Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/337972361
CITATIONS READS
0 124
5 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Amit Nerkar on 17 December 2019.
1
Design, Synthesis, Docking Studies And Biological Evaluation ……. Smita Pawar et al
synthesise novel compound. Substituted 100 μg/ml, 150 μg/ml of (solvent DMSO)
benzothiazoles fused with pyrazole have of the test compounds were added by the
been shown to possess antibacterial, micropipette. The Petri dishes was kept in
antifungal and antimicrobial activity. a refrigerator to facilitate the diffusion of
MATERIALS AND METHODS solvent for about 2 hrs. The extent of
All the reagents and chemicals used were inhibition was measured in mm after
of analytical grade. The progress of the incubation at 37 °C for 48 h.
reaction and purity of all the synthesized Minimum inhibitory concentration
compounds was monitored by TLC. IR The Minimum inhibitory concentration
spectra were recorded on Shimadzu FTIR study was performed by broth dilution
8400S by using KBr, and the NMR spectra method as follows:
were recorded in NMR Varian-Mercury Broth dilution method
300 MHz spectrometer in CDCl3 and The broth dilution was performed by using
values are expressed in ppm. microtiter plates. The nutrient broth
Antimicrobial activity (double strength) was prepared using
Zone of inhibition peptone (1%), beefextract (0.5%),
Thecompounds were evaluated for the sodiumchloride (0.8%). The double
antibacterial10 and antifungal11activity by strength nutrient broth was used for MIC.
the cup plate method against gram-positive All the compounds were dissolved in
bacteria B. subtilis (ATCC 6633)S. aureus DMSO to give a concentration of 200
(ATCC 9144) and gram-negative bacteria μg/ml. Two-fold dilutions of test and
E. coli (ATCC 25922) andP. aeruginosa standard compounds were prepared in
(ATCC 9027), at the concentration: 50 double strength nutrient broth. The stock
μg/ml, 100 μg/ml, 150 μg/ml in DMSO. solution was serially diluted to give
The bacterial strains were obtained from concentration of 200-3.12 μg/ml in
NCL, and fungal strains were obtained nutrient broth. First row (A) of microtiter
from the department of microbiology of plate was used to check the sterility of
Waghire College, Saswad. For medium and as a negative control. Second
antibacterial and antifungal study, the row (B) of microtiter plate was used to
ciprofloxacin and fluconazole150 μg/ml check the suitability of the medium for the
respectively were used as reference drugs. growth of test microorganism and viability
The nutrient agar medium containing of the inoculum and as positive control.
peptone (1%), beef extract (0.5%), sodium Fill each row (From C-H) of the microtiter
chloride (0.8%) and agar (2.5%), in plate with 100μlfrom each of the tubes
distilled water were used for bacterial sub- containing the corresponding
cultured. The solution was sterilized for 20 concentrations(200-3.12 μg/ml).
min at 15 psi pressure in an autoclave at Themicrotiter plate was then incubated at
120 °C. The basal medium 15-20 ml was 37 °C for 24 hrs for bacteria and 48 hrs for
poured into the sterile Petri dishes. After fungi .12
the solidification of the medium, the Docking studies
suspension of the organism was spread by The docking process was carried out to
the spreader and holes of 6 mm diameter analyse the possible interactions between
were bored to form cups with the help of a newly synthesized compounds and the
sterile cork borer. To this cup 50μg/ml, selected cavity of the DNA gyrase
2
Design, Synthesis, Docking Studies And Biological Evaluation ……. Smita Pawar et al
3
Design, Synthesis, Docking Studies And Biological Evaluation ……. Smita Pawar et al
two necked RBF and 10 ml of ethanol was TLC for completion of reaction. The
added to it. The reaction mixture was reaction mixture was cooled at room
irradiated in microwave for 10 min. at temperature to obtain the product.15
level of 5 and periodically monitored by
NH2 N
NH4SCN NH2
Br2 in glacial acetic acid
R (00)stirring 24 hrs S
R
4-Substituted aniline
6-Substituted 2-amino benzothiazole
B(1-5)
N
NH NH2
R S
S
R
CH3
6-Substituted 2-(3-substituted,5-methyl1H-pyrazol-1-yl)benzo[d]thiazole
F(1-10)
Compound R R1 IR NMR %
(ppm) yield
F1 OCH3 CH3 3132(ArC-H),2931(C- 6.03(s,1H,CH),3.88(s,3H,CH3),2.75(s,3H,C 68
H),1590(C=N),1234(C- H3),2.30(s,3H,OCH3),7.73(d,1H,Ar-
N),810(C-S),1011(C- H),7.01(d,1H,Ar-H),7.26(s,1H,Ar-H).
