GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON EXPLORATION (G3) FOR LIMESTONE IN

SULTANPUR BLOCK, MATTAMPALLY MANDAL,

DISTRICT- SURYAPET, TELANGANA

CONTENTS

PARA PAGE
DESCRIPTION
No. NO.
Salient features
(i)
CHAPTER-1 1-9
1.0.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1.0 General 1
1.2.0 Background 3
1.3.0 Location and Accessibility 4
1.4.0 Physiography and Drainage 5
1.5.0 Previous Work 7
1.6.0 Objectives of Exploration 7
1.7.0 Present Work 7
1.8.0 Acknowledgement 9
CHAPTER-II 10-16
2.0.0 GEOLOGY OF THE AREA 10
2.1.0 Regional Geology of the area 10
2.2.0 Geology of the Block 10
2.3.0 Description of formations 11
2.4.0 Regional structure of the area 11
CHAPTER-III 17-26
3.0.0 EXPLORATION METHODOLOGY 17
3.1.0 General 17
3.2.0 Scheme of Exploration 17
3.3.0 Limitations 18
3.4.0 Topographic Survey and Geological Mapping 18
3.5.0 Surface Drilling 18
3.6.0 Drill Core Logging & Sample Preservation 19
3.7.0 Sampling and Analysis 19
3.8.0 Physical Analysis 20
3.9.0 Petrographic Studies 21
3.10.0 Specific Gravity Determinations 21
3.11.0 Limestone Zones Intersected in MECL Boreholes 21
3.12.0 Utilisation Aspects and Mineability 23
PARA PAGE
DESCRIPTION
No. NO.
CHAPTER-IV
4.0.0 EVALUATION OF EXPLORATION DATA
4.1.0 General
4.2.0 Borehole Wise Evaluation
4.3.0 Inference
4.4.0 Grades of Limestone
4.5.0 Reliability of Chemical Analysis
4.6.0 Petrographic Studies
4.7.0 X-RAY Diffraction Studies
4.8.0 Minor and Trace Elements by spectroscopic analysis
CHAPTER-V
5.0.0 RESOURCES & GRADES
5.1.0 General
5.2.0 Basic Assumptions
5.3.0 Methodology
5.4.0 Categorisation of Resources
5.5.0 Resources
5.6.0 Summary of Resources
CHAPTER-VI
6.0.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1.0 Conclusions
6.2.0 Recommendations
Personnel Associated With the exploration in
Sultanpur Block
References
 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON EXPLORATION (G3) FOR LIMESTONE IN
SULTANPUR BLOCK, MATTAMPALLY MANDAL,
DISTRICT- SURYAPET, TELANGANA

LIST OF ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE PAGE
T I T L E
NO. NO.
Statement Showing Co-ordinates (in WGS-84), Reduced
IA Levels and total Depth of boreholes drilled by MECL, IA/1
Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Co-ordinates of cardinal points (in WGS-84) of block
IB boundary as provided by DMG,Telangana, Sultanpur IB/1
Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement Showing run-wise lithologs of boreholes
II MLTS- 01 to 03 drilled by MECL, Sultanpur Block, Dist: II/1-5
Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement Showing Primary Analysis (for 6 radicals CaO,
MgO, SiO2, Al2O3 Fe2O3 & LOI) of borehole core
III A IIIA/1-5
samples generated by MECL, Sultanpur Block, Dist:
Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement Showing primary Analysis (for 2 radicals, SO3
III B & P2O5) of borehole core samples collected by MECL, IIIB/1
Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing details of Composite Core sample
Analysis (for 12 radicals CaO, MgO, SiO2, Al2O3 Fe2O3,
III C SO3, P2O5, TiO2, Mn2O3, K2O, Na2O & LOI) of boreholes IIIC/1
drilled by MECL, Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet,
Telangana.
Statement showing borehole-wise intersections of
IV different grades of limestone in Boreholes drilled by IV/1
MECL, Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing Primary Vs. Check analysis (Internal)
VA of core samples of boreholes drilled by MECL, Sultanpur VA/1
Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing Primary Vs. Check analysis
VB (External) of core samples of boreholes drilled by MECL, VB/1
Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing Emission Spectroscopic analysis
VI results (10 elements) of Limestone samples, Sultanpur VI/1
Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing X-Ray Diffraction Analysis results of
VII Limestone samples, Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, VII/1
Telangana.
Statement showing Petrographic Studies of Limestone
VIII VIII/1-3
sample, Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
ANNEXURE PAGE
T I T L E
NO. NO.
Statement showing Specific Gravity of Limestone Samples,
IX IX/1
Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing Thickness-wise, Zone wise & Grade-
wise inferred Category Resources of Limestone estimated
XA XA/1
by Isochore Method of graded zone, Sultanpur Block, Dist:
Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing Thickness-wise, Zone wise & Grade-
wise inferred Category Resources of Limestone estimated
XB XB/1
by Isochore Method of ungraded zone, Sultanpur Block,
Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing Thickness-wise, Zone wise & Grade-
wise inferred Category Resources of Limestone estimated
XC XC/1
by Cross-sectional Method of graded zone, Sultanpur Block,
Dist: Suryapet, Telengana.
Statement showing Thickness-wise, Zone wise & Grade-
wise inferred Category Resources of Limestone estimated
XD XD/1
by Cross-sectional Method of ungraded zone, Sultanpur
Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telengana.
Statement showing Administrative/ Financial sanction of
XI NMET for G-3 Level Exploration of Limestone in Sultanpur XI
Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
XII Statement of comments &suggestions of Peer Reviewer XII/1-13

LIST OF PLATES

PLATE
TITLE R.F
NO
I Location Map, Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana. -

Topographical Map with Geology with Borehole Locations of

II 1:5000
Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Geological Cross Sections (A-A’) along dip direction with Zone
III data of Limestone, Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, 1:2000
Telangana.
Floor Contour Plan (On the basis of Floor of Graded Zone),
IV 1:5000
Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Plan of Reserve estimation of Graded zone by Isochore
VA 1:5000
method, Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Plan of Reserve estimation of ungraded zone by Isochore
VB 1:5000
method, Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Plan of Isograde of graded zone by Isograde method,
VIA 1:5000
Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Plan of Isograde of ungraded zone by Isograde method,
VIB 1:5000
Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Graphic Lithologs (On the basis of assay values) of MECL
VII Boreholes (MLTS-1 to 3) with Zone Details, Sultanpur Block, 1:500
Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON EXPLORATION (G3) FOR LIMESTONE IN
SULTANPUR BLOCK, MATTAMPALLY MANDAL,
DISTRICT- SURYAPET, TELANGANA

LIST OF TEXT FIGURES

Text Fig No. Description Page No
1 Location Map of Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana. 6
Regional Geological map with location of Sultanpur Block, Dist:
2 12
Suryapet, Telangana.
Geological Map with borehole locations of Sultanpur Block, Dist:
3 13
Suryapet, Telangana.
4 Field Photographs 14
5 Field Photographs 15
6 Field Photographs 16
7 Field Photographs
Scatter Plot of Primary Vs. Int. Check analysis of CaO% and
8A 31
MgO% Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Scatter Plot of Primary Vs. Ext. Check analysis of CaO% and
8B 31
MgO% Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Scatter Plot of Primary Vs. . Int. Check analysis of SiO2% and
9A 32
Fe2O3% Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Scatter Plot of Primary Vs. . Ext. Check analysis of SiO2% and
9B 32
Fe2O3% Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Scatter Plot of Primary Vs. . Int. Check analysis of Al2O3% and
10A 33
LOI%Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Scatter Plot of Primary Vs. Ext . Int. Check analysis of Al2O3%
10B 33
and LOI%Sultanpur Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Geological Cross Sections along A-A’ Sultanpur Block, Dist:
11 38
Suryapet, Telangana.

LIST OF TABLES
Table No Description Page No
I Quantum of work carried out by MECL in Sultanpur Block. 8
II Regional Stratigraphic Succession of the area around Sultanpur Block. 10
Borehole-wise intersection of different grades of limestone zones in
III-1 22
boreholes drilled by MECL in Sultanpur Block.
Table showing Specifications of chemical constituents for Cement,
III-2 26
SMS and Chemical Grade of Limestone
Statement showing Thickness-wise, Grade-wise Resources ofcement
V-1 grade Limestone estimated by Isochore Method, Sultanpur Block, 40
Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing Thickness-wise, Grade-wise Resources of
V-2 Ungraded Limestone estimated by Isochore Method, Sultanpur Block, 41
Dist: Suryapet, Telangana.
Statement showing Thickness-wise, Grade-wise Resources of cement
V-3 grade Limestone estimated by Cross Sectional method, Sultanpur 45
Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telengana
Statement showing Thickness-wise, Grade-wise Resources of
V-4 Ungraded Limestone estimated by Cross Sectional method, Sultanpur 46
Block, Dist: Suryapet, Telengana.
 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON EXPLORATION (G3 level) FOR LIMESTONE IN
SULTANPUR BLOCK, DIST: SURYAPET, TELANGANA.

SALIENT FEATURES

1. Name of the block SULTANPUR

Mandal –Mattampally
District – Suryapet
Telangana

2. Mineral Limestone

3. Area 1.36 Sq.Km

4. Period of Exploration October-2017 to December-2017

5. Meterage drilled by Total 130.00 m

MECL
6. No. of Boreholes drilled Total 03 Nos
by MECL

7. Thickness of Cement 10.82 m (Min.) to 36.08 m (Max)

grade Limestone zone

8. Cut-off grade Cao % MgO % SiO2%

42 (Min) 4.00 (Max) 16.00 (Max)

9. Resources 80.21 million tonnes (net in-situ)

10 Grade Cement

11. Average Grade CaO MgO SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 LOI

% % % % % %
47.10 1.22 9.75 1.32 1.00 38.32

12. UNFC Category Inferred Category (333)

13. Report Submission January 2018

(i)
1
 GEOLOGICAL REPORT ON EXPLORATION (G3) FOR LIMESTONE IN
SULTANPUR BLOCK, MATTAMPALLY MANDAL,
DISTRICT- SURYAPET, TELANGANA

CHAPTER-I
1.0.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1.0 GENERAL

1.1.1 Limestone which is used by the industries in bulk quantity is a bedded type
calcareous sedimentary rock mainly composed of carbonates. The two most
important constituents are calcite and dolomite. Limestone often contains
magnesium carbonates either as dolomite CaMg(CO3)2 or magnesite
(MgCO3) mixed with calcite. Such limestone is then termed as dolomitic or
magnesian limestone.

