You are on page 1of 1002

PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Final Submission: All Accounts

Course: Investments

Submitted to: Maha Ijaz

Programme: BBA (Hons) Double Majors Finance & Marketing

Section: C

Submitted by:

Manahil Waqar

Muhammad Wahaj Faisal

Nahel Asif

Dated: 11th May 2022

Page | 1
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Contents

SECTION I: BETA CALCULATION ...................................................................................................... 8


___________________________________________________________________________________ 18
SECTION II: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ......................................................................................... 19
Historical Data .......................................................................................................................................... 20
Balance Sheet (2007-2021) ..................................................................................................................... 20
Income Statement (2007-2021)............................................................................................................... 27
Cash Flow Statement (2007-2021) ......................................................................................................... 38
Vertical Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 49
Balance Sheet (2007-2021) ..................................................................................................................... 49
Income Statement (2007-2021)............................................................................................................... 56
Cash Flow Statement (2007-2021) ......................................................................................................... 67
Horizontal Analysis................................................................................................................................... 78
Balance Sheet (2007-2021) ..................................................................................................................... 78
Income Statement (2007-2021)............................................................................................................... 85
Cash Flow Statement (2007-2021) ......................................................................................................... 96
__________________________________________________________________________________ 107
SECTION III: FORECASTED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ......................................................... 108
Future Data.............................................................................................................................................. 109
Balance Sheet (2022-2026) ................................................................................................................... 109
Income Statement (2022-2026)............................................................................................................. 112
Cash Flow Statement (2022-2026) ....................................................................................................... 114
Vertical Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 117
Balance Sheet (2022-2026) ................................................................................................................... 117
Income Statement (2022-2026)............................................................................................................. 120
Cash Flow Statement (2022-2026) ....................................................................................................... 122
Horizontal Analysis................................................................................................................................. 125
Balance Sheet (2022-2026) ................................................................................................................... 125
Income Statement (2022-2026)............................................................................................................. 128
Cash Flow Statement (2022-2026) ....................................................................................................... 130
__________________________________________________________________________________ 133
SECTION IV: BALANCE SHEET ....................................................................................................... 134

Page | 2
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Non-Current Assets ................................................................................................................................ 135


Property Plant & Equipment ................................................................................................................. 136
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 139
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 148
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 158
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 170
Right of Use Assets .................................................................................................................................. 173
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 175
Intangibles ............................................................................................................................................... 177
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 179
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 184
Long Term Investments ......................................................................................................................... 187
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 190
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 195
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 205
Long Term Loans, Advances and other receivable.............................................................................. 208
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 211
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 216
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 225
Long Term Deposits and Prepayments ................................................................................................. 229
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 231
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 235
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 246
Deferred Tax Asset – net ........................................................................................................................ 250
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 253
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 258
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 269
Retirement Benefits ................................................................................................................................ 273
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 275
__________________________________________________________________________________ 277
Current Assets ......................................................................................................................................... 278
Stores, Spares & Loose Tools ................................................................................................................. 279
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 281

Page | 3
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 285


Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 293
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 301
Stock in Trade ......................................................................................................................................... 305
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 309
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 316
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 329
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 343
Trade Debts ............................................................................................................................................. 347
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 349
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 360
Economic analysis ................................................................................................................................ 377
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 390
Loans and Advances ............................................................................................................................... 394
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 396
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 400
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 410
Short term deposits and prepayments .................................................................................................. 412
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 414
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 418
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 427
Other Receivable ..................................................................................................................................... 428
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 431
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 438
Economic analysis ................................................................................................................................ 452
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 456
Taxation – net .......................................................................................................................................... 459
General Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 462
Cash & Bank Balance ............................................................................................................................. 468
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 470
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 478
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 487
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 496

Page | 4
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

________________________________________________________________________________ .... 500


Equity ....................................................................................................................................................... 501
Share Capital ........................................................................................................................................... 502
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 504
Reserves ................................................................................................................................................... 511
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 514
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 523
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 537
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 543
Non-Controlling Interest ........................................................................................................................ 546
__________________________________________________________________________________ 551
Non-Current Liabilities .......................................................................................................................... 552
Retirement and other service benefits ................................................................................................... 553
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 556
Long Term Borrowings .......................................................................................................................... 561
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 563
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 565
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 576
Lease Liabilities....................................................................................................................................... 579
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 582
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 584
Other Payable .......................................................................................................................................... 591
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 593
__________________________________________________________________________________ 595
Current Liabilities .................................................................................................................................. 596
Trade and Other Payable ....................................................................................................................... 597
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 600
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 608
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 627
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 634
Unclaimed Dividend................................................................................................................................ 638
General Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 640
Unpaid Dividend ..................................................................................................................................... 643

Page | 5
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

General Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 645


Provisions ................................................................................................................................................. 648
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 650
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 652
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 660
Current Portion of Lease Liability ........................................................................................................ 662
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 666
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 667
Accrued Markup/Interest ...................................................................................................................... 674
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 676
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 680
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 687
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 692
Short term borrowings ........................................................................................................................... 695
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 697
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 705
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 716
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 723
__________________________________________________________________________________ 726
SECTION X: INCOME STATEMENT ............................................................................................... 727
Sales .......................................................................................................................................................... 728
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 731
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 739
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 764
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 772
Cost of Goods Sold .................................................................................................................................. 786
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 789
Industrial Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 802
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 812
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 821
Other Income........................................................................................................................................... 831
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 834
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 840

Page | 6
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 853


Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 856
Distribution and Marketing Expense .................................................................................................... 859
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 862
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 869
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 880
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 886
Administrative Expense.......................................................................................................................... 890
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 893
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 900
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 909
Other Expense ......................................................................................................................................... 911
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 914
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 917
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 931
Finance Cost ............................................................................................................................................ 933
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 935
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 951
Statistical Forecasting ........................................................................................................................... 956
Taxation ................................................................................................................................................... 960
Company Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 962
Industry Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 967
Economic Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 978
__________________________________________________________________________________ 987
SECTION XI: APPLICATION OF VALUATION MODELS ........................................................... 988
Accounting Valuation Model ................................................................................................................. 989
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 991
Working ................................................................................................................................................ 992
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 992
Free Cash Flow Model ............................................................................................................................ 993
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 995
Working ................................................................................................................................................ 996
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 996

Page | 7
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

P/E Model ................................................................................................................................................ 997


Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 999
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 999
__________________________________________________________________________________
................................................................................................................................................................ 1000
SECTION XI: REMARKS FROM LAST SUBMISSION ................................................................ 1001

SECTION I: BETA

CALCULATION

Page | 8
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 9
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 10
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 11
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 12
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 13
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 14
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 15
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 16
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 17
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

_________________________

Page | 18
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

SECTION II: FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS

Page | 19
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Historical Data

Balance Sheet (2007-2021)

Page | 20
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 21
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 22
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 23
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 24
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 25
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 26
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Income Statement (2007-2021)

Page | 27
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 28
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 29
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 30
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 31
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 32
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 33
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 34
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 35
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 36
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 37
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash Flow Statement (2007-2021)

Page | 38
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 39
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 40
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 41
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 42
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 43
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 44
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 45
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 46
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 47
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 48
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Vertical Analysis

Balance Sheet (2007-2021)

Page | 49
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 50
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 51
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 52
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 53
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 54
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 55
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Income Statement (2007-2021)

Page | 56
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 57
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 58
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 59
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 60
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 61
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 62
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 63
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 64
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 65
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 66
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash Flow Statement (2007-2021)

Page | 67
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 68
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 69
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 70
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 71
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 72
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 73
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 74
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 75
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 76
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 77
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis

Balance Sheet (2007-2021)

Page | 78
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 79
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 80
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 81
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 82
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 83
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 84
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Income Statement (2007-2021)

Page | 85
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 86
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 87
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 88
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 89
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 90
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 91
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 92
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 93
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 94
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 95
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash Flow Statement (2007-2021)

Page | 96
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 97
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 98
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 99
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 100
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 101
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 102
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 103
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 104
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 105
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 106
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

________________________

Page | 107
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

SECTION III:

FORECASTED FINANCIAL

STATEMENTS

Page | 108
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Data

Balance Sheet (2022-2026)

Page | 109
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 110
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 111
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Income Statement (2022-2026)

Page | 112
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 113
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash Flow Statement (2022-2026)

Page | 114
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 115
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 116
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Vertical Analysis

Balance Sheet (2022-2026)

Page | 117
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 118
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 119
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Income Statement (2022-2026)

Page | 120
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 121
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash Flow Statement (2022-2026)

Page | 122
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 123
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 124
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis

Balance Sheet (2022-2026)

Page | 125
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 126
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 127
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Income Statement (2022-2026)

Page | 128
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 129
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash Flow Statement (2022-2026)

Page | 130
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 131
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 132
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

________________________

Page | 133
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

SECTION IV: BALANCE

SHEET

Page | 134
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Non-Current Assets

Page | 135
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Property Plant & Equipment

Breakdown:

Property, Plant and Equipment 2021 Vertical Analysis

Operating assets 32,810,904 85.30%

Capital work-in-progress 5,653,483 14.70%

38,464,387 100.00%

Page | 136
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (66.31%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

PPE 7.77% 3.21% 371.95% 5.51% 5.10% 4.33%

Vertical Analysis: Average (5.32%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

PPE 9.29% 9.51% 7.62% 1.82% 1.77% 1.93%

Forecasted Values

After analyzing all the industrial and economic factors, it is safe to assume that the PPE of the

company will increase in the future. The percentage by which the account will increase was a

challenge to understand. However, after looking at the historical data and analyzing the account

through statistical measures, it is safe to assume that the account will increase between 8-10%, a

figure which can be supported by historical data. The trend can be seen in the figure below.

Page | 137
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

400.00%
350.00%
300.00%
250.00%
200.00%
150.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
(50.00%)
(100.00%)

Page | 138
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effect

Increase in Capital Expenditure Increase

Capital Work in Progress Increase

Increase in Tanks and Pipes Increase

Filling Stations Increase

Oil Storage Facilities Increase

Upgradation in Fleet Increase

Increase in Retail Outlets Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

5.32% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 66.31% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Page | 139
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PPE
45,000,000

40,000,000

35,000,000

30,000,000

25,000,000

20,000,000

15,000,000

10,000,000

5,000,000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Factors that highly influence the PPE of a company may include the increase or decrease in

investing activities and operating assets etc. Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes

of the increase and decrease of the PPE of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

In FY21, Cash outflow from investing activities has increased primarily due to additions in

property, plant and equipment.

Year 2021:

The company’s fixed assets in category of property plant and equipment increased only by 10%

indicating maintenance level capital expenditure.

• Increase in Capital Expenditure: efforts were drawn to align PSO’s capital nature

spending in line with overall corporate strategy. Company ensured superior customer

Page | 140
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

forecourt experience through development of well-equipped state of the art retail outlets

and also product availability through development and enhancement of storage facilities

across Pakistan. Product awareness and reach were primarily the focused areas.

• Capital Work in progress increased: This includes the increase in tanks and pipelines,

services filling stations, plants and machinery etc.

• Increase in Tanks and Pipelines: Pipeline links have been completed to connect

operational locations with White Oil Pipeline to make product movement safer and more

efficient. 71 new vision retail outlets were also added to the company's footprint.

• Increase in Rehabilitation Storages: The company fast tracked infrastructural projects

to gain operational efficiency. 174,000 tons of new and rehabilitated storages were added

which significantly increase the number of day's cover of petroleum products.

• Launch of first digitally integrated oil storage facility: The company made significant

strides on its journey of digital transformation with the launch of Pakistan's first digitally

integrated oil storage and dispatch terminal in Karachi.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40115417

Year 2020:

Page | 141
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Property, plant and equipment of PSO saw an increase from year 2019 to 2020 which was

3.21%. Factors that affected this increase are listed down below;

• Increase in Operating Assets: Included in operating assets are fully depreciated assets

having cost of Rs.16,262,751 (2019: Rs.15,700,444).

• Capital Work in progress increased: This includes the increase in tanks and pipelines,

services filling stations, plants and machinery etc.

• Increase in Storage Tanks: The Infrastructure Construction Department initiated

several mega projects to rehabilitate and develop POL product storages throughout the

country and increase days cover as per OGRA’s requirement. Rehabilitation of 164,000

MT storage tanks was initiated at Keamari and Zulfiqarabad Oil terminal (ZOT). As of

June 30, 2020, 6 storage tanks having a storage capacity of 21,750 MT were successfully

completed and commissioned. Development of new 151,000 MT storage tanks is also

under progress at five locations.

• Increase in Pipeline facility: In FY20, two additional pipeline facilities between PSO

and PARCO terminals at Machike and Shikarpur were successfully connected.

Construction works on pipelines at Mehmoodkot and Faisalabad are in progress for the

receipt of multi-grade products.

Page | 142
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Increase in Service and filling Station: Service and filling stations include cost of

Rs.11,537,703 incurred by the Company on underground storage tanks, dispensing units

and other equipment, construction and related work.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ Director’s Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was a drastic increase in the Property, Plant and Equipment account of PSO. Factors are

given below;

• Drastic Increase in Operating Assets: The possession of these assets at EJHD and

NIAP is with Shell Pakistan Limited and Attock Petroleum Limited respectively. In view

of large number of assets, the Group considers it impracticable to disclose particulars of

assets not in the possession or name of the Group as required under the Fourth Schedule

to the Companies Act, 2017.

• Capital Work in progress increased: This includes the increase in tanks and pipelines,

services filling stations, plants and machinery etc.

• PSO opened Bahria Orchid Filling Station in Lahore: PSO is the first OMC, offering

fuel filling facility at the Bahria Orchard Lahore. Apart from general commuters of the

Page | 143
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

area; the outlet will also cater to the customers passing through the busy Raiwind Road.

The fuel filling facility brings real convenience for customers living in the area, who will

benefit from quality petroleum and lubricant products along with convenience shopping

at the company's rapidly expanding Shop Stop brand.

• Increase in Pipelines: Replacement of 550 meters of 20 inches dia Tanker Discharge

pipeline connecting Keamari terminals to Oil Piers was also completed.

• Underground Storage Tanks also increased: Service and filling stations include cost of

Rs.10,818,953 (2018: Rs.10,276,823) incurred by the Group on underground storage

tanks, dispensing units and other equipment, construction and related work.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

➢ https://fp.brecorder.com/2019/09/20190919518856/

Year 2018:

PPE Increased for the Year 2018 as compared to the previous 2017.

• Increase in Capital work in progress: This includes the increase in tanks and pipelines,

services filling stations, plants and machinery etc.

• Increase in the cost incurred on Service and filling stations: Service and filling

stations include cost of Rs. 10,276,823 (2017: Rs. 9,792,023) incurred by the Company

Page | 144
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

on underground storage tanks, dispensing units and other equipment, and construction

and related work.

• Increase in the cost of ‘New Vision Scheme’: It also includes cost incurred on

modernization and development under the "New Vision Scheme" on approximately 2,019

(2017: 1,947) out of the total 3,514 (2017: 3,489) retail filling station of dealers and

consumer sites.

• Increase in Advances to suppliers and contractors for tanks, pipelines and storage

development projects

• Upgradation in Fleet: To ensure safe and secure POL transportation through road, PSO,

in line with OGRA regulatory requirements and with the consent of all its stakeholders

including PSO’s business partners i.e., our Cartage Contractors, has launched its fully

compliant fleet. The fleet consists of state-of-the-art modern tank lorries which are in full

compliance with OGRA & NHA requirements equipped with best-in-class gauges, and

roll over prevention mechanism to minimize the chances of accidents.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

➢ https://fp.brecorder.com/2017/03/20170329159137/

Year 2017:

Page | 145
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PPE increased by 5.10% in 2017 as compared to 2016. Reasons are given below:

• Increase in Capital work in progress: This includes the increase in tanks and pipelines,

services filling stations, plants and machinery etc.

• Increase in the cost incurred on Service and filling stations: Service and filling

stations include cost of Rs. 9,792,023 (2016: Rs. 9,425,439) incurred by the Company on

underground storage tanks, dispensing units and other equipment, and construction and

related work.

• Increase in Retail Outlets: PSO’s nationwide retail outlet network was expanded with

the addition of more than 60 New Vision Retail Outlets (NVROs) making a grand total of

3,489 sites as of FY2017.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

PPE increased by 4.33% in 2016 as compared to 2015 but there was lesser investments

seen in 2016. Reasons are given below:

Page | 146
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Increase in operating Assets: Service and filling stations include cost of Rs. 9,425,439

(2015: Rs. 8,850,945) incurred by the Company on underground storage tanks,

dispensing units and other equipment, construction and related work.

• Decrease in Capital work in progress: There was a slight decrease in tanks and

pipelines, filling stations, plant and machinery etc.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 147
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Incentive given to OMCs to increase storage capacity Increase

Refiners go on strike Decrease

Upgrading Refineries including PARCO Increase

Investments in Pipelines to help OMCs Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration in order

to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of property, plant and equipment

(PPE) of all five years of the companies is given below.

Total PPE of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 6,944,509 7,327,476 34,581,849 35,691,707 38,464,387

HTL 2,465,200,699 1,386,311,847 1,583,889,323 1,693,745,762 1,833,545,894

APL 4,339,301 6,417,787 8,348,942 13,839,661 16,616,819

BPL 758,226 742,636 732,090 827,317 807,389

Industry 2,477,242,735 1,400,799,746 1,627,552,204 1,744,104,447 1,889,434,489

Page | 148
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t PPE

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 1.35%

HTL 98.07%

APL 0.54%

BPL 0.04%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t PPE

Total Market Share


120.00%

98.07%
100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%
1.35% 0.54% 0.04%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Page | 149
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above clearly tells us that HTL has the highest number of PPE in the industry

and the second place has been secured by PSO. However, if HTL is considered an outlier, PSO would

have the highest market share in terms of PPE in the industry.

PSO’s PPE Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly Share 0.28% 0.52% 2.12% 2.05% 2.04%

Graph Indicating PSO’s PPE Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


2.50%

2.12%
2.00% 2.05% 2.04%

1.50%

1.00%

0.50% 0.52%
0.28%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 150
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above clearly indicates that PSO’s share of PPE with respect to the industry

has grown over the period of time. The first table of the PPE of all companies also shows that there was

an increase in the PPE of all the companies.

Yearly Change/Growth in PPE of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly PPE Growth 5.10% 5.51% 371.95% 3.21% 7.77%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in PPE of PSO

PSO Yearly PPE Growth


400.00%
371.95%
350.00%

300.00%

250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00% 5.10% 5.51% 3.21% 7.77%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 151
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the PPE of PSO changed to a great extent in 2019. The change was

extremely drastic and the highest among all years. However, the growth was low in 2020. In 2021, the

PPE of PSO can be seen to increase again.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s PPE Overtime:

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly Growth 33.07% -43.45% 16.19% 7.16% 8.33%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s PPE Overtime:

Industry's Yearly Growth


40.00%
33.07%
30.00%

20.00%
16.19%
10.00% 8.33%
7.16%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00%

-20.00%

-30.00%

-40.00%
-43.45%
-50.00%

Page | 152
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The PPE of the entire industry dropped in 2018. This happened mainly because of a drop in the

PPE of HTL and BPL. However it increased in 2019, majorly because of an increase in PSO’s PPE. It

dropped in 2020 but in 2021 it increased again.

Incentive Provided to OMCs in 2021 for Expansion of Storage Capacity

The graphs given above clearly indicate that the PPE of the OMCs increased after 2020 and that was

majorly because the government provided incentives to those OMCs which supplied oil in the

international market. PSO is one of those companies due to which the PPE of PSO tended to increase as

well with an increase in overall industry’s PPE. This was done to have more levels of petroleum reserves

so that the export could be facilitated.

Future Outlook:

These incentives prove to be very beneficial for the OMCs because it allows them to increase their

assets further. If the government’s support is taken throughout, then the PPE of the OMCs are expected

the increase in the future.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/692667-pakistan-oil-refinery-and-marketing-policy-2020-

incentive-packages-for-refinery-omcs-in-the-pipeline

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40114376

➢ https://www.orfonline.org/research/energy-news-monitor-volume-xvii-issue-30/

Page | 153
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan Refinery Limited Shuts Down due to Storage Capacity Issues

Even though investments were received by OMCs for the expansion of their storage capacity, these

investments were not enough. In late 2021, Pakistan Refinery Limited shut down its operations. Since

the power sector is not lifting refined fuel oil from the local refineries, almost all of them are facing

storage constraints and shutting down further production gradually. Rented storages have massive

costs. So no one is interested in that, except one company that plans to export fuel oil. The source

claimed the Power Division had made a mess of things with the PSO having imported refined oil in large

quantities at the expense of the local refineries.

“The IPPs say they don’t have the money to pay PSO because of non-payment of their arrears. Hence,

the PSO was reluctant to supply oil to them,” as reported by a senior PRL executive. He went on to

predict that all refineries would shut down in 15 days if the issue wasn’t resolved immediately.

Future Outlook:

If this issue is not catered to, the PPE of many companies will go to waste. That is because they are

constantly importing oil from their international suppliers but they are not providing that fuel to their

customers because they have defaulted majorly. However, if this issue pertains, the all the refineries will

go on strike which would lead to a fall in the PPE in the future of OMCs. Alongside that, in 2022, PRL

started its operations again because it was facing heavy losses and the government’s new oil policy.

Page | 154
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1664286

➢ https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/oil/120121-

refinery-news-roundup-news-emerges-on-closures-in-asia-pacific

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2328329/why-oil-refineries-are-underutilised

Government to Upgrade Oil Refineries by 2026-2027

Considering how the refineries were going on strike and shutting down, the government has asked all

the refineries to make a plane of upgrading and expanding further. This also includes the refinery

associated with PSO which is PARCO. These refineries will submit a plan in 2022 and this will be worked

upon by the government on an urgent basis. The new policy gives them a number of incentives including

five-year tax holidays on import of crude oil, incentive in their products prices through tariff protection,

which will earn them additional revenue to invest, upgrade and remain in the business. They will be

required some five-year to fully implement the plans after committing revival plans, meaning they

would get fully upgraded by the years 2026-27. This would prove to be beneficial for them.

Future Outlook:

The PPE of PSO and other OMCs is expected to increase because of this in the future because this would

take 3-4 years to be established and expanded. However, once it is established, OMCs like PSO would

not have to rely on imports to meet the local demand because currently, the low output at domestic

Page | 155
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

refineries has prompted the government and oil marketing companies (OMCs) like Pakistan State Oil

(PSO) and others in the private sector to meet local demand of oil products through imports.

Source:

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2311149/pakistan-refineries-in-upgrade-phase

➢ https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-

news/petrochemicals/050522-refinery-news-roundup-progress-on-new-plants-in-the-middle-

east

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/937581-refineries-expansion-plans-hit-snags-on-policy-

delay

➢ https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/oil/110221-

refinery-news-roundup-plants-in-asia-pacific-ramp-up-run-rates

Investments in Tankers and Pipelines for OMCs by Refiners

The PPE also increased because the investments were made in the number of tankers available for the

OMCs and also in the pipelines. At present two pipelines - the White Oil Pipeline (WOP) and

Mehmoodkot-Faisalabad-Machike (MFM) pipeline - are transporting diesel to meet the entire demand

of upcountry. Pak-Arab Pipeline Company Limited (Papco) and Pak-Arab Refinery Company Limited

(Parco), the pipeline operators, have executed a project costing $194 million to convert the two

Page | 156
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

pipelines into such facilities that will transport multiple petroleum products like diesel and petrol in an

efficient way with less freight cost. OMCs had also made a huge investment to build storage tanks and

set up associated facilities at various delivery points along the pipelines.

Future Outlook:

The government is in support of the OMCs as they are not ready to bear the losses of pipeline deliveries

due to low margins. As a result of this, the losses will be sent forward to the customers. The investments

in the pipelines are only expected to increase in the future. However, if the oil tankers keep going on

strike, this would result in losses for PSO and other OMCs.

Source:

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2295831/omcs-refuse-to-bear-losses

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/energy/oil-gas/oil-bond-dues-the-rationale-

behind-not-reducing-your-fuel-bill-due-to-high-transportation-costs /articleshow/85391680.cms

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2306905/fear-of-petrol-shortage-looms-as-oil-tankers-go-on-

countrywide-strike

➢ https://www.globalvillagespace.com/oil-tankers-blackmail-pakistan-announce-strike-over-silly-

demands/

Page | 157
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Lift on the ban of furnace oil Increase

Increase in Imports (Agreement with SFD) Increase

Automotive Policy Increase

Technological Changes Increase

Growing Energy Demands Increase

Currency Devaluation Decrease/ Slow down the growth

If we look at the historical data of PSO for property, plant and equipment, it is very clear that

throughout the past 5 years, the company has been increasing its PPE, with the highest increase

recorded in 2019 when the company increased its PPE by a staggering 371%. This was mainly

accounted for to the investment in Pak-Arab Pipelines Company Limited on account of adoption

of new standard.

Moreover during the latest year 2021, the company increased its non-current assets by 3.4%

which was mainly accounted to additions in the PPE during the fiscal year. These additions to

PPE were made keeping in mind that PSO had to increase the reliability, availability, efficiency

and capacity of its infrastructure to meet the country's growing energy needs. So among other

Page | 158
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

things, the company added a capacity of 55 thousand tons to its storages. All the economic

reasons for this change in the company’s PPE have been analyzed below.

Source:

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=451

➢ Annual Report, 2019

➢ Annual Report 2021

Lift on the ban of furnace oil

During the fiscal year 2021, there was an increase in the demand for fuel and furnace oil due to

an increase in electricity demand, which was coupled with the shortage of natural gas for power

generation and dry docking related issues. PSO requested the federal government for advising

the domestic refineries for maximum allocation to PSO so that power sector demand can be

fulfilled, informing that they managed to provide 100,000 metric tons of furnace oil to K-Electric

against its demand of 120,000 metric tons.

Keeping in view this situation, the Cabinet Committee on Energy under Minister for Planning

Asad Umar approved withdrawal of ban on import of furnace oil and PSO was given NOC to

import two frim cargoes and one optional cargo of furnace oil as reported by The News. The

chief executive of KE also confirmed this in the statement, “We are getting furnace oil from PSO

Page | 159
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

on day to day basis in order to meet the generation demands and to avoid any unwarranted

situation”.

In order to store the freshly imported furnace oil, the company needed to expand its

infrastructure and thus they invested heavily its property, plant and equipment.

Future Outlook

In the future it was initially predicted that the demand for furnace oil would continue to increase

as the country is facing shortage of natural gas so import of furnace oil will become necessary

for power generation. This prediction was contradicted when in January 2022 refineries stopped

importing furnace oil as they were overflowing with this fuel, owing to zero demand from

independent power producers who happen to be the major consumer of furnace oil. This was

because at that time LNG was available in excess and due to its cheaper prices, the power

producers preferred LNG over furnace oil.

Now the demand for furnace oil has again increased owing to Gunvor defaulting and backing out

on the 4 RLNG cargo deliveries for April-June 2022, shifting the entire burden back on furnace

oil which is being consumed at maximum in the power sector despite being lower on the merit

order. So for future it is difficult to predict what will happen to the demand of furnace oil as this

is a cycle which continues. In any case, PSO is likely to increase its PPE by investing more in

storage facilities, keeping in mind the rising demand.

Page | 160
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/683166-pso-to-opt-for-gallop-import-of-furnace-oil

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/918251-gas-crisis-aggravates-gunvor-again-backs-

out-of-lng-cargo-delivery

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2308972/pol-demand-surges-to-two-year-high

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40166530/petroleum-woes-ahead

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40142992

➢ Director’s report, 2021

Increase in Imports (Agreement with the SFD)

Keeping in mind the massive increase in demand, according to reports Pakistan is likely to see a

rise in the import of petroleum products

After a slight decline in the demand for petroleum products during 2020, the country recorded

highest every demand during 2021 despite the price hike. In order to meet the increasing

demand, the country would be importing diesel and petrol for local consumption as local supply

from the refineries would not be enough to meet demand. This was further reported in economic

times where it was mentioned that Pakistan’s oil import bill has surged over the past year.

Moreover according to the latest agreement with Saudi Find for Development, the country will

be importing petroleum products on deferred payments to meet the local demand. Now PSO

Page | 161
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

being the largest OMC in the country needs to be at the top with the rise in imports as they need

enough capacity to store and deliver the product to the final consumer. Due to this the company

has been making investments in its PPE as can be seen in its balance sheet and cash flow

statement.

Future Outlook

As has been reported by economic times and trading economics, the imports for the country are

only expected to increase. According to other sources PARCO and NRL alone are expected to

import more than 30 million barrels of oil collectively. This along with the rising energy crisis

and increase in the demand for petroleum products is likely to keep the imports high as is also

illustrated in the graph below.

Page | 162
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

This would ultimately mean that PSO will keep investing in its PPE to expand its storage facility

even more so that it continues to be a reliable and efficient company, which is the best at what it

does and continues to meet the demand and energy needs of the people of Pakistan.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/947799-pakistan-to-import-32-7-million-barrels-oil-

under-sfd-programme

➢ https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-pakistan-oil-idINKCN2280FN

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1685377

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/imports

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/business/pakistan-oil-eatable-

import-bills-surge-by-60-per-cent/articleshow/90894283.cms

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1666786

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/929210-pakistan-may-import-500-000-tonnes-of-

petrol-next-month

Automotive Policy

During the fiscal year 2021, the government has envisioned to achieve a GDP growth of 4.4% in

the year 2022 and have taken several steps to supplement this vison. One such policy is the

reduction in the duty structure. The government reduced the duty and tax structure on vehicles

Page | 163
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

under 850 cc horsepower which is deemed to have a positive impact on the demand of petroleum

products in the country. To top this The Automotive Industry Development & Export Plan

(AIDEP) 2021-2026 increased competition for automobiles in the market with car sales

exhibiting a staggering growth of 40.2%, which indicated both the revival of the economy as

well as a an exponential increase in the demand for fuel and diesel in the country. In order to

meet the increased demand and cater to all the customers, the company made heavy investments

in its PPE as new retail outlets were opened and new pipelines and tankers were added in the

country.

Future Outlook

If we look at the next five years, it can be said that the demand for cars will continue to increase

as new players have been entering the market which would ultimately result in the increased

demand for petroleum products such as fuel. This implies that the company will be making

investments in PPE as time passes. However if we talk about the next 10 years, the demand for

petroleum products might decrease as people will start shifting towards electric vehicles, yet the

investments in PPE would still increase as now, instead of adding more outlets and pipelines, the

company will be adding EV chargers to its portfolio.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/921238-dissecting-govt-s-new-auto-policy-2021-26

Page | 164
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/949699-car-sales-increase-by-25pc-in-march

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/919801-auto-sales-likely-to-witness-growth-in-2022

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Technological changes

A transition is taking place on the retail industry as a change in the consumer demand can be

observed. The new EV policy for four wheelers is expected to increase competition in the market

while promoting sustainable development and preserving the environment. It is envisioned to

have an increase of 30% and 90% share in the light and heavy vehicles sales respectively within

the next 5-10 years. Moreover the salient features of the policy include a phased transition of the

automotive industry to electric vehicles. This implies that OMCs like PSO will start shifting their

focus towards establishing and installing EV charges in the country, thus adding more to its PPE.

This transition has already been started by PSO as they have successfully installed and

commissioned its first electric EV charger in Islamabad under the name PSO Electro. Moreover

the company has also joined hands with Frontier Works Organization (FWO) to install state of

the art EV chargers on the Lahore-Sialkot motorway.

Future Outlook

Within a span of 5-10 years, companies are expected to invest heavily in EV chargers and

technology as it can be observed that the consumer demand is shifting. So is the case with PSO

Page | 165
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

as we expect that in the future the company will invest heavily in technology and thus these

investments will increase its PPE.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/693968-pso-installs-ev-charging-facility

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=424

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=453

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Growing energy demands

The energy crisis in Pakistan is growing. Electricity demand in the country is at peak and it is

only expected to increase in the future as we approach hotter months of June and July. Contrary

to the high demand of electricity in the country, the supply has not been very good as could

clearly be seen during Ramzan when many cities faced power shortages or load shedding. The

higher electricity demand can be attributed to an exponential increase in the population as well as

a consumers using more electrical appliances and working towards improving their standard of

living.

Nonetheless in order to meet the higher electricity demand fuel is imported as the local supply is

not enough to meet the demand. This extra demand also creates problems in terms of circular

debt as the government has subsidized the prices, which results in the rise of import bill and

Page | 166
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

reduction of foreign reserves. The higher import is to be stored and delivered by OMC’s and

with PSO being the largest OMC in the country, it has invested it its PPE to ensure everything is

done smoothly.

Future Outlook

In the future it is expected that the demand for electricity would continue to increase. This

ultimately implies that the imports are also expected to increase thus the company is also

expected to invest more in PPE in the future.

Source:

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40168144

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40124544

➢ https://www.scienceimpactpub.com/Docs/jei62019.pdf

➢ https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13705-018-0167-y

➢ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X21001711

Currency Devaluation

Currency devaluation plays a very important role in determining the buying power of any

company. A stronger currency ultimately means that the cost incurred will be lower while a weak

Page | 167
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

currency implies vice versa. In case of Pakistan, however the currency position has not been very

stable as the Pakistani Rupee has continued to devalue under the PTI government.

The positive impact of a stronger currency is also reflected in the balance sheet of the company

when during the period 2018-2019, the company made heavy investments in PARCO which was

mainly in account of change in the IFRS. At that time the currency was trading at between $1 for

Rs.122. However after the PTI government came into power, there was record devaluation in the

within the past 4 years as now the dollar is trading at $1 for Rs.185. Thus the rate of increase in

the PPE of the company also slowed down as it seemed very expensive to be investing in PPE.

Future Outlook

In the future it is predicted that the Pakistani currency will continue to devalue by a further at

least 18%, as reported by trading economics. This ultimately implies that the cost for investing in

the PPE will increase which increases the likelihood that the company might choose not to invest

in PPE, rendering to high costs as the main reason. However on the contrary it can also be

assumed that foreign companies might invest in Pakistan as the cost for investing will be cheaper

due to weak currency. However, keeping in mind the current political situation in Pakistan, this

is highly unlikely. The forecast for currency devaluation against dollar is illustrated in the graph

below.

Page | 168
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

➢ https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/under-imran-khan-govt-pakistani-rupee-depreciated-

by-30-5-per-cent-report-2640765

➢ https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/187-to-a-us-dollar-political-crisis-in-pakistan-led-

to-the-free-fall-of-its-currency-469545

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/914762-pak-currency-in-freefall-rs54-lost-against-

dollar-in-current-govt-s-tenure

Page | 169
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 170
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

45,000,000.00
40,000,000.00
35,000,000.00
30,000,000.00
25,000,000.00
20,000,000.00
15,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

PPE Naïve Forecast

400.00%

350.00%

300.00%

250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2010

2014

2018

2022

2026
2007
2008
2009

2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017

2019
2020
2021

2023
2024
2025

(50.00%)

(100.00%)

Page | 171
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

45,000,000.00
40,000,000.00
35,000,000.00
30,000,000.00
25,000,000.00
20,000,000.00
15,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
0.00
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Series1 Series2

Page | 172
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Right of Use Assets

Page | 173
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (1.58%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Right-of-use Assets 9.47% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.43%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Right-of-use Assets 1.30% 1.31% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Forecasted Value

The account was just introduced in 2020 hence not much information is available on the account

so a general company analysis has been done and the account has been increased in a range of

10-15%.

Page | 174
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.36% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 47.5% due to the sudden increase.

Right-of-use Assets
6000000

5000000

4000000

3000000

2000000

1000000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Right-

of-use Assets of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021-20:

There was an increase of 9.47% in the year 2021, due to the following reasons;

• The right-of-use assets were recognized based on the amount equal to lease liabilities,

adjusted for any related prepaid and accrued lease payments previously recognized. Lease

liabilities were recognized based on the present value of the remaining lease payments,

Page | 175
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

discounted using the incremental borrowing rate at the date of initial application. The

Group does not have any sub-lease or finance leases as on July 1, 2019.

Page | 176
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Intangibles

Breakdown:

Intangibles 2021 Vertical Analysis

Net carrying value

Balance at beginning of the year 90,885 56.28%

Additions at cost 106,528 65.97%

Amortisation charge for the year -35,930 -22.25%

Balance at end of the year 161,483 100.00%

Gross carrying value

Cost 645,447 399.70%

Accumulated amortisation -483,964 -299.70%

Net book value 161,483 100.00%

Page | 177
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (41.79%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Intangibles 77.68% 50.33% 206.38% -32.90% - -

37.86% 12.91%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.02%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Intangibles 0.04% 0.02% 0.01% 0.00% 0.01% 0.01%

Forecasted Values

Intangibles is a very minor account of the company and had no factors from the industry or the

economy which would affect the account. Hence a general company analysis of the account was

done according to which the account has been increased within a range of 60-70%. This is also

illustrated in the graph below.

Page | 178
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
(50.00%)

(100.00%)

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Implementation of ERP System (SAP), anti- Increase

virus software and other office related

software

Decrease in book value of software and license Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.02% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 41.72% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Page | 179
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Intangibles
180000
160000
140000
120000
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the

Intangibles of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Factors Affecting the Intangible Assets (2016-2021):

• An intangible asset is recognized if it is probable that the future economic benefits that

are attributable to the asset will flow to the Company and that the cost of such asset can

also be measured reliably.

• Generally, costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software

programs are recognized as an expense as incurred. However, costs that are directly

associated with identifiable software and have probable economic benefits exceeding one

year, are recognized as an intangible asset. Direct costs include the purchase cost of

Page | 180
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

software and related overhead cost. Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on

initial recognition at cost.

Source:

➢ Annual Report

Year 2021:

There was an increase of 77.68% in the year 2021, due to the following reasons;

• Implementation of ERP System (SAP), anti-virus software and other office related

software: Cost increased by 19.7%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

There was an increase of 50.33% in the year 2020, due to the following reasons;

• Implementation of ERP System (SAP), anti-virus software and other office related

software: Cost increased by 11%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Page | 181
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2019:

There was an increase of 206.38% in the year 2019, due to the following reasons;

• Implementation of ERP System (SAP), anti-virus software and other office related

software: Cost increased by 18.10%.

• Increase in book value of software and license: Increase by 206.3%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

There was a decrease of 32.9% in the year 2018, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in book value of software and license: Decrease by 39.5%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

There was a decrease of 37.8% in the year 2017, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in book value of software and license: Decrease by 3.17%

Page | 182
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

There was a decrease of 37.8% in the year 2016, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in book value of software and license: Decrease by 0.36%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 183
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 184
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

180,000.00
160,000.00
140,000.00
120,000.00
100,000.00
80,000.00
60,000.00
40,000.00
20,000.00
0.00
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PPE Naïve Forecast

250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2010

2014

2018

2022

2026
2007
2008
2009

2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017

2019
2020
2021

2023
2024
2025

(50.00%)

(100.00%)

Page | 185
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Chart Title
180,000.00
160,000.00
140,000.00
120,000.00
100,000.00
80,000.00
60,000.00
40,000.00
20,000.00
0.00
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Series1 Series2

Page | 186
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Long Term Investments

Breakdown:

Long-Term Investments 2021 Vertical Analysis

Investment in related parties

Investment held at fair value through other

comprehensive income

In an unquoted company

- Pak-Arab Pipeline Company Limited (PAPCO)

Equity held: 12% (2020: 12%)

No. of shares: 8,640,000 (2020: 8,640,000) of Rs. 100 each 7,874,629 68.90%

Investment in associates

Page | 187
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

In unquoted companies

- Asia Petroleum Limited (APL)

Equity held: 49% (2020: 49%)

No. of shares: 46,058,570 (2020: 46,058,570) of Rs. 10/-

each 3,453,641 30.22%

Pak Grease Manufacturing Company (Private) Limited

Equity held: 49.26% (2020: 49.26%) 101,246 0.89%

No. of shares: 1,536,593 (2020: 1,536,593) of Rs. 10/- each 3,554,887 31.10%

11,429,516 100.00%

Page | 188
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (5.29%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Long-Term Investments -1.34% 29.72% 86.69% 9.01% -91.25% -1.08%

Vertical Analysis: Average (4.13%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Long-Term Investments 2.76% 3.09% 1.97% 1.19% 1.12% 14.65%

Forecasted Values

If we look at the historical data for this account, it can clearly be seen that the account is

consistently increasing by a great amount. It was only in 2021 that the account decreased, the

reason for which have been analyzed in the company analysis of this particular account. So, after

considering all the industrial factors, we are assuming that the account will increase between 10-

20% for the next 5 years, as shown above.

Page | 189
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effect

Gain on revaluation of investment in Pak Arab Increase

Pipeline Company

PSO acquired 84 million shares from Shell Increase

PSO investments in PIBs Increase

Investments from APL Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

4.13% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 5.29% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Page | 190
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Long-Term Investments
60000000

50000000

40000000

30000000

20000000

10000000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Factors that highly influence the long-term investments of a company may include the increase

or decrease are interest rates and the return etc. Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the

causes of the increase and decrease of the long-term investments of PSO year by year from 2021

to 2016.

Page | 191
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan is the part owner of many major companies such Pak-Arab Pipeline Company Limited

(Equity Held: 12%), Asia Petroleum Limited (Equity Held: 49%) and Pak Grease Manufacturing

Company (Private) Limited (Equity Held: 49.26%).

Year 2020-2021:

The long-term investments decreased (1.3%) from the year 2020 to 2021 but in 2020

there was an increase (29.72%) in the long-term investments.

• Gain on revaluation of investment in Pak Arab Pipeline Company (2020): Pakistan

State Oil (PSO) has signed multiple infrastructural MoUs of strategic importance with

Pak Arab Refinery Limited (PARCO) and Pak Arab Pipeline Company (PAPCO)

which aim to safeguard the country’s petroleum product supply chain and enable

economical and environment friendly transportation of fuels.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021-2020)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40089628/pso-enters-into-strategic-partnership-with-

parco-papco

Year 2018-2019:

Page | 192
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The long-term investments increased (86.6%) from the year 2018 to 2019 and in 2018 there was

an increase (9.01%) in the long-term investments.

• PSO acquired 84 million shares from Shell: Before 2019, majority of PRL's shares

were held primarily held by PSO, Shell and Hascol together hold over 70 percent of the

shares. However, it FY19, Pakistan State Oil Company Limited (PSO) acquired 84

million shares from Shell Petroleum Company Limited, UK, which increased its

shareholding in the Company to 52.68 percent, making PSO the parent company of

PRL. The table gives the breakdown of the shareholding.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019-18)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/554526

Year 2017-2016:

The long-term investments decreased majorly (91.2%) from the year 2017 to 2016 and in

2016 there was a decrease (1.08%) in the long-term investments.

• Investments from Asia Petroleum Limited Increased

• PSO invested in Pakistan Investment Bonds that matured in 2017: This represents

investment in Pakistan Investment Bonds (PIBs) amounting to Rs. 45,906,112 made in

Page | 193
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

June 2013 in accordance with plan duly approved by the Economic Coordination

Committee (ECC) -Government of Pakistan (GoP) out of the proceeds received against

partial settlement of circular debt issue then prevailing in the energy sector.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017-16)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1291463

Page | 194
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Formation of investor friendly policies for OMCs Increase

Recovery from pandemic resulted in profits for OMCs Increase

Provision of 11.73Bn PDC to OMC will improve profits Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of long term

investments of all five years of the companies is given below.

Total Long Term Investment of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 4,388,257 4,783,585 8,930,555 11,584,720 11,429,516

HTL 35,813,717 0 0 0 61,658,100

APL 1,198,044 1,137,657 903,965 807,973 842,469

BPL 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 41,400,018 5,921,242 9,834,520 12,392,693 73,930,085

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Long Term Investments

Page | 195
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 28.66%

HTL 67.93%

APL 3.41%

BPL 0.00%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Long Term Investments

Total Market Share of Long Term Investments


80.00%

70.00% 67.93%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%
28.66%
30.00%

20.00%

10.00%
3.41%
0.00%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above clearly tells us that HTL has the highest number of long term

investments in the industry and the second place has been secured by PSO. However, if HTL is

Page | 196
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

considered an outlier, PSO would have the highest market share in terms of long term

investments in the industry.

PSO’s Long Term Investments Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Graph Indicating PSO’s Long Term Investments Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


100.00%
93.48%
90.00% 90.81%

80.00% 80.79%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%
15.46%
10.00% 10.60%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: The graph given above indicates the long term investments of the company have

increased after 2017. However, these investments dropped considerably in 2021. These were not

Page | 197
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

as low as they were in 2017 however. These investments were highest in 2020. This is majorly

because HTL had zero long term investments in these years so PSO had a bigger share.

Yearly Change/Growth in Long Term Investments of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth -91.25% 9.01% 86.69% 29.72% -1.34%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Long Term Investments of PSO

Page | 198
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly PPE Growth


100.00%
86.69%
80.00%

60.00%

40.00%
29.72%
20.00%
9.01%
0.00% -1.34%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-20.00%

-40.00%

-60.00%

-80.00%
-91.25%
-100.00%

-120.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the long term investments were the highest in 2019 for PSO.

They grew substantially. This can be closely linked with an increase in the PPE to the maximum

figure in 2019 as well. The growth in the investments dropped in 2020 due to the pandemic.

However, there was a slight drop in the investments in 2021. In the other years, these grew at a

steady rate.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Long Term Investments Overtime


Page | 199
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth -19.04% -85.70% 66.09% 26.01% 496.56%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Long Term Investments Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


600.00%

500.00% 496.56%

400.00%

300.00%

200.00%

100.00%
66.09%
26.01%
0.00%
-19.04%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-85.70%
-100.00%

-200.00%

Page | 200
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The long term investments of the industry were the absolute highest in 2021. This was

majorly because of the investments made by HTL which increased the overall figure for the

industry. Several changes were being made in 2021.

Factors Affecting Long Tern Investments

Lower Investments in 2020 due to the Oil Crisis Catered to in 2021 by Revising Policies

There were low investments in 2020 because the OMCs were unable to make profits. They were

incurring losses in a time when they could be way too profitable. The oil prices fell in 2020 in

the international market and all the countries were importing oil. However, our government

imposed a ban on the import of oil. When the whole world was buying petrol and diesel and

filling up their tanks, Pakistan was struggling to meet its requirements due to the ban imposed by

the then DG Oil, the OMAP chairman said. Officials demanded acceptance of their demands on

priority basis and measures to check rupee slide against dollar as OMCs were suffering massive

foreign exchange losses because of its rapid depreciation. The industry has already suffered

losses of more than Rs. 60 billion and a mechanism must be immediately implemented to address

this anomaly. They also stressed there was an immediate need to introduce investor-friendly

policies to encourage OMCs to invest in outlets to provide quality fuels at the right price and in

the right quantity alongside best services. They said the government was leading the country’s

economy in right direction through its policies and the OMC’s fully supported it in every aspect.

Page | 201
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook:

The fact that they stressed on the need of introducing investor friendly policies which would

encourage the OMCs to invest in the refineries and other long term investment tools tells us that

the long term investments of the OMC industry is expected to increase in the future.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/899070-omcs-pin-2020-petroleum-crisis-on-energy-

ministry

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1685713

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1785845

Net Profits Left Room for Investments in 2021

After 2020, when the lockdowns were lifted and economic activity prospered, the OMCs were

making profits again and PSO made profits in trillion figures. This allowed the OMCs to

experience a growth in the long term investments and they could finally make the pending

decisions. The FY21 showed healthy recovery in the sale of the petroleum products (HSD and

MS Petrol) that was on a decline in the preceding FY19 and FY20. Overall sales stood higher by

18 percent compared to the previous year, meaning more tax revenue.

Future Outlook:

Page | 202
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The long term investments of the company are expected to increase in the near future due to the

availability of higher profits. Moreover, the fact that the OMCs will be keeping higher margins

as well would also increase their profits, leaving more room for investments to be made.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1665684

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40136818

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/53837512

11.73Bn Worth of PDC Approved for OMCs in Early 2022

The price differential claim given to the OMCs would help in increasing their profits and would

leave more chances for investments in their fixed assets and other decisions that were previously

pending. The ECC of the Cabinet considered the summary submitted by Petroleum Division on

March 7, 2022 which approved the procedure for making PDC payment to the OMCs and

refineries. The ECC approved a special PDC payment procedure to pay the PDC speedily. In this

regard, the PSO has informed that the PDC is generated through sale of petroleum products

therefore; OMCs will be at loss if PDC reimbursement is based on procurement rather than sales.

Private OMCs may shy away from the market and stop selling products in market. The PSO is of

the opinion that the consumers will only realise the benefit of the PDC when the product is sold

by the OMCs and mere procurement will not be sufficient. On March 1, 2022, the Oil

Page | 203
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Companies Advisory Council (OCAC) in a letter to the Petroleum Division stated, “In order to

avoid imminent shortage of petroleum products, we request that the PDC element should be

removed by revising petroleum product prices immediately or alternatively a subsidy mechanism

be founded”.

Future Outlook:

If the government keeps its promise of providing the PDC claims, the OMCs would have nothing

to worry about. Foreign exchange losses impact their profits to a great extent and this leaves a

lower margin for investments to be made by the companies. The long term investments can be

increased with increase in profits by PDC claims.

Source:

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40161047/omcs-pdcs-up-to-mar-31st-ecc-approves-

another-rs1173bn-as-suppl-grant

➢ https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/04/19/ecc-approves-rs68-billion-grant-for-

disbursement-of-price-differential-claims-to-omcs/

➢ https://newztodays.com/pso-payment/

➢ https://dailytimes.com.pk/901753/ecc-approves-rs8-2-billion-ramzan-relief-package/

Page | 204
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 205
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

60,000,000.00

50,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

30,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

LT Investments Naïve Forecast

Chart Title
2,500.00%

2,000.00%

1,500.00%

1,000.00%

500.00%

0.00%
2014
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

(500.00%)

Page | 206
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

60,000,000.00

50,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

30,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

0.00
2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Series1 Series2

Page | 207
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Long Term Loans, Advances

and other receivable

Breakdown:

Long-Term Loans, Advances and Other Receivables 2021 Vertical Analysis

Loans - considered good

Executives 153,715 37.23%

Employees 332,323 80.48%

486,038 117.71%

Current portion shown under current assets -176,260 -42.69%

309,778 75.02%

Advances - considered good (secured)

Employees 80,042 19.39%

Page | 208
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Current portion shown under current assets -25,303 -6.13%

54,739 13.26%

Other receivables

Considered good 48,387 11.72%

Considered doubtful 8,143 1.97%

56,530 13.69%

Provision for impairment -8,143 -1.97%

48,387 11.72%

412,904 100.00%

Page | 209
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (5.41%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Long-Term Loans and

Advances -10.12% 32.53% -13.03% -3.22% 18.79% 7.48%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.10%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Long-Term Loans and

Advances 0.10% 0.12% 0.08% 0.10% 0.10% 0.10%

Forecasted Values

After analyzing the historical data and taking into consideration the industry analysis of the

company, we have assumed that the account will decrease between 10-13% for the next 5 years.

This has been mainly on account of the reversal of loans during the pandemic as well as the

recovery from other receivables, among other factors.

Page | 210
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Decrease in the loans to Executives Decrease

Decrease in the loans Decrease

Increase in the advances given to the Employees Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average

of 0.10% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 5.41% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Long Term Loans and Advances


500,000
450,000
400,000
350,000
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Page | 211
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the

long-term loans and advances of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

After analyzing the horizontal analysis of long-term loans and advances, we see a

decrease of 10.2%. Factors will be discussed below;

• Decrease in the loans to Executives by 2%.

• Decrease in the loans to Employees by 10%.

• Increase in the advances given to the Employees by 40.3%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

After analyzing the horizontal analysis of long-term loans and advances, we see an

increase of 32.53%. Factors will be discussed below;

• Increase in the loans to Executives by 37%.

• Increase in the loans to Employees by 58%.

• Decrease in the advances given to the Employees by 15.25%.

Source:

Page | 212
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

After analyzing the horizontal analysis of long-term loans and advances, we see a

decrease of 13.03%. Factors will be discussed below;

• Decrease in the loans to Executives by 4%.

• Increase in the loans to Employees by 3%.

• Decrease in the advances given to the Employees by 17.02%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

After analyzing the horizontal analysis of long-term loans and advances, we see a

decrease of 3.2%. Factors will be discussed below;

• Decrease in the loans to Executives by 50%.

• Increase in the loans to Employees by 271%.

• Decrease in the advances given to the Employees by 9.16%.

Source:

Page | 213
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

After analyzing the horizontal analysis of long-term loans and advances, we see an

increase of 18.8%. Factors will be discussed below;

• Increase in the loans to Executives by 42%.

• Increase in the loans to Employees by 44%.

• Decrease in the advances given to the Employees by 11.08%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

After analyzing the horizontal analysis of long-term loans and advances, we see an

increase of 7.48%. Factors will be discussed below;

• Increase in the loans to Executives by 17%.

• Decrease in the loans to Employees by 30%.

• Increase in the advances given to the Employees by 50.58%.

Source:

Page | 214
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 215
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Reversal of loans taken by employees during the pandemic Decrease

Receivables recovered under other receivables section Decrease

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of long term loans

and advances of all five years of the companies is given below.

Total Long Term Loans, Advances and Other Receivables of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 411,777 398,525 346,617 459,376 412,904

HTL 1,049,136 280,132 0 0 0

APL 299,733 423,396 0 0 0

BPL 1,030 1,466 894 353 488

TOTAL 1,761,676 1,103,519 347,511 459,729 413,392

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Long Term Loans and Advances and

Other Receivables

Page | 216
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 49.66%

HTL 32.53%

APL 17.70%

BPL 0.10%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Long Term Loans and Advances and Other

Receivables

Page | 217
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


60.00%

49.66%
50.00%

40.00%
32.53%
30.00%

20.00% 17.70%

10.00%

0.10%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above tells us that PSO is the leader when it comes to long term loans

and advances being offered. HTL was not able to surpass PSO for this particular account. The

lowest market share is with BPL.

PSO’s Long Term Loans, Advances and Other Receivables Share in the Industry w.r.t

Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly Share 23.37% 36.11% 99.74% 99.92% 99.88%

Page | 218
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating PSO’s Long Term Loans, Advances and Other Receivables Share in the

Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


120.00%

100.00% 99.74% 99.92% 99.88%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%
36.11%

23.37%
20.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that this account has had an increasing trend

throughout the years. However, now, the share of PSO with respect to the industry is stagnant

Page | 219
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

and is not increasing as it was earlier. Nevertheless, the loans and advances are high of the

company if compared with the industry.

Yearly Change/Growth in Long Term Loans, Advances and Other Receivables of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 18.79% -3.22% -13.03% 32.53% -10.12%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Long Term Loans, Advances and Other Receivables

of PSO

PSO Yearly LTLAOR Growth


40.00%

32.53%
30.00%

20.00%
18.79%

10.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-3.22%

-10.00% -10.12%
-13.03%

-20.00%

Page | 220
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that there is no fixed pattern in the growth of LTLAOR of PSO.

These were the highest in 2020 among all yeas and were lowest in the 2019. However, the figure

has dropped for PSO to a great extent.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Long Term Loans, Advances and Other Receivables

Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly Growth -55.91% -37.36% -68.51% 32.29% -10.08%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Long Term Investments Overtime

Page | 221
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


40.00%
32.29%

20.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.08%
-20.00%

-40.00% -37.36%

-55.91%
-60.00%
-68.51%

-80.00%

Analysis: Since PSO is the major contributor of the industry’s LTLAOR, the industry followed

somewhat a similar pattern as compared to PSO as well. These were the highest in 2020, lowest

in 2019. Currently, they are growing at a decreasing rate.

Factors affecting Long term Loans, Advances and Other Receivable

Lower Loans and Advances Approved for Employees Post Pandemic

According to the directors reports of all the companies mentioned above, several loans and

advances were provided to the employees because of the pandemic crisis. The companies they

Page | 222
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

were working at were the last resort of them. Due to this, as we can see that the market share of

PSO is the highest for this account, PSO gave out the most loans and advances to its employees

in that period of time. However, this will drop in the future because this happened as a result of a

crisis. These levels were low in the beginning as well.

Repayment of Loans and Advances taken by Employees of OMCs

There was a drop in the receivables which were considered good and which were considered

doubtful. This happened mainly because the employees returned the loans that they took from

the companies at the right time without any delays.

Future Outlook:

OMCs would give out more loans and advances if the country faces another pandemic or a crisis

of similar manner. Other than that, the chance of this account increasing is very low. In the

future, if the employees take loans or advances from the companies, they can be trusted as they

would return the amount on time.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ Director’s Report HTL

➢ Director’s Report APL

Page | 223
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Director’s Report BPL

➢ https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/05/05/world/covid-19-brings-unforseen-crisis

Page | 224
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 225
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

700,000.00

600,000.00

500,000.00

400,000.00

300,000.00

200,000.00

100,000.00

0.00
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Long term loans Naïve Forecast

Page | 226
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%

2015

2019

2023
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2016
2017
2018

2020
2021
2022

2024
2025
2026
(10.00%)

(20.00%)

(30.00%)

Page | 227
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Chart Title
700,000.00
600,000.00
500,000.00
400,000.00
300,000.00
200,000.00
100,000.00
0.00
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Series1 Series2

Page | 228
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Long Term Deposits and

Prepayments

Breakdown:

Long-term deposits 2021 Vertical Analysis

Long-term deposits 357,041 100.00%

Page | 229
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (20.58%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Long-Term Deposits and 56.29% -35.29% 60.19% 11.98% - 40.79%

Prepayments 10.45%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.07%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Long-Term Deposits and 0.09% 0.06% 0.08% 0.05% 0.05% 0.06%

Prepayments

Forecasted Values

After analyzing the historical data and taking into account all the factors that can affect the

account, we assume that the account will increase between 25-30% for the next 5 years. This can

Page | 230
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

also be supported through the trend line shown below which depicts that the account has an

increasing trend.

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
(20.00%)

(40.00%)

(60.00%)

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Long Term Deposits increased Increase

Prepaid Rental Increased Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average

of 0.07% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 20.58% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Page | 231
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Long-Term Deposits and Prepayments


400000

350000

300000

250000

200000

150000

100000

50000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Long-

Term Deposits and Prepayments of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

There was an increase of 56.29% in the year 2021,

• Long Term Deposits increased by 56.29%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

Page | 232
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

There was a decrease of 35.29% in the year 2020,

• Long Term Deposits increased by 35.29%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was an increase of 60.19% in the year 2019,

• Long Term Deposits increased by 40.1%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

There was an increase of 11.98% in the year 2018,

• Long Term Deposits increased by 20.6%.

