Professional Documents
Culture Documents
companies in India. The Act came into force across India on 12th September 2013 and has a few
amendments to the previous act of 1956. It has also introduced new concepts like a One Person
Company.
With a phenomenal change in the domestic and international economic landscape, the Government
of India decided to replace the Companies Act, 1956 with a new legislation. The Companies Act,
2013, endeavours to make the corporate regulations in India more contemporary. In this article, we
will focus on the meaning and features of a Company.
Meaning of a Company
There are many definitions of a Company by various legal experts. However, Section 2(20) of the
Companies Act, 2013, defines the term ‘Company’ as follows: “Company means a company
incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law.”
Hence, in order to understand the meaning of a Company, it is important to look at the distinctive
features that explain the realm of a Company.
Features of a Company
One of the most distinctive features of a Company, as compared to other organizations, is that it
acquires a unique character of being a separate legal entity. Hence, when you register a company,
you give it a legal personality with similar rights and powers as a human being.
The existence of a company is distinct and separate from that of its members. It can own property,
bank accounts, raise loans, incur liabilities and enter into contracts. According to Law, it is
altogether different from the subscribers to the Memorandum of Association.
Also, it has a distinct personality which is different from those who compose it. Member can also
contract with the Company and acquire a right against it or incur a liability to it. However, for any
debts, the creditors can sue the Company but the members cannot.
A Company can own, enjoy, and dispose of a property in its own name. While the shareholders
contribute to the capital and assets, the company is the rightful owner of such assets and capital.
Further, the shareholders are not private or joint holders of the company’s property.
Perpetual Succession
Limited Liability
One of the important features of a company is the limited liability of its members. The liability of a
member depends on the type of company.
• In the case of a limited liability company, the debts of the company in totality do not become
the debts of its shareholders. In such a case, the liability of its members is limited to the extent
of the nominal value of shares held by them. The shareholders cannot be asked to pay more
than the unpaid value of their shares.
• In the case of a company limited by guarantee, members are liable only to the extent of the
amount guaranteed by them. Further, this liability arises only when the company goes into
liquidation.
• Finally, if it is an unlimited company, then the liability of its members is unlimited too. But
such instances are very rare.
Another one of the features of a company is that it is known as an Artificial Legal Person.
Since a company is an artificial person, it needs humans to function. These humans are Directors
who can authenticate the company’s formal acts either on their own or through the common seal of
the company.
Common Seal
While a company is an artificial person and works through the agency of human beings, it has an
official signature. This is affixed by the officers and employees of the company on all its
documents. This official signature is the Common Seal.
However, the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 has made the Common Seal optional. Section 9
of the Act does not have the phrase ‘and a common seal’ in it. This provides an alternative mode of
authorization for companies who do not wish to have a common seal.
According to this amendment, if a company does not have a common seal, then the authorization
shall be done by:
• Two Directors or
• One Director and the Company Secretary (if the company has appointed a Company
Secretary).
Memorandum Of Association
The Memorandum of Association or MOA of a company defines the constitution and the scope of
powers of the company. In simple words, the MOA is the foundation on which the company is
built. In this article, we will look at the laws and regulations that govern the MOA. Also, we will
understand the contents of the Memorandum of Association of a company.
• The MOA of a company contains the object for which the company is formed. It identifies the
scope of its operations and determines the boundaries it cannot cross.
• It is a public document according to Section 399 of the Companies Act, 2013. Hence, any
person who enters into a contract with the company is expected to have knowledge of the
MOA.
• It contains details about the powers and rights of the company.
Under no circumstance can the company depart from the provisions specified in the memorandum.
If it does so, then it would be ultra vires the company and void.
1. For a public limited company, the name of the company must have the word ‘Limited’ as the
last word
2. For the private limited company, the name of the company must have the words ‘Private
Limited’ as the last words.
This is not applicable to companies formed under Section 8 of the Act who must include one of the
following words, as applicable:
• Foundation
• Forum
• Association
• Federation
• Chambers
• Confederation
• Council
• Electoral Trust, etc.
It must specify the State in which the registered office of the company will be situated.
Object Clause
It must specify the objects for which the company is being incorporated. Further, if a company
changes its activities which are not reflected in its name, then it can change its name within six
months of changing its activities. The company must comply with all name-change provisions.
Liability Clause
It should specify the liability of the members of the company, whether limited or unlimited. Also,
1. For a company limited by shares – it should specify if the liability of its members is limited
to any unpaid amount on the shares that they hold.