1.1.2 Lime is obtained by calcinations of limestone and widely used in day to day
life. Limestone is also used in cement, Iron & steel making industries. The
other industries which are using limestone are chemical industries like
calcium carbide, bleaching powder, soda ash, precipitated calcium carbonate
etc. Besides it is also consumed in sugar, glass and fertilizers industries.

1.1.3 India has been endowed with huge resources of limestone distributed over
different parts of the country and comes at 2nd place in the world after China
in annual capacity & production of cement. Cement grade limestone occurs
in all limestone bearing areas as compared to SMS, BF, & Chemical grade
limestone which is restricted in selective areas. In recent years the demand
of BF & SMS grade limestone has increased on account of increase in steel
production in the country and this has resulted in concerted efforts for
locating SMS & BF grade limestone along with cement grade limestone for
reducing the import of limestone that has increased to 13.21 million tonnes in
2013-14 from 11.14 million tonnes previous i.e.2012-13 (as per mineral year
book-2014)

1.1.4 The total resources of limestone of all categories and grades as per UNFC
system as on 01/04/2010 are estimated at 184,935 million tonnes of which
14,926 million tonnes (8%) are under reserves category and 170,009 million
are under remaining resources category. Karnataka is the leading state
heaving 28% of the total resource followed by Andhra Pradesh (20%),
Gujarat (11%), and Rajasthan (12%) each, Meghalaya (9%) and
Chhattisgarh (5%). Grade wise, cement grade has leading share of about
69% followed by SMS & BF grades (12%) and Chemical grade (3%).
Remaining 16% are others, not known and are of unclassified grades.

2
1.1.5 As per mineral year book-2014, the production of limestone in 2013-14 was
about 278.73 million tonnes decreased by 2% as compared to that of the
previous year due to less demand in the market. There were 717 reporting
mines in 2013-14 as against 778 during the previous year. Twenty three
principal producers contributed about 78% of the total production. About
4.2% of the production was reported by Public Sector mines as against 3.9
million tonnes in the previous year. About 97% of the total production of
limestone during 2013-14 was of cement grade, 2% of SMS grade and the
rest consisted of chemical grades.

1.1.6 Andhra Pradesh was the leading producing state accounting for (21%) of the
total production of limestone followed by Rajasthan (20%) , Madhya Pradesh
(13%), Tamil Nadu (9%), , Gujarat, Karnataka & Maharashtra (4% each) and
the remaining 5% was contributed by Chhattisgarh, Meghalaya, Uttar
Pradesh, Orissa, Jharkhand, Kerala, Bihar, Assam, Himachal Pradesh and
Jammu & Kashmir.

1.1.7 In the year 2013-14, the total consumption of limestone and other calcareous
minerals/materials, as reported by different industries was 270.52 million
tonnes. Cement was the major consuming industry accounting for 93%
consumption followed by iron & steel (4%) and chemical industry (1%).

1.1.8 India is second largest in cement production after China. There are 182
cement plants in the country with 338.78 million tonnes in 2013-14 in
addition to mini and white cement plants having estimated capacity of 6
million tonnes per annum. The total production of cement reached to 240.08
million tonnes in 2013-14 compared to 235.11 million tonnes in the preceding
year.

1.1.9 The export and import of limestone is free in India. The export is decreased
slightly to 2.78 million tonnes in 2013-14 from 2.99 in the previous year. The
limestone from India is exported mainly to the adjoining countries like
Bangladesh (96%), Bhutan (1%) and UK (1%). The import of limestone is
increased drastically to 13.21 million tonnes in 2013-14 from 11.14 million
tonnes in the previous year. The limestone is imported mainly from UAE
(73%) and Oman (17%).

1.1.10 As per the report of the working Group, Planning Commission of India, the
total limestone requirement during the 12th plan (2012-2017) with the growth
scenario of cement @ 10%, 11% and 12% for the respective GDP growth of
8%, 9% and 10% is projected at 3163 million tonnes 3253 million tonnes and
3385 million tonnes respectively.

3
1.2.0 BACKGROUND

1.2.1 On enactment of MMDR Amendment Act 2015, Minerals (Evidence of

Mineral Contents) Rules 2015 and Mineral (Auction) Rules 2015, Govt. of
India directed State Governments to speed up exploration work for different
Mineral Commodities in the respective states. Accordingly Telangana
Government requested MECL to take up exploration work of Limestone in 3
Blocks in Suryapet District of Telangana.

1.2.2. The Govt. of India enacted the MMDR Amendment Act, 2015 duly introducing
the system of auction for allocation Mineral Concessions. Bauxite, Iron Ore,
Manganese and Limestone have been categorized in the Fourth Schedule which
needs prospecting and exploration by the State Govt. before auctioning of
Blocks. The Directorate of Mines & Geology, Telangana identified three
prospective Limestone Blocks for auction in the gap areas of existing
Limestone concessions in newly formed Suryapet district of Telangana.
Sultanpur Block is one of the prospective Limestone Block identified for
auction.

1.2.3 Senior Officers Meeting (SOM) held under the Chairmanship of Shri Arun
Kumar Secretary, Ministry of Mines at Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi on 04-09-
2017. Secretary (Mines) directed MECL to take up the exploration work of
Limestone Blocks of Telangana State on top priority basis for auctioning
purpose by Govt. of Telangana. Accordingly MECL officer contacted DMG,
Telangana and discussed the matter with Director DMG, Telangana. After
detailed discussion DMG, Telangana handed over the basic data/ information
for preparation of proposal for taking up the limestone exploration.

1.2.4 In the Meeting between GSI, SR, Hyderabad and DMG, Telangana held on
13.09.2017 at GSI, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad – Revised notes on agenda
regarding, exploration in the (3) gap area Limestone blocks in Suryapet
District, the DMG handed over the permission accorded by Principal CCF,
Hyderabad for survey and investigation to the ADG and informed that two
boreholes for each block allowed by the Forest Dept. are as per the standing
MOEF guidelines and the drilling will be done by MECL, if more boreholes
are required for exploration up to G3 stage, the GSI shall mark the location
on ground as per the grid pattern and intimate to the Dept. for engaging
NMET empanelled agency for drilling at rate on par with MECL norms.

4
 The ADG informed that two Geologists, Surveyors under Supdt. Geologists
already been Posted for the survey investigation started from 1 1.09.2017.

The DMG expressed that MECL will be the Transaction Advisor for release of
funds from NMET in respect of three gap area Limestone blocks.

The GSI shall take-up surveying, detailed mapping and fixing of boreholes.
MECL shall take-up drilling for two boreholes in each block, borehole logging,
sample preparation and chemical analysis of core drill samples not only for
two boreholes but also for other boreholes to be drilled by DMG, Telengana.
On receipt of analysis, MECL will prepare the geological report of the block.

1.2.5 Accordingly, MECL prepared the proposal for G-3 Level exploration in the
proposed areas (Pasupulabodu Block, Saidulnama Block and Sultanpur RF,
Nereducherla Mandal, District- Suryapet, Telangana) and put up for approval
of Technical Committee of NMET. The proposals were discussed in details
and after detailed discussion and deliberations committee suggested some
modifications in grid pattern for planning of boreholes. MECL accordingly
modified the proposal and submitted for approval of Executive Committee of
NMET.

1.3.0 LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY

1.3.1 The Sultanpur Block falls in Sultanpur RF under Huzurnagar DFO

jurisdiction. It is 136 Ha in extent and located near M/s. NCL Industries,
Mattampally Village, Mattampally Mandal, Suryapet District, Telangana. The
permissions under FCA, 1980 are awaited from PCCF, Govt. of Telangana
to take up the exploration. The proposed area is a part of Palnad Sub-Basin
and is located in the north-eastern part of the Cudappah Basin. The
coordinates of the block as provided by DGM, Telangana is given below:-

The Sultanpur Block is bounded by latitude 16°42NE-16°42'48"N and

longitude 79°48'22"E-79°49'37"E. The study area falls in Toposheet No.
56P/14.

1.3.2. Most of the Infrastructure (Police Station, Bank facility, workshop facility,
Bus Stand etc) are available at Mattampally Tehsil Town. The nearest
Railway station is Miryalguda Station which is about 60 km from the
proposed block. The proposed block is about 50 km from the district head
quarter, Suryapet and connected by state high way.

5
1.4.0. PHYSIOGRAPHY, DRAINAGE AND CLIMATE

1.4.1 Physiographically, the proposed block forms a part of plain area north of
Krishna River. The highest elevation of the ground is around 200 m above
MSL and ground slope is towards south.
1.4.2 The Suryapet district is mainly drained by Krishna River and its tributary
Vemuleru River. A few nalas originate in the block and meet Krishna River
in the south.
1.4.3 The area experiences tropical wet and dry climate. During dry spells,
maximum temperature often exceeds 45° C in May and June. In winter the
temperature comes down to 9-11° C in December and January. The
average annual rainfall in the area is 821mm.

