To whom it may concern, My name is Dr. Keith Smith.

I am a former Chief
Engineer with NASA. I write this message to you at great risk to my personal
safety as well as that of my family. However, after viewing your channel and
videos, I believe that you may be able to help me. I am trying to get my story out
to as many truth seekers like yourself as possible. There are terrible things going
on right now that the people need to know about. You are a brave person for
being willing to speak out against the evil powers that be. Below is the story of
how I became a part of the conspiracy to blind the masses to the true nature of
reality. I joined NASA in 1996 after earning my doctorate’s degree from the
University of******. I genuinely believed that the workthat I was doing on the
shuttle program was putting men in space. As a low level engineer, I was still
indoctrinated with the lie of the Earth’s shape. In 2012, I was promoted to Chief
Engineer. In this position, I was tasked with overseeing the engineersand
designers of various projects and future missions in the space program. At least,
this is what I thought I would be doing. It was only later that I found out that I
received this promotion because my superiors felt that I could be trusted with
the secret. On June 7, 2012, I was approached directly by the acting
Administrator of NASA, Charles Bolden. When he offered me the promotion, I
readily accepted. It was this at this point that I had to be let in on the secret. On
June 10, I went to Washington D.C. to meet with Administrator Bolden. The
pretense of the meeting was as a way of meeting the other heads of NASA and
as an introduction to my new position. When I went into the meeting room at
NASA Headquarters in Washington D.C., they sat me down and went through
introductions. The meeting consisted of myself, Administrator Bolden, Deputy
Administrator Lori Garver, Associate Administrator Robert Lightfoot, Director
Michael Coats of Johnson Space Center, Director Robert Cabana of Kennedy
Space Center, Director Arthur Goldman of Marshall Space Center, and Chief
Scientist Waleed Abdalati. After the niceties had concluded, Bolden became
very serious. He told me that what I was about to hear was going to change my
entire life and that I may struggle to believe it at first. His only request was that I
hear him out. From here, he revealed the secret to me. I will never forget the
moment Administrator Bolden looked me in the eyes and said, “Everything that
you have ever been taught is a lie.” From here he told me that the Earth was in
fact flat. This is something that had been known for thousands of years by the
ancient peoples. However, as the general population became more educated and
their social status increased, they became restless and a danger to themselves. It
became necessary for a great lie in order to prevent a collapse of society and
another dark age. You see, historians will tell you that humans have known that
the Earth was round for thousands of years. They will point to the likes of
Eratosthenes saying that he knew the Earth was a globe in the third century B.C.
They will even say that he calculated the circumference of the globe to within
1% accuracy by having bematists measure the distance between Alexandria and
Syene by walking the distance andcounting steps! However, these historical
records have been fabricated and left for the historians and archaeologists to
discover. It was only 200 years ago that the true nature of the Earth was general
knowledge. However, all records of this knowledge have been destroyed. I was
also told that NASA’s true purpose was not space exploration but maintaining
the Globe conspiracy and ‘maintaining the integrity of civilization.’When
Administrator Bolden had finished, I was left in utter shock at what I had heard.
Surely this could not be true. It must be some form of trick or joke. In fact, when
Bolden finished, I just laughed at him. However, Bolden maintained his
composure. He told me that he too reacted the same way when he
heard the truth. Others in the room went about recounting their stories of first
hearing the truth. In fact, Director Goldman said that it took him months to be
fully convinced. I was told to go back to my hotel and think it over. At first, I
was in denial of the truth. It took weeks before I fully accepted what I should
have always known. The other senior NASA officials where very supportive of
me throughout the process, being patient with my many questions. As Chief
Engineer, my main job was coming up with plausible designs to then pass down
to lower level engineers. They would then properly design and even build the
spacecraft. They never knew that what they were designing would never go to
space. It was my job to ensure that. Whenever we launched a rocket, it would
just fly out of range of the TV cameras and civilian tracking capabilities before
ditching into the ocean. Many rockets can even still be found at the bottom of
the Atlantic Ocean. I went along with spreading the lie for seven years until I
retired at the end of 2019. Even after I retired, I was still fully onboard with
spreading the lie of the Globe. I was indoctrinated to a fanatical degree that
lying about the Earth’s true form was the only way to preserve society.
However, with the COVID pandemic I have had a lot of time to reflect on my
former life and realized that the conspiracy is fundamentally flawed. The people
have a right to know the truth. It may cause a social upheaval but I think that it
is worth it to break the authority of the conspiracy. As a part of the conspiracy,
my every move is closely watched. They have been growing suspicious of me. I
am using false aliases as a way of defending my identity and delaying them from
silencing me.I strongly believe that it is important that the truth is spread to as
many people as possible. They will do everything they can to suppress your
message. It is no accident that YouTube and similar platforms are cracking
down on conspiracy videos. I hope you find this information helpful. Please feel
free to reach out with anyquestions that you may have. I will try my best to be
responsive for as long as possible. Thank You, Dr. Keith Smith