• Prepaid Rental Increased by 7.18%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:
Page | 233
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

There was a decrease of 11.98% in the year 2017,

• Prepaid Rental Decreased by 14.8%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

There was an increase of 40.79% in the year 2016,

• Long Term Deposits increased by 5.88%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 234
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Deposits to increase with an increase in long term investments for Increase

PPE

Deposits kept for the refineries to ensures uninterrupted supply Increase

Rising interest rates make deposits attractive Increase

Prepayments of rented storage capacity to increase Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of long term

deposits and prepayments of all five years of the companies is given below.

Total Long Term Deposits and Prepayments of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 196,816 220,399 353,058 228,454 357,041

HTL 59,083,196 41,092,506 28,460,350 9,719,718 29,401,655

APL 29,928 3,922 46,860 128,555 227,617

BPL 69,986 100,839 122,761 122,761 3,174

Page | 235
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

TOTAL 59,379,926 41,417,666 28,983,029 10,199,488 29,989,487

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Long Term Deposits and

Prepayments

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 0.80%

HTL 98.70%

APL 0.26%

BPL 0.25%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Long Term Deposits and Prepayments

Page | 236
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


120.00%

98.70%
100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.80% 0.26% 0.25%


0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest level of long term deposits

and prepayments as compared to other companies. PSO, is at second place in this case.

PSO’s Long Term Deposits and Prepayments Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 0.33% 0.53% 1.22% 2.24% 1.19%

Page | 237
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating PSO’s Long Term Deposits and Prepayments Share in the Industry w.r.t

Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


2.50%

2.24%

2.00%

1.50%

1.22% 1.19%
1.00%

0.50% 0.53%
0.33%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that this account has had an increasing trend

throughout till 2020. After 2020, the company’s share in terms of the industry fell and that was

majorly because HTL took the lead with a sharp increase in its LTDP.

Yearly Change/Growth in Long Term Deposits and Prepayments of PSO

Page | 238
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly PPE

Growth -10.45% 11.98% 60.19% -35.29% 56.29%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Long Term Deposits and Prepayments of PSO

PSO Yearly LTDP Growth


80.00%

60.00% 60.19%
56.29%

40.00%

20.00%
11.98%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.45%
-20.00%

-35.29%
-40.00%

-60.00%

Page | 239
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that there is no fixed pattern in the growth of LTDP of PSO. The

long term deposits and prepayments decreased significantly in 2020. However, they have had an

increasing trend in the previous years. After 2020, the account restores to increasing again.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Long Term Deposits and Prepayments Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth -41.66% -30.25% -30.02% -64.81% 194.03%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Long Term Deposits and Prepayments

Overtime

Page | 240
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


250.00%

200.00%
194.03%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-30.25% -30.02%
-41.66%
-50.00%
-64.81%

-100.00%

Analysis: The long term deposits and prepayments of all the OMCs have increased in 2021. The

industry had an upward trend throughout but it dropped considerably in 2020. It was the highest

in 2021 as compared to all other years.

Factors affecting Long Term Deposits

Long Term Deposits kept for Oil Refineries to Ensure Uninterrupted Oil Supply

This particular element is very important for the OMC industry. The companies have heavy

amounts of payables in their financial statements which are due to the oil refineries. Due to this,

Page | 241
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

when the OMCs are in need of more oil, they ask for it through providing deposits as a guarantee

that they will be paying them for the oil that they have purchased. This allows them to reduce the

trust deficit to some extent. Nauman Ali Butt, the secretary general of the association, said none

of the oil companies except Pakistan State Oil (PSO) were supplying fuel to the dealers. Butt

claimed that all private companies had suspended their operations and that PSO was the only

supplier currently operation in the province. PSO was struggling to manage oil supplies, owing

to its increasing liquidity crisis as international oil suppliers demanded hard currency from the

cash-strapped state-run entity for fresh supplies as well as higher premiums on delayed

payments.

Future Outlook

The payables of the OMCs are expected to increase in the future which would mean that the trust

deficit of the refineries would increase as well due to which the long term deposits would have to

increase as well in the future.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1686772

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1687789

➢ https://arynews.tv/ogra-rejects-speculations-of-fuel-shortage-in-pakistan/

Page | 242
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/950004-fuel-shortage-feared-as-subsidy-payments-

stuck-in-pipeline

Increase in Deposits as a Result of Increase in PPE and Long Term Investments

There is a direct link between these three accounts. We have already established that an increase

in PPE is taking place due to an increase in the long term investments. After the Hascol case,

banks have become reluctant in lending loans for financing to companies. So, OMCs have to

place deposits in the banks in order to get financing from them.

Future Outlook

The deposits are expected to increase in the future because the OMCs and the government is

working on the upgradation of the refineries and the fixed assets of the OMCs to strengthen the

bone of exports for the country in terms of oil.

Sources:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1659548

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1643211

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2331075/govt-gives-in-to-petrol-dealers-demands

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2341681/refineries-demand-more-financing

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2345893/banks-reluctant-to-open-lcs-for-oil-import

Page | 243
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Rising Interest Rates make Long Term Deposits an Attractive Investment

Companies usually buy long term deposits because when the cost of borrowing money increase,

saving money becomes more attractive. The interest rates in Pakistan have been increasing ever

since. This only means that in the future the long term deposits are expected to increase if the

companies want to take advantage of high interest rates.

Sources:

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2351831/high-interest-rate-will-destroy-economy

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2355353/economy-to-face-further-pressure

➢ https://www.fitchratings.com/research/sovereigns/pakistans-political-volatility-adds-to-

external-financing-risk-12-04-2022

➢ https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/economic-fallout-of-pakistan

Increase in Prepayment of Rented Storage Capacity

When the refineries went on strike in 2019 and 2020, OMCs had to rely on rented storage

capacity and for that they had to make prepayments. This has been increasing since a very long

time because the OMCs have high payables and the refineries demand their money which the

OMCs are unable to provide. So, rented capacities are the only option that they are left with.

Future Outlook

Page | 244
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

This is expected to increase as the upgradation is showing delays for the refineries and any time

now the refineries can go on strike. PSO and other OMCs would have to rely on rented storage

capacities after that.

Source:

➢ https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/03/01/chairman-ogra-calls-urgent-meeting-of-

omcs-refineries-to-discuss-oil-price-related-matters/

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40135972/petrol-pumps-in-lahore-partial-strike-

observed

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2307103/oil-transporters-govt-to-begin-negotiations

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2330681/countrywide-petrol-strike-on-nov-25

➢ https://propakistani.pk/2022/02/23/refinery-shortage-is-imminent-in-pakistan/

Page | 245
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 246
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

400,000.00

350,000.00

300,000.00

250,000.00

200,000.00

150,000.00

100,000.00

50,000.00

0.00
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

LT Deposits Naïve Forecast

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
2015

2019

2023
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2016
2017
2018

2020
2021
2022

2024
2025
2026

(20.00%)

(40.00%)

(60.00%)

Page | 247
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 248
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

450,000.00
400,000.00
350,000.00
300,000.00
250,000.00
200,000.00
150,000.00
100,000.00
50,000.00
0.00
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Series1 Series2

Page | 249
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Deferred Tax Asset – net

Breakdown:

Deferred Tax Asset 2021 Vertical Analysis

Taxable temporary difference in respect of:

Accelerated tax depreciation -1,603,384 -12.16%

Investment in associates accounted for under

equity method -464,144 -3.52%

Equity investment held as FVOCI -1,524,813 -11.57%

Right-of-use assets -1,518,340 -11.52%

Fair value of net assets acquired on acquisition -117,710 -0.89%

Deductible temporary difference in respect of:

Page | 250
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Provision for:

Tax amortization 1,369 0.01%

Lease Liabilities 1,565,540 11.88%

Impairment of Stores and spares 20,713 0.16%

Provision for slow moving products 25,967 0.20%

Impairment on trade debts 996,872 7.56%

Impairment on other Receivables 934,989 7.09%

Retirement and other service benefits 1,661,290 12.60%

Excise, taxes and other duties 21,121 0.16%

Liabilities offered for taxation 12,070,807 91.57%

Recoupable carried forward tax loss 1,109,313 8.42%

Recoupable minimum turnover Tax - -

others 2,361 0.02%

13,181,951 100.00%

Horizontal Analysis: Average (10.83%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Deferred Tax Asset -21.76% 42.12% 1.25% -1.71% 10.42% 34.66%

Page | 251
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Vertical Analysis: Average (3.23%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Deferred Tax Asset 3.18% 4.49% 2.61% 2.91% 3.04% 3.15%

Forecasted Values

After analyzing the historical data and taking all the factors which might affect the account into

consideration, we assume that the account will decrease between 22-25% as shown above. This c

is also supported by the trendline graph below.

1,400.00%

1,200.00%

1,000.00%

800.00%

600.00%

400.00%

200.00%

0.00%
2013
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

(200.00%)

(400.00%)

Page | 252
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Decrease in credit/debit balances Decrease

Decrease in the impairment on other Receivables Decrease

Decrease in Liabilities offered for taxation Decrease

Subsidiaries provided by the GoP Increase

Exchange loss due to rupee devaluation Decrease

Increase in the provision for retirement and other Increase

service benefits

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

3.23% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 10.83% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Page | 253
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Deferred Tax Asset


18,000,000
16,000,000
14,000,000
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the deferred

Tax Asset of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

Upon analyzing the Deferred Tax Asset, it can be seen from the horizontal analysis that there

was a decrease of 21.76% due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in credit/debit balances: There was a decrease of 0.4% on account of

accelerated depreciation allowance.

• Decrease in the impairment on other Receivables: There was a decrease of 17.3%.

• Decrease in Liabilities offered for taxation: There was a decrease of 6.9%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Page | 254
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2020:

Upon analyzing the Deferred Tax Asset, it can be seen from the horizontal analysis that there

was an increase of 42.1% due to the following reasons;

• Increase in credit/debit balances: There was an increase of 283.9% on account of

accelerated depreciation allowance.

• Incremental minimum tax paid and unused tax losses: Increase in Deferred tax asset

due to recognition of deferred tax asset on incremental minimum tax paid and unused tax

losses.

• Subsidiaries provided by the GoP: Due to the on going pandemic COVID-19,

Government has provided subsidiaries to PSO.

• Decrease in the impairment on other Receivables: There was a decrease of 8.3%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

Upon analyzing the Deferred Tax Asset, it can be seen from the horizontal analysis that there

was an increase of 1.25% due to the following reasons;

Page | 255
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Increase in credit/debit balances: There was an increase of 5.47% on account of

accelerated depreciation allowance.

• Increase in the provision for impairment of stores and spares: Increased by 22.4%.

• Increase in the provision for slow moving products: Increased by 7.4%.

• Increase in the provision for retirement and other service benefits: Increased by

57.7%.

• Increase in the provision for excise, taxes and other duties: Increased by 7.40%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

Upon analyzing the Deferred Tax Asset, it can be seen from the horizontal analysis that there

was a decrease of 1.71% due to the following reasons;

• Increase in credit/debit balances: There was an increase of 7.71% on account of

accelerated depreciation allowance.

• Exchange loss due to rupee devaluation and future corporate rates: Deferred Tax

Asset reduced due to Future corporate rates of tax by Rs. 1.3 billion, exchange loss due to

rupee devaluation and significant reduction in mark-up/interest received from PIBs due to

their maturity in July 2017. The aforesaid decline in PIBs interest was, however,
Page | 256
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

mitigated by decline in Finance. One time reversal of deferred tax asset due to decline in

future corporate tax rates to 25% by FY 2023 (1% in each tax year).

• Decrease in the provision for tax amortization: Decreased by 28%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/amp/4625968

Year 2017:

Upon analyzing the Deferred Tax Asset, it can be seen from the horizontal analysis that there

was an increase of 10.42% due to the following reasons;

• Increase in credit/debit balances: There was an increase of 2.73% on account of

accelerated depreciation allowance.

• Increase in the provision for retirement and other service benefits: Increased by

14%.

• Increase in liabilities offered for taxation: Increase by 7.3%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

Page | 257
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Upon analyzing the Deferred Tax Asset, it can be seen from the horizontal analysis that there

was an increase of 34.6% due to the following reasons;

• Increase in credit/debit balances: There was an increase of 7.51% on account of

accelerated depreciation allowance.

• Increase in the provision for retirement and other service benefits: Increased by

13.65%.

• Increase in liabilities offered for taxation: Increase by 40%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Decrease in carried forward tax loss of OMCs Decrease

Decrease in minimum turnover tax Decrease

Improved Profitability of Subsidiary Company Decrease

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value deferred taxation of

all five years of the companies is given below.

Page | 258
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Deferred Taxation of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 11,912,602 11,709,058 11,854,947 16,848,132 13,181,951

HTL 0 0 0 107,956,234 48,245,631

APL 0 0 0 936,005 0

BPL 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 11,912,602 11,709,058 11,854,947 125,740,371 61,427,582

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Deferred Taxation

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 29.42%

HTL 70.16%

APL 0.42%

BPL 0.00%

Page | 259
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Deferred Taxation

Total Market Share


80.00%

70.16%
70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

29.42%
30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.42% 0.00%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of deferred

taxation in their accounts. PSO is at second place.

Page | 260
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO’s Deferred Taxation Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 13.40% 21.46%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Deferred Taxation Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


120.00%

100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00% 21.46%
13.40%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 261
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates for the first three years, only PSO had deferred

taxation in their accounts. However, after 2019, their share dropped when HTL’s deferred

taxation increased as well.

Yearly Change/Growth in Deferred Taxation of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly PPE

Growth 10.42% -1.71% 1.25% 42.12% -21.76%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Deferred Taxation of PSO

Page | 262
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly Deferred Tax Growth


50.00%

42.12%
40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00% 10.42%

0.00% 1.25%
-1.71%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-10.00%

-20.00%
-21.76%

-30.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that deferred tax fell in 2018 grew in 2019. It was the highest in

2020 but dropped and was the lowest in 2021 in all five years.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Deferred Taxation Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 263
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly

Growth 9.37% -1.71% 1.25% 960.66% 262.45%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Deferred Taxation Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


1200.00%

1000.00%
960.66%

800.00%

600.00%

400.00%

262.45%
200.00%

0.00% 9.37% -1.71% 1.25%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-200.00%

Page | 264
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The deferred taxation was the highest in 2020. It was majorly because of sharp

increase in HTL’s deferred taxation and PSO’s taxation as well. In 2021, this dropped for both

the OMCs. We can also see a decreasing trend from 2017-2019.

Factors affecting Deferred Tax

Decrease in Carried Forward Tax Losses of OMCs Post Pandemic

When the OMCs experienced net losses, they also experienced tax losses because they had no

income to pay taxes from in the first place. These tax losses were carried forward by the

companies and were used to increase their profitability in 2021. This can be seen by an increase

in the taxable income of the OMCs. The oil industry says that the oil commission report ignored

key factors of the fuel shortage. It says that the commission ignored the unprecedented Covid-19

impact on product planning, procurement and supplies. The Petroleum Division disallowed

imports during April 2020 as 70% HSD and 40% PMG were imported. This uncalled-for ban and

the subsequent delay in permission affected the supply chain and the stock level of OMCs started

to decline drastically. The overall sales of the companies were extremely low due to this and

hence they incurred losses as well.

Future Outlook

Page | 265
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The OMCs would use the deferred tax asset to increase their profitability in the future. The asset

increased due to the pandemic; otherwise it had a decreasing trend and would continue having

one in the future.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1684732

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1427499

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2318147/fia-seeks-help-in-probe-into-omcs

Decrease in Carried Forward Minimum Turnover Tax for OMCs

Four different types of changes have been made in this regime through the Finance Act 2021.

One of them is generalized reduction in minimum turnover tax paid from 1.5 percent to 1.25

percent. This took place in 2021. In a report, Islamabad Policy Institute (IPI) said the turnover

tax is effectively negating the provisions of Section 57 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and is

putting a significant additional financial burden on the long-term viability of the regulated

petroleum sector. The fixed margin for OMCs on petrol and HSD in Rs2.97 against retail prices

of Rs108.56 for petrol and Rs110.76 for HSD. The rate of 0.75 percent of turnover is excessive

as the OMCs are bound to sell the goods on fixed margin which constitutes less than 3 percent of

the turnover and where margin is less than 3 percent of the turnover (meaning gross profit lesser

Page | 266
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

than 3 percent of turnover) imposition of minimum tax at the rate of 0.75 percent of the turnover

is harsh and exorbitant. The objective of minimum tax is to require the companies which suffered

loss or made low profit during a tax year to contribute reasonable amount in relation to their

respective turnover towards the government exchequer during that year something they would be

entitled to adjust against normal tax liability of subsequent years.

Future Outlook

The turnover tax has been reduced by the government. This means very minimal levels of

turnover taxes will be carried forward in the future. This would decrease the deferred taxation as

well in the future.

Sources:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1637927

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40104989#:~:text=Four%20different%20types%20of%

20changes,pay%20minimum%20tax%3B%20(III)

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/839984-omcs-pay-significantly-higher-than-

corporate-tax-rates

Use of Deferred Tax Assets for Subsidiaries of OMCs

Page | 267
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The deferred tax asset can be used to increase the profitability by reducing the taxable income.

That is exactly what the OMCs have done in 2021. For example, PSO has increased the

profitability of its subsidiary Pakistan Refinery Limited by using its carried forward tax losses

and turnover taxes. This is why in 2021, the value was lower.

Future Outlook

Deferred tax assets are expected to fall because OMCs would use these carried forward losses in

the future as well because they can face similar unforeseen issues in the future as well.

Sources:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/952209-pakistan-refinery-profit-soars-over-9-fold-in-

q3fy22

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/954116-pso-s-q3-net-profit-soars-273pc-to-rs32-58bn

➢ https://propakistani.pk/2022/04/28/pso-posts-record-breaking-profits-for-9-months-of-

fy22/

Page | 268
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 269
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

18,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
12,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Deferred tax Naïve Forecast

1,400.00%

1,200.00%

1,000.00%

800.00%

600.00%

400.00%

200.00%

0.00%
2025
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

2026

(200.00%)

(400.00%)

Page | 270
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 271
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

25,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

5,000,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Series1 Series2

Page | 272
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Retirement Benefits

Page | 273
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (11.32%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Retirement Benefits 79.25% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.10%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Retirement Benefits 0.36% 0.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Forecasted Values

Since this is a new account, very little information is available hence only a general company

analysis has been done according to which the account has been increased within a range of 60-

70% at a decreasing rate.

Page | 274
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in Gratuity and Pension Funds Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.10% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 11.32% due to the sudden increase.

Retirement Benefits
1600000

1400000

1200000

1000000

800000

600000

400000

200000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase of the Retirement Benefits

of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2020.

Year 2021-20:

Page | 275
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

An increase of 79.25% is seen after analyzing the Retirement Benefits from year 2021 to

2020. Due to the following reasons;

• Increase in Gratuity and Pension Funds: The company approved and fund pension

scheme for both management and non-management employees. The scheme provides

pension based on the employees last drawn salaries. Pension are payable for life. The

company also operates unfunded gratuity scheme for all its employees. There was an

increase of 40.2% in the Pension Funds given to ex-employees.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.ukessays.com/essays/commerce/pso-company-hrm-term-report-commerce-

essay.php

Page | 276
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

________________________

Page | 277
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Current Assets

Page | 278
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Stores, Spares & Loose Tools

Breakdown:

Stores, Spares, Chemicals and Loose Tools 2021 Vertical Analysis

Stores, spares, chemicals and loose tools 1,453,351 108.26%

Provision for obsolete / slow moving -110,870 -8.26%

1,342,481 100.00%

Page | 279
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (55.62%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Stores, Spares and Loose 35.39% 11.50% 270.57% 17.90% -7.05% 5.43%

Tools

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.16%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Stores, Spares and Loose 0.32% 0.26% 0.20% 0.06% 0.05% 0.06%

Tools

Forecasted values

After looking at all the industrial and economic factors which might affect the account as well as

the historical data, we assume that the account will increase between 15-25% for the next 5 years

that too at an increasing rate. This can mainly be accounted to increased demand of petroleum

products. This prediction can be supported by the trendline graph below.

Page | 280
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

300.00%

250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
(50.00%)

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Stores, spares, chemicals and loose tools Increase

increases

Increase in provision for obsolete / slow Increase

moving

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.16% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 55.62% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Page | 281
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Stores, Spares and Loose Tools


1600000

1400000

1200000

1000000

800000

600000

400000

200000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Stores,

Spares and Loose Tools of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

There was an increase of 35.39%, due to the following reasons;

• Stores, spares, chemicals and loose tools increases by 44.3%

• Increase in provision for obsolete / slow moving by 18%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

There was an increase of 11.50%, due to the following reasons;

Page | 282
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Stores, spares, chemicals and loose tools increases by 17.2%

• Increase in provision for obsolete / slow moving by 64.4%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was an increase of 270.5%, due to the following reasons;

• Stores, spares, chemicals and loose tools increases by 249.3%

• Increase in provision for obsolete / slow moving by 91.1%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

There was an increase of 17.9%, due to the following reasons;

• Stores increased by 15.3%

• Spares, chemicals and loose tools increases by 17.1%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Page | 283
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2017:

There was a decrease of 7.03%, due to the following reasons;

• Stores decreased by 6.04%

• Spares, chemicals and loose tools decreased by 7.61%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

There was an increase of 5.43%, due to the following reasons;

• Stores increased by 3.13%

• Spares, chemicals and loose tools increased by 3.30%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 284
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in retail outlets of all OMCs Increase

Investment in Petrochemical symposium by OMCs Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of stores, spares

and loose tools of all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Stores, Spares and Loose Tools of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 203,542 239,981 889,295 991,583 1,342,481

HTL 50,156,870 26,759,589 24,186,433 0 0

APL 48,658 75,841 92,287 12,460,539 12,865,862

BPL 5,800 2,606 2,415 2,215 3,873

TOTAL 50,414,870 27,078,017 25,170,430 13,454,337 14,212,216

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Stores, Spares and Loose Tools

Page | 285
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 2.81%

HTL 77.57%

APL 19.60%

BPL 0.01%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Stores, Spares and Loose Tools

Page | 286
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


90.00%

80.00% 77.57%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%
19.60%
20.00%

10.00%
2.81%
0.01%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of stores, spares

and loose tools in their accounts. APL is in the second place whereas PSO has the third position.

PSO’s Stores, Spares and Loose Tools Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 0.40% 0.89% 3.53% 7.37% 9.45%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Stores, Spares and Loose Tools Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Page | 287
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


10.00%
9.45%
9.00%

8.00%
7.37%
7.00%

6.00%

5.00%

4.00%
3.53%
3.00%

2.00%

1.00% 0.89%
0.40%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: The graph given above shows that there has been an increasing trend of PSO’s market

share with respect to the industry in terms of stores, spares and loose tools.

Yearly Change/Growth in Stores, Spares and Loose Tools of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly PPE

Growth -7.05% 17.90% 270.57% 11.50% 35.39%

Page | 288
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Stores, Spares and Loose Tools of PSO

PSO Yearly PPE Growth


300.00%

270.57%
250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%
35.39%
17.90%
11.50%
0.00% -7.05%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-50.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest growth of PSO’s stores, spares and loose tools took

place in 2019. However, there was a drop in 2020. In all other years, the account has increased.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Stores, Spares and Loose Tools Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 289
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly

Growth 10.73% 32.64% -7.04% -46.55% 5.63%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Stores, Spares and Loose Tools

Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


40.00%

32.64%
30.00%

20.00%

10.00% 10.73%
5.63%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-7.04%
-10.00%

-20.00%

-30.00%

-40.00%

-46.55%
-50.00%

-60.00%

Page | 290
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The stores spares and loose tools of the industry fell in 2019 majorly because of a fall

of this account at HTL’s end. However, after 2020, the industry’s trend for this account can be

seen to have increased as well.

Factors affecting Stock, Spare and Tools

New Retail Outlets Set to Start of Major OMCs in Pakistan

According to the Director’s report of PSO, BPL, APL etc. they are set to open more retail outlets

in the coming future. This would lead to an increase in this account over the period of time. PSO

in particular opened 71 new retail outlets. Every retail outlet would have its own shop stop which

would again lead to an increase in this account. APL too experienced a double digit growth in

2021 which would allow it to further expand its retail outlets across Pakistan.

Future Outlook

The retail outlets would not open in the future if another pandemic takes place. In 2020, the

account had the lowest figure. However, the account is expected to grow in the future as the

OMCs are set to make more profits by increasing their customer base.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ Director’s Report BPL

Page | 291
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Director’s Report APL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1666411

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/138472

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/164829

First Petrochemical Symposium seeks investments from OMCs

Currently, OMCs in Pakistan rely on imports for the chemicals in their production and

distribution. However, this new petrochemical symposium can help in reducing the import bill

and cost of these companies and act as a substitute. The symposium’s goal is to initiate a

conversation and spark interest in Pakistan’s petrochemical industry. The day’s schedule

includes a panel of specialists, including policymakers and corporate sector executives, who will

discuss the petrochemical industry’s prospects and how it may help Pakistan achieve exponential

economic growth. Pakistan is at a disadvantage because of its underdeveloped petrochemical

industry, which accounts for 5% of the country’s entire import bill. However, this industry

presents huge investment prospects to help Pakistan achieve long-term economic prosperity.

Future Outlook

The stores, spares and loose tools would definitely increase in the future because the OMCs have

enough buying power to cater to their needs of expansion.

Source:

Page | 292
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://newztodays.com/petrochemical-symposium-industry/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1638471

➢ https://nation.com.pk/2022/03/14/pakistans-first-petrochemical-symposium-to-be-held-

on-thursday/

➢ https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-

news/petrochemicals/050522-refinery-news-roundup-progress-on-new-plants-in-the-

middle-east

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Increase in Imports Increase

Currency Devaluation Increase

Inflation Increase

Stores, spares and loose tools are similar to inventory for PSO. This means that the factors which

affect the stock in trade for the company will also effect the stores, spares & loose tools.

Historically the account can be seen increasing which is of similar nature of that of stock in

trade. The economic reasons for this have been analyzed below.

Page | 293
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Increase in Imports

Keeping in mind the massive increase in demand, according to reports Pakistan is likely to see a

rise in the import of petroleum products

After a slight decline in the demand for petroleum products during 2020, the country recorded

highest every demand during 2021 despite the price hike. In order to meet the increasing

demand, the country would be importing diesel and petrol for local consumption as local supply

from the refineries would not be enough to meet demand. This was further reported in economic

times where it was mentioned that Pakistan’s oil import bill has surged over the past year.

Moreover according to the latest agreement with Saudi Find for Development, the country will

be importing petroleum products on deferred payments to meet the local demand. PSO being the

biggest OMC in the country accounts for most amount of imports which is also reflected in its

balance sheet. It could be seen that the stock in trade for the company declined when the imports

were less in 2020 while it rose by a significant amount in 2021 when the imports started to

increase on account of an increase in the demand.

Future Outlook

As has been reported by economic times and trading economics, the imports for the country are

only expected to increase in the future. According to other sources PARCO and NRL alone are

expected to import more than 30 million barrels of oil collectively. This along with the rising

Page | 294
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

energy crisis and increase in the demand for petroleum products is likely to keep the imports

high as is also illustrated in the graph below.

This would ultimately mean that PSO’s stock would continue to rise and could even reach a

record high, as compared to 2019 in order to meet the demand and energy needs of the people of

Pakistan.

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/imports

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/business/pakistan-oil-eatable-

import-bills-surge-by-60-per-cent/articleshow/90894283.cms

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1666786

Page | 295
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/929210-pakistan-may-import-500-000-tonnes-of-

petrol-next-month

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/947799-pakistan-to-import-32-7-million-barrels-oil-

under-sfd-programme

➢ https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-pakistan-oil-idINKCN2280FN

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1685377

Currency Devaluation

Currency devaluation plays a very important role in determining the buying power of any

company. A stronger currency ultimately means that the cost incurred will be lower while a weak

currency implies vice versa. In case of Pakistan, however the currency position has not been very

stable as the Pakistani Rupee has continued to devalue under the PTI government.

During 2018, the currency was trading at between $1 for Rs.122. However after the PTI

government came into power, there was record devaluation in the within the past 4 years as now

the dollar is trading at $1 for Rs.185. this ultimately meant that PSO enjoyed inventory gains as

the inventory which they had bought for cheap was now expensive, which is also reflected in the

balance sheet of the company where the company had the highest level of stock in trade in 2019,

which was right after the PTI government came into power and the rupee devalued

Future Outlook

Page | 296
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

In the future it is predicted that the Pakistani currency will continue to devalue by a further at

least 18%, as reported by trading economics. This ultimately implies that the cost of buying the

stock would increase, and at the same time the company will be enjoying inventory gains if the

rupee continues to devalue like this thus increasing the stock in trade in the future. The forecast

for currency devaluation against dollar is illustrated in the graph below.

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

➢ https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/under-imran-khan-govt-pakistani-rupee-depreciated-

by-30-5-per-cent-report-2640765

➢ https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/187-to-a-us-dollar-political-crisis-in-pakistan-led-

to-the-free-fall-of-its-currency-469545

Page | 297
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

International oil prices and Inflation

Since 2014 the international oil prices have seen the most significant volatility. The oil market

has taken on new features that affect the development of the global economy. According to EIA,

US shale oil production increased from 4.96 million barrels per day in 2017 to 5.59 million

barrels per day in 2022. In addition, there are geopolitical events, trade frictions, and OPEC’s

agreement have occurred in recent years, causing the volatility of oil price.

In a developing country like Pakistan, which has such high dependence on imported oil, an

increase in oil prices leads to inflationary pressure which in turn increases budget deficit making

imports more expensive. The government has refrained from passing on the complete price

increase to the consumers because it fears it will exacerbate inflation and stifle economic activity

which presents a significant challenge to the government’s plans of ending its tenure with a

strong growth phase.

This inflationary pressure and variances in the price of oil internationally has led to the company

enjoying inventory gains as the value of the already stock in hand increased, with the possibility

that the new stock also increases.

Future Outlook

Looking forward the international oil prices are forecasted to increase mainly on account of the

war between Russia and Ukraine, as can also be seen in the graph below which in turn means

Page | 298
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

that the inflation in the country will increase as well. Keeping in mind that the demand for

petroleum products is predicted to increase in the future, this in turn would also increase the sales

as has been predicted which would ultimately lead to the company increasing its stock in trade in

the future as well as enjoying inventory gains as has been reported in the director’s report.

Source:

➢ Director’s report, 2021

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/petroleum-prices-

in-pakistan-likely-to-increase-by-rs-10-per-litre/articleshow/89843799.cms

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/02/26/oil-prices-expected-to-increase-from-

march-1/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1677101

➢ https://www.geo.tv/latest/398774-petrol-price-expected-to-rise-in-pakistan-sources

Page | 299
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

➢ https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-021-00166-4

Page | 300
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 301
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1,600,000.00

1,400,000.00

1,200,000.00

1,000,000.00

800,000.00

600,000.00

400,000.00

200,000.00

0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Stores spares and tools Naïve Forecast

300.00%

250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2015

2019

2023
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2016
2017
2018

2020
2021
2022

2024
2025
2026

(50.00%)

Page | 302
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 303
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1,600,000.00

1,400,000.00

1,200,000.00

1,000,000.00

800,000.00

600,000.00

400,000.00

200,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Series1 Series2

Page | 304
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Stock in Trade

Page | 305
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Breakdown:

Vertical

Stock in Trade 2021 Analysis

Raw and packing material 9,385,377 10.55%

Petroleum and other products (gross) 56,966,018 64.05%

Less: Stock held on behalf of third parties -2,164,973 -2.43%

64,186,422 72.17%

Provision for slow moving products - -

Provision for write down to net realizable value - -

64,186,422 72.17%

In pipeline system of Pak-Arab Pipeline Company Limited 21,303,048 23.95%

and Pak-Arab Refinery Company Limited - net of loss 85,489,470 96.13%

Add: Charges incurred thereon 3,444,940 3.87%

88,934,410 100.00%

Page | 306
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (10.73%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Stock in Trade -

37.33% -34.49% 21.11% 23.04% 30.49% 13.09%

Vertical Analysis: Average (18.76%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Stock in Trade 21.49% 17.26% 21.79% 20.27% 16.90% 14.85%

Forecasted Values

Stock in trade is one of the major accounts of the company and thus holds great significance.

There were many industrial and economic factors which affected the account and all of them

have been taken into account. Some pf them caused the account to decrease while the others

caused the account to increase. However, the ones which caused increase were greater in number

Page | 307
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

hence we assume that the account will increase between 35-40% for the next 5 years as shown

above.

Page | 308
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Rise in international oil prices Increase

Increase in prices effected the GST Rate Increase

High Stock Levels Increase

Industrial Diesel Volume decreased Decrease

Reduction in the prices of petroleum products Decrease

Negative Volume Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

18.76% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 10.73% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Page | 309
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Stock in Trade
120,000,000

100,000,000

80,000,000

60,000,000

40,000,000

20,000,000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the Stock in

trade of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

There was an increase of 33% in 2021 as compared to the year 2020. The factors are discussed

below;

• Rise in international oil prices: The trend of International Oil Prices impacts the

financial performance of your Company and consequently the share price. Increasing

trend of oil prices may improve your Company’s financial performance and vice versa.

However, price trend impacts the Company’s performance in combination with stock and

sales situation.

Page | 310
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Increase in prices effected the GST Rate: The price of petrol in 2021 was Rs123.30 per

liter, while cost of supply of Pakistan State Oil (PSO) increased to Rs95.41 liter. Increase

in price also effected the GST rate, which increased to Rs11.76 per liter from Rs11.28 per

liter in the first half of September.

• High Stock Levels: Raw and Packaging material increased from 7,867,223 to 9,385,377.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40136350

Year 2020:

A drastic drip can be seen in terms of the stock in trade from 2019 to 2020, factors will be

discussed below;

• Negative Volume: Volume variance was caused by increase in market share at year end.

On the other hand, in the retail sector PSO experienced an increase in motor gasoline

volumes against an overall decline in the industry due to PSO’s increased assortment

amid low demand.

• Prince Variance due to decline in international prices: price variance was on account

of decline in international oil prices.

Page | 311
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Industrial Diesel Volume decreased: Industry diesel volumes too were affected due to

weak industrial activity, construction activity, and reduced road and rail movement.

However, PSO managed to gain volumetric growth.

• Reduction in the prices of petroleum products: In the first half of the year Petrol was

sold at Rs.74.52 per liter. The government reduced prices of all petroleum products

except High-Speed Diesel (HSD) in order to partially pass on the impact of massive

international price reduction to the masses.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40103472

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1560434

Year 2019:

2019’s stock in trade was the best in the 6 years of analysis due to the following reasons;

• Increase in oil prices: Prices of petroleum products were increased by up to Rs23 per

liter in 2019. The price of high-speed diesel - widely used in public transport and

agriculture sector and any hike in its price impacts all sectors - went up from Rs106.68 to

Rs125.01 per liter, an increase of Rs18.42 per liter. The other major fuel is petrol which

is widely used in motorcycles and cars. Its price rose Rs23.02 to Rs113.99 per liter.

Page | 312
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Low level of stock due to Furnace Oil: Some of the demand of petroleum products have

been the changes in the energy mix particularly shifting away from the furnace oil

towards coal and LNG; and then the comeback of furnace oil during COVID and post

COVID times due to the systemic issues in the refining system as well as the rise in

demand from the power sector.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40144311

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2128194/year-passes-pakistans-energy-sector-boasts-

success

Year 2018:

Stock in trade increased by 23% in the year 2018.

• High oil prices: PSO’s volumetric growth continued in FY18 in white oil segment,

especially motor spirit and HSD even though the retail segment faced stiff competition

from new entrants, and substantial discounts offered by competitors and the influx of

smuggled products like diesel from Iran.

• Partial offset by the decrease in the stock levels of furnace oil: Furnace oil volumes

declined by 29.6 percent year-on-year in 2018 owing to the supply situation and the

Page | 313
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

government’s strategy of switching priority of existing power plants from FO to

RLNG/natural gas. PSO’s furnace oil volumes declined by 29.6 percent year-on-year in

FY18 as government’s priority changed to RLNG and coal for the power sector.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/449733

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40103472

Year 2017:

30.49% increase in stock and trade in the year 2017.

• Upward trend in international oil prices: International oil prices was said to had

surged by 77pc in the period under review which was partially reflected in local ex-

refinery prices. As a result of higher oil prices, gross profits also increased to Rs.9.2bn vs.

loss of Rs 610 million in the same period last year. Higher gross profits could be

attributed to higher margins on furnace oil (margins linked with prices)

• High level of inventory: With cost of goods sold up by 28 percent, PSO was able to keep

gross margins also up in 2017. The increase in gross profit and gross margin could be due

to inventory gains booked on account of lower fuel costs in the low oil price scenario.

Page | 314
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2016:

Stock-in-trade balances have shown a declining trend over the last three years

• Reduction in oil prices increased PSO’s sales volumes significantly: The Company’s

sale volume of Motor Gasoline grew by 26%, mainly due to decrease in price of gasoline

and subsequent increase in customer demand. Furthermore, HSD sales recorded an

increase of 0.7%, due to the increased upliftment by PIA and international airlines. FO

volumes declined by 4.3% due to lower upliftment by IPP’s primarily due to shifting

from FO to natural gas.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=287

Page | 315
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in international oil prices due to Russia Ukraine War Increase

Increase in international oil prices due to high demand low supply Increase

Increase in the prices of natural gas Increase

Increase in price variance Increase

Decreased in Stock in Transit due to CPFTA Decrease

Provision of Price Differential Claims Decrease

Refusal of PSO to keep Stock of other OMCs Decrease

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of stock in trade of

all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Stock in Trade of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 66,333,048 81,615,455 98,847,665 64,758,242 88,934,410

HTL 2,070,841,515 1,181,900,227 1,544,074,179 447,345,239 878,741,709

Page | 316
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

APL 7,234,415 12,460,539 12,865,862 9,464,503 16,121,539

BPL 50,755 95,341 75,422 43,901 19,134

TOTAL 2,144,459,733 1,276,071,562 1,655,863,128 521,611,885 983,816,792

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Stock in Trade

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 6.08%

HTL 93.03%

APL 0.88%

BPL 0.00%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Stock in Trade

Page | 317
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


100.00%
93.03%
90.00%

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00% 6.08%
0.88% 0.00%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of stock in trade

in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Stock in Trade Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 3.09% 6.40% 5.97% 12.42% 9.04%

Page | 318
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating PSO’s Stock in Trade Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


14.00%

12.42%
12.00%

10.00%
9.04%
8.00%

6.40%
6.00% 5.97%

4.00%
3.09%
2.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of stock in trade has varied throughout the years. It

was the highest in 2020 but dropped in 2021. However, the value in 2021 is greater than 2017-

2019.

Yearly Change/Growth in Stock in Trade of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 319
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly PPE

Growth 30.49% 23.04% 21.11% -34.49% 37.33%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Stock in Trade of PSO

PSO Yearly Stock in Trade Growth


50.00%

40.00%
37.33%

30.00% 30.49%

23.04%
20.00% 21.11%

10.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00%

-20.00%

-30.00%
-34.49%
-40.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest growth of PSO’s stock in trade in 2020. However,

there was a increase in 2021. In all other years, the account has decreased.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Stock in Trade Overtime

Page | 320
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 165.43% 29.76% -68.50% 88.61% 569.01%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Stock in Trade Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


700.00%

600.00%
569.01%

500.00%

400.00%

300.00%

200.00%
165.43%

100.00% 88.61%

29.76%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-68.50%
-100.00%

-200.00%

Page | 321
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The industry has also experienced a downwards trend in its stock in trade and just like

PSO, the entire OMC industry faced a fall in this account till 2019 and this has increased

considerably in 2021.

Factors affecting Stock in Trade

Increase in International Oil Prices would case Piling-Up of Inventory of OMCs

Oil prices are expected to increase international in the future. This means that OMCs here would

be imported expensive oil but the government does not allow them to raise the prices of POL

products as they want to provide some relief to the customers. Due to this, they have to sell

costly POL products at lower rates. Companies tend to pile up the stock that they have, waiting

for the local prices to rise so that they can sell the products. They might also buy on cheaper rates

and provide the customers at higher rates. Internationally, Brent crude oil prices averaged nearly

$117 per barrel (/b) in March 2022, up $20/b from February's average. Prices are expected to

average $103.37/b in 2022, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA)

Short-Term Energy Outlook released on April 12, 2022. This is up from an annual average of

$70.89 in 2021. The EIA predicts that by 2025 Brent crude oil's nominal price will rise to $66/b.

By 2030, world demand is seen driving Brent prices to $89/b. By 2040, prices are projected to be

$132/b. By then, the cheap oil sources will have been exhausted, making it more expensive to

extract oil. By 2050, oil prices could be $185/b.

Page | 322
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Increase in International Oil Prices due to Russia Ukraine War

Russia is the third-largest producer of liquid fuels and petroleum, so when the country invaded

Ukraine in late February 2022, it had immediate impact on Brent crude oil futures prices.10 As

the conflict continued, the prices of crude oil settled in out on an upward trajectory, reaching

nearly $130/b in early March, and staying well above $100/b into April.

Increase in International Oil Prices as Demand Exceeds Supply of Oil

The coronavirus pandemic and natural events are still affecting oil demand and supply. The U.S.

experienced a drop in production following Hurricane Ida in September as the storm shut at least

nine refineries. The EIA estimates that U.S. crude oil production will average 12.01 million b/d

in 2022 and 12.95 million b/d in 2023.

Increase in the Prices of Natural Gas

Countries in Asia have relied on coal to generate power, but recent shortages have turned them to

natural gas. Higher temperatures in parts of Asia and Europe have led to high demand for natural

gas to generate power. COVID-19 has hampered Europe's natural gas production, and a colder-

than-expected heating season in early 2021 reduced supplies further. As a result, natural gas

prices soared in 2021 and are expected to remain high in 2022, and affected countries have

turned to gas-to-oil switching to reduce power generation costs.

Page | 323
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

The oil prices are expected to increase in the coming few years. This is something that cannot be

stopped and the only thing OMCs here can do is to mitigate the price variance to take maximum

advantage of this particular aspect. If they fail to do so, the stock in trade would increase due to

piling up of inventory.

Source:

➢ https://www.thebalance.com/oil-price-forecast-3306219

➢ http://knoema.com/infographics/yxptpab/crude-oil-price-forecast-2021-2022-and-long-

term2050#:~:text=The%20International%20Monetary%20Fund%2C%20in,for%20oil%

20in%20international%20markets.

➢ https://fortune.com/2022/03/09/worst-case-oil-forecast-240-per-barrel-global-recession/

➢ https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/oil-prices-expected-rise-with-big-variation-

projections-kemp-2022-01-18/

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/crude-oil-prices

Increase in Price Variance to Act as a Disincentive to Supply Products for OMCs

With an increase in international oil prices and a depreciating currency, price variance cannot be

mitigated. The OMCs want to supply the POL products by matching the prices in the

international market. But that is not possible considering the low purchasing power of customers

Page | 324
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

in Pakistan. The government has repeatedly failed to provide the PDC claims to PSO and other

companies and the circular debt of the country is increasing constantly because of this. OMCs

can face serious liquidity issues because of this if their inventory keeps piling up.

Future Outlook:

Stock in trade of OMCs is expected to increase keeping in mind how much Pakistani Rupee has

depreciated and how much the oil prices have rose. The country’s currency needs to appreciate if

improvement is to be seen.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1638436

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2329024/oicci-seeks-revision-in-omcs-margins

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2334040/govt-cuts-petrol-diesel-prices-by-rs5

➢ https://www.reuters.com/article/pakistan-currency-idINKBN1E22A2

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

CPFTA allows Fewer Stock in Transit and Efficient Delivery

It has now been two years since the terms of the revised CPFTA went into effect, through an

SRO issued by the Federal Board of Revenue that activated the reduced duties applicable on

6786 goods. One such item that has been exempted from custom duties is fuel from China which

Page | 325
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

includes Motor Gasoline, HOBC and diesel. And private oil companies in Pakistan availed the

benefits substantially.

Future Outlook

In the future, OMCs can greatly benefit from fewer stocks in transit and faster deliveries from

China as a result of the CPEK road that is being made by the two countries.

Source:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/01/09/chinese-petrol-drive-omc-profits/

➢ https://newztodays.com/pso-oil-imports/

Provision for Price Differential Claim Improves Liquidity of OMCs

The Petroleum Division has asked the Director General, Pakistan Revenue (Sub Office) Karachi

to advise the Manger National Bank of Pakistan to arrange payment of Rs40 billion for

reimbursement of Price Differential Claims (PDC) to Oil marketing Companies (OMCs) and

refineries. According to sources in the oil industry, the government had cleared a PDC of

Rs31.73 billion up till 31st March 2022. Similarly, it has now transferred an amount of Rs40

billion on account of PDC allocated for 1-15 April, 2022 which also includes a deficit of Rs2.31

billion from 16-31 March, 2022. Furthermore, the PDCs for the second fortnight of April will be

submitted during the first week of May, 2022, said sources. They added that PDC of only Rs28.3

Page | 326
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

billion is pending with the government which needs to be deposited in the assignment account

with PSO. PDC of Rs34.19 billion is expected for the period April 1-15, 2022. However, till date

approval for the same from Competent Authority has not been initiated,” the Oil Companies

Advisory Council (OCAC) said an urgent letter to the Oil & Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra)

and Director General Oil of the Petroleum Division.

Future Outlook

This would help OMCs in mitigating the loses that they face. It would also ensure constant

distribution and marketing of fuel and POL products in the market. The stock in trade would

reduce due to this.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1684919

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/04/25/president-sanctions-rs40bn-for-

reimbursement-of-pdc-to-omcs-refineries/

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/948674-govt-owes-omcs-rs55bn-in-april-fuel-subsidy

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2353362/ecc-approves-rs687-billion-grant

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/952776-rs40bn-released-for-oil-subsidy-payment

Refusal of PSO to Keep Stocks of Other OMCs

Page | 327
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

This would further reduce the stock in trade of the company. The stock in trade of other OMCs

would increase but of PSO would decrease due to this. PSO believes that this practice is

uncompetitive in nature. They have started conversing with Shell over this.

Future Outlook:

This would allow PSO to reduce its stock in trade. They would not have to import on the behalf

of different OMCs and then store it with themselves. This would however, increase the stock in

trade of other OMCs in the industry.

Source:

➢ https://newztodays.com/pso-oil-imports/

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/expert-view/fuel-prices-will-average-out-

in-long-run-shouldnt-worry-long-term-investors-mk-surana-

hpcl/articleshow/89425741.cms

Page | 328
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

International Oil Prices & inflation Increase

Guvnor defaults again Decrease

Agreement with Qatar Petroleum Increase

Growing energy demands Increase

Currency devaluation Increase

Increase in Imports Increase

The new EV policy Decrease

If we take a look at the historical data for stock in trade of the company, it is very evident that

except 2020 which is considered to be an abnormal year, the company’s stock in trade has been

increasing with the highest ever amount recorded in 2019 which was owed to higher prices. After

that in 2020 the world was hit by the pandemic and people were locked inside their homes. This

ultimately resulted in the decline of demand of petroleum products which is also reflected in the

financial statements of the company as the stock in trade fell by almost 35%. After that in 2021

the economy started to recover which also increased the demand for petroleum products as was

reflected in the financial statements of the company where it could be seen that the sales of the

company increased by a record amount.


Page | 329
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

This implied that the stock in trade for the company also increased as it was seen that the current

assets for the company increased by 11.8& which was mainly accounted to an increase in the

stock in trade of the company. The economic reasons for such an increase in the stock have been

analyzed below.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ Annual Report 2019

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=70

➢ https://psopk.com/en/investors/results-reporting/financial-highlights-2020

International oil prices and Inflation

Since 2014 the international oil prices have seen the most significant volatility. The oil market

has taken on new features that affect the development of the global economy. According to EIA,

US shale oil production increased from 4.96 million barrels per day in 2017 to 5.59 million

barrels per day in 2022. In addition, there are geopolitical events, trade frictions, and OPEC’s

agreement have occurred in recent years, causing the volatility of oil price.

In a developing country like Pakistan, which has such high dependence on imported oil, an

increase in oil prices leads to inflationary pressure which in turn increases budget deficit making

imports more expensive. The government has refrained from passing on the complete price

Page | 330
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

increase to the consumers because it fears it will exacerbate inflation and stifle economic activity

which presents a significant challenge to the government’s plans of ending its tenure with a

strong growth phase.

This inflationary pressure and variances in the price of oil internationally has led to the company

enjoying inventory gains as the value of the already stock in hand increased, with the possibility

that the new stock also increases.

Future Outlook

Looking forward the international oil prices are forecasted to increase mainly on account of the

war between Russia and Ukraine, as can also be seen in the graph below which in turn means

that the inflation in the country will increase as well. Keeping in mind that the demand for

petroleum products is predicted to increase in the future, this in turn would also increase the sales

as has been predicted which would ultimately lead to the company increasing its stock in trade in

Page | 331
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the future as well as enjoying inventory gains as has been reported in the director’s report.

Source:

➢ Director’s report, 2021

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/petroleum-prices-

in-pakistan-likely-to-increase-by-rs-10-per-litre/articleshow/89843799.cms

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/02/26/oil-prices-expected-to-increase-from-

march-1/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1677101

➢ https://www.geo.tv/latest/398774-petrol-price-expected-to-rise-in-pakistan-sources

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

➢ https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-021-00166-4

Page | 332
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Gunvor Defaults again

Gunvor is one of the major suppliers of RLNG to Pakistan. There was an agreement between

Gunvor and the government of Pakistan where they had to supply 4 cargoes of RLNG to the

country during the period of April to June 2022. However they have defaulted again and have

backed out on these deliveries which shifted the entire burden on furnace oil again and thus had a

negative impact on the stock in trade of the company as this was unplanned.

Future Outlook

This is the fourth occasion that the company has defaulted, with them backing out before on 19

November, 10 January and 11 March. This have had a negative impact on the inventory of the

company before as they had to take immediate steps to meet the rising demand in the country.

Looking at the historical data of how the company backs out last minute, we predict that this

would only affect the stock in trade of the company negatively as it is highly likely that they will

continue to do the same in the future.

Sources:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/952062-gas-crisis-deepens-as-eni-defaults-once-again

➢ https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/lng/032822-

gunvor-backs-out-of-lng-deliveries-to-pakistan-from-april-june-officials

Page | 333
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/918251-gas-crisis-aggravates-gunvor-again-backs-

out-of-lng-cargo-delivery

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/04/19/pakistan-to-file-for-damages-on-default-

by-eni-gunvor/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1655372

Agreement with Qatar Petroleum

In accordance with the vision 2030, PSO came into an LNG agreement with Qatar Petroleum as

the Qatar’s ambassador to Pakistan said affirmed that Qatar will continue helping Pakistan to

meet its energy needs.

According to the agreement Qatar Energy entered into a long-term sale and purchase agreement

with the PSO for the supply of up to three million tons per annum of the LNG. The price at

which the agreement has been made is the lowest ever price which is expected to significantly

reduce the costs of PSO in the future. Moreover it must also be noted that the launch of the direct

shipping line between Karachi port and Hamad port in Doha has greatly helped increase trade

engagements between the two countries thus in turn increasing the stock in trade of the company.

Future Outlook

The agreement really boosted the company’s stock in trade as they started getting a fixed supply

of LNG. Since the agreement is till 2030, the LNG supply to Pakistan by Qatar is confirmed for

Page | 334
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the next 8 years. This means that this supply will remain fixed and only new supply will be

added which will only increase the stock in trade in the future.

Source:

➢ Corporate briefing session

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/918280-qatar-to-continue-helping-pakistan-to-

meet-its-energy-needs

➢ https://www.offshore-technology.com/comment/qatar-petroleum-lng-cnooc-2/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1609619

➢ https://www.energyconnects.com/news/oil-and-gas/2021/march/qatar-petroleum-

enters-into-an-lng-agreement-in-pakistan/

Growing energy demands

The energy crisis in Pakistan is growing. Electricity demand in the country is at peak and it is

only expected to increase in the future as we approach hotter months of June and July. Contrary

to the high demand of electricity in the country, the supply has not been very good as could

clearly be seen during Ramzan when many cities faced power shortages or load shedding. The

higher electricity demand can be attributed to an exponential increase in the population as well as

a consumers using more electrical appliances and working towards improving their standard of

living.

Page | 335
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Nonetheless in order to meet the higher electricity demand fuel is imported as the local supply is

not enough to meet the demand. This extra demand also creates problems in terms of circular

debt as the government has subsidized the prices, which results in the rise of import bill and

reduction of foreign reserves. The higher import to meet the energy demands ultimately means

that PSO’s stock in trade will increase as they happen to be the biggest OMC in the country.

Future Outlook

In the future it is expected that the demand for electricity would continue to increase. This

ultimately implies that the imports are also expected to increase thus the company’s stock in

trade is also expected to increase

Source:

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40168144

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40124544

➢ https://www.scienceimpactpub.com/Docs/jei62019.pdf

➢ https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13705-018-0167-y

➢ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X21001711

Currency Devaluation

Page | 336
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Currency devaluation plays a very important role in determining the buying power of any

company. A stronger currency ultimately means that the cost incurred will be lower while a weak

currency implies vice versa. In case of Pakistan, however the currency position has not been very

stable as the Pakistani Rupee has continued to devalue under the PTI government.

During 2018, the currency was trading at between $1 for Rs.122. However after the PTI

government came into power, there was record devaluation in the within the past 4 years as now

the dollar is trading at $1 for Rs.185. this ultimately meant that PSO enjoyed inventory gains as

the inventory which they had bought for cheap was now expensive, which is also reflected in the

balance sheet of the company where the company had the highest level of stock in trade in 2019,

which was right after the PTI government came into power and the rupee devalued

Future Outlook

In the future it is predicted that the Pakistani currency will continue to devalue by a further at

least 18%, as reported by trading economics. This ultimately implies that the cost of buying the

stock would increase, and at the same time the company will be enjoying inventory gains if the

rupee continues to devalue like this thus increasing the stock in trade in the future. The forecast

for currency devaluation against dollar is illustrated in the graph below.

Page | 337
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

➢ https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/under-imran-khan-govt-pakistani-rupee-depreciated-

by-30-5-per-cent-report-2640765

➢ https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/187-to-a-us-dollar-political-crisis-in-pakistan-led-

to-the-free-fall-of-its-currency-469545

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/914762-pak-currency-in-freefall-rs54-lost-against-

dollar-in-current-govt-s-tenure

Increase in Imports

Keeping in mind the massive increase in demand, according to reports Pakistan is likely to see a

rise in the import of petroleum products

Page | 338
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

After a slight decline in the demand for petroleum products during 2020, the country recorded

highest every demand during 2021 despite the price hike. In order to meet the increasing

demand, the country would be importing diesel and petrol for local consumption as local supply

from the refineries would not be enough to meet demand. This was further reported in economic

times where it was mentioned that Pakistan’s oil import bill has surged over the past year.

Moreover according to the latest agreement with Saudi Find for Development, the country will

be importing petroleum products on deferred payments to meet the local demand. PSO being the

biggest OMC in the country accounts for most amount of imports which is also reflected in its

balance sheet. It could be seen that the stock in trade for the company declined when the imports

were less in 2020 while it rose by a significant amount in 2021 when the imports started to

increase on account of an increase in the demand.

Future Outlook

As has been reported by economic times and trading economics, the imports for the country are

only expected to increase in the future. According to other sources PARCO and NRL alone are

expected to import more than 30 million barrels of oil collectively. This along with the rising

energy crisis and increase in the demand for petroleum products is likely to keep the imports

high as is also illustrated in the graph below.

Page | 339
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

This would ultimately mean that PSO’s stock in trade would continue to rise and could even

reach a record high, as compared to 2019 in order to meet the demand and energy needs of the

people of Pakistan.

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/imports

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/business/pakistan-oil-eatable-

import-bills-surge-by-60-per-cent/articleshow/90894283.cms

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1666786

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/929210-pakistan-may-import-500-000-tonnes-of-

petrol-next-month

Page | 340
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/947799-pakistan-to-import-32-7-million-barrels-oil-

under-sfd-programme

➢ https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-pakistan-oil-idINKCN2280FN

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1685377

The New EV Policy

A transition is taking place on the retail industry as a change in the consumer demand can be

observed. The new EV policy for four wheelers is expected to increase competition in the market

while promoting sustainable development and preserving the environment. It is envisioned to

have an increase of 30% and 90% share in the light and heavy vehicles sales respectively within

the next 5-10 years. Moreover the salient features of the policy include a phased transition of the

automotive industry to electric vehicles. This implies that OMCs like PSO will start shifting their

focus towards establishing and installing EV charges in the country which ultimately means that

the demand for petroleum products in the country would decline ultimately having a negative

impact on the stock in trade for the company.

This transition has already been started by PSO as they have successfully installed and

commissioned its first electric EV charger in Islamabad under the name PSO Electro. Moreover

the company has also joined hands with Frontier Works Organization (FWO) to install state of

the art EV chargers on the Lahore-Sialkot motorway.

Page | 341
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

Within a span of 5-10 years, companies are expected to invest heavily in EV chargers and

technology as it can be observed that the consumer demand is shifting. So is the case with PSO

as we expect that in the future the company will invest heavily in technology and although these

investments might have a positive impact on the overall assets and sales of the company, it will

reduce the stock in trade as the majority of the stock which the company holds is that of

petroleum products.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/693968-pso-installs-ev-charging-facility

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=424

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=453

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Page | 342
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 343
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

120,000,000.00

100,000,000.00

80,000,000.00

60,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Stock in trade Naïve Forecast

Page | 344
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 345
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

120,000,000.00

100,000,000.00

80,000,000.00

60,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Series1 Series2

120.00%

100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
(20.00%)

(40.00%)

(60.00%)

Page | 346
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Trade Debts

Trade Debts Breakdown:

Trade Debts 2021 Vertical Analysis

Considered good

Due from Government agencies and autonomous bodies

Secured 198,221 0.09%

Unsecured 185,808,652 83.55%

186,006,873 83.64%

Due from other customers 4,157,539 1.87%

Secured 32,220,542 14.49%

Unsecured 36,378,081 16.36%

222,384,954 100.00%

Considered doubtful 3,572,380 1.61%

Trade debts - gross 225,957,334 101.61%

Provision for impairment -3,572,380 -1.61%

Trade debts - net 222,384,954 100.00%

Page | 347
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (4.21%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Trade debts 12.24% -11.47% -8.87% 15.50% 19.27% -1.39%

Vertical Analysis: Average (53.85%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Trade debts 53.73% 52.80% 49.34% 61.00% 54.18% 52.08%

Forecasted Values

After looking at the trend and analyzing all the industrial and economic factors, we are predicting

that in the future, trade debts for PSO are likely to increase by 6-10% every year.