6
7
1.5.0 PREVIOUS WORK

1.5.1 The block forms part of Palnad Sub-basin and is located in the north-eastern
portion of the Cudappah Basin. The earliest geological account of Palnad
Sub-basin was documented by William King (1872).
1.5.2 Mukherji and Syed Kazim(1947) of erstwhile Hyderabad Geological Survey
carried out geological mapping of Palnad Basin covering partsof Nalgonda
district.
1.5.3 Systematic geological mapping and mineral invstigation in this part of Palnad
Sub-basin was carried out by Ziauddin and Sharma(1959-61).
Ramalingaswamy, G. (1976-77) has mapped area in parts of Toposheet
No. 56P/10. Krupanidhi (1966-67), Nagaeswara Rao and Varaprasada Rao
(1967-68), Chakradhar et al, (1980-83), RavindraBabu et al, (1989),
Ramakrishnaiah et al, (2012-13), JagadishwarBabu Babu. K and.
Tirumurugan. M. (2013) and Sugathan & RimpalKar (2013) have carried out
investigation for limestone in parts of Palnad sub-basin.

1.6.0 OBJECTIVE OF EXPLORATION

1.6.1 The present exploration at G-3 level was carried out with the following
objectives.

i) To demarcate the limestone occurrence in the study area by drilling

boreholes at 800mx800m grid interval in G-3 level of exploration.
ii) To find out the quality & grade of limestone.
iii) To carry out exploration as per Minerals (Evidence of Mineral Contents)
Rules-2015, Mineral (Auction) Rules-2015 and MMDR Amendment Act-
2015 in turn to facilitate the State Govt. (Telangana) in Auctioning of the
Block.

1.7.0 PRESENT WORK

1.7.1 MECL commenced exploration work in Sultanpur block on 19.11.2017 and

concluded on 08.12.2017. A total of 130m of drilling has been done in three
bore holes in an area of 1.36 sq km.

1.7.2 Detailed geological mapping on 1:5000 scale has been carried out in
Sultanpur Block covering an area of 1.36 sq. km. to delineate the different
litho-units within the Narji Formation.

1.7.3 During the course of exploration the following quantum of work was carried
out by MECL. Table - I

1.7.4 This report incorporates the surface & sub surface data generated by
MECL& GSI during G3 level explorations within the block.

8
 Table No. - I

QUANTUM OF WORK CARRIED OUT BY MECL IN SULTANPUR

BLOCK, MATTAMPALLY MANDAL, DISTRICT- SURYAPET, TELANGANA

Quantum
Sl.
Item of Work Unit of work Achievement
No.
proposed
1 Sq. 1.36 sq.
Topographic Survey (on 1:5000 scale). 1.36 Sq.Km
Km. km
2 Sq. 1.36 sq.
Geological Mapping (on 1:5000 scale). 1.36 Sq.Km
Km. km
3 170m. 130.00m
Drilling m.
(7 BHs) (3 Bhs)
4 Laboratory Studies
i) Chemical Analysis; Primary + Check
Nos.
for 6 radicals i.e. CaO, MgO, Al2O3, 180 127
SiO2, Fe2O3 and LOI
ii) Check samples (10% of Primary) for
Nos.
6 radicals i.e. CaO, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, 20 15
Fe2O3 and LOI
iii) Primary samples for 2 radicals SO3
Nos 20 08
& P2O5
iv) External Check sample (5 %of
Primary) for analysis of 6 radicals i.e. Nos. 10 05
CaO, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, Fe2O3 and LOI
v) Composite Samples
Nos.
a) For 12 radicals (CaO, MgO, Al2O3, 35
15
SiO2, Fe2O3, SO3, P2O5 , LOI, MnO2,
K2O, Na2O and Cl.)
5 Physical Studies -
a) Spectroscopic Studies (10
Nos. 5 13
elements)
b) XRD studies Nos 5 13
6 Petrological Studies (Petrographic
Nos 10 10
Studies)
7 Specific Gravity Determinations Nos 10 10
8 Report Preparation (Digital format) Nos. 1 No. 1

9
1.8.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

1.8.1 Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited (MECL) expresses its sincere

gratitude to the Ministry of Mines, National Mineral Exploration Trust
(NMET), Govt. of India, Geological Survey of India (GSI) and Directorate of
Mining and Geology (DMG) Telangana at whose behalf, the exploration
work in block has been executed. The local administration / authorities at
Suryapet district, Telangana also deserves a special mention with thanks
for extending all necessary helps and guidance in completing the
exploration work successfully.

10
 CHAPTER-II

2.0.0 GEOLOGY OF THE AREA

2.1.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY OF THE AREA

The proposed area is a part of Palnad Sub-Basin and is located in the north-
eastern part of the Cudappah Basin. The major portion of the basin is
occupied by Kurnool Group of rocks of Neoproterozoic age. William King
(1872) documented the earliest geological account of Planad basin.
Ramalingaswamy, G. (1976-77) has mapped area in parts of Toposheet No.
56P/10. Krupanidhi (1966-67), Nagaeswara Rao and Varaprasada Rao
(1967-68), Chakradhar et al, (1980-83), RavindraBabu et al, (1989),
Ramakrishnaiah et al, (2012-13), JagadishwarBabu. K and Tirumurugan. M.
(2013) and Sugathan & RimpalKar (2013) have carried out investigation for
limestone in parts of Palnad sub-basin.

2.2.0 GEOLOGY OF THE BLOCK

2.2.1 The major portion of the basin is occupied by Kurnool Group of rocks of Neo
Proterozoic age
These rock formations are almost sub-horizontal having dips towards ESE varying
from 2° to 5°.
The general stratigraphic sequence is as below:
Recent Soil / clay
Massive Limestone
Kurnool Group of
Quartzite
rocks

2.3.0 DESCRIPTION OF FORMATIONS

2.3.1 Only two unit of Middle Massive Limestone of Narji Formation(Kurnool

Group) i.e. Grey Limestone and Varigated Limestone are exposed within
the block.

2.3.2 The Grey Limestone is light to dark grey in color and Variegated Limestone
is light greyish white to greenish grey in colour and thin bedded. In the
course of drilling Green and Purple limestones have been encountered. The
massive grey unit is devoid of any particular primary So(colour
compositional) bedding. It is massivewith a thickness of 20 to 50 m and
breaks along sharp edged conchoidal fractures exhibiting a serrated profile.
This limestone will account for good grade raw material for cement plants.
Few photographs of adjacent working mines are presented as Text Fig. 5 &
Text Fig. 6.

11
2.4.0 REGIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE AREA

2.4.1 The general strike of the formation is NNE-SSW dipping gently (20 to 50)
towards ESE and the younging direction is from west to east. The variation in
dip direction and amount may be attributed to warps and minor folds. Open
asymmetrical synform and antiform folds are preserved in the western part of
the study area which are having trend N700W–S700E (axial plane) and
plunging towards SE. Minor folds are formed in calcite and quartz vein within
the massive grey limestone, the axial plane is trending in E-W direction.

2.4.2 The broad warp, open fold and ptygmatic folds are having a similar trend of
axial plane caused by N-S asymmetrical compressional regime. Stylolites are
common in the study area.

2.4.3 Three sets of joints trending ENE-WSW, NNE-SSW and NW-SE are
recorded in the area. In the south eastern part, strike parallel joints dipping in
same direction occur but at higher angle than the S0 plane. A fault trending
NNE-SSW direction have been inferred on the basis of silicification,
calcification, closed spaced joints, steep escarpments and steeply dipping
beds. Calcite veins parallel to S0 plane(NE-SW) also occurs in this block.

The generalised strike of the strata is deciphered by Floor Contour Plan

(FCP) prepared at 1 m interval on 1:5000 scale (Plate no IV). The floor of
cement graded limestone zone is taken as base for taking FRL values. Strata
dips easterly with varying dips from 2° to 5° towards ESE. This can be
confirmed from Geological Cross Section AA’ drawn along dip direction.

12
13
14
 TEXT FIG. 4

15
 TEXT FIG. 5

16
 TEXT FIG. 6

17
 TEXT FIG. 7

18
 CHAPTER-III

3.0.0 EXPLORATION METHODOLOGY

3.1.0 GENERAL

3.1.1 On the request of Telangana State Department of Mines & Geology had
already undertaken and completed preliminary assessment of SMS &
high-grade limestone blocks of Narji limestone in the adjoining blocks.

3.1.2 Systematic geological mapping and mineral investigation in this part of

Palnad Sub-basin was carried out by Ziauddin and Sharma (1959-61);
Appavadhanulu et al., (1963-64); Rajurkar (1972); Ramalingaswamy
(1971-72, 1973-74); Hazra et al. (2005) and Sekhram A (1978-79).

3.1.3 The area is found to contain 10.82 m to 36.08 m thick dark grey and green
limestone horizon of middle Narji limestone of average grade
corresponding to cement grade. Active mines of Nagarjuna Cement Ltd.
which are adjacent to this proposed block have also indicated availability
of cement grade Limestone.

3.2.0 SCHEME OF EXPLORATION

3.2.1 Methodology of Exploration

In the Meeting between GSI, SR, Hyderabad and DGM, Telangana held on
13.09.2017 at GSI, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad – Revised notes on agenda
Regarding, exploration in the (3) gap area Limestone blocks in Suryapet
District, the DGM handed over the permission accorded by Prl. CCF,
Hyderabad for survey and investigation to the ADG and informed that (3)
boreholes for each block allowed by the Forest Dept. are as per the
standing MOEF guidelines and the drilling will be done by MECL, if more
boreholes are required for exploration up to G3 stage, the GSI shall mark
the location on ground as per the grid pattern and intimate to the Dept. for
engaging NMET empanelled agency for drilling at rate on par with MECL
norms.

