DESKMAG

2O21-22
COWORKING
SPACE TRENDS
FINAL RESULTS OF THE COWORKING TRENDS SURVEY, 4TH QUARTER OF 2021
(NOVEMBER 23 - DECEMBER 22, 2021)
A GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY PRESENTATION
 K M A G A G
D E S S K M S K M
G D E D E
A BIG TH🙏NKS to our supporters! M A A G A G
E S K S K M K M
D D E D E S
AG A G G
S K M K M M A
D E D E S E S K
A G G G D
K M M A M A
D E S E S K S K
G D D E
M A A G A G
E S K S K M K M
D D E D E S
AG A G G
S K M K M M A
D E D E S E S K
A G A G G D
S K M K M M A
D E D E S E S K
A G D A G G
KM A G S K M MA
E S S K M D E E S K
D E A G D
K M A G A G
D E S S KM S K M
G D E D E
M A A G A G
E S K S K M K M
D D E D E S
A G A G G
S K M K M M A
D E D E S E S K
A G G G D
K M M A M A
D E S E S K S K
G D D E
M A A G A G
E S K S K M K M
D D E D E S
A G A G G
S K M K M M A
D E D E S E S K
G
The supporters promoted the survey
Aa supporter
A G
in their D
newsletters.
G
K M
Would you like to become
S K M in futureAsurveys?
M
Drop a line to survey @ deskmag.com and let's arrange a call.
D E E S S K
 Current business situation of MAG
Over the past 3 months it got ... E S K
coworking spaces* is ... D G
MA
E S K
n.a. 4%
G D
MAbetter
9% 20%
E S K 71%
bad G D
MA
S K
17% good DE
0 25 50 75 100

AG
39% SK M
DE
AG
S K M
satisfactory D E
AG Over the next 3 months
40% ESKM it's expected to get ...
D
AG
S K M
D E
AG
KM better
D ES Global 11% 25% 64%
AG
KM November - December 2021** 0 25 50 75 100

n.a.
excluding seasonal variations worse
unchanged 2O21-22
better
*Respondents could describe their main business approach by themselves. The absolute majority decided for "coworking spaces", followed by a much smaller share of "hybrid
or mixed workspaces." **Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021. SPACE TRENDS
 Current business situation of MAG
Over the past 3 months it got ... E S K
coworking spaces* is ... D G
MA
E S K
D
n.a. 4%
November 2020*** 17%
AG
S K M better
bad 49% 12% 14%
DE 64%
AG
33%
S K M
21% good DE
0 25 50 75 100

AG
40% SK M
DE
AG
S K M Over the next 3 months
satisfactory AG D E
M it's expected to get ...
35% DES K
AG
S K M
D E
AG better
KM
ES Europe 46%
19% 35%
G D
A
KM November - December 2021**
0 25 50 75 100

n.a.
excluding seasonal variations worse
unchanged 2O21-22
better
*Respondents could describe their main business approach by themselves. The absolute majority decided for "coworking spaces", followed by a much smaller share of "hybrid or
mixed workspaces." **Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from Nov 23 - Dec 22, 2021.***Based on the Coworking Survey Europe, November 12-24, 2020. SPACE TRENDS
 Current business situation of MAG
Over the past 3 months it got ... E S K
coworking spaces* is ... D G
MA
E S K
n.a. 6%
G D
2%
MA
14% E S K better 84%
bad G D
MA
S K
13% good DE
0 25 50 75 100

AG
44% SK M
DE
AG
satisfactory S K M Over the next 3 months
D E
AG it's expected to get ...
38% KM
D ES
AG
S K M
D E
AG better
KM 2%
83%
ES
15%
G D North America
A
KM November - December 2021**
0 25 50 75 100

n.a.
excluding seasonal variations worse
unchanged 2O21-22
better
*Respondents could describe their main business approach by themselves. The absolute majority decided for "coworking spaces" , followed by a much smaller share of "hybrid
or mixed workspaces." **Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021. SPACE TRENDS
 Major limiting factors to
businesses of coworking spaces AG
S K M
DE
80

AG
72% Global
S K M
D E
Europe
63% AG
S K M North America
DE
G
60

54%
MA
52%
S K
DE
44% AG
SK M
38% DE
G
40

MA
ES K 32%
G D 27% 30%
26% 26%
MA 24% 25% 26%
ES K 24%
D
AG
20

S K M
D E
AG
KM
D ES
AG
KM Fear of Attracting Lack of planning Not able to Uncertain business
new members or certainty provide enough prospects
Coronavirus customers workspace
2O21-22
Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021.