2. For a company limited by guarantee – it should specify the amount undertaken by each
member to contribute to:
i. The assets of the company when it winds-up. This is provided that he is a member of the
company when it winds-up or the winding-up happens within one year of him ceasing to be
a member. In the latter case, the debts and liabilities considered would be those contracted
before he ceases to be a member.
ii. The costs, charges, and expenses of winding up and the adjustment of the rights of the
contributors among themselves.
Capital Clause
This is valid only for companies having share capital. These companies must specify the amount of
Authorized capital divided into shares of fixed amounts. Further, it must state the names of each
member and the number of shares against their names.
Association Clause
The MOA must clearly specify the desire of the subscriber to form a company. This is the last
clause.
For One-Person-Company
The MOA must specify the name of the person who becomes a member of the company in the
event of the death of the subscriber.
The separate legal entity of a company is one of its most unique features.
The Corporate Veil Theory is a legal concept which separates the identity of the company from
its members. Hence, the members are shielded from the liabilities arising out of the company’s
actions.
Therefore, if the company incurs debts or contravenes any laws, then the members are not liable
for those errors and enjoy corporate insulation. In simpler words, the shareholders are protected
from the acts of the company.
2. If yes, then what are the scenarios and the rules that govern piercing the corporate veil?
Piercing the Corporate Veil means looking beyond the company as a legal person. Or,
disregarding the corporate identity and paying regard to humans instead.
In certain cases, the Courts ignore the company and concern themselves directly with the
members or managers of the company. This is called piercing the corporate veil. Usually, Courts
choose this option when the case involves a question of control rather than ownership.
Scenarios under which the Courts consider piercing or lifting the corporate veil are as below,
There are cases where the Courts need to understand if the company is an enemy or friend. In
such cases, the Courts adopt the test of control. The Courts usually avoid piercing the corporate
veil, unless the public interest is in jeopardy. However, to ascertain if a company is an enemy
company, the Court might choose to do so.
So, how can a company be an enemy? It does not have a mind or consciousness and cannot be a
friend or foe, right? However, if the affairs of a company are under the control of people from an
enemy country, then the company might be an enemy too. In such cases, the Court may examine
the character of the humans who are at the helm of affairs of the company.
In matters concerning evasion or circumvention of taxes, duties, etc., the Court might disregard
the corporate entity.
Imagine a company that is used to evade tax. In such cases, piercing the corporate veil allows the
Court to understand the real owner of the income of the company and make the said person liable
for legitimate taxes.
Sometimes the members of a company can create another company/subsidiary company to avoid
certain legal obligations. In such cases, piercing the corporate veil allows the Courts to
understand the real transactions.
Imagine a company liable to share 20 percent of its profits with its employees as a bonus. This is
a legal obligation. To avoid this, the company opens a wholly owned subsidiary company and
transfers its investment holdings to it.
The new company formed has no assets of its own and no business income either. It is
completely dependent on the principal company.
By doing so, the principal company reduced the amount of bonus liable to be paid to its
employees. The Courts, by piercing the corporate veil, can understand the real intention of the
principal company and ensure that it fulfils its legal obligations.
Sometimes, the basis of the formation of a company is to act as an agent or trustee of its
members or of another company. In such cases, the company loses its individuality in favour of
its principal. Also, the principal is liable for the acts of such a company.
In cases where a company is formed for some illegal or improper purposes like defeating the
law, the Courts might decide to lift or pierce the corporate veil.
Types of Shares
A share or the proportion of interest of a shareholder is equal to the proportion of the amount paid
to the total capital payable to the company. Let us look at the various types of shares a company
can issue – equity shares and preferential shares.
Shares
A share in the share capital of the company, including stock, is the definition of the term ‘Share’.
This is in accordance with Section 2(84) of the Companies Act, 2013. In other words, a share is a
measure of the interest in the company’s assets held by a shareholder. In this article, we will look
at the different types of shares like preferential and equity shares. Further, we will understand
certain definitions and regulations surrounding them.
The Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company prescribe the rights and obligations
of shareholders. Further, a shareholder must have certain contractual and other rights as per the
provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.
Section 44 of the Companies Act, 2013, states that shares or debentures or other interests of any
member in a company are movable properties. Also, they are transferable in the manner prescribed
in the Articles of the company. Further, Section 45 of the Act mandates the numbering of every
share. This number is distinctive. However, if a person is a holder of the beneficial interest in the
share, then this rule does not apply (example: share in the records of a depository).