3.2.2 Accordingly, MECL prepared the proposal for G-3 Level exploration in the
proposed areas (Pasupulabodu Block, Saidulnama Block and Sultanpur
RF, District- Suryapet, Telangana) and put up for approval of Technical
Committee of NMET. The proposals were discussed in details and after
detailed discussion and deliberations committee suggested some
modifications in grid pattern for planning of boreholes. MECL accordingly
modified the proposal and submitted for approval of Executive Committee
of NMET.

19
3.3.0 LIMITATIONS

3.3.1 The entire assessment of deposit is based on surface and subsurface

data obtained from geological mapping, drilling & sampling. There are
limitations as regards to logical interpretation of these data. Sufficient data
from mines area is not available so not included in this report. However,
for logical interpretations, working quarry sections are studied.

3.3.2 Three boreholes were proposed in 800 X 800 m grid to be taken up in G3

level exploration to cover the entire block. The boreholes were proposed
by GSI and drilled by MECL. The grid could not be maintained for drilling
these boreholes as they were located in one section line.

3.3.3 The entire interpretation of the exploration data is based on the

assumptions of gradual change between the points of observations as it is
stratified deposit

3.4.0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND GEOLOGICAL MAPPING

3.4.1 The Geological Mapping and Topographical Survey work has been carried
out by Geological Survey of India. Triangulation network was laid down in
the proposed study area. Surface contouring was done on 1:5000 scale at
2 m contour intervals. Surface features like road, electric line, abandoned
quarry etc are surveyed and plotted on the plan. Boreholes were fixed on
the ground by GSI, reduced level and co-ordinates of survey and
exploration points were determined. Detailed geological mapping was
done in the proposed block on 1:5000 scale by GSI. This map was used
as base map for further work. Locations of drilled boreholes of MLTU
series are depicted in the part of District Resource Map of Suryapet
District of GSI (Plate-II). The block boundary is surveyed by DGPS with
Total Station in WGS-84 Datum by DMG, Telangana.

3.5.0 SURFACE DRILLING

3.5.1 MECL has taken up G-3 level investigation during 2017-18 which involved
130m drilling apart from detailed mapping on 1:5000. Three nos of
boreholes were marked on the plan at 800m x 800m grid interval (Plate-II).
Based on nearby available mining data, the borehole depth was planned
up to 20m in the up dip direction i.e. North Western part and 30m in the
down dip direction i.e. South Eastern part of the block, However,
boreholes were closed after intersecting bottom purple Limestone. One
borehole MLTU-3 was drilled up to quartzite of the basement complex
covering the entire area of the block. Thus the total meterage drilled in

20
 present G-3 level exploration is 130.00 m along with associated
geological & laboratory studies.

3.5.2 The entire core drilling has been done by wire line method in NQ borehole
size using diamond bits. The polymer was used as drilling fluid to flush out
the cuttings and to stabilize the borehole wall. The drilling fluid also works
as a coolant to avoid burning of drilling bits. Core recovery of more than
90% was maintained in limestone, however, in case of weathered, loose &
fractured formation and in solution cavities filled with clay the core
recovery was low.

3.6.0 DRILL CORE LOGGING AND SAMPLE PRESERVATION

3.6.1 The entire core recovered by drilling was logged systematically in detail
describing different lithological units. Detailed drill core logging was done
with consideration of weathering, grain size, fossil contents, colour of
various formations, intercalation / parting of shale, stylolite and structure.
Due to poor recovery at places, extrapolations of various drilled depth
were done on proportionate basis. All the cores were kept in core boxes in
“Book Pattern”.
The duplicate half (split core) samples have been handed over to DMG,
Telangana.

Primary samples are drawn at 1m interval subject to change in lithology

and core recovery. On the basis of different parameters, grade of
limestone is broadly presented and is also helpful in sampling. The
following parameters are considered while sampling the drill cores.
1) Color, grain size.
2) Fossil content and variation.
3) Thin intercalations of shale/siltstone.
4) Partially weathered zone.

3.6.2 The run-wise lithologs of boreholes MLTU-1 to MLTU-3 drilled by MECL

are given in Annexure-II/1 to Annexure-II/5 and its graphic lithologs on
1:500 scale ( On the basis of Assay Values) with Zone details(Thickness &
Grades) have been given in Plate-VII.

3.7.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

3.7.1 Primary and check samples: Considering the uniform nature of

limestone over considerable width in all the boreholes and after critical
study of lithological data generated during the present G-3 exploration, an
optimum sample length of 1.00 m is justifiable in evaluating the grade of
limestone. Hence the length of primary sample was kept at 1.00 m during
sampling of borehole cores depending on the Lithology, fossil content etc.
However, sample length varied at places near roof & floor of the zones.

21
3.7.2 The drill core samples of the limestone were split into two equal halves by
using core splitter for preparation of primary samples. One half was
grounded to fine powder and the other half was kept for further studies
(Petrological studies etc.). The powdered sample was passed through (-)
100 mesh size sieve. By mixing, coning and quartering of the sieved
powder desired representative samples were drawn. Out of these
representative samples, 100 gm samples were sent to MECL Chemical
Laboratory for primary analysis and remaining samples were preserved as
duplicate samples. A total of 127 Primary core samples have been
prepared and sent to Lab. for analysis of 6 radicals i.e. CaO, MgO, Al2O3,
SiO2, Fe2O3 & LOI. These are the basic and most essential chemical
constituents to specify the grade of limestone in view of its utilization
aspects such as cement manufacturing, Iron & Steel industry, Chemical
industry, Fertilizer and Glass industry. A total of 8 primary core samples
have been prepared and sent to Lab for analysis of 2 radicals i.e. SO3 &
P2O5. A total of 5 primary core samples have been prepared and sent for
external check analysis for 6 radicals i.e. CaO, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, Fe2O3 &
LOI. In addition to 127 primary samples 15 Nos of primary samples
(around 10% of primary samples) have been analyzed for 6 radicals i.e.
CaO, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, Fe2O3 & LOI as internal check samples.

3.7.3 The results of primary analysis of borehole core samples for both 6
radicals & 2 radicals of MECL are furnished in Annexure-IIIA & IIIB.
Analytical results of primary samples verses check samples for 6 radicals
are given in Annexure-VA (internal check) & VB (external check).

3.7.4 Composite sample analysis: A total of 15 Composite samples have

been prepared borehole wise and length wise (6 m each) at 42% Cao cut-
off, by taking powdered material (-) 100 mesh of each primary samples in
volume proportion and thoroughly mixing, followed by coning and
quartering. The details of composite sample (15 Nos.) and its analysis for
12 radicals (CaO, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, Fe2O3, SO3, P2O5, TiO2, Mn2O3, K2O,
Na2O and LOI has been furnished in Annexure-IIIC. A comparison is
made between the results of Laboratory and grades on calculated basis. It
is observed that grades are almost matching with a little variation.

3.8.0 PHYSICAL ANALYSIS

3.8.1 Spectroscopic Studies: 13 composite samples of selected zones from

boreholes were subjected to spectroscopic analysis for minor and trace
elements (10 radicals) at Physical Laboratory of MECL. The details of
these analyses are presented in Annexure-VI.

3.8.2 X-Ray Diffraction Studies:- The 13 composite samples of selected zones

from the boreholes were subjected to X-ray diffraction studies at physical

22
 laboratory of MECL to determine the individual composition and to identify
major and minor constituents in the limestone. The results of these
studies are presented in Annexure-VII.

3.9. 0 PETROGRAPHIC STUDIES

3.9.1 10 nos. of specimens of limestone each from boreholes cores were

subjected to petrographic studies on thin sections at Petrology Laboratory,
MECL, Nagpur. The results of these studies are presented in Annexure-
VIII/1 to Annexure-VIII/4.

3.10.0 SPECIFIC GRAVITY DETERMINATION

3.10.1 10 limestone core samples from boreholes were subjected to specific

gravity determination at petrology laboratory, MECL, and Nagpur. The
average specific gravity of these 10 samples has been calculated as 2.75
and considered for calculation of resources. The results of specific gravity
determination are presented in Annexure-IX.

3.11.0 LIMESTONE ZONES INTERSECTED IN MECL BOREHOLES

3.11.1 Borehole wise intersection of different grade limestone in boreholes

MLTU-1 to MLTU-3 drilled by MECL in Sultanpur block is furnished in
Table III-1. A single zone of cement grade limestone has been
encountered all the boreholes. The thickness of total cement grade
limestone zone as intersected in the boreholes drilled by MECL varies
from 10.82 m (MLTU-03) to 36.08 m (MLTU-2). The grade variation is
46.73 % CaO (MLTU-03) to 47.31% CaO (MLTU-2). The cement grade
limestone zone is found on top of ungraded limestone zone assessed on
the basis of the threshold value given by IBM i.e. ≥ 34 % CaO.