Page | 348
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Dues from previous government Increase

Receivables from SNGPL, PIA, GENCO Increase

Increase in PDC Increase

Rise in circular debt Increase

FE 25 receivables Increase

LNG supply chain disturbed Increase

Power crises Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

53.85% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 4.21% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Factors that highly influence the trade debts of a company may include the trade policy,

exchange rates, foreign currency reserves, inflation, demand etc. Further we’ll be dissecting the

factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the trade debts of PSO year by year from

2021 to 2016.

Page | 349
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2021:

From the year 2020 to the year 2021, there is seen a drastic change in the horizontal analysis of

the trade debts. The factors are discussed below:

• Trade Debts made on account by the subsidiary company: This also include trade

debts on account of export sales made by the Subsidiary Company i.e., Pakistan Refinery

Limited (PRL) amounting to Rs.989.8 million (2020: Rs.484.8 million) secured by way

of Export Letters of Credit.

• Overdue trade receivable customers due to inter-corporate circular debt issue and

from Government of Pakistan: As at June 30, 2021, the Group’s receivable from

Government of Pakistan and customers amounted to Rs.235,254 million which included

trade debts receivables of Rs.183,896 million from customers including the following

were past due for 6 months;

1. GENCO Holding Company Limited (GENCO): Rs.71,992 million

2. Hub Power Company Limited (HUBCO): Rs.13,317 million

3. Sui Gas Northern Pipelines Company Limited (SNGPL): Rs.93,511 million

4. The PIA has to pay Rs21.974 billion to the PSO.

• Recovery from the power sector: The PSO has recovered Rs194.283 billion from the

power sector along with late payment surcharge income. The power sector was a key

Page | 350
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

defaulter of the PSO that is to pay Rs192.5 billion to the company on account of oil

supply.

• The circular debt of Pakistan State Oil (PSO) soured high as of Rs397.5 billion in

November:

PSO continued to register profits that reported an all-time high net profit after tax. The

PSO made a profit of Rs11.9 billion in the first quarter of the fiscal year 2021-22. Its

profit was owing to inventory gains that led to its higher profitability in wake of rising oil

prices.

• FE 25 loan to be received by PSO: The Company is also to receive Rs5.3 billion on

account of exchange loss on the FE 25 loan.

• Insufficient power and RLNG sectors cause PSO receivables to hit Rs 380bn: PSO

braves the loss of Rs6.089 billion in the import of LNG because of the exchange rate loss.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40134437/circular-debt-of-pso-soars-to-all-time-high

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40131743

Year 2020:

Page | 351
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

A negative figure can be seen in the year 2020, there has been a decrease when we compare both

the year i.e., 2020 and 2019. Trade debts went down in FY20 primarily due to recoveries from

power sector. The recoverability of these amounts is dependent on the decisions of the GoP

including availability of funds due to circular debt situation being faced by the GoP.

• Decline in trade debts mainly due to recoveries from power sector: Debtor’s turnover

has increased primarily due to decrease in trade debts by 10.4% on account of recoveries

from power sector.

• FE exchange loss recovery: Net unfavorable exchange difference of Rs. 1,799 million,

net of recoveries during the year of Rs. 27,890 million, arising on foreign currency

borrowings (FE-25), obtained under the directives of Ministry of Finance, which was to

be settled in accordance with the instructions.

• Trade debts from the Government and other customers were due: Trade debts of an

aggregate amount of Rs. 169,990 million due from GENCO Holding Company Limited

(GENCO), Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL), Hub Power Company Limited

(HUBCO) and Kot Addu Power Company Limited (KAPCO). These include past due

debts of Rs. 166,768 million against which no impairment has been recognized.

• Price differential claims on account of supply of petroleum: Price differential claims

aggregating Rs.9297 million recoverable from GoP on account of supply of petroleum

products at subsidized rates to various customers. These balances are long outstanding

Page | 352
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

with no recoveries since past several years despite follow-ups by the Company with

relevant ministries.

• LNG supply chain faced a collapse: PSO and SSGC continued to push SNGPL to

ensure off-take as per the given demand or be ready to face a financial loss or a penalty of

$25 million on per LNG cargo basis. LNG vessel which came on Feb 29, offloaded the

cargo at a very slow discharge rate of 2,800 cubic meters per hour, and incurred

estimated demurrage and boil-off expense of around $185,000. The loss was put on the

account of the Power Division.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1539008

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40040595/pso-receivables-touch-rs3189-billion-mark

Year 2019:

A decrease in trade debts by Rs. 26 bn. is due to recoveries from power sector offset by increase

in receivables from SNGPL can be seen in the year 2019. These were at highest in FY 2018 both

as per vertical and horizontal analysis due to delay in payments by Power Sector and SNGPL and

increase in prices of products. These went down in FY 2019 due to;

Page | 353
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Receivables from Government of Pakistan (GoP) and the power sector: trade debts

of an aggregate amount of Rs. 180,676 million due from power generation companies

down below;

1. GENCO Holding Company Limited (GENCO)

2. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL)

3. Hub Power Company Limited (HUBCO)

4. Kot Addu Power Company Limited (KAPCO)

These include past due debts of Rs. 165,236 million against which no impairment has been

recognized.

• Price differential claims that have been long outstanding since 2013: Claims

aggregating to Rs. 9,297 million recoverable from GoP on account of supply of

petroleum products at subsidized rates to various customers.

• FE-25 borrowings were obtained under directives of MOF: A net unfavorable

exchange difference of Rs.30,244 million arising on foreign currency borrowings (FE-

25), obtained under the directives of Ministry of Finance. About Rs48bn are payable to

the PSO by the Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) and the federal government on

account of price differential claims and exchange rate loss.

Page | 354
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Pakistan State Oil (PSO) in dire straits with its receivables going beyond a record

Rs364bn: Receivables from the power sector alone had touched Rs265bn as of Jan 18

because of primary circular debt. In addition, a second-tier circular debt worth Rs51bn

has built up against the Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) due to non-

payment of LNG supplies, affecting the entire gas sector.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1458797

Year 2018:

Trade debts are highest in FY 18 in last 5 years (both as per vertical and horizontal analysis) due

to the delay in payments by Power Sector and SNGPL and increase in prices of products.

• PSO faces financial difficulties, asks government for help: Pakistan State Oil (PSO)

has written letters to the federal government, saying that it is facing financial difficulties

because of its outstanding amounts against power sector, Pakistan International Airlines

(PIA) and Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited (SNGPL). The amounts have reached Rs

330 billion so far.

• Unpaid money by the previous government: The PSO management has written to the

Ministries of Water and Power, Petroleum and Finance about its difficult financial

Page | 355
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

position in recent weeks and sought proactive support. Sources said that the previous

government had committed to pay Rs 25 billion to PSO in May but the money is still

awaited.

• Receivable failure from the Government: Persistent failure of the present government

in resolving circular debt has threatened financial viability of PSO as its receivable from

power sector, SNGPL and PIA surged to Rs 330 billion as of August 13, posing risk to

entire fuel supply chain.

• PSO’s customers fail to pay the amount they are due for: The PSO's total receivables

from the power sector alone stood at Rs 282 billion, while PIA and Sui Northern Gas

Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) owed Rs 26 billion and Rs 22 billion respectively to the oil

marketing company.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/4625998/psos-receivables-reach-rs-330-billion-

20180814399303

Year 2017:

Increase in trade debts by Rs. 34.4 bn. primarily due to increase in receivables of Power Sector,

PIA and SNGPL as compared to last year. The PML-N government also cleared a circular debt

Page | 356
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

worth Rs. 480 bn through a controversial scheme of cash and book payments. Whereas the

company’s receivables peaked at the end of PPP’s government at Rs 220 bn in May 2013.

• Overdue payments from PIA: PSO is also continuously meeting PIA's demand of jet

fuel. However, PIA is not making payments to PSO to settle outstanding dues, and as a

result the principal amount has swelled to Rs 13.8 billion by the end of November 2017.

• Overdue payments from SNGPL: Besides, an amount of Rs 13.4 billion was also on

receivable head from the SNGPL on account of the LNG supplies.

• The Power sector still remains a major defaulter: The total receivables from power

sector accumulated to Rs 196.5 billion including Rs 64.40 billion generated after the

inception of seven-day credit arrangements. The power sector remained a major defaulter

and multibillion rupees had been stuck in this sector following ban of use of furnace oil.

PSO had been supplying furnace oil to feed power plants but the government abandoned

use of this fuel in power plants and the PSO is now facing liquidity crunch following

refusal of power sector to clear multibillion rupees dues.

• Power sector to avoid power crises: The government instructed Ministry of Petroleum

and Natural Resources to ensure uninterrupted supplies to WAPDA, HUBCO and

KAPCO to avoid power crisis in the country however they could not make timely

payments to PSO.

Page | 357
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/4561561/psos-receivables-reach-rs-317-billion-by-december-1-

20171216327677

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/4486477/pso-receivables-soar-to-rs-2723-billion-na-told-

20170316154779

➢ https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=14_10_2017_010_005

Year 2016:

Trade debts remained almost stagnant over the last three years i.e., 2014, 2015 and 2015 due to

prevailing circular debt situation.

• Circular debt crisis looms as receivables rise to 250bn: This is the highest amount of

receivables in the accounts of the country’s largest fuel supplier that had peaked at

Rs220bn since May 2013 before the government cleared the amount through a

controversial scheme of cash payments and book adjustments.

• Late payments from the power sector: The government claimed of controlling energy

shortages and improving recoveries, a staggering Rs250 billion has been added to the

outstanding dues of the Pakistan State Oil (PSO) since June 2013. The PSO’s

management had repeatedly written to the ministries of water and power, petroleum and

Page | 358
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

finance about its difficult financial position that they were in and reached out for

proactive support.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1300174

Page | 359
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in prices of products Increase

Provision of Rs.450 billion to power sector Decrease

Government to lower subsidy to power sector Increase

Oil consumption reduced during pandemic Decrease

Inefficiencies of power sector Increase

Financial Crises faced by Customers Increase

OGRA shows Rs. 1 billion of PDC receivable Decrease

Refusal of importing oil for other OMCs Decrease

Rs. 100 billion provision to power sector Decrease

When it comes to the oil marketing and distribution companies, this industry makes most of its

sales on account which generate heavy proportions of trade debts. If we take into account the last

5 years, we can account for the 4 top companies and the proceeding market shares and growth

rates have been accounted for keeping these 4 companies in mind.

Total Receivables in Different Years of the OMCs:

Page | 360
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company

Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 212,619,281 245,577,071 223,797,044 198,134,828 222,384,954

HTL 179,385,219 236,936,937 1,189,383,247 76,104,012 103,225,348

APL 10,801,077 16,475,576 16,838,255 13,970,178 11,025,245

BPL 5,001 17,654 23,422 24,776 87,665

TOTAL 402,810,578 499,007,238 1,430,041,968 288,233,794 336,723,212

Market Share (Accounts Receivables)

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 37.29%

Hi-Tech Lubricants

Limited 60.37%

Attock Petroleum Limited 2.34%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.01%

Total Industry AR 100.00%

Page | 361
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.01%

Attock Petroleum Limited 2.34%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 60.37%

Pakistan State Oil 37.29%

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00%

Analysis: It can be clearly analyzed that Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited had the highest market

share in terms of the account receivables. It is more than half of the total market share in this

particular industry in terms of making sales on credit. PSO has the second highest market share.

Comparatively, the market share of APL and BPL are close to nothing. That is because they are

not among the major players as compared to PSO and HTL.

Industry’s Growth - Account Receivables:

Company Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 362
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth 19.27% 23.88% 186.58% -79.84% 16.82%

Industry's Yearly Growth


200.00%
186.58%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%
23.88%
19.27% 16.82%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-50.00%

-79.84%
-100.00%

Analysis: We can see that in 2019, the industry experienced a peak of 186.58% due to an

increase in the account receivables. This might have been because more sales were being made

on credit or there might be an increase in the sales level overall. This value is an outlier if we

compare it with the growth percentages of 2017, 2018 and 2021. Just like that, experiencing a

Page | 363
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

fall of 79.84% in 2020 is shocking because that means that either more sales were being made on

cash or more the overall sales level dropped considerably in this industry. This will be further

analyzed through secondary research.

Yearly Growth in Market Share – Industry

Company Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 52.78% 49.21% 15.65% 68.74% 66.04%

Page | 364
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Yearly Growth in Market Share


80.00%

70.00% 68.74%
66.04%
60.00%
52.78%
50.00% 49.21%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%
15.65%
10.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: We can see that PSO experienced a fall in its share of account receivables with respect

to the industry in year 2017, 2018 and a drastic further drop in 2019. However, after 2019, its

share in relevance to the industry increased in 2020 but it experienced a slight fall in 2021 but it

was not that considerable. This happened mainly because of an intense increase in the account

receivables of HTL in 2019 which made the proportion of PSO very minimal. The increase in the

industry’s share of account receivables can be seen in the previous graph as well were because of

HTL mainly. Even though the receivables of PSO increased in 2018, the industry’s overall value

of receivables increased at a higher rate due to increase in trade debts of HTL.

Page | 365
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Yearly Growth in Market Share – Last 5 years (Company)

Company Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 19.27% 15.50% -8.87% -11.47% 12.24%

PSO Company's Yearly Growth


25.00%

20.00% 19.27%

15.00% 15.50%
12.24%
10.00%

5.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-5.00%
-8.87%
-10.00%
-11.47%
-15.00%

Analysis: Here, we can analyze that with every passing year from 2017 till 2020, PSO has

experienced a drastic decline in its account receivables. If we look at the numbers, account

receivables are increasing but it is happening at a decreasing rate. This might be due to making

more sales on cash and lesser on credit. This can be a positive signal for the company. However,

Page | 366
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

after 2020, the credit sales began to increase again after a decline of 4 years. There is a

possibility that their DSO might be improving every year. We can also see that in 2019, account

receivables decreased at a decreasing rate. As discussed in the company analysis, it was also

because of the receivables collected from Power sector and SNGPL. 2020 accounted for having

the lowest receivables in all 5 years that have been considered for the calculations.

Supporting Articles:

Increase in trade debts due to increase in the prices of products:

In 2018, the OMCs experienced immense levels of trade debts when the prices of their products

began to increase. As the prices of oil and petroleum products increased, it led to the customers

having a lower purchasing power and they started making more purchases on credit. The price of

oil increased to $72.5 and that was when the new government came into being back in 2018

whereas the price of diesel and petrol costed $112.94 and $95.42 respectively.

Future Outlook

If we compare the prices of 2018 with that of 2021 and 2022, the price of oil has increased to

$85 a barrel whereas the prices of diesel and petrol are $135 and $138 respectively. If 2018

recorded the highest prices of products marketed by the OMCs which lead to high levels of

receivables, then considering 2021 and 2022 experienced a further spike in prices then the

account receivables are further expected to increase of the OMCs in the future.

Page | 367
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Director’s Report

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/900954-petroleum-prices-hiked-to-historic-high

Government offered Rs. 450 billion to the power sector in 2019 to make payments:

In 2019, we can see that PSO experienced a fall in its share of account receivables with respect

to the industry. That happened because out of all the other companies in this industry, the power

sector is highly dependent on PSO as they can easily supply oil and other petroleum products on

credit terms. So, when they received a subsidy from the government in 2019, they used it to clear

their circular debt by paying off to PSO, Shell and a few other companies in this sector.

Future Outlook

Even though the power sector got a relief but the government had something else planned. The

power sector has been known for eating up its subsidies and due to this, they do not use the cash

for its actual purpose. So, these inefficiencies might lead to higher receivables as they have

cleared some of them out so they are perceiving relaxation.

Source:

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2278309/govt-offers-rs450b-to-ipps-to-clear-circular-debt

Oil consumption by the power sector decreased in 2020 due to the pandemic:

Page | 368
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

In 2019, the oil consumption by the power sector was around 14%. This figure dropped to 11%

in 2020 in regards to the pandemic. This is also because of the power sector preferring LNG

over the furnace oil. We can see how in 2020, the entire industry’s account receivables were

decreasing at a decreasing rate and even became negative. This was because of lower demand of

oil due to which they were not much sales of credit to account for nor were there any cash sales

in that particular period of time.

Future Outlook

The power sector is more inclined towards using more renewable sources of energy and is trying

to avoid buying from the OMCs of Pakistan. If this pertains that they would not be have to make

purchases on credit which would further lead to lower receivables for OMCs in the near future.

Source:

➢ https://www.arx.cfa/~/media/516852A31D37400ABA1E75942E7C77F0.ashx

Petrol crisis experienced in late 2020 leading to lower sales:

In 2020, Pakistan experienced something which was later termed as a petrol crisis. During this

period, the OMCs had minimal petrol reserves. Due to this, they had nothing to provide to their

customers and it lowered their petrol sales. Now, sales include both, credit sales and cash sales.

When they did not have anything to sell off, their account receivables reduced as well which can

very well be noticed in all the graphs that after 2019, in 2020, the account receivables have

Page | 369
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

dropped considerably. One of the reasons of as to why these crises took place was because petrol

prices were expected to fall in the first week of June. The major customers of OMCs decided to

make purchases in the month of June and not before it. So, in the beginning of June 2020, petrol

was swapped out of the market of all OMCs. For the cherry on top, the government also imposed

a ban on the import of petrol, leading to petrol stations drying up.

Future Outlook

Like petrol in 2020, High Speed Diesel shortages are to be reported this year in 2022. This would

again bring about a crisis for the OMCs and their receivables will be lower due to lower sales

overall as they would have nothing to sell off to their customers. This is happening because the

operations of the refineries in the European Union are lower than normal and USA itself is

experiencing a shortage. Due to this, there is almost nothing left for Pakistani OMCs.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1676562

➢ https://ipipk.org/report-the-petrol-crisis-of-june-2020/

Inefficiencies of the power sector put burden on OMCs through increasing receivables:

In 2021, different companies in the power sector such as GENCOs and CPPA, were inefficient in

paying off their trade payables. This led to high levels of trade debts for different companies in

the oil and gas marketing companies and PSO was one of those companies which were affected

Page | 370
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the most. Their receivables increased up to Rs. 398 billion, due to which they were also not able

to meet their cash obligations of around 6 refineries. Their cash position worsened and this can

also be related to an increase in the accounts receivables in 2021 as shown in all the graphs that

have been shown above.

Future Outlook

Considering that the power sector has already eaten up 3.2 trillion worth of subsidies in the last

15 years, it is expected to do the same in the following years. The government has no room for

providing more subsidies to this sector. If in the following years, lower levels of subsidies are

provided, then their efficiency of paying back to the creditors would further worsen which would

lead to more trade debts for OMCs.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/909334-top-omc-in-economic-mess-pso-s-receivables- surge-

to-rs398-billion

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/847372-power-sector-eats-away-rs3-5tr

Financial crises caused by increasing trade debts leads to multinational OMCs wanting to leave

Pakistan:

In 2021, some of the major multinational OMCs complained about not receiving their payments

on time and the rising circular debt in the industry. Even though the government has been using

Page | 371
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO’s stock to fulfill this gap, but this has only been increasing their receivables and hence

increasing the receivables of the entire industry again. This can be seen in the graphs shown

above that in 2021, the receivables of the OMCs increased by 16.82%.

Future Outlook

If the situation pertains and private multinational OMCs leave Pakistan, then the burden would

be on the existing companies in the industry and mainly on PSO. All the sectors would rely on

PSO majorly and most of the sales would be made on credit again as always leading to higher

burden on PSO and trade debt in the coming years.

Source:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/09/06/financial-crisis-of-omcs-worsens/

OGRA shows receivables of Rs1 billion for OMCs due to price differential claims:

In 2022, the Prime Minister asked OGRA to evaluate the PDC of the OMCs and then provide a

relevant subsidy. Due to the price differential claims (buying at higher prices and selling at lower

prices) the OMCs are already facing a tough cash position. OMCs are requesting to gain the

subsidies for the previous years as well amounting to Rs.10 billion and want prices to remain at

the current level till the month of July. They would also have to sell their inventories to different

sectors at lower rates and they already buy on credit basis. This would greatly impact the

Page | 372
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

valuation of the total receivables from different industries if prices are not aligned with the cost.

Different sectors would then pay back lower amounts due to the price differential.

Future Outlook

Even after the OMCs requested a PDC, the prime minister announced a price cut to offer a relief

to the consumers. This would further increase the receivables in terms of the PDC in the coming

future which is not good for the OMCs as they already are facing immense cash challenges due

to irrecoverable receivables.

Sources:

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40158317

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1678010

PSO to refuse importing oil for inter-OMCs sale until receivables paid:

In 2022, PSO completely refused to import oil for other OMCs such as SNGPL. This was mainly

because of the inability to provide for the PDC by the government and also because their

receivables have been increasing since last year due to inter-OMCs sales. They also talked about

how it would be against the public interest if such anticompetitive practices were to take place.

PSO believes that other companies in the OMC industry can import their own oil and incur the

PDC risk as they do which would increase their receivables and lower the receivables of PSO.

Future Outlook

Page | 373
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Considering this, we can assume that the receivables will drop for PSO in the coming future as

major OMCs rely on PSO for their oil and other petroleum products. If they would not pay them

back, then most probably they would have to lose on their supplies.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/940949-pso-refuses-oil-import-for-omcs#

Provision worth of Rs.100 billion to the power sector to meet its obligations:

In 2022, considering ever rising receivables of the OMCs, the government of Pakistan decided to

take certain measures. The power sector has been a key defaulter of the OMCs in Pakistan. The

government has decided to provide the sector with a subsidy so that it can make payments and

meet their obligations. This would result in the receivables of OMCs to reduce in the coming

future as they would receive their payments from different companies in the power sector and

especially CPPA (Central Power Purchasing Agency).

Future Outlook

Even though, the power sector has been provided with a subsidy worth of Rs.100 billion, the

government is trying to make measures to cut the volume of subsidy. This means that if the

government is able to do that, they would have to purchase more on credit and make late

payments and the situation would worsen in the near future and the receivables of the OMCs

would then increase.

Page | 374
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://newztodays.com/power-sector-in-pakistan/

Further Indication of an Increase in Trade Debts in the Future

➢ Increase in receivables by SNGPL (Biggest Defaulter)

Years 2018 2019 2020 2021

Payment from

SNGPL 118,873,402 53,457,589 68,296,465 93,510,930

➢ Historical Decrease in AR turnover and Increase in Trade Debts to Sales Ratio

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Trade Debts 118,873,402 245,577,071 223,797,044 198,134,828 222,384,954

Average Trade Debts 148,572,210 182,225,237 234,687,058 210,965,936 210,259,891

Sales 878,146,786 1,056,900,563 1,185,484,132 1,121,161,417 1,223,678,351

AR Turnover 5.91 5.80 5.05 5.31 5.82

Page | 375
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

AR/Sales Ratio 13.54% 23.24% 18.88% 17.67% 18.17%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the trade debt turnover has decreased for three years till 2019.

This means the company was not efficient in collecting its receivables. However the ratio

improved during the pandemic as the government gave subsidies to its customers such as

GENCO and due to this their receivables decreased. The receivables from the biggest defaulters

are still there however.

Page | 376
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic analysis

Factors Effects

Gas Circular Debt to Increase Increase

Deregulation of Gas Sector Increase

Capacity Payments Decrease

Generation Capacity Expansion Plan Decrease

Line Losses Increase

Late Payment Surcharge Increase

Weak Governance of Wapda Increase

Trade debts went up in 2021 as compared to 2020 mainly because of lower recoveries from

SNGPL, GENCO and HUBCO which proved to be the biggest defaulters of the company. The

company’s receivables have been all time high which has also resulted in it having negative cash

flows. The management told that more than 80% of its total dues is held with the usual culprit-

power sector, with the non-payments likely to create oil supply crisis. There have been many

reasons due to which these companies have been unable to pay back to PSO which have been

discussed below.

Source:

Page | 377
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual report, 2021

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1363656

Gas Circular debt

Of the few major defaulters of PSO, Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) emerged as

one in the LNG sector, which is due to pay around Rs.161 billion to PSO. The link between PSO

and SNGPL is that PSO imports LNG from Qatar and other suppliers and supplies it to SNGPL

which onward sell it to the customers as per pricing mechanism given by the government of

Pakistan.

The elephant in the room is the disparity between cost of gas and consumer tariffs given by the

government of Pakistan. There is no debate on the fact that gas prices in Pakistan have been a

long dichotomy. Cost of gas is far more than the prices at which these are supplied to the end

consumers. Moreover considering that the gas allocations and pricing decisions in Pakistan have

always been political, there have been a lot of debates on the inefficient consumer pricing

mechanism of natural gas.

The current cost of local natural gas is 700 per mmbtu while the cost for imported gas is 2400

per mmbtu. On the contrary the selling price for both local and imported gas stands at 350 per

mmbtu which means there is a loss of 350 for local and 2050 per mmbtu for imported gas.

Pakistan was lucky to have deep reserves of gas in Sui Baluchistan. Unfortunately, people

Page | 378
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

consider the low-price pipeline gas availability is a fundamental right, however, it’s a luxury. But

because of the political decisions in Pakistan the luxury of providing cheap gas through

expensive infrastructure continued. Eventually the costs could not be recovered and the pressure

of low pricing dis-incentivized further exploration

The government continued to subsidize these losses with the promise to pay SNGPL. However

provision of cheap gas to households was manageable back when domestically produced gas was

abundant to meet local consumption requirements, and non-residential consumers who were

paying higher rates were enough in numbers to cross-subsidize the domestic supply. With natural

gas supply depleting, production has significantly reduced and would keep on falling. There is no

serious hope on new discoveries. That is why the country has diverted to the imported LNG to

bridge the widening gap. With the non-residential customers moving to RLNG, the remaining

good customers are not enough to cross subsidize domestic Thus receivables started to build up

with SNGPL claiming to have to receive over Rs.100 billion from domestic gas consumers

ultimately unable to pay back their gas suppliers which is PSO. This is also clearly highlighted in

the financial statements of PSO where they are making record profits on paper, however have a

negative cash flow due to being caught in the gas circular debt. The Company is also actively

pursuing the Government of Pakistan to get budgetary allocation for release of past due price

differential claims.

Page | 379
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

At current spot international prices, only a tiny fraction (10-15%) could be recovered from the

consumers at prevailing domestic prices. The government cannot afford to replace the depleting

gas with the imported RLNG without increasing the prices. It would be a financial suicide to

provide imported RLNG at throwaway prices to domestic consumers, while bearing all the cost.

All this would only result in the increased risk to gas circular debt and the bankruptcy of SNGPL

both of which the government cannot afford. So the only way to avoid trouble is increase prices,

which we predict will be done in phases as the government lack enough political will to increase

the prices all at once.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2317566/pso-receivables-soar-to-rs262b

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/amp/909334-top-omc-in-economic-mess-pso-s-receivables-surge-to-

rs398-billion

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40134437

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40141248

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/402099

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40062748

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40124127

Page | 380
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.investing.com/analysis/pso-pakistans-circular-debt-crisis-has-run-its-largest-fuel-

retailer-dry-200303636

Deregulation of Gas sector

With country wide depleting gas reserves, production has significantly reduced and the

government has started to rely more on imported RLNG. However the huge difference between

the cost of gas and the price at which it is supplied, coupled with the inability of the government

to increase the prices has resulted in the huge growth of gas circular debt. The government

cannot sustain this structure any longer and the gas sector is bound to be deregulated as hinted by

the federal information minister Fawad Chaudhry with license being issued to 10 companies for

supplying gas to the people after its import.

Future Outlook

With this deregulation, there will be a boost in the economic activity as new players will enter

the market. They will sell at a price feasible to them which means the gas prices in the country

will increase ultimately reducing the circular debt and receivables of PSO. Moreover with the

existing pipeline network, SNGPL will be the major transporter of the gas to the end consumer

which is likely to increase their sales and thus giving them the ability to pay back PSO. So the

forecast would be that the deregulation of the gas sector is likely help SNGPL in paying back

PSO, thus reducing its trade debt.

Page | 381
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://www.businesstribune.com.pk/economy-news/government-initiates-deregulation-of-gas-

sector/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1634632

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40141248

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40140218

Capacity Payments

At the moment, Pakistan’s energy sector is a total mess. The main reason for this is the

negligence in the previous contracts done with the Independent Power Producers (IPPs). Under

those contracts the agreement was such that the cost of production was 20-25% more, guarantee

was given by the government of Pakistan to pay the IPPs in full, the contracts were front loaded,

and they were done on take or pay basis. All of this meant that the entire risk is on the

government of Pakistan and close to none on the IPPs. This was done with the prediction that in

the future consumption will increase. However the opposite happened with the generation being

a lot more and the consumption less resulting in a 40% gap between consumption and

generation.

Page | 382
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

After suffering from decades of electricity shortages, now Pakistan is suffering from too much

generation which is an unexpected dilemma. Owing to higher electricity generation, the capacity

payments will also go up. The prime minister reported that

“Even if we do not use electricity in winter, the capacity payment would have to be made and all

this happened because of short-term planning and corruption”.

At another conference he said,

“The problem is that there is a huge gap in power consumption between winter and summer as

power consumption from around 24,000MW in summer drops to 8,000 or 9,000MW in winter,

and the country would still be making capacity payment against the entire generation, and this

was happening because of short-term planning,”

Due to close to no measures being taken, capacity payments have swelled 53% from 2018 to

2021.

Future Outlook

Page | 383
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Given the current scenario, capacity payments have continued to increase and are expected to

touch a high of Rs1.6 trillion in 2023 as can be seen in the graph above. However the

government has taken steps to reduce the capacity payment and ultimately the circular debt.

Under negotiations with the IPPs the government has been able to save Rs.120 billion every year

along with some cancellations of contracts. Moreover experts are of the view that the

government would have to offer incentives to industries and other consumers to consume more

electricity in a bid to reduce the burden of capacity payments.

We predict that in the future the government will be able to settle the capacity payments as more

reforms and negotiations are taking place. With incentives on board or industries to reduce the

Page | 384
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

burden, gradually the payments will be settled and ultimately major IPPs like HUBCO, KAPCO

and GENCO will pay back PSO after recovering their payments.

Source:

➢ HUBCO Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1609241

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2296006/power-consumers-to-pay-rs11tr

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/923506-new-terms-with-ipps-to-help-govt-save-rs120-billion-

every-year

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/784220-revised-power-tariff-all-47-ipps-sign-master-

agreements

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40057588/capacity-payment-charges-will-soar-to-rs15trn-by-

2023

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1606506

Indicative Generation Capacity Expansion Plan 2021-30 (IGCEP)

Pakistan has one of the biggest potentials for hydroelectricity generation in the world, with a

generation potential of almost 50,000 MW. Keeping in mind that the IPPs uses non-renewable

sources of fuel, oil and coal which are also very expensive NEPRA has approved the first ever

Indicative Generation Capacity Expansion Plan 2021-30 (IGCEP-2021) under provisions of the

National Transmission & Despatch Company (NTDC) grid code, and envisions increasing

Page | 385
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

renewable energy share in total mix to 60 percent. IFCEP would substitute these non-renewable

sources of energy with indigenous resources including hydel, local coal, bagasse, wind and solar

on least cost basis.

The NTDC officials said that we should not worry about availability of power as the plan will be

revised each year in accordance with ground progress of projects and demand and supply

position which would also ensure that there is no chance of any sudden jerk in supply and

demand.

Future Outlook

IGCEP (2021-30) would not only help in solving the energy crisis in Pakistan but would also

reduce the government’s reliance on the IPPs and help in paying them back which would

ultimately help PSO in recovering its receivables. Moreover this would also reduce the

possibility of an increase in the trade debt of PSO as the project aims at producing electricity

through renewable sources of energy. However the NTDC officials argued that this would only

be possible if the government does not give commitments to more projects over and above the

requirement, as payments which is already a problem will only worsen.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/895082-nepra-approves-igcep-2021-30-envisions-re-share-of-

60-percent

Page | 386
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40134662

Weak Governance of WAPDA

The current energy crisis has been a critical socio economic issue in Pakistan and is rooted in the

country’s poor governance. The electricity shortages are mainly due to widespread inefficiency

and corruption in the Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) and the KESC with

the decision-makers unable to do anything about it. The multiple problems include, poor supply-

demand management, kunda-system or power thefts, costly input and the rising recurring costs

Many public and private power producers have to shut down their power plants due to

suspension of fuel supply because of outstanding dues of power producers to the PSO.

Future Outlook

Effective management, check and balance in the transmission and distribution system, starting of

new projects and public awareness is the need of the hour to tackle this crisis. Pakistan has some

impressive assets in the energy sector. A number of new projects have also been started and there

has been a great surge in the generation of electricity within the country. However this has

resulted in the rise of other problems but there have been advantages as well. As for the future,

there is enough capacity to provide for the demand, the only thing required is that we have to

create an enabling environment to provide energy fast relief to the nation.

Source:

Page | 387
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1583804

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/710729/poor-governance-deepens-energy-crisis

Line losses

The economy as a whole suffers from unreliable and poor quality of electricity provision. Of the

many factors contributing, one of them is the high transmission and distribution losses. Under

CPEC agreements, a large amount of generation capacity was added without upgrading

transmission and distribution. Due to this the transmission and distribution losses for almost all

the companies is more than 15% while the recovery revenue is not enough. The visible evidence

of electricity theft in major cities only makes the matters worse.

In November 2019, KE initiated the ambitious Project Sarbulandi in six of the twelve high loss

IBCs to improve their performance. Several innovative were introduced and complementary

programme features, such as counselling of local influentials to gain their support, gaining

confidence of people to meter the unmetered, community engagement and facilitation for

winning the trust of customers.

Future Outlook

During Covid-19, Project Sarbulandi remained a huge success as it was able to improve the loss

to recovery ratio by a significant amount, reducing the electricity theft as well. True potential of

Project Sarbulandi is yet to be explored and with more such wide scale initiatives, we predict that

Page | 388
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

in the future line losses will be reduced as the recovery will increase, coupled with projects to

improve the transmission lines. This will help the IPPs in making profit thus paying back PSO.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1629670

Late payment surcharge

During the year late payment surcharge was made by HUBCO and KAPCO on account of

delaying payments. This was accounted for in the payment of Rs.13.4 billion by the power sector

to PSO. The amount received against the late payment surcharge from HUBCO and KAPCO

contributed materially in easing the financial strain on the company’s cost of funds for the year.

Future Outlook

Since the power sector has gradually started to pay off, we predict that in the coming year they

will increase their payments to PSO without delaying them any further. This can also be

supported by the past data.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Page | 389
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Naïve (15 years)

Page | 390
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1.4E+09

1.2E+09

1E+09

800000000

600000000

400000000

200000000

0
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Excel Forecasting

Page | 391
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 392
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1.4E+09

1.2E+09

1E+09

800000000

600000000

400000000

200000000

0
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Horizontal Analysis

Page | 393
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Loans and Advances

Breakdown:

Vertical

Loans and Advances 2021 Analysis

Secured

Loans and advances to executives and employees

Current portion of long-term loans and advances, including

Rs. 83,632 (2020: Rs.72,293) to executives 196,686 56.47%

Short-term loans and advances 129,815 37.27%

326,501 93.74%

Unsecured

Advance to suppliers 19,932 5.72%

Advance for Company-owned filling stations 1,863 0.53%

21,795 6.26%

348,296 100.00%

Page | 394
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (15.01%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Loans and Advances -11.45% 10.97% -79.63% 2.43% -1.17% -11.20%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.30%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Loans and Advances 0.09% 0.12% 0.09% 0.48% 0.48% 0.55%

Forecasted Values

After analyzing all the data, we predict that the account will decrease at an increasing rate

between 10-15% for the next 5 years. This prediction can also be supported with the trendline

graph below.

Page | 395
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

400.00%
350.00%
300.00%
250.00%
200.00%
150.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
(50.00%)
(100.00%)
(150.00%)

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Loans and advances to executives and Increase

employees increased

Increase in Short Term loans and advances Increase

Advance to suppliers decreased Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.30% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

Page | 396
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 15.01% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Loans and advances


2,500,000

2,000,000

1,500,000

1,000,000

500,000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Loans

and Advances of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

There was a decrease of 11.45%, due to the following reasons;

• Advance to suppliers decreased by 86.65%.

• Advance for Company-owned filling stations decreased by 52.9%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Page | 397
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2020:

There was an increase of 10.97%, due to the following reasons;

• Advance to suppliers increased by 258.2%.

• Loans and advances to executives and employees increased by 31.8%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was a decrease of 79.63%, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Short Term loans and advances by 47.6%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

There was an increase of 2.43%, due to the following reasons;

• Loans and advances to executives and employees increased by 31.8%.

• Increase in Short Term loans and advances by 20.4%

Source:

Page | 398
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

There was a decrease of 1.17%, due to the following reasons;

• Loans and advances to executives and employees decreased by 4.41%

• Decrease in Short Term loans and advances by 2.3%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

There was a decrease of 11.20%, due to the following reasons;

• Advance for Company-owned filling stations decreased by 96.85%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 399
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Reduction in Long Term Loans and Advances Decrease

Reduction in advances to foreign suppliers Decrease

Losses due to the pandemic reduce the availability of loans and advances Decrease

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of loans and

advances of all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Short Term Loans and Advances of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 1,896,038 1,919,400 390,909 433,797 384,136

HTL 125,795,530 80,222,041 53,856,012 151,181,999 89,718,454

APL 257,642 785947 927,887 72,198 454,682

BPL 75,209 120,714 59,615 53,084 72,027

TOTAL 128,024,419 83,048,102 55,234,423 151,741,078 90,629,299

Page | 400
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Short Term Loans and

Advances

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 0.99%

HTL 98.45%

APL 0.49%

BPL 0.07%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Short Term Loans and Advances

Page | 401
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


120.00%

98.45%
100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.99% 0.49% 0.07%


0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of short term

loans and advances in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Short Term Loans and Advances Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 1.48% 2.31% 0.71% 0.29% 0.42%

Page | 402
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating PSO’s Short Term Loans and Advances Share in the Industry w.r.t

Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


2.50%
2.31%

2.00%

1.50% 1.48%

1.00%

0.71%
0.50%
0.42%
0.29%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of short term loans and advances was the highest in

2018. However, it has fallen drastically after that. In 2021, it increased again. That is mainly

because HTL’s market share dropped considerably for this account in 2021. But for PSO, the fall

in 2021 for this account was not that drastic.

Yearly Change/Growth in Short Term Loans and Advances of PSO

Page | 403
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 0.00% 1.23% -79.63% 10.97% -11.45%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Short Term Loans and Advances of PSO

PSO Yearly STL&A Growth


20.00%

10.00% 10.97%

0.00% 0.00% 1.23%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00% -11.45%
-20.00%

-30.00%

-40.00%

-50.00%

-60.00%

-70.00%

-80.00% -79.63%

-90.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest loans and advances were given out in 2020. These

dropped in 2021. The fall was drastic in 2019 for PSO’s short term loans and advances.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Short Term Loans and Advances Overtime


Page | 404
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 27.92% -35.13% -33.49% 174.72% -40.27%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Short Term Loans and Advances

Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


200.00%
174.72%
150.00%

100.00%

50.00%
27.92%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-35.13% -33.49%
-40.27%
-50.00%

-100.00%

Analysis: The industry has also experienced a downwards trend in its loans and advances from

2017-2019. In 2020 it was the highest as all the OMCs gave out maximum number of loans and

Page | 405
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

advances to its employees. In 2021 it dropped considerably. This aligns well with the long term

loans and advances account as well which had similar changes to it.

Factors affecting Short Term Loans and Advances

Direct Impact of Long Term Loans and Advances on its Current Portion

In the analysis of long term loans and advances, it was already established that they are expected

to fall. That account already had a decreasing trend and that would impact its current portion as

well. The OMCs do not give out much loans and advances to their employees. They have

retirement and other service benefits for the employees. The loans and advances are only for

unforeseen circumstance such as the pandemic due to which in 2020, the companies offered

more loans to the employees.

Future Outlook

The account is expected to fall in the future because it already had minimal growth levels. The

current portion increased in 2020 as its long term account increased. Otherwise, it is expected to

fall in the near future as the OMCs need more money for investments instead.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ Director’s Report APL

Page | 406
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Director’s Report HTL

➢ Director’s Report BPL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1660178

➢ http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:429667/fulltext01

Losses during Pandemic Lead to Lower Availability of Funds for Loans and Advances

When in 2019, lockdowns were imposed and the companies were making losses, they did not

have many funds available for the employees to give them loans and advances. However, in late

2020’s the lockdown was lifted and economic activity started again. This led to them having

more funds available for the employees.

Future Outlook

The OMCs would be there in time of need for their employees; however, otherwise this

particular account will decrease as it only increased due to the pandemic.

Source:

➢ https://www.pacra.com/sector_research/OMCsPACRAResearchNov21.pdf

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=427

➢ https://cabinet.gov.pk/SiteImage/Misc/files/EC_Report.pdf

Page | 407
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2021-

03/UNIDO%20COVID19%20Assessment_Pakistan_FINAL.pdf

Decrease in Advances given to Suppliers as Cheaper LNG was Imported by OMCs

The OMCs showed heavy reliance on the import of LNG which is a lot cheaper than oil. This

made their raw material cheaper and led to lower advances being paid to the suppliers as well.

Up to seven million tonnes of LNG was imported last year. A major chunk of this comes from

Qatar Energy the producer with which Pakistan has long term contracts as well as suppliers like

the Italian multinational oil and gas company ENI and the Singapore-based Gunvor. Some more

is bought from the same suppliers at the spot rate when the gas runs out. Not surprisingly, the

LNG being imported has brought little relief for its people, with an increasing number of urban

homes resorting to using LPG cylinders in the kitchen and to fire the water geysers, with the

industries, especially in Karachi, turning to diesel, over the last several years.

Future Outlook:

It is evident that with the presence of cheaper oil and the fact that Saudi Arabia is making

policies to provide oil to Pakistan and with the facilitation of the CPFTA, they would have to pay

lower advances to suppliers as lower costs will be incurred by them.

Source:

Page | 408
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1684038

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1671124

➢ https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2021/9/28/pakistans-dependence-on-natural-gas-is-

turning-into-a-nightmare

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/937557-pm-slashes-petrol-diesel-prices-by-rs10-litre-

power-tariff-rs5-unit

➢ https://newztodays.com/pso-oil-imports/

Page | 409
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 410
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

400.00%
350.00%
300.00%
250.00%
200.00%
150.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
2010

2014

2018

2022

2026
2007
2008
2009

2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017

2019
2020
2021

2023
2024
2025
(50.00%)
(100.00%)
(150.00%)

Page | 411
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Short term deposits and

prepayments

Breakdown:

Short Term Deposits and Prepayments 2021 Vertical Analysis

Deposits - interest free 20,605 9.28%

Duty and development surcharge 53,006 23.88%

Deposit against court orders 73,611 33.16%

Prepayments 148,348 66.84%

221,959 100.00%

Page | 412
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (0.25%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Short-Term Deposits and -90.01% -19.48% -3.55% -42.47% 116.64% 40.37%

Prepayments

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.76%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Short-Term Deposits and 0.06% 0.69% 0.71% 0.83% 1.47% 0.78%

Prepayments

Forecasted Values

We predict that the account will continue to fall, in line with the historical data, for the next 5

years between a range of 20-30%. This can be supported with the graph below.

Page | 413
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Change
200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
(50.00%)

(100.00%)

(150.00%)

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Decrease in Duty and development surcharge Decrease

Decrease in Rentals (Prepayments) Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.76% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 15.01% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Page | 414
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Short-Term Deposits and Prepayments


7000000

6000000

5000000

4000000

3000000

2000000

1000000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Short-

Term Deposits and Prepayments of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

There was a decrease of 90.01%, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Duty and development surcharge by 99.01%.

• Decrease in Prepayments by 64.6%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

There was a decrease of 19.48%, due to the following reasons;

Page | 415
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Decrease in Duty and development surcharge by 22.08%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was a decrease of 3.55%, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Duty and development surcharge by 5.32%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

There was a decrease of 42.47%, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Duty and development surcharge by 45.08%.

• Decrease in Rentals (Prepayments) by 32.2%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

There was an increase of 116.6%, due to the following reasons;


Page | 416
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Increase in Duty and development surcharge by 125.1%.

• Decrease in Rentals (Prepayments) by 18.7%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

There was an increase of 40.37%, due to the following reasons;

• Increase in Duty and development surcharge by 125.2%.

• Decrease in Rentals (Prepayments) by 151.9%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 417
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Fall in duty and development surcharge of OMCs Decrease

Iraq freezes crude oil prepayment deal Decrease

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of short term

deposits and prepayments of all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Short Term Deposits and Prepayments of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 5,788,052 3,329,991 3,211,845 2,586,292 258,402

HTL 24,413,272 61,026,609 60,831,795 31,144,473 19,316,915

APL 910,353 1,641,485 890,788 4,797,007 1,560,408

BPL 5,966 11,601 5,545 2,298 99,920

TOTAL 31,117,643 66,009,686 64,939,973 38,530,070 21,235,645

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Short Term Deposits and

Prepayments

Page | 418
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 6.84%

HTL 88.69%

APL 4.42%

BPL 0.06%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Short Term Deposits and Prepayments

Page | 419
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


100.00%
88.69%
90.00%

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00% 6.84%
4.42%
0.06%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of short term

deposits and prepayments in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Short Term Deposits and Prepayments Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 18.60% 5.04% 4.95% 6.71% 1.22%

Page | 420
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating PSO’s Short Term Deposits and Prepayments Share in the Industry w.r.t

Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


20.00%
18.60%
18.00%

16.00%

14.00%

12.00%

10.00%

8.00%
6.71%
6.00%
5.04% 4.95%
4.00%

2.00%
1.22%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of short term deposits and prepayments has

experienced a decreasing trend throughout the years. These only increased in 2020. However, it

fell further in 2021. The decrease in PSO’s short term deposit and prepayments was lesser than

the industry’s decrease in this account.

Yearly Change/Growth in Short Term Deposits and Prepayments of PSO

Page | 421
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly PPE

Growth 116.64% 24.64% -3.55% -19.48% -90.01%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Short Term Deposits and Prepayments of PSO

PSO Yearly STD&P Growth


150.00%

116.64%
100.00%

50.00%
24.64%
0.00% -3.55%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-19.48%
-50.00%

-90.01%
-100.00%

-150.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest short term deposits of the company were in 2017.

Since then, they have been falling and there is a decreasing trend. In 2021, the growth was the

Page | 422
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

lowest and had a negative trend. This means that these deposits and prepayments have been

decreasing since 2017.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Short Term Deposits and Prepayments Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 45.26% 112.13% -1.62% -40.67% -44.89%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Short Term Deposits and Prepayments

Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


120.00%
112.13%
100.00%

80.00%

60.00%
45.26%
40.00%

20.00%

0.00% -1.62%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-20.00%

-40.00% -40.67% -44.89%


-60.00%

Page | 423
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The industry has also experienced a downwards trend in its short term deposits and

prepayments. This is majorly because all the OMCs experienced this trend. In 2020, APL had an

increase in this account but all other accounts faced a downwards trend.

Factors effecting Short Term Deposits

Iraq Freezes its Crude Oil Prepayment Deal, Affecting OMCs in Pakistan

Iraq has decided to freeze its first crude oil prepayment deal, which had aimed to boost its

finances, because oil prices are rising. The proposed change follows a decision by Iraq, OPEC’s

second-biggest producer, to cut its oil exports to India this year to comply with OPEC quotas just

as Indian refiners ramp up output to meet a demand uplift as the world’s third-largest crude

importer emerges from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Future Outlook

A fall in prepayments would reduce this account in the future as well. The international oil prices

are expected to increase in the future due to which Iraq would be reluctant to offer the

prepayment scheme to its customers such as Pakistani OMCs

Sources:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://www.orfonline.org/research/energy-news-monitor-volume-xvii-issue-40/

Page | 424
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/02/01/ocac-for-enhanced-trade-finance-

facilities-for-omcs-refineries/

Fall in Duty and Development Surcharges paid by OMCs

In 2021, there was a drastic fall in the duty and development surcharge because of the tax free

imports that were taking place from China under the CPFTA. This allowed the companies to

import oil at cheaper rates and fewer deposits were required. Moreover, there was a relief

provided by the government on the import of crude oil as that was shifted to petrol and diesel

instead. Crude oil became less expensive in this way and fewer deposits were required by the

OMCs in Pakistan.

Future Outlook

Government is in the favor of promoting the OMCs in Pakistan and several measures have been

taken by the government to facilitate easy operation of the OMCs. So, deposits and prepayments

are expected to fall in the future

Source:

➢ https://www.livemint.com/economy/better-margins-to-aid-omcs-in-second-half-

11639071172561.html

Page | 425
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/policy/if-oil-remains-above-110bbl-

burden-will-be-shared-by-govt-omcs-and-consumers-cea-8350621.html

➢ https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/economy/constant-rate-hikes-may-not-be-

needed-if-crude-oil-prices-stabilise-at-current-level-8350351.html

Page | 426
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 427
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Other Receivable

Breakdown:

Vertical

Other Receivables 2021 Analysis

Due from GoP, a related party, on account of:

Price differential claims (PDC)

- on imports (net of related liabilities) of Motor gasoline 1,350,961 6.33%

- on High-Speed Diesel (HSD) 602,603 2.82%

- on Ethanol E-10 fuel 27,917 0.13%

- on account of supply of Furnace Oil to K-Electric

Limited (KEL) at Natural Gas prices 3,908,581 18.32%

- GENCO receivables 3,407,357 15.97%

9,297,419 43.58%

Unfavorable exchange differences on FE-25 borrowings

due from GoP - a related party

Page | 428
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Excise, Petroleum Development Levy (PDL), custom duty

and

regulatory duty - due from related party 259,793 1.22%

9,557,212 44.80%

Provision for impairment -1,602,919 -7.51%

7,954,293 37.28%

Handling and hospitality charges 729,644 3.42%

Receivable from refineries 2,928,136 13.72%

Insurance and other claims 234,827 1.10%

Provision for impairment- considered doubtful -90,201 -0.42%

144,626 0.68%

Workers' Profit Participation Fund 145,397 0.68%

Inland Freight Equalization Margin (IFEM) including freight

equalization receivable from GoP (related party) 2,648,016 12.41%

Provision for impairment -46,000 -0.22%

2,602,016 12.20%

Others

Page | 429
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

- Considered good 6,830,623 32.02%

- Considered doubtful 1,484,981 6.96%

8,315,604 38.98%

Provision for impairment -1,484,981 -6.96%

6,830,623 32.02%

21,334,735 100.00%

Horizontal Analysis: Average (11.50%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Other Receivables -10.35% -58.10% 72.02% 44.02% -12.25% 33.63%

Vertical Analysis: Average (7.62%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Other Receivables 5.15% 6.34% 12.52% 8.20% 5.84% 7.63%

Forecasted Values

Page | 430
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Although the other receivable for the company can be seen decreasing for the past 2 years, the

economic factors and industrial factors suggest that the other receivables for the company will be

increasing in the future mainly on account of the PDC. We predict that the account will increase

between 20-25%. This can be supported with the graph below.

60,000,000.00

50,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

30,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

0.00
2012

2025
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024

Series1 Series2

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in sales tax receivables Increase

Increase in Inland Freight Equalization Margin Increase

Page | 431
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Loss receivable on FE loans Decrease

Decrease in the Excise, Petroleum Development Decrease

Levy

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

7.62% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 11.50% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Other Receivables
60000000

50000000

40000000

30000000

20000000

10000000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the other

receivables account of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

Page | 432
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

When we take a look at the other receivables account in the year 2021, a decrease of 10.3% is

seen due to the following reason;

• Subsidy receivables remained static: The subsidy receivables from the government of

Pakistan remained the same through year 2020-2021. As at June 30, 2021, the Group’s

receivable from Government of Pakistan and customers amounted to Rs. 235,254 million

which included trade debts receivables of Rs. 183,896 million

• Excise, Petroleum Development Levy (PDL), custom duty and regulatory duty was

due: It had not been paid to PSO due to which it remained static.

• Increase in sales tax receivables

• Claims Receivables remain constant.

• Increase in Inland Freight Equalization Margin (IFEM): Due from the government of

Punjab.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40134437/circular-debt-of-pso-soars-to-all-time-high

Year 2020:

When we take a look at the other receivables account in the year 2020, a decrease of 58.10% is

seen due to the following reason;

Page | 433
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Subsidy receivables remained static: The subsidy receivables from the government of

Pakistan remained the same through year 2020-2021.

• Decrease in the Excise, Petroleum Development Levy (PDL), custom duty and

regulatory duty.

• Claims Receivables remain constant.

• Increase in Inland Freight Equalization Margin (IFEM): Due from the government of

Punjab.

• Recovery of exchange loss receivable on FE loans: Net unfavorable exchange

difference of Rs. 1,799 million, net of recoveries during the year of Rs. 27,890 million,

arising on foreign currency borrowings (FE-25), obtained under the directives of Ministry

of Finance, which was to be settled in accordance with the instructions.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1539008

Year 2019:

When we take a look at the other receivables account in the year 2019, an increase of 72.02% is

seen due to the following reason;

Page | 434
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Exchange loss receivable booked on FE loans amounting to Rs. 30.2 bn: A net

unfavorable exchange difference of Rs.30,244 million arising on foreign currency

borrowings (FE-25), obtained under the directives of Ministry of Finance. About Rs48bn

are payable to the PSO by the Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) and the federal

government on account of price differential claims and exchange rate loss.

➢ Decrease in the Excise, Petroleum Development Levy (PDL), custom duty and

regulatory duty

➢ Increase in sales tax receivables

➢ Increase in Inland Freight Equalization Margin (IFEM): Due from the government of

Punjab.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1458797

Year 2018:

When we take a look at the other receivables account in the year 2019, an increase of 44.02% is

seen due to the following reason;

• Exchange loss receivable booked on FE loans amounting to Rs. 9.7 bn

Page | 435
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Decrease in the Excise, Petroleum Development Levy (PDL), custom duty and

regulatory duty

• Decrease in sales tax receivables

• Decrease in Inland Freight Equalization Margin (IFEM): Due from the government

of Punjab.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

When we take a look at the other receivables account in the year 2017, a decrease of 12.2% is

seen due to the following reason;

• Increase in the Excise, Petroleum Development Levy (PDL), custom duty and

regulatory duty

• Decrease in sales tax receivables

• Decrease in Inland Freight Equalization Margin (IFEM): Due from the government

of Punjab.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Page | 436
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2016:

When we take a look at the other receivables account in the year 2018, An increase of 33.63% by

Rs. 6.7 bn is seen due to the following reason;

• Decrease in the Excise, Petroleum Development Levy (PDL), custom duty and

regulatory duty

• Increase in sales tax receivables

• Increase in Inland Freight Equalization Margin (IFEM): Due from the government

of Punjab.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 437
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in price differential claims of OMCs Increase

Increase in supplies to Karachi Electric of Furnace Oil at Natural Gas Prices Increase

Increase in receivables of regulatory duty of OMCs Increase

Receivables of OMCs from Refineries Increase Increase

Increase in Insurance Claims on Inventory Losses Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of other

receivables of all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Other Receivables of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 22,925,566 33,017,635 56,797,908 23,797,120 21,334,735

HTL 243,868,294 109,129,419 32,546,523 34,306,841 141,381,054

APL 2,572,236 2,526,541 3,080,607 4,443,495 5,246,840

BPL 41,326 33,475 83,400 19,459 41,726

Page | 438
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

TOTAL 269,407,422 144,707,070 92,508,438 62,566,915 168,004,355

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Other Receivables

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 21.42%

HTL 76.13%

APL 2.42%

BPL 0.03%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Other Receivables

Page | 439
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


Total Market Share
76.13%

21.42%

2.42%
0.03%

PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of other

receivables in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Other Receivables Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 8.51% 22.82% 61.40% 38.03% 12.70%

Page | 440
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating PSO’s Other Receivables Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


70.00%

60.00% 61.40%

50.00%

40.00%
38.03%

30.00%

22.82%
20.00%

12.70%
10.00%
8.51%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of other receivables has had an increasing trend till

2019. However, the market share was the highest in 2019 but dropped significantly after that.

Yearly Change/Growth in Other Receivables of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth -12.25% 44.02% 72.02% -58.10% -10.35%

Page | 441
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Other Receivables of PSO

PSO Yearly Other Receivables Growth


80.00%
72.02%
60.00%

44.02%
40.00%

20.00%

0.00% -10.35%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-12.25%
-20.00%

-40.00%

-60.00% -58.10%

-80.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest other receivables for PSO were in 2019 because the

growth was drastic. However, it was followed by a sharp drop in 2020 and can be seen to

increase again in 2021.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Other Receivables Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 442
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly

Growth 289.43% -46.29% -36.07% -32.37% 168.52%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Other Receivables Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


350.00%

300.00%
289.43%

250.00%

200.00%
168.52%
150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-46.29% -36.07% -32.37%
-50.00%

-100.00%

Analysis: The industry has also experienced a downwards trend till 2018. However, in 2019 the

value started to increase as PSO’s market share increased and so did that of APL and BPL. The

growth was slow till 2020 but in 2021, the receivables can be seen to increase again.

Page | 443
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Breakdown of Receivables of Different OMCs

➢ PSO - (2020-2021)

➢ HTL – (2020-2021)

Page | 444
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ APL – (2020-2021)

➢ BPL – (2020-2021)

Page | 445
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Factors affecting Other Receivable

Issue of Price Differential Pertains, Increasing Other Receivables of OMCs

Price differential claims of oil marketing companies OMCs and refineries in the amount of

approximately Rs32.07 billion were estimated for the month of March 2022 (including PDC of

earlier period from 1-4, November 2011 and this price differential is to be paid to the oil

marketing companies and refineries by the government as a subsidy. The Petroleum Division

further stated in the proposal that as OGRA has projected that owing to rising trend of oil prices

in the international market, the PDC for the first and second fortnights of April 2022 is Rs31.80

billion and Rs35.73 billion, respectively.

Future Outlook

Page | 446
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

International oil prices are going to rise in the future and the price differential claim would also

rise due to this. This would lead to increase in receivables for the PDC of OMCs.

Sources:

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40168355/price-differential-claims-of-omcsrefineries-

rs6881bn-supplementary-grant-approved-by-ecc

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1683341

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/937868-oil-sector-fears-price-differential-claims-to-

remain-unpaid

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/939427-rs20-bn-proposed-for-paying-price-

differential-to-omcs

➢ https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/04/19/ecc-approves-rs68-billion-grant-for-

disbursement-of-price-differential-claims-to-omcs/

Provision of Furnace Oil to K-Electric at Natural Gas Prices

The K-Electric Limited (KEL) Has Secured The Supply Of 25,000 Tonnes Of Furnace Oil To

Ensure Maximisation Of All Available Generation Capacity. The OMCs experienced a price

differential claim because of this as well as furnace oil is extremely expensive to produce but the

company gets it at cheaper a rate which is unfair to the OMCs because they face losses in the

form of other receivables because of this.