• Dividend Payment – A fixed amount or amount calculated at a fixed rate. This might/might
not be subject to income tax.
• Repayment – In case of a winding up or repayment of the amount of paid-up share capital,
there is a preferential right to the payment of any fixed premium or premium on any fixed
scale. The Memorandum or Articles of the company specifies the same.
Equity Share Capital – Equity Shares
All share capital which is NOT preferential share capital is Equity Share Capital. Equity shares are
of two types:
1. For dividends, apart from the preferential rights to amounts specified above, it can participate
(fully or to a certain extent) with capital not entitled to the preferential rights.
2. In case of a winding up, apart from the preferential right of the capital amounts specified
above, it can participate (fully or to a certain extent), with capital not entitled to preferential
rights in any surplus remaining after repaying the entire capital.
Remember, Section 43 is not applicable to private companies if the Memorandum or Articles of
Associates specifies it.
The term Ultra Vires means ‘Beyond Powers’. In legal terms, it is applicable only to the acts
performed in excess of the legal powers of the doer. This works on an assumption that the powers
are limited in nature. Since the Doctrine of Ultra Vires limits the company to the objects specified
in the memorandum, the company can be:
• Restrained from using its funds for purposes other than those specified in the Memorandum
• Restrained from carrying on trade different from the one authorized.
The company cannot sue on an ultra vires transaction. Further, it cannot be sued too. If a company
supplies goods or offers service or lends money on an ultra vires contract, then it cannot obtain
payment or recover the loan.
However, if a lender loans money to a company which has not been extended yet, then he can stop
the company from parting with it via an injunction. The lender has this right because the company
does not become the owner of the money as it is ultra vires to the company and the lender remains
the owner.
Further, if the company borrows money in an ultra vires transaction to repay a legal loan, then the
lender is entitled to recover his loan from the company.
Sometimes an act which is ultra vires can be regularized by the shareholders of the company. For
example,
• If an act is ultra vires the power of directors, then the shareholders can ratify it.
• If an act is ultra vires the Articles of the company, then the company can alter the Articles.
Remember, you cannot bind a company through an ultra vires contract. Estoppel, acquiescence,
lapse of time, delay, or ratification cannot make it ‘Intravires’.
1. An act, legal in itself, but not authorized by the object clause of the Memorandum of
Association of a company or statute, is Ultra Vires the company. Hence, it is null and void.
2. An act ultra vires the company cannot be ratified even by the unanimous consent of all
shareholders.
3. If an act is ultra vires the directors of a company, but intra vires the company itself, then the
members of the company can pass a resolution to ratify it.
4. If an act is Ultra Vires the Articles of Association of a company, then the same can be ratified
by a special resolution at a general meeting.
The Flip-side
While the main advantage of the Doctrine of Ultra Vires is the protection of shareholders and
creditors, it has disadvantages too. This doctrine prevents the company from changing its activities
in a direction agreed by all members. Further, a special resolution can alter the object clause of the
Memorandum. This defeats the core purpose of the doctrine.
Classification of Capital
The word ‘Capital’ has different meanings in different professions and contexts. If a company is
limited by shares, then the term capital means share capital. Let us see the various classifications of
capital like nominal capital. paid up capital etc.
Capital
In simple words, the total contributions made by people to the common stock of the company is the
capital of the company. Further, a share is the proportion of the capital to which each member has
entitlement. Remember, a share is not an amount of money. It is an interest including different
rights in the contract.
In this article, we will look at five ways in which the term capital is used in Company Law:
nominal capital, issued capital, subscribed capital, called up capital and paid up capital.
The company also pays stamp duty in this amount. Typically, you can calculate nominal capital by
taking into consideration the working and reserve capital needs of the company.
Issued Capital
Issued capital is a part of the Authorized capital, offered by the company for the subscription. This
includes the allotment of shares. Section 2(50) of the Companies Act, 2013, offers this definition.
Further, it is mandatory for companies to disclose its issued capital in the balance sheet (Schedule
III of the Act).
Subscribed Capital
Section 2(86) of the Companies Act, 2013, defines Subscribed capital as the part of the capital
being subscribed by the members of the company. It is the number of shares that the public takes.
Further, if the company states Authorized Capital in any communication like notice, advertisement,
official/business letter, etc., then it has to also specify subscribed and paid up capital in equally
conspicuous characters.