Two questions: It wouldn’t be hard for them to figure out who you are by the
dates of those meetings, the peopleattending and your schooling. Doesn’t that
concern you? What is their explanation of how hiding the truth preventing a
collapse of society?
On Apr 11, 2021, at 12:34 PM, Smith, Keith <k> wrote:
Hello First off, no records exist of the original meeting referenced. This type of
business was conducted off the books. Most of the people who attended that
meeting no longer work with NASA. As for the information
about my schooling, I think that it would be best if that is left out of any
publicized version of my original message. As to your second question, this is
more complicated. For thousands of years the world was run by a small ruling
elite. These were the royal families, emperors, conquerers, etc. Theother 99% of
the worlds population were peasants whose only concern was their own survival.
Life was very difficult and the ruling class could easily maintain control of
society through social structures such as the feudal system. The commoners
knowing that the Earth was flat and the center of the universe made no
difference to that. However, with the Industrial Revolution at the end of the
18thcentury, this began to change. The feudal system was collapsing and being
replaced with systems of government that gave more power and importance to
the common folk. This is where the need for the conspiracy came in. Earth is a
flat, motionless plane that constitutes most of existence. Humans are the most
important part of the universe. However, with the heliocentric model, humanity
becomes insignificant. The commoners go back to what they were in the old
days, peasants slaving away without any purpose. The goal of the conspiracy is
to keep the everyday man feeling small and insignificant; to keep him from
realizing his true power. The whole preventing a collapse of society point really
is just a way of the elite staying in charge. To them a collapse of society is just
them loosing power. I personally do not believe that the result of this
information becoming public would cause the great dark age that they would
have you believe that it would cause. Thank You
From:David Weiss NewSent:Sunday, April 11, 2021 1:41 PMTo:Smith,
KeithSubject:Re: Senior NASA Official ConfessionI have a ton of questions. If
you can answer these in detail that would be great. How many people at NASA
know the truth?What do they launch when we see the shuttle launch? Explain
the trickery. What are we seeing when we track the ISS cross the sky. What are
we seeing when the ISS transits the sun or moon? What are the stars? What is
the accurate map of the earth? What’s at the North Pole?

On Apr 11, 2021, at 4:33 PM, Smith, Keith < wrote:

I’ll go through your questions in order with as much detail as I can. I should
start by saying that this conspiracy and information related to it is given out on a
very strict need to know basis. Most of what I know has to do with space travel
and topics related to it (specifically engineering, hardware design, and certain
mission parameters) as this was the information needed to do my job. That said,
I will try my best and answer your questions. How many people at NASA know
the truth? The short answer is not very many. Only people who must know in
order to carry out their duties are told the full truth. This limits it to the likes of
senior officials and project leads within the agency. Our job was to keep the
number that needed to know to as small as possible. Generally speaking, at any
given time the number of people in NASA who are in on it is less 100. However,
this fluctuates depending on what projects we are working on and other
circumstances. For example, during the Apollo program, this number was much
higher due to the sheer scope of the project. Also, as time goes on and computer
technology gets better, the number of people who need to know has been getting
smaller and smaller. I should point out that NASA does more than just convince
the public of the globe. A lot of NASA’s work and research is legitimate. As I
said, the vast majority of workers are well trained experts in their fields. They
are doing what they think is genuine research to solve technical problems for
various missions. The result of this is a lot of practical technological innovations
that we use today. What do they launch when we see the Space Shuttle launch?
Whenever there was a shuttle launch, an actual space shuttle would be launched
just like you have seen on TV. As I said in my original message, once the shuttle
was out of range of the cameras it would ditch into the ocean. From here a
recovery team would salvage the spacecraft. Once the ‘mission’ had concluded,
the shuttle would be flown on the Shuttle Carrier Aircraft (SCA) up to a high
altitude where it would then be released and the crew on board would glide it
down onto the runway just as you have seen on TV. The trickery in all of this is
ensuring that everything that the public sees is the real deal. This is what makes
the conspiracy so dangerous. Explain the trickeryI assume that by this you mean
the ways that we would fake space (e.g. space walks, ISS footage, etc.). This
stuff was generally not my job. My responsibilities where in design and
engineering of missions more so than the optics. All that to say, I do not know
much about it beyond what I stated above. I do know that large swimming pools
are sometimes used to film space walks and that videos of astronauts on the ISS
where filmed on board zero G aircraft. As for faked images of outer space or of
the Earth, I simply do not know the exact methods used. This whole conspiracy
is built around need to know information and that was outside of my need to
know. Whatare we seeing when we track the ISS across the sky? A large,
specially designed airplane. There are actually 5 ISS’s currently. Since the ISS is
an international project, multiple countries including the United States, Russia,
and the EU participate inits maintenance. The ISS’s are located at secret airbases
around the world (two in the US, one in Germany, one in Russia,
and one in Japan). They fly routes that correspond to the path the real ISS would
take if it were orbiting over a globe Earth with some exceptions. For example if
the real ISS (which we referred to as ISS-S) was to pass over a large uninhabited
area such as an ocean, an ISS would not fly the route. In most cases, ISS’s do
not fly during the day as ISS-S would not be visible during the day without very
specialized equipment. You asked about transits and what you are seeing is one
of the ISS’s making a transit of the Sun or Moon. While the ISS’s fly at very
high altitude, about 98,000 ft., they are far lower than the Sun or Moon. When
you see the ISS at night, what you are actually seeing is one of these aircraft.
Their entire underside lights up in order to make it look like what you see. What
are the stars? The simple answer that we where told is that stars are probably
just chunks of ice imbedded in the firmament. However, we have no real way of
actually knowing this so take it with a grain of salt. Despite our claims of being
a space exploration agency, we did no such thing. In fact we were explicitly not
allowed to do any such thing. The reason why I do not know, nor did my
superiors. This point actually caused a lot of frustration among senior NASA
officials. Keep in mind we were all scientists at heart and pretty much all of us
started as globe believers just as I did. One of the reasons that I am contacting
you is because NASA has the money and resources to explore space and the
firmament and I would love to see that happen. I want to know just as much as
you do what is truly up there. What is the accurate map of the Earth? I should
preface this by saying that I am an engineer and not a cartographer but I will try
my best. The map that I have commonly seen associated with flat earth is
actually not that far off of the real thing. Real maps of the world are a fairly
closely guarded secret that I lost access to after I retired from NASA. One of the
biggest differences between your map and a real one is the shape of continents,
especially in the southern hemisphere. Your map overly distorts them. In reality,
they are pretty much identical to what you would see on a globe. While I do not
know the exact details of how the globe map was originally designed, from what
I can tell they preserved the shapes of continents in the southern hemisphere and
simply shrunk the distances between them in order to make it all fit. Distances in
the southern hemisphere between continents (E.g. Australia and South America)
are far larger in real life than on the globe. On a bit of a side note, starting in
2018 and leading up to my retirement, I was involved in a project working with
Boeing to design a commercial aircraft capable of making a transpacific flight in
the southern hemisphere. While, as far as I know, the project is still ongoing,
many advances in aircraft design and fuel efficiency came out of it during my
time there. What is at the North Pole?As far as I know, not much. I am sure that
various countries have arctic research outposts around it but beyond that I do not
know. The south pole is a bit more interesting. Yes, there is anice wall
surrounding the world. However beyond that I know very little about what goes
on down there. NASA has very little if anything (as far as I know) to do with
guarding the ice wall. I do know that there is some level of security down there
preventing people from just going and seeing it, the nature of it or who is
running/paying for it I do not know. Me and my colleagues have speculated a lot
over what is down there. Some, like myself, believe that that is where the
firmament meets the ground, othersthink that there are more continents beyond
the ice wall. Without going down there my self, I could not tell you.
From: David Weiss NewSent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 5:52 PMTo: Smith, Keith
Subject: Re: Senior NASA Official Confession
When you say the “real ISS” you are referring to where the ISS should be and
not that there is anything there? Are you saying that the light we see that we call
the ISS is only a plane with lights. If the plane didn't fly then we wouldn’t see
anything because nothing would be there? You say they launch a space shuttle.
Is there ever anyone in it? I would assume not. Also the launching of something
that big is IMO impossible unless it was a lighter than air ship. Have you seen
my videos on that? https://www.youtube.com/playlist?
list=PLEzivhxtxgbuc3Z5IS_n6G0Crq21oiMk1
What else can you tell me that we wouldn’t know already?

