Title: 12 Angry Men Movie Review

By: Khushi Singh (PGP39363)

Introduction
12 Angry Men, which premiered in 1957 and directed by Sidney Lumet, is a cinematic maste
rpiece that not only immerses the audience in its gripping plot, but also captivates with its
thought proving organizational behaviour. The movie was a huge success after its release
Much of the movie takes place in the and focuses on the difficultly
of deciding how the jury will deal with the young man accused of murder. In the midst of
conflict, the film presents thebeauty of behavior. It explains the various psychological, social
and interpersonal factors that affect decision making and social organization.

Themes and Concepts

The quest for justice and the moral duty that every juror must fulfill in order to receive a fair
election is the essence of this film. The conflict between subjective and objective assessment
comes when 12 judges, each with their own biases and opinions, are asked to write a lot.
Analysis of the concept of reasonable doubt leads to an appreciation of the far-reaching conse
quences of decisions made with the help of a group that affect people's lives.
Independent people, just like their background and research, can have far-reaching consequen
ces for these decisions.

Character development
The development of the intelligence of the characters in the film allows the audience to see
the change in the thinking and behavior of each judge. At that time, the members of the jury
began to exhibit the manners and prejudices of the society in a certain way. With good
writing and acting, these stereotypical characters turn into incredible people with their own
personalities and reasons to work. For example, juror number three (Lee Cobb) was initially
biased towards the accused, but later revealed that he did not resolve the issue with his son, w
ho made his decision. These problems stemmed from the judge's inability to communicate eff
ectively with his son. Ed Begley's Juror Ten transforms from an inquisitive person into a quiet
er, more inquisitive person, demonstrating the human potential for growth and thinking.

Cinematography
The cinematography of the film exemplifies Sidney Lumet's directing style because he
creatively uses the limited space of the courtroom to advance the story. The emotional and
psychological problems faced by jurors are exacerbated by the use of camera angles, lighting
and spatial dynamics. As tension and pressure build up in the room, camera close
ups capture the expressions on the judges' faces, revealing their inner struggles.
According to the story, the young man accused of murdering his father was brought before a
jury of twelve people from all walks of life to determine whether he was guilty. Seeing the
evidence for the first time looks terrible and has many people quickly decide that he is
“guilty”. However, one of the jurors (we'll call him Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda) has
reservations and wants the trial to continue. This simple choice paves the way for a detailed
investigation of organizational behavior occurring within the confines of the courtroom.

Character Analysis:

1. Group Evolution and Dynamics:

The movie "Twelve Angry Men" focuses on group dynamics, it shows a group of different
people, everyone has their own personality, it shows how to meet one's needs. There are man
y
religious and historical interactions in decision making. The stages of team development that
Bruce Tuckerman describes in the video in the following order: Design, Storm, Norm and Per
formance. When the trial begins, the members of the jury try to protect their unique ideas, as t
hey do not know each other. As the discussion continues, differences begin to emerge, but ov
er time, participants begin to develop common standards and common goals, ultimately leadi
ng to more dialogue and collaborative decision-making.

2. Leadership and the Art of Influencing:

Henry Fonda's role as Juror 8 is a leadership model for other groups. Despite the criticism an
d skepticism, she faced, she initiated cultural change by advocating data analysis and promoti
ng open dialogue. His positive attitude, enthusiastic communication and passion for truth insp
ire decision makers to challenge their preconceived notions and open their minds to new pers
pectives. This change exemplifies the significant impact of leadership on team dynamics and
related decision-making.

3. Styles and Modes of Interpersonal Communication:

This movie presents the different types of communication that are important to consider the i
mportance of effective communication in any organization. The debate was open and fruitful
because of Jury #8's ability to listen, ask good questions, and create a safe space for discussio
n. On the other hand, some of the jurors try to impose their own worldviews by using differen
t communication styles or to silence those who disagree with them. These different communi
cation methods show that different technologies can help or hinder the group's ability to work
effectively.

4. Conflict management and conflict resolution:

As jury deliberations continue, disagreements, prejudices and opinions Personal issues
become a potential source of friction. The film shows the many ways to manage conflict,
including avoiding it, reaching compromises, and working together. Jury no. 8 The willingnes
s tospeakdirectly about conflicts and seek solutions creates an environment that allows for
more
comprehensive analysis of evidence and opinions. This shows how important it is to facilitate
group discussions through the ability to manage different perspectives.

5. Immorality in decision making and the reasons for doing so:

The Twelve Bad Men is an understanding and movement based on the lack of potential belief
in group decision making. It seems that some judges have chosen to interpret the evidence to
justify their own preconceived notions, examples of dissenting opinions. Opposing opposing
views can also lead to groupthink where decision makers stop following the majority opinion.
When we are subject to intellectual shortcuts and social pressures, it can be difficult to make i
nformed decisions because of these biases.