Also, Section 60 of the Act specifies that defaulters in this regard, the company and all officers
who default, will be fined around Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 5,000 respectively.
Called up Capital
According to Section 2(15) of the Companies Act, 2013, Called up Capital is the part of the capital
which the company calls for payment. This is the total amount that the company calls-up on the
issued shares.
Paid Up capital
Paid up capital is the part of called up capital actually paid or credited by shareholders on the
issued shares. Mathematically, Paid up capital = Called up capital – Calls in Arrears.
Paid up capital represents the money that the company has not borrowed. Also, it is the total
amount of money that the company receives from shareholders in exchange for shares of stock.
The Companies Act, 2013 details the regulations and company registration papers essential for the
incorporation of a company. In this article, we will understand all such rules and documents listed
in the Act. To begin with, let’s define the promoters of a company.
Promoters
Section 2(69) of the Companies Act, 2013, defines promoters as an individual who:-
Formation of a Company
Section 3 of the Companies Act, 2013, details the basic requirements of forming a company as
follows:
• Formation of a public company involves 7 or more people who subscribe their names to the
memorandum and register the company for any lawful purpose.
• Similarly, 2 or more people can form a private company.
• One person can form a One-person company.
To incorporate a company, the subscriber has to file the following company registration papers
with the registrar within whose jurisdiction the location of the registered office of the proposed
company falls.
1. The Memorandum and Articles of the company. All subscribers have to sign on the
memorandum.
2. The person who is engaged in the formation of the company has to give a declaration
regarding compliance of all the requirements and rules of the Act. A person named in the
Articles also has to sign the declaration.
3. Each subscriber to the Memorandum and individuals named as first directors in the Articles
should submit an affidavit with the following details:
i. Declaration regarding non-conviction of any offence with respect to the formation,
promotion, or management of any company.
ii. He has not been found guilty of fraud or any breach of duty to any company in the last five
years.
iii. The documents filed with the registrar are complete and true to the best of his knowledge.
4. Address for correspondence until the registered office is set-up.
5. If the subscriber to the Memorandum is an individual, then he needs to provide his full name,
residential address, and nationality along with a proof of identity. If the subscriber is a body
corporate, then prescribed documents need to be provided.
6. Individuals mentioned as subscribers to the Memorandum in the Articles need to provide the
details specified in the point above along with the Director Identification Number.
7. The individuals mentioned as first directors of the company in the Articles must provide
particulars of interests in other firms or bodies corporate along with their consent to act as
directors of the company as per the prescribed form and manner.
Once the Registrar receives the information and company registration papers, he registers all
information and documents and issues a Certificate of Incorporation in the prescribed form.
The Registrar also allocates a Corporate Identity Number (CIN) to the company which is a distinct
identity for the company. The allotment of CIN is on and from the company’s incorporation date.
The certificate carries this date.
The company must maintain copies of all information and documents until dissolution.
If a company is already incorporated but it is found at a later date that the information or
documents submitted were false or incorrect, then the promoters, first directors, and persons
making a declaration is liable for action for fraud under section 447.
• From the date of incorporation, the subscribers to the Memorandum and all subsequent
members of the company are a body corporate.
• A registered company can exercise all functions of a company incorporated under the Act.
Also, the company has perpetual succession with power to acquire, hold, and dispose of
property of all forms. Also, it can contract, sue and be sued by the said name.
• Further, the company becomes a legal person separate from the incorporators from the date of
incorporation. Also, a binding contract comes into existence between the company and its
members as mentioned in the Memorandum and Articles of Association. Until the company
dissolves or the Registrar removes it from the register, it has perpetual existence.
As per Companies Act, 2013, a Company can raise funds via right issue, preferential allotment,
employee stock option plans and sweat equity shares. However, the best way to raise funds for
an unlisted Company is by way of preferential allotment of shares. Section 62 along with Rule
13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 and Section 42 along with Rule
14 of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014 prescribes the
procedure and provisions for preferential allotment of shares.
The basic difference between Section 62 of the Companies Act, 2013 i.e. preferential allotment
and Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 i.e. private placement is that Section 62 deals with
allotment of shares only whereas Section 42 deals with allotment of securities [as defined in
Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956] as well. Comprehensively, when we issue shares
both the sections needs to be complied with whereas when we issue securities only the
provisions of Section 42 needs to be complied with. Further, in this article, we shall discuss
about the procedure for issuance and allotment of shares on preferential basis.