SPACE TRENDS
 businesses of coworking spaces
Global
Europe
North America

30

23% 21% 23%

22,5

21% 21%
16% 17%
15

14% 13% 13%

10% 10% 9% 9%
7,5

6%
2% 1% 2%

Insuf cient Financial Not able to nd Competition Legal None of them

market demand constraints enough regulations
(quali ed) staff (bureaucracy)

2O21-22
Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021.

SPACE TRENDS
fi
fi
fi
 Other additional limiting factors to coworking spaces
cited by respondents AG
S K M
D E
• Lack of funding opportunities A G
• Not having the coworking space in a building with a glass facade KM
• Product mix (too much open space, not enough privateESoffices)
• Furlough has changed habits and *our nei hbourhood* is hard hit • Achieving target rate D
G/ corporations
• Government is clueless on pandemic. Biden poor ... • Insufficient planning / hesitancy on larger M A
• Ability to expand/add new amenities • Events as revenue stream uncertainDdue K teams
ES to pandemic
• Lack of office space available as higher demand than before • The lockdown finished too closeA G to Christmas
• Shaping a new theme of coworking spaces where we mix S K
• Lack of marketing knowledge M
professionals with students • Low pricing D E
• Getting meeting room bookings, finding suitable space to open AG to own office
• Order toMreturn
new locations
E S
• HeatingK tariff increase by 4 times
• Lack of clients • D
G• It appears my community is unaware of how my space can serve them. I feel
Location
• Covid restrictions still in effect in Ontario MA
E S K
• Pricing
G D like I must increase their awareness before I ...*ch r cters were limited*
• Finding new networks to share news
M A • Economic crisis
• We don't have enough private office/phone S K • Critical financial situation of coworkers
DEphone meetings.
booth space. So many
people need private space for Zoom and • Current market rates for rental affecting my ability to expand
• Covid fears A G •
S K M Location
• Corona
D E • Infrastructure limitations
• Decreased demand G in event space & meeting rooms
Aaccepted as home office by employee
• Lack of private office space for 1-2 people
• Coworking
S M
K said private offices
not • Corona
D E
• I would have • Our private offices and meeting spaces are doing well. Our coworking
A•GLast minute cancelations memberships are pretty flat- probably due to COVID.
KM • Marketing • Covid19
• Regulation surrounding coronavirus • Government support and incentives
• Competitors lowering prices • Building a rural new market
• Lack of marketing plan • Corona pandemic
2O21-22
Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021.

SPACE TRENDS
g
a
a
 AG
S K M
DE
AG
S K M
D E
AG
S K M
DE
AG
S K M
DE
AG
M

ST P
E SK
G D
MA
ES K
G D
MA
ES K
D
AG
S K M
D E
AG
KM
D ES
AG
KM

* The results are based on the question: "Are there currently any regulations against the Coronavirus in your (region/country)?". "Region" was a response option for 2O21-22
coworking spaces that operate in only one region. National and international chains of coworking spaces had been asked for legal measures in the "country" they had been
responding from. Most workspace businesses responded from the regional perspective, see last pages. Measures can vary a lot within a country and among regions.

