Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Laws
1. Convention on Biological Diversity
2. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)
3. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
4. Cartagena Protocol
5. Nagoya Protocol
CBD
1. Conservation of Biological Diversity
2. Sustainable use of the components of biodiversity and its components
3. Fair and equitable sharing of benefits in the use of genetic resources
Cartagena Protocol
To protect biological diversity from the potential risks posed by living modified
organisms (LMOs) resulting from modern biotechnology- established a procedure for
ensuring that countries are provided with the information necessary to make informed
decisions before agreeing to the import of such organisms into their territory
Basel Convention
Basel Convention was designed to reduce the movements of hazardous waste between
nations, and specifically to prevent transfer of hazardous waste from developed to less
developed countries. It does not, however, address the movement of radioactive waste.
Two years ago, more than 180 countries agreed to ban hard-to-recycle plastic waste
trade in an attempt to stop rich countries dumping trash in the developing world, where it
often ends up polluting the local environment and the ocean.
Signatory countries can now only trade plastic waste if it meets certain
low-contamination criteria - which means it is clean, sorted and easy-to-recycle - or if the
exporting country gets prior consent from the importing country.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organisations/ Bodies
1. Department of Biosafety
Since Malaysia is privy to the Cartagena Protocol all field trials of LMOs for the purpose of
research and development must obtain a Certificate of Approval from the National Biosafety
Board
_______________________________________________________________________
Agriculture Activities
Efforts:
● National Forestry Act
○ To streamline and standardise management of forests in Malaysia
○ Implementation by the Forestry Dept
○ Section 81 prohibits the use of fire for removing timber from permanent forest
reserves unless specially authorised
○ Section 82- no person shall kindle, keep or carry any fire, or leave any fire
burning, within a permanent forest reserve in such a manner as to endanger the
forest reserves
○ Efficacy: Low as its legislative authority is restricted to forest reserves under
the administration of the Department of Forestry, while many forest fires start
outside the boundaries of permanent forest reserves.
● Environmental Quality Act
○ Addresses problems related to open burning to support Zero Burning Policy
○ Efficacy: High as
1. Expanded the power of investigation and enforcement of various
agencies including the fire fighting and police services, and officers from
the Ministry of Health and local councils/municipalities
2. Abolished the Department of Environment’s powers to issue
contravention licences for burning but instead provided a specific list of
authorised prescribed activities for open burning (15 with limited
hectares allowed ranging from only 2-20) i.e. effectively banned open
burning on vast plantation areas
3. A complete ban on burning on any peat soil area
➔ Since the implementation of the act, the number of fire occurrences in
the plantation areas has reduced significantly, because the companies
are deterred by the high fines and because of the monitoring by
government agencies, particularly through air surveillance
● Zero Burning Policy
○ Ban open burning in 1998- deliberate open burning can result in a maximum
penalty of RM 0.5 million.
○ Land clearing for oil palm cultivation used to be undertaken by the clean
clearing method, which included burning and re-burning of biomass but it does
not only pollute the air but is also costly
○ A financial and economic analysis of various zero burning techniques of land
clearing for oil palm cultivation indicated that the techniques are
environmentally friendly, cost effective, bring higher returns, and savings in
fertilizer input from nutrient recycling and soil preservation
● Initiatives to make use of residues by agencies in order to minimise fire risk
○ Sarawak Timber Association- initiative to use oil palm residues for MDF
(Medium Density Fibreboard).
Challenges:
● Most of the documented fires were caused by negligence or misuse of fire in land
clearing activities (WWF, 2002)
● Issue of NCR (Native Customary Right) land whereby villagers are allowed to use fire for
their traditional farming within their NCR land (around 300,000 hectares in Malaysia).