On Apr 11, 2021, at 7:13 PM, Smith, Keith < wrote: When I refer to the real
ISS, I am talking about where the ISS would be if it where orbiting a globe
Earth. The light that you call the ISS is just one of several planes. If it did not fly
you would not see any light. The shuttles are launched unmanned. The crew is in
a fake shuttle cockpit at a separate facility. This is where they get the camera
shots of the crew in the shuttle going through the launch process even after the
real space shuttle has ditched into the ocean. The Space Shuttles that you have
seen launched on TV are actually significantly lighter than you would think. The
total launch weight of a space shuttle was actually around 80 tons. The large
Orange tank is filled with helium. The two solid rocket boosters on the sides are
actual rocket motors that propel the shuttle. The biggest insight that I can give
you that I have not already said is that the conspiracy is very far reaching and
well organized. It is part of pretty much every aspect of your life in ways that
you could not even know. People who are in on it are only in on it because they
need to be and are only told what they need to know. I mentioned this earlier but
the ultimate goal, not just at NASA, but on a more global level is to have as few
people as possible know about the conspiracy, ideally to the point where only
the small group in charge knows. I could not even begin to tell you who is in
charge. The only other people that I know who know the truth are those at
NASA that I worked with.

From:David Weiss NewSent:Sunday, April 11, 2021 7:32 PMTo:Smith,

KeithSubject:Re: Senior NASA Official Confession
When an astronaut is supposedly on the ISS for an extended period of time,
where dot they hide? What do they do for those months? There has been many
times where we expose mistakes that happen on the ISS from getting tangled in
their wires and green screen issues. Does that ring any alarms at NAZSA? Can
you explain how they do the full ISS tours. I know they are done not live and are
highly edited and involve augmented reality objects. Are the astronauts actually
hanging in one place and are actually pulling the space station through their
position? One time they had the jerseys of the super bowl teams on the ISS and
we pointed out on Globebusters that the last rocket to come up was months
earlier and there was still something like 24 teams still playing. A few days lated
NASA releases a video of the astronauts opening a box that has all 24 teams
jerseys in it. Are you involved in that at all? When the Challenger blew up I
believe it was on purpose and not a mistake for many reasons. Do you have any
info you can share about that? We have located 6 of the 7 astronauts that are
suppose to be dead. Do we have that right? The smoke we see under a launch,
that comes from the ground, right? Are some of the launches we are shown
projects holograms? We have spotted weird lights one the lawn at NASA that
when we saw the serial numbers they came from a holographic projection
company. Some of the launches we see today are so bad I often wonder if they
are doing it on purpose to test our intelligence and mocking us for a good laugh.
There is some serious satanic shit going on with what they show us, can you
elaborate on that?

On Apr 11, 2021, at 8:48 PM, Smith, Keith <> wrote:

I will take go through your email point by point and do my best to answer your
questions. I am not very familiar with the operations related to the astronauts on
the ISS. NASA has a specific division related to the creation of public facing
materials. This includes things such as ISS tours, interviews, photos/videos, etc.
All of this is under the purview of Public Affairs as well as Education and
Outreach. The specifics of how the ISS was faked in terms of crew interviews,
etc. was controlled by Public Affairs and I had little to dowith it. I do know that
when astronauts are ‘on’ the ISS, they are actually at a secret facility located in
Alaska. They live in this facility for the entire duration of the mission and make
all of the footage that is released to the public from there. What they do in their
free time, I do not know. I do not know the specifics of how the ISS tours are
made as they are put out by Education and Outreach. I know that harnesses are
sometimes used as well as zero g aircraft. Beyond that I do not know. As forthe
incident with the football jerseys, I was not involved with that and had nothing
to do with it. As I said, the crew activities on the ISS were as well as other
public facing content made was not my responsibility and as such I had a
minimal need to know. I know that sometimes mistakes do happen. Generally
these are things that the general public would not notice. I do not know if you
and people like yourself pointing out these mistakes raises alarms with NASA
and the subsequent divisions responsibleas I am not involved in that. I would
assume that they would make changes to perfect their methods based off of
noticed inconsistencies. The Challenger explosion happened while I was still in
high school so I do not know much about it. I did actually ask if the Challenger
explosion was on purpose while I worked at NASA but was not given an
answer. I certainly would not be surprised if it was intentional. That said, if it
was the people working at NASA probably would not have known. The smoke
that you see during launches are actually produced by the rockets. As I said, the
rockets my engineers built were real rockets that would have produced lots of
smoke on launch. If more was added, I was not informed. The launches are not
holograms. I do know that hologram technology exists but I do not believe that
it is that good yet. That said, in my time with NASA, I have seen many
examples of technology above what I believed to be possible. I do not know
about the specific lighting equipment that is used at the launch sites. I would
assume that the lights come from some third-party contractor but I simply do not
know. My main responsibility was spacecraft design. At NASA, we strived to
make our launches look as realistic as possible. In some cases, this means that
the optics of a launch would differ from what the general public may have
expected. In the playlist that you referenced earlier, I noticed that many of the
rockets that you called out for looking ridiculous came from private companies
such as SpaceX. I only worked on rockets designs for NASA. I would assume
that at SpaceX, they hold themselves to the same standards that we did. But I
would not be surprised if Elon Musk isn’t at least having some good laughs. I
know that there is a lot going on with those at the very top of the conspiracy. We
are only told what we need to know to do our jobs. Why they tell us to do what
we do I simply do not know. Our job was simply to serve the will of who ever is
at the top running it all.

