Writing a coursework on a complex and historically significant topic like the Vietnam War can be a

challenging and time-consuming task. It requires in-depth research, critical analysis, and a
comprehensive understanding of the historical context. The Vietnam War involved intricate political,
social, and military aspects, making it essential for students to delve deep into various primary and
secondary sources.

Here are some reasons why writing a Vietnam War coursework can be difficult:

1. Extensive Research: To produce a well-rounded coursework, students need to conduct

extensive research to gather information from reliable sources. This involves studying
historical documents, books, articles, and possibly interviewing experts or individuals with
firsthand experience.
2. Complexity of the Topic: The Vietnam War is a multifaceted subject with intricate
geopolitical, cultural, and military aspects. Understanding and explaining these complexities
can be challenging for students, especially if they are not well-versed in the history of the
conflict.
3. Critical Analysis:A coursework on the Vietnam War requires students to critically analyze
the events, decisions, and consequences of the war. This involves developing strong
analytical skills and the ability to present a nuanced perspective.
4. Time Constraints: Students often face time constraints due to academic schedules and other
commitments. Meeting deadlines while ensuring the quality of the coursework adds an extra
layer of difficulty.

For those finding it challenging to tackle their Vietnam War coursework, seeking assistance from
professional writing services like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can be a viable option. These services often
have experienced writers with expertise in various subjects, including history. By outsourcing the
writing task, students can alleviate some of the pressures associated with coursework and ensure a
well-researched and well-written paper.

However, it's essential to approach such services cautiously, ensuring that they prioritize academic
integrity and provide original, plagiarism-free content. Additionally, students should use any external
assistance as a learning aid rather than a replacement for their own efforts.

