Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2-4-24
From the study of monetary policies in the housing bubbles of previous decades, It is interesting
to explore what the authors of the study who examined monetary policy and the bubble in the
real estate market thought about US monetary policy and the housing boom at that time. The
author's paper was insightful on monetary policy and the boom in home ownership that
From the position of the author the United States experienced an increase In the housing
market after the year 2000 In the form of residential Investments. The author states “The
prices:” (Kiley, 2009) From my perspective, according to Kiley, there is little evidence that loose
monetary policy is superior to tight monetary policy. Research shows that “The primary goal of
a loose monetary policy is to stimulate economic growth, increase employment, and combat
economic downturns, such as recessions or periods of low economic activity” (tutor2u, 2023)
The primary goal of a tight monetary policy is “to control inflation and stabilize the economy by
slowing down excessive economic growth and preventing the economy from overheating”.
(tutor2u, 2023) In contrast to what the author suggested when he said “We provide evidence
that monetary policy was well aligned with the goals of policymakers and was not the primary
Many factors affect low rates accompanied increase in demand for housing, “Some of the
factors that will influence housing demand include lower interest rates or borrowing costs. When
interest rates are low, people are generally willing to take on more debt because they can afford
relatively more debt for the same monthly outlay” (Mansa, n.d.) For example, if an individual's
interest rate is 2%, they will be able to borrow more for the same monthly payment than if they
increases purchasing power and makes it easier to borrow money so that home ownership
becomes more affordable. As a result of monetary policy, the timing of the housing boom
Next, we will examine policy assessment and outcomes, “During the 2003–06 time frame, the
setting of monetary policy appeared to follow the broad contours that would be expected given
conventional macroeconomic views:” (Kiley, 2009) The article gives three considerations for
desired outcome for policy assessments “policy must be forward-looking, policy should be
evaluated based on how effectively it promotes its objectives, and the benchmark for
effectiveness should be what could reasonably have been expected given what was known at
Lastly “The Taylor Rule is a formula tying a central bank's policy rate to inflation and economic
growth.” (Kelly, n.d.) But from studying the article this had little impact because the article states
“Besides the U.S., several other countries had loose monetary policy relative to a Taylor Rule,
albeit to varying degrees. At the same time, some but not all)foreign economies experienced
housing booms, again to varying degrees ” (Kiley, 2009) Global asset prices rose as housing
prices rose in many countries. People with more wealth purchased more assets.
In conclusion, the article gives a lot of great explanations on monetary policies in the housing
bubble between the years of 2003 to 2006 and the impact it had on housing development. The
article explores the housing boom and the author's opinion of Interest rates and housing
Kiley, M. (2009, December 22). Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble. Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Retrieved February 10, 2024, from
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200949/200949pap.pdf
Mansa, J. (n.d.). Housing Market Supply and Demand. Investopedia. Retrieved February
supply-and-demand-affect-housing-market.asp
tutor2u. (2023, October 14). What is the difference between tight and loose monetary
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/what-is-the-difference-between-tight-and-
loose-monetary-policy