Page | 447
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

The production of electricity is becoming more expensive day by day. The companies do not

have enough funding available to spend in the way of their payables. Due to this, the value of

other receivables is expected to only increase in the future because of this.

Source:

➢ https://technologytimes.pk/2021/06/26/k-electric-secures-25000-tonnes-of-furnace-oil-to-

maintain-supply/

➢ https://www.ke.com.pk/k-electrics-online-fuel-cost-adjustment-calculator-goes-live/

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/1700165/alternative-fuel-k-electric-expects-lower-tariff-lng-

use-plants

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/02/07/petroleum-division-seeks-amendment-to-

petroleum-product-ordinance-to-supply-rlng-to-k-electric/

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2355536/power-tariffs-to-go-up-for-a-month-across-country

Increase in Price Differential Claims of OMCs due to Increase in Regulatory Duty

The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) of the Cabinet in its meeting dated March 07,

2018 considered the summary submitted by Petroleum Division on the subject of regulatory duty

on crude oil and petroleum products and approved reimbursement of claims of OMCs on account

of non-recovery of regulatory duty.

Page | 448
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

In the short run, this would also increase the other receivables of the OMCs but in the long run,

these will be received by the OMCs.

Sources:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ Director’s Report HTL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1682147

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/10/17/fbr-increases-regulatory-duty-on-570-

imported-items-by-5-to-10pc/

Losses faced by Refineries generate Receivables in OMCs Accounts

As discussed earlier, the refineries in Pakistan are not operating at full capacity and that is

mainly because of the production of out of demand products such as furnace oil. Due to this, they

kept going on strikes and lowered their production and OMCs used to rely on imports for a short

term solution. The refineries or the holding companies had to pay the OMCs and they were

unable to do so. This includes amount due from Pak-Arab Refinery Limited - (related party) in

respect of sharing of crude oil, freight and other charges and National Refinery Limited in

respect of pipeline charges. Due to the short-term nature of other receivables, their carrying

amount is considered to be the same as their fair value.

Page | 449
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

This issue will pertain until the refineries are given incentives and motives to produce the

products which are in demand. If the refineries keep holding furnace oil, they will face liquidity

issues in the future, leading to an increase in this account.

Sources:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://www.pacra.com/summary_report/RR_809_9130_09-Jun-21.pdf

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/946309-refineries-refuse-output-boost-citing-cash-

crunch

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/325631

➢ http://lahoreschoolofeconomics.edu.pk/EconomicsJournal/Journals/Volume%2015/Issue

%20SP/04%20Syed%20Sajid%20EDITED%20TTC%2011-10-10.pdf

OMCs seek Insurance Claims for Inventory Losses

The value of the receivables also increased of OMCs when they were seeking insurance claims

on the account of destruction of pipelines, bridges etc. They also experienced inventory losses in

2020 due to the pandemic and the fact that the government did not allow the companies to raise

the prices. Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) take comprehensive Insurance Policy under

‘Public Liability Policy for Oil Industries’ to provide speedy relief to the affected persons in case

Page | 450
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

of LPG related accidents. It covers all LPG consumers registered with OMCs. Public Liability

Insurance Policy taken by OMCs covers losses arising out of accidents where LPG is the primary

cause of fire and not for cases where the primary cause of fire is other sources/reason wherein

LPG cylinders gets engulfed and subsequently burst. It includes insurance claim on account of

replacement cost for damaged components of the pile bridge and estimated inventory losses of

the Subsidiary Company on account of unusual heavy rain in Karachi in August 2020, which is

accepted by the insurance company and subsequently an amount of Rs. 50 million has been

received by the Subsidiary Company.

Future Outlook

The OMCs can face unforeseen circumstance every now and then. Other receivables account will

increase in the future because of this no matter what happens.

Sources:

➢ https://www.mylpg.in/docs/Public_Liability_Insurance_policies_for_accidents_involvin_

LPG.pdf

➢ https://www.financialexpress.com/money/insurance/insurance-policy-for-gas-cylinder-

blast-check-coverage-process-to-file-claim-other-details/2132939/

➢ Director’s Report

Page | 451
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic analysis

Factor Effect

Inland Freight Equalization Margin Decrease

Price Differential Claims Decrease

Taking a look at the historical data for the company, the other receivables have been inconsistent

when we compare them with sales. However for the past 2 years they have been decreasing

which can be accounted to a couple of economic reasons which range from IFEM to price

differential claims. This decrease in the other receivables has also been the reason to offset the

increase in the total current assets of the company, among other factors. All the economic factors

for such a decrease have been analyzed below.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Inland Freight equalization margin

The inland freight equalization margin (IFEM) is the cost of inland movement incurred by: a

refinery for transportation of crude oil from the source to the refinery; and. an oil marketing

company for transportation of the finished product from the supply point to various depots

Page | 452
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

around the country. With this duty the government makes sure that the prices of petroleum

products around the country in uniform i.e. the same price is being charged in Sindh and Punjab.

PSO being the largest OMC in Pakistan had receivables outstanding from the government in the

form on IFEM. The government realizing that the importance of paying back OMCs settled this

amount and paid pack almost 50% of the amount it owed to PSO which reduced the other

receivables of the company.

Future Outlook

Moving forward we expect that the government will keep settling the claims made by the OMCs

and will not delay them any further which implies that the other receivables for the company will

decrease in the future, as it has been consistent with the historical data.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/374085-inland-freight-equalisation-margin-new-omcs-

manipulating-mechanism-at-the-cost-of-others

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/tag/inland-freight-equalization-margin-ifem/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1123950

Price Differential Claims

Page | 453
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

After announcing a freeze on the petrol prices until the next budget, in the latest meeting of the

ministry of energy, it was also decided that the government would settle the price differential

claims of PSO and would transfer the state oil company Rs.11.73 billion. A letter was also sent

to the Oil Companies Advisory Council (OCAC) and the Petroleum division confirming the

above mentioned where the petroleum division emphasized that these payments would be

sufficient enough to cover the price differential claims for the month of March, 2022 thus

reducing the other receivables of the company.

Future Outlook

According to the petroleum division the government will arrange the required amount of the

price differential claims that will be made available well ahead of time when claims for the

relevant fortnight are submitted to the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA). The

government states that it is aware of the significance of timely payment of PDC and so the

claims are being processed on top priority basis thus reducing the other receivables in the future.

However it must be taken into account that the financial position of the government of Pakistan

is not very strong as Pakistan is a developing country thus settling such huge amounts of claims

on a timely basis can be troublesome as was reported by OGRA that it fell short of Rs.1.87

billion for the month of March 2022.

Source:

Page | 454
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2351294/govt-transfers-rs20b-to-pso

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40170573/payment-of-pdc-for-march-ogra-sees-

shortfall-of-rs187bn

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1678676

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/952776-rs40bn-released-for-oil-subsidy-payment

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/03/07/fortnightly-reimbursement-of-pdc-to-oil-

sector-on-the-cards/

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/03/15/ecc-to-approve-pdc-on-sales-of-

petroleum-products/

Page | 455
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 456
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%

2015

2019

2023
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2016
2017
2018

2020
2021
2022

2024
2025
2026
(20.00%)

(40.00%)

(60.00%)

(80.00%)

Page | 457
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

60,000,000.00

50,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

30,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Series1 Series2

Page | 458
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Taxation – net

Page | 459
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Forecasted Values

As of now no notes were given in the financial statements for this account which made it

difficult for us to predict it. However, looking at the industry pattern as well as historical trend,

we assume that the account will decrease at an increasing rate within a range of 32-35%. This

was also supported with the help of statistical forecasting and can be seen in the graph below.

Page | 460
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Change
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-20
-40
-60

Page | 461
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

General Analysis

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of taxation of all

five years of the companies are given below.

Total taxation of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 8,472,290 7,767,381 8,690,696 7,800,728 5,461,799

HTL 61,716,183 69,499,665 217,275,722 0 0

APL 0 0 0 0 0

BPL 5,012 9,311 13,652 8,627 106,990

TOTAL 70,193,485 77,276,357 225,980,070 7,809,355 5,568,789

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Taxation

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 9.87%

HTL 90.09%

Page | 462
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

APL 0.00%

BPL 0.04%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Taxation

Total Market Share


100.00%
90.09%
90.00%

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%
9.87%
10.00%
0.00% 0.04%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of taxation in

their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Taxation Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Page | 463
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 12.07% 10.05% 3.85% 99.89% 98.08%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Taxation Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


120.00%

100.00% 99.89% 98.08%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%
12.07% 10.05%
3.85%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of taxation as an asset fell till 2019 but increased

drastically in 2020. However, it fell again in 2021.

Page | 464
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Yearly Change/Growth in Taxation of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly PPE

Growth 47.70% -8.32% 11.89% -10.24% -29.98%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Taxation of PSO

PSO Yearly PPE Growth


60.00%

50.00%
47.70%
40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00% 11.89%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00% -8.32% -10.24%

-20.00%

-30.00% -29.98%

-40.00%

Page | 465
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest level of taxation of PSO was in 2017. After that, it

has experienced a decreasing trend.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Taxation Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 1123.26% 10.09% 192.43% -96.54% -28.69%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Taxation Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


1200.00%
1123.26%
1000.00%

800.00%

600.00%

400.00%

200.00% 192.43%

0.00% 10.09%
-28.69%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-96.54%
-200.00%

Page | 466
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The industry has also experienced a downwards trend when it comes to taxation as a

current asset for the OMCs.

Future Outlook

This account is expected to decrease in the future. As for now, no notes have been mentioned in

the financial statements of PSO regarding this particular account but taking into consideration

the graphs given above, this account is expected to decrease in the coming future and follow a

similar trend.

Page | 467
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash & Bank Balance

Breakdown:

Cash and Bank Balance 2021 Vertical Analysis

Cash in hand 10,873 0.37%

Cash at banks in: 2,506,037 86.37%

current accounts 384,709 13.26%

saving accounts 2,890,746 99.63%

2,901,619 100.00%

Page | 468
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (18.58%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Cash and Bank Balance -51.23% 25.82% 4.54% 12.24% -27.98% 148.12%

Vertical Analysis: Average (1.22%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Cash and Bank Balance 0.72% 1.63% 1.07% 1.15% 1.05% 1.68%

Forecasted Values

Since both the Sales and accounts receivables of the company are increasing, it can be assumed

that the majority proportion of the sales is done on credit. Taking this forward the cash and bank

balance of the company is likely to decrease between 20-30% for the next 5 years as shown

above. This can be supported with the graph below.

Page | 469
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Change
350.00%
300.00%
250.00%
200.00%
150.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
(50.00%)
(100.00%)
(150.00%)

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Decrease in the current accounts Decrease

Increase in cash in hand Decrease

Increase in the savings accounts Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

1.22% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 18.58% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Page | 470
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash and Bank Balance


7,000,000

6,000,000

5,000,000

4,000,000

3,000,000

2,000,000

1,000,000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Factors that highly influence the cash and bank balance of a company may include the increase

or decrease of the cash in hand, capacity to pay back loans and the capacity to borrow etc.

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the cash and

bank balance of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

The cash and bank balance for 2021 decreased by 51.2% due to following reasons;

Page | 471
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash and Bank Balance (2021-2020)


7,000,000

6,000,000

5,000,000

4,000,000

3,000,000

2,000,000

1,000,000

0
2021 2020

• Decrease in the current accounts: The cash in the current account dropped by a

significant 57%.

• Increase in cash in hand: There was a slight increase in the cash in hand which was

10.48%.

• Increase in the savings accounts: The cash in PSO’s savings account increased majorly

by 56%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

The cash and bank balance for 2020 increased by 25.82% due to following reasons;

Page | 472
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash and Bank Balance (2020-2019)


7,000,000

6,000,000

5,000,000

4,000,000

3,000,000

2,000,000

1,000,000

0
2020 2019

• Increase in the current accounts: The cash in the current account increased by a

significant 141%.

• Decrease in cash in hand: There was a slight decrease in the cash in hand which was

20.18%.

• Decrease in the savings accounts: The cash in PSO’s savings account decreased majorly

by 87.9%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

The cash and bank balance for 2019 increased slightly by 4.5% due to following reasons;

Page | 473
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash and Bank Balance (2019-2018)


4,900,000

4,850,000

4,800,000

4,750,000

4,700,000

4,650,000

4,600,000

4,550,000

4,500,000
2019 2018

• Decrease in the current accounts: The cash in the current account decreased by only

3%.

• Increase in cash in hand: There was a slight increase in the cash in hand which was

26.26%.

• Increase in the savings accounts: The cash in PSO’s savings account increased majorly

by 13.27%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

The cash and bank balance for 2018 increased by 12.24% due to following reasons;

Page | 474
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash and Bank Balance (2018-2017)


4,700,000
4,600,000
4,500,000
4,400,000
4,300,000
4,200,000
4,100,000
4,000,000
3,900,000
3,800,000
2018 2017

• Increase in the current accounts: The cash in the current account increased by a

significant 27%.

• Increase in cash in hand: There was a slight increase in the cash in hand which was

1.96%.

• Decrease in the savings accounts: The cash in PSO’s savings account decreased by

0.8%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

The cash and bank balance for 2017 decreased by 27.9% due to following reasons;

Page | 475
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash and Bank Balance (2017-2016)


7,000,000

6,000,000

5,000,000

4,000,000

3,000,000

2,000,000

1,000,000

0
2017 2016

• Decrease in the current accounts: The cash in the current account dropped by a

significant 14%.

• Decrease in cash in hand: There was a slight decrease in the cash in hand which was

1.33%.

• Decrease in the savings accounts: The cash in PSO’s savings account increased greatly

by 9538.3%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

The cash and bank balance for 2016 increased by 148.2% due to following reasons;

Page | 476
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash and Bank Balance (2016-2015)


7,000,000

6,000,000

5,000,000

4,000,000

3,000,000

2,000,000

1,000,000

0
2016 2015

• Decrease in the current accounts: The cash in the current account slightly dropped by

1%.

• Increase in cash in hand: There was a slight increase in the cash in hand which was

2.85%.

• Increase in the savings accounts: The cash in PSO’s savings account increased by

101.69%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 477
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

High interest rates/markup offered on saving accounts to OMCs Increase

Follows a Direct Relationship with Sales Account Increase

OMCs experience increase in receivables, affecting their current accounts Decrease

Deferred payables increase cash in hand Increase

Investments being done in future would lead to lower savings Decrease

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of cash and bank

balance all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Cash and Bank Balance of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 4,131,036 4,636,643 4,847,030 6,098,361 2,974,299

HTL 220,903,845 566,946,678 308,935,747 124,177,670 264,544,140

APL 10,933,386 4,198,160 2,920,168 3,482,386 9,831,007

BPL 113,156 112,179 175,069 266,636 93,623

Page | 478
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

TOTAL 236,081,423 575,893,660 316,878,014 134,025,053 277,443,069

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Cash and Bank Balance

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 1.47%

HTL 96.44%

APL 2.04%

BPL 0.05%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Cash and Bank Balance

Page | 479
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


120.00%

100.00% 96.44%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

1.47% 2.04% 0.05%


0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of cash and bank

balance in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Cash and Bank Balance Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 1.75% 0.81% 1.53% 4.55% 1.07%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Cash and Bank Balance Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Page | 480
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


5.00%

4.50% 4.55%

4.00%

3.50%

3.00%

2.50%

2.00%
1.75%
1.50% 1.53%

1.00% 1.07%
0.81%
0.50%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of cash and bank balance had an increasing trend

from 2018 till 2020. It fell considerably in 2021. This is majorly because of an increase in the

cash and bank balance of other OMCs and a decrease in this account of PSO.

Yearly Change/Growth in Cash and Bank Balance of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 481
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly

Growth -98.49% 12.24% 4.54% 25.82% -51.23%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Cash and Bank Balance of PSO

PSO Yearly Cash & Bank Balance Growth


40.00%
25.82%
20.00%
12.24%
4.54%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-20.00%

-40.00%
-51.23%
-60.00%

-80.00%

-100.00% -98.49%

-120.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest cash and bank balance of PSO was in 2020. This

account fell in 2019 and in 2021. It was the lowest in 2017 among all the years.

Page | 482
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Cash and Bank Balance Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth -49.87% 143.94% -44.98% -57.70% 107.01%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Cash and Bank Balance Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


200.00%

150.00%
143.94%

107.01%
100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-50.00% -49.87% -44.98%


-57.70%

-100.00%

Page | 483
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The industry in terms of this account experienced growth in 2018. After that, the

account fell for all the OMCs. It wasn’t until after 2020, when it grew again. From 2019-2020 all

the OMCs experienced lowest levels of cash and bank balance accounts.

Factors affecting Cash and Bank Balance

OMCs motivated to Keep Cash in Banks due to High Interest/Markup on Savings

Accounts

The interest on savings account was 3.8% to 10.7% in 2019. However, this increased in 2020 and

stood between 3.25% to 11.75%. The OMCs were inclined towards keeping the cash in the

savings account to take advantage of this particular aspect. However, in 2021, this fell to 3.25%

to 6.25% and the OMCs were again demotivated to keep high levels of cash in banks.

Future Outlook

This particular figure has increased to 10.75% and in the coming three months it is to reach

12.5% as well. This would lead to companies keeping more cash in banks which would lead to

an increase in this account.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ https://www.soneribank.com/rates/deposit-rates/current-rates/

Page | 484
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://savings.gov.pk/project/savings-account/

➢ https://www.sc.com/pk/save/basic-savings-account/

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/935950-sky-high-bank-profits

Direct Relationship between the Sales of OMCs and Cash Balances

With an increase in the sales, the cash in hand is usually expected to increase a swell. In the last

three years from 2017-2019 with an increase in sales, the cash position of PSO and other OMCs

could be seen to have increased as well. From 2020-2021, the cash fell however because of the

pandemic and high levels of receivables and some payments that were made on account of

deferred payables of the company.

Future Outlook

The cash and bank balance would increase when the sales of OMCs would increase

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

Current Account Deposits of OMCs Reduce due to High Receivables

OMCs cannot afford to maintain their current accounts as they do not have enough cash due to

the piling up of receivables. The companies due to this tend to provide security deposits but they

are kept in key separate accounts. The receivables of the Pakistan State Oil (PSO) have gone up

Page | 485
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

to Rs 398 billion the highest ever in the entity’s history with a major chunk of Rs 192.539 billion

from the power sector. However, the Sui Northern owes Rs 161.025 billion to the PSO in the

head of RLNG and the PIA is required to pay Rs 21.979 billion for using jet fuel. The non-

recovery of Rs 398 billion receivables has triggered the rise in the cash flow situation, resulting

in financial miseries for the state-owned entity.

Future Outlook

The receivables of PSO are expected to increase as it is owned by the government and they

cannot avoid but become a target of circular debt and price differential claims. This would lead

to lower cash in hand for them and liquidity would worsen as well.

Sources:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/909334-top-omc-in-economic-mess-pso-s-receivables-

surge-to-rs398-billion

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/950865-banks-shy-of-expending-trade-credit-for-oil-

imports

➢ https://www.business-standard.com/article/international/cash-strapped-pakistan-cuts-

power-to-households-on-fuel-shortage-122041801142_1.html

Deferred Payables and Few Payments from Receivables to Increase Cash in Hand

Page | 486
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

With rising CGS and trade payables, the payables of OMCs is expected to increase in the near

future. Due to this, PSO has some cash in hand left because it is deferring the payments. It has

also received some payments from SNGPL which can improve its liquidity position as well.

Sources:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/03/05/fuel-crisis-looms-as-banks-still-wary-of-

omcs/

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/909334-top-omc-in-economic-mess-pso-s-receivables-

surge-to-rs398-billion

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1678676

➢ https://www.pacra.com/sector_research/OMCsPACRAResearchNov21.pdf

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Higher Gross Margins Increase

Gas Circular Debt (High Accounts Decrease

Receivable)

Inflation (Higher Taxation) Decrease

Page | 487
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cash and cash balance is probably one of the most important accounts any company has since it

determines the liquidity position of the company. To put this into perspective, this account is

more important that the net income of the company as even if the company is making record

high profits, if it doesn’t have the cash to pay off its debt, it can be a serious crisis. The same is

the case with PSO as it has been recording highest profits but its cash flow position is not very

good on paper. The cash in hand and the cash flow position has been inconsistent throughout the

years. As of the latest year which is 2021, the cash in hand of the company decreased as well as

the cash flow positon of the company which can have grave impact on the liquidity position of

the company. All the economic factors for such a change as well as what might happen in the

future have been analyzed below.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Higher gross margins

The higher gross margins were mainly due to better cost absorption by PSO. To understand this

better, in 2019 the cost of production was 97.23% of the total sales which increased to 99.38% in

2020, a record high figure for PSO in the past 15 years. However in 2021, this figure decreased

and came down to 95.32% which is the record low for the past 10 years. This shows that despite

the figure increasing numerically, the rate by which it increased as compared to sales is

Page | 488
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

significantly low which means that the cost of production for the company has improved in 2021,

thus indicating that it is absorbing its fixed costs better as compared to the past 10 years. There

are many economic reasons for this which are listed below;

• International oil prices, Inflation and Currency Factor

• China Pakistan Free Trade Agreement

• White Oil pipeline (Partnership with PARCO & PEPCO)

• Agreement with Qatar Petroleum

• Contract with KPC

• Supply chain development

• Pakistan Railways

• Utilizing services of foreign companies

Higher gross margins in turn increase the profitability of the company, as the company recorded

its highest ever profit in 2021, which would in turn improve the cash position of the company.

Future Outlook

In the future we predict that the sales of the company will increase and so will the cost

absorption of the company as the rate by which cost of sales will increase with respect to sales

would be lower. This ultimately means that the profitability of the company will also increase

which would help in improving the cash position of the company in the cash flow statement.

Page | 489
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Sources:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1671124

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/934553-oil-refining-data-sought-to-decide-on-petrol-

imports

➢ https://www.parco.com.pk/our-business/transportation/pipeline-network/

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=437

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/504960/pso-signs-contract-with-kpc-for-diesel

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/09/02/pso-under-hot-water/

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2318132/pm-seeks-report-on-pso-oil-transport

Gas Circular debt (High Accounts Receivable)

Of the few major defaulters of PSO, Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) emerged as

one in the LNG sector, which is due to pay around Rs.161 billion to PSO. The link between PSO

and SNGPL is that PSO imports LNG from Qatar and other suppliers and supplies it to SNGPL

which onward sell it to the customers as per pricing mechanism given by the government of

Pakistan.

The elephant in the room is the disparity between cost of gas and consumer tariffs given by the

government of Pakistan. There is no debate on the fact that gas prices in Pakistan have been a

Page | 490
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

long dichotomy. Cost of gas is far more than the prices at which these are supplied to the end

consumers. Moreover considering that the gas allocations and pricing decisions in Pakistan have

always been political, there have been a lot of debates on the inefficient consumer pricing

mechanism of natural gas.

The current cost of local natural gas is 700 per mmbtu while the cost for imported gas is 2400

per mmbtu. On the contrary the selling price for both local and imported gas stands at 350 per

mmbtu which means there is a loss of 350 for local and 2050 per mmbtu for imported gas.

Pakistan was lucky to have deep reserves of gas in Sui Baluchistan. Unfortunately, people

consider the low-price pipeline gas availability is a fundamental right, however, it’s a luxury. But

because of the political decisions in Pakistan the luxury of providing cheap gas through

expensive infrastructure continued. Eventually the costs could not be recovered and the pressure

of low pricing dis-incentivized further exploration

The government continued to subsidize these losses with the promise to pay SNGPL. However

provision of cheap gas to households was manageable back when domestically produced gas was

abundant to meet the local consumption requirements, and non-residential consumers who were

paying higher rates were enough in numbers to cross-subsidize the domestic supply. With natural

gas supply depleting, production has significantly reduced and would keep on falling. There is no

serious hope on new discoveries. That is why the country has diverted to the imported LNG to

Page | 491
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

bridge the widening gap. With the non-residential customers moving to RLNG, the remaining

good customers are not enough to cross subsidize domestic Thus receivables started to build up

with SNGPL claiming to have to receive over Rs.100 billion from domestic gas consumers

ultimately unable to pay back their gas suppliers which is PSO. This is also clearly highlighted in

the financial statements of PSO where they are making record profits on paper, however have a

negative cash flow due to being caught in the gas circular debt. The Company is also actively

pursuing the Government of Pakistan to get budgetary allocation for release of past due price

differential claims.

Future Outlook

At current spot international prices, only a tiny fraction (10-15%) could be recovered from the

consumers at prevailing domestic prices. The government cannot afford to replace the depleting

gas with the imported RLNG without increasing the prices. It would be a financial suicide to

provide imported RLNG at throwaway prices to domestic consumers, while bearing all the cost.

All this would only result in the increased risk to gas circular debt and the bankruptcy of SNGPL

both of which the government cannot afford. So the only way to avoid trouble is increase prices,

which we predict will be done in phases as the government lack enough political will to increase

the prices all at once. However at the moment the government has fixed petrol and gas prices

Page | 492
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

until the next budget which implies that the accounts receivable of the company will only swore,

which would in turn worsen the cash in hand of the company thus decreasing it in the future.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2317566/pso-receivables-soar-to-rs262b

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/amp/909334-top-omc-in-economic-mess-pso-s-receivables-

surge-to-rs398-billion

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40134437

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40141248

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/402099

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40062748

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40124127

➢ https://www.investing.com/analysis/pso-pakistans-circular-debt-crisis-has-run-its-

largest-fuel-retailer-dry-200303636

International Oil prices & Inflation (Higher Taxation)

Since 2014 the international oil prices have seen the most significant volatility. The oil market

has taken on new features that affect the development of the global economy. According to EIA,

US shale oil production increased from 4.96 million barrels per day in 2017 to 5.59 million

Page | 493
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

barrels per day in 2022. In addition, there are geopolitical events, trade frictions, and OPEC’s

agreement have occurred in recent years, causing the volatility of oil price.

In a developing country like Pakistan, which has such high dependence on imported oil, an

increase in oil prices leads to inflationary pressure which in turn increases budget deficit making

imports more expensive. The government has refrained from passing on the complete price

increase to the consumers because it fears it will exacerbate inflation and stifle economic activity

which presents a significant challenge to the government’s plans of ending its tenure with a

strong growth phase.

This inflationary pressure and variances in the price of oil internationally has led to an increase

in the sales of the company in numeric terms which has ultimately increased the profit and thus

taxation.

Future Outlook

Looking forward the international oil prices are forecasted to increase mainly on account of the

war between Russia and Ukraine, as can also be seen in the graph below which in turn means

that the inflation in the country will increase as well. Keeping in mind that the demand for

petroleum products is predicted to increase in the future, this in turn would also increase the sales

as has been predicted which would ultimately lead to higher profits and thus a higher tax being

Page | 494
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

paid.

Source:

➢ Director’s report, 2021

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/petroleum-prices-

in-pakistan-likely-to-increase-by-rs-10-per-litre/articleshow/89843799.cms

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/02/26/oil-prices-expected-to-increase-from-

march-1/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1677101

➢ https://www.geo.tv/latest/398774-petrol-price-expected-to-rise-in-pakistan-sources

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

➢ https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-021-00166-4

Page | 495
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Methods chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 Years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Page | 496
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

25,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

5,000,000.00

0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Cash and bank balance Naïve Forecast

Change
350.00%
300.00%
250.00%
200.00%
150.00%
100.00%
50.00%
0.00%
2010

2014

2018

2022

2026
2007
2008
2009

2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017

2019
2020
2021

2023
2024
2025

(50.00%)
(100.00%)
(150.00%)

Page | 497
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 498
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

25,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

5,000,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Cash and Bank Balnce Forecasted Cash and bank balance

Page | 499
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

________________________-

________________________________________________________

Page | 500
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Equity

Page | 501
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Share Capital

Page | 502
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Forecasted Value

Since the account didn’t change in the previous years, we predict that it will stay the same in thee

future as well

Page | 503
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of share capital all

five years of the companies are given below.

Total Share Capital of all Companies in 5 Years

Companie

s 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 2,716,860 3,260,232 3,912,278 4,694,734 4,694,734

1,160,040,00 1,160,040,00 1,160,040,00 1,160,040,00

HTL 0 1,160,040,000 0 0 0

APL 829,440 829,440 995,328 995,328 995,328

BPL 224,888 224,888 224,888 224,888 224,888

1,163,811,18 1,165,172,49 1,165,954,95 1,165,954,95

TOTAL 8 1,164,354,560 4 0 0

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Share Capital

Page | 504
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 0.33%

HTL 99.57%

APL 0.08%

BPL 0.02%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Share Capital

Page | 505
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


120.00%

99.57%
100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.33% 0.08% 0.02%


0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of share capital.

PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Share Capital Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 0.23% 0.28% 0.34% 0.40% 0.40%

Page | 506
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating PSO’s Share Capital Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


0.45%

0.40% 0.40% 0.40%

0.35%
0.34%
0.30%
0.28%
0.25%
0.23%
0.20%

0.15%

0.10%

0.05%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of share capital has increased between 2017 till

2019. However, it has not changed since the past two years.

Yearly Change/Growth in Share Capital of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 507
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly

Growth 0.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 0.00%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Share Capital of PSO

PSO YEARLY SHARE CAPITAL


GROWTH
25.00%

20.00% 20.00% 20.00% 20.00%

15.00%

10.00%

5.00%

0.00% 0.00% 0.00%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the share capital grew from 2017-2018. The growth was

constant till 2020 and there was zero growth after that.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Share Capital Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 508
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly

Growth 0.00% 0.05% 0.07% 0.07% 0.00%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Share Capital Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


0.08%

0.07% 0.07%
0.07%
0.06%

0.05%
0.05%
0.04%

0.03%

0.02%

0.01%

0.00% 0.00% 0.00%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: The industry in terms of this account indicates that the share capital of other industries

had zero growth in it. However, that of PSO increased by 20% only and that change lead to a

change in industry’s share capital.

Future Outlook

Page | 509
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

It can be assumed that for a short period of time, like other OMCs, PSO would also experience

zero growth in its share capital. However, the share capital would not reduce as we can see that

in all the years it either had an increasing growth rate or a zero growth rate.

Page | 510
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Reserves

Reserves Breakdown:

Vertical

Reserves 2021 Analysis

Capital reserve

Surplus on vesting of net assets 3,373 0.00%

Special reserve 837,156 0.62%

Revenue reserves

Unrealized gain on remeasurement of FVOCI investment 5,485,817 4.05%

General reserve 25,282,373 18.65%

Un-appropriated profit 103,918,603 76.68%

134,686,793 99.38%

135,527,322 100.00%

Page | 511
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (9.78%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Reserves 25.64% -9.30% 10.95% 7.05% 12.68% 11.65%

Vertical Analysis: Average (27.64%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Reserves 32.74% 28.75% 26.22% 26.63% 25.52% 25.96%

Forecasted Values

After analyzing all the factors it was predicted that the sales for the company will increase every

year. Moreover due to many measures being taken, PSO started absorbing its fixed costs better

as it could be seen in the vertical analysis and it is only expected to further improve its

performance. Reserves are majorly impacted by the net income which is forecasted to increase

due to higher sales and better cost absorption among other factors like lower finance cost.

Furthermore if we look at the historical data, reserves as a percentage of sales are increasing

every year. With sales increasing by 12.5% every year, we forecast that the reserves will increase

by a significant more percentage, thus forecasting it to grow between 35-42% every year.

Page | 512
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Chart Title
200,000,000.00

150,000,000.00

100,000,000.00

50,000,000.00

0.00
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Resrerves Forecasted Reserves

Page | 513
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

27.64% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 9.78% due to the increase and decrease

in some years.

Factors that highly influence the reserves of a company may include the policy related to imports

and exports, present oil and gas reserves, petroleum exploration etc. Further we’ll be dissecting

the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the reserves of PSO year by year from

2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

In the year 2021, the revenue reserves as well as the capital reserves increased, due to profit

earned during the year on account vs loss in last year. Further reasons are given below:

• Increase in Revenue of Rs 1.4 trillion: PSO announced a record-breaking gross revenue

of Rs 1.4 trillion and highest ever profit after tax of Rs 29.1 billion for the financial year

2020-21 (FY21) against a loss after tax of Rs 6.5 billion in the preceding year. The net

profit translated into a healthy earning per share of Rs 62.07 vs. loss per share of Rs

13.77 in FY20.

Page | 514
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Dividends also increased by Rs. 15 per share (150%): The dividend for the financial

year stands at Rs 15 per share (150 percent). Pakistan Refinery Limited, a subsidiary of

PSO, also reported a profit after tax of Rs 0.94 billion during the year compared to a loss

of Rs 7.6 billion in the previous year. On a consolidated basis, the group achieved a profit

after tax of Rs 29.6 billion in FY21 compared to loss after tax of Rs 14.8 billion in FY20.

• Profits made primarily due to inventory gains: In the year 2021, PSO’s profits soared

mainly due to high inventory which was also due to the increase in the international oil

prices.

• Transfer of profits from the subsidiary company to Special Reserves: On March 27,

2013, the Government of Pakistan (GoP) issued a policy framework for up-gradation and

expansion of refinery projects that says that till the completion of the projects, refineries

will not be allowed to offset losses and they will be required to install Diesel Hydro

Desulphurization (DHDS) plant by June 2017. For the purpose the Subsidiary Company

transferred profit amounting to Rs. 837 million.

• Addition of New Retail outlets across Pakistan: PSO Added 71 New Vision retail

outlets to its network making a grand total of 3,501 sites as of June 30, 2021.

• Installation of EV chargers in Islamabad: Installed Electric Vehicle charger at

Islamabad in support of the government's ‘Clean and Green Pakistan’ initiative.

Page | 515
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Addition of new and improved rehabilitation storages across Pakistan: Added 174

thousand tons of new and rehabilitated storages.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ Director’s Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40115417

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2336589/psos-receivables-swell-to-rs425-billion

Year 2020:

In the year 2020, the revenue reserves as well as the capital reserves decreased drastically,

factors that catered to such decrease are given below:

• PSO incurred heavy inventory losses: A decline in the inventory of PSO versus the

similar period last year was seen in the year 2021. Majority of these inventory losses

were sustained as a result of lower local ex-refinery prices than the international prices in

the fiscal year.

• Decrease in revenue due to the fall in volumes: PSO’s decline in earnings was also

facilitated by the decline in the company’s’ topline. Revenues for PSO slipped by 4

percent year-on-year during the year due to fall in volumes sold as well as the price crash.

Page | 516
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The company’s overall volumes fell by around 10 percent, and the decline was led by

furnace oil sales.

• A slip in the earnings due to Covid-19 challenges and the Saudi-Russia oil price

war: The company reported a loss after taxation of Rs6.5 billion translating into a loss

per share of Rs13.8. There were unprecedented losses of Rs16.4 billion incurred during

Q4FY20 not only eroded the net profit of Rs3 billion earned during the first three

quarters but also resulted in a net loss for the complete fiscal year.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40029027/earning-rebound-for-pso

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40015709/pso-fy20-scarred-by-inventory-losses

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2262102/corporate-corner-pso-announces-results-for-fy20

Year 2019:

In the year 2019, there was no change seen in the capital reserves however revenue reserves did

increase due to the following reasons;

• Free reserves of the company were capitalized: A sum of Rs. 782,455,500 out of the

free reserves of the Company be capitalized and applied towards the issue of 78,245,550

Page | 517
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

ordinary shares of Rs. 10/- each and allotted as fully paid bonus shares to the Members

whose names appear in the Members Register on October 18, 2019.

• Higher Inventory losses were seen in 2019: This inventory loss came from high

inventory of FO, which could not be sold due to low power demand while the same led to

refineries lowering their selling prices, which further had an adverse effect on the

earnings of PSO by 16%.

• PSO’s COGS surged to a Rs.1.15 trillion: PSO’s share price inched down Rs0.26, or

0.17%, to Rs155.67 with trading in 6.96 million shares at the PSX. The profit or loss

account showed the cost of products sold surged 12.5% to Rs1.15 trillion in FY19

compared to Rs1.02 trillion last year FY18.

• Finance cost increased (74%) due to unstable interest rates and average borrowing

power: Operating costs remained stable; the finance cost increased significantly in the

rising interest rate environment. Also, the depreciating currency has resulted in exchange

losses for the company, which also resulted in the increase of the finance costs.

• Net income increased: Increased mainly due to increase in deferred tax asset due to

change in corporate tax rate.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Page | 518
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://fp.brecorder.com/2019/02/20190221448960/

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2065243/psos-earnings-slip-2-29-rs15-1-billion

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/491993/

Year 2018:

For the year 2018, capital reserves remained stagnant whereas the revenue reserves increased as

compared to the previous year.

• Free reserves of the company were capitalized: A sum of Rs. 652,046,250 out of the

free reserves of the Company were capitalized and applied towards the issue of

65,204,625 ordinary shares of Rs. 10/- each and allotted as fully paid bonus shares to the

Members whose names appear on the Members Register on October 09, 2018.

• Revenues increased by 8.3%: Jump in revenues came despite higher petroleum prices,

high competition and low utilization of furnace oil. Market sources that the increase in

net sales came from increased lubricants and LPG sales as well as the inventory gains

accumulated from higher oil prices.

• Net Profits decreased due to the fall in other income: Despite the decrease in furnace

oil utilization that is the major cause of payables and receivables accumulation for the

company. Other income includes penal income which fell by over 56%.

Page | 519
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Finance cost also decreased by 13.5% due to the average borrowing level: Due to

robust negotiations with banks to maintain the average borrowing level, and an increase

in the recovery of interest from the Power sector. Moreover, foreign exchange loss on

account of rupee devaluation.

• Net Income also decreased due to higher effective tax rate: Effective tax rates were

increased due to the decline in future corporate tax rate and high tax rates on LNG.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/449733

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/449689/

Year 2017:

As for the year 2017, there was no change in the capital reserves whereas revenue reserves

increased significantly;

• Free reserves of the company were capitalized: A sum of Rs. 543,371,880 out of the

free reserves of the Company be capitalized and applied towards the issue of 54,337,188

ordinary shares of Rs. 10/- each and allotted as fully paid bonus shares to the Members

whose names appear on the Members Register on October 13, 2017.

Page | 520
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• PSO’s revenues grew all due to increased sales volumes: PSO’s net revenues for FY17

surged by almost 30 percent year-on-year, and the growth came largely from improved

volumetric sales by the OMC particularly of petrol and diesel. Its growth in top line also

came from the RLNG business, which offsets the decrease in furnace oil volumetric

growth.

• COGS grew up to 28%: This also increased the gross profit and the gross margin due to

the increase in inventory gains booked on account of lower fuel costs in the low oil price

scenario.

• Finance cost decreased by 17%: Higher operating costs (6%) and lower other income

(16%) was offset by lower finance cost that came down by 17 percent. Hence the

earnings increased by 77%.

• Net income increased by 77% due to low tax rates on the LNG sector: LNG is subject

to higher rate of tax, deducted at import stage. But in 2017 it decreased due to bigger

contribution of the LNG segment. The effective tax rate of the Company has therefore

increased despite 1% reduction in corporate tax rate.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/364031/pso-a-sturdy-performance-in-fy17

Page | 521
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1350410

Year 2016:

In the year 2016, the capital reserves stood constant whereas there was an increase in the revenue

reserves;

• Revenue fell by 19% due the dip in oil prices: Revenue decreased from Rs. 1.11

trillion in 2015 to Rs. 0.91 trillion, registering a decrease of 19%. The reason being the

price impact on account of overall dip in the oil prices during the year.

• PSO’s earnings declined: PSO had reported a notable decline in earnings in the third

quarter of FY16 due to higher inventory losses, while the top line slowed down on

account of lower margins on furnace oil and weaker petrol and diesel sales in the quarter.

• Net Income increased by 49.2%: Increase in net income from Rs. 6.9 billion in FY2015

to Rs. 10.3 billion in FY2016.

• Reduction in Finance cost by 35%: There was a reduction in Finance cost on account

of reduction in borrowing rates due to declining KIBOR and reliance on cheaper FE-25

borrowings.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

➢ https://fp.brecorder.com/2017/01/20170124132073/

Page | 522
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Out of the top three accounts selected for analysis, reserves made a high proportion of around

32%. PSO is a company which has to keep considerable reserves considering that it is the market

leader. These funds are used to pay future obligations. PSO has 2-3 types of reserves. The capital

reserves are made through capital earnings. It is used for long-term investment projects or any

unexpected event in the future such as high inflation levels. These reserves may be used to write

of capital losses. The revenue reserves are also known as retained earnings which are generated

through the operations of a business. It can be used for expansion or to pay dividends. The

reserves of four companies have been considered and their market share has been calculated.

Note: The growth in the reserves of PSO in the last five years are not due to the capital reserves

as they have amounted to 3,373,000 even before 2016 and in 2021, they are still standing at this

amount. So, only revenue reserves will be considered for the analysis. The general reserves have

also not increased or decreased in the last 5 years.

Total Reserves of the OMCs in the Last 5 Years:

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 5 years


PSO 100,132,742 107,192,243 118,934,765 107,869,046 135,527,322 569,656,118
HTL 2,584,265,837 2,732,681,018 2,066,744,479 1,997,625,503 1,990,443,156 11,371,759,993
APL 214,608 249,542 219,785 219,855 219,971 1,123,761
BPL 278,983 297423 304,228 464862 352148 1,697,644
Total 2,684,892,170 2,840,420,226 2,186,203,257 2,106,179,266 2,126,542,597 11,944,237,516

Page | 523
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: We can see that the reserves of PSO have increased till 2019 and then decreased in

2020 but increased again in 2021. For HTL, the reserves increased till 2018 but fell after that till

2021. For APL, the reserves increased till 2018 and have been fall till then. The entire industry’s

reserves have increased till 2018 and have fell till 2020 but can be seen to increase again as

PSO’s reserves increase in the year 2021 and onwards.

Total Market Share of the OMCs in the Last 5 Years:

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 4.77%

Hi-Tech Lubricants

Limited 95.21%

Attock Petroleum Limited 0.01%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.01%

Total Industry AP 100.00%

Page | 524
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.01%

Attock Petroleum Limited 0.01%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 95.21%

Pakistan State Oil 4.77%

0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00% 90.00% 100.00%

Total market share if HTL is removed (Outlier):

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 99.51%

Attock Petroleum Limited 0.20%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.30%

Total Industry AP 100.00%

Page | 525
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.30%

Attock Petroleum Limited 0.20%

Pakistan State Oil 99.51%

0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00% 120.00%

Analysis: In terms of reserves, HTL, like any other account has the highest share as well. If we

do not consider this outlier, PSO would have the second highest portion of reserves in the OMC

industry. APL and BPL have very minimal reserves which can be seen in the table given above.

The table given above clearly shows the reserves of HTL and they stand in no comparison to the

minimal reserves of APL and BPL. PSO has some standing in front of HTL but it is not

considerable too.

Growth in the Total Reserves of the Industry:

Company Names Total Market Share

Pakistan State Oil 4.77%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 95.21%

Attock Petroleum Limited 0.01%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.01%

Page | 526
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Industry AP 100.00%

Industry's Yearly Growth


25.00%
20.00% 18.81%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00% 5.79%
0.00% -3.66% 0.97%
-5.00% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-10.00%
-15.00%
-20.00%
-23.03%
-25.00%
-30.00%

Analysis: We can see that the industry has experienced a dip in its reserves. It has decreased till

2018 and in 2019 recorded the lost point. After 2019, the reserves started increasing again and

increased up till 2021 and are still increasing. This dip in 2019 was majorly because of lower

reserves being kept by HTL. This might be because of lower performance during the pandemic

or other factors which will be discussed later.

PSO’s Reserves Market Share Over the Years W.R.T. the Industry:

Company Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 527
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 3.73% 3.77% 5.44% 5.12% 6.37%

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


7.00%
6.37%
6.00%
5.44%
5.00% 5.12%

4.00%
3.73% 3.77%
3.00%

2.00%

1.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: We can clearly see that there has been an increase in PSO’s share over the overs with

respect to the industry. Not a single year recorded any drop in the reserve’s growth. Every year

they have grown by 1-2%. According to these five years, the reserves were the highest in 2021.

The growth was slow between 2017-2018. It was higher in 2018-2019. In 2019-2020, it fell

which might be due to the pandemic but between 2020-2021 it was higher.

PSO’s Increase in Reserves Over the Years: Last 5 Years:

Company

Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 528
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly

Reserves Growth 12.68% 7.05% 10.95% -9.30% 25.64%

PSO Company's Yearly Reserves Growth


30.00%
25.64%
20.00%
12.68% 10.95%
10.00%
7.05%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00% -9.30%

-20.00%

Analysis: We can see that out of the five years, the lowest levels of reserves were in 2020 for

PSO. There was negative growth and reserves were falling to a great extent. After a sharp fall in

2018, the reserves did increase by 10.95% but 2020 noticed a sharp dip. However, 2021

mitigated that by recording a peak almost thrice times higher than the dip in 2020. The factors

which lead to it will be discussed through secondary research.

Supporting Articles (Impact of Profit/Loss on Revenue Reserves):

Increase in profits due to higher demand of petrol and diesel by transportation Sector in

2017:

In 2017, the OMCs experienced a profit when the transportation sector demanded more petrol

and diesel. This increase in demand is due to rising population, urbanization and lack of public

Page | 529
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

transport in urban areas. Everyone has private vehicles. Moreover, the transportation of raw

material for different other sectors also increased due to increase demand of products due to the

factors mentioned above. All of this, lead to higher demand in 2017.

We can see how the transportation sector used high levels of diesel, petrol and CNG in 2017 in

the graph mentioned above. So, the companies in this industry made use of it and had high sales.

Higher sales brought higher profits which lead to higher unappropriated profits and hence higher

revenue reserves.

Future Outlook:

There were major variations in the profits and losses of the OMCs because by 2017, they did not

know that 2019 had a pandemic in store for them. So, making predictions in the basis of this

would not be fair as we have to account for several unforeseen factors e.g. another pandemic or

the Russia Ukraine War currently taking place.

Page | 530
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/103455/1/MPRA_paper_103455.pdf

Lower furnace oil sales in 2018 lead to lower profits for OMCs in Pakistan:

In 2018, the OMCs experienced a sharp dip in their sales due to the low demand of furnace oil

which fell by 19% in 2018. This also resulted in the inventory losses of furnace oil as the

reserves they kept were not being used. Now, because there was low demand, they had to either

offer the furnace oil which is extremely expensive to import, at lower rates to attract customers

or they would have to waste it completely. This resulted in lower profits for the OMCs as well.

Future Outlook:

If companies keep purchasing furnace oil then they would incur more losses. The customers of

these OMCs are moving towards green sources of energy and furnace oil is very expensive for

them and cannot be bought due to already pending receivables.

Source:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/11/07/omc-sales-volume-falls-amid-increasing-

competition/

Increase in interest rates in 2018 by 13.25% leads to higher finance cost for OMCs:

Page | 531
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

In 2018, the banks increased their interest rates and borrowing became more expensive for the

OMCs. This happened due to high inflation level in 2018. This in return lead to lower levels of

profits for the company due to higher finance costs. When the profits reduced, so did the

unappropriated profits. Due to this, we can see that from an industry’s point of view, the value of

reserves has decreased in 2018.

Future Outlook:

Keeping in mind the Hascol case, the banks would want to keep high interest rates, giving

minimal relief to the companies in this sector. If that happens this would adversely impact the

companies in this sector and their reserves would then eventually fall.

Source:

➢ https://psopk.com/files/corporate_briefing_session/Corporate%20briefing%20session281

019.pdf

Pandemic causes inventory losses and high CGS leading to losses in 2019 and 2020:

In 2019 when the pandemic took place, lockdowns were imposed which lead to inventory losses

as traveling and any mode of transportation was practically banned. This led to minimal demand

and the CGS increased due to this. When the CGS increased, this led to lower profits and hence

Page | 532
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

losses for the OMCs in 2019 and 2020. So, due to this, their unappropriated profits were lower in

2020 which can also be seen in the graphs above.

Future Outlook:

PSO and other OMCs have recorded high profits in 2021, this would mean that the

unappropriated profits would increase hence the revenue reserves would also increase which is a

positive sign for the companies.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report 2019

➢ Director’s Report 2020

Increased economic activity in 2021 makes profits for OMCs in Pakistan:

In 2021, the OMCs of Pakistan experienced immense levels of profits after experiencing heavy

losses in 2020 due to the pandemic. This happened because the lockdowns were lifted, the

demand from the domestic consumers increased to a great extent. The economic activity was

really high and this is exactly what the OMCs took advantage of, making high profits. These

high profits lead to increase in the unappropriated profits for the companies leading to higher

revenue reserves as well.

Future Outlook:

Page | 533
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO and other oil marketing companies are expected to make higher sales which have been

discussed in the analysis of the OMCs in the sales portion of this report. This means higher

profits and in return higher revenue reserves as well.

Source:

➢ https://propakistani.pk/2021/10/02/pakistans-oil-marketing-company-sales-grew-26-yoy-

in-september/

Lower dividends paid by OMCs in 2021 leaving more for reserves:

Many companies in the OMC sector paid lower dividends in 2021. PSO itself reduced the value

of its dividend per share making it Rs. 10 per share which was originally Rs. 15 per share. This

means that more profit would be left for the revenue reserves. This is exactly what happened. this

was mainly because PSO was recovering from the pandemic in 2020. In 2020, the company

failed to give out dividends which because a liability for the company as well. Due to this, we

can see an increase in the revenue reserves due to an increase in the unappropriated profits left.

Future Outlook:

In the future, the companies would want to increase their dividends as the shareholders are

currently not satisfied. This will increase because the companies are making a lot of profit so

shareholders would eventually want their portion of the total profit made by the company. This

Page | 534
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

would lead to lower revenue reserves for the company if it does not increase its unappropriated

profits by other means.

Source:

➢ https://psopk.com/en/investors/results-reporting/dividend-information

Higher taxes imposed in 2021 on OMCs might affect their profits:

In 2021, the taxes imposed on the OMCs increased. Majorly, the petroleum levy, custom duties

and the turnover taxes have increased for the OMCs. The government plans on making their

revenues through these sources in the future as well. Even though, in 2021, this increase was

offset by similar decrease in the finance cost and higher volumes of sales, but these would not

able to offset or mitigate the impact of higher taxes in the future.

Future Outlook:

If the government would keep playing with the tax rates in such a way and would keep

generating their revenues through the OMCs then in the near future, the OMCs would have

minimal profits left. This would then lead to lower reserves for the companies.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/839984-omcs-pay-significantly-higher-than-

corporate-tax-rates

Page | 535
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO’s contract with Pakistan Railways in 2022 to Increase its Profits:

In 2022, PSO made a contract to supply its petroleum products to Pakistan Railways. This is a

major opportunity for them to increase their sales and also make higher profits in the coming

future which would then bring in higher levels of unappropriated profits and hence higher levels

of revenue reserves for the company. This would increase the overall reserves of the industry as

well and PSO might have a greater market share in terms of reserves among other OMCs.

Future Outlook:

Considering this, the profit of PSO is expected to increase due to an increase in the sales. That is,

if the Pakistan Railways does not become one of its defaulters, making most of the purchases on

credit and then delaying the payments.

Source:

➢ PSO’s Press Release 2022

Page | 536
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Unappropriated profit for PSO during the fiscal year 2021 increased by 36%, the major portion

of which was accounted for due to an increase in the net income.

The higher net income is mainly due to higher gross margins, increase in other income as well as

a reduction in finance cost all of which will be analyzed below.

Source

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Higher Gross Margins

The higher gross margins were mainly due to better cost absorption by PSO. To understand this

better, in 2019 the cost of production was 97.23% of the total sales which increased to 99.38% in

2020, a record high figure for PSO in the past 15 years. However in 2021, this figure decreased

and came down to 95.32% which is the record low for the past 10 years. This shows that despite

the figure increasing numerically, the rate by which it increased as compared to sales is

significantly low which means that the cost of production for the company has improved in 2021,

thus indicating that it is absorbing its fixed costs better as compared to the past 10 years. There

are many economic reasons for this which are listed below;

• International oil prices, Inflation and Currency Factor

Page | 537
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• China Pakistan Free Trade Agreement

• White Oil pipeline (Partnership with PARCO & PEPCO)

• Agreement with Qatar Petroleum

• Contract with KPC

• Supply chain development

• Pakistan Railways

• Utilizing services of foreign companies

Lower Interest Rate

Owing to desperate times during Covid-19, and taking cognizance of the negative fallout from

the Covid-19 pandemic for the economy, the state bank of Pakistan took some steps in order to

safeguard businesses and households. Among them was the reduction in the policy rates by 625

basis points to 7% from a huge amount of 13%.

Providing more details about the scheme, the central bank stated that it was introduced to provide

a stimulus to the economy in times of Covid-19. Owing to these lower markups, PSO was able to

reduce its finance cost Rs.3.2 billion or 25%, which was also positively reflected in its net

income

Future Outlook

Page | 538
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Looking forward the economy has started to recover from the impact of Covid-19 with the

economic growth to be projected at 4-5% during 2022. Owing to this the state bank has increased

the interest rate after holding it at 7% for almost 15 months. The state bank also stated that as the

economy has started to recover, a greater emphasis is needed on ensuring the appropriate policy

mix to protect the longevity of growth, keep inflation expectations anchored, and slow the

growth in the current account deficit. This indicates that in the future the interest rate can be

expected to further increase which would ultimately also increase the finance cost for PSO. This

forecast has been highlighted in the graph below;

Sources

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/interest-rate

Page | 539
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2321092/interest-rate-increased-to-725-after-a-15-month-gap

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2253969/sbp-reduces-mark-up-on-two-schemes

Exchange gain

During the year, PSO booked staggering amounts of exchange gains on account of appreciation

of PKR against USD. These were done on the settlement of foreign currency transactions which

was the loan taken for the retirement of letter of credit (LCs) of crude oil. The exchange gain

added a huge amount to the net income of the company

Future Outlook

Looking forward PKR is not expected to appreciate and is likely to stay between 180 and 190.

Owing to this, there will be no exchange gains in the future which might reduce the other income

for PSO ultimately having an effect on its net profit. This forecast has been demonstrated in the

graph below;

Page | 540
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://newztodays.com/pso-exchange-gains/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

Delayed Payment Interest

During the year late payment surcharge was made by HUBCO and KAPCO on account of

delaying payments. This was accounted for in the payment of Rs.13.4 billion by the power sector

to PSO. The interest/markup charged on these late payments was accounted for in the other

income, having a positive effect on the net income. The amount received against the late

payment surcharge from HUBCO and KAPCO contributed materially in easing the financial

strain on the company’s cost of funds for the year.

Page | 541
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

Since the power sector has gradually started to pay off, we predict that in the coming year they

will increase their payments to PSO without delaying them any further. This indicates that the

interest in the future can also be expected to increase thus having a positive effect on the net

income and thus the reserves. The prediction can also be supported by the past data.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Page | 542
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Method chosen

• Subjective analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

Naïve (15 years)

Excel forecasting

Page | 543
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis

Page | 544
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Change
35.00%

30.00%

25.00%

20.00%

15.00%

10.00%

5.00%

0.00%
2014
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

Page | 545
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Non-Controlling Interest

Breakdown:

Vertical

Non-Controlling Interest 2021 Analysis

Non-current assets 20,673,268 961.15%

Current assets 20,320,752 944.76%

Non-current liabilities -824,614 -38.34%

Current liabilities -38,122,408 -1772.41%

Net assets 2,046,998 95.17%

Adjustments for consolidation: 9,260,067 430.52%

Fair value adjustment -11,149,288 -518.36%

Consistency of accounting policy -3,360,452 -156.24%

Share deposit money -837,156 -38.92%

Page | 546
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Others 7,099,709 330.08%

1,012,880 47.09%

Adjusted net assets of the Subsidiary Company 3,059,878 142.26%

Share of NCI @ 36.44% (2020: 40%) 1,115,020 51.84%

Issue of right shares / Share deposit money of NCI 1,035,861 48.16%

2,150,881 100.00%

Page | 547
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (3.77%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Non-Controlling Interest 52.13% -74.75% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.36%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Non-Controlling Interest 0.52% 0.38% 1.23% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Forecasted values

The account was added in 2019 hence not a lot of information is available on the account. So a

general company analysis of the account was done and hence it was forecasted accordingly. We

predict that the account will increase between 45-50% for the next 5 years.

Page | 548
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

COMPANY ANALYSIS

Factors Effects

Increase in Net Assets Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.36% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 3.77% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Non-controlling interest
6000000
5000000
4000000
3000000
2000000
1000000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Non-

Controlling Interest of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021-2020:

Page | 549
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Upon analyzing the horizontal statements for the non-controlling interest, there was a decrease of

74.7% and then in 2021, there was an increase of 52.13%,

• It increased it 2021 due to an increase in the Net Assets of 107.06%.

• It decreased in 2020 due to the decrease in Net Assets of 95.01%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Page | 550
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

________________________

Page | 551
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Non-Current Liabilities

Page | 552
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Retirement and other service

benefits

Breakdown:

Retirement and Other Service Benefits 2021 Vertical Analysis

Retirement and other service benefits - Net Liabilities

Holding Company

Gratuity

Medical benefits 6,796,866 -458.21%

Compensated absences 389,480 -26.26%

Page | 553
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

7,186,346 -484.47%

Subsidiary Company

Management Pension Scheme 266,940 -18.00%

Non-management Pension Scheme 97,568 -6.58%

Management Gratuity Scheme 13,043 -0.88%

7,563,897 -509.92%

Retirement benefits - Asset

Holding Company

Gratuity -339,297 22.87%

Pension -1,118,464 75.40%

Subsidiary Company

Non-management Gratuity Scheme -25,580 1.72%

-1,483,341 100.00%

Page | 554
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (2.91%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Retirement and Other

Service Benefits 4.52% -8.13% 52.51% -36.15% 29.76% -25.08%

Vertical Analysis: Average (1.78%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Retirement and other

Service Benefits 1.83% 1.93% 1.74% 1.28% 2.06% 1.82%

Forecasted Values

The account is one of the minor accounts for PSO with a very small percentage in the vertical

analysis of the company. So, a general company analysis of the account was done and the

account was forecasted accordingly. According to the historical data we predict that the account

Page | 555
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

will increase within a range of 3-4% that too at a decreasing rate. The trend for increase can be

shown in the graph below.

140.00%
120.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
(20.00%)
(40.00%)
(60.00%)

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in the medical benefits Increase

Increase in the Non-Management Pension Increase

Scheme

Decrease in Gratuity and Pension Funds Decrease

Decrease in compensated absences Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

1.78% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

Page | 556
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 2.91% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Retirement and Other Service Benefits


9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the

retirement and other service benefits of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

There was an increase in this account by 4.52%, due to the following reasons;

• Increase in the medical benefits: Increased by 6.5%.