SPACE TRENDS
 Covid restrictions 60%
Physical distancing
affecting
coworking spaces
where regulations against the
Coronavirus took place.
Health status check at entrance 48%
(e.g. vaccination/recovery/test certificate)

Prohibition of larger events 44%

ST P
0% 1.500 % 3.000 % 4.500 % 6.000 %

Compulsory face masks at desks 29%

Compulsory home office rule 18%

Parts of the location(s) are out of use 7%

Lockdown for almost everyone 7%

Location(s) completely closed 2% Global

None of the listed measures above 7% November - December 2021*
0% 1.500 % 3.000 % 4.500 % 6.000 %

2O21-22
*Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021 and from participants that said 'yes' to question: "Are there currently any regulations against
the Coronavirus in your region/country?" The results are based on the question: "What of the following Coronavirus measures are currently affecting your *self-selected
workspace term* location(s in general)?". Most participants responded on behalf of one coworking space location. Results are rounded and only considered if at least one of
the options above was selected. Multiple responses were allowed except for 'None of the listed measures above". Measures can vary a lot within a country and among regions. SPACE TRENDS
 Covid restrictions 65%
Physical distancing AG
affecting 53% S K M
DE
coworking spaces AG
49% S K M
where regulations against the Health status check at entrance D E
Coronavirus took place.
A G
M
(e.g. vaccination/recovery/test certificate) 46%
E S K
G D
Prohibition of MA 54%
D E SK
larger events A G
31%
M

ST P
E SK
D
0% 1.500 % 3.000 % 4.500 % 6.000 %

Compulsory face masks at desks 20%

AG44%
S K M
D E 30%
Compulsory home office rule A G
S KM
4%
D E 9%
A G
Parts of the location(s) are out of use 7%
S K M
D E 9%
A G
Lockdown for almost everyone 0%

D E S KM
Location(s) completely closed 0% 2% Europe
AG North America
KM 4%
None of the listed measures above 15%
0% 1.500 % 3.000 % 4.500 %
November - December 2021*
6.000 %

2O21-22
*Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021 and from participants that said 'yes' to question: "Are there currently any regulations against
the Coronavirus in your region/country?" The results are based on the question: "What of the following Coronavirus measures are currently affecting your *self-selected
workspace term* location(s in general)?". Most participants responded on behalf of one coworking space location. Results are rounded and only considered if at least one of
the options above was selected. Multiple responses were allowed except for 'None of the listed measures above". Measures can vary a lot within a country and among regions. SPACE TRENDS
 Profitability of coworking spaces* in the past twelve months
AG
S K M
DE
AG
S K M
1 location 42% D E 26%
32%
AG
Profitable 2 - 4 locations 34% S K
23% M 42%
Global DE
AG
≥ 5 locations
S K M
44% 26% 30%
DE
0 25 50 75 100

Unprofitable No profit, no loss Profitable

AG
Unprofitable
SK M
DE
AG
S K M
D E
AG
KM
D ES Profitable

G
Profitable

MA
E S K
G D
MA 44%
E S K
D Unprofitable Unprofitable

AG 2019**
KM 15%
41%

2O21-22
* Respondents could choose how they describe themselves. The absolute majority decided for "coworking spaces", followed by a much smaller share of hybrid or mixed workspaces. The
results are based on the question: "How profitable was your *chosen workspace term* in the past twelve months?" - representing all locations of a workspace company!

SPACE TRENDS
 Top 3 workspace types by current* demand in following areas
AG
S K M
Meeting spaces D
60%E
AG
M
ES K
Team of ces G D
53%
MA
DE SK
Urban Individual of ces AG 51%
S K M
DE
0% 1.500 % 3.000 % 4.500 % 6.000 %

AG
Individual of ces SK M 52%
DE
A G
Meeting spacesESKM 49%
G D
Suburban MA
Hot D
desks
ES K 23%
AG
M
0% 1.500 % 3.000 % 4.500 % 6.000 %

S K
G DE Meeting spaces 58%
MA
ES K
G D
A Individual of ces 48%
KM
Rural Event spaces 33% THERE IS A HIGH OR VERY HIGH DEMAND (COMBINED).