From:David Weiss NewSent:Sunday, April 11, 2021 10:46 PMTo:Smith,

KeithSubject:Re: Senior NASA Official Confession
Can you tell me more about the ISS and how they light it up? Isthe brightly lit
ISS the same thing we see transit the moon with the lights off?

On Apr 11, 2021, at 11:03 PM, Smith, Keith < wrote:The entire bottom of the
planes that are used to mimic the ISS are covered in thousands of LEDs. Up
close, you can see the individual lights but when the plane is flying at its
cruising altitude, it gives the appearance that the entire object is glowing. The
lights are set to a very specific color to match that of sunlight. This gives the
look that the ISS is reflecting sunlight. The pilot can control the lights from the
cockpit and only turns them on when flying at the correct altitude and on the
correct path. We would create the route based on where the space station would
pass if it were orbiting a globe Earth. The planes we use to simulate the ISS are
the same objects that you see transiting the Sun and Moon.

From:David Weiss NewSent:Monday, April 12, 2021 12:13

AMTo:Smith,KeithSubject:Re: Senior NASA Official Confession
Keith, some more ISS questions. Not sure you may know the answers, If the ISS
is a plane how is it possible that someone in Northern California can see the
plane cross the moon at 11:30pm and someone in Mexico can see it cross the
moon 3 minutes later? How high is the moon? Do you know is the moon is in a
physical position or an optical one? How does a plane that can fly look like the
ISS?

On Apr 12, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Smith, Keith < wrote:

The design of the ISS airplanes is actually very interesting. They were originally
designed and built in the late 90s, at the same time as the ‘real’ ISS was
supposedly being built in orbit. As I mentioned earlier five were constructed and
these are the 5 that you see today. The aircraft are based on a modified version
of the B-2 Bomber produced by Northrop Grumman. The five B-2’s where
upgraded to increase their cruising altitude as well range. Obviously, A B-2
when viewed from below will not look anything like the ISS. This is especially
problematic when dealing with transits as you are now looking at a silhouetted
outline of the aircraft. To get around this, we made massive modifications to the
airframes of the aircraft. Instead of using the radar absorbent materials that are
used on the outsides of normal B-2s, we used transparent materials for much of
the airframe in order to carefully control its silhouette. The materials we used
include streched acrylic, and laminated plastic sheets. The airframe was then
reinforced with a lattice of thin metal trusses that only the most powerful
telescopes would be able to see. A plastic airplane is not as ridiculous as it
sounds when you consider that NASA has access to many materials not yet
available for commercial use. This includes ultra strong plastics that are only
now beginning to make their way out into more broad military and commercial
applications. To answer your questions about the Moon and transits, I will need
to briefly explain what is in thesky and what space actually is. As you go higher
and higher, the atmosphere turns from gas to liquid and eventually to solid. The
point where it becomes solid is the edge of the firmament that encloses the
Earth. The Sun and the Moon circle the Earth through the liquid part of space
(when I refer to space, this is really what I mean, the point where the atmosphere
becomes liquid). This liquid, made up of a soup of atmospheric gasses, can
distort perspective not only because of refraction through it, but the changes in
temperature caused by the heat from the Sun and the cold from the Moon. In fact
the heat from the Sun creates pockets of gas around it, causing further
distortions. The Moon is in a physical position several thousand miles above the
surface ofEarth, but what you are seeing when you see the Moon is
its optical position resulting from atmospheric refraction. We can exploit this
through careful positioning and timings of multiple ISS aircraft in order to
achieve realistic transits.