• Increase in the Non-Management Pension Scheme: Increased by 9.45%.

Source:

• Annual Report (2021)

Page | 557
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2020:

There was a decrease of 8.13%, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Gratuity and Pension Funds: The company approved and fund pension

scheme for both management and non-management employees. The scheme provides

pension based on the employees last drawn salaries. Pension are payable for life. The

company also operates unfunded gratuity scheme for all its employees. There was a

decrease of 79.5% in the Pension Funds.

Source:

• Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was an increase in this account by 52.51%, due to the following reasons;

• Increase in the Pension funds given to ex-employees: Increased by 101.4%

• Increase in Medical Benefits: Increased by 58.3%.

• Increase in compensated absences: Increased by 13.2%.

Source:

• Annual Report (2019)

Page | 558
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2018:

There was a decrease in this account by 36.15%, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Gratuity: Decreased by 8.5%.

• Decrease in Medical Benefits: Decreased by 5.11%.

Source:

• Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

There was a decrease in this account by 29.76%%, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in compensated absences: Decreased by 14.94%.

Source:

• Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

There was a decrease in this account by 25.08%, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Gratuity Funds: Decreased by 76.7%.

• Decrease in compensated absences: Decreased by 12.8%.

Source:

Page | 559
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 560
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Long Term Borrowings

Breakdown:

Long Term Borrowing 2021 Vertical Analysis

Diminishing Musharika / long - term borrowing 4,100,000 1294.92%

Less: Current portion of Diminishing Musharika -3,900,000 -1326.87%

200,000 68.04%

Salary Refinancing 231,369 78.72%

Less: Current portion of Salary Refinancing -137,445 -46.76%

93,924 31.96%

293,924 100.00%

Page | 561
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (47.50%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Long Term Borrowing -93.03% -1.97% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.36%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Long Term Borrowing 0.07% 1.12% 0.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Forecasted Value

This is also one of the minor accounts for PSO and the one which was added again in 2019, after

the borrowings were paid off in 2012. Although being a minor account, we considered that it is a

very important account for any company hence all three analysis for the account were done and

the forecasting was done accordingly. All the industrial and economic factors suggested that the

account will be decreasing in the future hence we decreased the account within a range of 10-

15%, at an increasing rate.

Page | 562
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Decrease in Diminishing Musharika Decrease

Increase in Salary Refinancing Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.36% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 47.5% due to the sudden increase.

Long Term Borrowing


5000000
4500000
4000000
3500000
3000000
2500000
2000000
1500000
1000000
500000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Long-

Term Borrowing of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

Page | 563
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

There was a decrease of 93.03% in the year 2021, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Diminishing Musharika: by 4.65%. Musharakah is a joint partnership

arrangement in Islamic finance in which profits and losses are shared. Profits from

interest are not permitted in Islamic practice, necessitating the need for musharakah.

• Increase in Salary Refinancing: by 75.8%

Source:

➢ Annual Report

➢ https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/musharakah

Year 2020-19:

There was a decrease of 1.97% in the year 2020, due to the following reasons;

• Decrease in Diminishing Musharika: by 8.51%. It was 4,300,000 in 2020 whereas it

was 4,700,000 in 2019.

Source:

➢ Annual Report

Page | 564
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value long term

borrowing of all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Long Term Borrowings of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 0 0 4,300,000 4,215,146 293,924

HTL 98,557,862 19,156,221 1,822,078 42,267,650 47,490,196

APL 627,240 0 0 120,323 61,418

BPL 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 99,185,102 19,156,221 6,122,078 46,603,119 47,845,538

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Long Term Borrowings

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 4.02%

HTL 95.61%

APL 0.37%

Page | 565
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

BPL 0.00%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Long Term Borrowings

Total Market Share


120.00%

100.00% 95.61%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%
4.02%
0.37% 0.00%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of long term

borrowings in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Long Term Borrowings Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Page | 566
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 0.00% 0.00% 70.24% 9.04% 0.61%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Cash and Bank Balance Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


80.00%

70.00% 70.24%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00% 9.04%

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.61%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of long term borrowings was the highest in 2019. It

did not have any long term borrowing before that in 2017 and 2018. However, in 2019, their

share increased but has been falling ever since.

Page | 567
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Yearly Change/Growth in Long Term Borrowings of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -1.97% -93.03%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Long Term Borrowings of PSO

PSO Yearly LTB Growth


0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -1.97%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00%

-20.00%

-30.00%

-40.00%

-50.00%

-60.00%

-70.00%

-80.00%

-90.00%
-93.03%
-100.00%

Page | 568
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the growth after 2019 is negative in both 2020 and is the

absolute lowest in 2021.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Long Term Borrowings Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly -

Growth -54.10% 80.69% -68.04% 661.23% 2.67%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Long Term Borrowings Overtime

Page | 569
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


700.00%
661.23%
600.00%

500.00%

400.00%

300.00%

200.00%

100.00%

0.00% 2.67%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-54.10% -68.04%
-100.00% -80.69%

-200.00%

Analysis: The industry in terms of this account experienced a peak in 2020 and that was mainly

because HTL’s long term borrowings increased in that year. The companies reduced their

borrowings in 2021 as the industry’s long term borrowings can be seen to have fallen.

Factors Effects

Implementation of Salary Refinancing Scheme by State Bank Decrease

Page | 570
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

SBP to allow businesses to defer loan repayments for one year Increase

Trust deficit of banks with OMCs after Hascol case Decrease

Banks not ready to extend the credit limits for OMCs Decrease

Outstanding claims of suppliers and banks Decrease

Investment Projects of OMCs for the refineries Increase

Salary Refinancing Scheme by State Bank of Pakistan

On May 11, 2020, SBP further facilitated businesses with enhanced refinance limits to finance

up to 100% of wages and salaries of businesses with average 3- month wage bill of up to Rs500

million. Earlier, 100% financing was available up to a wage bill of Rs 200 million only.

Similarly, for businesses with 3-month wage bill exceeding Rs 500 million, State Bank will now

finance of up to 75% with maximum financing of Rs1 billion. Earlier, 75% financing was

available up to a maximum of Rs375 million and 50% up to a maximum of Rs 500 million.

Businesses that had earlier availed lower financing due to applicable limits can now avail

additional financing on the basis of revised criteria.

Future Outlook

This was done to facilitate the businesses during the pandemic. The new government and the

lower impact of the pandemic would lead to SBP revising these schemes. In the short run, long

Page | 571
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

term borrowings might increase due to this. However, in the long run, the schemes would

change.

Source:

➢ https://www.sbp.org.pk/COVID2/Rozgar.html#:~:text=On%20May%2011%2C%202020

%2C%20SBP,of%20Rs%20200%20million%20only

➢ https://www.sbp.org.pk/smefd/circulars/2020/C6.htm

➢ Annual Report PSO

SBP allowed Businesses to Defer Payments for One Year in 2020

The long term borrowings also increased because the OMCs were taking advantage of the

facilitation provided by SBP. The bank allowed companies to pay their outstanding loans to them

after a year. This allowed them to pay back the loans in 2021 which lead to lower long term

borrowings in 2021 but higher long term borrowings in 2020.

Future Outlook

This too is very short term in nature. The banks are completely against the OMCs nowadays,

making it impossible for them to have long term borrowings.

Source:

➢ Annual Report PSO

Page | 572
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.sbp.org.pk/COVID2/Loans.html

➢ https://www.sbp.org.pk/bprd/2020/CL14.htm

➢ http://www.sbp.org.pk/bprd/pdf/FAQs-ReliefPackage-17-Apr-2020.pdf

Hascol Case Created a Trust Deficit for the Banks in case of the OMCs

After Hascol defaulted, the banks are rather reluctant to offer financing or any types of loans to

the OMCs. The banks are still trying to recover from the Hascol case. Despite the federal

government’s intervention, commercial banks remain reluctant to increase the credit limits of oil

marketing companies (OMCs) spurred by Hascol’s Rs54 billion default, which might trigger a

country-wide fuel shortage. The hesitance on part of commercial banks to increase the credit line

would certainly serve nothing, but expose the country to massive shortage of POL products,

particularly high speed diesel, which was in high demand for harvesting wheat in Punjab and

Sindh. Commercial Banks instead have asked for additional collateral far beyond the lending to

OMCs compared with other industries. Over the last five months, the purchasing power of

OMCs for PMG and HSD has declined by over 30 percent. The weakening of the rupee again

dollar also contributed to the increase in the products’ value.

Future Outlook

Page | 573
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The banks have completely refused to the government about extending credit limits to the

OMCs. They have not recovered from the Hascol case. Due to this, the long term borrowing

would become difficult and would decrease.

Sources:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/941547-federal-govt-intervention-fails-to-win-omcs-a-

rise-in-credit-limits

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/01/30/is-hascols-fate-finally-sealed/

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/04/25/what-is-hascol-hiding/

Outstanding Claims of Banks and Suppliers to be settled to get more Borrowing

Many suppliers in the international market and the local refineries have complained against the

OMCs for not making prompt payments to them. This would lead to banks showing reluctance

towards providing credit to the OMCs as they believe the chance of default is really high with

the OMCs in Pakistan.

Future Outlook

This issue is not expected to resolve anytime soon due to which long term borrowings would

have to reduce in the future

Sources:

Page | 574
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://lahore.comsats.edu.pk/cif/Documents/DiminishingMusharakah-Concept.

➢ https://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/chapters/05-Money%20and%20Credit08.pdf

➢ https://dps.psx.com.pk/download/document/155675.pdf

Future Investment Projects of OMCs for Refineries would require Funding

This has already been mentioned in the analysis of PPE and long term investments.

Page | 575
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Payroll Refinance Facility by SBP Decrease

Higher Profitability Decrease

Payroll Refinance Facility by SBP

To combat the impact of COVID-19 and to help the businesses in payment of wages and salaries

to their workers and employees and thereby support continued employment in this challenging

environment, State Bank of Pakistan introduced a temporary refinance scheme and its Sharia

compliant version under the name payroll refinance facility. Under this the state bank provided

loans to companies including PSO so that there are no layoff of employees which increased the

long term borrowing for the company.

This loan is to be repaid in eight equal quarterly installments with an interest rate of 3%

Future Outlook

Since the economy has started to recover and PSO did make extraordinary profits during the year

2021, it is highly unlikely that PSO will borrow again under this scheme in the future which

means that the borrowings in the future are likely to decrease.

Page | 576
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://www.sbp.org.pk/COVID2/Rozgar.html

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1548281

Higher Profitability

During the fiscal year 2021, PSO recorded all time highest sales and an all-time highest profit

after tax. The main reasons for this could be attributed to better cost absorption as well as the

increase in prices and demand of petroleum products.

An increase in the profits for the company ultimately implies that the taxation that it will be

paying on its profits will also be high which the case is for PSO. It could clearly be seen that the

record high profits for the company resulted in the increase in repayment of loans which

significantly reduced the amount of borrowings

Future Outlook

Looking forward the sales of the company are expected to increase and thus the profitability of

the company is also expected to increase as we predict better cost absorption by the company.

Thus assuming this, it is safe to say that the company will pay back its loans.

Source:

Page | 577
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1683025/tax-revenues

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2354945/fbr-collects-rs486tr-in-taxes

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Page | 578
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Lease Liabilities

Breakdown:

Lease Liabilities 2021 Vertical Analysis

Balance at beginning of the year: 4,529,062 101.82%

Impact of initial application of IFRS 16 - -

Additions during the year 588,383 13.23%

Accretion of interest 698,518 15.70%

Lease contracts modified during the year 333,650 7.50%

Less: Disposal during the year -346 -0.01%

Less: Lease rentals paid -913,613 -20.54%

Balance at the end of year 5,235,654 117.71%

Less: Current portion shown under current liability -787,713 -17.71%

Non-Current Balance 4,447,941 100.00%

Page | 579
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (0.91%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Lease Liabilities -0.91% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.38%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Lease Liabilities 1.07% 1.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Forecasted Value

Leased liability is another minor account of the company, however we conducted both the

company ad industry analysis of this account as it can have major impact on the financial

statements of the company. The account was added in 2020 hence not a lot of information is

Page | 580
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

available on the account. So, we predict that the account will decrease by a very minor amount

for a couple of years after which it will stay constant.

Page | 581
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in the lease contracts modified Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.38% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 0.91% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Lease Liabilities
5000000

4000000

3000000

2000000

1000000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the

Lease Liabilities of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021-20:

There was a decrease of 0.91% in the year 2021, due to the following reasons;

Page | 582
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Increase in the lease contracts modified during the year 2020: by 11%. On adoption

of IFRS 16, the Company has changed its accounting policy for operating leases which

are now recognized on the statement of financial position. The Company has accordingly

recognized lease liabilities amounting to Rs. 4,430 million.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Page | 583
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of lease liabilities

of all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Lease Liabilities of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 0 0 0 4,488,600 4,447,941

HTL 103,119,783 80,309,810 27,928,496 204,637,134 334,670,123

APL 0 0 0 6,274,485 3,978,932

BPL 3,940 938 2,177 17,511 9,942

TOTAL 103,123,723 80,310,748 27,930,673 215,417,730 343,106,938

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Lease Liabilities

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 1.16%

HTL 97.50%

Page | 584
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

APL 1.33%

BPL 0.00%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Lease Liabilities

Total Market Share


120.00%

100.00% 97.50%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

1.16% 1.33% 0.00%


0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of lease

liabilities in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

Page | 585
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO’s Lease Liabilities Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.08% 1.30%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Lease Liabilities Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


2.50%

2.08%
2.00%

1.50%
1.30%

1.00%

0.50%

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 586
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: the market share of PSO in lease liabilities was zero till 2019 as there were no lease

liabilities. However, leasing started for them in 2020 and so did the market share increase. It

decreased after the pandemic.

Yearly Change/Growth in Lease Liabilities of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -0.91%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Lease Liabilities of PSO

PSO Yearly Lease Liabilities Growth


0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-0.10%
-0.20%
-0.30%
-0.40%
-0.50%
-0.60%
-0.70%
-0.80%
-0.90% -0.91%
-1.00%

Page | 587
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the growth after 2020, the lease liabilities declined

considerably for PSO.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Lease Liabilities Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth -37.53% -22.12% -65.22% 671.26% 59.28%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Lease Liabilities Overtime

Page | 588
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


800.00%

700.00%
671.26%
600.00%

500.00%

400.00%

300.00%

200.00%

100.00%
59.28%
0.00% -22.12%
-37.53%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-65.22%
-100.00%

-200.00%

Analysis: The industry in terms of this account experienced a peak in 2020 and HTL and BPL

started increased their lease liabilities in this year.

Future Outlook

Lease Liabilities would either have zero growth or would decrease further in the forthcoming

future as leasing is something the company never really relied upon. Moreover, 2 years worth of

data is not enough to make decisions about lease liabilities of PSO. In 2020, there were lease

Page | 589
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

rentals for storage keeping as refineries refused to cooperate. This created lease rental liabilities

but in 2021, these dropped as well, lowering the lease liabilities.

Source:

➢ Annual Report PSO

Page | 590
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Other Payable

Page | 591
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (7.4%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Other Payable -44.64% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.09%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Other Payable 0.18% 0.36% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Forecasted Values

Other payable is one of the minor accounts of the company and the one which was added in

2020. Before that it was part of the trade payables account. So, a general company analysis of

this account has been done and according to that, the account has been decreased within a range

of 35-40% at a decreasing rate.

Page | 592
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.09% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 7.4% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Other Payable
5000000
4500000
4000000
3500000
3000000
2500000
2000000
1500000
1000000
500000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the

other payables of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016. Overall, The Other Payables decreased

by 44%. Other Payables are related to on account of import of LNG by the Holding Company.

As per the directions of Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs Division outstanding wharfage

has to be paid in 10 equal installments without interest over a period of 10 years. The Holding

Page | 593
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company has recognized this liability at amortized cost at inception rate prevailing at the time of

determining the liability.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021-20)

Page | 594
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

________________________

Page | 595
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Current Liabilities

Page | 596
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Trade and Other Payable

Breakdown:

Trade and other Payables 2021 Vertical Analysis

Local creditors 25,601,168 15.27%

Foreign creditors 51,182,728 30.52%

76,783,896 45.79%

Security deposits 5,237,383 3.12%

Accrued expenses and other liabilities 72,498,735 43.23%

Payable to provident funds 9,174 0.01%

Due to OMCs and refineries 379,730 0.23%

Advances - unsecured

Page | 597
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

from customers 8,699,802 5.19%

against equipment 1,728 0.00%

8,701,530 5.19%

Taxes and other government dues

Excise, taxes and other duties 2,531,105 1.51%

Octroi 51,590 0.03%

Sales tax payable - due to related party - -

Income tax deducted at source 117,619 0.07%

2,700,314 1.61%

Workers' Welfare Fund 1,279,084 0.76%

Others 103,980 0.06%

167,693,826 100.00%

Page | 598
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (4.54%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Trade and other payables 12.28% -13.93% -2.34% 31.36% 6.08% -6.23%

Vertical Analysis: Average (42.25%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Trade and other payables 43.81% 43.04% 41.37% 47.73% 37.27% 40.28%

Forecasted Values

Keeping in mind that the international oil prices, which play a major role in determine the trade

payables of the company, we forecast that trade and other payables are will increase between 10-

15% every year, with the pace gradually decreasing. This is also done keeping in mind that we

forecast that the cost of goods sold will also be increasing by a significant amount, although the

company will be absorbing its fixed costs better. This is also shown in the graph below

Page | 599
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Change
120.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%

2015

2019

2023
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2016
2017
2018

2020
2021
2022

2024
2025
2026
(20.00%)
(40.00%)

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

42.25% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 4.54% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Factors that highly influence the trade and other payables of a company may include the increase

or decrease of the purchase of inventory etc. Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the

causes of the increase and decrease of the trade and other payables of PSO year by year from

2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

Trade and other payables have increased in FY21 primarily due to increase in trade payables on

account of rise in international oil prices.

Page | 600
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• PSO due to pay oil refineries: The PSO has to pay Rs32.101 billion to oil refineries. It

owes Rs16.836 billion to Pak-Arab Refinery Company (Parco), Rs4.931 billion to

Pakistan Refinery Limited (PRL), Rs3.984 billion to National Refinery Limited (NRL),

Rs3.848 billion to Attock Refinery Limited (ARL), Rs1.100 billion to Byco, and Rs1.403

billion Enar.

• PSO’s deteriorating cashflow situation on account of non-recover of its dues: PSO

payables have soared to Rs177.459 billion because of the deteriorating cash flow

situation on account of non-recovery of its dues amounting to over Rs374 billion. The

PSO's inability to clear its outstanding liabilities have increased, which is why its

payables have also drastically increased to Rs148.366 billion under the head of letter of

credits with regards to payments to the KPC (Kuwait Petroleum Company).

• Increase in international oil prices: The price of petrol in 2021 was Rs123.30 per liter,

while cost of supply of Pakistan State Oil (PSO) increased to Rs95.41 liter. Increase in

price also effected the GST rate, which increased to Rs11.76 per liter from Rs11.28 per

liter in the first half of September.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40131743

Page | 601
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40136350

Year 2020:

Trade and other payables have declined in FY20 primarily due to decrease in trade payables on

account of dip in oil prices and payables related to procurement of product.

• PSO’s dues to the oil refineries: PSO’s management said its circular debt touched an

alarming level in the year 2021 and that PSO had to pay Rs18 billion to the oil

refineries.

• Reduction in the prices of petroleum products: In the first half of the year Petrol was

sold at Rs.74.52 per liter. The government reduced prices of all petroleum products

except High-Speed Diesel (HSD) in order to partially pass on the impact of massive

international price reduction to the masses.

• Pakistan’s lack of strategic storages led to a missed opportunity: The global oil

prices had crashed which had provided an opportunity for oil importing countries like

Pakistan to import the commodity and store it for future use. Unfortunately, due to a

lack of strategic storages the country was unable to take advantage of the slump. In

Pakistan, oil marketing companies are bound to store petroleum products for 20 days.

But they had been unable to maintain stocks due to which the country had faced a diesel

shortage crisis.

Page | 602
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40040595/pso-receivables-touch-rs3189-billion-mark

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1560434

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2217984/pakistan-shelves-plan-offshore-storages

Year 2019:

Trade and other payables have declined as per vertical and horizontal analysis primarily due to

decrease in trade payables on account of lower volumes of Furnace oil.

• Furnace oil volumes decrease due to the major shift towards coal and LNG: Some of

the demand of petroleum products have been the changes in the energy mix particularly

shifting away from the furnace oil towards coal and LNG; and then the comeback of

furnace oil during COVID and post COVID times due to the systemic issues in the

refining system as well as the rise in demand from the power sector.

• PSO’s Payables due to foreign suppliers and local oil refineries: PSO’s payables to

local refineries dropped from Rs16bn to Rs13bn whiles its outstanding payments to

international suppliers fell from Rs43bn to Rs28bn as of March 1. Yet, the PSO’s total

international obligations stood at Rs44bn when compared to Rs57bn.

Source:

Page | 603
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2019)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40144311

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1467725

Year 2018:

Trade and other payables are the highest in the year 2018 as per vertical and horizontal analysis

primarily due to increase in trade payables on account of higher oil prices.

• Decrease in furnace oil volumes due to the shift to coal: Furnace oil volumes declined

by 29.6 percent year-on-year in 2018 owing to the supply situation and the government’s

strategy of switching priority of existing power plants from FO to RLNG/natural gas.

• PSO seeks Rs 65 billion from the power sector: Pakistan State Oil (PSO) has sought Rs

65 billion from Power Division to release its choked credit line and ensure furnace oil

supplies to the power sector. Whereas power sector's consolidated payables reached Rs

1.148 trillion of which Rs 582.86 billion loans are parked in the books of Power Holding

(Private) Limited (PHPL) whereas Rs 566 billion was in circular debt.

• Dues to be paid to foreign suppliers and oil refineries: Total payables of PSO

currently stood at Rs84bn including almost Rs70bn to foreign suppliers and about

Rs15bn to local refineries.

Source:

Page | 604
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2018)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/449733

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/4627996

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1389819

Year 2017:

Trade and other payables have increased in 2017 as per horizontal analysis primarily due to

increase in trade payables on account of higher inventory levels and oil prices.

• Higher inventory due to lower fuel costs: The increase in gross profit and gross margin

could be due to inventory gains booked on account of lower fuel costs in the low oil price

scenario.

• PSO unable to meet the demands due to chocked credit lines: Power division was

seeking only 3,600 tonnes to buildup stocks at power plants despite their storage capacity

of 1.2 million tonnes. Pakistan State Oil (PSO) holds a storage capacity of more than

400,000 tonnes but they were unable to meet power sectors’ demand due to choked credit

lines.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/364031/pso-a-sturdy-performance-in-fy17

Page | 605
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1449746

Year 2016:

Trade and other payables have shown a declining trend in 2016 onwards mainly due to timely

payments to refineries coupled with impact of reduction in oil prices.

• PSO made timely payments to the local refineries: Due to this payment discipline, the

Company has not faced any default situation against its payment commitments during the

year 2016 under review contrary to last year 2015. Timely payments to local refineries

were made in order to ensure maximum availability of products from local sources

continuously affects the liquidity position, which remained under pressure and was

managed through short-term bank borrowings.

• Reduction in oil prices increased PSO’s sales volumes significantly: The Company’s

sale volume of Motor Gasoline grew by 26%, mainly due to decrease in price of gasoline

and subsequent increase in customer demand. Furthermore, HSD sales recorded an

increase of 0.7%, due to the increased upliftment by PIA and international airlines. FO

volumes declined by 4.3% due to lower upliftment by IPP’s primarily due to shifting

from FO to natural gas.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 606
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=287

Page | 607
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Considering that PSO is a company with high proportions of trade debts, it is safe to assume that

their cash position would be such that, their purchases would mostly be on credit as well and the

level of trade payables would vary from time to time, depending on how much cash they have

received from their customers and how efficient their operating cycle is. For any company, their

trade payables are closely tied with their cost of goods sold. They tend to have a direct

relationship. Trade payables tend to impact the purchase portion of the cost of goods sold.

Total Trade Payables of all OMCs:

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 5 years


PSO 146,269,601 192,145,744 187,650,036 161,505,913 181,342,763 868,914,057
HTL 805,085,777 613,957,734 739,055,365 704,278,864 1,385,266,386 4,247,644,126
APL 21,098,679 26,138,159 26,633,386 27,561,324 31,179,480 132,611,028
BPL 140,537 179,524 91,492 138,922 108,382 658,857
TOTAL 972,594,594 832,421,161 953,430,279 893,485,023 1,597,897,011 5,249,828,068

Total Market Share of OMCs in Trade Payables:

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 16.55%

Hi-Tech Lubricants

Limited 80.91%

Page | 608
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Attock Petroleum Limited 2.53%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.01%

Total Industry AP 100.00%

Total Market Share

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.01%

Attock Petroleum Limited 2.53%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 80.91%

Pakistan State Oil 16.55%

0.00% 20.00% 40.00% 60.00% 80.00% 100.00%

Total Market Share

Analysis: After Hi-Tech lubricants, PSO has the highest levels of trade payables in the market.

However, what we can notice is this that its share of trade payables (16.55%) is almost half the

share of its trade receivables (37.29%). The market share in terms of trade payables for APL and

BPL are not that considerable and stand in no comparison to PSO and HTL.

Total Growth in Industry’s Trade Payables:

Company Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 609
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry’s Yearly

Growth 31.95% -14.41% 14.54% -6.29% 78.84%

Industry's Yearly Growth


100.00%

80.00% 78.84%

60.00%

40.00%
31.95%

20.00%
14.54%

0.00% -6.29%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-14.41%
-20.00%

Analysis: The overall industry experienced a fall in the trade payables in the year 2018 after a

high level of 31.95% in 2017. After that, in 2019 it increased again almost by the same level as it

decreased in 2018. In 2020, the trade payables decreased at a decreasing rate but saw a high

speak in the year 2021. This happened mainly because even though in 2018, the trade payables

of PSO, ATL and BPL increased, the payables of HTL dropped by a larger amount and the

overall growth in the industry’s payables dropped due to this. In 2019, this was offset by a

decrease in the payables of PSO but an increase in the payables of HTL. In the year 2020, the

trade payables of the major players, PSO and HTL fell considerably and even though the

Page | 610
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

payables of APL and BPL increased but they were not enough to off-set the changes of PSO and

HTL due to which the industry’s payables declined in 2020. The peak in industry payables in

2021 was mainly because of HTL which recorded the highest level of payables in the last five

years in 2021. There was also an increase in the payables of PSO but it stands in no comparison

to the increase in the payables of HTL. HTL had some free cash flow in hand which it used to

pay off their liabilities.

Change in Market Share throughout the years w.r.t. the Industry:

Company Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry’s Yearly

Share 15.04% 23.08% 19.68% 18.08% 11.35%

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


25.00%
23.08%

20.00% 19.68%
18.08%

15.00% 15.04%

11.35%
10.00%

5.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 611
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: Payables were the highest in the year 2018 with respect to the industry. After and

increase in payables in 2018, PSO has experienced a relative decrease in the following 3 years.

The payables have reduced at a slow rate but the progress is still there. PSO had the highest trade

payables in 2018 among all five years as can be seen in the table given above. This tells us that

even though PSO experienced the highest payables in 2018, it stands in no comparison to HTL

as their decrease in payables was enough to reduce the entire industry’s level of trade payables. It

also had the lowest proportion in 2021 among all other companies in the industry.

PSO’s year wise increase in trade payables – Last 5 years:

Company Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Company’s Yearly AP

Growth 6.08% 31.36% -2.34% -13.93% 12.28%

Page | 612
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Company's Yearly AP Growth


35.00%
30.00% 31.36%

25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
12.28%
10.00%
5.00% 6.08%

0.00%
-2.34%
-5.00% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-10.00%
-15.00% -13.93%

-20.00%

Analysis: As mentioned earlier, that PSO had the highest levels of trade payables growth rate in

2018. However, the lowest level was noticed in 2020. This might mean that they were paying of

their credit on an urgent basis during the pandemic. However, just like the receivables, the

payables can also be seen to increase in 2021 for PSO. More insights can be developed through

the secondary research done below.

Supporting Articles:

Delays in payments from the customers lead to liquidity crises among OMCs:

In 2017, we can see from the graphs given above that the trade payables of the industry were

high. This was mainly because the OMCs and especially PSO were not receiving payments from

their customers which led to them not being able to pay their financial obligations. This led to

them not have enough money to pay off their current liabilities such as the trade and other

Page | 613
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

payables. These payments were to be received from the power sector, PIA, and the transportation

sector who have been major defaulters of the major OMCs such as PSO.

Future Outlook:

These defaulters have been eating up the subsidies that the government provide them with. In the

future, the government plans on reducing this subsidy. This means that the payments will be

delayed further leading to more liquidity crunches among the OMCs in the forthcoming future.

Source:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2017/01/30/delay-in-payments-exposes-pso-to-

liquidity-crunch/

➢ Audit report on the accounts of the petroleum division

International oil prices increase leading to higher trade payables:

In 2018, the government of Pakistan increased the prices of petroleum as a result of an increase

in the international oil prices. When the cost of their products increased, the inability to pay most

of the cost through cash also increased. Due to this, the OMCs of Pakistan incurred heavy trade

payables which can also be seen in the graphs given above that in all five years, the OMCs

experienced the highest growth in trade payables in 2018. Even though this impacted PSO, APL

and BPL, the trade payables of HTL were not impacted and they fell in 2018 which led to an

Page | 614
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

overall decrease in the industry’s trade payables. However, the 2018 increase in oil prices was

the major reason for increase in trade payables of other OMCs.

Future Outlook:

After 2018, the prices of petroleum products also increased in 2021. This means that more

account payables would have been incurred by the OMCs. If in the future, prices increase again,

the trade payables would increase as well.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report

➢ https://mettisglobal.news/government-to-raise-petroleum-prices-by-1st-may-2018/

Devaluation of Rupee leads to high cost for the OMCs in Pakistan:

In 2018, the Rupee devaluation of $1 to Rs.143 impacted the OMCs adversely. This meant that

the cost of their material e.g. crude oil rose. The price of crude oil went up to PKR 7400 in 2018.

This increase in cost of material lead to high levels of trade payables because this directly

impacted the purchasing power of the OMCs. They had to defer their payments or else they

would have experienced an immense shortage because the demand of the petroleum products

was also high in 2018.

Future Outlook:

Page | 615
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

We know that our currency has been experiencing devaluation since a long time. It is only safe to

assume that the trade payables are expected to increase in the forthcoming years as well keeping

in mind the current environment. The OMC industry needs to be mindful of that and need to

either lock their prices before hand or need to promote the domestic production.

Source:

➢ https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/30/pakistani-rupee-plunges-in-likely-central-bank-

devaluation-traders.html

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

Saudi Arabia provides oil on deferred payments

In 2018, another reason for an increase in the trade payables was the provision of oil during an

oil crisis by Saudi Arabia. They provided $3.2 billion worth of oil to Pakistan but this was done

on deferred payments which then increased the trade payables of the OMCs. This was to

continue for three consecutive years and would end on May 2020. It was need of the hour for

OMCs as they were already experiencing liquidity crises due to the delayed payments from their

customers in Pakistan and internationally.

Future Outlook:

Page | 616
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

After 2018, the pandemic took place in 2019. There was very little need of oil and other

petroleum products because of the lockdowns imposed and the ban on travel. The economic

activity was quite low. The OMCs did not need that much of oil from Saudi Arabia till 2020.

When 2020 ended, so did the provision of oil on deferred payments. But, in reality the actual

demand started after 2020 when lockdowns were lifted. Currently, in the latest meeting, Saudi

Arabia has refused to provide oil to OMCs on deferred payments until they clear the previous

piled up trade payables.

Sources:

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40011194

➢ https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/saudi-arabia-defers-to-

renew-pact-to-supply-oil-to-pakistan-on-deferred-

payments/amp_articleshow/77432529.cms

➢ https://mettisglobal.news/pakistan-to-get-petroleum-products-on-deferred-payment-from-

july-2019/

Lower imports / domestic buying of furnace oil improves liquidity conditions of OMCs:

In 2019, Pakistan experienced a fall in the demand of furnace oil. Furnace oil is one of the most

expensive petroleum products which the Pakistani OMCs import. When the energy production

sector and other major customers of the OMCs switched to more renewable sources such as

Page | 617
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

RLNG and coal for their production, the OMCs experienced a fall in the demand of furnace oil.

So, they did not import heavy volumes of FO in 2019 which is one of the reasons of as to why

the trade payables are lower in 2019.

Future Outlook:

The OMCs are switching towards using more renewable sources of energy in the future. The

trade payables are not expected to increase in the future due to the purchase of expensive furnace

oil.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/452588-slowdown-weighs-heavy-petroleum-sales-

down-25pc-in-july-march

Lower trade payables recorded by OMCs due to the pandemic:

In 2019, there was low economic activity. The OMCs did not have to purchase much oil from

foreign countries due to which we can also so a dip in the trade payables of 2019. Everyone was

locked inside their homes due to the pandemic and forthcoming lockdowns. They did not even

require the $3.2 billion worth of oil from Saudi Arabia because of this as that would have

resulted in inventory losses as the prices were expected to fall to provide some relief to the

consumers in difficult times.

Page | 618
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook:

Now that the pandemic has ended, the economic activity has started again. The trade payables

are expected to increase because the demand of the oil products has become very basic and

necessary for survival. If another wave would hit Pakistan, only then would the trade payables

reduce.

Source:

➢ https://www.spglobal.com/commodity-insights/en/market-insights/latest-

news/oil/072420-oilgram-ap-pakistans-oil-demand-feels-covid-19-pain-set-to-

bounce-back

OMCs take advantage of tax-free imports from China:

In 2020, our neighboring country, China signed an agreement with Pakistan called the China

Pakistan Free Trade Association. Under this, tax free imports were established. PSO, Shell and

other OMCs in the industry took great advantage of this, allowing minimal to no impact of the

taxes on their trade payables which would otherwise had increased incase the import was not tax

free in nature.

Future Outlook:

Page | 619
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan and China have been on good terms since quite some time. Considering the CPEC

project, the imports will be cheaper in nature from China and the OMCs can take advantage of

this product to a great extent, reducing their payables even further.

Source:

➢ https://www.aninews.in/news/world/asia/pak-oil-firms-make-huge-profits-through-

tax-free-imports20220124171342

Petroleum prices drop as the international oil prices drop leading to lower payables:

In 2020, to provide relief to the consumers during the pandemic, the petroleum prices were

matched with the international prices of oil. This was both good and bad for the OMCs. It was

good for them because they could import at lower rates and would not have to make more

payments on credit and could make cash payments. On the other hand, it was bad because that

would result in inventory losses as the same inventory would have to be sold at lower rates by

the OMCs.

Future Outlook:

The oil prices are only expected to increase in the future as even now the prices of petroleum

products are expected to increase till April 2022. So, the trade payables are expected to increase

in the future.

Page | 620
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/665965-petrol-price-reduces-by-rs7-06-kerosene-

rs11-88-ldo-by-rs9-37-litre

➢ https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/100615/will-oil-prices-go-2017.asp

International oil price experience growth higher than 2018 in 2021:

In 2021, the international oil prices experienced an extreme growth. If we look at the normal

demand and supply curve, the prices increased when the demand of oil increased as the

pandemic subsided and the supply was limited. So, the OMCs had to import oil at higher costs

leading to higher trade payables. This can be verified from the industry’s growth in trade

payables through the years. The highest trade payables were recorded in 2021. The major portion

was accounted by HTL. Even though PSO’s trade payables increased as well but HTL had the

major portion or chunk of it.

Future Outlook:

The petroleum product prices are only expected to increase as the government is not ready to

provide for the price differential claims that have been incurred before, this would tighten the

liquidity situation and the trade payables will not be paid off leading to an increase.

Source:

Page | 621
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.bbc.com/news/business-58727437

Increase in the petroleum levy by the government in 2021:

In 2021, the government wanted to raise Rs.250-300 billion through the petroleum levy. If we

look at the trade and other payable portion of the OMCs mentioned above, they have payables in

terms of taxes and duties. This increase in petroleum levy would increase their payables further

because their liquidity situation is already constricted due to the inability of recovering the

deferred payments from their customers.

Future Outlook:

These additional taxes and burden on the OMCs is to continue in the future if the government is

unable to reach their target of federal revenue collected. OMCs make a huge chunk of the total

taxes collected. Currently, the OMCs are facing major issues and are deciding to leave the

Pakistani market, imposing more burden on PSO. The trade payables are expected to hence,

increase in the future.

Sources:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/906446-govt-to-generate-up-to-rs250-300-bn-through-

petroleum-levy

Page | 622
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/12/01/govt-increases-levy-gst-on-pol-products-

to-meet-imf-conditions/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1661218

Tax receipts from petroleum products further increase to 72%:

In 2022, in the month of February, the government of Pakistan imposed several additional taxes

on the OMCs such as the custom duties on import station and also on sales tax. So, indirect taxes

have been imposed which lead to higher costs for the OMCs and in return higher payables for the

companies in this industry as well.

Future Outlook:

We can analyze from this that the government would do anything to reach their targets of

maintaining federal revenues and budgets. The OMCs and the taxes levied on them are a major

source of revenue for the government. If in the future, the government needs more revenue, the

OMCs will be targeted, further increasing the trade payables.

Source:

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2343247/tax-receipts-from-pol-items-jump-

72?amp=1#aoh=16481739356856&amp_ct=1648174233807&referrer=https%3A%2F

%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s

Page | 623
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

China Pakistan Free Trade Association proves to be ineffective:

In 2022, it is being noticed that it has been two years since the CPFTA is being practiced.

However, the OMCs only had advantage of it in the very beginning. Now, the benefit of duty

exemption is taken away from the OMCs till the product reaches them due to the high freight

costs and the premium charged on Pakistani buyers by the suppliers. OMCs are experiencing

high trade payables for these portions of trading with China.

Future Outlook:

Even though the CPFTA could lead to reductions in trade payables and improve the liquidity

situation of the companies in the OMC industry, but now, the pact does not seem of much use.

Maybe the CPEC project can cater to the freight cost charges and lead to lower costs and trade

payables. Ever so, the trade payables are expected to increase.

Source:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/01/09/chinese-petrol-drive-omc-profits/

Reduction in the profit margins of OMCs leads to liquidity crunches:

In 2022, the OICCI revised the profit margins of the OMCs and imposed more burden on them

by putting higher taxes. The OMCs are already finding it difficult to meet their financial

obligations. They are unable to cater to their trade payables which are the current liabilities let

Page | 624
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

alone the long-term liabilities. Lower profit margins would mean that the situation for OMCs

would worsen and the trade payables will be impacted negatively and would pile up.

Future Outlook:

Trade and other payables are expected to increase for the OMCs in the future because the

government does not plan on going easy on the OMCs especially after the Hascol case that was

experienced by the banks and the government.

Source:

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2329024/oicci-seeks-revision-in-omcs-margins

Banks are reluctant to extent credit limits after Hascol case:

In 2022, when a committee sat to discuss an increase the credit limits offered by the banks to the

OMCs, several banks disagreed to the idea of it. They are hesitant because of how Hascol has

defaulted previously and they have not been able to receive their payments back. The officials

tried explaining that they cannot make this decision due to one bad fish in the sea. The banks,

however, are still reluctant to increase the credit limits. This would mean that OMCs are in a

tough situation as the international oil prices are rising and there is a high demand of petroleum

products in the country. The supply chain will be interrupted. Their trade payables are already

high. They need to cater to them first and pay them off.

Page | 625
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook:

If the OMCs do not pay off their current trade payables and other payables, the banks would

remain hesitant and the OMCs would not be able to make more credit sales or have deferred

payments in line of their supply chain. However, they are in no position of meeting their current

obligations because of all the factors that have been mentioned earlier.

Source:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/03/05/fuel-crisis-looms-as-banks-still-wary-

of-omcs/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1678676

Page | 626
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

International Oil prices, Inflation and Currency Factor

Since 2014 the international oil prices have seen the most significant volatility. The oil market

has taken on new features that affect the development of the global economy. According to EIA,

US shale oil production increased from 4.96 million barrels per day in 2017 to 5.59 million

barrels per day in 2022. In addition, there are geopolitical events, trade frictions, and OPEC’s

agreement have occurred in recent years, causing the volatility of oil price.

In a developing country like Pakistan, which has such high dependence on imported oil, an

increase in oil prices leads to inflationary pressure which in turn increases budget deficit and puts

a downward pressure on the exchange rate, making imports more expensive. The government

has refrained from passing on the complete price increase to the consumers because it fears it

will exacerbate inflation and stifle economic activity which presents a significant challenge to

the government’s plans of ending its tenure with a strong growth phase.

This inflationary pressure and devaluation of the rupee, along with all other factors kept in mind

led to an increase in the cost of purchase of PSO as the country relies heavily on imported

RLNG.

Future Outlook

Page | 627
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Looking forward the international oil prices are forecasted to increase mainly on account of the

war between Russia and Ukraine, as can also be seen in the graph below which in turn means

that the inflation in the country will increase as well as the rupee will depreciate to some extent.

Keeping in mind that the sales of the company is predicted to increase, the cost of purchase will

also be increasing which in turn would increase the trade and other payables for PSO. Although

costs will be better absorbed, the cost of purchase will still increase.

Source:

➢ Director’s report

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

Page | 628
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-021-00166-

China Pakistan Free Trade Agreement

According to reports around 15 OMCs are reported to have imported over 2.4 billion litres of

petrol from China in 2 years earning a huge windfall because of the special agreement under

CPFTA. OMCs were allowed to import petrol from China without paying ten percent Custom

Duty, which is, otherwise, applied on the import of petrol from other countries.

PSO also took windfall benefit of petrol imports from China. It imported about 68 million litres

of petrol from China and claimed customs duty waiver against the FTA certificate as per

SRO.1640(1)/2019 S.No.10 and paid Rs64 million as ACD thus getting petrol at a low cost,

reducing the cost of production.

It is not clear yet as to how and why the petroleum imports were made part of the revised

CPFTA in 2019 when China is a net importer of oil as a top executive of a local refinery said,

“Granting this facility to OMCs under CPFTA makes no sense as China was also a net importer

of petrol”. However with this being said, all OMC’s including PSO have already enjoyed the low

cost benefit under this agreement as the import bill particularly of refined petroleum products,

has seen the largest chunk of 83pc increase in imports during the last fiscal year. Due to this all

Page | 629
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

OMC’s including PSO were able to enjoy low cost of purchase thus reducing their trade

payables.

Future Outlook

Looking forward we predict that PSO will further enjoy the cheaper imports through China

which will help in the reduction of its trade and other payables in the future.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1671124

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/934553-oil-refining-data-sought-to-decide-on-

petrol-imports

Delayed Payments by SNGPL

PSO has recently defaulted on payments to LNG supplier- Gunvor – and payments on various

POL products to some local refineries of PARCO (Pak-Arab Refinery Company), National

Refinery Limited (NRL) and ENAR due to severe liquidity crisis that has touched new heights

due to non-payment of dues of over Rs100 billion that Sui Northern has failed to pay to the entity

against the LNG supply.

SNGPL claims that it has payments due from the government and SSGC of almost Rs.50 billion,

which if cleared, SNGPL can clear all its dues to PSO.

Page | 630
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

In the coming two years it is not expected that SNGPL will pay back PSO so the payables are

likely to rise. However due to the inability of the government to further sustain the subsidy in the

LNG sector, prices for gas are likely to increase which would help SNGPL in clearing its dues to

PSO. However the increase in price will be done in phases which means that the dues will also

be cleared gradually. So the trade payables for PSO are still expected to rise but this rise will be

offset by the gradual payments which are expected from SNGPL.

Sources

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/659014-pso-defaults-on-payments-to-lng-supplier-

local-refineries

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/402099

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40124127

Increase in Excise, taxes and other duties

To keep up with the conditions given by the IMF, the government of Pakistan increased the taxes

on petroleum products by a significant amount which lead to a 4.5% increase in the current

liabilities of PSO on account of increased trade and other payables. This included custom duties

Page | 631
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

on import station and also on sales tax. So, indirect taxes have been imposed which lead to

higher costs for PSO and in return higher payables for the companies in this industry as well.

Future Outlook

Looking forward the government will achieve its target for federal revenue and will have to keep

up with any conditions being put by the IMF. So keeping in mind the current situation of the

economy, it is likely that in the future, taxes will increase further as taxes by PSO account for

major chunk of the total taxes thus an increase in the trade and other payables can be forecasted.

Sources

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/12/01/govt-increases-levy-gst-on-pol-products-

to-meet-imf-conditions/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1661218

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2320877/taxes-on-imports-fuel-inflation

Strategic Partnership with PARCO & PEPCO

During the year 2021, it could be observed that the local purchases by PSO increased by a drastic

amount. This was in line with the strategic partnership with PARCO and PEPCO, which also

proved beneficial as a whole for the country as local production was encouraged.

Page | 632
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO has entered into a strategic partnership with PARCO and PEPCO which aims to safeguard

the country's petroleum product supply chain and enable economical and environment friendly

transportation of fuel. Under the partnership PSO will uses the White Oil Pipeline, which is a

mega infrastructure expanding all the way from Port Qasim to Mahmood Kot for the

transportation of crude oil as well as diesel to the central regions of Pakistan which account for

almost 60% of the total Petroleum consumption in the country.

Future Outlook

With this partnership, PSO has managed to significantly reduce its costs which can clearly be

reflected in its cost of production. This also means that they have been able to eliminate the

effect of currency devaluation which increases the trade payable. Furthermore it is also expected

that the cost will continue to decline as more infrastructure is added, however the trade payables

will increase as the company has started to buy more from the local production thus accounting

for more percentage as a whole in the sales figure.

Source:

➢ https://www.parco.com.pk/our-business/transportation/pipeline-network/

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=437

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40089628/pso-enters-into-strategic-

partnership-with-parco-papco

Page | 633
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Method chosen

• Subjective analysis

Methods used

• Naïve (15 years)

• Excel forecasting

• Horizontal Analysis

• Moving Average

Naïve (15 years)

Page | 634
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Excel forecasting

Page | 635
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis

Moving average

Page | 636
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Change
120.00%

100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
2015

2019

2023
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2016
2017
2018

2020
2021
2022

2024
2025
2026
(20.00%)

(40.00%)

Page | 637
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Unclaimed Dividend

Page | 638
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Forecasted values

A general analysis has been done for this account as it is a minor account and was added in 2017

to the financial statements of the company. According to the analysis, the account will increase

between 2-5% for the next 5 years, which is also supported by the historical data.

Page | 639
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

General Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in dividends paid Increase

Decrease in Unpaid Dividend Increase

Increase in Profits Increase

It wasn’t until 2017, when this account came into being for PSO. The table given below provides

data of the unclaimed dividend of PSO throughout the years and also the growth of this account.

Years 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

PSO 1,393,280 1,374,930 1,761,628 3,443,218 2,784,318 0

Growth 1.33% -21.95% -48.84% 23.66% 0.00% 0.00%

Graph Indicating the Growth in Unclaimed Dividend throughout the Years

Page | 640
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly PPE Growth


30.00%
23.66%
20.00%

10.00%

0.00% 0.00% 1.33%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00%

-20.00%
-21.95%

-30.00%

-40.00%

-50.00% -48.84%

-60.00%

Analysis: the unclaimed dividends only decreased in 2019. In all other subsequent years, the

unclaimed dividends have experienced an increase. This makes it safe to assume that in the

forthcoming years, this account would continue to increase. It was the absolute lowest in 2019.

Factors affecting Unclaimed dividend

Increase in Profits in 2021

In 2021, when the profits of PSO increased, they had more cash to give out to their shareholders.

This led to an increase in dividends paid in 2021 and hence an increase in the unclaimed

Page | 641
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

dividends as well. In the future, if the profits will increase as well, the unclaimed dividends can

be expected to increase again.

Increase in Dividend Paid in 2021

The account of unclaimed dividend of PSO increased in 2021 as a result of higher dividends

being paid in that year. Unclaimed dividends are those dividends which have not been claimed

by the shareholders within 30 days of dividend declaration. This has a direct relationship with the

number of dividends paid. In 2019, the dividends paid by PSO fell due to which the value of

unclaimed dividends fell as well. Dividends paid in 2018 were the highest hence the highest

value of unclaimed dividends.

Decrease in Unpaid Dividend

The unpaid dividend has an inverse relationship with the unclaimed dividends. When the unpaid

dividends increase, the values of unclaimed dividends tend to decrease. However, in every year

when the unpaid dividends decreased, an increase in unclaimed dividends was noticed by PSO.

Source:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/954116-pso-s-q3-net-profit-soars-273pc-to-rs32-58bn

Page | 642
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Unpaid Dividend

Page | 643
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Forecasted value

The company paid of all of its dividend in 20220 but it rose again in 2021. Since the company is

making profits and in accordance with the analysis of the account, we predict that the company

will pay off all of the dividends, reducing the account to nil.

Page | 644
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

General Analysis

Factors Effects

Non-resident shareholders not given dividends Increase

Changes made to withholding non-resident Decrease

payments

It has already been established that unpaid dividends tend to reduce the value of unclaimed

dividends. This is mainly because they are subtracted from the unclaimed dividend. Given below

are the unpaid dividends of PSO and the growth in this account.

Years 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Unpaid dividend 129,789 0 103,297 221,587 193,542

Growth 0.00% -100.00% -53.38% 14.49% 0.00%

Graph Showing Growth in Unpaid Dividends

Page | 645
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly Unpaid dividend Growth


40.00%

20.00%
14.49%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-20.00%

-40.00%
-53.38%
-60.00%

-80.00%

-100.00% -100.00%

-120.00%

Non-resident Shareholders were not given Dividends

Dividend declared during the year represents part of interim dividend for the period ended

December 31, 2021 which remained unpaid to the Holding Company's non-resident

shareholders. The dividend repatriation requires approval from the State Bank of Pakistan which

has been obtained subsequently and the dividend has been remitted to the non-resident

shareholders.

Future Outlook

Page | 646
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

This account is mainly made for the non-resident shareholders of PSO. A reduction will be

noticed if the non-resident shareholders are paid on time. However, if they are not paid enough

dividends due to any reason, this account will increase.

Source:

➢ Annual Report PSO

Changes Made to Withholding Non-resident Payments

The period of 30 is on higher side and in certain cases, the non-resident recipient cannot be kept

to wait for this long and gets practically in possible. The KTBA suggested that the period of 30

days be curtailed to 15 days. As the commissioner would approve the dividends in 15 days, the

value of unpaid dividends would decrease.

Future Outlook

The account is expected to decrease in the forthcoming years because of the amendments that

have been made and the fact that the company is becoming more profitable with every passing

year.

Source:

➢ https://pkrevenue.com/changes-sought-in-withholding-on-non-resident-payment/

Page | 647
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Provisions

Breakdown:

Provisions 2021 Vertical Analysis

Claim raised by regulatory authorities 490972 194.47%

Infrastructure development cess 252464 100.00%

743436 294.47%

Movement of provision during the year is as follows:

Balance at beginning of the year 490972 194.47%

Addition during the year 252464 100.00%

Balance at closing of the year 743436 294.47%

Page | 648
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (3.79%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Provisions 51.42% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% - 0.00%

28.69%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.14%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Provisions 0.18% 0.13% 0.11% 0.12% 0.13% 0.20%

Forecasted Value

Provisions is another minor account for the company yet both industry and company analysis for

the account were done. It was found through this analysis that the account will decrease in the

future. We predict that this will be between 30-40%. The situation has also been illustrated in the

graph below.

Page | 649
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

800,000.00
700,000.00
600,000.00
500,000.00
400,000.00
300,000.00
200,000.00
100,000.00
0.00
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Provisions Forecasted Provisions

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.14% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 3.79% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Provisions
800,000

700,000

600,000

500,000

400,000

300,000

200,000

100,000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Page | 650
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the

Provisions of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Factors Effecting Provisions (2021-2016):

• Increased in 2021 due to claims raised by the regulatory authorities against the Company.

The outcome of these legal claims is not expected to give rise to material obligations

beyond those provided for.

• Stayed constant from 2018-2020.

• Increased in 2017, for the same reason mentioned above.

Page | 651
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factor Effect

Reduction in legal claims Decrease

Reduction in Infrastructure Development Cess Decrease

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of provisions of all

five years of the companies are given below.

Total Provisions of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 490,972 490,972 490,972 490,972 743,436

HTL 0 0 0 0 10,919,484

APL 240,380 190,453 0 41,162 0

BPL 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 731,352 681,425 490,972 532,134 11,662,920

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Provisions

Page | 652
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 19.20%

HTL 77.45%

APL 3.35%

BPL 0.00%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Provisions

Total Market Share


90.00%

80.00% 77.45%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%
19.20%
20.00%

10.00%
3.35%
0.00%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Page | 653
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of provisions in

their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Provisions Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 67.13% 72.05% 100.00% 92.26% 6.37%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Provisions Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


120.00%

100.00% 100.00%
92.26%

80.00%
72.05%
67.13%
60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

6.37%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 654
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of provisions was the absolute highest till 2019. It

had an increasing trend in the previous three years. However, the market share fell in 2020 and is

the lowest in 2021 among all years.

Yearly Change/Growth in Provisions of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth -28.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 51.42%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Provisions of PSO

Page | 655
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly Provisions Growth


60.00%

50.00% 51.42%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00%

-20.00%

-30.00% -28.69%

-40.00%

Analysis: positive growth can be noticed twice only, between 2017-2018 and from 2020-2021 in

case of PSO’s provisions. There was no growth in this account for three years in between.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Provisions Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth -9.00% -6.83% -27.95% 8.38% 2091.73%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Provisions Overtime


Page | 656
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


2500.00%

2091.73%
2000.00%

1500.00%

1000.00%

500.00%

0.00% -9.00% -6.83% -27.95% 8.38%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-500.00%

Analysis: The industry in terms of provisions faced a drop in 2019. However, currently, the

provisions of the industry are increasing. This is majorly because HTL did not have provisions in

their accounts before that but surpassed all the provisions in 2021. BPL on the other hand has no

provisions in their account.

Factors affecting Provisions

Reduction in Infrastructure Development Cess

Page | 657
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The government wants to provide relief to common man. Basic import duty and infrastructure

and development cess on OMCs have been brought down to offer better petrol prices to

consumers. It was 10% previously but now it is said to be 0%. Previously the government aimed

to collect around Rs.588 billion revenues through this “cess”. This is why the cess was levied in

2021 and increased the provisions of the companies.

Future Outlook

The new government is all about promoting businesses, they would work on eliminating this cess

even further leading to lower provisions for the companies in the OMC industry

Source:

➢ https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/economy/story/will-safeguard-interests-of-common-

man-govt-on-fuel-prices-326099-2022-03-15

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2241564/govt-aims-collect-rs588b-revenue-oil-gas

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40114376

Future Outlook

An increase in the provisions was experienced by PSO as a result of certain legal claims. There

was no growth in the provisions before that. The legal claims were regarding the education

qualification of the CEO of PSO. The ruling was settled in the favor of PSO and further rulings

Page | 658
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

are set to be in their favor as well. This means that in the near future, the provisions for legal

claims would decrease.

Source:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ Interim Report PSO

➢ https://psopk.com/files/media/clearification/pesponsechannel%2092v8oct22,2018-

converted.pdf

Page | 659
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Change
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00% 2015

2019

2023
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014

2016
2017
2018

2020
2021
2022

2024
2025
2026
(10.00%)
(20.00%)
(30.00%)
(40.00%)

Page | 660
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

800,000.00

700,000.00

600,000.00

500,000.00

400,000.00

300,000.00

200,000.00

100,000.00

0.00
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Provisions Forecasted Provisions

Page | 661
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Current Portion of Lease

Liability

Breakdown:

Lease Liabilities 2021 Vertical Analysis

Balance at beginning of the year: 4,529,062 101.82%

Impact of initial application of IFRS 16 - -

Additions during the year 588,383 13.23%

Accretion of interest 698,518 15.70%

Lease contracts modified during the year 333,650 7.50%

Less: Disposal during the year -346 -0.01%

Less: Lease rentals paid -913,613 -20.54%

Balance at the end of year 5,235,654 117.71%

Page | 662
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Less: Current portion shown under current liability -787,713 -17.71%

Non-Current Balance 4,447,941 100.00%

Page | 663
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (582.2%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Current Portion of Lease 1846.80% -99.97% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Liabilities

Vertical Analysis: Average (4.50%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Current Portion of Lease 0.19% 0.01% 26.83% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Liabilities

Forecasted values

The account is very abnormal to the eye s during 2020 the company paid off almost the entire

amount from this. However, in 2021 the amount rose by a staggering 1000%. Despite that we

Page | 664
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

predict that the amount will be decreasing in the future, the reasons for which have already been

discussed.

Page | 665
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.38% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 0.91% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Current Portion of Lease Liabilities


140000000

120000000

100000000

80000000

60000000

40000000

20000000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Lease

Liabilities of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020. From the year 2019 to 2021, there has been a

huge increase. But in 2018, this account dropper by 99.9%.

Page | 666
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factor Effect

Reduction in Long Term Lease Liabilities Decrease

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total values of current portion

of lease liabilities of all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Current Portion of Lease Liabilities of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 0 0 121,678,909 40,462 787,713

HTL 64,446,804 179,059,861 77,436,745 90,201,122 162,697,568

APL 0 0 0 43,046 190,500

BPL 254,439 254,439 254,439 254,439 254,439

TOTAL 64,701,243 179,314,300 199,370,093 90,539,069 163,930,220

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Current Portion of Lease

Liabilities

Page | 667
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 17.55%

HTL 82.23%

APL 0.03%

BPL 0.18%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Current Portion of Lease Liabilities

Total Market Share


90.00%
82.23%
80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00% 17.55%

10.00%
0.03% 0.18%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Page | 668
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of current

portion of lease liabilities in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Current Portion of Lease Liabilities Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 0.00% 0.00% 61.03% 0.04% 0.48%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Current Portion of Lease Liabilities Share in the Industry w.r.t

Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


70.00%

60.00% 61.03%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% 0.48%


2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 669
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of current portion of lease liabilities, it was the

highest in 2019 as the market share of HTL dropped in that year. In other years, the share is

minimal as compared to HTL.