Debentures
Types of Debenture
1. Secured and Unsecured:
Secured debenture creates a charge on the assets of the company, thereby mortgaging the assets of
the company. Unsecured debenture does not carry any charge or security on the assets of the
company.
2. Registered and Bearer:
A registered debenture is recorded in the register of debenture holders of the company. A regular
instrument of transfer is required for their transfer. In contrast, the debenture which is transferable
by mere delivery is called bearer debenture.
Advantages of Debentures
Disadvantages of Debentures
• Each company has certain borrowing capacity. With the issue of debentures, the capacity of a
company to further borrow funds reduces.
• With redeemable debenture, the company has to make provisions for repayment on the
specified date, even during periods of financial strain on the company.
• Debenture put a permanent burden on the earnings of a company. Therefore, there is a greater
risk when the earnings of the company fluctuate
Notice of Meetings: A meeting in order to be valid must be convened by a proper notice issued
by the proper authority. It means that the notice convening the meeting be properly drafted
according to the Act and the rules, and must be served on all members who are entitled to attend
and vote at the meeting. For general meeting of any kind at least 21days notice must be given to
members. A shorter notice for Annual General Meeting will be valid, if all members entitled to
vote give their consent. The number of days in each case shall be clear days, i.e. the days must be
calculated excluding the day on which the notice is issued, a day or so for postal transit, and the
day on which the meeting is to he held. Every notice of meeting of a company must specify the
place and the day and hour of the meeting, and shall contain a statement of the business to be
transacted thereat.
Quorum of Meetings: Quorum is the minimum number of members who must be present at a
meeting as required by the rules. Any business transacted at a meeting without a quorum is
invalid. The main purpose of having a quorum is to avoid decisions being taken at a meeting by a
small minority which may be found to be unacceptable to the vast majority of members. The
number constituting a quorum at any company meeting is usually laid down in the Articles of
Association. In the absence of any provision in the Articles, the provisions as to quorum laid
down in the Companies Act, 2013 (under Sec.103) will apply. Sec. 103 of Companies Act
provides that the quorum for general meetings of shareholders shall be five members personally
present in case of a public company if the number of members as on the date of meeting is upto
1000, 15 quorum if number of members as on the date of meeting is more than 1000 but upto
5000 and if number of member exceeds 5000 than 30 quorum is required; and two members
personally present for any private company or articles may provide otherwise.
Chairman of a Meeting: ‘Chairman’ is the person who has been designated or elected to
preside over and conduct the proceedings of a meeting. He is the chief authority in the conduct
and control of the meeting.
Agenda of Meetings: The word ‘agenda’ literally means ‘things to be done’. It refers to the
programme of business to be transacted at a meeting. Agenda is essential for the systematic
transaction of the business of a meeting in the proper order of importance. It is customary for all
organisations to send an agenda along with the notice of a meeting to all members. The business
of the meeting must be conducted in the same order in which the items are placed in the agenda
and the order can be varied only with the consent of the meeting.
Minute: Minute of a meeting contains a fair and correct summary of the proceedings of a
meeting. Minutes must be prepared and signed within 30 days of the conclusion of the meeting.
The minute books of meetings must be kept at the registered office of the company or at such
other place as may be approved by the board.
Proxy: The term ‘proxy’ is used to refer to the person who is nominated by a shareholder to
represent him at a general meeting of the company. It also refers to the instrument through which
such a nominee is named and authorised to attend the meeting
Types of resolutions
• Written resolutions – Used when a general meeting is not required to pass an ordinary
resolution or special resolution. Any written ordinary resolution must be passed by a
simple majority of shareholders’ votes; written special resolutions require a 75% majority
vote. Shareholders must sign a written resolution to cast their votes.
An ordinary resolution is passed if a simple majority (above 50%) of the votes cast are in favour
of the resolution. This type of resolution can be used by shareholders and directors for all day-to-
day matters, such as:
The types of decisions that company directors can make will depend on the powers they are
granted by the shareholders. Their rights and powers will be outlined in the articles of association
and shareholders’ agreement.
In the context of limited companies, a special resolution is a motion or proposal that requires the
approval of at least 75% of shareholder votes. This kind of resolution is reserved for important
and rare decisions, such as:
• Re-registering a company.
The Companies Act 2006 specifies the types of decisions requiring a special resolution. Where
no type of resolution is specified, shareholders may pass an ordinary resolution with a simple
majority of over 50% of the votes.