From:FEPCSent:Monday, April 12, 2021 12:18 PMTo:Smith, KeithSubject:Re:

Senior NASA Official Confession
Can you confirm the path of the sun and moon? Do they circle the North Pole
and migrate between the tropics? Or do they do something else.
On Apr 12, 2021, at 5:15 PM, Smith, Keith <> wrote:
We see southern stars rotating around a single point in space due to the way that
the firmament distorts light. Thefirmament has reflective properties that allow
light to appear the same when viewed from multiple angles. This combined with
the liquid upper atmosphere help to create the illusion of stars in the southern
hemisphere rotating around a celestial pole. I retired at the end of 2019. At this
point the COVID pandemic was limited to small outbreaks in China. Due to my
retirement, I was no longer privy to classified information related to the
conspiracy. Even if I did still have my security clearance, as I had mentioned
earlier the conspiracy is based on a strict “need-to-know” basis. Information
related to the pandemic would have fallen outside of my “need-to-know” as a
spacecraft engineer. The only thing I can give you is speculation based off of my
experiencein the conspiracy. That said, I do not believe the vaccines themselves
to be a method of population control. If this was the goal, I believe they would
have used a deadlier virus to begin with, as this would be a more effective
method. The sun and moon do circle around the North Pole, spiraling between
the tropics. This is where we get out seasons from.