Yearly Change/Growth in Current Portion of Lease Liabilities of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly

Growth 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -99.97% 1846.80%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Current Portion of Lease Liabilities of PSO

Page | 670
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly Current Portion of Lease Liabilities Growth


2000.00%
1846.80%

1500.00%

1000.00%

500.00%

0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%


2017 2018 2019 -99.97%
2020 2021

-500.00%

Analysis: this account did not grow until 2020 and even in 2020, the growth was negative. The

growth started in 2021 for PSO.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Current Portion of Lease Liabilities Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 6.65% 177.14% 11.18% -54.59% 81.06%

Page | 671
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Current Portion of Lease Liabilities

Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


200.00%
177.14%
150.00%

100.00%
81.06%

50.00%

6.65% 11.18%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-50.00% -54.59%

-100.00%

Analysis: The industry in terms of current portion of lease liabilities indicates that the growth

was the highest in 2018. After that, this account experienced a major drop. In 2021, it increased

again as the lease liabilities of most of the OMCs increased.

Future Outlook

This account is directly related to the long term lease liability account. Considering that, that

account is expected to decrease in the future. It is only fair to establish that the current portion of

that account is also expected to decrease in the future.

Page | 672
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Annual Report PSO

Page | 673
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Accrued Markup/Interest

Page | 674
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (3.93%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Accrued Interest/Markeup -67.90% 16.66% 62.21% -37.10% 56.08% -6.37%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.14%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Accrued Interest/Markeup 0.09% 0.12% 0.09% 0.48% 0.48% 0.55%

Forecasted Value

Although it is a minor account, yet it can have a major impact on the financial statements of the

company so all three analysis for this account have been done. According to the analysis done

and after considering all industrial and economic factors, we predict that the account will

increase between 15-20%, supported by the graph below.

Page | 675
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1,600,000.00

1,400,000.00

1,200,000.00

1,000,000.00

800,000.00

600,000.00

400,000.00

200,000.00

0.00

2012

2025
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Accrued Interest Forecasted Accrued Interest

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.30% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 15.01% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Accrued Interest / Mark-up


1600000

1400000

1200000

1000000

800000

600000

400000

200000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Page | 676
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Accrued

Interest/Markeup of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

There was a decrease of 67.9%, due to the following reasons;

• As at June 30, 2021, accrued interest / mark-up on short-term borrowings and finances

under mark-up arrangement amounted to Rs. 483,949 (2020: Rs.1,507,806), which

includes Rs. 41,578 (2020: Rs. 247,760) due to National Bank of Pakistan, a related

party.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

There was an increase of 16.66%, due to the following reasons;

• As at June 30, 2020, accrued interest / mark-up on short-term borrowings and finances

under mark-up arrangement amounted to Rs. 1,507,806 (2019: Rs.1,292,443), which

includes Rs. 247,760 (2019: Rs. 362,457) due to National Bank of Pakistan, a related

party.

Source:

Page | 677
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was an increase of 62.2%, due to the following reasons;

• As at June 30, 2019, accrued interest / mark-up on short-term borrowings and finances

under mark-up arrangement amounted to Rs. 1,017,317 (2018: Rs.796,795), which

includes Rs 351,970 (2018: Rs. 235,807) due to National Bank of Pakistan.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

There was a decrease of 37.10%, due to the following reasons;

• As at June 30, 2018, accrued mark-up on short-term borrowings and finances under

mark-up arrangement amounted to Rs.796,795 (2017: Rs.1,266,793).

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

There was an increase of 56.08%, due to the following reasons;

Page | 678
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• As at June 30, 2017 accrued mark-up on short-term borrowings and finances under mark-

up arrangement amounted to Rs. 1,266,793 (2016: Rs. 811,639).

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

There was a decrease of 6.37%, due to the following reasons;

• As at June 30, 2016 accrued mark-up on short-term local borrowings amounted to Rs.

811,639 (2015: Rs. 866,894).

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 679
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Direct Impact of Short Term Borrowings Increase

Increase in working capital to help in paying accrued interest Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of accrued interest

all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Accrued Interest of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 1,266,793 796,795 1,292,443 1,507,806 483,949

HTL 27,891,018 29,696,233 81,921,213 22,102,743 9,756,777

APL 0 0 0 0 0

BPL 35,209 60,295 60,295 97,029 119,392

TOTAL 29,193,020 30,553,323 83,273,951 23,707,578 10,360,118

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Accrued Interest

Page | 680
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 3.02%

HTL 96.77%

APL 0.00%

BPL 0.21%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Accrued Interest

Total Market Share


120.00%

100.00% 96.77%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

3.02% 0.21%
0.00%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Page | 681
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of accrued

interest in their liability accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Accrued Interest Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 4.34% 2.61% 1.55% 6.36% 4.67%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Accrued Interest Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


7.00%
6.36%
6.00%

5.00%
4.67%
4.34%
4.00%

3.00%
2.61%
2.00%
1.55%
1.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 682
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of accrued interest was such that it had a decreasing

trend till 2019 but increased in 2020. It fell again in 2021. HTL gained market share in these

years when PSO’s share was falling.

Yearly Change/Growth in Accrued Interest of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly

Growth 56.08% -1.83% 62.21% 16.66% -67.90%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Accrued Interest of PSO

Page | 683
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly accrued interest Growth


80.00%

60.00% 62.21%
56.08%

40.00%

20.00%
16.66%

0.00% -1.83%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-20.00%

-40.00%

-60.00%
-67.90%
-80.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest growth was in 2020 but overall, this account has

experienced a decreasing trend.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Accrued Interest Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 81.17% 4.66% 172.55% -71.53% -56.30%

Page | 684
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Accrued Interest Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


200.00%

172.55%
150.00%

100.00%
81.17%

50.00%

0.00% 4.66%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-50.00%
-56.30%
-71.53%

-100.00%

Analysis: The industry in terms of this account has also experienced a decreasing trend in most

of the years except for 2019. The accrued interest on HTL was really high in this year and it

dropped drastically in 2020 which impacted the total share of the industry of this account for

other OMCs.

Factors affecting Accrued Interest

Future Outlook

Page | 685
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

If short term borrowings would increase under the financing through markup arrangements, then

it is important to understand that the short term borrowings increased due to lower markups on

financing. The accrued interest would decrease if short term borrowings are increasing for this

particular reason. Moreover, in the future, the liquidity situation is expected to improve for

OMCs. This would lead to them having a better standing at paying off the current liabilities that

they might have incurred such as accrued interest.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy

➢ https://www.business-standard.com/article/markets/from-inventory-losses-to-higher-

interest-costs-analysts-cautious-on-omcs-119012700651_1.html

Page | 686
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Lower Interest Rates Increase

Currency Devaluation Increase

Looking at the historical data, the accrued interest for the company decreased by a significant

amount during the fiscal year 2021. This has been contrary to the previous years where the

account has been constantly increasing. All the economic reasons for such a change have been

analyzed below as well as what might be the effect of this in the future.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Lower Interest rates

Owing to desperate times during Covid-19, and taking cognizance of the negative fallout from the

Covid-19 pandemic for the economy, the state bank of Pakistan took some steps in order to safeguard

businesses and households. Among them was the reduction in the policy rates by 625 basis points to 7%

from a huge amount of 13%.

Page | 687
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Providing more details about the scheme, the central bank stated that it was introduced to provide a

stimulus to the economy in times of Covid-19. Owing to these lower markups, PSO enjoyed lower

interest in its borrowings from banks which resulted in the decrease for its accrued interest

Future Outlook

Looking forward the economy has started to recover from the impact of Covid-19 with the

economic growth to be projected at 4-5% during 2022. Owing to this the state bank has increased

the interest rate after holding it at 7% for almost 15 months. The state bank also stated that as the

economy has started to recover, a greater emphasis is needed on ensuring the appropriate policy mix to

protect the longevity of growth, keep inflation expectations anchored, and slow the growth in the current

account deficit. This indicates that in the future the interest rate can be expected to further increase which

would ultimately also increase the interest payments by PSO on its loan thus higher accrued

interest/markup. This forecast has been highlighted in the graph below;

Page | 688
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Sources

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/interest-rate

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2321092/interest-rate-increased-to-725-after-a-15-month-

gap

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2253969/sbp-reduces-mark-up-on-two-schemes

Currency Devaluation

Currency devaluation plays a very important role in determining the buying power of any

company. A stronger currency ultimately means that the cost incurred will be lower while a weak

currency implies vice versa. In case of Pakistan, however the currency position has not been very

stable as the Pakistani Rupee has continued to devalue under the PTI government.
Page | 689
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

During 2018, the currency was trading at between $1 for Rs.122. However after the PTI

government came into power, there was record devaluation within the past 4 years as now the

dollar is trading at $1 for Rs.185. Owing to this the loans which PSO had taken in the form of

foreign currency also increased ultimately increasing the short term borrowing amount

numerically.

Future Outlook

In the future it is predicted that the Pakistani currency will continue to devalue by a further at

least 18%, as reported by trading economics. This ultimately implies that the short term

borrowings would continue to increase as what PSO borrowed at a lower amount before is now

to be returned at a higher value. The forecast for currency devaluation against dollar is illustrated

in the graph below.

Page | 690
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

➢ https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/under-imran-khan-govt-pakistani-rupee-depreciated-

by-30-5-per-cent-report-2640765

➢ https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/187-to-a-us-dollar-political-crisis-in-pakistan-led-

to-the-free-fall-of-its-currency-469545

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/914762-pak-currency-in-freefall-rs54-lost-against-

dollar-in-current-govt-s-tenure

Page | 691
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

1,600,000.00

1,400,000.00

1,200,000.00

1,000,000.00

800,000.00

600,000.00

400,000.00

200,000.00

0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Accrued Interest Naïve Forecast

Page | 692
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Change
250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2010

2014

2018

2022

2026
2007
2008
2009

2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017

2019
2020
2021

2023
2024
2025
(50.00%)

(100.00%)

Page | 693
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1,600,000.00

1,400,000.00

1,200,000.00

1,000,000.00

800,000.00

600,000.00

400,000.00

200,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Accrued Interest Forecasted Accrued Interest

Page | 694
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Short term borrowings

Breakdown:

Short-term Borrowings 2021 Vertical Analysis

From National Bank of Pakistan - Related party

Short-term finances in foreign currency 16,941,787 23.01%

Finances under mark-up arrangements 490,353 0.67%

17,432,140 23.68%

From other than related party

Short-term finances

- local currency 17,721,004 24.07%

Page | 695
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

- foreign currency 20,561,912 27.93%

38,282,916 52.00%

Current portion of long - term borrowings 4,037,445 5.48%

Finances under mark-up arrangements 13,863,944 18.83%

73,616,445 100.00%

Horizontal Analysis: Average (-1.75%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Short-term Borrowings -6.85% -35.05% 35.43% -31.15% 24.15% 2.98%

Vertical Analysis: Average (25.33%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Short-term Borrowings 17.78% 21.06% 26.83% 22.32% 33.25% 30.71%

Forecasted values

Page | 696
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Unlike long term borrowings, short term borrowings is one of the major accounts for the

company and hence holds great significance in our analysis. All three analysis of this account

were done and the forecasting done accordingly. According to the analysis done, the account will

be increasing in the future, despite it decreasing for the past 2 years, the reasons for which have

been discussed in detail. We predict it to increase between 10-15% at an increasing rate. This is

also shown in the graph below.

160,000,000.00
140,000,000.00
120,000,000.00
100,000,000.00
80,000,000.00
60,000,000.00
40,000,000.00
20,000,000.00
0.00
2011

2025
2007
2008
2009
2010

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ST Borrowings Forecasted ST Borrowings

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Reduced working Capital Decrease

Trade Debts made on account by the subsidiary Decrease

company

Page | 697
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Recovery from the power sector Decrease

Borrowing from National Bank Pakistan Increase

Settlement of PIBS Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

25.33% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is -1.75% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Short-Term Borrowings
140000000

120000000

100000000

80000000

60000000

40000000

20000000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Factors that highly influence the Short-term borrowings of a company may include the

increase or decrease of the repayment terms, the total cost of capital and the requirements of the

Page | 698
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

lender or investor. etc. Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and

decrease of the short-term borrowings of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

There was a decrease of 6.85% in 2021 as compared to the year 2020. The factors are

discussed below;

• Reduced working Capital: It decreased by 46.7%.

• Trade Debts made on account by the subsidiary company: This also include trade

debts on account of export sales made by the Subsidiary Company i.e., Pakistan Refinery

Limited (PRL) amounting to Rs. 989.8 million (2020: Rs. 484.8 million) secured by way

of Export Letters of Credit.

• Recovery from the power sector: The PSO has recovered Rs194.283 billion from the

power sector along with late payment surcharge income. The power sector was a key

defaulter of the PSO that is to pay Rs192.5 billion to the company on account of oil

supply.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40134437/circular-debt-of-pso-soars-to-all-time-high

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40131743

Page | 699
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2020:

There was a decrease of 35.05% in 2020 as compared to the year 2019. The factors are

discussed below;

• Decline in trade debts mainly due to recoveries from power sector: Debtor’s turnover

has increased primarily due to decrease in trade debts by 10.4% on account of recoveries

from power sector.

• FE exchange loss recovery: Net unfavorable exchange difference of Rs. 1,799 million,

net of recoveries during the year of Rs. 27,890 million, arising on foreign currency

borrowings (FE-25), obtained under the directives of Ministry of Finance, which was to

be settled in accordance with the instructions.

• Borrowing decreased from other parties: Decreased by 36.2%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1539008

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40040595/pso-receivables-touch-rs3189-billion-mark

Year 2019:

Page | 700
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

There was an increase of 35.43% in 2019 as compared to the year 2018. The factors are

discussed below;

• Borrowing from National Bank Pakistan increased: It increased by 44.3%.

• Pakistan State Oil (PSO) in dire straits with its receivables going beyond a record

Rs364bn: Receivables from the power sector alone had touched Rs265bn as of Jan 18

because of primary circular debt. In addition, a second-tier circular debt worth Rs51bn

has built up against the Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) due to non-

payment of LNG supplies, affecting the entire gas sector

• Borrowing from other parties increased: It increased by 28.16%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1458797

Year 2018:

There was a decrease of 31.15% in 2018 as compared to the year 2017. The factors are

discussed below;

• PSO’s customers fail to pay the amount they are due for: The PSO's total receivables

from the power sector alone stood at Rs 282 billion, while PIA and Sui Northern Gas

Page | 701
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pipelines Limited (SNGPL) owed Rs 26 billion and Rs 22 billion respectively to the oil

marketing company.

• Working Capital reduced to a great extent: It decreased by 75.28%.

• Borrowings from NBP decreased significantly: It decreased by 64.7%.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/4625998/psos-receivables-reach-rs-330-billion-

20180814399303

Year 2017:

There was an increase of 24.15% in 2017 as compared to the year 2018. The factors are

discussed below;

• Settlement of PIBS in July: This represents investment in Pakistan Investment Bonds

(PIBs) amounting to Rs. 45,906,112 made in June 2013 in accordance with plan duly

approved by the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) -Government of Pakistan

(GoP) out of the proceeds received against partial settlement of circular debt issue then

prevailing in the energy sector. Investment Bond matured in 2016.

• The Power sector still remains a major defaulter: The total receivables from power

sector accumulated to Rs 196.5 billion including Rs 64.40 billion generated after the

Page | 702
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

inception of seven-day credit arrangements. The power sector remained a major

defaulter and multibillion rupees had been stuck in this sector following ban of use of

furnace oil. PSO had been supplying furnace oil to feed power plants but the

government abandoned use of this fuel in power plants and the PSO is now facing

liquidity crunch following refusal of power sector to clear multibillion rupees dues.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1291463

➢ https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=14_10_2017_010_005

Year 2016:

There was an increase of 2.98% in 2016 as compared to the year 2015. The factors are

discussed below;

• Late payments from the power sector: The government claimed of controlling energy

shortages and improving recoveries, a staggering Rs250 billion has been added to the

outstanding dues of the Pakistan State Oil (PSO) since June 2013. The PSO’s

management had repeatedly written to the ministries of water and power, petroleum and

finance about its difficult financial position that they were in and reached out for

proactive support.

Page | 703
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1300174

Page | 704
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in Working Capital Increase

OCAC to convince banks into providing short term loans Increase

Fall in markup rates of finances through markup arrangements Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of short term

borrowings all five years of the companies are given below.

Total Short Term Borrowings of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 130,498,503 89,846,517 121,678,909 79,032,665 73,616,445

HTL 1,235,959,909 1,325,250,528 2,243,170,808 766,262,927 461,180,637

APL 0 0 0 0 0

BPL 254,439 254,439 254,439 254,439 254,439

TOTAL 1,366,712,851 1,415,351,484 2,365,104,156 845,550,031 535,051,521

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Short Term Borrowings

Page | 705
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 7.58%

HTL 92.40%

APL 0.00%

BPL 0.02%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Short Term Borrowings

Total Market Share


100.00%
92.40%
90.00%

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00% 7.58%
0.00% 0.02%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Page | 706
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of short term

borrowings in their liability accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Short Term Borrowings Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 9.55% 6.35% 5.14% 9.35% 13.76%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Short Term Borrowings Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


16.00%

14.00% 13.76%

12.00%

10.00%
9.55% 9.35%
8.00%

6.00% 6.35%
5.14%
4.00%

2.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 707
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of short term borrowings is such that it has been

increasing since the past three years. The market share of HTL has been decreasing at the same

time in case of short term borrowings.

Yearly Change/Growth in Short Term Borrowings of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly PPE

Growth 24.15% -31.15% 35.43% -35.05% -6.85%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Short Term Borrowings of PSO

Page | 708
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly PPE Growth


40.00%
35.43%
30.00%
24.15%
20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-6.85%
-10.00%

-20.00%

-30.00% -31.15%
-35.05%
-40.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the highest growth was in 2020 but overall, every year with an

increase in short term borrowings is followed by a year with decrease in short term borrowings.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Short Term Borrowings Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 568.77% 3.56% 67.10% -64.25% -36.72%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Short Term Borrowings Overtime

Page | 709
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


700.00%

600.00%
568.77%

500.00%

400.00%

300.00%

200.00%

100.00%
67.10%

0.00% 3.56%
-36.72%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-64.25%
-100.00%

Analysis: The industry in terms of this account has also experienced a decreasing trend between

2017-2018. Every year with an increase in this account was followed by a decrease in this

account. This has been happening since five years now.

Factors affecting short term borrowings

Increase in Working Capital to Increase Short Term Foreign Currency Financing

Page | 710
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

To understand this, the working capital of PSO and other companies must be taken into

consideration

Working Capital of OMCs

Company 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 87,055,865 91,158,724 84,495,107 60,648,203 84,577,841

HTL 1,416,314,976 1,303,368,976 856,530,681 16,971,486 -92,786,071

APL 11,161,066 11,346,440 10,419,961 7,617,410 12,415,525

BPL -130,962 -148,055 -35,434 -157,706 -46,802

Total 1,472,119,435 1,322,478,465 799,087,134 -22,059,915 4,160,493

Market Share of Working Capital of OMCs

Company Names Total Market Share

Pakistan State Oil 11.41%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 97.89%

Attock Petroleum Limited 1.48%

Burshane (LPG) Limited -0.01%

Total Industry WC 100.00%

Page | 711
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Growth in PSO’s Working Capital

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Pakistan State Oil 6% 7% 11% -275% 2033%

Graph Showing Working Capital Growth of PSO

Pakistan State Oil


2500%

2000% 2033%

1500%

1000%

500%

0% 6% 7% 11%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-275%
-500%

Analysis: The graph given above shows that the working capital increased considerably in 2021

and that was because in 2021, short term borrowings through foreign currency was taken place to

facilitate the working capital. Working capital can be seen to have an increasing trend and the

Page | 712
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

impact of leverage is beneficial for it. Due to this, if PSO wants to increase its working capital,

short term borrowings would also increase.

Future Outlook

Short term borrowings are expected to increase with an increase in the need of strong working

capital for PSO and other OMCs.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ Annual Report HTL

➢ Annual Report APL

➢ Annual Report BPL

➢ https://finbislesh.com/2020/04/25/short-term-foreign-currency-

financing/#:~:text=Short%20term%20foreign%20currency%20financing%20are%20con

nected%20with%20supporting%20trade,an%20important%20contribution%20to%20dev

elopment.

OCAC to Convince Banks to Reconsider Facilitating Short Term Financing to OMCs

OCAC, in a letter dated January 31, 2022 to the SBP Governor, has highlighted the enhanced

financing requirements of the oil marketing sector and the refineries as well, saying banks should

Page | 713
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

be instructed to support uninterrupted supply of oil products, which in turn augment the

country’s defence and strategic objectives. The OCAC also said that OMCs and refineries are the

backbone of the energy sector and the economy, any disruption in their business will result in

catastrophic impact on the entire energy supply chain of the country. The OCAC through this

letter has further requested the Governor SBP to resolve regulatory issues with respect to

Prudential Regulations of SBP for corporate customers which imposes certain restrictions on

banks for extending additional financing to companies. It was advised that the trust deficit can be

reduced by starting to offer short term financing first. Giving reasons for significant increase in

trade finance requirements of refineries and OMCs, OCAC said that sales of POL products in the

country have increased by 24per cent as compared to last year. Motor gasoline (Petrol), high

speed diesel (HSD) and furnace oil (FO) consumption is up by 14per cent, 27per cent and 38per

cent respectively.

Future Outlook

If banks agree to this, it would improve the liquidity of the OMCs as they would get short term

loans and other financing from the banks. The account would then increase.

Source:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/02/01/ocac-for-enhanced-trade-finance-

facilities-for-omcs-refineries/

Page | 714
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/950865-banks-shy-of-expending-trade-credit-for-oil-

imports

Markups on Short Term Financing Fell in 2017, 2019, 2021

This is one of the major reasons of as to why financing of short term increased in these three

years for PSO and other OMCs in the industry. It ranged between 10-15% in 2019, increased to

16% in 2020 and fell as low as 6% in 2021.

Future Outlook

If this pertains, short term borrowings would increase but at the same time, the OMCs would

need to have enough collateral available.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

Page | 715
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Currency Devaluation Increase

Interest Rates Increase

Higher Gross Margins Decrease

Short term borrowings is one of the major accounts for PSO accounting for almost 17% of the

total liabilities and equity for the company. For the past 2 years, the company enjoyed lower

short term borrowings which was mainly owed to lower interest rates as well as higher

profitability.

The company borrows a major proportion of its short term loans from foreign banks which

makes it vulnerable to economic factors such as devaluation of currency which can have a

significant impact on the account. All the factors which can affect the short term borrowings of

the company have been analyzed below.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Currency Devaluation

Page | 716
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Currency devaluation plays a very important role in determining the buying power of any

company. A stronger currency ultimately means that the cost incurred will be lower while a weak

currency implies vice versa. In case of Pakistan, however the currency position has not been very

stable as the Pakistani Rupee has continued to devalue under the PTI government.

During 2018, the currency was trading at between $1 for Rs.122. However after the PTI

government came into power, there was record devaluation within the past 4 years as now the

dollar is trading at $1 for Rs.185. Owing to this the loans which PSO had taken in the form of

foreign currency also increased ultimately increasing the short term borrowing amount

numerically.

Future Outlook

In the future it is predicted that the Pakistani currency will continue to devalue by a further at

least 18%, as reported by trading economics. This ultimately implies that the short term

borrowings would continue to increase as what PSO borrowed at a lower amount before is now

to be returned at a higher value. The forecast for currency devaluation against dollar is illustrated

in the graph below.

Page | 717
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

➢ https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/under-imran-khan-govt-pakistani-rupee-depreciated-

by-30-5-per-cent-report-2640765

➢ https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/187-to-a-us-dollar-political-crisis-in-pakistan-led-

to-the-free-fall-of-its-currency-469545

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/914762-pak-currency-in-freefall-rs54-lost-against-

dollar-in-current-govt-s-tenure

Interest rates

Owing to desperate times during Covid-19, and taking cognizance of the negative fallout from the

Covid-19 pandemic for the economy, the state bank of Pakistan took some steps in order to safeguard

Page | 718
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

businesses and households. Among them was the reduction in the policy rates by 625 basis points to 7%

from a huge amount of 13%.

Providing more details about the scheme, the central bank stated that it was introduced to provide a

stimulus to the economy in times of Covid-19. Owing to these lower markups, PSO enjoyed lower

interest in its short term borrowings from banks which resulted in the decrease for its aggregate short term

borrowings.

Future Outlook

Looking forward the economy has started to recover from the impact of Covid-19 with the

economic growth to be projected at 4-5% during 2022. Owing to this the state bank has increased

the interest rate after holding it at 7% for almost 15 months. The state bank also stated that as the

economy has started to recover, a greater emphasis is needed on ensuring the appropriate policy mix to

protect the longevity of growth, keep inflation expectations anchored, and slow the growth in the current

account deficit. This indicates that in the future the interest rate can be expected to further increase which

would ultimately also increase the interest payments by PSO on its loan thus higher short term

borrowings. This forecast has been highlighted in the graph below;

Page | 719
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Sources

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/interest-rate

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2321092/interest-rate-increased-to-725-after-a-15-month-

gap

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2253969/sbp-reduces-mark-up-on-two-schemes

Higher gross margins

The higher gross margins were mainly due to better cost absorption by PSO. To understand this

better, in 2019 the cost of production was 97.23% of the total sales which increased to 99.38% in

2020, a record high figure for PSO in the past 15 years. However in 2021, this figure decreased

and came down to 95.32% which is the record low for the past 10 years. This shows that despite
Page | 720
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the figure increasing numerically, the rate by which it increased as compared to sales is

significantly low which means that the cost of production for the company has improved in 2021,

thus indicating that it is absorbing its fixed costs better as compared to the past 10 years. There

are many economic reasons for this which are listed below;

• International oil prices, Inflation and Currency Factor

• China Pakistan Free Trade Agreement

• White Oil pipeline (Partnership with PARCO & PEPCO)

• Agreement with Qatar Petroleum

• Contract with KPC

• Supply chain development

• Pakistan Railways

• Utilizing services of foreign companies

These higher gross margins meant that the profitability of the company increased due to which it

was able to pay back its short term borrowings by a significant amount, as also reflected in the

notes of the statement.

Future Outlook

In the future we predict that the sales of the company will increase and so will the cost

absorption of the company as the rate by which cost of sales will increase with respect to sales

Page | 721
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

would be lower. This ultimately means that the profitability of the company will also increase

which would help the company in paying back its short term borrowings.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1671124

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/934553-oil-refining-data-sought-to-decide-on-petrol-

imports

➢ https://www.parco.com.pk/our-business/transportation/pipeline-network/

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=437

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/504960/pso-signs-contract-with-kpc-for-diesel

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/09/02/pso-under-hot-water/

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2318132/pm-seeks-report-on-pso-oil-transport

Page | 722
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

140,000,000.00

120,000,000.00

100,000,000.00

80,000,000.00

60,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Short term borrowings Naïve Forecast

Page | 723
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Change
500.00%

400.00%

300.00%

200.00%

100.00%

0.00%
2010

2014

2018

2022

2026
2007
2008
2009

2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017

2019
2020
2021

2023
2024
2025
(100.00%)

Page | 724
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

160,000,000.00

140,000,000.00

120,000,000.00

100,000,000.00

80,000,000.00

60,000,000.00

40,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ST Borrowings Forecasted ST Borrowings

Page | 725
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

________________________

Page | 726
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

SECTION X: INCOME

STATEMENT

Page | 727
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Sales

Breakdown:

Sales 2021 Vertical Analysis

Gross sales 1,424,249,031 118.27%

Discount / allowances (473,553) -0.04%

Sales tax (197,836,660) -16.43%

Inland Freight Equalization Margin (IFEM) (21,691,443) -1.80%

(220,001,656) -18.27%

Net sales 1,204,247,375 100.00%

Page | 728
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis:

2021 2020 2019 2018

PKR (000s) PKR (000s) PKR (000s) PKR (000s)

Sales 9.14% -5.43% 12.17% 20.36%

Vertical Analysis:

2021 2020 2019 2018

PKR (000s) PKR (000s) PKR (000s) PKR (000s)

Sales 100% 100% 100% 100%

Forecasting

After taking into account all the factors which include GDP forecast, future oil prices, currency

devaluation, market share as well as consumer changes in demand and technology among other

things, it is safe to assume that the sales for the company will grow at a rate between 12-13% for

Page | 729
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the next 5 years. So, we are assuming that the sales for the company will grow at a constant rate

of 12.56% which is also in best fit with all the statistical methods used.

Page | 730
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO, it can be clearly seen that the same have

significantly dropped from 2018 till 2020. We can see that the sales figure goes into a negative

sign (-5.43%) in 2020, however things are looking better when we look into the sales figure for

2021 which increased drastically to a 9.14%.

PSO gained huge profits after sales which was PKR 29.2 billion in 2021 as compared to PKR 6.5

billion back in 2020. This was the highest ever profit achieved by PSO in its entire history. The

reason of these profits was the increase in white oil and black oil sales volumes that increased by

16.6% and 53.2% respectively. As well as the reduction in the finance cost by PKR 3.2 billion

(24%). PSO’s introduction of Euro 5 standard petrol, diesel and HOBC drove volume. Moreover,

factors such as recovery of late payment surcharge and favorable price regime also contributed

towards the profits of PSO.

Talking about the year 2022, during the first quarter oil sales were above 5.8 million tons growing

by 24 percent and a growth in furnace oil (38%), HSD (36%), and MS (14%). Pakistan State Oil

(PSX: PSO) was the clear winner among all OMCs with volumetric growth of 34 percent year-on-

year - surpassing the industry growth and regaining market share. The volumetric growth came

from reviving consumption and demand of petroleum products.

Source:

Page | 731
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40129719

The product wise performance that contributed towards the growth of sales are explained below;

Liquid Fuels

PSO’s sales volume grew by 21.9%, from 44.3% to 46.3% in 2021 resulting in the sales volume

of 9.2 million tons. The primary reason for this increase was by MoGas, HSD and FO.

• PSO launches Euro 5 standard feuls: PSO also launched the Euro 5 standards fuels

including High Octane 97, MoGas 92 RON and Hi-Cetane Diesel during the year of 2021,

which resulted in enhancing the customers confidence and trust in the company.

White Oils

The highest ever sales volume of 7.6 million tons was achieved by the company in this

segment.

Page | 732
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Retail segments boost white oil sales: The market share was 45.2% as of 2021. Most of

the sales of white oil was achieved through the retail segment.

MoGas

Just like White oil, MoGas is also being sold through the company’s retain fuel business. The

highest ever sales volume was achieved by PSO in the history of MoGas which was 3.5 million

tons in 2021.

• PSO upgrades to Hi-Octane Euro5 97: Hi-Octane Euro5 97 sales grew by 177.6% as

compared to 2020. Leading the sustainable energy revolution in the country, PSO also

became the first OMC to upgrade Pakistan's fuel standard from Euro 2 to Euro 5 and

launched Hi-Octane 97, Mogas and Hi-Cetane Diesel accordingly.

Page | 733
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=433

Hi-Cetane Euro 5 Diesel

The sales of this segment grew by 21.1% with a volume of 3.7 million tons in the year 2021. This

volume helped the company to regain its market share back to 47.2% from 45.8% from the last

year.

• PSO introduces Hi-Cetane Euro 5 Diesel (2020): Hi-Cetane Euro 5 Diesel was introduced

back in 2020, it reduces vehicle emissions and enhances engine life & efficiency by

protecting the engine's metallic parts. It also minimizes the negative impact on health while

enabling a cleaner environment for our future generations.

Page | 734
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Decrease in demand of diesel in the agricultural sector: The diesel consumption had also

dropped after the lockdown but has since picked up owing to wheat harvest.

Source:

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=431

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1560434

Jet Fuels

PSO dominates the fuel industry when it comes to providing high quality jet fuels that contribute

to a market share of 94.5%.

• Covid restriction disrupts the jet fuel supply (2019,2020): However, during Covid-19

the aviation sector experienced many disruptions like lock downs and travel restrictions

Page | 735
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

which resulted in lower demand of jet fuels. In the year 2021, the industry faced a decline

of 32.4% as compared to the last year. On the other hand, PSO jet fuel’s closing volume

was at 331.5 thousand tons with a significant decrease of 32.2%.

Black Oil

Due to the national energy mix, the demand for black oil is decreasing day by day. The fuel

industry observed a growth of 36.3% over the last year due to the increase in demand from the

power sector.

• Government’s policy on adding indigenous renewable energy sources: As PSO was one

of the biggest suppliers in the market, it grew by 53.2% in 2021 as compared to the last year

with a volume of 1.7 million tons and a market share of 51.7%. Due to the increase in gas

fired power plants and the GoP’s focus on the addition of indigenous renewable energy

sources, the volumes are bound to drop in the new future.

Page | 736
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Lubricants

As soon as many economic activities started, social mobility along with the agriculture sector

which prompted the demand for lubricants.

• Demands for lubricants increase due to agricultural industry: During the year of 2021

PSO continued to progress into several activations, which in return assisted in them reaching

volumes of 34 thousand tons alongside 11.3% of volumetric growth.

Liquefied Petroleum Gas

This specific sector grew by 7.3% over the last year with a sales volume of 1182 thousand tons.

• LPG Demands increase due to the winter season: Due to the cyclical demand from the

domestic segment during the winter season. There was a volumetric growth of 0.5% seen in

PSO, with volumes of 33 thousand tons.

Page | 737
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Liquefied Natural Gas

Local production of natural gas has been declining, estimated at around 2.8 bcf/day.

• Qatar Agreement to provide LNG to PSO: This shortage can be linked to the imports. To

overcome this problem, PSO entered into an agreement with Qatar Petroleum under G2G

arrangement. The company then imported about 4.4 million tons of LNG in 2021. However,

PSO is coming up with new ways to increase its stakes in the LNG value chain.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40115417

Page | 738
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

The industry analysis would allow us to have a better understanding regarding the dynamics of

Pakistan State Oil in the Oil and Gas Operations industry. The industry analysis would give us

insights regarding the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats that Pakistan State Oil

needs to consider. It would also allow us to interpret the standing of PSO in comparison to other

companies which belong to the same market. This would also give us information regarding the

market conditions hence, aiding in formulating better and more efficient strategies.

We can analyze the market share of PSO and other companies which fall under this industry. The

companies were taken from the Pakistan Stock Exchange Website. PSO’s competitors are:

1. HASCOL

2. Shell Limited

3. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited

4. Sui Southern Gas Pipelines Limited

5. Attock Petroleum Limited

6. Burshane LPG Limited

7. Hi-tech Lubricants Limited

1. Market Share - Sales

Page | 739
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

We can first compare these companies on the basis of the market share, calculated using the

typical sales method. For this method, the total sales of the last 5 years of PSO were taken and

then divided by the overall sales of the industry. Three comparisons have been done. Firstly, we

have the years 2015-2019. It has all the companies in the OMC industry.

Company Names Total Market Share

Pakistan State Oil 9.67%

HASCOL 1.52%

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited 4.30%

Sui Southern Gas Company Limited 1.91%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 79.00%

Shell Pakistan Limited 1.89%

Attock Petroleum Limited 1.68%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.03%

Total Industry Sales 100.00%

Moreover, if we were to get a more recent picture, we can see the data of 2017-2021. The

companies which did not provide their annual reports were not included in this particular

calculation of market share.

Page | 740
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 11.23%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 86.83%

Attock Petroleum Limited 1.91%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.03%

Total Industry Sales 100.00%

Hi-tech lubricant limited is an outlier. If we try removing it, the following data will be obtained

for the year 2015 – 2019. The table below it gives market shares for 2017-2021.

Company Names Total Market Share

Pakistan State Oil 46.05%

HASCOL 7.24%

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited 20.48%

Sui Southern Gas Company Limited 9.11%

Shell Pakistan Limited 8.99%

Attock Petroleum Limited 8.01%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.12%

Page | 741
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Industry Sales 100.00%

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 85.30%

Attock Petroleum Limited 14.49%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.21%

Total Industry Sales 100.00%

Here we can see that in these 5 years (2015-2019), PSO had the second largest market share of

9.67%. In these years, the market share has experienced heavy fluctuations which can be shown

in the graph that has been given below. The market share fell after 2015 and experienced

minimal level of growth till 2020. It was the highest among all years in 2020 and then it fell

again in 2021.

Page | 742
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan State Oil (Market


Share-Sales)
14.00%
12.68%
12.00%
10.00% 9.55% 9.66%
9.12%
8.00% 8.01%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2017-2021

Pakistan State Oil


18.00%
16.00% 16.12%
14.00%
12.00%
10.52% 10.93%
10.00% 10.07% 10.19%

8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Lower market share in 2015-2020 due to inefficiencies:

As discussed in the dawn news article, the demand varied to a great extent in case of petrol from

2015 till 2020. It happened because in 2019, after lockdowns were imposed, people were not

allowed to commute due to which they were not using their vehicles which resulted in lower

Page | 743
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

usage of petrol. Alongside that, the demand for petrol increased due to an increase in the demand

for two and three wheelers as well. Also, because Pakistan has an inefficient transport system,

people had no choice but to invest in motorbikes.

Covid-19 leads to a fall in air traffic hence, lower use of jet fuel:

In the beginning of Covid-19, the air traffic reduced considerably. Due to this the jet fuel taken

by the airlines fell considerably. Jet fuels make a large component of the total sales of any OMC.

Due to this, their sales fell hence the market share fell as well. However, when lockdowns were

finally lifted, in 2021, the sales began to increase again as the demand for jet fuels increased

again as more and more individuals were trying to get back to their countries.

Increase in the market share of PSO due to accumulation of inventory

Moreover, as discussed in the news international article that if we look into the future

projections, the sales of the company are expected to increase by 13% QoQ in 2022 due to 24%

increase in the inventory. This would lead to PSO obtaining a higher market share in the

following years as compared to other companies in the industry. The market share of the

company as mentioned in the article is increasing at a faster rate in terms of the liquid fuels as it

has a growth rate of 20.8% as mentioned in the article while the industry is growing at 12.3%

only. Their market share has been increasing and is expected to increase more due to motor

gasoline, high speed diesel and furnace oil majorly.

Page | 744
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Tax free import of oil from China under the CPFTA

From 2020 till 2022, 2.416 billion liters of petrol was imported from China under this agreement

as discussed in the Dawn news article. The major oil and gas companies were exempted from

paying taxes on these imports due to which we can assess that they had sufficient levels of

inventory with them and this tells us that their market share through sales increased because of

this and also will keep increasing if this continues. This resulted in the companies earning heavy

levels of profits. PSO imported 68 billion liters of petrol from China. Shell Limited was the

biggest beneficiary in this particular case however. The OMCs did not let the benefit of

exemption from import duties to the consumers due to which heavy profits were incurred.

Considering this agreement is valid till 2024, we can expect increasing sales and increasing

profits hence increasing market share of PSO.

Promotion of locally produced furnace oil:

Furnace oil is just another product that comes under the oil and marketing companies. PSO’s

furnace oil makes a great chunk of PSO’s sales. The government of Pakistan noticed that the

OMCs were beginning to import heavy amounts of furnace oil and that the current plants were

not working at their full capacity. Due to this, they focused on the production of local furnace oil.

This has already led to an increase in the sales of the OMCs and is expected to increase in the

following years as well as the government has put trade embargos on the imports of furnace oil.

Page | 745
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan currently has enough oil and gas reserves for the next 50 years

The former president of the chamber of commerce, Dr. Shahid Rasheed believes that Pakistan

has enough resources of oil and gas which will sustain for the next 50 years. This is majorly

because of the high levels of coal reserves that the country has. If the OMCs use these reserves,

they will not lack behind. If the local companies are given incentives to produce the energy

products using the coal reserves, the industry would be in a much better place because currently,

most of the petroleum products are imported and it is only bringing heavy amounts of debt and

loans on the country. Foreign companies which fell in this industry need to be brought back.

Increase in the demand for POL products in Pakistan

In a Dawn news article, it was specifically mentioned that the demand for POL (Petroleum Oil

Lubricants) products will increase considerably in Pakistan in the next 5 years. The OMCs in

Pakistan associate some chunk of their sales to this particular product as well. It is expected to

increase from 27 million tones to around 32 million tones. PSO has abundant levels of these

products due to which, we can expect high demand in the next couple of years and in return high

level of sales. When the sales will increase so will the market share of the company

comparatively. If need be, Pakistan has a long-term agreement with Kuwait for these products

and they can call in more inventory at any given period of time.

Hi-tech Lubricants Limited attaining high growth:

Page | 746
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

From the distribution of market share we can see that hi-tech lubricants have the highest levels of

market share and that is mainly because of their blending plant which gives them a competitive

advantage. Their growth is said to further increase in the future due to them increasing their

operational capacity and higher level of storage systems along with improving the efficiency of

their blending plant itself as well. Their net sales are increasing at a higher rate than other

companies in the OMC industry and PSO needs to look out for this one.

2. Market Share – Total Assets:

The next market share was calculated using the total assets. If we again take the 2015 till 2019

bracket, we will be able to accommodate most of the companies. However, we can also take the

data for 2017-2021. This would give us a more recent picture of the industry but the number of

companies adjusted in it are lower due to the unavailability of the annual reports of most

companies for the year 2020 and 2021. We can also consider Hi-tech lubricants to be an outlier.

2015 - 2019

Company Names Total Market Share

Pakistan State Oil 6.09%

HASCOL 1.11%

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited 5.92%

Page | 747
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Sui Southern Gas Company Limited 5.63%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 79.92%

Shell Pakistan Limited 0.71%

Attock Petroleum Limited 0.60%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.03%

Total Industry Assets 100.00%

2017 – 2021

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 11.23%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 86.83%

Attock Petroleum Limited 1.91%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.03%

Total Industry Sales 100.00%

If the outlier, Hi-Tech, is omitted then the following table will be obtained for 2015-2019. The

table below it gives us the market shares for 2017-2021.

Page | 748
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Names Total Market Share

Pakistan State Oil 30.30%

HASCOL 5.54%

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited 29.46%

Sui Southern Gas Company Limited 28.05%

Shell Pakistan Limited 3.52%

Attock Petroleum Limited 3.00%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.13%

Total Industry Assets 100.00%

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 85.30%

Attock Petroleum Limited 14.49%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.21%

Total Industry Sales 100.00%

Page | 749
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Throughout the years, we can see from the graph given below how the market share of PSO has

changed as compared to other OMCs in the industry.

Pakistan State Oil (Market


Share TA)
12.00%

10.00% 9.94% 9.97%

8.00%

6.00% 5.80% 5.72%


5.04%
4.00%

2.00%

0.00%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2017-2021

Pakistan State Oil (Market Share


TA)
8.00%
6.74% 6.85% 6.92% 6.83%
6.00%
5.57%
4.00%

2.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 750
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

We can observe a fall in the market share in terms of the total assets between 2015 and 2019.

However, slowly and gradually the total assets of the company started increasing. There were

many reasons for that but a few are listed below.

Increase in the current assets of PSO

In the industry, a lot of trading takes place between the companies. When it comes to PSO and

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited, they owe Rs. 77.7 billion to PSO. The company is not that

efficient in terms of its account receivables turnover. However, the company aims to sort this

issue out as they can see how it is affecting its market share in terms of sales. However, the

account receivables are increasing the value of the total assets of PSO. Due to this their market

share in terms of total assets can be seen to be higher with passing years. The increase in the

inventory of PSO has already been discussed. It is increasing due to accumulation of petroleum

products in the month of January and also because of the tax-free import of the oil from China.

Saudi Oil Facility soon to provide oil supplies to Pakistan

Saudi Oil Facility was to provide $1.2 billion worth of oil supplies to Pakistan but the provision

was being delayed. However, recently Dawn news published an article saying that Saudi Oil

Facility is working on sending the shipment on the earliest basis to Pakistan. this would again

lead to more supply of oil products to Pakistan. The OMCs can utilize it. If the supply would

increase, the consumers can enjoy lower prices and hence the demand would increase as well.

Page | 751
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the value of the total assets of the companies in this industry would increase due to more oil

reserves in their inventory levels.

3. Market Share – Net Income

In case of the net income, market share was calculated for 2015-2019 and again for 2017-2021 to

get more recent data entries. We can see that the net income of PSO stands at the second place

after the net income of HTL.

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 3.77%

HASCOL -1.79%

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited 1.40%

Sui Southern Gas Company Limited -2.46%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 97.34%

Shell Pakistan Limited 0.47%

Attock Petroleum Limited 1.26%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.01%

Total Industry NI 100.00%

Page | 752
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

2017-2021

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 5.14%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 93.19%

Attock Petroleum Limited 1.69%

Burshane (LPG) Limited -0.01%

Total Industry NI 100.00%

We can see that after HTL which is also an outlier, PSO had the highest market share in terms of

net income be it 2015-2019 or 2017-2021. This tells us that even if we remove the outlier, PSO

would have the highest net income as compared to other competitors in the market. The graph

below will give a better understanding of the distribution of net income over the years.

Page | 753
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan State Oil (Market


Share NI)
4.00%
2.33% 2.71%
2.00% 2.13% 1.92%
0.00%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
-2.00%
-3.26%
-4.00%

2017-2021

Pakistan State Oil (Market Share


NI)
30.00%
27.35%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
8.13%
5.00%
2.37% 2.69% -3.63%
0.00%
-5.00% 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00%

We can see that the net income was not that commendable when it comes to PSO. Even though

they had the second highest net income in the industry after HTL

Fall in Net Incomes due to Covid-19

The market share dropped the lowest levels in 2019 due to high levels of Covid-19 lockdowns

and due to that, people were not allowed to commute to travel by air. Their sales dropped

Page | 754
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

considerably, their storage expenses increased as inventory was not being sold so they had high

ITO ratios and therefore lower net income was recorded in this year. This can be rechecked from

the annual report of 2019. Overall there was a heavy economic slump as well and the purchasing

power of individuals dropped considerably.

Increase in the domestic production of Euro-5 fuels

The OMCs evolving and now, Pakistan is aiming to making its own Euro-5 fuel and

discouraging the imports. Due to this, the profits of the most companies in this industry has

increased since 2020-2021 an is expected to increase further as well. There was a profit of Rs.

3.6 billion in case of PSO as compared to loss experienced of Rs. 2.4 billion in the previous

years. The future demands for being environmentally friendly. That is what the major companies

in this industry are aiming for. So, net incomes are supposed to increase the market share as well.

all of this will recover the profits that were previously lost by the major companies like PSO.

4. Market Share – Working Capital

This too was calculated for 2015-2019 and then again from 2017-2021 with all the available

annual reports to get recent data.

Total Market

Company Names Share

Page | 755
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan State Oil 5.78%

HASCOL -1.24%

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline

Limited -1.49%

Sui Southern Gas Company

Limited -3.47%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 100.20%

Shell Pakistan Limited -0.75%

Attock Petroleum Limited 0.98%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.00%

Total Industry WC 100.00%

2017-2021

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 11.41%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 97.89%

Attock Petroleum Limited 1.48%

Page | 756
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Burshane (LPG) Limited -0.01%

Total Industry WC 100.00%

For year to year growth in market share, the graphs given below will provide better insights.

Pakistan State Oil (Market Share WC)


16%

14% 14%

12%
11%
10%

8%
7%
6% 6%
4%

2% 2%
0%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

2017-2021

Page | 757
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan State Oil Market Share (WC)


2500%

2000% 2033%

1500%

1000%

500%

0% 6% 7% 11%
2017 2018 2019 2020
-275% 2021
-500%

We can see that most of the companies had negative working capitals. They had more current

liabilities than current assets. Now, out of all the companies, PSO was one of those companies or

perhaps the only company which had positive working capitals in all years. The only negative

market share value it had was when the total industry’s working capital was negative due to

HTL’s working capital being negative. However, in PSO’s case, they have been trying to control

their current liabilities as according to their director’s report we can see that there is a

downwards trend for current liabilities and an upwards trend of current assets due to increasing

accounts receivables. However, if we analyze their market share, we can see that it was falling

considerably and started increasing after the pandemic started due to high current assets like

accounts receivables and the inventory.

5. Market Share – Cash Position

Page | 758
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The cash position can tell us that in the OMC industry which company has a better cash position

and this would be helpful for many stakeholders.

2015-2019

Total

Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil -13.23%

HASCOL -1.92%

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited -1.45%

Sui Southern Gas Company

Limited -2.79%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 116.60%

Shell Pakistan Limited -0.34%

Attock Petroleum Limited 3.07%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.07%

Total Industry CACE 100.00%

Individual year growths can be seen in the graph below. From this we can see that in 2018 the

cash position was getting better but it worsened again in 2019 when PSO began to lose its market

Page | 759
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

share with respect to its standing in terms of cash in that period of time. This was because of high

levels of finance cost that was paid in that period due to taking high levels of long-term

borrowings and short-term borrowings as PSO mainly works through bank financing. The

interest rates were increasing in that period.

Pakistan State Oil (Market


Share - Cash)
0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
-5,000,000
-7,924,869
-10,000,000
-15,000,000
-20,000,000 -21,015,683
-25,000,000
-30,000,000 -30,273,825
-35,000,000
-40,000,000 -39,584,225
-41,502,241
-45,000,000

2017-2021

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil -6.72%

HTL 103.86%

Attock 2.80%

Page | 760
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Burshane (LPG)

Limited 0.06%

Total Industry

CACE 100.00%

Pakistan State Oil (Market Share -


Cash)
0%
2017 -1%
2018 2019 2020 2021
-4% -4%
-5%

-10%

-15% -15%

-20%
-22%

-25%

We can see that the cash position of PSO was not too great. It has been incurring deficit in terms

of cash at the end of the year. PSO was perhaps the only company with negative cash balance at

the end.

Increase in the lending rates charged by commercial banks

Out of all the companies in the OMC industry, PSO is a company which is heavily dependent on

bank financing. When the rates increased, PSO started borrowing less long-term and short-term

Page | 761
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

debt. They were paying heavy finance cost in the beginning as compared to other companies.

They then controlled their liabilities. This is slowly and gradually leading to better cash

positions. Even though, PSO is still experiencing losses but in the next 5 years, the cash is

expected to increase by the expected growth rate. It did not affect other companies in this

industry due to lower reliance on bank financing of its competitors.

Source for 15 articles:

1. https://dps.psx.com.pk/

2. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/929210-pakistan-may-import-500-000-tonnes-of-

petrol-next-month

3. https://www.dawn.com/news/1666786

4. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/932876-pso-posts-highest-ever-half-yearly-profit-of-

rs32-189-billion

5. https://www.dawn.com/news/1671124

6. https://www.dawn.com/news/1666786/petrol-demand-hits-record-835m-tonnes-in-fy21

7. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/927726-pakistan-has-enough-oil-gas-reserves-for-

next-50-years-ex-president-icci

8. https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/01/09/chinese-petrol-drive-omc-profits/

9. https://www.dawn.com/news/1425235

Page | 762
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

10. https://www.brecorder.com/news/40119895

11. https://www.dawn.com/news/1673140

12. https://www.dawn.com/news/1652715

13. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/909334-top-omc-in-economic-mess-pso-s-

receivables-surge-to-rs398-billion

14. https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/09/06/financial-crisis-of-omcs-worsens/

15. https://tribune.com.pk/story/2330852/commercial-bank-lending-rate-spikes

Page | 763
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

During the last fiscal year, PSO performed above average of the industry as it bounced back

aimed Covid-19 and recorded all time highest sales revenue of over PKR 1.4 trillion. A number

of macroeconomic factors including uncertainty in the geopolitical environment, government

socioeconomic measures and technological changes among others contributed to the company’s

performance and are expected to leave an impact in the future as well. All of them have their

own importance so they will be looked at independently.

Government Policies

When we talk about the role pf government in oil and gas marketing companies, it plays a very

pivotal role especially in a developing country like Pakistan, which has such a high dependence

on imported oil.

During the fiscal year 2021, the government has envisioned to achieve a GDP growth of 4.4% in

the year 2022 and have taken several steps to supplement this vison. One such policy is the

reduction in the duty structure. The government reduced the duty and tax structure on vehicles

under 850 cc horsepower which is deemed to have a positive impact on the sales of the company

in the future. To top this The Automotive Industry Development & Export Plan (AIDEP) 2021-

2026 increased competition for automobiles in the market with car sales exhibiting a staggering

growth of 40.2%, which indicated both the revival of the economy as well as a prediction of an

Page | 764
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

increase in the sales volume of OMC’s specially PSO as it has the biggest market share in the

country.

Moreover, there was an increase in the demand for fuel and furnace oil due to an increase in

electricity demand, which was coupled with the shortage of natural gas for power generation and

dry-docking related issues. PSO requested the federal government for advising the domestic

refineries for maximum allocation to PSO so that power sector demand can be fulfilled,

informing that they managed to provide 100,000 metric tons of furnace oil to K-Electric against

its demand of 120,000 metric tons.

Keeping in view this situation, the Cabinet Committee on Energy under Minister for Planning

Asad Umar approved withdrawal of ban on import of furnace oil and PSO was given NOC to

import two firm cargoes and one optional cargo of furnace oil as reported by The News. The

chief executive of KE also confirmed this in the statement, “We are getting furnace oil from PSO

on day to day basis in order to meet the generation demands and to avoid any unwarranted

situation”.

The lift on the ban of import of furnace oil had a significant impact on the sales of the company

and it is expected to have a positive impact in the future as well.

Source:

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/683166-pso-to-opt-for-gallop-import-of-furnace-oil

Page | 765
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Director’s report

Global Impact

As in continuation with the previous years, virus mutations and accumulating death toll in

different parts of the world kept a high pressure on the energy market. However, an improvement

was seen as there was an increase in the vaccination efforts which translated to the resumption of

economic activity around the world thus leading to an increase in the demand for oil and gas by a

substantial amount. Due to this global growth is projected at 4.4%, with this projection

anticipated to further grow in the future.

Source:

Director’s report

International Oil prices, Inflation and Currency Factor

Since 2014 the international oil prices have seen the most significant volatility. The oil market

has taken on new features that affect the development of the global economy. According to EIA,

US shale oil production increased from 4.96 million barrels per day in 2017 to 5.59 million

barrels per day in 2022. In addition, there are geopolitical events, trade frictions, and OPEC’s

agreement have occurred in recent years, causing the volatility of oil price.

Page | 766
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

In a developing country like Pakistan, which has such high dependence on imported oil, an

increase in oil prices leads to inflationary pressure which in turn increases budget deficit and puts

a downward pressure on the exchange rate, making imports more expensive. The government

has refrained from passing on the complete price increase to the consumers because it fears it

will exacerbate inflation and stifle economic activity which presents a significant challenge to

the government’s plans of ending its tenure with a strong growth phase.

This inflationary pressure and devaluation of the rupee, along with all other factors kept in mind

led to an increase in the sales of PSO both numerically and volumetrically. Now looking forward

the international oil prices are forecasted to reduce as can be seen in the graph below which in

turn means that the inflation in the country as well as the rupee will also improve to some extent.

With this information, it can be predicted that numerically the sales of the company might

decrease. However, with all the other ventures and initiatives being taken, the volume of sales is

most likely to increase in the future which would offset the effect of numerical decrease in sales

thus overall having a positive increase in the sales figure of PSO.

Page | 767
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source

https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-021-00166-4

Director’s report

Technological Changes & Concerns about the Climate

A transition is taking place on the retail industry as a change in the consumer demand can be

observed. The new EV policy for four wheelers is expected to increase competition in the market

while promoting sustainable development and preserving the environment. It is envisioned to

have an increase of 30% and 90% share in the light and heavy vehicles sales respectively within

the next 5-10 years. Moreover, the salient features of the policy include a phased transition of the

Page | 768
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

automotive industry to electric vehicles. This is not good news for PSO as a major chunk of its

sales comes from nonfuel products and services and this would forecast a negative impact on its

future sales. Moreover, in the global risks report by the world forum, the production of oil and

gas was listed as one of the top ten global risks to the environment and climate change. The

burning of oil and gas not only just meets our energy needs but also drives the current global

warming crisis as it produces large quantities of carbon dioxide when burned which is a major

greenhouse gas. According to the BBC news, “Reducing our dependence on fossil fuels is the

only fair and sustainable way to address to climate change emergency”. All of these have raised

concerns of environmentalists which is predicted to have a daunting effect on the sales of OMC’s

like PSO.

The management of the company is cognizant of this shift and is offering new value

propositions, shifting from its core business and offering differentiated and state of the art non-

fuel retail products and services to the customers. With this in mind, PSO launched the first ever

EV charger in Islamabad. Moreover, over the course of the previous year, they opened 71 retail

outlets, 30 C-Stores and 12 QSRs all over the country, focusing on its non-core business in order

to offset the effects of technological change as well as concerns about the climate. With these

steps the company visions to offset the negative impacts an even bring a positive effect on the

sales of the company in the future.

Page | 769
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

https://www.nrdc.org/stories/fossil-fuels-dirty-facts

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-53051850

Director’s report

Aviation Sector

The aviation sector of Pakistan felt the most impacted. There were mass scale lockdowns, travel

restrictions and curtailed movement globally which resulted in a depressed demand for jet fuels.

However, the resumption of economic activity has spurred the demand for jet fuel. The Asia

Pacific reported that after the decrease of Covid-19 cases in Pakistan, there has been a surge in

air transportation as the number of flights passing over Pakistan airspace has reached more than

350 per day, with this figure only expected to grow as the Covid-19 cases reduce. Moreover, the

government of Pakistan has also taken some initiatives to promote tourism in the country which

is expected to bring several new players in the aviation sector. All of this is expected to bring an

increase in the demand for jet fuels, thus an increase in the sales of PSO which dominate the jet

fuel market with a market share of 94.5%.

Source:

http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/asiapacific/2020-09/09/c_139355115.htm

Page | 770
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Director’s report

Page | 771
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Method Chosen;

• Subjective Analysis

Methods used;

1. Naïve (5, 10 & 15 years)

2. Horizontal Analysis (5, 10 & 15 years)

3. Regression with GDP (5, 10 & 15 years)

4. Regression with Industry Sales (5 years)

5. Regression with PPE (5, 10 & 15 years)

6. Excel Forecast (5, 10 & 15 years)

7. EFN

8. Subjective Analysis

9.

Naïve method

Page | 772
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Time=15 years

1,400,000,000

1,200,000,000

1,000,000,000

800,000,000

600,000,000

400,000,000

200,000,000

0
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Net Sales Naïve Forecast

MAPE=17.1%

The MAPE figure should ideally be within 10% so we would reject this method since the figure

is too high.

Page | 773
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Time=10 years

1,400,000,000

1,200,000,000

1,000,000,000

800,000,000

600,000,000

400,000,000

200,000,000

0
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Net Sales Naïve Forecast

MAPE=16%

The MAPE figure should ideally be within 10% so we would reject this method since the figure

is too high.

Time=5 years

Page | 774
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1,400,000,000

1,200,000,000

1,000,000,000

800,000,000

600,000,000

400,000,000

200,000,000

0
2016.5 2017 2017.5 2018 2018.5 2019 2019.5 2020 2020.5 2021 2021.5

Net Sales Naïve Forecast

MAPE=10.4%

After looking at 3 MAPE figures calculated from 3 different time series, it can be observed that

as the time in consideration decreased, the value of MAPE came closer to 10 which is the ideal

figure. With this in mind, we can say that the Naïve model can be accepted. However, with a

greater timeline into consideration, the MAPE value is very large which is not a good sign thus

we will reject this method.

