Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT 2
Name of Student: MK
3. Financial Constraints
The financial constraints faced by the Dar es Salaam Water Supply and Sanitation
Authority (DAWASA) present a formidable challenge, significantly impeding the
organization's ability to invest in critical infrastructure upgrades and adopt modern
technologies. Insufficient funds limit DAWASA's capacity to implement necessary
improvements essential for optimizing operational efficiency(Helmold, 2021). This
financial constraint not only hampers the timely renewal of aging infrastructure but also
impedes the adoption of advanced technologies that could enhance the overall
effectiveness of water supply and sanitation services(Hoti Arifaj et al., 2023). The impact
is pervasive, affecting the organization's ability to meet the growing demands for water
services and hindering its capacity to implement strategic initiatives(Hoti Arifaj et al.,
2023). Addressing this challenge requires innovative financial management strategies,
seeking alternative funding sources, and advocating for increased financial support to
ensure the sustainability and resilience of DAWASA's operations in providing clean and
reliable water to the residents of Dar es Salaam
4. Governance Issues
The weak governance structures and regulatory frameworks within the Dar es Salaam
Water Supply and Sanitation Authority (DAWASA) pose a notable challenge, fostering
an environment of mismanagement and insufficient accountability(Liewarnata et al.,
2019). The impact of this challenge is profound, as the absence of effective oversight
impedes strategic decision-making and hinders the implementation of best practices in
water utility management. Without robust governance, the organization faces difficulties
in establishing clear guidelines, enforcing compliance, and ensuring adherence to
industry standards(asch-Schaalan, 2023). This not only compromises the efficiency of
daily operations but also inhibits the adoption of strategic initiatives that could enhance
the overall effectiveness and sustainability of DAWASA's water supply and sanitation
services. Addressing this challenge requires a concerted effort to strengthen governance
structures, implement transparent regulatory frameworks, and foster a culture of
accountability to optimize decision-making processes and ensure the responsible
management of water resources in Dar es Salaam(Ran & Qi, 2016).
5. Limited Community Engagement
Limited community engagement within the Dar es Salaam Water Supply and Sanitation
Authority (DAWASA) presents a significant challenge, fostering a lack of awareness and
participation in crucial water conservation practices(Hogge et al., 2003). This challenge
has a profound impact on the efficiency of water usage patterns, as the absence of
community involvement deprives DAWASA of valuable insights and collaborative
efforts to address water challenges(EWURA, 2021). The community, when actively
engaged, can play a pivotal role in adopting sustainable water practices and providing
feedback on service delivery. Failure to foster this engagement not only results in
inefficient water usage but also represents a missed opportunity for implementing
community-driven solutions. Addressing this challenge requires DAWASA to prioritize
community outreach programs, educational initiatives, and collaborative efforts to ensure
the active participation of residents in sustainable water management practices, ultimately
contributing to more effective and responsible water supply services in Dar es
Salaam(For et al., 2017).
2. Projected Targets
Setting SMART Goals: The evaluation involves assessing whether the projected targets are
SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-Bound). SMART goals provide
clarity, ensuring that objectives are well-defined and achievable within the specified timeframe.
Alignment with Mission: The projected targets should align with DAWASA's mission and long-
term vision. Evaluation criteria include how well the targets contribute to the overall goals of the
organization(Nygaard, 2024).
3. Implementation Strategies
Actionable Plans: The effectiveness of the strategic plan is contingent on the clarity and
feasibility of the implementation strategies. Actionable plans should detail how each objective
will be achieved, including resource allocation, timelines, and responsible parties.
Adaptability: The plan's adaptability to changing circumstances is crucial. Evaluation criteria
involve assessing how well the plan accommodates unforeseen challenges and
opportunities(Kapur, 2023).
References
Aljawazneh, B. (2024). The mediating role of supply chain digitization in the relationship
between supply chain agility and operational performance. Uncertain Supply Chain
Management, 12, 669–684. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2024.1.017
asch-Schaalan, M. (2023). Governance and Digital Transformation: Implementation of
Governance Principles into RUKHTEC Co. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19515.39201
Cantos, W. P., & Juran, I. (2018). Infrastructure aging risk assessment for water distribution
systems. Water Supply, 19(3), 899–907.
EWURA. (2021). the United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Water (Vol. 694, Issue March).
For, B., Reforms, R., Improve, T. O., & Environment, T. H. E. B. (2017). United Republic of
Tanzania Blueprint for Regulatory Reforms To Improve. December.
Helmold, M. (2021). Financial Management Tools (pp. 123–130). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
030-77661-9_11
Hogge, R. L., Engineer, E., & Service, U. S. P. H. (2003). Construction of a Water Storage Tank
for Storage Tank for Micronesia. February.
Hoti Arifaj, A., Berisha, V., Morina, F., & Avdyli, E. (2023). Exploring the impact of cash flow,
company size, and debt on financial performance in corporations. Investment Management
and Financial Innovations, 20(3), 264–272.
Kapur, R. (2023). SWOT Analysis: Meaning and Interpretation.
Liewarnata, H., Akbar, B., Jeddawi, M., & Lukman, S. (2019). The {Implementation} of the
{Government} {Goods} and {Services} {Procurement} {Policy} at the {General}
{Hospital} of {Sanggau} {Regency} {West} {Kalimantan} {Province}. Journal of Public
Administration and Governance, 9(2), 325.
Lusthaus, C., Bank, I. A. D., & Centre, I. D. R. (2002). Organizational {Assessment}. IDRC.
McKinsey, & Company, &. (2023). State of Organizations State of Organizations.
Nygaard, A. (2024). Green SWOT Analysis (pp. 113–135). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-
50333-7_7
Ran, B., & Qi, H. (2016). Issues and challenges of public service procurement in {China}: a
collaborative governance perspective. International Journal of Public Policy, 12(3/4/5/6),
339.
Selvakumar, A., & Tafuri, A. N. (2012). Rehabilitation of {Aging} {Water} {Infrastructure}
{Systems}: Key {Challenges} and {Issues}. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 18(3), 202–
209.
Vaseashta, A., & Maftei, C. (2021). Water {Safety}, {Security} and {Sustainability}. Springer
Nature.