Professional Documents
Culture Documents
docx
TRUSHA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TUSHAR
MOHITE
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
TRUSHA TUSHAR
MOHITE
Date: 2023.03.10
14:17:24 +0530 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.88 OF 2021
Vs.
1 Rule.
Solapur, it has been directed that the Sub Divisional Officer and
Tahsildar of the Region shall not mutate the Revenue Record on the
Mohite 1/8
pil88-21.docx
1958 (for short “the Act of 1958”) and submits that if the
of the Apex Court in the case of Mohammade Yusuf & Ors. vs.
Mohite 2/8
pil88-21.docx
find out the real nature of the transaction and the intention of the
parties to find out the correct stamp duty applicable to the same.
1958 is payable under such Family Partition Deed. The said Circular
was issued after analysing the judgment of this court in the case of
of 1958 is payable.
Mohite 3/8
pil88-21.docx
Mohite 4/8
pil88-21.docx
whereas the Act of 1958 prescribes the stamp duty leviable on the
section 17 (2)(vi) of the Act of 1908. Under the said provision, any
Act of 1908 carves out the distinction between the property which
forms subject matter of the suit and the property that was not the
Mohite 5/8
pil88-21.docx
subject matter of the suit but for which the compromise has been
property other than the decree involved, such a property would not
the Suit then the compromise decree does not require compulsory
the award passed by the Lok Adalat thereto assumes the character
of a decree and would also come within the ambit and purview of sub
two or more shares of equal value and not smaller than any of the
Mohite 6/8
pil88-21.docx
that from which the other shares are separated. Proviso (a) and (b)
the Stamp Duty on such a document would not be more than 100%.
Mohite 7/8
pil88-21.docx
(vi) of the Act of 1908 and it would also not require payment of the
with the decree in case of partition suit but is of general nature that
market value of the property but in accordance with the proviso (b)
Mohite 8/8