23
 Table No.- III.1
BOREHOLE WISE INTERSECTION OF DIFFERENT GRADE LIMESTONE IN
BOREHOLES DRILLED BY MECL IN SULTANPUR,
DISTRICT- SURYAPET, TELANGANA

ZONE BASED ON ≥42% CaO, ≤4% MgO and ≤16% SiO2 CUT-OFF

BH FROM TO THICKNESS CaO% MgO% SiO2% Fe2O3% Al2O3% LOI% GRADE

MLTU-1 0.00 33.00 33.00 46.95 1.27 10.03 0.99 1.32 38.26 Cement

MLTU-2 0.00 36.08 36.08 47.31 1.20 9.49 0.98 1.19 38.6 Cement

MLTU-3 0.18 11.00 10.82 46.73 1.16 10.02 1.14 1.92 37.3 Cement
Av. Grade 47.10 1.22 9.75 1.00 1.32 38.32

ZONE BASED ON ≥ 34% CaO and ≤ 5% MgO CUT-OFF Threshold value

BH From To Thickness CaO MgO SiO2 Fe2O3 Al2O3 LOI GRADE

MLTU-1 33.00 44.15 11.15 39.40 1.30 17.58 2.88 5.17 32.43 Ungraded

MLTU-2 36.08 44.00 7.92 39.59 1.01 17.54 2.87 5.24 31.78 Ungraded

MLTU-3 11.00 19.00 8.00 37.75 1.17 19.79 3.15 5.76 30.88 Ungraded
Av. Grade 39.03 1.17 18.15 2.94 5.34 31.80

24
3.12.0 UTILISATION ASPECTS AND MINEABILITY

The specifications of limestone for various industrial uses are as

follows:

1. Cement Industry
CaO : 42% (minimum) to 46%
MgO : 4% (max.)
Silica : 16% (max.)
Al2O3 : 2 (max.)
Fe2O3 : 2% (max.)
SO3 : 1.75% (max.)

a) Lime Saturation factor : 0.66 to 1.02

SiO2
Silica Modules = = 1.2 to 4.0
Al2O3 + Fe2O3

CaO
Iron Modules = = 1.7 to 2.4
SiO2+Al2O3 +Fe2O3

Al2O3
Hydraulic Modules = = 0.65 (min.)
Fe2O3

B. I. S. (Bureau of Indian Standards) Specification

CaO : 42% (Min)

MgO : 2.5% (Max.)
SiO2 : 15% (Max.)
P 2O 5 : 1.5 % (Max.)
FeS2 : 2% (Max.)

25
2. Iron & Steel Industry

Elements BF Grade SMS Grade LD Grade

CaO 42% (Min.) 48% (Min.) 52% (Min.)
MgO 4% (Max.) 3% (Max.) 2% (Max.)
SiO2 9% (Max.) 4% (Max.) 1% (Max.)
SiO2+ Al2O3 11.5% (Max.) - -
Total Insoluble 12% - -
Acid Insoluble - 6.5% (Max.) -

3. Chemical Industry
BIS Specifications (1S:3204-1978, Reaffirmed-2003)
Requirement in percent by mass for
Characteristics Calcium Bleaching Caustic
Sugar
carbide Powder soda
CaO (Min.) 54.0 54.0 53.0 50.0
MgO (Max.) 0.8 2.0 1.0 1.0
SiO2 (Max.) 1.0 0.75 - 2.0
Fe2O3 (Max.) 0.25 0.15 - -
Mn2O3 (Min.) - 0.06 - -
CO2 (Min.) 42.00 42.00 42.00 41.00
Loss on Ignition (LOI) 46.00 46.00 46.00 44.00
S (Max.) 0.10 - - -
P (Max.) 0.01 - - -
Al2O3+ Fe2O3 (Max.) 0.50 - - 1.5
SiO2+ Al2O3 + Fe2O3 (Max.) - - 3.0 -

26
4. Fertilizer Industry

 CaCO3+ MgCO3 : 85% (Min)

 SiO2 : 5% (Max.)

5. Glass Industry

CaCO3 : 94.5 %
CaCO3 + MgCO3 : 97.5 %
Fe2O3 : 0.20 % (Max.)
BIS Specifications (1S:997-1973, Reaffirmed-1998)
CaO : 53.0 %
SiO2 : 2.5 %
Fe2O3 : 0.10 %
CaO + MgO : 54.50 %

6. Foundry Industry

BIS Specifications (1S:4149-1978, Reaffirmed-2008)

Characteristics Grade-1 Grade-2 Grade-3

CaO (Min.) 52 % 50 % 45 %
SiO2 (Max) 1.5 % 3% 5%
R2O3 (Al2O3 + Fe2O3) Max. 1% 1% 2%
MgO 2% 3% 5%
Insoluble matter 0.5 1 2
Sulphur & Phosphorus Traces Traces Traces

27
 Table III - 2

Table Showing Specifications for Cement, Iron & Steel and Chemical Industry Limestone

Chemical Industry
BIS Specifications (1S:3204-1978,
Cement Iron & Steel Industry
Reaffirmed-2003)
Industry (Specification)
Constituents Requirement in percent by mass for
(Specific
LD Calcium Bleaching Caustic
-ation) BF Grade SMS Grade Sugar
Grade carbide Powder soda
42%
42% 48% 52%
CaO (Min.) (Min.) to 54.0 54.0 53.0 50.0
(Min.) (Min.) (Min.)
46%
4% 4% 2%
MgO (Max.) 3% (Max.) 0.8 2.0 1.0 1.0
(Max.) (Max.) (Max.)
16% 9% 1%
SiO2 (Max.) 4% (Max. 1.0 0.75 - 2.0
Max.) (Max.) (Max.)
2%
Fe2O3 (Max.) 0.25 0.15 - -
(Max.)
Mn2O3 (Min.) -- -- -- -- - 0.06 - -
CO2 (Min.) -- -- -- -- 42.00 42.00 42.00 41.00
Loss on
-- -- -- -- 46.00 46.00 46.00 44.00
Ignition (LOI)
S (Max.) -- -- -- -- 0.10 - - -
P (Max.) -- 0.01 - - -
Al2O3+ Fe2O3
-- 0.50 - - 1.5
(Max.)
SiO2+ Al2O3 + 11.5%
-- - - 3.0 -
Fe2O3 (Max.) (Max.)
6.5%
Acid Insoluble
(Max.)

28
 CHAPTER –IV

4.0.0 EVALUATION OF EXPLORATION DATA

4.1.0 GENERAL

4.1.1 In view of MMDR Amendment Act and Mineral (Auction) Rules 2015 DGM,
Telangana Government has requested MECL to take up the exploration in
this block, MECL accordingly prepared proposals, to take up the work
under NMET funding.

4.1.2. The exploration work was carried out systematically i.e. Geological
Mapping, Survey and regional drilling at 800mx800m grid (G-3 Level)
covering the entire area.

4.1.3 MECL completed exploration at G3 level from 19.11.2017 to 08.12.2017

by drilling 3 boreholes (MLTU-01 to 03 ) with a total meterage drilled
130.00 m. Efforts were made to cover entire block under this scheme of
exploration by considering surface & subsurface data. Due to
unapproachability on account of forest trees and rocky outcrops, the
drilling at actual points could not be maintained and boreholes were
shifted marginally to the nearest approachable sites so not to leave any
technical data gap.
4.1.4 A single zone of cement grade limestone has been intersected in all the
three boreholes. The total thickness of the cement grade limestone zone
as intersected in the boreholes drilled by MECL varies from 10.82m
(MLTU-03) to 36.08m (MLTU-02). The grade variation of CaO is Min
46.73% (MLTU-03) to Max 47.31%(MLTU-02).The cement grade
limestone zone lies on top of ungraded limestone zones assessed on the
basis of the threshold value given by IBM i.e. ≥34 % CaO. The resources
are estimated as total thickness of Cement grade throughout the block.

4.1.5 Isograd plan on 1:5000 scale is prepared for cement grade limestone zone
as intersected in all three boreholes to show the grade variations of for
CaO% (Plate No. VI A ). The average grade of the borehole is considered
for drawing Isogrades. It is observed that prevalent ranges for CaO% is
46.73%-47.31%, MgO% is 1.16%-1.27% & SiO2 is 9.49%-10.03%.
Isograd plan on 1:5000 scale is prepared for Ungraded Limestone (Plate
No. VI B)

29
4.2.0 BOREHOLE-WISE EVALUATION

i) Borehole No. MLTU-1: This borehole is located in the eastern part of

the block. The Narji limestone in this borehole has been intersected
from surface 0.00 m along with some clay bands. The Middle
Massive Narji Limestone is dark grey(Grey limestone) to greenish
black and grey(Variegated limestone) in colour, fine to medium
grained, and continued up to 46.00m depth from the surface. This
upper limestone part falls into the graded zone. The ungraded
limestone zone is purple in color. This zone is encountered from the
depth of 46.00m. This borehole has been closed at 49.00 m, after
intersection of ungraded shaly purple limestone at 46.00m. The
limestone with small calcite and quartz veins also occur as
intermittent horizons.

The thickness of graded zone is 33.00m found within the grey

limestone. The ungraded zone is found within the purple limestone
and the zone has a thickness of 11.15m.

ii) Borehole No. MLTU-2 : This borehole is located more or less in the
central part of the block. The Narji limestone horizons including some
clay bands has been intersected from surface (0.00m) to 44.00 m with
no soil cover. The same litho-units with same color are intersected in
this borehole sequence-wise like in the MLTU-01, but the depth of
intersections is different. Here grey color limestone starts from surface
(0.00m) to around 36.00m, then the green to greenish
brown(variegated) colored limestone starts up to around 43.00m, after
that the purple colored limestone starts. The borehole has been closed
at 44.00 m after intersection of the shaly purple limestone. Calcite and
quartz veins have been encountered mostly within the dark Grey
Limestone.

In the upper Grey limestone there is one 36.08m thick horizon of

Cement grade limestone which is intersected from 0.00 to 36.08 m
depth and one 7.92m thick ungraded limestone zone which is
intersected from 36.08m to 44.00m. The lower ungraded shaly purple
limestone zone of 7.92m thickness is intersected below cement grade
limestone zone.

iii) Borehole No. MLTU-3: This borehole is located in the western part
of the block. This borehole has a thin soil cover of 0.18m. The Narji
limestone in this borehole has been intersected from 0.18m up to
34.26m depth. The grey limestone occurs up to a depth of 8.64m
followed by variegated limestone which continues up to a depth of
16.00m. The shaly purple limestone occurs from 16.00m up to a
depth of 34.26m with some green shale and sandstone bands at its

30
 bottom. The borehole is closed at depth of 37.00m after the
intersection of quartzite at depth of 34.26m. The limestone with
small calcite/ quartz veins and pyrite crystallization also occur as
intermittent horizons.