2O21-22
0% 1.500 % 3.000 % 4.500 % 6.000 %

The results are based on the question: "How do you rate the current demand for following offerings in your region? - Please exclude normal seasonal variations & rate in stars:
1 ✭ = no demand <...> 5 ✭✭✭✭✭ = very high demand." Results are rounded and only considered if at least one of the options was selected.
SPACE TRENDS
fi
fi
fi
fi
 Rating of current* demand for workspace types
G
Excluding normal seasonal variations
Global MA
E S K
G D
MA
Flexible desks 9% 25% 34% 21% ES K 11% 0%
G D
MA
E S K
Fixed desks 16% 28% 30%AG D 18% 7% 1%
S K M
DE
AG
Individual offices 5% 18% 25%
SK M 26% 25% 2%
DE
AG
S K M
Team offices 9% D
23% E 25% 26% 16% 2%
AG
KM
D ES
Meeting spacesM3% AG 16% 24% 39% 18% 1%
E S K
G D
MA
E S K
Event spaces 20% 28% 21% 16% 11% 3%
G D
A
KM
0 25 50 75 100

No demand Low demand Moderate demand High demand Very high demand n.a.

2O21-22
The results are based on the question: "How do you rate the current demand for following offerings in your region? - Please exclude normal seasonal variations & rate in stars:
1 ✭ = no demand <...> 5 ✭✭✭✭✭ = very high demand." Results are rounded and only considered if at least one of the options was selected.

SPACE TRENDS
Rating of current* demand for workspace types
Excluding normal seasonal variations

Europe North America

Flexible desks 33% 34% 33% 37% 37% 26%

Fixed desks 47% 27% 24% 1% 46% 31% 22% 1%

Individual offices 33% 28% 37% 2% 11% 19% 68% 2%

Team offices 33% 25% 41% 2% 33% 31% 34% 2%

Meeting spaces 24% 27% 50% 12% 21% 67%

Event spaces 59% 18% 21% 2% 41% 25% 33% 1%

0 25 50 75 100 0 25 50 75 100

No or low demand Moderate demand High or very high demand n.a.

2O21-22
The results are based on the question: "How do you rate the current demand for following offerings in your region? - Please exclude normal seasonal variations & rate in stars:
1 ✭ = no demand <...> 5 ✭✭✭✭✭ = very high demand." Results are rounded and only considered if at least one of the options was selected.
SPACE TRENDS
Rating of current* demand for workspace types in urban areas
Excluding normal seasonal variations

Europe North America

Flexible desks 29% 31% 41% 34% 34% 32%

Fixed desks 41% 27% 31% 1% 46% 28% 25% 2%

Individual offices 29% 32% 37% 2% 11% 19% 68% 3%

Team offices 19% 25% 54% 2% 23% 29% 45% 3%

Meeting spaces 29% 26% 45% 11% 20% 69%

Event spaces 58% 18% 21% 2% 40% 25% 35%

0 25 50 75 100 0 25 50 75 100

No or low demand Moderate demand High or very high demand n.a.

2O21-22
The results are based on the question: "How do you rate the current demand for following offerings in your region? - Please exclude normal seasonal variations & rate in stars:
1 ✭ = no demand <...> 5 ✭✭✭✭✭ = very high demand." Results are rounded and only considered if at least one of the options was selected.
SPACE TRENDS
Development of workspace trends in the past three months*
% of coworking spaces** reported for their workspace business an/a ...
80

This chart shows how

many coworking spaces
have experienced an
increasing, decreasing or
no development in terms
60

of following criteria.

40
The results do not show
(by) how much
increasing 67% they have changed.

20
47% 46%
21% 21% 19% 11%

PAST
0 Members or users Earnings Profitability Employees Desks Prices Locations

Number of
Number of Number of Average Number of
Members or Earnings Profitability Employees Desks Prices Locations
users
0

decreasing -12,5

6% 7% 2%
14% 10%
-25

16% 17%
-37,5

-50 Members or users Earnings Profitability Employees Desks Prices Locations

"don't know"
1% 5% 3% 1% 1% 1% 0%
or n.a.
2O21-22
Remaining percentages indicate "no change". The results are based on the question: "How has the business of your *self-selected term* developed over the past three months in
terms of the following criteria? *Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021. *Results are rounded and only considered if at least one of the
options above was selected. **Workspace providers could describe their main business approach by themselves. The absolute majority decided for "coworking spaces", followed
by a much smaller share of "hybrid or mixed workspaces. SPACE TRENDS
 Expected workspace trends in the next three months*
A G
M
% of coworking spaces** expect for their workspace business an/a ...
This chartS
E K
manyD
shows how