In conclusion, while writing a Vietnam War coursework can be difficult due to its complexity and
the need for extensive research, seeking assistance from reputable writing services like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ may be a helpful option for those facing challenges in completing their
assignments.
See other similar resources ?3.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you
were looking for. The problems are that this source doesn’t tell us the other side of the argument and
it does not tell us how much is spent on health and education at home per year in comparison to that
spent on war each year. Another reason to why the Vietnamese supported the Vietcong rather than
the USA was because they wanted to be a communist ruled nation. Reviews Select overall rating (no
rating) Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. I made this by using many sources: I used
my lesson notes from school, CGP revision guides, and other online sources. EG: I use titles and
sub-titles to split each part of the content when necessary. It tells us that even at its lowest level
support are still at a relatively large 25 per cent of the population that were polled. Historical records
preserved at the National Archives provide insight into this critical period. For an optimal
experience, please switch to the latest version of Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Apple Safari or
Mozilla Firefox. I intend to study the sources in this booklet until I have come to a viable conclusion
and have given my ultimate verdict. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel
It's good to leave some feedback. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's
good to leave some feedback. The ferocity of this source suggests to me that Nixon may fear the
power of the AWM. Their fear of this small threat was the reason that the USA failed in Vietnam.
This source is a speech so immediately I can say it is biased and unreliable but not totally. Therefore,
I would definitely recommend buying these products if you would like to attain similar success.
What the father does is simply defend his daughters, and everyone’s right to free speech. Using the
sources and your own knowledge explain whether you agree or disagree with this statement.
However, this source is mainly factual so I would expect the author to be British or of another such
neutral nationality. Along with this, I used my knowledge and understanding I gained from the
revision guide, to do practice papers as well. Before we assess the reliability of this source we need
to know why the poll was taken, who took it, what question was asked and could the person being
asked have given the answer that the interviewer expected etc.? What we do know about opinion
polls is this: they are commonly neutral sources and are factual pieces. They realised too late that
they were not just fighting a military war, but were also fighting a political one. Vietnam had been
part of the French empire until the Vietminh at Dien Bien Phu had defeated it. See other similar
resources ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for.
Also it tells us the Nixon thought the brave ones were out risking their live for America. Also, I have
friends in school that have used my document, and they’ve seen great progress and success in their
grades, achieving 9s, 8s and 7s. Other reasons for the withdrawal of troops included the My Lai
Massacre, the Kent State University Massacre, and the election of President Nixon. The Vietcong
were experts at this type of warfare, and easily trapped the USA military as they had been trained to
fight conventional wars, which this was not. The Vietcong dug ditches, and booby-traps to control.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?3.00 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later ?3.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 25
January 2022 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest TandLGuru's Shop 4.70 1165 reviews Not the right
resource. This aggression shows the tension between the previously mentioned “doves” and “hawks”.
What caption, if any was placed with this snapshot. Each lesson includes a powerpoint with step by
step instructions and a range of activities, differentiated worksheets and tasks. The limitations
however are that what is said may be part of a speech and speeches usually bring about exaggeration
and exclusion of the argument of the opposition. The problems are that this source doesn’t tell us the
other side of the argument and it does not tell us how much is spent on health and education at home
per year in comparison to that spent on war each year. There is little emotion expressed in what he
says but it comes across quite sensible, although the source is biased. Also, I have friends in school
that have used my document, and they’ve seen great progress and success in their grades, achieving
9s, 8s and 7s. It features clear and detailed information on all aspects of the war (from combat
tactics, to the media coverage and protest movements in the USA). The Vietcong dug ditches, and
booby-traps to control. It was the only successful method fro a small nation to fight against a super-
power such as America, which was vastly superior in the number of ground troops available and
technology. They believed that this would help stop the spread of communism. We could be seeing
National Guardsmen attacking peaceful protesting students or we could be seeing violent rebelling
students attacking National Guardsmen. It is most probable that he wrote it primarily to convey a
message and secondly for combined money and fame. Our customer service team will review your
report and will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 16 June 2016 Share this Share through email Share
through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest
Nicksimmons's Shop 2.71 7 reviews Not the right resource. It is for this reason that we need to know
what context the source is in. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch.
?6.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?6.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save
for later Last updated 22 February 2018 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share
through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Will's Shop 4.67 3 reviews Not the
right resource. Because of the possibility of the photographer being biased we must ask, was the
photo doctored with in any way before it was published. No opinion can be immediately detected
although the photographer could have cut out part of the image to focus on a particular part of the
image or to exclude part of it out. These were used to strip the jungle of vegetation, but caused much
more human distress. The positive aspect of the sources includes the fat that it gives us the anti-
AWM view. Would he have cut out a part of the photo before publishing it. The resource is designed
to be printed onto A3, and is provided as both a PDF and a Word version (so that you can edit if you
want to). What the father does is simply defend his daughters, and everyone’s right to free speech.