The cement grade limestone horizon of 10.82 m thickness has been

intersected from 0.18 to 11.00 m depth which falls into the middle
grey to dark grey and green colored limestone part. This zone is
followed by 8.00m thick zone of ungraded limestone intersected from
11.00m to 19.00m.

4.3.0 INFERENCE

4.3.1 From the study of borehole data it has been inferred that the Narji
limestone varying in thickness from 34.26 m (MLTU-3) to 49.00 m (MLTU-
1) has been intersected in all the boreholes drilled in the block by MECL. It
occurs directly on the surface as no soil cover is available within the
block(except for MLTU-3, with 0.18m soil cover). Two boreholes have
been closed in purple limestone of Narji limestone formation. One
borehole (MLTU-3) on request of DMG, Telengana drilled up to Quartzite
of basement. A few thin bands of impure limestone i.e. argillaceous/shaly
limestone, limestone with clay, shale bands, calcite/ quartz veins and
pyrite crystallization also occur in this formation. The other grades i.e.
SMS, LD, Chemical grade limestone are absent in the boreholes drilled by
MECL within the block.

4.4.0 GRADES OF LIMESTONE

4.4.1 The grades of the limestone intersected in the boreholes drilled in

Sultanpur block has been assessed into Cement / BF, SMS, Chemical and
LD grades on the basis of compositional variations of main chemical
constituent’s viz. CaO, MgO, SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and LOI of primary
chemical analysis. The cut-off limit for compositional variations of main
chemical constituents fixed for different grades of limestone as
enumerated in table No. III – 2, have been adopted by MECL in this report
with marginal variations. Industry wise utilization aspects are described in
Para 3.12.0 in this chapter. The above grade wise compositional variation
holds good in best way with the specification of limestone utilized in
different industries after considering the reliability of chemical analysis.

4.5.0 RELIABILITY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS

4.5.1 A total of 15 internal check samples from boreholes MLTU-1 to MLTU-3,

have been analyzed in MECL Chemical Laboratory, Nagpur to check the

31
 reliability of chemical analysis. The primary analysis data v/s internal
check analysis data and variation in the percentage of CaO, SiO2, MgO,
Al2O3, Fe2O3 & LOI are given in Annexures- VA along with scatter
plot(Text Fig 8,9 & 10). The average variation in percentage of CaO, SiO2,
MgO, Al2O3 & Fe2O3 are given as follows:

No of No of No of No of No of No of
Percentage
Samples Samples Samples Samples Samples Samples
Variation
CaO SiO2 MgO Al2O3 Fe2O3 LOI
<0.5% 14 5 5 3 5 7
0.5-1% 1 4 Nil 4 Nil 2
1-1.5% Nil 2 Nil Nil Nil 3
1.5-2% Nil 3 5 4 Nil Nil
2-2.5% Nil Nil 3 Nil 4 Nil
2.5-3% Nil Nil 1 Nil 4 Nil
3-3.5% Nil Nil Nil Nil 1 Nil

In addition to that 5 nos of external check samples were prepared and

send to JNAARDC, Nagpur for 6 radicals. Results are presented in
Annexure VII B.

4.5.2 Thus it is obvious from the above table that the variation in CaO is less
than 0.5% in 100% of the samples. The variation of MgO is 30% with
<0.5%, 30% with 1.5-2% and 22% with 2-3% variation. The variation in
Al2O3 is 20% with <0.5%, 26% with 0.5-1% and 26% with 1.5-2% variation.
The variation in SiO2 is 33% with <0.5% and 60% with 0.5-2% variation.
The variation in Fe2O3 is 33% with <0.5% and 60% with 2-5% variation.
The variation in LOI is 46% with <0.5% and 33% with 0.5-1.5% variation.

4.5.3 As chemical variations from MECL lab and JNARDDC lab are found to be
within the permissible limits, the chemical analysis of limestone samples
can be taken as reliable for the purpose of calculation of grade of
limestone.

32
 TEXT FIG. 8A

33
 TEXT FIG. 8B

34
 TEXT FIG. 9A

35
 TEXT FIG. 9B

36
 TEXT FIG. 10A

37
 TEXT FIG. 10B

38
4.6.0 PETROGRAPHIC STUDIES

4.6.1 The petrographic study on limestone samples (10nos) of Sultanpur block

show that the rocks are finely crystalline to microcrystalline micritic/massive
aggregates or grains segregating in thin parallel layers of calcite. The major
minerals (>5%) in the rocks is calcite, minor minerals (>1% to <5%) are
opaque, clayey material, chlorite, albite, sericite, quartz and dolomite
whereas accessary minerals are opaque, quartz, albite, sericite etc. (<1%)
Opaques occur as fine anhedral grains, veins and fillings. Clayey material is
present in the fractures and as dull patches and very fine dispersed matter
intermixed with calcite at places. Quartz occurs as fine anhedral grains
floating in calcite mosaic. Dolomite occurs as medium subhedral to
euhedral aggregates. Recrystallization and grain size coarsening of calcite
is noted at some places. Sericite and chlorite is seen present as fine to very
fine flakes mostly segregated in clayey bands. Albite occurs as fine
anhedral to prismatic grains. Calcite and dolomite at some places occur as
intruding veins comprising medium to coarse subhedral grains.

4.6.2 The different limestone specimens studied for Petrographic studies under
microscope has been identified as massive limestone, micritic limestone,
impure micritic limestone, shaly limestone and quartz arenite.

4.7.0 X-RAY DIFFRACTION STUDIES

4.7.1 The emission spectrographic studies on 13 samples of limestone have been

advised. The results of 13 samples have been presented in Annexure-VII.

4.8.0 MINOR AND TRACE ELEMENTS BY SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS

4.8.1 The emission spectrographic studies on 13 samples of limestone have been

advised. The results of these studies are presented in Annexure-VI
The observations of these studies are as below-
Lead (Pb) is present and ranges from 2.90 ppm to 60.80 ppm.
Nickel (Ni) is present and ranges from 0.60 ppm to 5.20 ppm.
Cobalt (Co) is present and ranges from 0.20 ppm to 12.00 ppm.
Zinc (Zn) is present and ranges from 9.40 ppm to 28.20 ppm.
Molybdenum (Mo) is present and ranges from 0.20 ppm to 4.00 ppm.
Manganese (Mn) is present and ranges from 206.60 ppm to 323.40 ppm.

39
 CHAPTER V

5.0.0 RESOURCES AND GRADE

5.1.0 GENERAL

5.1.1 MECL carried out G3 level exploration for Strike and dip continuity of
limestone in Sultanpur block by drilling thee vertical boreholes in an area
of 1.36 sq. km. in the year 2017 with the objective to make systematic
assessment of limestone & to estimate Inferred category resources of
different grades to make this block auctionable. As an outcome of this
exploration, MECL estimated total resources of 80.21 million tonnes of
cement grade limestone in Inferred category (333).

5.1.2 In Sultanpur block, the Narji limestone (part of Kurnool Group) with one
horizon (Cement grade), is intersected in all the three boreholes. Borehole
wise graphic lithologs with zone details for 6 parameters (grade and
thickness variation) of MECL boreholes is furnished in Plate-VII.

5.2.0 BASIC ASSUMPTIONS

5.2.1 Eestimation of resources and grades of limestone is based on following

parameters.
 The resources have been estimated for the limestone on minimum
42% CaO, 4% MgO and 16% SiO2 cut-off (Cement Grade).
Limestone with 34% to <42% Cao, MgO more than 4% and SiO2 up
to 16% has been considered in ungraded limestone resources, as
per threshold value given by IBM.
 The zones of different grades have been demarcated from the
primary sample analysis values as per the cut-off limits for CaO,
MgO and SiO2 as detailed in para 3.12.0.

Exploratory drilling is restricted to purple limestone. Two boreholes

MLTU-01 & 02 were closed in the zone of purple limestone which is
supposed to be low grade limestone. However on request of DMG,
Telengana one borehole MLTU-03 in up dip direction was drilled up
to quartzite to assess the potentiality of total limestone zones & the
stratigraphic sequence. The resources of impure limestone
zone/bands i.e.argillaceous/siliceous limestone occurring as thin
bands within Narji limestone i.e. with CaO percentage varying
between 34 to less than 42 % (as per threshold value given by IBM)
has been estimated though they are of high silica, magnesia and
iron. This is done for future plan in case of use of low grade
limestone due to technological advancement.

40
  The thin and impersistent /localized zone intersected in the
boreholes established on the basis of primary analyses which could
not be correlated thus were merged with the thick /most persistent
zones within which they were occurring and average composite
analyses have been calculated for these merged zones.

 The quantity of limestone mined and dispatched from the worked

out 3 pits present in the block is deducted from net resources
estimated for cement grade limestone as requested by
DMG,Telengana. The quantity deducted is 1991665.00 metric
tonnes, provided by DMG, Telangana after DGPS survey.

 One geological cross section (A-A’) has been drawn along the dip
direction. Limestone zones from boreholes are correlated for
estimation of resources.
 As Sufficient exploration data is not available, the resources for
both graded & ungraded have been estimated by Isochore method
as well as Cross-sectional method.

 Based on the intersection and correlation of different lithological

units in the boreholes drilled. The strike and dip continuity of
limestone is established. This is a bedded sedimentary deposit of
regular habit has been established in the entire block. A total of
three boreholes (MLTU-01 to 3) have been drilled on grid spacing of
around 800 m. As per exploration norms for limestone enumerated
in the Mineral (Evidence of Mineral Content) Rule 2015.i.e. 800 m
for Inferred Mineral Resources,the entire limestone resources have
been kept under Inferred category (333)

 The average specific gravity of limestone has been taken as 2.75

deduced from mean of specific gravity determined for 10nos of
limestone samples at MECL laboratory.

 A deduction of 20% from gross in-situ resources has been made to

arrive at net in situ resources estimated by isochore method for
unseen geological factors i.e. slope factor and cavities/caverns etc.