AG are expecting an
coworking spaces

M
80

E S K increasing, decreasing or

G D no development in terms

MA of following criteria.
60

E S K
D
The results do not show

G
(by) how much they are
75% MA expected to change.
40

increasing
62% 61% S K
DE
AG
M
20

28%
K 30% 30%
DE S 23%
AG

FUTURE M
0 Members or users Earnings Profitability Employees Desks Prices Locations

ES K
D
Number of
EarningsAG Profitability
Number of Number of Average Number of
Members or
KM Employees Desks Prices Locations
users
D ES
AG
K M
0

D
decreasingE S 3% 4% 2%
G 9%
-10

MA 8% 4%
E S K -20

10%
G D
A
KM
-30

-40 Members or users Earnings Profitability Employees Desks Prices Locations

"don't know"
1% 3% 4% 1% 0% 2% 1%
or n.a.
2O21-22
Remaining percentages indicate "no change". The results are based on the question: "And what do you expect for the business of your *self-selected term* over the next three
months in terms of these criteria?" *Results of the Coworking Trends Survey from November 23 - December 22, 2021. *Results are rounded and only considered if at least one of
the options above was selected. **Workspace providers could describe their main business approach by themselves. The absolute majority decided for "coworking spaces",
followed by a much smaller share of "hybrid or mixed workspaces. SPACE TRENDS
 DESKMAG
Occupation & availability rates of flexible workspaces
AG
S K M
D E
G
Ais combined with a
The occupation rate in this
M
SK question on available
chart
D E
AG workspace capacities and a

S K M (b)lock rate due to Covid-19.

DE
North MAG
The sum of all rates in this
chart can't be higher than
c u p i e d Europe E S K 100% - representing the
o c D
America maximum capacity when
A G
M
spaces can't accept any

E SK more users or members.

Global G D
A
Flexible workspaces operate

S K M with different rates

D E depending on their business

mean
AG model.

KM
ES
For example, some offer hot
D desks that can be flexibly

AG rented to multiple members

S K M since not all people work at

D E
36% the same time.

AG
KM This chart attempts to

D ES ailable av
harmonize different

G
approaches in one chart.
A
KM
occupation rate by age of workspace business
< 1 year 35%
e d 1 - 2 years 49%
(b) lo ck 3 - 5 years 59%
occupied 2O21-22
> 5 years 63%
0% 1.500 % 3.000 % 4.500 % 6.000 %

COWORKING
The results are based on the question: "(On average...) Based on the maximum workspace capacity of our physical location(s), following percentages are currently ... "
SPACE TRENDS
 by job status by gender

Owners, founders or 11% 20% 64% 5% Female 9% 22% 62% 6%

self-employed operators

Employed operators or
space managers
14% 21% 61% 5% Male 12% 18% 67% 2%
2O21-22
0 25 50 75 100 0 25 50 75 100

The results are based on the question: "How satisfied are you currently with your own job situation? - 1 ✭ = very dissatisfied <...> 5 ✭✭✭✭✭ = very satisfied "
SPACE TRENDS
 Background of the responding 'flexible workspace' businesses
AG
Main business approach: S K M
DE
AG
K M
64% 13% 8% DES9% 2% 5%
AG
S K M
Coworking space Hybrid or mixed workspace D E
G
0 25 50 75 100

M A
Community or collaborative workspace Business center
E S K
D spaces, such as coworking spaces that also operate an
Shared of ce G
Other: are mainly
A
mixed
K M
incubator,
S
a hotel, a coliving space, an event location or offer child care etc.
D E
AG
#1 revenue source: S K M
D E
62% A G 26% 8% 3% 3%
S KM
D E
#2 revenue source: AG
0 25 50 75 100

