfer possession of the pledged asset to the
pledgee, the arrangement may not be considered a valid pledge. Transfer of possession is a fundamental
requirement for the creation of a pledge.
Concept of Bailment:
Bailment refers to a legal relationship where one party (the bailor) temporarily transfers possession of personal
property to another party (the bailee) for a specific purpose or duration. The bailee has a duty to return the
property to the bailor or dispose of it according to the bailor's instructions once the purpose of the bailment is
fulfilled.
Essentials of Bailment:
1. Delivery of Possession: The bailor must transfer possession of the property to the bailee, either
physically or constructively, for the duration of the bailment. The bailee must have exclusive control or
custody of the property during this time.

Page 33 of 48
 2. Purpose of Bailment: Bailment must be for a specific purpose or objective agreed upon by both
parties. This could include safekeeping, transportation, repair, or any other lawful purpose for which the
property is entrusted to the bailee.
3. Return or Disposal of Property: Once the purpose of the bailment is fulfilled, the bailee must return
the property to the bailor in the same condition as when it was received. If disposal of the property is
necessary, the bailee must act according to the bailor's instructions or any terms agreed upon.
Exceptions to Bailment:
1. Gratuitous Bailment: In cases of gratuitous bailment, where the bailee receives no compensation or
benefit for holding the property, the standard of care required may be lower than in cases of bailment
for hire.
2. Bailment for Hire: Bailments for hire, where the bailee receives compensation or benefit for holding
the property, impose a higher standard of care on the bailee to ensure the safekeeping and return of
the property.

Distinguish Between General Lien and Particular Lien (Rights of Pledge)

General Lien:
1. Definition: A general lien grants the right to retain possession of a debtor's property as security for all
outstanding debts owed by the debtor to the creditor, regardless of whether those debts are related to
the property being held as collateral.
2. Scope: With a general lien, the creditor can withhold any property in their possession belonging to the
debtor until all debts, including those unrelated to the pledged property, are satisfied.
3. Example: Suppose a bank extends multiple lines of credit to a business owner. The bank holds various
assets of the business as collateral, including inventory, equipment, and accounts receivable. If the
business defaults on one line of credit, the bank may invoke its general lien rights to retain possession
of all collateral until all outstanding debts, including those from other lines of credit, are repaid.
Particular Lien:
1. Definition: A particular lien grants the right to retain possession of a specific property as security for a
particular debt or obligation owed by the debtor related to that specific property.
2. Scope: Unlike a general lien, a particular lien is limited to the specific property that serves as collateral
for the corresponding debt. The creditor can only retain possession of that specific property until the
debt related to that property is satisfied.
3. Example: Suppose a jeweller repairs a customer's watch and retains possession of the watch until the
repair bill is paid. In this scenario, the jeweller has a particular lien over the watch, allowing them to
keep the watch as security for the unpaid repair bill. Once the customer settles the bill, the jeweller
must release the watch back to the customer.
Key Differences:
1. Scope of Security: General lien covers all outstanding debts owed by the debtor, while particular lien
is limited to a specific debt related to a specific property.
2. Retention of Possession: Under general lien, the creditor can retain possession of any property
belonging to the debtor until all debts are satisfied, whereas under particular lien, the creditor can only
retain possession of the specific property serving as collateral for the corresponding debt.
3. Release of Property: In general lien, the creditor must release all properties once all debts are settled,
whereas in particular lien, the creditor releases the specific property once the corresponding debt is paid
off.
Pledge - A Special Kind of Bailment
Concept of Pledge: Pledge, also known as pawn or collateral, is a special type of bailment where a borrower
(the pledgor) transfers possession of a valuable asset to a lender (the pledgee) as security for a debt or obligation.
The pledgee holds the asset until the debt is repaid, at which point the asset is returned to the pledgor. If the
pledgor defaults on the debt, the pledgee may sell the asset to recover the outstanding amount.
Essentials of Pledge:
1. Transfer of Possession: The pledgor must transfer possession of the pledged asset to the pledgee.
This can be done physically (handing over the asset) or constructively (providing access or control) to
the pledgee.
2. Security for Debt: The asset pledged serves as security for a debt or obligation owed by the pledgor
to the pledgee. This could be a loan, credit facility, or any other form of financial arrangement where
the asset acts as collateral.
3. Intention to Create Pledge: Both parties must intend to create a pledge relationship, with the pledgor
providing the asset as security for the debt, and the pledgee accepting the asset as collateral.
Simple Example: An individual, let's call her Priya, pledges her gold jewellery to a pawnbroker, Raj, in exchange
for a loan of ₹10,000. Priya transfers possession of the jewellery to Raj as security for the loan. Once Priya repays
the loan with interest, Raj returns the jewellery to Priya.
Exceptions to Pledge:
1. Invalid Pledges: If the pledgor does not have legal ownership or the right to pledge the asset, the
pledge may be invalid. For example, if the asset is subject to a prior lien or encumbrance, the pledgee's
rights may be subordinate to those of the prior lienholder.

Page 34 of 48
 2. Failure to Transfer Possession: If the pledgor fails to transfer possession of the pledged asset to the
pledgee, the arrangement may not be considered a valid pledge. Transfer of possession is a fundamental
requirement for the creation of a pledge.
Position Of Finder of Goods
Concept of Finder of Goods: The finder of goods is an individual who comes into possession of lost or misplaced
property belonging to another party. The finder may discover the goods accidentally or intentionally, but they do
not have legal ownership or title to the goods.
Essentials of Finder of Goods:
1. Discovery of Goods: The finder must come into possession of the goods through discovery, either by
finding them in a public place or by being entrusted with them by the true owner.
2. Lack of Ownership: The finder does not have legal ownership or title to the goods, even though they
are in possession of them. The true owner retains ownership rights unless they have abandoned the
goods.
3. Duty of Care: The finder has a duty to take reasonable care of the goods and make efforts to locate
the true owner or report the found goods to the authorities.
Simple Example: Suppose Ravi finds a wallet containing cash and identification documents on a park bench.
Ravi, as the finder of the wallet, takes custody of it and searches for contact information to return it to the rightful
owner. Until the wallet is returned, Ravi does not have legal ownership of its contents.
Exceptions to Finder of Goods:
1. Abandonment by True Owner: If the true owner has abandoned the goods with the intention of
relinquishing ownership, the finder may acquire title to the goods through abandonment. However,
determining abandonment can be subjective and depends on the circumstances.
2. Treasure Trove: In some jurisdictions, certain valuable items discovered hidden or buried in the
ground, known as treasure trove, may be subject to different legal rules. Treasure trove may be
considered the property of the state or may be subject to specific laws governing its discovery and
ownership.
Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se
Concept: "Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se" is a Latin legal maxim that translates to "he who acts through another
acts himself." It embodies the principle of agency law, indicating that when one person (the agent) acts on behalf
of another (the principal), the actions of the agent are legally attributable to the principal as if the principal had
performed the actions themselves.
Essentials of "Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se":
1. Agency Relationship: The principle applies in situations where there is an agency relationship between
the principal and the agent. The agent must be authorized by the principal to act on their behalf within
the scope of the agency relationship.
2. Authority and Consent: The actions of the agent must be within the authority granted by the principal
and with the consent of the principal. Unauthorized actions or actions beyond the scope of authority
may not bind the principal.
3. Legal Attribution: The legal consequences of the agent's actions are attributed to the principal. This
means that the principal is bound by the contracts, obligations, liabilities, and rights created or affected
by the agent's actions.
Simple Example: Suppose Anil appoints his friend Raj as his agent to sell his car. Raj enters into a contract with
Suresh to sell the car on behalf of Anil. Under the principle of "Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se," the contract
entered into by Raj is legally binding on Anil, and he is responsible for fulfilling its terms.
Exceptions to "Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se":
1. Ultra Vires Acts: If the agent exceeds the authority granted by the principal and engages in ultra vires
acts (acts beyond the scope of authority), the principle may not apply, and the principal may not be
bound by the agent's actions.
2. Fiduciary Duties: In situations where the agent breaches fiduciary duties owed to the principal or acts
fraudulently or negligently, the principle may not apply, and the principal may have recourse against
the agent for their actions.
Classification Of Agents
Concept of Classification of Agents: The classification of agents refers to categorizing individuals who act on
behalf of others (principals) into different types based on various factors such as authority, scope of duties, and
nature of representation. Understanding the classification helps in determining the rights, duties, and liabilities
of agents and principals in different scenarios.
Essentials of Classification of Agents:
1. Authority and Scope: Agents can be classified based on the extent of their authority to act on behalf
of the principal. This includes general agents with broad authority and specific agents with limited
authority for particular tasks.
2. Nature of Representation: Agents can also be classified based on the nature of their representation.
This includes categories such as special agents appointed for specific tasks, universal agents with broad
authority, and sub-agents appointed by primary agents.
3. Agency Relationship: The classification considers the relationship between the agent and the principal,
including whether the agent acts as a fiduciary with duties of loyalty, care, and obedience to the
principal.