5.3.0 METHODOLOGY

5.3.1 The resources of limestone( Graded& Ungraded ) have been estimated

by Isochore method as well as Cross sectional method..

5.3.2 Isochore Method: In this method of resource estimation, total thickness of

limestone zone intersected in each borehole below overburden has been
computed and marked on the Isochore plan. The Isochores at 1.00 m
interval were drawn for different thickness range by law of gradual change.

41
 The total data of three boreholes MLTU series are considered for drawing
Isochores.. The thickness-wise area between two successive Isochores
has been measured with the help of AutoCAD Map 2016 software and
recorded systematically. Each of these areas is multiplied by average value
of vertical thickness ranges in that area to get the volume. The formula for
resources estimation is as follows:
R = A x T x Sp. gr.
Where, R = Resources / Tonnage
A = Area between the contours
T = Average vertical Thickness
Sp. gr. = Specific gravity of limestone

5.3.2 Cross Sectional Method: Only one cross section line is drawn across the
strike in E-W direction in the block intersection across all three boreholes.
Since the beds are generally horizontal with very low dip of 2 to 5 degree
and boreholes drilled are all vertical, hence true thickness will be the same
as thickness intersected in the boreholes. Geological cross sections are
generated by GDM software. Cross sectional area on each section has
been measured with the help of Auto CAD map 2016 software and
recorded systematically. Influence either side of section line has been
taken 400 m and resources estimated at inferred category (333). The
resources beyond 400 m influence have been categorized as
reconnaissance resource (334). Each of these areas has been multiplied
with sectional influence / strike influence of the section lines to give
volume. The volume is then multiplied with average Sp. Gravity to
calculate gross resources.
R = Sv x T x Avg Sp. gravity
Where R = Resources / Tonnage
Sv = Sectional area of limestone
T = Influence of 400m between successive section line
Sp. gr. = Specific gravity of limestone

Efforts were made to calculate the average grade for 6 radicals CaO,
MgO, SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and LOI borehole wise along section line. Thus
average grade of the block is calculated.

5.3.3 To arrive at net in-situ resources of limestone by Isochore method and

cross sectional method, 20% reduction was made from gross in situ
resources for slope factor and void/cavity corrections and unforeseen
geologicalfactors.

42
43
5.4.0 CATEGORISATION OF RESOURCES

5.4.1 Resources of limestone have been categorized under “Inferred Mineral

Resources (333)” as per the United Nations Framework Classification
(UNFC). These parameters & assumptions for resources estimation have
already been defined in Para 5.2.1.

5.5.0 RESOURCES

5.5.1 The resources of limestone have been estimated category-wise,

thickness-wise, grade-wise as per specifications for different grades given
in Para 3.12.0 and basic assumptions enumerated para no.5.2.0 by
Isochore method and have been furnished in Annexure-XA, XB, XC &
XD.

5.5.2 Resources for Graded & Ungraded limestone are estimated by Isochore
Method & Cross sectional method . The details of these resources
estimated by both the methods are given in the Table-V-1,V-2, V-3 & V-4.

5.5.3 A total of 80.21 million tonnes net in-situ limestone resources with an
average grade of 47.10% CaO, 1.22% MgO, 9.75% SiO2, 1.32% Al2O3,
1.00% Fe2O3 and 38.32% LOI, have been estimated by Isochore method
in the block over an area of 1.36 sq.kms. All the resources belong to
“Inferred category”(333) as this was a exploration at G3 level carried out
by drilling 3 boreholes in the block. All the resources belong to the cement
grade as the average grade of resources confirms with the specifications
of cement/BF grade as detailed in para no.3.12.0.

5.5.4 A total of 25.57 million tonnes of resources of Ungraded Limestone (CaO

34% to 42%) are available in the block, which are estimated by Isochore
method.

5.5.5 An attempt has been made to calculate the average grade of the block by
Polygon method. Areas are measured by Autocad Map software 2016.
Thus calculated average grade of the block is 47.10% CaO, 1.22% MgO,
9.75% SiO2, 1.32% Al2O3, 1.00% Fe2O3 and 38.32% LOI, i.e. Cement/ BF
grade.

44
 Table-V-1
STATEMENT SHOWING THICKNESS-WISE, GRADE-WISE RESOURCES OF LIMESTONE GRADED
ZONE ESTIMATED BY ISOCHORE METHOD
SULTANPUR BLOCK, DIST- SURYAPET, TELANGANA
THICKNESS AVERAGE AREA VOLUME GROSS NET RESOURCE
RANGE THICKNESS (Sq. m) (Cu. m) RESOURCE (tonnes)
(m) (m) (tonnes)
10-11 10.5 201703.12 2117882.79 5824177.67 4659342.137
11-12 11.5 14629.37 168237.77 462653.86 370123.0888
12-13 12.5 13710.05 171375.64 471283.01 377026.408
13-14 13.5 13972.71 188631.53 518736.71 414989.3682
14-15 14.5 14039.31 203569.97 559817.42 447853.9348
15-16 15.5 14418.12 223480.83 614572.28 491657.8272
16-17 16.5 17088.52 281960.53 775391.47 620313.1744
17-18 17.5 17197.51 300956.46 827630.27 662104.212
18-19 18.5 17299.16 320034.53 880094.95 704075.9626
19-20 19.5 17500.74 341264.41 938477.13 750781.7074
20-21 20.5 17719.14 363242.32 998916.37 799133.0967
21-22 21.5 18079.91 388717.99 1068974.48 855179.5869
22-23 22.5 18472.64 415634.46 1142994.77 914395.8137
23-24 23.5 18923.25 444696.29 1222914.79 978331.8337
24-25 24.5 19495.02 477627.95 1313476.86 1050781.492
25-26 25.5 20169.61 514325.12 1414394.07 1131515.256
26-27 26.5 18313.88 485317.92 1334624.27 1067699.42
27-28 27.5 18477.81 508139.69 1397384.15 1117907.324
28-29 28.5 18946.51 539975.49 1484932.60 1187946.077
29-30 29.5 19025.22 561244.01 1543421.03 1234736.823
30-31 30.5 19553.88 596393.21 1640081.34 1312065.073
31-32 31.5 19756.76 622338.05 1711429.64 1369143.711
32-33 32.5 190284.21 6184236.73 17006651.01 13605320.81
33-34 33.5 217138.30 7274133.03 20003865.83 16003092.67
34-35 34.5 205810.86 7100474.59 19526305.13 15621044.11
35-36 35.5 185190.19 6574251.79 18079192.44 14463353.95
37368143.12 102762393.57 82209914.85

STATEMENT SHOWING QUANTITY OF LIMESTONE MINED OUT FROM WORKED OUT PITS AS PROVIDED
BY “DMG (TELANGANA)” IN
SULTANPUR BLOCK, DIST- SURYAPET, TELANGANA

LIMESTONE MINED OUT

1991665.00
(In Tonnes)

STATEMENTSHOWING THICKNESS-WISE, GRADE-WISE RESOURCES OF

LIMESTONE GRADED ZONE EXCLUDING MINED OUT AREA
SULTANPUR BLOCK, DIST- SURYAPET, TELANGANA
Net tonnage after deduction of mined out 80218249.85 tonnes
Limestone. Or 80.21 million tonnes

45
 Table-V-2
STATEMENT SHOWING THICKNESS-WISE, GRADE-WISE RESOURCES OF LIMESTONE UNGRADED
ZONE ESTIMATED BY ISOCHORE METHOD
SULTANPUR BLOCK, DIST- SURYAPET, TELANGANA
THICKNESS AVERAGE AREA VOLUME GROSS NET RESOURCE
RANGE THICKNESS (Sq. m) (Cu. m) RESOURCE (tonnes)
(m) (tonnes)
7-8 7.5 585227.263 4389204.473 12070312.3 9656249.84
8-9 8.5 179833.1238 1528581.552 4203599.269 3362879.415
9-10 9.5 229504.1607 2180289.527 5995796.198 4796636.959
10-11 10.5 180289.2666 1893037.299 5205852.573 4164682.058
11-12 11.5 141964.6954 1632593.997 4489633.492 3591706.794
25572155.07 OR
11623706.85 31965193.83 25.57 million
tonnes

5.5.6 A total of 80.21 million tonnes net in-situ limestone resources with an
average grade of 47.10% CaO, 1.22% MgO, 9.75% SiO2, 1.32% Al2O3,
1.00% Fe2O3 and 38.32% LOI, have been estimated in the block over an
area of 1.36 Sq.Km. All the resources belong to “Inferred category”(333)
as this was a exploration at G3 level carried out by drilling 3 boreholes in
the block. All the resources belong to the cement grade as the average
grade of resources confirms with the specifications of cement/BF grade as
detailed in para no.3.12.0.

5.5.7 A total of 25.57 million tonnes of resources of Ungraded Limestone (CaO

34% to 42%) are available in the block, which are estimated by Isochore
method.