O),1543(C=C)
F2 CH3 CH3 3018(ArC-H),2924(C- 6.03(s,1H,CH),2.76(s,3H,CH3),2.46(s,3H,C 60
H),1524(C=N),1280(C- H3),2.30(s,3H,CH3),7.72(d,1H,Ar-
N),688(C-S),1527(C=C) H),7.22(d,1H,Ar-H),7.60(s,1H,Ar-H)
F3 Cl CH3 3117(Ar C-H), 2947(C- 6.05(s,1H,CH),2.30(s,3H,CH3),2.75(s,3H,C 67
H),1600(C=N),1134(C- H3),7.74(s,1H,Ar-H),7.77(d,1H,Ar-
N),810(C- H)7.37(d,1H,Ar-H)
S),1573(C=C),771(C-Cl)
F4 NO2 CH3 3110(Ar C-H), 2931(C- 6.10(s,1H,CH),2.32(s,3H,CH3),2.78(s,3H,C 70
H),1751(C=N),1141(C- H3),8.75(s,1H,Ar-H),7.90(d,1H,Ar-
N),783(C- H),8.31(d,1H,Ar-H)
5
Design, Synthesis, Docking Studies And Biological Evaluation ……. Smita Pawar et al
S),1635(C=C),1334(N=O)
F5 H CH3 3055(Ar C-H), 2924(C- 6.03(s,1H,CH),2.30(s,3H,CH3),2.77(s,3 52
H),1580(C=N),1141(C- H,CH3),7.81-7.87(m,2H,Ar-H),7.25-
N),783(C-S),1573(C=C) 7.40(m,2H,Ar-H)
F6 OCH3 OC2H5 3009(Ar C-H),2901(C- 6.20(s,1H,CH),3.71(q,2H,CH2),1.32(t,3 59
H),1650(C=N),1211(C- H,CH3),2.46(s,3H,CH3)3.73(s,3H,OCH3
N),1101(C-O),758(C- ),7.37-7.39(m,2H,Ar-H),7.84(d,1H,Ar-
S),1526(C=C) H),8.04(d,1H,Ar-H)
F7 CH3 OC2H5 303(Ar C-H), 2978 (C- 6.00(s,1H,CH), 66
H),1750(C=N),1180(C- 3.26(q,2H,CH2),1.25(t,3H,CH3),2.46(s,3
N),1095(C-O),758(C- H,CH3)2.75(s,3H,CH3), 7.34-
S),1651(C=C) 7.41(m,2H,Ar-H),7.84(d,1H,Ar-
H),8.00(d,1H,Ar-H)
F8 Cl OC2H5 3132(Ar C-H), 2931(C- 5.99(s,1H,CH),3.71(q,2H,CH2),1.21(t,3 68
H),1610(C=N),1257(C- H,CH3),2.42(s,3H,CH3),7.37-
O),817(C- 7.39(m,2H,Ar-H),7.70(d,1H,Ar-
S),1558(C=C),710(C-Cl) H),8.10(d,1H,Ar-H)
F9 NO2 OC2H5 3309(Ar C-H),2924(C- 6.12(s,1H,CH),3.71(q,2H,CH2), 70
H),1745(C=N),1280(C- 1.30(t,3H,CH3),2.42(s,3H,CH3),7.37-
N),1128(C- 7.39(m,2H,Ar-H),7.70(d,1H,Ar-H),
O),748(CS)1550(C=C),145 8.10(d,1H,Ar-H)
0(N=O),
1327(N-O)
F10 H OC2H5 3124(Ar C-H), 2978(C- 5.94(s,1H,CH),3.71(q,2H,CH2),1.22(t,3 60
H),1745(C=N),1435(C- H,CH3),2.46(s,3H,CH3),7.37-
N),756(C- 7.39(m,2H,Ar-H),7.84(d,1H,Ar-
S),1527(C=C),1188(C-O) H),8.04(d,1H,Ar-H)
F1 50 12.5 50 25 25 50
F2 50 25 50 50 25 50
F3 25 12.5 25 6.5 12.5 25
F4 50 25 50 12.5 25 50
F5 50 25 50 25 25 25
F6 25 50 25 50 25 50
F7 50 25 50 50 50 50
F8 25 25 25 12.5 12.5 25
F9 50 50 50 25 25 50
F10 50 50 50 25 25 50
6
Design, Synthesis, Docking Studies And Biological Evaluation ……. Smita Pawar et al
Docking
To predict the probable interactions of The active site (cavity no 1) was defined to
newly synthesized compounds with the include residues within 10.0 A ° radius of
active site of DNA gyrase enzyme, any of the interaction. The docking
docking studies were carried out using procedure was validated by docking the
MDS V-life 3.5 software. The dock score, pyrazolthiazole extracted from PDB active
hydrophobic interactions, Van der Waal pocket. The molecular docking results
interactions and hydrogen bonds formed revealed a docking score of-4.8kcal/mol
with surrounding amino acids were used to for pyrazolthiazole, and it forms a single
predict the binding modes, binding hydrogen bond with Ser-55. The
affinities and orientation of docked compound F-3 is the most active
compounds in the active sites of DNA compound as antibacterial whichpossess
gyrase enzyme. dock score of -4.84 kcal/mol
Table 3: Dock score and binding interactions of newly synthesized compounds F (1-10)
Z o n e o f in h ib it io n o f t e s t c o m p o u n d s
50
NS
NS NS
NS C ip r o f lo x a c in
40
F1
z o n e o f in h ib itio n (m m )
F2
30 F3
F4
F5
20
F6
F7
10 F8
F9
F10
0
li
s
a
s
li
s
u
ti
o
c
re
b
in
.
u
E
u
g
.a
.s
ru
S
B
e
.a
P
S tr a in o f m ic r o o r g a n is m
Fig:2 Data expressed as mean±SEM. Data analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet test.
All test groups are compared with the control group, Ciprofloxacin
7
Design, Synthesis, Docking Studies And Biological Evaluation ……. Smita Pawar et al
Z o n e o f in h ib it io n o f t e s t c o m p o u n d s in f u n g i
40
F lu c a n a z o le
N S N S
F1
z o n e o f in h ib itio n (m m ) 30 F2
F3
F4
20 F5
F6
F7
10 F8
F9
F10
0
r
s
e
n
ig
a
ic
.n
lb
A
.a
C
S p e c ie s
Fig:3 Data expressed as mean±SEM. Data analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnet test.
All test groups are compared with the control group, Fluconazole.
8
Design, Synthesis, Docking Studies And Biological Evaluation ……. Smita Pawar et al