6. Diversity and Inclusion:

The diverse backgrounds, experiences and perspectives of jurors is a small sample of the dive
rsity of humanity. The film explores how a diverse group of people can improve decision-
making by taking different perspectives. However, this shows that the problems are very dive
rse, as preconceived notions and biases affect both participation and decision making. The fil
m raises questions about how important it is to foster a mixed climate, recognizing and consid
ering the value of multiple perspectives.

7. The relationship between group identity and culture:

The play Twelve Men inexplores the dynamics of group identity and social structure. At first,
everyone in the group was guided by the process of making quick decisions and following the
ir thoughts. The truth is that Jury No. 8 people who wanted to oppose this rule made the s
ituation worse and eventually made them reevaluate their ideas. The film shows how
individual behavior is influenced by group dynamics, including group membership and struct
ure. It also shows that humans can influence these changes.

8. Behavioural Implications:
Because of its detailed explanation of teamwork, leadership, communication, problem solvin
g, decision making, Twelfth Night is an important institution and research on critical behavior
that is objective, diverse and culturally diverse. The insights presented in the film can be
applied in many places, from business boards to community organisations, and provide infor
mation on how people can better voluntarily communicate with each other and draw conclusi
ons ingroups.

9. Adaptation and group norms

The concept of cohesion and group norms is strongly exemplified in Twelve Angry Men.
Most judges start with a guilty verdict because of society's expectations, solidarity, and the
desire to end the case as soon as possible. This shows that people often try to show the import
ance of a group. But when Juror 8 challenged the unity of the group by challenging the facts a
nd advocating for further investigation, the jurors began to doubt their views. This change is a
reminder of the impact of conflicting voices on intellectual and emotional development.

10. Social Identity Theory

The film also introduces identity theory, which studies how people know who they are
through their relationships with a group. Because jurors belong to different social, ethnic or
cultural groups, primary prejudices and prejudices of jurors originate from the group. His
social identity and associated preconceived notions shaped his thinking, as Juror No. 1 has
shown. 10 incredible words. As the trial progresses, those who decide their relationship
character early begin to bow to their union in order to reach a fair decision.

11. Power and Policy Dynamics

Group power strongly influences people's interactions and choices. For example, Jury No. 3.
Has managerial characteristics, tries to establish the law by discussing with each other. The n
eed to control his emotions is the result of conflicts in his own life. However, as the trial prog
ressed, there were subtle but logical changes in Jury No. 1's approach. Threatened control of
juror number 8. 3 causes a change in energy. This interaction indicates the possibility of new
leadership and the ability of individuals to influence the group regardless of their position.

12. Build Team Cohesion and Trust

The film shows the process of developing team cohesion and building trust among the judges.
The group began to disintegrate as people talked and interrupted each other. Confidence is en
hanced when Juror 8 encourages open discussion, respects the opinions of others, and demon
strates a passion for knowing the truth. By having a common purpose and being willing to list
en, culture can foster an environment where people feel respected and safe in expressing their
opinions. The transition from conflict to cooperation highlights the importance of effective co
mmunication to foster cooperation and trust.
13. Inspiration and dedication

Throughout the course of the movie, there are noticeable changes in the jurors' dedication to
and motivation for the deliberation process. Some jurors are initially driven by expediency,
wanting to reach a decision right away and move on. However, as Juror 8's commitment to
the case becomes clear, others start to change their minds as a result of his drive and
determination. This change illustrates how a single person's dedication and enthusiasm may
affect the drive and dedication of the entire group, ultimately leading to a more thorough and
fair judgment.

14. Styles of Group Decision-Making

The movie offers an interesting examination of several group decision-making processes. The
group initially exhibits a tendency toward authoritarian decision-making, with the foreman
attempting to direct the conversation and forge an immediate agreement. The group, however,
opens up to individual input and group decision-making as Juror 8 adopts a more consultative
and participative manner. This change emphasizes the benefits of inclusive decision-making,
when participants are given the chance to express their thoughts and participate in the
judgment.

Concluding remarks:

In conclusion, "12 Angry Men" is a cinematic masterpiece that not only enthralls viewers
with its riveting narrative but also provides a comprehensive investigation of the dynamics of
organizational behavior in the workplace. The video investigates the complex interplay of
group dynamics, leadership, communication, conflict management, prejudices, diversity, and
societal norms via the prism of a jury deliberation room. The lessons that can be learned from
this classic that has stood the test of time stretch far beyond the realm of the movie screen and
provide a useful case study for comprehending how individuals connect with one another,
work with one another, and make decisions within organizational settings. The legacy of the
movie will go on for a long time, and with it will come its ability to spark debates and
encourage introspection on the intricacies of human interaction in groups.