S K M
D E
14% AG 44% 21% 11% 4%
S KM
D E
0 25 50 75 100

#3
G revenue source:
MA
K
4% 13% 38% 23% 9%
0 25 50 75 100

Renting private of ces Renting desks or selling memberships for open workspaces 2O21-22
Renting meeting spaces Events or renting event spaces
Other SPACE TRENDS
fi
fi
 Background of the responding 'flexible workspace' businesses
AG
Main business model: S K M
DE
AG
S K M
84% E
D 13% 2% 2%
AG
S K M
0

For-pro t Non-pro t
25

Governmental
50

Other or n.a.G D E
75 100

M A
E S K
D
AG
Number of locations:
S K M
D E
66% AG 24% 5%
S K M 4% 1% 0%

D E
A G
0 25 50 75 100

1 location 2 - 4 locations KM 5 - 10 locations 11 - 50 locations > 50 locations n.a.

D ES
AG
K M
ES
Distribution ofDmulti-location 'flexible workspace' businesses:
AG
S KM
D E 61% 32% 4% 3%
AG
KM
n.a. = 0%
In the same city or region
0 25 50 75 100

In the same country, but in different cities or regions 2O21-22

On the same continent, but in different countries
On different continents
SPACE TRENDS
fi
fi
 Background of the responding 'flexible workspace' businesses
AG
Number of people working for a 'flexible workspace' business S K M
DE
AG
69% 20% DES K M 8% 2% 1%

AG
K M
0 25 50 75 100

1 - 4 people 5 - 19 people 20 - 99 people 100 - 499 people ≥ 500 E S

Dpeople n.a.
AG
S K M
DE
Size of (average) location, (rough and simplified indication) AG
SK M
DE
13% 30% AG 26% 21% 9% 2%
S K M
D E
G
0 25 50 75 100

XS = < 200m2/2200ft2 MA S = 200m2/2200ft2 to < 500m2/5500ft2 n.a. < 1%

E S K
D
M = 500m2/5500ft2 to < 1000m2/11000ft2 L = 1000m2/11000ft2 to < 2000m2/22000ft2
AGto < 10000m2/110000ft2
XL = 2000m2/22000ft2
S K M XXL = ≥ 10000m2/110000ft2
D E
AG
K M
AgeDofESa 'flexible workspace' business
AG
KM 10% 16% 33% 26% 13% 2%

0 25 50 75 100

< 1 year 1 - 2 years old 3 - 5 years old 6 - 10 years old > 10 years n.a.
2O21-22
Respondents that have not launched a workspace yet (< 1%) are excluded.
SPACE TRENDS
 Background of the responding 'flexible workspace' businesses
AG
S K M
Settlement in which (most of) the flexible workspaces are located DE
AG
S K M
37% 36% 16% DE 11% 1%
AG
0 25 50

S K
75

M 100

Large city (= more than 1,000,000 inhabitants)

G DE
Medium-sized city (= 100,000 - ≤ 1,000,000 inhabitants) MA
E S K
Small city (= 20,000 - < 100,000 inhabitants) D
AG
Town, village or outside a settlement (= less than 20,000 inhabitants)
SK M
n.a. DE
AG
S K M
D E
Continent: AG
KM
D ES
AG
1% 6%
S K M 48% 37% 5% 4%
D E
A G
S K M
E
Africa Asia Europe North America Oceania South America
0 25 50 75 100

G D
A
KM Africa, Asia and South America are underrepresented. Due to the small number of respondents, it was not possible to publish specific results for
these continents. The overall low number of respondents led to the same conclusion for Oceania.