Horizontal Analysis

Page | 775
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Time=15 years

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
(10.00%)

(20.00%)

(30.00%)

Time=10 years

Page | 776
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
(10.00%)

(20.00%)

(30.00%)

Time=5 years

25.00%

20.00%

15.00%

10.00%

5.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
(5.00%)

(10.00%)

Page | 777
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

It can clearly be seen that the model is not linear and there are large fluctuations in the sales of

the company over the course of the last 15 years. Since the rate of change is not constant, we will

drop this method.

Regression with GDP

Time=15 years

Time=10 years

Page | 778
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Time=5 years

Regression with Industry Sales

Time=5 years

Page | 779
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Regression with PPE

Time= 15 years

Time=10 years

Page | 780
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Time=5 years

Excel forecast

Time=15 years

Page | 781
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 782
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1,400,000,000

1,200,000,000

1,000,000,000

800,000,000

600,000,000

400,000,000

200,000,000

0
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Net Sales Forecasted Sales

Time= 10 years

Page | 783
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1,800,000,000
1,600,000,000
1,400,000,000
1,200,000,000
1,000,000,000
800,000,000
600,000,000
400,000,000
200,000,000
0
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026

Net Sales Forecasted Sales

Time=5 years

Page | 784
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1,800,000,000
1,600,000,000
1,400,000,000
1,200,000,000
1,000,000,000
800,000,000
600,000,000
400,000,000
200,000,000
0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Net Sales Forecasted Sales

Page | 785
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Cost of Goods Sold

Breakdown:

Cost of Products sold 2021 Vertical Analysis

Opening stock 64,758,242 5.55%

Purchases made during the year 1,190,599,212 102.07%

1,255,357,454 107.62%

Closing stock (88,934,410) -7.62%

1,166,423,044 100.00%

Page | 786
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (6.26%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

COPS 4.68% (3.33%) 13.31% 20.96% 28.32% (26.37%)

Vertical Analysis: Average (96.85%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

COPS 95.32% 99.38% 97.23% 96.25% 96.25% 96.68%

Forecasted Values

Analysis

After looking at the company, horizontal and economic analysis we estimated that the cost of

production for PSO will increase gradually over the next 5 years between 6-9%. We based this

Page | 787
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

assumption on many reasons which included the prediction of increase in sales, efficient supply

chain management as well as its organizational restricting and agreements with other companies

among other factors. We also had to take into consideration that due to these factors, we expect

that the cost of production will increase by a less proportionate amount as compared to sales

indicating better absorption of fixed assets by PSO, with this only getting better with time.

Previously we grew sales at a constant rate of 12.5%. so based on these assumptions, we grew

cost of production by 8.5% in 2022, growing it by removing 0.5% with time, thus indicating that

with time PSO is absorbing costs even better as the sales growth rate is assumed to be constant.

Page | 788
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2012 to 2021, an average of

96.85% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2012 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 6.26% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

The biggest factor influencing the final cost of petrol in Pakistan is the international oil market.

Starting from early 2018, the devaluation of the rupee meant that the cost of a barrel of crude oil

started rising significantly for Pakistan, even as the price remained fairly stable in USD terms.

For instance, a barrel of crude oil priced at USD 67 in January 2018 cost PKR 7,400 while in

May 2021, the same USD price cost PKR 10,205.

Page | 789
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

Factors affecting the COGS (2021-2016)

1. Year 2021:

Comparing the horizontal analysis of cost of products sold during the year 2021 and 2020, we

see a major increase. There was a significant decrease in 2020 whereas we see a positive change

in 2021 this could be due to many reasons which will be discussed further in the report. The cost

of products sold includes cost incurred on manufacturing of lubricants amounting to

Rs.6,903,232 (2020: Rs. 5,765,550).

• Crude Oil Production had no change: The cost of crude oil was incurred by the

company as well as the manufacturing of lubricants. Both of the cost had no change when

compared to the previous year.

Page | 790
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Significant growth in the LPG Industry: The Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) industry

is primarily driven by the domestic, transport and industrial sectors. This segment

witnessed a growth of 7.3% over last year with volumes of 1,182 thousand tons,

primarily driven by cyclical demand from domestic segment during winter season.

• Seasonal Demand for LNG increased: Due to the winter season the demand for

liquefied natural gas increases day to day by 5.5 bcf/day in the domestic sector. As the

local production of gas is being reduced, the estimated production eventually will be

around 2.8 bcf/day. However, this shortage will be catered to using the LNG import

agreement with Qatar.

• Black oil production expected to decrease due to government policies: Black Oil

production is expected to decline in the coming years due to the Government’s focus on

adding indigenous renewable energy sources.

• Aviation Industry Demands declines: During this year, jet fuel market share increased

from 94.3% to 94.5%. Whereas this particular industry witnessed a decline due to travel

restrictions. However, PSO continued to supply for the forces and 22 thousand liters of

jet fuel was supplied in 3 hours for Antonov An-225.

• PSO launches procurement through SAP Ariba: During the year PSO was able to

successfully launch its e-procurement program through SAP Ariba which not only

improved the efficiency of the procurement process but at the same time allowed access

Page | 791
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

to a greater vendor base, reduced turnaround time, enhanced transparency as well as

drastic reduction in the cost. This also enabled PSO to have access to a digital market

place where millions of buyers and suppliers interact in over 190 countries.

• Installation of newly equipped oil changing facilities: PSO lubricants witnessed an

overall growth of 11.3% as compared to the last year. PSO launched aggressive

marketing campaigns to improve availability and awareness of high tier lubricant brands

in the passenger car motor oil (PCMO) category while boosting the diesel engine oil

category. PSO has also installed newly equipped oil changing facilities at 57 retail outlets

across Pakistan.

• Vertical Integration to add sustainability: The company is exploring investment plans

for vertical integration and diversification of business portfolio to add sustainability.

Owing to well-perceived strategic initiatives, the company is well positioned to excel its

performance, both in volumetric and financial terms, year after year and would continue

to maximize its shareholders’ value.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report 2021

➢ https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/pakistan-lubricants-market

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/806119-pso-launches-procurement-through-sap-ariba

Page | 792
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

2. Year 2020:

The year 2020 was the most critical one for many industries. Due to the on-going pandemic most

of the fuel industry witnessed a decline. Talking about PSO, the cost of products sold also

declined majorly and went into a negative figure. Cost incurred by the Group on refining of

crude oil and manufacturing of lubricants amounting to Rs. 94,750,395 (2019: Rs. 72,086,042)

and Rs. 5,765,550 (2019: Rs. 4,849,565) respectively, there is an increase when compared to the

last year.

• Inventory Decline leads to losses: Due to significant downward inventory valuation,

OMC’s and refineries suffered loses and struggled to meet the demands.

• Massive strain on PSO’s Supply Chain: During the year, the daily average sales of

PSO outlets surged by 122% despite the massive strain on the Company's supply chain.

• Company Imports additional cargoes: The Company also imported 08 additional

cargoes of High-Speed Diesel and 02 additional cargoes of Motor gasoline to avert a

major fuel crisis in the country.

• Fall in international prices: Factors that resulted in net loss include abnormally high

inventory losses due to sharp fall in international oil prices, reduction in black oil sales

volume by 40.8% due to government policy of shifting to LNG and other alternative

fuels.

Page | 793
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Refining margins decreased: A decrease in refining margins, planned maintenance cost

and higher Finance cost on account of higher policy rate of 13.25% contributed

significantly in losses.

• Government Policy to switch from FO to RLNG: Due to Government’s decision to

impose ban on import of furnace oil and had a continued impact of switching the power

plants to RLNG which in turn decreased the demand and production.

Source:

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=427

➢ Director’s Report (2020)

3. Year 2019:

For PSO, there is a 9% increase in the Cost of products sold as compared to 2018. Cost incurred

by refining of crude oil and manufacturing of lubricants. The cost of manufacturing of lubricants

however decreased as compared to 2018.

• Domestic Production of crude oil decreases: The domestic production of crude oil

remained 24.6 million barrels during the period under review as compared to 21.8

million barrels in the same period of the fiscal year 2018.

• Decline of prices in International Markets: PSO’s performance faced a downfall

mainly due to the decline in pricing of Motor Gasoline (Petrol) in international markets,

Page | 794
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

depressed refining margins, unfavorable movements in exchange rate on imports and

higher interest rates.

• Depreciation of Pak Rupee: PSO also incurred exchange loss of approximately of Rs.

6 million, as the Pak Rupee depreciated by 35 % during the year 2019.

• Total Refinery Production to increase the fuel supply: PSO also maintained the

supply chain by importing 47% of total industry imports and uplifting 35% of total

refinery production in the country to ensure an uninterrupted fuel supply to its

customers.

• Inventory Losses due to international prices: There were also inventory losses due to

the rise in international prices, lower interest income from the power sector and an

increase in the finance cost.

• White oil volumes dropped due to smuggled products: Black oil volumes also

dropped due to the shift towards RLNG. White oils volumes declined due to smuggled

products and the decline in automobile sales.

Source:

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/524549

➢ Director’s Report (2019)

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=401

Page | 795
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2019/07/01/pakistans-crude-oil-production-increases-12-

8pc-imports-fall-15-38pc/

4. Year 2018:

From the Income Statement, it can be seen that the cost of products sold in the year 2018

increased by a percentage of 21%.

• Inventory losses due to international oil prices and trade: In the year 2018 OMC’s

reduced importing fuels due to an increase in international oil prices that made the trade

commercially unviable. PSO however remained firm in its resolve to exceed the

expectations of its customers and fuel Pakistan’s journey of growth and prosperity

despite incurring inventory losses.

• Lower Consumption by GENCOS: Furnace Oil (FO) sales went down by 9.4% in line

with reduction in industry volumes partly due to low consumption by GENCOS and

partly due to higher LNG utilization. The increase in FO prices in for year 2018, PSO

diligently managed to maintain uninterrupted supplies to the Power sector as per demand

to help reduce load-shedding in the country, and fulfilled its responsibilities as a

responsible National Company.

• Crude oil prices to stay consistent globally: The average crude oil price remained

around $63.21 per barrel in the global market during 2018.

Page | 796
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Reduced demand of Black Oil: The decline was witnessed primarily on account of the

drop in Black Oil demand due to the availability of RLNG/natural gas in the country and

the Government’s policy of operating existing power plants on RLNG/natural gas.

• LNG supplies dropped due to thin regulated margins: Despite having thin regulated

margin and significant delays in receipts against LNG supplies, PSO tried to bridge the

gap between the supply and demand of Natural Gas.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report (2018)

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/email-newsletter/2017/aug-nov/pakistan-state-oil-

announces-fy2018-financial-results-reports-33.7-growth

5. Year 2017:

As compared to the previous year (2018), there was an increase of 28% in the cost of products

sold.

• Inventory Gains which lowered fuel costs: With cost of goods sold up by 28 percent,

PSO was able to keep gross margins also up in 2017. The increase in gross profit and

gross margin could be due to inventory gains booked on account of lower fuel costs in

the low oil price scenario.

Page | 797
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• HSD, FO, Lubricants and Grease Import contract with Pakistan Railway: PSO

successfully secured the contract of supplying High Speed Diesel (HSD), Furnace Oil

(FO), Lubricants and Greases business for a five-year period to Pakistan Railways. The

High-Speed Diesel imported by PSO is the best quality HSD available in Pakistan with a

lowest Sulphur content, which is the most environment friendly and lowest emission

diesel fuel marketed in the country. Pakistan State Oil also has the most sophisticated

and state-of-the-art Lubricant Manufacturing Terminal (LMT) in Pakistan which

produces highest quality lubricants that are API compliant and certified.

• LNG businesses flourished: The LNG business continued with PSO for the whole year;

with 58 LNG vessels supplied during the year carrying 186,672,980 MMBTU, without

incurring any demurrage by managing a seamless supply chain operation.

• Revitalization and continuous product improvements: A key element in the

revitalization of the Lubricants business was continuous product improvement. The

Company successfully introduced an improved motorcycle oil Blaze 4T (3D

PROTECT), launched with a 360 media campaign and new packaging across the

country. This delivered approximately 40% growth in Blaze sales vs last year.

Source:

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/364031/pso-a-sturdy-performance-in-fy17

Page | 798
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=333

➢ Director’s Report (2017)

6. Year 2016:

The cost of goods sold for 2016 mainly include the manufacturing of lubricants which decreased

from Rs. 4,379,062 (2015) to Rs. 4,283,762.

• Cost Increase due to Customer Demands: The Company’s sale volume of Motor

Gasoline grew by 26% over Same Period Last Year (SPLY) mainly due to decrease in

price of gasoline and subsequent increase in customer demand.

• Upliftment by IPP’s of shifting from FO to natural gas: FO volumes declined by

4.3% due to lower upliftment by IPP’s primarily due to shifting from FO to natural gas.

Pakistan is deficient in FO, they are imported on spot tender basis to meet the shortage

however due to the oil industry strike in Kuwait, a force majeure was declared and PSO

floated tender to meet the demand of harvesting season and electricity generation.

• Decrease in Inventory Loss: This increase in revenue was mainly due to growth in

sales volume and margins of white oil products and decreased inventory losses.

• Decrease in OPEC prices: Decrease in black oil margins owing to reduction of 48% in

the OPEC price of crude oil per barrel had an adverse impact on profitability of the

Company.

Page | 799
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• LNG Purchase Agreement with Qatar: Pakistan State Oil also signed the LNG Sale

Purchase Agreement (LSPA) with Qatar gas for import of liquefied natural gas (LNG)

of around $16 billion in 15 years at a relatively lower rate to aid the agricultural sector

of Pakistan.

• Inland freight, equalization, margin mismanagement challenges faced by PSO:

Despite the challenges being faced by PSO such as non-resolution of inland freight

equalization, margin mismanagement and the delay in the settlement pending since

2008 by the regulators, storage and port constraint solutions pending with the

government but still PSO continues to take the lead in the liquid fuel industry.

Source:

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=287

➢ https://epaper.dawn.com/DetailImage.php?StoryImage=26_05_2016_010_005

Factors that will affect PSO’s COGS in the future years:

As the values of the cost of products sold are in negative, the forecasted values from 2022-2026

come out to be negative too, which means that the closing stock is more valued at an above cost.

PSO is undertaking several investment plans to cater to the increasing demand for oil and gas

products. Government policies and support related to the exploration and production of oil and

gas are playing a major role in the industry and encouraging to boost Pakistan Oil and Gas

Page | 800
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

investments. Major imbalance in the industry’s supply-demand equilibrium, mainly due to

changes in other OMCs’ business strategies are in the run to take opportunities arising from oil

price fluctuations which significantly affect the supply chain management of the company, thus

causing strain on its profitability and supply chain. PSO however, is managing such pressures

through effective supply chain management, while increasing storage capacity which will help

the company in managing it better.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Page | 801
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industrial Analysis

When it comes to the industry analysis, the maximum number of companies were covered by

taking into consideration 6 years (2015-2020). The table given below clearly indicates that HTL

had the majority of share in terms of cost of products sold. At the second place we have PSO.

2015 – 2020 (Considering all companies)

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 12.33%

HASCOL 1.84%

Sui Northern Gas Pipeline

Limited 5.86%

Hi-Tech Lubricants Limited 75.62%

Shell Pakistan Limited 2.19%

Attock Petroleum Limited 2.13%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.03%

Total Industry CGS 100.00%

2017-2021 (For more recent data)

Page | 802
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market

Company Names Share

Pakistan State Oil 13.01%

Hi-Tech Lubricants

Limited 84.77%

Attock Petroleum Limited 2.19%

Burshane (LPG) Limited 0.03%

Total Industry CGS 100.00%

2015 – 2020 (Growth w.r.t. the industry)

Company

Names 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Pakistan State

Oil 16% 11% 11% 11% 11% 16%

Page | 803
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Pakistan State Oil ( Growth


w.r.t industry)
20%

16% 16%
15%
11% 11% 11%
10% 11%

5%

0%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

2015 – 2021 (Growth w.r.t. to years)

Company

Names 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Pakistan State

Oil -22.65% -26.37% 28.32% 20.96% 13.31% -3.33% 4.68%

Pakistan State Oil


40.00%
30.00% 28.32%
20.00% 20.96%
13.31%
10.00%
4.68%
0.00%
-3.33%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00%
-20.00%
-22.65%
-26.37%
-30.00%

Page | 804
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

2017 – 2021 (Growth w.r.t. the industry)

Company Names 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Pakistan State Oil 13% 12% 12% 19% 11%

Pakistan State Oil (Growth w.r.t Industry))


25%

20%
19%

15%
13% 12% 12% 11%
10%

5%

0%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

2015 – 2020 (Growth in industry’s CGS)

Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Total Industry

Growth 12% 14% 16% 20% 23% 15%

Page | 805
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Industry's Growth


25%
23%

20% 20%

16%
15% 15%
14%
12%
10%

5%

0%
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

2017 – 2021 (Growth in the industry’s CGS)

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Total Industry Growth 16% 21% 23% 14% 25%

Total Industry's Growth


30%

25% 25%
23%
20% 21%

16%
15% 14%

10%

5%

0%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 806
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Now, we will be looking at all the factors which have caused these changes. We can see that the

growth in CGS was the lowest and sustainable from 2016 - 2019 industry wise for PSO. If we

look at it’s perspective from how much the CGS has grown with respect to the number of years

that have passed by, we can see that it was low from 2017 till 2019 but it has been increasing

since 2019. There are several reasons for that.

1. Collaboration with Power China for new refinery projects:

PSO’s market share with respect to the industry in terms of the CGS has increased because of its

collaboration with Power China. They partnership amounted to an estimate of $8 billion and it

was to ease out the production of crude oil. This increased their production capacity to up to

250,000 barrels per day. Keeping in mind the fact that at that time, the industry had five

refineries with a production capacity of 404,000 barrels per day, this collaboration helped in

improving the performance of the industry as well and aided in its growth over time.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/303191-pso-in-talks-with-power-china-for-new-

refinery-project

2. Foreign investments in Oil and Gas industry of Pakistan

In 2019, Pakistan received a lot of investments in this particular industry because the government

wanted to promote investments in this sector. This was to ensure that there is availability and

Page | 807
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

sustainability when it comes to the supply of oil and gas. This would further increase the refining

of crude oil because when the investments were made, the production of furnace oil was reduced

in the refineries and higher production of crude oil was ensured. This means that the in the

following years, the cost of goods sold would also increase due to an increase in the refining of

crude oil. All of this led to a growth in CGS of different companies in this industry such as PSO.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/430867-pakistan-seeks-investment-in-oil-and-gas-

sector

3. Revision of LNG policy, lifting the ban on imports of LNG in Pakistan

In 2020, Pakistan revised its LNG policy and allowed spot buying of LNG. This was because the

demand of LNG increased when lockdowns were uplifted in 2020. There was a need of LNG in

every household be it for cooking or for using it in commercial vehicles. When the LNG was

imported, it costed the companies in this industry a lot more due to all the tariffs and custom

duties. This was also one of the reasons of as to why the cost of goods sold increase for

companies in this industry from 2020.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/694915-energy-ministry-begins-exercise-to-update-

lng-policy

Page | 808
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

4. Purchase of the costliest LNG cargos in 2021 from Qatar Petroleum

As we can see that the growth in CGS increased for the entire industry in the year 2021 and

onwards. That was because most of the companies in this industry were producing LNG.

Considering that during winters, there could be a high chance of severe gas crisis. So, in order to

avoid that, on emergency basis, spot buying was done and in the history of Pakistan, the costliest

LNG cargo of $30.6 million was purchased by Pakistan. This obviously increased the cost of raw

material for all the companies in the industry due to which CGS of PSO also increased.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1656453

5. Pakistan’s oil industry suffered immense inventory losses in 2020 due to Covid-19

Due to the pandemic, several lockdowns were imposed. Travelling was close to minimal. Due to

this, there was low demand of fuel and energy products by both the consumer market and the

business market. Now, due to this, companies in this industry faced immense inventory losses as

they were unable to convert them into sales. Their stock in trade was increasing and expiring

without being put to use. Due to this, the cost of goods sold can be seen to increase in 2020 and

in the later years as well.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report (2020)

Page | 809
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

6. Discovery of Oil and Gas in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in 2022

In the first month of 2022, the News International published an article informing us about the

latest discovery of oil and gas reserves which were made in KPK, one of the provinces of

Pakistan. This is going to prove beneficial for the companies in this industry because that means

they would have to rely less on the imports of these items. If these are domestically produced and

refined, this would result in lower cost of supplies for the industry and promote more supply.

This means that we can forecast the cost of goods sold of the companies in this industry,

including that of PSO to fall in the coming years.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/922087-ogdcl-discovers-huge-oil-gas-reserves-in-kp

7. Reviving exploration and production activities in unexplored areas of Pakistan

More investments have been done for the E&P activities. This is because many areas of Pakistan

are still left unexplored even when they have heavy untapped reserves. This promotion and

revival would attract foreign investments. This would also then lead to lower imports. If imports

are low, then the prices of raw materials for the companies in the oil and gas industry would be

low. This would result in lower cost of goods sold and companies and buy more stock in trade.

From this, we can again predict that the cost of goods sold is expected to fall in the near future.

Source:

Page | 810
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/820827-pakistan-wants-to-revive-e-p-activities-in-

unexplored-areas

8. Tax concessions for LPG storage and production in Pakistan

This happened recently in 2021. Due to this, we can assume that the companies in the oil and gas

marketing and distribution industry would be able to buy LPG at lower costs. This would mean

that their cost of products sold would be low due to a fall in the prices of one of their raw

materials and the increase in the ease of storage as well. This would prove to be an incentive for

these companies. This was mainly done to facilitate the state-owned companies so that they can

easily compete with the private companies. Through this, we can assume that in 2022, the cost of

goods sold for these companies and especially for PSO, since it is a state-owned company, would

decline to some extent.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1634546

Page | 811
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

After looking at the past 3 years data, it can be seen that the cost of goods sold decreased by

3.33% from 2019-2020 while it increased by 4.68% from 2020-2021. Just by looking at this data,

it can be said that the cost of production for PSO has been the record highest numerically.

However this statement is far from truth. If we analyze these figures with respect to the sales of

the company, in 2019 the cost of production was 97.23% of the total sales which increased to

99.38% in 2020, a record high figure for PSO in the past 15 years. However in 2021, this figure

decreased and came down to 95.32% which is the record low for the past 10 years. This shows

that despite the figure increasing numerically, the rate by which it increased as compared to sales

is significantly low which means that the cost of production for the company has improved in

2021, thus indicating that it is absorbing its fixed costs better as compared to the past 10 years.

There are many economic reasons for this which will be looked at independently.

International Oil prices, Inflation and Currency Factor

Since 2014 the international oil prices have seen the most significant volatility. The oil market

has taken on new features that affect the development of the global economy. According to EIA,

US shale oil production increased from 4.96 million barrels per day in 2017 to 5.59 million

barrels per day in 2022. In addition, there are geopolitical events, trade frictions, and OPEC’s

agreement have occurred in recent years, causing the volatility of oil price.

Page | 812
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

In a developing country like Pakistan, which has such high dependence on imported oil, an

increase in oil prices leads to inflationary pressure which in turn increases budget deficit and puts

a downward pressure on the exchange rate, making imports more expensive. The government

has refrained from passing on the complete price increase to the consumers because it fears it

will exacerbate inflation and stifle economic activity which presents a significant challenge to

the government’s plans of ending its tenure with a strong growth phase.

This inflationary pressure and devaluation of the rupee, along with all other factors kept in mind

led to an increase in the sales of PSO both numerically and volumetrically. Now looking forward

the international oil prices are forecasted to reduce as can be seen in the graph below which in

turn means that the inflation in the country as well as the rupee will also improve to some extent.

With this information, it can be predicted that numerically the sales of the company might

decrease. However with all the other ventures and initiatives being taken, the volume of sales is

most likely to increase in the future which would offset the effect of numerical decrease in sales

thus overall having a positive increase in the sales figure of PSO.

Page | 813
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Director’s report (2021)

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

➢ https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-021-00166-4

China Pakistan Free Trade Agreement

According to reports around 15 OMCs are reported to have imported over 2.4 billion litres of

petrol from China in 2 years earning a huge windfall because of the special agreement under

CPFTA. OMCs were allowed to import petrol from China without paying ten percent Custom

Duty, which is, otherwise, applied on the import of petrol from other countries.

Page | 814
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO also took windfall benefit of petrol imports from China. It imported about 68 million litres

of petrol from China and claimed customs duty waiver against the FTA certificate as per

SRO.1640(1)/2019 S.No.10 and paid Rs64 million as ACD thus getting petrol at a low cost,

reducing the cost of production.

It is not clear yet as to how and why the petroleum imports were made part of the revised

CPFTA in 2019 when China is a net importer of oil as a top executive of a local refinery said,

“Granting this facility to OMCs under CPFTA makes no sense as China was also a net importer

of petrol”. However with this being said, all OMC’s including PSO have already enjoyed the low

cost benefit under this agreement as the import bill particularly of refined petroleum products,

has seen the largest chunk of 83pc increase in imports during the last fiscal year.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1671124

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/934553-oil-refining-data-sought-to-decide-on-petrol-

imports

White Oil Pipeline (Partnership with PARCO & PEPCO)

PSO has entered into a strategic partnership with PARCO and PEPCO which aims to safeguard

the country's petroleum product supply chain and enable economical and environment friendly

transportation of fuel. Under the partnership PSO will uses the White Oil Pipeline, which is a

Page | 815
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

mega infrastructure expanding all the way from Port Qasim to Mahmood Kot for the

transportation of crude oil as well as diesel to the central regions of Pakistan which account for

almost 60% of the total Petroleum consumption in the country.

With this partnership, PSO has managed to significantly reduce its costs which can clearly be

reflected in its cost of production. Furthermore it is also expected that the cost will continue to

decline as more infrastructure is added.

Source:

➢ https://www.parco.com.pk/our-business/transportation/pipeline-network/

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=437

Agreement with Qatar Petroleum

In accordance with the vision 2030, PSO came into an LNG agreement with Qatar Petroleum as

the Qatar’s ambassador to Pakistan said affirmed that Qatar will continue helping Pakistan to

meet its energy needs.

According to the agreement Qatar Energy entered into a long-term sale and purchase agreement

with the PSO for the supply of up to three million tons per annum of the LNG. The price at

which the agreement has been made is the lowest ever price which is expected to significantly

reduce the costs of PSO in the future. Moreover it must also be noted that the launch of the direct

Page | 816
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

shipping line between Karachi port and Hamad port in Doha has greatly helped increase trade

engagements between the two countries

Source:

➢ Corporate briefing session

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/918280-qatar-to-continue-helping-pakistan-to-meet-

its-energy-needs

Contract with KPC

10 years ago, PSO got into an agreement with KPC for diesel which is a government to

government agreement. The agreement gives PSO an edge in the pricing for diesel as compared

to other OMC’s in the country as this is a long term agreement so PSO has better pricing.

Historically this has helped PSO manage its costs and is looking forward it is expected to further

help the state run company reduce its costs for diesel.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/504960/pso-signs-contract-with-kpc-for-diesel

Supply chain Development

Page | 817
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

During the year operational efficiency was increased through pipeline links at SKP, Mkot, MCK

and FSB. Moreover 135 KMTs and new rehab storages were added thus increasing the overall

transportation efficiency and cost effectiveness.

Source:

➢ Corporate briefing session

Pakistan Railways

In order to reduce the cost for transportation, the federal government directed PSO to use rail for

transportation rather than road. According to estimations, the transportation cost is expected to

be reduced by 26% via rail. The transportation cost rose by a great amount when the PPP

government shifted the entire petroleum supply chain to oil tankers. As a result the oil tanker

owners did not only charge high rates but reportedly blackmailed the government by calling

strikes on different occasions, resulting in the suspension of oil supply across the country thus

increasing the cost of production for OMC’s.

Thus the government took this initiative, enabling the OMC’s to reduce their cost of production

with PSO entering an agreement to transport 2 million tons of product per year through Pakistan

Railways with subject to demand placed.

Source:

Page | 818
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://arynews.tv/cost-saving-govt-pso-fuel-rail/

Utilizing services of foreign Companies

Recently there have been complaints to the PM from the minister of railways and maritime

affairs over PSO not utilizing Pakistan railways for transportation. PM sought an explanation

from the minister for railways on why PSO has been utilizing the services of foreign shipping

companies which is resulting in the use of precious foreign exchange reserves of Pakistan.

PSO explained that it had to face challenges while using Pakistan Railway due to its limited

infrastructure. The company said that it poses a significant challenge as tank wagon loading

facility is only available at Mehmood Kot and unloading facilities are only available at

Chakpirana, Tarujaba and Sihala. Although product movement at these locations only represents

around 12% of PSO’s total diesel primary movement, however, the infrastructural constraints

restrict the quantum of diesel movement. Furthermore, they stated that the reason PSO is not

shifting to PNSC is that PNSC does not take in-transit quality responsibility for the product and

there are multiple past issues of delays.

So in order to keep the transportation costs at the minimum as well as abide by the agreement

with the Pakistan Railways, the company transports more than 80% of petroleum via foreign

companies which are much more efficient and cost effective.

Page | 819
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2021/09/02/pso-under-hot-water/

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2318132/pm-seeks-report-on-pso-oil-transport

Page | 820
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

Method Chosen

• Subjective Analysis

Methods Used

1. Naïve Forecast (5, 10 & 15 years)

2. Horizontal Analysis

3. Excel forecast function (5, 10 & 15 years)

4. Regression with Sales

5. Subjective Analysis

Naïve 15 years

Page | 821
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1.4E+09

1.2E+09

1E+09

800000000

600000000

400000000

200000000

0
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Net Sales Naïve Forecast

Naïve 10 years

Page | 822
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1.4E+09

1.2E+09

1E+09

800000000

600000000

400000000

200000000

0
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022

Net Sales Naïve Forecast

Naïve 5 years

Page | 823
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1.4E+09

1.2E+09

1E+09

800000000

600000000

400000000

200000000

0
2016.5 2017 2017.5 2018 2018.5 2019 2019.5 2020 2020.5 2021 2021.5

Net Sales Naïve Forecast

Analysis

In all three timelines used, i.e., 5, 10 and 15 years, the value of MAPE is very high. Ideally it

should be within 10 so we will reject this method.

Horizontal Analysis

Page | 824
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
(10.00%)

(20.00%)

(30.00%)

Analysis

Historical analysis gives an idea about the trend which the CGS follows. This can be used to

compliment the growth rate found through subjective analysis, however the forecasted values

cannot be based solely on this.

Excel Forecasting 15 years

Page | 825
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 826
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1.4E+09

1.2E+09

1E+09

800000000

600000000

400000000

200000000

0
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Net Sales Forecasted Sales

Excel forecasting 10 years

Page | 827
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

1.8E+09
1.6E+09
1.4E+09
1.2E+09
1E+09
800000000
600000000
400000000
200000000
0
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026

Net Sales Forecasted Sales

Page | 828
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Excel forecasting 5 years

1.8E+09

1.6E+09

1.4E+09

1.2E+09

1E+09

800000000

600000000

400000000

200000000

0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Net Sales Forecasted Sales

Analysis

Page | 829
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Excel forecasting would have been used if the model was linear. However no trend or pattern can

be seen in the values above due to which the forecasted values through excel are also very

different in all three timelines used. So it is better to reject this method.

Regression with Sales

Page | 830
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Other Income

Breakdown:

Other Income 2021 Vertical Analysis

Income from financial assets

Interest / mark-up received on delayed payments 12,663,513 65.22%

Interest / mark-up on saving accounts 185,243 0.95%

Discounting of wharfage liability 551,543 2.84%

Dividend income from FVOCI investment 350,972 1.81%

13,751,271 70.83%

Income from non-financial assets

Handling, storage and other services 2,331,827 12.01%

Income from Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) operators 135,659 0.70%

Page | 831
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Income from non-fuel retail business 129,564 0.67%

Income from retail outlets - net 116,604 0.60%

Insurance claims - -

Scrap sales 72,630 0.37%

Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment 35,981 0.19%

Penalties and other recoveries 333,649 1.72%

Liabilities written back 470,948 2.43%

Exchange gain 1,763,791 9.08%

Others 273,548 1.41%

5,664,201 29.17%

19,415,472 100.00%

Page | 832
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

ntal Analysis: Average (20.04%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Other Income 86.95% -38.63% 125.72% -32.71% - -8.16%

12.94%

Vertical Analysis: Average (1.30%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Other Income 1.59% 0.93% 1.43% 0.71% 1.27% 1.89%

Forecasted Value

Other income is a very important account for PSO. After looking at all the economic and

industrial factors as well as the historical data, we predict that the account will increase within a

range of 20-25% in the future. This is also supported in the graph below.

Page | 833
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

25,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

5,000,000.00

0.00

2012

2025
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Other Income Forecasted Other Income

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Exchange gain on account of appreciation of Increase

PKR vs USD

Receipt of higher LPS income Increase

Late payment interest from power sector Increase

Gain on the acquisition of PRL Increase

Maturity of PIBs resulting in lower interest Decrease

income

Lower receipt of interest from IPPs due to the Decrease

upliftment

Page | 834
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

1.30% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 20.04% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Other Income
25000000

20000000

15000000

10000000

5000000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Other

Income of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

There was an increase of 86.95% in the year 2021, due to the following reasons;

• Receipt of higher LPS income

• Exchange gain on account of appreciation of PKR vs USD: The biggest factor

influencing the final cost of petrol in Pakistan is the international oil market. Starting

Page | 835
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

from early 2018, the devaluation of the rupee meant that the cost of a barrel of crude oil

started rising significantly for Pakistan, even as the price remained fairly stable in USD

terms. For instance, a barrel of crude oil priced at USD 67 in January 2018 cost PKR

7,400 while in May 2021, the same USD price cost PKR 10,205.

• Late payment interest from power sector: Recovery from the power sector: The PSO

has recovered Rs194.283 billion from the power sector along with late payment

surcharge income. The power sector was a key defaulter of the PSO that is to pay

Rs192.5 billion to the company on account of oil supply.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40131743

Year 2020:

There was a decrease of 38.63% in the year 2020, due to the following reasons;

• Significant receipt of late payment interest from power sector: Debtor’s turnover has

increased primarily due to decrease in trade debts by 10.4% on account of recoveries

from power sector.

Page | 836
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40040595/pso-receivables-touch-rs3189-billion-mark

Year 2019:

There was an increase of 125.7% in the year 2019, due to the following reasons;

• Gain on the acquisition of PRL: The Group earned consolidated other income of Rs.

16.9 billion mainly due to acquisition of PRL in this financial year. Other income

includes Gain of Rs 2.8 billion on acquisition of PRL, determined based on the fair

valuation of the subsidiary. The above results translated into a consolidated net profit

after tax of Rs. 15.1 billion and consolidated EPS of Rs. 36.55 per share for FY2019.

• Receipt of late payment interest from power sector in these periods: Trade debts of

an aggregate amount of Rs. 180,676 million due from power generation companies down

below;

5. GENCO Holding Company Limited (GENCO)

6. Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL)

7. Hub Power Company Limited (HUBCO)

8. Kot Addu Power Company Limited (KAPCO)

Page | 837
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

These include past due debts of Rs. 165,236 million against which no impairment has been

recognized.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1458797

Year 2018:

There was a decrease of 32.71% in the year 2019, due to the following reasons;

• Maturity of PIBs resulting in lower interest income: This represents investment in

Pakistan Investment Bonds (PIBs) amounting to Rs. 45,906,112 made in June 2013 in

accordance with plan duly approved by the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) -

Government of Pakistan (GoP) out of the proceeds received against partial settlement of

circular debt issue then prevailing in the energy sector.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1291463

Year 2017 & 2016:

There was a decrease of 32.71% in the year 2019, due to the following reasons;

Page | 838
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Lower receipt of interest from IPPs due to the upliftment: FO volumes declined by

4.3% due to lower upliftment by IPP’s primarily due to shifting from FO to natural gas.

Pakistan is deficient in FO, they are imported on spot tender basis to meet the shortage

however due to the oil industry strike in Kuwait, a force majeure was declared and PSO

floated tender to meet the demand of harvesting season and electricity generation.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017 & 2016)

https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=287

Page | 839
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in non-fuel retail business of OMCs Increase

Increase in income generated from retail outlets of OMCs Increase

Increase in losses occurred in oceans for crude oil Increase

High interests offered on savings accounts Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of other income all

five years of the companies are given below.

Total Other Income of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 37,135,536 39,636,108 16,922,354 10,385,641 19,415,472

HTL 96,177,950 71,376,823 81,540,776 126,125,099 80,449,481

APL 912,713 884,577 1,148,305 898,534 1,260,580

BPL 50,074 35,590 42,737 35,281 29,513

TOTAL 134,276,273 111,933,098 99,654,172 137,444,555 101,155,046

Page | 840
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Total Other Income

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 21.13%

HTL 77.96%

APL 0.87%

BPL 0.03%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Other Income

Total Market Share


90.00%

80.00% 77.96%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%
21.13%
20.00%

10.00%
0.87% 0.03%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Page | 841
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest proportion of other income

in their accounts. PSO is in the second place.

PSO’s Other Income Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 27.66% 35.41% 16.98% 7.56% 19.19%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Other Income Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


40.00%

35.00% 35.41%

30.00%
27.66%
25.00%

20.00% 19.19%
16.98%
15.00%

10.00%
7.56%
5.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 842
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: the market share of PSO in terms of other income has experienced a decreasing trend

for three subsequent years as the market share of HTL in these years increased.

Yearly Change/Growth in Other Income of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 190.16% 6.73% -57.31% -38.63% 86.95%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Other Income of PSO

PSO Yearly PPE Growth


250.00%

200.00%
190.16%

150.00%

100.00%
86.95%

50.00%

0.00% 6.73%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-38.63%
-50.00%
-57.31%

-100.00%

Page | 843
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that the other income account has experienced a decrease in their

growth till 2019. However, it is increasing since the past two years for PSO.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Other Income Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 122.28% -16.64% -10.97% 37.92% -26.40%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Other Income Overtime

Page | 844
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


140.00%

120.00% 122.28%

100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00% 37.92%

20.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-16.64% -10.97%
-20.00%
-26.40%

-40.00%

Analysis: The industry in terms of this account is mainly changing due to HTL and not PSO.

The growth for industry has also been negative till 2019. However, after 2020, PSO’s other

income increased to a great extent. HTL’s other income fell in those years. Due to this, the

overall trend experienced a fall.

Bifurcation of Other Income of all OMCs

➢ PSO – (2020-2021)

Page | 845
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ HTL – (2020-2021)

Page | 846
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ APL – (2020-2021)

Page | 847
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ BPL – (2020-2021)

Factors affecting Other Income

OMCs Focus a lot more on Non-fuel Retail Businesses

Page | 848
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO and other OMCs have realized the importance of their non-fuel retail businesses and have to

constantly update them to make sure they are of top priority to the customers. Today, PSO

symbolizes more than just fuel. Its corporate image extends to well beyond the realm of fuel, a

thoroughly deserved recognition earned since its historic turnaround over a decade ago. Non-

Fuel Retail initiatives are not just revenue generating propositions; They mobilize PSO’s

Forecourts in accordance with the market dynamics and offer strategic services to the population

based on their territorial needs, ultimately creating a "Customer Centric image" of their stations

Future Outlook

This will only increase and update in the future, leading to an increase in the other income

account as well.

Sources:

➢ https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/focus-on-non-fuel-revenue-to-have-strong-

impact-on-gasoline-station-businesses--discover-company-insights-on-bizvibe-

301325227.html

➢ https://psopk.com/en/product-and-services/non-fuel-retail

➢ https://m.economictimes.com/infrastructure-index/tanking-up-on-non-fuel-

profits/articleshow/1606068.cms

Page | 849
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.ey.com/en_sg/oil-gas/how-fuel-retail-companies-can-win-customers-of-the-

future

OMCs experience Increase in Income Generated from Retail Outlets

In year 2020, the sales from the retail outlets stopped. However, in 2021, when the pandemic was

over, the gas filling stations of all the OMCs experienced an increase in their income. The OMCs

experienced an increase in their distribution margins by 15-20%. The OMCs argued that this is

because of an increase in inflation and cost of doing business. The dealers had threatened to go

on countrywide strike with effect from November 5 in protest against the government’s dilly-

dallying on increase in their margins. On November 3, they withdrew their protest strike call

after a government team led by Minister for Energy Hammad Azhar agreed to increase their

margins on sale of petroleum products by 6pc within a few days.

Future Outlook

This will increase in the future because the new government will support the business to a great

extent and would also want to provide relief to the consumers for their agenda.

Sources:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1659140

Page | 850
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/new-fuel-retail-outlets-may-rely-

on-public-sector-omcs-to-build-networks-121072201512_1.html

Insurance Received for Losses Covered at Ocean during Import of Crude Oil

Typical discharge losses explaining 80–90% of total crude oil losses are 0.03% of volume for

fully loaded tanker crude oil and 0.05% for lightered or short loaded tankers, varying with

vapour pressure or ullage prior to discharge. For this, the OMCs are provided with insurance

claims to help mitigate the losses.

Future Outlook

This is something that is not controllable and would keep happening in the future as well,

increasing the other income from insurance claims.

Sources:

➢ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142150300003X#:~:text=Typical

%20discharge%20losses%20explaining%2080,discharge%20(API%2C%201992).

➢ https://www.britannica.com/science/oil-spill

➢ https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/77067

High Interest on Savings Account to Increase Other Income

Page | 851
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The interest rates in Pakistan have been increasing ever since. This only means that in the future

the deposits are expected to increase if the companies want to take advantage of high interest

rates. Their interest income would definitely increase with this leading to an increase in the other

income account of OMCs

Sources:

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2351831/high-interest-rate-will-destroy-economy

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2355353/economy-to-face-further-pressure

➢ https://www.fitchratings.com/research/sovereigns/pakistans-political-volatility-adds-to-

external-financing-risk-12-04-2022

➢ https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/economic-fallout-of-pakistan

Page | 852
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Late Payment Surcharge Increase

Exchange Gains (Currency devaluation) Increase

The other income for the company accounts for almost 1.6% of its total sales which signifies the

importance it has in the net profitability of the company. Historically the other income of the

company has been very unpredictable with respect to the sales of the company as it only

increased in 2019 and 2021. However, after taking into account several economic factors, the

reasons for changes have been analyzed as well as a prediction also given.

Late payment surcharge

During the year late payment surcharge was made by HUBCO and KAPCO on account of

delaying payments. This was accounted for in the payment of Rs.13.4 billion by the power sector

to PSO. The amount received against the late payment surcharge from HUBCO and KAPCO

contributed materially in easing the financial strain on the company’s cost of funds for the year.

Future Outlook

Page | 853
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Since the power sector has gradually started to pay off, we predict that in the coming year they

will increase their payments to PSO without delaying them any further which would increase the

other income for the company. This can also be supported by the past data.

Source:

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Exchange Gain (Currency Devaluation)

Currency devaluation plays a very important role in determining the buying power of any

company. A stronger currency ultimately means that the cost incurred will be lower while a weak

currency implies vice versa. In case of Pakistan, however the currency position has not been very

stable as the Pakistani Rupee has continued to devalue under the PTI government. After the PTI

government came into power, there was record devaluation in the within the past 4 years as now

the dollar is trading at $1 for Rs.185.

Due to this, PSO booked staggering amounts of exchange gains as can be seen in the financial

statements of the company. These were done on the settlement of foreign currency transactions

which was the loan taken for the retirement of letter of credit (LCs) of crude oil. The exchange

gain added a huge amount to the other income of the company

Future Outlook

Page | 854
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

In the future it is predicted that the Pakistani currency will continue to devalue by a further at

least 18%, as reported by trading economics. Owing to this, there will be exchange gains in the

future which will increase the other income for PSO ultimately having an effect on its net profit.

This forecast for an increase in the exchange rate has been demonstrated in the graph below;

Source:

Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://newztodays.com/pso-exchange-gains/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

Page | 855
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

25,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

5,000,000.00

0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Other Income Naïve Forecast

Page | 856
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2010

2014

2018

2022

2026
2007
2008
2009

2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017

2019
2020
2021

2023
2024
2025
(50.00%)

(100.00%)

Page | 857
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

25,000,000.00

20,000,000.00

15,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

5,000,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Other Income Forecasted Other Income

Page | 858
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Distribution and Marketing

Expense

Breakdown:

Vertical

Distribution and Marketing Expenses 2021 Analysis

Salaries, wages and benefits 6,571,241 55.53%

Transportation costs 552,850 4.67%

Depreciation on property, plant and equipment 1,108,405 9.37%

Amortization on right-of-use assets 411,476 3.48%

Security and other services 283,025 2.39%

Page | 859
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Rent, rates and taxes 466,735 3.94%

Repairs and maintenance 1,293,428 10.93%

Insurance 119,053 1.01%

Travelling and office transport 241,376 2.04%

Printing and stationery 23,025 0.19%

Communication 28,483 0.24%

Utilities 226,308 1.91%

Storage and technical services 52,010 0.44%

Sales promotion and advertisement 418,773 3.54%

Fees and subscription 36,568 0.31%

100.00%

Page | 860
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (6.59%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Marketing and 2.13% 13.03% 13.71% 4.57% 8.29% -2.21%

Distribution Expense

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.99%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Marketing and 0.98% 1.05% 0.88% 0.87% 1.00% 1.19%

Distribution Expense

Forecasted Value

Distribution and marketing expense is the most major expense that the company pays, with it

accounting for 1% of the total sales. Through our economic and industry analysis we found that

the expense for the company is likely to increase which can also be supported with the fact that

Page | 861
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the sales of the company are likely to increase. All the reasons for this have been explained in

detail in the analysis section. The following graph supports the prediction.

16,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
12,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00

2012

2025
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Distribution & Marketing expense Forecasted D&M expense

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Security and other services Increase

Rent, rates and taxes Increase

Repairs and maintenance Increase

Insurance Increase

Printing, stationery and advertisements Increase

Communication Increase

Utilities Increase

Storage and technical services Increase

Page | 862
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Salaries, wages and benefits Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.38% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 0.91% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Marketing and Distribution Expense


14,000,000

12,000,000

10,000,000

8,000,000

6,000,000

4,000,000

2,000,000

0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the

Marketing and Distribution Expense of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

There was an increase of 0.90% in the year 2021, due to the increase of following accounts;

Page | 863
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Salaries, wages and benefits

• Depreciation on property, plant and equipment

• Amortization on right-of-use assets

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

• Printing, stationery and advertisements

• Communication

• Utilities

• Storage and technical services

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

There was an increase of 13.03% in the year 2020, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Depreciation on property, plant and equipment

• Security and other services

• Rent, rates and taxes

• Repairs and maintenance

Page | 864
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Communication

• Utilities

• Storage and technical services

• Salaries, wages and benefits

• Amortization

• Transportation Costs

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was an increase of 13.71% in the year 2019, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Depreciation on property, plant and equipment

• Security and other services

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

• Communication

• Utilities

• Storage and technical services

Page | 865
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Travelling and office transport

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

There was an increase of 4.57% in the year 2018, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Salaries, wages and benefits

• Sales promotion and advertisement

• Depreciation

• Security and other services

• Rent, rates and taxes

• Repairs and maintenance

• Communication

• Utilities

• Legal and professional

• Insurance

• Donations

• Storage and technical services

Source:

Page | 866
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

There was an increase of 8.29% in the year 2017, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Salaries, wages and benefits

• Depreciation

• Security and other services

• Rent, rates and taxes

• Travelling and office transport

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

• Utilities

• Donations

• Storage and technical services

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

There was a decrease of 2.21% in the year 2016, due to the decrease of following accounts;

Page | 867
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Transportation costs

• Rent, rates and taxes

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

• Travelling and office transport

• Utilities

• Sales promotion and advertisement

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 868
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Decrease in transportation cost due to lower duties Decrease

Increase in transportation cost due to inflation Increase

Increase in Sales promotion of OMCs Increase

Increase in storage expenses of OMCs Increase

Increase in rent rates and taxes Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of distribution

expense of all five years of the companies is given below.

Total Distribution Expense of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 8,758,929 9,159,330 10,414,831 11,771,399 12,022,223

HTL 472,316,882 635,791,336 846,161,758 713,811,747 812,725,253

APL 652,335 830,163 1,093,848 1,174,996 1,643,692

BPL 62,752 64,224 68,780 70,600 66,446

Page | 869
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

TOTAL 481,790,898 645,845,053 857,739,217 726,828,742 826,457,614

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Distribution Expense

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 1.47%

HTL 98.37%

APL 0.15%

BPL 0.01%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Distribution Expense

Page | 870
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share


120.00%

98.37%
100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

1.47% 0.15% 0.01%


0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest level of distribution expense

as compared to other companies. PSO is at second place in this case.

PSO’s Distribution Expense Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 1.82% 1.42% 1.21% 1.62% 1.45%

Page | 871
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Graph Indicating PSO’s Distribution Expense Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


2.00%

1.80% 1.82%

1.60% 1.62%

1.42% 1.45%
1.40%

1.20% 1.21%

1.00%

0.80%

0.60%

0.40%

0.20%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: The graph given above indicates this account experienced a fall in most of the years.

The expense only increased in 2020 but it decreased in 2021.

Yearly Change/Growth in Distribution Expense of PSO

Page | 872
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 8.29% 4.57% 13.71% 13.03% 2.13%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Distribution Expense of PSO

PSO Yearly PPE Growth


16.00%

14.00% 13.71%
13.03%
12.00%

10.00%

8.00% 8.29%

6.00%

4.57%
4.00%

2.00% 2.13%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 873
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that since the past three years the distribution expense has been

falling of PSO. It also fell before 2019. In 2019 only the distribution expense can be seen to have

increased at PSO.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Distribution Expense Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth -45.37% 34.05% 32.81% -15.26% 13.71%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Distribution Expense Overtime

Page | 874
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


40.00%
34.05% 32.81%
30.00%

20.00%
13.71%
10.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-10.00%
-15.26%
-20.00%

-30.00%

-40.00%
-45.37%
-50.00%

Analysis: The industry’s share can be seen to have fallen between 2018 till 2020. It only

increase after 2017 and 2021. Mainly happened because of HTL.

Factors affecting distribution and marketing expense

Transportation cost of OMC Reduces as a result of Lower Import Duties

To facilitate the OMCs in Pakistan, the authorities have proposed abolishing customs duty on

crude oil and high-speed diesel to completely and partially get rid of the PDC. This would also

enable finance and tax authorities to revive the petroleum levy to mop up revenues as

Page | 875
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

international prices come down because the levy is a 100pc federal tax while customs duty,

despite being a federal tax, has to be shared with the provinces.

Future Outlook

Fall in duties would allow them to reduce their transportation cost. Moreover, the CPFTA also

allows the import of tax free oil from China. This will reduce distribution expense in the future.

Sources:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1682147

➢ https://download1.fbr.gov.pk/Docs/2019491441258797FifthScheduleupdated.pdf

➢ https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/oil-toil-and-turmoil-

122050901270_1.html

Increase in Transportation Cost due to High Inflation

The transportation cost has increased by 9.1% due to this reason. Given the ongoing

consultations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the upward trend of global

commodity prices, the federal government increased the price of petrol by Rs 4 per litre and

high-speed diesel (HSD) by Rs 2 per litre at the start of October. In September as well, prices of

all petroleum products witnessed an increase to accommodate the impact of higher international

market rates and currency depreciation.

Page | 876
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

The inflation will keep increasing and so will the transportation cost in the future. The account

would hence increase.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/tns/detail/898657-revisiting-pol-prices

Increase in Sales Promotion of OMCs

The OMCs in Pakistan have taken up the new trend of the EV chargers, PSO cards and their new

affiliations and customers. In the coming future, the sales promotion of OMCs would increase as

they would be joining the bandwagon of modern technology such as EV vehicles etc.

Future Outlook

There is an increase in the distribution expense as a result of advertising expense of OMCs in

Pakistan.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://www.ravimagazine.com/oil-marketing-companies-omc-of-pakistan-an-academic-

report/

Page | 877
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Increase in Storage Expenses of OMCs in Pakistan

The government of Pakistan will be providing investments and upgradation of the refineries of

the OMCs in the near future. This would help them in having a bigger storage capacity, more

availability of tankers and establishment of pipelines. The OMCs would have to make

investments for this as well and to increase their storage capacities. This would increase their

expenses then.

Future Outlook

The distribution expense would increase if more storage capacity is to be seen in the future.

Sources:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1659548

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2341681/refineries-demand-more-financing

Rising Interest Rates make Long Term Deposits an Attractive Investment

Companies usually buy long term deposits because when the cost of borrowing money increase,

saving money becomes more attractive. The interest rates in Pakistan have been increasing ever

since. This only means that in the future the long term deposits are expected to increase if the

companies want to take advantage of high interest rates.

Sources:

Page | 878
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2351831/high-interest-rate-will-destroy-economy

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2355353/economy-to-face-further-pressure

➢ https://www.fitchratings.com/research/sovereigns/pakistans-political-volatility-adds-to-

external-financing-risk-12-04-2022

➢ https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/economic-fallout-of-pakistan

Increase in Rent Rates for OMCS

As the economy is in the boost period, the rent rates have also increased with the passage of

time. These rent rates are for their vehicles, property etc. these are expected to increase in the

future as well which might lead to an increase in the expenses of OMCs.

Future Outlook

This would definitely increase the distribution expense of OMCs in Pakistan.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ Annual Report HTL

➢ Annual Report BPL

➢ Annual Report APL

Page | 879
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Inflation Increase

Freight Charges Increase

Minimum Wage Increase

White Oil Pipeline Decrease

Distribution and marketing expense of PSO is the major expense that the company faces,

accounting for 1% of the total sales of the company. No other expense of the company is higher

than this. If we look at the historical data for this account, the cost has been increasing for the

past 5 years even when the sales of the company fell in 2020 due to Covid-19. This implies that

this is a fixed cost for the company and a cost which the company has to bear no matter what. All

the economic factors which might affect this account have been analyzed below.

International oil prices and Inflation

Since 2014 the international oil prices have seen the most significant volatility. The oil market

has taken on new features that affect the development of the global economy. According to EIA,

US shale oil production increased from 4.96 million barrels per day in 2017 to 5.59 million

Page | 880
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

barrels per day in 2022. In addition, there are geopolitical events, trade frictions, and OPEC’s

agreement have occurred in recent years, causing the volatility of oil price.

In a developing country like Pakistan, which has such high dependence on imported oil, an

increase in oil prices leads to inflationary pressure which in turn increases budget deficit making

imports more expensive. The government has refrained from passing on the complete price

increase to the consumers because it fears it will exacerbate inflation and stifle economic activity

which presents a significant challenge to the government’s plans of ending its tenure with a

strong growth phase.

This inflationary pressure and variances in the price of oil internationally has led to the company

experiencing high distribution and marketing costs.

Future Outlook

Looking forward the international oil prices are forecasted to increase mainly on account of the

war between Russia and Ukraine, as can also be seen in the graph below which in turn means

that the inflation in the country will increase as well. Keeping in mind that the demand for

petroleum products is predicted to increase in the future, this in turn would also increase the sales

as has been predicted which would ultimately lead to an increase in the distribution and

marketing expense for the company as well since there will be high inflation. The prediction for

Page | 881
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the increase in the international oil prices have been depicted in the graph below.

Source:

➢ Director’s report, 2021

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/petroleum-prices-

in-pakistan-likely-to-increase-by-rs-10-per-litre/articleshow/89843799.cms

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/02/26/oil-prices-expected-to-increase-from-

march-1/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1677101

➢ https://www.geo.tv/latest/398774-petrol-price-expected-to-rise-in-pakistan-sources

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

➢ https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-021-00166-4

Page | 882
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Freight Charges

As has been discussed before, there has been an abnormal growth in the number of imports in the

country after he restrictions for Covid-19 have been lifted and the economy has started to

recover. This abnormal increase in the imports of the country can be accounted to the increasing

demand of petroleum products as well as growing energy needs. The result of this has an

increase in the transportation cost of containerized cargo by up to 700%. Moreover, this surge in

international freight charges for sea, rail and air routes has offset the positive impact of

incentives provided by the government for some imports during the pandemic which has also led

to imported inflation in the country.

Future Outlook

Moving forward the freight charges are not expected to decrease as the shipping companies have

taken this as an opportunity to keep the prices high and increase their profit margins. So, in the

future we predict that the freight charges for the company will increase which would ultimately

increasing the distribution and marketing costs for the company. This is also in line with the

prediction of increase in the sales of the company as higher sales also imply an increase in the

cost for distribution.

Source:

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2289594/freight-rates-jump-up-to-700

Page | 883
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://time.com/6073233/shipping-costs-surge-price-hike-goods/

➢ https://www.gtreview.com/news/global/freight-costs-keep-surging-despite-shipping-

giants-freezing-prices/

Minimum wage

At the start of 2022, the minimum wage in Punjab and Islamabad increased by 14.4% to almost

20,000. Moreover, the trade unions urged the new PM Shahbaz Shariff to further increase the

minimum wage due to the conditions in the economy upon which on 1st April, the P increased

this wage to a further 25,000 for government employees. This implies higher costs for the

company as now they will have to pay more wages

Future Outlook

Looking forward we predict that the minimum wage will further increase in the country as the

condition of the economy is not very good. On top of this the new PM needs to make a mark and

get people on his side which can only be done by providing reliefs to the people during desperate

times, one such measure being increasing the minimum wage.

Source:

➢ https://www.geo.tv/latest/410842-shahbaz-announces-in-camera-briefing-on-threat-

letter-to-parliament-committee

Page | 884
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2342614/minimum-wage-increases-144-survey

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/949534-labour-leaders-hail-new-pm-s-announcement-

of-raise-in-minimum-

wage#:~:text=Trade%20unions%20and%20labour%20organisations,of%20workers%20

at%20Rs25%2C000.

White Oil Pipeline (Partnership with PARCO & PEPCO)

PSO has entered into a strategic partnership with PARCO and PEPCO which aims to safeguard

the country's petroleum product supply chain and enable economical and environment friendly

transportation of fuel. Under the partnership PSO will uses the White Oil Pipeline, which is a

mega infrastructure expanding all the way from Port Qasim to Mahmood Kot for the

transportation of crude oil as well as diesel to the central regions of Pakistan which account for

almost 60% of the total Petroleum consumption in the country.

Future Outlook

This strategic partnership helps PSO to significantly reduce its distribution costs as the

transportation will be much cheaper and efficient. Furthermore, it is also expected that the cost

will continue to decline as more infrastructure is added which is what we also predict that the

company will add more PPE in its portfolio.