Ultimately, this left me and my friends prepared to perform well for all our exams. Other reasons for
the withdrawal of troops included the My Lai Massacre, the Kent State University Massacre, and the
election of President Nixon. The USA where fighting on an unknown territory against the people
they were fighting for. But this is only Nixon’s perspective and he may be looking for favour after
his dishonourable discharge from presidency. During the years of 1961 to 1973 it was involved in
conflict with the USA. We don’t burn our draft cards down on main street.”.
This financial aid, and military advice soon became a full-scale military escalation, and a full-scale
war. Historical records preserved at the National Archives provide insight into this critical period.
Johnson, Tet Offensive, Giap, Operation Rolling Thunder, Khe Sanh, My Lai, Protests in America,
Kent State, and the Fall of Saigon. So we cannot conclude on whether or not these kids were really
“bums blowing up campuses” or not. Source 5 says that the AWM are not all hippies who smoke
marijuana etc. If it were being said privately then it would mean less than it would if it were said in
front of an audience or indeed on television. It is a completely factual source and this gives it a merit
in terms of reliability. As support declines, opposition naturally increases. Write a review Update
existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. The source’s other
disadvantages are that this statement could have been said in the heat of the moment and be a show
of arrogance and pretentiousness. I shall begin by categorizing the sources, as follows. I have put in
large amounts of time and effort into making the document. The Vietcong were experts at this type
of warfare, and easily trapped the USA military as they had been trained to fight conventional wars,
which this was not. Another reason to why the Vietnamese supported the Vietcong rather than the
USA was because they wanted to be a communist ruled nation. Write a review Update existing
review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. The negative aspects would be that
we are only given one side of the argument and we need to have another point of view. We must
however keep in mind that the evidence is constantly changing and new evidence could change
opinions and therefore outcomes, if the answer depends on opinionated sources etc. Pro-war was the
biggest group as American patriotism appealed to the public at this early stage. This resource hasn't
been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this
resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. They
realised too late that they were not just fighting a military war, but were also fighting a political one.
Without all these facts my opinion would be different and without all these facts I may not be able to
make an accurate judgement of a source. This tells me that he didn’t think the war was worthwhile
and the use of the work adventure indicates that he does not think this war is planned or in any way
organized and therefore the American Government was improvising as it went along in Vietnam. It
tells us that the AWM had a huge positive impact on the end of the war. Can we trust him to think
back 20 years accurately and reliably. Mr. Nixon could be referring to the AWM as bums, at home, in
university, protesting against the war while the brave ones are out fighting and dying in Vietnam.
This overpowering reaction caused the North Vietnamese to be more determined to resist against the
USA. In the years of 1965 to 1968 the body count rose from just under two thousand to fourteen
thousand. Ultimately, this left me and my friends prepared to perform well for all our exams.
However this source is biased and was written in 1972, could events have changed the writers mind.
This source demonstrates to me that Garfinkle had an anti-AWM view and that he supported the
general trend of sources 7,9 and 19. It was the only successful method fro a small nation to fight
against a super-power such as America, which was vastly superior in the number of ground troops
available and technology. According to “Newsweek” 64% supported the soldiers and 26% opposed
the war. I shall begin by categorizing the sources, as follows. This source is an unbiased source but
yet still not totally useful as it was written in 1995 and the memory of the writer could have been
impaired or he could have been resentful towards the people who called the college kids “bums”. As
well as that we need to know the specific views are i.e. the doves believe that the US government
spends too much money on a foreign war instead of health care at home. Source 4 tells us that
America is spending too much money on the war and not enough at home on health. See other
similar resources ?6.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were
looking for. It also shows the extent and depth of the propaganda war. The Vietcong were experts at
this type of warfare, and easily trapped the USA military as they had been trained to fight
conventional wars, which this was not. This aggression shows the tension between the previously
mentioned “doves” and “hawks”. But this is only Nixon’s perspective and he may be looking for
favour after his dishonourable discharge from presidency. The positive aspect of the sources includes
the fat that it gives us the anti-AWM view. What caption, if any was placed with this snapshot. This
was very different to why the Vietnamese were fighting. See other similar resources ?3.99 (no
rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. What the father
does is simply defend his daughters, and everyone’s right to free speech. There is little emotion
expressed in what he says but it comes across quite sensible, although the source is biased. The
Vietcong were experts at this type of warfare, and easily trapped the USA military as they had been
trained to fight conventional wars, which this was not. They were fighting to keep a way of life and
have freedom in their own country, and also to stay alive. It was the only successful method fro a
small nation to fight against a super-power such as America, which was vastly superior in the number
of ground troops available and technology. The doves being the anti-war members of the Democratic
Party and the hawks being the pro-war members. The insignificant threat to their superpower drove
them to war, and drove them to failure. We could be seeing National Guardsmen attacking peaceful
protesting students or we could be seeing violent rebelling students attacking National Guardsmen.
The opposition increased after events such as the TET offensive, a surprise attack by the Vietcong on
the American army to demoralise them, and turn the media against the US troops, also it brought the
medias attention closer to the war. This is recalling from 20 years ago how accurate is this mans
memory. We don’t burn our draft cards down on main street.”. The negative aspects would be that
we are only given one side of the argument and we need to have another point of view. This resource
hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this
resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. It
tells us that he is shameful and sorrowful and this shows decent human feeling.
But really what had lost the war was the lack of reasoning behind it in the first case. Source 10 has a
father of a shooting victim (Kent State Campus) saying his daughter was not a hippie bum and that
not all AWM members are hippies. If it were being said privately then it would mean less than it
would if it were said in front of an audience or indeed on television. It is a completely factual source
and this gives it a merit in terms of reliability. Other reasons for the withdrawal of troops included
the My Lai Massacre, the Kent State University Massacre, and the election of President Nixon. The
limitations however are that what is said may be part of a speech and speeches usually bring about
exaggeration and exclusion of the argument of the opposition. Without all these facts my opinion
would be different and without all these facts I may not be able to make an accurate judgement of a
source. EG: I use titles and sub-titles to split each part of the content when necessary. The USA did
not want communism to continue and so carried on sending aid to South Vietnam in the form of
financial and military aid. Newspapers, magazines, the radio and the television all were against the
war, and influenced the public to go against it too. This aggression shows the tension between the
previously mentioned “doves” and “hawks”. This spells out to me that Nixon thought all the college
students on the USA were AWM bums. The good thing about this source is that it tells us of the pro-
war side of the argument and what the President of America thought of college students at the time.
We must ask whether this was an American or British man or what nationality he otherwise was.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. As
well as that we need to know the specific views are i.e. the doves believe that the US government
spends too much money on a foreign war instead of health care at home. Again this song is directed
at the “hippies” that were present in the 1970’s. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson;
Main Participating Countries; Timeline of Major Events. Reviews Select overall rating (no rating)
Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. Another reason to why the Vietnamese supported
the Vietcong rather than the USA was because they wanted to be a communist ruled nation. Kenneth
O’Donnell describes the war a “foreign adventure”. The fact that she is shocked when people called
her a communist communicates sincerity. And that it shows us that the doves are the minority group.
All they wanted to do was serve their 12 months of duty and then go home back to their lives. This
resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. The USA began to use chemical warfare such as Napalm, and Agent Orange. However
this source is biased and was written in 1972, could events have changed the writers mind. The
source’s other disadvantages are that this statement could have been said in the heat of the moment
and be a show of arrogance and pretentiousness. It tells us that even at its lowest level support are
still at a relatively large 25 per cent of the population that were polled. These simplistic tactics proved
too straightforward for the USA to understand, and the Vietcong continued to keep them at bay.
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions.
Because of the possibility of the photographer being biased we must ask, was the photo doctored
with in any way before it was published. Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is
required to reflect your happiness. All they wanted to do was serve their 12 months of duty and then
go home back to their lives. Each lesson includes a powerpoint with step by step instructions and a
range of activities, differentiated worksheets and tasks. It was the only successful method fro a small
nation to fight against a super-power such as America, which was vastly superior in the number of
ground troops available and technology. This pushed fair equality and equal rights to the government
with increasing complaints on the matter. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson; Main
Participating Countries; Timeline of Major Events. There is little emotion expressed in what he says
but it comes across quite sensible, although the source is biased. There is no answer key for this study
guide as student responses vary in length and depth. See other similar resources ?2.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. The positive aspect of the
sources includes the fat that it gives us the anti-AWM view. What caption, if any was placed with
this snapshot. The Vietcong dug ditches, and booby-traps to control. This is useful because it tells us
one side of the argument and it is a very direct argument in its approach to the topic. This source is
an unbiased source but yet still not totally useful as it was written in 1995 and the memory of the
writer could have been impaired or he could have been resentful towards the people who called the
college kids “bums”. Source 5 says that the AWM are not all hippies who smoke marijuana etc.
Another limitation is that we need to know how many supported each group and how the supporters
protested if they did so. See other similar resources ?3.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for
later Not quite what you were looking for. This tells me that he didn’t think the war was worthwhile
and the use of the work adventure indicates that he does not think this war is planned or in any way
organized and therefore the American Government was improvising as it went along in Vietnam.
During the years of 1961 to 1973 it was involved in conflict with the USA. We must however keep
in mind that the evidence is constantly changing and new evidence could change opinions and
therefore outcomes, if the answer depends on opinionated sources etc. As well as that we need to
know the specific views are i.e. the doves believe that the US government spends too much money
on a foreign war instead of health care at home. We could be seeing National Guardsmen attacking
peaceful protesting students or we could be seeing violent rebelling students attacking National
Guardsmen. But this is only Nixon’s perspective and he may be looking for favour after his
dishonourable discharge from presidency. North Vietnam being controlled by Ho Chi Mihn, a
communist, and South Vietnam being controlled by Ngo Dihn Diem, a capitalist. Some of the
sources claim that the AWM had nothing to do with the end of the war and others state it did and
some others say that the outcome we all know of came about because of different events and
occurrences around the time. The source’s other disadvantages are that this statement could have
been said in the heat of the moment and be a show of arrogance and pretentiousness. This source
demonstrates to me that Garfinkle had an anti-AWM view and that he supported the general trend of
sources 7,9 and 19. The media aided this movement by continuously reporting from Vietnam on the
injustice of the war.