Plus no strong documentation thus anyone can claim their land as an NCR land
Efforts:
● National Forestry Act 1984, development on forest within the private lot is legal while
development on reserve lot such as reserve forest that belongs to the government
property is illegal and is considered as land encroachment
● Local District Plan or Rancangan Tempatan Daerah (RTD) were developed by Cameron
Highlands District Council to address the environmental issues in Cameron Highlands
○ Section 18 (1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1976- “no person shall use
or develop any land or building unless according to the Local Plan”
● Farm Accreditation Scheme or Skim Amalan Ladang Baik (SALM) was introduced in
2002 to promote Good Agriculture Practices (GAP) and to ensure the safety and quality
of vegetables produce among the farmers
● Malaysian Organic Scheme Certification (MyORGANIC)
Challenges:
● Inefficient law enforcement have cause many illegal land clearings, which trespass the
forest reserve and riverbank areas, and unsustainable developing methods such as
○ Farming on steep slopes
○ Installation of irrigation pipes on the road sideways and in the slope
○ Excessive usage of pesticides and fertilizers
● National Audit Report 2012:
○ Intensive land clearing and deforestation for agricultural activities where most
were operated illegally
● Only 16% of the farmers in Cameron Highlands applied Integrated Pest Management
(IPM) such as sticky traps and crop rotation while others used chemical pest control.
● SALM gained low participation from the local farmers as the majority of them have
small-scale production for the domestic market only. This results in higher risk of pest
infestation. Other factors include low promotional campaigns, limited support and
infrastructure, low financial capital capacity, and economic constraints
● There are only 13 certified organic farmers out of 2200 farmers in Cameron Highlands
due to lack of capital, labour shortage, lack of training by DOA and other agencies and
lack of marketing of the organic-based products
Solutions:
● Malaysian Certificate Scheme for Good Agricultural Practice (MyGAP) was introduced
in 2013 to replace SALM. Participation is voluntary and the services provided for
certification is free. To receive this accreditation, farmers must fulfill 17 requirements
including practices compatible with soil conservation and proper waste disposal plan
● Pesticides Board where pesticides used must be legally registered under the board
3. Water Pollution
Background:
In March 2012, Kuala Terla Water Treatment Plant (WTP) was temporarily shut down
because of illegal farming and the use of excessive pesticides and fertilizers that caused
hundreds of fishes in the stream to die. The main issues of river pollution in Cameron
Highlands are sedimentation and siltation seen through the physical characterization of the
river water which is brown or milk-tea in color
Logging
1. Log jam
Tourism
1. Agro-tourism
Background:
The policy of encouraging agro-tourism has led to environmental problems in
Cameron Highlands
Solutions:
● Local District Plan or Rancangan Tempatan Daerah (RTD) were developed by Cameron
Highlands District Council to address the environmental issues in Cameron Highlands
and to develop it as sustainable highland tourism area
○ Section 18 (1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1976- “no person shall use
or develop any land or building unless according to the Local Plan
b. Langkawi
i. Review, scrap the Langkawi reclamation project
ii. Langkasuka - A proposed artificial islands project in Langkawi
c. Johor
4. Additional reads
a. Redefining Development and the Hidden Cost of Land Reclamation in Penang
b. The case study on Penang South Island Reclamation Megaproject
c. Evaluating the Penang South Reclamation (PSR) Project According to the United
Nations' Sustainable Development Goals
Waste Management
Intro:
Poor waste management can harm biodiversity both directly (e.g. the consumption of
plastic microbeads by marine wildlife) and indirectly (e.g. landfill sites, which provide ideal
conditions for bacteria that produce methane – a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to
climate change).
Unmanaged waste in our environment can also affect human health, particularly in
developing countries where people rely directly on healthy, functioning environments for survival
(and where waste is not well managed, due to resource and technology limitations).
Types:
➔ Non-degradable waste enters the food chain, potentially causing illness, disease or death
➔ Organic waste is implicated in disease, pest outbreaks and contamination of water and
soils
➔ Toxic waste
Efforts:
● Shutdown of 218 illegal plastic recycling factories between 2019 and 2020 for not
complying with regulations
Efforts:
● Since discovering that 13 countries including the UK, Canada, China and Saudi Arabia,
had sent non recyclable waste to the country in 2018 and 2019, Malaysia has been
sending it back. The waste had been labelled as recyclable plastic but included CDs,
cables, contaminated milk cartons and electronics.