Page 35 of 48
Simple Example: Suppose Amit appoints Ravi as his real estate agent to sell his house. Ravi's authority is
limited to selling the house, making him a special agent. In another scenario, if Amit appoints his brother Suresh
to manage all his financial affairs, including banking, investments, and property transactions, Suresh would be
considered a general agent with broad authority.
Exceptions to Classification of Agents:
1. Hybrid Roles: In some situations, agents may perform tasks that span multiple classifications. For
example, an agent may have general authority for certain tasks but limited authority for others, making
their classification less straightforward.
2. Varied Authority: Agents' authority and scope of duties may vary over time or depending on the
specific tasks assigned by the principal. This fluidity in authority can make classification challenging in
certain circumstances.
Delcredere Agent
Concept of Delcredere Agent: A Delcredere agent is a type of mercantile agent appointed by a seller (principal)
to guarantee payment for goods sold on credit to buyers (debtors). This agent acts as a surety for the buyer's
creditworthiness and assumes the risk of non-payment in exchange for a commission or fee.
Essentials of Delcredere Agent:
1. Guarantee of Payment: The primary role of a Delcredere agent is to guarantee payment for goods
sold on credit by the principal. The agent assures the principal of receiving payment even if the buyer
defaults.
2. Commission or Fee: The Delcredere agent typically charges a commission or fee for providing the
guarantee. This compensation covers the risk assumed by the agent and the additional services
rendered.
3. Credit Evaluation: The agent may conduct credit evaluations of buyers to assess their financial stability
and creditworthiness. This helps mitigate the risk of non-payment and informs the decision to provide
a guarantee.
Simple Example: Suppose XYZ Company manufactures and sells electronic gadgets on credit to various
retailers. To mitigate the risk of non-payment, XYZ appoints Rahul as a Delcredere agent. When a retailer
requests credit terms, Rahul guarantees payment on behalf of the retailer to XYZ. If the retailer defaults, Rahul
is liable to XYZ for the outstanding amount.
Exceptions to Delcredere Agent:
1. Limited Liability: In some cases, the liability of the Delcredere agent may be limited by the terms of
the agency agreement or by law. The agent may not be liable for defaults beyond a certain threshold or
under specific circumstances.
2. Non-Guaranteed Accounts: The Delcredere agent may not provide guarantees for all credit
transactions. Some accounts or buyers may be deemed too risky, and the agent may decline to
guarantee payment for those transactions.
Extent Of Agent's Authority
Concept of Extent of Agent's Authority: The extent of an agent's authority refers to the scope and limits of
the agent's power to act on behalf of the principal. It delineates the actions and decisions that the agent is
authorized to undertake within the agency relationship.
Essentials of Extent of Agent's Authority:
1. Express Authority: Express authority is explicitly granted by the principal to the agent through written
or verbal instructions. It defines the specific tasks, transactions, or decisions that the agent is authorized
to perform on behalf of the principal.
2. Implied Authority: Implied authority arises from the agent's role, customary practices, or the nature
of the agency relationship. It encompasses actions that are reasonably necessary or incidental to
carrying out the express authority granted by the principal.
3. Apparent Authority: Apparent authority arises when the principal, through words or conduct, leads
third parties to reasonably believe that the agent has the authority to act on their behalf. Even if the
agent lacks actual authority, the principal may be bound by the agent's actions if third parties reasonably
rely on the appearance of authority.
Simple Example: Anil appoints his friend Raj as his real estate agent to sell his house. Anil expressly authorizes
Raj to negotiate and finalize the sale of the house within a specified price range (express authority). Additionally,
Anil implicitly authorizes Raj to hire a photographer to take pictures of the property for marketing purposes
(implied authority). If Raj exceeds the price range specified by Anil, he may lack authority to finalize the sale
beyond that limit.
Exceptions to Extent of Agent's Authority:
1. Acts Beyond Scope: If an agent exceeds the scope of their authority, their actions may not bind the
principal. The principal is not obligated to honor contracts or agreements entered into by the agent
beyond their authorized powers.
2. Notice of Limitations: If the principal notifies third parties of the limitations or restrictions on the
agent's authority, those parties cannot reasonably rely on the agent's actions beyond the specified limits.
Agency Coupled with Interest
Concept of Agency Coupled with Interest: Agency coupled with interest refers to a special type of agency
relationship where the authority of the agent is coupled with a personal interest or stake in the subject matter

