Writing coursework, especially in a complex subject like Maths C3, can be a challenging and time-

consuming task. It requires a deep understanding of the topic, strong analytical skills, and the ability
to articulate thoughts clearly. The Maths C3 coursework often involves intricate mathematical
problems, data analysis, and a comprehensive exploration of various mathematical concepts.

For many students, managing coursework alongside other academic responsibilities can be
overwhelming. Time constraints, lack of resources, or difficulty grasping certain concepts can further
add to the stress. In such situations, seeking assistance can be a wise decision.

One option is to consider professional help, and a reputable service like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can
be a valuable resource. They offer custom coursework writing services that cater to individual needs.
By ordering from a reliable platform, students can benefit from the expertise of experienced writers
who are well-versed in mathematical subjects. This can ensure a well-crafted coursework that meets
academic standards and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the Maths C3 topic.

However, it's essential to approach such services with caution. Always verify the credibility of the
platform, check for reviews, and ensure that they prioritize originality and quality in their work.
While seeking assistance is acceptable, it's crucial to use these services responsibly and in accordance
with academic integrity policies.

In conclusion, if you find Maths C3 coursework challenging and overwhelming, seeking help from
professional writing services like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ can be a viable solution. Just remember to
exercise due diligence when choosing such services to ensure a positive and ethical academic
experience.
This shows that generally the Newton-Raphson method has a much quicker speed of convergence
than the other two methods. It will explore instances where, for some reason, they fail and also
examine their ease, efficiency and usefulness in solving polynomial equations. With the use of
AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out the gradient function.
Report this Document Download now Save Save C3 MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later
100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths
Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title Coursework on the use of numerical
methods. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the method above and so the root
will not be found. A change of sign will always indicate a root if the function is continuous. To do
this, we need to find the gradient at that point. This repeats until we find the root of the equation,
(when x value starts repeating or reached enough significant levels). Full description Save Save C3
MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this
document as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful
Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document.
The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate to the real solution but more
easily. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are harder and more
complex. Out of the three, some are faster at converging to the root that others and some are easier
to use than others, especially with the recent technology made available to everyone. This is the only
hard part of the method as the iterative part of the method is very simple with the use of the formula.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. The
reason is that it only involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them. When the line met
the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-
axis, called X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. The integer search process of finding this interval is
shown for the two bounds here-. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it
is not completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very
repetitive. See other similar resources ?0.00 (no rating) 0 reviews Download Save for later Not quite
what you were looking for. Both make good use of Autograph software visually interpret equations
before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the calculations to find each root. This makes it even
easier than excel but it is less accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can
be configured to as many decimal places as needed. So using the Re- arrangement method to solve
f(x), I find that the root is - 1.961703555. Consequently, we would be unlikely to seach further in the
intervals. Therefore, we might miss the other two after finding the first one. So when I substitute the
incremented values of x between -10 and 0 into the equation, I get the following results. The
downside of the method is that it is the most likely method of all three to fail as there is always a
chance that when you rearrange an equation and start the iterative process, it will not converge to the
root but it will diverge away. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel to proof
the rest of the change of signs method. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for
our reviews, only customers who have downloaded this resource can review it Report this resource
to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. However the need for much manual
computation can make the process quite laborious and time consuming.
This reason is that the two points are too close to each other. But with ever growing technology,
there might already be software that solves the roots of an equation after entering the formula in.
This makes it very easy to work out the repetitive part of the method and makes the speed of
convergence much faster. Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x
0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second guess. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can
also be seen in the graph. But after the 4 th iteration, we have reached a point where the x value
started repeating due to the fact that this was to 4 decimal places. What is more? There is a function
of zooming in the graph in the graphic calculator, which makes it easier to find out the values that
correct to 5 decimal places. Both make good use of Autograph software visually interpret equations
before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the calculations to find each root. The reason is that it
only involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them. After 19 iterations, I found the root
of the equation as from then on, it repeats. Report this Document Download now Save Save C3
MEI A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 2K
views 18 pages C3 MEI A-Level Maths Coursework Uploaded by Maurice Yap AI-enhanced title
Coursework on the use of numerical methods. This method is slightly complex even on easy
formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder formulas are introduced. This will mean
that the gradient function will equal to zero. This makes it even easier than excel but it is less
accurate as it only gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many
decimal places as needed. Some methods give you the exact and precise answer but usually are
harder and more complex. Therefore, we might miss the other two after finding the first one. Upload
Read for free FAQ and support Language (EN) Sign in Skip carousel Carousel Previous Carousel
Next What is Scribd. After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel to proof the rest
of the change of signs method. For example sing the same rearrangement of the equation to find the
root between 5 and 6 using 5 as the starting point, the iterations converge on the root between 1 and
2. If the gradient function is zero, that will mean that the denominator is 0 and that is an impossible
fraction. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?0.00 (no rating) 0
reviews Download Save for later ?0.00 (no rating) 0 reviews Download Save for later Last updated
22 February 2018 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest JChamboredon's Shop 3.78 9 reviews Not the right