● In 2020, returned 150 shipping containers of illegally imported plastic waste to their
countries of origin, including the UK, US and France
● Collaborative efforts between Malaysia and international governments resulted in the
repatriation of 150 containers, totalling in 3,737 metric tonnes of illegal plastic waste
(about 1/3 as heavy as the Eiffel Tower)
● Closed 200 illegal recycling units
● View to clamp down on imports in the future
Challenges:
● Malaysia couldn’t cope with the quantity and much of the plastic was burnt in the open,
causing adverse health effects
● Wastes enter Malaysia illegally, under the guise of ‘recyclable scraps’,
Solutions:
● Exporting countries must take responsibility for their wastes including contributing to
the measures and shouldering all costs necessary to remove their wastes dumped in
countries like Malaysia
○ When plastics are exported from one country to another they can bring with
them a wide range of hazardous chemicals
○ Improper storage and treatment can later release these chemicals into the local
environment
● Conduct due diligence prior to the exportation of plastic waste in order to ensure and
strengthen the transparency of plastic usage, disposal and recycling systems globally
● Stronger regulations are needed to drastically reduce the production of unnecessary
single-use plastic packaging by multinationals like Nestle, so waste does not need to be
exported in the first place
● Enforce Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) (producers are given a significant
responsibility for the treatment or disposal of post-consumer products) in the
production of plastics by regulating corporations that produce unnecessary single-use
packaging for products, requiring them to track products from cradle to grave
3. International conflicts
USA, March 2021:
Malaysia returned a container of plastic trash en route from the United States as it
violates new U.N. rules governing hazardous waste under the Basel Convention. The shipment
did not meet the criterias under the Basel Convention (clean, sorted and easy-to-recycle) nor
did the US have prior approval from Malaysia.
The United States, which produces more plastic waste per capita than any other
country, is the only major nation not to have ratified the Basel Convention and is not bound by
its rules. However, under the treaty, Malaysia cannot accept prohibited plastic waste from the
United States.
1. GEF
The Coral Triangle Initiative:
● Links Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Timor Leste, Papua New Guinea, and the
Solomon Islands, is a vital global marine resource as it is home to 76 percent of all coral
species and 37 percent of all reef species. It is also the spawning ground for six species
of turtles as well as endangered fish. An estimated 363 million people live within the
Coral Triangle’s boundaries. Unfortunately some 95% of reefs in the region are at risk
● GEF joined a broad partnership led by the six Coral Triangle countries to
○ Strengthen the governance of the Coral Triangle
○ Implement a regional action plan focusing on sustainable management of the
seascape including fishing
○ Establish a functioning, protected marine area
○ Strengthen resilience to climate change
● Successes
○ “A Model of Success” - World Economic Forum
○ Malaysia
■ Community education, reef monitoring, beach cleanups, alternative
livelihood projects and school presentations
■ Green Lifestyles project- anti-plastics, anti-fish bombing, mangrove
reforestation, composting and recycling
● 25% reduction in use of plastic bags, 40% increase in recycling
■ Shifted focus from fishing to weaving to reduce pressure which has
turned out to be more lucrative as it is not susceptible to weather
conditions
2. Oil production
a. Malaysia is the second largest oil and natural gas producer in SEA and the fifth
largest exporter of liquefied natural gas in the world therefore making the
energy industry an important growth sector for the economy.
3. Paris Agreement
a. Malaysia is a signatory of the Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol
b. By 2030, Malaysia committed to reduce the production of greenhouse gases by
45 pct which has been stated in its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC)
4. Renewable Energy
a. Economically, Malaysia is showing a positive outlook for potential investors and
operators. Malaysia is ranked 12th in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business
index, reflecting Malaysia welcoming market landscape