Page 36 of 48
of the agency. Unlike a typical agency relationship, where the principal grants authority to the agent, in this
scenario, the agent's authority is tied to their own interest or benefit.
Essentials of Agency Coupled with Interest:
1. Personal Interest: In an agency coupled with interest, the agent has a personal interest or stake in
the subject matter of the agency. This interest motivates the agent to act in their own capacity, rather
than solely as a representative of the principal.
2. Non-Revocable Authority: The authority of the agent in an agency coupled with interest is typically
non-revocable by the principal. Since the agent's authority is tied to their own interest, the principal
cannot unilaterally revoke the agency relationship.
3. Independent Action: The agent in an agency coupled with interest has the discretion to act
independently to protect their own interest. They are not bound to follow instructions from the principal
and may pursue actions that align with their personal stake.
Simple Example: Suppose Arjun grants Karan the authority to sell his antique car collection. However, Karan
secures a loan using the antique cars as collateral. The authority to sell the cars is now coupled with Karan's
interest in repaying the loan. If Arjun attempts to revoke Karan's authority, Karan can still proceed with the sale
to satisfy the loan obligation.
Exceptions to Agency Coupled with Interest:
1. Fraudulent Intent: If the agent enters into the agency relationship with fraudulent intent or
misrepresents their interest, the agency coupled with interest may be deemed invalid. The principal
may revoke the agent's authority in such circumstances.
2. Change in Circumstances: If the circumstances giving rise to the agency coupled with interest change
significantly, such as the termination of the agent's interest, the authority may become revocable by
the principal. However, this depends on the specific terms of the agency relationship and applicable
laws.
Agent's Authority in An Emergency
Concept of Agent's Authority in an Emergency: An agent's authority in an emergency refers to the power
granted to an agent to act on behalf of the principal in urgent or unforeseen situations where immediate action
is necessary to protect the interests of the principal. In such circumstances, the agent is authorized to take
reasonable and necessary actions to address the emergency without prior approval from the principal.
Essentials of Agent's Authority in an Emergency:
1. Urgent Situation: The authority of the agent in an emergency arises when there is an urgent situation
requiring immediate action to prevent harm or loss to the principal's interests. The emergency must be
unforeseen and beyond the control of the principal.
2. Protective Measures: The agent's authority is limited to taking actions that are reasonable and
necessary to address the emergency and protect the interests of the principal. This may include making
decisions, entering contracts, or taking other measures to mitigate the effects of the emergency.
3. Good Faith: The agent must act in good faith and with the best interests of the principal in mind when
exercising authority in an emergency. The agent should prioritize the principal's interests above their
own and avoid actions that could be considered self-serving.
Simple Example: Suppose Ramesh appoints his friend, Suresh, as his agent to manage his rental property while
he is out of town. During a severe storm, the roof of the rental property starts leaking, causing extensive damage
to the interior. In this emergency situation, Suresh, as the agent, has the authority to hire a contractor to repair
the roof immediately, even though Ramesh is unavailable for consultation.
Exceptions to Agent's Authority in an Emergency:
1. Unreasonable Actions: If the agent's actions in response to the emergency are deemed unreasonable
or excessive under the circumstances, the principal may not be bound by those actions. The agent must
exercise discretion and judgment in determining the appropriate course of action.
2. Conflict of Interest: If the agent's actions in the emergency conflict with the interests of the principal
or if the agent stands to benefit personally from the emergency situation, the authority may be called
into question. The agent must prioritize the principal's interests and avoid self-dealing.
Sub Agent
Concept of Sub-Agent: A sub-agent is an individual appointed by an agent (who is already acting on behalf of
a principal) to perform specific tasks or functions related to the agency relationship. The sub-agent acts under
the authority and supervision of the original agent, not directly under the principal, and assists in carrying out
the duties delegated by the principal.
Essentials of Sub-Agent:
1. Appointment by Agent: The sub-agent is appointed by the original agent, not directly by the principal.
The authority of the sub-agent is derived from the agent's authority and is subject to the terms of the
agency agreement between the principal and the agent.
2. Limited Authority: The sub-agent's authority is limited to the tasks or functions delegated to them by
the agent. They do not have direct authority from the principal and cannot act beyond the scope of the
tasks assigned by the agent.
3. Responsibility to Agent: The sub-agent owes duties and responsibilities to the original agent who
appointed them. They must follow the instructions and guidelines provided by the agent and act in
accordance with the agent's authority.

Page 37 of 48
Simple Example: Let's say Rahul, a real estate agent, is appointed by Anil, the principal, to sell his property.
Rahul, in turn, appoints Priya as a sub-agent to conduct open house viewings. Priya's authority to conduct
viewings is derived from Rahul's appointment as the agent, and she acts under Rahul's supervision.
Exceptions to Sub-Agent:
1. Exceeding Authority: If the sub-agent exceeds the authority granted to them by the agent or acts
beyond the scope of their delegated tasks, their actions may not be binding on the principal. The sub-
agent must stay within the limits set by the agent.
2. Agent's Liability: The agent remains liable for the actions of the sub-agent within the scope of the
agency relationship. If the sub-agent commits a wrongful act or negligence while performing delegated
tasks, the principal may hold the agent accountable.

Undisclosed Principal
Concept of Undisclosed Principal: An undisclosed principal refers to a situation in which an agent acts on
behalf of a principal without disclosing the identity of the principal to third parties. In such cases, the agent
enters into contracts or transactions with third parties as if they were acting on their own behalf, without revealing
that they are representing a principal.
Essentials of Undisclosed Principal:
1. Agent's Authority: The agent possesses actual authority from the undisclosed principal to act on their
behalf. The agent has the power to enter into contracts and transactions with third parties, and their
actions bind the principal.
2. Lack of Disclosure: The principal's identity is not disclosed to the third parties with whom the agent
interacts. The third parties are unaware that the agent is representing someone else's interests and
assume that the agent is acting on their own behalf.
3. Principal's Liability: The undisclosed principal is bound by the contracts and transactions entered into
by the agent on their behalf. Despite the lack of disclosure, the principal remains legally responsible for
fulfilling the obligations arising from the agreements made by the agent.
Simple Example: Let's say Rohan, an art dealer, approaches Suman, an artist, to purchase a valuable painting.
Suman, acting as Rohan's agent, negotiates the purchase price with Maya, an art collector, without disclosing
Rohan's identity as the buyer. Maya believes that Suman is buying the painting for personal reasons and
completes the transaction. In this scenario, Rohan is the undisclosed principal, and he is legally bound to fulfill
the terms of the purchase agreement made by Suman.
Exceptions to Undisclosed Principal:
1. Agent's Personal Liability: In certain jurisdictions or specific circumstances, the agent may be held
personally liable to third parties if they expressly agree to assume liability or if they engage in fraudulent
conduct or misrepresentation during the transaction.
2. Third-Party Knowledge: If the third party has actual knowledge or reasonable grounds to believe that
the agent is acting on behalf of a principal, despite the lack of disclosure, the undisclosed principal may
not be bound by the agent's actions. This exception applies when the third party has information that
would lead a reasonable person to inquire about the principal's identity.
“Delegatus Non Potest Delegatus” - With Reference to an Agency
The Latin maxim "Delegatus non potest delegare" translates to "a delegate cannot delegate." In the context of
agency, this principle means that an agent who has been delegated authority by a principal to perform specific
tasks or duties cannot further delegate that authority to another party without the principal's consent.
Explanation: When a principal appoints an agent to act on their behalf, they entrust the agent with certain
powers and responsibilities to carry out tasks or make decisions. However, the agent is expected to personally
fulfill these duties unless expressly authorized by the principal to delegate them to someone else.
Example: Suppose Ravi, the owner of a construction company, appoints Anil as his agent to oversee the
construction of a building project. Anil has been given authority by Ravi to hire subcontractors, purchase
materials, and manage the project on his behalf.
Now, if Anil decides to delegate his authority to hire subcontractors to another person, such as Rahul, without
obtaining permission from Ravi, he would be violating the principle of "delegatus non potest delegare." Anil
cannot pass on the authority granted to him by Ravi to Rahul without Ravi's consent.
Exceptions:
1. Express Authorization: If the principal explicitly grants the agent the power to delegate their authority
to others, then the agent can do so within the scope of that authorization.
2. Custom or Usage: In certain industries or contexts where it is customary or understood that agents
may delegate their authority, such as in employment contracts or agency relationships within specific
trades, the principle may not apply.
Distinction Between Partnership and Company
Aspect Partnership Company
Ownership and Liability Partners collectively own; unlimited Shareholders own; limited liability
personal liability
Legal Entity Not a separate legal entity from Separate legal entity distinct from
partners shareholders