In order to pass a special resolution, 14 days’ notice must be given to all members about the
proposed resolution and its intention, unless the Articles states otherwise. If a general meeting is
held, a vote will be taken by a show of hands or using a poll. Alternatively, these decisions can
be passed by written resolution. If 75% of the shareholders agree to pass a proposed resolution,
the decision is legally binding in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Special resolutions must be delivered to Companies House by post within 15 days of being
passed. A copy must also be given to all shareholders and the company auditor. Furthermore, a
company must keep a copy of all resolutions at its registered office address or SAIL address for a
minimum period of 10 years.
Managerial Persons covered are Managing Director, Whole-time Director, Part time
Directors and managers who shall be paid remuneration subject to and in accordance with
provisions of Section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013. As compared to various sections and
chapters viz section 198, 309, etc of Companies Act, 1956 which deals with Managerial
remunerations separately, the new Act has solved this issue by consolidating all provisions under
a single provision of 197.
APPLICABILITY OF PROVISIONS TO WHOM:
The managerial remuneration shall be payable to a person appointed within the meaning of
section 196 of the Companies Act, 2013. Under the Companies Act, 2013 the provisions of
payment of managerial remuneration are governed by Section 197, 198,199 and Schedule V. The
word remuneration is defined under section 2 (78) of Companies Act,
2013 which says that “remuneration” means any money or its equivalent given or passed to any
person for services rendered by him and includes perquisites as defined under the Income Tax
Act, 1961. Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961 has given an inclusive definition of the term
“perquisite”. This clause comprises of eight sub-clauses followed by two provisos,and they deal
with the following perquisites:
3. The value of any benefit or amenity granted or provided free of cost or at a concessional rate
to employee directors; or to employees who have substantial interest and certain specified
employees with some exceptions.
4. Sums paid by the employer in respect of any obligation which, but for such obligation, would
have been payable by the assessee.
5. Sums payable by the employer to effect an assurance on the life of the assessee– employee or
to effect a contract for an annuity.
6. W.E.F assessment year 2010-11, value of securities / sweat equity shares allotted or
transferred by the employer or former employer to the employee.
9. The first proviso states that certain medical benefits are not treated as perquisites in certain
specific situations.
Any expenditure incurred by the Company to affect any insurance on the life of, or to provide
any pension, annuity or gratuity for, any of the persons aforesaid or spouse or child shall be
included in managerial remuneration.
We can say that definition of remuneration as well as perquisites are inclusive in nature and
hence it covers every amount that the company pays or spends for or for the benefit of a
Director, in whatever form and by whatever name.
Moreover, any remuneration for services rendered by any such director which are of professional
nature shall not be included in the managerial remuneration. Further, a director may receive
remuneration by way of a fee for each meeting of the Board, or a committee thereof attended by
him.
Where if insurance is taken by a company on behalf of its Key Managerial Personnel for
indemnifying against any liability in respect of any negligence, default, misfeasance, breach of
duty or breach of trust for which they may be guilty in relation to the company, the premium
paid on such insurance shall not be treated as part of remuneration. But if such Key Managerial
Personnel is found guilty then such insurance shall be treated as income part of remuneration.
If a manager or any director enjoys benefit or amenity without the company incurring any
expenditure therefor , such benefit or amenity may not be included in the managerial
remuneration.
An Independent director shall not be entitled to receive stock option. However, in case of other
directors, Stock options would be part of remuneration.
1.
Automatic Route by Profits.
Section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides a way to pay managerial remuneration in case
of Company’s having adequate profits. A Public Company can pay remuneration to its directors
including Managing Director s and Whole-time Directors, and its managers which shall not
exceed 11% of the net profit as calculated in a manner laid down in section 198 of the
Companies Act, 2013. Wherein a Company in which there is one Managing Director; Whole-
time Director or manager the remuneration to be payable shall not exceed 5% of net profits and
where there are more than one of such Directors remuneration payable shall not exceed 11 % of
the net profit.
MAXIMUM REMUNERATION PAYABLE BY A COMPANY TO ITS MANAGERIAL
PERSONNEL:
If a Company wants to pay remuneration in excess of the above limit payable then a Company
shall have to follow Schedule V of the Companies Act, 2013.
A company with inadequate profit may pay to its managing director or whole-time director 200%
of the above mentioned managerial remuneration if shareholders have given their approval
through a special resolution.