The Coworking Trends Survey could be taken anonymously and has excluded any respondent that did not represent a flexible workspace provider.
2O21-22

SPACE TRENDS
 Background of the Coworking Trends Survey
AG
The Coworking Trends Survey was active online from November 23rd to December 22nd, 2021. The results are
S K M
D E
checked using quality standards to remove bots or fake participants. Those 'people' are not considered in the analysis
AG
or in the counting of participants. The survey was taken by 425 participants. KM E S
G D
M A
E S K
365 represented a flexible workspace business 51 9
G D
MA
0 106 213 319 425

"Are you n owner, m n er or employee of coworkin sp ce

E S K Yes No Don't know & n.a.
or nother flexible worksp ce?" D
AG
SK M
365 of them responded to the survey on behalf of their flexible
D E workspace businesses.
326 of them completed the questionnaire, and only the AGdata of those respondents had been analyzed and are
S K M
included in the results of this report. D E
AG
S K M
D E 71% 25% 3% 2%
AG
S K M
0 25 50 75 100

Questions regardingEfinancial Founders, owners or self-employed operators

D aspects, such as the current
G revenue sources of a workspace business,
M A
profitability or main Employed operators or space managers
ESKbe answered by founders, owners and employed
couldDonly Other employed or freelancing team members
A G
KM operators or space managers. For this reason, the number of Trainees, interns or other
respondents may vary a little from question to question.
Female
Gender of founders or owners 43% 58% Male
2O21-22
employed operators or space managers 0 25
71% 50
26%
75
3%
100
Other
SPACE TRENDS
a
a
a
a
g
a
a
g
a
What is the main difference between the Coworking Trends Survey
& the Global Coworking Survey?

Coworking Trends Survey Global Coworking Survey

Response perspective entire workspace business

single location
of worksp ce providers: (all locations)

Response options: simplified more detailed

Number of topics: reduced more diverse

INTERESTED IN REGULAR UPDATES RELATING TO THE OUR SURVEYS?

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER!
a
Receiving too many emails from students about Coworking research?
More Statistics

ADD COWORKINGLIBRARY.COM
TO YOUR FAQ PAGE.

A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BY

DESKMAG
 Citation notes
It is permitted to use or quote individual charts, slides or the information therein in articles, live and online presentations as well as in "social networks" and non-commercial
publications as long as the users
1. Cite the source visibly (in visual presentations), audibly (in audio presentations) or both, visibly and audibly (in video presentations).
Visibly = as visible as the cited content, at least in the main font size of a user's presentation or publication, and directly when or where the content is cited.
Ex mple in non-scientific public tions: Deskmag or Deskmag's Coworking Survey or Deskmag's 2021-22 Coworking Trends Survey
Full note ex mple in scientific public tions: Carsten Foertsch: “2021-22 Coworking Space Trends,” Deskmag.com, January 22, 2022, https://www.deskmag.com/en/
coworking-spaces/2022-results-of-the-coworking-space-business-trends-survey
Short note ex mple in scientific public tions: Foertsch (2022), Deskmag's Coworking Trends Survey, 3-4.
Audibly = as audible and clear as the cited content, at least in the same volume as the main part of a user's audio or video presentation, and directly when the content is
cited.

2. Link to the source wherever it is possible.

Link to the slide deck: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1xqo3e783kxcfsw/2021-22%20Coworking%20Trends%20Survey%20-%20FINAL%20RESULTS.pdf
Or link to Deskmag's article on the main results of this slide deck: https://www.deskmag.com/en/coworking-spaces/2022-results-of-the-coworking-space-business-
trends-survey

People and companies who do not cite original sources appropriately, do great harm to those sources.

It is not permitted to use any chart, slide or information in a way that gives the impression that they were taken from or other sources.
It is not permitted to quote more than what usually is considered to be a citation. In short: do not cite major parts of the slide deck, some slides are allowed.
It is not permitted to resell any part of the slide deck's content.
It is also not allowed to copy questions from the survey's questionnaire into other questionnaires without asking for permission.

Please read the full terms or get in touch with us if you like to use or share content of this slide deck and need more information.

© 2022 DESKMAG - CARSTEN FOERTSCH

a
a
a
a
a
a
Thanks for reading!

DESKMAG
DESKMAG

2O21-22
COWORKING
SPACE TRENDS
FINAL RESULTS OF THE COWORKING TRENDS SURVEY, 4TH QUARTER OF 2021
(NOVEMBER 23 - DECEMBER 22, 2021)
A GLOBAL COWORKING SURVEY PRESENTATION