Page 38 of 48
 Formation and Formed through agreement; governed Formed by registration; governed by
Regulation by Partnership Act Companies Act
Management Partners collectively manage; shared Managed by directors appointed by
decision-making shareholders
Transferability Ownership interest not easily Shares freely transferable subject to
transferable restrictions
Continuity and Dissolves on partner's Continuity ensured; changes in
Succession death/retirement/insolvency; new ownership do not affect existence
partners admitted

Duties Of Partner
Concept: Partnership entails certain duties that partners owe to each other and to the partnership as a whole.
These duties are essential for maintaining trust, cooperation, and the smooth functioning of the business.
Essentials:
1. Duty of Loyalty: Partners must act in the best interests of the partnership and refrain from engaging
in activities that could harm the partnership or other partners. Example: Ajay, a partner in a law firm,
cannot represent a client whose interests’ conflict with those of the firm without the consent of other
partners.
2. Duty of Care: Partners are expected to exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in carrying out
partnership affairs. Example: Rahul, a partner in an accounting firm, must accurately prepare financial
statements for clients and adhere to professional standards.
3. Duty of Disclosure: Partners must provide full and accurate information to other partners regarding
partnership matters. Example: Priya, a partner in a real estate partnership, must disclose any potential
conflicts of interest when negotiating deals on behalf of the partnership.
4. Duty of Good Faith: Partners must act honestly and fairly in their dealings with each other and with
third parties. Example: Raj, a partner in a consulting firm, must not misrepresent the services offered
by the partnership to clients or competitors.
Exceptions:
1. Non-Compete Agreements: Partners may be subject to non-compete agreements that restrict their
ability to engage in similar business activities outside the partnership. Example: A partnership
agreement may include a clause preventing partners from starting a competing business within a certain
geographic area for a specified period after leaving the partnership.
2. Confidentiality Obligations: Partners may have confidentiality obligations regarding sensitive
partnership information. Example: Partners in a medical practice must maintain patient confidentiality
and refrain from disclosing patient information without proper authorization.
3. Statutory Duties: Partners are subject to duties imposed by statute, such as those outlined in the
Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Example: Under Section 9 of the Indian Partnership Act, partners must
indemnify the partnership for losses incurred due to their willful misconduct or negligence.
Relation Of Partners Inter-Se and with third-Parties
Concept: The relationship between partners within a partnership, as well as their interactions with third parties,
is governed by various legal principles and obligations. These relationships are crucial for the smooth operation
and success of the partnership.
Essentials:
1. Inter-Se Relations:
o Partners have rights and duties towards each other as outlined in the partnership agreement
and relevant laws.
o They must act with honesty, loyalty, and good faith towards one another.
o Partners share profits and losses according to the terms of the partnership agreement.
o Each partner has an equal right to participate in the management and decision-making of the
partnership, unless otherwise specified in the agreement.
2. Relations with Third Parties:
o Partners have the authority to bind the partnership in contracts and transactions with third
parties if acting within the scope of their authority.
o Third parties can hold the partnership liable for the actions of individual partners undertaken
in the ordinary course of business.
o Partners have a duty to disclose their status as partners when entering into contracts on behalf
of the partnership.
o The partnership is liable for the debts, obligations, and tortious acts of its partners in the course
of partnership business.
Examples:
 Inter-Se Relations Example: Rahul and Sameer are partners in a software development firm. They
agreed to share profits and losses equally. Rahul is responsible for managing the finances, while Sameer
oversees client relations.

Page 39 of 48
  Relations with Third Parties Example: Priya, a partner in a law firm, enters into a contract with a
client on behalf of the partnership to provide legal services. The client can hold the partnership liable
for any breach of contract or negligence in the provision of services.
Exceptions:
1. Unauthorized Acts: If a partner exceeds their authority or acts outside the scope of partnership
business, the partnership may not be bound by their actions. However, if a third party reasonably
believes the partner has authority, the partnership may still be liable under the doctrine of apparent
authority.
2. Indemnification: Partners may be personally liable to indemnify the partnership for losses incurred
due to their wrongful acts or breaches of duty. The partnership agreement may specify circumstances
under which partners are exempt from indemnification.
The Rights & duties of Partner
Concept: The rights and duties of partners in a partnership are the legal obligations and entitlements that
partners have towards each other and towards third parties. These rights and duties are essential for the smooth
functioning and success of the partnership.
Essentials:
1. Rights of Partners:
o Right to participate in the management and decision-making of the partnership.
o Right to share in the profits and losses of the partnership according to the terms of the
partnership agreement.
o Right to access partnership books and records for inspection.
o Right to receive compensation for services rendered to the partnership, if agreed upon.
2. Duties of Partners:
o Duty of loyalty: Partners must act in the best interests of the partnership and avoid conflicts
of interest.
o Duty of care: Partners must exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in carrying out
partnership affairs.
o Duty of good faith: Partners must act honestly and fairly in their dealings with each other and
with third parties.
o Duty of obedience: Partners must comply with the terms of the partnership agreement and
decisions made by the partnership.
Examples:
 Rights Example: Rahul and Sameer, partners in a restaurant partnership, have equal rights to
participate in decision-making regarding menu changes and business expansion.
 Duties Example: Priya, a partner in an accounting firm, has a duty to disclose any potential conflicts
of interest when recommending services to clients.
Exceptions:
1. Restrictions in Partnership Agreement: The partnership agreement may place restrictions on certain
rights or impose additional duties on partners beyond those required by law. For example, the
agreement may specify that certain decisions require unanimous consent or that partners cannot engage
in competing businesses.
2. Statutory Duties: Partners are subject to duties imposed by statute, such as those outlined in the
Indian Partnership Act, 1932. These statutory duties may vary depending on the jurisdiction and may
include obligations related to accounting, taxation, and reporting.
Minor as a Partner in a firm
Concept: A minor refers to an individual who has not attained the age of majority as prescribed by law. While
minors generally lack the legal capacity to enter into contracts, there are exceptions that allow minors to be
admitted as partners in a partnership firm.
Essentials:
1. Consent of Guardian:
o A minor can only be admitted as a partner with the consent of their guardian or parent.
o The guardian acts on behalf of the minor and represents their interests in the partnership.
2. Limited Liability:
o A minor's liability in the partnership is limited to the extent of their capital contribution or share
in profits.
o Minors are not personally liable for the debts and obligations of the partnership beyond their
investment.
3. Rights of Minor:
o Minors have the right to share in the profits and losses of the partnership according to their
agreed-upon share.
o They also have the right to participate in the management and decision-making of the
partnership, subject to any restrictions imposed by the partnership agreement.
Example: Ravi, a 17-year-old, is admitted as a minor partner in a software development firm with the consent
of his guardian, his father. Ravi contributes capital to the partnership and shares in the profits and losses
according to the terms of the partnership agreement.