Where the managerial person who is not holding Rs 5 lacs worth of shares or more or an
employee or a director of the company not related to any director or promoter at any time during
the two years prior to his appointment as a managerial person, In such cases, the company can
pay to him up to maximum of 2.5% of the “current relevant profits” and up to 5% with the
approval of shareholders by a special resolution.
For the purpose of this section, “current relevant profit” means profit calculated under section
198 but without deducting the excess of expenditure over income as defined in section 4(1) of
section 198 relating to all usual working charges in respect of those years during which the
managerial person was not an employee, director or shareholder of the company or its holding
and subsidiary companies.
However, Section IV Part II of Schedule V states that a managerial person shall be eligible for
the following perquisites which shall not be included in the computation of the ceiling on
remuneration specified in Section II and Section III:—
(a) Contribution to provident fund, superannuation fund or annuity fund to the extent these either
singly or put together are not taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961);
(b) Gratuity payable at a rate not exceeding half a month’s salary for each completed year of
service; and
i. in the event of adequacy of profits – the entire value of perquisites as per IT Act, 1961 will
have to be considered.
ii. in the event of inadequacy of profits of nil profits – only the taxable amount of perquisites
should be considered. This is relevant only in case of managerial person.
While an expatriate managerial person shall be eligible for the following which shall not be
considered in the definition of remuneration under Schedule V:
If any of such directors receive any amount in excess of limits mentioned under the provisions of
the Act, he shall refund such sums to the company and until such sum is refunded, hold it in trust
for the company.
Further, if a Company wants to pay remuneration exceeding Schedule V of the Act then it shall
require a Central Government approval.
Section 197 of the Company Act 2013 also does not bar a managing or whole-time director of a
company to receive compensation from its holding company or subsidiary provided the same
should be disclosed in the director’s report.
For the purpose of Section 197 of Companies Act’2013, the term “Effective Capital” means:
• The aggregate of paid up share capital (excluding share application money pending
allotment),
• Share premium,
• Reserves and Surplus excluding Revaluation Reserve,
• Long term loans and deposits repayable after one year, as reduced by –
• The aggregate of investments (except investments made by an investment company
whose principal business is dealing in shares, stocks, debentures or any other securities),
• Accumulated losses, and
• Preliminary expenses not written off
This is also important to know as to when the effective capital should be calculated for the
purpose of payment of managerial remuneration. In this regard, the following should be noted:
1. If the appointment of managerial person is made in the year in which the company is
incorporated, then the effective capital should be calculated on the date of appointment of such
managerial person.
2. In case other than above, the effective capital should be calculated on the last day of the
Financial Year immediately preceding the Financial Year in which the appointment of
managerial person is made.
In certain special circumstances, a company suffering from no profit or inadequate profit may
pay managerial remuneration in excess of limits specified in Section II above and that too
without the approval of Central Government. Those circumstances are specified below:
1. The company paying managerial remuneration in excess of maximum specified limits is either
a foreign company or a company who has got approval of its shareholders in this regard and
the total managerial remuneration payable by such company is within the permissible limits of
Section 197 of Companies Act’2013.
• A newly incorporated company and is in existence for last seven years from the date of
its incorporation, or
• A sick company in respect of which a scheme for revival and rehabilitation has been
ordered by BIFR or NCLT for a period of five years from the date of sanction of revival
scheme
• It may pay managerial remuneration up to two times of the amount specified in Section
II, given above.
3. Where such excess managerial remuneration is fixed by BIFR or NCLT, subject to fulfilment
of certain additional conditions apart from that given in Section 197 of Companies Act’2013
Section 197(5) of the Act 2013 specifically permits different fees to be paid to Independent
Directors, there is no such enabling provision with respect to profit related commission. This
means profit related commission may be paid uniformly to all non-executive directors. A
company may pay such commission within the limit of 1% or 3% of the net profits, as the case
may be. Further, Independent Directors cannot be granted stock options.
A company in or resident in India, to make payment in rupees to its non WTD who is resident
outside India and is on visit to India for the company’s work and is entitled to payment of sitting
fees or commission or remuneration, and travel expenses to and from and within India, in
accordance with the provisions contained in the company’s MOA & AOA or in agreement
entered into by it or in any resolution passed by the company in general meeting or by Board,
provided the requirements of any law, rules, regulations, directions applicable for making such
payments are duly complied with.
A non-resident Indian may occupy the position of managerial person in certain companies, it has
been examined by foreign exchange, taxation, Company Law and other aspects and was
accordingly decided as a matter of policy that, in case of devaluation of currency there was a
need to compensate such non-resident managerial persons to maintain these remittances at the
pre-devaluation level and such increase in remuneration is allowed even if the resultant increased
remuneration exceeds the statutory limits imposed by the Companies Act.