Source:

Page | 885
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.parco.com.pk/our-business/transportation/pipeline-network/

➢ https://psopk.com/en/media-center/press-releases/news-details?newsId=437

Statistical Forecasting

14,000,000.00

12,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

8,000,000.00

6,000,000.00

4,000,000.00

2,000,000.00

0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Distribution & Marketing expense Naïve Forecast

Page | 886
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%

(10.00%)
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

Page | 887
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 888
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

16,000,000.00

14,000,000.00

12,000,000.00

10,000,000.00

8,000,000.00

6,000,000.00

4,000,000.00

2,000,000.00

0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Distribution & Marketing expense Forecasted D&M expense

Page | 889
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Administrative Expense

Breakdown:

Vertical

Administrative Expense 2021 Analysis

Salaries, wages and benefits 2,300,952 61.93%

Depreciation on property, plant and equipment 256,046 6.89%

Amortization on right-of-use assets 30,307 0.82%

Amortization 35,930 0.97%

Security and other services 44,037 1.19%

Rent, rates and taxes 13,697 0.37%

Repairs and maintenance 306,494 8.25%

Insurance 165,746 4.46%

Travelling and office transport 46,454 1.25%

Printing, stationery and advertisements 17,397 0.47%

Page | 890
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Communication 65,311 1.76%

Utilities 72,373 1.95%

Storage and technical services 99,722 2.68%

Legal and professional 65,966 1.78%

Auditors' remuneration 18,685 0.50%

Contribution towards expenses of Board of Management 46,757 1.26%

Donations 107,348 2.89%

Fees and subscription 22,144 0.60%

3,715,366 100.00%

Page | 891
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (7.92%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Administrative Expense 0.90% 26.97% 4.71% 11.73% 2.31% 0.91%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.30%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Administrative Expense 0.30% 0.33% 0.24% 0.26% 0.28% 0.36%

Forecasted Values

According to the analysis done and the historical data, the administrative expense is likely to

increase in the future in accordance with the sales of the company. This is also supported with

the graph below.

Page | 892
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

5,000,000.00
4,500,000.00
4,000,000.00
3,500,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,500,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,500,000.00
1,000,000.00
500,000.00
0.00

2012

2025
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Admin expense Forecasted Admin expense

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Security and other services Increase

Rent, rates and taxes Increase

Repairs and maintenance Increase

Insurance Increase

Printing, stationery and advertisements Increase

Communication Increase

Utilities Increase

Storage and technical services Increase

Salaries, wages and benefits Increase

Page | 893
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.30% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 7.9% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Administrative, Marketing and Distribution


Expense
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the

Administrative, Marketing and Distribution Expense of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

There was an increase of 0.90% in the year 2021, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Depreciation on property, plant and equipment

Page | 894
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Amortization on right-of-use assets

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

• Printing, stationery and advertisements

• Communication

• Utilities

• Storage and technical services

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

There was an increase of 16.97% in the year 2020, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Depreciation on property, plant and equipment

• Security and other services

• Rent, rates and taxes

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

Page | 895
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Printing, stationery and advertisements

• Communication

• Utilities

• Storage and technical services

• Salaries, wages and benefits

• Amortization

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

There was an increase of 4.71% in the year 2019, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Depreciation on property, plant and equipment

• Amortization

• Security and other services

• Rent, rates and taxes

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

Page | 896
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Communication

• Utilities

• Donations

• Storage and technical services

• Travelling and office transport

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

There was an increase of 11.3% in the year 2018, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Depreciation on property, plant and equipment

• Salaries, wages and benefits

• Security and other services

• Rent, rates and taxes

• Repairs and maintenance

• Communication

• Utilities

Page | 897
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Legal and professional

• Donations

• Storage and technical services

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

There was an increase of 2.31% in the year 2017, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Salaries, wages and benefits

• Security and other services

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

• Utilities

• Donations

• Storage and technical services

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Page | 898
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2016:

There was an increase of 0.91% in the year 2016, due to the increase of following accounts;

• Salaries, wages and benefits

• Depreciation on property, plant and equipment

• Security and other services

• Repairs and maintenance

• Insurance

• Communication

• Utilities

• Donations

• Storage and technical services

• Travelling and office transport

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 899
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of administrative

expenses of all five years of the companies is given below.

Total Administrative Expense of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 2,478,797 2,769,667 2,900,105 3,682,218 3,715,366

HTL 360,692,907 444,926,193 497,432,186 381,797,129 469,239,729

APL 1,340,629 1,584,357 2,416,759 1,871,050 2,413,696

BPL 92,114 108,437 106,575 124,744 111,555

TOTAL 364,604,447 449,388,654 502,855,625 387,475,141 475,480,346

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Administrative Expense

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 0.71%

HTL 98.82%

APL 0.44%

Page | 900
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

BPL 0.02%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Administrative Expense

Total Market Share


120.00%

98.82%
100.00%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

0.71% 0.44% 0.02%


0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest level of administrative

expense as compared to other companies. PSO is at second place in this case.

PSO’s Administrative Expense Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Page | 901
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 0.68% 0.62% 0.58% 0.95% 0.78%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Administrative Expense Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


1.00%
0.95%
0.90%

0.80% 0.78%
0.70%
0.68%
0.60% 0.62%
0.58%
0.50%

0.40%

0.30%

0.20%

0.10%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: The graphs shows that PSO’s market share has fallen in all years except for 2020.

Page | 902
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Yearly Change/Growth in Administrative Expense of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 2.31% 11.73% 4.71% 26.97% 0.90%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Administrative Expense of PSO

PSO Yearly Administrative Expense Growth


30.00%

26.97%
25.00%

20.00%

15.00%

11.73%
10.00%

5.00% 4.71%
2.31%
0.90%
0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 903
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: It can be analyzed that since the administrative expense of PSO does not have a fixed

pattern. It was the highest in 2020 but is now the lowest in 2021. The growth was positive but it

was only increasing at a decreasing rate.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Administrative Expense Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth 23.93% 23.25% 11.90% -22.95% 22.71%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Administrative Expense Overtime

Page | 904
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly Growth


30.00%

23.93% 23.25% 22.71%


20.00%

11.90%
10.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-10.00%

-20.00%
-22.95%

-30.00%

Analysis: The industry’s share can be seen to have a falling trend. This trend had an increase in

2021 because the administrative expense of all the OMCs increased.

Factors Effects

Increase in Depreciation of Fixed Assets of OMCs Increase

High maintenance and upgradation cost of refineries Increase

Increase in rent rates and taxes Increase

Page | 905
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Depreciation of PPE increases for OMCs

All the OMCs have experienced depreciation of their PPE over the period of time. This is a

major contributor in their administrative expense account. This is also expected to increase in the

future as it has increased in all subsequent years.

Future Outlook

The administrative expense due to depreciation of PPE is unstoppable and will increase the

account in the future.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ Annual Report HTL

➢ Annual Report BPL

➢ Annual Report APL

Increase in Maintenance Cost of Refineries in Pakistan

The OMCs in Pakistan especially PSO has to invest a lot for this because the refineries need

constant upgrading. Currently, they have asked the refineries to make upgradation plans and this

would lead to an increase in this account. The government will contribute 26 percent of funds to

finance the up-gradation projects of existing refineries in Pakistan in the new proposed Policy

Page | 906
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

2021. Sources told Newztodays.com that Petroleum Division had moved a revised summary to

the cabinet committee on energy (CCoE) for approval. Earlier, the petroleum division had tabled

a summary before CCoE for approval. However, Asad Umar had raised questions over the

upfront tariff of 10 % for existing refineries.The CCoE had also raised questions over the

mechanism investment on up-gradation projects out of incremental revenue. Sources said that in

the revised draft, the petroleum division had informed CCoE that refineries will investment 74 %

whereas government share out of incremental revenue would be 26 % for the up-gradation

projects of refineries.

Future Outlook

There will be an increase in this account due to provisions for maintenance of refineries in the

future.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://newztodays.com/oil-refineries-pakistan/

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/425238-refineries-deserve-better-treatment-adequate-

protection

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/937581-refineries-expansion-plans-hit-snags-on-

policy-delay

Page | 907
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1642009

Increase in Rent Rates for OMCS

As the economy is in the boost period, the rent rates have also increased with the passage of

time. These rent rates are for their vehicles, property etc. these are expected to increase in the

future as well which might lead to an increase in the expenses of OMCs.

Future Outlook

This would definitely increase the distribution expense of OMCs in Pakistan.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ Annual Report HTL

➢ Annual Report BPL

➢ Annual Report APL

Page | 908
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

40.00%

35.00%

30.00%

25.00%

20.00%

15.00%

10.00%

5.00%

0.00%

2020

2024
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019

2021
2022
2023

2025
2026
(5.00%)

Page | 909
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

5,000,000.00
4,500,000.00
4,000,000.00
3,500,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,500,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,500,000.00
1,000,000.00
500,000.00
0.00
2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Admin expense Forecasted Admin expense

Page | 910
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Other Expense

Breakdown:

Vertical

Other Expenses 2021 Analysis

Research cost on refinery upgradation 32,638 0.81%

Penalties 10,500 0.26%

Workers' Profit Participation Fund 2,405,539 59.34%

Workers' Welfare Fund 889,958 21.96%

Exchange loss on foreign currency transactions - net - -

Provision against stock-in-trade - net - -

Provision against stores, spares, chemical and loose tools 10,895 0.27%

including capital spares 252,464 6.23%

Other provisions 443,000 10.93%

CNG receivable adjustment 4,849 0.12%

Fixed assets written-off 3,678 0.09%

Page | 911
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Others 4,053,521 100.00%

Page | 912
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (238%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Other Expenses 1474.35% -94.12% 31.30% 40.19% 19.75% -43.46%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.27%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Other Expenses 0.33% 0.02% 0.37% 0.32% 0.27% 0.29%

Forecasted Value

The other expenses for the company are likely to increase within a range of 30-40% at a

decreasing rate. This prediction has been made keeping in mind all the economic and industrial

factors for the account.

Page | 913
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in Research cost on refinery Increase

upgradation

Increase in Penalties Increase

Increase in Workers' Profit Participation Fund Increase

Increase in Workers' Welfare Fund Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.27% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 238% due to the sudden increase or

decrease.

Page | 914
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Other Expenses
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease in the Other

Expenses of PSO year by year from 2016 to 2020.

Year 2021:

An increase of 1474.1%, due to an increase in the following reasons;

Research cost on refinery upgradation

• Penalties

• Workers' Profit Participation Fund

• Workers' Welfare Fund

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Page | 915
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Year 2020:

A decrease of 94.12, due to a decrease in the following reasons;

• Workers' Profit Participation Fund

• Workers' Welfare Fund

• Provision for impairment against other receivables - net

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2016-2019:

An increase was recorded from the year 2016 till 2019, due to an increase in the following

reasons;

• Research cost on refinery upgradation

• Penalties

• Workers' Profit Participation Fund

• Workers' Welfare Fund

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016,2017,2018,2019)

Page | 916
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of Other expenses

of all five years of the companies is given below.

Total Other Expense of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 2,378,315 3,334,100 4,377,571 257,473 4,053,521

HTL 37,981,691 108,050,088 192,356,087 20,179,969 41,274,592

APL 112,107 126,094 79,689 32,637 94,365

BPL 9,076 11,717 12,756 12,843 9,076

TOTAL 40,481,189 111,521,999 196,826,103 20,482,922 45,431,554

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Other Expense

Total Market

Companies Share

PSO 3.47%

Page | 917
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

HTL 96.41%

APL 0.11%

BPL 0.01%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Other Expense

Total Market Share


120.00%

100.00% 96.41%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

3.47%
0.11% 0.01%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest level of other expense as

compared to other companies. PSO is at second place in this case.

Page | 918
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO’s Other Expense Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 5.88% 2.99% 2.22% 1.26% 8.92%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Other Expense Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


10.00%

9.00% 8.92%

8.00%

7.00%

6.00% 5.88%
5.00%

4.00%

3.00% 2.99%

2.00% 2.22%

1.26%
1.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 919
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graphs shows that PSO’s market share of other expenses has fallen for four years

but it increased in 2021.

Yearly Change/Growth in Other Expense of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth 19.75% 40.19% 31.30% -94.12% 1474.35%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Other Expense of PSO

Page | 920
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly other expenses Growth


1600.00%

1474.35%
1400.00%

1200.00%

1000.00%

800.00%

600.00%

400.00%

200.00%

19.75% 40.19% 31.30%


0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-94.12%
-200.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed other expenses of PSO have grown in all the years except for 2020.

But this continue to grow in 2021 again.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Other Expense Overtime

Page | 921
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Industry's Yearly

Growth -11.09% 175.49% 76.49% -89.59% 121.80%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Other Expense Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


200.00%
175.49%
150.00%

121.80%
100.00%
76.49%
50.00%

0.00%
-11.09%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-50.00%

-89.59%
-100.00%

-150.00%

Analysis: The industry’s share can be seen to have a falling tend for three years in its growth.

This is mainly because of HTL. This will be increasing in 2021 however.

Page | 922
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Bifurcation of Other Expenses of OMCs

➢ PSO – (2020-2021)

➢ HTL – (2020-2021)

Page | 923
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ APL – (2020-2021)

➢ BPL – (2020-2021)

Page | 924
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Factors Effects

Increase in R&D cost of refinery upgradation Increase

Penalties faced by OMCs after quality assurance Increase

Increase in exchange loss of foreign currency Increase

Increase in Receivable Adjustment for CNG by OMCs Increase

Upgradation of Refineries to Require Ample Research

All the OMCs are working on the development of the refineries. This is being done to make the

DHDS more available in the refineries. Government of Pakistan (GOP) planned to introduce

Euro II complaint fuels in the country. In pursuance of the plans, GOP directed to all refineries in

Page | 925
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

the country to develop facilities to meet the above objective. To meet GOP’s requirement

regarding Euro II compliant High Speed Diesel, PARCO was the first refinery to take initiative

and commissioned a Diesel Hydro Desulphurization (DHDS) plant at their Mid-Country

Refinery in 2010, at a cost of US$132 million. By producing HSD with low-sulphur content, this

plant greatly contributes towards a greener environment. The DHDS plant is equipped with a

maximum capacity of 26,000 barrels per day, and reduces sulphur contents in High Speed Diesel

(HSD) from 7,000 parts per million to 500 parts per million which is an EURO II requirement.

This is yet another important initiative of PARCO which complies with the Government of

Pakistan’s directive to reduce sulphur contents in petroleum products. With the timely

completion of the DHDS project, PARCO has accomplished yet another milestone to greatly

augment the energy system of the country. With more projects currently in the pipeline, PARCO

is determined to continue its mission and maintain its pivotal role in the country’s Energy Sector.

Future Outlook

This research expense would only increase if OMCs want to stay in business hence increasing

the account in the future as well.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ https://www.parco.com.pk/our-business/refining/dhds-plant/

Page | 926
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ http://environmentclearance.nic.in/DownloadPfdFile.aspx?FileName=e2j2MtsWJaAylJ1

0SMsWhFRhISUY2siTPnb82Fkt9G3lHIgfJQFKZc1kENHWbRGH&FilePath=93ZZBm8

LWEXfg+HAlQix2fE2t8z/pgnoBhDlYdZCxzXmG8GlihX6H9UP1HygCn3pc6cozY6ep7R3

LypBLCViIFVlc4CqzCG0mJyK0ayAJaE=

➢ https://www.pacra.com/summary_report/RR_809_9130_09-Jun-21.pdf

Penalties Faced Due to Low Quality and Artificial Shortage of POL Products by OMCs

The Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) has imposed a fine of Rs5 million each on three oil

marketing companies (OMCs) after they were found involved in creating artificial shortage of

petrol in the country by hoarding the commodity in first 10 days of the current month. Hoarding

and artificial shortage was witnessed soon after the government’s decision to pass on the impact

of plunging international oil prices to consumers by lowering ex-refinery prices amid protests

from the OMCs.

“Ogra imposed a penalty of Rs5 million each on Byco, Askar and BE Energy on show-cause

notices issued during oil shortage crisis earlier this month,” Ogra spokesman Imran Ghaznavi

tweeted. A preliminary investigation report of the Petroleum Division and physical inspection by

Ogra, in collaboration with the Hydrocarbon Development Institute of Pakistan (HDIP),

indicated that the three OMCs were involved in hoarding petrol from June 1 to June 10.

Page | 927
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

The margin of penalties will always be a part of other expenses from time to time will increase

the account as well.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2252578/ogra-imposes-fine-on-omcs

➢ https://ogra.org.pk/oil-9

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2020/06/11/ogra-imposes-rs40mn-penalty-on-six-

omcs/

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/671239-govt-fines-omcs-rs40mln-for-fuel-crisis

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/10491-ogra-finds-10-omcs-responsible-for-petrol-

crisis

Exchange Loss on Foreign Currency Increases as Imports of OMCs Increase

“The current deemed duty of 7.5 percent on high-speed diesel may discontinue and instead

refinery margins may be introduced on the basis of 50 percent OMCs (oil marketing companies)

margin on MS (motor spirit or petrol) and HSD being worked out on CPI (consumer price index)

on annual basis,” the document said. The government may also include ‘ocean losses’ in import

Page | 928
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

parity formula in case of motor spirit and diesel and also add weighted average of actual tender

premium, freight and incidentals of Pakistan State Oil’s cargoes from the last importing period.

To fully recover all the actual cost incurred on the import of crude oil and petroleum products by

importing refineries and OMCs, including all duties and import incidental expenses, the relevant

foreign exchange currency rate on import parity price shall be applicable, the document said.

Any gain/ loss including losses due to delay in SBP approval to OMCs/ refineries because of in-

month movement of the foreign exchange rate shall be adjusted in the following period’s price.

An official of the petroleum ministry conceded proposals were under consideration, but the

government is also asking the refineries to upgrade their plants.

Future Outlook

The currency is constantly depreciating and this would lead to exchange losses no matter what.

So, this account is expected to increase.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/578159-oil-refineries-may-hold-foreign-currency-

accounts

Page | 929
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ http://www.nrlpak.com/pdf/FinancialReport/2008-09/third_quarter_march_31_2009.pdf

➢ https://www.accaglobal.com/hk/en/student/exam-support-resources/fundamentals-exams-

study-resources/f9/technical-articles/forex.html

Page | 930
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Worker Welfare Fund Act Increase

Supply cut to CNG stations Increase

Workers Welfare Fund Act

According to the amendments made in the act during 2020, all companies are required to

maintain 5% of its profit for disbursement among eligible workers. Due to this act the WPPF

increased by a significant amount in 2021 as the company made record profits.

Future Outlook

The company is expected to make huge profits in the future as the sales for the company are

predicted to increase along with better cost absorption by the company owing to higher demand

and steps taken to ensure better fixed cost absorption. This would ultimately increase the WWF

of the company as 5% is to be set aside of the profit, thus increasing the other expense for the

company.

Source:

Page | 931
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://pwwf.punjab.gov.pk/finance#:~:text=Key%20Initiatives,-

Top&text=As%20per%20Companies%20Profits%20(Workers,disbursement%20amongst

%20the%20eligible%20workers.

Supply Cut to CNG stations

During the year 2021, the supply to CNG stations was cut by SNGPL as to ensure that the

pressure of gas to domestic consumers is not disrupted. In a report to tribune, the CNG station

owners said that if the situation continues like this, it will not be long before their sector gets

wiped out. The economic situation in the country only makes the situation worse.

Future Outlook

In the future it is expected that the supply to CNG stations will remain cut which ultimately

implies that they will remain closed, making this the longest supply cut to CNG stations. So PSO

is likely to recognize the receivables from CNG stations as bad debt, thus increasing its other

expenses.

Source:

➢ https://www.arabnews.pk/node/1978991/pakistan

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1668197

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2325196/businessmen-lament-closure-of-cng-stations

Page | 932
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Finance Cost

Breakdown:

Finance Cost 2021 Vertical Analysis

Interest / mark-up on short-term borrowings in:

- local currency 1,221,718 11.93%

- foreign currency 504,291 4.92%

1,726,009 16.85%

Mark-up on bank accounts under Islamic mode 531,814 5.19%

Late payment surcharge and other bank charges 7,192,384 70.22%

7,724,198 75.41%

9,450,207 92.27%

Finance cost on wharfage liability 114,581 1.12%

Finance cost on lease liabilities 677,562 6.62%

10,242,350 100.00%

Page | 933
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (7.58%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Finance Cost -24.94% 54.62% 68.07% 0.00% -17.15% -35.10%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.91%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Finance Cost 0.94% 1.37% 0.84% 0.56% 0.67% 1.05%

Forecasted Values

Finance cost is a very important account for PSO as it takes into consideration the interest rates.

After analyzing all the economic and industrial factors, we predict that the finance cost for the

company will increase which is mainly on account of the interest rates by the SBP. We predict

that the increase will be between 20-30% for the next 5 years.

Page | 934
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Recoveries from the power sector Decrease

Reduced Policy Rates Decrease

Increase sales in white oil Decrease

Increase in the interest rates Increase

Reliance on cheaper FE-25 borrowings Decrease

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average

of 0.91% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 7.58% due to the sudden increase and

decrease in some years.

Page | 935
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Finance Cost
18,000,000
16,000,000
14,000,000
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Factors that highly influence the Finance Cost of a company may include the increase or

decrease of the market opportunities, capital provider preference, risk, and inflation etc. Further

we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the Finance Cost of

PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Year 2021:

Upon analyzing the data, we found out that there was a 24.9% decrease in the Finance

Cost of PSO from Year 2020-2021. Reasons will be discussed below;

• Lower average borrowing levels due to recoveries from the power sector: The

company’s management working with GOP on recoveries and PKR 25.8 billion were

recovered from the Power Sector along with late payment surcharge income in the

preceding year while reducing finance cost by Rs 3.2 billion (24%).

Page | 936
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Reduced Policy Rates: The company also reported a net profit of PKR 0.83 bn. in LNG

segment. vs. loss of PKR 2.43 bn. in FY 20 mainly due to decrease in finance cost on

account of reduced policy rate maintained by SBP this year to provide stimulus to the

economy in times of COVID.

• Increased white oil sales: White Oil volumetric growth of 16.6% resulting in highest

ever White Oil sales. PSO achieved its highest ever volume of 7.6 million tons in the

white oil segment despite the shrinking jet fuel and kerosene oil industry, with a market

share of 45.2% in FY21 vs 44% in FY20 i.e., a growth of 120 basis points (bps).

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40129579

Year 2020:

Upon analyzing the data, we found out that there was a 54.6% increase in the Finance

Cost of PSO from Year 2019-2020. Reasons will be discussed below;

• Higher policy rates of State Bank of Punjab: Increase in Finance cost by Rs. 4.4 bn

(54%) due to availability of financing at exorbitant rates during the year on account of

higher policy rate of 13.25% that prevailed most of the year

Page | 937
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Higher average borrowing levels primarily on account of delayed payments from

SNGPL: Trade debts of an aggregate amount of Rs. 169,990 million due from Sui

Northern Gas Pipelines Limited (SNGPL).

Sources:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1539008

Year 2019:

Upon analyzing the data, we found out that there was a 68% increased to a Rs3.1

billion owing to higher reliance on short-term borrowings of PSO from Year 2018-2019.

Reasons will be discussed below;

• Increase in the interest rates: Finance Cost increased significantly as the State Bank of

Pakistan took bold decisions on money market front and almost doubled the interest rate

from 6.5% to 12.25%.

• Average borrowing Levels: The growth in finance cost was surprising as it increased

despite the fact that PSO received overdue payments from the power sector and the LNG

sector.

Sources:

Page | 938
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report (2021)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/539897

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2090283/pso-profit-drops-17-rs3-5b

Year 2018-17:

Upon analyzing the data, we found out that there was no change in both the years.

The team’s efforts resulted in a decline in finance cost though robust negotiations with the banks

and maintenance of an appropriate mix of local and foreign currency borrowings/efficient

treasury management. Although the Finance cost remained the same, in the first half of 2017 the

Finance cost increased 2.5 times to Rs1.82 billion compared to Rs756.07 million in 2016.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018-17)

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/364031/pso-a-sturdy-performance-in-fy17

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/1836855/psos-profit-drops-17-due-high-finance-cost

Year 2016:

Upon analyzing the data, we found out that there was a 35.10% decrease to Rs7.14 billion

from Rs11.01 billion in the previous year in the Finance Cost of PSO from Year 2015-2016.

Reasons will be discussed below;

Page | 939
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• Reduction in borrowing rates due to declining KIBOR: the KIBOR rate is the Karachi

Inter Bank Offered Rate, which is equal to the average interest rate at which term

deposits are exchanged between prime banks in the Pakistani interbank market.

• Reliance on cheaper FE-25 borrowings: Includes favourable exchange difference of

Rs. 2,536,634 (2015: Rs. 2,506,217) arising on foreign currency borrowings (FE-25),

obtained under the directives of Ministry of Finance - GoP. These exchange differences

are to be settled in accordance with the instructions to be obtained by the Company from

MoF-GoP.

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

➢ https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_KIBOR_bid_and_offer_rate

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/1163109/corporate-results-psos-profit-soars-48-rs10-27b

Page | 940
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

Factors Effects

Increase in late payment surcharge from Power Sector Increase

Direct Relation with Short Term Borrowing Increase

Increase in markup rates of banks Increase

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of Finance Cost of

all five years of the companies is given below.

Total Finance Cost of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 5,923,256 5,923,256 9,955,428 15,393,332 11,553,734

HTL 77,089,573 127,280,022 313,959,399 186,325,810 81,147,580

APL 324,461 564,333 848,992 1,597,199 1,418,918

BPL 35,167 29,976 4,892 44,559 26,989

TOTAL 83,372,457 133,797,587 324,768,711 203,360,900 94,147,221

Page | 941
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Finance Cost

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 5.81%

HTL 93.61%

APL 0.57%

BPL 0.02%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Finance Cost

Total Market Share


100.00% 93.61%
90.00%

80.00%

70.00%

60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00% 5.81%
0.57% 0.02%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Page | 942
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest level of finance cost as

compared to other companies. PSO is at second place in this case.

PSO’s Finance Cost Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 7.10% 4.43% 3.07% 7.57% 12.27%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Finance Cost Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Page | 943
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Industry's Yearly Share


14.00%

12.00% 12.27%

10.00%

8.00%
7.57%
7.10%
6.00%

4.43%
4.00%
3.07%
2.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Analysis: The graphs shows that PSO’s market share of other expenses has fallen for three years

but has been increasing since 2019.

Yearly Change/Growth in Finance Cost of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly Growth -17.15% 0.00% 68.07% 54.62% -24.94%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Finance Cost of PSO

Page | 944
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly Finance Cost Growth


80.00%

68.07%
60.00%
54.62%

40.00%

20.00%

0.00% 0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

-17.15%
-20.00%
-24.94%

-40.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed finance cost of PSO has increased in all the years. The growth was

slow in 2020 however. In 2021, the finance cost did not grow and fell.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Finance Cost Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 945
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly

Growth 228.99% 60.48% 142.73% -37.38% -53.70%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Finance Cost Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


250.00%
228.99%

200.00%

150.00%
142.73%

100.00%

60.48%
50.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-37.38%
-50.00% -53.70%

-100.00%

Analysis: The industry’s share of finance cost was such that it increased till 2019. It dropped

considerably in 2020 and 2021.

Page | 946
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Increase in Receivables of Late Payment Surcharge from Power Sector and SNGPL

The second biggest defaulter is the power sector, which needs to pay PSO an amount of

Rs166.992 billion. Among the defaulters' list, Pakistan flag carrier, PIA also owes PSO Rs22

billion. According to the financial sheet of PSO showing its receivables and payables position as

of February 06, 2022, the payables of PSO have also increased to Rs142.5 billion. The

worsening receivables and payables position of PSO clearly narrates the fact that PSO has landed

in danger zone as its liquidity crisis has increased manifold. The SNGPL has emerged on the

scene as the biggest defaulter in the wake of non-recovery of the cost of LNG that it imports

through the first LNG terminal. In other words, PSO has also become the victim of circular debt

because of the LNG. PSO is already facing the circular debt of Rs166.992 billion in the power

sector. The daily payables and receivables position also shows that SNGPL, power sector

(CPPA, HUBCO, and KAPCO) and PIA will also have to pay a huge amount of Rs99.049 billion

in the head of late payment surcharge, which is included in the total amount of Rs443.790

billion. The details show that PSO has faced a loss of Rs6 billion just because of the exchange

rate loss on LNG imports for SNGPL. Coming to the power sector, the Central Power Purchase

Agency (CPPA) is required to pay PSO Rs140.577 billion, HUBCO Rs21.290 bn and KAPCO

Rs5.125 billion. In addition, PSO is also required to be paid Rs9.774 billion in the form of price

Page | 947
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

differential claims from the government of Pakistan. The state-owned oil marketing company,

according to the data, is also required to be paid Rs5.180 billion on account of exchange rate

differential on FE 25 loan. Moreover, PSO also needs to be paid Rs106.064 billion against the

payments on letter of credits of POL imports from Kuwait Petroleum Company and on standby

letter of credits for LNG imports. However, the amount of payables by PSO towards five local

refineries stands at Rs18.415 billion. PSO is required to pay Rs11.057 billion to PARCO, Rs620

million to PRL, Rs2.093 billion to NRL, Rs3.811 billion to ARL and Rs834 million to ENAR.

Future Outlook

The circular debt will increase and so will the receivables of the OMCs this will lead to increase

in their finance cost as well.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/932026-pso-receivables-rise-to-rs443-79-bn

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/909334-top-omc-in-economic-mess-pso-s-receivables-

surge-to-rs398-billion

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2349028/psos-receivables-reach-record-high

Page | 948
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Finance Cost to Increase with Increase in Short Term Borrowing of OMCs

Finance cost is expected to increase as it has a direct relationship with the Short term borrowings

account. As in the future short term borrowings are expected increase as well, it is safe to assume

that the finance cost would be expected to increase with it as well.

Future Outlook

Finance cost to increase as borrowing is necessary to invest in working capital requirements of

the OMCs.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://www.pacra.com/sector_research/OMCsPACRAResearchNov21.pdf

➢ http://www.finance.gov.pk/pr_apr_jun_2020.html

Increase in Interest Rates by SBP

Even though the long term borrowings have reduced but the short term borrowings of the OMCs

have been increasing. This is what will have an impact on because the interest rates by SBP are

increasing. This would make the borrowing more expensive. The State Bank of Pakistan (SB)

has hiked the markup rate for financing under Export Finance Scheme (EFS) to 5.5%. In a

circular to all banks, the SBP has decided to increase the markup rate for financing under the

Page | 949
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

EFS by 2.5% in line with the increase in the policy rate announced in the MPC meeting earlier

today where the policy rate was hiked by 250 bps. This brings up the mark rate for EFS part I

and II to 5.5% per anum with effect from April 8, 2022. The SBP says “till further instructions”

which may be seen as an implication for a further hike in the future. Despite the increased

markup rate for EFS, the banks’ spread for corporate borrowers and SMEs remains unchanged at

1% and 2% respectively.

Future Outlook

The interest rates are expected to increase in the forthcoming future as well due to which the

finance cost is expected to increase for the OMCs.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/04/07/markup-rate-for-efs-up-by-2-5-to-5-

5/#:~:text=In%20a%20circular%20to%20all,was%20hiked%20by%20250%20bps.

➢ https://www.sbp.org.pk/smefd/circulars/2022/C6.html

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/04/07/markup-rate-for-efs-up-by-2-5-to-5-5/

Page | 950
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Interest Rates Increase

Currency Devaluation Increase

Finance cost for the company plays one of the most significant costs that the company has been

facing during recent times as it stands to be the second highest cost the company is paying only

after distribution and marketing expense. If we compare the historical data for finance cost of the

last 5 years, the trend for the account was increasing up until 2021 when the finance cost for the

company decreased by a staggering 25%. All the economic reasons for such a change as well as

the factors which will affect the finance cost for the company in the future have been analyzed

below.

Lower Interest Rate

Owing to desperate times during Covid-19, and taking cognizance of the negative fallout from the

Covid-19 pandemic for the economy, the state bank of Pakistan took some steps in order to safeguard

businesses and households. Among them was the reduction in the policy rates by 625 basis points to 7%

from a huge amount of 13%.

Page | 951
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Providing more details about the scheme, the central bank stated that it was introduced to provide a

stimulus to the economy in times of Covid-19. Owing to these lower markups, PSO was able to reduce its

finance cost Rs.3.2 billion or 25%, which was also positively reflected in its net income

Future Outlook

Looking forward the economy has started to recover from the impact of Covid-19 with the

economic growth to be projected at 4-5% during 2022. Owing to this the state bank has increased

the interest rate after holding it at 7% for almost 15 months. The state bank also stated that as the

economy has started to recover, a greater emphasis is needed on ensuring the appropriate policy mix to

protect the longevity of growth, keep inflation expectations anchored, and slow the growth in the current

account deficit. This indicates that in the future the interest rate can be expected to further increase which

would ultimately also increase the finance cost for PSO. This forecast has been highlighted in the graph

below;

Page | 952
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Sources

➢ Annual Report, 2021

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/interest-rate

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2321092/interest-rate-increased-to-725-after-a-15-month-

gap

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2253969/sbp-reduces-mark-up-on-two-schemes

Currency Devaluation

Currency devaluation plays a very important role in determining the buying power of any

company. A stronger currency ultimately means that the cost incurred will be lower while a weak

currency implies vice versa. In case of Pakistan, however the currency position has not been very

stable as the Pakistani Rupee has continued to devalue under the PTI government.
Page | 953
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

During 2018, the currency was trading at between $1 for Rs.122. However, after the PTI

government came into power, there was record devaluation in the within the past 4 years as now

the dollar is trading at $1 for Rs.185. This ultimately meant that the costs for the company will

increase as what was cheaper before is now expensive, ultimately increasing the finance cost as

well.

Future Outlook

In the future it is predicted that the Pakistani currency will continue to devalue by a further at

least 18%, as reported by trading economics. This ultimately implies that the costs for the

company would increase. Moreover, we also predict that the long-term borrowings for the

company are expected to increase which implies that the interest on them will also increase due

to the rupee being of less value thus increasing the finance costs for the company. The forecast

for currency devaluation against dollar is illustrated in the graph below.

Page | 954
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

➢ https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/under-imran-khan-govt-pakistani-rupee-depreciated-

by-30-5-per-cent-report-2640765

➢ https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/187-to-a-us-dollar-political-crisis-in-pakistan-led-

to-the-free-fall-of-its-currency-469545

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/914762-pak-currency-in-freefall-rs54-lost-against-

dollar-in-current-govt-s-tenure

Page | 955
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Statistical Forecasting

18,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
12,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021

Finance cost Naïve Forecast

Page | 956
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

400.00%

350.00%

300.00%

250.00%

200.00%

150.00%

100.00%

50.00%

0.00%
2010

2014

2018

2022

2026
2007
2008
2009

2011
2012
2013

2015
2016
2017

2019
2020
2021

2023
2024
2025
(50.00%)

(100.00%)

Page | 957
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 958
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

18,000,000.00
16,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
12,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00

2017
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Finance cost Forecasted finance cost

Page | 959
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Taxation

Breakdown:

Taxation 2021 Vertical Analysis

Current

for the year 10,676,540 71.58%

for prior years - (net) 511,043 3.43%

11,187,583 75.00%

Deferred 3,728,924 25.00%

14,916,507 100.00%

Page | 960
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Horizontal Analysis: Average (135.16%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Taxation 819.70% -75.56% -41.27% 5.20% 84.86% 18.02%

Vertical Analysis: Average (0.88%)

2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Taxation 1.26% 0.15% 0.58% 1.11% 1.27% 0.89%

Forecasted Value

The tax rate applied is the average of the last 5 years and the forecasted value is calculated

accordingly.

Page | 961
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Company Analysis

Factors Effects

Decrease in Deferred Taxes Increase

Increase in the Current Tax Increase

When we take a look at the vertical analysis of PSO from years 2016 to 2021, an average of

0.88% was found. On the other hand, when we take a look at the Horizontal Analysis of PSO

from years 2016 to 2021, the calculated average we get is 135.16% due to the sudden increase

and decrease in some years.

Taxation
18,000,000
16,000,000
14,000,000
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Further we’ll be dissecting the factors and the causes of the increase and decrease of the taxation

of PSO year by year from 2021 to 2016.

Page | 962
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Provision for current taxation is based on the taxable income for the year determined in

accordance with the prevailing law for taxation on income. The charge for current tax is

calculated using prevailing tax rates. The charge for current tax also includes adjustments for

prior years or otherwise considered necessary for such years. Current tax is charged to profit or

loss except to the extent it relates to items recognized in statement of other comprehensive

income. The Holding Company and Subsidiary Company are taxed as separate entities. The

current and deferred income taxes have been estimated on income of each of the companies

according to the applicable law. Accordingly, no adjustment arising solely with respect to the

losses unutilized by the subsidiary company.

Source:

• Annual Report (2021)

Year 2021:

Tax charge for the year June 30, 2021 included minimum tax at the rate of 0.75% on the

turnover, in accordance with section 113 of the Income Tax Ordinance. An overall increase in

the taxation was seen in 2021 of 819.7%.

Page | 963
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• The value remains negative fluctuating between -10 million to -1 million rupees after

2017. Hence, the drastic increase in the taxation was seen in 2021.

• Decrease in Deferred: 44.1%

• Increase in the Current Tax: 61.93%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2021)

Year 2020:

Includes minimum tax at the rate of 0.75% on the turnover, in accordance with Section 113 of

the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. An overall decrease in the taxation was seen in 2020 of 75.5%.

• The value remains negative fluctuating between -10 million to -1 million rupees after

2017. Hence, the drastic decrease in the taxation was seen in 2020.

• Increase in Deferred: 421.54%

• Decrease in the Current Tax: 5.41%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2020)

Year 2019:

An overall decrease in the taxation was seen in 2019 of 41.2%.

Page | 964
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

• The value remains negative fluctuating between -10 million to -1 million rupees after

2017. Hence, the decrease in the taxation was seen in 2019.

• Increase in Deferred: 252.17%

• Decrease in the Current Tax: 31.60%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2019)

Year 2018:

An overall increase in the taxation was seen in 2018 of 5.20%, although 2017 had higher

deferred taxation.

• The value remains negative fluctuating between -10 million to -1 million rupees after

2017. Hence, the decrease in the taxation was seen in 2018.

• Decrease in Deferred: 26.6%

• Decrease in the Current Tax: 2.07%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2018)

Year 2017:

Page | 965
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Taxation has been positive in the year 2017 due to high subsidiaries from the government. The

Company recognized deferred taxation of Rs. 11.9 billion as at June 30, 2017 on the assumption

that sufficient taxable profits will exist in future periods to utilize this deferred tax asset. Further,

significant judgments have been applied in determining the provision for income taxes. An

overall increase was seen in 2017 of 84.8%.

• Decrease in Deferred: 81.3%

• Increase in the Current Tax: 35.07%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2017)

Year 2016:

An overall increase in the taxation was seen in 2016 of 18.02%.

• Decrease in Deferred: 18.10%

• Increase in the Current Tax: 4.40%

Source:

➢ Annual Report (2016)

Page | 966
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry Analysis

In case of this particular account, the four companies which have been taken into consideration

in order to avail the latest data ate HTL, APL, BPL and PSO. The total value of Taxation of all

five years of the companies is given below.

Total Taxation of all Companies in 5 Years

Companies 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO 11,121,242 11,699,223 6,870,536 1,679,384 15,445,368

HTL 334,677,749 391,017,141 259,447,192 10,979,935 142,532,964

APL 2,400,000 2,632,963 1,762,251 494,792 2,019,426

BPL 21,628 34,035 39,150 164,253 70,460

TOTAL 348,220,619 405,383,362 268,119,129 13,318,364 160,068,218

Total Market Share of all Companies in 5 Years w.r.t Taxation

Companies Total Market Share

PSO 3.92%

HTL 95.28%

APL 0.78%

Page | 967
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

BPL 0.03%

TOTAL 100.00%

Graph of Market Share of all Companies w.r.t Taxation

Total Market Share


120.00%

100.00% 95.28%

80.00%

60.00%

40.00%

20.00%

3.92%
0.78% 0.03%
0.00%
PSO HTL APL BPL

Analysis: The graph given above indicates that HTL has the highest level of Taxation as

compared to other companies. PSO is at second place in this case.

PSO’s Taxation Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

Page | 968
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Industry's Yearly

Share 3.19% 2.89% 2.56% 12.61% 9.65%

Graph Indicating PSO’s Taxation Share in the Industry w.r.t Years

PSO Industry's Yearly Share

14.00%

12.61%
12.00%

10.00%
9.65%

8.00%

6.00%

4.00%
3.19% 2.89%
2.56%
2.00%

0.00%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 969
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The graph shows that the taxation share of PSO fell till 2019. It only increased in 2020

and fell again in 2021.

Yearly Change/Growth in Taxation of PSO

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

PSO Yearly

Growth 84.86% 5.20% -41.27% -75.56% 819.70%

Graph Indicating Change/Growth in Taxation of PSO

Page | 970
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

PSO Yearly Taxation Growth


900.00%

800.00% 819.70%

700.00%

600.00%

500.00%

400.00%

300.00%

200.00%

100.00% 84.86%

0.00% 5.20%
-41.27%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-100.00% -75.56%

-200.00%

Analysis: It can be analyzed taxation of PSO faced a declining growth. The taxation only

reduced in 2019. In all other years, the taxation of PSO has grown.

Growth/Change in the Industry’s Taxation Overtime

Years 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Page | 971
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Industry's Yearly

Growth -2.40% 16.42% -33.86% -95.03% 1101.86%

Graph Indicating Growth/Change in the Industry’s Taxation Overtime

Industry's Yearly Growth


1200.00%

1101.86%

1000.00%

800.00%

600.00%

400.00%

200.00%

0.00% -2.40% 16.42%


-33.86%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
-95.03%

-200.00%

Page | 972
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Analysis: The industry’s share of taxation was such that it fell in 2019 and in 2020. In all other

years taxation on the industry has increased.

Factors Effects

Increase in Sindh Maintenance and Development “Cess” Increase

Increase in Excise Duties of Crude Oil Increase

Increase in turnover tax to hinder profits Increase

OMCs pay a lot more than corporate tax rates Increase

Increase in Sindh Maintenance and Development Cess

The OMCs wanted to be more developed in the Sindh province of Pakistan due to which they

were working on the development of stations in that area and imported POL products for that.

However, with that came the tax on the maintenance and development called the cess. OMCs

have a target of becoming more accessible. This would keep generating development cess.

Through the said notice, a demand of Rs.6,438,869 thousand was raised on account of Sindh

maintenance & development infrastructure cess (SMDIC) in respect of POL products

consignments imported by PSO.

Future Outlook

Page | 973
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

The cess is something the government is not ready to provide relief with so it will increase the

taxes in the future as well.

Sources:

➢ Annual Report PSO

➢ http://www.pas.gov.pk/index.php/acts/details/en/31/364

➢ https://excise.gos.pk/taxes/Infrastructure-Cess

➢ http://www.pas.gov.pk/uploads/acts/Sindh%20Act%20No.XVIII%20of%202017.pdf

Excise Duty increases by 73% due to Crude Oil being Expensive

The companies' finances suggest a five times jump in excise duty on petroleum products in the

last seven years. If prices of petrol and diesel are burning a hole in your pocket, then blame it on

the steep hike in excise duty on transport fuels last year. The country’s top four oil-refining and -

marketing companies paid 73 per cent higher excise duty in FY21 than they did the previous

fiscal year.

Future Outlook

Price of crude oil is not expected to fall in the future so the excise duty will increase in the future

as well.

Source:

Page | 974
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/omcs-pay-73-higher-excise-duty-

even-as-crude-oil-prices-decline-121053100008_1.html

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

Increase in Turnover Taxes Lowers the Profits made by OMCs

Turnover over tax is applied on the cumulative per liter price of petrol and HSD, which

comprises taxes like petroleum levy and sales tax, besides distribution costs. Only fixed margin

is the turnover/revenue of the OMCs. For the purpose of minimum tax u/s 113 of the Ordinance,

only fixed margin needs to be considered, he said. The fixed margin for OMCs on petrol and

HSD in Rs2.97 against retail prices of Rs108.56 for petrol and Rs110.76 for HSD. The rate of

0.75 percent of turnover is excessive as the OMCs are bound to sell the goods on fixed margin

which constitutes less than 3 percent of the turnover and where margin is less than 3 percent of

the turnover (meaning gross profit lesser than 3 percent of turnover) imposition of minimum tax

at the rate of 0.75 percent of the turnover is harsh and exorbitant. The objective of minimum tax

is to require the companies which suffered loss or made low profit during a tax year to contribute

reasonable amount in relation to their respective turnover towards the government exchequer

during that year – something they would be entitled to adjust against normal tax liability of

subsequent years.

Page | 975
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

The turnover taxes reduced by 0.25% for OMCs but the government is expected to increase the

turnover tax again in the future. This would increase the taxation account.

Source:

➢ Director’s Report PSO

➢ https://dailytimes.com.pk/761696/turnover-tax-hurting-viability-of-omcs-ipi-report/

➢ https://dailytimes.com.pk/761376/ipi-proposes-review-of-turnover-tax-on-oil-marketing-

companies/

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/577783/turnover-tax-on-omcs-reverted-to-0-5pc

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/979217/omcs-turnover-tax-issue-remains-unresolved

OMCs pay significantly more than the normal Corporate Tax Rates

Oil marketing companies (OMCs) are paying significantly higher than the 29 percent corporate

tax rate in the country because of anomalies in turnover taxation, an independent think-tank said

on Tuesday. In a report, Islamabad Policy Institute (IPI) said the turnover tax is effectively

negating the provisions of Section 57 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and is putting a

significant additional financial burden on the long-term viability of the regulated petroleum

sector. Although the profit margin of petroleum dealers, petroleum agents and distributors is

higher than that of OMCs, the petroleum dealers operating petrol pumps are exempt from this tax

Page | 976
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

and petroleum agents are enjoying low rate of 0.25 percent, IPI said in a report. This is

discriminatory, arbitrary and absurd as in similar sector the persons with high profit margin pay

no/lesser percentage of tax on turnover while the OMCs having fewer profit margins suffer

higher rates. Citing examples of other sectors like dealers, sub-dealers, retailers and wholesalers

of fast-moving consumer goods, sugar, cement and edible oil that have been allowed discounted

rate of 0.25 percent under Clause (24D) of Part II of the second schedule to the Income Tax

Ordinance, 2001, the IPI said petrol and HSD also fell in the definition of fast-moving consumer

goods and needed to be treated at par with regards to rate of turnover tax.

Future Outlook

OMCs are facing a hard luck with respect to their taxation and the government takes little

measures to facilitate them as they want to provide relief to the customers. So, the taxation

account is expected to increase in the future as well.

Sources:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/839984-omcs-pay-significantly-higher-than-

corporate-tax-rates

➢ https://psopk.com/files/corporate_briefing_session/Corporate%20briefing%20session281

019.pdf

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1671124

Page | 977
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Taxation

Economic Analysis

Factor Effect

Inflation Increase

Track and Trace System Increase

Higher Profitability Increase

Currency Devaluation Increase

Effective Tax Rate Increase

Taxation is one of the most important accounts any company can maintain and is one of the

accounts which any company flaunts very proudly i.e. they are a tax paying country. In Pakistan

OMCs is one of the highest tax paying industries and it accounts for a large proportion of the

government revenue. PSO being the largest OMC in the country thus pays a huge amount of tax

to the government. The amount of tax which the company pays ultimately depends on a number

of economic factors which have been analyzed below.

Source:

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/839984-omcs-pay-significantly-higher-than-

corporate-tax-rates

Page | 978
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Inflation

Since 2014 the international oil prices have seen the most significant volatility. The oil market

has taken on new features that affect the development of the global economy. According to EIA,

US shale oil production increased from 4.96 million barrels per day in 2017 to 5.59 million

barrels per day in 2022. In addition, there are geopolitical events, trade frictions, and OPEC’s

agreement have occurred in recent years, causing the volatility of oil price.

In a developing country like Pakistan, which has such high dependence on imported oil, an

increase in oil prices leads to inflationary pressure which in turn increases budget deficit making

imports more expensive. The government has refrained from passing on the complete price

increase to the consumers because it fears it will exacerbate inflation and stifle economic activity

which presents a significant challenge to the government’s plans of ending its tenure with a

strong growth phase.

This inflationary pressure and variances in the price of oil internationally has led to an increase

in the sales of the company in numeric terms which has ultimately increased the profit and thus

taxation.

Future Outlook

Page | 979
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Looking forward the international oil prices are forecasted to increase mainly on account of the

war between Russia and Ukraine, as can also be seen in the graph below which in turn means

that the inflation in the country will increase as well. Keeping in mind that the demand for

petroleum products is predicted to increase in the future, this in turn would also increase the sales

as has been predicted which would ultimately lead to higher profits and thus a higher tax being

paid.

Source:

➢ Director’s report, 2021

➢ https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/petroleum-prices-

in-pakistan-likely-to-increase-by-rs-10-per-litre/articleshow/89843799.cms

➢ https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2022/02/26/oil-prices-expected-to-increase-from-

march-1/

Page | 980
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1677101

➢ https://www.geo.tv/latest/398774-petrol-price-expected-to-rise-in-pakistan-sources

➢ https://macropakistani.com/petrol-pricing/

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil

➢ https://energyinformatics.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s42162-021-00166-4

Track and trace system

In order to prevent leakage of revenue, under-reporting of production and sales, and to ensure

proper payment of FED (Federal Excise Duty) and Sales Tax on the manufacture and sale of

specified goods/ products, the FBR (Federal board of Revenue) has decided to implement a

Track and Trace System for specified goods/ products which include Petroleum, Cement, Sugar,

Fertilizer and Beverages imported into or manufactured in Pakistan.

Federal Board of Revenue has successfully completed the Evaluation Process for the grant of

five-year license for an IT-based solution for electronic monitoring (Track and Trace System) of

specified goods i.e. Tobacco, Cement, Sugar, Petroleum and Fertilizer.

This has resulted in an effective and efficient collection of taxes from different businesses,

ultimately increasing the tax revenue of the government.

Future Outlook

Page | 981
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Moving forward the system is expected to play a very important part in the tax collection for the

government as it will ensure effective and efficient tax collection thus increasing the amount of

tax for PSO.

Source:

➢ https://www.fbr.gov.pk/introduction-track-and-trace/152962/152963

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2328522/track-and-trace-system-a-game-changer

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1610932

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/911235-fbr-s-track-trace-system-launched-ex-rulers-

must-be-punished-for-taking-rs30tr-loans-pm

➢ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40170693

Higher Profitability

During the fiscal year 2021, PSO recorded all time highest sales and an all-time highest profit

after tax. The main reasons for this could be attributed to better cost absorption as well as the

increase in prices and demand of petroleum products.

An increase in the profits for the company ultimately implies that the taxation that it will be

paying on its profits will also be high which the case is for PSO. It could clearly be seen that the

record high profits for the company resulted in the increase in taxation paid by a significant

amount, despite the tax rate being the same at 29%.

Page | 982
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Future Outlook

Looking forward the sales of the company are expected to increase and thus the profitability of

the company is also expected to increase as we predict better cost absorption by the company.

Thus assuming this, it is safe to say that the tax paid by the company will also increase.

Source:

➢ https://www.dawn.com/news/1683025/tax-revenues

➢ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2354945/fbr-collects-rs486tr-in-taxes

➢ Annual Report, 2021

Currency Devaluation

Currency devaluation plays a very important role in determining the buying power of any

company. A stronger currency ultimately means that the cost incurred will be lower while a weak

currency implies vice versa. In case of Pakistan, however the currency position has not been very

stable as the Pakistani Rupee has continued to devalue under the PTI government.

During 2018, the currency was trading at between $1 for Rs.122. However after the PTI

government came into power, there was record devaluation in the within the past 4 years as now

the dollar is trading at $1 for Rs.185. This ultimately meant that the cost of buying will increase

thus increasing the price of the petroleum products. Sales of the company also increased

Page | 983
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

numerically which increased the profit in numeric terms as well, as was reported in the annual

report of 2021.

Future Outlook

In the future it is predicted that the Pakistani currency will continue to devalue by a further at

least 18%, as reported by trading economics. This ultimately implies that the cost of buying the

stock would increase, which would in turn increase the selling price of the petroleum products,

thus increasing the sales and profits. Higher profits would ultimately mean higher taxation. The

forecast for currency devaluation against dollar is illustrated in the graph below.

Source:

➢ https://tradingeconomics.com/pakistan/currency

Page | 984
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

➢ https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/under-imran-khan-govt-pakistani-rupee-depreciated-

by-30-5-per-cent-report-2640765

➢ https://www.wionews.com/south-asia/187-to-a-us-dollar-political-crisis-in-pakistan-led-

to-the-free-fall-of-its-currency-469545

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/914762-pak-currency-in-freefall-rs54-lost-against-

dollar-in-current-govt-s-tenure

Effective tax rate for the company

The applicable tax rate for the company has not changed since last year and stands at stands at

29%. However as has been reported by the news, OMCs pay a higher tax rate than the corporate

29% in the country because of anomalies in turnover taxation. This is also reflected in the annual

report of the company where the effective tax rate for the company has increased to 33% in 2021

from 26% in 2020. Even if we look at the historical data, the effective tax rate has been much

higher where it was 39% in 2019 while it was 43% in 2018.

These high percentages of effective tax rate can mainly be attributed to adjustments relating to

prior years as well as the advances which the company has been and have not been adjusted.

Future Outlook

Page | 985
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Moving forward it is safe to assume that the effective tax rate will remain significantly higher as

compared to the normal tax rate, a statement which can also be supported by the historical data.

So the tax paid by the company will also increase in the future.

Sources:

➢ Annual report, 2021

➢ Annual Report 2019

➢ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/839984-omcs-pay-significantly-higher-than-

corporate-tax-rates

Page | 986
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

________________________

Page | 987
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

SECTION XI:

APPLICATION OF

VALUATION MODELS

Page | 988
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Accounting Valuation Model

Page | 989
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 990
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Introduction

This model is designed to determine whether or not our stock is undervalued. We can come to

this conclusion by comparing the stock's intrinsic worth to its market value. One of the three

outcomes is possible.

1. Stock is undervalued because intrinsic value is greater than market value. (Intrinsic Value

> Market Value)

2. Stock is fairly priced, intrinsic value equals market value (Intrinsic Value = Market

Value)

3. Market value vs. intrinsic value, stock is overvalued (Intrinsic Value < Market Value)

This is the most appealing stock to investors, and it should be purchased. This implies that the

stock should be traded at a greater price than it now is. This scenario benefits investors, who are

more willing to invest because the stock price is expect ed to rise in the future

This type of stock isn't very appealing to investors because they won't make a lot of money, but

they won't lose anything either. Investors in desperate need of cash would sell this stock since

there would be no risk of losing money.

This is the least appealing stock to investors, and it should be sold. This implies that the stock

should be traded at a lower price than it already is. This scenario is risky for investors because

the stock price will drop in the future, causing them to lose money.

Page | 991
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Working

We used the values of expected net income for the computation of intrinsic value per share. from

the income statement predicted for the next five years. For each year, the initial owner's equity is

taken as the previous year's closing owner's equity. Kc was estimated using the CAPM approach,

and ROE was derived by dividing anticipated NI by forecasted owner's equity for each year.

Then, for all future years, (ROE-Kc) was calculated. ANIs were calculated using the formula

BOE* using the above data (ROE-Kc). The terminal value was estimated using the sustainable

growth rate. This terminal value was then included in the year 2025's final ANI. The NPV was

then estimated using the BA2 Plus calculator. The PE ratio was multiplied by the EPS Ratio to

arrive at the market value. The number of shares included in the model is the average of all

anticipated years' number of shares.

Conclusion

The results show that stock is overvalued. Intrinsic value came out to be PKR 54.38 whereas,

market price is PKR 76.5. This will not attract many investors towards PSO stocks in the next

five years.

Page | 992
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Free Cash Flow Model

Page | 993
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 994
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Introduction

Free cash flow (FCF) is a financial performance indicator computed by subtracting operating

cash flow from capital expenditure. Free cash flow (FCF) is the amount of money a firm can

generate after deducting the costs of maintaining or expanding its asset base. Free cash flow is

critical because it allows a business to pursue possibilities that will increase shareholder value.

There are three inferences that can be drawn.

1. Stock is underappreciated (Intrinsic Value < Market Value)

2. The stock market is overpriced (Intrinsic Value > Market Value).

3. The stock market is overpriced (Market Value = Intrinsic Value)

This first case implies that the stock should be traded at a greater price than it now is. This

scenario benefits investors, and they are more likely to invest because the stock price is expected

to rise in the future.

This first second that the stock should be traded at a lower price than it is now. This scenario is

unfavorable for investors, who are more likely to invest because the stock price will fall in the

future.

This third case that the stock should be traded at the same price as it currently is. This is the same

scenario for investors, who are likely to invest or not invest based on whether the stock price will

rise or fall in the future.

Page | 995
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Working

Free cash flow is determined by subtracting the increase in operating capital from NOPAT,

which is the operating cash flow for the years 2021-2025. The outcome of tax adjusted EBIT is

NOPAT. FCF was negative throughout the years. The terminal value is then computed by

increasing FCF Because the corporation is discounting future free cash flows to determine their

present value today, this WACC is used. After that, FCF was discounted at WACC every year,

and in 2025, FCF was added to the terminal value and then discounted. We next estimated the

stock's net present value using a financial calculator. The fair price per share was calculated by

dividing the net present value by the number of shares.

Conclusion

As the fair price is well below the current market price, we can say that the stock is overvalued,

and investors shouldn’t invest in it

Page | 996
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

P/E Model

Page | 997
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 998
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Introduction

The PE valuation model was employed, with the EPS and DPS calculated first. Kc was

determined using the CAPM method, and then Kc and ROE were combined to determine the

franchise factor value. The difference between 1/Kc and 1/ROE is known as the franchise factor.

A ratio of return to owner's equity was used to determine the ROE. The formula was used to

compute the growth rates 'g'; ROE (1-d). As a result, these growth rates were used to derive the

growth factor. Furthermore, multiplying the growth factor by the franchise factor yielded the

franchise PE value, which was then added to tangible PE to yield the intrinsic leading PE. The

division of Po with EPS1 (MVo/NI1) was the actual leading PE

Conclusion

When the intrinsic and actual leading PEs were compared, the actual PE was higher than the

intrinsic PE, indicating that the stock is overvalued.

Page | 999
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

__________________________________________________________

________________________

Page | 1000
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

SECTION XI: REMARKS

FROM LAST SUBMISSION

Page | 1001
PAKISTAN STATE OIL

Page | 1002

You might also like