Page 40 of 48
Exceptions:
1. Liability for Necessaries:
o While a minor's liability in the partnership is generally limited, they are still liable for the
payment of necessaries—essential goods and services required for their maintenance and
support.
o If a minor contracts for necessaries on credit, they can be held personally liable for the
payment.
2. Minor's Right to Dissociate:
o In some jurisdictions, minors have the right to dissociate from the partnership at any time,
even if the partnership agreement stipulates otherwise.
o Upon dissociation, the minor may be entitled to the return of their capital contribution and their
share of the profits.
Rights and duties of an Outgoing Partner of a firm
Concept: An outgoing partner refers to a partner who ceases to be a member of a partnership firm. This could
occur due to various reasons such as retirement, expulsion, or dissolution of the partnership. Understanding the
rights and duties of an outgoing partner is essential for ensuring a smooth transition and equitable treatment
during the process.
Essentials:
1. Right to Share in Profits:
o An outgoing partner retains the right to receive their share of profits or losses from the
partnership up until the date of their departure.
o This right is based on their ownership interest in the partnership and is typically outlined in the
partnership agreement.
2. Duty of Good Faith:
o Even after ceasing to be a partner, an outgoing partner has a duty to act in good faith and in
the best interests of the partnership until all affairs are settled.
o They must not take any actions that would harm the partnership or its remaining partners.
3. Liability for Partnership Debts:
o An outgoing partner remains liable for any partnership debts or obligations incurred during
their tenure as a partner.
o However, their liability is limited to the extent of their capital contribution or share in the
partnership profits.
Example: Sonia decides to retire from her partnership in a law firm. Despite her retirement, she is entitled to
receive her share of profits from the firm's ongoing cases until her departure date. Additionally, Sonia remains
liable for any debts incurred by the firm prior to her retirement.
Exceptions:
1. Release from Liability:
o In some cases, the partnership agreement or a separate agreement between the outgoing
partner and the remaining partners may release the outgoing partner from future liabilities.
o However, such release is typically contingent upon the outgoing partner fulfilling certain
obligations, such as settling their share of partnership debts.
2. Dispute Resolution:
o Disputes regarding the rights and duties of an outgoing partner may arise during the transition
period.
o In such cases, the partnership agreement or relevant laws may provide mechanisms for
resolving disputes, such as arbitration or mediation.
Expulsion of a Partner
Concept: Expulsion of a partner refers to the removal of a partner from a partnership firm by the consent of the
remaining partners. This decision is typically made due to reasons such as misconduct, breach of partnership
agreement, or irreconcilable differences. The process of expulsion is governed by the terms of the partnership
agreement or applicable laws.
Essentials:
1. Justifiable Cause:
o Expulsion must be based on justifiable cause, such as misconduct, violation of partnership
terms, or failure to fulfill partnership obligations.
o The grounds for expulsion should be clearly defined in the partnership agreement to ensure
fairness and transparency.
2. Unanimous Consent:
o The decision to expel a partner usually requires unanimous consent from the remaining
partners, as outlined in the partnership agreement.
o Unilateral expulsion without proper consent may lead to legal disputes and liability for wrongful
expulsion.
3. Notice and Due Process:
o The partner facing expulsion must be provided with notice of the proposed action and an
opportunity to present their case before the remaining partners.

Page 41 of 48
 o Due process should be followed to ensure that the expulsion decision is fair and reasonable.
Example: In a partnership firm, Raj is expelled by the other partners due to repeated breaches of the partnership
agreement, including failure to contribute capital and engage in misconduct. The decision is made unanimously
after providing Raj with notice and an opportunity to explain his actions.
Exceptions:
1. Partnership Agreement Provisions:
o The partnership agreement may contain specific provisions governing the expulsion of
partners, including alternative procedures or criteria for expulsion.
o Parties are bound by the terms of the partnership agreement, which may override default legal
principles.
2. Legal Constraints:
o Legal constraints, such as statutory provisions or court rulings, may limit the circumstances
under which a partner can be expelled from a partnership.
o Partnerships must comply with applicable laws and regulations governing expulsion to avoid
legal repercussions.
Dissolution of a Firm
Concept: Dissolution of a firm refers to the termination or winding up of a partnership or business entity. It
marks the end of the firm's existence as a legal entity and involves the settlement of its affairs, including the
distribution of assets and liabilities among partners or stakeholders.
Essentials:
1. Mutual Agreement or Legal Requirement:
o Dissolution may occur either by mutual agreement among the partners or as mandated by law
due to specific circumstances such as bankruptcy, expiration of partnership term, or death of
a partner.
o The decision to dissolve the firm should be made in accordance with the partnership agreement
or relevant legal provisions.
2. Liquidation of Assets and Liabilities:
o Upon dissolution, the firm's assets are liquidated, and its liabilities are settled.
o The proceeds from asset liquidation are used to pay off creditors, with any remaining funds
distributed among the partners according to their respective shares.
3. Notification of Stakeholders:
o Stakeholders, including creditors, employees, customers, and regulatory authorities, must be
notified of the firm's dissolution.
o Proper notice should be provided to ensure transparency and facilitate the settlement of claims
and obligations.
Procedure:
1. Decision to Dissolve:
o Partners must agree to dissolve the firm either through mutual consent or as required by law.
o The decision may be documented in writing, and any dissenting partners should be given an
opportunity to express their objections.
2. Liquidation of Assets:
o The firm's assets are identified, valued, and liquidated through sale or other means.
o Proceeds from asset liquidation are used to settle outstanding debts and liabilities.
3. Settlement of Liabilities:
o Creditors are notified of the firm's dissolution, and arrangements are made to settle
outstanding debts and obligations.
o Any remaining funds after debt settlement are distributed among the partners according to
their entitlements.
Example: ABC Partnership decides to dissolve due to financial difficulties and declining business prospects. The
partners agree to liquidate the firm's assets, pay off creditors, and distribute the remaining proceeds among
themselves based on their profit-sharing ratios.
Exceptions:
1. Partnership Agreement Provisions:
o The dissolution process may be subject to specific provisions outlined in the partnership
agreement, such as procedures for dispute resolution or alternative methods of asset
distribution.
2. Legal Constraints:
o Legal requirements and regulatory frameworks may impose restrictions or additional steps on
the dissolution process, depending on the jurisdiction and nature of the firm's activities.
Mode of settlement of accounts between Partners of a Firm
Concept: Settlement of accounts between partners of a firm refers to the process of determining each partner's
share of profits or losses, capital contributions, and other financial obligations upon the dissolution or
reconstitution of the partnership. This process ensures fair distribution of assets and liabilities among the partners
based on their respective rights and interests.
Essentials:

Page 42 of 48
 1. Evaluation of Assets and Liabilities:
o Partners must assess the firm's assets, including cash, inventory, investments, and liabilities
such as debts, loans, and outstanding expenses.
o Proper valuation of assets and liabilities is essential to determine the firm's financial position
accurately.
2. Calculation of Profits and Losses:
o Profits and losses accrued during the partnership's operation period are calculated based on
the firm's financial records and accounting principles.
o Each partner's share of profits or losses is determined according to the partnership agreement
or profit-sharing ratio.
3. Adjustment of Capital Accounts:
o Capital accounts of partners are adjusted to reflect their contributions, withdrawals, and share
of profits or losses over time.
o Any additional capital injections or drawings made by partners are accounted for in the
settlement process.
Modes of Settlement:
1. Cash Settlement:
o Partners may opt for a cash settlement where the firm's assets are liquidated, and the resulting
proceeds are distributed among the partners in proportion to their respective interests.
o This mode of settlement provides immediate liquidity to partners but may result in the sale of
assets at a discounted price.
2. Asset Distribution:
o Partners may choose to divide the firm's assets among themselves based on their agreed-upon
valuation or as per legal requirements.
o Assets such as property, equipment, and inventory are transferred to individual partners, who
assume responsibility for their management or disposal.
3. Credit Settlement:
o In certain cases, partners may agree to settle accounts through the transfer of debts or
obligations owed to the firm.
o Credit settlement involves the allocation of outstanding receivables, loans, or other financial
instruments to partners, who may pursue collection or repayment as appropriate.
Example: XYZ Partnership decides to dissolve, and partners A, B, and C agree to settle their accounts through
a combination of cash settlement and asset distribution. After assessing the firm's assets and liabilities, they
allocate cash proceeds from asset liquidation and distribute remaining assets such as equipment and inventory
among themselves based on their profit-sharing ratios.
Exceptions:
 Partnership Agreement Provisions:
o The mode of settlement may be subject to specific provisions outlined in the partnership
agreement, which may override default legal principles or offer alternative methods of asset
distribution.
 Legal Constraints:
o Legal requirements and regulatory frameworks may impose restrictions or additional steps on
the settlement process, depending on the jurisdiction and nature of the firm's activities.
Effects of Non-registration of a Partnership
Concept: The non-registration of a partnership refers to a situation where a partnership firm fails to comply with
the legal requirement of registering with the appropriate authority as per the provisions of the Indian Partnership
Act, 1932. Registration confers certain rights, privileges, and legal status upon the partnership, and non-
compliance can have various implications for the firm and its partners.
Essentials:
1. Legal Recognition:
o Registration provides the partnership with legal recognition as a distinct entity, separate from
its individual partners.
o Without registration, the partnership may not enjoy certain legal rights and benefits conferred
upon registered firms.
2. Rights and Liabilities:
o Registered partnerships are entitled to sue or be sued in their own name, while unregistered
partnerships may face limitations in legal proceedings.
o Partnerships are liable for debts, obligations, and legal consequences arising from their
business activities, regardless of registration status.
3. Taxation and Compliance:
o Registered partnerships may avail themselves of tax benefits, incentives, and compliance
requirements prescribed by tax authorities.
o Non-registered partnerships may face challenges in tax assessment, compliance audits, and
claiming deductions or exemptions available to registered entities.
Effects:

Page 43 of 48
 1. Limited Legal Standing:
o Unregistered partnerships may lack the legal standing to enforce contracts, protect intellectual
property rights, or engage in certain business transactions.
o Third parties dealing with unregistered partnerships may hesitate due to concerns regarding
legal enforceability and liability.
2. Restrictions on Legal Proceedings:
o Unregistered partnerships may encounter difficulties in initiating legal actions or defending
against claims in court.
o The partnership may not have the authority to file lawsuits or pursue legal remedies in its
name, potentially exposing partners to personal liability.
3. Tax Disadvantages:
o Non-registration may result in adverse tax consequences, such as higher tax rates, loss of
deductions, or penalties for non-compliance with tax laws.
o Tax authorities may scrutinize the partnership's financial transactions more closely, leading to
increased regulatory scrutiny and potential fines or penalties.
Example: ABC Partnership, comprising three partners engaged in trading activities, neglects to register under
the Indian Partnership Act. While conducting business, they enter into a significant contract with a supplier.
However, due to their non-registration status, the supplier refuses to honor the contract, citing concerns about
the partnership's legal standing. As a result, the partnership faces challenges in fulfilling its obligations and may
incur financial losses.
Exceptions:
 Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs):
o Certain types of partnerships, such as Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs), are governed by
separate legislation and may have different registration requirements and effects.
o LLPs enjoy limited liability protection for partners, which shields them from personal liability
for the partnership's debts and obligations, subject to compliance with statutory requirements.
Sale by Auction
Concept: Sale by auction refers to a method of selling goods or property to the highest bidder through a public
bidding process. It is a transparent and competitive way to determine the market value of items and facilitate
fair transactions between buyers and sellers.
Essentials:
1. Public Bidding:
o Auctions are conducted in a public setting where potential buyers gather to bid on the items
being sold.
o Bidding typically starts at a minimum price set by the seller, and participants incrementally
raise their bids until the highest offer is accepted.
2. Auctioneer:
o An auctioneer serves as the facilitator of the auction, overseeing the bidding process,
announcing bids, and determining the winning bidder.
o The auctioneer ensures fairness and transparency in the auction proceedings and may enforce
rules to maintain order and prevent collusion among bidders.
3. Reserve Price:
o The seller may set a reserve price, which is the minimum price at which they are willing to sell
the item.
o If bidding does not reach the reserve price, the seller reserves the right to withdraw the item
from the auction or negotiate with potential buyers privately.
Example: An antique furniture dealer organizes an auction to sell a collection of vintage chairs and tables.
Interested buyers gather at the auction house, where the auctioneer introduces each item and begins accepting
bids. Bidders compete by raising their offers until the auctioneer declares the highest bid as the winning offer.
The antique dealer sets a reserve price for each item, ensuring that they receive a satisfactory minimum price
for the furniture pieces.
Exceptions:
 Private Auctions:
o In some cases, auctions may be conducted privately, with participation limited to invited
bidders or registered buyers.
o Private auctions may occur online or through exclusive events and may have different rules
and procedures compared to public auctions.
 Regulated Auctions:
o Certain types of auctions, such as government auctions or bankruptcy auctions, may be subject
to specific regulations or legal requirements.
o Sellers and auctioneers must adhere to applicable laws governing the sale of goods, ensuring
compliance with consumer protection, contract, and auction regulations.