46
 Table-V-3
SECTION-WISE AND CATEGORY WISE RESOURCES OF LIMESTONE
ESTIMATED BY CROSS-SECTIONAL METHOD, SULTANPUR BLOCK
Gross
Section Sectional Strike Volume
Resources Category Grade
Line Area (m2) Influence(m) (Cu.m)
(Tonnes)
CEMENT
A-A’ 55004.29 600 33002579.1 90757092.53 333
GRADE

Area beyond strike influence (North)

Gross
Section Av. Volume
Line
Area Resources Category Grade
Thickness(m) (Cu.m)
(Tonnes)
CEMENT
A-A’ 158157.97 34.45 5448875.40 14984407.36 334
GRADE

Area beyond strike influence (South)

Gross
Section Av. Volume
Line
Area Resources Category Grade
Thickness(m) (Cu.m)
(Tonnes)
CEMENT
A-A’ 47435.29 31.21 1480471.68 4071297.13 334
GRADE

Area beyond block boundary

Gross
Section Av. Volume
Line
Area Resources Category Grade
Thickness(m) (Cu.m)
(Tonnes)
CEMENT
A-A’ 201460.35 14.61 2944330.03 8096907.59 334
GRADE

Quantity of limestone mined out as provided by DMG,

1991665.00
Telangana (Tonnes)

Gross Resources (Tonnes) 101715889.4

Net Resources (Tonnes) 81372711.54
79381046.54
Total Resources after deduction of mined out Limestone
79.38 million
(Tonnes)
tonnes

47
 Table-V-4
SECTION-WISE AND CATEGORY WISE RESOURCES OF LIMESTONE
ESTIMATED BY CROSS-SECTIONAL METHOD OF UNGRADED LIMESTONE, SULTANPUR BLOCK

Section Sectional Strike Volume Gross Resources

Category Grade
Line Area (m2) Influence (Cu.m) (Tonnes)
A-A’ 20022.54 800 12013529.76 33037206.84 333 UNGRADED

Area beyond strike influence (North)

Section Av. Volume Gross Resources
Line
Area Category Grade
Thickness (Cu.m) (Tonnes)
158157.974
A-A’
1
9.62 1522614.30 4187189.328 334 UNGRADED

Area beyond strike influence (South)

Section Av. Volume Gross Resources
Line
Area Category Grade
Thickness (Cu.m) (Tonnes)
A-A’ 47435.2915 10.34 490549.0696 1349009.941 334 UNGRADED

Area beyond block boundary and under old quarries

Section Av. Volume Gross Resources
Line
Area Category UNGRADED
Thickness (Cu.m) (Tonnes)
251558.253
A-A’
7
8.5 2141976.232 5890434.639 334 UNGRADED

Gross Resources (Tonnes) 32682971.47

26146377.18
Net Resources (Tonnes)
26.15 million tonnes

5.5.8 A total of 79.38 million tonnes net in-situ graded limestone resources with an
average grade of 47.08% CaO, 1.22% MgO & 9.78% SiO2 have been
estimated by cross sectional method in the block over an area of 1.70
sq.kms. All the resources belong to “Inferred category” (333) as this was a
exploration at G3 level carried out by drilling 3 boreholes in the block. All the
resources belong to the cement grade as the average grade of resources
confirms with the specifications of cement/BF grade as detailed in para
no.3.12.0.

5.5.9 A total of 26.15 million tonnes of resources of Ungraded Limestone (CaO

34% to 42%) are available in the block, which are estimated cross sectional
method.

48
5.6.0 SUMMARY OF RESOURCES

5.6.1 The summary of resources by Isochore method is given below.

i) The grade-wise net in-situ resources in an area of 1.36 sq. km
by Iso-chore method under “Inferred Category” for Cement/BF
grade computed after deduction of 20% from gross resources
for unknown geological factors are in the order of 80.21 million
tonnes with an average grade of 47.10% CaO, 1.22% MgO,
9.75% SiO2, 1.32% Al2O3, 1.00% Fe2O3 and 38.32% LOI.
ii) The thickness-wise, Grade wise resources by Isochore method
of graded and ungraded zones are given in Annexure- XA &
XB.
5.6.2 The summary of resources by cross sectional method is given below.
i) The grade-wise net in-situ resources in an area of 1.36 sq. km
by Iso-chore method under “Inferred Category” for Cement/BF
grade computed after deduction of 20% from gross resources
for unknown geological factors are in the order of 79.38 million
tonnes with an average grade of 47.08% CaO, 1.22% MgO, &
9.78% SiO2
ii) The thickness-wise, Grade wise resources by Isochore method
of graded and ungraded zones are given in Annexure- XC &
XD.

5.6.3 Comparison of resources by cross-sectional method as well as Iso-Chore

method are given as below:

Method of estimation of Resource in Million

Graded Limestone Tonnes
Gross Net
Cross-sectional method 101.71 79.38
Iso-Chore method 102.76 80.21
Difference 1.05 0.83

The difference in net in situ resources calculated by both methods is 0.83

million tonnes which is less than 10 % and is well within tolerance limit.

49
 CHAPTER-VI

6.0.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1.0 CONCLUSIONS

6.1.1 The geological domain of Narji Formation begins from Sunyapahad and
continues up to the end of block in the east. It has a gradational contact
with the underlying Banaganapalli Formation. The general trend of
formation is NNE-SSW with gentle dips of 2° to 5° towards ESE. Narji
limestone varying in thickness from 34.26 m (MLTU-3) to 49.00m (MLTU-1)
has been intersected in all the boreholes drilled in the block by MECL. It
occurs directly on the surface as very thin soil cover is available within the
block(except for MLTU-3, with 0.18 m soil cover). Two boreholes have been
closed in purple limestone of Narji limestone formation. However on request
of DMG, Telangana one borehole MLTU-03 towards up dip direction was
drilled up to quartzite to assess the potentiality of total limestone zones &
the stratigraphic sequence. The block has mostly exposed surface
limestone outcrops with very thin soil/alluvium cover.

6.1.2 The G-3 level exploration was carried out in 1.36 sq. km. area by drilling
130.00 m in 3 boreholes, analysing 127 primary samples (including 15 nos
internal and 5 nos external check samples) for 6 radicals (CaO, MgO,
Al2O3, Fe2O3, SiO2 & LOI), 8 primary for 2 radicals ( SO3 & P2O5), 15
composite samples for 12 radicals (CaO, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, Fe2O3, SO3,
P2O5, TiO2, Mn2O3, K2O, Na2O and LOI), 10 petrographic study samples, 13
samples each for X-ray diffraction and spectroscopic studies and 10
samples for specific gravity determination.

6.1.3 The cement grade limestone zone has attained a thickness which varies
from 10.82m (MLTU-3) to 36.08m (MLTU-2). The Ungraded limestone zone
has attained a thickness which varies from 7.92m (MLTU-2) to 11.15m
(MLTU-1).

6.1.4 X-ray diffraction studies of 13 composite samples of limestone have

revealed the presence of calcite and Quartz as major constituent (≥5%),
and dolomite, muscovite, sericite as minor minerals (<5 to 1%).Pyrite,
ankerite, muscovite, kaolinite, etc occur as accessory or trace minerals (<1
%).

6.1.5 Based on the outcome of 3 boreholes, limestone resources of Inferred

(333) category have been estimated by Isochore and cross sectional
method. A total of 80.21 million tonnes of net in situ resources of Inferred
category.

50
6.1.6 The grade-wise net in-situ resources by Iso-chore method under “Inferred
Category” for Cement/BF grade computed after deduction 20% from total
resources for unknown geological factors are 80.21 million tonnes with an
average grade 47.10% CaO, 1.22% MgO, 9.75% SiO2, 1.32% Al2O3, 1.00%
Fe2O3 and 38.32% LOI, i.e Cement/ BF grade. A total of 25.57 million
tonnes of resources of Ungraded Limestone (CaO 34% to 42%) are
available in the block, which are estimated by Isochore method.

6.1.7 The grade-wise net in-situ resources in an area of 1.36 sq. km by cross
sectional method under “Inferred Category” for Cement/BF grade
computed after deduction of 20% from gross resources for unknown
geological factors are in the order of 79.38 million tonnes with an average
grade of 47.08% CaO, 1.22% MgO, & 9.78% SiO2

6.2.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

6.2.1 As the exploration carried out on 800 x 800 m grid in the block and
estimated resources of entire block is under Inferred (333) Category of
UNFC. The sizable deposit will facilitate state government for Auctioning of
the block as per Mineral (Evidence of Mineral Contents) Rule -2015,
Mineral Auction Rule -2015 and MMDR Amendment Act-2015.

51
 PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXPLORATION IN
SULTANPUR BLOCK
A : OVERALL GUIDANCE
Shri Mushtaque , HOD (Exploration)

B : OVERALL SUPERVISION

Shri Mushtaque, HOD (Exploration)

Shri B.P. Raturi, DGM (Exploration)
Shri Jayant Kumar, DGM (Exploration)
Shri P.P.Kulkarni, Sr.Manager (Geoogy)

C : PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Shri Anil Tiwari, Project Manager
Shri Saurabh Upadhyay, Drilling Engineer

D : PHYSICAL EXECUTION OF WORK

Shri Pradip P. Kulkarni, Sr Manager(Geo)
Shri Anirban Das, ET(Geo)

E : CHEMICAL LABORATORY, MECL, NAGPUR

Shri Tembhurne, Sr.Manager (Labs.)
Shri Sandip Gawande, Sr.Chemist
Dr. (Mrs.) Dipti Rahangdale, Sr.Chemist
Shri Rohit Sharm, Sr.Chemist

F : PHYSICAL LABORATORY, MECL, NAGPUR

Shri Proloy Taran Das,Sr.Mineralogist

G : PETROLOGICAL LABORATORY, MECL NAGPUR

Shri Sayantan Pal, Sr.Geologist

H : IT CENTRE
Mrs. Priti Ujaoney, DGM (System)
Shri A.D.P. Rao, Sr.Manager (System)
Shri K.K.Kaushik, Sr.Manager (Geo)
Shri Rahul Mathankar, Sr. Programmer

I : DATA PROCESSING & DOCUMENTATION

Shri Pradeep Kulkarni , Sr.Manager (Geology)

Shri Nayan Khatonier, Sr. Geologist.
Shri Anirban Das, ET(Geo)
Shri Muzzamil Hussain, ET(Geo)

J : REPROGRAPHY & PRINTING

Shri L.R. Mallick, Sr. Survey & Map Officer
Shri V.K. Taiwade, Technician (S&M)
Shri P.Keshava Rao, Technician (S&M)

52
53