Subject to the provisions of sections I to IV, a managerial person shall draw remuneration from
one or both companies, provided that the total remuneration drawn from the companies does not
exceed the higher maximum limit admissible from any one of the companies of which he is a
managerial person.
PENALTY CLAUSES:
If any person contravenes the provisions of the section 197, he shall be punishable with fine
which shall not be less than one lakh rupees and may extend to five lakhs rupees If a company or
any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the
rules made there under, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such
other person shall be punishable with fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees, and where
the contravention is continuing one, with a further fine which may extend to one thousand rupees
for every day after the first during which the contravention continues.
Companies Act 2013
The Companies Act, 2013 completely revolutionized corporate laws in India by introducing
several new concepts that did not exist previously. On such game-changer was the introduction
of One Person Company concept. This led to the recognition of a completely new way of starting
businesses that accorded flexibility which a company form of entity can offer, while also
providing the protection of limited liability that sole proprietorship or partnerships lacked.
Several other countries had already recognized the ability of individuals forming a company
before the enactment of the new Companies Act in 2013. These included the likes of China,
Singapore, UK, Australia, and the USA.
Section 2(62) of Companies Act defines a one-person company as a company that has only one
person as to its member. Furthermore, members of a company are nothing but subscribers to its
memorandum of association, or its shareholders. So, an OPC is effectively a company that has
only one shareholder as its member.
Such companies are generally created when there is only one founder/promoter for the business.
Entrepreneurs whose businesses lie in early stages prefer to create OPCs instead of sole
proprietorship business because of the several advantages that OPCs offer.
A sole proprietorship form of business might seem very similar to one-person companies
because they both involve a single person owning the business, but they’re actually exist some
differences between them.
The main difference between the two is the nature of the liabilities they carry. Since an OPC is a
separate legal entity distinguished from its promoter, it has its own assets and liabilities. The
promoter is not personally liable to repay the debts of the company.
On the other hand, sole proprietorships and their proprietors are the same persons. So, the law
allows attachment and sale of promoter’s own assets in case of non-fulfilment of the business’
liabilities.
b. Single member: OPCs can have only one member or shareholder, unlike other private
companies.
c. Nominee: A unique feature of OPCs that separates it from other kinds of companies is
that the sole member of the company has to mention a nominee while registering the
company.
d. No perpetual succession: Since there is only one member in an OPC, his death will
result in the nominee choosing or rejecting to become its sole member. This does not
happen in other companies as they follow the concept of perpetual succession.
e. Minimum one director: OPCs need to have minimum one person (the member) as
director. They can have a maximum of 15 directors.
f. No minimum paid-up share capital: Companies Act, 2013 has not prescribed any
amount as minimum paid-up capital for OPCs.
g. Special privileges: OPCs enjoy several privileges and exemptions under the Companies
Act those other kinds of companies do not possess.
A single person can form an OPC by subscribing his name to the memorandum of association
and fulfilling other requirements prescribed by the Companies Act, 2013. Such memorandum
must state details of a nominee who shall become the company’s sole member in case the
original member dies or becomes incapable of entering into contractual relations.
This memorandum and the nominee’s consent to his nomination should be filed to the Registrar
of Companies along with an application of registration. Such nominee can withdraw his name at
any point in time by submission of requisite applications to the Registrar. His nomination can
also later be canceled by the member.
Only natural persons who are Indian citizens and residents are eligible to form a one-person
company in India. The same condition applies to nominees of OPCs. Further, such a natural
person cannot be a member or nominee of more than one OPC at any point in time.
It is important to note that only natural persons can become members of OPCs. This does not
happen in the case of companies wherein companies themselves can own shares and be
members. Further, the law prohibits minors from being members or nominees of OPCs.
Conversion of OPCs into other Companies
Rules regulating the formation of one-person companies expressly restrict the conversion of
OPCs into Section 8 companies, i.e. companies that have charitable objectives. OPCs also cannot
voluntarily convert into other kinds of companies until the expiry of two years from the date of
their incorporation.
OPC enjoy the following privileges and exemptions under the Companies Act:
• A company secretary is not required to sign annual returns; directors can also do so.
• Their articles can provide for additional grounds for vacation of a director’s office.
• They can pay more remuneration to directors than compared to other companies.