Page 44 of 48
Sale of specific Goods
Concept: The sale of specific goods refers to the transaction where the seller agrees to transfer ownership of
identified or specified goods to the buyer in exchange for a price. Specific goods are goods that are identified
and agreed upon at the time the contract is made, distinguishing them from generic or unascertained goods.
Essentials:
1. Identification of Goods:
o Specific goods are identified or designated at the time of contracting, either by description or
by reference to a specific lot, batch, or individual item.
o The goods must be sufficiently identified to distinguish them from other similar items and to
enable both parties to understand what is being bought and sold.
2. Transfer of Ownership:
o Ownership of specific goods passes from the seller to the buyer at the time of contracting,
provided that the goods are in a deliverable state and the parties intend to transfer ownership.
o The seller must have the right to transfer ownership of the goods, free from any encumbrances
or third-party claims.
3. Delivery and Acceptance:
o The seller is obligated to deliver the specific goods to the buyer in accordance with the terms
of the contract.
o Upon delivery, the buyer has the right to inspect the goods and must accept them if they
conform to the contract specifications.
Example: A customer visits a car dealership and selects a specific car from the showroom floor. After negotiating
the price and terms with the salesperson, the customer agrees to purchase that particular car. The sales contract
identifies the vehicle by its make, model, color, and vehicle identification number (VIN). Once the contract is
signed and payment is made, ownership of the car transfers from the dealership to the customer.
Exceptions:
 Sale by Description:
o If goods are sold by description rather than specifically identified, the contract is governed by
rules related to sales by description rather than specific goods.
o In such cases, the goods must correspond with the description provided in the contract, but
they need not be individually identified or specified at the time of contracting.
 Sale by Sample:
o In some transactions, goods may be sold based on a sample provided by the seller.
o The buyer relies on the sample to judge the quality and characteristics of the goods, and the
actual goods delivered must correspond with the sample provided.
Unpaid seller rights
Concept: The rights of an unpaid seller refer to the legal entitlements granted to a seller who has not received
payment for the goods sold. These rights empower the seller to protect their interests, recover payment, and
assert control over the goods until payment is made.
Essentials:
1. Right of Lien: An unpaid seller retains the right of lien over the goods, allowing them to retain
possession of the goods until full payment of the purchase price. This right exists even if the seller has
delivered the goods to the buyer, provided that the seller has not surrendered possession.
2. Right of Stoppage in Transit: If the seller learns that the buyer has become insolvent and the goods
are in transit, the seller can stop the goods while they are in transit and resume possession. This right
allows the seller to prevent the buyer from receiving the goods and reclaim them for themselves or
resell them to recover the outstanding amount.
3. Right of Resale: In the event of non-payment by the buyer, the unpaid seller has the right to resell
the goods. The seller must provide reasonable notice to the buyer of their intention to resell, and any
proceeds from the resale are applied towards the unpaid amount.
4. Right to Sue for Damages: The unpaid seller has the right to sue the buyer for damages arising from
the breach of contract, including non-payment or refusal to accept delivery. Damages may include the
loss of profit, expenses incurred due to non-acceptance, or any other losses suffered by the seller as a
result of the buyer's default.
Example: Suppose a seller delivers a shipment of electronic appliances to a buyer but does not receive payment
as agreed upon in the sales contract. In this scenario, the seller retains the right of lien over the appliances until
the buyer settles the outstanding payment. If the buyer declares insolvency while the goods are in transit, the
seller can exercise the right of stoppage in transit to reclaim possession of the appliances. Additionally, if the
buyer fails to make payment within a reasonable time, the seller can resell the appliances to recover the unpaid
amount.
Exceptions: The rights of an unpaid seller may be subject to certain limitations or exceptions based on the
terms of the contract, applicable laws, or specific circumstances of the transaction. For example, if the seller has
waived their rights in the contract or if the goods have been sold on credit with specific payment terms, the
exercise of certain rights may be restricted.

Page 45 of 48
Distinguish between Condition and Warranty
Concept: In the context of sales contracts, conditions and warranties are terms that define the nature of the
contractual obligations regarding the goods being sold. Understanding the difference between them is essential
because they have different legal implications in case of breach by either party.
Essentials:
1. Condition:
o A condition is a fundamental term of the contract, the breach of which gives the aggrieved
party the right to terminate the contract and claim damages.
o Conditions are vital elements that go to the root of the contract, and their fulfilment is crucial
for the performance of the contract.
o Breach of a condition entitles the innocent party to repudiate the contract and seek remedies
for the breach.
2. Warranty:
o A warranty is a minor term of the contract that is collateral to the main purpose of the contract.
o Breach of a warranty gives rise to a claim for damages only, but does not entitle the innocent
party to terminate the contract.
o Warranties are subsidiary promises or undertakings that do not go to the essence of the
contract.
Simple Example: Consider a scenario where a buyer purchases a laptop from a seller. The contract specifies
that the laptop must have a certain processor speed and memory capacity (conditions) and also includes a
promise from the seller that the laptop comes with a free carrying case (warranty). If the laptop fails to meet
the specified processor speed and memory capacity, the buyer can choose to terminate the contract and claim
damages (breach of condition). However, if the carrying case is of inferior quality, the buyer can only claim
damages for the breach but cannot terminate the contract (breach of warranty).
Exceptions:
 The distinction between conditions and warranties may sometimes be blurred, and the categorization of
a term as a condition or warranty may depend on the intention of the parties, the subject matter of the
contract, or the specific circumstances of the case.
 Courts may also consider factors such as the relative importance of the term to the contract, the
consequences of the breach, and the remedies sought by the parties in determining whether a term is
a condition or warranty.
Distinguish between Sale and Hire-Purchase Agreement
Sale Concept: A sale is a transaction where ownership of goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer in
exchange for a price paid by the buyer. In a sale, the buyer immediately becomes the owner of the goods upon
payment of the purchase price, and the seller relinquishes all rights and responsibilities associated with the
goods.
Essentials:
1. Transfer of Ownership: In a sale, ownership of the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer.
2. Immediate Payment: The buyer typically pays the entire purchase price upfront or agrees to make
full payment before taking possession of the goods.
3. Finality: Once the sale is completed, the seller has no further interest or control over the goods, and
the buyer assumes all risks and benefits associated with ownership.
Simple Example: John purchases a bicycle from a store for $200. He pays the full amount upfront and receives
a receipt confirming the sale. As soon as John pays the purchase price, ownership of the bicycle is transferred to
him, and he becomes the legal owner of the bicycle.
Hire-Purchase Agreement Concept: A hire-purchase agreement is a type of contract where goods are hired
out to a person (hirer) for a specified period with an option to purchase the goods at the end of the hire period.
Unlike a sale, where ownership of the goods is immediately transferred to the buyer, in a hire-purchase
agreement, ownership remains with the seller until the hirer exercises the option to purchase the goods.
Essentials:
1. Ownership: The ownership of the goods remains with the seller until the hirer exercises the option to
purchase.
2. Payment Terms: The hirer typically pays an initial deposit followed by regular installments over a fixed
term.
3. Option to Purchase: The hirer has the option to purchase the goods at the end of the hire period by
paying a final lump sum or nominal amount, known as the "option to purchase price."
Simple Example: Sarah enters into a hire-purchase agreement with a car dealership to acquire a car. She pays
an initial deposit of $1000 and agrees to make monthly payments of $200 over a period of three years. At the
end of the hire period, Sarah has the option to purchase the car for an additional payment of $5000.
Distinction:
1. Ownership: In a sale, ownership of the goods is immediately transferred to the buyer, whereas in a
hire-purchase agreement, ownership remains with the seller until the hirer exercises the option to
purchase.
2. Payment: In a sale, the buyer pays the full purchase price upfront, while in a hire-purchase agreement,
the hirer pays an initial deposit followed by regular installments.