From:David Weiss NewSent:Monday, April 12, 2021 5:40 PMTo:Smith,

KeithSubject:Re: Senior NASA Official Confession
Can you elaborate on how everyone sees the moon in the same shape no matter
what angle? How in Australia in December we can see the sun setting South of
Capricorn? You mentioned how the suns heat creates a gas pocket in the waters
and the moon is cold. Can you elaborate on what you know about that?
Have you heard of the “Lunar Wave” which was first filmed by Crrow777?
Recently with special scopes and filters we have been able to film the sun and
what we call a 2nd sun behind it. Any insight on that? During a solar eclipse, it’s
the real moon in the waters above eclipsing the light from the real sun and since
the moon is not lit at that time we never get to see it approach or exit the suns
face. Is that correct? What about the lunar eclipse? What causes that. We know
its not the shadow of the earth. Can you elaborate on what it is? Do you know
what all the markings on the moon are and why they look like craters and appear
to have shadows? To start, I should take sometimeto explain what I know about
the firmament as I think that that will help to clarify some of your questions
about perspective and astronomy on a Flat Earth, especially in the southern
hemisphere. It is not exactly known what material the firmament is madeout of.
What we do know is that it has very special optical properties. It can reflect and
distort light in ways that no known material can. The main theory for what the
firmament is made out of is a special material, generally referred to as aether
crystal. The light bending properties of aether crystal allow for the many bizarre
properties that are associated with stars in the southern hemisphere. As for lunar
eclipses, these are caused by a third object circling above the Earth, below the
Moon. We called this object Anubis. We believe that Anubis is made out of a
chunk of aether crystal that separated from the firmament several millennia ago.
What would cause a chunk to be broken off of the firmament, we do not know.
When you see a lunar eclipse, you are seeing Anubis pass in front of the Moon.
Why does the Moon turn orange when fully obscured? This is a result of the
difference in brightness between the Moon and the amount of light allowed to
pass through Anubis. The full Moon emits a large amount of light, enough to
overwhelm the comparatively small amount of light that can pass through
Anubis. However, when Anubis is fully blocking the Moon, we can see the
Moon’s light through Anubis causing it to appear orange. Solar eclipses are
caused by, as you mentioned, the Moon passing in front of the Sun. The Moon
circles above Earth at an altitude lower than the Sun. I watched the video you
mentioned about the lunar wave. The explanation to that as well as your
question about craters and shadows on the moon are somewhat related. In the
early 2000’s, as consumer optics became better, there became problems of
amateur astronomers being able to see that the surface of the Moon does not
look like it should based on the heliocentric model. To get around this, a system
of holographic projectors was set up around the world in order to ‘touch up’ the
appearance of the Moon. This is where you get shadowing in craters from as
well as other small details on the Moons surface. The real, unaltered surface of
the Moon is not significantly different than what you see now. The real
differences are very subtle and would only be noticeable with a telescope. The
Lunar Wave that you mentioned was probably some distortion related to these
holograms. There are craters on the Moon. These are caused by collisions with
small pieces of debris floating through space. The Sun generates a very large
amount of heat. In fact it is the only heat source in the Firmament. As I
mentioned earlier, as you ascend in altitude, the atmosphere givesway to a liquid
‘outer space.’ The Sun’s heat vaporizes this liquid in a several hundred mile
radius around it. I should mention that the liquid above us is not strictly water,
though it does contain some water. It is comprised mainly of liquified
atmospheric gasses. The Moon is cold on account of the fact that it generates a
cold light. This can be seen by measuring the temperature of a surface in direct
Moonlight versus one in shadow. You mentioned about filming a second Sun. I
am not sure what you arereferring to here. If you could link me a video of your
findings, that would make it easier for me to clarify what you are seeing. There
are other objects floating through space above us. You could be seeing one of
them but without seeing the video you took for myself, I could not know what
exactly you saw. I don't fully understand the projecting on to the moon. Where
are there projectors and how do they keep the projection on the moon. The
craters are impacts from debris? Why are they all circles? If the moon is its own
light why do the dark spots (shadows) behave like they are light coming from
the sun? When we see some spaceX launches and they look like boat wakes,
what are we seeing? https://youtu.be/zOXzuHi3anY?t=121
What can you show me or tell me that would be evidence that you worked at
NASA? We have very skeptical researchers looking into this. Are you aware of
any earth cycles that may be ending soon that I should be concerned about? Why
are you leaving the country? The same reason I want to leave? If Anubis broke
off the firmament, how does it keep a perfect predicted cycle? Wouldn’t it be
random and non repeating? At what height does the air turn to liquid? What is
the highest a rocket or plane can fly? Can you elaborate on how the air gets
thinner as you gain altitude and how it then gets thicker and turns to liquid?
Does anyone know what’s outside the dome beyond Antarctica? Are there any
flat earth proofs that you know of that we haven’t covered? Satellites. We know
there aren’t satellites falling around the earth as described and there are many
balloons holding equipment up there. Can you elaborate on how GPS works and
what they are calling Satellite phones that you have to useoutdoors and points
the antenna towards the equator? We know there aren’t satellites falling around
the earth as described and there are many balloons holding equipment up there.
Can you elaborate on how GPS works and what they are calling Satellite phones
that you have to use outdoors and points the antenna towards the equator? I
don’t have a lot of time to respond right now. But I have not messaged you in a
few days so I feel that you deserve some signs of life until I get more time to
answer your questions more thoroughly. I will answer your question about
satellites as that is relatively simple. Expect a follow up email in the coming
days with answers to your other questions. Communications on a flat Earth work
very differently than how they would work on a globe Earth. On a globe Earth,
direct, long distance communication is impossible as the curvature of the planet
gets in the way. This is explained away by claiming that there is a network of
communication satellites orbiting the planet bouncing signals around the globe.
In reality, once you get high enough to avoid ground based obstacles such as
mountains, buildings, etc. you can broadcast to pretty much any point on Earth,
assuming your equipment is powerful enough. A proof of the flat Earth
thatstems from this is the ability of some radio broadcasts to be picked up
hundreds of miles away from their origin. This would not be possible on a globe
Earth. When we at NASA referred to satellites internally, we where talking
about pieces of equipment that are suspended in the sky and in space above us.
Communications satellites are used because sending signals is far more efficient
in the thinner upper atmosphere or even in the liquid space above than it is on
the ground. Satellites are suspended stationary above the surface of the Earth.
Starting in 2013 we have been working on a project to replace the network of
low altitude (low altitude is a bit of a misnomer here as we really mean between
about 80,000 –110,000 feet. We mean low relative to space based satellites
which are generally hundreds of miles up.) balloons with more permanent
satellites positioned in liquid space. Atmospheric balloons naturally deflate over
time and need to be replaced on a regular basis. This is an expensive and time
consuming operation to maintain. The new generation of space satellites are
neutrally buoyant in the liquid space due to careful balancing of weight and the
use of ballast tanks filled with lighter than air gasses. They can remain above
Earth almost indefinitely.