resource. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is relatively low as it is not completely
automated and requires human interaction after each set of results and is very repetitive. So the only
human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually looking at between which two points
(limits) there is a sign change and then setting the new limits as such. But whichever bit of software
you use, it is hands down the easier way of finding the roots of an equation. With the use of
AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out the gradient function.
Writing the formula in a cell and dragging it down so it is easier to calculate the y values for various
points of x. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will
use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. Despite this, it is a very effective method as
failure chances are relatively very low and the root can be found to many decimal places if the right
software is used. It will explore instances where, for some reason, they fail and also examine their
ease, efficiency and usefulness in solving polynomial equations. These changes are shown as the
blue rows of the table.
But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an
equation after entering the formula in. So the only human interaction needed is to look at the results
and manually looking at between which two points (limits) there is a sign change and then setting
the new limits as such. After 19 iterations, I found the root of the equation as from then on, it
repeats. I am going to use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will
use Excel to work the root out to more decimal places. Join our team of reviewers and help other
students learn. This repeats until we find the root of the equation, (when x value starts repeating or
reached enough significant levels). There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement involved in the
formulae and it is very easy to enter all the information into Excel. This shows that generally the
Newton-Raphson method has a much quicker speed of convergence than the other two methods.
With the use of AutoGraph Software, It is even easier as you don’t even have to work out the
gradient function. A pdf file containing 20 random questions to revise topics for Core and Core 4
maths (A level). Despite this, it is a very effective method as failure chances are relatively very low
and the root can be found to many decimal places if the right software is used. In some cases you
may not be able to differentiate f(x). When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended
until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 4, which is equal to -3.5273.
This process is then repeated on the new x values until they converge on the root to the required level
of accuracy. As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will always indicate a root. The
iterations are also wrong as they diverge away from the point as well. Some methods give you the
exact and precise answer but usually are harder and more complex. Because of this it is the most
difficult method to use, especially if you do not have software to automate the iterations. So I used
the formula to work out the values in excel. Some computer programs, such as Autograph, can carry
out the iterations for you, which, if they are available to you, can make it easier to use than a decimal
search. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?0.00 (no rating) 0
reviews Download Save for later ?0.00 (no rating) 0 reviews Download Save for later Last updated
22 February 2018 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest JChamboredon's Shop 3.78 9 reviews Not the right
resource. So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the failure of the graph. The
reason is that it only involves a few calculations and it is easy to calculate them. If so, I think that the
decimal search will be the simplest way to find the roots. Taking x 0 as the first guess at the root, the
tangent to the curve at (x 0,f(x 0 )) crosses the x axis at x 1, the second guess. This method is slightly
complex even on easy formulas, but when we get really complicated when harder formulas are
introduced. The Decimal search method enables you to get a very close approximate to the real
solution but more easily. This makes it much easier than excel but it is again less accurate as it only
gives the root to 3 decimal places where as excel can be configured to as many decimal places as
needed. When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it
is a new point on the x-axis, called X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. The diagram above shows that the
gradient of g(x) is within this range at the root which is found.
Looking at the graph you can see that the root is between -2 and -1. Regarding the speed the
convergence, this is by far the fastest to converge to the root and it is also the method which fails the
least out of the three different methods. With the use of excel, it can be really easy to work out the
values of y when you sub in the x values. A decimal search, in contrast, just requires calculations,
which can easily be done using a computer. When the line met the curve, a tangent is drawn and
extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis, called X 4, which is equal to -
3.5273. There isn’t any iteration and rearrangement involved in the formulae and it is very easy to
enter all the information into Excel. So this means that there will be no sign changes resulting in the
failure of the graph. As a result of this no change of sign will be found using the method above and
so the root will not be found. See other similar resources ?0.00 (no rating) 0 reviews Download Save
for later Not quite what you were looking for. But regarding the speed of convergence, this is
relatively low as it is not completely automated and requires human interaction after each set of
results and is very repetitive. If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the
roots. But with ever growing technology, there might already be software that solves the roots of an
equation after entering the formula in. So using the Re- arrangement method to solve f(x), I find that
the root is - 1.961703555. Then we look at where the tangent crosses the X axis and that value will
be the new x value on the graph for a tangent. This shows that generally the Newton-Raphson
method has a much quicker speed of convergence than the other two methods. When the line met the
curve, a tangent is drawn and extended until it meets the x-axis and it is a new point on the x-axis,
called X 3, which is equal to -3.5566. The fact that the solution lies between -3 and -4 can also be
seen in the graph. So the only human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually looking
at between which two points (limits) there is a sign change and then setting the new limits as such.
As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will always indicate a root. This will mean that
the gradient function will equal to zero. Using Autograph is much, much simpler as you have the
ability to zoom in on the point where the signs change, i.e. the point on the X-axis, and can do so to
many places. A pdf file containing 20 random questions to revise topics for Core and Core 4 maths
(A level). If we take a look at the Newton Raphson formula, it’s denominator is the gradient function
of f(x). After finding the roots, we can leave Autograph and use Excel to proof the rest of the
change of signs method. Compared to the change of sign method both are generally more easy to use
as once the initial formula has been entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many
times. Most of the mistakes are made in this stage by humans. The diagram above shows that the
gradient of g(x) is within this range at the root which is found. Full description Save Save C3 MEI
A-level Maths Coursework For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this document
as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share
Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 18 Search inside document. I am going to
use the inbuilt function in AutoGraph to work it out initially and then I will use Excel to work the
root out to more decimal places.