Page 46 of 48
 3. Finality: Once a sale is completed, the seller has no further interest in the goods, whereas in a hire-
purchase agreement, the seller retains ownership until the hirer exercises the option to purchase.
Goods sent on Approval for Sale or Return Basis
Concept: Goods sent on approval for sale or return basis refer to a commercial arrangement where a seller
sends goods to a buyer for inspection or evaluation with the option to purchase or return them within a specified
period. This arrangement allows the buyer to assess the goods before making a final decision to purchase,
thereby reducing the risk of unsuitable purchases.
Essentials:
1. Consignment Basis: The goods are sent by the seller to the buyer on a consignment or trial basis,
with the understanding that ownership remains with the seller until the buyer decides to purchase them.
2. Evaluation Period: The buyer is given a specific period to evaluate the goods, typically ranging from
a few days to several weeks, during which they can use, examine, or test the goods.
3. Option to Purchase or Return: At the end of the evaluation period, the buyer has the option to either
purchase the goods by paying the agreed-upon price or return them to the seller at no cost.
4. Risk and Liability: While the goods are in the buyer's possession for evaluation, the buyer bears the
risk of any damage or loss unless caused by the seller's negligence. However, the seller retains liability
for the goods until they are accepted by the buyer or returned.
Simple Example: Suppose a furniture manufacturer, XYZ Furniture, sends a set of dining chairs to a retail store,
ABC Home Furnishings, on approval for sale or return basis. The retail store displays the chairs in its showroom
for customers to evaluate. After two weeks, if the chairs meet the store's quality standards and appeal to
customers, ABC Home Furnishings can purchase them from XYZ Furniture. If not, the store can return the chairs
to the manufacturer without any obligation.
Exceptions:
1. Negligence: If the goods are damaged or lost due to the seller's negligence during transit or while in
the buyer's possession for evaluation, the seller may still be liable for compensation, irrespective of the
approval for sale or return arrangement.
2. Agreed Terms: Any specific terms or conditions agreed upon between the seller and the buyer
regarding the approval for sale or return arrangement may override general principles, provided they
are lawful and do not contravene consumer protection laws.
Note: It's essential for sellers and buyers to clearly document the terms of the approval for sale or return
arrangement to avoid misunderstandings or disputes regarding ownership, liability, and the option to purchase
or return the goods.
Ascertainment of Price
Concept: Ascertainment of price refers to the determination or fixation of the amount of money that a buyer
agrees to pay and a seller agrees to accept for the sale of goods or services. It is a crucial element in a contract
of sale as it defines the consideration exchanged between the parties.
Essentials:
1. Mutual Agreement: Both the buyer and the seller must mutually agree on the price or a method for
determining the price. This agreement can be explicit or implied through conduct.
2. Definite or Determinable: The price must be definite or determinable at the time of entering into the
contract. It should be clear enough to enable enforcement of the contract.
3. Methods of Ascertainment: The price can be fixed by various methods such as:
o Stipulation by the parties
o Calculation based on a formula
o Market price at the time of delivery
o Valuation by a third party
4. Consideration: The price serves as the consideration for the transfer of ownership or the provision of
goods or services. It should be reasonable and commensurate with the value of the goods or services
exchanged.
Simple Example: Suppose Mr. A agrees to sell his car to Mr. B for a price of ₹300,000. In this case, the price is
explicitly agreed upon by both parties, making it a straightforward method of ascertainment.
Exceptions:
1. Agreement to Agree: If the parties intend to agree on the price in the future but fail to do so, the
contract may be considered void for uncertainty. However, if the parties have established a method for
determining the price, such as referring to market rates or valuation by an expert, the contract may still
be valid.
2. Non-Monetary Consideration: In certain cases, the consideration for the sale may not be in the form
of money, making it challenging to ascertain the price. For example, if goods are exchanged for other
goods or services, determining an equivalent monetary value can be complex.
Note: It's essential for parties entering into a contract of sale to clearly specify the method of ascertainment of
price to avoid ambiguity and potential disputes. Additionally, adherence to relevant statutory requirements and
market practices is crucial for enforceability.

Page 47 of 48
Risk Prima-facie passes with the Property
Concept: "Risk prima facie passes with the property" means that unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties,
the risk associated with the goods passes from the seller to the buyer along with the transfer of ownership or
property. This principle governs the allocation of risk between the parties in a contract of sale.
Essentials:
1. Transfer of Ownership: The risk passes along with the transfer of ownership or property in the goods
from the seller to the buyer. This typically occurs upon delivery of the goods, unless the parties agree
otherwise.
2. Prima Facie Presumption: The principle operates as a prima facie presumption, meaning it applies by
default unless the parties expressly agree otherwise or the circumstances indicate a different intention.
3. Default Rule: In the absence of any contrary agreement between the parties, the risk passes with the
property automatically. This default rule provides clarity and predictability in commercial transactions.
Simple Example: Suppose Mr. A sells a valuable painting to Mr. B, and the contract specifies that the painting
will be delivered to Mr. B's art gallery. During transit, the painting gets damaged due to an unforeseen accident.
In this scenario, as per the principle of "risk prima facie passes with the property," the risk of damage to the
painting would typically pass from Mr. A to Mr. B at the moment of delivery. Therefore, Mr. B, as the buyer, would
bear the risk of loss or damage to the painting.
Exceptions:
1. Agreement Contrary to Default Rule: If the parties explicitly agree in the contract that the risk will
not pass with the property until a specific event occurs (e.g., acceptance of the goods by the buyer),
the default rule may not apply.
2. Specific Statutory Provisions: Certain statutory provisions or regulations may override the default
rule regarding the passage of risk. Parties should be aware of any relevant legal requirements or
exceptions applicable to their transaction.
Note: It's essential for parties to clearly define and agree upon the allocation of risk in a contract of sale to avoid
ambiguity and potential disputes. Additionally, factors such as insurance coverage and the nature of the goods
should be considered when determining the appropriate allocation of risk between the parties.

Disclaimer: The author, Hemant Patil, GLC Mumbai Batch of 2025, generously distributes these notes freely to
all aspiring law students, irrespective of their college, university, location, or any other parameter, with zero
discrimination. In fact, the author encourages the free subsequent distribution of these notes so that everyone
may benefit.

The author makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness,
accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the information contained herein for any purpose. Any reliance
you place on such information is strictly at your own risk. In no event shall the author be liable for any loss or
damage, including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever
arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this document. The author
reserves the right to modify, add, or delete any information in this document at any time without prior notice.
For obtaining a recent and updated copy of this document, please send a request with your clear and accurate
identification details (Full Name, Contact, Institution, etc.) to hbpatil@gmail.com

Page 48 of 48